{"kind":"expression","expression":{"expr_id":"1767","doc_id":"1767","label":"SL 21 of 1997","is_as_enacted":"t","commenced_on":null,"superseded_on":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_to":null,"is_current":"t","incorporating":null,"akn_expr_iri":"\/akn\/ky\/act\/sl\/1997\/21\/eng@1997-01-01","akn_envelope":"{\"_canary\": {\"iri\": {\"work\": \"\/akn\/ky\/act\/sl\/1997\/21\", \"expression\": \"\/akn\/ky\/act\/sl\/1997\/21\/eng@1997-01-01\", \"manifestation\": \"\/akn\/ky\/act\/sl\/1997\/21\/eng@1997-01-01.pdf\"}, \"pdf\": {\"md5\": \"41be88ad064609984e08237178645916\", \"path\": \"\/Users\/q\/kyleg-data\/working\/SUBORDINATE\/1997\/1997-0021\/1997-0021_SL 21 of 1997.pdf\", \"pages\": 26, \"filename\": \"1997-0021_SL 21 of 1997.pdf\"}, \"errors\": [], \"extraction\": {\"model\": null, \"stats\": {\"word_count\": 7250, \"paragraph_count\": 9, \"text_char_count\": 45890}, \"usage\": null, \"method\": \"pymupdf-text\", \"version\": \"kyleg-akn-1.0\", \"extracted_at\": \"2026-06-22\"}, \"classification\": \"text_layer\", \"validation_flags\": [], \"docai_processor_id\": null}, \"akomaNtoso\": {\"act\": {\"body\": [{\"eId\": \"sec_n1\", \"num\": null, \"text\": \"The Development Plan 1997 (Being the Plan for the Zoning and Physical Development of the Cayman Islands) Cayman Islands Government Central Planning Authority The Development Plan 1997 (Being the Plan for the Zoning and Physical Development of the Cayman Islands) In exercise of the powers conferred upon the Central Planning Authority by the Executive Council under Section 7 of the Development and Planning Law (1995 Revision), the following development plan containing alterations and additions to and omissions from the original Development Plan is hereby made further to the studies, surveys and public consultations which have been carried out. (1) This document shall be known as the Development Plan 1997 (hereinafter called the \u201cPlan\u201d) and amends, supercedes and replaces all previous development plans (with the new 1997 provisions in bold print and the old 1977 unchanged in light print).  This Plan has been prepared for the purpose of regulating the development and use of land in the Cayman Islands, and applies to all of the Cayman Islands except - (a) The control of development in Cayman Brac described in Regulation 32 (1) and (3) of the Development and Planning Regulations 1995 (Appendix 1 of the Planning Statement for the Cayman Islands 1997 herein enclosed); and (b) The control of development in Little Cayman described in Regulation 32 (2) and (3) of the Development and Planning Regulations 1995 (Appendix 2 of the Planning Statement for the Cayman Islands 1997 herein enclosed). The development guidelines for Cayman Brac and Little Cayman will be reviewed and updated after the commencement day of this plan. (2) The Plan consists of - (a) This document which constitutes the written statement as called for by Section 6 (1) (a) (b) (c) of the Law; and (b) The zoning map attached hereto which shall be deposited with the Governor in accordance with the law. (3) Subject to Section 8 of the Law - (a) The Planning Statement for the Cayman Islands 1977 is superceded  and replaced by the Planning Statement for the Cayman Islands 1997; and (b) The 1977 zoning maps are superceded and replaced by the 1997 zoning maps with zoning overlays. (4) As provided for in Regulation 5 (3) of the Development and Planning Regulations (1995 Revision), those regulations are read with and interpreted having regard to the Development Plan provided that where there is a conflict between those regulations and this Planning Statement, the regulations shall prevail. i THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1997 FOR THE PLANNING STATEMENT CONTENTS PART 1 BACKGROUND 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Objectives 1.3 Strategy 1.4 Structure of the Plan PART 2 PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS 2.1 Population Trends 2.2 Land availability 2.3 Ecology 2.4 Fresh water supplies 2.5 Sewerage and sewage disposal. 2.6 Other Material Considerations PART 3 PLANNING POLICY 3.01 Residential development zones 3.02 Commercial development zones 3.03 Beach Resort\/Residential development zones 3.04 Tourism development zone 3.05 Institutional development zones 3.06 Industrial development zones 3.07 Public Open Space zones 3.08 Mangrove Buffer zones 3.09 Agricultural\/Residential zones 3.10 Scenic Coastline zones 3.11 Historic Overlay zone 3.12 Land above water lenses 3.13 National and Community Parks 3.14 Road Requirements 3.15 Subdivision of land LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix 1 THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1977 - Guidelines for Development Control in Cayman Brac Appendix 2 THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1977 - Guidelines for Development Control in Little Cayman Appendix 3 Provisions for Environmental Impact Statement - Content Requirements DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE PLANNING STATEMENT PART 1 BACKGROUND 1.1 INTRODUCTION This statement is formulated under the Development and Planning Law, 1971 (1995 Revision). In May 1991, the review of the Development Plan 1977 commenced pursuant to section 7 (1), Development and Planning Law (1995 Revision).  To broaden the scope of public involvement a Development Plan Review Committee and committees for each of Grand Cayman\u2019s five (5) electoral districts were formed.  The Development Plan Review Committee was the liaison unit between the Central Planning Authority and the District Review Committees. Between May 1991 and December 1993, the Authority and the District Review Committees held numerous meetings to seek public input for the exercise.  To reach as wide an audience as possible, public meetings were held in each of the districts, questionnaires were distributed to the public, and discussions were held with the essential utility providers (Caribbean Utilities Company Limited, Cable & Wireless, Water Authority and Cayman Water Company Ltd.) and Government departments. As a result of this information sharing exercise the CPA accepted the Fourth Draft of the proposed amendments in December 1993 and put a plan on public display for two months, starting in December 1994.  This period was extended by another month to allow additional public input.  By the end of the three month public comment period, 313 objections and representations were received. In late March 1995, the CPA started reviewing all the objections and representations as well as rezone applications that were previously refused.  Three Tribunals were formed to expedite the process.  By October 1995, the CPA had submitted the reports to the Ministry of Education and Planning, for transmission to the Development Plan Tribunals. The Development Plan Tribunals held hearings from January until July 1996, after each person who had made representations was afforded at least 28 days notice of the hearing. The Tribunals submitted their reports between June 1996 and March 1997. The Tribunals\u2019 reports were submitted to the CPA during three meetings in April 1997. After careful consideration and deliberations during these meetings, as well as those in May and June 1997, The Development Plan 1997 was prepared. The Development Plan 1997 still incorporates some of the guiding principles of the Development Plan 1977 as well as the Development Guidelines for development in Cayman Brac and Little Cayman (Appendices 1 and 2).  The Plan is still intended to reflect the heritage and aspirations of the Islands - their self reliance, their seafaring, their free enterprise and land ownership interests.  The Plan is still intended to take the form of practical guidelines to be applied with flexibility, understanding and commonsense by the Authority. Further Future Amendments Three new zones ( Environmentally Sensitive, Environmentally Protected, and Neighborhood Tourism) recommended by one of the Development Plan Tribunals and the road reserves were not published in the 1994 Draft Plan and the public had no opportunity to make objections and representations on the said three zones in accordance with Section 8 of the Development and Planning Law (1995 Revision).  The Executive Council intends, under the provision of the Law, to require the Authority to carry out a fresh survey of the said three zones and the road reserves. 1.2 OBJECTIVES The general aim of the plan is to maintain and enhance the quality of life in the Cayman Islands by effectively directing development so as to safeguard the economic, cultural, social and general welfare of the people, and subject thereto the environment. The primary objective of the Development Plan is to maintain and enhance the  Cayman Islands and the well-being and prosperity of its people subject thereto its environmental character.  It is intended to define and develop a planning strategy for the Islands which is flexible enough in concept and implication to accommodate individual requirements, special circumstances and changing conditions.  A secondary objective of the Planning Statement is to provide for and encourage better coordination and co-operation among all interested entities, be they private or public. 1.3 STRATEGY The policies which collectively are intended to achieve the objectives may be summarized by the following guiding strategies: (a) to accommodate the present and future population of the Cayman Islands to the best advantage having regard to the quality of life and the economic well-being of the people and to their individual requirements; (b) to maintain and encourage the further development of the tourist and financial industries; (c) to encourage and improve the commercial areas of the Island: (d) to preserve the natural assets of the Island for their value in protection from the elements and their natural beauty; (e) to maintain and improve the internal and external communications systems of the Island; (f) to minimize road traffic congestion in the Island by the introduction of prudent transportation planning initiatives; (g) to encourage the necessary conservation of existing fresh water supplies and the development of new sources of supply and distribution together with measures for effective drainage and avoidance of pollution; (h) to protect areas of environmental significance; (i) to encourage the preservation and enhancement of areas and structures of architectural and historical importance and sites of archaeological significance; and, (j) to encourage the development of manufacturing industries and to continue agricultural development. 1.4 STRUCTURE OF THE PLAN The map shall be read in conjunction with the Planning Statement and designates the following categories of development zones:- (a) Agricultural\/Residential (b) Residential There are three types of residential zones: Low Density, Medium Density, and High Density Residential. (c) Beach Resort\/Residential (d) Hotel\/Tourism (e) Commercial There are three types of commercial zones: General Commercial, Neighbourhood Commercial and Marine Commercial. (f) Industrial There are two types of industrial zones: Light Industrial and Heavy Industrial. (g) Institutional (h) Mangrove Buffer (i) Public Open Space (j) Historic Overlay (k) Scenic Coastline This Statement sets out the policies which the Authority will apply in each of these zones. This Statement also sets out policies which the Authority will apply in respect of the above and:- (a) land above water lenses, (b) natural and community parks; (c) roads; and, (d) subdivision of land. irrespective of the zone in which such features may be located. The designated land use of each zone is not in any way inflexible.  Subject as hereinafter provided, the zoning is intended to indicate the primary land use of each zone, and thus other development may be permitted providing that it can be demonstrated that it will not adversely affect the primary use of the zone. The map shows the precise boundaries of each zone. The map also identifies some parcels of lands which may be recommended by the Authority for acquisition, subject to Government funding, which are critical to the implementation of this Plan.  These subject parcels pertain to the Public Open Space. The requirements of the Law, Regulations, and this statement will be applied in considering applications to develop land. PART 2 PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS Before stating the policy of the Development Plan, it is necessary to refer, albeit briefly, to several of the features of the Cayman Islands which influence the planning policy. They are:- (a) population trends; (b) land availability; (c) the ecology and environmentally fragile areas of the Island; (d) fresh water supplies; (e) the need for sewerage and for sewage disposal facilities; and, (f) other material considerations. 2.1 POPULATION TRENDS Two elements contribute to the change in the numbers and composition of a community viz.:- (1) rate of natural increase; and, (2) immigration\/emigration rate. The present population of Grand Cayman is concentrated mainly in the western end of the Island.  The eastern districts are experiencing very moderate growth with the exception of Bodden Town, the fastest growing district, where growth in the past ten years has averaged about 11% per annum. 2.2 LAND AVAILABILITY Ownership of land has always been an important part of the way of life in the Cayman Islands, hence a flexible approach to land zoning has been adopted as the policy of this development plan. The area of Grand Cayman Island is 76.4 square miles but a substantial percentage of this area consists of \\\"wetlands\\\", namely the mangrove swamps.  As explained later in this statement, certain areas of mangrove must be retained since they are performing important ecological, biological and storm protection functions but there remains a considerable acreage of land available for development. 2.3 ECOLOGY This extensive subject has elsewhere been studied in depth in many of its aspects. Subject to paragraph 1.2 of this Plan, it  is proposed here only to mention briefly the main features of the ecology of the Cayman Islands which must be regarded in planning land use and development. (a) The beauty of the coral reefs and the remarkable clarity of the coastal waters which are a national asset, may be adversely affected by the operation of dredging the sea bed in certain areas to provide fill material for filling land for development and roads. A careful balance must be struck between what is a valuable natural feature and a desirable development.  Areas of particular concern include the wetlands, virgin forests, and beaches. (b) A comparable situation arises where developments are proposed in the mangrove wetlands.  Consideration must be given to the type of mangrove that would be disturbed, to the ecological and biological effects and to whether the storm and hurricane protection of the Islands would be reduced. New developments proposed in the mangrove areas or wetlands may be subject to the environmental analysis provisions contained in Appendix 3 and other relevant provisions of the Statement in a manner which enables the Authority to be satisfied that- (i) the application site is suitable for the use and form of development proposed; (ii) the development will not have a detrimental impact on the natural, human and built environments of the area; and (iii) the scale, density and design of development take proper account of a site\u2019s physical and environmental characteristics. (c) The beaches of the Cayman Islands are an important national asset in which the rights of the public must be protected.  Steps must be taken to prevent the removal of sand from the beach, to preserve the beach ridge and to control the spreading of litter. The submission of a comprehensive site analysis report may be required by the Authority in cases where the characteristics of the site and the particulars of the proposal, or the potential impact of development, require closer examination prior to the determination of an application. 2.4 FRESH WATER SUPPLIES The principal method of obtaining water for drinking and domestic purposes in the Cayman Islands is by public water supply and the individual collection and storage of rainwater from the roofs of buildings.  Under some parts of the Islands there are water lenses, directly supplied by the abundant (60 inches per year) rainfall, into which wells are sunk.  The sort of development which is taking place and is likely to continue, i.e. a high proportion of hotels and apartments, makes for heavier per capita consumption and a lesser supply facility than is the case with individual houses, and this, coupled with the demands of industry and a rising standard of living, make it necessary to examine improved methods of fresh water collection, storage and distribution. 2.5 SEWERAGE AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL The general method of sewage treatment is by means of septic tanks and biological treatment plants, as approved by the Authority.  The more densely populated area of Seven Mile Beach has a public sewer system.  All developments situated within the area to which the public sewerage system extends shall be connected to it.  As further development takes place, the public sewerage system may have to be extended throughout the Island. In areas not provided with public sewerage system, properly designed septic tanks approved by the Authority will be satisfactory for smaller developments.  Larger developments will be required to treat their waste water to a higher degree in biological waste water treatment plants approved by the Authority.  Protection of the water lenses from contamination by sewage is of particular importance. 2.6 OTHER MATERIAL CONSIDERATIONS The provisions for development setbacks are for achieving the following purposes: (a) to provide adequate natural light, ventilation and privacy to all buildings; (b) to provide amenity space and to facilitate landscaping around buildings; (c) to maintain and enhance the quality and character of development fronting a road; (d) to provide a buffer between buildings on neighbouring lots; and, (e) to avoid or minimise any negative impact the development or use of one lot may have on the occupants of a neighboring lot. PART 3 PLANNING POLICY The Authority shall apply the provisions of the Law and Regulations, and other relevant planning provisions of the Statement in a manner which - (a) is consistent with the provisions of the Statement which gives the Authority certain powers of discretion with respect to details of planning; and, (b) will achieve and satisfy the provisions and purposes set out in each respective zone. 3.01 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ZONES The map indicates the location of three categories of residential zones, i.e. those intended primarily for low, medium and high density developments, respectively. In large scale developments, site clearance, earthmoving, parking of workers vehicles on the development, and building operations should be so phased as to ensure that each section of development is completed to a standard acceptable to the Authority before work on a succeeding phase of the development is commenced. Notwithstanding all other provisions of this statement, no use of land in a residential zone shall be dangerous, obnoxious, toxic or cause offensive odours or noise, or otherwise create a nuisance or annoyance to others. Planning applications for dwelling units on land zoned for other forms of development will be considered on their merits having regard to the effect they would have on the character of such other area. 3.02 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ZONES Commercial development includes banks, offices, businesses, restaurants, shops, supermarkets and gas stations. There are three types of Commercial Zones: (a) GENERAL COMMERCIAL - which shall apply to central George Town and permit more flexibility in use because of its maximum site coverage and building height allowance. (b) NEIGHBOURHOOD COMMERCIAL - which shall apply to commercial nodes outside of central George Town and provide for a less intense commercial use, with limits on building heights and site coverage.  Neighbourhood Commercial shall include shops, and businesses that service the needs of the community.  Smaller scale professional buildings as well as grocery stores are typical uses.  This zone shall also allow a mixed use of commercial and residential. (c) MARINE COMMERCIAL - which shall apply to waterfront commercial areas dedicated primarily to marine activities, and shall also include the Port Facility, George Town Barcadere, Jackson\u2019s Barcadere in West Bay, and Harbour House Marina in Prospect. Marine commercial shall include general commercial activities as well as activities associated with ships and shipping, charter boats and dive boats, and water sport operations.  Cargo handling and boat repair are two examples of allowable uses. The Authority will require a standard of design, construction, and landscaping which reflects the local architectural heritage. 3.03 BEACH RESORT\/RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ZONE The intent of this zone is to provide a transition zone between the Hotels\/Tourism Zones and the Low Density Residential Zone.  Development within this zone will generally have the appearance of residential development in scale and massing. The Authority shall apply the Beach Resort\/Residential Zone provisions and other relevant provisions of the Statement in a manner best calculated to ensure - (a) that decent, safe and sanitary projects are built to appropriate standards; (b) that harmonious and compatible land use with adjacent properties and their zones are achieved; (c) that sites and areas do not become overly dense by ensuring that the densities established by the zones is respected; (d) that aesthetically pleasing development, designed with sensitivity towards heritage results from the grant of the planning permission. Allowable development in this zone shall include detached and semi-detached houses, beach resorts and in suitable locations, guest houses, apartments, cottage colonies and other tourist related development. The Authority when considering applications for planning permission in a Beach Resort\/ Residential Zone shall ensure that development provides a high standard of accommodation, amenities and open space.  For developments other than a detached and a semi-detached house and a duplex, outdoor facilities such as swimming pools, gardens, sun decks, patios, terraces, and an abundant degree of lush, tropical landscaping, incorporating sufficient screening to provide privacy from adjacent properties. The Authority shall determine the setback in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Development and Planning Law and Regulations and shall take into consideration - the elevation of the property and its environs; the geology of the property; the storm and beach ridge; the existence of a protective reef adjacent to the proposed development; the location of the adjacent development; and, any other material consideration which the Authority considers will affect the proposal. 3.04 HOTEL\/TOURISM ZONE Development within these zones will include hotel, cottage colony development, detached and semi-detached houses, and apartments.  Development will be carefully regulated to ensure that the needs of the tourist industry are met and that new buildings will in general be related to the needs of the industry. The Authority shall apply the Hotel\/Tourism Zone provisions and other relevant provisions of this Statement in a manner best calculated to - (a) provide for the orderly development, expansion and upgrading of facilities required to maintain a successful tourism industry; (b) ensure that all development enhances the quality and character of the Cayman Islands\u2019 hotels and cottage colonies; (c) prevent the over-development of sites and to ensure that the scale and density of development are compatible with and sensitive to the physical characteristics of the site; (d) ensure minimal traffic impacts on surrounding properties and existing public roads; (e) ensure that waterfront developments are designed to avoid interference with natural coastal processes; and (f) ensure adequate allowance for public access to the sea. The Authority shall take into consideration the characteristics of the form of tourist accommodation proposed and shall be satisfied that the layout, scale and massing of development are compatible with the ecological, aesthetics, and other physical characteristics of the site; and that a high quality of design and landscaping are used. 3.05 INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT ZONES Development within this zone shall include civic and educational buildings, cemeteries, social and recreational facilities.  Area requirements such as lot sizes, setbacks and height limitations shall be at the discretion of the Authority. Religious, social, and educational institutions, including recreational facilities and public and civic buildings, are permissible in any zone where they meet the needs of the community. 3.06 INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ZONES Industrial development will be confined to the areas zoned for that purpose on the map and in residential zones shall be subject to section 3.01.   Light industrial development is also permissible in the commercial zones at the discretion of the Authority, but will be required to conform to the setback requirements applicable to the category of commercial zone, as well as other requirements applicable to its own particular type of development. (1) The LIGHT INDUSTRIAL Development Zone shall include - (a) industry linked to or based upon agriculture which may alternatively be located convenient to the agricultural activity with which it is associated; (b) industry which is linked to or based upon fishing, boating, sailing and related activities may alternatively be located conveniently to the activity with which it is associated; (c) light industry linked to the needs of local communities may be alternatively located conveniently within a residential area, subject to paragraph 3.01 of this statement; (d) light industrial uses shall include storage and warehousing; bulk wholesale; agricultural processing; and research labs; and (2) The intensification of non-conforming forms of development shall be discouraged and strictly controlled in order to reserve industrial land for future industrial purposes. (3) The Authority shall require an acceptable standard of layout, design, construction and landscaping. (a) Industrial buildings and structures, and areas for storage, waste disposal, parking and loading shall be screened from public roads and adjoining non-industrial properties. (b) The Authority will require an acceptable standard of layout, design and construction and a high order of landscaping to achieve this. (c) The Authority may require reasonable provisions for integration of the development into its surroundings. 3.07 PUBLIC OPEN SPACE ZONE Public Open Space is land in which Government has acquired, or is proposing to acquire, rights of ownership or use for the benefit of the public.  New acquisitions will normally be in accordance with the provisions of the Law or by agreement but, where alternative solutions cannot be found, acquisition by Government may be necessary. The land shown as public open space on the map includes: land already owned by Government including playing fields, public beaches, public parks and established public rights of way; land which it is intended to acquire or in respect of which new negotiations may be carried out; any other land whether publicly or privately owned to which the public has certain existing rights. 3.08 MANGROVE BUFFER ZONE The policy for Mangrove Buffer Zones will comprise and be subject to control of development in the following ways:  - Red and predominantly red mangroves in the area defined on the map as Mangrove Buffer will be protected from development except in exceptional circumstances. 3.09 AGRICULTURAL\/RESIDENTIAL ZONE These lands are designated on the map and shall be preserved primarily for agricultural and residential uses, and shall include the following: (1) Agricultural and single family residential uses shall be allowed in this zone. (2) Multi-family, commercial, or industrial uses shall not be permitted unless they are agriculturally dependent. (3) Land in its natural state may also be included in the Agricultural\/Residential zone because of its correlation contribution to water and soil quality and rustic ambiance. (4) Institutional development may also be permitted in this zone.  Other uses may be allowed if they are concomitant to the primary use. 3.10 SCENIC COASTLINE ZONE Certain lengths of the coastline which have been identified as being of high landscape or scenic value forming a particularly attractive feature of the Island are designated as Scenic Coastline and will be subject to the following provisions:- (1) the land will be conserved basically in its natural state, (2) the ownership of the land will not be affected, (3) development which is consistent with the policies of this Statement will be permitted. It will be the duty of the Authority to ensure that the open character of scenic coastline land is preserved, in particular, that of the beaches, and also to safeguard the public's right to use the beaches and to gain access to them through public rights of way.  The panoramic views and vistas provided by these coastlines are natural assets which are to be safeguarded for present and future generations. 3.11 HISTORIC OVERLAY ZONE The purpose of the Historic Overlay Zone is to promote and encourage the perpetuation of historic buildings and structures with the underlying zone remaining in effect. Development will be strictly controlled to conserve the Cayman Islands historical and architectural heritage. Subject to the Development and Planning Law and Regulations, the Authority shall apply the Historic Overlay Zone provisions and other relevant provisions of the Statement in a manner best calculated to - (a) preserve and protect the established historical, architectural or cultural character of the area; (b) preserve any significant aspect, appearance or view of the area; and (c) preserve and protect any prospect or view, being an environmentally important prospect or view, from any public area. 3.12 LAND ABOVE WATER LENSES The policy in respect of proposals for development on land above water lenses will be that:- (1) residential development will in general be permitted over a water lens, (2) agricultural development will in general be permitted over a water lens, (3) an industrial development will be permitted over a water lens only in the following circumstances: (a) if the development is a small industrial land use and, (b) if it requires a supply of water readily available and, (c) if it can be demonstrated that this facility cannot be provided elsewhere on the Island. Strict conditions will be imposed to ensure that the water in the lens will not be contaminated by the development or by the effluent therefrom, and that the quantity of water used will not deplete the lens to the disadvantage of existing or future users. 3.13 NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY PARKS National and community parks will be identified on the map.  It is recommended that some of these be developed by joint public \/ private partnerships. 3.14 ROAD REQUIREMENTS The existing network of public roads for which Government is responsible for maintaining will continue.  Subject to the availability of funds, government will consider constructing a number of collector and arterial roads to relieve the more populated areas where the needs of through traffic are in conflict with those of local residents.  The lines of proposed new public roads and the extension of private roads are shown in diagrammatic form on the map. In making decisions on planning applications, the likely requirements of land for new public roads and road improvements shall be taken into account. Government will consider assuming responsibility of private roads when they have been constructed and maintained to an acceptable standard or where there is evidence of common use by the general public. Applicants shall be encouraged to utilize and share existing roads in a subdivision in order to avoid the duplication of roads and to promote a more efficient use of land, and in this regard, the Authority may require an applicant to fully investigate such options and to report back to the Authority prior to the determination of an application for a new road in a subdivision. 3.15 SUBDIVISION OF LAND The Authority shall apply the subdivision of land provisions and other relevant provisions of the Statement in a manner best calculated to - (1) ensure that the layout and design of subdivision proposals are sensitive to a site\u2019s physical and environmental characteristics; (2) make the most efficient use of land designated for the intended purposes; and (3) prevent the unnecessary fragmentation of large tracts of open land. In considering a draft plan or an application for a subdivision, the Authority shall have regard, among other matters, to the health, safety, convenience and welfare of the future inhabitants Normally land shall not be subdivided unless it is suited to the purpose for which the subdivision is intended. The subdivision of land encompassing important or prime agricultural land shall not, except in exceptional circumstances, be permitted where it may - (a) fragment into separate lots neighbouring fields which function as a farm unit or agricultural holding; or (b) result in good quality arable land being taken out of production. APPENDIX 1 THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1977 GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPMENT CONTROL IN CAYMAN BRAC Resulting from the objections which were received in 1975, the Tribunal recommended that specific guidelines were needed for Cayman Brac and Little Cayman rather than a full scale development plan.  It is, however, the Government\u2019s intention to produce plans for Cayman Brac for the near future. Notes on discussion between the members of the Development Control Board, the members of the local committees appointed to consider the plan and the members of the planning team on the 18th and 19th April 1975 and on 24th May 1975.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_1\", \"num\": \"1.\", \"text\": \"It is recognized that the development and planning problems of Cayman Brac and Little Cayman will require different treatment from those in Grand Cayman. 2 . The Development and Planning Law recognizes this fact by providing for a separate Development Control Board and makes special provision for representations and alternative draft plans and proposals under the Law. The following proposals and considerations are submitted by the Development Control Board in consultation with members of the public of the two islands for incorporation in this Statement. (a) The people of Cayman Brac and Little Cayman believe that a system of free enterprise is best suited to their needs at this early stage.  A flexible set of guidelines is required which permits the people of the islands discretion in their planning, until the final pattern of development is determined, through their representatives of the Development Control Board. (b) Any person's existing rights of property must not be taken away through zoning or other regulations. (c) It is recommended that underdeveloped land in the Bluff area of the Brac should be developed in the light of circumstances of each case as projects come before the Development Control Board in the Brac. (d) The following GUIDELINES should be used in assessing any proposal on the Bluff: (i) It is recommended that wherever practical agricultural land (locally known as mouldy land) will be retained for present and future use for pasture of horticultural purposes. (ii) Adequate road access through the whole length of the Bluff should be provided whether for agricultural or residential purposes.  A survey of such a road was prepared by the P.W.D. and should be re-examined APP. 1-1 immediately for adoption wherever it is practical to do so.  It is desirable that rights of way should be granted without charge to permit development on either side of the road whether for public or private purposes. (iii) It is recognized that the Bluff is a unique feature of Cayman Brac and an important attraction to visitors.  Every effort should therefore be made to retain the unspoiled visual aspect of the cliff face of the Bluff.  The setback in each case is to be determined by the Development Control Board and each application will be dealt with on its merits. (iv) It is recommended, wherever possible that sufficient access be provided at the top of the Bluff to permit the public to enjoy the scenic views along the Bluff edge.  This can be done as the Bluff is developed and as suitable opportunities occur over the period of this Statement. (V) The people of the Brac believe that the Bluff is needed for residential use in view of the potential danger of hurricanes on the low lying land and the limited amount of such low land available for residential and other development purposes. (vi) Particular care should be taken in the siting of septic tanks near the edge of the Bluff to avoid potential leakage and pollution of low-lying land and water supplies.  Septic tanks should be of a high standard as recommended by the Department of Personal Health Services. (e) The following points have been agreed with regard to the control of foreshore and including ironshore. (i) Ironshore should be left wherever it is practical to do so in its original condition. (ii) Individual owners are permitted ownership of land down to the water front and foreshore will be left free from obstructions to permit the public to walk along it. Sand beaches will be treated in a similar manner.  At the discretion of the Board, sufficient access to the beach will be provided alongside any major development such as a hotel and at intervals along the coast to ensure that the public have access to the beach areas and in order to retain and enhance the development value of the land not directly fronting the sea. (g) Land designated for industry around the Creek should be modified and reduced in size in consultation with the Planning Board so as to avoid any conflicts with potential residential development in this area.  It should show initially the area required for the operation of the harbour and related activities and provide for any future expansion of the harbour area. APP. 1-2 (h) Should there be any other industrial development in the Brac a suitable area will need to be readily available for such development. The Board will consider further where this might best be located in relation to appropriate transportation requirements by air or sea and the availability of infrastructure. (i) It is recognized that local commercial development such as shops, services and offices need to remain adjacent to existing communities. No regulations to change these arrangements would be acceptable to the people of the Brac.  New developments for local needs should be permitted where they do not interfere with local residential requirements.  The Development Control Board will consider where facilities should be most conveniently provided for any major commercial development which might be attracted to the Brac. (j) It is recommended that the same provisions be made for residential development on the low lands as for the Bluff in order to protect the existing interests of individual owners.  Residential development should be permitted at the discretion of the Development Board bearing in mind the need to keep sufficient agricultural and horticultural land and a sufficiently open aspect to the sea.- (k) The hotel areas on the South Coast should be reviewed.  Potential hotel projects should be allowed for on the South Coast.  This area could be of considerable benefit for tourism and it is recommended that as much as possible of this section of the South Coast within the reef should be designated for potential tourist purposes subject to there being adequate public access to the beaches for residents. (l) Proper locations for the disposal of solid waste including cars should be made. Parts of the pond near the airport should be investigated for this purpose by the Department of Personal Health Services for use as a controlled landfill for solid waste.  A separate location may be required for the disposal of old vehicles. (m) The lagoon adjacent to the airport should be landscaped. (n) All Government Buildings are to be subject to the guidelines of the Development Control Board. (o) Investigation should be made of the harbour potential of South Channel as an alternative harbour and boat facility to the Creek especially in certain weathers.  The necessary safeguarding of land around this area should be made to permit any future harbour or port development. (p) The Public Open Spaces should include the Cay at West End of the Island with an access thereto. APP. 1-3 (q) The road to join Rock Turn to Tibbetts Turn should be reconstructed and incorporated into any development programme for the island. (r) Careful consideration should be given to preserving the detached rocks known as \\\"cays\\\" for their scenic and landscape value when planning developments anywhere in the Brac. (s) Measures should similarly be taken to identify, protect, preserve, explore and evaluate the valuable caves on the Brac which are of importance for their scientific and tourist interest. (t) Rights of way and extensions of the public road should be ensured to gain access to the scenic areas and beaches. The above proposals and recommendations are submitted by the Development Control Board after consultation with the people and committees appointed by them. The general principles set out above should apply to Little Cayman where appropriate but further considerations of the development problems of Little Cayman are set out in a separate memorandum.  Additional considerations will therefore be submitted in respect of Little Cayman. CAYMAN BRAC 28TH May, 1975 APP. 1-4 APPENDIX 2 THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1977 GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPMENT CONTROL IN LITTLE CAYMAN Resulting from the objections which were received in 1975, the Tribunal recommended that specific guidelines were needed for Cayman Brac and Little Cayman rather than a full scale development plan.  It is, however, the Government\u2019s intention to produce plans for Little Cayman for the near future. Following discussion by the Development Control Board on 24th May 1975 and with the members of the planning team, the following proposals are put forward for consideration in a new land use plan for Little Cayman. 1. The road round the island should be improved to a more adequate standard without destroying the tourist attraction of the island.  A beginning should be made with the road along the South coast.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_2\", \"num\": \"2.\", \"text\": \"Steps should be taken to assess the value of the mahogany trees on the island whether for their economic value or their attraction to visitors.  The possibility of developing the area for other tropical plants as a visitor attraction should be investigated also.  Access to these and other areas of interest on the island should be considered after appropriate investigation and study has taken place. The tarpon lake should be developed as a visitor attraction.  It should at the same time be protected to ensure that its attractions continue to be available in the future.  It should be acquired as a public park and protected area.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_4\", \"num\": \"4.\", \"text\": \"East Point should be investigated for its potential as an area of the greatest natural beauty for visitors and the people of the islands.  Any development should take special care to protect the interests of the public to have access to and use of the beach and other natural amenities in the area of East Point, Sandy Point and Snipe Point.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_5\", \"num\": \"5.\", \"text\": \"The airstrip should be improved to ensure that the island is readily accessible to the people of the island and to visitors on regular flight schedule.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_6\", \"num\": \"6.\", \"text\": \"The general considerations set out for the Development of Cayman Brac will apply in Little Cayman in the following way: (a) The principles outlined in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 (a) (b) and (c) of the notes on Cayman Brac apply equally to Little Cayman. (b) The guidelines for the development to the Bluff area in Cayman Brac are not appropriate in all respects and the following suggestions are put forward for conditions on Little Cayman. APP. 2-1 (i) Wherever possible agricultural land will be retained for present and future use as in the case of the Bluff - (ii) It is recognized that Little Cayman is considered a unique island.  Every effort should therefore be made to retain its unspoiled character and to make it an attraction for persons interested in natural life.  Selected development would encourage such persons to visit Little Cayman.  Development should be in harmony with the unspoiled character of the island.  Positive efforts should be made to attract the right type of visitor who appreciates natural life and the unspoiled character of Little Cayman. (iii) It is recommended that careful access should be provided to the natural features of the island to enable visitors to enjoy the natural life which is available without jeopardising these natural assets. (c) Sections 3 (e) and (f) of the notes on Cayman Brac apply equally on Little Cayman (ironshore and beaches).\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_7\", \"num\": \"7.\", \"text\": \"Should the oil terminal proceed as planned care should be taken to ensure that it is fitted in to the island to minimise its impact on the physical environment and to keep the island an attraction for the sake of its natural beauty and wild life.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_8\", \"num\": \"8.\", \"text\": \"In the case of hotel development care should be taken to keep the natural amenities including beach and shore available for the public.  It is suggested that suitably designed hotels be encouraged in the area of South Hole Sound and East Point.  Other proposals for development would be considered in accordance with the principles laid down for the development of the two islands but special care must be taken to avoid indiscriminate opening up of the island if prime assets are not to be lost.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_9\", \"num\": \"9.\", \"text\": \"Investigation should be made of the harbour needs for Little Cayman whether in South Hole Sound or along the Salt Rocks. CAYMAN BRAC 28TH May, 1975 APP. 2-2 APPENDIX 3 PROVISIONS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT CONTENT REQUIREMENTS The submission of an environmental impact statement (EIS) for development projects which, because of the characteristics of the site or the particulars of the proposal, may be required in order for the Authority to carefully examine the potential impacts of the development prior to the determination of the application. An environmental impact statement shall include the appropriate plans, information and data in sufficient details to enable the Authority to determine, examine and assess the potential environmental impacts of the proposal.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}], \"meta\": {\"notes\": null, \"workflow\": null, \"lifecycle\": {\"source\": \"#cilegis\", \"eventRef\": [{\"eId\": \"e_commence_1997_01_01\", \"date\": \"1997-01-01\", \"type\": \"generation\", \"source\": \"#cilegis\"}]}, \"references\": {\"source\": \"#canary\", \"TLCRole\": [], \"TLCEvent\": [{\"eId\": \"ev_commencement\", \"href\": \"\/akn\/ontology\/canary\/event\/commencement\", \"showAs\": \"commencement\"}], \"TLCPerson\": [], \"TLCConcept\": [{\"eId\": \"inForce\", \"href\": \"\/akn\/ontology\/canary\/concept\/temporal\/in-force\", \"showAs\": \"in force\"}], \"TLCProcess\": [], \"TLCLocation\": [], \"TLCOrganization\": [{\"eId\": \"cilegis\", \"href\": \"\/akn\/ontology\/canary\/organization\/editor\/cilegis\", \"showAs\": \"Cayman Islands legislation mirror (kyleg)\"}]}, \"temporalData\": {\"source\": \"#cilegis\", \"temporalGroup\": [{\"eId\": \"tg_inforce_1997_01_01\", \"timeInterval\": [{\"end\": null, \"start\": \"#e_commence_1997_01_01\", \"duration\": null, \"refersTo\": \"#inForce\"}]}]}, \"classification\": null, \"identification\": {\"source\": \"#cilegis\", \"FRBRWork\": {\"FRBRuri\": \"\/akn\/ky\/act\/sl\/1997\/21\", \"FRBRdate\": [{\"date\": \"1997-01-01\", \"name\": \"generation\"}], \"FRBRthis\": \"\/akn\/ky\/act\/sl\/1997\/21\/!main\", \"FRBRalias\": [{\"name\": \"cmsId\", \"value\": \"1997-0021\"}], \"FRBRauthor\": [{\"as\": \"#editor\", \"href\": \"\/akn\/ontology\/canary\/organization\/editor\/cilegis\"}], \"FRBRnumber\": \"21 of 1997\", \"FRBRcountry\": \"ky\", \"FRBRsubtype\": \"subordinate\"}, \"FRBRExpression\": {\"FRBRuri\": \"\/akn\/ky\/act\/sl\/1997\/21\/eng@1997-01-01\", \"FRBRdate\": [{\"date\": \"1997-01-01\", \"name\": \"generation\"}], \"FRBRthis\": \"\/akn\/ky\/act\/sl\/1997\/21\/eng@1997-01-01\/!main\", \"FRBRauthor\": [{\"as\": \"#editor\", \"href\": \"\/akn\/ontology\/canary\/organization\/editor\/cilegis\"}], \"FRBRlanguage\": \"eng\"}, \"FRBRManifestation\": {\"FRBRuri\": \"\/akn\/ky\/act\/sl\/1997\/21\/eng@1997-01-01.xml\", \"FRBRdate\": [{\"date\": \"2026-06-22\", \"name\": \"generation\"}], \"FRBRthis\": \"\/akn\/ky\/act\/sl\/1997\/21\/eng@1997-01-01.xml\", \"FRBRauthor\": [{\"as\": \"#editor\", \"href\": \"\/akn\/ontology\/canary\/organization\/editor\/cilegis\"}], \"FRBRformat\": \"application\/xml\"}}}, \"name\": \"act\", \"header\": {\"title\": \"Judges' and Magistrates' Emoluments and Allowances Act\", \"actNumber\": \"21 of 1997\", \"longTitle\": null}}, \"doc\": null, \"bill\": null, \"judgment\": null}}","akn_full_text":"The Development\nPlan 1997\n(Being the Plan for the Zoning and Physical\nDevelopment of the Cayman Islands)\n\nCayman Islands Government\n\nCentral Planning Authority\n\nThe Development\nPlan 1997\n(Being the Plan for the Zoning and Physical\nDevelopment of the Cayman Islands)\n\nIn exercise of the powers conferred upon the Central Planning Authority by the\nExecutive Council under Section 7 of the Development and Planning Law (1995\nRevision), the following development plan containing alterations and additions to and\nomissions from the original Development Plan is hereby made further to the studies,\nsurveys and public consultations which have been carried out.\n(1)\nThis document shall be known as the Development Plan 1997 (hereinafter called\nthe \u201cPlan\u201d) and amends, supercedes and replaces all previous development plans\n(with the new 1997 provisions in bold print and the old 1977 unchanged in light\nprint).  This Plan has been prepared for the purpose of regulating the development\nand use of land in the Cayman Islands, and applies to all of the Cayman Islands\nexcept -\n(a)\nThe control of development in Cayman Brac described in Regulation 32\n(1) and (3) of the Development and Planning Regulations 1995 (Appendix\n1 of the Planning Statement for the Cayman Islands 1997 herein\nenclosed); and\n(b)\nThe control of development in Little Cayman described in Regulation 32\n(2) and (3) of the Development and Planning Regulations 1995 (Appendix\n2 of the Planning Statement for the Cayman Islands 1997 herein\nenclosed).\nThe development guidelines for Cayman Brac and Little Cayman will be\nreviewed and updated after the commencement day of this plan.\n(2)\nThe Plan consists of -\n(a)\nThis document which constitutes the written statement as called for by\nSection 6 (1) (a) (b) (c) of the Law; and\n(b)\nThe zoning map attached hereto which shall be deposited with the\nGovernor in accordance with the law.\n(3)\nSubject to Section 8 of the Law -\n(a)\nThe Planning Statement for the Cayman Islands 1977 is superceded  and\nreplaced by the Planning Statement for the Cayman Islands 1997; and\n(b)\nThe 1977 zoning maps are superceded and replaced by the 1997 zoning\nmaps with zoning overlays.\n(4)\nAs provided for in Regulation 5 (3) of the Development and Planning Regulations\n(1995 Revision), those regulations are read with and interpreted having regard to\nthe Development Plan provided that where there is a conflict between those\nregulations and this Planning Statement, the regulations shall prevail.\n\n i\n\nTHE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1997 FOR THE\nCAYMAN ISLANDS\nPLANNING STATEMENT\nCONTENTS\nPAGE\nPART 1\nBACKGROUND\n1.1\nIntroduction\n1\n1.2\nObjectives\n2\n1.3\nStrategy\n2\n1.4\nStructure of the Plan\n3\nPART 2\nPLANNING CONSIDERATIONS\n2.1\nPopulation Trends\n5\n2.2\nLand availability\n5\n2.3\nEcology\n5\n2.4\nFresh water supplies\n6\n2.5\nSewerage and sewage disposal.\n6\n2.6\nOther Material Considerations\n7\nPART 3\nPLANNING POLICY\n3.01\nResidential development zones\n8\n3.02\nCommercial development zones\n8\n3.03\nBeach Resort\/Residential development zones\n10\n3.04\nTourism development zone\n10\n3.05\nInstitutional development zones\n10\n3.06\nIndustrial development zones\n10\n3.07\nPublic Open Space zones\n11\n3.08\nMangrove Buffer zones\n12\n3.09\nAgricultural\/Residential zones\n12\n3.10\nScenic Coastline zones\n12\n3.11\nHistoric Overlay zone\n13\n3.12\nLand above water lenses\n13\n3.13\nNational and Community Parks\n13\n3.14\nRoad Requirements\n13\n3.15\nSubdivision of land\n14\n\nLIST OF APPENDICES\nAppendix 1\nTHE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1977 - Guidelines for Development\nControl in Cayman Brac\n\nAppendix 2\nTHE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1977 - Guidelines for Development\nControl in Little Cayman\n\nAppendix 3\nProvisions for Environmental Impact Statement - Content\nRequirements\n\nDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE\nCAYMAN ISLANDS\nPLANNING STATEMENT\nPART 1\nBACKGROUND\n1.1\nINTRODUCTION\nThis statement is formulated under the Development and Planning Law, 1971 (1995\nRevision).\nIn May 1991, the review of the Development Plan 1977 commenced pursuant to section 7\n(1), Development and Planning Law (1995 Revision).  To broaden the scope of public\ninvolvement a Development Plan Review Committee and committees for each of Grand\nCayman\u2019s five (5) electoral districts were formed.  The Development Plan Review\nCommittee was the liaison unit between the Central Planning Authority and the District\nReview Committees.\nBetween May 1991 and December 1993, the Authority and the District Review\nCommittees held numerous meetings to seek public input for the exercise.  To reach as\nwide an audience as possible, public meetings were held in each of the districts,\nquestionnaires were distributed to the public, and discussions were held with the essential\nutility providers (Caribbean Utilities Company Limited, Cable & Wireless, Water\nAuthority and Cayman Water Company Ltd.) and Government departments.\nAs a result of this information sharing exercise the CPA accepted the Fourth Draft of the\nproposed amendments in December 1993 and put a plan on public display for two\nmonths, starting in December 1994.  This period was extended by another month to allow\nadditional public input.  By the end of the three month public comment period, 313\nobjections and representations were received.\nIn late March 1995, the CPA started reviewing all the objections and representations as\nwell as rezone applications that were previously refused.  Three Tribunals were formed to\nexpedite the process.  By October 1995, the CPA had submitted the reports to the\nMinistry of Education and Planning, for transmission to the Development Plan Tribunals.\nThe Development Plan Tribunals held hearings from January until July 1996, after each\nperson who had made representations was afforded at least 28 days notice of the hearing.\nThe Tribunals submitted their reports between June 1996 and March 1997.\nThe Tribunals\u2019 reports were submitted to the CPA during three meetings in April 1997.\nAfter careful consideration and deliberations during these meetings, as well as those in\nMay and June 1997, The Development Plan 1997 was prepared.\nThe Development Plan 1997 still incorporates some of the guiding principles of the\nDevelopment Plan 1977 as well as the Development Guidelines for development in\nCayman Brac and Little Cayman (Appendices 1 and 2).  The Plan is still intended to\nreflect the heritage and aspirations of the Islands - their self reliance, their seafaring, their\n\n 1\n\nfree enterprise and land ownership interests.  The Plan is still intended to take the form of\npractical guidelines to be applied with flexibility, understanding and commonsense by the\nAuthority.\nFurther Future Amendments\nThree new zones ( Environmentally Sensitive, Environmentally Protected, and\nNeighborhood Tourism) recommended by one of the Development Plan Tribunals and\nthe road reserves were not published in the 1994 Draft Plan and the public had no\nopportunity to make objections and representations on the said three zones in accordance\nwith Section 8 of the Development and Planning Law (1995 Revision).  The Executive\nCouncil intends, under the provision of the Law, to require the Authority to carry out a\nfresh survey of the said three zones and the road reserves.\n1.2\nOBJECTIVES\nThe general aim of the plan is to maintain and enhance the quality of life in the Cayman\nIslands by effectively directing development so as to safeguard the economic, cultural,\nsocial and general welfare of the people, and subject thereto the environment.\nThe primary objective of the Development Plan is to maintain and enhance the  Cayman\nIslands and the well-being and prosperity of its people subject thereto its environmental\ncharacter.  It is intended to define and develop a planning strategy for the Islands which\nis flexible enough in concept and implication to accommodate individual requirements,\nspecial circumstances and changing conditions.  A secondary objective of the Planning\nStatement is to provide for and encourage better coordination and co-operation among all\ninterested entities, be they private or public.\n1.3\nSTRATEGY\nThe policies which collectively are intended to achieve the objectives may be\nsummarized by the following guiding strategies:\n(a)\nto accommodate the present and future population of the Cayman Islands\nto the best advantage having regard to the quality of life and the economic\nwell-being of the people and to their individual requirements;\n(b)\nto maintain and encourage the further development of the tourist and\nfinancial industries;\n(c)\nto encourage and improve the commercial areas of the Island:\n(d)\nto preserve the natural assets of the Island for their value in protection\nfrom the elements and their natural beauty;\n(e)\nto maintain and improve the internal and external communications\nsystems of the Island;\n(f)\nto minimize road traffic congestion in the Island by the introduction of\nprudent transportation planning initiatives;\n\n 2\n\n(g)\nto encourage the necessary conservation of existing fresh water supplies\nand the development of new sources of supply and distribution together\nwith measures for effective drainage and avoidance of pollution;\n(h)\nto protect areas of environmental significance;\n(i)\nto encourage the preservation and enhancement of areas and structures of\narchitectural and historical importance and sites of archaeological\nsignificance; and,\n(j)\nto encourage the development of manufacturing industries and to continue\nagricultural development.\n1.4\nSTRUCTURE OF THE PLAN\nThe map shall be read in conjunction with the Planning Statement and designates the\nfollowing categories of development zones:-\n(a)\nAgricultural\/Residential\n(b)\nResidential\nThere are three types of residential zones: Low Density, Medium Density,\nand High Density Residential.\n(c)\nBeach Resort\/Residential\n(d)\nHotel\/Tourism\n(e)\nCommercial\nThere are three types of commercial zones: General Commercial,\nNeighbourhood Commercial and Marine Commercial.\n(f)\nIndustrial\nThere are two types of industrial zones: Light Industrial and Heavy\nIndustrial.\n(g)\nInstitutional\n(h)\nMangrove Buffer\n(i)\nPublic Open Space\n(j)\nHistoric Overlay\n(k)\nScenic Coastline\nThis Statement sets out the policies which the Authority will apply in each of these\nzones.\nThis Statement also sets out policies which the Authority will apply in respect of the\nabove and:-\n(a)\nland above water lenses,\n(b)\nnatural and community parks;\n(c)\nroads; and,\n(d)\nsubdivision of land.\nirrespective of the zone in which such features may be located.\n\n 3\n\nThe designated land use of each zone is not in any way inflexible.  Subject as hereinafter\nprovided, the zoning is intended to indicate the primary land use of each zone, and thus\nother development may be permitted providing that it can be demonstrated that it will not\nadversely affect the primary use of the zone.\nThe map shows the precise boundaries of each zone.\nThe map also identifies some parcels of lands which may be recommended by the\nAuthority for acquisition, subject to Government funding, which are critical to the\nimplementation of this Plan.  These subject parcels pertain to the Public Open Space.\nThe requirements of the Law, Regulations, and this statement will be applied in\nconsidering applications to develop land.\n\n 4\n\nPART 2\nPLANNING CONSIDERATIONS\nBefore stating the policy of the Development Plan, it is necessary to refer, albeit briefly,\nto several of the features of the Cayman Islands which influence the planning policy.\nThey are:-\n(a)\npopulation trends;\n(b)\nland availability;\n(c)\nthe ecology and environmentally fragile areas of the Island;\n(d)\nfresh water supplies;\n(e)\nthe need for sewerage and for sewage disposal facilities; and,\n(f)\nother material considerations.\n2.1\nPOPULATION TRENDS\nTwo elements contribute to the change in the numbers and composition of a community\nviz.:-\n(1)\nrate of natural increase; and,\n(2)\nimmigration\/emigration rate.\nThe present population of Grand Cayman is concentrated mainly in the western end of\nthe Island.  The eastern districts are experiencing very moderate growth with the\nexception of Bodden Town, the fastest growing district, where growth in the past ten\nyears has averaged about 11% per annum.\n2.2\nLAND AVAILABILITY\nOwnership of land has always been an important part of the way of life in the Cayman\nIslands, hence a flexible approach to land zoning has been adopted as the policy of this\ndevelopment plan.\nThe area of Grand Cayman Island is 76.4 square miles but a substantial percentage of this\narea consists of \"wetlands\", namely the mangrove swamps.  As explained later in this\nstatement, certain areas of mangrove must be retained since they are performing\nimportant ecological, biological and storm protection functions but there remains a\nconsiderable acreage of land available for development.\n2.3\nECOLOGY\nThis extensive subject has elsewhere been studied in depth in many of its aspects. Subject\nto paragraph 1.2 of this Plan, it  is proposed here only to mention briefly the main\nfeatures of the ecology of the Cayman Islands which must be regarded in planning land\nuse and development.\n(a) The beauty of the coral reefs and the remarkable clarity of the coastal waters which\nare a national asset, may be adversely affected by the operation of dredging the sea bed in\ncertain areas to provide fill material for filling land for development and roads.\n\n 5\n\nA careful balance must be struck between what is a valuable natural feature and a\ndesirable development.  Areas of particular concern include the wetlands, virgin forests,\nand beaches.\n(b) A comparable situation arises where developments are proposed in the mangrove\nwetlands.  Consideration must be given to the type of mangrove that would be disturbed,\nto the ecological and biological effects and to whether the storm and hurricane protection\nof the Islands would be reduced.\nNew developments proposed in the mangrove areas or wetlands may be subject to the\nenvironmental analysis provisions contained in Appendix 3 and other relevant provisions\nof the Statement in a manner which enables the Authority to be satisfied that-\n(i)\nthe application site is suitable for the use and form of development\nproposed;\n(ii)\nthe development will not have a detrimental impact on the natural, human\nand built environments of the area; and\n(iii)\nthe scale, density and design of development take proper account of a\nsite\u2019s physical and environmental characteristics.\n(c) The beaches of the Cayman Islands are an important national asset in which the rights\nof the public must be protected.  Steps must be taken to prevent the removal of sand from\nthe beach, to preserve the beach ridge and to control the spreading of litter.\nThe submission of a comprehensive site analysis report may be required by the Authority\nin cases where the characteristics of the site and the particulars of the proposal, or the\npotential impact of development, require closer examination prior to the determination of\nan application.\n2.4\nFRESH WATER SUPPLIES\nThe principal method of obtaining water for drinking and domestic purposes in the\nCayman Islands is by public water supply and the individual collection and storage of\nrainwater from the roofs of buildings.  Under some parts of the Islands there are water\nlenses, directly supplied by the abundant (60 inches per year) rainfall, into which wells\nare sunk.  The sort of development which is taking place and is likely to continue, i.e. a\nhigh proportion of hotels and apartments, makes for heavier per capita consumption and a\nlesser supply facility than is the case with individual houses, and this, coupled with the\ndemands of industry and a rising standard of living, make it necessary to examine\nimproved methods of fresh water collection, storage and distribution.\n2.5\nSEWERAGE AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL\nThe general method of sewage treatment is by means of septic tanks and biological\ntreatment plants, as approved by the Authority.  The more densely populated area of\nSeven Mile Beach has a public sewer system.  All developments situated within the area\nto which the public sewerage system extends shall be connected to it.  As further\n\n 6\n\ndevelopment takes place, the public sewerage system may have to be extended\nthroughout the Island.\nIn areas not provided with public sewerage system, properly designed septic tanks\napproved by the Authority will be satisfactory for smaller developments.  Larger\ndevelopments will be required to treat their waste water to a higher degree in biological\nwaste water treatment plants approved by the Authority.  Protection of the water lenses\nfrom contamination by sewage is of particular importance.\n2.6\nOTHER MATERIAL CONSIDERATIONS\nThe provisions for development setbacks are for achieving the following purposes:\n(a)\nto provide adequate natural light, ventilation and privacy to all buildings;\n(b)\nto provide amenity space and to facilitate landscaping around buildings;\n(c)\nto maintain and enhance the quality and character of development fronting\na road;\n(d)\nto provide a buffer between buildings on neighbouring lots; and,\n(e)\nto avoid or minimise any negative impact the development or use of one\nlot may have on the occupants of a neighboring lot.\n\n 7\n\nPART 3\nPLANNING POLICY\nThe Authority shall apply the provisions of the Law and Regulations, and other relevant\nplanning provisions of the Statement in a manner which -\n(a)\nis consistent with the provisions of the Statement which gives the\nAuthority certain powers of discretion with respect to details of planning;\nand,\n(b)\nwill achieve and satisfy the provisions and purposes set out in each\nrespective zone.\n3.01\nRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ZONES\nThe map indicates the location of three categories of residential zones, i.e. those intended\nprimarily for low, medium and high density developments, respectively.\nIn large scale developments, site clearance, earthmoving, parking of workers vehicles on\nthe development, and building operations should be so phased as to ensure that each\nsection of development is completed to a standard acceptable to the Authority before\nwork on a succeeding phase of the development is commenced.\nNotwithstanding all other provisions of this statement, no use of land in a residential zone\nshall be dangerous, obnoxious, toxic or cause offensive odours or noise, or otherwise\ncreate a nuisance or annoyance to others.\nPlanning applications for dwelling units on land zoned for other forms of development\nwill be considered on their merits having regard to the effect they would have on the\ncharacter of such other area.\n3.02\nCOMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ZONES\nCommercial development includes banks, offices, businesses, restaurants, shops,\nsupermarkets and gas stations.\nThere are three types of Commercial Zones:\n(a) GENERAL COMMERCIAL - which shall apply to central George Town and\npermit more flexibility in use because of its maximum site coverage and building height\nallowance.\n(b) NEIGHBOURHOOD COMMERCIAL - which shall apply to commercial nodes\noutside of central George Town and provide for a less intense commercial use, with\nlimits on building heights and site coverage.  Neighbourhood Commercial shall include\nshops, and businesses that service the needs of the community.  Smaller scale\nprofessional buildings as well as grocery stores are typical uses.  This zone shall also\nallow a mixed use of commercial and residential.\n(c) MARINE COMMERCIAL - which shall apply to waterfront commercial areas\ndedicated primarily to marine activities, and shall also include the Port Facility, George\n\n 8\n\nTown Barcadere, Jackson\u2019s Barcadere in West Bay, and Harbour House Marina in\nProspect.\nMarine commercial shall include general commercial activities as well as activities\nassociated with ships and shipping, charter boats and dive boats, and water sport\noperations.  Cargo handling and boat repair are two examples of allowable uses.\nThe Authority will require a standard of design, construction, and landscaping which\nreflects the local architectural heritage.\n3.03\nBEACH RESORT\/RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ZONE\nThe intent of this zone is to provide a transition zone between the Hotels\/Tourism Zones\nand the Low Density Residential Zone.  Development within this zone will generally\nhave the appearance of residential development in scale and massing.\nThe Authority shall apply the Beach Resort\/Residential Zone provisions and other\nrelevant provisions of the Statement in a manner best calculated to ensure -\n(a)\nthat decent, safe and sanitary projects are built to appropriate standards;\n(b)\nthat harmonious and compatible land use with adjacent properties and\ntheir zones are achieved;\n(c)\nthat sites and areas do not become overly dense by ensuring that the\ndensities established by the zones is respected;\n(d)\nthat aesthetically pleasing development, designed with sensitivity towards\nheritage results from the grant of the planning permission.\nAllowable development in this zone shall include detached and semi-detached houses,\nbeach resorts and in suitable locations, guest houses, apartments, cottage colonies and\nother tourist related development.\nThe Authority when considering applications for planning permission in a Beach Resort\/\nResidential Zone shall ensure that development provides a high standard of\naccommodation, amenities and open space.  For developments other than a detached and\na semi-detached house and a duplex, outdoor facilities such as swimming pools, gardens,\nsun decks, patios, terraces, and an abundant degree of lush, tropical landscaping,\nincorporating sufficient screening to provide privacy from adjacent properties.\nThe Authority shall determine the setback in accordance with the relevant provisions of\nthe Development and Planning Law and Regulations and shall take into consideration -\nthe elevation of the property and its environs; the geology of the property; the storm and\nbeach ridge; the existence of a protective reef adjacent to the proposed development; the\nlocation of the adjacent development; and, any other material consideration which the\nAuthority considers will affect the proposal.\n\n3.04\nHOTEL\/TOURISM ZONE\nDevelopment within these zones will include hotel, cottage colony development,\ndetached and semi-detached houses, and apartments.  Development will be carefully\n\n 9\n\nregulated to ensure that the needs of the tourist industry are met and that new buildings\nwill in general be related to the needs of the industry.\nThe Authority shall apply the Hotel\/Tourism Zone provisions and other relevant\nprovisions of this Statement in a manner best calculated to -\n(a)\nprovide for the orderly development, expansion and upgrading of facilities\nrequired to maintain a successful tourism industry;\n(b)\nensure that all development enhances the quality and character of the\nCayman Islands\u2019 hotels and cottage colonies;\n(c)\nprevent the over-development of sites and to ensure that the scale and\ndensity of development are compatible with and sensitive to the physical\ncharacteristics of the site;\n(d)\nensure minimal traffic impacts on surrounding properties and existing\npublic roads;\n(e)\nensure that waterfront developments are designed to avoid interference\nwith natural coastal processes; and\n(f)\nensure adequate allowance for public access to the sea.\nThe Authority shall take into consideration the characteristics of the form of tourist\naccommodation proposed and shall be satisfied that the layout, scale and massing of\ndevelopment are compatible with the ecological, aesthetics, and other physical\ncharacteristics of the site; and that a high quality of design and landscaping are used.\n\n3.05\nINSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT ZONES\nDevelopment within this zone shall include civic and educational buildings, cemeteries,\nsocial and recreational facilities.  Area requirements such as lot sizes, setbacks and height\nlimitations shall be at the discretion of the Authority.\nReligious, social, and educational institutions, including recreational facilities and public\nand civic buildings, are permissible in any zone where they meet the needs of the\ncommunity.\n3.06\nINDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ZONES\nIndustrial development will be confined to the areas zoned for that purpose on the map\nand in residential zones shall be subject to section 3.01.   Light industrial development is\nalso permissible in the commercial zones at the discretion of the Authority, but will be\nrequired to conform to the setback requirements applicable to the category of commercial\nzone, as well as other requirements applicable to its own particular type of development.\n(1)\nThe LIGHT INDUSTRIAL Development Zone shall include -\n\n10\n\n(a)\nindustry linked to or based upon agriculture which may alternatively be\nlocated convenient to the agricultural activity with which it is associated;\n(b)\nindustry which is linked to or based upon fishing, boating, sailing and\nrelated activities may alternatively be located conveniently to the activity\nwith which it is associated;\n(c)\nlight industry linked to the needs of local communities may be\nalternatively located conveniently within a residential area, subject to\nparagraph 3.01 of this statement;\n(d)\nlight industrial uses shall include storage and warehousing; bulk\nwholesale; agricultural processing; and research labs; and\n(2)\nThe intensification of non-conforming forms of development shall be discouraged\nand strictly controlled in order to reserve industrial land for future industrial\npurposes.\n(3)\nThe Authority shall require an acceptable standard of layout, design, construction\nand landscaping.\n(a)\nIndustrial buildings and structures, and areas for storage, waste disposal,\nparking and loading shall be screened from public roads and adjoining\nnon-industrial properties.\n(b)\nThe Authority will require an acceptable standard of layout, design and\nconstruction and a high order of landscaping to achieve this.\n(c)\nThe Authority may require reasonable provisions for integration of the\ndevelopment into its surroundings.\n3.07\nPUBLIC OPEN SPACE ZONE\nPublic Open Space is land in which Government has acquired, or is proposing to acquire,\nrights of ownership or use for the benefit of the public.  New acquisitions will normally\nbe in accordance with the provisions of the Law or by agreement but, where alternative\nsolutions cannot be found, acquisition by Government may be necessary.\nThe land shown as public open space on the map includes:\nland already owned by Government including playing fields, public beaches,\npublic parks and established public rights of way;\nland which it is intended to acquire or in respect of which new negotiations may\nbe carried out;\nany other land whether publicly or privately owned to which the public has\ncertain existing rights.\n\n11\n\n3.08\nMANGROVE BUFFER ZONE\nThe policy for Mangrove Buffer Zones will comprise and be subject to control of\ndevelopment in the following ways:  - Red and predominantly red mangroves in the area\ndefined on the map as Mangrove Buffer will be protected from development except in\nexceptional circumstances.\n3.09\nAGRICULTURAL\/RESIDENTIAL ZONE\nThese lands are designated on the map and shall be preserved primarily for agricultural\nand residential uses, and shall include the following:\n(1)\nAgricultural and single family residential uses shall be allowed in this zone.\n(2)\nMulti-family, commercial, or industrial uses shall not be permitted unless they are\nagriculturally dependent.\n(3)\nLand in its natural state may also be included in the Agricultural\/Residential zone\nbecause of its correlation contribution to water and soil quality and rustic\nambiance.\n(4)\nInstitutional development may also be permitted in this zone.  Other uses may be\nallowed if they are concomitant to the primary use.\n3.10\nSCENIC COASTLINE ZONE\nCertain lengths of the coastline which have been identified as being of high landscape or\nscenic value forming a particularly attractive feature of the Island are designated as\nScenic Coastline and will be subject to the following provisions:-\n(1)\nthe land will be conserved basically in its natural state,\n(2)\nthe ownership of the land will not be affected,\n(3)\ndevelopment which is consistent with the policies of this Statement will be\npermitted.\nIt will be the duty of the Authority to ensure that the open character of scenic coastline\nland is preserved, in particular, that of the beaches, and also to safeguard the public's\nright to use the beaches and to gain access to them through public rights of way.  The\npanoramic views and vistas provided by these coastlines are natural assets which are to\nbe safeguarded for present and future generations.\n3.11\nHISTORIC OVERLAY ZONE\nThe purpose of the Historic Overlay Zone is to promote and encourage the perpetuation\nof historic buildings and structures with the underlying zone remaining in effect.\nDevelopment will be strictly controlled to conserve the Cayman Islands historical and\narchitectural heritage.\n\n12\n\nSubject to the Development and Planning Law and Regulations, the Authority shall apply\nthe Historic Overlay Zone provisions and other relevant provisions of the Statement in a\nmanner best calculated to -\n(a)\npreserve and protect the established historical, architectural or cultural character\nof the area;\n(b)\npreserve any significant aspect, appearance or view of the area; and\n(c)\npreserve and protect any prospect or view, being an environmentally important\nprospect or view, from any public area.\n3.12\nLAND ABOVE WATER LENSES\nThe policy in respect of proposals for development on land above water lenses will be\nthat:-\n(1)\nresidential development will in general be permitted over a water lens,\n(2)\nagricultural development will in general be permitted over a water lens,\n(3)\nan industrial development will be permitted over a water lens only in the\nfollowing circumstances:\n(a)\nif the development is a small industrial land use and,\n(b)\nif it requires a supply of water readily available and,\n(c)\nif it can be demonstrated that this facility cannot be provided\nelsewhere on the Island.\nStrict conditions will be imposed to ensure that the water in the lens will not be\ncontaminated by the development or by the effluent therefrom, and that the quantity of\nwater used will not deplete the lens to the disadvantage of existing or future users.\n3.13\nNATIONAL AND COMMUNITY PARKS\nNational and community parks will be identified on the map.  It is recommended that\nsome of these be developed by joint public \/ private partnerships.\n3.14\nROAD REQUIREMENTS\nThe existing network of public roads for which Government is responsible for\nmaintaining will continue.  Subject to the availability of funds, government will consider\nconstructing a number of collector and arterial roads to relieve the more populated areas\nwhere the needs of through traffic are in conflict with those of local residents.  The lines\nof proposed new public roads and the extension of private roads are shown in\ndiagrammatic form on the map.\nIn making decisions on planning applications, the likely requirements of land for new\npublic roads and road improvements shall be taken into account.\nGovernment will consider assuming responsibility of private roads when they have been\nconstructed and maintained to an acceptable standard or where there is evidence of\ncommon use by the general public.\n\n13\n\nApplicants shall be encouraged to utilize and share existing roads in a subdivision in\norder to avoid the duplication of roads and to promote a more efficient use of land, and in\nthis regard, the Authority may require an applicant to fully investigate such options and\nto report back to the Authority prior to the determination of an application for a new road\nin a subdivision.\n3.15\nSUBDIVISION OF LAND\nThe Authority shall apply the subdivision of land provisions and other relevant\nprovisions of the Statement in a manner best calculated to -\n(1)\nensure that the layout and design of subdivision proposals are sensitive to a site\u2019s\nphysical and environmental characteristics;\n(2)\nmake the most efficient use of land designated for the intended purposes; and\n(3)\nprevent the unnecessary fragmentation of large tracts of open land.\nIn considering a draft plan or an application for a subdivision, the Authority shall have\nregard, among other matters, to the health, safety, convenience and welfare of the future\ninhabitants\nNormally land shall not be subdivided unless it is suited to the purpose for which the\nsubdivision is intended.\nThe subdivision of land encompassing important or prime agricultural land shall not,\nexcept in exceptional circumstances, be permitted where it may -\n(a)\nfragment into separate lots neighbouring fields which function as a farm\nunit or agricultural holding; or\n(b)\nresult in good quality arable land being taken out of production.\n\n14\n\nAPPENDIX 1\nTHE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1977\nGUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPMENT CONTROL IN\nCAYMAN BRAC\nResulting from the objections which were received in 1975, the Tribunal recommended\nthat specific guidelines were needed for Cayman Brac and Little Cayman rather than a\nfull scale development plan.  It is, however, the Government\u2019s intention to produce plans\nfor Cayman Brac for the near future.\nNotes on discussion between the members of the Development Control Board, the\nmembers of the local committees appointed to consider the plan and the members of the\nplanning team on the 18th and 19th April 1975 and on 24th May 1975.\n1.\nIt is recognized that the development and planning problems of Cayman Brac\nand Little Cayman will require different treatment from those in Grand\nCayman.\n2 .\nThe Development and Planning Law recognizes this fact by providing for a\nseparate Development Control Board and makes special provision for\nrepresentations and alternative draft plans and proposals under the Law.\n3\nThe following proposals and considerations are submitted by the Development\nControl Board in consultation with members of the public of the two islands\nfor incorporation in this Statement.\n(a)\nThe people of Cayman Brac and Little Cayman believe that a system of free\nenterprise is best suited to their needs at this early stage.  A flexible set of\nguidelines is required which permits the people of the islands discretion in\ntheir planning, until the final pattern of development is determined, through\ntheir representatives of the Development Control Board.\n(b)\nAny person's existing rights of property must not be taken away through\nzoning or other regulations.\n(c)\nIt is recommended that underdeveloped land in the Bluff area of the Brac\nshould be developed in the light of circumstances of each case as projects\ncome before the Development Control Board in the Brac.\n(d)\nThe following GUIDELINES should be used in assessing any proposal on the\nBluff:\n(i)\nIt is recommended that wherever practical agricultural land (locally\nknown as mouldy land) will be retained for present and future use for\npasture of horticultural purposes.\n(ii)\nAdequate road access through the whole length of the Bluff should be\nprovided whether for agricultural or residential purposes.  A survey of\nsuch a road was prepared by the P.W.D. and should be re-examined\nAPP.\n1-1\n\nimmediately for adoption wherever it is practical to do so.  It is\ndesirable that rights of way should be granted without charge to\npermit development on either side of the road whether for public or\nprivate purposes.\n(iii)\nIt is recognized that the Bluff is a unique feature of Cayman Brac and\nan important attraction to visitors.  Every effort should therefore be\nmade to retain the unspoiled visual aspect of the cliff face of the\nBluff.  The setback in each case is to be determined by the\nDevelopment Control Board and each application will be dealt with\non its merits.\n(iv)\nIt is recommended, wherever possible that sufficient access be\nprovided at the top of the Bluff to permit the public to enjoy the\nscenic views along the Bluff edge.  This can be done as the Bluff is\ndeveloped and as suitable opportunities occur over the period of this\nStatement.\n(V)\nThe people of the Brac believe that the Bluff is needed for residential\nuse in view of the potential danger of hurricanes on the low lying land\nand the limited amount of such low land available for residential and\nother development purposes.\n(vi)\nParticular care should be taken in the siting of septic tanks near the\nedge of the Bluff to avoid potential leakage and pollution of low-lying\nland and water supplies.  Septic tanks should be of a high standard as\nrecommended by the Department of Personal Health Services.\n(e)\nThe following points have been agreed with regard to the control of foreshore\nand including ironshore.\n(i)\nIronshore should be left wherever it is practical to do so in its original\ncondition.\n(ii)\nIndividual owners are permitted ownership of land down to the water\nfront and foreshore will be left free from obstructions to permit the\npublic to walk along it.\nSand beaches will be treated in a similar manner.  At the discretion of the\nBoard, sufficient access to the beach will be provided alongside any major\ndevelopment such as a hotel and at intervals along the coast to ensure that the\npublic have access to the beach areas and in order to retain and enhance the\ndevelopment value of the land not directly fronting the sea.\n(g)\nLand designated for industry around the Creek should be modified and reduced\nin size in consultation with the Planning Board so as to avoid any conflicts\nwith potential residential development in this area.  It should show initially the\narea required for the operation of the harbour and related activities and provide\nfor any future expansion of the harbour area.\nAPP.\n1-2\n\n(h)\nShould there be any other industrial development in the Brac a suitable area\nwill need to be readily available for such development.\nThe Board will consider further where this might best be located in relation to\nappropriate transportation requirements by air or sea and the availability of\ninfrastructure.\n(i)\nIt is recognized that local commercial development such as shops, services and\noffices need to remain adjacent to existing communities.\nNo regulations to change these arrangements would be acceptable to the people\nof the Brac.  New developments for local needs should be permitted where\nthey do not interfere with local residential requirements.  The Development\nControl Board will consider where facilities should be most conveniently\nprovided for any major commercial development which might be attracted to\nthe Brac.\n(j)\nIt is recommended that the same provisions be made for residential\ndevelopment on the low lands as for the Bluff in order to protect the existing\ninterests of individual owners.  Residential development should be permitted at\nthe discretion of the Development Board bearing in mind the need to keep\nsufficient agricultural and horticultural land and a sufficiently open aspect to\nthe sea.-\n(k)\nThe hotel areas on the South Coast should be reviewed.  Potential hotel\nprojects should be allowed for on the South Coast.  This area could be of\nconsiderable benefit for tourism and it is recommended that as much as\npossible of this section of the South Coast within the reef should be designated\nfor potential tourist purposes subject to there being adequate public access to\nthe beaches for residents.\n(l)\nProper locations for the disposal of solid waste including cars should be made.\nParts of the pond near the airport should be investigated for this purpose by the\nDepartment of Personal Health Services for use as a controlled landfill for\nsolid waste.  A separate location may be required for the disposal of old\nvehicles.\n(m)\nThe lagoon adjacent to the airport should be landscaped.\n(n)\nAll Government Buildings are to be subject to the guidelines of the\nDevelopment Control Board.\n(o)\nInvestigation should be made of the harbour potential of South Channel as an\nalternative harbour and boat facility to the Creek especially in certain\nweathers.  The necessary safeguarding of land around this area should be made\nto permit any future harbour or port development.\n(p)\nThe Public Open Spaces should include the Cay at West End of the Island with\nan access thereto.\nAPP.\n1-3\n\n(q)\nThe road to join Rock Turn to Tibbetts Turn should be reconstructed and\nincorporated into any development programme for the island.\n(r)\nCareful consideration should be given to preserving the detached rocks known\nas \"cays\" for their scenic and landscape value when planning developments\nanywhere in the Brac.\n(s)\nMeasures should similarly be taken to identify, protect, preserve, explore and\nevaluate the valuable caves on the Brac which are of importance for their\nscientific and tourist interest.\n(t)\nRights of way and extensions of the public road should be ensured to gain\naccess to the scenic areas and beaches.\n4\nThe above proposals and recommendations are submitted by the Development\nControl Board after consultation with the people and committees appointed by\nthem.\n5\nThe general principles set out above should apply to Little Cayman where\nappropriate but further considerations of the development problems of Little\nCayman are set out in a separate memorandum.  Additional considerations will\ntherefore be submitted in respect of Little Cayman.\n\nCAYMAN BRAC\n28TH May, 1975\n\nAPP.\n1-4\n\nAPPENDIX 2\nTHE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1977\nGUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPMENT CONTROL IN\nLITTLE CAYMAN\nResulting from the objections which were received in 1975, the Tribunal recommended\nthat specific guidelines were needed for Cayman Brac and Little Cayman rather than a\nfull scale development plan.  It is, however, the Government\u2019s intention to produce plans\nfor Little Cayman for the near future.\nFollowing discussion by the Development Control Board on 24th May 1975 and with the\nmembers of the planning team, the following proposals are put forward for consideration\nin a new land use plan for Little Cayman.\n1.\nThe road round the island should be improved to a more adequate standard\nwithout destroying the tourist attraction of the island.  A beginning should be\nmade with the road along the South coast.\n2.\nSteps should be taken to assess the value of the mahogany trees on the island\nwhether for their economic value or their attraction to visitors.  The possibility\nof developing the area for other tropical plants as a visitor attraction should be\ninvestigated also.  Access to these and other areas of interest on the island\nshould be considered after appropriate investigation and study has taken place.\n3\nThe tarpon lake should be developed as a visitor attraction.  It should at the\nsame time be protected to ensure that its attractions continue to be available in\nthe future.  It should be acquired as a public park and protected area.\n4.\nEast Point should be investigated for its potential as an area of the greatest\nnatural beauty for visitors and the people of the islands.  Any development\nshould take special care to protect the interests of the public to have access to\nand use of the beach and other natural amenities in the area of East Point,\nSandy Point and Snipe Point.\n5.\nThe airstrip should be improved to ensure that the island is readily accessible\nto the people of the island and to visitors on regular flight schedule.\n6.\nThe general considerations set out for the Development of Cayman Brac will\napply in Little Cayman in the following way:\n(a)\nThe principles outlined in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 (a) (b) and (c) of\nthe notes on Cayman Brac apply equally to Little Cayman.\n(b)\nThe guidelines for the development to the Bluff area in Cayman\nBrac are not appropriate in all respects and the following\nsuggestions are put forward for conditions on Little Cayman.\nAPP.\n2-1\n\n(i)\nWherever possible agricultural land will be\nretained for present and future use as in the case\nof the Bluff -\n(ii)\nIt is recognized that Little Cayman is considered a\nunique island.  Every effort should therefore be\nmade to retain its unspoiled character and to make\nit an attraction for persons interested in natural\nlife.  Selected development would encourage such\npersons to visit Little Cayman.  Development\nshould be in harmony with the unspoiled\ncharacter of the island.  Positive efforts should be\nmade to attract the right type of visitor who\nappreciates natural life and the unspoiled\ncharacter of Little Cayman.\n(iii)\nIt is recommended that careful access should be\nprovided to the natural features of the island to\nenable visitors to enjoy the natural life which is\navailable without jeopardising these natural\nassets.\n(c)\nSections 3 (e) and (f) of the notes on Cayman Brac apply equally\non Little Cayman (ironshore and beaches).\n7.\nShould the oil terminal proceed as planned care should be taken to ensure that\nit is fitted in to the island to minimise its impact on the physical environment\nand to keep the island an attraction for the sake of its natural beauty and wild\nlife.\n8.\nIn the case of hotel development care should be taken to keep the natural\namenities including beach and shore available for the public.  It is suggested\nthat suitably designed hotels be encouraged in the area of South Hole Sound\nand East Point.  Other proposals for development would be considered in\naccordance with the principles laid down for the development of the two\nislands but special care must be taken to avoid indiscriminate opening up of\nthe island if prime assets are not to be lost.\n9.\nInvestigation should be made of the harbour needs for Little Cayman whether\nin South Hole Sound or along the Salt Rocks.\n\nCAYMAN BRAC\n28TH May, 1975\n\nAPP.\n2-2\n\nAPPENDIX 3\nPROVISIONS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT\nCONTENT REQUIREMENTS\nThe submission of an environmental impact statement (EIS) for development projects\nwhich, because of the characteristics of the site or the particulars of the proposal, may be\nrequired in order for the Authority to carefully examine the potential impacts of the\ndevelopment prior to the determination of the application.\nAn environmental impact statement shall include the appropriate plans, information and\ndata in sufficient details to enable the Authority to determine, examine and assess the\npotential environmental impacts of the proposal.","akn_extracted_at":"2026-06-22 15:38:44.344667+00","cms_id":"1997-0021","law_type":"subordinate","year":"1997","number":"21","title":"Judges' and Magistrates' Emoluments and Allowances Act","status":"in_force"},"provenance":{"files":[{"file_id":"6598","expr_id":"1767","kind":"akn_xml","filename":"1997-0021_SL 21 of 1997.akn.xml","source_url":null,"storage_path":"\/Users\/q\/kyleg-data\/working\/SUBORDINATE\/1997\/1997-0021\/1997-0021_SL 21 of 1997.akn.xml","content_md5":"7528089cac93154851e65c6706d7bb68","byte_size":"49255","http_last_modified":null,"fetched_at":"2026-06-22 15:38:44.477854+00"},{"file_id":"3533","expr_id":"1767","kind":"pristine_pdf","filename":"1997-0021_SL 21 of 1997.pdf","source_url":"\/cms\/images\/LEGISLATION\/SUBORDINATE\/1997\/1997-0021\/1997-0021_SL 21 of 1997.pdf","storage_path":"\/Users\/q\/kyleg-data\/pristine\/SUBORDINATE\/1997\/1997-0021\/1997-0021_SL 21 of 1997.pdf","content_md5":"41be88ad064609984e08237178645916","byte_size":"150243","http_last_modified":null,"fetched_at":"2026-06-21 23:09:34.844448+00"},{"file_id":"3534","expr_id":"1767","kind":"working_pdf","filename":"1997-0021_SL 21 of 1997.pdf","source_url":"\/cms\/images\/LEGISLATION\/SUBORDINATE\/1997\/1997-0021\/1997-0021_SL 21 of 1997.pdf","storage_path":"\/Users\/q\/kyleg-data\/working\/SUBORDINATE\/1997\/1997-0021\/1997-0021_SL 21 of 1997.pdf","content_md5":"41be88ad064609984e08237178645916","byte_size":"150243","http_last_modified":null,"fetched_at":"2026-06-21 23:09:34.844448+00"}],"paragraph_count":37,"latest_history":null},"quality":{"expr_id":"1767","doc_id":"1767","quality_state":"known_issue","quality_score":"59","needs_human_review":"t","deterministic_categories":"{commencement_metadata_problem,page_header_footer_noise,title_mismatch}","llm_categories":"{title_mismatch,other}","repair_actions":"{manual_review,strip_page_furniture,verify_commencement_metadata,verify_title_metadata}","finding_severity_counts":"{\"low\": 1, \"medium\": 1}","finding_summary":"Metadata title does not match extracted legislation content; potential truncation at document end.","assessed_at":"2026-06-22 15:29:45.731641+00","updated_at":"2026-06-22 15:29:45.731641+00"}}