{"kind":"expression","expression":{"expr_id":"1850","doc_id":"1850","label":"PD-2014-09 - Practice Circular No 9 of 2014 - Committal for Contempt of Court (SL 17 of 2014)","is_as_enacted":"f","commenced_on":null,"superseded_on":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_to":null,"is_current":"t","incorporating":null,"akn_expr_iri":"\/akn\/ky\/act\/amending\/2014\/17\/eng@2014-01-01","akn_envelope":"{\"_canary\": {\"iri\": {\"work\": \"\/akn\/ky\/act\/amending\/2014\/17\", \"expression\": \"\/akn\/ky\/act\/amending\/2014\/17\/eng@2014-01-01\", \"manifestation\": \"\/akn\/ky\/act\/amending\/2014\/17\/eng@2014-01-01.pdf\"}, \"pdf\": {\"md5\": \"721f6a037350388a63771eb6046b1d18\", \"path\": \"\/Users\/q\/kyleg-data\/working\/AMENDING\/2014\/2014-0017\/2014-0017.pdf\", \"pages\": 3, \"filename\": \"2014-0017.pdf\"}, \"errors\": [], \"extraction\": {\"model\": null, \"stats\": {\"word_count\": 667, \"paragraph_count\": 8, \"text_char_count\": 3892}, \"usage\": null, \"method\": \"pymupdf-text\", \"version\": \"kyleg-akn-1.0\", \"extracted_at\": \"2026-06-22\"}, \"classification\": \"text_layer\", \"validation_flags\": [], \"docai_processor_id\": null}, \"akomaNtoso\": {\"act\": {\"body\": [{\"eId\": \"sec_n1\", \"num\": null, \"text\": \"Gazette No. 33 dated 14 May, 2014. PRACTICE CIRCULAR No. 9\/2014 (GCR O.1, r.12) (GCR O. 52) (GCR O.6(11) COMMITTAL FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT \u2013 FAMILY DIVISION and IN \u201cCOURT OF PROTECTION MATTERS\u201d PRACTICE CIRCULAR No. 9\/2014 (GCR O.1, r.12) (GCR O. 52) (GCR O.6(11) COMMITTAL FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT \u2013 FAMILY DIVISION and IN \u201cCOURT OF PROTECTION MATTERS\u201d\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_1\", \"num\": \"1.\", \"text\": \"It is a fundamental principle of the administration of justice in the Cayman Islands that applications for committal for contempt should be heard and decided in public, that is, in open court.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_2\", \"num\": \"2.\", \"text\": \"The Grand Court when dealing with matters concerning the property of a person under disability or when dealing with the applications arising out of proceedings relating to a child1, is vested with a discretionary power to hear a committal application in private protection matters\u201d. This discretion should be exercised only in exceptional cases where it is necessary in the interests of justice. The fact that the committal application is being made in \u201crespect of a protection matter does not of itself justify the application being heard in private. Moreover the fact that the hearing of the committal application may involve the disclosure of material which ought not to be published does not of itself justify hearing the application in private if such publication can be restrained by an appropriate order.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_3\", \"num\": \"3.\", \"text\": \"If, in an exceptional case, a committal application is heard in private and the court finds that a person has committed a contempt of court it must state in public as required by Order 52 rule 6(2) of the Grand Court Rules: (a) the name of that person; (b) in general terms the nature of the contempt of court in respect of which the committal order [\u201ccommittal order\u201d for this purpose includes a suspended committal order] is being made; and (c) the punishment being imposed. 1 That is:  in terms of GCR O.52(5)(i)(a) in relation to children: \u201cwhere the application arises out of proceedings relating to the wardship or adoption of an infant or wholly or mainly to the guardianship, custody, maintenance or upbringing of a child, or rights of access to a child\u201d. This is mandatory; there are no exceptions. There are never any circumstances in which any one may be committed to custody without these matters being publicly stated.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_4\", \"num\": \"4.\", \"text\": \"Committal applications should at the outset be listed and heard in public. This applies to every committal application without exception. The application should be shown in the public court list as follows: FOR HEARING IN OPEN COURT Application by [full names of applicant] for The Committal to prison of [full names of the person alleged to be in contempt]\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_5\", \"num\": \"5.\", \"text\": \"Whenever the court decides to exercise its discretion to sit in private the judge should, before   continuing the hearing in private, give reasons in public for doing so. At the conclusion of any hearing in private the judge should sit in public to comply with the requirements set out in paragraph 3.  If the judge, having decided to continue in private, adjourns the   hearing to a future date the application should be shown in the public court list as: FOR HEARING IN PRIVATE Application by [full names of applicant] for The Committal to prison of [full names of the person alleged to be in contempt]\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_6\", \"num\": \"6.\", \"text\": \"A person who is not a party to the proceedings is not entitled as of right to a copy of the application notice. The court may, however, authorize such a person to obtain a copy. If in an exceptional case the court decides that a copy of the application notice is not to be made available to a person who requests it, the judge must set out in writing the reasons for doing so.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_7\", \"num\": \"7.\", \"text\": \"Whenever a committal application is being heard in public the judge and the attorneys should be robed. DATED this 2nd day of May 2014 The Hon. Anthony Smellie, QC Chief Justice\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}], \"meta\": {\"notes\": null, \"workflow\": null, \"lifecycle\": {\"source\": \"#cilegis\", \"eventRef\": [{\"eId\": \"e_commence_2014_01_01\", \"date\": \"2014-01-01\", \"type\": \"generation\", \"source\": \"#cilegis\"}]}, \"references\": {\"source\": \"#canary\", \"TLCRole\": [], \"TLCEvent\": [{\"eId\": \"ev_commencement\", \"href\": \"\/akn\/ontology\/canary\/event\/commencement\", \"showAs\": \"commencement\"}], \"TLCPerson\": [], \"TLCConcept\": [{\"eId\": \"inForce\", \"href\": \"\/akn\/ontology\/canary\/concept\/temporal\/in-force\", \"showAs\": \"in force\"}], \"TLCProcess\": [], \"TLCLocation\": [], \"TLCOrganization\": [{\"eId\": \"cilegis\", \"href\": \"\/akn\/ontology\/canary\/organization\/editor\/cilegis\", \"showAs\": \"Cayman Islands legislation mirror (kyleg)\"}]}, \"temporalData\": {\"source\": \"#cilegis\", \"temporalGroup\": [{\"eId\": \"tg_inforce_2014_01_01\", \"timeInterval\": [{\"end\": null, \"start\": \"#e_commence_2014_01_01\", \"duration\": null, \"refersTo\": \"#inForce\"}]}]}, \"classification\": null, \"identification\": {\"source\": \"#cilegis\", \"FRBRWork\": {\"FRBRuri\": \"\/akn\/ky\/act\/amending\/2014\/17\", \"FRBRdate\": [{\"date\": \"2014-01-01\", \"name\": \"generation\"}], \"FRBRthis\": \"\/akn\/ky\/act\/amending\/2014\/17\/!main\", \"FRBRalias\": [{\"name\": \"cmsId\", \"value\": \"2014-0017\"}], \"FRBRauthor\": [{\"as\": \"#editor\", \"href\": \"\/akn\/ontology\/canary\/organization\/editor\/cilegis\"}], \"FRBRnumber\": \"17 of 2014\", \"FRBRcountry\": \"ky\", \"FRBRsubtype\": \"amending\"}, \"FRBRExpression\": {\"FRBRuri\": \"\/akn\/ky\/act\/amending\/2014\/17\/eng@2014-01-01\", \"FRBRdate\": [{\"date\": \"2014-01-01\", \"name\": \"generation\"}], \"FRBRthis\": \"\/akn\/ky\/act\/amending\/2014\/17\/eng@2014-01-01\/!main\", \"FRBRauthor\": [{\"as\": \"#editor\", \"href\": \"\/akn\/ontology\/canary\/organization\/editor\/cilegis\"}], \"FRBRlanguage\": \"eng\"}, \"FRBRManifestation\": {\"FRBRuri\": \"\/akn\/ky\/act\/amending\/2014\/17\/eng@2014-01-01.xml\", \"FRBRdate\": [{\"date\": \"2026-06-22\", \"name\": \"generation\"}], \"FRBRthis\": \"\/akn\/ky\/act\/amending\/2014\/17\/eng@2014-01-01.xml\", \"FRBRauthor\": [{\"as\": \"#editor\", \"href\": \"\/akn\/ontology\/canary\/organization\/editor\/cilegis\"}], \"FRBRformat\": \"application\/xml\"}}}, \"name\": \"act\", \"header\": {\"title\": \"PD-2014-09 - Practice Circular No 9 of 2014 - Committal for Contempt of Court (SL 17 of 2014)\", \"actNumber\": \"17 of 2014\", \"longTitle\": null}}, \"doc\": null, \"bill\": null, \"judgment\": null}}","akn_full_text":"CAYMAN ISLANDS\n\nSupplement No. 4 published with Extraordinary\nGazette No. 33 dated 14 May, 2014.\n\nPRACTICE CIRCULAR No. 9\/2014\n(GCR O.1, r.12)\n(GCR O. 52)\n(GCR O.6(11)\n\nCOMMITTAL FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT \u2013 FAMILY DIVISION and IN \u201cCOURT\nOF PROTECTION MATTERS\u201d\n\nPRACTICE CIRCULAR No. 9\/2014\n(GCR O.1, r.12)\n(GCR O. 52)\n(GCR O.6(11)\nCOMMITTAL FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT \u2013 FAMILY DIVISION and IN \u201cCOURT\nOF PROTECTION MATTERS\u201d\n1.\nIt is a fundamental principle of the administration of justice in the Cayman Islands that\napplications for committal for contempt should be heard and decided in public, that is,\nin open court.\n2.\nThe Grand Court when dealing with matters concerning the property of a person under\ndisability or when dealing with the applications arising out of proceedings relating to a\nchild1, is vested with a discretionary power to hear a committal application in private\nprotection matters\u201d. This discretion should be exercised only in exceptional cases\nwhere it is necessary in the interests of justice. The fact that the committal application\nis being made in \u201crespect of a protection matter does not of itself justify the application\nbeing heard in private. Moreover the fact that the hearing of the committal application\nmay involve the disclosure of material which ought not to be published does not of\nitself justify hearing the application in private if such publication can be restrained by\nan appropriate order.\n3.\nIf, in an exceptional case, a committal application is heard in private and the court finds\nthat a person has committed a contempt of court it must state in public as required by\nOrder 52 rule 6(2) of the Grand Court Rules:\n(a)\nthe name of that person;\n(b)\nin general terms the nature of the contempt of court in respect of which the\ncommittal order [\u201ccommittal order\u201d for this purpose includes a suspended\ncommittal order] is being made; and\n(c)\nthe punishment being imposed.\n\n1 That is:  in terms of GCR O.52(5)(i)(a) in relation to children: \u201cwhere the application arises out of proceedings\nrelating to the wardship or adoption of an infant or wholly or mainly to the guardianship, custody, maintenance or\nupbringing of a child, or rights of access to a child\u201d.\n\n2\nThis is mandatory; there are no exceptions. There are never any circumstances in which\nany one may be committed to custody without these matters being publicly stated.\n4.\nCommittal applications should at the outset be listed and heard in public. This applies\nto every committal application without exception. The application should be shown in\nthe public court list as follows:\nFOR HEARING IN OPEN COURT\nApplication by [full names of applicant] for\nThe Committal to prison of\n[full names of the person alleged to be in contempt]\n5.\nWhenever the court decides to exercise its discretion to sit in private the judge should,\nbefore   continuing the hearing in private, give reasons in public for doing so. At the\nconclusion of any hearing in private the judge should sit in public to comply with the\nrequirements set out in paragraph 3.  If the judge, having decided to continue in private,\nadjourns the   hearing to a future date the application should be shown in the public\ncourt list as:\nFOR HEARING IN PRIVATE\nApplication by [full names of applicant] for\nThe Committal to prison of\n[full names of the person alleged to be in contempt]\n6.\nA person who is not a party to the proceedings is not entitled as of right to a copy of the\napplication notice. The court may, however, authorize such a person to obtain a copy.\nIf in an exceptional case the court decides that a copy of the application notice is not to\nbe made available to a person who requests it, the judge must set out in writing the\nreasons for doing so.\n7.\nWhenever a committal application is being heard in public the judge and the attorneys\nshould be robed.\nDATED this 2nd day of May 2014\nThe Hon. Anthony Smellie, QC\nChief Justice","akn_extracted_at":"2026-06-22 15:41:55.253304+00","cms_id":"2014-0017","law_type":"amending","year":"2014","number":"17","title":"PD-2014-09 - Practice Circular No 9 of 2014 - Committal for Contempt of Court (SL 17 of 2014)","status":"spent"},"provenance":{"files":[{"file_id":"6665","expr_id":"1850","kind":"akn_xml","filename":"2014-0017.akn.xml","source_url":null,"storage_path":"\/Users\/q\/kyleg-data\/working\/AMENDING\/2014\/2014-0017\/2014-0017.akn.xml","content_md5":"3686b1b29bb452d2c72dcc52ad702af5","byte_size":"7341","http_last_modified":null,"fetched_at":"2026-06-22 15:41:55.307584+00"},{"file_id":"3699","expr_id":"1850","kind":"pristine_pdf","filename":"2014-0017.pdf","source_url":"\/cms\/images\/LEGISLATION\/AMENDING\/2014\/2014-0017\/2014-0017.pdf","storage_path":"\/Users\/q\/kyleg-data\/pristine\/AMENDING\/2014\/2014-0017\/2014-0017.pdf","content_md5":"721f6a037350388a63771eb6046b1d18","byte_size":"229021","http_last_modified":null,"fetched_at":"2026-06-16 04:01:11.049942+00"},{"file_id":"3700","expr_id":"1850","kind":"working_pdf","filename":"2014-0017.pdf","source_url":"\/cms\/images\/LEGISLATION\/AMENDING\/2014\/2014-0017\/2014-0017.pdf","storage_path":"\/Users\/q\/kyleg-data\/working\/AMENDING\/2014\/2014-0017\/2014-0017.pdf","content_md5":"721f6a037350388a63771eb6046b1d18","byte_size":"229021","http_last_modified":null,"fetched_at":"2026-06-16 04:01:11.049942+00"}],"paragraph_count":6,"latest_history":null},"quality":{"expr_id":"1850","doc_id":"1850","quality_state":"known_issue","quality_score":"71","needs_human_review":"t","deterministic_categories":"{duplicate_text,title_mismatch}","llm_categories":"{}","repair_actions":"{collapse_duplicate_text,strip_page_furniture,verify_title_metadata}","finding_severity_counts":"{\"low\": 1, \"high\": 1}","finding_summary":"stored title is not visible in the opening extracted text; duplicate-line ratio is 13.24%","assessed_at":"2026-06-22 15:29:46.560862+00","updated_at":"2026-06-22 15:29:46.560862+00"}}