{"kind":"expression","expression":{"expr_id":"1885","doc_id":"1885","label":"Grand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2016 (SL 54 of 2016)","is_as_enacted":"f","commenced_on":null,"superseded_on":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_to":null,"is_current":"t","incorporating":null,"akn_expr_iri":"\/akn\/ky\/act\/amending\/2016\/54\/eng@2016-01-01","akn_envelope":"{\"_canary\": {\"iri\": {\"work\": \"\/akn\/ky\/act\/amending\/2016\/54\", \"expression\": \"\/akn\/ky\/act\/amending\/2016\/54\/eng@2016-01-01\", \"manifestation\": \"\/akn\/ky\/act\/amending\/2016\/54\/eng@2016-01-01.pdf\"}, \"pdf\": {\"md5\": \"7e00d4e405a5a4ff37a7751b8e6245c6\", \"path\": \"\/Users\/q\/kyleg-data\/working\/AMENDING\/2016\/2016-0054\/2016-0054.pdf\", \"pages\": 25, \"filename\": \"2016-0054.pdf\"}, \"errors\": [], \"extraction\": {\"model\": null, \"stats\": {\"word_count\": 8339, \"paragraph_count\": 32, \"text_char_count\": 46967}, \"usage\": null, \"method\": \"pymupdf-text\", \"version\": \"kyleg-akn-1.0\", \"extracted_at\": \"2026-06-22\"}, \"classification\": \"text_layer\", \"validation_flags\": [], \"docai_processor_id\": null}, \"akomaNtoso\": {\"act\": {\"body\": [{\"eId\": \"sec_n1\", \"num\": null, \"text\": \"Gazette No. 78 dated 30 September, 2016. GRAND COURT LAW (2015 REVISION) THE GRAND COURT (AMENDMENT No 1) RULES 2016 GRAND COURT LAW (2015 REVISION) THE GRAND COURT (AMENDMENT No 1) RULES 2016 These Rules are made by the Rules Committee pursuant to Section 19(3) of the Grand Court Law (2015 Revision).\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_1\", \"num\": \"1.\", \"text\": \"Citation, Commencement and Interpretation. (1) These Rules shall be referred to as the Grand Court (Amendment No 1) Rules 2016. (2) These Rules shall come into operation on the 29th day of March 2016 referred to in these Rules as the \\\"Commencement Date\\\". (3) These Rules shall apply to every proceeding which is pending or commenced in the Court on or after the Commencement Date. (4) A receiving party may apply pursuant to GCR O. 62, r. 4(7)(h) (that a paying party pay a reasonable sum on account of costs pending taxation of his costs) whether or not \u2013 (a) the proceedings to which the application relates were commenced, (b) the order that the paying party pay the receiving party his costs was made, before or after the Commencement Date. (5) Words and expressions in these Rules which are also used in the Grand Court Rules 1995 (as revised and amended) shall have the same meaning in these Rules as they have in the Grand Court Rules 1995 (as revised and amended).\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_2\", \"num\": \"2.\", \"text\": \"Revocation and replacement of Order 62 (1) GCR Order 62 is hereby revoked and replaced by the Order 62 contained in the Schedule hereto. Made by the Rules Committee on the 14th day of March 2016. The Honourable Anthony Smellie QC, Chief Justice The Honourable Sam Bulgin QC, Attorney General Colin McKie QC, Legal Practitioner Hector Robinson, Legal Practitioner GCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16) ORDER 62 COSTS PART I: PRELIMINARY Application (O. 62, r. 1) 1.         (1) This Order shall have effect, with such modifications as may be necessary, where by virtue of any Law the costs of any proceedings before an arbitrator or umpire or before a tribunal or other body constituted by or under any Law not being proceedings in the Court, are taxable in the Court. (2) The powers and discretion of the Court under Section 24 of the Judicature Law (2013 Revision) (which relates to the costs of proceedings in the Court) shall be exercised subject to and in accordance with this Order. Transitional provisions (O. 62, r. 2) 2.         (1)-(7) [spent] Definitions (O. 62, r. 3)\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_3\", \"num\": \"3.\", \"text\": \"(1) In this Order, unless the context otherwise requires - \\\"assessed costs\\\" means costs assessed by a Judge in accordance with rule 8 or by a taxing officer in accordance with rule 26(2); \\\"assisted person\\\" means a person to whom a legal aid Certificate has been granted pursuant to the Legal Aid Law (1999 Revision) in respect of the relevant proceedings; \\\"Court\\\" includes the Court of Appeal; \\\"foreign lawyer\\\" means a person who is engaged in practice as a professional lawyer in any country outside the Islands; \\\"the Guidelines\\\" means the guidelines made from time to time by the Rules Committee pursuant to rule 16; \\\"party\\\", in relation to a cause or matter, includes a party who is treated as being a party to that cause or matter by virtue of Order 4, rule 3(2) and an appellant or respondent to any appeal; \\\"paying party\\\" includes, in the case of taxation of costs payable out of a fund, any person to whom the Court has directed that notice of the appointment for taxation be given; GCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16) \\\"person under disability\\\" has the same meaning as in Order 80, rule 1; \\\"proceedings\\\" includes any cause or matter or any step in any cause or matter and any appeal and any step in any appeal; \\\"successful party\\\" means a party in whose favour an order for costs is made or who is otherwise entitled to receive costs from another party or out of a fund. \\\"the standard basis\\\" and \\\"the indemnity basis\\\" have the meanings assigned to them by rules 13(1) and (3), respectively; \\\"taxed costs\\\" means costs taxed in accordance with this Order; \\\"taxing officer\\\" means any person appointed as a taxing officer by the Chief Justice and includes every Judge who shall be ex officio taxing officers. (2) References to a fund, being a fund out of which costs are to be paid or which is held by a trustee or personal representative, include references to - (a) any estate or property, whether real or personal, held for the benefit of any person or class of persons; and (b) the assets of a company or partnership which is the subject of a winding up proceeding, and references to a fund held by a trustee or personal representative include references to any fund to which he is entitled (whether alone or together with any other person) in that capacity, whether the fund is for the time being in his possession or not. (3) References to costs shall be construed as including references to fees, charges, disbursements, expenses and remuneration in relation to proceedings (including taxation proceedings) and shall include references to costs of or incidental to those proceedings. (4) References to $ means Cayman Islands dollars but shall be interpreted to include the United States dollar equivalent. (5) Bills of costs may be drawn up either in Cayman Islands dollars or United States dollars. GCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16) PART II: ENTITLEMENT TO COSTS General principles (O. 62, r. 4)\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_4\", \"num\": \"4.\", \"text\": \"(1) This rule shall have effect unless otherwise provided by any Law. (2) The overriding objective of this Order is that a successful party to any proceeding should recover from the opposing party the reasonable costs incurred by him in conducting that proceeding in an economical, expeditious and proper manner unless otherwise ordered by the Court. (3) A person who claims to be entitled pursuant to a contract to recover the legal fees and expenses incurred in enforcing that contract shall be entitled to judgment for the amount found due under the contract and such amount shall not be subject to taxation pursuant to this Order. (4) Except as provided in paragraph (3), no party to any proceedings shall be entitled to recover any of the costs of those proceedings from any other party to those proceedings except under an order of the Court. (5) If the Court in the exercise of its discretion sees fit to make any order as to the costs of any proceedings, the Court shall order the costs to follow the event, except when it appears to the Court that in the circumstances of the case some other order should be made as to the whole or any part of the costs. (6) The amount of the costs which a successful party shall be entitled to recover from any other party is \u2013 (a) the fixed costs prescribed in rule 7; (b) the amount assessed by the Judge in accordance with rule 8; (c) the amount allowed after taxation on the standard basis; or (d) the amount allowed after taxation on the indemnity basis. (7) The orders which the Court may make under this rule include an order that a party must pay \u2013 (a) a proportion of another party\u2019s costs; (b) a stated amount in respect of another party\u2019s costs; (c) costs from or until a certain date only; (d) costs incurred before proceedings have begun; GCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16) (e) costs relating to particular steps taken in the proceedings; (f) costs relating only to a distinct part of the proceedings; (g) interest on costs (at the prescribed rate for Cayman Islands dollars) from or until a certain date, including a date before judgment; and (h) where the Court orders the paying party to pay costs subject to taxation, a reasonable sum on account of costs, such sum to be assessed summarily. (8) No order for costs shall be made against an assisted person. (9) A term mentioned in the first column of the table below, when used in an order for costs, shall have the effect indicated in the second column of the table. Term Effect Costs or Costs in any event The party in whose favour the order is made is entitled to the costs in respect of the part of the proceedings to which the order relates whatever other costs orders are made in the proceedings Costs reserved The issue of costs will be determined on a subsequent application. Costs here and below The party in whose favour the costs order is made shall be entitled not only to his costs in respect of the proceedings in which it is made but also to his costs of the same proceedings in any lower court, save that where such an order is made by the Court of Appeal on an appeal from the Grand Court the party shall not be entitled by virtue of that order to any costs which he has incurred in any court below the Grand Court. Costs in the cause or Costs in the application The party in whose favour the Court makes an order for costs at the end of the proceedings is entitled to his costs of the part of the proceedings to which the order relates. Plaintiff\u2019s costs in the cause or Defendant\u2019s costs in the cause If the party in whose favour the costs order is made is awarded costs at the end of the proceedings, that party is entitled to his costs of the part of the proceedings to which the order relates. If any other party is awarded costs at the end of the proceedings, the party in whose favour the final costs order is made is not liable to pay the costs of any other party in respect of the part of the proceedings to which the order relates. GCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16) Costs thrown away Where proceedings or any part of them have been ineffective or have been subsequently set aside, the party in whose favour this order is made shall be entitled to his costs of those proceedings or that part of the proceedings in respect of which it is made. No order for costs Each party is to bear his own costs of the part of the proceedings to which the order relates whatever costs order the Court makes at the end of the proceedings (10) When used in an order of the Court, the expressions Costs, Order for costs and Costs to be taxed if not agreed shall mean costs to be taxed on the standard basis. (11) The Court may make an inter partes order for costs to be taxed on the indemnity basis only if it is satisfied that the paying party has conducted the proceedings, or that part of the proceedings to which the order relates, improperly, unreasonably or negligently. Cases where order for costs deemed to have been made (O. 62, r. 5)\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_5\", \"num\": \"5.\", \"text\": \"(1) In each of the circumstances mentioned in this rule an order for costs shall be deemed to have been made to the effect respectively described in the following paragraphs of this rule. (2) Where a party by notice in writing and without leave discontinues an action or counterclaim or withdraws any particular claim made by him as against any other party (except for the purpose of obtaining a default judgment), that other party shall be entitled to his costs of the action or counterclaim or his costs occasioned by the claim withdrawn, as the case may be, incurred to the time of receipt of the notice of discontinuance or withdrawal. (3) Where a plaintiff by notice in writing in accordance with Order 22, rule 3(1), accepts money paid into Court in satisfaction of the cause of action or of all the causes of action in respect of which he claims, or accepts money paid in satisfaction of one or more specified causes of action and gives notice that he abandons the others, he shall be entitled to his costs of the action incurred up to the time of giving notice of acceptance. (4) Where in an action for libel or slander against several defendants sued jointly a plaintiff, by notice in writing in accordance with Order 22, rule 3(1), accepts money paid into Court by one of the defendants he shall be entitled to his costs of the action against that defendant incurred up to the time of giving notice of acceptance. (5) A defendant who has counterclaimed shall be entitled to the costs of the counterclaim if - GCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16) (a) he pays money into Court and his notice of payment in states that he has taken into account and satisfied the causes of action in respect of which he counterclaims; and (b) the plaintiff accepts the money paid in, but the costs of such counterclaim shall be limited to those incurred up to the time when the defendant receives notice of acceptance by the plaintiff of the money paid into Court. Cases where costs do not follow the event (O. 62, r. 6)\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_6\", \"num\": \"6.\", \"text\": \"(1) The provisions of this rule shall apply in the circumstances mentioned in this rule unless the Court orders otherwise. (2) Where a person is or has been a party to any proceedings in the capacity of trustee, personal representative, mortgagee, chargee or official liquidator he shall be entitled to the costs of those proceedings, insofar as they are not recovered from or paid by any other person, out of the fund and the Court may order otherwise only on the ground that he has acted unreasonably or, in the case of a trustee, personal representative or official liquidator has in substance acted for his own benefit rather than for the benefit of the fund or the creditors as the case may be. (3) Where any person claiming to be a creditor \u2013 (a) seeks to establish any claim to a debt under any judgment or order in accordance with Order 44, or (b) comes in to prove his title, debt or claim in relation to a company in pursuance of any such procedure as is mentioned in Order 102, rule 13, he shall, if his claim succeeds, be entitled to his costs incurred in establishing it: and, if his claim or any part of it fails, he may be ordered to pay the costs of any person incurred in opposing it. (4) Where a claimant (other than a person claiming to be creditor) has established a claim to be entitled under a judgment or order in accordance with Order 44 and has been served with notice of the judgment or order pursuant to rule 2 of that Order, he shall, if he acknowledges service of that notice, be entitled as part of his costs of action (if allowed) to costs incurred in establishing his claim; and where such a claimant fails to establish his claim or any part of it he may be ordered to pay the costs of any person incurred in opposing it. (5) The costs of any amendment made without leave in the writ or any pleadings shall be borne by the party making the amendment. GCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16) (6) The costs of any application to extend the time fixed by these rules or by any direction or order thereunder shall be borne by the party making the application. (7) If a party on whom a notice to admit facts is served under Order 27, rule 2, refuses or neglects to admit the facts within 14 days after the service on him of the notice or such longer time as may be allowed by the Court, the costs of proving the facts and the costs occasioned by and thrown away as a result of his failure to admit the facts shall be borne by him. (8) If a party - (a) on whom a list of documents is served under Order 24, or (b) on whom a notice to admit documents is served under Order 27, rule 5, gives notice of non-admission of any of the documents in accordance with Order 27, rule 4(2) or 5(2), as the case may be, the costs of proving that document and the costs occasioned by and thrown away as a result of his non-admission shall be borne by him. Claim for fixed costs (O. 62, r. 7)\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_7\", \"num\": \"7.\", \"text\": \"(1) Where a writ is indorsed with a claim for a liquidated sum only, it may include a claim for fixed costs on the following scale - (a) the sum of $50 where the principal sum claimed does not exceed $2,000; (b) the sum of $250 where the principal sum claimed exceeds $2,000 but does not exceed $10,000; (c) the sum of $500 where the principal sum claimed exceeds $10,000, plus in each case the prescribed fee paid upon issue of the writ. (2) Where a writ is indorsed with a claim of the kind mentioned in Order 13, rules 2, 3 or 4 and Order 19, rule 3, 4 or 5, it may be include a claim for fixed costs in the sum of $250. (3) Nothing in this rule shall preclude a plaintiff from waiving his right to claim fixed costs and instead claiming costs to be assessed or taxed. GCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16) Assessment of Costs (O. 62, r. 8)\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_8\", \"num\": \"8.\", \"text\": \"(1) The amount of costs which a successful party is entitled to recover against another party shall be assessed if the order is made in respect of \u2013 (a) an appeal from the Summary Court; or (b) an action in which the Writ is indorsed only with a claim for a liquidated sum not exceeding $25,000 (or where other relief claimed is abandoned). (2) Except in a case to which paragraph (1) applies, whenever the Court makes an order for costs, the party entitled to the benefit of the order shall be entitled, at his option - (a) to an order that such costs shall be taxed if not agreed; or (b) to have the amount of such costs assessed by the Judge. (3) Subject to paragraph (4), where the Court is required to assess costs the Judge shall make his own summary assessment of the amount of legal fees and disbursements which he considers that a reasonable litigant is likely to have incurred and award that amount. (4) The amount of costs payable by any party pursuant to an order for costs to be assessed shall not exceed \u2013 (a) $1,000 where the order relates to the costs of an interlocutory application; or (b) $10,000 where the order relates to the costs of an entire proceeding, together with the Court fees which have been paid by the successful party. Stage of proceedings at which costs to be taxed (O. 62, r. 9)\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_9\", \"num\": \"9.\", \"text\": \"(1) Subject to paragraph (2), the costs of any proceedings shall not be taxed until the conclusion of the cause or matter in which the proceedings arise. (2) If it appears to the Court when making an order for costs that all or any part of the costs ought to be taxed at an earlier stage it may order accordingly. (3) In the case of an appeal the costs of the proceedings giving rise to the appeal, as well as the costs of the appeal, may be dealt with by the Court hearing the appeal. (4) Where it appears to the Court on application that there is no likelihood of any further order being made in a cause or matter, it may forthwith order the costs of any interlocutory proceedings which have taken place to be taxed. GCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16) Matters to be taken into account in exercising discretion (O. 62, r. 10)\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_10\", \"num\": \"10.\", \"text\": \"The Court in exercising its discretion to make an order for costs shall take into account - (a) any offer of contribution brought to its attention in accordance with Order 16, rule 10; (b) any payment of money into Court and the amount of such payment; (c) any written offer made under Order 33, rule 4A(2); and (d) any written offer made under Order 22, rule 14. PART III: WASTED COSTS ORDERS Personal liability of attorney for costs (O. 62, r. 11)\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_11\", \"num\": \"11.\", \"text\": \"(1) In Part III of this Order the expression \\\"attorney\\\" shall include a \\\"foreign lawyer\\\". (2) Where it appears to the Court in any proceedings that anything has been done or that any omission has been made improperly, unreasonably or negligently by or on behalf of any party, the Court may order that the costs of that party in respect of the act or omission, as the case may be, shall not be allowed and that any costs occasioned by it to any other party shall be paid by him to that other party. (3) Subject to the following provisions of this rule, where it appears to the Court that costs have been incurred improperly, unreasonably or negligently in any proceedings or have been wasted by failure to conduct proceedings with reasonable competence and expedition, the Court may order \u2013 (a) the attorney whom it considers to be responsible (whether personally or through an employee or agent) to repay to his client costs which the client has been ordered to pay to any other party to the proceedings; or (b) the attorney personally to indemnify such other parties against costs payable by them. (4) The amount payable under a wasted costs order made under paragraph 3(b) of this rule shall be taxed on the indemnity basis. Application for wasted costs orders (O. 62, r. 12)\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_12\", \"num\": \"12.\", \"text\": \"(1) A wasted costs order may be made by the Court of its own motion if the attorney\u2019s liability is plain and obvious and can fairly be determined without the need for extensive evidence or any extensive investigation of the circumstances giving rise to that liability. GCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16) (2) Subject to paragraph (3), before an order may be made under paragraph (1) of this rule the Court shall give the attorney a reasonable opportunity to appear and show cause why an order should not be made. (3) The Court shall not be obliged to give the attorney a reasonable opportunity to appear and show cause where proceedings fail, cannot conveniently proceed or are adjourned without useful progress being made because the attorney \u2013 (a) fails to attend in person or by a proper representative; (b) fails to deliver any document for the use of the Court, which ought to have been delivered or to be prepared with any proper evidence or account, or (c) otherwise fails to proceed. (4) In any other case, an application for a wasted costs order shall be made by summons setting out the grounds of the application which shall be supported by an affidavit containing full particulars of all the facts and matters relied upon by the applicant. (5) A copy of a summons issued under this rule and the supporting affidavit must be served \u2013 (a) on the attorney personally; or (b) in the case of an application against Crown Counsel or any other attorney acting on behalf of the Attorney General, on the Attorney General. (6) The Court may direct that notice of any proceedings or order against an attorney under this rule be given to his client in such manner as may be specified in the direction. (7) The Court shall direct that notice of any proceedings or order under this rule against Crown Counsel shall be given to the Attorney General. PART IV: TAXATION OF COSTS Basis of taxation (O. 62, r. 13)\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_13\", \"num\": \"13.\", \"text\": \"(1) On a taxation of costs on the standard basis there shall be allowed a reasonable amount in respect of all costs reasonably incurred and any doubts which the taxing officer may have as to whether the costs were reasonably incurred or were reasonable in amount shall be resolved in favour of the paying party; and in these rules the term \\\"the standard basis\\\" in relation to the taxation of costs shall be construed accordingly. GCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16) (2) Where the amount of costs is to be taxed on the standard basis, the taxing officer will only allow costs which are not only reasonable but are also proportionate to the matters in issue having regard to - (a) the amount of money involved; (b) the importance of the case; and (c) the complexity of the issues. (3) On a taxation on the indemnity basis all costs shall be allowed except insofar as they are of an unreasonable amount or have been unreasonably incurred and any doubts which the taxing officer may have as to whether the costs were reasonably incurred or were reasonable in amount shall be resolved in favour of the receiving party; and in these rules the term \\\"the indemnity basis\\\" in relation to the taxation of costs shall be construed accordingly. (4) Where the Court makes an order for costs without indicating the basis of taxation or an order that costs be taxed on a basis other than the standard basis or the indemnity basis, the costs shall be taxed on the standard basis. Costs payable to a trustee, personal representative or official liquidator out of any fund (O. 62, r. 14)\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_14\", \"num\": \"14.\", \"text\": \"(1) Unless the Court otherwise orders, every taxation of a trustee's, personal representative's or official liquidator\u2019s costs where - (a) he is or has been a party to any proceedings in that capacity; and (b) he is entitled to be paid his costs out of any fund, shall be on the indemnity basis. (2) On a taxation to which this rule applies, costs shall be taxed on the indemnity basis but shall be presumed to have been unreasonably incurred if they were incurred contrary to the duty of the trustee or personal representative or official liquidator as such. Costs payable to an attorney where money claimed by or on behalf of a person under disability (O. 62, r. 15)\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_15\", \"num\": \"15.\", \"text\": \"(1) This rule applies to any proceedings in which - (a) money is claimed or recovered by or on behalf of, or adjudged, or ordered, or agreed to be paid to, or for the benefit of, a person under disability, or (b) money paid into court is accepted by or on behalf of a person under disability. GCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16) (2) The costs of proceedings to which this rule applies which are payable by any plaintiff to his attorney shall, unless the Court otherwise orders, be taxed on the indemnity basis but shall be presumed - (a) to have been reasonably incurred if they were incurred with the express or implied approval of the client, and (b) to have been reasonable in amount if their amount was expressly or impliedly approved by the client, and (c) to have been unreasonably incurred if in the circumstances of the case they are of an unusual nature unless the attorney satisfies the taxing officer that prior to their being incurred he informed his client that they might not be allowed on a taxation of costs inter partes; and for purposes of this rule \\\"plaintiff\\\" shall include any person acting on behalf of such person under disability. (3) On a taxation under paragraph (2), the taxing officer shall also tax any costs payable to that client in those proceedings and shall certify - (a) the amount allowed on the taxation of the attorney's bill to his own client, and (b) the amount allowed on the taxation of any costs payable to that plaintiff in those proceedings, and (c) the amount (if any) by which the amount mentioned in sub-paragraph (a) exceeds the amount mentioned in sub-paragraph (b), and (d) where necessary, the proportion of the amount of such excess payable by, or out of money belonging to, respectively any claimant who is a person under disability or patient and any other party. (4) Nothing in the foregoing provisions of this rule shall prejudice any attorney's lien for costs. (5) The foregoing provisions of this rule shall apply in relation to - (a) a counterclaim by or on behalf of a person who is a person under disability; and (b) a claim made by or on behalf of a person who is a person under disability in an action by any other person for relief under section 504 of the Merchant Shipping Act 1894, as if for references to a plaintiff there were substituted references to a defendant. GCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16) Amount of costs (O. 62, r. 16)\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_16\", \"num\": \"16.\", \"text\": \"(1) The amount of costs to be allowed on taxation shall (subject to rule 17 and to any order of the Court fixing the costs to be allowed) be in the discretion of the taxing officer. (2) In exercising his discretion the taxing officer shall have regard the Guidelines issued by the Rules Committee pursuant to paragraph (3), to all the relevant circumstances, and in particular to - (a) the circumstances of the item or of the cause or matter in which it arises and the difficulty or novelty of the questions involved; (b) the skill, specialised knowledge and responsibility required of, and the time and labour expended by, the attorney; (c) the number and importance of the relevant documents (however brief), properly prepared or perused; (d) where money or property is involved, its amount or value; (3) The Rules Committee may issue guidelines relating to - (a) the procedure in respect of taxation; (b) the form and content of bills of costs; and (c) the nature and amount of fees, charges, disbursements, expenses or remuneration which may be allowed on taxation, and, for the avoidance of doubt, including the maximum rates that may be allowed on a taxation. Allowance or disallowance of items and allowance of increased sums (O. 62, r. 17)\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_17\", \"num\": \"17.\", \"text\": \"(1) Where the costs of any action or matter are to be taxed the Court may, if it thinks fit, direct that any item of work shall be allowed, disallowed, restricted or qualified on taxation. (2) An application for a direction under paragraph (1) may be made at the trial or hearing of the proceeding or on notice to be served on the party by whom the costs are payable within 14 days after the making of the order for their payment, provided that where an application which could have been made at the trial or hearing is made subsequent thereto, the Court may refuse the application on the ground that it ought to have been made at the trial or hearing. GCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16) Foreign lawyers (O. 62, r. 18)\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_18\", \"num\": \"18.\", \"text\": \"(1) Work done by foreign lawyers may be recovered on taxation under these rules on the standard basis provided that - (a) the foreign lawyer has been temporarily admitted as an attorney; and (b) the work was done after he was admitted. (2) Work done by foreign lawyers who are temporarily admitted must be fully itemised in the bill of costs and may not be treated as a disbursement. (3) Whenever a claim is made for work done by foreign lawyers, the taxing officer will investigate whether it has resulted in a duplication or increase in the cost of the proceedings and any such increase shall be disallowed. (4) Work done by local attorneys for the purpose of instructing foreign lawyers and vice versa shall be disallowed. (5) The taxing officer shall disallow any item which appears to have been incurred, or the costs of which appears to have been increased, because the successful party has engaged both local attorneys and foreign attorneys. (6) Time spent and disbursements incurred in respect of written and oral communication between foreign lawyers and local attorneys will be disallowed. (7) The overriding principle is that a paying party should not be required to pay more because the successful party has engaged a foreign lawyer than he would have been required to pay if the successful party had employed only local attorneys. Litigants in person (O. 62, r. 19)\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_19\", \"num\": \"19.\", \"text\": \"(1) The costs of a litigant in person to be taxed on the standard basis shall be taxed subject to the provisions of this rule. (2) Where it appears to the taxing officer that the litigant in person has suffered pecuniary loss in doing any item of work to which the costs relate, there may be allowed such costs as would have been allowed if the work and disbursements to which the costs relate had been done or made by an attorney on the litigant's behalf together with any payments reasonably made by him for legal advice relating to the conduct of or the issues raised by the proceedings, provided that the amount allowed in respect of any such item of work shall be such sum as the taxing officer thinks fit but not exceeding, except in the case of a disbursement or expense, twothirds of the sum which would have been allowed in respect of that item of work if an attorney had been employed or the actual amount of pecuniary loss suffered, whichever is the less. GCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16) (3) Where it appears to the taxing officer that the litigant has not suffered any pecuniary loss in doing any item of work to which the costs relate, he shall be allowed in respect of the time reasonably spent by him on that item an amount not exceeding $30 per hour. (4) A litigant who is allowed costs in respect of a pre-trial examination or of attending Court to conduct his case shall not be entitled to a witness payment or allowance in addition. (5) For the purposes of this rule a litigant in person includes a litigant who is a practising attorney. (6) For the purposes of this rule, a company acting without an attorney is to be treated as a litigant in person. PART V: POWERS OF TAXING OFFICERS Powers of taxing officers (O. 62, r. 20)\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_20\", \"num\": \"20.\", \"text\": \"A taxing officer shall have power to tax - (a) the costs of or arising out of any proceedings to which this Order applies, (b) the costs ordered by an award made on a reference to arbitration under any Law or payable pursuant to an arbitration agreement, and (c) any other costs the taxation of which is ordered by the Court. Extensions of time (O. 62, r. 21)\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_21\", \"num\": \"21.\", \"text\": \"(1) The Court or the taxing officer may extend the period within which a party is required by or under this Order to commence proceedings for taxation or within which a party is required to do anything in or in connection with such proceedings on such terms (if any) as it thinks just and the Court or the taxing officer may do so although the application for such extension is not made until after the expiration of that period. (2) Where no period is specified by or under this Order or by the Court for the doing of anything in or in connection with proceedings for taxation a taxing officer may specify the period within which the thing is to be done. GCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16) Costs Certificates (O. 62, r. 22)\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_22\", \"num\": \"22.\", \"text\": \"(1) The taxing officer - (a) shall, at the conclusion of taxation proceedings before him, issue a certificate in Form 305 for the net amount of the costs allowed by him (after making such set-offs as may be required); (b) may from time to time in the course of the taxation issue an interim certificate in Form 308 for any part of the costs which have been taxed or agreed; (c) may correct any clerical mistake in any certificate issued by him or any error arising therein from any accidental slip or omission. (2) If the successful party and paying party agree the amount of costs, either party may apply to the taxing officer for a costs certificate (either interim or final) for the amount agreed. (3) The successful party may apply to the taxing officer for the issue of a default costs certificate in Form 309 if the paying party fails to comply with any time limit prescribed by the rules or the Guidelines or fixed by the taxing officer. (4) A default costs certificate - (a) must be set aside by the taxing officer if it appears to him that the successful party was not entitled to it; and (b) in any other case, may be set aside by the taxing officer if it appears to him that there is some good reason why he should conduct a taxation. (5) A paying party who seeks to set aside a default costs certificate shall within 14 days of service of the default costs certificate - (a) lodge an application in Form 313; (b) lodge the bill of costs signed and completed in accordance with rule 27(3); (c) lodge an affidavit explaining the reasons for his default; and (d) pay into Court the whole amount specified in the certificate. (6) A costs certificate shall be enforceable as if it were a judgment or order of the Court. GCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16) Power of taxing officer to effect set offs (O. 62, r. 23)\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_23\", \"num\": \"23.\", \"text\": \"(1) Where a party entitled to be paid costs is also liable to pay costs, the taxing officer shall - (a) tax the costs which the party is liable to pay and set off the amount allowed against the amount he is entitled to be paid and certify payment of any balance; or (b) delay the issue of a certificate for the costs the party is entitled to be paid, until he has paid or tendered the amount he is liable to pay. Taxation of bill of costs comprised in an account (O. 62, r. 24)\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_24\", \"num\": \"24.\", \"text\": \"(1) Where the Court orders an account to be taken and the account consists in part of costs, the Court may direct a taxing officer to tax those costs and the taxing officer shall after taxation of the bill of costs return it, together with his report on it, to the Court. (2) A taxing officer taxing a bill of costs in accordance with a direction under paragraph (1) shall have the same powers, and the same fee shall be payable in connection with the taxation, as if an order for taxation of the costs had been made by the Court. Powers of taxing officers on taxation of costs out of a fund (O. 62, r. 25)\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_25\", \"num\": \"25.\", \"text\": \"(1) Where any costs are to be paid out of a fund the Court may give directions as to the parties who are entitled to receive notice of the taxation of those costs. (2) Where the Court has directed that a bill of costs be taxed for the purpose of being paid out of a fund it may direct the party whose bill is to be taxed to send to any person entitled to notice of the taxation a copy of the bill, or of any part thereof, free of charge, together with the following information, that is to say - (a) that the bill of costs, a copy of which or of part of which is sent has been referred to a taxing officer for taxation; (b) the time appointed by the taxing officer at which an oral hearing will take place or be continued; and (c) such other information, if any, as the Court may direct. GCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16) Powers of taxing officers in relation to costs of taxation proceedings (O.6 2, r. 26)\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_26\", \"num\": \"26.\", \"text\": \"(1) Subject to the provisions of this Order, the party whose bill is being taxed shall be entitled to his costs of the taxation proceedings which shall be assessed by the taxing officer. (2) Subject to paragraph (3) the taxing officer shall make his own assessment of the costs which he considers that a reasonable litigant is likely to have incurred in preparing his bill of costs and attending the taxation and award that amount. (3) The amount of costs payable by any party pursuant to an order made by a taxing officer under this rule shall not exceed - (a) $5,000 in the case of taxations conducted by a Judge; (b) $2,000 in all other cases. (4) Where an order is made in favour of the paying party, the amount shall be deducted from the costs ordered to be paid by him and a certificate issued for the balance. (5) The party liable to pay the costs of the proceedings which gave rise to the taxation proceedings may make a written offer to pay a specified sum in satisfaction of those costs which is expressed to be \\\"without prejudice save as to the costs of taxation\\\" at any time before the expiration of 14 days after the delivery to him of a copy of the bill of costs under rule 31(3) and, where such an offer is made, the fact that it has been made shall not be communicated to the taxing officer until question of the costs of the taxation proceedings falls to be decided. (6) The taxing officer may take into account any offer made under paragraph (4) which has been brought to his attention. PART VI: PROCEDURE ON TAXATION Service of a bill of costs (0. 62, r. 27)\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_27\", \"num\": \"27.\", \"text\": \"(1) The successful party shall prepare a bill of costs in Form 314 and serve it on the paying party. (2) Where more than one party is liable jointly or severally to pay the whole or part of the costs, a copy of the bill of costs shall be served on every party. (3) The paying party shall state the extent to which he agrees with and accepts liability to pay the amounts claimed in the bill of costs by completing column 4 and returning the completed bill of costs to the successful party within 21 days or such longer period as may be agreed. GCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16) (4) In addition to completing column 4, the paying party may also serve a written statement of objections. Commencement of taxation proceedings (O. 62, r. 28)\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_28\", \"num\": \"28.\", \"text\": \"(1) Proceedings for the taxation of costs shall be commenced by lodging the following documents with the taxing officer - (a) an application for taxation in such of Forms 301 to 304 as may be appropriate; (b) a bill of costs completed and signed by each of the paying parties in accordance with rule 27(3); (c) any statement of objections received from the paying party; (d) any reply to the Statement of Objections relied upon by the successful party; (e) where a party is entitled to require taxation of any costs directed to be paid by any award made on an arbitration under any Law or pursuant to any arbitration agreement and no order of the Court for enforcement of the award has been made, a true copy of the award; and (f) where a party is entitled to require taxation of any costs directed to be paid by any order, award or other determination of any tribunal or other body constituted by or under any Law or Regulation, a true copy of the order, award or determination, as the case may be. (2) Where a party is entitled to recover taxed costs or to require any costs to be taxed by virtue of - (a) a judgment, direction or order given or made in proceedings in the Court; or (b) rule 5; or (c) an award made on an arbitration under any Law or pursuant to an arbitration agreement; or (d) an order, award or other determination of a tribunal or other body constituted by or under any Law, he must commence proceedings for the taxation of those costs either within 3 months after the judgment, direction, or order was filed or the award or other determination was signed or otherwise perfected or, within 3 months after his right to taxation arose in accordance with rule 9, whichever is the later. (3) The taxing officer may summarily dismiss any application for taxation which is made out of time. GCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16) Subsequent procedure (O. 62, r.2 9)\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_29\", \"num\": \"29.\", \"text\": \"(1) A taxation shall be inquisitorial in nature. (2) The taxing officer shall enquire into the bill of costs and determine the amount to be paid in accordance with this Order and the Guidelines for which purpose the taxing officer shall obtain such written explanations from the successful party and\/or such written submissions on behalf of the paying party as may be appropriate to enable him to make such determination fairly. (3) If the taxing officer considers that he cannot properly tax a bill of costs or complete his taxation of a bill of costs without hearing an oral submission from the successful party and\/or the paying party, he shall fix a hearing date and send a notice of appointment to (a) the successful party; and (b) every paying party who has completed column 4 and signed the bill of costs; (4) The taxing officer may require the successful party to produce the following documents - (a) the engagement letters or other documents which evidence the terms upon which he engaged his attorneys and foreign lawyers; (b) the invoices (and detailed versions of the invoices) rendered on him by his attorneys and foreign lawyers; (c) an index and\/or bundle of the pleadings, affidavits and orders relating to the proceeding before the Court; (d) the invoice, account or other document evidencing the payment of any disbursement; (e) time records relating to legal fees; (f) instructions, briefs, opinions or reports; (g) the whole or any part of the correspondence files of his attorneys and foreign lawyers; (h) any other documents which he considers relevant for the purpose of justifying the amounts claimed in the bill of costs. (5) The taxing officer may require that any document produced by the successful party is made available for inspection by the paying party, provided that the document in question is not privileged. GCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16) (6) The taxing officer shall not give reasons for any of his decisions. (7) The taxing officer shall send an office copy of his costs certificate to each of the successful and paying parties. PART VII: REVIEW OF TAXATION AND APPEAL ON POINTS OF CONSTRUCTION Review by the Judge (O.6 2, r. 30)\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_30\", \"num\": \"30.\", \"text\": \"(1) Any party who is dissatisfied with the amount of any costs certificate may apply to a Judge to review the taxing officer\u2019s decision. (2) In the event that the taxation was conducted by a Judge in his capacity as an ex officio taxing officer, the review shall be conducted by a different Judge. (3) An application under this rule for review of the taxing officer\u2019s decision must be made within 14 days after the decision to be reviewed or within such other period as may be fixed by the taxing officer. (4) Every applicant for review under this rule must at the time of making his application - (a) deliver to the Judge his objections in writing specifying what is objected to and stating concisely the nature and grounds of the objection in each case; (b) deliver a copy of the objections to all parties affected by the application; (c) if the applicant is the paying party, pay the amount as taxed into Court; and (d) serve notice of payment into Court on every party referred to in subparagraph (b) above. (5) Any party to whom a copy of the objections is delivered under this rule may, within 14 days after delivery of the copy to him or such other period as may be fixed by the Judge, deliver to the Judge answers in writing to the objections stating concisely the grounds on which he will oppose the objections and must at the same time deliver a copy of the answers to the party applying for review and to any other party who was entitled to receive notice under paragraph (4). (6) A review under this rule shall be inquisitional in nature and the Judge may receive further evidence and may exercise all the powers which he might have exercised on an original taxation, including the power to award costs of the proceedings before him. GCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16) (7) In the event that the Judge considers that he cannot properly review the taxing officer's decision without hearing oral submissions, he shall fix a hearing date and any party to whom a copy of the objections was delivered under paragraph (4) shall be entitled to be heard in respect of all or any of the objections notwithstanding that he did not deliver written answers to the objections under paragraph (5). Appeal to the Court of Appeal on points of construction (O. 62, r. 31)\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_31\", \"num\": \"31.\", \"text\": \"(1) A party to any taxation proceeding who is dissatisfied with any decision of a Judge (whether or not such decision has been reviewed in accordance with rule 30) may apply to the Judge for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal which shall be granted only if the Judge is satisfied that the proposed appeal involves a point of construction of general importance. (2) There shall be no other right of appeal to the Court of Appeal in respect of a decision made by a Judge, whether acting as an ex officio taxing officer or conducting a review under rule 30. GCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16)\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}], \"meta\": {\"notes\": null, \"workflow\": null, \"lifecycle\": {\"source\": \"#cilegis\", \"eventRef\": [{\"eId\": \"e_commence_2016_01_01\", \"date\": \"2016-01-01\", \"type\": \"generation\", \"source\": \"#cilegis\"}]}, \"references\": {\"source\": \"#canary\", \"TLCRole\": [], \"TLCEvent\": [{\"eId\": \"ev_commencement\", \"href\": \"\/akn\/ontology\/canary\/event\/commencement\", \"showAs\": \"commencement\"}], \"TLCPerson\": [], \"TLCConcept\": [{\"eId\": \"inForce\", \"href\": \"\/akn\/ontology\/canary\/concept\/temporal\/in-force\", \"showAs\": \"in force\"}], \"TLCProcess\": [], \"TLCLocation\": [], \"TLCOrganization\": [{\"eId\": \"cilegis\", \"href\": \"\/akn\/ontology\/canary\/organization\/editor\/cilegis\", \"showAs\": \"Cayman Islands legislation mirror (kyleg)\"}]}, \"temporalData\": {\"source\": \"#cilegis\", \"temporalGroup\": [{\"eId\": \"tg_inforce_2016_01_01\", \"timeInterval\": [{\"end\": null, \"start\": \"#e_commence_2016_01_01\", \"duration\": null, \"refersTo\": \"#inForce\"}]}]}, \"classification\": null, \"identification\": {\"source\": \"#cilegis\", \"FRBRWork\": {\"FRBRuri\": \"\/akn\/ky\/act\/amending\/2016\/54\", \"FRBRdate\": [{\"date\": \"2016-01-01\", \"name\": \"generation\"}], \"FRBRthis\": \"\/akn\/ky\/act\/amending\/2016\/54\/!main\", \"FRBRalias\": [{\"name\": \"cmsId\", \"value\": \"2016-0054\"}], \"FRBRauthor\": [{\"as\": \"#editor\", \"href\": \"\/akn\/ontology\/canary\/organization\/editor\/cilegis\"}], \"FRBRnumber\": \"54 of 2016\", \"FRBRcountry\": \"ky\", \"FRBRsubtype\": \"amending\"}, \"FRBRExpression\": {\"FRBRuri\": \"\/akn\/ky\/act\/amending\/2016\/54\/eng@2016-01-01\", \"FRBRdate\": [{\"date\": \"2016-01-01\", \"name\": \"generation\"}], \"FRBRthis\": \"\/akn\/ky\/act\/amending\/2016\/54\/eng@2016-01-01\/!main\", \"FRBRauthor\": [{\"as\": \"#editor\", \"href\": \"\/akn\/ontology\/canary\/organization\/editor\/cilegis\"}], \"FRBRlanguage\": \"eng\"}, \"FRBRManifestation\": {\"FRBRuri\": \"\/akn\/ky\/act\/amending\/2016\/54\/eng@2016-01-01.xml\", \"FRBRdate\": [{\"date\": \"2026-06-22\", \"name\": \"generation\"}], \"FRBRthis\": \"\/akn\/ky\/act\/amending\/2016\/54\/eng@2016-01-01.xml\", \"FRBRauthor\": [{\"as\": \"#editor\", \"href\": \"\/akn\/ontology\/canary\/organization\/editor\/cilegis\"}], \"FRBRformat\": \"application\/xml\"}}}, \"name\": \"act\", \"header\": {\"title\": \"Grand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2016 (SL 54 of 2016)\", \"actNumber\": \"54 of 2016\", \"longTitle\": null}}, \"doc\": null, \"bill\": null, \"judgment\": null}}","akn_full_text":"CAYMAN ISLANDS\n\nSupplement No. 2 published with Extraordinary\nGazette No. 78 dated 30 September, 2016.\n\nGRAND COURT LAW (2015 REVISION)\nTHE GRAND COURT (AMENDMENT No 1) RULES 2016\n\nGRAND COURT LAW (2015 REVISION)\n\nTHE GRAND COURT (AMENDMENT No 1) RULES 2016\n\nThese Rules are made by the Rules Committee pursuant to Section 19(3) of the Grand Court Law\n(2015 Revision).\n\n1.\nCitation, Commencement and Interpretation.\n\n(1)\nThese Rules shall be referred to as the Grand Court (Amendment No 1) Rules\n2016.\n\n(2)\nThese Rules shall come into operation on the 29th day of March 2016 referred to\nin these Rules as the \"Commencement Date\".\n\n(3)\nThese Rules shall apply to every proceeding which is pending or commenced in\nthe Court on or after the Commencement Date.\n(4)\nA receiving party may apply pursuant to GCR O. 62, r. 4(7)(h) (that a paying party\npay a reasonable sum on account of costs pending taxation of his costs) whether or\nnot \u2013\n(a)\nthe proceedings to which the application relates were commenced,\n(b)\nthe order that the paying party pay the receiving party his costs was made,\nbefore or after the Commencement Date.\n\n(5)\nWords and expressions in these Rules which are also used in the Grand Court\nRules 1995 (as revised and amended) shall have the same meaning in these Rules\nas they have in the Grand Court Rules 1995 (as revised and amended).\n2.\nRevocation and replacement of Order 62\n(1)\nGCR Order 62 is hereby revoked and replaced by the Order 62 contained in the\nSchedule hereto.\n\nMade by the Rules Committee on the 14th day of March 2016.\n\nThe Honourable Anthony Smellie QC, Chief Justice\n\nThe Honourable Sam Bulgin QC, Attorney General\n\nColin McKie QC, Legal Practitioner\n\nHector Robinson, Legal Practitioner\n\n355\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16)\n\nORDER 62\n\nCOSTS\n\nPART I: PRELIMINARY\n\nApplication (O. 62, r. 1)\n\n1.         (1)\nThis Order shall have effect, with such modifications as may be necessary, where\nby virtue of any Law the costs of any proceedings before an arbitrator or umpire or\nbefore a tribunal or other body constituted by or under any Law not being\nproceedings in the Court, are taxable in the Court.\n\n(2)\nThe powers and discretion of the Court under Section 24 of the Judicature Law\n(2013 Revision) (which relates to the costs of proceedings in the Court) shall be\nexercised subject to and in accordance with this Order.\n\nTransitional provisions (O. 62, r. 2)\n\n2.         (1)-(7) [spent]\n\nDefinitions (O. 62, r. 3)\n\n3.\n(1)\nIn this Order, unless the context otherwise requires -\n\n\"assessed costs\" means costs assessed by a Judge in accordance with rule 8 or by a\ntaxing officer in accordance with rule 26(2);\n\n\"assisted person\" means a person to whom a legal aid Certificate has been granted\npursuant to the Legal Aid Law (1999 Revision) in respect of the relevant\nproceedings;\n\n\"Court\" includes the Court of Appeal;\n\n\"foreign lawyer\" means a person who is engaged in practice as a professional\nlawyer in any country outside the Islands;\n\n\"the Guidelines\" means the guidelines made from time to time by the Rules\nCommittee pursuant to rule 16;\n\n\"party\", in relation to a cause or matter, includes a party who is treated as being a\nparty to that cause or matter by virtue of Order 4, rule 3(2) and an appellant or\nrespondent to any appeal;\n\n\"paying party\" includes, in the case of taxation of costs payable out of a fund, any\nperson to whom the Court has directed that notice of the appointment for taxation\nbe given;\n\n356\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16)\n\n\"person under disability\" has the same meaning as in Order 80, rule 1;\n\n\"proceedings\" includes any cause or matter or any step in any cause or matter and\nany appeal and any step in any appeal;\n\n\"successful party\" means a party in whose favour an order for costs is made or who\nis otherwise entitled to receive costs from another party or out of a fund.\n\n\"the standard basis\" and \"the indemnity basis\" have the meanings assigned to them\nby rules 13(1) and (3), respectively;\n\n\"taxed costs\" means costs taxed in accordance with this Order;\n\n\"taxing officer\" means any person appointed as a taxing officer by the Chief Justice\nand includes every Judge who shall be ex officio taxing officers.\n\n(2)\nReferences to a fund, being a fund out of which costs are to be paid or which is held\nby a trustee or personal representative, include references to -\n\n(a)\nany estate or property, whether real or personal, held for the benefit of any\nperson or class of persons; and\n\n(b)\nthe assets of a company or partnership which is the subject of a winding up\nproceeding,\n\nand references to a fund held by a trustee or personal representative include\nreferences to any fund to which he is entitled (whether alone or together with any\nother person) in that capacity, whether the fund is for the time being in his\npossession or not.\n\n(3)\nReferences to costs shall be construed as including references to fees, charges,\ndisbursements, expenses and remuneration in relation to proceedings (including\ntaxation proceedings) and shall include references to costs of or incidental to those\nproceedings.\n\n(4)\nReferences to $ means Cayman Islands dollars but shall be interpreted to include\nthe United States dollar equivalent.\n\n(5)\nBills of costs may be drawn up either in Cayman Islands dollars or United States\ndollars.\n\n357\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16)\n\nPART II: ENTITLEMENT TO COSTS\n\nGeneral principles (O. 62, r. 4)\n\n4.         (1)\nThis rule shall have effect unless otherwise provided by any Law.\n\n(2)\nThe overriding objective of this Order is that a successful party to any proceeding\nshould recover from the opposing party the reasonable costs incurred by him in\nconducting that proceeding in an economical, expeditious and proper manner unless\notherwise ordered by the Court.\n\n(3)\nA person who claims to be entitled pursuant to a contract to recover the legal fees\nand expenses incurred in enforcing that contract shall be entitled to judgment for\nthe amount found due under the contract and such amount shall not be subject to\ntaxation pursuant to this Order.\n\n(4)\nExcept as provided in paragraph (3), no party to any proceedings shall be entitled to\nrecover any of the costs of those proceedings from any other party to those\nproceedings except under an order of the Court.\n\n(5)\nIf the Court in the exercise of its discretion sees fit to make any order as to the costs\nof any proceedings, the Court shall order the costs to follow the event, except when\nit appears to the Court that in the circumstances of the case some other order should\nbe made as to the whole or any part of the costs.\n\n(6)\nThe amount of the costs which a successful party shall be entitled to recover from\nany other party is \u2013\n\n(a)\nthe fixed costs prescribed in rule 7;\n\n(b)\nthe amount assessed by the Judge in accordance with rule 8;\n\n(c)\nthe amount allowed after taxation on the standard basis; or\n\n(d)\nthe amount allowed after taxation on the indemnity basis.\n\n(7)\nThe orders which the Court may make under this rule include an order that a party\nmust pay \u2013\n\n(a)\na proportion of another party\u2019s costs;\n\n(b)\na stated amount in respect of another party\u2019s costs;\n\n(c)\ncosts from or until a certain date only;\n\n(d)\ncosts incurred before proceedings have begun;\n\n358\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16)\n\n(e)\ncosts relating to particular steps taken in the proceedings;\n\n(f)\ncosts relating only to a distinct part of the proceedings;\n\n(g)\ninterest on costs (at the prescribed rate for Cayman Islands dollars) from or\nuntil a certain date, including a date before judgment; and\n\n(h)\nwhere the Court orders the paying party to pay costs subject to taxation, a\nreasonable sum on account of costs, such sum to be assessed summarily.\n\n(8)\nNo order for costs shall be made against an assisted person.\n\n(9)\nA term mentioned in the first column of the table below, when used in an order for\ncosts, shall have the effect indicated in the second column of the table.\n\nTerm\nEffect\nCosts or Costs in any event\nThe party in whose favour the order is made is entitled to\nthe costs in respect of the part of the proceedings to\nwhich the order relates whatever other costs orders are\nmade in the proceedings\nCosts reserved\nThe issue of costs will be determined on a subsequent\napplication.\nCosts here and below\nThe party in whose favour the costs order is made shall\nbe entitled not only to his costs in respect of the\nproceedings in which it is made but also to his costs of\nthe same proceedings in any lower court,\nsave that where such an order is made by the Court of\nAppeal on an appeal from the Grand Court the party shall\nnot be entitled by virtue of that order to any costs which\nhe has incurred in any court below the Grand Court.\nCosts in the cause or\nCosts in the application\nThe party in whose favour the Court makes an order for\ncosts at the end of the proceedings is entitled to his costs\nof the part of the proceedings to which the order relates.\nPlaintiff\u2019s costs in the cause or\nDefendant\u2019s costs in the cause\nIf the party in whose favour the costs order is made is\nawarded costs at the end of the proceedings, that party is\nentitled to his costs of the part of the proceedings to\nwhich the order relates. If any other party is awarded\ncosts at the end of the proceedings, the party in whose\nfavour the final costs order is made is not liable to pay\nthe costs of any other party in respect of the part of the\nproceedings to which the order relates.\n\n359\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16)\n\nCosts thrown away\nWhere proceedings or any part of them have been\nineffective or have been subsequently set aside, the party\nin whose favour this order is made shall be entitled to his\ncosts of those proceedings or that part of the proceedings\nin respect of which it is made.\nNo order for costs\nEach party is to bear his own costs of the part of the\nproceedings to which the order relates whatever costs\norder the Court makes at the end of the proceedings\n\n(10)\nWhen used in an order of the Court, the expressions Costs, Order for costs and\nCosts to be taxed if not agreed shall mean costs to be taxed on the standard basis.\n\n(11)\nThe Court may make an inter partes order for costs to be taxed on the indemnity\nbasis only if it is satisfied that the paying party has conducted the proceedings, or\nthat part of the proceedings to which the order relates, improperly, unreasonably or\nnegligently.\n\nCases where order for costs deemed to have been made (O. 62, r. 5)\n\n5.         (1)\nIn each of the circumstances mentioned in this rule an order for costs shall be\ndeemed to have been made to the effect respectively described in the following\nparagraphs of this rule.\n\n(2)\nWhere a party by notice in writing and without leave discontinues an action or\ncounterclaim or withdraws any particular claim made by him as against any other\nparty (except for the purpose of obtaining a default judgment), that other party shall\nbe entitled to his costs of the action or counterclaim or his costs occasioned by the\nclaim withdrawn, as the case may be, incurred to the time of receipt of the notice of\ndiscontinuance or withdrawal.\n\n(3)\nWhere a plaintiff by notice in writing in accordance with Order 22, rule 3(1),\naccepts money paid into Court in satisfaction of the cause of action or of all the\ncauses of action in respect of which he claims, or accepts money paid in satisfaction\nof one or more specified causes of action and gives notice that he abandons the\nothers, he shall be entitled to his costs of the action incurred up to the time of giving\nnotice of acceptance.\n\n(4)\nWhere in an action for libel or slander against several defendants sued jointly a\nplaintiff, by notice in writing in accordance with Order 22, rule 3(1), accepts money\npaid into Court by one of the defendants he shall be entitled to his costs of the\naction against that defendant incurred up to the time of giving notice of acceptance.\n\n(5)\nA defendant who has counterclaimed shall be entitled to the costs of the\ncounterclaim if -\n\n360\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16)\n\n(a)\nhe pays money into Court and his notice of payment in states that he has\ntaken into account and satisfied the causes of action in respect of which he\ncounterclaims; and\n\n(b)\nthe plaintiff accepts the money paid in,\n\nbut the costs of such counterclaim shall be limited to those incurred up to the time\nwhen the defendant receives notice of acceptance by the plaintiff of the money paid\ninto Court.\n\nCases where costs do not follow the event (O. 62, r. 6)\n\n6.         (1)\nThe provisions of this rule shall apply in the circumstances mentioned in this rule\nunless the Court orders otherwise.\n\n(2)\nWhere a person is or has been a party to any proceedings in the capacity of trustee,\npersonal representative, mortgagee, chargee or official liquidator he shall be entitled\nto the costs of those proceedings, insofar as they are not recovered from or paid by\nany other person, out of the fund and the Court may order otherwise only on the\nground that he has acted unreasonably or, in the case of a trustee, personal\nrepresentative or official liquidator has in substance acted for his own benefit rather\nthan for the benefit of the fund or the creditors as the case may be.\n\n(3)\nWhere any person claiming to be a creditor \u2013\n\n(a)\nseeks to establish any claim to a debt under any judgment or order in\naccordance with Order 44, or\n\n(b)\ncomes in to prove his title, debt or claim in relation to a company in\npursuance of any such procedure as is mentioned in Order 102, rule 13,\n\nhe shall, if his claim succeeds, be entitled to his costs incurred in establishing it:\nand, if his claim or any part of it fails, he may be ordered to pay the costs of any\nperson incurred in opposing it.\n\n(4)\nWhere a claimant (other than a person claiming to be creditor) has established a\nclaim to be entitled under a judgment or order in accordance with Order 44 and has\nbeen served with notice of the judgment or order pursuant to rule 2 of that Order, he\nshall, if he acknowledges service of that notice, be entitled as part of his costs of\naction (if allowed) to costs incurred in establishing his claim; and where such a\nclaimant fails to establish his claim or any part of it he may be ordered to pay the\ncosts of any person incurred in opposing it.\n\n(5)\nThe costs of any amendment made without leave in the writ or any pleadings shall\nbe borne by the party making the amendment.\n\n361\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16)\n\n(6)\nThe costs of any application to extend the time fixed by these rules or by any\ndirection or order thereunder shall be borne by the party making the application.\n\n(7)\nIf a party on whom a notice to admit facts is served under Order 27, rule 2, refuses\nor neglects to admit the facts within 14 days after the service on him of the notice or\nsuch longer time as may be allowed by the Court, the costs of proving the facts and\nthe costs occasioned by and thrown away as a result of his failure to admit the facts\nshall be borne by him.\n\n(8)\nIf a party -\n\n(a)\non whom a list of documents is served under Order 24, or\n\n(b)\non whom a notice to admit documents is served under Order 27, rule 5,\n\ngives notice of non-admission of any of the documents in accordance with Order\n27, rule 4(2) or 5(2), as the case may be, the costs of proving that document and the\ncosts occasioned by and thrown away as a result of his non-admission shall be\nborne by him.\n\nClaim for fixed costs (O. 62, r. 7)\n\n7.         (1)\nWhere a writ is indorsed with a claim for a liquidated sum only, it may include a\nclaim for fixed costs on the following scale -\n\n(a)\nthe sum of $50 where the principal sum claimed does not exceed $2,000;\n\n(b)\nthe sum of $250 where the principal sum claimed exceeds $2,000 but does\nnot exceed $10,000;\n\n(c)\nthe sum of $500 where the principal sum claimed exceeds $10,000,\n\nplus in each case the prescribed fee paid upon issue of the writ.\n\n(2)\nWhere a writ is indorsed with a claim of the kind mentioned in Order 13, rules 2, 3\nor 4 and Order 19, rule 3, 4 or 5, it may be include a claim for fixed costs in the sum\nof $250.\n\n(3)\nNothing in this rule shall preclude a plaintiff from waiving his right to claim fixed\ncosts and instead claiming costs to be assessed or taxed.\n\n362\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16)\n\nAssessment of Costs (O. 62, r. 8)\n\n8.         (1)\nThe amount of costs which a successful party is entitled to recover against another\nparty shall be assessed if the order is made in respect of \u2013\n\n(a)\nan appeal from the Summary Court; or\n\n(b)\nan action in which the Writ is indorsed only with a claim for a liquidated\nsum not exceeding $25,000 (or where other relief claimed is abandoned).\n\n(2)\nExcept in a case to which paragraph (1) applies, whenever the Court makes an order\nfor costs, the party entitled to the benefit of the order shall be entitled, at his option\n-\n\n(a)\nto an order that such costs shall be taxed if not agreed; or\n\n(b)\nto have the amount of such costs assessed by the Judge.\n\n(3)\nSubject to paragraph (4), where the Court is required to assess costs the Judge shall\nmake his own summary assessment of the amount of legal fees and disbursements\nwhich he considers that a reasonable litigant is likely to have incurred and award\nthat amount.\n\n(4)\nThe amount of costs payable by any party pursuant to an order for costs to be\nassessed shall not exceed \u2013\n\n(a)\n$1,000 where the order relates to the costs of an interlocutory application; or\n\n(b)\n$10,000 where the order relates to the costs of an entire proceeding, together\nwith the Court fees which have been paid by the successful party.\n\nStage of proceedings at which costs to be taxed (O. 62, r. 9)\n\n9.         (1)\nSubject to paragraph (2), the costs of any proceedings shall not be taxed until the\nconclusion of the cause or matter in which the proceedings arise.\n\n(2)\nIf it appears to the Court when making an order for costs that all or any part of the\ncosts ought to be taxed at an earlier stage it may order accordingly.\n\n(3)\nIn the case of an appeal the costs of the proceedings giving rise to the appeal, as\nwell as the costs of the appeal, may be dealt with by the Court hearing the appeal.\n\n(4)\nWhere it appears to the Court on application that there is no likelihood of any\nfurther order being made in a cause or matter, it may forthwith order the costs of\nany interlocutory proceedings which have taken place to be taxed.\n\n363\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16)\n\nMatters to be taken into account in exercising discretion (O. 62, r. 10)\n\n10.\nThe Court in exercising its discretion to make an order for costs shall take into account -\n\n(a)\nany offer of contribution brought to its attention in accordance with Order 16, rule\n10;\n\n(b)\nany payment of money into Court and the amount of such payment;\n\n(c)\nany written offer made under Order 33, rule 4A(2); and\n\n(d)\nany written offer made under Order 22, rule 14.\n\nPART III: WASTED COSTS ORDERS\n\nPersonal liability of attorney for costs (O. 62, r. 11)\n\n11.       (1)\nIn Part III of this Order the expression \"attorney\" shall include a \"foreign lawyer\".\n\n(2)\nWhere it appears to the Court in any proceedings that anything has been done or\nthat any omission has been made improperly, unreasonably or negligently by or on\nbehalf of any party, the Court may order that the costs of that party in respect of the\nact or omission, as the case may be, shall not be allowed and that any costs\noccasioned by it to any other party shall be paid by him to that other party.\n\n(3)\nSubject to the following provisions of this rule, where it appears to the Court that\ncosts have been incurred improperly, unreasonably or negligently in any\nproceedings or have been wasted by failure to conduct proceedings with reasonable\ncompetence and expedition, the Court may order \u2013\n\n(a)\nthe attorney whom it considers to be responsible (whether personally or\nthrough an employee or agent) to repay to his client costs which the client\nhas been ordered to pay to any other party to the proceedings; or\n\n(b)\nthe attorney personally to indemnify such other parties against costs payable\nby them.\n\n(4)\nThe amount payable under a wasted costs order made under paragraph 3(b) of this\nrule shall be taxed on the indemnity basis.\n\nApplication for wasted costs orders (O. 62, r. 12)\n\n12.       (1)\nA wasted costs order may be made by the Court of its own motion if the attorney\u2019s\nliability is plain and obvious and can fairly be determined without the need for\nextensive evidence or any extensive investigation of the circumstances giving rise\nto that liability.\n\n364\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16)\n\n(2)\nSubject to paragraph (3), before an order may be made under paragraph (1) of this\nrule the Court shall give the attorney a reasonable opportunity to appear and show\ncause why an order should not be made.\n\n(3)\nThe Court shall not be obliged to give the attorney a reasonable opportunity to\nappear and show cause where proceedings fail, cannot conveniently proceed or are\nadjourned without useful progress being made because the attorney \u2013\n\n(a)\nfails to attend in person or by a proper representative;\n\n(b)\nfails to deliver any document for the use of the Court, which ought to have\nbeen delivered or to be prepared with any proper evidence or account, or\n\n(c)\notherwise fails to proceed.\n\n(4)\nIn any other case, an application for a wasted costs order shall be made by\nsummons setting out the grounds of the application which shall be supported by an\naffidavit containing full particulars of all the facts and matters relied upon by the\napplicant.\n\n(5)\nA copy of a summons issued under this rule and the supporting affidavit must be\nserved \u2013\n\n(a)\non the attorney personally; or\n\n(b)\nin the case of an application against Crown Counsel or any other attorney\nacting on behalf of the Attorney General, on the Attorney General.\n\n(6)\nThe Court may direct that notice of any proceedings or order against an attorney\nunder this rule be given to his client in such manner as may be specified in the\ndirection.\n\n(7)\nThe Court shall direct that notice of any proceedings or order under this rule against\nCrown Counsel shall be given to the Attorney General.\n\nPART IV: TAXATION OF COSTS\n\nBasis of taxation (O. 62, r. 13)\n\n13.       (1)\nOn a taxation of costs on the standard basis there shall be allowed a reasonable\namount in respect of all costs reasonably incurred and any doubts which the taxing\nofficer may have as to whether the costs were reasonably incurred or were\nreasonable in amount shall be resolved in favour of the paying party; and in these\nrules the term \"the standard basis\" in relation to the taxation of costs shall be\nconstrued accordingly.\n\n365\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16)\n\n(2)\nWhere the amount of costs is to be taxed on the standard basis, the taxing officer\nwill only allow costs which are not only reasonable but are also proportionate to the\nmatters in issue having regard to -\n\n(a)\nthe amount of money involved;\n\n(b)\nthe importance of the case; and\n\n(c)\nthe complexity of the issues.\n\n(3)\nOn a taxation on the indemnity basis all costs shall be allowed except insofar as\nthey are of an unreasonable amount or have been unreasonably incurred and any\ndoubts which the taxing officer may have as to whether the costs were reasonably\nincurred or were reasonable in amount shall be resolved in favour of the receiving\nparty; and in these rules the term \"the indemnity basis\" in relation to the taxation of\ncosts shall be construed accordingly.\n\n(4)\nWhere the Court makes an order for costs without indicating the basis of taxation or\nan order that costs be taxed on a basis other than the standard basis or the indemnity\nbasis, the costs shall be taxed on the standard basis.\n\nCosts payable to a trustee, personal representative or official liquidator out of any fund (O.\n62, r. 14)\n\n14.       (1)\nUnless the Court otherwise orders, every taxation of a trustee's, personal\nrepresentative's or official liquidator\u2019s costs where -\n\n(a)\nhe is or has been a party to any proceedings in that capacity; and\n\n(b)\nhe is entitled to be paid his costs out of any fund, shall be on the indemnity\nbasis.\n\n(2)\nOn a taxation to which this rule applies, costs shall be taxed on the indemnity basis\nbut shall be presumed to have been unreasonably incurred if they were incurred\ncontrary to the duty of the trustee or personal representative or official liquidator as\nsuch.\n\nCosts payable to an attorney where money claimed by or on behalf of a person under\ndisability (O. 62, r. 15)\n\n15.       (1)\nThis rule applies to any proceedings in which -\n\n(a)\nmoney is claimed or recovered by or on behalf of, or adjudged, or ordered,\nor agreed to be paid to, or for the benefit of, a person under disability, or\n\n(b)\nmoney paid into court is accepted by or on behalf of a person under\ndisability.\n\n366\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16)\n\n(2)\nThe costs of proceedings to which this rule applies which are payable by any\nplaintiff to his attorney shall, unless the Court otherwise orders, be taxed on the\nindemnity basis but shall be presumed -\n\n(a)\nto have been reasonably incurred if they were incurred with the express or\nimplied approval of the client, and\n\n(b)\nto have been reasonable in amount if their amount was expressly or\nimpliedly approved by the client, and\n\n(c)\nto have been unreasonably incurred if in the circumstances of the case they\nare of an unusual nature unless the attorney satisfies the taxing officer that\nprior to their being incurred he informed his client that they might not be\nallowed on a taxation of costs inter partes;\n\nand for purposes of this rule \"plaintiff\" shall include any person acting on behalf of\nsuch person under disability.\n\n(3)\nOn a taxation under paragraph (2), the taxing officer shall also tax any costs\npayable to that client in those proceedings and shall certify -\n\n(a)\nthe amount allowed on the taxation of the attorney's bill to his own client,\nand\n\n(b)\nthe amount allowed on the taxation of any costs payable to that plaintiff in\nthose proceedings, and\n\n(c)\nthe amount (if any) by which the amount mentioned in sub-paragraph (a)\nexceeds the amount mentioned in sub-paragraph (b), and\n\n(d)\nwhere necessary, the proportion of the amount of such excess payable by, or\nout of money belonging to, respectively any claimant who is a person under\ndisability or patient and any other party.\n\n(4)\nNothing in the foregoing provisions of this rule shall prejudice any attorney's lien\nfor costs.\n\n(5)\nThe foregoing provisions of this rule shall apply in relation to -\n\n(a)\na counterclaim by or on behalf of a person who is a person under disability;\nand\n\n(b)\na claim made by or on behalf of a person who is a person under disability in\nan action by any other person for relief under section 504 of the Merchant\nShipping Act 1894,\n\nas if for references to a plaintiff there were substituted references to a defendant.\n\n367\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16)\n\nAmount of costs (O. 62, r. 16)\n\n16.       (1)\nThe amount of costs to be allowed on taxation shall (subject to rule 17 and to any\norder of the Court fixing the costs to be allowed) be in the discretion of the taxing\nofficer.\n\n(2)\nIn exercising his discretion the taxing officer shall have regard the Guidelines\nissued by the Rules Committee pursuant to paragraph (3), to all the relevant\ncircumstances, and in particular to -\n\n(a)\nthe circumstances of the item or of the cause or matter in which it arises and\nthe difficulty or novelty of the questions involved;\n\n(b)\nthe skill, specialised knowledge and responsibility required of, and the time\nand labour expended by, the attorney;\n\n(c)\nthe number and importance of the relevant documents (however brief),\nproperly prepared or perused;\n\n(d)\nwhere money or property is involved, its amount or value;\n\n(3)\nThe Rules Committee may issue guidelines relating to -\n\n(a)\nthe procedure in respect of taxation;\n\n(b)\nthe form and content of bills of costs; and\n\n(c)\nthe nature and amount of fees, charges, disbursements, expenses or\nremuneration which may be allowed on taxation, and, for the avoidance of\ndoubt, including the maximum rates that may be allowed on a taxation.\n\nAllowance or disallowance of items and allowance of increased sums (O. 62, r. 17)\n\n17.      (1)\nWhere the costs of any action or matter are to be taxed the Court may, if it thinks\nfit, direct that any item of work shall be allowed, disallowed, restricted or qualified\non taxation.\n\n(2)\nAn application for a direction under paragraph (1) may be made at the trial or\nhearing of the proceeding or on notice to be served on the party by whom the costs\nare payable within 14 days after the making of the order for their payment, provided\nthat where an application which could have been made at the trial or hearing is\nmade subsequent thereto, the Court may refuse the application on the ground that it\nought to have been made at the trial or hearing.\n\n368\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16)\n\nForeign lawyers (O. 62, r. 18)\n\n18.      (1)\nWork done by foreign lawyers may be recovered on taxation under these rules on\nthe standard basis provided that -\n\n(a)\nthe foreign lawyer has been temporarily admitted as an attorney; and\n\n(b)\nthe work was done after he was admitted.\n\n(2)\nWork done by foreign lawyers who are temporarily admitted must be fully itemised\nin the bill of costs and may not be treated as a disbursement.\n\n(3)\nWhenever a claim is made for work done by foreign lawyers, the taxing officer will\ninvestigate whether it has resulted in a duplication or increase in the cost of the\nproceedings and any such increase shall be disallowed.\n\n(4)\nWork done by local attorneys for the purpose of instructing foreign lawyers and\nvice versa shall be disallowed.\n\n(5)\nThe taxing officer shall disallow any item which appears to have been incurred, or\nthe costs of which appears to have been increased, because the successful party has\nengaged both local attorneys and foreign attorneys.\n\n(6)\nTime spent and disbursements incurred in respect of written and oral\ncommunication between foreign lawyers and local attorneys will be disallowed.\n\n(7)\nThe overriding principle is that a paying party should not be required to pay more\nbecause the successful party has engaged a foreign lawyer than he would have been\nrequired to pay if the successful party had employed only local attorneys.\n\nLitigants in person (O. 62, r. 19)\n\n19.       (1)\nThe costs of a litigant in person to be taxed on the standard basis shall be taxed\nsubject to the provisions of this rule.\n\n(2)\nWhere it appears to the taxing officer that the litigant in person has suffered\npecuniary loss in doing any item of work to which the costs relate, there may be\nallowed such costs as would have been allowed if the work and disbursements to\nwhich the costs relate had been done or made by an attorney on the litigant's behalf\ntogether with any payments reasonably made by him for legal advice relating to the\nconduct of or the issues raised by the proceedings, provided that the amount\nallowed in respect of any such item of work shall be such sum as the taxing officer\nthinks fit but not exceeding, except in the case of a disbursement or expense, twothirds of the sum which would have been allowed in respect of that item of work if\nan attorney had been employed or the actual amount of pecuniary loss suffered,\nwhichever is the less.\n\n369\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16)\n\n(3)\nWhere it appears to the taxing officer that the litigant has not suffered any\npecuniary loss in doing any item of work to which the costs relate, he shall be\nallowed in respect of the time reasonably spent by him on that item an amount not\nexceeding $30 per hour.\n\n(4)\nA litigant who is allowed costs in respect of a pre-trial examination or of attending\nCourt to conduct his case shall not be entitled to a witness payment or allowance in\naddition.\n\n(5)\nFor the purposes of this rule a litigant in person includes a litigant who is a\npractising attorney.\n\n(6)\nFor the purposes of this rule, a company acting without an attorney is to be treated\nas a litigant in person.\n\nPART V: POWERS OF TAXING OFFICERS\n\nPowers of taxing officers (O. 62, r. 20)\n\n20.\nA taxing officer shall have power to tax -\n\n(a)\nthe costs of or arising out of any proceedings to which this Order applies,\n\n(b)\nthe costs ordered by an award made on a reference to arbitration under any Law or\npayable pursuant to an arbitration agreement, and\n\n(c)\nany other costs the taxation of which is ordered by the Court.\n\nExtensions of time (O. 62, r. 21)\n\n21.      (1)\nThe Court or the taxing officer may extend the period within which a party is\nrequired by or under this Order to commence proceedings for taxation or within\nwhich a party is required to do anything in or in connection with such proceedings\non such terms (if any) as it thinks just and the Court or the taxing officer may do so\nalthough the application for such extension is not made until after the expiration of\nthat period.\n\n(2)\nWhere no period is specified by or under this Order or by the Court for the doing of\nanything in or in connection with proceedings for taxation a taxing officer may\nspecify the period within which the thing is to be done.\n\n370\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16)\n\nCosts Certificates (O. 62, r. 22)\n\n22.      (1)\nThe taxing officer -\n\n(a)\nshall, at the conclusion of taxation proceedings before him, issue a\ncertificate in Form 305 for the net amount of the costs allowed by him (after\nmaking such set-offs as may be required);\n\n(b)\nmay from time to time in the course of the taxation issue an interim\ncertificate in Form 308 for any part of the costs which have been taxed or\nagreed;\n\n(c)\nmay correct any clerical mistake in any certificate issued by him or any\nerror arising therein from any accidental slip or omission.\n\n(2)\nIf the successful party and paying party agree the amount of costs, either party may\napply to the taxing officer for a costs certificate (either interim or final) for the\namount agreed.\n\n(3)\nThe successful party may apply to the taxing officer for the issue of a default costs\ncertificate in Form 309 if the paying party fails to comply with any time limit\nprescribed by the rules or the Guidelines or fixed by the taxing officer.\n\n(4)\nA default costs certificate -\n\n(a)\nmust be set aside by the taxing officer if it appears to him that the successful\nparty was not entitled to it; and\n\n(b)\nin any other case, may be set aside by the taxing officer if it appears to him\nthat there is some good reason why he should conduct a taxation.\n\n(5)\nA paying party who seeks to set aside a default costs certificate shall within 14 days\nof service of the default costs certificate -\n\n(a)\nlodge an application in Form 313;\n\n(b)\nlodge the bill of costs signed and completed in accordance with rule 27(3);\n\n(c)\nlodge an affidavit explaining the reasons for his default; and\n\n(d)\npay into Court the whole amount specified in the certificate.\n\n(6)\nA costs certificate shall be enforceable as if it were a judgment or order of the\nCourt.\n\n371\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16)\n\nPower of taxing officer to effect set offs (O. 62, r. 23)\n\n23.      (1)\nWhere a party entitled to be paid costs is also liable to pay costs, the taxing officer\nshall -\n\n(a)\ntax the costs which the party is liable to pay and set off the amount allowed\nagainst the amount he is entitled to be paid and certify payment of any\nbalance; or\n\n(b)\ndelay the issue of a certificate for the costs the party is entitled to be paid,\nuntil he has paid or tendered the amount he is liable to pay.\n\nTaxation of bill of costs comprised in an account (O. 62, r. 24)\n\n24.       (1)\nWhere the Court orders an account to be taken and the account consists in part of\ncosts, the Court may direct a taxing officer to tax those costs and the taxing officer\nshall after taxation of the bill of costs return it, together with his report on it, to the\nCourt.\n\n(2)\nA taxing officer taxing a bill of costs in accordance with a direction under\nparagraph (1) shall have the same powers, and the same fee shall be payable in\nconnection with the taxation, as if an order for taxation of the costs had been made\nby the Court.\n\nPowers of taxing officers on taxation of costs out of a fund (O. 62, r. 25)\n\n25.      (1)\nWhere any costs are to be paid out of a fund the Court may give directions as to the\nparties who are entitled to receive notice of the taxation of those costs.\n\n(2)\nWhere the Court has directed that a bill of costs be taxed for the purpose of being\npaid out of a fund it may direct the party whose bill is to be taxed to send to any\nperson entitled to notice of the taxation a copy of the bill, or of any part thereof,\nfree of charge, together with the following information, that is to say -\n\n(a)\nthat the bill of costs, a copy of which or of part of which is sent has been\nreferred to a taxing officer for taxation;\n\n(b)\nthe time appointed by the taxing officer at which an oral hearing will take\nplace or be continued; and\n\n(c)\nsuch other information, if any, as the Court may direct.\n\n372\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16)\n\nPowers of taxing officers in relation to costs of taxation proceedings (O.6 2, r. 26)\n\n26.       (1)\nSubject to the provisions of this Order, the party whose bill is being taxed shall be\nentitled to his costs of the taxation proceedings which shall be assessed by the\ntaxing officer.\n\n(2)\nSubject to paragraph (3) the taxing officer shall make his own assessment of the\ncosts which he considers that a reasonable litigant is likely to have incurred in\npreparing his bill of costs and attending the taxation and award that amount.\n\n(3)\nThe amount of costs payable by any party pursuant to an order made by a taxing\nofficer under this rule shall not exceed -\n\n(a)\n$5,000 in the case of taxations conducted by a Judge;\n\n(b)\n$2,000 in all other cases.\n\n(4)\nWhere an order is made in favour of the paying party, the amount shall be deducted\nfrom the costs ordered to be paid by him and a certificate issued for the balance.\n\n(5)\nThe party liable to pay the costs of the proceedings which gave rise to the taxation\nproceedings may make a written offer to pay a specified sum in satisfaction of those\ncosts which is expressed to be \"without prejudice save as to the costs of taxation\" at\nany time before the expiration of 14 days after the delivery to him of a copy of the\nbill of costs under rule 31(3) and, where such an offer is made, the fact that it has\nbeen made shall not be communicated to the taxing officer until question of the\ncosts of the taxation proceedings falls to be decided.\n\n(6)\nThe taxing officer may take into account any offer made under paragraph (4) which\nhas been brought to his attention.\n\nPART VI: PROCEDURE ON TAXATION\n\nService of a bill of costs (0. 62, r. 27)\n\n27.       (1)\nThe successful party shall prepare a bill of costs in Form 314 and serve it on the\npaying party.\n\n(2)\nWhere more than one party is liable jointly or severally to pay the whole or part of\nthe costs, a copy of the bill of costs shall be served on every party.\n\n(3)\nThe paying party shall state the extent to which he agrees with and accepts liability\nto pay the amounts claimed in the bill of costs by completing column 4 and\nreturning the completed bill of costs to the successful party within 21 days or such\nlonger period as may be agreed.\n\n373\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16)\n\n(4)\nIn addition to completing column 4, the paying party may also serve a written\nstatement of objections.\n\nCommencement of taxation proceedings (O. 62, r. 28)\n\n28.      (1)\nProceedings for the taxation of costs shall be commenced by lodging the following\ndocuments with the taxing officer -\n\n(a)\nan application for taxation in such of Forms 301 to 304 as may be\nappropriate;\n\n(b)\na bill of costs completed and signed by each of the paying parties in\naccordance with rule 27(3);\n\n(c)\nany statement of objections received from the paying party;\n\n(d)\nany reply to the Statement of Objections relied upon by the successful party;\n\n(e)\nwhere a party is entitled to require taxation of any costs directed to be paid\nby any award made on an arbitration under any Law or pursuant to any\narbitration agreement and no order of the Court for enforcement of the\naward has been made, a true copy of the award; and\n\n(f)\nwhere a party is entitled to require taxation of any costs directed to be paid\nby any order, award or other determination of any tribunal or other body\nconstituted by or under any Law or Regulation, a true copy of the order,\naward or determination, as the case may be.\n\n(2)\nWhere a party is entitled to recover taxed costs or to require any costs to be taxed\nby virtue of -\n\n(a)\na judgment, direction or order given or made in proceedings in the Court; or\n\n(b)\nrule 5; or\n\n(c)\nan award made on an arbitration under any Law or pursuant to an arbitration\nagreement; or\n\n(d)\nan order, award or other determination of a tribunal or other body\nconstituted by or under any Law,\n\nhe must commence proceedings for the taxation of those costs either within 3\nmonths after the judgment, direction, or order was filed or the award or other\ndetermination was signed or otherwise perfected or, within 3 months after his right\nto taxation arose in accordance with rule 9, whichever is the later.\n\n(3)\nThe taxing officer may summarily dismiss any application for taxation which is\nmade out of time.\n\n374\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16)\n\nSubsequent procedure (O. 62, r.2 9)\n\n29.       (1)\nA taxation shall be inquisitorial in nature.\n\n(2)\nThe taxing officer shall enquire into the bill of costs and determine the amount to be\npaid in accordance with this Order and the Guidelines for which purpose the taxing\nofficer shall obtain such written explanations from the successful party and\/or such\nwritten submissions on behalf of the paying party as may be appropriate to enable\nhim to make such determination fairly.\n\n(3)\nIf the taxing officer considers that he cannot properly tax a bill of costs or complete\nhis taxation of a bill of costs without hearing an oral submission from the successful\nparty and\/or the paying party, he shall fix a hearing date and send a notice of\nappointment to\n\n(a)\nthe successful party; and\n\n(b)\nevery paying party who has completed column 4 and signed the bill of costs;\n\n(4)\nThe taxing officer may require the successful party to produce the following\ndocuments -\n\n(a)\nthe engagement letters or other documents which evidence the terms upon\nwhich he engaged his attorneys and foreign lawyers;\n\n(b)\nthe invoices (and detailed versions of the invoices) rendered on him by his\nattorneys and foreign lawyers;\n\n(c)\nan index and\/or bundle of the pleadings, affidavits and orders relating to the\nproceeding before the Court;\n\n(d)\nthe invoice, account or other document evidencing the payment of any\ndisbursement;\n\n(e)\ntime records relating to legal fees;\n\n(f)\ninstructions, briefs, opinions or reports;\n\n(g)\nthe whole or any part of the correspondence files of his attorneys and\nforeign lawyers;\n\n(h)\nany other documents which he considers relevant for the purpose of\njustifying the amounts claimed in the bill of costs.\n\n(5)\nThe taxing officer may require that any document produced by the successful party\nis made available for inspection by the paying party, provided that the document in\nquestion is not privileged.\n\n375\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16)\n\n(6)\nThe taxing officer shall not give reasons for any of his decisions.\n\n(7)\nThe taxing officer shall send an office copy of his costs certificate to each of the\nsuccessful and paying parties.\n\nPART VII: REVIEW OF TAXATION AND APPEAL ON POINTS OF CONSTRUCTION\n\nReview by the Judge (O.6 2, r. 30)\n\n30.      (1)\nAny party who is dissatisfied with the amount of any costs certificate may apply to\na Judge to review the taxing officer\u2019s decision.\n\n(2)\nIn the event that the taxation was conducted by a Judge in his capacity as an ex\nofficio taxing officer, the review shall be conducted by a different Judge.\n\n(3)\nAn application under this rule for review of the taxing officer\u2019s decision must be\nmade within 14 days after the decision to be reviewed or within such other period\nas may be fixed by the taxing officer.\n\n(4)\nEvery applicant for review under this rule must at the time of making his\napplication -\n\n(a)\ndeliver to the Judge his objections in writing specifying what is objected to\nand stating concisely the nature and grounds of the objection in each case;\n\n(b)\ndeliver a copy of the objections to all parties affected by the application;\n\n(c)\nif the applicant is the paying party, pay the amount as taxed into Court; and\n\n(d)\nserve notice of payment into Court on every party referred to in\nsubparagraph (b) above.\n\n(5)\nAny party to whom a copy of the objections is delivered under this rule may, within\n14 days after delivery of the copy to him or such other period as may be fixed by\nthe Judge, deliver to the Judge answers in writing to the objections stating concisely\nthe grounds on which he will oppose the objections and must at the same time\ndeliver a copy of the answers to the party applying for review and to any other party\nwho was entitled to receive notice under paragraph (4).\n\n(6)\nA review under this rule shall be inquisitional in nature and the Judge may receive\nfurther evidence and may exercise all the powers which he might have exercised on\nan original taxation, including the power to award costs of the proceedings before\nhim.\n\n376\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16)\n\n(7)\nIn the event that the Judge considers that he cannot properly review the taxing\nofficer's decision without hearing oral submissions, he shall fix a hearing date and\nany party to whom a copy of the objections was delivered under paragraph (4) shall\nbe entitled to be heard in respect of all or any of the objections notwithstanding that\nhe did not deliver written answers to the objections under paragraph (5).\n\nAppeal to the Court of Appeal on points of construction (O. 62, r. 31)\n\n31.       (1)\nA party to any taxation proceeding who is dissatisfied with any decision of a Judge\n(whether or not such decision has been reviewed in accordance with rule 30) may\napply to the Judge for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal which shall be granted\nonly if the Judge is satisfied that the proposed appeal involves a point of\nconstruction of general importance.\n\n(2)\nThere shall be no other right of appeal to the Court of Appeal in respect of a\ndecision made by a Judge, whether acting as an ex officio taxing officer or\nconducting a review under rule 30.\n\n377\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (Amended 14.04.11) (re-amended 29.03.16)","akn_extracted_at":"2026-06-22 15:43:49.196715+00","cms_id":"2016-0054","law_type":"amending","year":"2016","number":"54","title":"Grand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2016 (SL 54 of 2016)","status":"spent"},"provenance":{"files":[{"file_id":"6695","expr_id":"1885","kind":"akn_xml","filename":"2016-0054.akn.xml","source_url":null,"storage_path":"\/Users\/q\/kyleg-data\/working\/AMENDING\/2016\/2016-0054\/2016-0054.akn.xml","content_md5":"7f90f50840d851b6ed8e9c10a67118c2","byte_size":"52635","http_last_modified":null,"fetched_at":"2026-06-22 15:43:49.359121+00"},{"file_id":"3769","expr_id":"1885","kind":"pristine_pdf","filename":"2016-0054.pdf","source_url":"\/cms\/images\/LEGISLATION\/AMENDING\/2016\/2016-0054\/2016-0054.pdf","storage_path":"\/Users\/q\/kyleg-data\/pristine\/AMENDING\/2016\/2016-0054\/2016-0054.pdf","content_md5":"7e00d4e405a5a4ff37a7751b8e6245c6","byte_size":"278330","http_last_modified":null,"fetched_at":"2026-06-16 04:01:11.071723+00"},{"file_id":"3770","expr_id":"1885","kind":"working_pdf","filename":"2016-0054.pdf","source_url":"\/cms\/images\/LEGISLATION\/AMENDING\/2016\/2016-0054\/2016-0054.pdf","storage_path":"\/Users\/q\/kyleg-data\/working\/AMENDING\/2016\/2016-0054\/2016-0054.pdf","content_md5":"7e00d4e405a5a4ff37a7751b8e6245c6","byte_size":"278330","http_last_modified":null,"fetched_at":"2026-06-16 04:01:11.071723+00"}],"paragraph_count":29,"latest_history":null},"quality":{"expr_id":"1885","doc_id":"1885","quality_state":"needs_review","quality_score":"92","needs_human_review":"t","deterministic_categories":"{commencement_metadata_problem,page_header_footer_noise}","llm_categories":"{}","repair_actions":"{strip_page_furniture,verify_commencement_metadata}","finding_severity_counts":"{\"low\": 2}","finding_summary":"repeated line furniture detected: gcr 1995 revised amended 14 04 11 re amended 29 03 x23; commencement language is visible but no commencement\/version date is stored","assessed_at":"2026-06-22 15:29:46.405278+00","updated_at":"2026-06-22 15:29:46.405278+00"}}