{"kind":"expression","expression":{"expr_id":"718","doc_id":"718","label":"2023 Revision","is_as_enacted":"f","commenced_on":null,"superseded_on":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_to":null,"is_current":"t","incorporating":null,"akn_expr_iri":"\/akn\/ky\/act\/sl\/2003\/2\/eng@2023-01-01","akn_envelope":"{\"_canary\": {\"iri\": {\"work\": \"\/akn\/ky\/act\/sl\/2003\/2\", \"expression\": \"\/akn\/ky\/act\/sl\/2003\/2\/eng@2023-01-01\", \"manifestation\": \"\/akn\/ky\/act\/sl\/2003\/2\/eng@2023-01-01.pdf\"}, \"pdf\": {\"md5\": \"4c89bb1197f0309d1e47ba790c47a6f4\", \"path\": \"\/Users\/q\/kyleg-data\/working\/SUBORDINATE\/2003\/2003-0002\/2003-0002_2023 Revision.pdf\", \"pages\": 510, \"filename\": \"2003-0002_2023 Revision.pdf\"}, \"errors\": [], \"extraction\": {\"model\": null, \"stats\": {\"word_count\": 193944, \"paragraph_count\": 45, \"text_char_count\": 1160318}, \"usage\": null, \"method\": \"pymupdf-text\", \"version\": \"kyleg-akn-1.0\", \"extracted_at\": \"2026-06-22\"}, \"classification\": \"text_layer\", \"validation_flags\": [], \"docai_processor_id\": null}, \"akomaNtoso\": {\"act\": {\"body\": [{\"eId\": \"sec_n1\", \"num\": null, \"text\": \"Grand Court Act (2015 Revision) GRAND COURT RULES (2023 Revision) VOLUME I - ORDERS (Published in electronic format only) PUBLISHING DETAILS The Grand Court Rules, 1995 made by the Rules Committee of the Court of Appeal on 8th April 2009 and by the Rules Committee of the Grand Court on 14th September, 2009 as amended by the Cayman Islands Constitution Order, 2009 [UKSI 1379\/2009], the Cayman Islands Constitution (Amendment) Order, 2020 [UKSI 1283\/2020], the Civil Partnership Act, 2020 [Law 35 of 2020] and the Citation of Acts of Parliament Act, 2020 [Act 56 of 2020]. Consolidated with \u2014 Grand Court (Amendment) Rules 1995-13th September, 1995 Grand Court (Amendment) (No. 2) Rules 1995-15th December, 1995 Grand Court (Amendment) Rules 1996-23rd December, 1996 Grand Court (Amendment) Rules 1997-9th April, 1997 Grand Court (Amendment) (No. 2) Rules 1997-8th December, 1997 Grand Court (Amendment) Rules 1999-28th January, 1999 Grand Court (Amendment) Rules 2000-3rd March, 2000 Grand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2001-15th May, 2001 Court Cost Rules, 2001-22nd October, 2001 Grand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2002-4th July, 2002 Grand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2006-13th October, 2006 Grand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2008-31st October, 2008 Grand Court (Amendment) (No. 2) Rules, 2008-15th December, 2008 Grand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2009-14th September, 2009 Grand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2011-14th April, 2011 Grand Court (Amendment) (No. 2) Rules, 2011-12th July, 2011 Grand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2012-29th August, 2012 Grand Court (Amendment) (No. 2) Rules, 2012-19th October, 2012 Grand Court (Amendment) (No. 3) Rules, 2012-17th December, 2012 Grand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2013-7th June, 2013 Grand Court (Amendment) (No. 2) Rules, 2013-26th September, 2013 Grand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2014-20th November, 2014 Grand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2015-19th February, 2015 Grand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2016-14th March, 2016 Grand Court (Amendment) (No. 1) Rules, 2022-21st June, 2022 Revised under the authority of the Law Revision Act (2020 Revision). Grand Court Rules - Vol I \u2013 Orders (2023 Revision) Publication Details Continued Consolidated and revised this 31st day of December, 2022. Note (not forming part of these Rules): This revision replaces the 2022 Consolidation which should now be discarded. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) Arrangement of Rules - Orders Grand Court Act (2015 Revision) GRAND COURT RULES (2023 Revision) VOLUME I - ORDERS Arrangement of Rules - Orders\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_1\", \"num\": \"1.\", \"text\": \"Preamble Explanatory Memorandum 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_17\", \"num\": \"17.\", \"text\": \"Arrangement of Rules - Orders Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 18. 19. 20. 21. 22.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_23\", \"num\": \"23.\", \"text\": \"ORDER 1 CITATION, APPLICATION, COMMENCEMENT, INTERPRETATION AND FORMS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_12\", \"num\": \"12.\", \"text\": \"ORDER 2 EFFECT OF NON-COMPLIANCE 1.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_2\", \"num\": \"2.\", \"text\": \"ORDER 3 TIME 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_6\", \"num\": \"6.\", \"text\": \"ORDER 4 ASSIGNMENT, TRANSFER AND CONSOLIDATION OF PROCEEDINGS 1. 2.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_4\", \"num\": \"4.\", \"text\": \"ORDER 5 MODE OF BEGINNING PROCEEDINGS 1. 2. 3. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) Arrangement of Rules - Orders 4. 4A.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_5\", \"num\": \"5.\", \"text\": \"6. ORDER 6 WRITS OF SUMMONS: GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_8\", \"num\": \"8.\", \"text\": \"ORDER 7 ORIGINATING SUMMONSES: GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_7\", \"num\": \"7.\", \"text\": \"ORDER 8 ORIGINATING AND OTHER MOTIONS: GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. ORDER 9 PETITIONS: GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. ORDER 10 SERVICE OF ORIGINATING PROCESS: GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. Arrangement of Rules - Orders Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 5. ORDER 11 SERVICE OF PROCESS, ETC. OUT OF THE JURISDICTION 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Service of writ abroad through foreign governments, judicial authorities and British 7. 8.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_9\", \"num\": \"9.\", \"text\": \"ORDER 12 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE TO WRIT OR ORIGINATING SUMMONS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 8A. 9.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_10\", \"num\": \"10.\", \"text\": \"ORDER 13 FAILURE TO GIVE NOTICE OF INTENTION TO DEFEND 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 6A. 7. 7A. 7B. 8. 9. ORDER 14 SUMMARY JUDGMENT 1. 2. 3. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) Arrangement of Rules - Orders 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_11\", \"num\": \"11.\", \"text\": \"12. 13.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_14\", \"num\": \"14.\", \"text\": \"ORDER 14A DISPOSAL OF CASE ON POINT OF LAW 1. 2. ORDER 15 CAUSES OF ACTION, COUNTERCLAIMS AND PARTIES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 6A. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_13\", \"num\": \"13.\", \"text\": \"14. 15.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_16\", \"num\": \"16.\", \"text\": \"17. ORDER 16 THIRD PARTY AND SIMILAR PROCEEDINGS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Arrangement of Rules - Orders Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. ORDER 17 INTERPLEADER 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. ORDER 18 PLEADINGS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 7A. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_15\", \"num\": \"15.\", \"text\": \"16. 17. 18. 19. 20.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_21\", \"num\": \"21.\", \"text\": \"ORDER 19 DEFAULT OF PLEADINGS Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) Arrangement of Rules - Orders 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. ORDER 20 AMENDMENT 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. ORDER 21 WITHDRAWAL AND DISCONTINUANCE 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. ORDER 22 PAYMENT INTO AND OUT OF COURT 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Arrangement of Rules - Orders Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 13. 14. ORDER 23 SECURITY FOR COSTS 1. 2. 3. ORDER 24 DISCOVERY 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_20\", \"num\": \"20.\", \"text\": \"21.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_22\", \"num\": \"22.\", \"text\": \"ORDER 25 SUMMONS FOR DIRECTIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. ORDER 26 INTERROGATORIES 1. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) Arrangement of Rules - Orders 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. ORDER 27 ADMISSIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. ORDER 28 ORIGINATING SUMMONS PROCEDURE 1. 1A. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. ORDER 29 INTERLOCUTORY INJUNCTIONS, INTERIM PRESERVATION OF PROPERTY, INTERIM PAYMENTS, ETC. 1. 1A. 2. 2A. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 7A. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Arrangement of Rules - Orders Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 13. 14. 15. 16. 17.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_18\", \"num\": \"18.\", \"text\": \"ORDER 30 RECEIVERS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. ORDER 31 SALES, ETC., OF LAND BY ORDER OF COURT 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. ORDER 32 APPLICATIONS AND PROCEEDINGS IN CHAMBERS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 9A. Applications for a direction under the Limitation Act (as amended and revised) (O.32, 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) Arrangement of Rules - Orders 17. 18.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_19\", \"num\": \"19.\", \"text\": \"20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_28\", \"num\": \"28.\", \"text\": \"ORDER 33 PLACE AND MODE OF TRIAL 1. 2. 3. 4. 4A. 5. 6. 7. ORDER 34 FIXING A TRIAL DATE FOR ACTIONS BEGUN BY WRIT 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. ORDER 35 PROCEEDINGS AT TRIAL 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Arrangement of Rules - Orders Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 11. 12. 13. 14. ORDER 36 NO ORDER ORDER 37 DAMAGES: ASSESSMENT AFTER JUDGMENT 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. ORDER 38 EVIDENCE 1. 1A. 2. 2A. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_26\", \"num\": \"26.\", \"text\": \"Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) Arrangement of Rules - Orders\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_27\", \"num\": \"27.\", \"text\": \"Determination of question whether person can or should be called as a witness (O.38, 28. 29.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_30\", \"num\": \"30.\", \"text\": \"Restriction on adducing evidence as to credibility of maker, etc., of certain statements\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_31\", \"num\": \"31.\", \"text\": \"Notice required of intention to give evidence of certain inconsistent statements (O.38, 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_43\", \"num\": \"43.\", \"text\": \"ORDER 39 EVIDENCE BY DEPOSITION: EXAMINERS OF THE COURT 1. 2. 3. 3A. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. ORDER 40 COURT EXPERT 1. 2. 3. Arrangement of Rules - Orders Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 4. 5. 6. ORDER 41 AFFIDAVITS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. ORDER 42 JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS 1. 1A. 2. 3. 3A. 4. 5. 5A. 6. 7. 8. 9. ORDER 43 ACCOUNTS AND INQUIRIES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) Arrangement of Rules - Orders ORDER 44 PROCEEDINGS UNDER JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. ORDER 45 ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS: GENERAL 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. ORDER 46 WRITS OF EXECUTION: GENERAL 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. ORDER 47 WRITS OF FIERI FACIAS 1. Arrangement of Rules - Orders Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 2. 3. ORDER 48 EXAMINATION OF JUDGMENT DEBTOR, ETC. 1. 2. 3. ORDER 49 GARNISHEE PROCEEDINGS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. ORDER 50 CHARGING ORDERS, STOP ORDERS, ETC. 1. 1A. 2. 3. 4. 4A. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. ORDER 50A ATTACHMENT OF EARNINGS ORDERS 1. 2. 3. 4. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) Arrangement of Rules - Orders 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. ORDER 51 RECEIVERS: EQUITABLE EXECUTION 1. 2. 3. ORDER 52 COMMITTAL 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. ORDER 53 APPLICATIONS FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW 1. 2. 3. 4. Arrangement of Rules - Orders Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. ORDER 54 APPLICATIONS FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. ORDER 55 APPEALS TO GRAND COURT FROM THE CABINET, REGISTRAR OF LANDS, TRIBUNAL OR OTHER PERSON: GENERAL 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. ORDER 56 APPEALS TO COURT BY CASE STATED: GENERAL 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) Arrangement of Rules - Orders 13. ORDER 57-61 NO ORDERS ORDER 62 COSTS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. Costs payable to a trustee, personal representative or official liquidator out of any fund 15. Costs payable to an attorney where money claimed by or on behalf of a person under 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_25\", \"num\": \"25.\", \"text\": \"26. 27. 28.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_29\", \"num\": \"29.\", \"text\": \"30. 31. ORDER 63 OFFICE OF THE GRAND COURT 1. 2. 3. 3A. 4. Arrangement of Rules - Orders Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. ORDER 64 NO ORDER ORDER 65 SERVICE OF DOCUMENTS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 5A. 6. Service on the Cabinet, etc., in proceedings which are not by or against the Crown (O.65, 7. 8. 9. 10. ORDER 66 PAPER, PRINTING, BINDING AND COPIES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. ORDER 67 ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) Arrangement of Rules - Orders ORDER 68 NO ORDER ORDER 69 PROVISIONS AS TO FOREIGN PROCEEDINGS; SERVICE OF FOREIGN PROCESS 1. 2. 3. 4. ORDER 70 OBTAINING EVIDENCE FOR FOREIGN COURTS, ETC. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. ORDER 71 FOREIGN JUDGMENTS RECIPROCAL ENFORCEMENT ACT (as amended and revised) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. ORDER 72 FINANCIAL SERVICES PROCEEDINGS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. ORDER 73 ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS 1. 2. Arrangement of Rules - Orders Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_24\", \"num\": \"24.\", \"text\": \"25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_36\", \"num\": \"36.\", \"text\": \"ORDER 74 APPLICATIONS AND APPEALS UNDER THE MERCHANT SHIPPING ACTS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. ORDER 75 ADMIRALTY PROCEEDINGS 1. 2. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) Arrangement of Rules - Orders 2A. Proceedings against, or concerning, the International Oil Pollution Compensation Fund 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Remedy where property protected by caveat is arrested without good and sufficient 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_35\", \"num\": \"35.\", \"text\": \"36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_42\", \"num\": \"42.\", \"text\": \"43. 44.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_45\", \"num\": \"45.\", \"text\": \"Arrangement of Rules - Orders Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 76 CONTENTIOUS PROBATE PROCEEDINGS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. ORDER 77 PROCEEDINGS BY AND AGAINST THE CROWN 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 8A. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. Application under Section 20 of the Crown Proceedings Act (as amended and revised) ORDER 77A PROCEEDINGS UNDER SECTIONS 23 AND 26 OF THE CONSTITUTION 1. 2. 3. 4. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) Arrangement of Rules - Orders 5. Reference to the Court under Section 26(2) of the Constitution; general provisions 6. Procedure to be applied for a reference by a Lower Court to the Court under Section 7. 8. 9. 10. ORDER 78-79 NO ORDERS ORDER 80 DISABILITY 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Appointment of guardian where person under disability does not acknowledge service 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Proceedings under the Torts (Reform) Act (as amended and revised) - apportionment by 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. Application for settlement or gift of patient's property or for execution of will of patient 27. 28. 29. 30. 31.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_32\", \"num\": \"32.\", \"text\": \"Arrangement of Rules - Orders Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 81 PARTNERS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Applications for orders charging partner's interest in partnership property, etc. (O.81, r.10) ... 443 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. ORDER 82 DEFAMATION ACTIONS 1. 2. 2A. 3. 3A. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Fulfilment of offer of amends under Section 11 of the Defamation Act (as amended and ORDER 83-84 NO ORDERS ORDER 85 ADMINISTRATION AND SIMILAR ACTIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Ordinary application under Section 48 of the Trusts Act (as amended and revised) (O.85, 8. Written application under Section 48 of the Trusts Act (as amended and revised) (O.85, 9. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) Arrangement of Rules - Orders ORDER 86 ACTIONS FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE, ETC.: SUMMARY JUDGMENT 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. ORDER 87-91 NO ORDERS ORDER 92 LODGMENT, INVESTMENT, ETC., OF FUNDS IN COURT 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. ORDER 93 THE ELECTIONS ACT (as amended and revised) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Arrangement of Rules - Orders Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. ORDER 94 APPLICATIONS TO THE GRAND COURT UNDER VARIOUS STATUTES 1. 2. 3. 4. Application under Section 9 of the Strata Titles Registration Act (as amended and 5. Application under Section 17 of the Strata Titles Registration Act (as Amended and 6. Applications under the Married Women's Property Act (as amended and revised) (O.94, ORDER 95 THE BANKS AND TRUST COMPANIES ACT (as amended and revised) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Application for an order requiring a person to provide information, documents or ORDER 96 THE REGISTERED LAND ACT (as amended and revised) 1. 2. 3. 4. ORDER 97-98 NO ORDERS ORDER 99 PRIZE ORDER 100-101 NO ORDERS ORDER 102 APPLICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE COMPANIES ACT (as amended and revised) 1. 2. 3. 4. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) Arrangement of Rules - Orders 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. Restoration of companies to the register: Application by a company or a member thereof 18. 19. 20. ORDER 103 THE CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION DISCLOSURE ACT (as amended and revised) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. ORDER 104-111 NO ORDERS ORDER 112 APPLICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE STATUS OF CHILDREN ACT, 2003 [Law 23 of 2003] 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. Arrangement of Rules - Orders Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 113 SUMMARY PROCEEDINGS FOR POSSESSION OF LAND 1. 1A. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. ENDNOTES Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) Rule 1 Grand Court Act (2015 Revision) GRAND COURT RULES (2023 Revision) VOLUME I - ORDERS 1. Citation 1. These Rules may be cited as the Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision). Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) Preamble Preamble 1. The Overriding objective 1.1 The overriding objective of these Rules is to enable the Court to deal with every cause or matter in a just, expeditious and economical way. 1.2 Dealing with a cause or matter justly includes, as far as is practicable \u2014 (a) ensuring that the substantive law is rendered effective and that it is carried out; (b) ensuring that the normal advancement of the proceeding is facilitated rather than delayed; (c) saving expense; (d) dealing with the cause or matter in ways which are proportionate (i) to the amount of money involved; (ii) to the importance of the case; and (iii) to the complexity of the issues; (e) allotting to it an appropriate share of the Court\u2019s resources, while taking into account the need to allot resources to other proceedings. 2. Application by the Court of the overriding objective 2.1 The Court must seek to give effect to the overriding objective when it (a) applies, or exercises any discretion given to it by these Rules; or (b) interprets the meaning of any Rule. 2.2 These Rules shall be liberally construed to give effect to the overriding objective and, in particular, to secure the just, most expeditious and least expensive determination of every cause or matter on its merits. 3. Duty of the parties The parties are obliged to help the Court to further the overriding objective. In applying the Rules to give effect to the overriding objective the Court may take into account a party\u2019s failure to help in this respect. 4. Court\u2019s duty to manage proceedings 4.1 The Court must further the overriding objective by actively managing proceedings. 4.2 This may include \u2014 (a) identifying the issues at an early stage; (b) deciding promptly which issues need full investigation and trial and accordingly disposing summarily of the others; Preamble Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (c) encouraging the parties to co-operate with each other in the conduct of the proceedings; (d) helping the parties to settle the whole or part of the proceeding; (e) deciding the order in which issues are to be resolved; (f) fixing timetables or otherwise controlling the progress of the proceeding; (g) considering whether the likely benefits of taking a particular step will justify the cost of taking it; (h) dealing with as many aspects of the proceeding as is practicable on the same occasion; (i) dealing with the proceeding without the parties needing to attend at court; (j) conducting procedural hearings by means of telephone conference calls; (k) making appropriate use of technology; and (l) giving directions to ensure that the trial proceeds quickly and efficiently. 4.3 Whenever a proceeding comes before the Court, whether on a summons for directions or otherwise, the Court will consider making orders on its own motion for the purpose of giving effect to the overriding objectives of the rules. GCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 19.11.2003) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) Explanatory Memorandum Explanatory Memorandum 1. Introduction 1. (1) The purpose of this Memorandum was to draw to the attention of legal practitioners and Court staff the key features of the Grand Court Rules (2023 Revision) (\\\"the Rules\\\") which originally came into force on the 1st June, 1995, were published in revised form on 30th June, 2003 and in consolidated form on 20th January, 2022.. (2) The purpose of this 2023 Revision of the Memorandum is to draw attention to important changes in the way in which the Court's civil caseload is organised, with effect from 1st November 2009.The overall purpose and effect of the Grand Court (Amendment) Rules 2009 were to divide the Court's business amongst separate divisions, namely the Civil Division, the Family Division, the Admiralty Division, the Financial Services Division and the Criminal Division. (3) The Grand Court (Civil Procedure) Rules 1976 and the Rules of the Supreme Court 1965 ceased to apply to any proceeding commenced in the Grand Court on or after the 1st June, 1995 and ceased to apply in respect of any step taken or required to be taken after that date in every proceeding which was pending on that date. (4)` The Rules follow the layout of the Rules of the Supreme Court and are designed so that the notes contained in the Supreme Court Practice 1999 can be used as an aid to the interpretation and application of these Rules where they are the same or similar to the Rules of Supreme Court, as they existed prior to the enactment of the Civil Procedure Rules 1998. (5) This Memorandum is not intended to be a comprehensive guide. Nor is it to be regarded as a substitute for the Rules. 2. Commencement of Proceedings 2. (1) With effect from 1st November 2009 every new proceeding must be commenced in the appropriate division of the Court. The fixed fee payable upon issuing the originating process will vary according to the division in which it is issued. In addition to the fixed fee, an ad valorem fee may be payable if the proceeding is commenced in the Civil Division. (2) All \u201cfamily proceedings\u201d (as defined in O.1, r.7) must be commenced in the Family Division. Every family proceeding which is pending on 1st November 2009 will be treated as having been transferred automatically to the Family Division. Explanatory Memorandum Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (3) All \\\"admiralty proceedings\\\" (as defined in O.1, r.7) must be commenced in the Admiralty Division. At present, this division exists in name only because there are no admiralty proceedings pending before the Court. (4) All \\\"financial services proceedings\\\" (as defined in O.72, r.1(2) must be commenced in the Financial Services Division. Every proceeding commenced in or transferred to the Financial Services Division will be assigned to a specific Commercial Judge under O.4, r.2(2) and that Commercial Judge\u2019s initials will be added as a suffix to the cause number. The Commercial Judge assigned to a financial services proceeding is responsible for managing every aspect of the case, including the adjudication of all interlocutory applications and the trial of the matter. (5) All other \\\"civil proceedings\\\", which do not fall within the definition of family, admiralty or financial services proceedings, must be commenced in the Civil Division. 3. Assignment and Transfer of Existing Proceedings 3. (1) Every proceeding (including every civil appeal from the Summary Court) which is pending before the Court immediately before the commencement of the Grand Court (Amendment) Rules 2009 on 1st November 2009, is treated as having been assigned to the Civil Division unless it is a family proceeding, in which case it will be assigned automatically to the Family Division. (2) The financial services proceedings which are pending before the Court on 1st November 2009 will not be assigned automatically to the Financial Services Division. Such proceedings may be transferred to the Financial Services Division only pursuant to an order which may be made by the Registrar \u2014 (a) upon the application of any party made in Form No. 73 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised); or (b) on the Registrar\u2019s own motion pursuant to O.72, r.6(3). (3) When a financial services proceeding is ordered to be transferred to the Financial Services Division, a transfer fee may be payable in accordance with Rule 3(5) of the Court Fees Rules (as amended and revised). In principle, the transfer fee is the difference between the fees actually paid when the proceeding was commenced and the fixed fee of CI$15,000 which would have been paid had the proceeding been commenced in the Financial Services Division. It follows that no transfer fee will be payable if the maximum ad valorem fee has already been paid. 4. The Register of Writs and Other Originating Process 4. (1) The Grand Court Cause Book was abolished in 1995. (2) It was replaced by the Register of Writs and other Originating Process (\\\"Register of Writs\\\") (O.63, r.8). With effect from 1st November 2009, the Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) Explanatory Memorandum Register will be divided into separate sections, one for each division of the Court. The section relating to each division will have its own numbering sequence. (3) The Register of Writs takes the form of a series of ring binders into which an office copy of every originating process (i.e. every writ, petition, originating summons or originating motion) is to be placed in numerical cause number order with the exception of any originating process filed in the Family Division. There is to be an index at the front of each binder containing summarised details of the title of each proceeding in similar form to that previously entered into the Cause Book. (4) In order to issue any originating process the Clerk of the Court must be presented with at least three copies, i.e. one to be placed in the Court File; one to be placed on the Register of Writs; and a service copy for use of the party issuing it (O.5, r.1). (5) The Register of Writs is open to public inspection upon payment of the prescribed fee (O.63, r.8(3)) except for the section relating to the Family Division. 5. Issue and Service of Writs 5. (1) Writs must be in Form No. 1 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). Since the writ no longer takes the form of a command by His Majesty, it may be served out of the jurisdiction subject to obtaining the leave of the Court in accordance with O.11. (2) Writs must be endorsed with the information contained in O.6, r.2, r.3 and r.4. Failure to comply with these Rules will prevent a plaintiff from obtaining a default judgment either at all or for the full extent of the relief to which the plaintiff might otherwise be entitled. (3) A writ is not validly served unless it is accompanied by an acknowledgment of service form in Form No. 8 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). (4)  With effect from 1st November 2009, the title of every proceeding must identify the division of the Court in which it is pending. 6. Acknowledgment of Service 6. (1) The concept of entering an appearance was abolished in 1995. (2) The defendant to a proceeding commenced by writ must be served with an acknowledgment of service in Form No. 8 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). The defendant to a proceeding commenced by originating summons must be served with an acknowledgment of service in Form No. 9 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). Delivery to the defendant of a writ or originating summons alone does not Explanatory Memorandum Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) constitute good service. It must be accompanied by an acknowledgment of service in Form No. 8 or Form No. 9 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised), as appropriate. (3) The defendant to a proceeding commenced by writ or originating summons must complete and file the acknowledgment of service within 14 days calculated from the date of service. (4) Filing a completed acknowledgment of service does not constitute a waiver of the defendant's right to challenge the jurisdiction or apply to set aside the writ or originating summons on grounds of irregularity. (5) A defendant wishing to challenge the jurisdiction must take out a summons or motion within the period for serving a defence. (6) An acknowledgment of service form in Form No. 8 or Form No. 9 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) must be served on every person against whom a counterclaim is made or against whom a third party claim is made, unless that person is already a party to the action. (7) A copy of every acknowledgment of service filed in the Court Office will be sent by the Clerk of the Court to the plaintiff or other claimant, as the case may be. 7. Default Judgments 7. (1) Applications for default judgments under O.13 or O.19 are made to the Clerk of the Court in Form No. 20 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) and must be accompanied by a draft order in Form No. 21 or Form No. 22 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). (2) Upon filing an application for a default judgment, the Court file is deemed to be closed (O.42, r.6) until the application is either granted or rejected. During the period when the Court file is closed, no step may be taken in the action by either party (3) Applications for default judgments are processed administratively without the need for any appearance by or on behalf of the plaintiff. (4) Default judgments may be final (i.e. in Form No. 21 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised)) or interlocutory (i.e. in Form No. 22 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised)). (5) A plaintiff seeking a default judgment may also seek interest provided that the plaintiff\u2019s writ has been endorsed with a claim in compliance with O.6, r.2(e) (i.e. contractual interest) or r.2(f) (i.e. statutory interest) calculated in accordance with the rates prescribed by the Judgment Debts (Rates of Interest) Rules (as amended and revised). The prescribed rates are varied from time to time in line with changes in the published LIBOR rates for the relevant currencies. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) Explanatory Memorandum (6) A default judgment may include fixed costs calculated in accordance with O.62, r.7, provided that the writ has been endorsed with a claim in accordance with O.6, r.2(g). (7) Failure to endorse a writ in accordance with O.6, r.2 will prevent the plaintiff from obtaining a default judgment. 8. Summary Judgment 8. (1) Application for summary judgment may be made by a plaintiff pursuant to O.14 only if a statement of claim has been served. It matters not that the statement of claim is endorsed on the writ or served separately. (2) An application for summary judgment may also be made by defendants, but only if a defence has been served. (3) In either case, an application for summary judgment must be supported by an affidavit complying with the requirements of r.2 or r.13, as the case may be. 9. Consent Judgments 9. (1) Consent judgments and orders (i.e. final orders) to which the parties are entitled as of right are obtained administratively in accordance with O.42, r.5A, without the need for any party to appear before a Judge. (2) Most interlocutory orders involve the exercise of a judicial discretion and are therefore excluded from O.42 r.5A. 10. Discovery 10. (1) With effect from 8th September 2003, discovery has encompassed two elements. O.24, Part I deals with documentary discovery which occurs automatically in every action begun by writ unless the Court orders otherwise. In addition, the Court may order discovery by oral examination pursuant to Part II of O.24. (2) If a party wishes to claim that any discoverable document in that party\u2019s possession, custody or control contains confidential information in respect of which the relevant principal is someone other than an opposing party, the claim must be made in paragraph 3 and Schedule 1, Part III of the List. (3) Where such a claim is made, the party making it may be required by the opposing party to make a \\\"Section 4 application\\\". See O.24, r.5(4). (4) Interrogatories may be served without first obtaining the leave of the Court. See O.26, r.3. Explanatory Memorandum Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 11. Interlocutory Summonses and Motions 11. (1) Every interlocutory summons must be in Form No. 17 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). Every interlocutory summons issued in the Financial Services Division must specify the Commercial Judge to which the cause or matter has been assigned. (2) Every interlocutory summons must be endorsed with a realistic time estimate in compliance with O.32, r.2(4). (3) Every interlocutory summons will be heard in Chambers, but the Judge may adjourn the hearing or the delivery of the Judge\u2019s ruling into open Court if it is considered to be of some general importance (O.32, r.13). (4) Every interlocutory motion will be heard in open court, the listing of which requires a special appointment to be arranged with the Clerk of the Court. 12. Affidavits and Exhibits 12. (1) O.41 applies to all proceedings, including matrimonial proceedings, winding up proceedings, bankruptcy proceedings and civil appeals from the summary court. (2) Every affidavit must comply with the formal requirements of O.41, r.1 and O.66, r.1. (3) Documents for use in conjunction with affidavits must be exhibited, not annexed, i.e. United States procedure is not acceptable. See O.41, r.11. (4) Documentary exhibits must be prepared in accordance with the formal requirements of O.41, r.12. (5) Copies of the same document shall not be exhibited twice in any one proceeding. See O.41, r.15. (6) Where a deponent swears more than one affidavit to which there are exhibits, the numbering of such exhibits shall run consecutively throughout and shall not begin again with each affidavit. See O.41, r.12(3). (7) The rule that affidavits may only be sworn before Justices of the Peace is abolished. Affidavits may now be sworn either before a Justice of the Peace (including the Clerk of the Court and other ex-officio justices) or a Notary Public (except one who is the party's attorney) as may be convenient. 13. Trials and Final Hearings A. Actions Begun by Writ (O.34) 13. (1) An application to the Clerk of the Court to fix a date for the trial of an action commenced by writ must be in Form No. 63 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) and must be supported by an agreed statement, or in the absence of agreement, two statements containing reasoned time estimates (O.34, r.3). Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) Explanatory Memorandum (2) This procedure does not apply to the Financial Services Division, in which a trial date will be fixed by the Commercial Judge at a case management conference convened in accordance with O.72, r.4(5). (3) Trial bundles containing the documents, and only the documents, specified in O.34, r.10, must be delivered to the Clerk of the Court between 2 and 14 days prior to the trial. Trial bundles which constitute a photocopy of the Court file are unacceptable. (4) The trial of every action begun by writ will take place in open court. B. Actions Begun by Originating Summons (O.28) (5) An application to the Clerk of the Court to fix a date for the trial of an originating summons in Form No. 2 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) must be made in Form No. 63 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) (as in paragraph 13.1 above). Notice of hearing in Form No. 5 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) must be served. In the case of an originating summons pending in the Financial Services Division, the hearing date will be fixed by the Commercial Judge at a case management conference. (6) An application to the Clerk of the Court to fix a date for the hearing of an ex parte originating summons or one in Form No. 3 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) should be made informally at the time of issuing the summons. (7) It is only necessary to prepare indexes and trial bundles in cases in which the Court will be referred to large numbers of affidavits, exhibits, orders, etc. (8) The hearing of originating summonses in Form No. 3 (i.e.expedited form) or ex parte originating summons will take place in Chambers unless the Court directs otherwise. Trials of contested originating summonses in Form No. 2 will take place in open Court unless the Court directs otherwise. All uncontested originating summonses will usually be heard in Chambers or adjourned into Chambers. C. Proceedings Begun by Originating Motion (9) Proceedings may only be begun by originating motion if required or authorised by the Rules (O.5, r.5). For example, O.103, r.3 requires that certain applications under the Confidential Information Disclosure Act (as amended and revised) be commenced by originating motion. (10) An application to fix a date for the hearing of an originating notice of motion should be made informally at the time of issuing it. (11) The hearing of every notice of motion must take place in open court. D. Proceedings Begun by Petition Explanatory Memorandum Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (12) Proceedings may only be begun by petition if required or authorised by the Rules (O.5, r.5), for example winding up petitions (which are governed by the Companies Winding Up Rules (as amended and revised); certain other applications under the Companies Act (as amended and revised) (O.102, r.4); and applications under certain other statutes (O.94, r.5). In principle, applications are made by petition if the resulting order will be binding upon \\\"the whole world\\\" or upon a substantial class of persons, whether or not they were aware of the petition or participated in the hearing. It is for this reason that the Rules generally require that notice of the hearing of a petition must be advertised. (13) The procedure relating to divorce petitions is governed by the Matrimonial Causes Rules (as amended and revised) Divorce petitions are served without specifying any hearing date. (14) The procedure relating to winding up petitions is governed by the Companies Winding Up Rules (as amended and revised). Part II deals with creditor's petitions; Part III deals with contributory's petitions; and Part IV deals with petitions presented by the Monetary Authority. (15) In the case of a creditor's winding up petition, the hearing date must be fixed with the Registrar of the Financial Services Division upon issuing the petition. A creditor's petition may not be served unless the hearing date is endorsed upon it or stated in a notice of hearing served with it (CWR O.3, r.5). The hearing date also requires to be advertised (See CWR O.3, r.6). (16)  In the case of a contributory's petition and a petition issued by the Monetary Authority, a summons for directions must be issued at the same time as the petition and served with it. The date for the hearing of the petition will be fixed by the Commercial Judge to whom the matter is assigned, either upon hearing the summons for directions or upon a subsequent application made after the parties have complied with the order for directions. 14. Exchange of Witness Statements 14. On every summons for directions in actions commenced by writ the Court will consider whether or not it is appropriate to order the exchange of witness statements in advance of the trial in accordance with O.38, r.2(A). 15. Drawing Up and Filing Orders and Judgments 15. (1) O.42 applies to all civil proceedings pending in the Civil, Family, Admiralty and Financial Services Divisions of the Court. (2) Every order or judgment must comply with the formal requirements of O.42, r.1. See Form Nos. 22, 24, 24A, 25 and 30 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) for examples. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) Explanatory Memorandum (3) The procedure for drawing up, signing and filing orders and judgments is contained in O.42, r.5. (4) The procedure for obtaining default judgments is contained in O.42, r.6. This is done administratively without the need for any appearance by the plaintiff before the Court. (5) Consent orders or judgments of a kind which do not involve the exercise of judicial discretion should also be obtained administratively in accordance with O.42, r.5(A). See paragraph 7 above. (6) Note that money judgments may continue to be made in foreign currencies. O.42, r.8. (7) Judgments or orders of a kind which are or can be made in open Court are placed on the Register of Judgments which is open to public inspection upon payment of the prescribed fee. See O.63, r.7. 16. Paper, Printing, Binding and Copies 16. (1) Legal size and fools-cap paper may not be used. (2) All documents requiring to be filed in Court must be produced on letter size paper, 11\\\" long and 8-1\/2\\\" wide. (3) A-4 paper (which is not generally available in the United States or Cayman Islands) may be used only if unavoidable and then only if the document is produced with sufficient margins at the top and bottom of each page to enable it to be photocopied on to letter size paper. (4) Ring binders must be used for all documents of more than 50 pages. 17. Court Fees 17. (1) The Court Fees Rules (as amended and revised) came into effect on the 1st November 2009. There are three types of fees, namely fixed fees, ad valorem fees and Court hearing fees. The incidence and amount of these fees depends upon the division of the Court in which the proceeding is pending. The transfer of a proceeding from the Civil Division to the Financial Services Division may result in liability for payment of a transfer fee. (2) Fixed fees are payable in all the divisions of the Court. (3) The fixed fees payable in the Civil and Family Divisions are specified in Part A of the First Schedule to the Rules. A fixed fee of CI$200 is payable upon issuing the originating process by which every proceeding is commenced. Additional fixed fees are payable upon issuing interlocutory applications and filing pleadings, affidavits and orders. (4) The fixed fees payable in the Financial Services and Admiralty Divisions are specified in Part B of the First Schedule to the Rules. Subject to certain Explanatory Memorandum Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) exceptions, a fixed fee of CI$15,000 is payable upon issuing the originating process by which the proceeding is commenced. No other fixed fees are payable. (5) Ad valorem fees are payable only in the Civil Division. The amount payable is a percentage of (a) the amount claimed in the writ and (b) the amount awarded in the final judgment, subject to a maximum of CI$15,000. The percentage amounts payable and the method of calculation is set out in rule 4 and the Second Schedule to the Rules. (6) Court hearing fees are payable in respect of proceedings pending in the Civil, Admiralty and Financial Services Divisions. No Court hearing fees are payable in respect of any proceedings pending in the Family Division. (7) A Court hearing fee of CI$250 per day or part of a day is payable in the Civil Division after the first 3 days. If a proceeding involves a single hearing lasting more than 3 days, a Court hearing fee is payable in respect of the 4th and every subsequent day of the hearing. If a proceeding involves a series of interlocutory hearings, each of which lasts one day or less, a Court hearing fee of CI$250 will become payable in respect of the 4th hearing and every subsequent day in court. (8) A Court hearing fee of CI$750 per day or part of a day is payable in the Admiralty and Financial Services Divisions after the first 20 days. The method of calculation is the same as in the Civil Division. 18. Court Funds Office 18. (1) All payments into Court must be made to the Courts Administrator of the Grand Court whose office is at the Law Courts, George Town. See O.22 and O.92. (2) All payments into Court should be made using the forms contained in the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). These forms may be photocopied and completed in ink. 19. Execution Generally 19. (1) Since 1995 the jurisdiction of the Grand Court to enforce judgments has been substantially, but not exactly, the same as that of the English High Court and County Courts. (2) A money judgment may be enforced by \u2014 (a) a writ of fieri facias (O.47 and Form No. 26 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised)) resulting in the sale of the judgment debtor's goods and chattels; (b) garnishee proceedings (O.49 and Forms Nos. 31 and 32) resulting in the attachment of bank account balances and other debts; (c) a charging order (O.50 and Forms Nos. 33 and 34) resulting in the imposition of a statutory charge over the debtor's land or securities which can then be enforced by an order for sale; Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) Explanatory Memorandum (d) the appointment of a receiver (O.30); (e) an order for committal (O.52, Part II and Form Nos. 49, 50, 51 and 52 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised)) resulting in the debtor being sentenced to a term of imprisonment (or successive terms of imprisonment) not exceeding 6 weeks; (f) a writ of sequestration (Form No. 29) which empowers a sequestrator to seize all the debtor's real and personal property; and (g) an attachment of earnings order (O.50A and Form Nos. 35 to 47 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised)) resulting in the debtor's employer being required to deduct specific amounts from the debtor\u2019s wages each week or month and pay it over to the Courts Administrator of the Grand Court for the credit of the judgment creditor. (3) Judgments requiring a person to do or refrain from doing something other than pay money may be enforced by \u2014 (a) a writ of possession (O.45, r.3 and Form No. 28 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised)) requiring a person to deliver up possession of land; (b) a writ of delivery (O.45, r.4) requiring a person to deliver up goods or, in the alternative, pay their assessed value; (c) a writ of specific delivery (O.45, r.4) requiring a person to deliver up goods without the alternative of paying their assessed value; (d) a writ of sequestration (O.46, r.5); (e) an order for committal (O.52, Part I and Form No. 48 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised)); and (f) the appointment of a receiver by way of equitable execution (O.51). (4) Note that all these remedies are available to enforce orders made in matrimonial proceedings. (5) Note that a receiver may be appointed for the purposes of collecting money (e.g. rents) or to carry out some other act (e.g. the execution of a contract or document of title). (6) Note that judgments may be given on orders made by the Summary Court by means which are not available in the Summary Court (e.g. orders for committal, sequestration orders or the appointment of a receiver). (7) The only means of enforcement available in the Summary Court are \u2014 (a) an attachment of earnings order pursuant to GCR O.50A which is applied in the Summary Court by virtue of SCR rule 12(1); (b) a writ of fieri facias pursuant to GCR O.46 and O.47 which are applied in the Summary Court pursuant to SCR rule 12(2); or Explanatory Memorandum Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (c) a garnishee order pursuant to O.39 which is applied in the Summary Court pursuant to SCR rule 12(3). (8) The Summary Court only has power to commit a person to prison by virtue of specific statutory provisions, e.g. Schedule 2 of the Judicature Act (as amended and revised) and O.50A (i.e. in connection with attachment of earnings orders); under the Protection from Domestic Violence Act (as amended and revised); but not otherwise. (9) An application to the Grand Court pursuant to Section 34 of the Summary Jurisdiction Act (as amended and revised), as amended, for enforcement of a judgment given or order made by the Summary Court must be made in accordance with SCR rule 12(4). 20. Examination of Judgment Debtors 20. (1) The commitment summons procedure was abolished in both the Grand Court and the Summary Court in 1995. (2) A judgment creditor wishing to conduct post judgment discovery must make application under O.48 for an order for the examination of the judgment debtor in Form No. 30 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). (3) Orders for examination will not normally be made against individuals if the Court considers that an attachment of earnings order is likely to be an appropriate and effective remedy. (4) In the case of corporate judgment debtors, orders for examination may be made against any officer. 21. Imprisonment for Non-Payment of Debts 21. (1) An application to commit a judgment debtor to prison is considered to be an extraordinary remedy which is only available if it can be demonstrated that the judgment debtor has the means to pay but is refusing to do so. (2) A judgment creditor who has reasonable grounds for believing that a judgment debtor can pay but is willfully refusing to do so, may apply to the Grand Court (but not the Summary Court) for an order that the judgment debtor be sentenced to a term of imprisonment not exceeding 6 weeks. See O.52, Part II. (3) Applications must be made by notice of motion in Form No. 50 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised), supported by an affidavit. Like all other notices of motion, it must be heard in open court. (4) The notice of motion will not be validly served unless it is accompanied by a statement of means form in Form No. 30 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). This form is designed to be photocopied. The judgment creditor's attorney should insert the Cause No.; the title (or Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) Explanatory Memorandum abbreviated title) of the action; and the judgment debtor's name. The judgment debtor must complete the form and return it to the Court Office within 8 days of the date of service. (5) Since such applications involve the liberty of the subject, the Court will insist upon strict adherence to the Rules and Forms. 22. Attachment of Earnings Orders 22. (1) Attachment of earnings orders may be made pursuant to the Second Schedule of the Judicature Act (as amended and revised) by both the Grand Court and the Summary Court. The procedure applicable in the Summary Court is the same as that applicable in the Grand Court. (2) Applications for attachment of earnings orders in respect of judgments or maintenance orders made by the Summary Court must be made in accordance with O.50A and the relevant forms contained in the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). (3) Applications for attachment of earnings orders to enforce money judgments of CI$500 or more are made in Form No. 35 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) and must be accompanied by an affidavit in accordance with O.50A, r.4. (4) Applications for attachment of earnings orders to enforce maintenance orders which are in arrears are made in Form No. 44 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) and must be supported by an affidavit proving the amount of the arrears. (5) The applications must be served on the debtor together with a statement of means form in Form No. 36 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). (6) Upon receipt of a completed statement of means form the Clerk of the Court will place the file before a Judge or Magistrate, as the case may be, who will normally make an attachment of earnings order in accordance with O.50A, r.7, without the need for the parties to attend before the Court. If either party is dissatisfied with an order made in their absence, the party may ask the Clerk of the Court to issue a notice of hearing in Form No. 39 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) for a reconsideration of the order. (7)  If the judgment debtor fails to deliver a completed statement of means form to the Court Office within 8 days of service, the Clerk of the Court will of the Clerk of the Court\u2019s own motion issue a notice in Form No. 41 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) requiring the judgment debtor to attend Court in person and explain why the judgment debtor should not be committed to prison for contempt of court. In addition to sentencing the judgment debtor to a term of imprisonment, the Court may make an attachment of earnings order. Explanatory Memorandum Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (8) Attachment of earnings orders will be made in Form No. 38 (Judgment Debts) or Form No. 45 (Maintenance Orders) of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). In the case of judgment debts, the installments shall be deemed to include interest calculated in accordance with Grand Court Practice Direction No. 2\/95. (9) In cases where the judgment creditor is legally represented the judgment creditor\u2019s attorney will be expected to serve the attachment of earnings order upon the employer and the judgment debtor. In addition to the order, the employer must also be served with a book of preprinted carbonised lodgment\/receipt forms which will be issued by the Clerk of the Court in accordance with Grand Court Practice Direction No. 3\/95. In cases where the judgment creditor is not legally represented, the Clerk of the Court will serve the order. (10) Before applying for an attachment of earnings order, the applicant should check the Register of Attachment of Earnings Orders to ascertain whether or not the judgment debtor is already the subject of an order, in which case it will be appropriate to apply in Form No. 46 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) for a consolidated order pursuant to O.50A, r.18. For this purpose Summary Court proceedings and Grand Court proceedings may be consolidated. 23. Applications Under Section 48 of the Trusts Act 23. (1) O.85, rr.7 and r.8 create two alternative methods by which an executor, administrator or trustee may make application under Section 48 of the Trusts Act (as amended and revised) for the opinion, advice or direction of the Court upon any question respecting the management or administration of the estate or trust fund. (2) An ordinary application under r.7 is made by an inter partes originating summons in Form No. 3 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) or an ex parte originating summons in Form No. 4 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised), as may be appropriate and the originating summons procedure contained in O.28 will apply. (3) A written application under r.8 is made by an ex parte originating application in Form No. 57 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). O.26 shall not apply to such applications. (4) Written applications under r.7 are intended as an expeditious and economical means by which executors, administrators or trustees may obtain the opinion, advice or direction of the Court in non-contentious cases. Dated this 1st day of November, 2009 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) Explanatory Memorandum The Honourable Margaret Ramsay-Hale, Chief Justice The Honourable Samuel Bulgin KC, Attorney General Colette Wilkins KC, Legal Practitioner Colin McKie KC, Legal Practitioner GCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 08.09.03) (amended 01.11.09) ORDER 1 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 1 CITATION, APPLICATION, COMMENCEMENT, INTERPRETATION AND FORMS 1. Citation (O.1, r.1) 1. (1) These Rules may be cited as the Grand Court Rules (2023 Revision). (2) An individual rule may be cited using the abbreviation \\\"GCR\\\". 2. Application (O.1, r.2) 2. (1) Subject to the following provisions of this rule, these Rules shall apply in relation to all proceedings in the Court. (2) Except for Part I of O.52 (Committal), O.53 (Applications for Judicial Review), Part III of O.62 (Wasted Costs Orders) and O.103 (Confidential Information Disclosure Act, 2016, these Rules shall not apply to any criminal proceedings. (3) The Probate Registry established pursuant to Rule 3 of the Probate and Administration Rules (as amended and revised) shall continue as part of the Civil Division of the Grand Court but these Rules shall not apply to any application made under the Probate and Administration Rules (as amended and revised) (4) Except for Orders 3 (Time), 4 (Assignment, Transfer and Consolidation of Proceedings), 5 (Mode of Beginning Proceedings), 38 Part II (Writs of Subpoena), 39 (Evidence by Deposition), 62 (Costs), 67 (Change of Attorney), 45-51 (Enforcement) and 52 (Committal) these Rules shall not apply to any proceedings which are \u2014 (a) governed by the Matrimonial Causes Rules (as amended and revised), (b) governed by the Grand Court (Bankruptcy) Rules (as amended and revised), (c) governed by the Companies Winding Up Rules (as amended and revised); or (d) on appeal from civil proceedings in the Summary Court. (5) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraphs (2) to (4) of this rule \u2014 (a) every affidavit or other document filed in the Court office shall comply with the requirements of Orders 41 and 66; (b) every judgment and order made by the Court shall comply with the requirements of O.42; (c) except in the case of petitions in proceedings governed by the Matrimonial Causes Rules (as amended and revised), every originating process or other Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 1 document required to be served by these Rules or any other rules in connection with any civil proceedings shall be served in accordance with Orders 10 and 65; (d) Part I of O.80 shall apply to every proceeding to which a person under disability is a party; and (e) every interlocutory summons issued by the Court, including summonses issued in proceedings governed by the Matrimonial Causes Rules (as amended and revised) and those issued in proceedings under the Companies Winding Up Rules (as amended and revised), shall be endorsed in accordance with O.32, r.2(4), and O.32, rr.2 to 8 shall apply to the hearing of such summonses. (6) All funds required to be paid into or out of Court, whether by order of the Court of Appeal, the Court, the Summary Court or otherwise, in both criminal and civil proceedings, shall be lodged, paid, invested and dealt with in accordance with the provisions of O.92. 3. Commencement and transitional provisions (O.1, r.3) 3. (1) These Rules came into operation on the 1st day of June, 1995, referred to in this Order as the \\\"commencement date\\\". (2) These Rules shall apply to \u2014 (a) every proceeding commenced on or after the commencement date; and (b) every step taken or required to be taken after the commencement date in any proceeding pending on that date. (3) No step taken or required to be taken before the commencement date shall be treated as a non-compliance with these Rules provided that it complied with the rules then in force. (4) Order 6, rule 8 shall have no application to writs issued prior to the commencement date. 4. Revocations (O.1, r.4) 4. The following rules are hereby revoked with effect from the commencement date \u2014 (a) the Grand Court (Civil Procedure) Rules 1976, as amended; (b) the Grand Court (Admiralty) Rules 1977; (c) the Grand Court (Forms and Miscellaneous) Rules 1976; (d) the Civil Evidence Rules 1978; (e) the Grand Court (Proceedings by and against the Crown) Rules 1977; (f) Part IV of the Succession Law (Probate and Administration) Rules 1977, as amended; ORDER 1 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (g) the Grand Court (Applications for Orders of Mandamus, Prohibition, Certiorari and Habeas Corpus) Rules 1977; (h) the Grand Court (Foreign Process) Rules 1977 (as amended); and (i) the Grand Court (Foreign Judgments) (Reciprocal Enforcement) Rules 1977. 5. Non application of English rules (O.1, r.5) 5. (1) Except as provided in O.75, r.2, the Rules of the Supreme Court 1965 shall cease to have any application to \u2013 (a) every proceeding commenced on or after the commencement date; and (b) any step taken or required to be taken after the commencement date in any proceeding pending on that date. (2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), The Supreme Court Practice 1999 may be relied upon where appropriate as an aid to the interpretation and application of these Rules. 6. Application of Interpretation Act (as amended and revised) (O.1, r.6) 6. The Interpretation Act (as amended and revised) shall apply to the interpretation of these Rules as it applies to the interpretation of a Law. 7. Definitions (O.1, r.7) 7. (1) In these Rules, unless the context otherwise requires \u2014 \\\" Courts Administrator\\\" means the Courts Administrator of the Grand Court appointed under paragraph 1 of the First Schedule of the Judicature Act (as amended and revised) or an officer appointed by the Courts Administrator under O.92, r.6; \\\"Admiralty Judge\\\" means a Judge who is appointed to try admiralty proceedings commenced in or transferred to the Admiralty Division of the Court; \\\"admiralty proceeding\\\" shall mean any admiralty action, limitation action or other proceeding governed by Orders 74 or 75; \\\"an action for personal injuries\\\" means an action in which there is a claim for damages in respect of personal injuries to the plaintiff or any other person or in respect of a person's death, and \\\"personal injuries\\\" includes any disease and any impairment of a person's physical or mental condition; \\\"attorney\\\" means a person admitted or otherwise entitled to practise as an attorney-at-law in the Cayman Islands either generally or in respect of a particular cause or matter and includes Crown Counsel; \\\"Bailiff\\\" means the person appointed as such under Section 7(1) of the Grand Court Act (as amended and revised), and includes any assistant bailiffs; Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 1 \\\"Chief Justice\\\" means the Chief Justice of the Cayman Islands or any other Judge authorised to act as Chief Justice; \\\"Chief Marshall\\\" means the person appointed as such under Section 7(1) of the Grand Court Act (as amended and revised) and includes any deputies and assistants; \\\"Clerk of the Court\\\" means the person appointed as such under Section 7(1) of the Grand Court Act (as amended and revised), and includes any deputies; \\\"Commercial Judge\\\" means a Judge who is appointed to try financial services proceedings commenced in or transferred to the Financial Services Division of the Court; \\\"the Court\\\" means the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands constituted pursuant to the Constitution and Section 3 of the Grand Court Act (as amended and revised) whether sitting as the Grand Court or as the Chief Court of Bankruptcy or as a Colonial Court of Admiralty; \\\"Court Funds Office\\\" means the office of the Courts Administrator or of an officer appointed by the Courts Administrator under O.92, r.6; \\\"Court office\\\" is the office established pursuant to Section 10 of the Grand Court Act (as amended and revised); \\\"Court file\\\" means the file established in respect of every proceeding in accordance with O.63, r.2; \\\"family proceeding\\\" shall include \u2014 (a) any petition for divorce, judicial separation or nullity of marriage presented pursuant to the Matrimonial Causes Act (as amended and revised) and any ancillary proceeding arising thereunder; (b) any application under Part I, Part II, Part IV or Part V of the Children Act (as amended and revised), the Adoption of Children Act (as amended and revised), the Marriage Act (as amended and revised) or the Civil Partnership Act (as amended and revised); (c)  any application under the Protection from Domestic Violence Act (as amended and revised); (d)  any application under the Child Abduction and Custody (Cayman Islands) Order 1997 [UKSI 2754\/1997]; (e) proceedings under the inherent jurisdiction of the Grand Court in relation to children; or (f) any appeal from an order of the Summary Court made under Part I, Part II, or Part IV of the Children Act (as amended and revised); the Protection from Domestic Violence Act (as amended and revised), the Affiliation Act (as amended and revised); the Maintenance Act (as amended and revised) the Marriage Act (as amended and revised) or the Civil Partnership Act (as amended and revised); ORDER 1 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) \\\"financial services proceeding\\\" shall have the meaning ascribed to it by O. 72, r.1(2) \\\"Grand Court Act\\\" means the Grand Court Act (as amended and revised); \\\"Judicature Act\\\" means the Judicature Act (as amended and revised); \\\"Judge\\\" means any judge or acting judge of the Court; \\\"notice of intention to defend\\\" means an acknowledgment of service containing a statement to the effect that the person by whom or on whose behalf it is signed intends to contest the proceedings to which the acknowledgment relates; \\\"originating summons\\\" means every summons other than a summons in a pending cause or matter; \\\"pleading\\\" does not include a petition, summons or preliminary act; \\\"practice form\\\" means a form contained in a practice direction issued pursuant to O.1, r.12; \\\"prescribed fee\\\" means the fee prescribed by the Court Fees Rules (as amended and revised); \\\"prescribed form\\\" means a form prescribed by these Rules and contained in the Appendices; \\\"prescribed rate\\\" means the applicable rate of interest prescribed from time to time by the Rules Committee pursuant to Section 34 of the Judicature Act (as amended and revised); \\\"probate action\\\" has the meaning assigned by O.76; \\\"receiver\\\" includes a manager; \\\"Register of Judgments\\\" means the file maintained in accordance with Order 63, rule 7; \\\"Register of Writs\\\" means the file maintained in accordance with O.63, r.8; \\\"State Immunity Act 1978\\\" means the United Kingdom\u2019s State Immunity Act 1978 as applied to the Cayman Islands by the State Immunity (Overseas Territories) Order 1979 [UKSI 1979\/458]; and \\\"writ\\\" means a writ of summons. (2) In these Rules, unless the context otherwise requires, \\\"the Court\\\" means the Grand Court or any one or more Judges thereof, whether sitting in open Court or in chambers. (3) In these Rules, unless the context otherwise requires, a reference to acknowledging service of a document or giving notice of intention to defend any proceedings is a reference to lodging in the Court office an acknowledgment Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 1 of service of that document or, as the case may be, a notice to defend those proceedings. 8. Construction of references to orders, rules, etc. (O.1, r.8) 8. (1) Unless the context otherwise requires, any reference in these Rules to a specified Order, rule or form in the Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (as amended and revised) and the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) is a reference to that Order or rule of these Rules and any reference to a specified rule, paragraph or subparagraph is a reference to that rule of the Order, that paragraph of the rule, or that subparagraph of the paragraph, in which the reference occurs. (2) Any reference in these Rules to anything done under a rule of these Rules includes a reference to the same thing done before the commencement date under any corresponding rule of Court ceasing to have effect on the commencement date. (3) Except where the context otherwise requires, any reference in these Rules to any Law shall be construed as a reference to the Law as amended, extended or applied by or under any other Law. 9. Construction of references to action, etc. for possession of land (O.1, r.9) 9. Except where the context otherwise requires, references in these Rules to an action or claim for the possession of land shall be construed as including references to proceedings against the Crown for an order declaring that the plaintiff is entitled as against the Crown to the land or to the possession thereof. 10. Prescribed forms (O.1, r.10) 10. The forms in the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) shall be used where applicable with such variations as the circumstances of the particular case require. 11. Use of English Practice Forms as precedents (O.1, r.11) 11. The Queens Bench and Chancery Masters' Practice Forms contained in Part 2 of The Supreme Court Practice 1999 are not incorporated in these Rules, but they shall be regarded as approved precedents to be used, with all necessary variations, whenever it is practical and appropriate to do so. 12. Practice directions (O.1, r.12) 12. (1) The Chief Justice may issue practice directions for the purpose of \u2014 (a) supplementing these Rules, provided that no practice direction shall revoke or vary any rule; ORDER 1 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (b) establishing forms to be known as \\\"practice forms\\\" in respect of any matter in which no prescribed form is contained in the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised); and (c) providing for the practice and procedure of the Court in respect of any matter not governed by these or any other rules. (2) The Rules Committee shall from time to time issue practice directions containing guidelines relating to the matters referred to in O.62, r.16. (3) The Courts Administrator may, with the concurrence of the Chief Justice, issue practice directions for the purpose of supplementing the provisions of O.92 and establish practice forms in respect of any matter relating to O.92 for which no prescribed form is contained in the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). (4) All practice directions and practice forms issued pursuant to this rule shall be gazetted. (5) Any practice direction or practice form issued pursuant to this rule may be varied or revoked by the Chief Justice in the case of those issued by the Chief Justice or by the Courts Administrator in the case of those issued by the Courts Administrator. (6) Any practice direction or practice form may be revoked by the Rules Committee. GCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 16.10.95) (amended 22.01.96) (amended 01.01.02) (amended 01.01.09) (amended 01.11.09) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 2 ORDER 2 EFFECT OF NON-COMPLIANCE 1. Non-compliance with rules (O.2, r.1) 1. (1) Where, in beginning or purporting to begin any proceedings or at any stage in the course of or in connection with any proceedings, there has, by reason of anything done or left undone, been a failure to comply with the requirements of these Rules, whether in respect of time, place, manner, form or content or in any other respect, the failure shall be treated as an irregularity and shall not nullify the proceedings, any step taken in the proceedings, or any document, judgment or order therein. (2) Subject to paragraph (3), the Court may, on the ground that there has been such a failure as is mentioned in paragraph (1) and on such terms as to costs or otherwise as it thinks just, set aside either wholly or in part the proceedings in which the failure occurred, any step taken in those proceedings or any document, judgment or order therein or exercise its powers under these Rules to allow such amendments (if any) to be made and to make such order (if any) dealing with the proceedings generally as it thinks fit. (3) The Court shall not wholly set aside any proceedings or the writ or other originating process by which they were begun on the ground that the proceedings were required by any of these Rules to be begun by an originating process other than the one employed. 2. Application to set aside for irregularity (O.2, r.2) 2. (1) An application to set aside for irregularity any proceedings, any step taken in any proceedings or any document, judgment or order therein shall not be allowed unless it is made within a reasonable time and before the party applying has taken any fresh step after becoming aware of the irregularity. (2) An application under this rule may be made by summons or motion and the grounds of objection must be stated in the summons or notice of motion. GCR 1995 (Revised) ORDER 3 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 3 TIME 1. \\\"Month\\\" means calendar month (O.3, r.1) 1. Without prejudice to Section 3 of the Interpretation Act (as amended and revised) the word \\\"month\\\", where it occurs in any judgment, order, direction or other document forming part of any proceedings in the Court, means a calendar month unless the context otherwise requires. 2. Reckoning periods of time (O.3, r.2) 2. (1) Any period of time fixed by these Rules or by any judgment, order or direction for doing any act shall be reckoned in accordance with the following provisions of this rule. (2) Where the act is required to be done within a specified period after or from a specified date, the period begins immediately after that date. (3) Where the act is required to be done within or not less than a specified period before a specified date, the period ends immediately before that date. (4) Where the act is required to be done a specified number of clear days before or after a specified date, at least that number of days must intervene between the day on which the act is done and that date. (5) Where, apart from this paragraph, the period in question, being a period of 7 days or less, would include a Saturday or a Sunday or a public general holiday, that day shall be excluded. 3. No rule (O.3, r.3) 3. No rule (O.3, r.3) 4. Time expires on Saturday, Sunday, etc. (O.3, r.4) 4. Where the time prescribed by these Rules, or by any judgment, order or direction, for doing any act at the Court office expires on a Saturday, a Sunday or other day on which the Court office is closed, and by reason thereof that act cannot be done on that day, the act shall be in time if done on the next day on which the Court office is open. 5. Extension, etc. of time (O.3, r.5) 5. (1) The Court may, on such terms as it thinks just, by order extend or abridge the period within which a person is required or authorised by these Rules, or by any judgment, order or direction, to do any act in any proceedings. (2) The Court may extend any such period as is referred to in paragraph (1) although the application for extension is not made until after the expiration of that period. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 3 (3) The period within which a person is required by these Rules, or by any order or direction, to serve, file or amend any pleading or other document may be extended by consent (given in writing) without an order of the Court being made for that purpose. 6. Notice of intention to proceed after six months' delay (O.3, r.6) 6. Where a period of 6 months or more has elapsed since the last proceeding in a cause or matter, the party who desires to proceed must give to every other party not less than 1 month's notice of that party\u2019s intention to proceed. A summons on which no order was made is not a proceeding for the purposes of this rule. GCR 1995 (Revised) ORDER 4 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 4 ASSIGNMENT, TRANSFER AND CONSOLIDATION OF PROCEEDINGS 1. Assignment of proceedings amongst divisions of the Court (O.4, r.1) 1. Every civil proceeding (including every civil appeal from the Summary Court) shall be commenced in the Civil Division unless \u2014 (a) it is a family proceeding in which case it shall be commenced in the Family Division; (b) it is an admiralty proceeding, in which case it shall be commenced in the Admiralty Division; or (c) it is a financial services proceeding, in which case it shall be commenced in the Financial Services Division. 2. Assignment of proceedings to a particular Judge (O.4, r.2) 2. (1) Any proceeding pending in the Civil Division or Family Division may be reserved to a particular Judge of that division if the Judge trying the matter is satisfied that the interests of justice require that it be reserved to that Judge. (2) Every proceeding commenced in or transferred to the Financial Services Division shall be assigned to a Commercial Judge who shall adjudicate the trial of the matter and every interlocutory application arising before or after the trial of the matter. (3) Every proceeding commenced in or transferred to the Admiralty Division shall be assigned to an Admiralty Judge who shall adjudicate the trial of the matter and every interlocutory application arising before or after the trial of the matter. (4)  (a)    In the event that the Judge to whom a cause or matter is reserved or assigned (i)    dies; (ii)    ceases to be a Judge; or (iii)    is unable to adjudicate upon the matter in a timely manner by reason of that Judge\u2019s ill health or absence from the Islands; or (b) In the event that the administration of justice otherwise requires, the Chief Justice shall nominate some other Judge to whom the application shall be made or by whom the jurisdiction shall be exercised. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 4 3. Transfer of proceedings between divisions (O.4, r.3) 3. (1) Any civil proceeding pending in the Court (including proceedings commenced prior to the establishment of the Divisions of the Court) may be transferred from one Division to another by order of the Court on the grounds that \u2014 (a) the proceeding has been commenced in the wrong Division and ought properly to be transferred; or (b) the Court is satisfied that it would be appropriate in all the circumstances for the cause or matter to be tried by a Commercial Judge or an Admiralty Judge. (2) When a proceeding is ordered to be transferred to the Financial Services Division or the Admiralty Division, the Court shall determine the amount of the transfer fee payable in accordance with Rule 3(5) of the Court Fees Rules (as amended and revised). 4. Consolidation of causes or matters (O.4, r.4) 4. (1) Where two or more causes or matters are pending in the same Division of the Court and it appears to the Court that \u2014 (a) some common question of law or fact arises in both or all of them; or (b) the rights or relief claimed are in respect of or arise out of the same transaction or series of transactions; or (c) for some other reason it is desirable to make an order under this Rule, the Court may order those causes or matters to be consolidated on such terms as it thinks just or may order them to be tried at the same time or one immediately after another or may order any of them to be stayed until after the determination of any other of them. (2) When the Court makes an order under paragraph (1) that two or more causes or matters are to be tried at the same time but no order is made for those causes or matters to be consolidated, then, a party to one of those causes or matters may be treated as if that party were a party to any other of those causes or matters for the purpose of making an order for costs against that party or in that party\u2019s favour. (3) Nothing in this rule shall prevent two or more causes or matters being consolidated pursuant to O.50, r.1(6). GCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 01.11.09) ORDER 5 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 5 MODE OF BEGINNING PROCEEDINGS 1. Mode of beginning civil proceedings (O.5, r.1) 1. (1) Subject to the provision of any Act and of these Rules, civil proceedings in the Court may be begun by writ, originating summons, originating motion, petition, arbitration application, or written application, which are referred to collectively in these Rules (save where the context otherwise requires) as \u201coriginating process\u201d. (2) A \\\"written application\\\" means \u2014 (a) a stop notice under O.50, r.11; (b) an application under O.85, r.8; (c) an application under O.102, r.17; and (d) any other application which is required by these Rules to be made and determined in  writing without any oral hearing. (2A) An \u201carbitration application\u201d means an application under Order 73 and has the same meaning as provided for in Order 73, rule 2. (2B) Subject to the provision of any Act and of these Rules, civil proceedings may be begun by electronic filing of any originating process and these Rules will be read and construed accordingly (3) The Clerk of the Court shall not affix the seal of the Court to any originating process without: (a) having first determined the amount of the prescribed fee payable in accordance with the First Schedule of the Court Fees Rules (as amended and revised); and (b) being satisfied that the prescribed fee has been paid. At the same time as affixing the seal of the Court to any originating process the Clerk of the Court shall affix a seal indicating the date upon which the seal of the Court was affixed thereto. (4) Any person seeking the sealing of an originating process shall provide it to the Clerk of the Court either electronically or on paper.  The originating process shall be signed by the plaintiff, applicant, petitioner, or appellant (the \u201cclaimant\u201d), or by the attorney stated in the originating process as acting for the claimant, as the case may be.  If the originating process is provided electronically then it shall be provided to the Clerk of the Court pursuant to the Court\u2019s instructions for electronic filing as published, from time to time, on www.judicial.ky. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 5 (5) If, pursuant to paragraph 1(4), an originating process is provided on paper to the Clerk of the Court, the Clerk of the Court shall: (a)  scan and upload the document electronically into the appropriate court electronic database record; (b)  affix electronically the seal of the Grand Court to the originating process together with a seal indicating the date upon which the seal of the Court was affixed thereto; (c)  forthwith provide to the claimant, or the claimant\u2019s attorney, the originating process with the aforesaid court seals duly affixed: (i) if the process was originally provided by the claimant\u2019s attorney to the Clerk of the Court, by delivery of a paper copy of the electronically sealed duplicate to the claimant\u2019s attorney\u2019s collection box maintained by the court\u2019s registry; or (ii)  if the originating process was originally provided by the claimant in person to the Clerk of the Court, by returning a paper copy of the electronically sealed duplicate to the claimant. (6) If, pursuant to paragraph 1(4), an originating process is provided electronically to the Clerk of the Court, the Clerk of the Court shall: (a) upload the document electronically into the appropriate court electronic database record; (b)  affix electronically the seal of the Grand Court to the originating process together with a seal indicating the date upon which the seal of the Court was affixed thereto; (c) forthwith provide electronically to the claimant, or the claimant\u2019s attorney, the originating process with the aforesaid court seals duly affixed. (7) In every case where an originating process is provided (electronically or on paper) to the Clerk of the Court pursuant to paragraph 1(4), the following steps will be taken.  Upon the affixing of the aforesaid seals of the Grand Court to the originating process the Clerk of the Court shall immediately thereafter: (a) assign the proceedings to the appropriate Division of the Court; (b) assign to it a cause number, using chronological sequences for each Division, commencing on the 1st January of each year; (c) establish a court file in respect of the proceedings in accordance with Order 63, rule 2 by generating a paper duplicate from the electronic record and placing it on the file. (8) Pursuant to Order 63, the Clerk of the Court shall upload electronically a copy of the sealed originating process to either the Register of Writs and other Originating Processes or a Restricted Register of Writs and other Originating Processes, as maintained in accordance with Order 63. 2. ORDER 5 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (9) In the event that the Clerk of the Court, pursuant to Order 72, assigns an originating process to the Financial Services Division, the Registrar of that Division, acting in consultation with the Chief Justice, shall assign the proceeding to a particular Commercial Judge.  Upon the Registrar assigning the proceedings to a particular Commercial Judge, the Registrar shall inform the Clerk of the Court of that assignment and the Clerk of the Court shall thereupon immediately inform the claimant, or the claimant\u2019s attorney, of that assignment and shall include the initials of the relevant Commercial Judge in the title of the proceedings and make any necessary changes to the Court file. 2. Proceedings which must be begun by writ (O. 5, r. 2) 2. Subject to any provisions of a Law, or of these Rules, by virtue of which any proceedings are expressly required to be begun otherwise than by writ, the following proceedings must, notwithstanding anything in rule 4, be begun by writ, that is to say, proceedings \u2014 (a) in which a claim is made by the plaintiff for any relief or remedy for any tort, other than trespass to land; (b) in which any claim by the plaintiff is based on an allegation of fraud; (c) in which a claim is made by the plaintiff for damages for breach of duty (whether the duty exists by virtue of a contract or of a provision made by or under any Law or independently of any contract or any such provision) where the damages claimed consist of or include damages in respect of the death of any person or in respect of personal injuries to any person or in respect of damage to any property; (d) in which a claim is made by the plaintiff in respect of the infringement of a patent; and (e) which are a probate action. 3. Proceedings which must be begun by originating summons (O.5, r.3) 3. (1) Proceedings by which an application is to be made to the Court or a Judge thereof under any Law must be begun by originating summons except where by these Rules or by or under any Law the application in question is expressly required or authorised to be made by some other means. (2) This rule does not apply to an application made in pending proceedings. 4. Proceedings which may be begun by writ or originating summons (O.5, r.4) 4. (1) Except in the case of proceedings which by these Rules or by or under any Law are required to be begun by originating motion or petition, proceedings may be begun either by writ or by originating summons as the plaintiff considers appropriate. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 5 (2) Proceedings \u2014 (a) in which the sole or principal question at issue is, or is likely to be, one of the construction of any Law or of any deed, will, contract or other document, or some other question of law; or (b) in which there is unlikely to be any substantial dispute of fact, are appropriate to be begun by originating summons unless the plaintiff intends in those proceedings to apply for judgment under O.14 or O.86 or for any other reason considers the proceedings more appropriate to be begun by writ. 4A. Proceedings which may be begun by petition or by writ (O.5, r.4A) 4A. (1) Proceedings under Section 23 or 26(1) of the Cayman Islands Constitution Order 2009 (as amended) shall be begun by petition or writ. (2) Such proceedings \u2014 (a) in which the sole or principal question at issue is, or is likely to be, one of the construction of any Law or of any deed, will, contract or other document, or some other question of law; or (b) in which there is unlikely to be any substantial dispute of fact, are appropriate to be begun by petition unless the applicant for any reason considers it more appropriate to begin the proceedings by writ. 5. Proceedings to be begun by motion or petition (O.5, r.5) 5. Proceedings may be begun by originating motion or petition if, but only if, by these Rules or by or under any Law the proceedings in question are required or authorised to be so begun. 6. Right to sue in person (O.5, r.6) 6. (1) Subject to paragraph (2) and to O.80, r.2, any person (whether or not the person sues as a trustee or personal representative or in any other representative capacity) may begin and carry on proceedings in the Court by an attorney or in person. (2) Except as expressly provided by or under any Law, a body corporate may not begin or carry on or defend any such proceedings otherwise than by an attorney. GCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 01.11.09) (amended 06.11.12) (replaced 10.07.22) ORDER 6 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 6 WRITS OF SUMMONS: GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. Form of writ (O.6, r.1) 1. Every writ must be in Form No. 1 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). 2. Indorsement of claim (O.6, r.2) 2. Before a writ is issued it must be indorsed \u2014 (a) with a statement of claim or, if the statement of claim is not indorsed on the writ, with a concise statement of the nature of the claim made or the relief or remedy required in the action begun thereby; (b) where the claim made by the plaintiff is for a debt or liquidated demand only, with a statement of the amount claimed in respect of the debt or demand and for costs and also with a statement that further proceedings will be stayed if, within the time limited for acknowledging service, the defendant pays the amount so claimed to the plaintiff, the plaintiff\u2019s attorney or agent; (c) where the action is brought to enforce a right to recover possession of goods, with a statement showing the value of the goods; (d) where the claim made by the plaintiff is for a debt or liquidated demand it must specify the currency of the debt or liquidated demand. (e) where a claim is made for interest pursuant to the terms of any contract, with a statement of  \u2014 (i) the relevant contractual term(s); (ii) the agreed rate of interest; (iii) the date(s) from which it is payable; (iv) the total amount of interest claimed; and (v) the amount of interest accruing due each day; (f) where a claim is made for interest pursuant to Section 34 of the Judicature Act (as amended and revised) or any other statute, with a statement of \u2014 (i) the prescribed rate(s); (ii) the date(s) from which it is calculated; (iii) the total amount of interest claimed as at the date of the issue of the writ; and (iv) the amount of interest accruing each day thereafter; Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 6 (g) where the claim made by the plaintiff includes a claim for fixed costs pursuant to O.62, r.1, with a statement of the amount payable in accordance with the scale and the amount of the prescribed fee payable upon issue of the writ. 3. Indorsement as to capacity (O.6, r.3) 3. Before a writ is issued it must be indorsed \u2014 (a) where the plaintiff sues in a representative capacity, with a statement of the capacity in which that plaintiff sues; (b) where a defendant is sued in a representative capacity, with a statement of the capacity in which that defendant is sued. 4. Indorsement as to insurers of motor vehicles (O.6, r.4) 4. (1) Any writ which includes a claim for damages arising out of the use of a motor vehicle or vehicles on any road shall be endorsed with the name and address of the insurer or insurers of such vehicles. (2) The Clerk of the Court shall send a copy of any writ indorsed in accordance with paragraph (1) to the insurer or insurers whose names are indorsed thereon within 10 days of the date upon which such writ is issued. 5. Indorsement as to attorney and address (O.6, r.5) 5. (1) Before a writ is issued, it must be indorsed \u2014 (a) where the plaintiff sues by an attorney, with the plaintiff's address and the attorney's name or firm and a business address of the plaintiff\u2019s attorney within the jurisdiction; or (b) where the plaintiff sues in person, with the address of the plaintiff\u2019s place of residence and, if the plaintiff\u2019s place of residence is not within the jurisdiction or if the plaintiff has no place of residence, the address of a place within the jurisdiction at or to which documents for the plaintiff may be delivered or sent. (2) The address for service of a plaintiff shall be \u2014 (a) where the plaintiff sues by an attorney, the business address of the attorney indorsed on the writ; or (b) where the plaintiff sues in person, the plaintiff\u2019s address within the jurisdiction indorsed on the writ. (3) Where the name of an attorney is indorsed on a writ, the attorney must, if any defendant who has been served with or who has acknowledged service of the writ requests the attorney in writing so to do, declare in writing whether the writ was issued by the attorney or with the attorney\u2019s authority or privity. ORDER 6 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (4) If an attorney whose name is indorsed on a writ declares in writing that the writ was not issued by that attorney or with that attorney\u2019s authority or privity, the Court may on the application of any defendant who has been served with or who has acknowledged service of the writ, stay all proceedings in the action begun by the writ. 6. Office copies of writs (O.6, r.6) 6. (1) One or more office copies of a writ may, at the request of the plaintiff, be issued at the time when the original writ is issued or at any time thereafter before the original writ ceases to be valid. (2) Without prejudice to the generality of paragraph (1) a writ for service within the jurisdiction may be issued as an office copy writ with one which is to be served out of the jurisdiction and a writ which is to be served out of the jurisdiction may be issued as an office copy writ with one for service within the jurisdiction. (3) An office copy of a writ is a true copy of the original writ with such differences only (if any) as are necessary having regard to the purpose for which the writ is issued and which has been sealed. 7. No rule (O.6, rr.7-7A) 7. No rule (O.6, rr.7-7A) 8. Duration and renewal of writ (O.6, r.8) 8. (1) For the purpose of service, a writ (other than an office copy of a writ) is valid in the first instance \u2014 (a) where leave to serve the writ out of the jurisdiction is required under Order 11, for 6 months; and (b) in any other case, for 4 months, beginning with the date of its issue and an office copy of a writ is valid in the first instance for the period of validity of the original writ which is unexpired at the date of issue of the office copy. (2) Subject to paragraph (3), where a writ has not been served on a defendant, the Court may by order extend the validity of the writ from time to time for such period, not exceeding 4 months at any one time, beginning with the day next following that on which it would otherwise expire, as may be specified in the order, if an application for extension is made to the Court before that day or such later day (if any) as the Court may allow. (3) Where the Court is satisfied on an application under paragraph (2) that, despite the making of all reasonable efforts, it may not be possible to serve the writ within 4 months, the Court may, if it thinks fit, extend the validity of the writ for such period, not exceeding 12 months, as the Court may specify. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 6 (4) Before a writ, the validity of which has been extended under this rule, is served, it must be marked with an official stamp showing the period for which the validity of the writ has been so extended. (5) Where the validity of a writ is extended by order made under this rule, the order shall operate in relation to any other writ (whether original or office copy) issued in the same action which has not been served so as to extend the validity of that other writ until the expiration of the period specified in the order. GCR 1995 (Revised) ORDER 7 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 7 ORIGINATING SUMMONSES: GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. Application (O.7, r.1) 1. The provisions of this Order apply to all originating summonses subject, in the case of originating summonses of any particular class, to any special provisions relating to originating summonses of that class made by these Rules or by or under any Law. 2. Form of summons, etc. (O.7, r.2) 2. (1) Every originating summons (other than an ex parte summons) shall be in Form No. 2 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) or, if so authorised or required, in Form No. 3 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) and every ex parte originating summons shall be in Form No. 4 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). (2)    The party taking out an originating summons (other than an ex parte summons) shall be described as a plaintiff, and the other parties shall be described as defendants. 3. Contents of summons (O.7, r.3) 3. (1) Every originating summons must include a statement of the questions on which the plaintiff seeks the determination or direction of the Court or, as the case may be, a concise statement of the relief or remedy claimed in the proceedings begun by the originating summons with sufficient particulars to identify the cause or causes of action in respect of which the plaintiff claims that relief or remedy. (2)   O.6, rr.3 and 5, shall apply in relation to an originating summons as they apply in relation to a writ. 4. Office copy of summons (O.7, r.4) 4. O.6, r.6, shall apply in relation to an originating summons as it applies in relation to a writ. 5. No rule (O.7, r.5) 5. No rule (O.7, r.5) 6. Duration and renewal of summons (O.7, r.6) 6. O.6, r.8, shall apply in relation to an originating summons as it applies in relation to a writ. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 7 7. Ex parte Originating Summonses (O.7, r.7) 7. Rules 2(1) and 3(1) shall, so far as applicable, apply to ex parte originating summonses; but, save as aforesaid, the foregoing Rules of this Order shall not apply to ex parte originating summonses. GCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 01.10.12) ORDER 8 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 8 ORIGINATING AND OTHER MOTIONS: GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. Application (O.8, r.1) 1. The provisions of this Order apply to all motions subject, in the case of originating motions of any particular class, to any special provisions relating to motions of that class made by these Rules or by or under any Law. 2. Notice of motion (O.8, r.2) 2. (1) Except where an application by motion may properly be made ex parte, no motion shall be made without previous notice to the parties affected thereby, but the Court, if satisfied that the delay caused by proceedings in the ordinary way would or might entail irreparable or serious mischief may make an order ex parte on such terms as to costs or otherwise, and subject to such undertaking, if any, as it thinks just; and any party affected by such order may apply to the Court to set it aside. (2) Unless the Court gives leave to the contrary, there must be at least 4 clear days between the service of notice of a motion and the day named in the notice for hearing the motion. (3) A day and time for the hearing of a motion shall be fixed by the Clerk of the Court at the time of its issue. 3. Form and issue of notice of motion (O.8, r.3) 3. (1) The notice of an originating motion must be in Form No. 6 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). When leave has been given under r.2(2) to serve short notice of motion, that fact must be stated in the notice. The notice of a motion must include a concise statement of the nature of the claim made or the relief or remedy required. (2) Order 6, rule 5, shall, with the necessary modifications, apply in relation to notice of an originating motion as it applies in relation to a writ. 4. Service of notice of motion with writ, etc. (O.8, r.4) 4. Notice of motion to be made in an action may be served by the plaintiff on the defendant with the writ of summons or originating summons or at any time after service of such writ or summons, whether or not the defendant has acknowledged service in the action. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 8 5. Adjournment of hearing (O.8, r.5) 5. The hearing of any motion may be adjourned from time to time on such terms, if any, as the Court thinks fit. GCR 1995 (Revised) ORDER 9 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 9 PETITIONS: GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. Application (O.9, r.1) 1. Rules 2 and 4 apply to petitions by which civil proceedings in the Court are begun, subject, in the case of petitions of any particular class, to any special provisions relating to petitions of that class made by these Rules or by or under any Law or any rules under any Law. 2. Contents of petition (O.9, r.2) 2. (1) Every petition (except an election petition) shall be in Form No. 7 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) and shall include a concise statement of the nature of the claim made or the relief or remedy required in the proceedings begun by the petition. (2) Every petition must include at the end thereof a statement of the names of the persons, if any, required to be served therewith or, if no person is required to be served, a statement to that effect. (3) O.6, r.5, shall, with the necessary modifications, apply in relation to a petition as it applies in relation to a writ. 3. No rule (O.9, r.3) 3. No rule (O.9, r.3) 4. Fixing time for hearing petition (O.9, r.4) 4. (1) A day and time for the hearing of a petition which is required to be heard shall be fixed by the Clerk of the Court at the time of its issue. (2) If a petition is required to be served on any person, it shall be indorsed with the hearing date or accompanied by a notice of hearing. (3) Unless the Court otherwise directs, a petition which is required to be served on any person must be served on the person not less than 14 days before the day fixed for the hearing of the petition. 5. Certain applications not to be made by petition (O.9, r.5) 5. No application in any cause or matter may be made by petition. GCR 1995 (Revised) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 10 ORDER 10 SERVICE OF ORIGINATING PROCESS: GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. General provisions (O.10, r.1) 1. (1) A writ must be served personally on each defendant by the plaintiff or the plaintiff\u2019s agent. (2) Where a defendant's attorney indorses on the writ a statement that that defendant's attorney accepts service of the writ on behalf of that defendant, the writ shall be deemed to have been duly served on that defendant and to have been so served on the date on which the indorsement was made. (3) Subject to O.12, r.7, where a writ is not duly served on a defendant but the defendant acknowledges service of it, the writ shall be deemed, unless the contrary is shown, to have been served on the defendant and to have been so served on the date on which the defendant acknowledges service. (4) Every copy of a writ for service on a defendant shall be sealed with the seal of the Court and shall be accompanied by a form of acknowledgment of service in Form No. 8 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) in which the title of the action and its number have been entered. (5) This rule shall have effect subject to the provision of any Law and these Rules and in particular to any Law which provides for the manner in which documents may be served on bodies corporate. 2. Service of writ on agent of overseas principal (O.10, r.2) 2. (1) Where the Court is satisfied on an ex parte application that \u2014 (a) a contract has been entered into within the jurisdiction with or through an agent who is either an individual residing in or carrying on business within the jurisdiction or a body corporate having a registered office or a place of business within the jurisdiction; and (b) the principal for whom the agent was acting was at the time the contract was entered into and is at the time of the application neither such an individual nor such a body corporate; and (c) at the time of the application either the agent's authority has not been determined or the agent is still in a business relationship with the agent's principal, the Court may authorise service of a writ beginning an action relating to the contract to be effected on the agent instead of the principal. ORDER 10 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (2) An order under this rule authorising service of a writ on a defendant's agent must limit a time within which the defendant must acknowledge service. (3) Where an order is made under this rule authorising service of a writ on a defendant's agent, a copy of the order and of the writ must be sent by post to the defendant at the defendant\u2019s address out of the jurisdiction. 3. Service of writ in pursuance of contract (O.10, r.3) 3. (1) Where  \u2014 (a) a contract contains a term to the effect that the Court shall have jurisdiction to hear and determine any action in respect of a contract or, apart from any such term, the Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine any such action; and (b) the contract provides that, in the event of any action in respect of the contract being begun, the process by which it is begun may be served on the defendant, or on such other person on the defendant\u2019s behalf as may be specified in the contract, in such manner, or at such place (whether within or out of the jurisdiction), as may be so specified, then, if an action in respect of the contract is begun in the Court and the writ by which it is begun is served in accordance with the contract, the writ shall, subject to paragraph (2) be deemed to have been duly served on the defendant. (2) A writ which is served out of the jurisdiction in accordance with a contract shall not be deemed to have been duly served on the defendant by virtue of paragraph (1) unless leave to serve the writ out of the jurisdiction has been granted under O.11. 4. Service of writ in certain actions for possession of land (O.10, r.4) 4. Where a writ is indorsed with a claim for the possession of land, the Court may, subject to the provisions of Section 153 of the Registered Land Act (as amended and revised) \u2014 (a) if satisfied on an ex parte application that no person appears to be in possession of the land and that service cannot be otherwise effected on any defendant, authorise service on that defendant to be effected by affixing a copy of the writ to some conspicuous part of the land; or (b) if satisfied on such an application that no person appears to be in possession of the land and that service could not otherwise have been effected on any defendant, order that service already effected by affixing a copy of the writ to some conspicuous part of the land shall be treated as good service on that defendant. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 10 5. Service of originating summons, notice of motion or petition (O.10, r.5) 5. (1) The foregoing rules of this Order shall apply, with any necessary modifications in relation to an originating summons (other than an ex parte originating summons, or an originating summons under O.113) as they apply in relation to a writ, except that an acknowledgment of service shall be in Form No. 9 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). (2) Paragraphs (1) and (2) of rule 1 shall apply, with any necessary modifications, in relation to a notice of an originating motion and a petition as they apply in relation to a writ. GCR 1995 (Revised) ORDER 11 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 11 SERVICE OF PROCESS, ETC. OUT OF THE JURISDICTION 1. Principal cases in which service of writ out of jurisdiction is permissible (O.11, r.1) 1. (1) Provided that the writ does not contain any claim mentioned in O.75, r.1(3), service of a writ out of the jurisdiction is permissible with the leave of the Court if in the action begun by the writ \u2014 (a) relief is sought against a person who \u2014 (i) has the right to reside permanently in the Islands; or (ii) has a right to work in the Islands; or (iii) is resident in and the nature and circumstances of the person\u2019s residence indicate that the person has a substantial connection with the Islands; (b) an injunction is sought ordering the defendant to do or refrain from doing anything within the jurisdiction (whether or not damages are also claimed in respect of a failure to do or the doing of that thing); (c) the claim is brought against a person who has been or will be duly served within or out of the jurisdiction and a person out of the jurisdiction is a necessary or proper party thereto; (d) the claim is brought to enforce, rescind, dissolve, annul or otherwise affect a contract, or to recover damages or obtain other relief in respect of the breach of a contract, being (in either case) a contract which \u2014 (i) was made within the jurisdiction; or (ii) was made by or through an agent trading or residing within the jurisdiction on behalf of a principal trading or residing out of the jurisdiction; or (iii) is by its terms, or by implication, governed by the law of the Islands; or (iv) contains a term to the effect that the Court shall have jurisdiction to hear and determine any action in respect of the contract; (e) the claim is brought in respect of a breach committed within the jurisdiction of a contract made within or out of the jurisdiction, and irrespective of the fact, if such be the case, that the breach was preceded or accompanied by a breach committed out of the jurisdiction that rendered impossible the performance of so much of the contract as ought to have been performed within the jurisdiction; Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 11 (f) the claim is founded on a tort, fraud or breach of duty whether statutory at law or in equity and the damage was sustained, or resulted from an act committed, within the jurisdiction; (ff) the claim is brought against a person who is or was a director, officer or member of a company registered within the jurisdiction or who is or was a partner of a partnership, whether general or limited, which is governed by the laws of the Islands and the subject matter of the claim relates in any way to such company or partnership or to the status, rights or duties of such director, officer, member or partner in relation thereto; (g) the whole subject-matter of the action is land situate within the jurisdiction (with or without rents or profits) or the perpetuation of testimony relating to land so situate; (h) the claim is brought to construe, rectify, set aside or enforce an act, deed, will, contract, obligation or liability affecting land situate within the jurisdiction; (i) the claim is made for a debt secured on immovable property or is made to assert, declare or determine proprietary or possessory rights, or rights of security, in or over movable property, or to obtain authority to dispose of movable property, situate within the jurisdiction; (j) the claim is brought for any relief or remedy in respect of any trust, whether express, implied or constructive, that is governed by or ought to be executed according to the laws of the Islands or in respect of the status, rights or duties of any trustee thereof in relation thereto; (k) the claim is made for the administration of the estate of a person who died domiciled within the jurisdiction or for any relief or remedy which might be obtained in any such action; (1) the claim is brought in a probate action within the meaning of O.76; or (m) the claim is brought to enforce any judgment or arbitral award (within the meaning of Section 2(1) of the Arbitration Act, 2012 [Law 3 of 2012]) or interim measure (within the meaning of Part VIII of the Arbitration Act, 2012[Law 3 of 2012]); or (n) the claim is brought for any relief or remedy pursuant to Section 11A of the  Grand Court Act (as amended and revised). (2) Service of a writ out of the jurisdiction is permissible without the leave of the Court if every claim made in the action begun by the writ is one which by virtue of a Law or these Rules the Court has power to hear and determine notwithstanding that the person against whom the claim is made is not within the jurisdiction of the Court or that the wrongful act, neglect or default giving rise to the claim did not take place within the jurisdiction, including, for the avoidance of doubt, applications made pursuant to Sections 48, 63, 64, 67, 68, 72, 103 or 104 of the Trusts Act (as amended and revised) or O.85. ORDER 11 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (3) Where a writ is to be served out of the jurisdiction pursuant to an order under paragraph (1), the time to be inserted in the writ within which the defendant served therewith must acknowledge service shall be such time as may be fixed by the Court. (4) Where a writ is to be served out of the jurisdiction under paragraph (2), the time to be inserted in the writ within which the defendant served therewith must acknowledge service shall be 28 days. 2. No rule (O.11, r.2) 2. No rule (O.11, r.2) 3. No rule (O.11, r.3) 3. No rule (O.11, r.3) 4. Application for, and grant of, leave to serve writ out of jurisdiction (O.11, r.4) 4. (1) An application for the grant of leave under rule 1(1) must be supported by an affidavit stating \u2014 (a) the grounds on which the application is made; (b) that in the deponent's belief the plaintiff has a good cause of action; (c) in what place or country the defendant is, or probably may be found; (d) where the application is made under rule 1(1)(c), the grounds for the deponent's belief that there is between the plaintiff and the person on whom a writ has been served a real issue which the plaintiff may reasonably ask the Court to try; and (e) if service is not to be effected personally the method or methods of service which are in accordance with the law of the country in which service is to be effected. (2) No such leave shall be granted unless it shall be made sufficiently to appear to the Court that the case is a proper one for service out of the jurisdiction under this Order. (3) An order granting leave to serve a writ out of the jurisdiction under rule 1 must limit a time within which the defendant to be served must acknowledge service. 5. Service of writ abroad; general (O.11, r.5) 5. (1) Subject to the following provisions of this rule, O.10, rr.1(1), (2), (3) and (4) and O.65, r.4, shall apply in relation to the service of a writ, notwithstanding that the writ is to be served out of the jurisdiction, save that the accompanying form of acknowledgment of service shall be modified in such manner as may be appropriate. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 11 (2) Nothing in this rule or in any order or direction of the Court made by virtue of it shall authorise or require the doing of anything in a country in which service is to be effected which is contrary to the law of that country. (3) A writ which is to be served out of the jurisdiction \u2014 (a) need not be served personally on the person required to be served so long as it is served on the person in accordance with the law of the country in which service is effected; and (b) need not be served by the plaintiff or the plaintiff\u2019s agent if it is served by a method provided for by rule 6 or rule 7. (4) An official certificate stating that a writ as regards which rule 6 has been complied with has been served on a person personally, or in accordance with the law of the country in which service was effected, on a specified date, being a certificate \u2014 (a) by a British consular authority in that country; or (b) the government or judicial authorities of that country; or (c) by any other authority designated in respect of that country under the Hague Convention, shall be evidence of the facts so stated. (5) An official certificate by the Secretary of State stating that a writ has been duly served on a specified date in accordance with a request made under rule 7 shall be evidence of that fact. (6) A document purporting to be such a certificate as is mentioned in paragraphs (4) and (5) shall, until the contrary is proved, be deemed to be such a certificate. (7) In this rule and rule 6 \\\"the Hague Convention\\\" means the convention on the service abroad of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters signed at the Hague on November 15, 1965. 6. Service of writ abroad through foreign governments, judicial authorities and British consuls (O.11, r.6) 6. (1) Save where a writ is to be served pursuant to paragraph (3), this rule does not apply to service in \u2014 (a)  the United Kingdom, including the Isle of Man and the Channel Islands; (b) any independent Commonwealth country; (c) any associated state; (d) any dependent territory of the United Kingdom; or (e) the Republic of Ireland. (2) Where in accordance with these Rules a writ is to be served on a defendant in any country with respect to which there subsists a Civil Procedure Convention ORDER 11 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (other than the Hague Convention) providing for service in that country of process of the Court, the writ may be served \u2014 (a) through the judicial authorities of that country; or (b) through a British consular authority in that country (subject to any provision of the convention as to the nationality of persons who may be so served). (3) Where in accordance with these Rules a writ is to be served on a defendant in any country which is party to the Hague Convention, the writ may be served \u2014 (a) through the authority designated under the Convention in respect of that country; or (b) if the law of that country permits \u2014 (i) through the judicial authorities of that country; or (ii) through a British consular authority in that country. (4) Where in accordance with these Rules a writ is to be served on a defendant in any country with respect to which there does not subsist a Civil Procedure Convention providing for service in that country of process of the Court, the writ may be served \u2014 (a) through the government of that country, where the government is willing to effect service; or (b) through a British consular authority in that country, except where service through such an authority is contrary to the law of that country. (5) A person who wishes to serve a writ by a method specified in paragraph (2), (3) or (4) must deliver to the Clerk of the Court a request for service of the writ by that method, together with a copy of the writ and an additional copy thereof for each person to be served. (6) Every copy of a writ delivered under paragraph (5) must be accompanied by a translation of the writ in the official language of the country in which service is to be effected or, if there is more than one official language of that country, in any one of those languages which is appropriate to the place in that country where service is to be effected: Provided that this paragraph shall not apply in relation to a copy of a writ which is to be served in a country the official language of which is, or the official languages of which include, English, or is to be served in any country by a British consular authority on a British subject, unless the service is to be effected under paragraph (2) and the Civil Procedure Convention with respect to that country expressly requires the copy to be accompanied by a translation. (7) Every translation delivered under paragraph (6) must be certified by the person making it to be a correct translation; and the certificate must contain a statement Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 11 of that person's full name, of that person\u2019s address and of that person\u2019s qualifications for making the translation. (8) Documents duly delivered under paragraph (5) shall be sent by the Clerk of the Court to the Governor with a request that the Governor forward them to the Secretary of State asking the Secretary of State to arrange for the writ to be served by the method indicated in the request delivered under paragraph (5) or, where alternative methods are so indicated, by such one of those methods as is most convenient. 7. Service of process on a foreign state (O.11, r.7) 7. (1) Subject to paragraph (4) where a person to whom leave has been granted under rule 1 to serve a writ on a State, as defined in Section 14 of the United Kingdom\u2019s State Immunity Act 1978, wishes to have the writ served on that State, the person must deliver with the Clerk of the Court \u2014 (a) a request for service to be arranged by the Secretary of State; (b) a copy of the writ; and (c) except where the official language of the State is, or the official languages of that State include, English, a translation of the writ in the official language or one of the official languages of the State. (2) Rule 6(7) shall apply in relation to a translation delivered under paragraph (1) of this rule as it applies in relation to a translation delivered under paragraph (6) of that rule. (3) Documents duly delivered under this rule shall be sent by the Clerk of the Court to the Governor with a request that the Secretary of State be asked to arrange for the writ to be served on the State or the government in question, as the case may be. (4) Where Section 12(6) of the United Kingdom\u2019s State Immunity Act 1978 applies and the State has agreed to a method of service other than that provided by the preceding paragraph, the writ may be served either by the method agreed or in accordance with the preceding paragraphs of this rule. 8. Undertaking to pay expenses of Governor (O.11, r.8) 8. Every request delivered under rule 6(5) or rule 7 must contain an undertaking by the person making the request to be responsible personally for all expenses incurred by the Governor in respect of the service requested including the expenses incurred by the Governor in making any request of the Secretary of State and, on receiving due notification of the amount of those expenses, to pay that amount to the Financial Secretary and to produce a receipt for such payment to the Clerk of the Court. ORDER 11 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 9. Service of originating summons, petition, notice of motion, etc. (O.11, r.9) 9. (1) Subject to O.73, r.8, and O.102, rr.16 and 1 of this Order shall apply to the service out of the jurisdiction of an originating summons, notice of motion or petition as it applies to the service of a writ. (2) Service out of the jurisdiction of any summons, notice or order issued, given or made in any proceedings is permissible with the leave of the Court, but leave shall not be required for such service in any proceedings in which the writ, originating summons, motion or petition may by these Rules or under any Law be served without leave. (3) Rule 4(1) and (2) shall, so far as applicable, apply in relation to an application for the grant of leave under this rule as they apply in relation to an application for the grant of leave under rule 1. (4) An order under this rule granting leave to serve an originating summons out of the jurisdiction must limit a time within which the defendant to be served with the summons must acknowledge service. (5) Rules 5, 6 and 8 shall apply in relation to any document in respect of which leave to serve out of the jurisdiction has been granted under this rule as they apply in relation to a writ. GCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 01.06.11) (amended 01.10.12) (amended 01.07.13) (amended 12.12.14) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 12 ORDER 12 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE TO WRIT OR ORIGINATING SUMMONS 1. Mode of acknowledging service (O.12, r.1) 1. (1) Subject to paragraph (2) and to O.80, r.2, a defendant to an action begun by writ may (whether or not the defendant is sued as a trustee or personal representative or in any other representative capacity) acknowledge service of the writ and defend the action by an attorney or in person. (2) The defendant to such an action who is a body corporate may acknowledge service of the writ and give notice of intention to defend the action either by an attorney or by a person duly authorised to act on the defendant's behalf but, except as aforesaid or as expressly provided by any Law, such a defendant may not take steps in the action otherwise than by an attorney. (3) Service of a writ may be acknowledged by properly completing an acknowledgment of service, as defined by rule 2, and handing it in at the Court office, or sending it by post to the Clerk of the Court. (4) If two or more defendants to an action acknowledge service by the same attorney and at the same time, only one acknowledgment of service need be completed and delivered for those defendants. (5) The date on which service is acknowledged is the date on which the acknowledgment of service is received by the Clerk of the Court. 2. No rule (O.12, r.2) 2. No rule (O.12, r.2) 3. Acknowledgment of service (O.12, r.3) 3. (1) An acknowledgment of service shall be in Form No. 8 or Form No. 9 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised), whichever is appropriate, and except as provided in rule 1(2) must be signed by the attorney acting for the defendant specified in the acknowledgment or, if the defendant is acting in person, by that defendant. (2) An acknowledgment of service must specify \u2014 (a) in the case of a defendant acknowledging service in person, the address of the defendant\u2019s place of residence and, if the defendant\u2019s place of residence is not within the jurisdiction or if the defendant has no place of residence, the address of a place within the jurisdiction at or to which documents for the defendant may be delivered or sent; and ORDER 12 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (b) in the case of a defendant acknowledging service by an attorney a business address of the defendant\u2019s attorney within the jurisdiction, and where the defendant acknowledges service in person, the address within the jurisdiction specified under subparagraph (a) shall be the defendant\u2019s address for service, but otherwise the business address of the defendant\u2019s attorney shall be the defendant\u2019s address for service. In relation to a body corporate the references in subparagraph (a) to the defendant's place of residence shall be construed as references to the defendant's registered office. (3) If an acknowledgment of service does not specify the defendant's address for service or the Court is satisfied that any address specified in the acknowledgment of service is not genuine, the Court may on application by the plaintiff set aside the acknowledgment or order the defendant to give an address or, as the case may be, a genuine address for service and may in any case direct that the acknowledgment shall nevertheless have effect for the purposes of O.10, r.1(3) and O.65, r.9. 4. Procedure on receipt of acknowledgment of service (O.12, r.4) 4. On receiving an acknowledgment of service the Clerk of the Court must \u2014 (a) affix to the acknowledgment an official stamp showing the date on which the Clerk of the Court received it; (b) file the acknowledgment of service on the Court file; and (c) make a copy of the acknowledgment, having affixed to it an official stamp showing the date on which the Clerk of the Court received the acknowledgment and send it to the plaintiff or, as the case may be, the plaintiff\u2019s attorney at the plaintiff's address for service. 5. Time limited for acknowledging service (O.12, r.5) 5. References in these Rules to the time limited for acknowledging service are references \u2014 (a) in the case of a writ served within the jurisdiction, to 14 days after service of the writ (including the day of service) or, where that time has been extended by or by virtue of these Rules, to that time as so extended; and (b) in the case of a writ served out of the jurisdiction, to the time limited under O.10, r.2(2), O.11, r.1(3) or O.11, r.4(3) or, where that time has been extended as aforesaid, to that time as so extended. 6. Late acknowledgment of service (O.12, r.6) 6. (1) Except with the leave of the Court, a defendant may not give notice of intention to defend in an action after judgment has been obtained therein. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 12 (2) Except as provided by paragraph (1) nothing in these Rules or any writ or order thereunder shall be construed as precluding a defendant from acknowledging service in an action after the time limited for so doing, but if a defendant acknowledges service after that time, the defendant shall not, unless the Court otherwise orders, be entitled to serve a defence or do any other act later than if the defendant had acknowledged service within that time. 7. Acknowledgment not to constitute waiver (O.12, r.7) 7. The acknowledgment by a defendant of service of a writ shall not be treated as a waiver by the defendant of any irregularity in the writ or service thereof or in any order giving leave to serve the writ out of the jurisdiction or extending the validity of the writ for the purpose of service. 8. Dispute as to jurisdiction (O.12, r.8) 8. (1) A defendant who wishes to dispute the jurisdiction of the Court in the proceedings by reason of any such irregularity as is mentioned in rule 7 or on any other ground shall give notice of intention to defend the proceedings and shall within the time limited for service of a defence, apply to the Court for \u2014 (a) an order setting aside the writ or service of the writ on the defendant; (b) an order declaring that the writ has not been duly served on the defendant; (c) the discharge of any order giving leave to serve the writ on the defendant out of the jurisdiction; (d) the discharge of any order extending the validity of the writ for the purpose of service; (e) the protection or release of any property of the defendant seized or threatened with seizure, in the proceedings; (f) the discharge of any order made to prevent any dealing with any property of the defendant; (g) a declaration that in the circumstances of the case the Court has no jurisdiction over the defendant in respect of the subject matter of the claim or the relief or remedy sought in the action; or (h) such other relief as may be appropriate. (2) An application under paragraph (1) must be made \u2014 (a) in an admiralty action in rem, by motion; or (b) in any other action, by summons or motion, and the summons or notice of motion must state the grounds of the application. (3) An application under paragraph (1) must be supported by an affidavit verifying the facts on which the application is based and a copy of the affidavit must be served with the notice of motion or summons by which the application is made. ORDER 12 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (4) Upon hearing an application under paragraph (1) the Court, if it does not dispose of the matter in dispute, may give such directions for its disposal as may be appropriate, including directions for the trial thereof as a preliminary issue. (5) A defendant who makes an application under paragraph (1) shall not be treated as having submitted to the jurisdiction of the Court by reason of the defendant\u2019s having given notice of intention to defend the action; and if the Court makes no order on the application or dismisses it, the notice shall cease to have effect, but the defendant may, subject to rule 6(1), file a further acknowledgment of service within 14 days or such other period as the Court may direct and in that case paragraph (6) shall apply as if the defendant had not made any such application. (6) Except where the defendant makes an application in accordance with paragraph (1) the acknowledgment by a defendant of service of a writ shall, unless the acknowledgment is withdrawn by leave of the Court under O.21, r.1, be treated as a submission by the defendant to the jurisdiction of the Court in the proceedings. 8A. Application by defendant where writ not served (O.12, r.8A) 8A. (1) Any person named as a defendant in a writ which has not been served on the person may serve on the plaintiff a notice requiring the plaintiff within a specified period not less than 14 days after service of the notice either to serve the writ on the defendant or to discontinue the action as against the person. (2) Where the plaintiff fails to comply with a notice under paragraph (1) within the time specified the Court may, on the application of the defendant by summons, order the action to be dismissed or make such other order as it thinks fit. (3) A summons under paragraph (2) shall be supported by an affidavit verifying the facts on which the application is based and stating that the defendant intends to contest the proceedings and a copy of the affidavit must be served with the summons. (4) Where the plaintiff serves the writ in compliance with a notice under paragraph (1) or with an order under paragraph (2) the defendant must acknowledge service within the time limited for so doing. 9. Acknowledgment of service of originating summons (O.12, r.9) 9. (1) Each defendant named in and served with an originating summons (other than an ex parte originating summons) must acknowledge service as if it were a writ. (2) The foregoing rules of this Order shall apply in relation to an originating summons (other than an ex parte summons) as they apply to a writ except that after the word \\\"extended\\\", wherever it occurs in rule 5(a) there shall be inserted the words \\\"or abridged\\\" and for the reference in rule 5(b) to O.11, r.1(3) and 4(3) there shall be substituted a reference to O.11, r.9(4). Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 12 10. Acknowledgment of service to be treated as entry of appearance (O.12, r.10) 10. For the purpose of any Law referring expressly or impliedly to the entry of appearance as a procedure provided by rules of Court for responding to a writ or other process issuing out of the Court, or of any rule of law, the acknowledgment of service of the writ or other process in accordance with these Rules shall be treated as the entry of an appearance to it, and related expressions shall be construed accordingly. GCR 1995 (Revised) ORDER 13 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 13 FAILURE TO GIVE NOTICE OF INTENTION TO DEFEND 1. Claim for liquidated demand (O.13, r.1) 1. (1) Where a writ is indorsed with a claim against a defendant for a liquidated demand only, then, if that defendant fails to give notice of intention to defend, the plaintiff may, after the prescribed time enter final judgment against that defendant for a sum not exceeding \u2014 (a) the principal sum claimed in the writ; (b) interest, provided that the writ has been indorsed with a claim pursuant to O.6, r.2(e) or (f), as the case may be; and (c) fixed costs, and proceed with the action against the other defendants, if any. (2) A claim shall not be prevented from being treated for the purposes of this rule as a claim for a liquidated demand by reason only that part of the claim is for interest under Section 34 of the Judicature Act (as amended and revised). 2. Claim for unliquidated damages (O.13, r.2) 2. Where a writ is indorsed with a claim against a defendant for unliquidated damages only, then, if that defendant fails to give notice of intention of defend, the plaintiff may, after the prescribed time, enter interlocutory judgment against that defendant for damages to be assessed and costs, and proceed with the action against the other defendants, if any. 3. Claim in detinue (O.13, r.3) 3. Where a writ is indorsed with a claim against a defendant relating to the detention of goods only, then, if that defendant fails to give notice of intention to defend the plaintiff may, after the prescribed time, at the plaintiff\u2019s option enter either \u2014 (a) interlocutory judgment against the defendant for delivery of the goods or their value to be assessed and costs; or (b) interlocutory judgment for the value of the goods to be assessed and costs, and proceed with the action against the other defendants, if any. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 13 4. Claim for possession of land (O.13, r.4) 4. (1) Where a writ is indorsed with a claim against a defendant for possession of land only, then, if that defendant fails to give notice of intention to defend the plaintiff may, after the prescribed time enter judgment for possession of the land as against that defendant and costs, and proceed with the action against the other defendants, if any. (2) Where there is more than one defendant, judgment entered under this rule shall not be enforced against any defendant unless and until judgment for possession of the land has been entered against all the defendants. 5. Mixed claims (O.13, r.5) 5. Where a writ issued against any defendant is indorsed with two or more of the claims mentioned in the foregoing rules, and no other claim, then, if that defendant fails to give notice of intention to defend, the plaintiff may, after the prescribed time, enter against that defendant such judgment in respect of any such claim as the plaintiff would be entitled to enter under those rules if that were the only claim indorsed on the writ, and proceed with the action against the other defendants, if any. 6. Other claims (O.13, r.6) 6. (1) Where a writ is indorsed with a claim of a description not mentioned in rules 1 to 4 then, if any defendant fails to give notice of intention to defend, the plaintiff may, after the prescribed time and, if that defendant has not acknowledged service, upon filing an affidavit proving due service of the writ on the defendant and, where the statement of claim was not indorsed on or served with the writ, upon serving a statement of claim on the defendant, proceed with the action as if that defendant had given notice of intention to defend. (2) Where a writ issued against a defendant is indorsed as aforesaid, but by reason of the defendant's satisfying the claim or complying with the demands thereof or any other like reason it has become unnecessary for the plaintiff to proceed with the action, then, if the defendant fails to give notice of intention to defend, the plaintiff may, after the prescribed time, enter judgment with the leave of the Court against that defendant for costs. (3) An application for leave to enter judgment under paragraph (2) shall be by summons which must, unless the Court otherwise orders, and notwithstanding anything in O.65, r.9, be served on the defendant against whom it is sought to enter judgment. 6A. Prescribed time (O.13, r.6A) 6A. In the foregoing rules of this Order \\\"the prescribed time\\\" in relation to a writ issued against a defendant means the time limited for the defendant to acknowledge service of the writ or, if within that time the defendant has returned to the Clerk of the Court an acknowledgement of service containing a statement to the effect that the defendant ORDER 13 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) does not intend to contest the proceedings, the date on which the acknowledgement was received by the Clerk of the Court. 7. Proof of service of writ (O.13, r.7) 7. (1) Judgment shall not be entered against a defendant under this Order unless \u2014 (a) the defendant has acknowledged service on the defendant of the writ; or (b) an affidavit is filed by or on behalf of the plaintiff proving due service of the writ on the defendant; or (c) the Bailiff has indorsed on a copy of the writ that the Bailiff has served it on the defendant; or (d) the plaintiff produces the writ indorsed by the defendant's attorney with a statement that the defendant's attorney accepts service of the writ on the defendant's behalf. (2) Where, in an action begun by writ, an application is made to the Court for an order affecting a party who has failed to acknowledge service, the Court hearing the application may require to be satisfied in such manner as it thinks fit that the party is in default of acknowledgment of service. 7A. Judgment against a State (O.13, r.7A) 7A. (1) In this rule \\\"the Act\\\" means the United Kingdom\u2019s State Immunity Act 1978. (2) Where the defendant is a State, as defined in Section 14 of the Act the plaintiff shall not be entitled to enter judgment under this Order except with the leave of the Court. (3) An application for leave to enter judgment shall be supported by an affidavit \u2014 (a) stating the grounds of the application; (b) verifying the facts relied on as exempting the State from the immunity conferred by Section 1 of the Act; and (c) verifying that the writ has been served by being transmitted through the Secretary of State to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the State or in such other manner as may have been agreed to by the State, and that the time for acknowledging service, as extended by Section 12(2) of the Act (by 2 months) where applicable, has expired. (4) The application may be made ex parte but the Court hearing the application may direct a summons to be issued and served on the State, for which purpose such a direction shall include leave to serve the summons and a copy of the affidavit out of the jurisdiction. (5) Unless the Court otherwise directs, an affidavit for the purpose of this rule may contain statements of information or belief with the sources and grounds thereof, and the grant of leave to enter judgment under this Order shall include leave to serve out of the jurisdiction \u2014 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 13 (a) a copy of the judgment; and (b) a copy of the affidavit, where not already served. (6) The procedure of effecting service out of the jurisdiction pursuant to leave granted in accordance with the rule shall be the same as for the service of the writ under O.11, r.7(1) except where Section 12(6) of the Act applies and an alternative method of service has been agreed. 7B. No rule (O.13, r.7B) 7B. No rule (O.13, r.7B) 8. Stay of execution on default judgment (O.13, r.8) 8. Where judgment for a debt or liquidated demand is entered under this Order against a defendant who has returned to the Clerk of the Court an acknowledgment of service containing a statement to the effect that, although the defendant does not intend to contest the proceedings, the defendant intends to apply for a stay of execution of the judgment by writ of fieri facias, execution of the judgment by such a writ shall be stayed for a period of 14 days from the acknowledgment of service and, if within that time the defendant issues and serves on the plaintiff a summons for such a stay supported by an affidavit in accordance with O.47, r.1, the stay imposed by this rule shall continue until the summons is heard or otherwise disposed of, unless the Court after giving the parties an opportunity of being heard otherwise directs. 9. Setting aside judgment (O.13, r.9) 9. The Court may, on such terms as it thinks just, set aside or vary any judgment entered in pursuance of this Order. GCR 1995 (Revised) ORDER 14 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 14 SUMMARY JUDGMENT I. APPLICATION BY PLAINTIFF 1. Application by plaintiff for summary judgment (O.14, r.1) 1. (1) Where in an action to which this rule applies a statement of claim has been served on a defendant and that defendant has given notice of intention to defend the action, the plaintiff may, on the ground that the defendant has no defence to a claim included in the writ, or to a particular part of such a claim, or has no defence to such a claim or part except as to the amount of any damages claimed, apply to the Court for judgment against the defendant. (2) This rule applies to every action begun by writ in the Court other than \u2014 (a) an action which includes a claim by the plaintiff for libel, slander, malicious prosecution or false imprisonment; (b) an admiralty action in rem; or (c) an action to which Order 86 applies. 2. Manner in which application under rule 1 must be made (O.14, r.2) 2. (1) An application under rule 1 must be made by summons supported by an affidavit verifying the facts on which the claim, or the part of the claim, to which the application relates is based and stating that in the deponent's belief there is no defence to that claim or part, as the case may be, or no defence except as to the amount of any damages claimed. (2) Unless the Court otherwise directs, an affidavit for the purpose of this rule may contain statements of information or belief with the sources and grounds thereof. (3) The summons, a copy of the affidavit in support and of any exhibits referred to therein must be served on the defendant not less than 10 clear days before the return day. 3. Judgment for plaintiff (O.14, r.3) 3. (1) Unless on the hearing of an application under rule 1 either the Court dismisses the application or the defendant satisfies the Court with respect to the claim, or that part of the claim, to which the application relates that there is an issue or question in dispute which ought to be tried, the Court may give such judgment for the plaintiff against that defendant on that claim or part as may be just having regard to the nature of the remedy or relief claimed. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 14 (2) The Court may by order, and subject to such conditions, if any, as may be just, stay execution of any judgment given against a defendant under this rule until after the trial of any counterclaim made or raised by the defendant in the action. 4. Leave to defend (O.14, r.4) 4. (1) A defendant may show cause against an application under rule 1 by affidavit or otherwise to the satisfaction of the Court. (2) Rule 2(2) applies for the purpose of this rule as it applies for the purposes of that rule. (3) The Court may give a defendant against whom such an application is made leave to defend the action with respect to the claim, or the part of a claim, to which the application relates either unconditionally or on such terms as to giving security or time or mode of trial or otherwise as it thinks fit. (4) On the hearing of such an application the Court may order a defendant showing cause or, where that defendant is a body corporate, any director, manager, secretary or other similar officer thereof, or any person purporting to act in any such capacity \u2014 (a) to produce any document; (b) if it appears to the Court that there are special circumstances which make it desirable that the defendant should do so, to attend and be examined on oath. 5. Application for summary judgment on counterclaim (O.14, r.5) 5. (1) Where a defendant to an action begun by writ has served a counterclaim on the plaintiff, then, subject to paragraph (3) the defendant may, on the ground that the plaintiff has no defence to a claim made in the counterclaim, or to a particular part of such a claim, apply to the Court for judgment against the plaintiff on that claim or part. (2) Rules 2, 3 and 4 shall apply in relation to an application under this rule as they apply in relation to an application under rule 1 but with the following modifications, that is to say \u2014 (a) references to the plaintiff and defendant shall be construed as references to the defendant and plaintiff respectively; (b)  the words in rule 3(2) \\\"any counterclaim made or raised by the defendant in\\\" shall be omitted; and (c) the reference in rule 4(3) to the action shall be construed as a reference to the counterclaim to which the application under this rule relates. (3) This rule shall not apply to a counterclaim which includes any such claim as is referred to in rule 1(2). ORDER 14 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 6. Directions (O.14, r.6) 6. Where the Court \u2014 (a) orders that a defendant or a plaintiff have leave (whether conditional or unconditional) to defend an action or counterclaim, as the case may be, with respect to a claim or a part of a claim; or (b) gives judgment for a plaintiff or a defendant on a claim or part of a claim but also orders that execution of the judgment be stayed pending the trial of a counterclaim or of the action, as the case may be, the Court shall give directions as to the further conduct of the action and O.25, rr.2 to 7 shall, with the omission of so much of rule 7(1) as requires parties to serve a notice specifying the orders and directions which they require and with any other necessary modifications, apply as if the application under rule 1 of this Order or rule 5, as the case may be, on which the order was made were a summons for directions. 7. Costs (O.14, r.7) 7. (1) If the plaintiff makes an application under rule 1 where the case is not within this Order or if it appears to the Court that the plaintiff knew that the defendant relied on a contention which would entitle the defendant to unconditional leave to defend, then, the Court may dismiss the application with costs and may, if the plaintiff is not a legally aided person, require the costs to be paid by the plaintiff forthwith. (2) The Court shall have the same power to dismiss an application under rule 5 as it has under paragraph (1) to dismiss an application under rule 1, and that paragraph shall apply accordingly with the necessary modifications. 8. Right to proceed with residue of action or counterclaim (O.14, r.8) 8. (1) Where on an application under rule 1 the plaintiff obtains judgment on a claim or a part of a claim against any defendant, the plaintiff may proceed with the action as respects any other claim or as respects the remainder of the claim or against any other defendant. (2) Where on an application under rule 5 a defendant obtains judgment on a claim or part of a claim made in a counterclaim against the plaintiff, the defendant may proceed with the counterclaim as respects any other claim or as respects the remainder of the claim or against any other defendant to the counterclaim. (3) Where on an application under rule 12A a defendant to counterclaim obtains judgment on a counterclaim or part of a counterclaim against any defendant, the defendant may proceed with the counterclaim as respects any other counterclaim or as respects the remainder of the counterclaim or against any other defendant to counterclaim. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 14 9. Judgment for delivery up of chattel (O.14, r.9) 9. Where the claim to which an application under rule 1 or rule 5 relates is for the delivery of a specific chattel and the Court gives judgment under this Order for the applicant, it shall have the same power to order the party against whom judgment is given to deliver up the chattel without giving the party an option to retain it on paying the assessed value thereof as if the judgment had been given after trial. 10. Relief against forfeiture (O.14, r.10) 10. A tenant shall have the same right to apply for relief after judgment for possession of land on the ground of forfeiture for non-payment of rent has been given under this Order as if the judgment had been given after trial. 11. Setting aside judgment (O.14, r.11) 11. Any judgment given against a party who does not appear at the hearing of an application under rule 1 or rule 5 may be set aside or varied by the Court on such terms as it thinks just. II. APPLICATION BY DEFENDANT AND BY DEFENDANT TO COUNTERCLAIM 12. Application by defendant for summary judgment (O.14, r.12) 12. (1) Where in an action to which this rule applies a defence has been served by any defendant, that defendant may, on the ground that the whole or part of the plaintiff\u2019s claim has no prospect of success or, in respect of a claim for damages, that the plaintiff has no prospect of recovering more than nominal damages, apply to the Court for the plaintiff\u2019s claim to be dismissed and judgment entered for the defendant on the whole or part of the claim. (2) This rule applies to every action begun by writ in the Court other than one of a kind mentioned in rule 1(2). 12A. Application by defendant to counterclaim for summary judgment (0.14, r.12A) 12A. (1) Where in an action to which this rule applies a counterclaim has been served by any defendant then, subject to paragraph (2) the defendant to counterclaim may, on the ground that the whole or part of the defendant's counterclaim has no prospect of success or, in respect of a counterclaim for damages, that the defendant has no prospect of recovering more than nominal damages, apply to the Court for the defendant's counterclaim to be dismissed and judgment entered for the defendant to counterclaim on the whole or part of the counterclaim. (2)  This rule applies to every action begun by writ other than \u2013 (a)  an action which includes a counterclaim by the defendant for libel, slander, malicious prosecution or false imprisonment; ORDER 14 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (b)  an admiralty action which includes a counterclaim by the defendant in rem; or (c)  an action which includes a counterclaim to which O.86 applies. 13. Manner in which application under rule 12 must be made (O.14, r.13) 13. (1) An application under rule 12 must be made by summons supported by an affidavit verifying the facts pleaded in the defence and stating the deponent's belief that the plaintiff\u2019s claim has no prospect of success or, in respect of a claim for damages, that the plaintiff has no prospect of recovering more than nominal damages, as the case may be. (1A) An application under rule 12A must be made by summons supported by an affidavit verifying the facts pleaded in the defence to counterclaim and stating the deponent's belief that the defendant's counterclaim has no prospect of success or, in respect of a counter claim for damages, the defendant has no prospect of recovering more than nominal damages, as the case may be. (2) Rule 2(2) shall apply to applications under rule 12 or rule 12A. (3) A plaintiff may show cause against an application under rule 12 by \u2014 (a) filing and serving a reply; or (b) filing and serving an affidavit in reply. (4)  A defendant may show cause against an application under rule 12A by filing and serving an affidavit in reply. 14. Judgment for defendant (O.14, r.14) 14. (1) Unless on the hearing of an application under rule 12 or rule 12A \u2014 (a)  the Court dismisses the application or (b)  on an application under rule 12 the plaintiff satisfies the Court that the plaintiff has a prospect of succeeding on the whole or part of the plaintiff\u2019s claim and, where the claim includes a claim for damages, that the plaintiff has a prospect of recovering more than nominal damages, or (c)  on an application under rule 12A the defendant satisfies the Court that the defendant has a prospect of succeeding on the whole or part of the defendant\u2019s counterclaim and, where the counterclaim includes a claim for damages, that the defendant has a prospect of recovering more than nominal damages, the Court may dismiss the whole or part of a claim or counterclaim and give judgment for the defendant or defendant to counterclaim respectively. (2) Where the Court dismisses an application under rule 12 or rule 12A and allows the plaintiff to proceed with the plaintiff\u2019s claim or the defendant to proceed with the defendant\u2019s counterclaim as the case may be, it shall give directions as to the further conduct of the action and O.25, rr.2 to 7 shall, with the omission Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 14 of so much of rule 7(1) as requires parties to serve a notice specifying the orders and directions which they require and with any other necessary modifications, apply as if the application under rule 12 or 12A, as the case may be, on which the order was made were a summons for directions. GCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 31.10.08) (amended 01.06.11) ORDER 14A Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 14A DISPOSAL OF CASE ON POINT OF LAW 1. Determination of questions of law or construction (O.14A, r.1) 1. (1) The Court may, upon the application of a party or of its own motion, determine any question of law or construction of any document arising in any cause or matter at any stage of the proceedings where it appears to the Court that \u2014 (a) such question is suitable for determination without a full trial of the action; and (b) such determination will finally determine (subject only to any possible appeal) the entire cause or matter or any claim or issue therein. (2) Upon such determination the Court may dismiss the cause or matter or make such order or judgment as it thinks just. (3) The Court shall not determine any question under this Order unless the parties have either \u2014 (a) had an opportunity of being heard on the question; or (b) consented to an order or judgment on such determination. (4) Nothing in this Order shall limit the powers of this Court under O.18, r.19 or any other provision of these Rules. 2. Manner in which application under rule 1 may be made (O.14A, r.2) 2. An application under rule 1 may be made by summons or motion or (notwithstanding O.32, r.1) may be made orally in the course of an interlocutory application to the Court. GCR 1995 (Revised) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 15 ORDER 15 CAUSES OF ACTION, COUNTERCLAIMS AND PARTIES 1. Joinder of causes of action (O.15, r.1) 1. (1) Subject to rule 5(1), a plaintiff may in one action claim relief against the same defendant in respect of more than one cause of action \u2014 (a) if the plaintiff claims, and the defendant is alleged to be liable, in the same capacity in respect of all the causes of action; or (b) if the plaintiff claims or the defendant is alleged to be liable in the capacity of executor or administrator of an estate in respect of one or more of the causes of action and in the defendant\u2019s personal capacity but with reference to the same estate in respect of all the others; or (c) with leave of the Court. (2) An application for leave under this rule must be made ex parte by affidavit before the issue of the writ or originating summons, as the case may be, and the affidavit must state the grounds of the application. 2. Counterclaim against plaintiff (O.15, r.2) 2. (1) Subject to rule 5(2), a defendant in any action who alleges that the defendant has any claim or is entitled to any relief or remedy against a plaintiff in the action in respect of any matter (whenever and however arising) may, instead of bringing a separate action, make a counterclaim in respect of that matter, and where the defendant does so the defendant must add the counterclaim to the defendant\u2019s defence. (2) Rule 1 shall apply in relation to a counterclaim as if the counterclaim were a separate action and as if the person making the counterclaim were the plaintiff and the person against whom it is made a defendant. (3) A counterclaim may be proceeded with notwithstanding that judgment is given for the plaintiff in the action or that the action is stayed, discontinued or dismissed. (4) Where a defendant establishes a counterclaim against the claim of the plaintiff and there is a balance in favour of one of the parties, the Court may give judgment for the balance, so, however, that the provision shall not be taken as affecting the Court's discretion with respect to costs. ORDER 15 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 3. Counterclaim against additional parties (O.15, r.3) 3. (1) Where a defendant to an action who makes a counterclaim against the plaintiff alleges that any other person (whether or not a party to the action) is liable to the defendant along with the plaintiff in respect of the subject matter of the counterclaim, or claims against such other person any relief relating to or connected with the original subject matter of the action, then, subject to rule 5(2) the defendant may join that other person as a party against whom the counterclaim is made. (2) Where a defendant joins a person as a party against whom the defendant makes a counterclaim, the defendant must add that person's name to the title of the action and serve on that person a copy of the counterclaim and, in the case of a person who is not already a party to the action, a form of acknowledgment of service in form No. 8 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) with such modification as the circumstances may require; and a person on whom a copy of a counterclaim is served under this paragraph shall, if the person is not already a party to the action, become a party to it as from the time of service with the same rights in respect of the person\u2019s defence to the counterclaim and otherwise as if the person had been duly sued in the ordinary way by the party making the counterclaim. (3) A defendant who is required by paragraph (2) to serve a copy of the counterclaim made by the defendant on any person who before service is already a party to the action must do so within the period within which, by virtue or O.18, r.2, the defendant must serve on the plaintiff the defence to which the counterclaim is added. (4) [No rule] (5) Where by virtue of paragraph (2) a copy of a counterclaim is required to be served on a person who is not already a party to the action, the following provision of these Rules, namely, O.5, r.1, Orders.10 to 13 and O.75, r.4, shall, subject to the last foregoing paragraph, apply in relation to the counterclaim and the proceedings arising from it as if \u2014 (a) the counterclaim were a writ and the proceedings arising from it an action; and (b) the party making the counterclaim were a plaintiff and the party against whom it is made a defendant in that action. (5A)  Where by virtue of paragraph (2) a copy of a counterclaim is required to be served on any person other than the plaintiff who, before service is already a party to the action, the provisions of O.14, r.5, shall apply in relation to the counterclaim and the proceedings arising therefrom, as if the party against whom the counterclaim is made were the plaintiff in the action. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 15 (6) A copy of a counterclaim required to be served on a person who is not already a party to the action must be indorsed with a notice in Form No. 10 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) addressed to that person. 4. Joinder of parties (O.15, r.4) 4. (1) Subject to rule 5(1) two or more persons may be joined together in one action as plaintiffs or as defendants with the leave of the Court or where \u2014 (a) if separate actions were brought by or against each of them, as the case may be, some common question of law or fact would arise in all the actions; and (b) all rights to relief claimed in the action (whether they are joint, several or alternative) are in respect of or arise out of the same transaction or series of transactions. (2) Where the plaintiff in any action claims any relief to which any other person is entitled jointly with the plaintiff, all persons so entitled must, subject to the provisions of any Law and unless the Court gives leave to the contrary, be parties to the action and any of them who do not consent to being joined as a plaintiff must, subject to any order made by the Court on an application for leave under this paragraph, be made a defendant. This paragraph shall not apply to a probate action. 5. Court may order separate trials, etc. (O.15, r.5) 5. (1) If claims in respect of two or more causes of action are included by a plaintiff in the same action or by a defendant in a counterclaim, or if two or more plaintiffs or defendants are parties to the same action, and it appears to the Court that the joinder of causes of action or of parties, as the case may be, may embarrass or delay the trial or is otherwise inconvenient, the Court may order separate trials or make such other order as may be expedient. (2) If it appears on the application of any party against who a counterclaim is made that the subject matter of the counterclaim ought for any reason be disposed of by a separate action, the Court may order the counterclaim to be struck out or may order it to be tried separately or may make such other order as may be expedient. 6. Misjoinder and nonjoinder of parties (O.15, r.6) 6. (1) No cause or matter shall be defeated by reason of the misjoinder or nonjoinder of any party; and the Court may in any cause or matter determine the issues or questions in dispute so far as they affect the rights and interest of the persons who are parties to the cause or matter. ORDER 15 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (2) Subject to the provisions of this rule, at any stage of the proceedings in any cause or matter the Court may on such terms as it thinks just and either of its own motion or on application \u2014 (a) order any person who has been improperly or unnecessarily made a party or who has for any reason ceased to be a proper or necessary party, to cease to be a party; (b) order any of the following persons to be added as a party, namely \u2014 (i) any person who ought to have been joined as a party or whose presence before the Court is necessary to ensure that all matters in dispute in the cause or matter may be effectually and completely determined and adjudicated upon; or (ii) any person between whom and any party to the cause or matter there may exist a question or issue arising out of or relating to or connected with any relief or remedy claimed in the cause or matter which in the opinion of the Court it would be just and convenient to determine as between the person and that party as well as between the parties to the cause or matter. (3) An application by any person for an order under paragraph (2) adding the person as a party must, except with the leave of the Court, be supported by an affidavit showing the person\u2019s interest in the matters in dispute in the cause or matter or, as the case may be, the question or issue to be determined as between the person and any party to the cause or matter. (4) No person shall be added as a plaintiff without the person\u2019s consent signified in writing or in such other manner as may be authorised. (5) No person shall be added or substituted as a party after the expiry of any relevant statutory period of limitation unless either \u2014 (a) the relevant period was current at the date when proceedings were commenced and it is necessary for the determination of the action that the new party should be added, or substituted; or (b) the relevant period arises under the provisions of Section 13 or 16 of the Limitation Act (as amended and revised) and the Court directs that those provisions should not apply to the action by or against the new party. In this paragraph \\\"any relevant period of limitation\\\" means a time limit under the Limitation Act (as amended and revised). (6) The addition or substitution of a new party shall be treated as necessary for the purposes of paragraph (5) if, and only if, the Court is satisfied that \u2014 (a) the new party is a necessary party to the action in that property is vested in the new party at law or in equity and the plaintiff's claim in respect of an equitable interest in that property is liable to be defeated unless the new party is joined; or Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 15 (b) the relevant cause of action is vested in the new party and the plaintiff jointly but not severally; or (c) the new party is the Attorney General and the proceedings should have been brought by relator proceedings in this name; or (d) the new party is a company in which the plaintiff is a shareholder and on whose behalf the plaintiff is suing to enforce a right vested in the company; or (e) the new party is sued jointly with the defendant and is not also liable severally with the defendant and failure to join the new party might render the claim unenforceable. 6A. Proceedings against estates (O.15, r.6A) 6A. (1) Where any person against whom an action would have lain has died but the cause of action survives, the action may, if no grant of probate or administration has been made, be brought against the estate of the deceased. (2) Without prejudice to the generality of paragraph (1), an action brought against \\\"the personal representatives of A.B. deceased\\\" shall be treated, for the purpose of that paragraph, as having been brought against that person\u2019s estate. (3) An action purporting to have been commenced against a person shall be treated, if the person was dead at its commencement, as having been commenced against the person\u2019s estate in accordance with paragraph (1) whether or not a grant of probate or administration was made before its commencement. (4) In any such action as is referred to in paragraph (1) or (3) \u2014 (a) the plaintiff shall, during the period of validity for service of the writ or originating summons, apply to the Court for an order appointing a person to represent the deceased's estate for the purpose of the proceedings or, if a grant of probate or administration has been made, for an order that the personal representative of the deceased be made a party to the proceedings, and in either case of an order that the proceedings be carried on against the person appointed or, as the case may be, against the personal representative, as if the personal representative had been substituted for the estate; (b)  the Court may, at any stage of the proceedings and on such terms as it thinks just and whether of its own motion or on application, make any such order as is mentioned in subparagraph (a) and allow such amendments (if any) to be made and make such other order as the Court thinks necessary in order to ensure that all matters in dispute in the proceedings may be effectually and completely determined and adjudicated upon. (5) Before making an order under paragraph (4) the Court may require notice to be given to any insurer of the deceased who has an interest in the proceedings and to such (if any) of the persons having an interest in the estate as it thinks fit. ORDER 15 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (6) Where an order is made under paragraph (4), rules 7(4) and 8(3) and (4) shall apply as if the order had been made under rule 7 on the application of the plaintiff. (7) Where no grant of probate or administration has been made, any judgment or order given or made in the proceedings shall bind the estate to the same extent as it would have been bound if a grant had been made and a personal representative of the deceased had been a party to the proceedings. 7. Change of parties by reason of death, etc. (O.15, r.7) 7. (1) Where a party to an action dies or become bankrupt but the cause of action survives, the action shall not abate by reason of the death or bankruptcy. (2) Where at any stage of the proceedings in any cause or matter the interest or liability of any party is assigned or transmitted to or devolves upon some other person, the Court may, if it thinks it necessary in order to ensure that all matters in dispute in the cause or matter may be effectually and completely determined and adjudicated upon, order that other person to be made a party to the cause or matter and the proceedings to be carried on as if the other person had been substituted for the first mentioned party. An application for an order under this paragraph may be ex parte. (3) An order may be made under this rule for a person to be made a party to a cause or matter notwithstanding that the person is already a party to it on the other side of the record, or on the same side but in a different capacity; but \u2014 (a) if the person is already a party on the other side, the order shall be treated as containing a direction that the person shall cease to be a party on that other side; and (b) if the person is already a party on the same side but in another capacity, the order may contain a direction that the person shall cease to be a party in that other capacity. (4) The person on whose application an order is made under this rule must procure the order to be filed in the Register of Writs, and after the order has been filed that person must, unless the Court otherwise directs, serve the order on every other person who is a party to the cause or matter or who becomes or ceases to be a party by virtue of the order and serve with the order on any person who becomes a defendant a copy of the writ or originating summons by which the cause or matter was begun and a form of acknowledgment of service in Form No. 8 or Form No. 9 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised), whichever is appropriate. Any application to the Court by a person served with an order made ex parte under this rule for the discharge or variation of the order must be made within 14 days after the service of the order on that person. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 15 8. Provisions consequential on making of order under rule 6 or 7 (O.15, r.8) 8. (1) Where an order is made under rule 6 the writ by which the action in question was begun must be amended accordingly and must be indorsed with \u2014 (a) a reference to the order in pursuance of which the amendment is made; and (b) the date on which the amendment is made, and the amendment must be made within such period as may be specified in that order or, if no period is so specified, within 14 days after the making of the order. (2) Where by an order under rule 6 a person is to be made a defendant, the rules as to service of a writ shall apply accordingly to service of the amended writ on the person, but before serving the writ on the person the person on whose application the order was made must procure the order to be filed in the Register of Writs. (3) Where by an order under rule 6 or 7 a person is to be made a defendant the rules as to acknowledgment of service shall apply accordingly to acknowledgment of service by the person subject, in the case of a person to be made a defendant by an order under rule 7, to the modification that the time limited for acknowledging service shall begin with the date on which the order is served on the person under rule 7(4) or, if the order is not required to be served on the person, with the date on which the order is to be filed in the Register of Writs. (4) Where by an order under rule 6 or 7 a person is to be added as a party or is to be made a party in substitution for some other party, that person shall not become a party until \u2014 (a) where the order is made under rule 6, the writ has been amended in relation to that person under this rule and (if that person is a defendant) has been served on that person; or (b) where the order is made under rule 7, the order has been served on that person under rule 7(4) or, if the order is not required to be served on that person, the order has been filed in the Register of Writs, and where by virtue of the foregoing provision a person becomes a party in substitution for some other party, all things done in the course of the proceedings before the making of the order shall have effect in relation to the new party as they had in relation to the old, except that acknowledgment of service by the old party shall not dispense with acknowledgment of service by the new. (5) The foregoing provisions of this rule shall apply in relation to an action begun by originating summons as they apply in relation to an action begun by writ. 9. Failure to proceed after death of party (O.15, r.9) 9. (1) If after the death of a plaintiff or defendant in any action the cause of action survives, but no order under rule 7 is made substituting as plaintiff any person ORDER 15 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) in whom the cause of action vests or, as the case may be, the personal representative of the deceased defendant, the defendant or, as the case may be, those representatives may apply to the Court for an order that unless the action is proceeded with within such time as may be specified in the order the action shall be struck out as against the plaintiff or the defendant, as the case may be, who has died; but where it is the plaintiff who has died the Court shall not make an order under this rule unless satisfied that due notice of the application has been given to the personal representatives (if any) of the deceased plaintiff and to any other interested persons who, in the opinion of the Court, should be notified. (2) Where in any action a counterclaim is made by a defendant, this rule shall apply in relation to the counterclaim as if the counterclaim were a separate action and as if the defendant making the counterclaim were the plaintiff and the person against whom it is made a defendant. 10. Actions for possession of land (O.15, r.10) 10. (1) Without prejudice to rule 6, the Court may at any stage of the proceedings in an action for possession of land order any person not a party to the action who is in possession of the land (whether in actual possession or by a tenant) to be added as a defendant. (2) An application by any person for an order under this rule may be made ex parte, supported by an affidavit showing that the person is in possession of the land in question and if by a tenant, naming the person. The affidavit shall specify the applicant's address for service and O.12, rr.3(2) and (3) shall apply as if the affidavit were an acknowledgment of service. (3) A person added as a defendant by an order under this rule shall serve a copy of the order on the plaintiff giving the added defendant's address for the service specified in accordance with paragraph (2). 10A. Actions in detinue, conversion or for trespass to goods (O.15, r.10A) 10A. (1) Where the plaintiff in an action in detinue, conversion or for trespass to goods is one of two or more persons having or claiming any interest in the goods, then, unless the plaintiff has the written authority of every other such person to sue on the latter's behalf, the writ or originating summons by which the action was begun shall be indorsed with a statement giving particulars of the plaintiff's title and identifying every other person who to the plaintiff\u2019s knowledge, has or claims any interest in the goods. This paragraph shall not apply to an action arising out of an accident on land due to collision or apprehended collision involving a vehicle. (2) A defendant to an action in detinue, conversion or for trespass to goods who desires to show that a third party has a better right than the plaintiff as respects all or any part of the interest claimed by the plaintiff may, at any time after Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 15 giving notice of intention to defend, and before any judgment or order is given or made on the plaintiff's claim, apply for directions as to whether any person named in the application (not being a person whose written authority the plaintiff has to sue on the person\u2019s behalf) should be joined with a view to establishing whether the person has a better right than the plaintiff, or has a claim as a result of which the defendant might be doubly liable. (3) An application under paragraph (2) shall be made by summons, which shall be served personally on every person named in it as well as being served on the plaintiff. (4) Where a person named in an application under paragraph (2) fails to appear on the hearing of the summons or to comply with any direction given by the Court on the application, the Court may by order deprive the person of any right of action against the defendant for the wrong, either unconditionally or subject to such terms and conditions as the Court thinks fit. 11. Relator actions (O.15, r.11) 11. Before the name of any person is used in any action as a relator, that person must give a written authorisation so to use that person\u2019s name to that person\u2019s attorney and the authorisation must be filed in the Court office. 12. Representative proceedings (O.15, r.12) 12. (1) Where numerous persons have the same interest in any proceedings, not being such proceedings as are mentioned in rule 13, the proceedings may be begun, and, unless the Court otherwise orders, continued, by or against any one or more of them as representing all or as representing all except one or more of them. (2) At any stage of proceedings under this rule the Court may, on the application of the plaintiff, and on such terms, if any, as it thinks fit, appoint any one or more of the defendants or other persons as representing whom the defendants are sued to represent all, or all except one or more, of those persons in the proceedings; and where in exercise of the power conferred by this paragraph, the Court appoints a person not named as a defendant, it shall make an order under rule 6 adding that person as a defendant. (3) A judgment or order given in proceedings under this rule shall be binding on all the persons as representing whom the plaintiffs sue or, as the case may be, the defendants who are sued, but shall not be enforced against any person not a party to the proceedings except with the leave of the Court. (4) An application for the grant of leave under paragraph (3) must be made by summons which must be served personally on the person against whom it is sought to enforce the judgment or order. (5) Notwithstanding that a judgment or order to which any such application relates is binding on the person against whom the application is made, that person may ORDER 15 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) dispute liability to have the judgment or order enforced against that person on the ground that by reason of facts and matters particular to this case that person is entitled to be exempted from such liability. (6) The Court hearing an application for the grant of leave under paragraph (3) may order the question whether the judgment or order is enforceable against the person against whom the application is made to be tried and determined in any manner in which any issue or question in an action may be tried and determined. 12A. Derivative actions (O.15, r.12A) 12A. (1) This rule applies to every action begun by writ by one or more shareholders of a company where the cause of action is vested in the company and relief is accordingly sought on its behalf (referred to in this rule as a \\\"derivative action\\\"). (2) Where a defendant in a derivative action has given notice of intention to defend, the plaintiff must apply to the Court for leave to continue the action. (3) The application must be supported by an affidavit verifying the facts on which the claim and the entitlement to sue on behalf of the company are based. (4) Unless the Court otherwise orders, the application must be issued within 21 days after the relevant date, and must be served, together with the affidavit in support and any exhibits to the affidavit, not less than 10 clear days before the return day on all defendants who have given notice of intention to defend; any defendant so served may show cause against the application by affidavit or otherwise. (5) In paragraph (4), the relevant date means the later of \u2014 (a) the date of service of the statement of claim; (b) the date when notice of intention to defend was given, provided that, where more than one notice of intention to defend is given, that date shall be the date when the first notice was given. (6) Nothing in this rule shall prevent the plaintiff from applying for interlocutory relief pending the determination of an application for leave to continue the action. (7) In a derivative action, O.18, r.2(1) (time for service of defence) shall not have effect unless the Court grants leave to continue the action and, in that case, shall have effect as if it required the defendant to serve a defence within 14 days after the order giving leave to continue, or within such other period as the Court may specify. (8) On the hearing of the application under paragraph (2), the Court may \u2014 (a) grant leave to continue the action, for such period and upon such terms as the Court may think fit; Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 15 (b) subject to paragraph (11), dismiss the action; (c) adjourn the application and give such direction as to joinder of parties, the filing of further evidence, discovery, cross examination of deponents and otherwise as it may consider expedient. (9) If the plaintiff does not apply for leave to continue the action as required by paragraph (2) within the time laid down in paragraph (4), any defendant who has given notice of intention to defend may apply for an order to dismiss the action or any claim made in it by way of derivative action. (10)  On the hearing of such an application for dismissal, the Court may \u2014 (a) subject to paragraph (11), dismiss the action; (b) if the plaintiff so requests, grant the plaintiff (on such terms as to costs or otherwise as the Court may think fit) an extension of time to apply for leave to continue the action; or (c) make such other order as may in the circumstances be appropriate. (11) Where only part of the relief claimed in that action is sought on behalf of the company, the Court may dismiss the claim for that part of the relief under paragraphs (8) and (10), without prejudice to the plaintiff's right to continue the action as to the remainder of the relief and O.18, r.2(1) shall apply as modified by paragraph (7). (12) If there is a material change in circumstances after the Court has given leave to the plaintiff to continue the action in pursuance of an application under paragraph (2), any defendant who has given notice of intention to defend may make an application supported by affidavit requiring the plaintiff to show cause why the Court should not dismiss the action or any claim made in it by way of derivative action. On such application the Court shall have the same powers as it would have had upon an application under paragraph (2). (13) The plaintiff may include in an application under paragraph (2) an application for an indemnity out of the assets of the company in respect of costs incurred or to be incurred in the action and the Court may grant such indemnity upon such terms as may in the circumstances be appropriate. (14) So far as possible, any application under paragraph (13) and any application by the plaintiff under O.14 shall be made so as to be heard at the same time as the application under paragraph (2). 13. Representation of interested person who cannot be ascertained, etc. (O.15, r.13) 13. (1) In any proceedings concerning \u2014 (a) the estate of a deceased person; or (b) property subject to a trust; or ORDER 15 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (c) the construction of a written instrument, including a Law, the Court, if satisfied that it is expedient so to do, and that one or more of the conditions specified in paragraph (2) are satisfied, may appoint one or more persons to represent any person (including an unborn person) or class who is or may be interested (whether presently or for any future contingent or unascertained interest) in or affected by the proceedings. (2) The conditions of the exercise of the power conferred by paragraph (1) are as follows \u2014 (a) that the person, the class or some member of the class, cannot be ascertained or cannot readily be ascertained; (b) that the person, class or some member of the class, though ascertained, cannot be found; (c) that, though the person or the class and the members thereof can be ascertained and found, it appears to the Court expedient (regard being had to all the circumstances, including the amount at stake and the degree of difficulty of the point to be determined) to exercise the power for the purpose of saving expense. (3) Where in any proceedings to which paragraph (1) applies, the Court exercises the power conferred by that paragraph, a judgment or order of the Court given or made when the person or persons appointed in exercise of that power are before the Court shall be binding on the person or class represented by the person or persons so appointed. (4) Where, in any such proceedings, a compromise is proposed and some of the persons who are interested in, or who may be affected by, the compromise are not parties to the proceedings (including unborn or unascertained persons) but \u2014 (a) there is some other person in the same interest before the Court who assents to the compromise or on whose behalf the Court sanctions the compromise; or (b) the absent persons are represented by a person appointed under paragraph (1) who so assents, the Court, if satisfied that the compromise will not be for the benefit of the absent persons and that it is expedient to exercise this power, may approve the compromise and order that it shall be binding on the absent persons, and they shall be bound accordingly except where the order has been obtained by fraud or non-disclosure of material facts. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 15 13A. Notice of action to non-parties (O.15, r.13A) 13A. (1) At any stage in an action to which this rule applies, the Court may, on the application of any party or of its own motion, direct that notice of the action be served on any person who is not a party thereto but who will or may be affected by any judgment given therein. (2) An application under this rule may be made ex parte and shall be supported by an affidavit stating the grounds of the application. (3) Every notice of an action under this rule shall be in Form No. 11 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) and accompanied by a copy of the originating summons or writ and a form of acknowledgment of service in Form No. 8 or Form No. 9 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) with such modifications as may be appropriate. (4) A person may, within 14 days of service on that person of a notice under this rule, acknowledge service of the writ or originating summons and shall thereupon become a party to the action, but in default of such acknowledgment and subject to paragraph (5) shall be bound by any judgment given in the action as if that person were a party thereto. (5) If at any time after service of such notice on any person the writ or originating summons is amended so as substantially to alter the relief claimed the Court may direct that the judgment shall not bind such person unless a further notice together with a copy of the amended writ or originating summons is served on such person under this rule. (6) This rule applies to any action relating to \u2014 (a) the estate of a deceased person; or (b) property subject to a trust. 14. Representation of beneficiaries by trustees, etc. (O.15, r.14) 14. (1) Any proceedings, including proceedings to enforce a security by foreclosure or otherwise, may be brought by or against trustees, executors or administrators in their capacity as such without joining any of the persons having a beneficial interest in the trust or estate, as the case may be and any judgment or order given or made in those proceedings shall be binding on those persons unless the Court in the same or other proceedings otherwise orders on the ground that the trustees, executors or administrators, as the case may be, could not or did not in fact represent the interests of those persons in the first-mentioned proceedings. (2) Paragraph (1) is without prejudice to the power of the Court to order any person having such an interest as aforesaid to be made a party to the proceedings or to make an order under rule 13. ORDER 15 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 15. Representation of deceased person interested in proceedings (O.15, r.15) 15. (1) Where in any proceedings it appears to the Court that a deceased person was interested in the matter in question in the proceedings and that the deceased person has no estate representative, the Court may, on the application of any party to the proceedings, proceed in the absence of a person representing the estate of the deceased person or may by order appoint a person to represent that estate for the purposes of the proceedings; and any such order, and any judgment or order subsequently given or made in the proceedings, shall bind the estate of the deceased to the same extent as it would have been bound had an estate representative of that person been a party to the proceedings. (2) Before making an order under this rule, the Court may require notice of the application for the order to be given to such (if any) of the persons having an interest in the estate as it thinks fit. 16. Declaratory judgment (O.15, r.16) 16. No action or other proceeding shall be open to objection on the ground that a merely declaratory judgment or order is sought thereby, and the Court may make binding declarations of right whether or not any consequential relief is or could be claimed. 17. Conduct of proceedings (O.15, r.17) 17. The Court may give the conduct of any action, inquiry or other proceedings to such person as it thinks fit. GCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 16.10.95) (amended 20.01.97) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 16 ORDER 16 THIRD PARTY AND SIMILAR PROCEEDINGS 1. Third party notice (O.16, r.1) 1. (1) Where in any action a defendant who has given notice of intention to defend \u2014 (a) claims against a person not already a party to the action any contribution or indemnity; or (b) claims against such a person any relief or remedy relating to or connected with the original subject matter of the action and substantially the same as some relief or remedy claimed by the plaintiff; or (c) requires that any question or issue relating to or connected with the original subject matter of the action should be determined not only as between the plaintiff and the defendant but also as between either or both of them and a person not already a party to the action, then, subject to paragraph (2), the defendant may issue a notice in Form No. 12 or Form No. 13 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised), whichever is appropriate, (in this Order referred to as a third party notice) containing a statement of the nature of the claim made against the defendant and, as the case may be, either of the nature and grounds of the claim made by the defendant or the question or issue required to be determined. (2) A defendant to an action may not issue a third party notice without the leave of the Court unless the action was begun by writ and the defendant issues the notice before serving that defendant\u2019s defence on the plaintiff. (3) Where a third party notice is served on the person against whom it is issued, the person shall as from the time of service be a party to the action (in this Order referred to as a third party) with the same rights in respect of the person\u2019s defence against any claim made against the person in the notice and otherwise as if the person had been duly sued in the ordinary way by the defendant by whom the notice is issued. 2. Application for leave to issue third party notice (O.16, r.2) 2. (1) Application for leave to issue a third party notice may be made ex parte but the Court may direct a summons for leave to be issued. (2) An application for leave to issue a third party notice must be supported by an affidavit stating \u2014 (a) the nature of the claim made by the plaintiff in the action; (b) the stage which proceedings in the action have reached; ORDER 16 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (c) the nature of the claim made by the applicant or particulars of the question or issue required to be determined, as the case may be, and the facts on which the proposed third party notice is based; and (d) the name and address of the person against whom the third party notice is to be issued. 3. Issue, service and acknowledgment of service, of third party notice (O.16, r.3) 3. (1) The order granting leave to issue a third party notice may contain directions as to the period within which the notice is to be issued. (2) There must be served with every third party notice \u2014 (a) a copy of the writ or originating summons by which the action was begun; (b) a copy of the pleadings (if any) served in the action; and (c) a form of acknowledgment of service in Form No. 8 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) with such modification as may be appropriate. (3) The appropriate office for acknowledging service of a third party notice is the Court office. (4) Subject to the foregoing provisions of this rule, the following provisions of these Rules, namely, O.5, rr.1(2) and (3), O.10 to O.12 and O.75, r.4, shall apply in relation to a third party notice and to the proceedings begun thereby as if \u2014 (a) the third party notice were a writ and the proceeding begun thereby an action; and (b) the defendant issuing the third party notice were a plaintiff and the person against whom it is issued a defendant in that action, provided that in the application of O.11, r.1(1)(c) leave may be granted to serve a third party notice outside the jurisdiction on any necessary or proper party to the proceedings brought against the defendant. 4. Third party directions (O.16, r.4) 4. (1) If the third party gives notice of intention to defend, the defendant who issues the third party notice must, by summons to be served on all the other parties to the action, apply to the Court for directions. (2) A summons for third party directions shall be in Form No. 61 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). (3) If no summons is served on the third party under paragraph (1) the third party may, not earlier than 7 days after giving notice of intention to defend by summons to be served on all the other parties to the action, apply to the Court for directions or for an order to set aside the third party notice. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 16 (4) On an application for directions under this rule the Court may \u2014 (a) if the liability of the third party to the defendant who issued the third party notice is established on the hearing, order such judgment as the nature of the case may require to be entered against the third party in favour of the defendant; or (b) order any claim, question or issue stated in the third party notice to be tried in such manner as the Court may direct; or (c) dismiss the application and terminate the proceedings on the third party notice, and may do so either before or after any judgment in the action has been signed by the plaintiff against the defendant. (5) On an application for directions under this rule the Court may give the third party leave to defend the action, either alone or jointly with any defendant, upon such terms as may be just, or to appear at the trial and to take such part therein as may be just, and generally may make such orders and give such directions as appear to the Court proper for having the rights and liabilities of the parties most conveniently determined and enforced and as to the extent to which the third party is to be bound by any judgment or decision in the action. (6) An order for third party directions shall be in Form No. 62 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). (7) Any order made or direction given under this rule may be varied or rescinded by    the Court at any time. 5. Default of third party, etc. (O.16, r.5) 5. (1) If a third party does not give notice of intention to defend or, having been ordered to serve a defence, fails to do so \u2014 (a) the third party shall be deemed to admit any claim stated in the third party notice and shall be bound by any judgment (including judgment by consent) or decision in the action insofar as it is relevant to any claim, question or issue stated in that notice; and (b) the defendant by whom the third party notice was issued may, if judgment in default is given against the defendant in the action, at any time after satisfaction of that judgment and, with the leave of the Court, before satisfaction thereof, enter judgment against the third party in respect of any contribution or indemnity claimed in the notice, and, with the leave of the Court, in respect of any other relief or remedy claimed therein. (2) If a third party or the defendant by whom a third party notice was issued makes default in serving any pleading which that third party is ordered to serve, the Court may, on the application by summons of that defendant or the third party, as the case may be, order such judgment to be entered for the applicant as the ORDER 16 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) applicant is entitled to on the pleadings or may make such other orders as may appear to the Court necessary to do justice between the parties. (3) The Court may at any time set aside or vary a judgment entered under subparagraph (1)(b) or paragraph (2) on such terms (if any) as it thinks just. 6. Setting aside third party proceedings (O.16, r.6) 6. Proceedings on a third party notice may, at any stage of the proceedings, be set aside by the Court. 7. Judgment between defendant and third party (O.16, r.7) 7. (1) Where in any action a defendant has served a third party notice, the Court may at or after trial of the action or, if the action is decided otherwise than by trial, on an application by summons or motion, order such judgment as the nature of the case may require to be entered for the defendant against the third party or for the third party against the defendant. (2) Where judgment is given for the payment of any contribution or indemnity to a person who is under a liability to make a payment in respect of the same debt or damage, execution shall not issue on the judgment without the leave of the Court until that liability has been discharged. (3) For the purpose of paragraph (2) \\\"liability\\\" includes liability under a judgment in the same or other proceedings. 8. Claims and issues between a defendant and some other party (O.16, r.8) 8. (1) Where in any action a defendant who has given notice of intention to defend \u2014 (a) claims against a person who is already a party to the action any contribution or indemnity; or (b) claims against such a person any relief or remedy relating to or connected with the original subject matter of the action and substantially the same as some relief or remedy claimed by the plaintiff; or (c) requires that any question or issue relating to or connected with the original subject matter of the action should be determined not only as between the plaintiff and themselves but also as between either or both of them and some other person who is already a party to the action, then, subject to paragraph (2) the defendant may, without leave, issue and serve on that person a notice containing a statement of the nature and grounds of the defendant\u2019s claim or, as the case may be, of the question or issue required to be determined. (2) Where a defendant makes such a claim as is mentioned in paragraph (1) and that claim could be made by the defendant by counterclaim in the action, paragraph (1) shall not apply in relation to the claim. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 16 (3) No acknowledgment of service of such a notice shall be necessary if the person on whom it is served has acknowledged service of the writ or originating summons in the action or is a plaintiff therein, and the same procedure shall be adopted for the determination between the defendant by whom, and the person on whom, such a notice is served of the claim, question or issue stated in the notice as would be appropriate under this Order if the person served with the notice were a third party and (where the person has given notice of intention to defend the action or is a plaintiff) had given notice of intention to defend the claim, question or issue. (4) Rule 4(3) shall have effect in relation to proceedings on a notice issued under this rule as if for the words \\\"7 days after giving notice of intention to defend\\\" there were substituted the words \\\"14 days after service of the notice on the person\\\". 9. Claims by third and subsequent parties (O.16, r.9) 9. (1) Where a defendant has served a third party notice and the third party makes such a claim or requirement as is mentioned in rule 1 or rule 8, this Order shall, with the modification mentioned in paragraph (2) and any other necessary modifications, apply as if the third party were a defendant; and similarly where any further person to whom by virtue of this rule this Order applies as if that further person were a third party makes such a claim or requirement. (2) The modification referred to in paragraph (1) is that paragraph (3) shall have effect in relation to the issue of a notice under rule 1 by a third party in substitution for rule 1(2). (3) A third party may not issue a notice under rule 1 without the leave of the Court unless the action in question was begun by writ and the third party issues the notice before the expiration of 14 days after the time limited for acknowledging service of the notice issued against that third party. 10. Offer of contribution (O.16, r.10) 10. (1) If, at any time after a party has acknowledged service, a party to an action who stands to be held liable in the action to another party to contribute towards any debt or damages which may be recovered against that other party in the action, makes (without prejudice to that party\u2019s defence) a written offer to that other party to contribute to a specified extent to the debt or damages, then, subject to paragraph (2) and notwithstanding that the other party reserves the right to bring the offer to the attention of the Judge at the trial, the offer shall not be brought to the attention of the Judge until after all questions of liability and amount of debt or damages have been decided. (2) Where the question of the costs of the issue of liability falls to be decided, that issue having been tried and an issue or question concerning the amount of the debt or damages remaining to be tried separately, any party may bring to the ORDER 17 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) attention of the Judge the fact that a written offer under paragraph (1) has or has not been made and the date (but not the amount) of such offer or of the first such offer if more than one. 11. Counterclaim by defendant (O.16, r.11) 11. Where in any action a counterclaim is made by a defendant, the foregoing provisions of this Order shall apply in relation to the counterclaim as if the subject matter of the counterclaim were the original subject matter of the action, and as if the person making the counterclaim were the plaintiff and the person against whom it is made a defendant. GCR 1995 (Revised) ORDER 17 INTERPLEADER 1. Entitlement to relief by way of interpleader (O.17, r.1) 1. Where \u2014 (a) a person is under a liability in respect of a debt or in respect of any money, goods or chattels and the person is, or expects to be, sued for or in respect of that debt or money or those goods or chattels by two or more persons making adverse claims thereto; or Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 17 (b) claim is made to any money, goods or chattels taken or intended to be taken by the Bailiff in execution under any process, or to the proceeds or value of any such goods or chattels, by a person other than the person against whom the process is issued, the person under liability as mentioned in subparagraph (a) or (subject to rule 2) the Bailiff may apply to the Court for relief by way of interpleader. 2. Claim to goods, etc., taken in execution (O.17, r.2) 2. (1) Any person making a claim to or in respect of any money, goods or chattels taken or intended to be taken in execution under process of the Court, or to the proceeds or value of any such goods or chattels, must give notice of their claim to the Bailiff charged with the execution of the process and must include in their notice a statement of their address, and that address shall be that person\u2019s address for service. (2) On receipt of a claim made under this rule the Bailiff on whom notice in accordance with paragraph (1) has been given must forthwith give notice thereof to the execution creditor and the execution creditor must, within 7 days after receiving the notice, give notice to that Bailiff informing that Bailiff whether the execution creditor admits or disputes the claim. An execution creditor who gives notice in accordance with this paragraph admitting a claim shall only be liable for any fees and expenses incurred by the Bailiff before receipt of that notice. (3) Where \u2014 (a) the Bailiff receives a notice from an execution creditor under paragraph (2) disputing a claim, or the execution creditor fails, within the period mentioned in that paragraph, to give the required notice; and (b) the claim made under this rule is not withdrawn, the Bailiff may apply to the Court for relief under this Order. (4) The Bailiff who receives a notice from an execution creditor under paragraph (2) admitting a claim made under this rule shall withdraw from possession of the money, goods or chattels claimed and may apply to the Court for relief under this Order of the following kind, that is to say, an order restraining the bringing of an action against the Bailiff for or in respect of the Bailiff having taken possession of that money or those goods or chattels. 3. Mode of application (O.17, r.3) 3. (1) An application for relief under this Order must be made by originating summons unless made in a pending action, in which case it must be made by summons in the action. (2) Where the applicant is the Bailiff who has withdrawn from possession of money, goods or chattels taken in execution and who is applying for relief under rule ORDER 17 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 2(4) the summons must be served on any person who made a claim under that rule to or in respect of that money or those goods or chattels, and that person may attend the hearing of the application. (3) An originating summons under this rule shall be in Form No. 3 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). (4) Subject to paragraph (5) a summons under this rule must be supported by evidence that the applicant \u2014 (a) claims no interest in the subject matter in dispute other than for charges or costs; (b) does not collude with any of the claimants to that subject matter; and (c) is willing to pay or transfer that subject matter into Court or to dispose of it as the Court may direct. (5) Where the applicant is the Bailiff, the Bailiff shall not provide such evidence as is referred to in paragraph (4) unless directed by the Court so to do. (6) Any person who makes a claim under rule 2 and who is served with a summons under this rule shall within 14 days serve on the execution creditor and the Bailiff an affidavit specifying any money and describing any goods and chattels claimed and setting out the grounds upon which such claim is based. (7) Where the applicant is the Bailiff a summons under this rule must give notice of the requirement in paragraph (6). 4. No rule (O.17, r.4) 4. No rule (O.17, r.4) 5. Powers of Court hearing summons (O.17, r.5) 5. (1) Where on the hearing of a summons under this Order all the persons by whom adverse claims to the subject matter in dispute (hereafter in this Order referred to as \\\"the claimants\\\") appear, the Court may order \u2014 (a) that any claimant be made a defendant in any action pending with respect to the subject matter in dispute in substitution for or in addition to the applicant for relief under this Order; or (b) that an issue between the claimants be stated and tried and may direct which of the claimants is to be plaintiff and which defendant. (2) Where \u2014 (a) the applicant on a summons under this Order is the Bailiff; or (b) all the claimants consent or any of them so request; or (c) the question at issue between the claimants is a question of law and the facts are not in dispute, Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 17 the Court may summarily determine the question at issue between the claimants and make an order accordingly on such terms as may be just. (3) Where a claimant, having been duly served with a summons for relief under this Order, does not appear on the hearing of the summons or, having appeared, fails or refuses to comply with an order made in the proceedings, the Court may make an order declaring the claimant, and all persons claiming under the claimant, forever barred from prosecuting the claim against the applicant for such relief and all persons claiming under the claimant, but such an order shall not affect the rights of the claimants as between themselves. 6. Power to order sale of goods taken in execution (O.17, r.6) 6. Where an application for relief under this Order is made by the Bailiff who has taken possession of any goods or chattels in execution under any process, and a claimant alleges that that claimant is entitled, under a bill of sale or otherwise, to the goods or chattels by way of security for debts, the Court may order those goods or chattels or any part thereof to be sold and may direct that the proceeds of sale be applied in such manner and on such terms as may be just and as may be specified in the order. 7. Power to stay proceedings (O.17, r.7) 7. Where a defendant to an action applies for relief under this Order in the action, the Court may by order stay all further proceedings in the action. 8. Other powers (O.17, r.8) 8. Subject to the foregoing rules of this Order, the Court may in or for the purposes of any interpleader proceedings make such order as to costs or any other matter as it thinks just. 9. One order in several causes or matters (O.17, r.9) 9. Where the Court considers it necessary or expedient to make an order in any interpleader proceedings in several causes or matters pending before different Judges\u2014 (a) the Court may make such an order; and (b) the order shall be entitled in all those causes or matters; and (c) the order shall be binding on all the parties to those causes or matters. 10. Discovery (O.17, r.10) 10. Orders 24 and 26 shall, with the necessary modifications, apply in relation to an interpleader issue as they apply in relation to any other cause or matter. ORDER 17 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 11. Trial of interpleader issue (O.17, r.11) 11. (1) Order 35 shall, with the necessary modifications, apply to the trial of an interpleader issue as it applies to the trial of an action. (2) The Court by whom an interpleader issue is tried may give such judgment or make such order as finally to dispose of all questions arising in the interpleader proceedings. 12. Appeal from judgment etc. of Judge in interpleader proceedings (O.17, r.12) 12. (1) Any judgment, order or decision of a Judge given or made in summarily determining under rule 5(2)(b) or (c) any question at issue between claimants in interpleader proceedings shall be final and conclusive against the claimants and all persons claiming under them unless leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal is given by the Judge or the Court of Appeal. (2) Where an interpleader issue is tried by a Judge an appeal shall lie to the Court of Appeal, without the leave of the Judge or that Court, from any judgment, order or decision given or made by the Judge on the trial. (3) The time within which notice of appeal under this rule must be served shall be the same as in the case of an appeal from an interlocutory order. GCR 1995 (Revised) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 18 ORDER 18 PLEADINGS 1. Service of statement of claim (O.18, r.1) 1. Unless the Court gives leave to the contrary or a statement of claim is indorsed on the writ, the plaintiff must serve a statement of claim on the defendant or, if there are two or more defendants, on each defendant, and must do so either when the writ is served on that defendant or at any time after service of the writ but before the expiration of 14 days after that defendant gives notice of intention to defend. 2. Service of defence (O.18, r.2) 2. (1) Subject to paragraph (2), a defendant who gives notice of intention to defend an action must, unless the Court gives leave to the contrary, serve a defence on the plaintiff before the expiration of 14 days after the time limited for acknowledging service of the writ or after the statement of claim is served on the defendant, whichever is the later. (2) If a summons under O.14, r.1 or under O.86, r.1 is served on a defendant before the defendant serves their defence, paragraph (1) shall not have effect in relation to the defendant unless by the order made on the summons the defendant is given leave to defend the action and, in that case, shall have effect as if it required the defendant to serve their defence within 14 days after the making of the order or within such other period as may be specified therein. (3) Where an application is made by a defendant under O.12, r.8(1), paragraph (1) of this rule shall not have effect in relation to the defendant unless the application is dismissed or no order is made on the application and, in that case, paragraph (1) shall have effect as if it required the defendant to serve their defence within 14 days after the final determination of the application or within such other period as may be specified by the Court. (4) Paragraph (1) is subject to the provisions of O.15, r.12A(7) (derivative actions). 3. Service of reply and defence to counterclaim (O.18, r.3) 3. (1) A plaintiff on whom a defendant serves a defence must serve a reply on that defendant if it is needed for compliance with rule 8, and if no reply is served, rule 14(1) will apply. (2) A plaintiff on whom a defendant serves a counterclaim must, if the plaintiff intends to defend it, serve on that defendant a defence to counterclaim. (3) Where a plaintiff serves both a reply and a defence to counterclaim on any defendant, the plaintiff must include them in the same document. ORDER 18 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (4) A reply to any defence must be served by the plaintiff before the expiration of 14 days after the service on the plaintiff of that defence, and a defence to counterclaim must be served by the plaintiff before the expiration of 14 days after the service on the plaintiff of the counterclaim to which it relates. 4. Pleadings subsequent to reply (O.18, r.4) 4. No pleading subsequent to a reply or a defence to counterclaim shall be served except with the leave of the Court. 5. No rule (O.18, r.5) 5. No rule (O.18, r.5) 6. Pleadings: formal requirements (O.18, r.6) 6. (1) Every pleading in an action must bear on its face \u2014 (a) the cause number; (b) the title of the action; and (c) the date on which it was filed. (2) Every pleading must, if necessary, be divided into paragraphs numbered consecutively, each allegation being so far as convenient contained in a separate paragraph. (3) Dates, sums and other numbers must be expressed in a pleading in figures and not in words. (4) Every pleading of a party must be indorsed \u2014 (a) where the party sues or defends in person, with the party\u2019s name and address; (b) in any other case, with the name or firm and business address of the attorney by whom it was served. (5) Every pleading of a party must be signed by an attorney or firm of attorneys, if settled by an attorney or firm of attorneys, or by the party, if the party sues or defends in person. 7. Facts, not evidence, to be pleaded (O.18, r.7) 7. (1) Subject to the provisions of this rule, and rules 7A, 10, 11 and 12, every pleading must contain, and contain only, a statement in a summary form of the material facts on which the party pleading relies for their claim or defence, as the case may be, but not the evidence by which those facts are to be proved, and the statement must be as brief as the nature of the case admits. (2) Without prejudice to paragraph (1), the effect of any document or the purport of any conversation referred to in the pleading must, if material, be briefly stated, Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 18 and the precise words of the document or conversation shall not be stated, except insofar as those words are themselves material. (3) A party need not plead any fact if it is presumed by law to be true or the burden of disproving it lies on the other party, unless the other party has specifically denied it in that party\u2019s pleading. (4) A statement that a thing has been done or that an event has occurred, being a thing or event the doing or occurrence of which, as the case may be, constitutes a condition precedent necessary for the case of a party is to be implied in that party\u2019s pleading. 7A. Conviction, etc. to be adduced in evidence: matters to be pleaded (O.18, r.7A) 7A. (1) If in any action which is to be tried with pleadings any party intends, in reliance on Section 35 of the Evidence Act (as amended and revised) to adduce evidence that a person was convicted of an offence by or before the Court or the Summary Court, that person must include in their pleading a statement of their intention with particulars of \u2014 (a) the conviction and the date thereof; (b) the Court which made the conviction; and (c) the issue in the proceedings to which the conviction is relevant. (1A) If in any action to which paragraph (1) of this rule applies the relevant conviction has been expunged pursuant to the Criminal Records (Spent Convictions) Act (as amended and revised), and the relevant expunction has not been revoked pursuant to section 40 of that Act, then the party seeking to adduce evidence of that expunged conviction must include in the pleading particulars of the exceptional circumstances that require the admission of the expunged conviction. (2) If in any action which is to be tried with pleadings any party intends in reliance on Section 53 of the Evidence Act (as amended and revised) to adduce evidence that a person was found guilty of adultery in matrimonial proceedings before the Court or has been adjudged to be the father of a child in affiliation or maintenance proceedings before the Court or the Summary Court, the person must include in their pleading a statement of their intention with particulars of \u2014 (a) the finding or adjudication and the date thereof; (b) the Court which made the finding or adjudication and the proceedings in which it was made; and (c) the issue in the proceedings to which the finding or adjudication is relevant. (3) Where a party's pleading includes such a statement as is mentioned in paragraph (1) or (2), then if the opposite party \u2014 ORDER 18 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (a) denies the conviction or finding of adultery or adjudication of paternity to which the statement relates; (b) alleges that the conviction, finding or adjudication was erroneous; or (c) denies that the conviction, finding or adjudication is relevant to any issue in the proceedings, the party must make the denial or allegation in their pleading. 8. Matters which must be specifically pleaded (O.18, r.8) 8. (1) A party must in any pleading subsequent to a statement of claim plead specifically any matter, for example, performance, release, any relevant statute of limitation, fraud or any fact showing illegality \u2014 (a) which the party alleges makes any claim or defence of the opposite party not maintainable; or (b) which, if not specifically pleaded, must take the opposite party by surprise; or (c) which raises issues of fact not arising out of the preceding pleading. (2) Without prejudice to paragraph (1), a defendant to an action for the recovery of land must plead specifically every ground of defence on which the defendant relies, and a plea that the defendant is in possession of the land by themselves or their tenant is not sufficient. (3) A claim for exemplary damages must be specifically pleaded together with the facts on which the party pleading relies. (4) A party must plead specifically any claim for interest under Section 34 of the Judicature Act (as amended and revised) or otherwise and \u2014 (a) the claim for interest must be pleaded in the body of the pleading and should be repeated in the prayer; (b) the ground or basis on which interest is claimed must be identified precisely; and (c) wherever possible, the date from which and the rate at which interest is claimed must be stated. 9. Matter may be pleaded whenever arising (O.18, r.9) 9. Subject to rules 7(1), 10 and 15(2), a party may in any pleading plead any matter which has arisen at any time, whether before or since the issue of the writ. 10. Departure (O.18, r.10) 10. (1) A party shall not in any pleading make an allegation of fact, or raise any new ground or claim, inconsistent with a previous pleading of that party. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 18 (2) Paragraph (1) shall not be taken as prejudicing the right of a party to amend, or apply for leave to amend, that party\u2019s previous pleading so as to plead the allegations or claims in the alternative. 11. Points of law may be pleaded (O.18, r.11) 11. A party may by that party\u2019s pleading raise any point of law. 12. Particulars of pleading (O.18, r.12) 12. (1) Every pleading must contain the necessary particulars of any claim, defence or other matter pleaded including, without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing words \u2014 (a) particulars of any misrepresentation, fraud, breach of trust, wilful default or undue influence on which the party pleading relies; and (b) where a party pleading alleges any condition of the mind of any person, whether any impairment or disability of mind or any malice, fraudulent intention or other condition of mind except knowledge, particulars of the facts on which the party relies. (2) The Court may order a party to serve on any other party particulars of any claim, defence or other matter stated in that party\u2019s pleading, or in any affidavit of that party\u2019s ordered to stand as a pleading, or a statement of the nature of the case on which the party relies, and the order may be made on such terms as the Court thinks just. (3) Where a party alleges as a fact that a person had knowledge or notice of some fact, matter or thing, then, without prejudice to the generality of paragraph (2), the Court may, on such terms as it thinks just, order that party to serve on any other party \u2014 (a) where the party alleges knowledge, particulars of the facts on which the party relies; and (b) where the party alleges notice, particulars of the notice. (4) An order under this rule shall not be made before service of the defence unless, in the opinion of the Court, the order is necessary or desirable to enable the defendant to plead or for some other special reason. (5) Where the applicant for an order under this rule did not apply by letter for the particulars the applicant requires, the Court may refuse to make the order unless of opinion that there were sufficient reasons for an application by letter not having been made. (6) Where particulars are given pursuant to a request, or order of the Court, the request or order shall be incorporated with the particulars, each item of the particulars following immediately after the corresponding item of the request or order. ORDER 18 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 13. Admissions and denials (O.18, r.13) 13. (1) Subject to paragraph (4), any allegation of fact made by a party in the party\u2019s pleading is deemed to be admitted by the opposite party unless it is traversed by that party in their pleading or a joinder of issue under rule 14 operates as a denial of it. (2) A traverse may be made either by a denial or by a statement of non-admission and either expressly or by necessary implication. (3) Subject to paragraph (4), every allegation of fact made in a statement of claim or counterclaim which the party on whom it is served does not intend to admit must be specifically traversed by that party in their defence or defence to counterclaim, as the case may be; and a general denial of such allegations, or a general statement of non-admission of them is not a sufficient traverse of them. (4) Any allegation that a party has suffered damage and any allegation as to the amount of damages is deemed to be traversed unless specifically admitted. 14. Denial by joinder of issue (O.18, r.14) 14. (1) If there is no reply to a defence, there is an implied joinder of issue on that defence. (2) Subject to paragraph (3) \u2014 (a) there is at the close of pleadings an implied joinder of issue on the pleading last served; and (b) a party may in their pleading expressly join issue on the next preceding pleading. (3) There can be no joinder of issue, implied or express, on a statement of claim or counterclaim. (4) A joinder of issue operates as a denial of every allegation of fact made in the pleading on which there is an implied or express joinder of issue unless, in the case of an express joinder of issue, any such allegation is excepted from the joinder and is stated to be admitted, in which case the express joinder of issue operates as a denial of every other such allegation. 15. Statement of Claim (O.18, r.15) 15. (1) A statement of claim must state specifically the relief or remedy which the plaintiff claims; but costs need not be specifically claimed. (2) A statement of claim must not contain any allegation or claim in respect of a cause of action unless that cause of action is mentioned in the writ or arises from facts which are the same as, or include or form part of, facts giving rise to a cause of action so mentioned; but, subject to that, a plaintiff may in the plaintiff\u2019s statement of claim, alter, modify or extend any claim made by the plaintiff in the indorsement of the writ without amending the indorsement. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 18 (3) Every statement of claim must bear on its face a statement of the date on which the writ in the action was issued. 16. Defence of tender (O.18, r.16) 16. Where in any action a defence of tender before action is pleaded, the defendant must pay into Court in accordance with O.22 the amount alleged to have been tendered, and the tender shall not be available as a defence unless and until payment into Court has been made. 17. Defence of set-off (O.18, r.17) 17. Where a claim by a defendant to a sum of money (whether of an ascertained amount or not) is relied on as a defence to the whole or part of a claim made by the plaintiff, it may be included in the defence and set-off against the plaintiff's claim, whether or not it is also added as a counterclaim. 18. Counterclaim and defence to counterclaim (O.18, r.18) 18. Without prejudice to the general application of this Order to a counterclaim and a defence to counterclaim, or to any provision thereof which applies to either of those pleadings specifically \u2014 (a) rule 15(1) shall apply to a counterclaim as if the counterclaim were a statement of claim and the defendant making it a plaintiff; and (b) rules 8(2), 16 and 17 shall, with the necessary modifications, apply to a defence to counterclaim as they apply to a defence. 19. Striking out pleadings and indorsements (O.18, r.19) 19. (1) The Court may at any stage of the proceedings order to be struck out or amended any pleading or the indorsement of any writ in the action, or anything in any pleading or in the indorsement, on the ground that \u2014 (a) it discloses no reasonable cause of action or defence, as the case may be; or (b) it is scandalous, frivolous or vexatious; or (c) it may prejudice, embarrass or delay the fair trial of the action; or (d) it is otherwise an abuse of the process of the court, and may order the action to be stayed or dismissed or judgment to be entered accordingly, as the case may be. (2) No evidence shall be admissible on an application under subparagraph (1)(a). (3) This rule shall, so far as applicable, apply to an originating summons and a petition as if the summons or petition, as the case may be, were a pleading. ORDER 18 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 20. Close of pleadings (O.18, r.20) 20. (1) The pleadings in an action are deemed to be closed \u2014 (a) at the expiration of 14 days after service of the reply or, if there is no reply but only a defence to counterclaim, after service of the defence to counterclaim; or (b) if neither a reply nor a defence to counterclaim is served, at the expiration of 14 days after service of the defence. (2) The pleadings in an action are deemed to be closed at the time provided by paragraph (1) notwithstanding that any request or order for particulars has been made but has not been complied with at that time. 21. Trial without pleadings (O.18, r.21) 21. (1) Where in an action to which this rule applies any defendant has entered an appearance in the action, the plaintiff or that defendant may apply to the Court by summons for an order that the action shall be tried without pleadings or further pleadings, as the case may be. (2) If, on the hearing of an application under this rule, the Court is satisfied that the issues in dispute between the parties can be defined without pleadings or further pleadings, or that for any reason the action can properly be tried without pleadings or further pleadings, as the case may be, the Court shall order the action to be so tried, and may direct the parties to prepare a statement of the issues in dispute or, if the parties are unable to agree such a statement, may settle the statement itself. (3) Where the Court makes an order under paragraph (2), it shall, and where it dismisses an application for such an order, it may, give such directions as to the further conduct of the action as may be appropriate, and O.25, rr.2 to 7, shall, with the omission of so much of rule 7(1) as requires parties to serve a notice specifying the orders and direction which they desire and with any other necessary modifications, apply as if the application under this rule were a summons for directions. (4) This rule applies to every action begun by writ other than one which includes \u2014 (a) a claim by the plaintiff for libel, slander, malicious prosecution or false imprisonment; or (b) a claim by the plaintiff based on an allegation of fraud. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 19 GCR 1995 (Revised) ORDER 19 DEFAULT OF PLEADINGS 1. Default of service of statement of claim (O.19, r.1) 1. Where the plaintiff is required by these Rules to serve a statement of claim on a defendant and the plaintiff fails to serve it on the defendant, the defendant may, after the expiration of the period fixed by or under these Rules for service of the statement of claim, apply to the Court for an order to dismiss the action, and the Court may by order dismiss the action or make such other order on such terms as it thinks just. 2. Default of defence: claim for liquidated demand (O.19, r.2) 2. (1) Where the plaintiff's claim against a defendant is for a liquidated demand only, then, if that defendant fails to serve a defence on the plaintiff, the plaintiff may, after the expiration of the period fixed by or under these Rules for service of the defence, enter final judgment against that defendant for a sum not exceeding \u2014 (a) the principal sum claimed in the writ; (b) interest, provided that the writ has been indorsed with a claim pursuant to O.6, r.2(e) or (f), as the case may be; and (c) fixed costs, and proceed with the action against the other defendants, if any. (2) O.13, r.1(2), shall apply for the purposes of this rule as it applies for the purposes of that rule. 3. Default of defence: claim for unliquidated damages (O.19, r.3) 3. Where the plaintiff's claim against a defendant is for unliquidated damages only, then, if that defendant fails to serve a defence on the plaintiff, the plaintiff may, after the expiration of the period fixed by or under these Rules for service of the defence, enter interlocutory judgment against that defendant for damages to be assessed and costs, and proceed with the action against the other defendants, if any. 4. Default of defence: claim in detinue (O.19, r.4) 4. Where the plaintiff's claim against a defendant relates to the detention of goods only, then, if that defendant fails to serve a defence on the plaintiff, the plaintiff may, after the expiration of the period fixed by or under these Rules for the service of the defence at the plaintiff\u2019s option enter either \u2014 ORDER 19 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (a) interlocutory judgment against that defendant for delivery of the goods or their value to be assessed and costs; or (b) interlocutory judgment for the value of the goods to be assessed and costs, and proceed with the action against the other defendants, if any. 5. Default of defence: claim for possession of land (O.19, r.5) 5. (1) Where the plaintiff's claim against a defendant is for possession of land only, then if that defendant fails to serve a defence on the plaintiff, the plaintiff may, after the expiration of the period fixed by or under these Rules for service of the defence, enter judgment for possession of the land as against that defendant and for costs, and proceed with the action against the other defendants, if any. (2) Where there is more than one defendant, judgment entered under this rule shall not be enforced against any defendant unless and until judgment for possession of the land has been entered against all the defendants. 6. Default of defence: mixed claims (O.19, r.6) 6. Where the plaintiff makes against a defendant two or more of the claims mentioned in rules 2 to 5, and no other claim, then, if that defendant fails to serve a defence on the plaintiff, the plaintiff may, after the expiration of the period fixed by or under these Rules for service of the defence, enter against that defendant such judgment in respect of any such claim as the plaintiff would be entitled to enter under those rules if that were the only claim made, and proceed with the action against the other defendants, if any. 7. Default of defence: other claims (O.19, r.7) 7. (1) Where the plaintiff makes against a defendant or defendants a claim of a description not mentioned in rules 2 to 5, then, if the defendant or all the defendants (where there is more than one) fails or fail to serve a defence on the plaintiff, the plaintiff may, after the expiration of the period fixed by or under these Rules for service of the defence, apply to the Court for judgment, and on the hearing of the application the Court shall give such judgment as the plaintiff appears entitled to on the plaintiff\u2019s statement of claim. (2) Where the plaintiff makes such a claim as is mentioned in paragraph (1) against more than one defendant, then, if one of the defendants makes default as mentioned in that paragraph, the plaintiff may \u2014 (a) if the plaintiff\u2019s claim against the defendant in default is severable from the plaintiff\u2019s claim against the other defendants, apply under that paragraph for judgment against that defendant, and proceed with the action against the other defendants; or Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 19 (b) set down the action on motion for judgment against the defendant in default at the time when the action is set down for trial, or is set down on motion for judgment, against the other defendants. (3) An application under paragraph (1) must be by summons or motion. 8. Default of defence to counterclaim (O.19, r.8) 8. A defendant who counterclaims against a plaintiff shall be treated for the purposes of rules 2 to 7 as if the defendant were a plaintiff who had made against a defendant the claim made in the counterclaim and, accordingly, where the plaintiff or any other party against whom the counterclaim is made fails to serve a defence to counterclaim, those rules shall apply as if the counterclaim were a statement of claim, the defence to counterclaim a defence and the parties making the counterclaim and against whom it is made were plaintiffs and defendants respectively, and as if references to the period fixed by or under these Rules for service of the defence were references to the period so fixed for service of the defence to counterclaim. 9. Setting aside judgment (O.19, r.9) 9. The Court may, on such terms as it thinks just, set aside or vary any judgment entered in pursuance of this Order. ORDER 19 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) GCR 1995 (Revised) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 20 ORDER 20 AMENDMENT 1. Amendment of writ without leave (O.20, r.1) 1. (1) Subject to paragraph (3), the plaintiff may, without the leave of the Court, amend the writ once at any time before the pleadings in the action begun by the writ are deemed to be closed. (2) Where a writ is amended under this rule after service thereof, then, unless the Court otherwise directs on an application made ex parte, the amended writ must be served on each defendant to the action. (3) This rule shall not apply in relation to an amendment which consists of \u2014 (a) the addition, omission or substitution of a party to the action or an alteration of the capacity in which a party to the action sues or is sued; or (b) the addition or substitution of a new cause of action; or (c) without prejudice to rule 3(1) an amendment of the statement of claim (if any) indorsed on the writ, unless the amendment is made before service of the writ on any party to the action. 2. Amendment of acknowledgment of service (O.20, r.2) 2. (1) Subject to paragraph (2) a party may not amend the party\u2019s acknowledgment of service without the leave of the Court. (2) A party whose acknowledgment of service contains a statement to the effect that \u2014 (a) the party does; or (b) the party does not, intend to contest the proceedings to which the acknowledgment relates may, without the leave of the Court, amend the acknowledgment by substituting for that statement a statement to the opposite effect, provided that in a case falling under subparagraph (b) the amendment is made before judgment has been obtained in the proceedings. (3) Where an acknowledgment of service is authorised to be amended under this rule, a fresh acknowledgment, amended as so authorised, must be handed in at the Court office or sent by post to the Clerk of the Court, and O.12, r.3, shall apply accordingly. ORDER 20 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 3. Amendment of pleadings without leave (O.20, r.3) 3. (1) A party may, without the leave of the Court, amend any pleading of the party\u2019s once at any time before the pleadings are deemed to be closed and, where the party does so, the party must serve the amended pleading on the opposite party. (2) Where an amended statement of claim is served on a defendant \u2014 (a) the defendant, if the defendant has already served a defence on the plaintiff, may amend that defendant\u2019s defence; and (b) the period for service of the defendant\u2019s defence or amended defence, as the case may be, shall be either the period fixed by or under these Rules for service of the defendant\u2019s defence or a period of 14 days after the amended statement of claim is served on the defendant, whichever expires later. (3) Where an amended defence is served on the plaintiff by a defendant - (a) the plaintiff, if the plaintiff has already served a reply on that defendant, may amend the plaintiff\u2019s reply; and (b) the period for service of the plaintiff\u2019s reply or amended reply, as the case may be, shall be 14 days after the amended defence is served on the plaintiff. (4) In paragraphs (2) and (3) references to a defence and a reply include references to a counterclaim and a defence to counterclaim respectively. (5) Where an amended counterclaim is served by a defendant on a party (other than the plaintiff) against whom the counterclaim is made, paragraph (2) shall apply as if the counterclaim were a statement of claim and as if the party by whom the counterclaim is made were the plaintiff and the party against whom it is made a defendant. (6) Where a party has pleaded to a pleading which is subsequently amended and served on the party under paragraph (1), then, if that party does not amend that party\u2019s pleading under the foregoing provisions of this rule, the party shall be taken to rely on it in answer to the amended pleading, and O.18, r.14(2), shall have effect in such a case as if the amended pleading had been served at the time when that pleading, before its amendment under paragraph (1), was served. 4. Application for disallowance of amendment made without leave (O.20, r.4) 4. (1) Within 14 days after the service on a party of a writ amended under rule 1 or of a pleading amended under rule 3(1), that party may apply to the Court to disallow the amendment. (2) Where the Court hearing an application under this rule is satisfied that if an application for leave to make the amendment in question had been made under rule 5 at the date when the amendment was made under rule 1(1) or rule 3(1) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 20 leave to make the amendment or part of the amendment would have been refused, it shall order the amendment or that part to be struck out. (3) Any order made on an application under this rule may be made on such terms as to costs or otherwise as the Court thinks just. 5. Amendment of writ or pleading with leave (O.20, r.5) 5. (1) Subject to O.15, rr.6, 6A, 7 and 8 and the following provisions of this rule, the Court may at any stage of the proceedings allow the plaintiff to amend the plaintiff\u2019s writ, or any party to amend that party\u2019s pleading, on such terms as to costs or otherwise as may be just and in such manner (if any) as it may direct. (2) Where an application to the Court for leave to make the amendment mentioned in paragraph (3), (4) or (5) is made after any relevant period of limitation current at the date of issue of the writ has expired, the Court may nevertheless grant such leave in the circumstances mentioned in that paragraph if it thinks it just to do so. (3) An amendment to correct the name of a party may be allowed under paragraph (2) notwithstanding that it is alleged that the effect of the amendment will be to substitute a new party if the Court is satisfied that the mistake sought to be corrected is a genuine mistake and was not misleading or such as to cause any reasonable doubt as to the identity of the person intending to sue or, as the case may be, intended to be sued. (4) An amendment to alter the capacity in which a party sues may be allowed under paragraph (2) if the new capacity is one which that party had at the date of the commencement of the proceedings or has since acquired. (5) An amendment may be allowed under paragraph (2) notwithstanding that the effect of the amendment will be to add or substitute a new cause of action if the new cause of action arises out of the same facts or substantially the same facts as a cause of action in respect of which relief has already been claimed in the action by the party applying for leave to make the amendment. 6. No rule (O.20, r.6) 6. No rule (O.20, r.6) 7. Amendment of other originating process (O.20, r.7) 7. Rule 5 shall have effect in relation to an originating summons, a petition and a notice of originating motion as it has effect in relation to a writ. ORDER 20 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 8. Amendment of certain other documents (O.20, r.8) 8. (1) For the purpose of determining the real question in controversy between the parties to any proceedings, or of correcting any defect or error in any proceedings, the Court may at any stage of the proceedings and either of its own motion or on the application of any party to the proceedings order any document in the proceedings to be amended on such terms as to costs or otherwise as may be just and in such manner (if any) as it may direct. (2) This rule shall not have effect in relation to a judgment or order. 9. Failure to amend after order (O.20, r.9) 9. Where the Court makes an order under this Order giving any party leave to amend a writ, pleading or other document, then, if that party does not amend the document in accordance with the order before the expiration of the period specified for that purpose in the order or, if no period is so specified, of a period of 14 days after the order was made, the order shall cease to have effect, without prejudice, however, to the power of the Court to extend the period. 10. Mode of amendment of writ, etc. (O.20, r.10) 10. (1) Any amendments authorised under any rule of this order to be made in a writ, pleading or other document shall be given effect by preparing a fresh document, unless the Court directs otherwise in any case where the amendment is minimal. (2) An amended writ or other originating process shall be re-issued and any amended pleading shall be re-filed. (3) A writ, pleading or other document which has been amended under this Order must be indorsed with a statement that it has been amended, specifying the date on which it was amended, the name of the Judge by whom the order (if any) authorising the amendment was made and the date thereof, or, if no such order was made, the number of the rule of this Order in pursuance of which the amendment was made. 11. Amendment of judgments and orders (O.20, r.11) 11. Clerical mistakes in judgments or orders, or errors arising therein from any accidental slip or omission, may at any time be corrected by the Court on motion or summons without an appeal. 12. Amendment of pleadings by agreement (O.20, r.12) 12. (1) Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Order any pleading in any cause or matter may, by written agreement between the parties, be amended at any stage of the proceedings. (2) This rule shall not have effect in relation to an amendment to a counterclaim which consists of the addition, omission or substitution of a party. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 20 13. Manner in which amendments should be shown (O.20, r.13) 13. (1) In all cases in which a writ, pleading or other document is amended, the amended copy which is filed should make it clear what has been deleted and what has been added or altered so that the Court, when reading the amended document, shall be able to see at once the exact nature and extent of the amendments made. (2) Any amendments made should be shown in the following different coloured inks, namely \u2014 (a) a first amendment in red; (b) a second or re-amendment in green; (c) a third or re-re-amendment in violet; and (d) a fourth or re-re-re-amendment in yellow. GCR 1995 (Revised) ORDER 21 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 21 WITHDRAWAL AND DISCONTINUANCE 1. Withdrawal of acknowledgment of service (O.21, r.1) 1. A party who has acknowledged service in an action may withdraw the acknowledgment at any time with the leave of the Court. 2. Discontinuance of action, etc., without leave (O.21, r.2) 2. (1) Subject to paragraph (2A), the plaintiff in an action begun by writ may, without the leave of the Court, discontinue the action, or withdraw any particular claim made by the plaintiff therein, as against any or all of the defendants at any time not later than 14 days after service of the defence on the plaintiff or, if there are two or more defendants, of the defence last served, by serving a notice to that effect on the defendant concerned. (2) Subject to paragraph (2A), a defendant to an action begun by writ may, without the leave of the Court \u2014 (a) withdraw the defendant\u2019s defence or any part of it at any time; or (b) discontinue a counterclaim, or withdraw any particular claim made by the defendant therein, as against any or all of the parties against whom it is made, at any time not later than 14 days after service on the defendant of a defence to counterclaim or, if the counterclaim is made against two or more parties, of the defence to counterclaim last served, by serving a notice to that effect on the plaintiff or other party concerned. (2A)  A party in whose favour an interim payment has been ordered, in accordance with O.29, r.11, may not discontinue any action or counterclaim, or withdraw any particular claim therein, except with the leave of the Court or the consent of all the other parties. (3) Where there are two or more defendants to an action not all of whom serve a defence on the plaintiff, and the period fixed by or under these Rules for service by any of those defendants of their defence expires after the latest date on which any other defendant serves that defendant\u2019s defence, paragraph (1) shall have effect as if the reference therein to the service of the defence last served were a reference to the expiration of that period. This paragraph shall apply in relation to a counterclaim as it applies in relation to an action with the substitution for references to a defence, to the plaintiff and to paragraph (1), of references to a defence to counterclaim, to the defendant and to paragraph (2) respectively. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 21 (3A) The plaintiff in an action begun by originating summons may, without the leave of the Court, discontinue the action or withdraw any particular question or claim in the originating summons, as against any or all of the defendants at any time not later than 14 days after service on the plaintiff of the defendant's affidavit evidence filed pursuant to O.28, r.1A(4) or, if there are two or more defendants, of such evidence last served, by serving a notice to that effect on the defendant concerned. (3B) When there are two or more defendants to an action begun by originating summons not all of whom serve affidavit evidence on the plaintiff and the period fixed by order under these Rules for service by any of those defendants of their affidavit evidence, paragraph (3A) shall have effect as if the reference therein to the service of the affidavit evidence last served were a reference to the expiration of that period. (4) If all the parties to an action consent, the action may be withdrawn without the leave of the Court at any time before trial by producing to the Clerk of the Court a written consent to the action being withdrawn signed by all the parties. 3. Discontinuance of action, etc., with leave (O.21, r.3) 3. (1) Except as provided by rule 2, a party may not discontinue an action (whether begun by writ or otherwise) or counterclaim, or withdraw any particular claim made by the party therein, without the leave of the Court, and the Court hearing an application for the grant of such leave may order the action or counterclaim to be discontinued, or any particular claim made therein to be struck out, as against any or all of the parties against whom it is brought or made on such terms as to costs, the bringing of a subsequent action or otherwise as it thinks just. (2) An application for the grant of leave under this rule may be made by summons or motion or by notice under O.25, r.7. 4. Effect of discontinuance (O.21, r.4) 4. Subject to any terms imposed by the Court in granting leave under rule 3, the fact that a party has discontinued an action or counterclaim or withdrawn a particular claim made by the party therein shall not be a defence to the subsequent action for the same, or substantially the same, cause of action. ORDER 21 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 5. Stay of subsequent action until costs paid (O.21, r.5) 5. (1) Where a party has discontinued an action or counterclaim or withdrawn any particular claim made by the party therein and the party is liable to pay any other party's costs of the action or counterclaim or the costs occasioned to any other party by the claim withdrawn, then, if, before payment of those costs, the party subsequently brings an action for the same, or substantially the same, cause of action, the Court may order the proceedings in that action to be stayed until those costs are paid. (2) An application for an order under this rule may be made by summons or motion, or by notice under O.25, r.7. 6. Withdrawal of summons (O.21, r.6) 6. A party who has taken out a summons in a cause or matter may not withdraw it without the leave of the Court. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 21 GCR 1995 (Revised) ORDER 22 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 22 PAYMENT INTO AND OUT OF COURT 1. Payment into Court (O.22, r.1) 1. (1) In any action for a debt or damages any defendant may at any time pay into Court a sum of money in satisfaction of the cause of action in respect of which the plaintiff claims or, where two or more causes of action are joined in the action, a sum or sums of money in satisfaction of any or all of those causes of action. (2) On making any payment into Court under this rule, and on increasing any such payment already made, the defendant must give notice thereof in Form No. 14 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) to the plaintiff and every other defendant (if any); and within 3 days after receiving the notice the plaintiff must send the defendant a written acknowledgment of its receipt. (3) A defendant may, without leave, give notice of an increase in a payment made under this rule but, subject to that and without prejudice to paragraph (5), a notice of payment may not be withdrawn or amended without the leave of the Court which may be granted on such terms as may be just. (4) Where two or more causes of action are joined in the action and money is paid into Court under this rule in respect of all, or some only of, those causes of action, the notice of payment \u2014 (a) must state that the money is paid in respect of all those causes of action, or, as the case may be, must specify the cause or causes of action in respect of which the payment is made; and (b) where the defendant makes separate payments in respect of each, or any two or more of those causes of action, must specify the sum paid in respect of that cause or, as the case may be, those causes of action. (5) Where a single sum of money is paid into Court under this rule in respect of two or more causes of action, then, if it appears to the Court that the plaintiff is embarrassed by the payment, the Court may, subject to paragraph (6), order the defendant to amend the notice of payment so as to specify the sum paid in respect of each cause of action. (6) Where a cause of action under the Torts (Reform) Act (as amended and revised) and a cause of action under the Estates Proceedings Act (as amended and revised) are joined in the action, with or without any other cause of action, the causes of action under the said Laws shall, for the purpose of paragraph (5) be treated as one cause of action. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 22 (7)  For the purposes of this rule, the plaintiff's cause of action in respect of a debt or damages shall be construed as a cause of action in respect, also, of such interest as might be included in the judgment, whether under Section 34 of the Judicature Act (as amended and revised) or otherwise, if judgment were given at the date of the payment into Court. 2. Payment in by defendant who has counterclaimed (O.22, r.2) 2. Where a defendant, who makes by counterclaim a claim against the plaintiff for a debt or damages, pays a sum or sums of money into Court under rule 1, the notice of payment must state, if it be the case, that in making the payment the defendant has taken into account and intends to satisfy \u2014 (a) the cause of action in respect of which the defendant claims; or (b) where two or more causes of action are joined in the counterclaim, all those causes of action or, if not all, which of them. 3. Acceptance of money paid into Court (O.22, r.3) 3. (1) Where money is paid into Court under rule 1, then, subject to paragraph (2), within 21 days after receipt of the notice of payment, or, where more than one payment has been made or the notice has been amended, within 21 days after receipt of the notice of the last payment or the amended notice but, in any case, before the trial or hearing of the action begins, the plaintiff may \u2014 (a) where the money was paid in respect of the cause of action or all the causes of action in respect of which the plaintiff claims, accept the money in satisfaction of that cause of action or those causes of action, as the case may be; or (b) where the money was paid in respect of some only of the causes of action in respect of which the plaintiff claims, accept in satisfaction of any such cause or causes of action the sum specified in respect of that cause or those causes of action in the notice of payment, by giving notice in Form No. 15 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) to every defendant to the action. (2) Where after the trial or hearing of an action has begun \u2014 (a) money is paid into Court under rule 1; or (b) money in Court is increased by a further payment into Court under that rule, the plaintiff may accept the money in accordance with paragraph (1) within 2 days after receipt of the notice of payment or notice of the further payment, as the case may be, but, in any case, before the Judge begins to deliver judgment or, if the trial is with a jury, before the Judge begins the Judge\u2019s summing up. ORDER 22 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (3) Rule 1(5) shall not apply in relation to money paid into Court in an action after the trial or hearing of the action has begun. (4) On the plaintiff accepting any money paid into Court all further proceedings in the action or in respect of the specified cause or causes of action, as the case may be, to which the acceptance relates, both against the defendant making the payment and against any other defendant sued jointly with or in the alternative to the defendant, shall be stayed. (5) Where money is paid into Court by a defendant who made a counterclaim and the notice of payment stated, in relation to any sum paid, that in making the payment the defendant had taken into account and satisfied the cause or causes of action, or the specified cause or causes of action, in respect of which the plaintiff claimed, then, on the plaintiff accepting that sum all further proceedings on the counterclaim or in respect of the specified cause or causes of action, as the case may be, against the plaintiff shall be stayed. (6) A plaintiff who has accepted any sum paid into Court shall, subject to rule 4 and O.80, r.12, be entitled to receive payment of that sum in satisfaction of the cause or causes of action to which the acceptance relates. 4. Order for payment out of money accepted required in certain cases (O.22, r.4) 4. (1) Where a plaintiff accepts any sum paid into Court and that sum was paid into Court \u2014 (a) by some but not all of the defendants sued jointly or in the alternative by the plaintiff; or (b) with a defence of tender before action; or (c) in satisfaction either of causes of action arising under the Torts (Reform) Act (as amended and revised) and the Estates Proceedings Act (as amended and revised) or of a cause of action arising thereunder where more than one person is entitled to the money, the money in Court shall not be paid out except under paragraph (2) or in pursuance of an order of the Court, and the order shall deal with the whole costs of the action or of the cause of action to which the payment relates, as the case may be. (2) Where an order of the Court is required under paragraph (1) by reason only of subparagraph (1)(a), then if, either before or after accepting the money paid into Court by some only of the defendants sued jointly or in the alternative by the plaintiff, the plaintiff discontinues the action against all other defendants and those defendants consent in writing to the payment out of that sum, it may be paid out without an order of the Court. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 22 (3) Where after the trial or hearing of an action has begun a plaintiff accepts any money paid into Court and all further proceedings in the action or in respect of the specified cause or causes of action, as the case may be, to which the acceptance relates are stayed by virtue of rule 3(4), then, notwithstanding anything in paragraph (2), the money shall not be paid out except in pursuance of an order of the Court, and the order shall deal with the whole costs of the action. 5. Money remaining in Court (O.22, r.5) 5. If any money paid into Court in an action is not accepted in accordance with rule 3, the money remaining in Court shall not be paid out except in pursuance of an order of the Court which may be made at any time before, or after the trial or hearing of the action; and where such an order is made before the trial or hearing the money shall not be paid out except in satisfaction of the cause or causes of action in respect of which it was paid in. 6. Counterclaim (O.22, r.6) 6. A plaintiff against whom a counterclaim is made and any other defendant to the counterclaim may pay money into Court in accordance with rule 1, and that rule and rules 3 (except paragraph (5)), 4 and 5 shall apply accordingly with the necessary modifications. 7. Non-disclosure of payment into Court (O.22, r.7) 7. (1) Except in an action to which a defence of tender before action is pleaded, and except in an action all further proceedings in which are stayed by virtue of rule 3(4) after the trial or hearing has begun and subject to paragraph (2), the fact that money has been paid into Court under the foregoing provisions of this Order shall not be pleaded and no communication of that fact shall be made to the Court at the trial or hearing of the action or counterclaim or of any question or issue as to the debt or damages until all questions of liability and of the amount of debt or damages have been decided. (2) Where the question of the costs of the issue of liability falls to be decided, that issue having been tried and an issue or question concerning the amount of the debt or damages remaining to be tried separately, any party may bring to the attention of the Court the fact that a payment into Court has or has not been made and the date (but not the amount) of such payment or of the first payment if more than one. 8. Money paid into Court under order (O.22, r.8) 8. (1) On making any payment into Court under an order of the Court or certificate of the Clerk of the Court, a party must give notice thereof to every other party to the proceedings. ORDER 22 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (2) Subject to paragraph (3), money paid into Court under an order of the Court or a certificate of the Clerk of the Court shall not be paid out except in pursuance of an order of the Court. (3) Unless the Court otherwise orders, a party who has paid money into Court in pursuance of an order made under O.14 \u2014 (a) may by notice to the other party appropriate the whole or any part of the money and any additional payment, if necessary, to any particular claim made in the writ or counterclaim, as the case may be, and specified in the notice; or (b) if the party pleads a tender, may by the party\u2019s pleading appropriate the whole or any part of the money as payment into Court of the money alleged to have been tendered, and money appropriated in accordance with this rule shall be deemed to be money paid into Court in accordance with rule 1 or money paid into Court with a plea of tender, as the case may be, and this Order shall apply accordingly. (4) If the Court so orders, paragraph (3) shall apply, with the necessary modifications, where a party has paid money to another person to abide the outcome of the action. 9. No rule (O.22, r.9) 9. No rule (O.22, r.9) 10. No rule (O.22, r.10) 10. No rule (O.22, r.10) 11. No rule (O.22, r.11) 11. No rule (O.22, r.11) 12. No rule (O.22, r.12) 12. No rule (O.22, r.12) 13. Investment of money in Court (O.22, r.13) 13. Cash under the control of or subject to the order of the Court shall be invested in accordance with the provisions of Order 92. 14. Written offers \\\"without prejudice save as to costs\\\" (O.22, r.14) 14. (1) A party to proceedings may at any time make a written offer to any other party to those proceedings which is expressed to be \\\"without prejudice save as to costs\\\" and which relates to any issue in the proceedings. (2) Where an offer is made under paragraph (1), the fact that such an offer has been made shall not be communicated to the Court until the question of costs falls to Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 22 be decided and the Court shall take into account any offer which has been brought to its attention when making an order for costs. Provided that the Court shall not take such offer into account if, at the time it is made, the party making it could have protected that party\u2019s position as to costs by means of a payment into Court under Order 22. GCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 20.01.97) ORDER 23 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 23 SECURITY FOR COSTS 1. Security for costs of action, etc. (O.23, r.1) 1. (1) Where, on the application of a defendant to an action or other proceedings it appears to the Court \u2014 (a) that the plaintiff is ordinarily resident out of the jurisdiction; or (b) that the plaintiff (not being a plaintiff who is suing in a representative capacity) is a nominal plaintiff who is suing for the benefit of some other person and that there is reason to believe that the plaintiff will be unable to pay the costs of the defendant if ordered to do so; or (c) subject to paragraph (3), that the plaintiff's address is not stated in the writ or other originating process or is incorrectly stated therein; or (d) that the plaintiff has changed the plaintiff\u2019s address during the course of the proceedings with a view to evading the consequences of the litigation, then if, having regard to all the circumstances of the case, the Court thinks it just to do so, it may order the plaintiff to give such security for the defendant's costs of the action or other proceedings as it thinks just. (2) For the purposes of this rule a person is deemed to be ordinarily resident out of the jurisdiction if the person does not have the right either to reside permanently in the Islands or have the right to work in the Islands. (3) The Court shall not require a plaintiff to give security by reason only of subparagraph (1)(c) if the plaintiff satisfies the Court that the failure to state the plaintiff\u2019s address or the mis-statement thereof was made innocently and without intention to deceive. (4) The references in the foregoing paragraphs to a plaintiff and a defendant shall be construed as references to the person (howsoever described on the record) who is in the position of plaintiff or defendant, as the case may be, in the proceedings in question, including a proceeding on a counterclaim. 2. Manner of giving security (O.23, r.2) 2. Where an order is made requiring any party to give security for costs, security shall be given in such manner, at such time, and on such terms (if any), as the Court may direct. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 23 3. Saving for enactments (O.23, r.3) 3. This Order is without prejudice to the provisions of any Law which empowers the Court to require security to be given for the costs of any proceedings. GCR 1995 (Revised) ORDER 24 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 24 DISCOVERY I. DOCUMENTARY DISCOVERY 1. Mutual discovery of documents (O.24, r.1) 1. (1) After the close of pleadings in an action begun by writ there shall, subject to and in accordance with the provisions of this Order, be discovery by the parties to the action of the documents which are or have been in their possession, custody or power relating to matters in question in the action. (2) Nothing in this Order shall be taken as preventing the parties to an action agreeing to dispense with or limit the discovery of documents which they would otherwise be required to make to each other. 2. Discovery by parties without order (O.24, r.2) 2. (1) Subject to the provisions of this rule and of rule 4, the parties to an action between whom pleadings are closed must make discovery by exchanging lists of documents and, accordingly, each party must, within 14 days after the pleadings in the action are deemed to be closed as between that party and any other party, make and serve on that other party a list of the documents which are or have been in the party\u2019s possession, custody or power relating to any matter in question between them in the action. Without prejudice to any directions given by the Court under O.16, r.4, this paragraph shall not apply in third party proceedings, including proceedings under that Order involving fourth or subsequent parties. (2) Unless the Court otherwise orders, a defendant to an action arising out of an accident on land due to a collision or apprehended collision involving a vehicle shall not make discovery of any documents to the plaintiff under paragraph (1). (3) Paragraph (1) shall not be taken as requiring a defendant to an action for the recovery of any penalty recoverable by virtue of any enactment to make discovery of any documents. (4) Paragraphs (2) and (3) shall apply in relation to a counterclaim as they apply in relation to an action but with the substitution, for the reference in paragraph (2) to the plaintiff, of a reference to the party making the counterclaim. (5) On the application of any party required by this rule to make discovery of documents, the Court may \u2014 (a) order that the parties to the action or any of them shall make discovery under paragraph (1) of such documents or classes of documents only, or Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 24 as to such only of the matters in question, as may be specified in the order; or (b) if satisfied that discovery by all or any of the parties is not necessary, or not necessary at that stage of the action, order that there shall be no discovery of documents by any or all of the parties either at all or at that stage, and the Court shall make such an order if and so far as it is of opinion that discovery is not necessary either for disposing fairly of the action or for saving costs. (6) An application for an order under paragraph (5) must be by summons, and the summons must be taken out before the expiration of the period within which by virtue of this rule discovery of documents in the action is required to be made. (7) Any party to whom discovery of documents is required to be made under this rule may, at any time before the summons for directions in the action is taken out, serve on the party required to make such discovery a notice requiring that party to make an affidavit verifying the list the party is required to make under paragraph (1), and the party on whom such a notice is served must, within 14 days after service of the notice, make and file an affidavit in compliance with the notice and serve a copy of the affidavit on the party by whom the notice was served. 3. Order for discovery (O.24, r.3) 3. (1) Subject to the provisions of this rule and of rules 4 and 8, the Court may order any party to a cause or matter (whether begun by writ, originating summons or otherwise) to make and serve on any other party a list of the documents which are or have been in the party\u2019s possession, custody or power relating to any matter in question in the cause or matter, and may at the same time or subsequently also order the party to make and file an affidavit verifying such a list and to serve a copy thereof on the other party. (2) Where a party who is required by rule 2 to make discovery of documents fails to comply with any provision of that rule, the Court on the application of any party to whom discovery was required to be made may make an order against the first mentioned party under paragraph (1) of this rule or, as the case may be, may order that party to make and file an affidavit verifying the list of documents that party is required to make under rule 2 and to serve a copy thereof on the applicant. (3) An order under this rule may be limited to such documents or classes of documents only or to such only of the matters in question in the cause or matter, as may be specified in the order. ORDER 24 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 4. Orders for determination of issue, etc., before discovery (O.24, r.4) 4. (1) Where on an application for an order under rule 2 or 3 it appears to the Court that any issue or question in the cause or matter should be determined before any discovery of documents is made by the parties, the Court may order that that issue or question be determined first. (2) Where in an action begun by writ an order is made under this rule for the determination of an issue or question, O.25, rr.2 to 7 shall, with the omission of so much of rule 7(1) as requires parties to serve a notice specifying the orders and directions which they desire and with any other necessary modifications, apply as if the application on which the order was made were a summons for directions. 5. Form of list and affidavit (O.24, r.5) 5. (1) A list of documents made in compliance with rule 2 or with an order under rule 3 must be in Form No. 16 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised), and must enumerate the documents in a convenient order and as shortly as possible but describing each of them or, in the case of bundles of documents of the same nature, each bundle, sufficiently to enable it to be identified. (2) If it is desired to claim that any documents are privileged from production, the claim must be made in the list of documents with a sufficient statement of the grounds of the privilege. (3) If it is desired to claim that any documents contain confidential information within the meaning of Section 2 of the Confidential Information Disclosure Act (as amended and revised), and that the relevant principal in relation to such confidential information is someone other than the party or parties on whom the list of documents is to be served, the claim must be made in the list of documents with a sufficient statement of the grounds of the claim. (4) Where a claim is made under paragraph (3) of this rule, any party to whom discovery was required to be made may serve a notice on the party making discovery, requiring that party to make an application to the Court under Section 4 of the Confidential Information Disclosure Act (as amended and revised), and such application shall be made within 14 days of receipt of the notice. 6. Defendant entitled to copy of co-defendant's list (O.24, r.6) 6. (1) A defendant who has pleaded in an action shall be entitled to have a copy of any list of documents served under any of the foregoing rules of this Order on the plaintiff by any other defendant to the action; and a plaintiff against whom a counterclaim is made in an action begun by writ shall be entitled to have a copy of any list of documents served under any of those rules on the party making the counterclaim by any other defendant to the counterclaim. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 24 (2) A party required by virtue of paragraph (1) to supply a copy of a list of documents must supply it free of charge on a request made by the party entitled to it. (3) Where in an action begun by originating summons the Court makes an order under rule 3 requiring a defendant to the action to serve a list of documents on the plaintiff, it may also order the defendant to supply any other defendant to the action with a copy of that list. (4)  In this rule \\\"list of documents\\\" includes an affidavit verifying a list of documents. 7. Order for discovery of particular documents (O.24, r.7) 7. (1) Subject to rule 8, the Court may at any time, on the application of any party to a cause or matter, make an order requiring any other party to make an affidavit stating whether any document specified or described in the application or any class of documents so specified or described is, or has at any time been in that other party\u2019s possession, custody or power, and if not then in that other party\u2019s possession, custody or power when that other party parted with it and what has become of it. (2) An order may be made against a party under this rule notwithstanding that the party may already have made or been required to make a list of documents or affidavit under rule 2 or 3. (3) An application for an order under this rule must be supported by an affidavit stating the belief of the deponent that the party from whom discovery is sought under this rule has, or at some time had, in the deponent\u2019s possession custody or power the document, or class of documents specified or described in the application and that it relates to one or more of the matters in question in the cause or matter. 8. Discovery to be ordered only if necessary (O.24, r.8) 8. On the hearing of an application for an order under rule 3 or 7 the Court, if satisfied that discovery is not necessary, or not necessary at that stage of the cause or matter, may dismiss or, as the case may be, adjourn the application and shall in any case refuse to make such an order if and so far as it is of opinion that discovery is not necessary either for disposing fairly of the cause or matter or for saving costs. ORDER 24 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 9. Inspection of documents referred to in list (O.24, r.9) 9. A party who has served a list of documents on any other party, whether in compliance with rule 2 or with an order under rule 3, must allow the other party to inspect the documents referred to in the list (other than any which the party objects to produce) and to take copies thereof, and, accordingly, the party must when the party serves the list on the other party also serve on that party a notice stating a time within 7 days after the service thereof at which the said documents may be inspected at a place in the notice. 10. Inspection of documents referred to in pleadings and affidavits (O.24, r.10) 10. (1) Any party to a cause or matter shall be entitled at any time to serve a notice on any other party in whose pleadings or affidavits reference is made to any document requiring that party to produce that document for the inspection of the party giving the notice and to permit the party to take copies thereof. (2) The party on whom a notice is served under paragraph (1) must, within 4 days after service of the notice, serve on the party giving the notice a notice stating a time within 7 days after the service thereof at which the documents, or such of them as the party does not object to produce, may be inspected at a place specified in the notice, and stating which (if any) of the documents the party objects to produce and on what grounds. 11. Order for production for inspection (O.24, r.11) 11. (1) If a party who is required by rule 9 to serve such a notice as is therein mentioned or who is served with a notice under rule 10(1) \u2014 (a) fails to serve a notice under rule 9 or, as the case may be, rule 10(2); or (b) objects to produce any document for inspection; or (c) offers inspection at a time or place such that, in the opinion of the Court, it is unreasonable to offer inspection then, or, as the case may be, there, then, subject to rule 14(1), the Court may, on the application of the party entitled to inspection, make an order for production of the documents in question for inspection at such time and place, and in such manner, as it thinks fit. (2) Without prejudice to paragraph (1), but subject to rule 14(1) the Court may, on the application of any party to a cause or matter, order any other party to permit the party applying to inspect any documents in the possession, custody or power of that other party relating to any matter in question in the cause or matter. (3) An application for an order under paragraph (2) must be supported by an affidavit specifying or describing the documents of which inspection is sought and stating the belief of the deponent that they are in the possession, custody or power of the other party and that they relate to a matter in question in the cause or matter. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 24 12. Provision of copies of documents (O.24, r.12) 12. (1) Any party who is entitled to inspect any documents under any provision of this Order or any order made thereunder may at or before the time when inspection takes place serve on the party who is required to produce such documents for inspection a notice (which shall contain an undertaking to pay the reasonable charges) requiring the party to supply a true copy of any such document as is capable of being copied by photographic or similar process. (2) The party on whom such a notice is served must within 7 days of receipt thereof supply the copy required together with an account of the reasonable charges. (3) When a party fails to supply to another party a copy of any document under paragraph (2), the Court may on the application of either party, make such order as to the supply of that document as it thinks fit. 13. Order for production to Court (O.24, r.13) 13. At any stage of the proceedings in any cause or matter the Court may, subject to rule 14(1), order any party to produce to the Court any document in that party\u2019s possession, custody or power relating to any matter in question in the cause or matter and the Court may deal with the document when produced in such manner as it thinks fit. 14. Production to be ordered only if necessary, etc. (O.24, r.14) 14. (1) No order for the production of any documents for inspection or to the Court or for the supply of a copy of any document shall be made under any of the foregoing rules unless the Court is of opinion that the order is necessary either for disposing fairly of the cause or matter or for saving costs. (2) Where on an application under this Order for production of any document for inspection or to the Court or for the supply of a copy of a document privileged from such production or supply is claimed or objection is made to such production or supply on the ground that it contains confidential information or on any other ground, the Court may inspect the document for the purpose of deciding whether the claim or objection is valid. 15. Production of business books (O.24, r.15) 15. (1) Where production of any business books for inspection is applied for under any of the foregoing rules, the Court may, instead of ordering production of the original books for inspection, order a copy of any entries therein to be supplied and verified by an affidavit of some person who has examined the copy with the original books. (2) Any such affidavit shall state whether or not there are in the original books any and what erasures, interlineations or alterations. ORDER 24 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (3) Notwithstanding that a copy of any entries in any book has been supplied under this rule, the Court may order production of the book from which the copy was made. II. DISCOVERY BY ORAL EXAMINATION 16. Order for Discovery by Oral Examination (O.24, r.16) 16. (1) In an action begun by Writ, the Court may make an order for discovery by oral examination of any party or, if the party is a body corporate, any officer thereof. (2) On the hearing of an application for an order under this rule, the Court may make such an order if and so far as it is of opinion that discovery by oral examination is necessary either for disposing fairly of the cause or matter or for saving costs. (3) An order shall not be made under this rule until after the parties have given discovery of documents in accordance with rules 2 or 3 or until after the Court has determined in accordance with rule 8 that discovery of documents is not necessary. (4) An order for examination under this rule shall specify \u2014 (a) the time and place of the examination; (b) the maximum duration of the examination; and (c) the party having responsibility for engaging the services of a Court reporter. 17. Conduct of examination (O.24, r.17) 17. (1) An examination for discovery shall be taken down by a Court reporter in the form of questions and answers and the transcript shall be certified as an accurate transcription by the Court reporter. (2) The Court reporter shall record the names and addresses of all the persons present and the time(s) at which the examination commenced and finished. (3) The examination shall be done under oath and the Court reporter shall be empowered to administer the oath. (4) The examination of a person for discovery shall be in the nature of a crossexamination and the person examined may be re-examined on that person\u2019s own behalf or on behalf of another party not adverse in interest to that person in relation to any matter respecting which that person has been examined. (5) Documents referred to during an examination for discovery shall be retained by the parties and shall be exhibited to the transcript only if all parties agree that it is necessary to do so. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 24 (6) Unless the Court otherwise orders, a person being examined for discovery shall (subject to any claim of privilege) answer any question within that person\u2019s knowledge or means of knowledge regarding any matter in question in the action and is compellable to give the names and addresses of all persons who reasonably might be expected to have knowledge relating to any matter in question in the action. (7) A person ordered to be examined for discovery shall take all such steps as may be reasonably necessary to inform themselves of the matters in question in the action and the examination may be adjourned for that purpose. (8) Where a person under examination objects to answering any questions put to the person, or if objection is taken to any such question, that question, the ground for the objection and the answer to the question to which objection is taken must be taken down and recorded. (9) The validity of the ground for objecting to answer any such question or for objecting to any such question shall be decided by the Court. (10) If the Court decides against the person taking the objection it may order the person to submit to further examination and to pay the costs occasioned by that person\u2019s objection. 18. Use of transcripts (O.24, r.18) 18. (1) Certified copies of transcripts of oral examinations for discovery (which may be ordered by any party) shall be served on all the parties to the action within 14 days after completion of the transcript of the examination. (2) At the trial of an action any party may use in evidence as part of that party\u2019s case, if otherwise admissible, the whole or part of the examination for discovery of a party having an adverse interest (the \\\"adverse party\\\") in the following manner. (3) A party may read in evidence as part of that party\u2019s case, any portion of any adverse party's discovery, subject to the Court ordering that any further passage should be read in, as a matter of fairness, to fully explain or qualify any answer given. (4) A party may put to an adverse party in cross examination any questions and answers contained in the transcript of the adverse party\u2019s examination. (5) If the adverse party does not testify personally or call any evidence, then the other parties may read in evidence any portion of the transcript of the adverse party's examination, as evidence for that party's case, subject to the Court ordering that any further passage should be read in, as a matter of fairness, to fully explain or qualify any answer given. ORDER 24 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) III. GENERAL PROVISIONS 19. Disclosure which would be injurious to public interest: saving (O.24, r.19) 19. The foregoing provisions of this Order shall be without prejudice to any rule of law which authorises or requires the withholding of any document or information on the ground that the disclosure of it would be injurious to the public interest. 20. Failure to comply with an order for discovery (O.24, r.20) 20. (1) Where the Court has made an order for discovery (either of documents or by way of oral examination) against any party and such party fails to comply, the Court may make such order as it thinks just, including, in particular, an order that the action be dismissed or, as the case may be order that the defence be struck out and final judgment entered accordingly. (2) If any party against whom an order for discovery is made fails to comply with it, then, without prejudice to paragraph (1), the party shall be liable to committal or, where the party is a body corporate, its responsible officer(s) shall be liable to committal. (3) Service on a party's attorney of an order for discovery made against that party shall be sufficient service to found an application for committal of the party disobeying the order but the party may show cause in answer to the application that the party had no notice or knowledge of the order. (4) An attorney on whom an order made against that attorney\u2019s client is served and who fails without reasonable excuse to give notice thereof to that attorney\u2019s client shall be liable to committal. 21. Revocation and variation of orders (O.24, r.21) 21. Any order made under this Order (including an order made on appeal) may, on sufficient cause being shown, be revoked or varied by a subsequent order or direction of the Court made or given at or before the trial of the cause or matter in connection with which the original order was made. 22. Use of documents and transcripts (O.24, r.22) 22. Any undertaking, whether expressed or implied, not to use a document or transcript for any purposes other than the proceedings in which it is disclosed or made shall cease to apply to such document or transcript after it has been read to or by the Court, or referred to in open Court, unless the Court for special reasons has otherwise ordered on the application of a party or of the person to whom the document belongs or by whom the oral evidence was given. GCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 08.09.03) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 25 ORDER 25 SUMMONS FOR DIRECTIONS 1. Summons for directions (O.25, r.1) 1. (1) With a view to providing, in every action to which this rule applies, an occasion for the consideration by the Court of the preparations for the trial of the action, so that \u2014 (a) all matters which must or can be dealt with on interlocutory applications and have not already been dealt with may so far as possible be dealt with; and (b) such directions may be given as to the future course of the action as appear best adapted to secure the just, expeditious and economical disposal thereof, the plaintiff must, within 1 month after the pleadings in the action are deemed to be closed, take out a summons (in these Rules referred to as a summons for directions) returnable in not less than 14 days. (2) This rule applies to all actions begun by writ except \u2014 (a) actions in which the plaintiff or defendant has applied for judgment under O.14, or in which the plaintiff applied for judgment under O.86 and directions have been given under the relevant Orders; (b) actions in which the plaintiff or defendant has applied under O.18, r.21, for trial without pleadings or further pleadings and directions have been given under that rule; (c) actions in which an order has been made under O.24, r.4, for the trial of an issue or question before discovery; (d) actions in which directions have been given under O.29, r.7; (e) actions in which an order for the taking of an account has been made under O.43, r.1; (f) actions for the infringement of a patent; and (g) actions for personal injuries for which automatic directions are provided by rule 8. (3) Where, in the case of any action in which discovery of documents is required to be made by any party under O.24, r.2, the period of 14 days referred to in paragraph (1) of that rule is extended, whether by consent or by order of the Court or both by consent and by order, paragraph (1) of this rule shall have effect in relation to that action as if for the reference therein to 1 month after the ORDER 25 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) pleadings in the action are deemed to be closed there were substituted a reference to 14 days after the expiration of the period referred to in paragraph (1) of the said rule 2 as so extended. (4) If the plaintiff does not take out a summons for directions in accordance with the foregoing provisions of this rule, the defendant or any defendant may do so or apply for an order to dismiss the action. (5) On an application by a defendant to dismiss the action under paragraph (4) the Court may either dismiss the action on such terms as may be just or deal with the application as if it were a summons for directions. (6) In the case of an action which is proceeding only as respects a counterclaim, references in this rule to the plaintiff and defendant shall be construed respectively as references to the party making the counterclaim and the defendant to the counterclaim. (7) Notwithstanding anything in paragraph (1) \u2014 (a) any party to the action to which this rule applies may take out a summons for directions at any time after the defendant has given notice of intention to defend, or, if there are two or more defendants, at least one of them has given such notice; and (b) the Court may make directions of its own motion at any time provided that the parties have been given such notice, if any, as may be appropriate having regard to the nature of the directions intended to be given by the Court. 2. Duty to consider all matters (O.25, r.2) 2. (1) When the summons for directions first comes to be heard, the Court shall consider whether \u2014 (a) it is possible to deal then with all the matters which, by the subsequent rules of this Order, are required to be considered on the hearing of the summons for directions; or (b) it is expedient to adjourn the consideration of all or any of those matters until a later stage. (2) If, when the summons for directions first comes to be heard, the Court considers that it is possible to deal with all the said matters, it shall deal with them forthwith and shall endeavour to secure that all other matters which must or can be dealt with on interlocutory applications and have not already been dealt with are also then dealt with. (3) If, when the summons for directions first comes to be heard, the Court considers that it is expedient to adjourn the consideration of all or any of the matters which, by the subsequent rules of this Order, are required to be considered on the hearing of the summons, the Court shall deal forthwith with such of those Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 25 matters as it considers can conveniently be dealt with forthwith and adjourn the consideration of the remaining matters and shall endeavour to secure that all other matters which must or can be dealt with on interlocutory applications and have not already been dealt with are dealt with either then or at a resumed hearing of the summons for directions. (4) If the hearing of the summons for directions is adjourned without a day being fixed for the resumed hearing thereof, any party may restore it to the list on 4 days' notice to the other parties. 3. Particular matters for consideration (O.25, r.3) 3. On the hearing of the summons for directions, or when giving directions of its own motion, the Court shall in particular consider (if necessary of its own motion) whether any order should be made or direction given in respect of any of the following matters \u2014 (a) fixing a trial date and\/or a timetable for future steps in the action; (b) making orders for the disposal of the whole or part of the cause or matter pursuant to O.14A and\/or striking out the whole or part of any pleading pursuant to O.18, r.19; (c) amendment of the writ or any pleading pursuant to O.20, r.5; (d) directions pursuant to O.38, r.2 to r.7 in relation to evidence generally; (e) directions pursuant to O.38, r.21 to r.31 relating to hearsay evidence; (f) directions pursuant to O.38, r.36 to r.43 relating to expert evidence; (g) directions for the determination of preliminary issues pursuant to O.33, r.3 or a split trial pursuant to O.33, r.4A; (h) orders pursuant to O.24 relating to discovery including an order pursuant to rule 20 that an action be dismissed or, as the case may be, that the defence be struck out and final judgment entered accordingly; (i) give directions which facilitate alternative dispute resolutions. 4. Admissions and agreements to be made (O.25, r.4) 4. At the hearing of the summons for directions the Court shall endeavour to secure that the parties make all admissions and all agreements as to the conduct of the proceedings which ought reasonably to be made by them and may cause the order on the summons to record any admissions or agreements so made, and (with a view to such special order, if any, as to costs as may be just being made at the trial) any refusal to make any admission or agreement. ORDER 25 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 5. Limitation of right of appeal (O.25, r.5) 5. Nothing in rule 4 shall be construed as requiring the Court to endeavour to secure that the parties shall agree to exclude or limit any right of appeal, but the order made on the summons for directions may record any such agreement. 6. Duty to give all information at hearing (O.25, r.6) 6. (1) Subject to paragraph (2), no affidavit shall be used on the hearing of the summons for directions except by the leave or direction of the Court, but, subject to paragraph (4), it shall be the duty of the parties to the action and their advisers to give all such information and produce all such documents on any hearing of the summons as the Court may reasonably require for the purposes of enabling it properly to deal with the summons. The Court may, if it appears proper so to do in the circumstances, authorise any such information or documents to be given or produced to the Court without being disclosed to the other parties but, in the absence of such authority, any information or document given or produced under this paragraph shall be given or produced to all the parties present or represented on the hearing of the summons as well as to the Court. (2) No leave shall be required by virtue of paragraph (1) for the use of an affidavit by any party on the hearing of the summons for directions in connection with any application thereat for any order if, under any of these Rules, an application for such an order is required to be supported by an affidavit. (3) If the Court on any hearing of the summons for directions requires a party to the action or the party\u2019s attorney to give any information or produce any document and that information or document is not given or produced, then, subject to paragraph (4), the Court may \u2014 (a) cause the facts to be recorded in the order with a view to such special order, if any, as to costs as may be just being made at the trial; or (b) if it appears to the Court to be just so to do, order the whole or any part of the pleadings of the party concerned to be struck out, or, if the party is plaintiff or the claimant under a counterclaim, order the action or counterclaim to be dismissed on such terms as may be just. (4) Notwithstanding anything in the foregoing provisions of this rule, no information or documents which are confidential or privileged from disclosure shall be required to be given or produced under this rule by or by the attorneys of any party otherwise than with the consent of that party. 7. Duty to make all interlocutory applications on summons for directions (O.25, r.7) 7. (1) Any party to whom the summons for directions is addressed must so far as practicable apply at the hearing of the summons for any order or directions Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 25 which the party may desire as to any matter capable of being dealt with on an interlocutory application in the action and must, not less than 7 days before the hearing of the summons, serve on the other parties a notice specifying those orders and directions insofar as they differ from the orders and directions asked for by the summons. (2) If the hearing of the summons for directions is adjourned and any party to the proceedings desires to apply at the resumed hearing for any order or directions not asked for by the summons or in any notice given under paragraph (1), the party must, not less than 7 days before the resumed hearing of the summons, serve on the other parties a notice specifying those orders and directions insofar as they differ from the orders and directions asked for by the summons or in any such notice as aforesaid. (3) Any application subsequent to the summons for directions and before judgment as to any matter capable of being dealt with on an interlocutory application in the action must be made under the summons by 4 clear days' notice to the other party stating the grounds of the application. 8. Automatic directions in personal injury actions (O.25, r.8) 8. (1) When the pleadings in any action to which this rule applies are deemed to be closed the following directions shall take effect automatically \u2014 (a) there shall be discovery of documents within 14 days in accordance with O.24, r.2, and inspection within 7 days thereafter, save that where liability is admitted, or where the action arises out of a road accident, discovery shall be limited to disclosure by the plaintiff of any documents relating to special damages; (b) subject to paragraph (2), when any party intends to place reliance at the trial on expert evidence, the party shall, within 10 weeks disclose the substance of that evidence to the other parties in the form of a written report, which shall be agreed if possible; (c) unless such reports are agreed, the parties shall be at liberty to call as expert witnesses those witnesses, the substance of whose evidence has been disclosed in accordance with the preceding subparagraph, except that the number of expert witnesses shall be limited in any case to two medical experts and one expert of any other kind; (d) photographs, a sketch plan and the contents of any police accident report book shall be receivable in evidence at the trial, and shall be agreed if possible; (e) the action shall be tried by Judge alone and shall be set down within 6 months; (f) the Court shall be notified, on setting down, of the estimated length of the trial. ORDER 25 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (2) When subparagraph (1)(b) applies to more than one party the reports shall be disclosed by mutual exchange, medical for medical and non-medical for nonmedical, within the time provided or as soon thereafter as the reports on each side are available. (3) Nothing in paragraph (1) shall prevent any party to an action to which this rule applies from applying to Court for such further or different directions or orders as may, in the circumstances, be appropriate. (4) For the purposes of this rule \u2014 (a) \\\"road accident\\\" means an accident on land due to a collision or apprehended collision involving a vehicle; and (b) \\\"documents relating to special damages\\\" include \u2014 (i) documents relating to any industrial injury, industrial disablement or sickness benefit rights; and (ii) when the claim is made under the Torts (Reform) Act (as amended and revised) documents relating to any claim for dependency on the deceased. (5) This rule applies to any action for personal injuries except \u2014 (a) any admiralty action; and (b) any action where the pleadings contain an allegation of a negligent act or omission in the course of medical treatment. GCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 08.09.03) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 26 ORDER 26 INTERROGATORIES 1. Discovery by interrogatories (O.26, r.1) 1. (1) A party to any cause or matter may in accordance with the following provisions of this Order serve on any other party interrogatories relating to any matter in question between the applicant and that other party in the cause or matter which are necessary either \u2014 (a) for disposing fairly of the cause or matter; or (b) for saving costs. (2) Without prejudice to the provisions of paragraph (1), a party may apply to the Court for an order giving the party leave to serve on any other party interrogatories relating to any matter in question between the applicant and that other party in the cause or matter. (3) A proposed interrogatory which does not relate to such a matter as is mentioned in paragraph (1) may not be administered notwithstanding that it might be admissible in oral cross-examination of a witness. (4) In this Order \u2014 (a) \\\"interrogatories without order\\\" means interrogatories served under paragraph (1); and (b) \\\"ordered interrogatories\\\" means interrogatories served under paragraph (2) or interrogatories which are required to be answered pursuant to an order made on an application under rule 3(2) and, where such an order is made the interrogatories shall not, unless the Court orders otherwise, be treated as interrogatories without order for the purposes of rule 3(1). (5) Unless the context otherwise requires, the provisions of this Order apply to both interrogatories without order and ordered interrogatories. 2. Form and nature of interrogatories (O.26, r.2) 2. (1) Where interrogatories are served, a note at the end of the interrogatories shall specify \u2014 (a) a period of time (not being less than 28 days from the date of service) within which the interrogatories are to be answered; (b) where the party to be interrogated is a body corporate or unincorporate which is empowered by law to sue or be sued whether in its own name or in the name of an officer or other person, the officer or member on whom the interrogatories are to be served; and ORDER 26 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (c) where the interrogatories are to be served on two or more parties or are required to be answered by an agent or servant of a party, which of the interrogatories each party or, as the case may be, an agent or servant is required to answer, and which agent or servant. (2) Subject to rule 5(1), a party on whom interrogatories are served shall, unless the Court orders otherwise on an application under rule 3(2), be required to give within the period specified under rule 2(1)(a) answers, which shall (unless the Court directs otherwise) be on affidavit. 3. Interrogatories without order (O.26, r.3) 3. (1) Interrogatories without order may be served on a party not more than twice. (2) A party on whom interrogatories without order are served may, within 14 days of the service of the interrogatories, apply to the Court for the interrogatories to be varied or withdrawn and, on any such application, the Court may make such order as it thinks fit (including an order that the party who served the interrogatories shall not serve further interrogatories without order). (3) Interrogatories without order shall not be served on the Crown. 4. Ordered interrogatories (O.26, r.4) 4. (1) Where an application is made for leave to serve interrogatories, a copy of the proposed interrogatories shall be served with the summons or the notice under O.25, r.7, by which the application is made. (2) In deciding whether to give leave to serve interrogatories, the Court shall take into account any offer made by the party to be interrogated to give particulars, make admissions or produce documents relating to any matter in question and whether or not interrogatories without order have been administered. 5. Objections and insufficient answers (O.26, r.5) 5. (1) Without prejudice to rule 3(2), where a person objects to answering any interrogatory on the ground of privilege the person may take the objection in that person\u2019s answer. (2) Where any person on whom ordered interrogatories have been served answers any of them insufficiently, the Court may make an order requiring the person to make a further answer, either by affidavit or on oral examination as the Court may direct. (3) Where any person on whom interrogatories without order have been served answers any of them insufficiently, the party serving the interrogatories may ask for further and better particulars of the answer given and any such request shall not be treated as service of further interrogatories for the purposes of rule 3(1). (4) If it is desired to claim that the answer to any interrogatory constitutes confidential information within the meaning of Section 2 of the Confidential Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 26 Information Disclosure Act (as amended and revised), and that the relevant principal in relation to such confidential information is someone other than the party or parties on whom the answers to the interrogatories are to be served, the claim must be made in the answer with a sufficient statement of the grounds of the claim. (5) Where a claim is made under paragraph (4) of this rule, any party on whom the answers to the interrogatories are required to be served may serve a notice on the party answering the interrogatories, requiring that party to make an application to the Court under Section 4 of the Confidential Information Disclosure Act (as amended and revised), and such application shall be made within 14 days of receipt of the notice. 6. Failure to comply with order (O.26, r.6) 6. (1) If a party fails to answer interrogatories or to comply with an order made under rule 5(2) or a request made under rule 5(3), the Court may make such order as it thinks just including, in particular, an order that the action be dismissed or, as the case may be, an order that the defence be struck out and judgment be entered accordingly. (2) Without prejudice to paragraph (1), where a party fails to answer ordered interrogatories or to comply with an order made under rule 5(2), the party shall be liable to committal. (3) Service on a party's attorney of an order to answer interrogatories made against the party shall be sufficient service to found an application for committal of the party disobeying the order, but the party may show in answer to the application that the party had no notice or knowledge of the order. (4) An attorney on whom an order to answer interrogatories made against that attorney\u2019s client is served and who fails without reasonable excuse to give notice thereof to that attorney\u2019s client shall be liable to committal. 7. Use of answers to interrogatories at trial (O.26, r.7) 7. A party may put in evidence at the trial of a cause or matter, or of any issue therein, some only of the answers to interrogatories, or part only of such an answer, without putting in evidence the other answers or, as the case may be, the whole of that answer, but the Court may look at the whole of the answers and if of opinion that any other answer or other part of an answer is so connected with an answer or part thereof used in evidence that the one ought not to be used without the other, the Court may direct that that other answer or part shall be put in evidence. 8. Revocation and variation of orders (O.26, r.8) 8. Any order made under this Order (including an order made on appeal) may, on sufficient cause being shown, be revoked or varied by a subsequent order or direction ORDER 26 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) of the Court made or given at or before the trial of the cause or matter in connection with which the original order was made. GCR 1995 (Revised) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 27 ORDER 27 ADMISSIONS 1. Admission of case of other party (O.27, r.1) 1. Without prejudice to O.18, r.13, a party to a cause or matter may give notice, by that party\u2019s pleading or otherwise in writing, that the party admits the truth of the whole or any part of the case of any other party. 2. Notice to admit (O.27, r.2) 2. (1) A party to a cause or matter may not later than 21 days after the cause or matter is set down for trial serve on any other party a notice requiring the party to admit, for the purpose of that cause or matter only, the facts specified in the notice. (2) An admission made in compliance with a notice under this rule shall not be used against the party by whom it was made in any cause or matter other than the cause or matter for the purpose of which it was made or in favour of any person other than the person by whom the notice was given, and the Court may at any time allow a party to amend or withdraw an admission so made by the party on such terms as may be just. 3. Judgment on admissions (0.27, r.3) 3. Where admissions of fact are made by a party to a cause or matter either by the party\u2019s pleadings or otherwise, any other party to the cause or matter may apply to the Court for such judgment or order as upon those admissions the other party may be entitled to, without waiting for the determination of any other question between the parties, and the Court may give such judgment, or make such order on the application as it thinks just. An application for an order under this rule may be made by motion or summons. 4. Admission and production of documents specified in list of documents (O.27, r.4) 4. (1) Subject to paragraph (2) and without prejudice to the right of a party to object to the admission in evidence of any document, a party on whom a list of documents is served in pursuance of any provision of O.24 shall, unless the Court otherwise orders, be deemed to admit \u2014 (a) that any document described in the list as an original document is such a document and was printed, written, signed or executed as it purports respectively to have been; and (b) that any document described therein as a copy is a true copy. ORDER 27 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) This paragraph does not apply to a document the authenticity of which the party has denied in the party\u2019s pleading. (2) If before the expiration of 21 days after inspection of the documents specified in a list of documents or after the time limited for inspection of those documents expires, whichever is the later, the party on whom the list is served serves on the party whose list it is a notice stating, in relation to any document specified therein, that the party does not admit the authenticity of that document and requires it to be proved at the trial, the party shall not be deemed to make any admission in relation to that document under paragraph (1). (3) A party to a cause or matter by whom a list of documents is served on any other party in pursuance of any provision of O.24 shall be deemed to have been served by that other party with a notice requiring the party to produce at the trial of the cause or matter such of the documents specified in the list as are in the party\u2019s possession, custody or power. (4) The foregoing provisions of this rule apply in relation to an affidavit made in compliance with an order under O.24, r.7, as they apply in relation to a list of documents served in pursuance of any provision of that Order. 5. Notices to admit or produce documents (O.27, r.5) 5. (1) Except where rule 4(1) applies, a party to a cause or matter may within 21 days after the cause or matter is set down for trial serve on any other party a notice requiring the party to admit the authenticity of the documents specified in the notice. (2) If a party on whom a notice under paragraph (1) is served desires to challenge the authenticity of any document therein specified the party must, within 21 days after service of the notice, serve on the party by whom it was given a notice stating that the party does not admit the authenticity of the document and requires it to be proved at the trial. (3) A party who fails to give a notice of non-admission in accordance with paragraph (2) in relation to any document shall be deemed to have admitted the authenticity of that document unless the Court otherwise orders. (4) Except where rule 4(3) applies, a party to a cause or matter may serve on any other party a notice requiring the other party to produce the documents specified in the notice at the trial of the cause or matter. GCR 1995 (Revised) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 28 ORDER 28 ORIGINATING SUMMONS PROCEDURE 1. Application (O.28, r.1) 1. The provisions of this Order apply to all originating summonses subject, in the case of originating summonses of any particular class, to any special provisions relating to originating summonses of that class made by these Rules or by or under any Law; and, subject as aforesaid, O.32, r.5, shall apply in relation to originating summonses as it applies in relation to other summonses. 1A. Affidavit evidence (O.28, r.1A) 1A. (1) In any cause or matter begun by originating summons (not being an ex parte summons) the plaintiff must, before the expiration of 14 days after the defendant has acknowledged service, or, if there are two or more defendants, at least one of them has acknowledged service, file the affidavit evidence on which the plaintiff intends to rely. (2) In the case of an ex parte summons, the applicant must file the applicant\u2019s affidavit evidence not less than 4 clear days before the day fixed for the hearing. (3) Copies of the affidavit evidence filed in Court under paragraph (1) must be served by the plaintiff on the defendant, or, if there are two or more defendants, on each defendant, before the expiration of 14 days after service has been acknowledged by that defendant. (4) When a defendant who has acknowledged service wishes to adduce affidavit evidence the defendant must within 28 days after service on the defendant of copies of the plaintiff's affidavit evidence under paragraph (3) file the defendant\u2019s own affidavit evidence and serve copies thereof on the plaintiff and on any other defendant who is affected thereby. (5) A plaintiff on whom a copy of a defendant's affidavit evidence has been served under paragraph (4) may within 14 days of such service file further affidavit evidence in reply and shall in that event serve copies thereof on that defendant. (6) No other affidavit shall be received in evidence without leave of the Court. (7) Where an affidavit is required to be served by one party on another party it shall be served without prior charge. (8) The provisions of this rule apply subject to any directions by the Court to the contrary. (9) In this rule references to affidavits and copies of affidavits include references to exhibits to affidavits and copies of such exhibits. ORDER 28 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 2. Fixing time for attendance of parties before Court (O.28, r.2) 2. (1) In the case of an originating summons which is in Form No. 2 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised), the plaintiff must, within 1 month of the expiry of the time within which copies of affidavit evidence may be served under rule 1A, make an application to fix an appointment in accordance with the provisions of O.34, r.3. (2) A day and time fixed for the attendance of the parties before the Court for the hearing of an originating summons which is in Form No. 3 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised), or for the hearing of an ex parte originating summons, may be fixed on the application of the plaintiff or applicant, as the case may be and, in the case of a summons which is required to be served, the time limited for acknowledging service shall, where appropriate, be abridged so as to expire on the next day but one before the day so fixed, and the time limits for filing affidavits under rule 1A(2) and (3) shall, where appropriate, be abridged so as to expire, respectively, on the fifth day before, and the next day but one before, the day so fixed. (3) Where a plaintiff fails to apply for an appointment under paragraph (1), any defendant may, with the leave of the Court, obtain an appointment in accordance with that paragraph provided that that defendant has acknowledged service of the originating summons. 3. Notice of hearing (O.28, r.3) 3. (1) Not less than 14 clear days before the day fixed under rule 2 for the attendance of the parties before the Court for the hearing of an originating summons which is in Form No. 2 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised), the party on whose application the day was fixed must serve a copy of the notice fixing it on every other party who has acknowledged service of the originating summons and, if the first mentioned party is a defendant, on the plaintiff. (2) Not less than 4 clear days before the day fixed under rule 2 for the hearing of an originating summons, which is in Form No. 3 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised), the plaintiff must serve the summons on every defendant or, if any defendant has already been served with the summons, must serve on that defendant notice of the day fixed for hearing. (3) Where notice in Form No. 5 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) is served in accordance with paragraph (1), such notice shall specify what orders or directions the party serving the notice intends to seek at the hearing; and any party served with such notice who wishes to seek different orders or directions must, not less than 7 days before the hearing, serve on every other party a notice specifying the other orders and directions that party intends to seek. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 28 (4) If the hearing of an originating summons which is in Form No. 2 or Form No. 3 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) is adjourned and any party to the proceedings desires to apply at the resumed hearing for any order or direction not previously asked for that party must not less than 7 days before the resumed hearing of the summons serve on every other party a notice specifying those orders and directions. (5) Where a party is required by any provision of this rule or rule 5(2) to serve a notice or a copy of a notice on \\\"every other party\\\" the party must \u2014 (a) where the party is the plaintiff, serve it on every defendant who has acknowledged service of the originating summons; and (b) where the party is a defendant, serve it on the plaintiff and on every other defendant affected thereby. 4. Directions, etc., by Court (O.28, r.4) 4. (1) The Court by whom an originating summons is heard may, if the liability of the defendant to the plaintiff in respect of any claim made by the plaintiff is established, make such order in favour of the plaintiff as the nature of the case may require, but where the Court makes an order under this paragraph against a defendant who does not appear at the hearing, the order may be varied or revoked by a subsequent order of the Court on such terms as it thinks just. (2) Unless on the first hearing of an originating summons the Court disposes of the summons altogether or makes an order under rule 8, the Court shall give such directions as to the further conduct of the proceedings as it thinks best adapted to secure the just, expeditious and economical disposal thereof. (3) Without prejudice to the generality of paragraph (2), the Court shall, at as early a stage of the proceedings on the summons as appears to it to be practicable, consider whether there is or may be a dispute as to fact and whether the just, expeditious and economical disposal of the proceedings can accordingly best be secured by hearing the summons on oral evidence or mainly on oral evidence, and, if it thinks fit, may order that no further evidence shall be filed and that the summons shall be heard on oral evidence or partly on oral evidence and partly on affidavit evidence, with or without cross-examination of any of the deponents, as it may direct. (4) Without prejudice to the generality of paragraph (2), and subject to paragraph (3), the Court may give directions as to the filing of evidence and as to the attendance of deponents for cross-examination and any directions which it could give under O.25 if the cause or matter had been begun by writ and the summons were a summons for directions under that Order. (5) The Court may at any stage of the proceedings order that any affidavit, or any particulars of any claim, defence or other matter stated in any affidavit, shall ORDER 28 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) stand as pleadings or that points of claim, defence or reply be delivered and stand as pleadings. 5. Adjournment of summons (O.28, r.5) 5. (1) The hearing of the summons by the Court may, if necessary, be adjourned from time to time, either generally or to a particular date, as may be appropriate, and the powers of the Court under rule 4 may be exercised at any resumed hearing. (2) If the hearing of the summons is adjourned generally, any party may restore it to the list on 14 days' notice to every other party, and rule 3(4) shall apply to any adjourned hearing. 6. Applications affecting party who has not acknowledged service (O.28, r.6) 6. Where in a cause or matter begun by originating summons an application is made to the Court for an order affecting a party who has failed to acknowledge service, the Court hearing the application may require to be satisfied in such manner as it thinks fit that the party has so failed. 7. Counterclaim by defendant (O.28, r.7) 7. (1) A defendant to an action begun by originating summons who has acknowledged service of the summons and who alleges that the defendant has any claim or is entitled to any relief or remedy against the plaintiff in respect of any matter (whenever and however arising) may make a counterclaim in the action in respect of that matter instead of bringing a separate action. (2) A defendant who wishes to make a counterclaim under this rule must at the first or any resumed hearing of the originating summons by the Court but, in any case, at as early a stage in the proceedings as is practicable, inform the Court of the nature of the defendant\u2019s claim and, without prejudice to the powers of the Court under paragraph (3), the claim shall be made in such manner as the Court may direct under rule 4 or 8. (3) If it appears on the application of a plaintiff against whom a counterclaim is made under this rule that the subject matter of the counterclaim ought for any reason to be disposed of by a separate action, the Court may order the counterclaim to be struck out or may order it to be tried separately or make such other order as may be expedient. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 28 8. Continuation of proceedings as if cause or matter begun by writ (O.28, r.8) 8. (1) Where, in the case of a cause or matter begun by originating summons, it appears to the Court at any stage of the proceedings that the proceedings should for any reason be continued as if the cause or matter had been begun by writ, it may order the proceedings to continue as if the cause or matter had been so begun and may, in particular, order that any affidavits shall stand as pleadings, with or without liberty to any of the parties to add thereto or to apply for particulars thereof. (2) Where the Court decides to make such an order, O.25, rr.2 to 7 shall, with the omission of so much of rule 7(1) as requires parties to serve a notice specifying the orders and directions which they require and, with any other necessary modifications, apply as if there had been a summons for directions in the proceedings and that order were one of the orders to be made thereon. (3) This rule applies notwithstanding that the cause or matter in question could not have been begun by writ. (4) Any reference in these Rules to an action begun by writ, shall, unless the context otherwise requires, be construed as including a reference to a cause or matter, proceedings in which are ordered under this rule to continue as if the cause or matter had been so begun. 9. Order for hearing or trial (O.28, r.9) 9. (1) Except where the Court disposes of a cause or matter begun by originating summons in Chambers or makes an order in relation to it under rule 8 or some other provision of these Rules, the Court shall, on being satisfied that the cause or matter is ready for determination, make an order for the hearing or trial of the cause or matter as may be appropriate. (2) The Court shall by order determine the place and mode of the trial, but any such order may be varied by a subsequent order of the Court made at or before the trial. (3) O.33, r.4(2), and O.34, rr.1 to 5, shall apply in relation to a cause or matter begun by originating summons and to an order made therein under this rule as they apply in relation to an action begun by writ and to an order made therein under the said rule 4 and shall have effect accordingly with the necessary modifications and with the further modification that for references therein to the summons for directions there shall be substituted references to the first or any resumed hearing of the originating summons by the Court. (4) The Court may order the Plaintiff to deliver to the Court office bundles comprising documents of the kind specified in O.34, r.10, but O.34, r.10 shall not otherwise apply to any cause or matter begun by originating summons. ORDER 28 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 10. Failure to comply with rules of Court orders (O.28, r.10) 10. If any party to a cause or matter begun by originating summons, or a counterclaim under rule 7, does not comply with this Order, or with any order or direction of the Court as to the conduct of the proceedings, the Court may order that the cause or matter or counterclaim be dismissed or, as the case may be, the defendant be debarred from adducing such evidence in the cause or matter or counterclaim as the Court may specify, or (if it thinks appropriate) that the defence or counterclaim be struck out and judgment entered accordingly. 11. No rule (O.28, r.11) 11. No rule (O.28, r.11) GCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 20.01.07) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 29 ORDER 29 INTERLOCUTORY INJUNCTIONS, INTERIM PRESERVATION OF PROPERTY, INTERIM PAYMENTS, ETC. I. INTERLOCUTORY INJUNCTIONS, INTERIM PRESERVATION OF PROPERTY, ETC. 1. Application for injunction (O.29, r.1) 1. (1) An application for the grant of an injunction may be made by any party to a cause or matter before or after the trial of the cause or matter, whether or not a claim for the injunction was included in that party's writ, originating summons, counterclaim or third party notice, as the case may be. (2) Where the applicant is the plaintiff and the case is one of urgency such application may be ex parte on affidavit but, except as aforesaid, such application must be made by motion or summons. (3) The plaintiff may not make such an application before the issue of the writ or originating summons by which the cause or matter is to be begun except where the case is one of urgency, and in that case the injunction applied for may be granted on terms providing for the issue of the writ or summons and such other terms, if any, as the Court thinks fit. 1A. No rule (O.29, 1A) 1A. No rule (O.29, 1A) 2. Detention, preservation, etc., of subject matter of cause or matter (O.29, r.2) 2. (1) On the application of any party to a cause or matter the Court may make an order for the detention, custody or preservation of any property which is the subject matter of the cause or matter, or as to which any question may arise therein, or for the inspection of any such property in the possession of a party to the cause or matter. (2) For the purpose of enabling any order under paragraph (1) to be carried out the Court may by the order authorise any person to enter upon any land or building in the possession of any party to the cause or matter. (3) Where the right of any party to a specific fund is in dispute in a cause or matter, the Court may, on the application of a party to the cause or matter, order the fund to be paid into Court or otherwise secured. (4) An order under this rule may be made on such terms, if any, as the Court thinks just. ORDER 29 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (5) An application for an order under this rule must be made by summons or by notice under O.25, r.7. (6) Unless the Court otherwise directs, an application by a defendant for such an order may not be made before the defendant acknowledges service of the writ or originating summons by which the cause or matter was begun. 2A. No rule (O.29, 2A) 2A. No rule (O.29, 2A) 3. Power to order samples to be taken, etc. (O.29, r.3) 3. (1) Where it considers it necessary or expedient for the purpose of obtaining full information or evidence in any cause or matter, the Court may, on the application of a party to the cause or matter, and on such terms, if any, as it thinks just, by order authorise or require any sample to be taken of any property which is the subject matter of the cause or matter or as to which any question may arise therein, any observation to be made on such property or any experiment to be tried on or with such property. (2) For the purpose of enabling any order under paragraph (1) to be carried out the Court may by order authorise any person to enter upon any land or building in the possession of any party to the cause or matter. (3) Rule 2(5) and (6) shall apply in relation to an application for an order under this rule as they apply in relation to an application for an order under that rule. 4. Sale of perishable property, etc. (O.29, r.4) 4. (1) The Court may, on the application of any party to a cause or matter, make an order for the sale by such person, in such manner and on such terms (if any) as may be specified in the order of any property (other than land) which is the subject matter of the cause or matter or as to which any question arises therein and which is of a perishable nature or likely to deteriorate if kept or which for any other good reason it is desirable to sell forthwith. In this paragraph \\\"land\\\" includes any interest in, or right over, land. (2) Rule 2(5) and (6) shall apply in relation to an application for an order under this rule as they apply in relation to an application for an order under that rule. 5. Order for early trial (O.29, r.5) 5. Where on the hearing of an application, made before the trial of a cause or matter, for an injunction or the appointment of a receiver or an order under rule 2, 3 or 4 it appears to the Court that the matter in dispute can be better dealt with by an early trial than by considering the whole merits thereof for the purposes of the application, the Court may make an order accordingly and may also make such order as respects the period before the trial as the justice of the case requires. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 29 Where the Court makes an order for early trial it shall by the order determine the place and mode of the trial. 6. Recovery of personal property subject to lien, etc. (O.29, r.6) 6. Where the plaintiff, or the defendant by way of counterclaim, claims the recovery of specific property (other than land) and the party from whom recovery is sought does not dispute the title of the party making the claim but claims to be entitled to retain the property by virtue of a lien or otherwise as security for any sum of money, the Court, at any time after the claim to be so entitled appears from the pleadings (if any) or by affidavit or otherwise to its satisfaction, may order that the party seeking to recover the property be at liberty to pay into Court, to abide the event of the action, the amount of money in respect of which the security is claimed and such further sum (if any), for interest and costs as the Court may direct and that, upon such payment being made, the property claimed be given up to the party claiming it. 7. Directions (O.29, r.7) 7. (1) Where an application is made under any of the foregoing provisions of this Order, the Court may give directions as to the further proceedings in the cause or matter. (2) If, in an action begun by writ, not being any such action as is mentioned in subparagraphs (a) to (c) and (e) to (g) of O.25, r.1(2), the Court thinks fit to give directions under this rule before the summons for directions, rules 2 to 7 of that Order shall, with the omission of so much of rule 7(1) as requires parties to serve a notice specifying the orders and directions which they desire and with any other necessary modifications, apply as if the application were a summons for direction. 7A. No rule (O.29, r.7A) 7A. No rule (O.29, r.7A) 8. Allowance of income of property pending suit (O.29, r.8) 8. Where any real or personal property forms the subject matter of any proceedings, and the Court is satisfied that it will be more than sufficient to answer all the claims thereon for which provision ought to be made in the proceedings, the Court may at any time allow the whole or part of the income of the property to be paid, during such period as it may direct, to any or all of the parties who have an interest therein or may direct that any part of the personal property be transferred or delivered to any or all of such parties. II. INTERIM PAYMENTS 9. Interpretation of Part II (O.29, r.9) 9. In this Part of this Order \u2014 ORDER 29 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) \\\"interim payments\\\" in relation to a defendant, means a payment on account of any damages, debt or other sum (excluding costs) which the defendant may be held liable to pay to or for the benefit of the plaintiff and any reference to the plaintiff or defendant includes a reference to any person who, for the purpose of the proceedings acts as next friend of the plaintiff or guardian of the defendant. 10. Application for interim payment (O.29, r.10) 10. (1) The plaintiff may, at any time after the writ has been served on a defendant and the time limited for the defendant to acknowledge service has expired, apply to the Court for an order requiring that defendant to make an interim payment. (2) An application under this rule shall be made by summons but may be included in a summons for summary judgment under O.14 or O.86. (3) An application under this rule shall be supported by an affidavit which shall \u2014 (a) verify the amount of the damages, debt or other sum the application relates to and the grounds of the application; and (b) exhibit any documentary evidence relied on by the plaintiff in support of the application. (4) The summons and a copy of the affidavit in support and any documents exhibited thereto shall be served on the defendant against whom the order is sought not less than 10 clear days before the return day. (5) Notwithstanding the making or refusal of an order for an interim payment, a second or subsequent application may be made upon cause shown. 11. Order for interim payment in respect of damages (O.29, r.11) 11. (1) If, on the hearing of an application under rule 10 in an action for damages, the Court is satisfied \u2014 (a) that the defendant against whom the order is sought (in this paragraph referred to as \\\"the respondent\\\") has admitted liability for the plaintiff's damages; or (b) that the plaintiff has obtained judgment against the respondent for damages to be assessed; or (c) that if the action proceeded to trial, the plaintiff would obtain judgment for substantial damages against the respondent or, where there are two or more defendants, against any of them, the Court may, if it thinks fit and subject to paragraph (2), order the respondent to make an interim payment of such amount as it thinks just, not exceeding a reasonable proportion of the damages which in the opinion of the Court are likely to be recovered by the plaintiff after taking into account any relevant contributory negligence and any set-off, cross-claim or counterclaim on which the respondent may be entitled to rely. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 29 (2) No order shall be made under paragraph (1), in an action for personal injuries if it appears to the Court that the defendant is not a person falling within one of the following categories, namely \u2014 (a) a person who is insured in respect of the plaintiff's claim; (b) a public authority; or (c) a person whose means and resources are such as to enable the defendant to make the interim payment. 12. Order for interim payment in respect of sums other than damages (O.29, r.12) 12. If on the hearing of an application under rule 10, the Court is satisfied \u2014 (a) that the plaintiff has obtained an order for an account to be taken as between themselves and the defendant and for any amount certified due on taking the account to be paid; or (b) that the plaintiff's action includes a claim for possession of land and, if the action proceeded to trial, the defendant would be held liable to pay to the plaintiff a sum of money in respect of the defendant's use and occupation of the land during the pendency of the action, even if a final judgment or order were given or made in favour of the defendant; or (c) that if the action proceeded to trial the plaintiff would obtain judgment against the defendant for a substantial sum of money apart from any damages or costs, the Court may, if it thinks fit, and without prejudice to any contentions of the parties as to the nature or character of the sum to be paid by the defendant, order the defendant to make an interim payment of such amount as it thinks just, after taking into account any set-off, crossclaim or counterclaim on which the defendant may be entitled to rely. 13. Manner of payment (O.29, r.13) 13. (1) Subject to O.80, r.12, the amount of any interim payment ordered to be made shall be paid to the plaintiff unless the order provides it to be paid into Court, and where the amount is paid into Court, the Court may, on the application of the plaintiff, order the whole or any part of it to be paid out to the plaintiff at such time or times as the Court thinks fit. (2) An application under the preceding paragraph for money in Court to be paid out may be made ex parte, but the Court hearing the application may direct a summons to be issued. (3) An interim payment may be ordered to be made in one sum or by such instalments as the Court thinks fit. (4) Where a payment is ordered in respect of the defendant's use and occupation of land the order may provide for periodical payments to be made during the pendency of the action. ORDER 29 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 14. Directions on application under rule 10 (O.29, r.14) 14. Where an application is made under rule 10, the Court may give instructions as to the further conduct of the action, and, so far as may be applicable, O.25, rr.2 to 7, shall, with the omission of so much of rule 7(1) as requires the parties to serve a notice specifying the orders and directions which they require and with any other necessary modifications, apply as if the application were a summons for directions, and, in particular, the Court may order an early trial of the action. 15. Non-disclosure of interim payment (O.29, r.15) 15. The fact that an order has been made under rule 11 or 12 shall not be pleaded and, unless the defendant consents or the Court so directs, no communication of that fact or the fact that an interim payment has been made, whether voluntarily or pursuant to an order, shall be made to the Court at the trial, or hearing, of any question or issue as to liability or damages until all questions of liability and amount have been determined. 16. Payment into Court in satisfaction (O.29, r.16) 16. Where, after making an interim payment, whether voluntarily or pursuant to an order, a defendant pays a sum of money into Court under O.22, r.1, the notice of payment must state that the defendant has taken into account the interim payment. 17. Adjustment on final judgment or order or on discontinuance (O.29, r.17) 17. Where a defendant has been ordered to make an interim payment or has in fact made an interim payment, whether voluntarily or pursuant to an order, the Court may, in giving or making a final judgment or order or granting the plaintiff leave to discontinue the plaintiff\u2019s action or to withdraw the claim in respect of which the interim payment has been made, or at any other stage of the proceedings on the application of any party, make an order with respect to the interim payment as may be just, and in particular \u2014 (a) an order for the repayment by the plaintiff of all or part of the interim payment; or (b) an order for the payment to be varied or discharged; or (c) an order for the payment by any other defendant of any part of the interim payment which the defendant who made it is entitled to recover from the other defendant by way of contribution or indemnity or in respect of any remedy or relief relating to or connected with the plaintiff's claim. 18. Counterclaims and other proceedings (O.29, r.18) 18. The preceding rules in this Part of this Order shall apply with the necessary modifications, to any counterclaim or proceeding otherwise than by writ, where one party seeks an order for an interim payment to be made by another. GCR 1995 (Revised) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 30 ORDER 30 RECEIVERS 1. Application for receiver and injunction (O.30, r.1) 1. (1) An application for the appointment of a receiver may be made by summons or motion. (2) An application for an injunction ancillary or incidental to an order appointing a receiver may be joined with the application for such order. (3) Where the applicant wishes to apply for the immediate grant of such an injunction, the applicant may do so ex parte on affidavit. (4) The Court hearing an application under paragraph (3) may grant an injunction restraining the party beneficially entitled to any interest in the property of which a receiver is sought from assigning, charging or otherwise dealing with that property until after the hearing of a summons for the appointment of the receiver and may require such a summons, returnable on such date as the Court may direct, to be issued. 2. Giving of security by receiver (O.30, r.2) 2. (1) A judgment or order directing the appointment of a receiver may include such directions as the Court thinks fit for the giving of security by the person appointed. (2) Where by virtue of any judgment or order appointing a person named therein to be receiver, a person is required to give security in accordance with this rule that person must give security approved by the Court duly to account for what that person receives as receiver and to deal with it as the Court directs. (3) Unless the Court otherwise directs, the security shall be by guarantee. (4) The guarantee shall be submitted for approval by the Clerk of the Court and shall then be filed. 3. Remuneration of receiver (O.30, r.3) 3. A person appointed receiver shall be allowed such proper remuneration, if any, as may be authorised by the Court and the Court may direct that such remuneration shall be fixed by reference to such scales or rates of professional charges as it thinks fit. 4. Service of order and notice (O.30, r.4) 4. A copy of the order or judgment appointing a receiver shall be served by the party having conduct of the proceedings on the receiver and all other parties to the cause or matter in which the receiver has been appointed. ORDER 30 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 5. Receiver's accounts (O.30, r.5) 5. (1) A receiver shall submit accounts to the Court at such intervals or on such dates as the Court may direct in order that they may be passed. (2) Any party to whom a receiver is required to submit accounts may, on giving reasonable notice to the receiver, inspect, either personally or by an agent, the books and other papers relating to the accounts. (3) Any party who is dissatisfied with the accounts of the receiver may give notice specifying the item or items to which objection is taken and requiring the receiver within 14 days to file the receiver\u2019s accounts with the Court. (4) Following an examination by or on behalf of the Court of an item or items in an account to which objection is taken the result of such examination must be certified by the examiner and an order may thereupon be made as to the incidence of any costs or expenses incurred. 6. Payment into Court by receiver (O.30, r.6) 6. The Court may fix the amounts and frequency of payments into Court to be made by a receiver. 7. Default by receiver (O.30, r.7) 7. (1) Where a receiver fails to attend for the examination of any account of the receiver\u2019s, or fails to submit any account, provide access to any books or papers or do any other thing which the receiver is required to submit, provide or do, the receiver and any or all of the parties to the cause or matter in which the receiver is appointed may be required to attend in Chambers to show cause for the failure, and the Court may, either in Chambers or after adjournment into Court, give such directions as it thinks proper including, if necessary, directions for the discharge of the receiver and the appointment of another and the payment of costs. (2) Without prejudice to paragraph (1) where a receiver fails to attend for the examination of any account of the receiver\u2019s or fails to submit any account or fails to pay into Court on the day fixed by the Court any sum required to be so paid, the Court may disallow any remuneration claimed by the receiver and may, where the receiver has failed to pay any such sum into Court, charge the receiver with interest at the rate currently payable in respect of judgments of the Court on that sum while in the receiver\u2019s possession as receiver. 8. Directions to receivers (O.30, r.8) 8. A receiver may at any time request the Court to give the receiver directions and such a request shall state in writing the matter with regard to which directions are required. GCR 1995 (Revised) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 31 ORDER 31 SALES, ETC., OF LAND BY ORDER OF COURT 1. Certifying result of sale (O.31, r.1) 1. Where, in any cause or matter relating to any land, it appears necessary or expedient for the purposes of the cause or matter that the land or any part thereof should be sold, the Court may order that land or part thereof to be sold, and any party bound by the order and in possession of that land or part, or in receipt of the rents and profits thereof, may be compelled to deliver up such possession or receipt to the purchaser or to such other person as the Court may direct. In this Order \\\"land\\\" includes any interest in, or right over, land. 2. Manner of carrying out sale (O.31, r.2) 2. (1) Where an order is made, whether in Court or in Chambers, directing any land to be sold, the Court may permit the party or person having the conduct of the sale to sell the land in such manner as the party or person thinks fit, or may direct that the land be sold in such manner as the Court may either by the order or subsequently direct for the best price that can be obtained, and all proper parties shall join in the sale and transfer as the Court shall direct. (2) The Court may give such directions as it thinks fit for the purpose of effecting the sale, including, without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing words, directions \u2014 (a) appointing the party or person who is to have the conduct of the sale; (b) fixing the manner of sale, whether by contract conditional on the approval of the Court, private treaty, public auction, tender or some other manner; (c) fixing a reserve or minimum price; (d) requiring payment of the purchase money into Court or to trustees or other persons; (e) for settling the particulars and conditions of sale; (f) for obtaining evidence of the value of the property; (g) fixing the security (if any) to be given by the auctioneer, if the sale is to be by public auction, and the remuneration to be allowed the auctioneer. 3. Certifying result of sale (O.31, r.3) 3. (1) If either the Court has directed payment of the purchase money into Court or the Court so directs, the result of sale by order of the Court must be certified \u2014 ORDER 31 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (a) in the case of a sale by public auction, by the auctioneer who conducted the sale; and (b) in any other case, by the attorney of the party or person having the conduct of the sale, and the Court may require the certificate to be verified by the affidavit of the auctioneer or attorney, as the case may be. (2) The attorney of the party or person having the conduct of the sale must file the certificate and any affidavit. 4. Charge, exchange or partition under order of the Court (O.31, r.4) 4. Rules 2 and 3 shall, so far as applicable and with the necessary modifications, apply in relation to the charge, exchange or partition of any land under an order of the Court as they apply in relation to the sale of any land under such an order. 5. No rule (O.31, r.5) 5. No rule (O.31, r.5) 6. No rule (O.31, r.6) 6. No rule (O.31, r.6) 7. No rule (O.31, r.7) 7. No rule (O.31, r.7) 8. No rule (O.31, r.8) 8. No rule (O.31, r.8) GCR 1995 (Revised) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 32 ORDER 32 APPLICATIONS AND PROCEEDINGS IN CHAMBERS 1. Mode of making application (O.32, r.1) 1. Except as provided by O.25, r.7, every application in Chambers not made ex parte must be made by summons. 2. Issue of summons (O.32, r.2) 2. (1) Issue of a summons by which an application in Chambers is to be made takes place on its being sealed and filed by the Clerk of the Court. (2) No summons may be issued unless it specifies a date and time at which the hearing will take place. (3) A summons may not be amended after issue without leave of the Court. (4) Every summons must have indorsed upon it by the party issuing it the party\u2019s estimate of the length of the hearing and it shall be that party's duty to notify the Clerk of the Court if for whatever reason the party\u2019s estimate is no longer considered to be accurate. (5) Every summons shall be in Form No. 17 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). 3. Service of summons (O.32, r.3) 3. (1) A summons asking only for extension or abridgement of any period of time may be served on the day before the day specified in the summons for the hearing of the application. (2) Except as provided by paragraph (1), and unless the Court otherwise orders or any of these rules otherwise provides \u2014 (a) a summons must be served on every other party not less than four days before the day specified in the summons for the hearing of the application; (b) any evidence relied on in support of the application must be served with the summons. 4. Adjournment of hearing (O.32, r.4) 4. (1) The hearing of a summons may be adjourned from time to time either generally or to a particular date, as may be appropriate. (2) If the hearing is adjourned generally, the party by whom the summons was taken out may restore it to the list on 4 clear days' notice to all the other parties on whom the summons was served. ORDER 32 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 5. Proceeding in the absence of party failing to attend (O.32, r.5) 5. (1) Where any party to a summons fails to attend on the first or any resumed hearing thereof, the Court may proceed in the party\u2019s absence if, having regard to the nature of the application, it thinks it expedient so to do. (2) Before proceeding in the absence of any party the Court may require to be satisfied that the summons or, as the case may be, notice of the time appointed for the resumed hearing was duly served on that party. (3) Where the Court hearing a summons proceeds in the absence of a party, then, provided that any order made on the hearing has not been perfected, the Court, if satisfied that it is just to do so, may re-hear the summons. (4) Where an application made by summons has been dismissed without a hearing by reason of the failure of the party who took out the summons to attend the hearing, the Court, if satisfied that it is just to do so, may allow the summons to be restored to the list. 6. Order made ex parte may be set aside (O.32, r.6) 6. The Court may set aside an order made ex parte. 7. Subpoena for attendance of witness (O.32, r.7) 7. A writ of subpoena ad testificandum or a writ of subpoena duces tecum to compel the attendance of a witness for the purposes of proceedings in Chambers may be issued by the Clerk of the Court, if the Judge so authorises. 8. Officers may administer oaths (O.32, r.8) 8. The following persons shall have authority to administer oaths in proceedings in Chambers namely \u2014 (a) a Judge; (b) the Clerk of the Court; (c)  the Chief Marshall; or (d) a Court usher. 9. No rule (O.32, r.9) 9. No rule (O.32, r.9) 9A. Applications for a direction under the Limitation Act (as amended and revised) (O.32, r.9A) 9A. (1) The jurisdiction to direct, under Section 39 of the Limitation Act (as amended and revised), that Section 13 or Section 16 of that Law should not apply to an Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 32 action or to any specified cause of action to which the action relates shall be exercisable by the Judge in Chambers. (2) An application for a direction under paragraph (1) above shall be by originating summons and must be supported by an affidavit setting out the grounds on which such leave is sought and any facts necessary to substantiate those grounds. 10. No rule (O.32, r.10) 10. No rule (O.32, r.10) 11. No rule (O.32, r.11) 11. No rule (O.32, r.11) 12. No rule (O.32, r.12) 12. No rule (O.32, r.12) 13. Power to direct hearing in Court (O.32, r.13) 13. (1) The Judge in Chambers may direct that any summons, application or appeal shall be heard in Court or shall be adjourned into Court to be so heard if the Judge considers that by reason of its importance or for any other reason it should be so heard. (2) Any matter heard in Court by virtue of a direction under paragraph (1) above may be adjourned from Court into Chambers. 14. No rule (O.32, r.14) 14. No rule (O.32, r.14) 15. No rule (O.32, r.15) 15. No rule (O.32, r.15) 16. Obtaining assistance of experts (O.32, r.16) 16. If the Court thinks it expedient in order to enable it better to determine matters arising in proceedings in Chambers, it may obtain the assistance of any person specifically qualified to advise on that matter and may act upon the person\u2019s opinion. 17. Service and notice of affidavit (O.32, r.17) 17. (1) Any party filing an affidavit intended to be used by the party in any proceedings in Chambers shall serve a copy of such affidavit on every other party to the proceedings. (2) Any party intending to use in such proceedings any affidavit filed by the party in previous proceedings shall give notice to every other party of the party\u2019s ORDER 32 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) intention so to do and serve a copy of such affidavit on every other party to the proceedings. 18. No rule (O.32, r.18) 18. No rule (O.32, r.18) 19. Disposal of matters in Chambers (O.32, r.19) 19. The judge may by any judgment or order made in Court in any proceedings direct that such matters (if any) in the proceedings as the Judge may specify shall be disposed of in Chambers. 20. No rule (O.32, r.20) 20. No rule (O.32, r.20) 21. Papers for use of Court, etc. (O.32, r.21) 21. (1) Copies of documents may be used in evidence in proceedings in Chambers provided that such copies are exhibited to an affidavit stating that such copies are or are believed to be true copies of the originals. (2) Any party upon whom is served an affidavit to which are exhibited copies of documents may serve a notice requiring the party intending to rely upon such affidavit to produce for inspection within 4 days the original of any such copies. (3) Any party who fails to produce for inspection the original of any document required to be produced pursuant to paragraph (2) shall be permitted to use the copy thereof in evidence only with the leave of the Court. 22. Notes of proceedings in Chambers (O.32, r.22) 22. (1) A note shall be kept of all proceedings in Chambers with the dates thereof so that all such proceedings in any cause or matter are noted in chronological order with a short statement of the matter decided at each hearing. (2) The Clerk of the Court shall provide any party to the proceeding with a photocopy or typed transcript of such note if requested to do so unless the Judge otherwise orders. 23. No Rule (O.32, rr.23-26) 23. No Rule (O.32, rr.23-26) 24. No Rule (O.32, rr.23-26) 24. No Rule (O.32, rr.23-26) 25. No Rule (O.32, rr.23-26) 25. No Rule (O.32, rr.23-26) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 32 26. No Rule (O.32, rr.23-26) 26. No Rule (O.32, rr.23-26) 27. Judgments and orders in Chambers (O.32, r.27) 27. (1) On the making of any judgment or order in Chambers the Judge may direct that an office copy of such judgment or order is to be filed in the Register of Judgments to be kept pursuant to O.63, r.7(1). (2) A direction pursuant to paragraph (1) that an office copy of any judgment or order is to be filed in the Register of Judgments shall be noted in writing on such judgment or order and all copies thereof for filing. 28. Applications outside of Chambers, etc. (O.32, r.28) 28. (1) For the avoidance of doubt, nothing in this Order shall prevent a Judge from hearing an interlocutory application without the Judge being physically present in the Judge\u2019s Chambers.  In an appropriate case a Judge may hear any interlocutory application \u2014 (a) where the Judge is present by telephone, by video-link or via other electronic means (and whether the Judge is physically in the Islands or outside the Islands); (b) elsewhere in the Islands; or (c) any place outside the Islands. Without limitation, an appropriate case would ordinarily include cases where a Judge has already been assigned to the cause or matter and it is not convenient (having regard to the Overriding Objective) to assign a different Judge to hear the application. (2) Notwithstanding O.1, r.2(4), this Rule shall apply to any proceedings that are: governed by the Matrimonial Causes Rules (as amended and revised); governed by the Grand Court (Bankruptcy) Rules (as amended and revised); governed by the Companies Winding Up Rules (as amended and revised); on appeal from Civil Proceedings in the Summary Court. (3) Order 33 shall continue to apply in respect of the place of any trial of a cause or matter, or any question or issue arising therein. GCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 13.07.2011) ORDER 33 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 33 PLACE AND MODE OF TRIAL 1. Place of trial (O.33, r.1) 1. (1) Subject to the provisions of these Rules, the place of trial of a cause or matter, or of any question or issue arising therein, shall be the Law Courts, George Town, Grand Cayman, or any other building in George Town at which sittings of the Court are authorised by the Chief Justice to be held, unless for some special reason the Court orders that the trial of a cause or matter, or any question or issue arising therein shall be heard \u2014 (a) elsewhere in the Islands; or (b) in any place outside the Islands. (2) No order shall be made under subparagraph (1)(b) unless the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs has certified that neither that Secretary of State nor the authorities in the country concerned have any objection to the Court sitting in such country. 2. Mode of trial (O.33, r.2) 2. (1) The Court may, on application by any party pursuant to Section 21 of the Judicature Act (as amended and revised), order any cause or matter, or any question or issue arising therein, to be tried before a jury. (2) An application under paragraph (1) shall be made by summons supported by an affidavit setting out the reasons why, in the applicant's opinion, the cause or matter or question or issue arising therein can with advantage be so tried. 3. Time, etc. of trial of questions or issues (O.33, r.3) 3. The Court may order any question or issue arising in a cause or matter, whether of fact or law or partly of fact and partly of law, and whether raised by the pleadings or otherwise, to be tried before, at or after the trial of the cause or matter, and may give directions as to the manner in which the question or issue shall be stated. 4. Determining the place and mode of trial (O.33, r.4) 4. (1) In every action begun by writ, an order made on the summons for directions shall determine the place and mode of the trial; and any such order may be varied by a subsequent order of the Court made at or before the trial. (2) In any such action different questions or issues may be ordered to be tried by different modes of trial and one or more questions or issues may be ordered to be tried before the others. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 33 (3) The references in this Order to the summons for directions include references to any summons or application to which, under any of these Rules, O.25, rr.2 to 7, are to apply, with or without modifications. 4A. Split trial: offer on liability (O.33, r.4A) 4A. (1) This rule applies where an order is made under rule 4(2) for the issue of liability to be tried before any issue or question concerning the amount of damages to be awarded if liability is established. (2) After the making of an order to which paragraph (1) applies, any party against whom a finding of liability is sought may (without prejudice to the party\u2019s defence) make a written offer to the other party to accept liability up to a specified proportion. (3) Any offer made under the preceding paragraph may be brought to the attention of the Judge after the issue of liability has been decided, but not before. 5. No rule (O.33, r.5) 5. No rule (O.33, r.5) 6. No rule (O.33, r.6) 6. No rule (O.33, r.6) 7. Dismissal of action, etc. after decision of preliminary issue (O.33, r.7) 7. If it appears to the Court that the decision of any question or issue arising in a cause or matter and tried separately from the cause or matter substantially disposes of the cause or matter or renders the trial of the cause or matter unnecessary, it may dismiss the cause or matter or make such other order or give such judgment as may be just. GCR 1995 (Revised) ORDER 34 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 34 FIXING A TRIAL DATE FOR ACTIONS BEGUN BY WRIT 1. Application and interpretation (O.34, r.1) 1. This Order applies to actions begun by writ and accordingly, references in this Order to an action shall be construed as references to an action so begun. 2. Order for action to be tried (O.34, r.2) 2. (1) Every order made in an action which provides for trial before a Judge shall, whether the trial is to be with or without a jury, fix a period within which the plaintiff is to apply to the Clerk of the Court to fix a trial date. (2) Where the plaintiff does not, within the period fixed under paragraph (1), apply to the Clerk of the Court to fix a trial date, the defendant may so apply or may apply to the Court to dismiss the action for want of prosecution and, on the hearing of any such application, the Court may order the action to be dismissed accordingly or may make such other order as it thinks just. 3. Notice to fix a trial date (O.34, r.3) 3. (1) An application to fix a trial date shall be made by notice in Form No. 63 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) addressed to the Clerk of the Court, referred to in this Order as a \\\"notice to fix a trial date\\\", copies of which shall be served on all the other parties to the action. (2) Within 14 days of receipt of a notice to fix a trial date the Clerk of the Court shall fix an appointment at the Clerk of the Court\u2019s office to be attended by the attorneys for all the parties, or the parties themselves if acting in person, at which the trial date shall be fixed. (3) Not less than 3 days prior to the appointment with the Clerk of the Court, the parties shall deliver to the Clerk of the Court the following documents \u2014 (a) a statement by each party of the name, address, telephone and facsimile number of all overseas counsel who may be instructed to appear at the trial; and (b) an agreed statement containing a reasoned estimate of the length of the trial; or (c) in the absence of agreement, separate statements by each party containing the party\u2019s reasoned estimate of the length of the trial. (4) Any party who has delivered a statement of the party\u2019s intention to instruct overseas counsel at the trial may arrange for such counsel's clerk to participate in the appointment by telephone. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 34 4. Directions relating to fixing a trial date (O.34, r.4) 4. Nothing in this Order shall prejudice any powers of the Judge to give directions \u2014 (a) providing for the determination of a date for the trial of any action or a date before which the trial thereof is not to take place; or (b) as to the making of applications to fix, vacate or alter any trial date or the estimate of the length of any trial. 5. Further provisions fixing a trial date (O.34, r.5) 5. At any time after a trial date has been fixed in respect of any action, the Court may require the parties to furnish the Court, by personal attendance or otherwise, with such information as may be necessary to show whether the action is ready for trial, and if any party fails to comply with any such requirement, the Court may \u2014 (a) of its own motion, on 7 days' notice to the parties, direct that the fixture be vacated; or (b) on the application of any party, dismiss the action for want of prosecution or strike out the defence or counterclaim or make such other order as the Court thinks fit. 6. No rule (O.34, r.6) 6. No rule (O.34, r.6) 7. No rule (O.34, r.7) 7. No rule (O.34, r.7) 8. Notification of relevant information (O.34 r.8) 8. It shall be the duty of all parties to an action in respect of which a trial date has been fixed to furnish without delay to the Clerk of the Court all available information as to the action being or being likely to be settled, or affecting the estimated length of the trial, and, if the action is settled or withdrawn, to notify the Clerk of the Court of the fact without delay. 9. No rule (O.34, r.9) 9. No rule (O.34, r.9) 10. Delivery of bundles to the Court (O.34, r.10) 10. (1) Not less than 14 days prior to the trial date, the plaintiff shall deliver to the Clerk of the Court one set of bundles comprising the following documents \u2014 (a) a bundle containing the writ and all relevant pleadings, affidavits, interrogatories and orders; (b) a core bundle containing those documents central to the plaintiff's case and those documents which the defendant wishes to have included; ORDER 34 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (c) whenever witness statements have been exchanged whether by agreement or pursuant to a direction, a bundle containing all such statements, together with a note specifying which, if any, of such statements are agreed; (d) a bundle of all experts' reports which have been exchanged, together with a note stating which, if any, of such reports have been agreed; and (e) a note agreed by the parties or, failing agreement, a note by each party giving (in the following order) \u2014 (i) a summary of the issues involved; (ii) a summary of any propositions of law to be advanced together with a list of the authorities to be cited; (iii) a chronology of the relevant events; and (iv) a reading guide for the Judge. (2) Not less than 2 days before the trial date, the plaintiff shall deliver to the Clerk of the Court one set of bundles comprising all the documents, except for those already contained in the core bundle, intended to be used at the trial. (3) All such bundles shall be indexed, paginated and contained in ring binders or bound in such other manner as may be agreed with the Clerk of the Court. (4) Nothing in this rule shall prevent the Court from giving, whether before or after the bundles have been delivered, such further or different directions as to the documents to be delivered as may, in the circumstances, be appropriate. (5) For the purposes of this rule, \\\"plaintiff\\\" includes a defendant where an action is proceeding on a counterclaim and, \\\"defendant\\\" includes any other party who is entitled under any order of the Court or otherwise to be heard at the trial. GCR 1995 (Revised) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 35 ORDER 35 PROCEEDINGS AT TRIAL 1. Failure to appear by both parties or one of them (O.35, r.1) 1. (1) If, when the trial of an action is called on, neither party appears, the action may be struck out, without prejudice, however, to the restoration thereof, on the direction of a Judge. (2) If, when the trial of an action is called on, on the first or any subsequent day of the trial, one party does not appear, the Judge may proceed with the trial of the action or any counterclaim in the absence of that party. 2. Judgment etc. given in absence of party may be set aside (O.35, r.2) 2. (1) Any judgment, order or verdict obtained where one party does not appear at the trial may be set aside by the Court, on the application of that party, on such terms as it thinks just. (2) An application under this rule must be made within 7 days after the trial. 3. Adjournment of trial (O.35, r.3) 3. The Judge may, if the Judge thinks it expedient in the interest of justice, adjourn a trial for such time and upon such terms, if any, as the Judge thinks fit. 4. No rule (O.35, r.4) 4. No rule (O.35, r.4) 5. No rule (O.35, r.5) 5. No rule (O.35, r.5) 6. No rule (O.35, r.6) 6. No rule (O.35, r.6) 7. Order of speeches (O.35, r.7) 7. (1) The Judge before whom an action is tried (whether with or without a jury) may give directions as to the party to begin and the order of speeches at the trial, and, subject to any such directions, the party to begin and the order of speeches shall be that provided by this rule. (2) Subject to paragraph (6) the plaintiff shall begin by opening the plaintiff\u2019s case. (3) If the defendant elects not to adduce evidence, then, whether or not the defendant has in the course of cross-examination of a witness for the plaintiff or ORDER 35 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) otherwise put in a document, the plaintiff may, after the evidence on the plaintiff\u2019s behalf has been given, make a second speech closing the plaintiff\u2019s case and the defendant shall then state the defendant\u2019s case. (4) If the defendant elects to adduce evidence, the defendant may, after any evidence on behalf of the plaintiff has been given, open the defendant\u2019s case and, after the evidence on the defendant\u2019s behalf has been given, make a second speech closing the defendant\u2019s case, and at the close of the defendant's case the plaintiff may make a speech in reply. (5) Where there are two or more defendants who appear separately or are separately represented, then \u2014 (a) if none of them elects to adduce evidence, each of them shall state their case in the order in which their name appears on the record; (b) if each of them elects to adduce evidence, each of them may open their case and the evidence on behalf of each of them shall be given in the order aforesaid and the speech of each of them closing their case shall be made in that order after the evidence on behalf of all the defendants has been given; (c) if some of them elect to adduce evidence and some do not, those who do not shall state their cases in the order aforesaid after the speech of the plaintiff in reply to the other defendants. (6) Where the burden of proof of all the issues in the action lies on the defendant or, where there are two or more defendants and they appear separately or are separately represented, on one of the defendants, the defendant or that defendant, as the case may be, shall be entitled to begin and in that case paragraphs (2), (3) and (4) shall have effect in relation to, and as between the defendant and the plaintiff as if for references to the plaintiff and the defendant there were substituted references to the defendant and the plaintiff respectively. (7) Where, as between the plaintiff and any defendant, the party who would, but for this paragraph, be entitled to make the final speech raises any fresh point of law in that speech or cites in that speech any authority not previously cited, the opposite party may make a further speech in reply, but only in relation to that point of law or that authority, as the case may be. 8. Inspection by Judge or jury (O.35, r.8) 8. (1) The Judge by whom any cause or matter is tried may inspect any place or thing with respect to which any question arises in the cause or matter. (2) Where a cause or matter is tried with a jury and the Judge inspects any place or thing under paragraph (1), the Judge may authorise the jury to inspect it also. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 35 9. Death of party before giving of judgment (O.35, r.9) 9. Where a party to any action dies after the verdict or finding of the issues of fact and before judgment is given, judgment may be given notwithstanding the death, but the foregoing provision shall not be taken as affecting the power of the Judge to make an order under O.15, r.7(2), before giving judgment. 10. No rule (O.35, r.10) 10. No rule (O.35, r.10) 10A. No rule (O.35, r.10A) 10A. No rule (O.35, r.10A) 11. List of Exhibits (O.35, r.11) 11. (1) The Clerk of the Court shall take charge of every document or object put in as an exhibit during the trial of any action and shall mark or label every exhibit with a letter or letters indicating the party by whom the exhibit is put in or the witness by whom it is proved, and with a number. In this paragraph a witness by whom an exhibit is proved includes a witness in the course of whose evidence the exhibit is put in. (2) The Clerk of the Court shall cause a list to be made of all the exhibits in the action, and any party may, on payment of the prescribed fee, have an office copy of that list. (3) The list of exhibits when completed shall be attached to the pleadings and shall form part of the record of the action. (4) For the purpose of this rule a bundle of documents may be treated and counted as one exhibit. 12. Custody of exhibit after trial (O.35, r.12) 12. It shall be the duty of every party to an action who has put in any exhibit to apply to the Clerk of the Court immediately after the trial for the return of the exhibit, and, so far as is practicable, regard being had to the nature of the exhibit, to keep it duly marked and labelled as before, so that in the event of an appeal, the party may be able to produce the exhibit so marked and labelled at the hearing of the appeal in case the party is required to do so. 13. Impounded documents (O.35, r.13) 13. (1) Documents impounded by order of the Court shall not be delivered out of the custody of the Court except in compliance with an order made by a Judge on an application made by motion: ORDER 35 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) Provided that where the Attorney General makes a written request in that behalf, documents so impounded shall be delivered into the Attorney General\u2019s custody. (2) Documents impounded by order of the Court, while in the custody of the Court, shall not be inspected except by a person authorised to do so by an order signed by a Judge. 14. Officers may administer oaths (O.35, r.14) 14. Order 32, rule 8 shall apply to proceedings in Court as it applies to proceedings in Chambers. GCR 1995 (Revised) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 36 ORDER 36 NO ORDER GCR 1995 (Revised) ORDER 37 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 37 DAMAGES: ASSESSMENT AFTER JUDGMENT 1. Assessment of damages by a Judge (O.37, r.1) 1. (1) Where judgment is given in the Court for damages to be assessed and no provision is made in the judgment as to how they are to be assessed, the damages shall be assessed by a Judge, and the party entitled to the benefit of the judgment may, after obtaining the necessary appointment from the Judge, and at least 7 days before the date of the appointment, serving notice of the appointment on the party against whom the judgment is given, proceed accordingly. (2) Notwithstanding anything in O.65, r.9, a notice under this rule must be served on the party against whom the judgment is given. 2. Certificate of amount of damages (O.37, r.2) 2. Where in pursuance of this Order or otherwise damages are assessed by a Judge, the Judge shall certify the amount of the damages, and the certificate shall be filed in the Court office. 3. Default judgment against some but not all defendants (O.37, r.3) 3. Where any such judgment as is mentioned in rule 1 is given for failure to give notice of intention to defend or in default of defence, and the action proceeds against other defendants, the damages under the judgment shall be assessed at the trial unless the Court otherwise orders. 4. No rule (O.37, r.4) 4. No rule (O.37, r.4) 5. Assessment of value (O.37, r.5) 5. The foregoing provisions of this Order shall apply in relation to a judgment for the value of goods to be assessed, with or without damages to be assessed, and references in those provisions to the assessment of damages shall be construed accordingly. 6. Assessment of damages to time of assessment (O.37, r.6) 6. Where damages are to be assessed (whether under this Order or otherwise) in respect of any continuing cause of action, they shall be assessed down to the time of the assessment. GCR 1995 (Revised) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 38 ORDER 38 EVIDENCE I. GENERAL RULES 1. General rule: witnesses to be examined orally (O.38, r.1) 1. Subject to the provisions of these Rules and of the Law, and any other law relating to evidence, any fact required to be proved at the trial of any action begun by writ by the evidence of witnesses shall be proved by the examination of the witnesses orally and in open Court. 1A. Interpretation (O.38, r.1A) 1A. In this Order \u2014 \\\"the Law\\\" means the Evidence Act (as amended and revised), and any expressions used in this Order and in the Law have the same meanings in this Order as they have in the Law. 2. Evidence by affidavit (O.38, r.2) 2. (1) The Court may, at or before the trial of an action begun by writ, order that the affidavit of any witness may be read at the trial if in the circumstances of the case it thinks it reasonable so to order. (2) An order under paragraph (1) may be made on such terms as to the filing and giving of copies of the affidavits and as to the production of the deponents for cross-examination as the Court thinks fit but, subject to any such terms and to any subsequent order of the Court, the deponents shall not be subject to crossexamination and need not attend the trial for that purpose. (3) In any cause or matter begun by originating summons, originating motion or petition, and on any application made by summons or motion, evidence may be given by affidavit unless in the case of any such cause, matter or application any provision of these Rules otherwise provides or the Court otherwise directs, but the Court may, on the application of any party, order the attendance for crossexamination of the person making any such affidavit, and where, after such an order has been made, the person in question does not attend, the person\u2019s affidavit shall not be used as evidence without leave of the Court. 2A. Exchange of witnesses' statements (O.38, r.2A) 2A. (1) The powers of the Court under this rule may be exercised for the purpose of disposing fairly and expeditiously of the cause or matter before it, and saving costs, having regard to all the circumstances of the case, including (but not limited to) \u2014 ORDER 38 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (a) the extent to which the facts are in dispute or have been admitted; (b) the extent to which the issues of fact are defined by the pleadings; (c) the extent to which information has been or is likely to be provided by further and better particulars, answers to interrogatories or otherwise. (2) At the summons for directions in an action commenced by writ the Court may direct every party to serve on the other parties, within 14 weeks (or such other period as the Court may specify) of the hearing of the summons and on such terms as the Court may specify, written statements of the oral evidence which the party intends to adduce on any issues of fact to be decided at the trial. The Court may give a direction to any party under this paragraph at any other stage of such an action and at any stage of any other cause or matter. (3) Directions under paragraph (2) or (17) may make different provision with regard to different issues of fact or different witnesses. (4) Statements served under this rule shall \u2014 (a) be dated and, except for good reason (which should be specified by letter accompanying the statement), be signed by the intended witness and shall include a statement by the intended witness that the contents are true to the best of that witness\u2019s knowledge and belief; (b) sufficiently identify any documents referred to therein; and (c) where they are to be served by more than one party, be exchanged simultaneously. (5) Where a party is unable to obtain a written statement from an intended witness in accordance with paragraph (4)(a), the Court may direct the party wishing to adduce that witness' evidence to provide the other party with the name of the witness and (unless the Court otherwise orders) a statement of the nature of the evidence intended to be adduced. (6) Subject to paragraph (9), where the party serving a statement under this rule does not call the witness to whose evidence it relates, no other party may put the statement in evidence at the trial. (7) Subject to paragraph (9), where the party serving the statement does call such a witness at a trial \u2014 (a) except where the trial is with a jury, the Court may, on such terms as it thinks fit, direct that the statement served, or part of it, shall stand as the evidence in chief of the witness or part of such evidence; (b) the party may not without the consent of the other parties or the leave of the Court adduce evidence from that witness, the substance of which is not included in the statement served, except \u2014 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 38 (i) where the Court's directions under paragraph (2) or (17) specify that statements should be exchanged in relation to only some issues of fact, in relation to any other issues; (ii) in relation to new matters which have arisen since the statement was served on the other party; (c) whether or not the statement or any part of it referred to during the evidence in chief of the witness, any party may put the statement or any part of it in cross-examination of that witness. (8) Nothing in this rule shall make admissible evidence which is otherwise inadmissible. (9) Where any statement served is one to which the Law applies, paragraphs (6) and (7) shall take effect subject to the provisions of that Law and Parts III and IV of this Order. The service of a witness statement under this rule shall not, unless expressly so stated by the party serving the same, be treated as a notice under the Law; and where a statement or any part thereof would be admissible in evidence by virtue only of the Law the appropriate notice under Part III or Part IV of this Order shall be served with the statement notwithstanding any provision of those Parts as to the time for serving such a notice. Where such a notice is served a counternotice shall be deemed to have been served under rule 26(1). (10) Where a party fails to comply with a direction for the exchange of witness statements the party shall not be entitled to adduce evidence to which the direction relates without leave of the Court. (11) Where a party serves a witness statement under this rule, no other person may make use of that statement for any purpose other than the purpose of the proceedings in which it was served \u2014 (a) unless and to the extent that the party serving it gives the party\u2019s consent in writing or the Court gives leave; or (b) unless and to the extent that it has been put in evidence (whether pursuant to a direction under paragraph (7)(a) or otherwise). (12) Subject to paragraph (13), the Judge shall, if any person so requests during the course of the trial, direct that any witness statement which was ordered to stand as evidence in chief under paragraph (7)(a) shall be open to public inspection. A request under this paragraph shall be made orally or in writing. (13) The Judge may refuse to give a direction under paragraph (12) in relation to a witness statement, or may exclude from such a direction any words or passages in a statement, if the Judge considers that inspection should not be available \u2014 (a) in the interests of justice or national security; (b) because of the nature of any expert medical evidence in the statement; or ORDER 38 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (c) for any other sufficient reason. (14)  Where a direction is made under paragraph (12) the Judge shall direct the Clerk of the Court to \u2014 (a) prepare a certificate which shall be attached to a copy (\\\"the certified copy\\\") of that witness statement; and (b) make the certified copy available for inspection. (15)  Subject to any conditions which the Court may by special or general direction impose, any person may inspect and (subject to payment of the prescribed fee) take a copy of the certified copy of a witness statement from the time when the direction is given until the end of 7 days after the conclusion of the trial. (16)  In this rule \u2014 (a) any reference in paragraphs (12) to (15) to a witness statement shall, in relation to a witness statement of which only part has been ordered to stand as evidence in chief under paragraph (7)(a), be construed as a reference to that part; (b) any reference to inspecting or copying the certified copy of a witness statement shall be construed as including a reference to inspecting or copying a copy of that certified copy. (17)  The Court shall have power to vary or override any of the provisions of this rule (except paragraphs (1), (8) and (12) to (16)) and to give such alternative directions as it thinks fit. 3. Evidence of particular facts (O.38, r.3) 3. (1) Without prejudice to rule 30, the Court may, at or before the trial of any action, order that evidence of any particular fact shall be given at the trial in such a manner as may be specified by the order. (2) The power conferred by paragraph (1) extends in particular to ordering that evidence of any particular fact may be given at the trial \u2014 (a) by statement on oath of information or belief; or (b) by the production of documents or entries in books; or (c) by copies of documents or entries in books; or (d) in the case of a fact which is or was a matter of common knowledge either generally or in a particular district, by the production of a specific newspaper which contains a statement of that fact. 4. Limitation of expert evidence (O.38, r.4) 4. The Court may, at or before the trial of any action, order that the number of medical or other expert witnesses who may be called at the trial shall be limited as specified by the order. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 38 5. Limitation of plans, etc. in evidence (O.38, r.5) 5. Unless, at or before the trial, the Court for special reasons otherwise orders, no plan, photograph or model shall be receivable in evidence at the trial of an action unless at least 10 days before the commencement of the trial the parties, other than the party producing it, have been given an opportunity to inspect it and to agree to the admission thereof without further proof. 6. Revocation or variation of orders under rules 2 to 5 (O.38, r.6) 6. Any order under rules 2 to 5 (including an order made on appeal) may, on sufficient cause being shown, be revoked or varied by a subsequent order of the Court made at or before the trial. 7. Evidence of finding on foreign law (O.38, r.7) 7. (1) A party to any cause or matter who intends to adduce in evidence a finding or decision on a question of foreign law contained in a judgment of the Court or the Court of Appeal where such judgment is in citable form shall \u2014 (a) in the case of an action to which O.25, r.1, applies, within 14 days after the pleadings in the action are deemed to be closed; and (b) in the case of any other cause or matter, within 21 days after the date on which an appointment for the first hearing of the cause or matter is obtained, or in either case, within such other period as the Court may specify, serve notice of the party\u2019s intention on every other party to the proceedings, (2) The notice shall specify the question on which the finding or decision was given or made and specify the document in which it is reported or recorded in citable form. (3) In any cause or matter in which evidence may be given by affidavit, an affidavit specifying the matters contained in paragraph (2) shall constitute notice under paragraph (1) if served within the period mentioned in that paragraph. 8. Application to trials of issues, references, etc. (O.38, r.8) 8. The foregoing rules of this Order shall apply to trials of issues or questions of fact or law, references, inquiries and assessments of damages as they apply to the trial of actions. 9. Depositions: when receivable in evidence at trial (O.38, r.9) 9. (1) No deposition taken in any cause or matter shall be received in evidence at the trial of the cause or matter unless \u2014 ORDER 38 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (a) the deposition was taken in pursuance of an order under O.39, r.1; and (b) either the party against whom the evidence is offered consents or it is proved to the satisfaction of the Court that the deponent is dead, or beyond the jurisdiction of the Court or unable from sickness or other infirmity to attend the trial. (2) A party intending to use any deposition in evidence at the trial of a cause or matter must, a reasonable time before the trial, give notice of the party\u2019s intention to do so to the other party. (3) A deposition purporting to be signed by the person before whom it was taken shall be receivable in evidence without proof of the signature being the signature of that person. 10. Court documents admissible or receivable in evidence (O.38, r.10) 10. (1) Certified copies of writs, records, pleadings and documents filed in the Court shall be admissible in evidence in any cause or matter and between all parties to the same extent as the original would be admissible. (2) Without prejudice to the provisions of any enactment, every document purporting to be sealed with the seal of the Court shall be received in evidence without further proof, and any document purporting to be so sealed and to be a copy of a document filed in, or issued out of, the Court shall be deemed to be an office copy of that document without further proof unless the contrary is shown. 11. Evidence of consent of new trustee to act (O.38, r.11) 11. A document purporting to contain the written consent of a person to act as trustee and to bear the person\u2019s signature verified by some other person shall be evidence of such consent. 12. Evidence at trial may be used in subsequent proceedings (O.38, r.12) 12. Any evidence taken at the trial of any cause or matter may be used in any subsequent proceedings in that cause or matter. 13. Order to produce document at proceeding other than trial (O.38, r.13) 13. (1) At any stage in a cause or matter the Court may order any person to attend any proceeding in the cause or matter and produce any document, to be specified or described in that order, the production of which appears to the Court to be necessary for the purpose of that proceeding. (2) No person shall be compelled by an order under paragraph (1) to produce any document at the proceeding in a cause or matter which the person could not be compelled to produce at the trial of that cause or matter. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 38 II. WRITS OF SUBPOENA 14. Form and issue of writ of subpoena (O.38, r.14) 14. (1) A writ of subpoena ad testificandum or a writ of subpoena duces tecum must be in Form No. 18 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). (2) Issue of a writ of subpoena takes place upon its being sealed by the Clerk of the Court. (3) Before a writ of subpoena is issued a praecipe for the issue of the writ must be filed; and the praecipe must contain the name and address of the party issuing the writ, if the party is acting in person, or the name or firm and business address of that party's attorney. 15. More than one name may be included in one writ of subpoena (O.38, r.15) 15. The names of two or more persons may be included in one writ of subpoena ad testificandum. 16. Amendment of writ of subpoena (O.38, r.16) 16. Where there is a mistake in any person's name or address in a writ of subpoena, then, if the writ has not been served, the party by whom the writ was issued may have the writ resealed in correct form by filing a second praecipe under rule 14(3) indorsed with the words \\\"Amended and re-sealed\\\". 17. Service of writ of subpoena (O.38, r.17) 17. A writ of subpoena must be served personally and the service shall not be valid unless effected within 12 weeks after the date of issue of the writ and not less than 4 days or such other period as the Court may fix, before the day on which attendance before the Court is required. 18. Duration of writ of subpoena (O.38, r.18) 18. A writ of subpoena continues to have effect until the conclusion of the trial or other proceeding at which the attendance of the witness is required. 19. Inspection of banker's books (O.38, r.19) 19. (1) An application under Section 8 of the Law for an order that a party be at liberty to inspect and take copies of any matter in a banker's book shall be made by summons to a Judge in Chambers. (2) An application under paragraph (1) may be made ex parte. (3) The application shall be supported by an affidavit stating \u2014 (a) the nature of the proceedings and the reasons why the inspection is necessary; ORDER 38 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (b) how the entries of which inspection is sought will be admissible in evidence at the trial of the action; (c) the period over which it is proposed that the inspection should extend; and (d) where the accountholder has consented to the inspection and, if not, whether any relevant directions have been made under Section 4 of the Confidential Information Disclosure Act (as amended and revised). III. HEARSAY EVIDENCE 20. Application (O.38, r.20) 20. This Part of this Order shall apply in relation to the trial or hearing of an issue or question arising in a cause or matter, and to a reference, inquiry and assessment of damages, as it applies in relation to the trial or hearing of a cause or matter. 21. Notice of intention to give certain statements in evidence (O.38, r.21) 21. (1) Subject to the provisions of this rule, a party to a cause or matter who desires to give in evidence at the trial or hearing of the cause or matter any statement which is admissible in evidence by virtue of Section 45, 47 or 48 of the Law must \u2014 (a) in the case of a cause or matter which is required to be set down for trial or hearing or adjourned into Court, within 21 days after it is set down or so adjourned, or within such other period as the Court may specify; and (b) in the case of any other cause or matter, within 21 days after the date on which an appointment for the first hearing of the cause or matter is obtained, or within such other period as the Court may specify, serve on every other party to the cause or matter notice of the party\u2019s desire to do so, and the notice must comply with the provisions of rule 22, 23 or 24, as the circumstances of the case require. (2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply in relation to any statement which is admissible as evidence of any act stated therein by virtue not only of the said Section 45, 47 or 48 but by virtue also of any other Law. (3) Paragraph (1) shall not apply in relation to any statement which any party to a probate action desires to give in evidence at the trial of that action and which is alleged to have been made by the deceased person whose estate is the subject of the action. (4) Where by virtue of any provision of these Rules or of any order or direction of the Court the evidence in any proceedings is to be given by affidavit then, without prejudice to paragraph (2), paragraph (1) shall not apply in relation to any statement which any party to the proceedings desires to have included in any affidavit to be used on the party\u2019s behalf in the proceedings, but nothing in Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 38 this paragraph shall affect the operation of O.41, r.5, or the powers of the Court under rule 3. (5) Order 65, rule 9, shall not apply to a notice under this rule but the Court may direct that the notice need not be served on any party who at the time when service is to be effected is in default as to entry of appearance or who has no address for service. 22. Statement admissible by virtue of Section 45 of the Law: contents of notice (O.38, r.22) 22. (1) If the statement is admissible by virtue of Section 45 of the Law, and was made otherwise than in a document, the notice must contain particulars of \u2014 (a) the time, place and circumstances at or in which the statement was made; (b) the person by whom and the person to whom, the statement was made; and (c) the substance of the statement or if material, the words used. (2) If the statement is admissible by virtue of the said Section 45 and was made in a document, a copy or transcript of the document, or of the relevant part thereof, must be annexed to the notice, and the notice must contain such (if any) of the particulars mentioned in paragraphs 1(a) and (b) as are not apparent on the face of the document or part. (3) If the party giving the notice alleges that any person, particulars of whom are contained in the notice, cannot or should not be called as a witness at the trial or hearing for any of the reasons specified in rule 25, the notice must contain a statement to that effect specifying the reason relied on. 23. Statement admissible by virtue of Section 47 of the Law: contents of notice (O.38, r.23) 23. (1) If the statement is admissible by virtue of Section 47 of the Law, the notice must have annexed to it a copy or transcript of the document containing the statement, or of the relevant part thereof, and must contain \u2014 (a) particulars of \u2014 (i) the person by whom the record containing the statement was compiled; (ii) the person who originally supplied the information from which the record was compiled; and (iii) any other person through whom that information was supplied to the compiler of that record, and, in the case of any such person as is referred to in (i) or (iii) above, a description of the duty under which that person was acting when compiling that record or supplying information from which that record was compiled, as the case may be; ORDER 38 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (b) if not apparent on the face of the document annexed to the notice, a description of the nature of the record which, or part of which, contains the statement; and (c) particulars of the time, place and circumstances at or in which that record or part was compiled. (2) If the party given the notice alleges that any person, particulars of whom are contained in the notice, cannot or should not be called as a witness at the trial or hearing for any of the reasons specified in rule 25, the notice must contain a statement to that effect specifying the reason relied on. 24. Statement admissible by virtue of Section 48 of the Law: contents of notice (O.38, r.24) 24. (1) If the statement is contained in a document produced by a computer and is admissible by virtue of Section 48 of the Law, the notice must have annexed to it a copy or transcript of the document containing the statement, or of the relevant part thereof, and must contain particulars of \u2014 (a) a person who occupied a responsible position in relation to the management of the relevant activities for the purpose of which the computer was used regularly during the material period to store or process information; (b) a person who at the material time occupied such a position in relation to the supply of information to the computer, being information which is reproduced in the statement or information from which the information contained in the statement is derived; (c) a person who occupied such a position in relation to the operation of the computer during the material period, and where there are two or more persons who fall within any of the foregoing subparagraphs and some only of those persons are at the date of service of the notice capable of being called as witnesses at the trial or hearing, the person, particulars of whom are to be contained in the notice, must be such one of those persons as is at the date so capable. (2) The notice must also state whether the computer was operating properly throughout the material period and, if not, whether any respect in which it was not operating properly or was out of operation during any part of that period was such as to affect the production of the document in which the statement is contained or the accuracy of its contents. (3) If the party giving the notice alleges that any person, particulars of whom are contained in the notice, cannot or should not be called as a witness at the trial or hearing for any of the reasons specified in rule 25, the notice must contain a statement to that effect specifying the reason relied on. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 38 25. Reasons for not calling a person as a witness (O.38, r.25) 25. The reasons referred to in rules 22(3), 23(2) and 24(3) are that the person in question is dead, or beyond the seas or unfit by reason of the person\u2019s bodily or mental condition to attend as a witness or that despite the exercise of reasonable diligence it has not been possible to identify or find the person or that the person cannot reasonably be expected to have any recollection of matters relevant to the accuracy or otherwise of the statement to which the notice relates. 26. Counter-notice requiring person to be called as a witness (O.38, r.26) 26. (1) Subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), any party to a cause or matter on whom a notice under rule 21 is served may within 21 days after service of the notice on the party serve on the party who gave the notice a counter notice requiring that party to call as a witness at the trial or hearing of the cause or matter any person (naming the person) particulars of whom are contained in the notice. (2) Where any notice under rule 21 contains a statement that any person, particulars of whom are contained in the notice, cannot or should not be called as a witness for the reason specified therein, a party shall not be entitled to serve a counternotice under this rule requiring that person to be called as a witness at the trial or hearing of the cause or matter unless the party contends that that person can or, as the case may be, should be called, and in that case the party must include in the party\u2019s counter-notice a statement to that effect. (3) Where a statement to which a notice under rule 21 relates is one to which rule 28 applies, no party on whom the notice is served shall be entitled to serve a counter-notice under this rule in relation to that statement, but the foregoing provision is without prejudice to the right of any party to apply to the Court under rule 28 for directions with respect to the admissibility of that statement. (4) If any party to a cause or matter by whom a notice under rule 21 is served fails to comply with a counter-notice duly served on the party under this rule, then unless any of the reasons specified in rule 25 applies in relation to the person named in the counter-notice, and without prejudice to the powers of the Court under rule 29, the statement to which the notice under rule 21 relates shall not be admissible at the trial or hearing of the cause or matter as evidence of any fact stated therein by virtue of Section 45, 47 or 48 of the Law, as the case may be. ORDER 38 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 27. Determination of question whether person can or should be called as a witness (O.38, r.27) 27. (1) Where in any cause or matter a question arises whether any of the reasons specified in rule 25 applies in relation to a person, particulars of whom are contained in a notice under rule 21, the Court may, on the application of any party to the cause or matter, determine the question before the trial or hearing of the cause or matter or give directions for it to be determined before the trial or hearing and for the manner in which it is to be so determined. (2) Unless the Court otherwise directs, the summons by which an application under paragraph (1) is made must be served by the party making the application on every other party to the cause or matter. (3) Where any such question as is referred to in paragraph (1) has been determined under or by virtue of that paragraph, no application to have it determined afresh at the trial or hearing of the cause or matter may be made unless the evidence which it is sought to adduce in support of the application could not with reasonable diligence have been adduced at the hearing which resulted in the determination. 28. Directions with respect to statement made in previous proceedings (O.38, r.28) 28. Where a party to a cause or matter has given notice in accordance with rule 21 that the party desires to give in evidence at the trial or hearing of the cause or matter \u2014 (a) a statement falling with Section 45(1) of the Law which was made by a person, whether orally or in a document, in the course of giving evidence in some other legal proceedings (whether civil or criminal); or (b) a statement falling within Section 47(1) of the said Law which is contained in a record of direct oral evidence given in some other legal proceedings (whether civil or criminal), any party to the cause or matter may apply to the Court for directions under this rule, and the Court hearing such an application may give directions as to whether, and if so on what conditions, the party desiring to give the statement in evidence will be permitted to do so and (where applicable) as to the manner in which that statement and any other evidence given in those other proceedings is to be proved. 29. Power of Court to allow statement to be given in evidence (O.38, r.29) 29. (1) Without prejudice to Sections 45(2)(a) and 47(2)(a) of the Law and rule 28, the Court may, if it thinks it just to do so, allow a statement falling within Section 45(1), 47(1) or 48(1) to be given in evidence at the trial or hearing of a cause or matter notwithstanding \u2014 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 38 (a) that the statement is one in relation to which rule 21(1) applies and that the party desiring to give the statement in evidence has failed to comply with that rule; or (b) that that party has failed to comply with any requirement of a counter notice relating to that statement which was served on that party in accordance with rule 26. (2) Without prejudice to the generality of paragraph (1), the Court may exercise its power under that paragraph to allow a statement to be given in evidence at the trial or hearing of a cause or matter if a refusal to exercise that power might oblige the party desiring to give the statement in evidence to call as a witness at the trial or hearing an opposite party or person who is or was at the material time the servant or agent of an opposite party. 30. Restriction on adducing evidence as to credibility of maker, etc., of certain statements (O.38, r.30) 30. Where \u2014 (a) a notice given under rule 21 in a cause or matter relates to a statement which is admissible by virtue of Section 45 or 47 of the Law; and (b) the person who made the statement, or, as the case may be, the person who originally supplied the information from which the record containing the statement was compiled, is not called as a witness at the trial or hearing of the cause or matter; and (c) none of the reasons mentioned in rule 25 applies so as to prevent the party who gave the notice from calling that person as a witness, no other party to the cause or matter shall be entitled, except with the leave of the Court, to adduce in relation to that person any evidence which could otherwise be adduced by that party by virtue of Section 50 of the Law unless that party gave a counter-notice under rule 26 in respect of that person or applied under rule 28 for a direction that that person be called as a witness at the trial or hearing of the cause or matter. 31. Notice required of intention to give evidence of certain inconsistent statements (O.38, r.31) 31. (1) Where a person, particulars of whom were contained in a notice given under rule 21 in a cause or matter, is not to be called as a witness at the trial or hearing of the cause or matter, any party to the cause or matter who is entitled and intends to adduce in relation to that person any evidence which is admissible for the purpose mentioned in Section 50(b) of the Law must, not more than 21 days after service of that notice on the party, serve on the party who gave that notice, notice of the party\u2019s intention to do so. ORDER 38 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (2) Rule 22(1) and (2) shall apply to a notice under this rule as if the notice were a notice under rule 21 and the statement to which the notice relates were a statement admissible by virtue of Section 45 of the Law. (3) The Court may, if it thinks it just to do so, allow a party to give in evidence at the trial or hearing of a cause or matter any evidence which is admissible for the purpose mentioned in the said Section 50(b) notwithstanding that that party has failed to comply with the provisions of paragraph (1). 32. Costs (O.38, r.32) 32. If \u2014 (a) a party to a cause or matter serves a counter-notice under rule 26 in respect of any person who is called as a witness at the trial of the cause or matter in compliance with a requirement of the counter-notice; and (b) it appears to the Court that it was unreasonable to require that person to be called as a witness, then the Court may direct that any costs to that party in respect of the preparations and service of the counter-notice shall not be allowed to the party and that any costs occasioned by the counter-notice to any other party shall be paid by the party to that other party.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_33\", \"num\": \"33.\", \"text\": \"Certain powers exercisable in Chambers (O.38, r.33) 33. The jurisdiction of the Court under Section 45(2)(a), 45(3), 47(2)(a) and 49(1) of the Law may be exercised in Chambers.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_34\", \"num\": \"34.\", \"text\": \"Statements of opinion (O.38, r.34) 34. When a party to a cause or matter desires to give in evidence by virtue of Part IV of the Law a statement of opinion other than a statement to which Part IV of this Order applies, the provisions of rules 20 to 23 and 25 to 33 shall apply with such modifications as the Court may direct or the circumstances may require. IV. EXPERT EVIDENCE 35. Interpretation (O.38, r.35) 35. In this Part of this Order a reference to a summons for directions includes a reference to any summons or application to which, under any of these Rules, O.25, rr.2 to 7, apply. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 38 36. Restrictions on adducing expert evidence (O.38, r.36) 36. (1) Except with the leave of the Court or where all parties agree, no expert evidence may be adduced at the trial or hearing of any cause or matter unless the party seeking to adduce the evidence has applied to the Court to determine whether a direction should be given under rule 37 or 41 (whichever is appropriate) or has complied with automatic directions taking effect under O.25, r.8(1)(b). (2) Nothing in paragraph (1) shall apply to evidence which is permitted to be given by affidavit or shall affect the enforcement under any other provision of these Rules (except O.45, r.5) of a direction given under this Part of this Order.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_37\", \"num\": \"37.\", \"text\": \"Direction that expert report be disclosed (O.38, r.37) 37. Where in any cause or matter an application is made under rule 36(1) in respect of oral expert evidence, then unless the Court considers that there are special reasons for it not doing so, it shall direct that the substance of the evidence be disclosed in the form of a written report or reports to such other parties and within such period as the Court may specify.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_38\", \"num\": \"38.\", \"text\": \"Meeting of experts (O.38, r.38) 38. In any cause or matter the Court may, if it thinks fit, direct that there be a meeting \\\"without prejudice\\\" of such experts within such periods before or after the disclosure of their reports as the Court may specify, for the purpose of identifying those parts of their evidence which are in issue. Where such a meeting takes place the experts may prepare a joint statement indicating those parts of their evidence on which they are, and those on which they are not, in agreement.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_39\", \"num\": \"39.\", \"text\": \"Disclosure of part of expert evidence (O.38, r.39) 39. Where the Court considers that any circumstances rendering it undesirable to give a direction under rule 37 relating to part only of the evidence sought to be adduced, the Court may, if it thinks fit, direct disclosure of the remainder.\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_40\", \"num\": \"40.\", \"text\": \"No rule (O.38, r.40) 40. No rule (O.38, r.40)\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_41\", \"num\": \"41.\", \"text\": \"Expert evidence contained in statement (O.38, r.41) 41. Where an application is made under rule 36 in respect of expert evidence contained in a statement and the applicant alleges that the maker of the statement cannot or should not be called as a witness, the Court may direct that the provisions of rules 20 to 23 and 25 to 33 shall apply with such modifications as the Court thinks fit. ORDER 38 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 42. Putting in evidence expert report disclosed by another party (O.38, r.42) 42. A party to any cause or matter may put in evidence any expert report disclosed to the party by any other party in accordance with this Part of this Order. 43. Time for putting expert report in evidence (O.38, r.43) 43. Where a party to any cause or matter calls as a witness the maker of a report which has been disclosed in accordance with a direction given under rule 37, the report may be put in evidence at the commencement of its maker's examination in chief or at such other time as the Court may direct. GCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 01.10.12) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 39 ORDER 39 EVIDENCE BY DEPOSITION: EXAMINERS OF THE COURT 1. Power to order depositions to be taken (O.39, r.1) 1. (1) The Court may, in any cause or matter where it appears necessary for the purposes of justice, make an order for the examination on oath before a Judge, the Clerk of the Court, an attorney or some other person at any place, of any person. (2) An order under paragraph (1) may be made on such terms (including, in particular, terms as to the giving of discovery before the examination takes place) as the Court thinks fit and may contain an order for the production of any document which appears to the Court to be necessary for the purpose of the examination. 2. Where person to be examined is out of the jurisdiction (O.39, r.2) 2. (1) Where the person in relation to whom an order under rule 1 is required is out of the jurisdiction, an application may be made \u2014 (a) for an order under that rule for the issue of a letter of request to the judicial authorities of the country in which that person is to take, or cause to be taken, the evidence of that person; or (b) if the government of that country allows a person in that country to be examined before a person appointed by the Court, for an order under that rule appointing a special examiner to take the evidence of that person in that country. (2) An application may be made for the appointment as special examiner of a British Consul in the country in which the evidence is to be taken or that special examiner\u2019s deputy \u2014 (a) if there subsists with respect to that country a Civil Procedure Convention providing for the taking of the evidence of any person in that country for the assistance of proceedings in the Court; or (b) with the consent of the Secretary of State for Commonwealth and Foreign Affairs. 3. Order for issue of letter of request (O.39, r.3) 3. (1) Where an order is made under rule 1 for the issue of a letter of request to the judicial authorities of a country to take, or cause to be taken, the evidence of any person in that country the following provisions of this rule shall apply. ORDER 39 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (2) The party obtaining the order must draw up the letter of request in Form No. 19 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) with such amendments as the order may require and present it to the Clerk of the Court together with one copy thereof. (3) If the evidence of the person to be examined is to be obtained by means of written questions, the party obtaining the order must draw up the list of the interrogatories and cross-interrogatories and present them to the Clerk of the Court together with one copy thereof. (4) Each document presented to the Clerk of the Court under paragraph (2) or (3) must be accompanied by a translation of the document in the official language of that country, or if there is more than one official language of that country, in any one of those languages which is appropriate to the place in that country where the examination is to be taken, together with one copy thereof, unless the official language or one of the official languages of that country is English. (5) Every translation presented to the Clerk of the Court under paragraph (4) must be certified by the person making it to be a correct translation; and the certificate must contain a statement of the person's full name, of the person\u2019s address and of the person\u2019s qualifications for making the translation. (6) The party obtaining the order must, when the party presents to the Clerk of the Court the documents mentioned in paragraphs (2) to (5), also file an undertaking signed by the party or the party\u2019s attorney to be responsible personally for all expenses incurred by the Secretary of State in respect of the letter of request and, on receiving due notification of the amount of those expenses, to pay that amount to the Financial Secretary on behalf of the Secretary of State and to produce a receipt for the payment to the Clerk of the Court. (7) Upon being presented with a letter of request and other documents referred to in paragraphs (2) to (6), the Clerk of the Court shall present the letter of request to a Judge for the Judge\u2019s signature. (8) As soon as the letter of request has been signed by a Judge, the Clerk of the Court shall send it to the relevant judicial authority and file the copy thereof. 3A. Examination otherwise than on oath (O.39, r.3A) 3A. Notwithstanding the provisions of rule 1, where the person to be examined is out of the jurisdiction that person may be examined on oath or affirmation or otherwise in accordance with the procedure of the country in which the examination is to take place. 4. Enforcing attendance of witness at examination (O.39, r.4) 4. Where an order has been made under rule 1 \u2014 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 39 (a) for the examination of any person before the Clerk of the Court, an attorney or some other person (in this rule and rules 5 to 14 referred to as \\\"the examiner\\\"); or (b) for the cross-examination before the examiner of any person who has made an affidavit which is to be used in any cause or matter, the attendance of that person before the examiner and the production by the person of any document at the examination may be enforced by writ of subpoena in like manner as the attendance of a witness and the production by a witness of a document at a trial may be enforced. 5. Refusal of witness to attend, be sworn, etc. (O.39, r.5) 5. (1) If any person, having been duly summoned by writ of subpoena to attend before the examiner, refuses or fails to attend or refuses to be sworn for the purpose of the examination or to answer any lawful question or produce any document therein, a certificate of the person\u2019s refusal or failure, signed by the examiner, must be filed in the Court, and upon the filing of the certificate the party by whom the attendance of that person was required may apply to the Court for an order requiring that person to attend, or to be sworn or to answer any question or produce any document, as the case may be. (2) An application for an order under this rule may be made ex parte. (3) If the Court makes an order under this rule it may order the person against whom the order is made to pay any costs occasioned by the person\u2019s refusal or failure. (4) A person who wilfully disobeys any order made against the person under paragraph (1) is guilty of contempt of court. 6. Appointment of time and place for examination (O.39, r.6) 6. (1) The examiner must give the party on whose application the order for examination was made a notice appointing the place and time at which, subject to any application by the parties, the examination shall be taken, and such time shall, having regard to the convenience of the persons to be examined and all the circumstances of the case, be as soon as practicable after the making of the order. (2) The party to whom a notice under paragraph (1) is given must on receiving it forthwith give notice of the appointment to all the other parties. 7. Examiner to have certain documents (O.39, r.7) 7. The party on whose application the order for examination before the examiner was made must furnish the examiner with copies of such of the documents in the cause or matter as are necessary to inform the examiner of the questions at issue in the cause or matter. ORDER 39 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 8. Conduct of examination (O.39, r.8) 8. (1) Subject to any directions contained in the order for examination \u2014 (a) any person ordered to be examined before the examiner may be crossexamined and re-examined; and (b) the examination, cross-examination and re-examination of persons before the examiner shall be conducted in like manner as at the trial of a cause or matter. (2) The examiner may put any question to any person examined before the examiner as to the meaning of any answer made by that person or as to any matter arising in the course of the examination. (3) The examiner may, if necessary, adjourn the examination from time to time. 9. Examination of additional witnesses (O.39, r.9) 9. The examiner may, with the written consent of all the parties to the cause or matter, take the examination of any person in addition to those named or provided for in the order for examination, and must annex such consent to the original deposition of that person. 10. Objection to questions (O.39, r.10) 10. (1) If any person being examined before the examiner objects to answer any questions put to the person, or if objection is taken to any such question, that question, the ground for the objection and the answer to any such question to which objection is taken must be set out in the deposition of that person or in a statement annexed thereto. (2) The validity of the ground for objecting to answer any such question or for objecting to any such question shall be decided by the Court and not by the examiner, but the examiner must state to the parties the examiner\u2019s opinion thereon, and the statement of the examiner\u2019s opinion must be set out in the deposition or in a statement annexed thereto. (3) If the Court decides against the person taking the objection it may order the person to pay the costs occasioned by the person\u2019s objection. 11. Taking of depositions (O.39, r.11) 11. (1) The deposition of any person examined before the examiner must be taken down by the examiner or a shorthand writer or some other person in the presence of the examiner but, subject to paragraph (2) and rule 10(1), the deposition need not set out every question and answer so long as it contains as nearly as may be the statement of the person examined. (2) The examiner may direct the exact words of any particular question and the answer thereto to be set out in the deposition if that question and answer appear to the examiner to have special importance. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 39 (3) The deposition of any person shall be read to the person, and the person shall be asked to sign it, in the presence of such of the parties as may attend, but the parties may agree in writing to dispense with the foregoing provision. If a person refuses to sign a deposition when asked under this paragraph to do so, the examiner must sign the deposition. (4) The original deposition of any person, authenticated by the signature of the examiner before whom it was taken, must be sent by the examiner to the Clerk of the Court and shall be filed. 12. Time taken by examination to be indorsed on depositions (O.39, r.12) 12. Before sending any deposition to the Clerk of the Court under rule 11(4), the examiner must indorse on the deposition a statement signed by the examiner of the time occupied in taking the examination and the fees received in respect thereof. 13. Special report by examiner (O.39, r.13) 13. The examiner may make a special report to the Court with regard to any examination taken before the examiner and with regard to the absence or conduct of any person thereof and the Court may direct such proceedings to be taken, or make such order, on the report as it thinks fit. 14. Order for payment of examiner's fees (O.39, r.14) 14. (1) If the fees and expenses due to an examiner are not paid the examiner may report that fact to the Court and the Court may direct the Clerk of the Court to apply for an order against the party on whose application the order for examination was made to pay the examiner the fees and the expenses due the examiner in respect of the examination. (2) An order under this rule shall not prejudice any determination on the taxation of costs or otherwise as to the party by whom the costs of the examination are ultimately to be borne. 15. Perpetuation of testimony (O.39, r.15) 15. (1) Witnesses shall not be examined to perpetuate testimony unless an action has been begun for the purpose. (2) Any person who would under the circumstances alleged by the person to exist become entitled, upon the happening of any future event, to any honour, title, dignity or office, or to any estate or interest in any real or personal property, the right or claim to which cannot be brought to trial by the person before the happening of such event, may begin an action to perpetuate any testimony which may be material for establishing such right or claim. (3) No action to perpetuate the testimony of witnesses shall be set down for trial. ORDER 39 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 16. Examiners of the Court (O.39, r.16) 16. A sufficient number of attorneys, of not less than 3 years standing, may be appointed by the Chief Justice to act as examiners of the Court for a period not exceeding 5 years at a time, but the Chief Justice may at any time revoke any such appointment. 17. No rule (O.39, r.17) 17. No rule (O.39, r.17) 18. No rule (O.39, r.18) 18. No rule (O.39, r.18) 19. Fees and expenses of examiners of the Court (O.39, r.19) 19. (1) The fees of examiners of Court shall be agreed with and paid by the party prosecuting the order. (2) If such party is unable to reach agreement with the examiner of Court that party may apply to the Court for an order fixing the amount or rate of fees to be paid. GCR 1995 (Revised) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 40 ORDER 40 COURT EXPERT 1. Appointment of expert to report on certain questions (O.40, r.1) 1. (1) In any cause or matter which is to be tried without a jury and in which any question for an expert witness arises the Court may at any time, on the application of any party, appoint an independent expert or, if more than one such question arises, two or more such experts, to inquire and report upon any question of fact or opinion not involving questions of law or of construction. An expert appointed under this paragraph is referred to in this Order as a \\\"Court expert\\\". (2) Any Court expert in a cause or matter shall, if possible, be a person agreed between the parties and, failing agreement, shall be nominated by the Court. (3) The question to be submitted to the Court expert and the instructions (if any) given to the Court expert shall, failing agreement between the parties, be settled by the Court. (4) In this rule \\\"expert\\\", in relation to any question arising in a cause or matter, means any person who has such knowledge or experience of or in connection with that question that the person\u2019s opinion on it would be admissible in evidence. 2. Report of Court expert (O.40, r.2) 2. (1) The Court expert must send the Court expert\u2019s report to the Court, together with such number of copies thereof as the Court may direct, and the Clerk of the Court must send copies of the report to the parties or their attorneys. (2) The Court may direct the Court expert to make a further or supplemental report. (3) Any part of a Court expert's report which is not accepted by all the parties to the cause or matter in which it is made shall be treated as information furnished to the Court and be given such weight as the Court thinks fit. 3. Experiments and tests (O.40, r.3) 3. If the Court expert is of opinion that an experiment or test of any kind (other than one of a trifling character) is necessary to enable the Court expert to make a satisfactory report, the Court expert shall inform the parties or their attorneys and, if possible, make an arrangement with them as to the expenses involved, the persons to attend and other relevant matters; and if the parties are unable to agree on any of those matters it shall be settled by the Court. ORDER 40 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 4. Cross-examination of Court expert (O.40, r.4) 4. Any party may, within 14 days after receiving a copy of the Court expert\u2019s report, apply to the Court for leave to cross-examine the Court expert on that report, and on that application the Court shall make an order for the cross-examination of the Court expert by all the parties either \u2014 (a) at the trial; or (b) before an examiner or Judge at such time and place as may be specified in the order. 5. Remuneration of Court expert (O.40, r.5) 5. (1) The remuneration of the Court expert shall be fixed by the Court and shall include a fee for the Court expert\u2019s report and a proper sum for each day during which the Court expert is required to be present either in Court or before an examiner. (2) Without prejudice to any order providing for payment of the Court expert's remuneration as part of the costs of the cause or matter, the parties shall be jointly and severally liable to pay the amount fixed by the Court for the Court expert\u2019s remuneration but, where the appointment of a Court expert is opposed, the Court may, as a condition of making the appointment, require the party applying for the appointment to give such security for the remuneration of the Court expert as the Court thinks fit. 6. Calling of expert witnesses (O.40, r.6) 6. Where a Court expert is appointed in a cause or matter, any party may, on giving to the other parties a reasonable time before the trial notice of the party\u2019s intention to do so, call one expert witness to give evidence on the question reported on by the Court expert but no party may call more than one such witness without the leave of the Court, and the Court shall not grant leave unless it considers the circumstances of the case to be exceptional. GCR 1995 (Revised) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 41 ORDER 41 AFFIDAVITS 1. Form of affidavit (O.41, r.1) 1. (1) Subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), every affidavit sworn in a cause or matter must be entitled in that cause or matter. (2) Where a cause or matter is entitled in more than one matter, it shall be sufficient to state the first matter followed by the words \\\"and other matters\\\", and where a cause or matter is entitled in a matter or matters and between parties, that part of the title which consists of the matter or matters may be omitted. (3) Where there are more plaintiffs than one, it shall be sufficient to state the full name of the first followed by the words \\\"and others\\\", and similarly with respect to defendants. (4) Every affidavit must be expressed in the first person and must state the place of residence or business of the deponent and the deponent\u2019s occupation or, if the deponent has none, the deponent\u2019s description, and if the deponent is, or is employed by, a party to the cause or matter in which the affidavit is sworn, the affidavit must state that fact. In the case of a deponent who is giving evidence in a professional, business or other occupational capacity the affidavit may, instead of stating the deponent's residence, state the address at which the deponent works, the position the deponent holds and the name of the deponent\u2019s firm or employer, if any. (5) Every affidavit must follow continuously from page to page. (6) Every affidavit must be divided into paragraphs numbered consecutively, each paragraph being as far as possible confined to a distinct portion of the subject and each paragraph or group of paragraphs may be preceded by headings and sub-headings. (7) Dates, sums and other numbers must be expressed in an affidavit in figures and not in words. (8) Every affidavit must be signed by the deponent and the jurat must be completed and signed by the person before whom it is sworn. (9) At the top right hand corner of the first page of every affidavit there shall be written \u2014 (a) the party on whose behalf it is filed; (b)  the initials and surname of the deponent; (c) the number of the affidavit in relation to the deponent; and ORDER 41 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (d) the date when it was sworn. 2. Affidavit by two or more deponents (O.41, r.2) 2. Where an affidavit is made by two or more deponents, the names of the persons making the affidavit must be inserted in the jurat except that, if the affidavit is sworn by both or all the deponents at one time before the same person, it shall be sufficient to state that it was sworn by both (or all) of the \\\"above-named\\\" deponents. 3. Affidavit by illiterate or blind person (O.41, r.3) 3. Where it appears to the person administering the oath that the deponent is illiterate or blind, that person must certify in the jurat that \u2014 (a) the affidavit was read in that person\u2019s presence to the deponent; (b) the deponent seemed perfectly to understand it; and (c) the deponent made the deponent\u2019s signature or mark in that person\u2019s presence, and the affidavit shall not be used in evidence without such a certificate unless the Court is otherwise satisfied that it was read to and appeared to be perfectly understood by the deponent. 4. Use of defective affidavit (O.41, r.4) 4. An affidavit may, with the leave of the Court, be filed or used in evidence notwithstanding any irregularity in the form thereof. 5. Contents of affidavit (O.41, r.5) 5. (1) Subject to O.14, rr.2(2) and 4(2), to O.86, r.2(1), to paragraph (2) of this rule and to any order made under O.38, r.3, an affidavit may contain only such facts as the deponent is able of the deponent\u2019s own knowledge to prove. (2) An affidavit sworn for the purpose of being used in interlocutory proceedings may contain statements of information or belief with the sources and grounds thereof. (3) An affidavit sworn by an attorney shall not be admissible in any cause or matter unless the attorney has direct personal knowledge of the facts and matters to which the attorney deposes and does not appear as advocate in the cause or matter. 6. Scandalous, etc., matter in affidavit (O.41, r.6) 6. The Court may order to be struck out of any affidavit any matter which is scandalous, irrelevant or otherwise oppressive. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 41 7. Alterations in affidavits (O.41, r.7) 7. An affidavit which has in the jurat or body thereof an interlineation, erasure or other alteration shall not be filed or used in any proceeding without the leave of the Court unless the person before whom the affidavit was sworn has initialled the alteration and, in the case of an erasure, has re-written in the margin of the affidavit any words or figures written on the erasure and has signed or initialled them. 8. Affidavits to be sworn (O.41, r.8) 8. (1) Subject to paragraph (2), every affidavit shall be sworn before a justice of the peace or a notary public. (2) No affidavit shall be admissible if sworn before an attorney who will also appear on behalf of the party on whose behalf the affidavit is to be used. (3) A document purporting to have affixed or impressed thereon or subscribed thereto the seal or signature of a court, judge, notary public or person having authority to administer oaths outside the Islands in testimony of an affidavit being sworn before it or that person shall be admitted in evidence without proof of the seal or signature being the seal or signature of that court, judge, notary public or person. 9. Filing of affidavits (O.41, r.9) 9. (1) Every affidavit used in a cause or matter proceeding in the Court must be filed. (2) The exhibits to an affidavit shall not be filed and it shall be the duty of the party on whose behalf an affidavit is filed to preserve the exhibits for use by the Court. 10. Use of original affidavit or office copy (O.41, r.10) 10. (1) Subject to paragraph (2), an original affidavit may be used in any proceedings without leave of the Court notwithstanding that it has not been filed in accordance with rule 9. (2) Where an original affidavit is used, the party using it must undertake to file it. (3) Where an affidavit has been filed, an office copy thereof may be used in any proceedings. (4) Where an affidavit has been sworn outside the Islands, a copy transmitted by facsimile to the Islands may be used, unless the Court directs otherwise, upon the party's attorney undertaking to file the original. 11. Document to be used in conjunction with affidavit to be exhibited to it (O.41, r.11) 11. (1) Any document to be used in conjunction with an affidavit must be exhibited, and not annexed, to the affidavit. ORDER 41 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (2) Any exhibit to an affidavit must be identified by a certificate of the person before whom the affidavit is sworn. The certificate must be entitled in the same manner as the affidavit and rule 1(1), (2) and (3) shall apply accordingly. 12. Form of documentary exhibits (O.41, r.12) 12. (1) Every documentary exhibit shall have attached to it a frontsheet entitled in the cause or matter and specifying \u2014 (a) the affidavit to which it is exhibited; (b) the exhibit number; and (c) at the top right hand corner the information specified in rule 1(9). (2) Every exhibit shall bear a number comprising the initials of the deponent. (3) Where a deponent swears more than one affidavit to which there are exhibits, the numbering of such exhibits shall run consecutively throughout and shall not begin again with each affidavit. (4) Clearly legible photographic copies of original documents may be exhibited provided that the originals are made available at the hearing if required to be produced by notice served by any other party not less than 2 clear days prior to the hearing. (5) Any document which the Court is being asked to construe or enforce or the trusts of which it is being asked to vary, shall be separately exhibited and not included in any bundle of documents. (6) Where a number of documents are contained in one exhibit they shall be arranged in chronological order; be paginated; and the frontsheet shall contain an index. (7) Letters shall not be made separate exhibits. (8) Exhibits comprising letters shall be collected together in bundles; arranged in chronological order; be paginated; and the frontsheet shall contain an index listing each letter and specifying whether it is an original (or copy of an original) or copy (or copy of a copy). (9) Documentary exhibits may be \u2014 (a) firmly stapled; (b) bound together; (c) placed in ring binders provided that they are clearly separated by dividers; or (d) tied with tape, as may be convenient, provided that bundles are firmly held together and the pages easily turned. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 41 13. Exhibits other than documents (O.41, r.13) 13. (1) Exhibits other than documents must be clearly marked with labels firmly attached to the item. (2) Exhibit labels must contain the information, in abbreviated form if necessary, required by rule 12(1) and shall be numbered in the manner required by rule 12(2) and (3). 14. Court documents not to be exhibited (O.41, r.14) 14. (1) Copies of originating process, pleadings, affidavits and other documents filed in Court shall not be exhibited to affidavits. (2) A party wishing to refer to a document contained in a Court file shall serve notice of the party\u2019s intention to do so and shall provide the opposing party with an office copy thereof. 15. Reference to exhibits (O.41, r.15) 15. (1) Copies of the same document shall not be exhibited twice in any proceeding. (2) Where a deponent wishes to refer to a document already exhibited to some other deponent's affidavit, the deponent shall not also exhibit it to the deponent\u2019s own affidavit, but must identify it by reference to its number and the affidavit to which it is exhibited. GCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 01.03.99) (amended 08.09.03) ORDER 42 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 42 JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS 1. Form of judgment, etc. (O.42, r.1) 1. (1) Every judgment or order made by a Judge shall contain the following information in addition to its operative parts \u2014 (a) the name of the Judge who made it; (b) whether it was made in open Court or in Chambers; (c) the date from which it takes effect; (d) the date upon which it was filed; (e) the summons, notice or other application in respect of which it was made; (f) the identity of those parties who appeared and those who did not appear and in the case of those who appeared, whether they appeared in person or by an attorney; (g) except in the case of a judgment given in the trial of an action begun by writ, a statement of the affidavits read and witnesses who gave oral evidence; (h) if it was made upon any undertaking given by any party or parties, the full terms of such undertaking or undertakings; and (i) at the foot of its last page, the name and address of the party by whom it was drawn up and presented for filing. (2) If, in the case of any judgment, a form thereof is prescribed by the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) the judgment must be in that form. (3) Every judgment or order shall be signed by the Judge who made it except that the Clerk of the Court may sign it if the Judge is unable to do so by reason of that Judge\u2019s subsequent death, illness or absence from the Islands. (4) This Clerk of the Court shall be authorised to sign \u2014 (a) any consent judgment or order to which rule 5A applies; and (b) any default judgment or order to which rule 6 applies. 1A. No rule (O.42, r.1A) 1A. No rule (O.42, r.1A) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 42 2. Judgment, etc., requiring act to be done: time for doing it (O.42, r.2) 2. (1) Subject to paragraph (2), a judgment or order which requires a person to do an act must specify the time after service of the judgment or order, or some other time, within which the act is to be done. (2) Where the act which any person is required by any judgment or order to do is to pay money to some other person, give possession of any land or deliver any goods, a time within which the act is to be done need not be specified in the judgment or order by virtue of paragraph (1) but the foregoing provision shall not affect the power of the Court to specify such a time and to adjudge or order accordingly. 3. Date from which judgment or order takes effect (O.42, r.3) 3. (1) Subject to the provisions of rule 3A, a judgment or order of the Court takes effect from the day of its date. (2) Such judgment or order shall be dated as of the day on which it is pronounced, given or made, unless the Court orders it to be dated as of some earlier or later day, in which case it shall be dated as of that other day. (3) Whenever any judgment or order is drawn up and filed after the date upon which it is pronounced, given or made, it shall bear the date of filing in addition to the date upon which it was pronounced, given or made. (4) It shall be the duty of the attorney drawing up a judgment or order to include in it the date upon which it was pronounced, given or made and it shall be the duty of the Clerk of the Court to include in it the date of filing. 3A. Judgment against a State (O.42, r.3A) 3A. When a judgment on failure to acknowledge service has been entered against a State, as defined in Section 14 of the United Kingdom\u2019s State Immunity Act 1978, the judgment shall not take effect until 2 months after service on the State of \u2014 (a) a copy of the judgment; and (b) a copy of the affidavit in support of the application for leave to enter judgment, unless one has already been served pursuant to a direction under O.13, r.7A(4). 4. Orders required to be drawn up (O.42, r.4) 4. (1) Subject to paragraph (2), every order of the Court shall be drawn up and filed unless the Court otherwise directs. (2) An order \u2014 (a) which \u2014 (i) extends the period within which a person is required or authorised by these Rules, or by any judgment, order or direction, to do any act; or ORDER 42 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (ii) grants leave for the doing of any of the acts mentioned in paragraph (3); and (b) which neither imposes any special terms nor includes any special directions other than a direction as to costs, need not be drawn up and filed unless the Court otherwise directs. (3) The acts referred to in subparagraph (2)(a)(ii) are \u2014 (a) the issue of any writ, other than a writ for service out of the jurisdiction; (b) the amendment of a writ or other originating process or a pleading; (c) the filing of any document; (d) any act to be done by the Clerk of the Court. 5. Drawing up and filing of judgments and orders (O.42, r.5) 5. (1) The party seeking to have any judgment or order filed must draw up the judgment or order and present it to the Clerk of the Court together with the number of copies required by paragraph (8) or (9), as the case may be. (2) In the event that any judgment or order requires that any money be paid into or out of Court, the party seeking to have it filed must also draw up the necessary lodgment or payment schedule in accordance with O. 92, r.10, and present it to the Clerk of the Court at the same time as presenting the judgment or order. (3) It shall be the duty of the Clerk of the Court to provide at the request of any party a copy of any minute of order. (4) A party presenting a judgment or order for filing (other than one in default or by consent) must identify to the Clerk of the Court the relevant cause number. (5) Where more than one party has appeared in a proceeding in which a judgment or order has been made and all those parties are represented by attorneys, the attorney for the successful party shall draw up the judgment or order and circulate it to the attorneys for the other parties who shall indorse it \\\"approved as to form and content\\\". (6) Upon being presented with a judgment or order complying with rule 5A or rule 6 or indorsed in accordance with paragraph (5), the Clerk of the Court shall sign it and file it by sealing it and placing it on the Court file. (7) Upon being presented with an ex parte order or an inter partes order which has not been indorsed in accordance with paragraph (5), the Clerk of the Court shall present it to the judge for signature. (8) The Clerk of the Court shall notify the party who drew up the judgment or order when it has been filed and shall provide such party with as many sealed copies as such party may require upon payment of the prescribed fee. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 42 (9) A party seeking to file a final judgment or order or a default judgment shall provide the Clerk of the Court with at least three copies, two of which shall be retained for filing. (10) A party seeking to file an interlocutory judgment or order other than a final one shall provide the Clerk of the Court with at least two copies, one of which shall be retained for filing. (11) An office copy of every judgment or order of the kind specified in paragraph (9) shall be placed by the Clerk of the Court on the Register of Judgments maintained in accordance with O.63, r.7. 5A. Consent judgments and orders (O.42, r.5A) 5A. (1) Subject to paragraphs (2), (3) and (4), where all the parties to a cause or matter are agreed upon the terms in which a judgment should be given or an order should be made, a judgment or order in such terms may be given effect as a judgment or order of the Court by the procedure provided in rule 5 without the need for any party to appear before a Judge. (2) This rule applies to any judgment or order which consists of one or more of the following \u2014 (a) any judgment or order for \u2014 (i) the payment of a liquidated sum, or damages to be assessed, or the value of goods to be assessed; (ii) the delivery up of goods, with or without the option of paying the value of the goods to be assessed, or the agreed value; or (iii) the possession of land; (b) any order for \u2014 (i) the dismissal, discontinuance or withdrawal of any proceedings, wholly or in part; (ii) the stay of proceedings, either unconditionally or upon conditions as to the payment of money; (iii) the stay of proceedings upon terms which are scheduled to the order but which are not otherwise part of it (a \\\"Tomlin order\\\"); (iv) the stay of enforcement of a judgment, either unconditionally or upon condition that money due under judgment is paid by instalments specified in the order; (v) the setting aside of a judgment in default; (vi) the payment out of money in Court; (vii) the discharge from liability of any party; or (viii) the payment, taxation or waiver of costs, or such other provision for costs as may be agreed; ORDER 42 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (c) any order, to be included in a judgment or order to which the preceding subparagraphs apply, for \u2014 (i) the extension of the period required for the service or filing of any pleading or other document; (ii) the withdrawal of the record; or (iii) liberty to apply, or to restore. (3) Before any judgment, or order to which this rule applies may be filed, it must be drawn up in terms agreed and entitled \\\"Consent Order\\\" and it must be indorsed by attorneys acting for each of the parties. (4) This rule shall not apply to any judgment or order in proceedings in which any of the parties is a litigant in person or a person under disability. 6. Default judgments (O.42, r.6) 6. (1) A party seeking to have a default judgment entered pursuant to O.13 or O.19 shall make an application to the Clerk of the Court in Form No. 20 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) referred to in this rule as an \\\"application for default judgment\\\". (2) An application for default judgment shall be accompanied by a draft of the judgment sought together with such number of copies specified in rule 5(9). (3) When an application for default judgment has been filed the Court file shall be deemed to be closed and no notice of intention to defend, pleading, summons or other document shall be filed until after the default judgment has been made or, if the application for default judgment is found to be irregular, until after it has been rejected. (4) Upon receipt of an application for default judgment the Clerk of the Court shall \u2014 (a) if it appears to the Clerk of the Court that the requirements of O.13 or O.19 have been met, sign the judgment and file it in accordance with rule 5(6) and notify the applicant in accordance with rule 5(8); or (b) if it appears to the Clerk of the Court that the requirements of O.13 or O.19 have not been met or that it is otherwise irregular, indorse the application to the effect that it is irregular specifying the reason, whereupon the Court file shall be deemed to be open and the Clerk of the Court shall return the notice of application for default judgment to the applicant. (5) Any notice of intention to defend or pleading which purports to have been filed whilst the Court file is closed pursuant to paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be a nullity, unless the application for default judgment is rejected, whereupon it shall be deemed to have been filed on such date of such rejection. (6) A party seeking to file \u2014 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 42 (a) a judgment or order made in open Court including such a judgment or order made by consent; or (b) a default judgment; or (c) a judgment or order made in Chambers which by the direction of the Judge pursuant to O.32, r.27 or by the consent of all the parties noted thereon is to be filed on the Register of Judgments under O.63, r.7(1), shall provide the Clerk of the Court with at least three copies, two of which shall be retained for filing. (7) A party seeking to file a judgment or order made in Chambers other than such a judgment or order referred to in subparagraph (6)(c) shall provide the Clerk of the Court with at least two copies, one of which shall be retained for filing. 7. Original and office copies of judgments etc. (O.42, r.7) 7. (1) The original of any judgment or order is that which bears the Judge's or Clerk of the Court's signature as the case may be and shall be filed on the Court file. (2) An office copy of any judgment or order is one which bears the official facsimile of the signature of the Judge who signed the original. (3) The Clerk of the Court may issue any number of office copies. (4) Both original and office copies of judgments and orders must be sealed with the Court seal. (5) A duplicate original of any judgment or order may be signed only if the Judge considers that there is some special reason for doing so. 8. Judgments given in foreign currencies (O.42, r.8) 8. (1) Every judgment providing for payment of any sum of money shall specify the currency or currencies in which judgment is given. (2) A judgment expressed only in \\\"dollars\\\" or \\\"$\\\" shall be deemed to mean Cayman Islands dollars. 9. Application in respect of orders of the Privy Council (O.42, r.9) 9. An application to make an order of the Privy Council an order of the Grand Court may be made ex parte by affidavit to the Court. GCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 01.03.99) (amended 01.04.00) (amended 08.09.03) ORDER 43 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 43 ACCOUNTS AND INQUIRIES 1. Summary order for account (O.43, r.1) 1. (1) Where a writ is indorsed with a claim for an account or a claim which necessarily involves taking an account, the plaintiff may, at any time after the defendant has acknowledged service or after the time limited for acknowledging service, apply for an order under this rule. (1A) A defendant to an action begun by writ who has served a counterclaim, which includes a claim for an account or a claim which necessarily involves taking an account, on \u2014 (a) the plaintiff; or (b) any other party; or (c) any person who becomes a party by virtue of such service, may apply for an order under this rule. (2) An application under this rule must be made by summons and, if the Court so directs, must be supported by affidavit or other evidence. (3) On the hearing of the application, the Court may, unless satisfied by the defendant by affidavit or otherwise that there is some preliminary question to be tried, order that an account be taken and may also order that any amount certified on taking the account to be due to either party be paid to that party within a time specified in the order. 2. Court may direct taking of accounts, etc. (O.43, r.2) 2. (1) The Court may, on an application made by summons at any stage of the proceedings in a cause or matter, direct any necessary accounts or inquiries to be taken or made. (2) Every direction for the taking of an account or the making of an inquiry shall be numbered in the judgment or order so that, as far as may be, each distinct account and inquiry may be designated by a number. 3. Directions as to manner of taking account or making inquiry (O.43, r.3) 3. (1) Where the Court orders an account to be taken or inquiry to be made it may by the same or a subsequent order give directions with regard to the manner in which the account is to be taken or vouched or the inquiry is to be made. (2) Without prejudice to the generality of paragraph (1), the Court may direct that in taking an account the relevant books of account shall be evidence of the Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 43 matters contained therein with liberty to the parties interested to take such objection thereto as they think fit. 4. Account to be made, verified etc. (O.43, r.4) 4. (1) Where an account has been ordered to be taken, the accounting party must make out the accounting party\u2019s account and, unless the Court otherwise directs, verify it by an affidavit to which the account must be exhibited. (2) The items on each side of the account must be numbered consecutively. (3) Unless the order for the taking of the account otherwise directs, the accounting party must file the account with the Court and must at the same time notify the other parties that the accounting party has done so and of the filing of any affidavit verifying the account and of any supporting affidavit. 5. Notice to be given of alleged omissions, etc. in account (O.43, r.5) 5. Any party who seeks to charge an accounting party with an amount beyond that which the accounting party has by the accounting party\u2019s account admitted to have received or who alleges that any amount in the accounting party\u2019s account is erroneous in respect of amount or in any other respect must give the accounting party notice thereof stating, so far as the party is able, the amount sought to be charged with brief particulars thereof or, as the case may be, the grounds for alleging that the item is erroneous. 6. Allowances (O.43, r.6) 6. In taking any account directed by any judgment or order all just allowance shall be made without any direction to that effect. 7. Delay in prosecution of accounts, etc. (O.43, r.7) 7. (1) If it appears to the Court that there is undue delay in the prosecution of any accounts or inquiries, or any other proceedings under any judgment or order, the Court may require the party having the conduct of the proceedings or any other party to explain the delay and may then make such order for staying the proceedings or for expediting them or for the conduct thereof and for costs as the circumstances require. (2) The Court may direct any party to take over the conduct of the proceedings in question and to carry out any directions made by an order under this rule. 8. Distribution of fund before all persons entitled are ascertained (O.43, r.8) 8. Where some of the persons entitled to share in a fund are ascertained, and difficulty or delay has occurred or is likely to occur in ascertaining the other persons so entitled, the Court may order or allow immediate payment of their shares to the persons ascertained without reserving any part of those shares to meet the subsequent costs of ascertaining those other persons. ORDER 43 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 9. No rule (O.43, r.9) 9. No rule (O.43, r.9) GCR 1995 (Revised) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 44 ORDER 44 PROCEEDINGS UNDER JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS 1. Application to orders (O.44, r.1) 1. In this Order references to a judgment include references to an order. 2. Service of notice of judgment on person not a party (O.44, r.2) 2. (1) Where in an action for \u2014 (a) the administration of the estate of a deceased person; or (b) the execution of a trust; or (c) the sale of any property, the Court gives a judgment or makes a direction which affects persons not parties to the action, the Court may when giving the judgment or at any stage of the proceedings under the judgment direct notice of the judgment to be served on any such person and any person so served shall, subject to paragraph (4), be bound by the judgment as if the person had originally been made a party to the action. (2) If it appears that it is not practicable to serve notice of a judgment on a person directed to be served the Court may dispense with service and may also order that such person be bound by the judgment. (3) Every notice of a judgment for service under this rule must be indorsed with a memorandum in Form No. 9 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) with such modifications as may be appropriate. (4) A person served with notice of a judgment may, within 1 month after service of the notice on the person, and after acknowledging service, apply to the Court to discharge, vary or add to the judgment. (5) A person served with notice of a judgment may, after acknowledging service of the notice, attend the proceedings under the judgment. (6) Order 12, rules 1 to 4, shall apply in relation to the acknowledgment of service of a notice of judgment as if the judgment were a writ, the person by whom the notice is served were the plaintiff and the person on whom it is served were a defendant. 3. Directions by the Court (O.44, r.3) 3. (1) Where a judgment given in a cause or matter contains directions which make it necessary to proceed in Chambers under the judgment, the Court hearing the summons to proceed shall give directions with respect to the proceedings to be ORDER 44 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) taken under the judgment and the conduct thereof, including, in particular, directions with respect to \u2014 (a) the manner in which any account or inquiry is to be prosecuted; (b) the evidence to be adduced in support thereof; (c) the preparation and service on the parties to be bound thereby of the draft of any deed or other instrument which is directed by the judgment to be settled by the Court and the service of any objections to the draft; (d) without prejudice to O.15, r.17, the parties required to attend all or any part of the proceedings; (e) the representation by the same attorney of parties who constitute a class and by different attorneys of parties who ought to be separately represented; and (f) the time within which each proceeding is to be taken, and may fix a day or days for the further attendance of the parties. (2) The Court may revoke or vary any directions given under this rule. 4. Application of rr.5 to 8 (O.44, r.4) 4. Rules 5 to 8 apply \u2014 (a) where in proceedings for the administration under the direction of the Court of the estate of a deceased person the judgment directs any account of debts or other liabilities of the deceased's estate to be taken or any inquiry for next of kin or other unascertained claimants to be made; and (b) where in proceedings for the execution under the direction of the Court of a trust the judgment directs any such inquiry to be made, and those rules shall, with the necessary modifications, apply where in any other proceedings the judgment directs any account of debts or other liabilities to be taken or any inquiry to be made. 5. Advertisements for creditors and other claimants (O.44, r.5) 5. The Court may, when giving a judgment, give directions for the issue of advertisements for creditors or other claimants and may fix the time within which creditors and claimants may respond. 6. Examination of claims (O.44, r.6) 6. (1) Where an account of debts or other liabilities of the estate of a deceased person has been directed, such party as the Court may direct must \u2014 (a) examine the claims of persons claiming to be creditors of the estate; (b) determine, so far as the party is able, to which of such claims the estate is liable; and Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 44 (c) at least 7 clear days before the time appointed for adjudicating on claims, make an affidavit stating such party\u2019s findings and such party\u2019s reasons for them and listing all the other debts of the deceased which are or may still be due. (2) Where an inquiry for next of kin or other unascertained claimants has been directed, such party as the Court may direct must \u2014 (a) examine the claims; (b) determine, so far as the party is able, to which of such claims the estate is liable; and (c) at least 7 clear days before the time appointed for adjudicating on claims, make an affidavit stating such party\u2019s findings and such party\u2019s reasons for them. (3) If the personal representatives or trustees concerned are not the parties directed by the Court to examine claims, they must join with the party directed to examine them in making the affidavit required by this rule. 7. Adjudication on claims (O.44, r.7) 7. For the purpose of adjudicating on claims the Court may \u2014 (a) allow any claim after or without proof thereof; (b) direct any claim to be investigated in such manner as it thinks fit; or (c) require any claimant to attend and prove the claimant\u2019s claim or to furnish further particulars or evidence of it. 8. Notice of adjudication (O.44, r.8) 8. The Court shall give directions that there be served on every creditor whose claim or any part thereof has been allowed or disallowed, and who did not attend when the claim was disposed of, a notice informing the creditor of that fact. 9. Interest on debts (O.44, r.9) 9. (1) Where an account of the debts of a deceased person is directed by any judgment, then, unless the deceased's estate is insolvent or the Court otherwise orders, interest shall be allowed \u2014 (a) on any such debt as carries interest, at the rate it carries; and (b) on any other debt, from the date of the judgment at the rate payable on judgment debts at that date. (2) A creditor who has established the creditor\u2019s debt in proceedings under the judgment and whose debt does not carry interest shall be entitled to interest on the creditor\u2019s debt in accordance with subparagraph (1)(b) out of any assets which may remain after satisfying the costs of the cause or matter, the debts ORDER 44 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) which have been established and the interest on such of those debts as by law carry interest. (3) For the purposes of this rule \\\"debt\\\" includes funeral, testamentary or administration expenses and, in relation to expenses incurred after the judgment, for the reference in subparagraph (1)(b) to the date of the judgment there shall be substituted a reference to the date when the expenses became payable. 10. Interest on legacies (O.44, r.10) 10. When an account of legacies is directed by any judgment, then, subject to any directions contained in the will or codicil in question and to any order made by the Court, interest shall be allowed on each legacy at the prescribed rate beginning at the expiration of 1 year after the testator's death. 11. No rule (O.44, r.11) 11. No rule (O.44, r.11) 12. No rule (O.44, r.12) 12. No rule (O.44, r.12) GCR 1995 (Revised) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 45 ORDER 45 ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS: GENERAL 1. Enforcement of judgment, etc., for payment of money (O.45, r.1) 1. (1) Subject to the provisions of these Rules, a judgment or order for the payment of money, not being a judgment or order for the payment of money into Court, may be enforced by one or more of the following means, that is to say \u2014 (a) writ of fieri facias; (b) garnishee proceedings; (c) a charging order; (d) the appointment of a receiver; (e) an order for committal; (f) writ of sequestration; (g) an attachment of earnings order. (2) Subject to the provisions of these Rules, a judgment or order for the payment of money into Court may be enforced by one or more of the following means, that is to say \u2014 (a) the appointment of a receiver; (b) an order of committal; (c) writ of sequestration. (3) Paragraphs (1) and (2) are without prejudice to the enactments relating to bankruptcy or the winding up of companies. (4) In this Order references to any writ shall be construed as including references to any further writ in aid of the first mentioned writ. 2. No rule (O.45, r.2) 2. No rule (O.45, r.2) 3. Enforcement of judgment for possession of land (O.45, r.3) 3. (1) Subject to the provisions of these Rules, a judgment or order for the giving of possession of land may be enforced by one or more of the following means, that is to say \u2014 (a) writ of possession; (b) in a case in which rule 5 applies, an order of committal; (c) in such a case, writ of sequestration. ORDER 45 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (2) A writ of possession to enforce a judgment or order for the giving of possession of any land shall not be issued without the leave of the Court. (3) Such leave shall not be granted unless it is shown that every person in actual possession of the whole or any part of the land has received such notice of the proceedings as appears to the Court sufficient to enable the person to apply to the Court for any relief to which the person may be entitled. (4) A writ of possession may include provision for enforcing the payment of any money adjudged or ordered to be paid by the judgment or order which is to be enforced by the writ. 4. Enforcement of judgment for delivery of goods (O.45, r.4) 4. (1) Subject to the provisions of these Rules, a judgment or order for the delivery of any goods which does not give a person against whom the judgment is given or order made the alternative of paying the assessed value of the goods may be enforced by one or more of the following means, that is to say  \u2014 (a) writ of delivery to recover the goods without alternative provision for recovery of the assessed value thereof (hereafter in this rule referred to as a \\\"writ of specific delivery\\\"); (b) in a case in which rule 5 applies, an order of committal; (c) in such a case, writ of sequestration. (2) Subject to the provisions of these Rules, a judgment or order for the delivery of any goods or payment of their assessed value may be enforced by one or more of the following means, that is to say \u2014 (a) writ of delivery to recover the goods or their assessed value; (b) with the leave of the Court, writ of specific delivery; (c) in a case in which rule 5 applies, writ of sequestration. An application for an order under subparagraph (b) shall be made by summons, which must, notwithstanding O.65, r.9, be served on the defendant against whom the judgment or order sought to be enforced was given or made. (3) A writ of specific delivery, and a writ of delivery to recover any goods or their assessed value, may include provision for enforcing the payment of any money adjudged or ordered to be paid by the judgment or order which is to be enforced by the writ. (4) A judgment or order for the payment of the assessed value of any goods may be enforced by the same means as any other judgment or order for the payment of money. 5. Enforcement of judgment to do or abstain from doing any act (O.45, r.5) 5. (1) Where \u2014 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 45 (a) a person required by a judgment or order to do an act within a time specified in the judgment or order refuses or neglects to do it within that time, or, as the case may be, within that time as extended or abridged under O.3, r.5; or (b) a person disobeys a judgment or order requiring the person to abstain from doing an act, then, subject to the provisions of these Rules, the judgment or order may be enforced by one or more of the following means, that is to say \u2014 (i) with the leave of the Court, writ of sequestration against the property of that person; (ii) where that person is a body corporate, with the leave of the Court, a writ of sequestration against the property of any director or other officer of the body corporate; (iii) an order of committal against that person or, where that person is a body corporate, against any such officer. (2) Where a judgment or order requires a person to do an act within a time therein specified and an order is subsequently made under rule 6 requiring the act to be done within some other time, references in paragraph (1) of this rule to a judgment or order shall be construed as references to the order made under rule 6. (3) Where under any judgment or order requiring the delivery of any goods the person liable to execution has the alternative of paying the assessed value of the goods, the judgment or order shall not be enforceable by order of committal under paragraph (1), but the Court may, on the application of the person entitled to enforce judgment or order, make an order requiring the first mentioned person to deliver the goods to the applicant within a time specified in the order, and that order may be so enforced. 6. Judgment, etc. requiring act to be done: order fixing time for doing (O.45, r.6) 6. (1) Notwithstanding that a judgment or order requiring a person to do an act specifies a time within which the act is to be done, the Court shall, without prejudice to O.3, r.5, have power to make an order requiring the act to be done within another time, being such time after service of that order, or such other time, as may be specified therein. (2) Where, notwithstanding O.42, r.2(1), or by reason of O.42, r.2(2), a judgment or order requiring a person to do an act does not specify a time within which the act is to be done, the Court shall have power subsequently to make an order requiring the act to be done within such time after service of that order, or such other time, as may be specified therein. ORDER 45 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (3) An application for an order under this rule must be made by summons and the summons must, notwithstanding anything in O.65, r.9, be served on the person required to do the act in question. 7. Service of copy of judgment, etc., prerequisite to enforcement under r.5 (O.45, r.7) 7. (1) In this rule references to an order shall be construed as including references to a judgment. (2) Subject to O.24, r.20(3), O.26, r.6(3), and paragraphs (6) and (7) of this rule, an order shall not be enforced under rule 5 unless \u2014 (a) a copy of the order has been served personally on the person required to do or abstain from doing the act in question; and (b) in the case of an order requiring a person to do an act, the copy has been so served before the expiration of the time within which the person was required to do the act. (3) Subject as aforesaid, an order requiring a body corporate to do or abstain from doing an act shall not be enforced as mentioned in rule 5(1), (ii) or (iii) unless \u2014 (a) a copy of the order has also been served personally on the officer against whose property leave is sought to issue a writ of sequestration or against whom an order of committal is sought; and (b) in the case of an order requiring the body corporate to do an act, the copy has been so served before the expiration of the time within which the body was required to do the act. (4) There must be indorsed on the copy of an order served under this rule a notice informing the person on whom the copy is served \u2014 (a) in the case of service under paragraph (2), that if the person neglects to obey the order within the time specified therein, or, if the order is to abstain from doing an act, that if the person disobeys the order, the person is liable to process of execution to compel the person to obey it; and (b) in the case of service under paragraph (3), that if the body corporate neglects to obey the order within the time so specified or, if the order is to abstain from doing an act, that if the body corporate disobeys the order, the body corporate is liable to process of execution to compel the body to obey it. (5) With the copy of an order required to be served under this rule, being an order requiring a person to do an act, there must also be served a copy of any order made under O.3, r.5, extending or abridging the time for doing the act and, where the first mentioned order was made under rule 5(3) or 6 of this Order, a copy of the previous order requiring the act to be done. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 45 (6) An order requiring a person to abstain from doing an act may be enforced under rule 5 notwithstanding that service of a copy of the order has not been effected in accordance with this rule if the Court is satisfied that, pending such service, the person against whom or against whose property it is sought to enforce the order has had notice thereof either \u2014 (a) by being present when the order was made; or (b) by being notified of the terms of the order, whether by telephone, telegram or otherwise. (7) Without prejudice to its powers under O.65, r.4, the Court may dispense with service of a copy of an order under this rule if it thinks it just to do so. 8. Court may order act to be done at expense of disobedient party (O.45, r.8) 8. If an order of mandamus, a mandatory order, an injunction or a judgment or order for the specific performance of a contract is not complied with, then, without prejudice to any other power it may have including its powers to punish the disobedient party for contempt, the Court may direct that the act required to be done may, so far as practicable, be done by the party by whom the order or judgment was obtained or some other person appointed by the Court, at the cost of the disobedient party, and upon the act being done the expenses incurred may be ascertained in such manner as the Court may direct and execution may issue against the disobedient party for the amount so ascertained and for costs. 9. Execution by or against person not being a party (O.45, r.9) 9. (1) Any person, not being a party to a cause or matter, who obtains any order or in whose favour any order is made, shall be entitled to enforce obedience to the order by the same process as if the person were a party. (2) Any person, not being a party to a cause or matter, against whom obedience to any judgment or order may be enforced, shall be liable to the same process for enforcing obedience to the judgment or order as if the person were a party. 10. Conditional judgment: waiver (O.45, r.10) 10. A party entitled under any judgment or order to any relief subject to the fulfilment of any condition who fails to fulfil that condition is deemed to have abandoned the benefit of the judgment or order, and, unless the Court otherwise directs, any other person interested may take any proceedings which either are warranted by the judgment or order or might have been taken if the judgment or order had not been given or made. 11. Matters occurring after judgment: stay of execution, etc. (O.45, r.11) 11. Without prejudice to O.47, r.1, a party against whom a judgment has been given or an order made may apply to the Court for a stay of execution of the judgment ORDER 45 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) or order or other relief on the ground of matters which have occurred since the date of the judgment or order, and the Court may by order grant such relief, and on such terms, as it thinks just. 12. Forms of writs (O.45, r.12) 12. (1) A writ of fieri facias must be in Form No. 26 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised), adapted as may be appropriate to meet the circumstances of the particular case or in Form No. 27 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). (2) A writ of possession must be in Form No. 28 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). (3) A writ of sequestration must be in Form No. 29 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). 13. Enforcement of judgments and orders for recovery of money, etc. (O.45, r.13) 13. (1) Rule 1(1) of this Order, with the omission of subparagraphs (e) and (f) thereof, and Orders 46 to 51 shall apply in relation to a judgment or order for the recovery of money as they apply in relation to a judgment or order for the payment of money. (2) Rule 3 of this Order, with the omission of subparagraphs (1)(b) and (c) thereof, and O.47, r.3(2), shall apply in relation to a judgment or order that a person do have a return of any goods and to a judgment or order for the recovery of possession of land as they apply in relation to judgment or order for the giving or delivery of possession of land. (3) Rule 4 of this Order, with the omission of subparagraphs 1(b) and (c) and (2)(c) thereof, and O.47, r.3(2) shall apply in relation to a judgment or order that a person do have a return of any goods and to a judgment or order that a person do have a return of any goods or do recover the assessed value thereof as they apply in relation to a judgment or order for the delivery of any goods and a judgment or order for the delivery of any goods or payment of the assessed value thereof respectively. 14. No rule (O.45, r.14) 14. No rule (O.45, r.14) 15. No rule (O.45, r.15) 15. No rule (O.45, r.15) GCR 1995 (Revised) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 46 ORDER 46 WRITS OF EXECUTION: GENERAL 1. Definition (O.46, r.1) 1. In this Order, unless the context otherwise requires, \\\"writ of execution\\\" includes a writ of fieri facias, a writ of possession, a writ of delivery, a writ of sequestration and any further writ in aid of any of the aforementioned writs. 2. When leave to issue any writ of execution is necessary (O.46, r.2) 2. (1) A writ of execution to enforce a judgment or order may not issue without the leave of the Court in the following cases, that is to say \u2014 (a) where 6 years or more have elapsed since the date of the judgment or order; (b) where any change has taken place, whether by death or otherwise, in the parties entitled or liable to execution under the judgment or order; (c) where the judgment or order is against the assets of a deceased person coming to the hands of  the deceased person\u2019s executors or administrators after the date of the judgment or order, and it is sought to issue execution against such assets; (d) where under the judgment or order any person is entitled to relief subject to the fulfilment of any condition which it is alleged has been fulfilled; (e) where any goods or land sought to be seized under a writ of execution are in the hands of a receiver appointed by the Court or a sequestrator. (2) Paragraph (1) is without prejudice to any enactment or rule by virtue of which a person is required to obtain the leave of the Court for the issue of a writ of execution or to proceed to execution on or otherwise to the enforcement of a judgment or order. (3) Where the Court grants leave, whether under this rule or otherwise, for the issue of a writ of execution and the writ is not issued within 1 year after the date of the order granting such leave, the order shall cease to have effect, without prejudice, however, to the making of a fresh order. 3. Leave required for issue of writ in aid of other writ (O.46, r.3) 3. A writ of execution in aid of any other writ of execution shall not issue without the leave of the Court. 4. Application for leave to issue writ (O.46, r.4) 4. (1) An application for leave to issue a writ of execution may be made ex parte unless the Court directs it to be made by summons. ORDER 46 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (2) Such an application must be supported by an affidavit \u2014 (a) identifying the judgment or order to which the application relates and, if the judgment or order is for the payment of money, stating the amount originally due thereunder and the amount due thereunder at the date of the application; (b) stating, where the case falls within rule 2(1)(a), the reason for the delay in enforcing the judgment or order; (c) stating, where the case falls within rule 2(1)(b), the change which has taken place in the parties entitled or liable to execution since the date of the judgment or order; (d) stating, where the case falls within rule 2(1)(c) or (d), that a demand to satisfy the judgment or order was made on the person liable to satisfy it and that the person has refused or failed to do so; and (e) giving such other information as is necessary to satisfy the Court that the applicant is entitled to proceed to execution on the judgment or order in question and that the person against whom it is sought to issue execution is liable to execution on it. (3) The Court hearing such application may grant leave in accordance with the application or may order that any issue or question, a decision on which is necessary to determine the rights of the parties, be tried in any manner in which any question of fact or law arising in an action may be tried and, in either case may impose such terms as to costs or otherwise as it thinks just. 5. Application for leave to issue writ of sequestration (O.46, r.5) 5. (1) Notwithstanding anything in rules 2 and 4, an application for leave to issue a writ of sequestration must be made to a Judge by motion. (2) Subject to paragraph (3), the notice of motion, stating the grounds of the application and accompanied by a copy of the affidavit in support of the application, must be served personally on the person against whose property it is sought to issue the writ. (3) Without prejudice to its powers under O.65, r.4, the Court may dispense with service of the notice of motion under this rule if it thinks it just to do so. (4) The Judge hearing an application for leave to issue a writ of sequestration may sit in private in any case in which, if the application were for an order of committal, the Judge would be entitled to do so by virtue of O.52, r.6, but except in such a case, the application shall be heard in open Court. 6. Issue of writ of execution (O.46, r.6) 6. (1) Issue of a writ of execution takes place on its being sealed by the Clerk of the Court. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 46 (2) Before such a writ is issued a praecipe for its issue must be filed. (3) The praecipe must be signed by the attorney of the person entitled to execution or, if that person is acting in person, by the person entitled to execution. (4) No such writ shall be sealed unless at the time of the tender thereof for sealing \u2014 (a) the person tendering it identifies in the Court file \u2014 (i) the judgment or order on which the writ is to issue, or an office copy thereof; (ii) where the writ may not issue without the leave of the Court, the order granting such leave or evidence of the granting of it; (b) where judgment on failure to acknowledge service has been entered against a State, as defined in Section 14 of the United Kingdom\u2019s State Immunity Act 1978, the person tendering it produces evidence that the State has been served in accordance with O.42, r.3A and that the judgment has taken effect; and (c) the Clerk of the Court is satisfied that the period, if any, specified in the judgment or order for the payment of any money or the doing of any other act thereunder has expired. (5) Every writ of execution shall bear the date of the day on which it is issued. 7. No rule (O.46, r.7) 7. No rule (O.46, r.7) 8. Duration and renewal of execution (O.46, r.8) 8. (1) For the purpose of execution, a writ of execution is valid in the first instance for 12 months beginning with the date of its issue. (2) Where a writ has not been wholly executed the Court may by order extend the validity of the writ from time to time for a period of 12 months at any time beginning with the day on which the order is made, if an application for extension is made to the Court before the day next following that on which the writ would otherwise expire or such later day, if any, as the Court may allow. (3) Before a writ, the validity of which has been extended under paragraph (2), is executed either the writ must be sealed with the seal of the Court showing the date on which the order extending its validity was made or the applicant for the order must serve a notice, sealed as aforesaid, on the Bailiff to whom the writ is directed informing the Bailiff of the making of the order and the date thereof. (4) The priority of a writ, the validity of which has been extended under this rule, shall be determined by reference to the date on which it was originally delivered to the Bailiff. (5) The production of a writ of execution, or of such a notice as is mentioned in paragraph (3), purporting in either case to be sealed as mentioned in that ORDER 46 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) paragraph, shall be evidence that the validity of that writ or, as the case may be, of the writ referred to in that notice, has been extended under paragraph (2). 9. Return of writ of execution (O.46, r.9) 9. (1) Any party at whose instance a writ of execution was issued may serve a notice on the Bailiff to whom the writ was directed requiring the Bailiff, within such time as may be specified in the notice, to indorse on the writ a statement of the manner in which the Bailiff has executed it and to send to that party a copy of the statement. (2) If the Bailiff on whom such a notice is served fails to comply with it the party by whom it was served may apply to the Court for an order directing the Bailiff to comply with the notice. GCR 1995 (Revised) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 47 ORDER 47 WRITS OF FIERI FACIAS 1. Power to stay execution by writ of fieri facias (O.47, r.1) 1. (1) Where a judgment is given or an order made for the payment by any person of money, and the Court is satisfied, on an application made at the time of the judgment or order, or at any time thereafter, by the judgment debtor or other party liable to execution \u2014 (a) that there are special circumstances which render it inexpedient to enforce the judgment or order; or (b) that the applicant is unable from any cause to pay the money, then, notwithstanding anything in rule 2 or 3, the Court may by order stay the execution of the judgment or order by writ of fieri facias either absolutely or for such period and subject to such conditions as the Court thinks fit. (2) An application under this rule, if not made at the time the judgment is given or order made, must be made by summons and may be so made notwithstanding that the party liable to execution did not acknowledge service of the writ or originating summons in the action or did not state in the party\u2019s acknowledgment of service that the party intends to apply for a stay of execution under this rule pursuant to O.13, r.8. (3) An application made by summons must be supported by an affidavit made by or on behalf of the applicant stating the grounds of the application and the evidence necessary to substantiate them and, in particular, where such application is made on the grounds of the applicant's inability to pay, disclosing the applicant\u2019s income, the nature and value of any property, whether real or personal, of the applicant\u2019s and the amount of any other liabilities of his. (4) The summons and a copy of the supporting affidavit must, not less than 4 clear days before the return day, be served on the party entitled to enforce the judgment or order. (5) An order staying execution under this rule may be varied or revoked by a subsequent order. 2. No rule (O.47, r.2) 2. No rule (O.47, r.2) ORDER 47 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 3. Separate writs to enforce payment of costs, etc. (O.47, r.3) 3. (1) Where only the payment of money, together with costs to be taxed, is adjudged or ordered, then, if when the money becomes payable under the judgment or order the costs have not been taxed, the party entitled to enforce that judgment or order may issue a writ of fieri facias to enforce payment of the sum (other than for costs) adjudged or ordered and, not less than 8 days after the issue of that writ, the party may issue a second writ to enforce payment of the taxed costs. (2)  A party entitled to enforce a judgment or order for the delivery of possession of any property (other than money) may, if the party so elects, issue a separate writ of fieri facias to enforce payment of any damages or costs awarded to the party by that judgment or order. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 47 GCR 1995 (Revised) ORDER 48 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 48 EXAMINATION OF JUDGMENT DEBTOR, ETC. 1. Order for examination of judgment debtor (O.48, r.1) 1. (1) Where a person has obtained a judgment or order for the payment by some other person (hereinafter referred to as \\\"the judgment debtor\\\") of money, the Clerk of the Court may, on an application made by the person entitled to enforce the judgment or order, order the judgment debtor or, if the judgment debtor is a body corporate, an officer thereof, to attend before a Judge and be orally examined on the question \u2014 (a) whether any and, if so, what debts are owing to the judgment debtor, and (b) whether the judgment debtor has any and, if so, what other property or means of satisfying the judgment or order, and the Court may also order the judgment debtor or officer to produce any books or documents in the possession of the judgment debtor relevant to the questions aforesaid at the time and place appointed for the examination. (2) An application under this rule shall be made in Form No. 30A of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) and shall be determined by the Clerk of the Court without hearing the applicant. (3) The application must be supported by an affidavit \u2014 (a) identifying the judgment or order and stating the amount unpaid at the time of the application; (b) stating the date and place at which the judgment or order was served upon the judgment debtor; (c) giving particulars of the document sought to be produced and the reasons for believing that such documents are in the possession of the judgment debtor; and (d) where the judgment debtor is a body corporate, particulars of its relationship with the person to be summoned for examination. (4) An order under this rule must be in Form No. 30 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) and must be served personally on the judgment debtor and on any officer of a body corporate ordered to attend for examination. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 48 2. Examination of party liable to satisfy other judgment (O.48, r.2) 2. Where any difficulty arises in or in connection with the enforcement of any judgment or order, other than such a judgment or order as is mentioned in rule 1, the Court may make an order under that rule for the attendance of the party liable to satisfy the judgment or order and for the party\u2019s examination on such questions as may be specified in the order, and that rule shall apply accordingly with the necessary modifications. 3. Examiner to make record of debtor's statement (O.48, r.3) 3. The Judge shall take down, or cause to be taken down, in writing the statement made by the judgment debtor or other person at the examination. The Judge shall certify the accuracy of the statement by signing it. GCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 01.03.99) ORDER 49 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 49 GARNISHEE PROCEEDINGS 1. Attachment of debt due to judgment debtor (O.49, r.1) 1. (1) Where a person (in this Order referred to as \\\"the judgment creditor\\\") has obtained a judgment or order for the payment by some other person (in this Order referred to as \\\"the judgment debtor\\\") of money, not being a judgment or order for the payment of money into Court, and any other person within the jurisdiction (in this Order referred to as \\\"the garnishee\\\") is indebted to the judgment debtor, the Court may, subject to the provisions of this Order and of any enactment, order the garnishee to pay the judgment creditor the amount of any debt due or accruing due to the judgment debtor from the garnishee, or so much thereof as is sufficient to satisfy that judgment or order and the costs of the garnishee proceedings. (2) An order under this rule shall in the first instance be an order to show cause, specifying the time and place for further consideration of the matter, and in the meantime attaching such debt as is mentioned in paragraph (1) or so much thereof as may be specified in the order, to answer the judgment or order mentioned in that paragraph and the costs of the garnishee proceedings. 2. Application for order (O.49, r.2) 2. An application for an order under rule 1 must be made ex parte supported by an affidavit \u2014 (a) stating the name and last known address of the judgment debtor; (b) identifying the judgment or order to be enforced and stating the amount remaining unpaid under it at the time of the application; and (c) stating that to the best of the information or belief of the deponent the garnishee (naming the garnishee) is within the jurisdiction and is indebted to the judgment debtor and stating the sources of the deponent's information or the grounds for the deponent\u2019s belief. 3. Service and effect of order to show cause (O.49, r.3) 3. (1) Unless the Court otherwise directs, an order under rule 1 to show cause must be served \u2014 (a) on the garnishee personally, at least 14 days before the day appointed thereby for the further consideration of the matter; and (b) on the judgment debtor, at least 7 days after the order has been served on the garnishee and at least 7 days before the day appointed for the further consideration of the matter. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 49 (2) Such an order shall bind in the hands of the garnishee as from the service of the order on the garnishee any debt specified in the order or so much thereof as may be so specified. 4. No appearance or dispute of liability by garnishee (O.49, r.4) 4. (1) Where on the further consideration of the matter the garnishee does not attend or does not dispute the debt due or claimed to be due from the garnishee to the judgment debtor, the Court may make an order absolute under rule 1 against the garnishee. (2) An order absolute under rule 1 against the garnishee may be enforced in the same manner as any other order for the payment of money. 5. Dispute of liability by garnishee (O.49, r.5) 5. Where on the further consideration of the matter the garnishee disputes liability to pay the debt due or claimed to be due from the garnishee to the judgment debtor, the Court may summarily determine the question at issue or order that any question necessary for determining the liability of the garnishee be tried in any manner in which any question or issue in an action may be tried. 6. Claims of third persons (O.49, r.6) 6. (1) If in garnishee proceedings it is brought to the notice of the Court that some other person than the judgment debtor is or claims to be entitled to the debt sought to be attached or has or claims to have a charge or lien upon it, the Court may order that person to attend before the Court and state the nature of the claim with particulars thereof. (2) After hearing any person who attends before the Court in compliance with an order under paragraph (1), the Court may summarily determine the questions at issue between the claimants or make such other order as it thinks just, including an order that any question or issue necessary for determining the validity of the claim of such other person as is mentioned in paragraph (1) be tried in such manner as is mentioned in rule 5. 7. No rule (O.49, r.7) 7. No rule (O.49, r.7) 8. Discharge of garnishee (O.49, r.8) 8. Any payment made by a garnishee in compliance with an order absolute under this Order, and any execution levied against the garnishee in pursuance of such an order, shall be a valid discharge of the garnishee\u2019s liability to the judgment debtor to the extent of the amount paid or levied notwithstanding that the garnishee proceedings are subsequently set aside or the judgment or order from which they arose reversed. ORDER 49 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 9. Money in Court (O.49, r.9) 9. (1) Where money is standing to the credit of the judgment debtor in Court, the judgment creditor shall not be entitled to take garnishee proceedings in respect of that money but may apply to the Court by summons for an order that the money or so much thereof as is sufficient to satisfy the judgment or order sought to be enforced and the costs of the application be paid to the judgment creditor. (2) Unless the Court otherwise directs, the summons must be served on the judgment debtor at least 7 days before the day named therein for the hearing of it. (3) Subject to O.75, r.24, the Court hearing an application under this rule may make such order with respect to the money in Court as it thinks just. 10. Costs (O.49, r.10) 10. The costs of any application for an order under rule 1 or 9 and of any proceedings arising therefrom or incidental thereto, shall, unless the Court otherwise directs, be retained by the judgment creditor out of the money recovered by the judgment creditor under the order and in priority to the judgment debt. GCR 1995 (Revised) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 50 ORDER 50 CHARGING ORDERS, STOP ORDERS, ETC. 1. Order imposing a charge on a beneficial interest (O.50, r.1) 1. (1) The power to make a charging order under paragraph 1 of the Law shall be exercisable by the Court. (2) An application by a judgment creditor for a charging order in respect of a judgment debtor's beneficial interest in any property may be made by an ex parte originating motion, and any order made on such an application shall in the first instance be an order, made in Form No. 33 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised), to show cause, specifying the time and place for further consideration of the matter and imposing the charge in any event until that time. (3) The application shall be supported by an affidavit \u2014 (a) identifying the judgment or order to be enforced and stating the amount unpaid at the date of the application; (b) stating the name of the judgment debtor and of any creditor of whom the applicant can identify; (c) giving full particulars of the subject matter of the intended charge, including \u2014 (i) in the case of securities other than securities in Court, the full title of the securities, their amount and the name in which they stand; (ii) and, in the case of funds in Court, the number of the account; and (iii) in the case of land, the registration details. (d) verifying that the interest to be charged is owned beneficially by the judgment debtor. (4) In any case where the subject matter of the intended charge is an interest in land, the supporting affidavit shall have exhibited to it an uncertified extract of the relevant Land Register. (5) Unless the Court otherwise directs, an affidavit for the purposes of this rule may contain statements of information or belief with the sources and grounds thereof. (6) An application may be made for a single charging order in respect of more than one judgment or order against the debtor provided that an order is first made pursuant to O.4, r.4, for all the causes or matters to be consolidated. ORDER 50 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 1A. Interpretation (O.50, r.1A) 1A. (1) In this Order \u2014 \\\"the Law\\\" means Schedule 3 of the Judicature Act (as amended and revised) and any expressions used in this Order and in the Law have the same meanings in this Order as they have in the Law. (2) References to \\\"Form RL10\\\", \\\"Form RL12\\\" and \\\"Form RL13\\\" are references to such forms as prescribed in the Third Schedule of the Registered Land Rules (as amended and revised). 2. Service of notice of order to show cause (O.50, r.2) 2. (1) On the making of an order to show cause, notice of the order shall, unless the Court otherwise directs, be served as follows \u2014 (a) a copy of the order, together with a copy of the affidavit in support, shall be served on the judgment debtor; (b) where the order relates to securities, other than securities in Court, copies of the order shall also be served \u2014 (i) in the case of securities issued by or on behalf of the government of the Islands, on the Financial Secretary and the stock transfer agent (if any); (ii) in the case of shares in any company, not being a registered mutual fund, upon its registered office and share transfer agent (if any); (iii) in the case of shares or units of any registered mutual fund, upon its licensed mutual fund administrator and its share transfer agent (if any); (c) where the order relates to a fund in Court, a copy of the order shall be served on the Courts Administrator at the Court Funds Office; and (d) where the order relates to an interest under a trust, not being a registered mutual fund, copies of the order shall be served on such of the trustees as the Court may direct. (2) Without prejudice to the provisions of paragraph (1), the Court may, on the making of the order to show cause, direct the service of copies of the order, and of the affidavit in support, on any other creditor of the judgment debtor or on any other interested person as may be appropriate in the circumstances. (3) Documents to be served under this rule must be served at least 7 days before the time appointed for the further consideration of the matter. 3. Order made on further consideration (O.50, r.3) 3. (1) On the further consideration of the matter the Court shall, either make the order absolute, with or without modifications, or discharge it. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 50 (2) Where the order is made absolute, it shall be made in Form No. 34 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised), and where it is discharged, the provisions of rule 7, regarding the service of copies of the order of discharge, shall apply. 4. Order imposing a charge on an interest held by a trustee (O.50, r.4) 4. (1) Save as provided by this rule, the provisions of rules 1, 2 and 3 shall apply to an order charging an interest held by a trustee as they apply to an order charging the judgment debtor's beneficial interest. (2) Instead of verifying the judgment debtor's beneficial ownership of the interest to be charged, the affidavit required by rule 1(3) shall state the ground on which the application is based and shall verify the material facts. (3) On making the order to show cause, the Court shall give directions for copies of the order, and of the affidavit in support, to be served on such of the trustees and beneficiaries, if any, as may be appropriate. (4) Rules 5, 6 and 7 shall apply to an order charging an interest held by a trustee as they apply to an order charging the judgment debtor's beneficial interest, except that, where the order is made under subsection (ii) or (iii) of paragraph 2(1)(b) of the Law references in those rules to \\\"the judgment debtor\\\" shall be references to the trustee. (5) Form Nos. 33 and 34 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) shall be modified so as to indicate that the interest is held by the debtor as trustee or, as the case may be, that it is held by a trustee (to be named in the order) on trust for the debtor beneficially. 4A. Registration of order imposing a charge on an interest in land (O.50, r.4A) 4A. (1) An order made under rule 1 in respect of any interest in land shall be registered in the encumbrances section of the relevant land register. (2)  When making an order, in Form 33 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised), to which this rule applies the Judge shall also sign an order in Form RL10 and it shall be the judgment creditor's duty to present the original of such order, together with at least three copies, to the Registrar of Lands for registration. (3) When the judgment creditor receives back from the Registrar of Lands the receipted copies of the order, the judgment creditor shall forthwith file one copy in Court and serve one copy on the judgment debtor. (4) If an order nisi to which this rule applies \u2014 (a) is made absolute without any modification, the fact that it is made absolute shall not be registered; ORDER 50 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (b) is made absolute with modifications, a variation of charge order in Form RL13 shall be signed by the Judge; or (c) is discharged, a discharge of charge order in Form RL12 shall be signed by the Judge, and it shall be the duty of the judgment creditor to present such order together with the appropriate number of copies to the Registrar of Lands and file and serve the receipted copies in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (3) of this rule. (5) If an order to which this rule applies relates to more than one registered parcel of land, the Judge shall sign separate orders, Form RL10 or RL12 or RL13, as the case may be, in respect of each parcel. (6) A charging order or variation of charge or discharge of a charging order to which this rule applies shall take effect from the date upon which it is registered in the incumbrances section of the relevant land register. 5. Effect of order in relation to securities out of Court (O.50, r.5) 5. (1) No disposition by the judgment debtor of the judgment debtor\u2019s interest in any securities to which an order to show cause relates made after the making of that order shall, so long as that order remains in force, be valid as against the judgment creditor. (2) Until such order is discharged or made absolute, any person or body served in accordance with rule 2(1)(b) shall not permit any transfer of any of the securities specified in the order, or pay any dividend, interest or redemption payment in relation thereto, except with the authority of the Court, and, if it does so, shall be liable to pay the judgment creditor the value of the securities transferred or, as the case may be, the amount of the payment made or, if that value or amount is more than sufficient to satisfy the judgment or order to which such order relates, so much thereof as is sufficient to satisfy it. (3) If the Court makes the order absolute, a copy of the order, including a stop notice as provided in Form No. 34 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised), shall be served on such person or body specified in rule 2(1)(b) as may be appropriate and, save as provided in rule 7(5), rules 11 to 14 shall apply to such a notice as they apply to a stop notice made and served under rule 11. (4) This rule does not apply to orders in respect of securities in Court. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 50 6. Effect of order in relation to funds in Court (O.50, r.6) 6. (1) Where an order to show cause has been made in relation to funds in Court (including securities in Court) and a copy thereof has been served on the Courts Administrator in accordance with rule 2, no disposition by the judgment debtor of any interest to which the order relates, made after the making of that order, shall, so long as the order remains in force, be valid as against the judgment creditor. (2) If the Court makes the order absolute, a copy of the order shall be served on the Courts Administrator at the Court Funds Office. 7. Discharge, etc., of charging order (O.50, r.7) 7. (1) Subject to paragraph (2), on the application of the judgment debtor or any other person interested in the subject matter of the charge, the Court may, at any time, whether before or after the order is made absolute, discharge or vary the order on such terms (if any) as to costs or otherwise as it thinks fit. (2) Notice of the application for the discharge or variation of the order shall be served on such interested parties as the Court may direct. (3) Where an order is made for the discharge or variation of a charging order in respect of funds in Court, a copy thereof shall be served on the Courts Administrator at the Court Funds Office. (4) Where an order is made for the discharge or variation of a charging order in respect of securities other than securities in Court, a copy thereof shall be served on the body or person specified in rule 2(1)(b) as may be appropriate, and the service thereof shall discharge, or, as the case may be, vary any stop notice in respect of such securities which may be in force pursuant to the original order. (5) Where an order is made under this rule for the discharge or variation of a charge of an interest in land, the provisions of rule 4A shall apply. 8. Enforcement of order charging an interest in land (O.50, r.8) 8. (1) A registered charge of an interest in land may be enforced by sale or the appointment of a receiver only if an order absolute has been made in accordance with rule 3. (2) A judgment creditor may exercise that judgment creditor\u2019s power of sale in respect of a charge to which this rule applies by public auction in accordance with Section 75 of the Registered Land Act (as amended and revised) without applying to the Court for an order for sale and without giving any notice in accordance with Section 72 of the Registered Land Act (as amended and revised). ORDER 50 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (3) A judgment creditor may apply to the Court for an order for sale by private treaty, tender or any other means and upon such application the Court shall give directions for sale in accordance with O.31, r.2. (4) An application for an order for sale under this rule shall be supported by an affidavit \u2014 (a) identifying the charging order sought to be enforced and giving full particulars of the registered title of the land; (b) specifying the amount in respect of which the charge was imposed and the balance outstanding at the date of the affidavit; (c) identifying any persons having a prior interest registered in the encumbrances section in the relevant land register; and (d) setting out the judgment creditor's proposals as to the manner of sale. (5) Order 31, rule 3, shall apply to sales made pursuant to paragraph (2) or pursuant to an order made under paragraph (3) of this rule. 9. Enforcement of order charging property other than land (O.50, r.9) 9. (1) An application for an order for sale of any property other than land made subject to a charging order shall be made by summons and O.31 shall apply, with such variations as may be necessary, as if the charged property were land. (2) An application for the appointment of a receiver of property other than land shall be made by summons and O.30 shall apply. 10. Funds in Court: stop order (O.50, r.10) 10. (1) The Court, on the application of any person \u2014 (a) who has a charge on the interest of any person in funds in Court; or (b) to whom that interest has been assigned; or (c) who is a judgment creditor of the person entitled to that interest, may make an order prohibiting the transfer, sale, delivery out, payment or other dealing with such funds, or any part thereof, or the income thereon, without notice to the applicant. (2) An application for an order under this rule must be made by summons in the cause or matter relating to the funds in Court, or, if there is no cause or matter, by originating summons. (3) The summons must be served on every person whose interest may be affected by the order applied for and on the Courts Administrator but shall not be served on any other person. (4) Without prejudice to the Court's powers and discretion as to costs, the Court may order the applicant for an order under this rule to pay the costs of any party Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 50 to the cause or matter relating to the funds in question, or of any person interested in those funds, occasioned by the application. 11. Securities not in Court: stop notice (O.50, r.11) 11. (1) Any person claiming to be beneficially entitled to an interest in any securities of the kinds set out in paragraph 2(2)(b) of the Law, other than securities in Court, who wishes to be notified of any proposed transfer or payment of those securities may avail themselves of the provisions of this rule. (2) A person claiming to be so entitled must file in Court \u2014 (a) an affidavit identifying the securities in question and describing the person\u2019s interest therein by reference to the document under which it arises; and (b) a notice in Form No. 34A of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) (a stop notice) signed by the deponent to the affidavit, and annexed to it, addressed to the person, body, state, territory or mutual fund concerned and must serve an office copy of the affidavit, and a sealed copy of the notice, on the other person or body, as provided in rule 2(1)(b). (3) There must be indorsed on the affidavit filed under this rule a note stating the address to which any such notice as is referred to in rule 12 is to be sent and, subject to paragraph (4), that address shall for the purposes of that rule be the address for service of the person on whose behalf the affidavit is filed. (4) A person on whose behalf an affidavit under this rule is filed may change the person\u2019s address for service for the purpose of rule 12 by serving on the other person or body, a notice to that effect, and, as from the date of service of such a notice, the address stated therein shall for the purposes of that rule be the address for service of that person. 12. Effect of stop notice (O.50, r.12) 12. Where a stop notice has been served in accordance with rule 11, then, so long as the stop notice is in force, the person or body on which it is served shall not register a transfer of the securities or take any other steps restrained by the stop notice until 14 days after sending notice thereof, by post, to the person on whose behalf the stop notice was filed, but shall not by reason only of that notice refuse to register a transfer, or to take any other step, after the expiry of that period. 13. Amendment of stop notice (O.50, r.13) 13. If any securities are incorrectly described in a stop notice which has been filed and of which a sealed copy has been served in accordance with rule 11, an amended stop notice may be filed and served in accordance with the same procedure and shall take effect as a stop notice on the day on which the sealed copy of the amended notice is served. ORDER 50 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 14. Withdrawal etc. of stop notice (O.50, r.14) 14. (1) The person on whose behalf a stop notice was filed may withdraw it by serving a request for its withdrawal on the person or body on whom the notice was served. (2) Such request must be signed by the person on whose behalf the notice was filed and the person\u2019s signature must be witnessed by a notary public, Justice of the Peace or attorney at law and O.41, rule 8(3) shall apply. (3) The Court, on the application of any person claiming to be beneficially entitled to an interest in the securities to which a stop notice relates, may by order discharge the notice. (4) An application for an order under paragraph (3) must be made \u2014 (a) by filing a consent order signed by on or behalf of the applicant and the person(s) claiming to be beneficially interested in the securities; or (b) by an application made by originating summons in Form No.3 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). (5) O.42, r.5A(4) shall not apply to a consent order filed under this rule which may be signed by persons not represented by an attorney provided only that such persons' signatures have been witnessed by a notary public, Justice of the Peace or attorney at law and O.41, r.8(3) shall apply. 15. Order prohibiting transfer, etc. of securities (O.50, r.15) 15. (1) The Court, on the application of any person claiming to be beneficially entitled to an interest in any securities of the kinds set out in paragraph 2(2)(b) of the Law, may by order prohibit the person or body concerned from registering any transfer of the securities or taking any other step to which paragraph 4(4) of the Law applies. The order shall specify the securities to which the prohibition relates, the name in which they stand and the steps which must not be taken, and shall state whether the prohibition applies to the securities only or to the dividends or interest as well. (2) An application for an order under this rule must be made by motion. (3) The Court, on the application of any person claiming to be entitled to an interest in any securities to which an order under this rule relates, may discharge or vary the order on such terms (if any) as to costs or otherwise as it thinks fit. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 50 GCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 13.10.06) ORDER 50A Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 50A ATTACHMENT OF EARNINGS ORDERS 1. Interpretation (O.50A, r.1) 1. In this Order \u2014 \\\"the Law\\\" means Schedule 2 of the Judicature Act (as amended and revised) and, unless the context otherwise requires, expressions used in Schedule 2 of that Law have the same meaning as in that Law; and \\\"maintenance order\\\" means an order of a kind mentioned in paragraph 1(1)(b) of the Law. 2. Register of orders (O.50A, r.2) 2. (1) The Clerk of the Court shall create a file containing, in chronological order, an office copy of every attachment of earnings order, including consolidated orders, made by the Court, which shall be referred to as the Register of Attachment of Earnings Orders. (2) The Clerk of the Court shall, on the request of any person having a judgment or order against a person, cause a search to be made in the Register and shall issue a certificate of the result of the search. 3. Non-resident debtors (O.50A, r.3) 3. An application for an attachment of earnings order may be made to the Court notwithstanding that the judgment debtor does not reside within the Islands. 4. Mode of applying (O.50A, r.4) 4. (1) An application by a judgment creditor for an attachment of earnings order shall be in Form No. 35 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). (2) The application shall be supported by an affidavit \u2014 (a) identifying the judgment or order in respect of which the attachment of earnings order is sought; (b) verifying the amount due under the judgment or order; and (c) stating whether a writ of execution has been issued to enforce it. 5. Service and reply (O.50A, r.5) 5. (1) The application, together with a form of reply as to the debtor's means in Form No. 36 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised), shall be served on the debtor in the manner prescribed by O.65. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 50A (2) The debtor shall within 8 days after service on the debtor of the documents mentioned in paragraph (1), file a statement of means in the form provided, and the instruction to that effect in the notice to the debtor shall constitute a requirement imposed by virtue of paragraph 10(3) of the Law: Provided that no proceedings shall be taken for an offence alleged to have been committed under paragraph 14(1)(c) or (f) of the Law in relation to the requirement unless the said documents have been served on the debtor personally or the Court is satisfied that they came to the debtor\u2019s knowledge in sufficient time for the debtor to comply with the requirement. (3) Nothing in paragraph (2) shall require a defendant to file a statement of means if, within the period of time mentioned in that paragraph, the defendant pays to the judgment creditor the money remaining due under the judgment or order and, where such payment is made, the judgment creditor shall so inform the Clerk of the Court. (4) On receipt of a statement of means the Clerk of the Court shall send a copy to the applicant. 6. Notice to employer (O.50A, r.6) 6. Without prejudice to the powers conferred by paragraph 10(1) of the Law, the Court may of its own motion, at any stage of the proceedings, send to any person appearing to have the debtor in the person\u2019s employment a notice in Form No. 37 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) requesting the person to give to the Court, within such period as may be specified in the notice, a statement of the debtor's earnings and anticipated earnings with such particulars as may be specified. 7. Attachment of earnings order (O.50A, r.7) 7. (1) On receipt of the debtor's reply, the Judge may, if the Judge has sufficient information to do so, make an attachment of earnings order in Form No. 38 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) and a copy of the order shall be sent to the parties and the debtor's employer. (2) Where an order is made under paragraph (1), the judgment creditor or the debtor may, within 14 days of service of the order on the judgment creditor or the debtor and giving their reasons, make an application for the order to be reconsidered and, upon receipt of any such application (in whatever form), the Clerk of the Court shall fix a day for the hearing of the application and give notice of hearing in Form No. 39 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) to the judgment creditor and the debtor. (3) On hearing an application under paragraph (2), the Judge may confirm the order or set it aside and make such new order as the Judge thinks fit and the order so made shall be filed in accordance with O.42, r.5. ORDER 50A Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (4) Where the Judge does not determine the application under paragraph (1), the Judge shall direct that a day be fixed for the hearing of the application whereupon the Clerk of the Court shall fix such a day and give notice of hearing in Form No. 40 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) to the judgment creditor and the debtor. (5) If the creditor does not appear at the hearing of the application under paragraph (4), but the creditor requests the Court in writing to proceed in the creditor\u2019s absence, the Court may, notwithstanding anything in O.35, r.1, proceed to hear the application and to make an order thereon. (6) An attachment of earnings order may be made to secure the payment of a judgment debt if the debt is \u2014 (a) not less than $100; or (b) for the amount remaining payable under a judgment for a sum of not less than $100. 8. Failure by debtor (O.50A, r.8) 8. (1) If the debtor fails to comply with rule 5(2) or to make payment to the judgment creditor, the Court of its own motion shall issue a notice in Form No. 41 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) calling on the debtor to show good reason why the debtor should not be imprisoned or fined and such notice shall be served on the debtor personally not less than 5 days before the hearing. (2) Order 52, rule 12, shall apply where a notice is issued under paragraph (1). (3) On a hearing under paragraph (1), the Judge may, if the Judge has sufficient information to do so, determine the application for an attachment of earnings order or may direct that a day be fixed for the hearing of the application, whereupon the Clerk of the Court shall fix such a day and give to the judgment creditor and the debtor not less than 8 days' notice of the day so fixed. (4) An application by a debtor for the revocation of an order committing the debtor to prison and, if the debtor is already in custody, for the debtor\u2019s discharge shall be made to the Judge ex parte in writing showing the reasons for the debtor's failure to attend the Court or the debtor\u2019s refusal to be sworn or to give evidence, as the case may be, and containing an undertaking by the debtor to attend the Court or to be sworn or to give evidence when next ordered or required to do so. (5) Before dealing with the application the Judge may, if the Judge thinks fit, cause notice to be given to the judgment creditor that the application has been made and of a day and hour when the judgment creditor may attend and be heard. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 50A 9. Costs (O.50A, r.9) 9. On the hearing of an application for an attachment of earnings order, the Court may award costs against the judgment debtor and such costs shall be assessed in accordance with Order 62. 10. Contents and service of order (O.50A, r.10) 10. (1) An attachment of earnings order shall be in Form No. 38 or Form No. 45 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) and shall contain such of the following particulars relating to the debtor as are known to the Court \u2014 (a) the debtor\u2019s full name and address; (b) the debtor\u2019s employer's name and address; (c) the nature of the debtor\u2019s work; and (d) where the debtor has a work permit, the work permit's number, and those particulars shall be the prescribed particulars for the purposes of paragraph 3(3) of the Law. (2) An attachment of earnings order and any order varying or discharging such an order shall be served on the debtor and on the person to whom the order is directed, and O.65, r.5, shall apply. 11. Application to determine whether particular payments are earnings (O.50A, r.11) 11. An application to the Court under paragraph 12 of the Law to determine whether payments to the debtor of a particular class or description are earnings for the purposes of an attachment of earnings order may be made by summons supported by an affidavit, which shall be served on the persons mentioned in the said paragraph 12(2)(a), (b) and (c). 12. Notice of cessation (O.50A, r.12) 12. Where an attachment of earnings order ceases to have effect under paragraph 6(2) of the Law, the Clerk for the Court shall give notice of its cessation to the person to whom the order was directed. 13. Variation and discharge by Court of own motion (O.50A, r.13) 13. (1) The powers conferred by paragraph 7(1) of the Law may be exercised by the Court of its own motion in the circumstances mentioned in the following paragraphs. (2) Where it appears to the Court that a person served with an attachment of earnings order directed to the person does not have the debtor in the person\u2019s employment, the Court may discharge the order. ORDER 50A Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (3) Where an attachment of earnings order which has lapsed under paragraph 7(4) of the Law is again directed to a person who appears to the Court to have the debtor in the person\u2019s employment, the Court may make such consequential variations in the order as it thinks fit. (4) Where, after making an attachment of earnings order, the Court makes or is notified of the making of another such order in respect of the same debtor, the Court may discharge or vary the first mentioned order. (5) Where it appears to the Court that a bankruptcy order has been made against a person in respect of whom an attachment of earnings order is in force to secure the payment of a judgment debt, the Court may discharge the attachment of earnings order. (6) Where an attachment of earnings order has been made to secure the payment of a judgment debt and the Court grants leave to issue execution for the recovery of the debt, the Court may discharge the order. (7) Before varying or discharging an attachment of earnings order of its own motion under any of the foregoing paragraphs of this rule, the Court shall, unless it thinks it unnecessary in the circumstances to do so, give the debtor and the person on whose behalf the order was made an opportunity of being heard on the question whether the order should be varied or discharged, and for that purpose the Clerk of the Court may give them notice of a date and time when the question will be considered. 14. Exercise of power to obtain statement of earnings (O.50A, r.14) 14. (1) An order under paragraph 10(1)(b) of the Law shall be in Form No. 42 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) and shall be indorsed with or incorporate a notice warning the person to whom it is directed of the consequences of disobedience to the order and shall be served on the person personally. (2) If a person served with an order made pursuant to paragraph (1) fails to obey it, the Court of its own motion shall issue a notice in Form No. 43 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) calling on that person to show good reason why the person should not be imprisoned or fined and such notice shall be served on that person personally not less than 5 days before the hearing. (3) In this rule \\\"statement of earnings\\\" means a statement given under paragraph 10(1)(b) of the Law, specifying \u2014 (a) the nature of the debtor's employment; (b) if the debtor's employment is temporary, the anticipated length of employment; (c) if the debtor is paid a salary, the weekly or monthly amount; Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 50A (d) if the debtor is paid overtime, the average amount of such payments over the preceding 3 months; (e) if the debtor is paid by the hour, the hourly rate(s) and the debtor\u2019s average earnings over the preceding 6 weeks; and (f) particulars of any other benefits to which the debtor is entitled under the debtor\u2019s contract of employment. 15. Offenses (O.50A, r.15) 15. (1) Where it is alleged that a person has committed any offence under paragraph 14(1)(a), (b), (c), (d), (e) or (f) of the Law in relation to proceedings in, or to an attachment of earnings order made by the Court, the Clerk of the Court shall issue a summons in accordance with Section 15 of the Criminal Procedure Code (as amended and revised) to compel the attendance of that person before a Summary Court, unless the Court shall have dealt with such person pursuant to a notice to show cause served in accordance with rule 14. (2) The summons shall be served on the alleged offender in accordance with Sections 18, 18A or 19 of the Criminal Procedure Code (as amended and revised), as the case may be. 16. Maintenance orders (O.50A, r.16) 16. (1) An application for an attachment of earnings order to secure payments under a maintenance order may be made on the making of the maintenance order or an order varying the maintenance order, in which case rules 4 and 5 shall not apply. (2) In a case in which no attachment of earnings order was made in accordance with paragraph (1), an application for an attachment of earnings order to secure payments under a maintenance order may be made whenever the payments are in arrears. (3) An application under paragraph (2) shall be in Form No. 44 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). (4) Rule 13 shall have effect as if for paragraphs (4) to (6) there were substituted the following paragraph \u2014 \\\"(4)    Where an attachment of earnings order has been made and it appears to the Court that the related maintenance order has ceased to have effect, whether by virtue of the terms of the maintenance order, or otherwise, the Court may discharge or vary the attachment of earnings order.\\\" (5) An attachment of earnings order made under this rule shall be in Form No. 45 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). 17. Cases in which consolidated order may be made (O.50A, r.17) 17. Subject to the provisions of rules 18 to 21, a Court may make a consolidated attachment order where \u2014 ORDER 50A Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (a) two or more attachment of earnings orders are in force to secure payment of judgment debts by the same debtor; or (b) on an application for an attachment of earnings order to secure the payment of a judgment debt, or for a consolidated attachment order to secure the payment of two or more judgment debts, it appears to the Court that an attachment of earnings order is already in force to secure the payment of a judgment debt by the same debtor. 18. Application for consolidated order (O.50A, r.18) 18. (1) An application for a consolidated attachment order may be made \u2014 (a) by the debtor in respect of whom the order is sought; or (b) by any person who has obtained or is entitled to apply for an attachment of earnings order to secure the payment of a judgment debt by the same debtor, provided that an order is first made pursuant to O.4, r.4, for all the causes or matters to be consolidated. (2) An application under paragraph (1) may be made in the proceedings in which any attachment of earnings order is in force. The application shall be in Form No. 46 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) and rules 4 and 5 of this Order shall not apply. (3) Where an application for a consolidated attachment order is made, the Clerk of the Court shall \u2014 (a) notify any party who may be affected by the application of its terms; and (b) require the party to notify the Court in writing, within 14 days of service of notification upon the party, giving the party\u2019s reasons for any objection the party may have to the granting of the application. (4) If notice of any objection is not given within the time stated, the Clerk of the Court shall make a consolidated attachment of earnings order. (5) If any party objects to the making of a consolidated attachment of earnings order, the Judge, after considering the objection made and the reasons given, may grant the application or may cause notice to be given to any party affected by the application of a day and hour when the party may attend and be heard. (6) In the foregoing paragraphs of this rule, a party affected by the application means \u2014 (a) where the application is made by the debtor, the creditor in the proceedings in which the application is made and any other creditor who has obtained an attachment of earnings order which is in force to secure the payment of a judgment debt by the debtor; Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 50A (b) where the application is made by the judgment creditor, the debtor, and every person who, to the knowledge of the applicant, has obtained an attachment of earnings order which is in force to secure the payment of a judgment debt by the debtor. (7) A person to whom two or more attachment of earnings orders are directed to secure the payment of judgment debts by the same debtor may make an application in Form No. 46 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) for the Court to make a consolidated attachment order to secure the payment of those debts, and on receipt of such an application paragraphs (4) to (7) shall apply, with the necessary modifications, as if the request were an application by the judgment creditor. (8) A consolidated attachment of earnings order shall be in Form No. 47 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). 19. Making of consolidated order by Court of its own motion (O.50A, r.19) 19. Where an application is made for an attachment of earnings order to secure the payment of a judgment debt by a debtor in respect of whom an attachment of earnings order is already in force to secure the payment of another judgment debt and no application is made for a consolidated order, the Court of its own motion may make such an order after giving all persons concerned an opportunity of submitting written objections and the provisions of rule 18 shall apply with the necessary modifications. 20. Extension of consolidated order (O.50A, r.20) 20. Where a consolidated attachment order is in force to secure payment of one or more judgment debts, any creditor to whom another judgment debt is owed by the same judgment debtor may apply to the Court in Form No. 46 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) for the order to be extended so as to secure the payment of that debt as well as the first mentioned debts and, if the application is granted, the Court may either vary the order accordingly or may discharge it and make a new consolidated attachment order to secure payment of all the aforesaid judgment debts. 21. Payments under consolidated order (O.50A, r.21) 21. Where payments are made in compliance with a consolidated attachment order, the sums paid shall be treated as if they had been paid by the debtor to satisfy the relevant adjudications in proportion to the amounts payable thereunder, and for that purpose dividends may from time to time be declared and distributed among the creditors entitled thereto. GCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 04.06.01) ORDER 51 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 51 RECEIVERS: EQUITABLE EXECUTION 1. Appointment of receiver by way of equitable execution (O.51, r.1) 1. Where an application is made for the appointment of a receiver by way of equitable execution, the Court in determining whether it is just or convenient that the appointment should be made shall have regard to the amount claimed by the judgment creditor, to the amount likely to be obtained by the receiver and to the probable costs of the receiver\u2019s appointment and may direct an inquiry on any of these matters or any other matter before making the appointment. 2. No rule (O.51, r.2) 2. No rule (O.51, r.2) 3. Application of rules as to appointment of receiver, etc. (O.51, r.3) 3. An application for the appointment of a receiver by way of equitable execution may be made in accordance with O.30, r.1 and rr.2 to 6 of that Order shall apply in relation to a receiver appointed by way of equitable execution as they apply in relation to a receiver appointed for any other purpose. GCR 1995 (Revised) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 52 ORDER 52 COMMITTAL I. GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. Committal for contempt of Court (O.52, r.1) 1. The power of the Court to punish for contempt of Court may be exercised by an order of committal. 2. No rule (O.52, r.2) 2. No rule (O.52, r.2) 3. No rule (O.52, r.3) 3. No rule (O.52, r.3) 4. Application for committal (O.52, r.4) 4. (1) An application to the Court for an order of committal must be made by notice of motion in Form No. 48 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) and be supported by an affidavit. (2) Subject to paragraph (3), the notice of motion stating the grounds of the application and accompanied by a copy of the affidavit in support of the application, must be served personally on the person sought to be committed. (3) Without prejudice to its power under Order 65, rule 4, the Court may dispense with the service of the notice of motion under this rule if it thinks it just so to do. 5. Committal by the Court of its own motion (O.52, r.5) 5. Nothing in the foregoing provisions of this Order shall be taken as affecting the power of the Court to make an order of committal of its own motion against a person guilty of contempt of court. 6. Provisions as to hearing (O.52, r.6) 6. (1) Subject to paragraph (2), the Court hearing an application for an order of committal may sit in private in the following cases, that is to say \u2014 (a) where the application arises out of proceedings relating to the wardship or adoption of an infant or wholly or mainly to the guardianship, custody, maintenance or upbringing of a child, or rights of access to a child; (b) where the application arises out of proceedings relating to a person who is or appears to be mentally impaired within the meaning of Section 2 of the Mental Health Act (as amended and revised); ORDER 52 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (c) where the application arises out of proceedings in which a secret process, discovery or invention was in issue; or (d) where it appears to the Court that in the interests of the administration of justice or for reasons of national security the application should be heard in private, but, except as aforesaid, the application shall be heard in open Court. (2) If the Court hearing an application in private by virtue of paragraph (1) decides to make an order of committal against the person sought to be committed, it shall in open Court state \u2014 (a) the name of that person; (b) in general terms the nature of the contempt of Court in respect of which the order of committal is being made; and (c) the length of the period for which the person is being committed. (3) Except with the leave of the Court hearing an application for an order of committal, no grounds shall be relied upon at the hearing except the grounds set out in the notice of motion under rule 4. The foregoing provision is without prejudice to the powers of the Court under O.20, r.8. (4) If on the hearing of the application the person sought to be committed expresses a wish to give oral evidence on the person\u2019s own behalf, the person shall be entitled to do so. 7. Power to suspend execution of committal order (O.52, r.7) 7. (1) The Court by whom an order of committal is made may by order direct that the execution of the order of committal shall be suspended for such period or on such terms or conditions as it may specify. (2) Where execution of an order of committal is suspended by an order under paragraph (1), the applicant for the order of committal must, unless the Court otherwise directs, serve on the person against whom it was made a notice informing the person of the making and terms of the order under that paragraph. 8. Discharge of person committed (O.52, r.8) 8. (1) The Court may, on the application of any person committed to prison for any contempt of court, discharge that person. (2) Where a person has been committed for failing to comply with a judgment or order requiring the person to deliver anything to some other person or to deposit it in Court or elsewhere, and a writ of sequestration has also been issued to enforce that judgment or order, then, if the thing is in the custody or power of the person committed, the commissioners appointed by the writ of sequestration Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 52 may take possession of it as if it were the property of that person and, without prejudice to the generality of paragraph (1), the Court may discharge the person committed and may give such directions for dealing with the thing taken by the commissioners as it thinks fit. 9. Saving for other powers (O.52, r.9) 9. Nothing in the foregoing provisions of this Order shall be taken as affecting the power of Court to make an order requiring a person guilty of contempt of court, or a person punishable by virtue of any enactment in like manner as if the person had been guilty of contempt of the Court, to pay a fine or to give security for the person\u2019s good behaviour, and those provisions, so far as applicable, and with the necessary modifications, shall apply in relation to an application for such an order as they apply in relation to an application for an order of committal. 10. Warrant of committal (O.52, r.10) 10. If an order is made for the committal of a person to prison with immediate effect, the Court shall issue a warrant of committal in Form No. 49 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). II. IMPRISONMENT FOR NON-PAYMENT OF JUDGMENT DEBTS 11. No Rule (O.52, r.11) 11. No Rule (O.52, r.11) 12. Application for committal (O.52, r.12) 12. (1) An application to commit a debtor to a term of imprisonment shall be made by motion in Form No. 50 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). (2) Notice of a motion under this rule must be served on the debtor personally and O.65, rr.4 and 5 shall not apply. (3) A notice of motion under this rule must be accompanied by a statement of means form in Form No. 36 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) which shall be completed and returned to the Court office within 8 days from the date of service. (4) A notice of motion under this rule must be supported by an affidavit verifying the amount owing by the debtor and explaining why the applicant believes the conditions specified in Section 30(1) of the Judicature Act (as amended and revised) to be satisfied. (5) If a suspended order has been made pursuant to rule 15(1)(b) and the debtor has failed to comply with the conditions of the order, an application for the issue of ORDER 52 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) a warrant of committal may be made ex parte by motion, supported by an affidavit verifying non-compliance with the conditions of the order. 13. Attendance of debtor (O.52, r.13) 13. (1) The debtor shall attend before the Court at the time and date specified in the notice of motion. (2) A debtor who has failed to complete and return a statement of means in accordance with rule 12(3) may do so at the hearing of the notice of motion. (3) The debtor may give oral evidence to explain why the debtor is in default of payment of any sum due and the applicant may cross-examine the debtor upon the debtor\u2019s statement of means. (4) The Court may issue a warrant for the arrest of a debtor who, having been served with a notice of motion in accordance with rule 12, fails to attend before the Court at the time and on the date specified. 14. Payment of the judgment debt (O.52, r.14) 14. (1) The provisions of rule 13 shall not apply in the case of any debtor who satisfies the judgment debt in full by paying the amount due into Court and complying with the requirements of O.22, r.1, prior to the date specified in the notice or motion for the debtor\u2019s attendance before the Court and the application for the debtor\u2019s committal shall be dismissed. (2) No order for costs shall be made against a debtor who satisfies the judgment debt in full in accordance with paragraph (1). 15. Order for committal (O.52, r.15) 15. (1) If the Court is satisfied as to the matters specified in Section 30(1) of the Judicature Act (as amended and revised), it may \u2014 (a) sentence the debtor to a fixed term of imprisonment with immediate effect; (b) sentence the debtor to a fixed term of imprisonment, suspended on terms that the debtor pays the debt or any instalment thereof within a fixed period not exceeding 28 days; (c) make an attachment of earnings order in accordance with O.50A; or (d) make no order. (2) An order made under paragraph 1(a) shall be in Form No. 51 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) and an order made under paragraph 1(b) shall be in Form No. 51A of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). (3) If an order is made under paragraph (1)(a) the Court shall issue a warrant of committal in Form No. 49 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 52 (4) In every case where an order is made under this rule, the Court shall award costs to the judgment creditor which shall be assessed by the Judge in accordance with O. 62, r.3. 16. Discharge of debtor (O.52, r.16) 16. A debtor who has been sentenced to a term of imprisonment in accordance with rule 15(1)(a) and satisfies the judgment debt by paying the full amount into Court in accordance with rule 14(1) prior to the expiry of the term of imprisonment shall be discharged forthwith and the Court shall issue a warrant of discharge in Form No. 52 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). GCR 1995 (Revised) ORDER 53 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 53 APPLICATIONS FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW 1. Cases appropriate for application for judicial review (O.53, r.1) 1. (1) An application for \u2014 (a) an order of mandamus, prohibition or certiorari; or (b) an injunction restraining a person from acting in any substantive office of a public nature and permanent character which is held under the Crown or which has been created by any statutory provision, regulation or directive, shall be made by way of an application for judicial review in accordance with the provisions of this Order. (2) An application for a declaration or an injunction (not being an injunction mentioned in subparagraph (1)(b)) may be made by way of an application for judicial review, and on such an application the Court may grant the declaration or injunction claimed if it considers that, having regard to \u2014 (a) the nature of the matters in respect of which relief may be granted by way of an order of mandamus, prohibition or certiorari; (b) the nature of the persons and bodies against whom relief may be granted by way of such an order; and (c) all the circumstances of the case, it would be just and convenient for the declaration or injunction to be granted on an application for judicial review. 2. Joinder of claims for relief (O.53, r.2) 2. On an application for judicial review any relief mentioned in rule 1(1) or (2) may be claimed as an alternative or in addition to any other relief so mentioned if it arises out of or relates to or is connected with the same matter. 3. Grant of leave to apply for judicial review (O.53, r.3) 3. (1) No application for judicial review shall be made unless the leave of the Court has been obtained in accordance with this rule. (2) An application for leave must be made ex parte to a Judge by filing \u2014 (a) a notice in Form No. 53 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) containing a statement of \u2014 (i) the name and description of the applicant; (ii) the relief sought and the grounds upon which it is sought; (iii) the name and address of the applicant's attorney (if any); and Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 53 (iv) the applicant's address for service; and (b) an affidavit which verifies the facts relied on. (3) The Judge may determine the application without a hearing, unless a hearing is requested in the notice of application, and need not sit in open Court; in any case, the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of the Judge's order on the applicant. (4) Where the application for leave is refused by the Judge, or is granted on terms, the applicant may renew it by applying to a single Judge sitting in open Court: Provided that no application for leave may be renewed in any non-criminal cause or matter in which the Judge has refused leave under paragraph (3) after a hearing. (5) In order to renew the applicant\u2019s application for leave the applicant must within 10 days of being served with notice of the Judge's refusal, file notice of the applicant\u2019s intention in Form No. 54 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). (6) Without prejudice to its powers under O.20, r.8, the Court hearing an application for leave may allow the applicant's statement to be amended, whether by specifying different or additional grounds of relief or otherwise, on such terms, if any, as it thinks fit. (7) The Court shall not grant leave unless it considers that the applicant has a sufficient interest in the matter to which the application relates. (8) Where leave is sought to apply for an order of certiorari to remove for the purpose of its being quashed any judgment, order, conviction or other proceeding which is subject to appeal and a time is limited for the bringing of the appeal, the Court may adjourn the application for leave until the appeal is determined or the time for appealing has expired. (9) If the Court grants leave, it may impose such terms as to costs and as to giving security as it thinks fit. (10) Where leave to apply for judicial review is granted, then \u2014 (a) if the relief sought is an order of prohibition or certiorari and the Court so directs, the grant shall operate as a stay of the proceedings to which the application relates until the determination of the application or until the Court otherwise orders; (b) if any other relief is sought, the Court may at any time grant in the proceedings such interim relief as could be granted in an action begun by writ. ORDER 53 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 4. Delay in applying for relief (O.53, r.4) 4. (1) An application for leave to apply for judicial review shall be made promptly and in any event within 3 months from the date when grounds for the application first arose unless the Court considers that there is good reason for extending the period within which the application shall be made. (2) Where the relief sought is an order of certiorari in respect of any judgment, order, conviction or other proceeding, the date when grounds for the application first arose shall be taken to be the date of that judgment, order, conviction or proceeding. (3) The preceding paragraphs are without prejudice to any statutory provision which has the effect of limiting the time within which an application for judicial review may be made. 5. Mode of applying for judicial review (O.53, r.5) 5. (1) In any cause or matter, where leave has been granted to make an application for judicial review, the application shall be made by originating motion to a Judge sitting in open Court, unless the Court directs that it shall be made to a Judge in Chambers. Any such direction shall be without prejudice to the Judge's powers under O.32, r.13. (2) Within 7 days of being granted leave, the applicant shall serve copies of \u2014 (a) the notice of motion; (b) the supporting affidavits; (c) the order for leave; and (d) the Form No. 53 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) application upon the defendant and all other persons directly affected. (3) Where the application relates to any proceedings in or before a Court and the object of the application is either to compel the Court or an officer of the Court to do any act in relation to the proceedings or to quash them or any order made therein, the documents specified in paragraph (2) must also be served on the Clerk or Registrar of the Court and, where any objection to the conduct of a Justice of the Peace or Magistrate is made, on such Justice of the Peace or Magistrate. (4) Unless the defendant and all other persons served agree, the first hearing of the notice of motion shall be treated as a directions hearing. (5) Unless the Court granting leave has otherwise directed, there must be at least 14 days between the service of the notice of motion and the first hearing. (6) An affidavit giving the names and addresses of, and the places and dates of service on, all persons who have been served with the notice of motion must be Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 53 filed before the motion is listed for hearing and, if any person who ought to be served under this rule has not been served, the affidavit must state that fact and the reason for it. (7) If on the hearing of the motion the Court is of opinion that any person who ought, whether under this rule or otherwise, to have been served has not been served, the Court may adjourn the hearing on such terms (if any) as it may direct in order that the notice may be served on that person. 6. Statements and affidavits (O.53, r.6) 6. (1) Copies of the statement in support of an application for leave under rule 3 must be served with the notice of motion and, subject to paragraph (2), no grounds shall be relied upon or any relief sought at the hearing except the grounds and relief set out in the statement. (2) The Court may on the hearing of the motion allow the applicant to amend the applicant\u2019s statement, whether by specifying different or additional grounds of relief or otherwise, on such terms, if any, as it thinks fit and may allow further affidavits to be used if they deal with new matters arising out of an affidavit of any other party to the application. (3) Where the applicant intends to ask to be allowed to amend the applicant\u2018s statement or to use further affidavits, the applicant shall give notice of the applicant\u2019s intention and of any proposed amendment to every other party and the affidavit shall be before the Court on the hearing of the motion. (4) Any respondent who intends to use an affidavit at the hearing shall file it as soon as practicable and in any event, unless the Court otherwise directs, within 56 days after service upon the respondent of the documents required to be served by paragraph (1). (5) Each party to the application must supply to every other party on demand and on payment of the proper charges copies of every affidavit which the party proposes to use at the hearing, including, in the case of the applicant, the affidavit in support of the application for leave under rule 3. 7. Claim for damages (O.53, r.7) 7. (1) On an application for judicial review the Court may, subject to paragraph (2), award damages to the applicant if \u2014 (a) the applicant has included in the statement in support of the applicant\u2018s application for leave under rule 2 a claim for damages arising from any matter to which the application relates; and (b) the Court is satisfied that, if the claim had been made in an action begun by the applicant at the time of making the applicant\u2019s application, the applicant could have been awarded damages. ORDER 53 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (2) Order 18, rule 12, shall apply to a statement relating to a claim for damages as it applies to a pleading. 8. Interlocutory applications (O.53, r.8) 8. (1) Unless the Court otherwise directs, any interlocutory applications shall be made at the first hearing of the notice of motion. (2) In this rule \\\"interlocutory applications\\\" includes an application under O.24, O.26, O.38, r.2(3) or for an order granting relief or dismissing the proceedings by consent of the parties. 9. Hearing of application for judicial review (O.53, r.9) 9. (1) On the hearing of any motion under rule 5, any person who desires to be heard in opposition to the motion, and appears to the Court to be a proper person to be heard, shall be heard, notwithstanding that the person has not been served with notice of the motion. (2) Where the relief sought is or includes an order of certiorari to remove any proceedings for the purpose of quashing them, the applicant may not question the validity of any order, warrant, commitment, conviction, inquisition or record unless before the hearing of the motion the applicant has filed a copy thereof verified by affidavit or accounts for the applicant\u2019s failure to do so to the satisfaction of the Court hearing the motion. (3) Where an order for certiorari is made in any such case as is referred to in paragraph (2) the order shall, subject to paragraph (4), direct that the proceedings shall be quashed forthwith on their removal into the Court. (4) Where the relief sought is an order of certiorari and the Court is satisfied that there are grounds for quashing the decision to which the application relates, the Court may, in addition to quashing it, remit the matter to the Court, tribunal or authority concerned with a direction to reconsider it and reach a decision in accordance with the findings of the Court. (5) Where the relief sought is a declaration, an injunction or damages and the Court considers that it should not be granted on an application for judicial review but might have been granted if it had been sought in an action begun by writ by the applicant at the time of making the applicant\u2019s application, the Court may, instead of refusing the application, order the proceedings to continue as if they had been begun by writ. 10. Saving for person acting in obedience to mandamus (O.53, r.10) 10. No action or proceeding shall be begun or prosecuted against any person in respect of anything done in obedience to an order of mandamus. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 53 11. No rule (O.53, r.11) 11. No rule (O.53, r.11) 12. Consolidation of applications (O.53, r.12) 12. Where there is more than one application pending against several persons in respect of the same offence, and on the same grounds, the Court may order the applications to be consolidated. 13. Appeal from Court's order (O.53, r.13) 13. No appeal shall lie from an order made under paragraph (3) of rule 3 on an application for leave which may be renewed under paragraph (4) of that rule. GCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 01.03.99) ORDER 54 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 54 APPLICATIONS FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 1. Application for writ of habeas corpus ad subjiciendum (O.54, r.1) 1. (1) An application for a writ of habeas corpus ad subjiciendum shall be made to the Court, except that an application on behalf of a minor must be made in the first instance to a Judge in Chambers. (2) An application for such writ may be made ex parte and, subject to paragraph (3), must be supported by an affidavit by the person restrained showing that it is made at the person\u2019s  instance and setting out the nature of the restraint. (3) When the person restrained is unable for any reason to make the affidavit required by paragraph (2) the affidavit may be made by some other person on the person\u2019s behalf and that affidavit must state that the person restrained is unable to make the affidavit themselves and for what reason. 2. Power of Court to whom ex parte application is made (O.54, r.2) 2. (1) The Court or Judge to whom an application under rule 1 is made ex parte may make an order forthwith for the writ to issue, or may \u2014 (a) where the application is made to a Judge in Chambers, direct that an originating summons for the writ be issued, or that an application therefor be made by originating motion to the Court; (b) where the application is made to the Court, adjourn the application so that notice thereof may be given or direct that an application be made by originating motion. (2) The summons or notice of motion must be served on the person against whom the issue of the writ is sought and on such other persons as the Judge may direct, and, unless the Judge otherwise directs, there must be at least 8 clear days between the service of the summons or notice and the date named therein for the hearing of the application. 3. Copies of affidavits to be supplied (O.54, r.3) 3. Every party to an application under rule 1, must supply to every other party on demand and on payment of the proper charges copies of the affidavits which the party proposes to use at the hearing of the application. 4. Power to order release of person restrained (O.54, r.4) 4. Without prejudice to rule 2(1) the Court or Judge hearing an application for a writ of habeas corpus ad subjiciendum may in its or the Judge\u2019s discretion order that the Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 54 person restrained be released, and such order shall be sufficient warrant to any prison officer, constable or other person for the release of the person under restraint. 5. Directions as to return to writ (O.54, r.5) 5. Where a writ of habeas corpus ad subjiciendum is ordered to issue the Judge by whom the order is made shall give directions as to the Judge before whom, and the date on which the writ is returnable. 6. Service of writ and notice (O.54, r.6) 6. (1) Subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), a writ of habeas corpus ad subjiciendum must be served personally on the person to whom it is directed. (2) If it is not possible to serve such a writ personally, or if it is directed to a prison officer or constable, it must be served by leaving it with a servant or agent of the person to whom the writ is directed at the place where the person restrained is confined or restrained. (3) If the writ is directed to more than one person, the writ must be served in the manner provided by this rule on the person first named in the writ, and copies must be served on each of the other persons in the same manner as the writ. (4) There must be served with the writ a notice stating the Judge before whom and the date on which the person restrained is to be brought and that in default of obedience proceedings for committal of the party disobeying will be taken. 7. Return to the writ (O.54, r.7) 7. (1) The return to a writ of habeas corpus ad subjiciendum must be indorsed on or annexed to the writ and must state all the causes of the detainer of the person restrained. (2) The return may be amended or another return substituted therefor, by leave of the Judge before whom the writ is returnable. 8. Procedure at hearing of writ (O.54, r.8) 8. When a return to a writ of habeas corpus ad subjiciendum is made, the return shall first be read, and motion then made for discharging or remanding the person restrained or amending or quashing the return, and where that person is brought up in accordance with the writ, the person\u2019s attorney shall be heard first, then the attorney for the Crown and then the attorney for the person restrained in reply. 9. Bringing up prisoner to give evidence, etc. (O.54, r.9) 9. (1) An application for a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum or habeas corpus ad respondendum must be made on affidavit to a Judge in Chambers. (2) An application for an order to bring up a prisoner, otherwise than by writ of habeas corpus, to give evidence in any civil cause or matter before any Court, ORDER 54 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) tribunal or justice, must be made on affidavit to a Judge in Chambers. 10. Form of writ (O.54, r.10) 10. A writ of habeas corpus ad subjiciendum must be in Form No. 55 of Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). GCR 1995 (Revised) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 55 ORDER 55 APPEALS TO GRAND COURT FROM THE CABINET, REGISTRAR OF LANDS, TRIBUNAL OR OTHER PERSON: GENERAL 1. Application (O.55, r.1) 1. (1) Subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), this Order shall apply to every appeal which by or under any enactment lies to the Court from the Cabinet, the Registrar of Lands, any tribunal or person. (2) This Order shall not apply \u2014 (a) to any appeal to which O.73 applies; (b) to any appeal under the Criminal Procedure Code (as amended and revised); (c) to any appeal under the Summary Jurisdiction Act (as amended and revised); (d) to an appeal by case stated. (3) The following rules of this Order shall, in relation to an appeal to which this Order applies, have effect subject to any provision made in relation to that appeal by any other provision of these Rules or by or under any enactment. (4) In this Order references to a tribunal shall be construed as references to any tribunal, board or authority constituted by or under any enactment other than any of the ordinary courts of law. 2. Court to hear appeal (O.55, r.2) 2. Except where it is otherwise provided by these Rules or by any enactment an appeal to which this order applies shall be heard and determined by a single Judge. 3. Bringing of appeal (O.55, r.3) 3. (1) An appeal to which this Order applies shall be by way of rehearing and must be brought by originating motion. (2) Every notice of the motion by which such an appeal is brought must state the grounds of the appeal and, if the appeal is against part only of any order, determination, award or other decision, must state whether the appeal is against the whole or part of that order, determination, award or other decision and, if against a part only, must specify the part. (3) The bringing of such an appeal shall not operate as a stay of proceedings on the order, determination, award or other decision against which the appeal is ORDER 55 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) brought unless the Court by which the appeal is to be heard or the Cabinet, the Registrar of Lands, tribunal, arbitrator or person by which or by whom the decision was given so orders. 4. Service of notice of motion and entry of appeal (O.55, r.4) 4. (1) The persons to be served with notice of the motion by which an appeal against an order, determination, award or other decision of the Cabinet, the Registrar of Lands, any tribunal or person is brought, are the Cabinet Secretary, the Registrar of Lands, the chairperson of the tribunal or person, as the case may be, and every party to the proceedings in which the decision was given who is directly affected by the appeal. (2) In the absence of any other statutory time limit, the notice must be served, and the appeal entered, within 28 days after the date of the order, determination, award or other decision against which the appeal is brought. (3) The period specified in paragraph (2) shall be calculated from the date on which notice of the order, decision, determination or award was given to the appellant by the person or persons who made it or by a person authorised in that behalf to do so. 5. Date of hearing of appeal (O.55, r.5) 5. Unless the Court otherwise directs, an appeal to which this Order applies shall not be heard sooner than 21 days after service of notice of the motion by which the appeal is brought. 6. Amendment of grounds of appeal, etc. (O.55, r.6) 6. (1) The notice of the motion by which an appeal to which this Order applies is brought may be amended by the appellant, without leave, by supplementary notice filed and served not less than 7 days before the day appointed for the hearing of the appeal, on each of the persons on whom the notice to be amended was served. (2) Except with the leave of the Court no grounds other than those stated in the notice of the motion by which the appeal is brought or any supplementary notice under paragraph (1) may be relied upon by the appellant at the hearing; but the Court may amend the grounds so stated or make any other order, on such terms as it thinks just, to ensure the determination of the merits of the real question in controversy between the parties. (3) The foregoing provisions of this rule are without prejudice to the powers of the Court under O.20. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 55 7. Powers of Court hearing appeal (O.55, r.7) 7. (1) In addition to the power conferred by rule 6(2), the Court when hearing an appeal to which this Order applies shall have the powers conferred by the following provisions of this rule. (2) The Court shall have power to receive further evidence on questions of fact, and the evidence may be given in such manner as the Court may direct either by oral examination in Court, by affidavit, by deposition taken before an examiner or in some other manner. (3) The Court shall have power to draw any inferences of fact which might have been drawn in the proceedings out of which the appeal arose. (4) It shall be the duty of the appellant to apply to the person presiding at the proceedings in which the decision appealed against was given for a signed copy of any note made by that presiding person of the proceedings and to furnish that copy for the use of the Court; and in default of production of such note, or, if such note is incomplete, in addition to such note, the Court may hear and determine the appeal on any other evidence or statement of what occurred in those proceedings as appears to the Court to be sufficient. Except where the Court otherwise directs, an affidavit or note by a person present at the proceedings shall not be used in evidence under this paragraph unless it was previously submitted to the person presiding at the proceedings for the person\u2019s comments. (5) The Court may give any judgment or decision or make any order which ought to have been given or made by the Cabinet, the Registrar of Lands, tribunal or other person and make such further or other order as the case may require or may remit the matter with the opinion of the Court for rehearing and determination by it or that person. (6) The Court may, in special circumstances, order that such security shall be given for the costs of the appeal as may be just. (7) The Court shall not be bound to allow the appeal on the ground merely of misdirection, or of the improper admission or rejection of evidence, unless in the opinion of the Court substantial wrong or miscarriage has been thereby occasioned. 8. Right of the Cabinet to appear and be heard (O.55, r.8) 8. Where an appeal to which this Order applies is against an order, determination or other decision of the Cabinet, the Registrar of Lands or other person, that person shall be entitled to appear and be heard in the proceedings on the appeal. GCR 1995 (Revised) ORDER 56 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 56 APPEALS TO COURT BY CASE STATED: GENERAL 1. No rule (O.56, r.1) 1. No rule (O.56, r.1) 2. No rule (O.56, r.2) 2. No rule (O.56, r.2) 3. No rule (O.56, r.3) 3. No rule (O.56, r.3) 4. No rule (O.56, r.4) 4. No rule (O.56, r.4) 5. No rule (O.56, r.5) 5. No rule (O.56, r.5) 6. No rule (O.56, r.1) 6. No rule (O.56, r.1) 7. Case stated by the Cabinet, the Registrar of Lands, tribunal or other person (O.56, r.7) 7. (1) The jurisdiction of the Court under any enactment to hear and determine a case stated by the Cabinet, the Registrar of Lands, tribunal or other person, or question of law referred to the Court by the Cabinet, the Registrar of Lands, tribunal or other person by way of case stated, shall be exercised by a single Judge, except where it is otherwise provided by these Rules or by or under any enactment. (2) The following rules of this Order shall apply to proceedings for the determination of such a case, question or application and, in relation to any such proceedings, shall have effect subject to any provision made in relation to those proceedings by any other provision of these Rules or by or under any enactment. (3) In this Order references to a tribunal shall be construed as references to any tribunal, board or authority constituted by or under any enactment other than any of the ordinary Courts of law. (4) In the following rules and in this rule \\\"case\\\" includes a special case. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 56 8. Application for order to state a case (O.56, r.8) 8. (1) An application to the Court for an order directing the Cabinet, the Registrar of Lands, tribunal or other person to state a case for determination by the Court or to refer a question of law to the Court by way of case stated must be made by originating motion; and the persons to be served with notice thereof are the Cabinet Secretary, the Registrar of Lands, secretary of the tribunal or other person, as the case may be, and every party (other than the applicant) to the proceedings to which the application relates. (2) The notice of motion must state the grounds of the application, the question of law on which it is sought to have the case stated and any reasons given by the Cabinet, the Registrar of Lands, tribunal or other person for that person\u2019s or its refusal to state a case. (3) The motion must be entered for hearing, and the notice thereof served, within 14 days after receipt by the applicant of notice of the refusal of the applicant\u2019s request to state a case. 9. Signing and service of case (O.56, r.9) 9. (1) A case stated by the Cabinet, must be signed by the Cabinet Secretary. (2) A case stated by a tribunal must be signed by the chairperson or president of the tribunal, and a case stated by the Registrar of Lands or any other person must be signed by that person or by a person authorised in that behalf to do so. (3) The case must be served on the party at whose request, or as a result of whose application to the Court, the case was stated; and if the Cabinet, the Registrar of Lands, tribunal, arbitrator or other person is entitled by virtue of any enactment to state a case, or to refer a question of law by way of case stated, for determination by the Court without request being made by any party to the proceedings before that person, the case must be served on such party to those proceedings as the Cabinet, the Registrar of Lands, secretary of the tribunal, arbitrator or other person, as the case may be, thinks appropriate. (4) When a case is served on any party under paragraph (3) notice must be given to every other party to the proceedings in question that the case has been served on the party named, and on the date specified, in the notice. 10. Proceedings for determination of case (O.56, r.10) 10. (1) Proceedings for the determination by the Court of a case stated, or a question of law referred by way of case stated, by the Cabinet, the Registrar of Lands, tribunal, arbitrator, or other person must be begun by originating motion by the person on whom the case was served in accordance with rule 9(3) or, when the case is stated without a request being made, by the Cabinet, the Registrar of Lands, secretary of the tribunal, arbitrator or other person by whom the case is stated. ORDER 56 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (2) The applicant shall serve notice of a motion under paragraph (1) together with a copy of the case on \u2014 (a) the Cabinet Secretary, the Registrar of Lands, secretary of the tribunal, arbitrator or other person by whom the case was stated, unless the Cabinet, the Registrar of Lands, tribunal, arbitrator or other person is the applicant; and (b) every party (other than the applicant) to the proceedings in which the question of law to which the case relates arose; and (c) any other person (other than the applicant) served with the case under rule 9(3). (3) The notice of such motion must set out the applicant's contentions on the question of law to which the case stated relates. (4) The motion must be entered for hearing and the notice thereof served, within 14 days after the case stated was served on the applicant. (5) If the applicant fails to enter the motion within the period specified in paragraph (4) then, after obtaining a copy of the case from the Cabinet, the Registrar of Lands, tribunal, arbitrator or other person by whom the case was stated, any other party to the proceedings in which the question of law to which the case relates arose may, within 14 days after the expiration of the period so specified, begin proceedings for the determination of the case, and paragraphs (1) to (4) shall have effect accordingly with the necessary modifications. The references in this paragraph to the period specified in paragraph (4) shall be construed as including references to that period as extended by any order of the Court. (6) Unless the Court otherwise directs, the motion shall not be heard sooner than 7 days after service of notice of the motion. 11. Amendment of case (O.56, r.11) 11. The Court hearing a case stated by the Cabinet, the Registrar of Lands, tribunal, arbitrator or other person may amend the case or order it to be returned to that person for amendment, and may draw inferences of fact from the facts stated in the case. 12. Right of the Cabinet, etc. to appear and be heard (O.56, r.12) 12. In proceedings for the determination of a case stated, or of a question of law referred by case stated, the Cabinet, the Registrar of Lands, chairperson or president of the tribunal, arbitrator or other person by whom the case was stated shall be entitled to appear and be heard. 12A. No Rule (O.56, r.12A) 12A. No Rule (O.56, r.12A) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 56 13. No Rule (O.56, r.13) 13. No Rule (O.56, r.13) GCR 1995 (Revised) ORDER 57-61 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 57-61 NO ORDERS GCR 1995 (Revised) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 62 ORDER 62 COSTS PART I: PRELIMINARY 1. Application (O.62, r.1) 1. (1) This Order shall have effect, with such modifications as may be necessary, where by virtue of any Law the costs of any proceedings before an arbitrator or umpire or before a tribunal or other body constituted by or under any Law not being proceedings in the Court, are taxable in the Court. (2)  The powers and discretion of the Court under Sections 24 and 24A of the Judicature Act (as amended and revised) (which relates to the costs of proceedings in the Court) shall be exercised subject to and in accordance with this Order. 2. Transitional provisions (O.62, r.2) 2. (1)-(7) [spent] 3. Definitions (O.62, r.3) 3. (1) In this Order, unless the context otherwise requires \u2014 \\\"assessed costs\\\" means costs assessed by a Judge in accordance with rule 8 or by a taxing officer in accordance with rule 26(2); \\\"assisted person\\\" means a person to whom a legal aid Certificate has been granted pursuant to the Legal Aid Act (as amended and revised) in respect of the relevant proceedings; \\\"Court\\\" includes the Court of Appeal; \\\"foreign lawyer\\\" means a person who is engaged in practice as a professional lawyer in any country outside the Islands; \\\"the Guidelines\\\" means the guidelines made from time to time by the Rules Committee pursuant to rule 16; \\\"party\\\", in relation to a cause or matter, includes a party who is treated as being a party to that cause or matter by virtue of O.4, r.3(2) and an appellant or respondent to any appeal; \\\"paying party\\\" includes, in the case of taxation of costs payable out of a fund, any person to whom the Court has directed that notice of the appointment for taxation be given; \\\"person under disability\\\" has the same meaning as in O.80, r.1; ORDER 62 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) \\\"proceedings\\\" includes any cause or matter or any step in any cause or matter and any appeal and any step in any appeal; \\\"successful party\\\" means a party in whose favour an order for costs is made or who is otherwise entitled to receive costs from another party or out of a fund; \\\"the standard basis\\\" and \\\"the indemnity basis\\\" have the meanings assigned to them by rules 13(1) and (3), respectively; \\\"taxed costs\\\" means costs taxed in accordance with this Order; \\\"taxing officer\\\" means any person appointed as a taxing officer by the Chief Justice and includes every Judge who shall be ex officio taxing officers. (2)  References to a fund, being a fund out of which costs are to be paid or which is held by a trustee or personal representative, include references to \u2014 (a)  any estate or property, whether real or personal, held for the benefit of any person or class of persons; and (b)  the assets of a company or partnership which is the subject of a winding up proceeding, and references to a fund held by a trustee or personal representative include references to any fund to which the trustee or personal representative  is entitled (whether alone or together with any other person) in that capacity, whether the fund is for the time being in the trustee\u2019s or personal representative\u2019s possession or not. (3)  References to costs shall be construed as including references to fees, charges, disbursements, expenses and remuneration in relation to proceedings (including taxation proceedings) and shall include references to costs of or incidental to those proceedings. (4)  References to \\\"$\\\" means Cayman Islands dollars but shall be interpreted to include the United States dollar equivalent. (5)  Bills of costs may be drawn up either in Cayman Islands dollars or United States dollars. PART II: ENTITLEMENT TO COSTS 4. General principles (O.62, r.4) 4. (1) This rule shall have effect unless otherwise provided by any Law. (2)  The overriding objective of this Order is that a successful party to any proceeding should recover from the opposing party the reasonable costs incurred by successful party in conducting that proceeding in an economical, expeditious and proper manner unless otherwise ordered by the Court. (3)  A person who claims to be entitled pursuant to a contract to recover the legal fees and expenses incurred in enforcing that contract shall be entitled to Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 62 judgment for the amount found due under the contract and such amount shall not be subject to taxation pursuant to this Order. (4)  Except as provided in paragraph (3), no party to any proceedings shall be entitled to recover any of the costs of those proceedings from any other party to those proceedings except under an order of the Court. (5)  If the Court in the exercise of its discretion sees fit to make any order as to the costs of any proceedings, the Court shall order the costs to follow the event, except when it appears to the Court that in the circumstances of the case some other order should be made as to the whole or any part of the costs. (6)  The amount of the costs which a successful party shall be entitled to recover from any other party is \u2014 (a)  the fixed costs prescribed in rule 7; (b)  the amount assessed by the Judge in accordance with rule 8; (c)  the amount allowed after taxation on the standard basis; or (d)  the amount allowed after taxation on the indemnity basis. (7)  The orders which the Court may make under this rule include an order that a party must pay \u2014 (a)  a proportion of another party\u2019s costs; (b)  a stated amount in respect of another party\u2019s costs; (c)  costs from or until a certain date only; (d)  costs incurred before proceedings have begun; (e)  costs relating to particular steps taken in the proceedings; (f)  costs relating only to a distinct part of the proceedings; (g)  interest on costs (at the prescribed rate for Cayman Islands dollars) from or until a certain date, including a date before judgment; and (h)  where the Court orders the paying party to pay costs subject to taxation, a reasonable sum on account of costs, such sum to be assessed summarily. (8)  No order for costs shall be made against an assisted person. (9)  A term mentioned in the first column of the table below, when used in an order for costs, shall have the effect indicated in the second column of the table. Term Effect Costs or Costs in any event  The party in whose favour the order is made is entitled to the costs in respect of the part of the proceedings to which the order relates whatever other costs orders are made in the proceedings Costs reserved The issue of costs will be determined on a subsequent application. ORDER 62 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) Term Effect Costs here and below The party in whose favour the costs order is made shall be entitled not only to the party\u2019s costs in respect of the proceedings in which it is made but also to the party\u2019s costs of the same proceedings in any lower court, save that where such an order is made by the Court of Appeal on an appeal from the Grand Court the party shall not be entitled by virtue of that order to any costs which the party has incurred in any Court below the Grand Court. Costs in the cause or Costs in the application The party in whose favour the Court makes an order for costs at the end of the proceedings is entitled to the party\u2019s costs of the part of the proceedings to which the order relates. Plaintiff\u2019s costs in the cause or Defendant\u2019s costs in the cause If the party in whose favour the costs order is made is awarded costs at the end of the proceedings, that party is entitled to the party\u2019s costs of the part of the proceedings to which the order relates. If any other party is awarded costs at the end of the proceedings, the party in whose favour the final costs order is made is not liable to pay the costs of any other party in respect of the part of the proceedings to which the order relates. Costs thrown away Where proceedings or any part of them have been ineffective or have been subsequently set aside, the party in whose favour this order is made shall be entitled to the party\u2019s costs of those proceedings or that part of the proceedings in respect of which it is made. No order for costs Each party is to bear the party\u2019s own costs of the part of the proceedings to which the order relates whatever costs order the Court makes at the end of the proceedings. (10)  When used in an order of the Court, the expressions \\\"Costs\\\", \\\"Order for costs\\\" and \\\"Costs to be taxed if not agreed\\\" shall mean costs to be taxed on the standard basis. (11)  The Court may make an inter partes order for costs to be taxed on the indemnity basis only if it is satisfied that the paying party has conducted the proceedings, or that part of the proceedings to which the order relates, improperly, unreasonably or negligently. 5. Cases where order for costs deemed to have been made (O.62, r.5) 5. (1) In each of the circumstances mentioned in this rule an order for costs shall be deemed to have been made to the effect respectively described in the following paragraphs of this rule. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 62 (2)  Where a party by notice in writing and without leave discontinues an action or counterclaim or withdraws any particular claim made by the party as against any other party (except for the purpose of obtaining a default judgment), that other party shall be entitled to the other party\u2019s costs of the action or counterclaim or the other party\u2019s costs occasioned by the claim withdrawn, as the case may be, incurred to the time of receipt of the notice of discontinuance or withdrawal. (3)  Where a plaintiff by notice in writing in accordance with O.22, r.3(1), accepts money paid into Court in satisfaction of the cause of action or of all the causes of action in respect of which the plaintiff claims, or accepts money paid in satisfaction of one or more specified causes of action and gives notice that the plaintiff abandons the others, the plaintiff shall be entitled to the plaintiff\u2019s costs of the action incurred up to the time of giving notice of acceptance. (4)  Where in an action for libel or slander against several defendants sued jointly a plaintiff, by notice in writing in accordance with O.22, r.3(1), accepts money paid into Court by one of the defendants the plaintiff shall be entitled to the plaintiff\u2019s costs of the action against that defendant incurred up to the time of giving notice of acceptance. (5)  A defendant who has counterclaimed shall be entitled to the costs of the counterclaim if \u2014 (a)  the defendant pays money into Court and the defendant\u2019s notice of payment in states that the defendant has taken into account and satisfied the causes of action in respect of which the defendant counterclaims; and (b)  the plaintiff accepts the money paid in, but the costs of such counterclaim shall be limited to those incurred up to the time when the defendant receives notice of acceptance by the plaintiff of the money paid into Court. 6. Cases where costs do not follow the event (O.62, r.6) 6. (1) The provisions of this rule shall apply in the circumstances mentioned in this rule unless the Court orders otherwise. (2)  Where a person is or has been a party to any proceedings in the capacity of trustee, personal representative, mortgagee, chargee or official liquidator the person shall be entitled to the costs of those proceedings, insofar as they are not recovered from or paid by any other person, out of the fund and the Court may order otherwise only on the ground that the person has acted unreasonably or, in the case of a trustee, personal representative or official liquidator has in substance acted for the person\u2019s own benefit rather than for the benefit of the fund or the creditors as the case may be. (3)  Where any person claiming to be a creditor \u2014 ORDER 62 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (a)  seeks to establish any claim to a debt under any judgment or order in accordance with O.44, or (b)  comes in to prove the person\u2019s title, debt or claim in relation to a company in pursuance of any such procedure as is mentioned in O.102, r.12, the person shall, if the person\u2019s claim succeeds, be entitled to the person\u2019s costs incurred in establishing it: and, if the person\u2019s claim or any part of it fails, the person may be ordered to pay the costs of any person incurred in opposing it. (4)  Where a claimant (other than a person claiming to be creditor) has established a claim to be entitled under a judgment or order in accordance with O.44 and has been served with notice of the judgment or order pursuant to rule 2 of that Order, the claimant shall, if the claimant acknowledges service of that notice, be entitled as part of the claimant\u2019s costs of action (if allowed) to costs incurred in establishing the claimant\u2019s claim; and where such a claimant fails to establish the claimant\u2019s claim or any part of it the claimant may be ordered to pay the costs of any person incurred in opposing it. (5)  The costs of any amendment made without leave in the writ or any pleadings shall be borne by the party making the amendment. (6)  The costs of any application to extend the time fixed by these rules or by any direction or order thereunder shall be borne by the party making the application. (7)  If a party on whom a notice to admit facts is served under O.27, r.2, refuses or neglects to admit the facts within 14 days after the service on the party of the notice or such longer time as may be allowed by the Court, the costs of proving the facts and the costs occasioned by and thrown away as a result of the party\u2019s failure to admit the facts shall be borne by the party. (8)  If a party \u2014 (a)  on whom a list of documents is served under O.24, or (b)  on whom a notice to admit documents is served under O.27, r.5, gives notice of non-admission of any of the documents in accordance with O.27, rr.4(2) or 5(2), as the case may be, the costs of proving that document and the costs occasioned by and thrown away as a result of the party\u2019s non-admission shall be borne by that party. 7. Claim for fixed costs (O.62, r.7) 7. (1) Where a writ is indorsed with a claim for a liquidated sum only, it may include a claim for fixed costs on the following scale \u2014 (a)  the sum of $50 where the principal sum claimed does not exceed $2,000; (b)  the sum of $250 where the principal sum claimed exceeds $2,000 but does not exceed $10,000; (c)  the sum of $500 where the principal sum claimed exceeds $10,000, Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 62 plus in each case the prescribed fee paid upon issue of the writ. (2)  Where a writ is indorsed with a claim of the kind mentioned in O.13, rr.2, 3 or 4 and O.19, rr.3, 4 or 5, it may include a claim for fixed costs in the sum of $250. (3)  Nothing in this rule shall preclude a plaintiff from waiving the plaintiff\u2019s right to claim fixed costs and instead claiming costs to be assessed or taxed. 8. Assessment of Costs (O.62, r.8) 8. (1) The amount of costs which a successful party is entitled to recover against another party shall be assessed if the order is made in respect of \u2014 (a)  an appeal from the Summary Court; or (b)  an action in which the writ is indorsed only with a claim for a liquidated sum not exceeding $25,000 (or where other relief claimed is abandoned). (2)  Except in a case to which paragraph (1) applies, whenever the Court makes an order for costs, the party entitled to the benefit of the order shall be entitled, at the party\u2019s option \u2014 (a)  to an order that such costs shall be taxed if not agreed; or (b)  to have the amount of such costs assessed by the Judge. (3)  Subject to paragraph (4), where the Court is required to assess costs the Judge shall make the Judge\u2019s own summary assessment of the amount of legal fees and disbursements which the  Judge considers that a reasonable litigant is likely to have incurred and award that amount. (4)  The amount of costs payable by any party pursuant to an order for costs to be assessed shall not exceed \u2014 (a)  $1,000 where the order relates to the costs of an interlocutory application; or (b)  $10,000 where the order relates to the costs of an entire proceeding, together with the Court fees which have been paid by the successful party. 9. Stage of proceedings at which costs to be taxed (O.62, r.9) 9. (1) Subject to paragraph (2), the costs of any proceedings shall not be taxed until the conclusion of the cause or matter in which the proceedings arise. (2)  If it appears to the Court when making an order for costs that all or any part of the costs ought to be taxed at an earlier stage it may order accordingly. (3)  In the case of an appeal the costs of the proceedings giving rise to the appeal, as well as the costs of the appeal, may be dealt with by the Court hearing the appeal. (4)  Where it appears to the Court on application that there is no likelihood of any further order being made in a cause or matter, it may forthwith order the costs of any interlocutory proceedings which have taken place to be taxed. ORDER 62 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 10. Matters to be taken into account in exercising discretion (O.62, r.10) 10. The Court in exercising its discretion to make an order for costs shall take into account \u2014 (a)  any offer of contribution brought to its attention in accordance with Order 16, rule 10; (b)  any payment of money into Court and the amount of such payment; (c)  any written offer made under O.33, r.4A(2); and (d)  any written offer made under O.22, r.14. PART III: WASTED COSTS ORDERS 11. Personal liability of attorney for costs (O.62, r.11) 11. (1) In Part III of this Order the expression \\\"attorney\\\" shall include a \\\"foreign lawyer\\\". (2)  Where it appears to the Court in any proceedings that anything has been done or that any omission has been made improperly, unreasonably or negligently by or on behalf of any party, the Court may order that the costs of that party in respect of the act or omission, as the case may be, shall not be allowed and that any costs occasioned by it to any other party shall be paid by that party to that other party. (3)  Subject to the following provisions of this rule, where it appears to the Court that costs have been incurred improperly, unreasonably or negligently in any proceedings or have been wasted by failure to conduct proceedings with reasonable competence and expedition, the Court may order \u2014 (a)  the attorney whom it considers to be responsible (whether personally or through an employee or agent) to repay to that attorney\u2019s client costs which the client has been ordered to pay to any other party to the proceedings; or (b)  the attorney personally to indemnify such other parties against costs payable by them. (4)  The amount payable under a wasted costs order made under paragraph 3(b) of this rule shall be taxed on the indemnity basis. 12. Application for wasted costs orders (O.62, r.12) 12. (1) A wasted costs order may be made by the Court of its own motion if the attorney\u2019s liability is plain and obvious and can fairly be determined without the need for extensive evidence or any extensive investigation of the circumstances giving rise to that liability. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 62 (2)  Subject to paragraph (3), before an order may be made under paragraph (1) of this rule the Court shall give the attorney a reasonable opportunity to appear and show cause why an order should not be made. (3)  The Court shall not be obliged to give the attorney a reasonable opportunity to appear and show cause where proceedings fail, cannot conveniently proceed or are adjourned without useful progress being made because the attorney \u2014 (a)  fails to attend in person or by a proper representative; (b)  fails to deliver any document for the use of the Court, which ought to have been delivered or to be prepared with any proper evidence or account, or (c)  otherwise fails to proceed. (4)  In any other case, an application for a wasted costs order shall be made by summons setting out the grounds of the application which shall be supported by an affidavit containing full particulars of all the facts and matters relied upon by the applicant. (5)  A copy of a summons issued under this rule and the supporting affidavit must be served \u2014 (a)  on the attorney personally; or (b)  in the case of an application against Crown Counsel or any other attorney acting on behalf of the Attorney General, on the Attorney General. (6)  The Court may direct that notice of any proceedings or order against an attorney under this rule be given to the attorney\u2019s client in such manner as may be specified in the direction. (7)  The Court shall direct that notice of any proceedings or order under this rule against Crown Counsel shall be given to the Attorney General. PART IV: TAXATION OF COSTS 13. Basis of taxation (O.62, r.13) 13. (1) On a taxation of costs on the standard basis there shall be allowed a reasonable amount in respect of all costs reasonably incurred and any doubts which the taxing officer may have as to whether the costs were reasonably incurred or were reasonable in amount shall be resolved in favour of the paying party; and in these rules the term \\\"the standard basis\\\" in relation to the taxation of costs shall be construed accordingly. (2)  Where the amount of costs is to be taxed on the standard basis, the taxing officer will only allow costs which are not only reasonable but are also proportionate to the matters in issue having regard to \u2014 (a)  the amount of money involved; (b)  the importance of the case; and ORDER 62 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (c)  the complexity of the issues. (3)  On a taxation on the indemnity basis all costs shall be allowed except insofar as they are of an unreasonable amount or have been unreasonably incurred and any doubts which the taxing officer may have as to whether the costs were reasonably incurred or were reasonable in amount shall be resolved in favour of the receiving party; and in these rules the term \\\"the indemnity basis\\\" in relation to the taxation of costs shall be construed accordingly. (4)  Where the Court makes an order for costs without indicating the basis of taxation or an order that costs be taxed on a basis other than the standard basis or the indemnity basis, the costs shall be taxed on the standard basis. 14. Costs payable to a trustee, personal representative or official liquidator out of any fund (O.62, r.14) 14. (1) Unless the Court otherwise orders, every taxation of a trustee's, personal representative's or official liquidator\u2019s costs where \u2014 (a)  that person is or has been a party to any proceedings in that capacity; and (b)  that person is entitled to be paid that person\u2019s costs out of any fund, shall be on the indemnity basis. (2)  On a taxation to which this rule applies, costs shall be taxed on the indemnity basis but shall be presumed to have been unreasonably incurred if they were incurred contrary to the duty of the trustee or personal representative or official liquidator as such. 15. Costs payable to an attorney where money claimed by or on behalf of a person under disability (O.62, r.15) 15. (1) This rule applies to any proceedings in which \u2014 (a)  money is claimed or recovered by or on behalf of, or adjudged, or ordered, or agreed to be paid to, or for the benefit of, a person under disability, or (b)  money paid into Court is accepted by or on behalf of a person under disability. (2)  The costs of proceedings to which this rule applies which are payable by any plaintiff to the paintiff\u2019s attorney shall, unless the Court otherwise orders, be taxed on the indemnity basis but shall be presumed \u2014 (a)  to have been reasonably incurred if they were incurred with the express or implied approval of the client, and (b)  to have been reasonable in amount if their amount was expressly or impliedly approved by the client, and (c)  to have been unreasonably incurred if in the circumstances of the case they are of an unusual nature unless the attorney satisfies the taxing officer that Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 62 prior to their being incurred the attorney informed the attorney\u2019s client that they might not be allowed on a taxation of costs inter partes; and for purposes of this rule \\\"plaintiff\\\" shall include any person acting on behalf of such person under disability. (3)  On a taxation under paragraph (2), the taxing officer shall also tax any costs payable to that client in those proceedings and shall certify \u2014 (a)  the amount allowed on the taxation of the attorney's bill to the attorney's own client, and (b)  the amount allowed on the taxation of any costs payable to that plaintiff in those proceedings, and (c)  the amount (if any) by which the amount mentioned in sub-paragraph (a) exceeds the amount mentioned in sub-paragraph (b), and (d)  where necessary, the proportion of the amount of such excess payable by, or out of money belonging to, respectively any claimant who is a person under disability or patient and any other party. (4)  Nothing in the foregoing provisions of this rule shall prejudice any attorney's lien for costs. (5)  The foregoing provisions of this rule shall apply in relation to \u2014 (a)  a counterclaim by or on behalf of a person who is a person under disability; and (b)  a claim made by or on behalf of a person who is a person under disability in an action by any other person for relief under Section 504 of the United Kingdom\u2019s Merchant Shipping Act 1894, as if for references to a plaintiff there were substituted references to a defendant. 16. Amount of costs (O.62, r.16) 16. (1) The amount of costs to be allowed on taxation shall (subject to rule 17 and to any order of the Court fixing the costs to be allowed) be in the discretion of the taxing officer. (2)  In exercising the taxing officer\u2019s discretion the taxing officer shall have regard to the Guidelines issued by the Rules Committee pursuant to paragraph (3), to all the relevant circumstances, and in particular to \u2014 (a)  the circumstances of the item or of the cause or matter in which it arises and the difficulty or novelty of the questions involved; (b)  the skill, specialised knowledge and responsibility required of, and the time and labour expended by, the attorney; (c)  the number and importance of the relevant documents (however brief), properly prepared or perused; (d)  where money or property is involved, its amount or value; ORDER 62 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (3)  The Rules Committee may issue guidelines relating to \u2014 (a)  the procedure in respect of taxation; (b)  the form and content of bills of costs; and (c)  the nature and amount of fees, charges, disbursements, expenses or remuneration which may be allowed on taxation, and, for the avoidance of doubt, including the maximum rates that may be allowed on a taxation. 17. Allowance or disallowance of items and allowance of increased sums (O.62, r.17) 17. (1) Where the costs of any action or matter are to be taxed the Court may, if it thinks fit, direct that any item of work shall be allowed, disallowed, restricted or qualified on taxation. (2)  An application for a direction under paragraph (1) may be made at the trial or hearing of the proceeding or on notice to be served on the party by whom the costs are payable within 14 days after the making of the order for their payment, provided that where an application which could have been made at the trial or hearing is made subsequent thereto, the Court may refuse the application on the ground that it ought to have been made at the trial or hearing. 18. Foreign lawyers (O.62, r.18) 18. (1) Work done by foreign lawyers may be recovered on taxation under these rules on the standard basis provided that \u2014 (a)  the foreign lawyer has been temporarily admitted as an attorney; and (b)  the work was done after the foreign lawyer was admitted. (2)  Work done by foreign lawyers who are temporarily admitted must be fully itemised in the bill of costs and may not be treated as a disbursement. (3)  Whenever a claim is made for work done by foreign lawyers, the taxing officer will investigate whether it has resulted in a duplication or increase in the cost of the proceedings and any such increase shall be disallowed. (4)  Work done by local attorneys for the purpose of instructing foreign lawyers and vice versa shall be disallowed. (5)  The taxing officer shall disallow any item which appears to have been incurred, or the costs of which appears to have been increased, because the successful party has engaged both local attorneys and foreign attorneys. (6)  Time spent and disbursements incurred in respect of written and oral communication between foreign lawyers and local attorneys will be disallowed. (7)  The overriding principle is that a paying party should not be required to pay more because the successful party has engaged a foreign lawyer than the paying Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 62 party would have been required to pay if the successful party had employed only local attorneys. 19. Litigants in person (O.62, r.19) 19. (1) The costs of a litigant in person to be taxed on the standard basis shall be taxed subject to the provisions of this rule. (2)  Where it appears to the taxing officer that the litigant in person has suffered pecuniary loss in doing any item of work to which the costs relate, there may be allowed such costs as would have been allowed if the work and disbursements to which the costs relate had been done or made by an attorney on the litigant's behalf together with any payments reasonably made by the litigant for legal advice relating to the conduct of or the issues raised by the proceedings, provided that the amount allowed in respect of any such item of work shall be such sum as the taxing officer thinks fit but not exceeding, except in the case of a disbursement or expense, two-thirds of the sum which would have been allowed in respect of that item of work if an attorney had been employed or the actual amount of pecuniary loss suffered, whichever is the less. (3)  Where it appears to the taxing officer that the litigant has not suffered any pecuniary loss in doing any item of work to which the costs relate, the litigant shall be allowed in respect of the time reasonably spent by the litigant on that item an amount not exceeding $30 per hour. (4)  A litigant who is allowed costs in respect of a pre-trial examination or of attending Court to conduct the litigant\u2019s case shall not be entitled to a witness payment or allowance in addition. (5)  For the purposes of this rule a \\\"litigant in person\\\" includes a litigant who is a practising attorney. (6)  For the purposes of this rule, a company acting without an attorney is to be treated as a litigant in person. PART V: POWERS OF TAXING OFFICERS 20. Powers of taxing officers (O.62, r.20) 20. A taxing officer shall have power to tax \u2014 (a)  the costs of or arising out of any proceedings to which this Order applies, (b)  the costs ordered by an award made on a reference to arbitration under any Law or payable pursuant to an arbitration agreement, and (c)  any other costs the taxation of which is ordered by the Court. ORDER 62 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 21. Extensions of time (O.62, r.21) 21. (1) The Court or the taxing officer may extend the period within which a party is required by or under this Order to commence proceedings for taxation or within which a party is required to do anything in or in connection with such proceedings on such terms (if any) as it thinks just and the Court or the taxing officer may do so although the application for such extension is not made until after the expiration of that period. (2)  Where no period is specified by or under this Order or by the Court for the doing of anything in or in connection with proceedings for taxation a taxing officer may specify the period within which the thing is to be done. 22. Costs Certificates (O.62, r.22) 22. (1) The taxing officer \u2014 (a)  shall, at the conclusion of taxation proceedings before the taxing officer, issue a certificate in Form No. 305 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) for the net amount of the costs allowed by the taxing officer (after making such set-offs as may be required); (b) may from time to time in the course of the taxation issue an interim certificate in Form No. 308 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) for any part of the costs which have been taxed or agreed; (c)  may correct any clerical mistake in any certificate issued by the taxing officer or any error arising therein from any accidental slip or omission. (2) ` If the successful party and paying party agree the amount of costs, either party may apply to the taxing officer for a costs certificate (either interim or final) for the amount agreed. (3)  The successful party may apply to the taxing officer for the issue of a default costs certificate in Form No. 309 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) if the paying party fails to comply with any time limit prescribed by the rules or the Guidelines or fixed by the taxing officer. (4)  A default costs certificate \u2014 (a)  must be set aside by the taxing officer if it appears to the taxing officer that the successful party was not entitled to it; and (b)  in any other case, may be set aside by the taxing officer if it appears to the taxing officer that there is some good reason why the taxing officer should conduct a taxation. (5)  A paying party who seeks to set aside a default costs certificate shall within 14 days of service of the default costs certificate \u2014 (a)  lodge an application in Form No. 313 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised); Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 62 (b)  lodge the bill of costs signed and completed in accordance with rule 27(3); (c)  lodge an affidavit explaining the reasons for the paying party\u2019s default; and (d)  pay into Court the whole amount specified in the certificate. (6)  A costs certificate shall be enforceable as if it were a judgment or order of the Court. 23. Power of taxing officer to effect set offs (O.62, r.23) 23. (1) Where a party entitled to be paid costs is also liable to pay costs, the taxing officer shall \u2014 (a)  tax the costs which the party is liable to pay and set off the amount allowed against the amount the party is entitled to be paid and certify payment of any balance; or (b)  delay the issue of a certificate for the costs the party is entitled to be paid, until the party has paid or tendered the amount the party is liable to pay. 24. Taxation of bill of costs comprised in an account (O.62, r.24) 24. (1) Where the Court orders an account to be taken and the account consists in part of costs, the Court may direct a taxing officer to tax those costs and the taxing officer shall after taxation of the bill of costs return it, together with the taxing officer\u2019s report on it, to the Court. (2)  A taxing officer taxing a bill of costs in accordance with a direction under paragraph (1) shall have the same powers, and the same fee shall be payable in connection with the taxation, as if an order for taxation of the costs had been made by the Court. 25. Powers of taxing officers on taxation of costs out of a fund (O.62, r.25) 25. (1) Where any costs are to be paid out of a fund the Court may give directions as to the parties who are entitled to receive notice of the taxation of those costs. (2)  Where the Court has directed that a bill of costs be taxed for the purpose of being paid out of a fund it may direct the party whose bill is to be taxed to send to any person entitled to notice of the taxation a copy of the bill, or of any part thereof, free of charge, together with the following information, that is to say \u2014 (a)  that the bill of costs, a copy of which or of part of which is sent has been referred to a taxing officer for taxation; (b)  the time appointed by the taxing officer at which an oral hearing will take place or be continued; and (c)  such other information, if any, as the Court may direct. ORDER 62 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 26. Powers of taxing officers in relation to costs of taxation proceedings (O.62, r.26) 26. (1) Subject to the provisions of this Order, the party whose bill is being taxed shall be entitled to that party\u2019s costs of the taxation proceedings which shall be assessed by the taxing officer. (2)  Subject to paragraph (3) the taxing officer shall make the taxing officer\u2019s own assessment of the costs which the taxing officer considers that a reasonable litigant is likely to have incurred in preparing the litigant\u2019s bill of costs and attending the taxation and award that amount. (3)  The amount of costs payable by any party pursuant to an order made by a taxing officer under this rule shall not exceed \u2014 (a)  $5,000 in the case of taxations conducted by a Judge; (b)  $2,000 in all other cases. (4)  Where an order is made in favour of the paying party, the amount shall be deducted from the costs ordered to be paid by the paying party and a certificate issued for the balance. (5)  The party liable to pay the costs of the proceedings which gave rise to the taxation proceedings may make a written offer to pay a specified sum in satisfaction of those costs which is expressed to be \\\"without prejudice save as to the costs of taxation\\\" at any time before the expiration of 14 days after the delivery to that party of a copy of the bill of costs under rule 31(3) and, where such an offer is made, the fact that it has been made shall not be communicated to the taxing officer until question of the costs of the taxation proceedings falls to be decided. (6)  The taxing officer may take into account any offer made under paragraph (5) which has been brought to the taxing officer\u2019s attention. PART VI: PROCEDURE ON TAXATION 27. Service of a bill of costs (O.62, r.27) 27. (1) The successful party shall prepare a bill of costs in Form No. 314 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) and serve it on the paying party. (2)  Where more than one party is liable jointly or severally to pay the whole or part of the costs, a copy of the bill of costs shall be served on every party. (3)  The paying party shall state the extent to which the paying party agrees with and accepts liability to pay the amounts claimed in the bill of costs by completing column 4 and returning the completed bill of costs to the successful party within 21 days or such longer period as may be agreed. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 62 (4)  In addition to completing column 4, the paying party may also serve a written statement of objections. 28. Commencement of taxation proceedings (O.62, r.28) 28. (1) Proceedings for the taxation of costs shall be commenced by lodging the following documents with the taxing officer \u2014 (a)  an application for taxation in such of Forms 301 to 304 as may be appropriate; (b)  a bill of costs completed and signed by each of the paying parties in accordance with rule 27(3); (c)  any statement of objections received from the paying party; (d)  any reply to the Statement of Objections relied upon by the successful party; (e)  where a party is entitled to require taxation of any costs directed to be paid by any award made on an arbitration under any Law or pursuant to any arbitration agreement and no order of the Court for enforcement of the award has been made, a true copy of the award; and (f)  where a party is entitled to require taxation of any costs directed to be paid by any order, award or other determination of any tribunal or other body constituted by or under any Law or Regulation, a true copy of the order, award or determination, as the case may be. (2)  Where a party is entitled to recover taxed costs or to require any costs to be taxed by virtue of \u2014 (a)  a judgment, direction or order given or made in proceedings in the Court; or (b)  rule 5; or (c)  an award made on an arbitration under any Law or pursuant to an arbitration agreement; or (d)  an order, award or other determination of a tribunal or other body constituted by or under any Law, the party must commence proceedings for the taxation of those costs either within 3 months after the judgment, direction, or order was filed or the award or other determination was signed or otherwise perfected or, within 3 months after the party\u2019s right to taxation arose in accordance with rule 9, whichever is the later. (3)  The taxing officer may summarily dismiss any application for taxation which is made out of time. 29. Subsequent procedure (O.62, r.29) 29. (1) A taxation shall be inquisitorial in nature. ORDER 62 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (2)  The taxing officer shall enquire into the bill of costs and determine the amount to be paid in accordance with this Order and the Guidelines for which purpose the taxing officer shall obtain such written explanations from the successful party and\/or such written submissions on behalf of the paying party as may be appropriate to enable the taxing officer to make such determination fairly. (3)  If the taxing officer considers that the taxing officer cannot properly tax a bill of costs or complete the taxing officer\u2019s taxation of a bill of costs without hearing an oral submission from the successful party and\/or the paying party, the taxing officer shall fix a hearing date and send a notice of appointment to \u2014 (a)  the successful party; and (b)  every paying party who has completed column 4 and signed the bill of costs; (4)  The taxing officer may require the successful party to produce the following documents \u2014 (a)  the engagement letters or other documents which evidence the terms upon which the successful party engaged the successful party\u2019s attorneys and foreign lawyers; (b)  the invoices (and detailed versions of the invoices) rendered on the successful party by the successful party\u2019s attorneys and foreign lawyers; (c)  an index and\/or bundle of the pleadings, affidavits and orders relating to the proceeding before the Court; (d)  the invoice, account or other document evidencing the payment of any disbursement; (e)  time records relating to legal fees; (f)  instructions, briefs, opinions or reports; (g)  the whole or any part of the correspondence files of the successful party\u2019s attorneys and foreign lawyers; (h)  any other documents which the taxing officer considers relevant for the purpose of justifying the amounts claimed in the bill of costs. (5)  The taxing officer may require that any document produced by the successful party is made available for inspection by the paying party, provided that the document in question is not privileged. (6)  The taxing officer shall not give reasons for any of the taxing officer\u2019s decisions. (7)  The taxing officer shall send an office copy of the taxing officer\u2019s costs certificate to each of the successful and paying parties. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 62 PART VII: REVIEW OF TAXATION AND APPEAL ON POINTS OF CONSTRUCTION 30. Review by the Judge (O.62, r.30) 30. (1) Any party who is dissatisfied with the amount of any costs certificate may apply to a Judge to review the taxing officer\u2019s decision. (2)  In the event that the taxation was conducted by a Judge in the Judge\u2019s capacity as an ex officio taxing officer, the review shall be conducted by a different Judge. (3)  An application under this rule for review of the taxing officer\u2019s decision must be made within 14 days after the decision to be reviewed or within such other period as may be fixed by the taxing officer. (4)  Every applicant for review under this rule must at the time of making the applicant\u2019s application \u2014 (a)  deliver to the Judge the applicant\u2019s objections in writing specifying what is objected to and stating concisely the nature and grounds of the objection in each case; (b)  deliver a copy of the objections to all parties affected by the application; (c)  if the applicant is the paying party, pay the amount as taxed into Court; and (d)  serve notice of payment into Court on every party referred to in subparagraph (b) above. (5)  Any party to whom a copy of the objections is delivered under this rule may, within 14 days after delivery of the copy to that party or such other period as may be fixed by the Judge, deliver to the Judge answers in writing to the objections stating concisely the grounds on which that party will oppose the objections and must at the same time deliver a copy of the answers to the party applying for review and to any other party who was entitled to receive notice under paragraph (4). (6)  A review under this rule shall be inquisitional in nature and the Judge may receive further evidence and may exercise all the powers which the Judge might have exercised on an original taxation, including the power to award costs of the proceedings before the Judge. (7)  In the event that the Judge considers that the Judge cannot properly review the taxing officer's decision without hearing oral submissions, the Judge shall fix a hearing date and any party to whom a copy of the objections was delivered under paragraph (4) shall be entitled to be heard in respect of all or any of the objections notwithstanding that that party did not deliver written answers to the objections under paragraph (5). ORDER 62 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 31. Appeal to the Court of Appeal on points of construction (O.62, r.31) 31. (1) A party to any taxation proceeding who is dissatisfied with any decision of a Judge (whether or not such decision has been reviewed in accordance with rule 30) may apply to the Judge for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal which shall be granted only if the Judge is satisfied that the proposed appeal involves a point of construction of general importance. (2)  There shall be no other right of appeal to the Court of Appeal in respect of a decision made by a Judge, whether acting as an ex officio taxing officer or conducting a review under rule 30. GCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 01.01.02) (amended 01.06.11) (amended 29.03.16) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 63 ORDER 63 OFFICE OF THE GRAND COURT 1. Distribution of business in the Court (O.63, r.1) 1. The office of the Court shall be divided into such departments and the business performed in the office of the Court shall be distributed amongst the departments in such manner as the Chief Justice may direct. 2. Court files (O.63, r.2) 2. (1) The Clerk of the Court shall create a Court file in respect of every proceeding immediately prior to sealing the originating process by which such proceeding is commenced.  For the purpose of rules 2 and 3 of this Order an \\\"originating process\\\" includes an application pursuant to Order 53, rule 3. (2) The Court file shall be identified by the cause number and, subject to paragraph (3), the full title of the proceeding to which it relates. (3) If the full title of the proceeding is too long to be typed or printed on one sheet of 11\\\" x 8\u00bd\\\" paper, the Court file shall be given an abbreviated title. (4) If the Court file comprises more than one volume, each volume shall be identified by the cause number, the full or abbreviated title of the proceeding, as appropriate, the volume number in a chronological sequence and the period of time to which the volume relates. 3. Filing of documents (O.63, r.3) 3. (1) Every document required to be filed in any proceeding shall be provided to the Clerk of the Court whereupon the Clerk of the Court shall take the same steps, mutatis mutandis, as apply to originating processes provided pursuant to Order 5, rule 1(5) and (6). (2) Any document required to be filed which is more than 50 pages long (and not filed electronically) shall be placed in a ring binder or otherwise suitably bound and be kept with and deemed to form part of the Court file. (3) Subject to paragraphs (4) and (5), the Court file relating to any proceeding shall be open to inspection only by the parties to that proceeding. (4) The Court may order that the Court file relating to any proceeding or any specific document therein be closed and not open to inspection by any party or other person except with the prior leave of the Court. (5) The Court may give leave on application to any person not being a party to the proceedings to inspect the Court file or to take a copy of any document on the Court file relating to those proceedings. ORDER 63 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (6) This rule shall have no application to Court files in respect of proceedings relating to \u2014 (a) the estate of any deceased person; (b) the winding up of any company; or (c) the bankruptcy of any person, which shall be open to inspection in accordance with the Probate and Administration Rules (as amended and revised) made under the Succession Act (as amended and revised); the Companies Winding Up Rules (as amended and revised); and the Grand Court (Bankruptcy) Rules (as amended and revised), respectively. 3A. Filing of documents by electronic means (O. 63, r. 3A) 3A. (1) Every document required to be filed in any proceedings shall be filed by electronic means unless it is not practicable for the person filing the document to do so, having regard to Practice Directions 5, 5A, 5B, 5C, and 5D of 2020 and 11 of 2020 and any subsequent related Practice Directions replacing, amending or supplementing the same. (2) For the purposes of rule 2 and Order 5, rule 1(3) documents filed by electronic means insofar as they are required by the Rules to be filed, shall comprise or otherwise form part of the Court file in respect of the proceedings to which they relate. (3) This rule applies to documents filed by electronic means and to the Court file in all respects as they would apply to paper documents and files. 4. Restriction on removal of documents (O.63, r.4) 4. (1) No document shall be removed from a Court file except \u2014 (a) by order of the Court; or (b) by the Clerk of the Court in the event that it has been mistakenly placed on the wrong Court file. (2) A document may be temporarily removed from the Court file by or with the permission of the Clerk of the Court for the purpose of photocopying it. (3) When a Court file is contained in more than one volume, the volumes shall not be separated unless they are so numerous or so large that it is inconvenient for the Judge using such file to have before the Judge the whole of it. 5. Identity of party filing documents (O.63, r.5) 5. Every document filed in or document sealed by the Court office shall contain a statement (at the foot of each page) of the name and address of the party or the party\u2019s attorney responsible for filing or causing it to be sealed, as the case may be. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 63 6. Deposit of documents (O.63, r.6) 6. (1) Where the Court orders any documents to be deposited in Court they must, unless otherwise directed, be deposited with the Clerk of the Court. (2) No document deposited in accordance with paragraph (1) shall be taken out of the Court office without the leave of the Court. 7. Register of judgments (O.63, r.7) 7. (1) The Clerk of the Court shall create a file upon which shall be placed an office copy of every final judgment given or made by the Court of the kind referred to in Order 42, rule 5(8), unless otherwise directed by the Court, which shall be referred to as the \u2018Register of Judgments\u2019. (1A) With effect from 1 January 2022 every document entered on the Register of Judgments will be an electronic copy and the Register of Judgments will thereafter be maintained in electronic form only. (2) The Register of Judgments shall be open to public inspection upon payment of the prescribed fee, if any. (3) Any person shall be entitled, upon payment of the prescribed fee, to obtain from the Clerk of the Court a certified paper copy of any judgment or order contained in the Register of Judgments. 8. Register of writs and other originating processes (O.63, r.8) 8. (1) Subject to paragraph (1A), the Clerk of the Court shall create a file containing, in chronological order, an office copy of every writ and every other originating process and every third-party notice, including amendments thereto, sealed by the Court, which shall be referred to as the \\\"Register of Writs and other Originating Processes\\\".  For the avoidance of doubt, the Register of Writs and Other Originating Processes shall include every ex parte originating summons and ex parte originating motion but it shall not include any application made pursuant to Order 53, rule 3. (1A) Unless otherwise directed by the Court, any originating process issued pursuant to the following Acts or rules shall not be included in the Register of Writs and other Originating Processes but shall be maintained on separate registers, collectively referred to as Restricted Registers of Writs and other Originating Processes: (a) Proceeds of Crime Act (as amended and revised); (b) Misuse of Drugs Act (as amended and revised); (c) Criminal Justice (International Cooperation) Act (as amended and revised); (d) Tax Information Authority Act (as amended and revised); ORDER 63 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (e) Mutual Legal Assistance (United States of America) Act (as amended and revised); (f)  Order 70, rule 3; (g) family proceedings; (h) any application seeking to make a child a ward of court; (i)  any application seeking a declaration of paternity pursuant to the Status of Children Act, 2003; (j)  any application seeking any order pursuant to the Mental Health Act (as amended and revised); (k) any application pursuant to section 7 of the Legal Practitioners Act (as amended and revised). (1B) With effect from 1 January 2022 every document entered on the Register of Writs and other Originating Processes and on the Restricted Registers of Writs and other Originating Processes (together, the \u201cRegisters\u201d) will be an electronic copy and the Registers will thereafter be maintained in electronic form only. (2) The Register of Writs and other Originating Process shall be open to public inspection upon payment of the prescribed fee. (3) Any person shall be entitled, upon payment of the prescribed fee, to obtain from the Clerk of the Court a certified copy of any writ and every other originating process and third-party notice, including amendments thereto, contained in the Register of Writs and other Originating Processes. (4) The parties to proceedings referred to in paragraph (1A), or their attorneys, may, upon payment of the prescribed fee or fees, inspect and take copies of documents contained on the Restricted Registers of Writs and other Originating Processes. Save as aforesaid, no person may inspect, or take copies of, documents contained on any of the Restricted Registers of Writs and other Originating Processes without the leave of the Court.  Any such application for leave to inspect or take copies of such documents shall be made on notice to all of the parties to the proceedings. (5) Nothing in paragraph (1A) of this rule shall limit the right of the Attorney General to inspect and take copies of any documents contained in the Restricted Registers of Writs and other Originating Processes. 9. Office hours (O.63, r.9) 9. The office of the Court shall be open on every day of the year except \u2014 (a) Saturdays and Sundays; and (b) public holidays. The hours during which the office of the Court shall be open to the public shall be such as the Chief Justice may from time to time direct. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 63 GCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 01.02.13) (replaced 10.07.22) ORDER 64 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 64 NO ORDER GCR 1995 (Revised) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 65 ORDER 65 SERVICE OF DOCUMENTS 1. When personal service required (O.65, r.1) 1. (1) Any document which by virtue of these Rules is required to be served on any person need not be served personally unless the document is one which by an express provision of these Rules or by order of the Court is required to be so served. (2) Paragraph (1) shall not affect the power of the Court under any provision of these Rules to dispense with the requirement for personal service. 2. Personal service: how effected (O.65, r.2) 2. Personal service of a document is effected by leaving a copy of the document with the person to be served. 3. Service on body corporate (O.65, r.3) 3. Personal service of a document on a body corporate other than a company registered under the Companies Act (as amended and revised) may, in cases for which provision is not otherwise made by any enactment, be effected by serving it in accordance with rule 2 on the chairperson or president of the body corporate or the secretary, treasurer or other similar officer thereof. 4. Substituted service (O.65, r.4) 4. (1) If, in the case of any document which by virtue of any provision of these Rules is required to be served personally on any person, it appears to the Court that it is impracticable for any reason to serve that document personally on that person, the Court may make an order for substituted service of that document. (2) An application for an order for substituted service may be made by an affidavit stating the facts on which the application is founded. The affidavit shall set out the means by which it is proposed to bring the document to the notice of the person to be served, including electronic means if reasonably practicable. (3) Substituted service of a document, in relation to which an order is made under this rule, is effected by taking such steps as the Court may direct to bring the document to the notice of the person to be served. 5. Ordinary service: how effected (O.65, r.5) 5. (1) Service of any document, not being a document which by virtue of any provision of these Rules is required to be served personally, may be effected \u2014 (a) by leaving the document at the proper address of the person to be served; ORDER 65 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (b) by post; (c) by facsimile, in accordance with paragraph (2); or (d) in such other manner as the Court may direct. (2) Service by facsimile may be effected only where \u2014 (a) the party serving the document acts by an attorney; (b) the party on whom the document is served acts by an attorney and service is effected by transmission to the business address of such an attorney; (c) the attorney acting for the party on whom the document is served has indicated in writing to the attorney serving the document that the attorney acting for the party on whom the document is served is willing to accept service by facsimile at a specified facsimile number and the document is transmitted to that number; and for this purpose the inscription of a facsimile number on the writing paper of an attorney shall be deemed to indicate that such an attorney is willing to accept service in accordance with this paragraph unless the attorney acting for the party on whom the document is served states otherwise in writing; and (d) as soon as practicable after service by facsimile, the attorney acting for the party serving the document despatches a copy of it to the attorney acting for the other party by any of the methods described for service by paragraph (1), and if the attorney acting for the party serving the document fails to do so the document shall be deemed never to have been served by facsimile. (3) Where a facsimile is transmitted on a business day before 4 p.m., it shall, unless the contrary is shown, be deemed to be served on that day, and, in any other case, on the business day next following. (4) For the purposes of this rule and Section 53 of the Interpretation Act (as amended and revised), in its application to this rule, the proper address of any person on whom a document is to be served in accordance with this rule shall be the address for service of that person, but if at the time when service is effected that person has no address for service that person\u2019s address for the purposes aforesaid shall be \u2014 (a) in any case, the business address of the attorney (if any) who is acting for the person in the proceedings in connection with which service of the document in question is to be effected; or (b) in the case of an individual, that person\u2019s usual or last known address; or (c) in the case of individuals who are suing or being sued in the name of a firm, the principal or last known place of business of the firm within the jurisdiction; or (d) in the case of a body corporate, the registered or principal office of the body. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 65 (5) Nothing in this rule shall be taken as prohibiting the personal service of any document or as affecting any enactment which provides for the manner in which documents may be served on bodies corporate. 5A. Service by electronic means (O. 65, r. 5A) 5A. Any document which pursuant to these Rules is required to be served on any person may be served by electronic means where an address for service by electronic means is, or has been, provided by that person for those purposes.  For the avoidance of doubt, in such circumstances no prior order for substituted service is required. 6. Service on the Cabinet, etc., in proceedings which are not by or against the Crown (O.65, r.6) 6. Where for the purpose of or in connection with any proceedings in the Court, not being civil proceedings by or against the Crown within the meaning of the Crown Proceedings Act (as amended and revised), any document is required by any enactment or these Rules to be served on a government department or on the Attorney General, Section 12 of the said Law and O.77, r.4, shall apply in relation to the service of the document as they apply in relation to the service of documents required to be served on the Crown for the purpose of or in connection with any civil proceedings by or against the Crown. 7. Effect of service after certain hours (O.65, r.7) 7. Any document (other than a writ or other originating process) service of which is effected under rule 2 or under rule 5(1)(a) between midnight on a Friday and midnight on the following Sunday or after 4 p.m. on any other weekday shall, for the purpose of computing any period of time after service of that document, be deemed to have been served on the Monday following that Friday or on the day following that other weekday, as the case may be. 8. Affidavit of service (O.65, r.8) 8. An affidavit of service of any document must state by whom the document was served, the day of the week and date on which and the time when it was served, where it was served and how. 9. No service required in certain cases (O.65, r.9) 9. Where by virtue of these Rules any document is required to be served on any person but is not required to be served personally, and at the time when service is to be effected that person is in default as to acknowledgment of service or has no address for service, the document need not be served on that person unless the Court otherwise directs or any of these Rules otherwise provides. ORDER 65 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 10. Service of process on Sunday (O.65, r.10) 10. (1) No process shall be served or executed within the jurisdiction on a Sunday except, in case of urgency, with the leave of the Court. (2) For the purpose of this rule \\\"process\\\" includes a writ, judgment, notice, order, petition, originating or other summons, or warrant. GCR 1995 (Revised) (replaced 10.07.22) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 66 ORDER 66 PAPER, PRINTING, BINDING AND COPIES 1. Quality and size of paper (O.66, r.1) 1. (1) Unless it is impracticable, every document prepared by a party for use in the Court must be on letter sized paper (11\\\" long and 8.5\\\" wide) of durable quality, having a margin, not less than 1\\\" wide, to be left blank on the left side of the face of the paper, and on the right side of the reverse. (2) When the use of A4 paper is unavoidable, it shall have a margin of at least 1\\\" to be left blank at the top and bottom of each page. 2. Regulations as to printing, etc. (O.66, r.2) 2. (1) Except where these Rules otherwise provide, every document prepared by a party for use in the Court must be produced by one of the following means, that is to say, printing, writing (which must be clear and legible) and typewriting otherwise than by means of a carbon, and may be produced partly by one of those means and partly by another or others of them. (2) [Repealed.] (3) Any type used in producing a document for use as aforesaid must be such as to give a clear and legible impression and must be not smaller than 11 point type for printing or elite type for type lithography, stencil duplicating or typewriting. (4) Any document produced by a photographic or similar process giving a positive and permanent representation free from blemishes shall, to the extent that it contains a facsimile of any printed, written or typewritten matter, be treated for the purposes of these Rules as if it were printed, written or typewritten, as the case may be. (5) Any notice required by these Rules may not be given orally except with the leave of the Court. 3. Copies of documents for other party (O.66, r.3) 3. Where a document prepared by a party for use in the Court is written or typewritten, the party by whom it was prepared must supply any other party entitled to a copy of it, not being a party on whom it has been served, with one copy of it and where the document in question is an affidavit, of any document exhibited to it. The copy must be ready for delivery within 48 hours after a written request for it, together with an undertaking to pay the proper charges, is received and must be supplied thereafter on payment of those charges. ORDER 66 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 4. Requirements as to copies (O.66, r.4) 4. (1) Before a copy of a document is supplied to a party under these Rules, it must be indorsed with the name and address of the party or attorney by whom it was supplied. (2) The party by whom a copy is supplied under rule 3, or, if the party sues or appears by an attorney, the party\u2019s attorney, shall be answerable for the copy being a true copy of the original or of an office copy, as the case may be. 5. Requirements as to binding (O.66, r.5) 5. (1) Documents or bundles of documents not exceeding 50 pages in length may be firmly stapled in the top left hand corner and shall be punched with a hole for filing. (2) Documents or bundles of documents exceeding 50 pages shall be placed in ring binders or otherwise suitably bound and the cover thereof must bear a frontsheet containing the title of the action and a description or index of the documents contained therein. GCR 1995 (Revised) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 67 ORDER 67 ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW PART 1 - CHANGE OF ATTORNEY 1. Notice of change of attorney (O.67, r.1) 1. (1) A party to any cause or matter who sues or defends by an attorney may change the party\u2019s attorney without an order for that purpose but, unless and until notice of the change is filed and copies of the notice are served in accordance with this rule, the former attorney shall, subject to rules 5 and 6, be considered the attorney of the party until the final conclusion of the cause or matter in the Court. (2) The party giving the notice must serve on every other party to the cause or matter (not being a party in default as to acknowledgment of service) and on the former attorney a copy of the notice. (3) The party giving the notice may perform the duties prescribed by this rule in person or by the party\u2019s new attorney. 2. No rule (O.67, r.2) 2. No rule (O.67, r.2) 3. Notice of appointment of attorney (O.67, r.3) 3. Where a party, after having been sued or defended in person, appoints an attorney to act in the cause or matter on the party\u2019s behalf, the change may be made without an order for that purpose and rule 1 shall, with the necessary modifications, apply in relation to a notice of appointment of an attorney as it applies in relation to a notice of change of attorney. 4. Notice of intention to act in person (O.67, r.4) 4. Where a party, after having sued or defended by an attorney, intends and is entitled to act in person, the change may be made without an order for that purpose and rule 1 shall, with the necessary modifications, apply in relation to a notice of intention to act in person as it applies in relation to a notice of change of attorney except that the notice of intention to act in person must contain an address for service of the party giving it. 5. Removal of attorney from record at instance of another party (O.67, r.5) 5. (1) Where \u2014 ORDER 67 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (a) an attorney who has acted for a party in a cause or matter has died or becomes bankrupt or cannot be found or has been struck off the roll of attorneys or has been suspended from practising or has for any other reason ceased to practice; and (b) the party has not given notice of change of attorney or notice of intention to act in person in accordance with the foregoing provisions of this Order, any other party to the cause or matter may apply to the Court for an order declaring that the attorney has ceased to be the attorney acting for the first mentioned party in the cause or matter, and the Court may make an order accordingly. (2) An application for an order under this rule must be made by summons and the summons must, unless the Court otherwise directs, be served on the party to whose attorney the application relates. The application must be supported by an affidavit stating the grounds of the application. (3) Where an order is made under this rule the party on whose application it was made must file the order and serve a copy on every other party to the cause or matter (not being a party in default as to acknowledgment of service). (4) An order made under this rule shall not affect the rights of the attorney and the party for whom the attorney acted as between themselves. 6. Withdrawal of attorney who has ceased to act for party (O.67, r.6) 6. (1) Where an attorney who has acted for a party in a cause or matter has ceased so to act and the party has not given notice of change in accordance with rule 1, or notice of intention to act in person in accordance with rule 4, the attorney may apply to the Court for an order declaring that the attorney has ceased to be the attorney acting for the party in the cause or matter, and the Court may make an order accordingly, but unless and until the attorney files and serves a copy of the order on every party to the cause or matter (not being a party in default as to acknowledgment of service) the attorney shall be considered the attorney of the party until the final conclusion of the cause or matter in the Court. (2) An application for an order under this rule must be made by summons and the summons must, unless the Court otherwise directs, be served on the party for whom the attorney acted. The application must be supported by an affidavit stating the grounds of the application. (3) An order made under this rule shall not affect the rights of the attorney and the party for whom the attorney acted as between themselves. (4) Notwithstanding anything in paragraph (1), where a certificate within the meaning of Section 2 of the Legal Aid Act (as amended and revised) in respect Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 67 of any matter is revoked or discharged, the attorney assigned to the person to whom the certificate was granted shall cease to be the attorney acting in the cause or matter; and if the person whose certificate has been revoked or discharged desires to proceed with the cause or matter without legal aid and appoints that attorney or another attorney to act on the person\u2019s behalf, the provisions of rule 3 shall apply as if that party had previously sued or defended in person. 7. Address for service of party whose attorney is removed, etc. (O.67, r.7) 7. Where \u2014 (a) an order is made under rule 5; or (b) an order is made under rule 6, and the applicant for that order has complied with rule 6(1); or (c) a certificate within the meaning of Section 2 of the Legal Aid Act (as amended and revised)  is revoked or discharged, then, unless and until the party to whose attorney or to whom, as the case may be, the order or certificate relates either appoints another attorney and complies with rule 3 or, being entitled to act in person, gives notice of the party\u2019s intention so to do and complies with rule 4, the party\u2019s last known address or, where the party is a body corporate, its registered or principal office shall, for the purpose of the service on the party of any document not required to be served personally, be deemed to be the party\u2019s address for service. 8. Copy of notice to be filed (O.67, r.8) 8. A notice required to be given under rule 1, 3 or 4 shall be filed on the Court file. PART 2 \u2013 DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST ATTORNEYS 9. Commencement and service of Proceedings (O. 67, r. 9) 9. (1) No proceedings against an attorney pursuant to section 7 of the Legal Practitioners Act (as amended and revised) (the \u201cAct\u201d) shall be commenced without the prior authorisation of the Chief Justice.  Upon the Chief Justice authorising the commencement of such proceedings the Attorney General, as ex officio head of the legal profession and acting in the public interest, shall file and serve on the attorney an originating notice of motion embodying full particulars of charge (which shall be a pleading for the purpose of Order 18) together with affidavit evidence in support thereof.  The form of notice of originating motion shall be in Form 6A of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). (2) The Clerk of the Court shall place the notice of originating motion on a Restricted Register of Writs and other Originating Processes. ORDER 67 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (3)   From the date of service of the notice of originating motion on the attorney until the determination of the proceedings (including any appeals) against the attorney: (a)  any application by the attorney to the Clerk of the Court voluntarily seeking to be struck off the Court Roll will be stayed; (b)  if, at any time during that period, the attorney has for a period of twentyfour months not been in possession of an annual practising certificate pursuant to section 12 of the Act, the Clerk of the Court will stay consideration of striking the attorney off the Court Roll pursuant to section 14 of the Act pending the determination of the proceedings. (5) At any time the Attorney General may delegate conduct of the proceedings to the Solicitor General. 10. Acknowledgment of Service (O. 67, r. 10) 10. Within 14 days of the service of the notice of originating motion, the attorney shall file and serve on the Attorney General an acknowledgment of service.  The provisions of Order 12 with respect to acknowledgment of service of an originating summons shall apply mutatis mutandis. 11. Case management (O. 67, r. 11) 11. Within 28 days of the service of the notice of originating motion and the affidavit evidence referred to in rule 9(1) of this Order, there shall be a case management conference for the future conduct of the proceedings. 12. Trial (O. 67, r. 12) 12. (1) The burden and standard of proof shall be the same as in criminal proceedings. (2)  If at the conclusion of the trial the Court determines that the attorney either be suspended from, or struck off, the Court Roll then, absent agreement from the attorney, the judgment will be effective from 14 days after delivery of the judgment or such longer period as the Court orders. (3)   Unless the Court dismisses the motion then 14 days after delivery of the judgment, or such longer period as the Court orders, all judgments delivered in the proceedings will be placed on the Register of Judgments and Orders and a copy of the notice of originating motion (and any amendments thereto) will be placed on the Register of Writs and other Originating Processes. (4)  If the Court dismisses the motion then the Court may order that any such judgment in anonymised or redacted format may be placed on the Register of Judgments and Orders. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 67 13. Confidentiality of proceedings (O. 67, r. 13) 13. Unless the Court otherwise orders all hearings, including the trial, shall be conducted in private. GCR 1995 (Revised) (replaced 10.07.22) ORDER 68 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 68 NO ORDER GCR 1995 (Revised) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 69 ORDER 69 PROVISIONS AS TO FOREIGN PROCEEDINGS; SERVICE OF FOREIGN PROCESS 1. Definitions (O.69, r.1) 1. In this Order \u2014 \\\"a convention country\\\" means a foreign country in relation to which there subsists a civil procedure convention providing for service in that country of process of the Court, and includes a country which is a party to the Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters signed at the Hague on 15th November 1965; and \\\"process\\\" includes a citation. 2. Applications (O.69, r.2) 2. This Order applies to the service on a person in the Islands of any process in connection with civil or commercial proceedings in a foreign Court or tribunal where the Clerk of the Court receives a written request for service \u2014 (a) from the Governor, with a recommendation by the Governor that service should be effected; or (b) where the foreign Court or tribunal is in a convention country, from a consular or other authority of that country. 3. Service of process (O.69, r.3) 3. (1) The request shall be accompanied by a translation thereof in English, two copies of the process and, unless the foreign Court or tribunal certifies that the person to be served understands the language of the process, two copies of a translation thereof. (2) Subject to paragraphs (3) and (4), and to any enactment providing for the manner of service of documents on corporate bodies, the process shall be served by the Bailiff's leaving a copy of the process and a copy of the translation or certificate, as the case may be, with the person to be served. (3) The Bailiff shall send to the Clerk of the Court a copy of the process and an affidavit, certificate or report proving due service of the process or stating the reason why service could not be effected, as the case may be, and if the Court directs shall specify the costs involved in effecting or attempting to effect service. (4) Order 65, rule 4 (substituted service) shall apply to the service of foreign process as it applies to the service of writs except that a Judge may make an order for ORDER 69 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) substituted service of foreign process on the basis of the Bailiff's affidavit, certificate or report, without an application being made to the Judge in that behalf. (5) The Clerk of the Court shall send a certificate, together with a copy of the process, to the consular or other authority or the Governor, as the case may be, stating \u2014 (a) when and how service was effected or the reason why service could not be effected, as the case may be; and (b) where appropriate, the amount certified by the Clerk of the Court to be the costs of effecting or attempting to effect service. (6) The certificate under paragraph (5) shall be sealed with the seal of the Court for use out of the jurisdiction. 4. Service of process by private process server (O.69, r.4) 4. Nothing in this Order shall prevent the service of process in connection with civil or commercial proceedings in a foreign Court or tribunal otherwise than pursuant to a civil procedure convention being effected by an attorney or private process server. GCR 1995 (Revised) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 70 ORDER 70 OBTAINING EVIDENCE FOR FOREIGN COURTS, ETC. 1. Interpretation (O.70, r.1) 1. In this Order \u2014 \\\"the Law\\\" means the Evidence (Proceedings in Other Jurisdictions) (Cayman Islands) Order 1978 (S.I. 1890\/78) and the expressions used in the Law which are used in this Order shall have the same meaning as in the Law. 2. Application for order (O.70, r.2) 2. (1) Subject to rule 3, an application for an order under the Law may be made ex parte and must be supported by affidavit. (2) There shall be exhibited to the affidavit the request in pursuance of which the application is made and, if the request is not in the English language, a translation thereof in that language. (3) An order under this rule shall be in Form No. 56 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). 3. Application by Attorney General in certain cases (O.70, r.3) 3. Where a request \u2014 (a) is received by the Governor and sent by the Governor to the Clerk of the Court with an intimation that effect should be given to the request without requiring an application for that purpose to be made by the agent in the Islands of any party to the matter pending before the Court or tribunal; or (b) is received by the Clerk of the Court in pursuance of a civil procedure convention providing for the taking of the evidence of any person in the Islands for the assistance of a Court or tribunal in the foreign country, and no person is named in the document as the person who will make the necessary application on behalf of such a party, the Clerk of the Court shall send the document to the Attorney General and the Attorney General may make an application for an order under the Law and take such other steps as may be necessary to give effect to the request. 4. Person to take and manner of taking examination (O.70, r.4) 4. (1) Any order made in pursuance of this Order for the examination of a witness may order the examination to be taken before any fit and proper person nominated by the person applying for the order or before such qualified person as to the Court deems fit. ORDER 70 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (2) Subject to rule 6 and to any special directions contained in any order made in pursuance of this Order for the examination of any witness, the examination shall be taken in manner provided by O.39, rr.5 to 10 and 11(1) to (3), and an order may be made under O.39, r.14, for payment of the fees and expenses due to the examiner, and those rules shall apply accordingly with any necessary modifications. 5. Dealing with deposition (O.70, r.5) 5. Unless any order made in pursuance of this Order for the examination of any witness otherwise directs, the examiner before whom the examination was taken must send the deposition of that witness to the Clerk of the Court and the Clerk shall \u2014 (a) give a certificate sealed with the seal of the Court identifying the documents annexed thereto, that is to say, the letter of request, the order of the Court for examination and the deposition taken in pursuance of the order; and (b) send the certificate with the documents annexed thereto to the Governor, or, where the request was sent to the Clerk of the Court by some other person in accordance with a Civil Procedure Convention to that other person, for transmission to the Court or tribunal out of the jurisdiction requesting the examination. 6. Claim to privilege (O.70, r.6) 6. (1) The provisions of this rule shall have effect where a claim by a witness to be exempt from giving any evidence on the ground specified in Section 3(1)(b) of the Law is not supported or conceded as mentioned in subsection (2) of that Section. (2) The examiner may, if the examiner thinks fit, require the witness to give the evidence to which the claim relates and if the examiner does not do so, the Court may do so, on the ex parte application of the person who obtained the order under Section 2. (3) If such evidence is taken \u2014 (a) it must be contained in a document separate from the remainder of the deposition of the witness; (b) the examiner shall send to the Clerk of the Court with the deposition a statement signed by the examiner setting out the claim and the ground on which it was made; (c) on receipt of the statement the Clerk of the Court shall, notwithstanding anything in rule 5, retain the document containing the part of the witness' evidence to which the claim relates and shall send the statement and a request to determine the claim to the foreign Court or tribunal with the documents mentioned in rule 5; Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 70 (d) if the claim is rejected by the foreign Court or tribunal, the Clerk of the Court shall send to that Court or tribunal the document containing that part of the witness' evidence to which the claim relates, but if the claim is upheld the Clerk of the Court shall send the document to the witness, and shall in either case notify the witness and the person who obtained the order under Section 2 of the Law of the Court or tribunal's determination. GCR 1995 (Revised) ORDER 71 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 71 FOREIGN JUDGMENTS RECIPROCAL ENFORCEMENT ACT (as amended and revised) 1. Interpretation (O.71, r.1) 1. In this Order \u2014 \\\"the Law\\\" means the Foreign Judgments Reciprocal Enforcement Act (as amended and revised) and expressions used in the Law which are used in this Order shall have the same meaning as in the Law. 2. Application for registration (O.71, r.2) 2. An application under Section 4 of the Law to have a judgment registered in the Court shall be made by an ex parte originating summons unless the Court directs the summons to be served on the judgment debtor. 3. Evidence in support of application (O.71, r.3) 3. An application for registration must be supported by an affidavit \u2014 (a) exhibiting the judgment or a verified or certified or otherwise duly authenticated copy thereof, and where the judgment is not in the English language, a translation thereof in that language certified by a notary public or authenticated by affidavit; (b) stating the name, trade or business and the usual or last known place of abode or business of the judgment creditor and the judgment debtor respectively, so far as known to the deponent; (c) stating to the best of the information or belief of the deponent \u2014 (i) that the judgment creditor is entitled to enforce the judgment; (ii) as the case may require, either that at the date of the application the judgment has not been satisfied, or the amount in respect of which it remains unsatisfied; (iii) that the judgment does not fall within any of the cases in which a judgment may not be registered under Section 4 of the Law. 4. Security for costs (O.71, r.4) 4. Save as otherwise provided by any relevant Order in Council made under Section 3 of the Law, the Court may order the judgment creditor to give security for the costs for the application for registration and of any proceedings which may be brought to set aside the registration. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 71 5. Order for registration (O.71, r.5) 5. (1) An order giving leave to register a judgment must be drawn up by, or on behalf of, the judgment creditor. (2) No such order need be served on the judgment debtor, unless the Court otherwise directs. (3) Every such order shall state the period within which an application may be made to set aside the registration and shall contain a notification that execution on the judgment will not issue until after the expiration of that period. (4) The Court may, on an application made at any time while it remains competent for any party to apply to have the registration set aside, extend the period (either as originally fixed or as subsequently extended) within which an application to have the registration set aside may be made. 6. Filing of judgments (O.71, r.6) 6. Every judgment ordered to be registered under the Law shall be filed in the Register of Judgments as if it were a judgment or order made by the Court. 7. Notice of registration (O.71, r.7) 7. (1) Notice of registration of a judgment must be served on the judgment debtor by delivering it to the judgment debtor personally or by sending it to the judgment debtor at the judgment debtor\u2019s usual or last known place of abode or business or in such other manner as the Court may direct. (2) Service of such a notice out of the jurisdiction is permissible without leave, and O.11, rr.4, 5 and 6, shall apply in relation to such a notice as they apply in relation to a writ. (3) The notice of registration must state \u2014 (a) full particulars of the judgment registered and the order for registration; (b) the name and address of the judgment creditor or of the judgment creditor\u2019s attorney or agent on whom, and at which, any summons issued by the judgment debtor may be served; (c) the right of the judgment debtor to apply to have the registration set aside; and (d) the period within which an application to set aside the registration may be made. 8. No rule (O.71, r.8) 8. No rule (O.71, r.8) ORDER 71 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 9. Application to set aside registration (O.71, r.9) 9. (1) An application to set aside the registration of a judgment must be made by summons supported by affidavit. (2) The Court hearing the application may order any issue between the judgment creditor and the judgment debtor to be tried in any manner in which an issue in an action may be ordered to be tried. 10. Issue of execution (O.71, r.10) 10. (1) Execution shall not issue on a judgment registered under the Law until after the period which in accordance with rule 5(3) is specified in the order for registration as the period within which an application may be made to set aside the registration or, if that period has been extended by the Court, until after the expiration of that period as so extended. (2) If an application is made to set aside the registration of a judgment execution on the judgment shall not issue until after such application is finally determined. (3) Any party wishing to issue execution on a judgment registered under the Law must produce to the Clerk of the Court an affidavit of service of the notice of registration of the judgment and any order made by the Court in relation to the judgment. 11. No rule (O.71, r.11) 11. No rule (O.71, r.11) 12. No rule (O.71, r.12) 12. No rule (O.71, r.12) 13. Certified copy of Grand Court judgment (O.71, r.13) 13. (1) An application under Section 11 of the Law for a certified copy of a judgment entered in the Court must be made by ex parte summons in the proceeding in which the judgment is given. (2) Such an application must be supported by an affidavit stating \u2014 (a) that the judgment creditor wishes to enforce the judgment in a foreign country to which Part I of the Law extends; (b) the name, trade or business and the usual or last known place of residence of the judgment debtor so far as known to the deponent; (c) the extent to which the judgment is outstanding; (d) that the judgment is not subject to any stay of execution and that the time for appealing has expired or, as the case may be, the date on which it will expire; and Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 71 (e) that there is no other impediment to enforcement of the judgment or reason why it may not be enforced. (3) The certified copy of the judgment shall be an office copy sealed with the seal of the Court and indorsed with a certificate signed by the Clerk of the Court, certifying that the copy is a true copy of a judgment obtained in the Grand Court of the Islands and that it is issued in accordance with Section 11 of the Law. (4) There shall also be issued with such certified copy of the judgment a certificate of the Clerk of the Court having annexed to it a copy of the writ, originating summons or other process by which the proceedings were begun and stating \u2014 (a) the manner in which the writ or other process was served on the defendant or that the defendant acknowledged service thereof; (b) what objections, if any, were made to the jurisdiction; (c) what pleadings, if any, were served; (d) the grounds on which the judgment was based; (e) that the time for appealing has expired, or, as the case may be, the date on which it will expire; (f) whether notice of appeal against the judgment has been filed; and (g) such other particulars as may be necessary to give to the Court in the foreign country in which it is sought to obtain execution of the judgment, and a certificate (signed and sealed as aforesaid) stating the rate at which the judgment carries interest. GCR 1995 (Revised) ORDER 72 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 72 FINANCIAL SERVICES PROCEEDINGS 1. Application and Interpretation (O.72, r.1) 1. (1) This Order applies to financial services proceedings and the other provisions of these Rules apply to those proceedings subject to the provisions of this Order. (2)  In these Rules \\\"financial services proceeding\\\" means \u2014 (a)  any proceeding relating to a mutual fund, including an action by or against its directors (in the case of a corporate fund), its trustee (in the case of a unit trust), its general partner (in the case of a limited partnership), its investment manager or adviser, its administrator, its prime broker or its auditor; (b)  any proceeding relating to an exempted insurer, including an action by or against its directors, insurance manager or auditor; (c)  any action for breach of a contract of insurance (including an application for a declaration) where the amount claimed exceeds $1 million; (d)  any application (including an appeal by a licensee) made to the Court under any of the regulatory laws; (e)  any administration action or application under the Trusts Act (as amended and revised) (to which O.85 applies) except those relating to the estates of deceased persons who died domiciled in the Islands and the net asset value of the estate is less than $1 million; (f)  any action against a trustee or protector of a trust or the executor or administrator of an estate for breach of trust or breach of fiduciary duty, except those actions relating to a trust or estate whose net asset value is less than $1 million; (g)  any application made to the Court under the Companies Act (as amended and revised) (to which O.102 applies), including any application made in a winding up proceeding (to which the Companies Winding Up Rules (as amended and revised) apply); (h)  any application for an order for the dissolution of a partnership which carries on business as a mutual fund, including any application made in the dissolution proceeding; (i)  any action for breach of contract or breach of duty by or against a professional service provider, except for actions relating to the nonpayment or over-payment of fees where the amount claimed is less than $250,000; Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 72 (j)  any application for an order for evidence pursuant to a letter of request to which O.70 applies, including any related application for directions to which O.103 applies; (k)  any application to which the Grand Court (Bankruptcy) Rules (as amended and revised) or the Foreign Bankruptcy Proceedings (International CoOperation) Rules (as amended and revised) apply; (l)  any action for the enforcement of a foreign judgment, whether at common law or pursuant to the Foreign Judgments Reciprocal Enforcement Act; (m)  any action for the enforcement of a foreign arbitral award pursuant to the Foreign Arbitral Awards Enforcement Act; (n)  any application made to the Court pursuant to the Arbitration Act 2012[Law 3 of 2012]. (2)  In this Order \u2014 (a)  \\\"the Registrar\\\" means the Registrar of the Financial Services Division of the Court; (b)  \\\"mutual fund\\\" has the meaning ascribed to it in Section 2 of the Mutual Funds Act (as amended and revised); (c)  \\\"external insurer\\\" has the meaning ascribed to it in Section 2 of the Insurance Act (as amended and revised); (d)  \\\"regulatory laws\\\" has the meaning ascribed to it in Section 2 of the Monetary Authority Act (as amended and revised); and (e)  \\\"professional service provider\\\" has the meaning ascribed to it in Section 89 of the Companies Act (as amended and revised). 2. Commencement of Financial Services Proceedings (O.72, r.2) 2. (1) Every financial services proceeding shall be commenced in the Financial Services Division. (2)  Every financial services proceeding shall be commenced by writ, originating summons, originating motion or petition in accordance with O.5 and entered into the Register of Writs and other Originating Process in accordance with O.63, r.8. (3)  The title of every proceeding commenced in or transferred to the Financial Services Division shall include the words In the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands, Financial Services Division. (4)  In addition to establishing and maintaining a Court file in accordance with O.63, r.2, the Registrar shall create and maintain a computerised record for each financial services proceeding which shall comprise the following documents and\/or produce reports comprising the following information \u2014 (a)  a chronological index of all the pleadings, affidavits and orders; ORDER 72 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (b)  a copy of each pleading, affidavit (without its exhibits) and order; (c)  a copy of each skeleton argument (without copy authorities); and (d)  a schedule containing details of \u2014 (i)  the fixed Court fee paid; (ii)  the date and length of each hearing; (iii)  the Court hearing fees paid (if any); and (iv)  the identity of the party or parties by whom the fixed fee and any Court hearing fees have been paid. (5)  The computerised record (created and maintained in accordance with paragraph (4) above) shall enable the Registrar to produce reports in respect of each proceeding which is commenced in or transferred to the Financial Services Division containing the following information \u2014 (a)  the date on which the proceeding was commenced or transferred to the Financial Services Division; (b)  the title of the proceeding; (c)  the name of the Commercial Judge to whom it has been assigned; (d)  particulars of the parties' attorneys and any foreign lawyers; (e)  the date and a brief description of each hearing; (f)  the date and estimated length of future hearings; (g) particulars of the date and manner in which the proceeding was concluded. (6)  The Registrar, acting in consultation with the Chief Justice, shall assign every financial services proceeding to one of the Commercial Judges and the cause number assigned to it in accordance with O.5, r.1(5)(b) shall include the judge's initials. (7)  The trial of every financial services proceeding shall be heard by the Commercial Judge assigned to it. (8)  Every interlocutory application made in a financial services proceeding (including every application made in a winding up proceeding) shall be heard or determined by the Commercial Judge assigned to it, except that another Commercial Judge may hear or determine an urgent application if the Judge assigned to the proceeding is not available. 3. Transfer of Proceedings (O.72, r.3) 3. Any cause or matter pending in the Court, including matters commenced prior to the Commencement Date, may be transferred to the Financial Services Division on the ground that \u2014 (a)  it is a financial services proceedings which ought properly to have been commenced in the Financial Services Division; or Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 72 (b)  the Court is satisfied upon the application of any party that it would be appropriate in all the circumstances for the cause or matter to be tried by a Commercial Judge. 4. Case management and summonses for directions (O.72, r.4) 4. (1) Order 25 shall apply to proceedings pending in the Financial Services Division subject to the following modifications. (2)  The Registrar shall issue an initial summons for directions in Form No.71 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) in every financial services proceeding within 3 months of the date on which it was commenced or transferred to the Financial Services Division unless in the meantime \u2014 (a)  the cause or matter has been finally determined; (b)  the Registrar has received notice that the cause or matter has been discontinued or settled; (c)  the Court has already made an order for directions; or (d)  one or other of the parties has taken out a summons for directions. (3)  In order that the Court may be informed of the general nature of the case and the issues which are expected to arise, the attorneys for each party shall prepare and file an agreed case memorandum (within such period as the Registrar shall direct) which should contain \u2014 (a)  a short and uncontroversial description of what the case is about; (b)  a list of issues, including both issues of fact and law, to the extent that it is practical to do so having regard to the state of the pleadings; and (c)  a procedural history. (4)  The attorneys for the plaintiff shall be responsible for filing the agreed case memorandum. (5)  The Registrar may at any time issue a notice in Form No.72 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) requiring that the parties' attorneys and their foreign lawyers (if any) attend before the Judge for the purposes of a case management conference. (6)  If a party has instructed or intends to instruct a foreign lawyer to appear at the trial or any interlocutory hearing the Registrar shall be so informed and such foreign lawyer may be required to appear on any summons for directions or case management conference. (7)  If one or more of the parties have instructed a foreign lawyer, the Registrar may require that the hearing of any summons for directions or any case management conference be conducted via a video link, in which case the parties shall provide suitable conference room facilities for the use of the Judge. ORDER 72 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 5. Listing interlocutory hearings and trials (O.72, r.5) 5. (1) The Registrar shall be responsible for listing the hearing of all case management conferences, interlocutory applications and trials. (2)  Order 34 shall not apply to proceedings pending in the Financial Services Division. (3)  The Registrar shall maintain \u2014 (a)  a composite Court diary for the Financial Services Division; and (b)  an individual Court diary for each Commercial Judge. 6. Transitional Provisions (O.72, r.6) 6. (1) The Financial Services Division Court shall be established with effect from the 1st day of November 2009 (referred to in this Rule as \\\"the Commencement Date\\\") and this Rule shall apply to every financial services proceeding commenced prior to the Commencement Date. (2)  Any party or parties to a cause or matter commenced prior to the Commencement Date may apply to the Registrar in Form No. 73 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) for an order that it be transferred to the Financial Services Division and the Registrar shall make a transfer order if the Registrar is satisfied that the cause or matter is a financial services proceeding within the meaning of Rule 1(2). (3)  Whenever a party seeks to issue an interlocutory summons or an application is made to fix a hearing date for a trial and it appears to the Registrar that the cause or matter is a financial services proceeding, the Registrar shall \u2014 (a)  invite the parties to apply in Form No. 73 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) for a transfer order; or (b)  if the parties or any of them fail to apply in Form No. 73 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) within 14 days, the Registrar shall make a transfer order on the Registrar\u2019s own motion. (4)  Every transfer order made by the Registrar under this rule shall be in Form No. 74 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) and shall specify \u2014 (a)  the Commercial Judge to whom the proceeding has been assigned; (b)  the amount of the transfer fee payable in accordance with Rule 3(5) of the Court Fees Rules (as amended and revised); and (c)  the party or parties liable to pay the transfer fee. (5)  The liability for payment of the transfer fee shall be determined as follows \u2014 (a)  the parties may agree that any one of them shall be liable or that liability be divided amongst them in agreed proportions; and, in default of agreement \u2014 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 72 (b)  the party by whom a transfer application is made under paragraph (2) of this Rule shall be liable to pay the transfer fee; or (c)  in the case of a transfer order made under paragraph (3)(b) of this Rule, the party seeking to issue the summons or fix the hearing date shall be liable to pay the transfer fee; or (d)  in the case of an application made in a winding up proceeding (to which the Companies Winding Up Rules (as amended and revised) apply), the official liquidator shall be liable to pay the transfer fee as an expense of the liquidation. (6)  Every transfer order made by the Registrar shall be served by the Registrar upon the attorneys for all the parties by facsimile or e-mail and by placing an office copy in the attorneys' Court office post box. (7)  Any party who is dissatisfied with the decision to make a transfer order may apply within 7 days to the Chief Justice who shall review the matter de novo and may substitute the Chief Justice\u2019s own decision for that of the Registrar. (8)  Any party who is dissatisfied with the terms of a transfer order may apply within 7 days to the Chief Justice who shall review the matter de novo and may vary the transfer order by assigning the matter to a different Commercial Judge and\/or reducing the amount of the transfer fee and\/or varying the paying party or parties. (9)  An application under paragraphs (7) or (8) of this Rule shall be made in writing in Form No.75 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) upon notice to the other parties who may submit their own reply or submission in writing within 3 days after receiving notice of the application. (10) No step may be taken in any proceeding which has been transferred to the Financial Services Division under this rule, except for any application under paragraphs (7) or (8) for a review of the transfer order, unless and until the transfer fee has been paid in full. GCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 01.11.09) (amended 01.07.13) ORDER 73 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 73 ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS PART I 1. The overriding objective (O.73, r.1) 1. This Order is founded on the general principles in Section 3(3) of the 2012 Law and shall be construed accordingly. 2. Meaning of arbitration application (O.73, r.2) 2. (1) Subject to paragraph (2), \u201carbitration application\u201d means the following \u2014 (a)  an application to the Court under the 2012 Law; (b)  proceedings to determine \u2014 (i)  whether there is a valid arbitration agreement; (ii)  whether an arbitration tribunal is properly constituted; (iii)  what matters have been submitted to arbitration in accordance with an arbitration agreement; (c)  proceedings to declare that an award by an arbitral tribunal is not binding on a party; (d)  any other application \u2014 (i)  affecting arbitration proceedings (whether instituted or anticipated); or (ii)  to construe or affecting an arbitration agreement, and includes the originating process by which an arbitration application is begun. (2)  In this Part of this Order, an arbitration application does not include proceedings to enforce an award to which Part II of this Order applies. 3. Interpretation (O.73, r.3) 3. In this Order \u2014 (1)  \u201cthe 1974 Law\u201d means the Arbitration Law 1974 [Law 2 of 1974]; (2)  \u201cthe 1975 Law\u201d means the Foreign Arbitral Awards Enforcement Act 1975 [Law 30 of 1975]; (3)  \u201cthe 2012 Law\u201d means the Arbitration Act, 2012 [Law 3 of 2012]; Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 73 (4)  References to the 1974 Law, the 1975 Law or the 2012 Law include references to any current amendments and Revisions to those Laws as may be in force from time to time; (5)  \u201cthe 1967 Order\u201d means the Arbitration (International Investment Disputes) Act 1966 (Application to Colonies etc.) Order 1967 [UKSI 1967\/159] (as amended); (6)  \u201cthe 1988 Order\u201d means the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (Overseas Territories) Order 1988 [UKSI 1988\/791]; (7)  \u201cthe MIGA Convention\u201d means the Convention establishing the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency signed in Seoul on 11 October 1985; (8)  \u201cthe Washington Convention\u201d means the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of other States done at Washington, 18 March 1965; 4. Form and content of arbitration application (O.73, r.4) 4. (1) Except where paragraph (5) applies, every arbitration application must be in Form No. 6A of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). (2)  Every arbitration application must \u2014 (a)  include a concise statement of \u2014 (i)  the remedy or relief claimed, and (ii)  (where appropriate) the questions on which the applicant seeks the determination or direction of the Court; (b)  give details of any arbitration award that is challenged by the applicant, showing the grounds for any such challenge; (c)  where the applicant claims an order for costs, identify the respondent against whom the claim is made; (d)  (where appropriate) specify the Section of the 2012 Law under which the application is brought; and (e)  show that any statutory requirements have been satisfied. (3)  The arbitration application must also state \u2014 (a)  whether it is made ex parte or on notice and, if made on notice, must give the names and addresses of the persons to whom notice is to be given, stating their role in the arbitration and whether they are made respondents to the application; (b)  whether (having regard to Section 83 of the 2012 Law) the applicant intends to apply for the proceedings to be heard in open court; and (c)  the date and time when the application will be heard or that such date has not yet been fixed. ORDER 73 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (4)  Every arbitration application which is used as an originating process shall be indorsed with the applicant's address for service in accordance with O.6, r.5. (5)  An application to stay proceedings under Section 9 of the 2012 Law must be made by summons in those proceedings. 5. Issue of application (O.73, r.5) 5. Every arbitration application shall be commenced in the Financial Services Division, pursuant to O.72 rr.1(2)(m) or (n) as applicable. 6. Stay of legal proceedings (O.73, r.6) 6. (1) An application under section 9 of the 2012 Law to stay legal proceedings shall be served \u2014 (a)  in accordance with O.65, r.5, on the party bringing the relevant legal proceedings and on any other party to those proceedings who has given an address for service; and (b)  on any party to those legal proceedings who has not given an address for service, by sending to the party (whether or not the party is within the jurisdiction) at the party\u2019s last known address or at a place where it is likely to come to the party\u2019s attention, a copy of the application for the party\u2019s information. (2)  Where a question arises as to whether an arbitration agreement has been concluded or as to whether the dispute which is the subject-matter of the proceedings falls within the terms of such an agreement, the Court may determine that question or give directions for its determination, in which case it may order the proceedings to be stayed pending the determination of that question. 7. Service of arbitration application (O.73, r.7) 7. (1) Subject to paragraphs (2) and (4) below and to rules 6(1) and 8 of this Order, an arbitration application shall be served in accordance with O.10. (2)  Where the Court is satisfied on an ex parte application that \u2014 (a)  arbitral proceedings are taking place, or an arbitration award has been made, within the jurisdiction; and (b)  an arbitration application is being made in connection with those arbitral proceedings or being brought to challenge the award or to appeal on a question of law arising out of the award; and (c)  the respondent to the arbitration application (not being an individual residing or carrying on business within the jurisdiction or a body corporate having a registered office or a place of business within the jurisdiction) \u2014 (i)  is or was represented in the arbitral proceedings by an attorney or other agent within the jurisdiction who was authorised to receive Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 73 service of any notice or other document served for the purposes of those proceedings; and (ii)  has not (at the time when the arbitration application is made) determined the authority of that attorney or agent, the Court may authorise service of the arbitration application to be effected on the attorney or agent instead of the respondent. (3)  An order made under paragraph (2) must limit a time within which the respondent must acknowledge service and a copy of the order and of the arbitration application must be sent by post, by courier or electronically to the respondent at the respondent\u2019s address or electronic address out of the jurisdiction. (4)  Where an arbitration application has been issued, any subsequent arbitration application made by the respondent and arising out of the same arbitration or arbitration agreement may be served on the applicant in accordance with O.65, r.5 (Ordinary service: how effected) and similarly any subsequent arbitration application by any party may be served at the address for service given in the first arbitration application or in the acknowledgment of service. (5)  For the purposes of service, an arbitration application is valid in the first instance \u2014 (a)  where service is to be effected out of the jurisdiction, for such period as the Court may fix; (b)  in any other case, for one month, beginning with the date of its issue and O.6 r.8 shall apply with the substitution, in paragraphs (2) and (3), of \\\"2 months\\\" for \\\"4 months\\\" and \\\"6 months\\\" for \\\"12 months\\\". 8. Service out of the jurisdiction (O.73, r.8) 8. (1) Service out of the jurisdiction of an arbitration application is permissible with the leave of the Court if \u2014 (a)  the applicant seeks to challenge, or to appeal to the Court on a question of law arising out of, an arbitration award made within the jurisdiction (the place where an award is treated as made being determined by Section 63(4) of the 2012 Law); (b)  the application is for an order under Section 43 of the 2012 Law (Court\u2019s powers exercisable in support of arbitral proceedings). Where the application is for interim relief in support of arbitral proceedings which are taking (or will take) place outside the jurisdiction, the Court may give leave for service out of the jurisdiction notwithstanding that no other relief is sought; or (c)  the applicant \u2014 ORDER 73 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (i)  seeks some other remedy or relief, or requires a question to be decided by the Court, affecting an arbitration (whether pending or anticipated), an arbitration agreement or an arbitration award; and (ii)  the seat of the arbitration is or will be within the jurisdiction. (2)  An application for the grant of leave under this rule must be supported by an affidavit \u2014 (a)  stating the grounds on which the application is made; and (b)  showing in what place or country the person to be served is, or probably may be found, and no such leave shall be granted unless it shall be made sufficiently to appear to the Court that the case is a proper one for service out of the jurisdiction under this rule. (3)  Order 11, rules 5 to 8 shall apply to the service of an arbitration application under this rule as they apply to the service of a writ. (4)  Service out of the jurisdiction of any order made on an arbitration application is permissible with the leave of the Court. 9. Affidavit in support of arbitration application (O.73, r.9) 9. (1) The applicant shall file an affidavit in support of the arbitration application which sets out the evidence on which the applicant intends to rely and a copy of every affidavit so filed must be served with the arbitration application. (2)  Where an arbitration application is made with the written agreement of all the other parties to the arbitral proceedings or with the permission of the arbitral tribunal, the affidavit in support must \u2014 (a)  give details of the agreement or, as the case may be, permission; and (b)  exhibit copies of any document which evidences that agreement or permission. 10. Requirements as to notice (O.73, r.10) 10. (1) Where the 2012 Law requires that an application to the Court is to be made upon notice to other parties notice shall be given by making those parties respondents to the application and serving on them the arbitration application and any affidavit in support. (2)  Where an arbitration application is made under Section 20, 65 or 67 of the 2012 Law, the arbitrators or, in the case of an application under Section 20, the arbitrator concerned shall be made respondents to the application and notice shall be given by serving on them the arbitration application and any affidavit in support. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 73 (3)  In cases where paragraph (2) does not apply, an applicant shall be taken as having complied with any requirement to give notice to the arbitrator if the applicant sends a copy of the arbitration application to the arbitrator for the arbitrator\u2019s information at the arbitrator\u2019s last known address or electronic address with a copy of any affidavit in support. (4)  This rule does not apply to applications under Section 9 of the 2012 Law to stay legal proceedings. 11. Acknowledgment of service by respondent (O.73, r.11) 11. (1) Service of an arbitration application may be acknowledged by completing an acknowledgment of service in Form No. 9A in the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) in accordance with O.12 (as that Order applies by virtue of rule 9 of that Order). (2)  A respondent who \u2014 (a)  fails to acknowledge service within the time limited for so doing; or (b)  having indicated on the respondent\u2019s acknowledgment of service that the applicant does not intend to contest the arbitration application, then wishes to do so, shall not be entitled to contest the application without the leave of the Court. (3)  The Court will not give notice of the date on which an arbitration application will be heard to a respondent who has failed to acknowledge service. (4)  The failure of a respondent to give notice of intention to contest the arbitration application or to acknowledge service shall not affect the applicant's duty to satisfy the Court that the order applied for should be made. (5)  This rule does not apply to \u2014 (a)  applications under Section 9 of the 2012 Law to stay legal proceedings; or (b)  subsequent arbitration applications. 12. Acknowledgment of service, etc., by arbitrator (O.73, r.12) 12. (1) An arbitrator who is sent a copy of an arbitration application for the arbitrator\u2019s information may make \u2014 (a)  a request ex parte in writing to be made a respondent; or (b)  representations to the Court under this rule, and, where an arbitrator is ordered to be made a respondent, the arbitrator shall acknowledge service within 14 days of the making of that order. (2)  An arbitrator who wishes to make representations to the Court under this rule may file an affidavit or make representations in writing to the Court. ORDER 73 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (3)  The arbitrator shall as soon as is practicable send a copy of any document filed or made under paragraph (2) to all the parties to the arbitration application. (4)  Nothing in this rule shall require the Court to admit a document filed or made under paragraph (2) and the weight to be given to any such document shall be a matter for the Court. 13. Automatic directions (O.73, r.13) 13. (1) Unless the Court otherwise directs, the following directions shall take effect automatically and to this extent O.72, r.4 shall not apply to arbitration applications. (2)  A respondent who wishes to put evidence before the Court in response to any affidavit filed in support of an arbitration application shall serve the respondent\u2019s affidavit on the applicant before the expiration of 21 days after the time limited for acknowledging service or, in a case where a respondent is not required to file an acknowledgment of service, within 21 days after service of the arbitration application. (3)  An applicant who wishes to put evidence before the Court in response to an affidavit lodged under paragraph (2) shall serve the applicant\u2019s affidavit on the respondent within 7 days after service of the respondent's affidavit. (4)  Where a date has not been fixed for the hearing of the arbitration application, the applicant shall, and the respondent may, not later than 14 days after the expiration of the time limit specified in paragraph (2), apply to the Court for such a date to be fixed. (5)  Agreed indexed and paginated bundles of all the evidence and other documents to be used at the hearing shall be prepared by the applicant (with the cooperation of the respondent). (6)  Not later than 5 clear days before the hearing date estimates for the length of the hearing shall be lodged with the Court together with a complete set of the documents to be used. (7)  Not later than 2 days before the hearing date the applicant shall lodge with the Court \u2014 (a)  a chronology of the relevant events cross-referenced to the bundle of documents; (b)  (where necessary) a list of the persons involved; (c)  a skeleton argument which lists succinctly \u2014 (i)  the issues which arise for decision, (ii)  the grounds of relief (or opposing relief) to be relied upon, (iii)  the submissions of fact to be made with the references to the evidence, and Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 73 (iv)  the submissions of law with references to the relevant authorities, and shall send a copy to the respondent. (8)  Not later than the day before the hearing date the respondent shall lodge with the Court a skeleton argument which lists succinctly \u2014 (a)  the issues which arise for decision, (b)  the grounds of relief (or opposing relief) to be relied upon, (c)  the submissions of fact to be made with the references to the evidence, and (d)  the submissions of law with references to the relevant authorities, and shall send a copy to the applicant. 14. Directions by the Court (O.73, r.14) 14. (1) The Court may give such directions as to the conduct of the arbitration application as it thinks best adapted to secure the just, expeditious and economical disposal thereof. (2)  Where the Court considers that there is or may be a dispute as to fact and that the just, expeditious and economical disposal of the application can best be secured by hearing the application on oral evidence or mainly on oral evidence, it may, if it thinks fit, order that no further evidence shall be filed and that the application shall be heard on oral evidence or partly on oral evidence and partly on affidavit evidence, with or without cross-examination of any of the deponents, as it may direct. (3)  The Court may give directions as to the filing of evidence and as to the attendance of deponents for cross-examination and any directions which it could give in proceedings begun by writ. (4)  If the applicant makes default in complying with these rules or with any order or direction of the Court as to the conduct of the application, or if the Court is satisfied that the applicant is not prosecuting the application with due dispatch, the Court may order the application to be dismissed or may make such other order as may be just. (5)  If the respondent fails to comply with these rules or with any order or direction given by the Court in relation to the evidence to be relied on, or the submission to be made by that respondent, the Court may, if it thinks fit, hear and determine the application without having regard to that evidence or those submissions. 15. No rule (O.73, r.15) 15. No rule (O.73, r.15) ORDER 73 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 16. Securing the attendance of witnesses (O.73, r.16) 16. A party to arbitral proceedings being conducted in the jurisdiction who wishes to secure the attendance of a witness may apply to the Court pursuant to Section 40 of the 2012 Law for a writ of subpoena ad testificandum or of subpoena duces tecum. A writ of subpoena shall not be issued until the applicant lodges an affidavit which shows that the application is made with the permission of the tribunal or the agreement of the other parties. 17. Securing for costs (O.73, r.17) 17. Subject to Section 77(6) of the 2012 Law, the Court may order any applicant (including an applicant who has been granted leave to appeal) to provide security for costs of any arbitration application. 18. Powers exercisable in support of arbitral proceedings (O.73, r.18) 18. (1) Where the case is one of urgency, an application for an order under Section 43 of the 2012 Law (Court\u2019s powers exercisable in support of arbitral proceedings) may be made ex parte on affidavit (before the issue of an arbitration application) and the affidavit shall (in addition to dealing with the matters required to be dealt with by rule 9) state the reasons \u2014 (a)  why the application is made ex parte; and (b)  (where the application is made without the permission of the arbitral tribunal or the agreement of the other parties to the arbitral proceedings) why it was not practicable to obtain that permission or agreement, and (c)  why the deponent believes that the condition in section 43(5) is satisfied. (2)  Where the case is not one of urgency, an application for an order under Section 43 of the 2012 Law shall be made on notice and the affidavit in support shall (in addition to dealing with the matters required to be dealt with by rule 9 and paragraph (1) (c) above) state that the application is made with the permission of the tribunal or the written agreement of the other parties to the arbitral proceedings. (3)  Where an application for an order under Section 43 of the 2012 Law is made before the issue of an arbitration application, any order made by the Court may be granted on terms providing for the issue of an application and such other terms, if any, as the Court thinks fit. 19. Applications under Sections 27(9) and 71 of the 2012 Law (O.73, r.19) 19. (1) This rule applies to the following arbitration applications \u2014 (a)  applications for the determination of a question as to the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal under section 27(9) of the 2012 Law; and Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 73 (b)  applications for the determination of a preliminary point of law under section 71 of the 2012 Law. (2)  Where an application is made without the agreement in writing of all the other parties to the arbitral proceedings but with the permission of the arbitral tribunal, the affidavits filed by the parties shall set out any evidence relied on by the parties in support of their contention that the Court should, or should not, consider the application. (3)  As soon as practicable after the affidavits are lodged, the Court shall decide whether or not it should consider the application and, unless the Court otherwise directs, may so decide without a hearing. 20. Applications for leave to appeal (O.73, r.20) 20. (1) Where the applicant seeks leave to appeal to the Court on a question of law arising out of an arbitration award, the arbitration application shall identify the question of law and state the grounds on which the applicant alleges that leave should be granted. (2)  The affidavit in support of the application shall set out any evidence relied on by the applicant for the purpose of satisfying the Court of the matters mentioned in Section 76(4) of the 2012 Law and for satisfying the Court that leave should be granted. (3)  The affidavit lodged by the respondent to the application shall \u2014 (a)  state the grounds on which the respondent opposes the grant of leave; (b)  set out any evidence relied on by the respondent relating to the matters mentioned in Section 76(4) of the 2012 Law; and (c)  specify whether the respondent wishes to contend that the award should be upheld for reasons not expressed (or not fully expressed) in the award and, if so, state those reasons. (4)  As soon as practicable after the lodging of the affidavits, the Court shall determine the application for leave to appeal. (5)  Where leave is granted, a date shall be fixed for the hearing of the appeal. 21. Extension of time: applications under Section 13 (O.73, r.21) 21. An application for an order under Section 13 of the 2012 Law may include as an alternative an application for a declaration that such an order is not needed. 22. Time limit for challenges to or appeals from awards (O.73, r.22) 22. (1) An applicant shall not be taken as having complied with the time limit of one month referred to in Section 77(3) of the 2012 Law unless the arbitration application has been issued, and all the affidavits in support have been sworn and filed, by the expiry of that time limit. ORDER 73 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (2)  An applicant who wishes \u2014 (a)  to challenge an award under Section 75 of the 2012 Law; or (b)  to appeal under section 76 on a question of law arising out of an award, may, where the time limit of 30 days or one month, as the case may be, has not yet expired, apply ex parte on affidavit for an order extending that time limit. (3)  In any case where an applicant seeks to challenge an award under Section 75 of the 2012 Law or to appeal under Section 76 after the time limit of 30 days or one month, as the case may be, has already expired, the following provisions shall apply \u2014 (a)  the applicant must state in the applicant\u2019s arbitration application the grounds why an order extending time should be made and the applicant\u2019s affidavit in support shall set out the evidence on which the applicant relies; (b)  a respondent who wishes to oppose the making of an order extending time shall file an affidavit within 7 days after service of the applicant's affidavit, and (c)  the Court shall decide whether or not to extend time without a hearing unless it appears to the Court that a hearing is required, and, where the Court makes an order extending the time limit, the respondent shall file the respondent affidavit in response to the arbitration application 21 days after the making of the order. 23. No rule (O.73, r.23) 23. No rule (O.73, r.23) 24. No rule (O.73, r.24) 24. No rule (O.73, r.24) 25. No rule (O.73, r.25) 25. No rule (O.73, r.25) 26. No rule (O.73, r.26) 26. No rule (O.73, r.26) 27. No rule (O.73, r.27) 27. No rule (O.73, r.27) 28. No rule (O.73, r.28) 28. No rule (O.73, r.28) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 73 29. No rule (O.73, r.29) 29. No rule (O.73, r.29) 30. No rule (O.73, r.30) 30. No rule (O.73, r.30) PART II 31. Enforcement of awards (O.73, r.31) 31. (1) An application for leave under Section 52 or 72 of the 2012 Law or under Section 5 of the 1975 Law to enforce an arbitral award, shall be made by ex parte originating summons. (2)  The Court hearing an application under paragraph (1) may direct that the application is to be served on such parties to the arbitration as it may specify and service of the application out of the jurisdiction is permissible with the leave of the Court irrespective of where the award is, or is treated as, made. (3)  Where a direction is given under paragraph (2), rules 11 and 13 to 17 shall apply with the necessary modifications as they apply to applications under Part I of this Order. (4)  Where the applicant applies to enforce an agreed award within the meaning of Section 62 of the 2012 Law, the application must state that the award is an agreed award and any order made by the Court shall also contain such a statement. (5)  An application for leave must be supported by an affidavit \u2014 (a)  Exhibiting \u2014 (i)  where the application is under Section 52 or 72 of the 2012 Law, the arbitration agreement and the original award or, in either case, a copy thereof; (ii)  where the application is made under Section 5 of the 1975 Law, exhibiting the documents specified in Section 6 of the 1975 Law. (b)  stating the name and usual or last known place of residence or business of the applicant and of the person against whom it is sought to enforce the award respectively; (c)  stating as the case may require, either that the award has not been complied with or the extent to which it has not been complied with at the date of the application. (6)  An order giving leave must be drawn up by or on behalf of the applicant and must be served on the respondent by delivering a copy to the respondent ORDER 73 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) personally or by sending a copy to the respondent at the respondent\u2019s usual or last known place of residence or business or in such other manner as the Court may direct, including electronically. (7)  Service of the order out of the jurisdiction is permissible without leave, and O.11, rr.5 to 8, shall apply in relation to such an order as they apply in relation to a writ. (8)  Within 14 days after service of the order or, if the order is to be served out of the jurisdiction, within such other period as the Court may fix, the respondent may apply to set aside the order and the award shall not be enforced until after the expiration of that period or, if the respondent applies within that period to set aside the order, until after the application is finally disposed of. (9)  The copy of the order served on the respondent shall state the effect of paragraph (8). (10)  In relation to a body corporate this rule shall have effect as if for any reference to the place of residence or business of the applicant or the respondent there were substituted a reference to the registered or principal address of the body corporate. Nothing in this rule shall affect any enactment which provides for the manner in which a document may be served on a body corporate. 32. Interest on awards (O.73, r.32) 32. (1) Where an applicant seeks to enforce an award of interest, the whole or any part of which relates to a period after the date of the award, the applicant shall file an affidavit giving the following particulars \u2014 (a)  whether simple or compound interest was awarded; (b)  the date from which interest was awarded; (c)  the rate of interest awarded; and (d)  a calculation showing the total amount claimed up to the date of the affidavit and any sum which will become due thereafter on a per diem basis. (2)  The affidavit under paragraph (1) must be filed whenever the amount of interest has to be quantified for the purpose of obtaining a judgment or order under Section 52 or 72 of the 2012 Law or under Section 5 of the 1975 Law, or for the purposes of enforcing such a judgment or order by one of the means mentioned in O.45, r.1. 33. No rule (O.73, r.33) 33. No rule (O.73, r.33) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 73 34. Registration of awards under 1967 Order (O.73, r.34) 34. (1) In this rule and in any provision of these rules as applied by this rule, \\\"award\\\" means an award rendered pursuant to the Washington Convention. (2)  Subject to the provisions of this rule, the following provisions of O.71, namely, rules 3, 7 (except paragraph (3)(c) and (d) thereof) and 10(3) shall apply with necessary modifications in relation to an award as they apply in relation to a judgment to which the Foreign Judgments Reciprocal Enforcement Act (as amended and revised) applies. For that purpose, the expressions \\\"judgment creditor\\\" and \\\"judgment debtor\\\" as they appear in O.71 shall mean the person seeking recognition or enforcement of an award and the other party to the award. (3)  An application to have an award registered under the 1967 Order shall be made by originating summons. (4)  The affidavit required by O.71, r.3, in support of an application for registration shall \u2014 (a)  in lieu of exhibiting the judgment or a copy thereof, exhibit a copy of the award certified pursuant to the Washington Convention; and (b)  in addition to the matters mentioned in paragraph 3(c)(i) and (ii) of O.71, state whether at the date of the application the enforcement of the award has been stayed (provisionally or otherwise) pursuant to the Washington Convention and whether any, and if so what, application has been made pursuant to the Washington Convention, which, if granted, might result in a stay of the enforcement of the award. (5)  There shall be kept by the Clerk of the Court a public register of the awards ordered to be registered under the 1967 Order and particulars shall be entered in the register of any execution issued on such an award. (6)  Where it appears to the Court on granting leave to register an award or on an application made by the applicant after an award has been registered \u2014 (a)  that the enforcement of the award has been stayed (whether provisionally or otherwise) pursuant to the Washington Convention; or (b)  that an application has been made pursuant to the Washington Convention, which, if granted, might result in a stay of the enforcement of the award, the Court shall, or, in the case referred to in subparagraph (b) may, stay execution of the award for such time as it considers appropriate in the circumstances. (7)  An application by the applicant under paragraph (6) shall be made by summons and supported by affidavit. ORDER 73 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 35. Registration of awards under the 1988 Order (O.73, r.35) 35. Rule 34 shall apply, with the necessary modifications, in relation to an award rendered pursuant to the MIGA Convention as it applies to an award rendered pursuant to the Washington Convention. 36. Arbitrations conducted under the 1974 Law (O.73, r.36) 36. Any arbitration application made in respect of an arbitration commenced under the 1974 Law shall be conducted in accordance with such Rules of the Grand Court as were in force at the time that such arbitration was commenced. GCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 01.07.13) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 74 ORDER 74 APPLICATIONS AND APPEALS UNDER THE MERCHANT SHIPPING ACTS 1. Interpretation (O.74, r.1) 1. In this Order \u2014 \\\"the Merchant Shipping Act 1970\\\" shall mean the United Kingdom\u2019s Merchant Shipping Act 1970 as modified and applied in the Cayman Islands by the Merchant Shipping Act 1970 (Cayman Islands) Order 1988 [UKSI 1988\/246]; and \\\"the Merchant Shipping Act 1894\\\" shall mean the United Kingdom\u2019s Merchant Shipping Act 1894 as modified and applied in the Cayman Islands by Schedule 2 of the Merchant Shipping Act 1988 (Cayman Islands) Order 1988 [UKSI 1988\/1841]. 2. Rehearing of and appeal from inquiries and investigations (O.74, r.2) 2. (1) Orders 55 and 56 shall apply to the rehearing of and appeal from any inquiry or investigation conducted by the Cabinet and for this purpose a rehearing and an application under Section 52(2) of the United Kingdom\u2019s Merchant Shipping Act 1970 shall be treated as an appeal. (2) Where a rehearing by the Court is ordered under Section 57 of the United Kingdom\u2019s Merchant Shipping Act 1970 the Cabinet shall cause such reasonable notice to be given to the parties whom the Cabinet considers to be affected by the rehearing as the circumstances of the case may, in the Cabinet\u2019s opinion, permit. 3. Order for sale on transmission of a ship to an unqualified person (O.74, r.3) 3. An application for an order for sale under Section 28 of the United Kingdom\u2019s Merchant Shipping Act 1894 shall be made by originating motion which shall be served on all the persons having an interest, whether as owners or mortgagees, of the ship in question. 4. Proceedings on forfeiture of ship (O.74, r.4) 4. An application under Section 76 of the United Kingdom\u2019s Merchant Shipping Act 1894 for adjudication where any ship has become subject to forfeiture shall be made by originating motion which shall be served on all the persons having an interest, whether as owners, mortgagees or charterers, of the ship in question. ORDER 74 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 5. Proceedings before Courts of Survey (O.74, r.5) 5. Proceedings before a Court of Survey established pursuant to Section 31 of the Merchant Shipping Law, 1992 shall be conducted, as nearly as may be possible, in accordance with the United Kingdom Rules of the Court of Survey 1876 and the forms contained in Appendix B thereof shall be used with such modifications as may be necessary.1 1 (Note: The Merchant Shipping Law, 1992 (Law 12 of 1992) was repealed by S.466 of the Merchant Shipping Law, 1997(Law 24 of 1997). The Court of Survey was replaced by the arbitration provision found in s.201 of the Merchant Shipping Act (as amended and revised)) 6. Awards of wreck commissioners (O.74, r.6) 6. (1) An application pursuant to Part XII of the Merchant Shipping Act (as amended and revised) for an award of a wreck commissioner to be made on order of the Court shall be made by letter in writing addressed to the Clerk of the Court and accompanied by a minute of the order sought. (2) An award of costs made by a wreck commissioner shall be taxable by the Clerk of the Court on an indemnity basis in accordance with O.62, r.12(2), of the Rules of the Supreme Court of England and Wales. GCR 1995 (Revised) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 75 ORDER 75 ADMIRALTY PROCEEDINGS 1. Application and interpretation (O.75, r.1) 1. (1) This Order applies to admiralty actions, and the other provisions of these Rules apply to those actions subject to the provisions of this Order. (2) In this Order \u2014 \\\"action in rem\\\" means an admiralty action in rem; \\\"caveat against arrest\\\" means a caveat entered in the caveat book under rule 6; \\\"caveat against release and payment\\\" means a caveat entered in the caveat book under rule 14; \\\"caveat book\\\" means the book kept in the Court office in which caveats issued under this Order are entered; \\\"collision regulations\\\" means regulations under the Merchant Shipping (Prevention of Collisions and Use of Distress Signals) Regulations (as amended and revised); \\\"limitation action\\\" means an action by shipowners or other persons under Secrion 342 of the Merchant Shipping Act (as amended and revised); \\\"Merchant Shipping (Oil Pollution) Act 1971\\\" and the \\\"Merchant Shipping Act 1974\\\" are references to those Acts as modified and applied in the Cayman Islands by the Merchant Shipping (Oil Pollution) (Cayman Islands) Order 1975 [UKSI 1975\/2166] as amended by [UKSI 1981\/217]; \\\"RSC Appendix B\\\" means Appendix B to the Rules of the United Kingdom\u2019s Supreme Court 1999 (contained in Part 6 of the Supreme Court Practice 1999); \\\"ship\\\" includes any description of vessel used in navigation. (3) Admiralty actions include \u2014 (a) every action to enforce a claim for damage, loss of life or personal injury arising out of \u2014 (i) a collision between ships; or (ii) the carrying out of or omission to carry out a manoeuvre in the case of one or more of two or more ships; or (iii) non-compliance, on the part of one or more of two or more ships, with the collision regulations; (b) every limitation action; and ORDER 75 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (c) every action to enforce a claim under Section 1 of the United Kingdom\u2019s Merchant Shipping (Oil Pollution) Act 1971. 2. Forms (O.75, r.2) 2. The Forms contained in RSC Appendix B shall be used, with such modifications as may be necessary, for the purposes of all proceedings governed by this Order. 2A. Proceedings against, or concerning, the International Oil Pollution Compensation Fund (O.75, r.2A) 2A. (1) All proceedings against the International Oil Pollution Compensation Fund (in this rule referred to as \\\"the Fund\\\") under Section 356 of the Merchant Shipping Act (as amended and revised) shall be commenced by originating summons. (2) For the purposes of Section 6(2) of the United Kingdom\u2019s Merchant Shipping Act 1974 any party to proceedings brought against an owner or guarantor in respect of liability under Sections 338 and 338A of the Merchant Shipping Act (as amended and revised) may give notice to the Fund of such proceedings by serving a notice in writing on the Fund together with a copy of the writ and copies of the pleadings (if any) served in the action. (3) The Court shall, on the application made ex parte by the Fund, grant leave to the Fund to intervene in any proceedings to which the preceding paragraph applies, whether notice of such proceedings has been served on the Fund or not and paragraphs (3) and (4) of rule 17 shall apply to such an application. (4) Where judgment is given against the Fund in any proceedings under Sections 338 and 338A of the Merchant Shipping Act (as amended and revised) the Clerk of the Court shall cause an office copy of the judgment to be sent by post to the Fund. (5) The Fund shall notify the Clerk of the Court of the matters set out in Section 360(3) of the Merchant Shipping Act (as amended and revised) by a notice in writing sent to the Court office. 3. Issue of writ and acknowledgment of service (O.75, r.3) 3. (1) An admiralty action must be begun with writ in Form No. 1 of RSC Appendix B, or in the case of a limitation action in Form No. 2 of RSC Appendix B. (2) Subject to the following paragraphs O.6, r.8, shall apply in relation to a writ by which an admiralty action is begun, and O.12 shall apply in relation to such an action. (3) An acknowledgment of service in an action in rem or a limitation action shall be in Form No. 2B of RSC Appendix B. (4) A defendant to an action in rem in which the writ has not been served, or a defendant to a limitation action who has not been served with a writ, may, if the defendant desires to take part in the proceedings, acknowledge the issue of the Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 75 writ by handing in at, or sending to the Court office, an acknowledgment of service but with the substitution for the reference therein to service of references to the issue of the writ. (5) These Rules shall apply, with the necessary modifications, in relation to an acknowledgment of issue or service in Form No. 2B of RSC Appendix B as they apply in relation to an acknowledgment of service in Form No. 8 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) which contains a statement to the effect that the defendant intends to contest the proceedings to which the acknowledgment relates. 4. Service of writ out of jurisdiction (O.75, r.4) 4. (1) Subject to the following provisions of this rule, service out of the jurisdiction of a writ, or notice of a writ, containing a claim relative to any admiralty cause or matter is permissible with the leave of the Court if, but only if \u2014 (a) the defendant has the defendant\u2019s habitual residence or a place of business within the Islands; or (b) the cause of action arose within the territorial waters of the Islands; or (c) an action arising out of the same incident or series of incidents is proceeding in the Court or has been heard and determined in the Court; or (d) the defendant has submitted or agreed to submit to the jurisdiction of the Court. (1A)  Service out of the jurisdiction of a writ in an action to enforce a claim under Section 1 of the United Kingdom\u2019s Merchant Shipping (Oil Pollution) Act 1971 or Section 4 of the United Kingdom\u2019s Merchant Shipping Act 1974 is permissible with the leave of the Court. (2) Order 11, rule 5 and rule 6(2) and (4) shall apply in relation to an application for the grant of leave under this rule as they apply in relation to an application for the grant of leave under rule 1 or 2 of that Order. (3) Paragraphs (1) and (1A) shall not apply to an action in rem. (4) Order 11, rule 1(2) shall not apply to a writ by which any admiralty action is begun. 5. Warrant of arrest (O.75, r.5) 5. (1) After a writ has been issued in an action in rem a warrant in Form No. 3 of RSC Appendix B for the arrest of the property against which the action or any counterclaim in the action is brought may, subject to the provisions of this rule, be issued at the instance of the plaintiff or of the defendant, as the case may be. (2) A party applying for the issue out of the Court office of a warrant to arrest any property shall procure a search to be made in the caveat book for the purpose of ORDER 75 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ascertaining whether there is a caveat against arrest in force with respect to that property. (3) A warrant of arrest shall not be issued until the party applying for it has filed an affidavit made by the party or the party\u2019s agent containing the particulars required by paragraph (8); however, the Court may, if it thinks fit, give leave to issue a warrant notwithstanding that the affidavit does not contain all those particulars. (4) Except with the leave of the Court, a warrant of arrest shall not be issued in an action in rem against a foreign ship belonging to a port of a State having a consulate in London, being an action for the possession of the ship or for wages, until notice that the action has been begun has been sent to the consul. (5) A warrant of arrest may not be issued as of right in the case of property whose beneficial ownership has since the issue of the writ changed as a result of a sale or disposal by any Court exercising admiralty jurisdiction. (6) Where by any convention or treaty, the United Kingdom has undertaken on behalf of the Cayman Islands to minimise the possibility of arrest of ships of another State no warrant of arrest shall be issued against a ship owned by that State until notice in Form No. 15 of RSC Appendix B has been served on a consular officer at the consular office of that State in London. (7) Issue of a warrant of arrest takes place upon its being sealed by the Clerk of the Court. (8) An affidavit required by paragraph (3) must state \u2014 (a) in every case \u2014 (i) the nature of the claim or counterclaim and that it has not been satisfied and, if it arises in connection with a ship, the name of that ship; and (ii) the nature of the property to be arrested and, if the property is a ship, the name of the ship and its port of registry; and (b) in the case of a claim against a ship by virtue of Section 3(4) of the United Kingdom\u2019s Administration of Justice Act 19561 \u2014 (i) the name of the person who would be liable on the claim in an action in personam (\\\"the relevant person\\\"); and (ii) that the relevant person was when the cause of action arose the owner or charterer of, or in possession or in control of, the ship in connection with which the claim arose; and (iii) at the time of the issue of the writ the relevant person was either the beneficial owner of all the shares in the ship in respect of which the warrant is required or (where appropriate) the charterer of it under a charter by demise; and Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 75 (c) in the case of a claim for possession of a ship or for wages, the nationality of the ship in respect of which the warrant is required and that the notice (if any) required by paragraph (4) has been sent; and (d) in the case of a claim in respect of liability incurred under Sections 338 and 338A of the Merchant Shipping Act (as amended and revised), the facts relied on as establishing that the Court is not prevented from entertaining the action by reason of Sections 338(1) and 338A(1) of that Act. (9) Where appropriate, a copy of any notice sent to a consul under paragraph (4) shall be exhibited to an affidavit required by paragraph (3). 1 (Note: The United Kingdom\u2019s Administration of Justice Act 1956 was repealed by S.152(4), Sch 7 of the Supreme Court Act 1981. 6. Caveat against arrest (O.75, r.6) 6. (1) A person who desires to prevent the arrest of any property must file in the Court office a praecipe, in Form No. 5 of RSC Appendix B, signed by the person or the person\u2019s attorney undertaking \u2014 (a) to acknowledge issue of service (as may be appropriate) of the writ in any action that may be begun against the property described in the praecipe; and (b) within 3 days after receiving notice that such an action has been begun, to give bail in the action in a sum not exceeding an amount specified in the praecipe or to pay the amount so specified into Court, and on the filing of the praecipe a caveat against the issue of a warrant to arrest the property described in the praecipe shall be entered in the caveat book. (2) The fact that there is a caveat against arrest in force shall not prevent the issue of a warrant to arrest the property to which the caveat relates. 7. Remedy where property protected by caveat is arrested without good and sufficient reason (O.75, r.7) 7. Where any property with respect to which a caveat against arrest is in force is arrested in pursuance of a warrant of arrest, the party at whose instance the caveat was entered may apply to the Court by motion for an order under this rule and, on the hearing of the application, the Court, unless it is satisfied that the party procuring the arrest of the property had a good and sufficient reason for so doing, may by order discharge the warrant and may also order the last-mentioned party to pay to the applicant damages in respect of the loss suffered by the applicant as a result of the arrest. 8. Service of writ in action in rem (O.75, r.8) 8. (1) Subject to paragraph (2), a writ by which an action in rem is begun must be served on the property against which the action is brought except \u2014 ORDER 75 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (a) where the property is freight, in which case it must be served on the cargo in respect of which the freight is payable or on the ship in which that cargo was carried; or (b) where that property has been sold and the proceeds of the sale paid into Court, in which case it must be served on the Clerk of the Court. (2) A writ need not be served on the property or the Clerk of the Court if the writ is deemed to have been duly served on the defendant by virtue of O.10, rr.1(2) or (3). (3) Where by virtue of this rule a writ is required to be served on any property, the plaintiff may request service of the writ to be effected by the Bailiff if, but only if, a warrant of arrest has been issued for service against the property or the property is under arrest, and in that case the plaintiff must file in the Court office a praecipe in Form No. 6 of RSC Appendix B and \u2014 (a) deliver an office copy of the writ to be served; and (b) file an undertaking to pay on demand all expenses incurred by the Bailiff in respect of the service of the writ, and thereupon the Bailiff shall serve the writ on the property described in the praecipe. (3A)  Where a writ is served on any property by the Bailiff, the person effecting service must indorse on the writ the following particulars, that is to say, where it was served, the property on which it was served, the day of the week and the date on which it was served, the manner in which it was served and the name and address of the person effecting service, and the indorsement shall be evidence of the facts stated therein. (4) Where the plaintiff in an action in rem, or the plaintiff\u2019s attorney, becomes aware that there is in force a caveat against arrest with respect to the property against which the action is brought, the plaintiff must serve the writ forthwith on the person at whose instance the caveat was entered. (5) Where a writ by which an action in rem is begun is amended under O.20, r.1, after service thereof, O.20, r.1(2), shall not apply and, unless the Court otherwise directs on an application made ex parte, the amended writ must be served on any intervener and any defendant who has acknowledged issue or service of the writ in the action or, if no defendant has acknowledged issue of service of the writ, it must be served in accordance with paragraph (1) of this rule. 9. Committal of attorney failing to comply with undertaking (O.75, r.9) 9. Where the attorney of a party to an action in rem fails to comply with a written undertaking given by the attorney to any other party or the other party\u2019s attorney to enter an appearance in the action, give bail or pay money into Court in lieu of bail, the attorney shall be liable to committal. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 75 10. Execution, etc., of warrant of arrest (O.75, r.10) 10. (1) A warrant of arrest is valid for 12 months beginning with the date of its issue. (2) A warrant of arrest may be executed only by the Bailiff. (3) A warrant of arrest shall not be executed until an undertaking in writing, satisfactory to the Clerk of the Court, to pay on demand the fees and expenses of the Bailiff has been filed in the Court office. (4) A warrant of arrest shall not be executed if the party at whose instance it was issued files a written request to that effect with the Bailiff. (5) A warrant of arrest issued against freight may be executed by serving the warrant on the cargo in respect of which the freight is payable or on the ship in which that cargo was carried or on both of them. (6) Subject to paragraph (5), a warrant of arrest must be served on the property against which it is issued. (7) Within 7 days after the service of a warrant of arrest, the warrant must be filed in the Court office by the Bailiff. 11. Service on ships, etc.: how effected (O.75, r.11) 11. (1) Subject to paragraph (2), service of a warrant of arrest or writ in an action in rem against a ship, freight or cargo shall be effected by \u2014 (a) affixing the warrant or writ for a short time on any mast of the ship or on the outside of any suitable part of the ship's superstructure; and (b) on removing the warrant or writ, leaving a copy of it affixed (in the case of the writ) on a sheltered, conspicuous part of the ship. (2) Service of a warrant of arrest or writ in an action in rem against freight or cargo or both shall, if the cargo has been landed or transshipped be effected \u2014 (a) by placing the warrant or writ for a short time on the cargo, and, on removing the warrant or writ, leaving a copy of it on the cargo; or (b) if the cargo is in the custody of a person who will not permit access to it, by leaving a copy of the warrant or writ with that person. (3) Order 65, rule 10, shall not apply in relation to a warrant of arrest or writ in rem. 12. Directions with respect to property under arrest (O.75, r.12) 12. (1) The Bailiff may at any time apply to the Court for directions with respect to property under arrest in an action and may, or, if the Court so directs, shall, give notice of the application to any or all of the parties referred to in paragraph (2). (2) The Bailiff shall send a copy of any order made under paragraph (1) to all those persons who, in relation to that property, have \u2014 (a) entered a caveat which is still in force; or ORDER 75 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (b) caused a warrant for the arrest of the property to be executed by the Bailiff; or (c) acknowledged issue of service of the writ in any action in which the property is under arrest; or (d) intervened in any action in which the property is under arrest. (3) A person other than the Bailiff may make an application under this rule by summons or motion in the action in which the property is under arrest and the summons or notice of motion together with copies of any affidavit in support must be served upon the Bailiff and all persons referred to in paragraph (2) unless the Court otherwise orders on an application made ex parte. 13. Release of property under arrest (O.75, r.13) 13. (1) Except where property arrested in pursuance of a warrant of arrest is sold under an order of the Court, property which has been so arrested shall be released only under the authority of an instrument of release (in this rule referred to as a \\\"release\\\"), in Form No. 7 of RSC Appendix B, issued out of the Court office. (2) A release shall not be issued with respect to property as to which a caveat against a release is in force, unless, either \u2014 (a) at the time of the issue of the release the property is under arrest in one or more other actions; or (b) the Court so orders. (3) A release may be issued at the instance of a party interested in the property under arrest if the Court so orders, or, subject to paragraph (2), if all the other parties, except any defendant who has not acknowledged issue or service of the writ, consent. (4) Before property under arrest is released in compliance with a release issued under this rule, the party at whose instance it was issued must, in accordance with the directions of the Bailiff either \u2014 (a) pay the fees of the Bailiff already incurred and file in the Court office an undertaking to pay on demand the other fees and expenses in connection with the arrest of the property and the care and custody of it while under arrest and of its release; or (b) file in the Court office an undertaking to pay on demand all such fees and expenses, whether incurred or to be incurred. (5) The Court, on the application of any party who objects to directions given to that party by the Bailiff under paragraph (4), may vary or revoke the directions. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 75 14. Caveat against release, etc. (O.75, r.14) 14. (1) A person who desires to prevent the release of any property under arrest in an action in rem and the payment out of Court of any money in Court representing the proceeds of sale of that property must file in the Court office a praecipe in Form No. 9 of RSC Appendix B, and on the filing of the praecipe a caveat against the issue of a release with respect to that property and the payment out of Court of that money shall be entered in the caveat book. (2) Where the release of any property under arrest is delayed by the entry of a caveat under this rule, any person having an interest in that property may apply to the Court by motion for an order requiring the person who procured the entry of the caveat to pay to the applicant damages in respect of the loss suffered by the applicant by reason of the delay, and the Court, unless it is satisfied that the person procuring the entry of the caveat had a good and sufficient reason for so doing, may make an order accordingly. 15. Duration of caveats (O.75, r.15) 15. (1) Every caveat entered in the caveat book is valid for 12 months beginning with the date of its entry but the person at whose instance a caveat was entered may withdraw it by filing a praecipe in Form No. 10 of RSC Appendix B. (2) The period of validity of a caveat may not be extended but this provision shall not be taken as preventing the entry of successive caveats. 16. Bail (O.75, r.16) 16. (1) Bail on behalf of a party to an action in rem must be given by bond in Form No. 11 of RSC Appendix B; and the sureties to the bond must enter into the bond before a Justice of the Peace. (2) Subject to paragraph (3), a surety to a bail bond must make an affidavit stating that the surety is able to pay the sum for which the bond is given. (3) Where a corporation is a surety to a bail bond given on behalf of a party, no affidavit shall be made under paragraph (2) on behalf of the corporation unless the opposite party requires it, but where such an affidavit is required it must be made by a director, manager, secretary or other similar officer of the corporation. (4) The party on whose behalf bail is given must serve on the opposite party a notice of bail containing the names and addresses of the persons who have given bail on the party\u2019s behalf and of the Justice of the Peace before whom the bail bond was entered into; and after the expiration of 24 hours from the service of the notice (or sooner with the consent of the opposite party) the party may file the bond and must at the same time file the affidavits (if any) made under paragraph (2) and an affidavit proving due service of the notice of bail to which a copy of that notice must be exhibited. ORDER 75 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 17. Interveners (O.75, r.17) 17. (1) Where property against which an action in rem is brought is under arrest or money representing the proceeds of sale of that property is in Court, a person who has an interest in that property or money but who is not a defendant to the action may, with the leave of the Court, intervene in the action. (2) An application for the grant of leave under this rule must be made ex parte by affidavit showing the interest of the applicant in the property against which the action is brought or in the money in Court. (3) A person to whom leave is granted to intervene in an action under this rule shall thereupon become a party to the action. (4) The Court may order that a person to whom it grants leave to intervene in an action shall, within such period as may be specified in the order, serve on every other party to the action such pleading as may be so specified. 18. Preliminary acts (O.75, r.18) 18. (1) In an action to enforce a claim for damage, loss of life or personal injury arising out of a collision between ships, unless the Court otherwise orders, the plaintiff must, within 2 months after issue of the writ, and the defendant must, within 2 months after acknowledging issue or service of the writ in the action, and before any pleading is served, file in the Court office a document (in these Rules referred to as a preliminary act) containing a statement of the following particulars \u2014 (a) the names of the ships which came into collision and their ports of registry; (b) the date and time of the collision; (c) the place of the collision; (d) the direction and force of the wind; (e) the state of the weather; (f) the state, direction and force of the tidal or other current; (g) the course steered and speed through the water of the ship when the other ship was first seen or immediately before any measures were taken with reference to the first ship\u2019s presence, whichever was the earlier; (h) the lights or shapes (if any) carried by the ship; (i)    (i) the distance and bearing of the other ship if and when its echo was first observed by radar; (ii) the distance, bearing and approximate heading of the other ship when first seen; (j) what light or combination of lights (if any) of the other ship was first seen; (k) what other lights or combinations of lights (if any) of the other ship were subsequently seen before the collision, and when; Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 75 (l) what alterations (if any) were made to the course and speed of the ship after the earlier of the two times referred to in subparagraph (g) up to the time of the collision, and when, and what measures (if any), other than alterations of course or speed, were taken to avoid the collision, and when; (m) the heading of the ship, the parts of each ship which first came into contact and the approximate angle between the two ships at the moment of contact; (n) what sound signals (if any) were given, and when; (o) what sound signals (if any) were heard from the other ship, and when. (2) Every preliminary act shall be sealed by the Clerk of the Court and shall be filed in a closed envelope (stamped with an official stamp showing the date of filing) and, unless the Court otherwise orders, no envelope shall be opened until the pleadings are closed and a consent signed by each of the parties or the parties\u2019 attorney to the opening of the preliminary acts filed in the Court office. (2A) A defendant who has filed a preliminary act must within 7 days thereafter serve notice of filing on all other parties to the action. (3) Where the Court orders the preliminary acts to be opened, the Court may further order the action to be tried without pleadings but, where the Court orders the action to be so tried, any party who intends to rely on the defence of compulsory pilotage must give notice of the party\u2019s intention to do so to the other parties within 7 days after the opening of the preliminary acts. (4) Where the Court orders the action to be tried without pleadings, it may also order each party, within such period as may be specified in the order, to file a statement of the grounds on which the party charges any other party with negligence in connection with the collision and to serve a copy thereof on that other party. (5) Order 18, rule 1, shall not apply to an action in which preliminary acts are required but, unless the Court orders the action to be tried without pleadings, the plaintiff must serve a statement of claim on each defendant within 14 days after the latest date on which the preliminary act of any party to the action is filed. 19. Failure to file preliminary act: proceedings against party in default (O.75, r.19) 19. (1) Where in such an action as is referred to in rule 18(1) the plaintiff fails to file a preliminary act within the prescribed period, any defendant who has filed such an act may apply to the Court by summons for an order to dismiss the action or make such other order on such terms as it thinks just. (2) Where in such an action, being an action in personam, a defendant fails to file a preliminary act within the prescribed period, O.19, rr.2 and 3, shall apply as if the defendant's failure to file the preliminary act within that period was a failure by the defendant to serve a defence on the plaintiff within the period fixed by ORDER 75 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) order under these Rules for service thereof, and the plaintiff, if the plaintiff has filed a preliminary act may, subject to O.77, r.9, accordingly enter judgment against the defendant in accordance with the said rule 2 or the said rule 3, as the circumstances of the case require. (3) Where in such an action, being an action in rem, a defendant fails to file a preliminary act within the prescribed period, the plaintiff, if the plaintiff has filed such an act, may apply to the Court by motion for judgment against that defendant, and it shall not be necessary for the plaintiff to file or serve a statement of claim or an affidavit before the hearing of the motion. (4) On the hearing of a motion under paragraph (3) the Court may make such order as it thinks just, and where the defendant does not appear on the hearing and the Court is of opinion that judgment should be given for the plaintiff provided the plaintiff proves the plaintiff\u2019s case, it shall order the plaintiff's preliminary act to be opened and require the plaintiff to satisfy the Court that the plaintiff\u2019s claim is well founded. The plaintiff's evidence may, unless the Court otherwise orders, be given by affidavit without any order or direction in that behalf. (5) Where the plaintiff in accordance with a requirement under paragraph (4) satisfies the Court that the plaintiff\u2019s claim is well founded, the Court may give judgment for the claim with or without a reference to the Clerk of the Court and may at the same time order the property against which the action is brought to be appraised and sold and the proceeds to be paid into Court or make such order as it thinks just. (6) The Court may, on such terms as it thinks just, set aside any judgment entered in pursuance of this rule. (7) In this rule references to the prescribed period shall be construed as references to the period within which by virtue of rule 18(1) or of any order of the Court the plaintiff or defendant, as the context of the reference requires, is required to file a preliminary act. 20. Special provisions as to pleadings in collision, etc., actions (O.75, r.20) 20. (1) Notwithstanding anything in O.18, r.3, the plaintiff in any such action as is referred to in rule 1(3)(a) may not serve a reply or a defence to counterclaim on the defendant except with the leave of the Court. (2) If in such an action there is a counterclaim and no defence to counterclaim by the plaintiff, then, notwithstanding O.18, r.14(3), but without prejudice to the other provisions of that rule, there is an implied joinder of issue on the counterclaim, and the joinder of issue operates as a denial of every material allegation of fact made in the counterclaim. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 75 21. Judgment by default (O.75, r.21) 21. (1) Where a writ is served under rule 8(4) on a party at whose instance a caveat against arrest was issued, then if \u2014 (a) the sum claimed in the action begun by the writ does not exceed the amount specified in the undertaking given by that party or that party\u2019s attorney to procure the entry of the caveat; and (b) that party or that party\u2019s attorney does not within 14 days after service of the writ fulfil the undertaking given by that party as aforesaid, the plaintiff may, after filing an affidavit verifying the facts on which the action is based, apply to the Court for judgment by default. (2) Judgment given under paragraph (1) may be enforced by the arrest of the property against which the action was brought and by committal of the party at whose instance the caveat with respect to that property was entered. (3) Where a defendant to an action in rem fails to acknowledge service of the writ within the time limited for doing so, then, on the expiration of 14 days after service of the writ and upon filing an affidavit proving due service of the writ, an affidavit verifying the facts on which the action is based and, if a statement of claim was not indorsed on the writ, a copy of the statement of claim, the plaintiff may apply to the Court for judgment by default. Where the writ is deemed to have been duly served on the defendant by virtue of O.10, r.1(2), or was served by the Bailiff under rule 8 of this Order, an affidavit proving due service of the writ need not be filed under this paragraph, but the writ indorsed as mentioned in the said rule 1(2) or indorsed as mentioned in 8(3A) must be filed with the affidavit verifying the facts on which the action is based. (4) Where a defendant to an action in rem fails to serve a defence on the plaintiff, then after the expiration of the period fixed by or under these Rules for service of the defence and upon filing an affidavit stating that no defence was served on the plaintiff by that defendant during that period, an affidavit verifying the facts on which the action is based and, if a statement of claim was not indorsed on the writ, a copy of the statement of claim, the plaintiff may apply to the Court for judgment by default. (5) Where a defendant to a counterclaim in an action in rem fails to serve a defence to counterclaim on the defendant making the counterclaim, then, subject to paragraph (6), after the expiration of the period fixed by or under these Rules for service of the defence to counterclaim and upon filing an affidavit stating that no defence to counterclaim was served on the defendant by the first mentioned defendant during that period, an affidavit verifying the facts on which the counterclaim is based and a copy of the counterclaim, the defendant making the counterclaim may apply to the Court for judgment by default. ORDER 75 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (6) No application may be made under paragraph (5) against the plaintiff in any such action as is referred to in rule 1(3)(a). (7) An application to the Court under this rule must be made by motion and if, on the hearing of the motion, the Court is satisfied that the applicant's claim is well founded it may give judgment for the claim with or without the reference to the Clerk of the Court and may at the same time order the property against which the action or, as the case may be, counterclaim is brought to be appraised and sold and the proceeds to be paid into Court or may make such other order as it thinks just. (8) In default actions in rem evidence may, unless the Court otherwise orders, be given by affidavit without any order or direction in that behalf. (9) The Court may, on such terms as it thinks just, set aside or vary any judgment entered in pursuance of this rule. (10) O.13 and O.19 (except rule 1) shall not apply to actions in rem. 22. Order for sale of ship: determination of priority of claims (O.75, r.22) 22. (1) Where in an action in rem against a ship the Court has ordered the ship to be sold, any party who has obtained judgment against the ship or proceeds of sale of the ship may \u2014 (a) in a case where the order for sale contains the further order referred to in paragraph (2), after the expiration of the period specified in the order under subparagraph (2)(a); or (b) in any other case, after obtaining judgment, apply to the Court by motion for an order determining the order of priority of the claims against the proceeds of sale of the ship. (2) Where in an action in rem against a ship the Court orders the ship to be sold, it may further order \u2014 (a) that the order of priority of the claims against the proceeds of the sale shall not be determined until after the expiration of 90 days, or of such other period as the Court may specify, beginning with the day on which the proceeds of sale are paid into Court; (b) that any party to the action or to any other action in rem against the ship or the proceeds of sale thereof may apply to the Court in the action to which that party is a party to extend the period specified in the order; (c) that within 7 days after the date of payment into Court of the proceeds of sale the Clerk of the Court shall send for publication in the Gazette, Lloyd's List and Shipping Gazette and such other newspaper, if any, as the Court may direct a notice complying with paragraph (3). (3) The notice referred to in subparagraph (2)(c) must state \u2014 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 75 (a) that the ship (naming that ship) has been sold by order of the Court in an action in rem, identifying the action; (b) that the gross proceeds of the sale, specifying the amount thereof, have been paid into Court; (c) that the order of priority of the claims against the said proceeds will not be determined until after the expiration of the period (specifying it) specified in the order for sale; and (d) that any person with a claim against the ship or the proceeds of sale thereof, on which the person intends to proceed to judgment should do so before the expiration of that period. (4) The expenses incurred by the Clerk of the Court in complying with an order of the Court under this rule shall be included in the Clerk of the Court\u2019s expenses relating to the sale of the ship. (5) An application to the Court to extend the period referred to in subparagraph (2)(a) must be made by motion, and a copy of the notice of motion, must, at least 3 days before the day fixed for the hearing thereof, be served on each party who has begun an action in rem against the ship or the proceeds of sale thereof. 23. Appraisement and sale of property (O.75, r.23) 23. (1) A commission for the appraisement and sale of any property under an order of the Court shall not be issued until the party applying for it has filed a praecipe in Form No. 12 of RSC Appendix B. (2) Such a commission must, unless the Court otherwise orders, be executed by the Clerk of the Court and must be in Form No. 13 of RSC Appendix B. (3) A commission for appraisement and sale shall not be executed until an undertaking in writing satisfactory to the Clerk of the Court to pay the fees and expenses of the Bailiff on demand has been filed. (4) The Bailiff shall pay into Court the gross proceeds of the sale of any property sold by the Bailiff under a commission for sale and shall bring into Court the account relating to the sale (with vouchers in support) for taxation. (5) On the taxation of the Bailiff's account relating to a sale any person interested in the proceeds of the sale shall be entitled to be heard, and any decision made on the taxation shall be subject to review by the Court. 23A. Undertakings as to expenses, etc. (O.75, r.23A) 23A. (1) Every undertaking under rule 8(3), 10(3), 13(4) or 23(3) shall be given in writing to the satisfaction of the Clerk of the Court. (2) Where a party is required by rule 8(3), 10(3), 13(4) or 23(3) to give to the Bailiff an undertaking to pay any fees or expenses, the Bailiff or the Clerk of the Court, as the case may be, may accept instead of the undertaking the deposit with the ORDER 75 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) Bailiff or the Clerk of the Court of such sum as the Bailiff considers reasonable to meet those fees and expenses. (3) The Court may on the application of any party who is dissatisfied with a direction or determination under rule 13(5) or this rule, vary or revoke the direction or determination. 24. Payment into and out of Court (O.75, r.24) 24. (1) O.22 (except rr.3, 4 and 5) shall apply in relation to an admiralty action as it applies to an action for debt or damages. (2) Subject to paragraph (3), money paid into Court shall not be paid out except in pursuance of an order of the Court. (3) The Clerk of the Court may, with the consent of the parties interested in money paid into Court, order the money to be paid out to the person entitled thereto in the following cases, that is to say \u2014 (a) where property has been sold and the proceeds of sale thereof paid into Court, and the parties are agreed as to the persons to whom the proceeds shall be paid and the amount to be paid to each of those persons; (b) where in any other case there is no dispute between the parties. 25. Summons for directions (O.75, r.25) 25. (1) Order 25 shall apply to admiralty actions (other than limitation actions) as it applies to other actions, except that \u2014 (a) the summons for directions shall be returnable in not less than 21 days; (b) any notice under O.25, r.7(1), must be served within 14 days after service of the summons for directions on the party giving the notice. (2) An order made on the summons for directions shall determine whether the trial is to be without assessors or with one or more assessors, whether nautical assessors or other assessors. (3) The trial shall be before a Judge without jury unless, on the ground that there are special reasons to the contrary, an order made on the summons for directions otherwise provides. (4) Any such order or direction as is referred to in paragraph (2) or (3) (including an order made on appeal) may be varied or revoked by a subsequent order or direction made or given by the Court at or before the trial. 26. Fixing date for trial, etc. (O.75, r.26) 26. (1) The date for trial of an admiralty action shall be fixed by the Judge at the hearing of the summons for directions, unless the Court otherwise directs. (2) Order 34 shall apply to admiralty actions subject to the following and any other necessary modifications \u2014 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 75 (a) the bundles referred to in rule 10(1) shall include any preliminary acts and any notice given under rule 18(3) or filed under 18(4) of this Order, and where trial with one or more assessors has been ordered an additional bundle shall be delivered to the Clerk of the Court for the purpose of each assessor; and (b) in an action which has been ordered to be tried with an assessor or assessors the attorney to the party setting it down must file in the Court office an undertaking to pay the proper fees and expenses of such assessor or assessors. (3) If all the parties to an action consent, the action may be withdrawn without the leave of the Court at any time before trial by producing to the Clerk of the Court a written consent to the action being withdrawn signed by all the parties. 27. Stay of proceedings in collision, etc., actions until security given (O.75, r.27) 27. Where an action in rem, being an action to enforce any such claim as is referred to in rule 1(3)(a), is begun and a cross action in rem arising out of the same collision or other occurrence as the first mentioned action is subsequently begun, or a counterclaim arising out of that occurrence is made in the first mentioned action, then \u2014 (a) if the ship in respect of or against which the first mentioned action is brought has been arrested or security given to prevent that ship\u2019s arrest; but (b) the ship in respect of or against which the cross action is brought or the counterclaim made cannot be arrested and security has not been given to satisfy any judgment given in favour of the party bringing the cross action or making the counterclaim, the Court may stay proceedings in the first mentioned action until security is given to satisfy any judgment given in favour of that party. 28. Inspection of ship, etc. (O.75, r.28) 28. Without prejudice to its powers under O.29, rr.2 and 3, and O.35, r.8, the Court may, on the application of any party, make an order for the inspection by the assessors (if the action is tried with assessors), or by any party or witness, of any ship or other property, whether real or personal, the inspection of which may be necessary or desirable for the purpose of obtaining full information or evidence in connection with any issue in the action. 29. No rule (O.75, r.29) 29. No rule (O.75, r.29) ORDER 75 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 30. Examination of witnesses and other persons (O.75, r.30) 30. (1) The power conferred by O39, r.1, shall extend to the making of an order authorising the examination of a witness or person on oath before a Judge sitting in Court as if for the trial of the cause or matter, without that cause or matter having been set down for trial or called on for trial. (2) The power conferred by the said O.39, r.1, shall also extend to the making of an order, with the consent of the parties, providing for the evidence of a witness being taken as if before an examiner, but without an examiner actually being appointed or being present. (3) Where an order is made under paragraph (2), it may make provision for any consequential matters and, subject to any provision so made, the following provisions shall have effect \u2014 (a) the party whose witness is to be examined shall provide a shorthand writer to take down the evidence of the witness; (b) any representative, being an attorney, of either of the parties shall have authority to administer the oath to the witness; (c) the shorthand writer need not themselves be sworn but shall certify in writing as correct a transcript of the shorthand writer\u2019s notes of the evidence and deliver it to the attorney for the party whose witness was examined, and that attorney shall file it in the Court office; (d) unless the parties otherwise agree or the Court otherwise orders, the transcript or a copy thereof shall, before the transcript is filed, be made available to the attorney or other persons who acted as advocates at the examination, and if any of those persons is of opinion that the transcript does not accurately represent the evidence the person shall make a certificate specifying the corrections which in the person\u2019s opinion should be made therein, and that certificate must be filed with the transcript. (4) In actions in which preliminary acts fall to be filed under rule 18, an order shall not be made under O.39, r.1, authorising any examination of a witness before the preliminary acts have been filed, unless for special reasons the Court thinks fit so to direct. 31. Trial without pleadings (O.75, r.31) 31. Order 18, rule 21, shall apply to admiralty as it applies to other actions except that the summons must be served on every other party not less than 7 clear days before the day specified in the summons for the hearing thereof. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 75 32. Further provisions with respect to evidence (O.75, r.32) 32. (1) Unless the Court otherwise directs, O.38, r.21(1), shall not apply in relation to any statement which is admissible in evidence by virtue of Section 32, 34 or 35 of the Evidence Act (as amended and revised) and which an applicant for judgment in default under rule 19 or 21 desires to give in evidence at the hearing of the motion by which the application for judgment is made. (2) Unless the Court otherwise directs, an affidavit for the purposes of rule 19(4), 21 or 38(2) may, except insofar as it relates to the service of a writ, contain statements of information or belief with the sources and grounds thereof. 33. Proceedings for apportionment of salvage (O.75, r.33) 33. (1) Proceedings for the apportionment of salvage, the aggregate amount of which has already been ascertained, shall be begun in the Court office by originating motion. (2) The notice of such motion, together with the affidavits in support thereof, must be filed in the Court office at least 7 days before the hearing of the motion, unless the Court gives leave to the contrary, and a copy of the notice and of the affidavits must be served on all the other parties to the proceedings before the originals are filed. 33A. No rule (O.75, r.33A) 33A. No rule (O.75, r.33A) 34. Notice of motion in actions in rem (O.75, r.34) 34. (1) The affidavits, if any, in support of a motion in an action in rem must be filed when the notice of motion is issued. (2) A notice of motion, except a motion for judgment in default, must be served on all caveators together with copies of the affidavits, if any, in support of the motion at least 4 clear days before the hearing, unless the Court gives leave to the contrary. 35. Agreement between attorneys may be made an order of Court (O.75, r.35) 35. Any agreement in writing between the attorneys of the parties to a cause or matter, dated and signed by those attorneys, may, if the Judge thinks it reasonable, be filed in the Court office, and the agreement shall thereupon become an order of Court. 36. No rule (O.75, r.36) 36. No rule (O.75, r.36) ORDER 75 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 37. Limitation action: parties (O.75, r.37) 37. (1) In a limitation action the person seeking relief shall be the plaintiff and shall be named in the writ by the person\u2019s name and not described merely as the owner of, or as bearing some other relation to, a particular ship or other property. (2) The plaintiff must make one of the persons with claims against the plaintiff in respect of the casualty to which the action relates defendant to the action and may make any or all of the others defendants also. (3) At least one of the defendants to the action must be named in the writ by the defendant\u2019s name but the other defendants may be described generally and not named by their names. (4) The writ must be served on one or more of the defendants who are named by their names therein and need not be served on any other defendant. (5) In this rule and rules 38, 39 and 40 \\\"name\\\" includes a firm name or the name under which a person carries on that person\u2019s business, and where any person with a claim against the plaintiff in respect of the casualty to which the action relates has described themselves for the purposes of the person\u2019s claim merely as the owner of, or as bearing some other relation to, a ship or other property, that person may be so described as defendant in the writ and, if so described, shall be deemed for the purposes of the rules aforesaid to have been named in the writ by that person\u2019s name. 37A. Limitation action: payment into Court (O.75, r.37A) 37A. (1) The plaintiff may constitute a limitation fund by paying into Court the currency equivalent of the number of special drawing rights to which the plaintiff claims to be entitled to limit the plaintiff\u2019s liability under the United Kingdom\u2019s Merchant Shipping Act 1979 together with interest thereon from the date of the occurrence giving rise to the plaintiff\u2019s liability to the date of payment into Court. (2) A limitation fund may be constituted under paragraph (1) in any designated currency and references in this rule to the \\\"currency equivalent\\\" means the equivalent in the designated currency of the relevant number of special drawing rights. (3) Where the plaintiff does not know the currency equivalent of the said number of special drawing rights on the date of payment into Court the plaintiff may calculate the same on the basis of the latest available published currency equivalent of a special drawing right as fixed by the International Monetary Fund, and in the event of the currency equivalent of a special drawing right on the date of payment into Court under paragraph (1) being different from that used for calculating the amount of that payment into Court, the plaintiff may \u2014 (a) make up any deficiency by making a further payment into Court which, if made within 14 days after the payment into Court under paragraph (1), Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 75 shall be treated, except for the purposes of the rules relating to the accrual of interest on money paid into Court, as if it had been made on the date of that payment into Court; or (b) apply to the Court for payment out of any excess amount (together with any interest accrued thereon) paid into Court under paragraph (1). (4) An application under subparagraph (3)(b) may be made ex parte and must be supported by evidence proving the currency equivalent of the appropriate number of special drawing rights on the date of payment into Court. (5) On making any payment into Court under this Rule, the plaintiff shall give notice thereof in writing to every defendant, specifying the date of payment in, the amount paid in, the amount of interest included therein, the rate of such interest and the period to which it relates. The plaintiff shall also give notice in writing to every defendant of any excess amount (and any interest thereon) paid out to the plaintiff under subparagraph (3)(b). (6) O.22, r.13, shall apply to a limitation action as it applies to an action for debt or damages, and rule 24(2) and (3) of this Order shall apply with the necessary modifications to the payment out of money paid into Court under this rule. 38. Limitation action: summons for decree or directions (O.75, r.38) 38. (1) Within 7 days after the acknowledgment of issue or service of the writ by one of the defendants named therein by their names or, if one of them acknowledges issue or service, within 7 days after the time limited for acknowledging service the plaintiff, without serving a statement of claim, must take out a summons returnable in Chambers before a Judge asking for a decree limiting the plaintiff\u2019s liability or, in default of such a decree, for directions as to the further proceedings in the action. (2) The summons must be supported by an affidavit or affidavits proving \u2014 (a) the plaintiff's case in the action; and (b) if none of the defendants named in the writ by their names has entered an appearance, service of the writ on at least one of the defendants so named. (3) The affidavit in support of the summons must state \u2014 (a) the names of all the persons who, to the knowledge of the plaintiff, have claims against the plaintiff in respect of the casualty to which the action relates, not being defendants to the action who are named in the writ by their names; and (b) the address of each of those persons, if known to the plaintiff. (4) The summons and every affidavit in support thereof must, at least 7 days before the hearing of the summons, be served on any defendant who has acknowledged issue or service of the writ. ORDER 75 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (5) On the hearing of the summons the Judge, if it appears to the Judge that the plaintiff has a right to limit the plaintiff\u2019s liability, shall make a decree limiting the plaintiff's liability and fix the amount to which the liability is to be limited. (6) On the hearing of the summons the Judge, if it appears to the Judge that any defendant has not sufficient information to enable the defendant to decide whether or not to dispute that the plaintiff has a right to limit the plaintiff\u2019s liability, shall give such directions as appear to the Judge to be appropriate for enabling the defendant to obtain such information and shall adjourn the hearing. (7) If on the hearing or resumed hearing of the summons the Judge does not make a decree limiting the plaintiff's liability, the Judge shall give such directions as to the further proceedings in the action as appear to the Judge to be appropriate including, in particular, a direction requiring the taking out of a summons for directions under O.25, and if the Judge gives no such direction, a direction fixing the period within which any notice under O.38, r.21, must be served. (8) Any defendant who, after the Judge has given directions under paragraph (7), ceases to dispute the plaintiff's right to limit the plaintiff\u2019s liability must forthwith file a notice to that effect in the Court office and serve a copy on the plaintiff and on any other defendant who has acknowledged issue or service of the writ. (9) If every defendant who disputes the plaintiff's right to limit the plaintiff\u2019s liability serves a notice on the plaintiff under paragraph (8) the plaintiff may take out a summons returnable in Chambers before the Judge asking for a decree limiting the plaintiff\u2019s liability; and paragraphs (4) and (5) shall apply to a summons under this paragraph as they apply to a summons under paragraph (1). 39. Limitation action: proceedings under decree (O.75, r.39) 39. (1) Where the only defendants in a limitation action are those named in the writ by their names and all the persons so named have either been served with the writ or acknowledge the issue thereof, any decree in the action limiting the plaintiff's liability \u2014 (a) need not be advertised; but (b) shall only operate to protect the plaintiff in respect of claims by the persons so named or persons claiming through or under them. (2) In any case not falling within paragraph (1), any decree in the action limiting the plaintiff's liability \u2014 (a) shall be advertised by the plaintiff in such manner and within such time as may be provided by the decree; (b) shall fix a time within which persons with claims against the plaintiff in respect of the casualty to which the action relates may acknowledge issue of the writ (if they have not already done so) and file their claims, and, in Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 75 cases to which rule 40 applies, take out a summons, if they think fit, to set the order aside. (3) The advertisement to be required under subparagraph (2)(a), shall, unless for special reasons the Judge thinks fit otherwise to provide, be a single advertisement in a newspaper specified in the decree, identifying the action, the casualty and the relation to the plaintiff thereto (whether as owner of a ship involved in the casualty or otherwise as the case may be), stating that the decree has been made and specifying the amount fixed thereby for the entering of appearances, the filing of claims and the taking out of summonses to set the decree aside. The plaintiff must within the time fixed under subparagraph (2)(b) file in the Court office a copy of the newspaper in which the advertisement required under subparagraph (2)(a) appears. (4) The time to be allowed under subparagraph (2)(b) shall, unless for special reasons the Judge thinks fit otherwise to provide, be not less than 2 months from the latest date allowed for the appearance of the advertisements; and after the expiration of the time so allowed, no claim may be filed or summons taken out to set aside the decree except with the leave of the Judge. (5) Save as aforesaid, on the making of any decree limiting the plaintiff's liability arising out of an occurrence the Court may distribute the limitation fund and may stay any proceedings relating to any claim arising out of that occurrence which are pending against the plaintiff. 40. Limitation action: proceedings to set aside decree (O.75, r.40) 40. (1) Where a decree limiting the plaintiff's liability fixes a time in accordance with rule 39(2), any person with a claim against the plaintiff in respect of the casualty to which the action relates, who \u2014 (a) was not named by the person\u2019s name in the writ as a defendant to the action; or (b) if so named, neither was served with the writ nor has acknowledged the issue thereof, may, within that time, after acknowledging issue of the writ, take out a summons returnable in Chambers before a Judge asking that the decree be set aside. (2) The summons must be supported by an affidavit or affidavits showing that the defendant in question has a bona fide claim against the plaintiff in respect of the casualty in question and that the defendant has sufficient prima facie grounds for the contention that the plaintiff is not entitled to the relief given the plaintiff by the decree. ORDER 75 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (3) The summons and every affidavit in support thereof must, at least 7 clear days before the hearing of the summons, be served on the plaintiff and any defendant who has acknowledged issue or service of the writ. (4) On hearing the summons the Judge, if the Judge is satisfied that the defendant in question has a bona fide claim against the plaintiff and sufficient prima facie grounds for the contention that the plaintiff is not entitled to the relief given the plaintiff by the decree, shall set the decree aside and give such directions as to the further proceedings in the action as appear to the Judge to be appropriate including, in particular, a direction requiring the taking out of a summons for directions under O.25. 41. No rule (O.75, r.41) 41. No rule (O.75, r.41) 42. No rule (O.75, r.42) 42. No rule (O.75, r.42) 43. No rule (O.75, r.43) 43. No rule (O.75, r.43)\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}, {\"eId\": \"sec_44\", \"num\": \"44.\", \"text\": \"No rule (O.75, r.44) 44. No rule (O.75, r.44) 45. Drawing up and filing judgments and orders (O.75, r.45) 45. Every judgment given or order made in an admiralty cause or a matter shall be drawn up and filed in accordance with O.42, r.5. GCR 1995 (Revised) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 76 ORDER 76 CONTENTIOUS PROBATE PROCEEDINGS 1. Application and interpretation (O.76, r.1) 1. (1) This Order applies to probate causes and matters, and the other provisions of these Rules apply to those causes and matters subject to the provisions of this Order. (2) In these Rules \\\"probate action\\\" means an action for the grant of probate of the will, or letters of administration of the estate, of a deceased person or for the revocation of such a grant or for a decree pronouncing for or against the validity of an alleged will, not being an action which is non-contentious or common form probate business. (3) In this Order \u2014 (a) \\\"will\\\" includes a codicil; (b) \\\"the Probate Rules\\\" means the Probate and Administration Rules (as amended and revised) made under the Succession Act (as amended and revised); (c) \\\"the Registry\\\" means the Probate Registry created under rule 3 of the Probate Rules. 2. Requirements in connection with issue of writ (O.76, r.2) 2. (1) A probate action must be begun by writ and the requirements of O.5, r.1(4) shall apply notwithstanding that a file has already been created in the Registry pursuant to rule 4 of the Probate Rules. (2) Before a writ beginning a probate action is issued it must be indorsed with \u2014 (a) a statement of the nature of the interest of the plaintiff and of the defendant in the estate of the deceased to which the action relates; and (b) the Probate Registry file number, if any, of the relevant estate. 3. Parties to action to revocation of grant (O.76, r.3) 3. Every person who is entitled or claims to be entitled to administer the estate of a deceased person under or by virtue of an unrevoked grant of probate of the deceased person\u2019s will or letters of administration of the deceased person\u2019s grant shall be made a party to any action for revocation of the grant. 4. No rule (O.76, r.4) 4. No rule (O.76, r.4) ORDER 76 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 5. Affidavit of testamentary scripts (O.76, r.5) 5. (1) Unless the Court otherwise directs, the plaintiff and every defendant who has acknowledged service of the writ in a probate action must swear an affidavit \u2014 (a) describing any testamentary script of the deceased person, whose estate is the subject of the action, of which the plaintiff and every defendant has any knowledge or, if such be the case, stating that that person knows of no such script; and (b) if any such script of which the plaintiff and every defendant has knowledge is not in that person\u2019s possession or under that person\u2019s control, giving the name and address of the person in whose possession or under whose control it is or, if such be the case, stating that the plaintiff and every defendant does not know the name or address of that person. (2) Any affidavit required by this rule must be filed on the Court file before the action is listed for trial. (3) Where any testamentary script required by this rule to be filed or any part thereof is written in pencil, then, unless the Court otherwise directs, a facsimile copy of that script, or of the page or pages thereof containing the part written in pencil, must also be filed and the words which appear in pencil in the original must be underlined in red ink in the copy. (4) Except with the leave of the Court, a party to a probate action shall not be allowed to inspect an affidavit filed, or any testamentary script referred to therein by any other party to the action under this rule, unless and until an affidavit sworn by that party containing the information referred to in paragraph (1) has been filed. (5) In this rule \\\"testamentary script\\\" means a will or draft thereof, written instructions for a will made by or at the request or under the instructions of the testator and any documents purporting to be evidence of the contents, or to be a copy, of a will which is alleged to have been lost or destroyed. 6. Failure to acknowledge service (O.76, r.6) 6. (1) Order 13 shall not apply in relation to a probate action. (2) Where any of several defendants to a probate action fails to acknowledge service of the writ, the plaintiff upon filing an affidavit proving due service of the writ on that defendant may, after the time limited for appearing, proceed with the action as if that defendant had acknowledged service. (3) Where the defendant, or all the defendants, to the probate action, fails or fail to acknowledge service of the writ then, unless on the application of the plaintiff the Court orders the action to be discontinued, the plaintiff may after the time limited for acknowledging service by the defendant apply to the Court for an order for trial of the action. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 76 (4) Before applying for an order under paragraph (3) the plaintiff must file an affidavit proving due service of the writ on the defendant and, if no statement of claim is indorsed on the writ, the plaintiff must file a statement of claim. (5) Where the Court grants an order under paragraph (3), it may direct the action to be tried on affidavit evidence. 7. Service of statement of claim (O.76, r.7) 7. The plaintiff in a probate action must, unless the Court gives leave to the contrary or unless a statement of claim is indorsed on the writ, serve a statement of claim on every defendant who acknowledges service of the writ in the action and must do so before the expiration of 6 weeks after acknowledgment of service by that defendant or of 14 days after the filing by that defendant of an affidavit under rule 5, whichever is the later. 8. Counterclaim (O.76, r.8) 8. (1) Notwithstanding anything in O.25, r.2(1), a defendant to a probate action who alleges that the defendant has any claim or is entitled to any relief or remedy in respect of any matter relating to the grant of probate of the will, or letters of administration of the estate, of the deceased person which is the subject of the action, must add to the defendant\u2019s defence a counterclaim in respect of that matter. (2) If the plaintiff fails to serve a statement of claim, any such defendant may, with the leave of the Court, serve a counterclaim and the actions shall then proceed as if the counterclaim were the statement of claim. 9. Contents of pleadings (O.76, r.9) 9. (1) Where the plaintiff in a probate action disputes the interest of a defendant the plaintiff must allege in the plaintiff\u2019s statement of claim that the plaintiff denies the interest of that defendant. (2) In a probate action in which the interest by virtue of which a party claims to be entitled to a grant of letters of administration is disputed, the party disputing that interest must show in that party\u2019s pleading that if the allegations made therein are proved that party would be entitled to an interest in the estate. (3) Without prejudice to O.18, r.7, any party who pleads that at the time when a will, the subject of the action, was alleged to have been executed the testator did not know and approve of its contents must specify the nature of the case on which the party intends to rely, and no allegation in support of that plea which would be relevant in support of any of the following other pleas, that is to say \u2014 (a) that the will was not duly executed; (b) that at the time of the execution of the will the testator was not of sound mind, memory and understanding; and ORDER 76 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (c) that the execution of the will was obtained by undue influence or fraud, shall be made by that party unless that other plea is also pleaded. 10. Default of pleadings (O.76, r.10) 10. (1) Order 19 shall not apply in relation to a probate action. (2) Where any party to a probate action fails to serve on any other party a pleading which the party is required by these Rules to serve on that other party, then, unless the Court orders the action to be discontinued or dismissed, that other party may after the expiration of the period fixed by or under these Rules for service of the pleading in question, apply to the Court for an order for trial of the action; and if an order is made the Court may direct the action to be tried on affidavit evidence. 11. Discontinuance and dismissal (O.76, r.11) 11. (1) Order 21 shall not apply in relation to a probate action. (2) At any stage of the proceedings in a probate action the Court may, on the application of the plaintiff or of any party to the action who has acknowledged service of the writ therein, order the action to be discontinued or dismissed on such terms as to costs or otherwise as it thinks just, and may further order that a grant of probate of the will, or letters of administration of the estate, of the deceased person, as the case may be, which is the subject of the action, be made to the person entitled thereto. (3) An application for an order under this rule may be made by motion or summons or by notice under O.25, r.7. 12. Compromise of action: trial on affidavit evidence (O.76, r.12) 12. Where, whether before or after the service of the defence in a probate action, the parties to the action agree to a compromise, the Court may order the trial of the action on affidavit evidence. 13. Application for order to bring will, etc. (O.76, r.13) 13. (1) Any application in a probate action for an order requiring a person to bring a will or other testamentary paper into the Registry or to attend in Court for examination shall be made by summons which must be served on the person against whom the order is sought. (2) Any application in a probate action for the issue of a subpoena requiring a person to bring into the Registry a will or other testamentary paper may be made ex parte and must be supported by an affidavit setting out the grounds of the application. (3) Any person against whom a subpoena is issued pursuant to paragraph (2) and who denies that the will or other testamentary paper referred to in the subpoena Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 76 is in that person\u2019s possession or under that person\u2019s control may file an affidavit to that effect. 14. Administration pending suit (O.76, r.14) 14. (1) An application for an order for the grant of administration pending suit may be made by summons issued by any party to the suit. (2) Where an order for a grant of administration is made O.30, rr.2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, shall apply as if the administrator were a receiver appointed by the Court. (3) The order appointing an administrator pending suit shall \u2014 (a) operate as a grant of letters of administration to the person so appointed; and (b) contain all such directions as may be necessary. 15. Probate counterclaim in other proceedings (O.76, r.15) 15. (1) In this rule \\\"probate counterclaim\\\" means a counterclaim in any action other than a probate action by which the defendant claims any such relief as is mentioned in rule 1(2). (2) Subject to paragraph (3), this Order shall apply with the necessary modifications to a probate counterclaim as it applies to a probate action. (3) A probate counterclaim must contain a statement of the nature of the interest of the defendant and of the plaintiff in the estate of the deceased to which the counterclaim relates. 16. No Rule (O.76, r.16) 16. No Rule (O.76, r.16) GCR 1995 (Revised) ORDER 77 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 77 PROCEEDINGS BY AND AGAINST THE CROWN 1. Application and interpretation (O.77, r.1) 1. (1) These Rules apply to civil proceedings to which the Crown is a party subject to the following rules of this Order. (2) In this Order \u2014 \\\"the Law\\\" means the Crown Proceedings Act (as amended and revised); \\\"civil proceedings by the Crown\\\", \\\"civil proceedings against the Crown\\\" and \\\"civil proceedings by or against the Crown\\\" have the same respective meanings as in Part III of the Law, and do not include any proceedings brought by the Attorney General upon the relation of some other person; \\\"civil proceedings to which the Crown is a party\\\" shall be construed as including a reference to civil proceedings to which the Attorney General as such is a party, not being proceedings brought by the Attorney General upon the relation of some other person; \\\"order against the Crown\\\" means any order (including an order for costs) made in any civil proceedings by or against the Crown or in connection with any arbitration to which the Crown is a party, in favour of any person against the Crown or against a Government Department or against an officer of the Crown as such; \\\"order\\\" includes a judgment, decree, rule, award or declaration. 2. No rule (O.77, r.2) 2. No rule (O.77, r.2) 3. Particulars to be included in indorsement of claim (O.77, r.3) 3. (1) In the case of a writ which begins civil proceedings against the Crown the indorsement of claim required by O.6, r.2, shall include a statement of the circumstances in which the Crown's liability is alleged to have arisen and as to the Minister and officers of the Crown concerned. (2) If in civil proceedings against the Crown the Attorney General considers that the writ does not contain a sufficient statement as required by this rule, the Attorney General may, before the expiration of the time limited for acknowledging service of the writ, apply to the plaintiff by notice for a further and better statement containing such information as may be specified in the notice. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 77 (3) Where the Attorney General gives a notice under this rule, the time limited for acknowledging service of the writ shall not expire until 4 days after the Attorney General has notified the plaintiff in writing that the Attorney General is satisfied with the statement supplied in compliance with the notice or 4 days after the Court has, on the application of the plaintiff by summons served on the Attorney General not less than 7 days before the return day, decided that no further information as to the matters referred to in paragraph (1) is reasonably required. 4. Service on the Crown (O.77, r.4) 4. (1) O.10, O.11 and any other provision of these Rules relating to service out of the jurisdiction shall not apply in relation to the service of any process by which civil proceedings against the Crown are begun. (2) Personal service of any document required to be served on the Crown for the purpose of or in connection with any civil proceedings is not requisite; but where the proceedings are by or against the Crown service on the Crown must be effected by leaving the document at the office of the Attorney General or at the office of an officer prescribed by the Attorney General for the purpose of accepting service. (3) In relation to the service of any document required to be served on the Crown for the purpose of or in connection with any civil proceedings by or against the Crown, O.65, rr.5 and 9, shall not apply, and O.65, r.7, shall apply as if the reference therein to rules 2 and 5(1)(a) of that Order were a reference to paragraph (2) of this rule. 5. No rule (O.77, r.5) 5. No rule (O.77, r.5) 6. Counterclaim and set-off (O.77, r.6) 6. (1) Notwithstanding O.15, r.2, and O.18, rr.17 and 18, no counterclaim may be made, or set-off pleaded against the Crown if the proceedings are for the recovery of, or the counterclaim or set-off arises out of a right or claim to repayment in respect of, any taxes, duties or penalties. (2) Notwithstanding O.15, r.2, and O.18, rr.17 and 18, no counterclaim may be made, or set-off pleaded, without the leave of the Court, by the Crown in proceedings against the Crown, or by any person in proceedings by the Crown. (3) Any application for leave under this rule must be made by summons. 7. Summary judgment (O.77, r.7) 7. (1) No application against the Crown shall be made under O.14, r.1, or O.86, r.1, in any proceedings against the Crown nor under O.14, r.5, in any proceedings by the Crown. ORDER 77 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (2) Where an application is made by the Crown under O.14, r.1, O.14, r.5, or O.86, r.1, the affidavit required in support of the application must be made by \u2014 (a) the Attorney General or crown counsel having conduct of the matter; or (b) an officer duly authorised by the Attorney General or by the Minister concerned, and the affidavit shall be sufficient if it states that in the deponent's belief the applicant is entitled to the relief claimed and there is no defence to the claim or part of a claim to which the application relates or no defence except as to the amount of any damages claimed. 8. No rule (O.77, r.8) 8. No rule (O.77, r.8) 8A. No rule (O.77, r.8A) 8A. No rule (O.77, r.8A) 9. Judgment in default (O.77, r.9) 9. (1) Except with the leave of the Court, no judgment in default of notice of intention to defend or of pleading shall be entered against the Crown in civil proceedings against the Crown or in third party proceedings against the Crown. (2) Except with the leave of the Court, O.16, r.5(1)(a), shall not apply in the case of third party proceedings against the Crown. (3) An application for leave under this rule may be made by summons or except in the case of an application relating to O.16, r.5, by motion; and the summons or, as the case may be, notice of the motion must be served not less than 7 days before the return day. 10. Third party notices (O.77, r.10) 10. (1) Notwithstanding anything in O.16, a third party notice (including a notice issuable by virtue of O.16, r.9) for service on the Crown shall not be issued without the leave of the Court, and the application for the grant of such leave must be made by summons, and the summons must be served on the plaintiff and the Crown. (2) Leave to issue such a notice for service on the Crown shall not be granted unless the Court is satisfied that the Crown is in possession of all such information as it reasonably requires as to the circumstances in which it is alleged that the liability of the Crown has arisen and as to the Ministers and officers of the Crown concerned. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 77 11. Interpleader: application for order against Crown (O.77, r.11) 11. No order shall be made against the Crown under O.17, r.5(3), except upon an application by summons served not less than 7 days before the return day. 12. Discovery and interrogatories (O.77, r.12) 12. (1) O.24, rr.1 and 2, shall not apply in civil proceedings to which the Crown is a party. (2) In any civil proceedings to which the Crown is a party any order of the Court made under the powers conferred by Section 19(1) of the Law, shall be construed as not requiring the disclosure of the existence of any document, the existence of which it would, in the opinion of the Governor, be injurious to the public interest to disclose. (3) Where in any such proceedings an order of the Court directs that a list of documents made in answer to any order for discovery against the Crown shall be verified by affidavit, the affidavit shall be made by such officer of the Crown as the Court may direct. (4) Where in any such proceedings an order is made under the said Section 19 for interrogatories to be answered by the Crown, the Court shall direct by what officer of the Crown the interrogatories are to be answered. 13. No rule (O.77, r.13) 13. No rule (O.77, r.13) 14. Evidence (O.77, r.14) 14. (1) Civil proceedings against the Crown may be instituted under O.39, r.15, in any case in which the Crown is alleged to have an interest or estate in the honour, title, dignity or office or property in question. (2) For the avoidance of doubt it is hereby declared that any powers exercisable by the Court in regard to the taking of evidence are exercisable in proceedings by or against the Crown as they are exercisable in proceedings between subjects. 15. Execution and satisfaction of orders (O.77, r.15) 15. (1) Nothing in Orders 45 to 52 shall apply in respect of any order against the Crown. (2) An application under subsection (1) of Section 16 of the Law for a direction that a separate certificate shall be issued under that subsection with respect to the costs (if any) ordered to be paid to the applicant, may be made to the Court ex parte without summons. 16. Attachment of debts (O.77, r.16) 16. (1) No order \u2014 ORDER 77 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (a) for the attachment of debts under O.49; (b) for the appointment of a sequestrator under O.45; or (c) for the appointment of a receiver under O.30 or 51, shall be made or have effect in respect of any money due or accruing due, or alleged to be due or accruing due, from the Crown. (2) No application shall be made under paragraph (3) unless the order of the Court to be enforced is for a sum of money amounting in value to at least $500. (3) Every application for an order under Section 18 of the Law restraining any person from receiving money payable to that person by the Crown and directing payment of the money to the applicant or some other person must be made by summons and, unless the Court otherwise directs, served \u2014 (a) on the Crown at least 15 days before the return day; and (b) on the person to be restrained or that person\u2019s attorney at least 7 days after the summons has been served on the Crown and at least 7 days before the return day. (4) An application under paragraph (3) must be supported by an affidavit \u2014 (a) setting out the facts giving rise to the application; (b) stating the name and last known address of the person to be restrained; (c) identifying the order to be enforced and stating the amount of such order and the amount remaining unpaid under it at the time of application; and (d) identifying the particular debt from the Crown in respect of which the application is made. (5) O.49, rr. 5 and 6, shall apply in relation to such an application as is mentioned in paragraph (3) for an order restraining a person from receiving money payable to that person by the Crown as those rules apply to an application under Order 49, rule 1, for an order for the attachment of a debt owing to any person from a guarantee except that the Court shall not have the power to order execution to issue against the Crown. 17. No rule (O.77, r.17) 17. No rule (O.77, r.17) 18. Application under Section 20 of the Crown Proceedings Act (as amended and revised) (O.77, r.18) 18. An application such as is referred to in Section 20(2) of the Law may be made to the Court at any time before trial by motion or summons, or may be made at the trial of the proceedings. GCR 1995 (Revised) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 77 ORDER 77A Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 77A PROCEEDINGS UNDER SECTIONS 23 AND 26 OF THE CONSTITUTION 1. Definitions  (O.77A, r.1) 1. (1) In this Order \u2014 \\\"act\\\" includes a failure to act but excludes a failure to introduce before the Cayman Islands Parliament, or for the Legislature to enact, primary legislation; \\\"Bill of Rights\\\" means Part 1 of the Constitution; \\\"Constitution\\\" means the Cayman Islands Constitution Order 2009 (UKSI 1379\/2009) (as amended); \\\"Lower Court\\\" means the Summary Court, the Youth Court, the Drug Rehabilitation Court, and the Coroner's Court; \\\"primary legislation\\\" means a Law enacted by the Legislature; \\\"public official\\\" \u2014 (a) includes a public or governmental body, including any statutory body or company or association in which the Cayman Islands has an interest and performs a public function or duty; (b) includes any organisation or person carrying out a public function or duty, including the Governor, except where the nature of their act is private; (c) excludes private schools (whether or not in receipt of government funding, subsidy or other assistance), churches, the Legislature and the Court, Court of Appeal, and any Lower Court; \\\"tribunal\\\" means any tribunal, board or authority constituted by or under any enactment but excludes any Lower Court, the Court, the Court of Appeal or the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. 2. General (O.77A, r.2) 2. (1) Pursuant to O.5, r.4A, proceedings under Section 23 or 26(1) of the Constitution shall be begun by petition or writ. (2) References to the Court pursuant to Section 26(2) of the Constitution shall be begun by petition. (3) No such writ shall be issued unless it is indorsed with a statement of claim. Every reference in this Order to a writ shall be deemed to include the statement of claim indorsed on the writ. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 77A (4) At the same time as every such petition is presented an affidavit shall be sworn by or on behalf of the petitioner confirming the facts and matters referred to in the petition. (5) Unless the Court otherwise orders, all proceedings (interlocutory and final) pursuant to this Order shall be heard in open Court. 3. Proceedings under Section 23 of the Constitution (O.77A, r.3) 3. (1) In any proceedings to which the Attorney General is not already a party, where a party seeks a declaration that primary legislation, or any part thereof, is incompatible with a section or sections of the Bill of Rights, the party seeking the declaration shall forthwith serve on the Attorney General copies of the originating process together with all pleadings and particulars already served on the parties to those proceedings. (2) In any proceedings where there is no claim for a declaration that primary legislation, or any part thereof, is incompatible with a section or sections of the Bill of Rights, but the Court considers that the proceedings may necessarily raise a real question as to whether primary legislation, or any part thereof, is compatible with a section or sections of the Bill of Rights, then the Court shall convene a hearing to determine whether or not the Attorney General should be given notice of the proceedings and generally for the future conduct of the proceedings. (3) Unless the Court otherwise orders, no further step may be taken in the proceedings until the earlier of \u2014 (a)  7 days after the service on the Attorney General of the copies of the originating process and any pleadings and particulars, or (b)  the service on the parties of a notice of non-intervention by the Attorney General pursuant to rule 2(4) of this Order. (4) Within 7 days of service on the Attorney General of the originating process and any pleadings and particulars, the Attorney General shall file and serve on the parties a notice stating whether or not the Attorney General wishes to intervene in the proceedings, provided that if, after the expiry of the said 7 days, the Attorney General shall determine that it is in the public interest for the Attorney General to intervene the Attorney may do so by filing and serving a notice on the parties.  If the Attorney General's notice states that the Attorney General wishes to intervene in the proceedings the Attorney General shall automatically become an intervener in the proceedings without further order. (5) If the Attorney General gives notice of intervention then, unless the Court otherwise orders, no party may seek costs against the Attorney General nor may the Attorney General seek costs against any party. (6) Upon the Attorney General serving a notice of intervention, the party seeking the aforesaid declaration shall issue forthwith a summons and serve it on all the ORDER 77A Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) other parties and on the Attorney General seeking directions as to the future conduct of the action. (7) If the Court grants a declaration that primary legislation, or any part thereof, is incompatible with a section or sections of the Bill of Rights, the Attorney General shall cause a copy of the order embodying the declaration to be served forthwith on the Clerk of the Cayman Islands Parliament. 4. Proceedings under Section 26(1) of the Constitution (O.77A, r.4) 4. (1) A petition, or a writ, or any pleading alleging that the government has breached or threatened the applicant's rights and freedoms under the Bill of Rights shall include full particulars of \u2014 (a) the circumstances in which the government's liability is alleged to have arisen, and the circumstances of the conduct of any public official or officials in respect of which the applicant complains; (b) the decision or decisions or the act or acts that is or are alleged to breach the Bill of Rights, and the date or dates of each such decision or act; (c) to the extent that any such decision or act as referred to in rule 4(1)(b) of this Order is alleged to have taken place more than one year prior to the issuing of the writ, the presentation of the petition, or filing of the pleading, the date or dates on which such decision or act was alleged to be known or alleged could reasonably have been known to the applicant. (2) The respondent to such a petition, or the defendant to such a writ, as the case may be, shall be the Attorney General and any relevant public official. (3) If a claim is brought by way of counterclaim then the defendant to such a counterclaim shall be the Attorney General and any relevant public official. 5. Reference to the Court under Section 26(2) of the Constitution; general provisions (O.77A, r.5) 5. (1) Every reference from a Lower Court or tribunal to the Court shall concisely set out \u2014 (a) in the case of any criminal cause or matter, or in proceedings pursuant to the Extradition Act (Overseas Territories) Order 2016 [UKSI 2016 No.990], the charge, summons, information or complaint in respect of which the proceedings arose;] (b) in any other proceedings, cause or matter, the identity of the parties and the allegations contained in the pleadings or, if there are no pleadings, a record of the proceedings; (c) the facts, if any, found by the Lower Court or tribunal to have been proved or admitted, and\/or the facts to be presumed; and Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 77A (d) the issue as to the interpretation of the Bill of Rights on which the opinion of the Court is sought. (2) The Lower Court or tribunal shall not in its reference provide a record of the evidence taken before it. (3) Where a Lower Court or tribunal makes a reference to the Court the applicant seeking the opinion of the Court must: (a) within 5 days after (i) in the case of a reference made by a Lower Court, the applicant receiving the reference from the Clerk of the Court, or (ii) in the case of a reference made by a tribunal, the applicant being served with the reference, the applicant shall present a petition to which is annexed the reference; and (b) within 3 days after the applicant has received from the Court a sealed copy of the petition, serve on the parties a copy of that petition together with the reference annexed and the affidavit in support of the petition. (4) Unless the Attorney General is already a party to the proceedings before the Lower Court or tribunal, within 3 days after the petitioner has received from the Court a sealed copy of the petition, the petitioner must serve on the Attorney General a copy of that petition together with the reference annexed and the affidavit in support of the petition. (5) The petition must set out the petitioner's contentions on the issue as to the interpretation of the Bill of Rights as settled by the Lower Court pursuant to rule 5(1)(d) of this Order. (6) Within 5 days of service on the Attorney General of the petition under rule 5(4) of this Order, the Attorney General shall file and serve on the parties a notice stating whether or not the Attorney General wishes to intervene in the proceedings, provided that if, after the expiry of the said 5 days, the Attorney General shall determine that it is in the public interest for the Attorney General to intervene the Attorney General may do so by filing and serving a notice on the parties.  If the Attorney General's notice states that the Attorney General wishes to intervene in the proceedings the Attorney General shall automatically become an intervener in the proceedings without further order. (7)  If the Attorney General gives notice of intervention then, unless the Court otherwise orders, no party may seek costs against the Attorney General nor may the Attorney General seek costs against any party. (8) Unless the Court otherwise orders, a reference in a pending criminal cause or matter, or in proceedings pursuant to the Extradition Act (Overseas Territories) Order 2016, shall be heard on an expedited basis; a reference in any other matter shall not be heard sooner than 10 days after the petitioner has served a copy of the petition on the persons specified in rules 5(3), 5(4) and 8 of this Order. ORDER 77A Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 6. Procedure to be applied for a reference by a Lower Court to the Court under Section 26(2) of the Constitution (O.77A, r.6) 6. (1) If in proceedings before any Lower Court, any issue arises as to the interpretation of the Bill of Rights, and if the Lower Court is satisfied that it is necessary for the issue to be determined then it shall refer the question to the Court. (2) In any proceedings before a Lower Court where an application is made to the Lower Court to refer an issue to the Court the following rules shall apply \u2014 (a) The applicant shall file with the Clerk of the Court and serve on all other parties a notice in writing. (b) The notice shall be signed by the applicant or the applicant\u2019s attorney and it shall state the facts found by the Lower Court, or the presumed facts, and the issue as to the interpretation of the Bill of Rights on which the opinion of the Court is sought. (c) Unless the Lower Court shall refuse to make a reference, within 4 days after filing of the notice the Magistrate or Justices shall cause the Clerk of the Court to send to the parties or their attorneys a draft reference in which are stated the matters required by rules 5(1) and 5(2) of this Order. (d) Within 4 days of receipt of the draft reference under rule 6(2)(c) of this Order each party may make representations on the draft reference.  Any such representations shall be in writing and signed by the party making them or the party\u2019s attorney and shall be filed. (e) Within 4 days after the latest day on which representations may be made under rule 6(2)(d) of this Order, the Magistrate or Justices shall make such adjustments, if any, to the draft reference prepared for the purpose of that rule as the Magistrate or they shall think fit, after considering any such representations, and shall refer the issue to the Court. (f) Forthwith after the reference has been made, the Clerk of the Court shall send a copy of the reference to the parties or their attorneys. (g) If the Clerk of the Court is unable to send a draft reference under rule 6(2)(c) of this Order, or the Magistrate is, or Justices are, unable to make the reference under rule 6(2)(e) of this Order, the Magistrate or they shall do so as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter and the time periods in those rules shall be extended accordingly.  In any such event, the Clerk of the Court shall notify the parties or their attorneys in writing of the delay and the reasons therefor. (h) Any party may apply in writing to the Lower Court for leave to extend the period under rule 6(2)(d) of this Order, as may have been extended, but not after any such period has expired. (i) The making of a reference shall not in itself have the effect of \u2014 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 77A (i) if and to the extent that the proceedings before the Lower Court are still pending, suspending those proceedings, or (ii) suspending the execution or enforcement of any decision, sentence or order of the Lower Court. (3) Upon making any reference the Lower Court may give consideration to the future conduct of the proceedings before it including, without limitation, pending the determination of the reference whether or not it should suspend those proceedings, or suspend the execution or enforcement of any decision, sentence or order of it, in the case of any criminal cause or matter, or proceedings pursuant to the Extradition Act (Overseas Territories) Order 2016 [UKSI 2016 No.990]. (4) The Lower Court may refuse to make a reference if it considers the matter to be vexatious or unreasonable but if so it shall provide to the applicant written reasons for its refusal. 7. Signing and service of reference by a tribunal (O.77A, r.7) 7. (1) A reference by the Governor must be signed by the head of the Governor's office and a reference by the Cabinet must be signed by the Clerk of the Cabinet. (2) A reference by any other tribunal, not being an individual, must be signed by the chairperson or president of the tribunal, and a reference by a tribunal being an individual must be signed by that person or by a person authorised in that behalf to do so. (3) The reference must be served on the party at whose request the reference was made. 8. Service of petition under GCR O.77A, rule 5(3) (O.77A, r.8) 8. The petitioner shall serve a petition under rule 5(3) of this Order together with the affidavit in support and a copy of the reference, on \u2014 (a) the head of the Governor's office, the Clerk of the Cabinet, the secretary of the tribunal, or other person by whom the reference was made, unless the Governor, the Cabinet, that tribunal or other person is the petitioner; and (b) every party (other than the petitioner) to the proceedings in which the reference relates arose; and (c) the Attorney General, unless the Attorney General is already a party to the proceedings before the tribunal. 9. Amendment of reference (O.77A, r.9) 9. The Court hearing a reference from a Lower Court or a tribunal may amend the reference. ORDER 77A Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 10. Right of Governor, the Cabinet, etc. to appear and be heard (O.77A, r.10) 10. In proceedings for the determination of a reference by a tribunal to the Court, the Governor, the Cabinet, chairperson or president of the tribunal, or other person by whom the reference was made shall be entitled to appear and be heard. GCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 06.11.12) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 78-79 ORDER 78-79 NO ORDERS GCR 1995 (Revised) ORDER 80 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 80 DISABILITY I. CONDUCT OF LITIGATION 1. Interpretation (O.80, r.1) 1. (1) In this Order \u2014 (a) \\\"the Law\\\" means the Mental Health Act (as amended and revised); (b) \\\"patient\\\" means \u2014 (i) a person who is a patient within the meaning of Section 2 of the Law; or (ii) a person in respect of whom a guardian has been appointed under Section 14 of the Grand Court Act (as amended and revised); (c) \\\"person under disability\\\" means a person who is a child or a patient. 2. Person under disability must sue, etc., by next friend or guardian ad litem (O.80, r.2) 2. (1) A person under disability may not bring, or make a claim in, any proceedings except by that person\u2019s next friend and may not defend, make a counterclaim or intervene in any proceedings, or appear in any proceedings under a judgment or order, notice of which has been served on that person, except by that person\u2019s guardian ad litem. (2) Subject to the provisions of these Rules, anything which in the ordinary conduct of any proceedings is required or authorised by a provision of these Rules to be done by a party to the proceedings shall or may, if the party is a person under disability, be done by that party\u2019s next friend or guardian ad litem. (3) A next friend or guardian ad litem of a person under disability must act by an attorney. 3. Appointment of next friend or guardian ad litem (O.80, r.3) 3. (1) Except as provided by paragraph (3) or (4) or by rule 6, an order appointing a person next friend or guardian ad litem of a person under disability is not necessary. (2) Where a person is authorised under Section 19(a)(vi) of the Law to conduct legal proceedings in the name of a patient or on the patient\u2019s behalf, that person shall be entitled to be next friend or guardian ad litem, as the case may be, of the patient in any proceedings to which that person\u2019s authority extends unless, in a Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 80 case to which paragraph (3) or (4) or rule 6 applies, some other person is appointed by the Court under that paragraph or rule to be next friend or guardian ad litem, as the case may be, of the patient in those proceedings. (3) Where a person has been or is next friend or guardian ad litem of a person under disability in any proceedings no other person shall be entitled to act as such friend or guardian, as the case may be, of the person under disability in those proceedings unless the Court makes an order appointing that person such friend or guardian in substitution for the person previously acting in that capacity. (4) Where, after any proceedings have been begun, a party to the proceedings becomes a patient, an application must be made to the Court for the appointment of a person to be next friend or guardian ad litem, as the case may be, of that party. (5) Except where the next friend or guardian ad litem, as the case may be, of a person under disability has been appointed by the Court \u2014 (a) the name of any person shall not be used in a cause or matter as next friend or guardian ad litem of a person under disability; (b) service shall not be acknowledged in a cause or matter for a person under disability; and (c) a person under disability shall not be entitled to appear by that person\u2019s guardian ad litem on the hearing of a petition, summons or motion which, or notice of which, has been served on that person, unless and until the documents listed in paragraph (6) have been filed in the Court office. (6) The documents referred to in paragraph (5) are the following \u2014 (a) a written consent to be next friend or guardian ad litem, as the case may be, of the person under disability in the cause or matter in question given by the person proposing to be such friend or guardian; (b) where the person proposing to be next friend or guardian ad litem of the person under disability, being a patient, has been appointed guardian under Section 14 of the Grand Court Act (as amended and revised), an office copy of the order appointing the person; (c) where the person proposing to be next friend or guardian ad litem of the person under disability, being a child, has been appointed guardian under the Children Act (as amended and revised), an office copy of the order appointing the person; (d) where the person under disability, being a child, is the subject of an order for care and control or custody made under Sections 20(a) or 22(1) of the Matrimonial Causes Act (as amended and revised), an office copy of such order; and ORDER 80 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (e) a certificate made by the attorney for the person under disability certifying \u2014 (i) that that attorney knows or believes, as the case may be, that the person to whom the certificate relates is a child or a patient, giving (in the case of a patient) the grounds of that attorney\u2019s knowledge or belief; and (ii) where the person under disability is a patient, that there is no person authorised as aforesaid; and (iii) that the person so named has no interest in the cause or matter in question adverse to that of the person under disability. (3) If it appears to the Court that there is no fit and proper person who is willing and able to act as next friend or guardian ad litem for a person under disability, it shall appoint the Solicitor General. 4. No rule (O.80, r.4) 4. No rule (O.80, r.4) 5. No rule (O.80, r.5) 5. No rule (O.80, r.5) 6. Appointment of guardian where person under disability does not acknowledge service (O.80, r.6) 6. (1) Where \u2014 (a) in an action against a person under disability begun by writ, or by originating summons, no acknowledgment of service is given in the action for that person; or (b) the defendant to an action serves a defence and counterclaim on a person under disability who is not already a party to the action, and no acknowledgment of service is given for that person, an application for the appointment by the Court of a guardian ad litem of that person must be made by the plaintiff or defendant, as the case may be, after the time limited (as respects that person) for appearing and before proceeding further with the action or counterclaim. (2) Where a party to an action has served on a person under disability who is not already a party to the action a third party notice within the meaning of O.16 and no acknowledgment of service is given for that person to the notice, an application for the appointment by the Court of a guardian ad litem of that person must be made by that party after the time limited (as respects that person) for acknowledging service and before proceeding further with the third party proceedings. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 80 (3) Where in any proceedings against a person under disability begun by petition or motion, that person does not appear by a guardian ad litem at the hearing of the petition or motion, as the case may be, the Court hearing it may appoint a guardian ad litem of that person in the proceedings or direct that an application be made by the petitioner or applicant, as the case may be, for the appointment of such a guardian. (4) At any stage in the proceedings under any judgment or order, notice of which has been served on a person under disability, the Court may, if no acknowledgment of service is given for that person, appoint a guardian ad litem of that person in the proceedings or direct that an application be made for the appointment of such a guardian. (5) An application under paragraph (1) or (2) must be supported by evidence proving \u2014 (a) that the person to whom the application relates is a person under disability; (b) that the person proposed as guardian ad litem is willing and a proper person to act as such and has no interest in the proceedings adverse to that of the person under disability; (c) that the writ, originating summons, defence and counterclaim or third party notice, as the case may be, was duly served on the person under disability; and (d) subject to paragraph (6), that notice of the application was, after the expiration of the time limited for appearing and at least 7 days before the day named in the notice for hearing of the application, so served on the person under disability. (6) If the Court so directs, notice of an application under paragraph (1) or (2) need not be served on a person under disability. (7) An application for the appointment of a guardian ad litem made in compliance with a direction of the Court given under paragraph (3) or (4) must be supported by evidence proving the matters referred to in subparagraph (5)(b). 7. Application to discharge or vary certain orders (O.80, r.7) 7. An application to the Court on behalf of a person under disability served with an order made ex parte under O.15, r.7, for the discharge or variation of the order must be made \u2014 (a) if a next friend or guardian ad litem is acting for that person in the cause or matter in which the order is made, within 14 days after the service of the order on that person; (b) if there is no next friend or guardian ad litem acting for that person in that cause or matter, within 14 days after the appointment of such a friend or guardian to act for that person. ORDER 80 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 8. Admission not to be implied from pleading of person under disability (O.80, r.8) 8. Notwithstanding anything in O.18, r.13(1), a person under disability shall not be taken to admit the truth of any allegation of fact made in the pleading of the opposite party by reason only that the person under disability has not traversed it in that person\u2019s pleadings. 9. Discovery and interrogatories (O.80, r.9) 9. Orders 24 and 26 shall apply to a person under disability and to that person\u2019s next friend or guardian ad litem. 10. Compromise, etc. by person under disability (O.80, r.10) 10. Where in any proceedings money is claimed by or on behalf of a person under disability, no settlement, compromise or payment and no acceptance of money paid into Court, whenever entered into or made, shall so far as it relates to that person's claim be valid without the approval of the Court. 11. Approval of settlement (O.80, r.11) 11. (1) Where, before proceedings in which a claim for money is made by or on behalf of a person under disability (whether alone or in conjunction with any other person) are begun, an agreement is reached for the settlement of the claim, and it is desired to obtain the Court's approval to the settlement, then notwithstanding anything in O.5, r.2, the claim may be made in proceedings begun by originating summons and in the summons an application may also be made for \u2014 (a) the approval of the Court to the settlement and such orders or directions as may be necessary to give effect to it or as may be necessary or expedient under rule 12; or (b) alternatively, directions as to the further prosecution of the claim. (2) Where in proceedings under this rule a claim is made under the Torts (Reform) Act (as amended and revised), the originating summons must include the particulars mentioned in Section 5 of the Torts (Reform) Act (as amended and revised). (3) An originating summons under this rule shall be in Form No. 3 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). (4) In this rule \\\"settlement\\\" includes a compromise. 12. Control of money recovered by person under disability (O.80, r.12) 12. (1) Where in any proceedings \u2014 (a) money is recovered by or on behalf of, or adjudged or ordered or agreed to be paid to, or for the benefit of, a person under disability; or Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 80 (b) money paid into Court is accepted by or on behalf of a plaintiff who is a person under disability, the money shall be dealt with in accordance with directions given by the Court, and not otherwise. (2) Directions given under this rule may provide that the money shall, as to the whole or any part thereof, be paid into the Court and invested or otherwise dealt with there. (3) Without prejudice to the foregoing provisions of this rule, directions given under this rule may include any general or special directions that the Court thinks fit to give and, in particular, directions as to how the money is to be applied or dealt with and as to any payment to be made, either directly or out of the amount paid into Court to the plaintiff, or to the next friend in respect of monies paid or expenses incurred for or on behalf or for the benefit of the person under disability or for that person\u2019s maintenance or otherwise for that person\u2019s benefit or to the plaintiff's attorney in respect of costs. (4) Where in pursuance of directions given under this rule money is paid into Court to be invested or otherwise dealt with there, the money (including any interest thereon) shall not be paid out, nor shall any securities in which the money is invested, or the dividends thereon, be sold, transferred or paid out of Court, except in accordance with an order of the Court. (5) The foregoing provisions of this rule shall apply in relation to a counterclaim by or on behalf of a person under a disability, and a claim made by or on behalf of such person in an action by any other person for relief under Section 504 of the United Kingdom\u2019s Merchant Shipping Act 1894,1 as if for the references to a plaintiff and a next friend there were substituted references to a defendant and to a guardian ad litem respectively. 1 (Note: Section 504 of theUK\u2019s Merchant Shipping Act 1894 was repealed by Schedule 7 of the UK\u2019s Merchant Shipping Act, 1979.) 13. Appointment of guardian of child's estate (O.80, r.13) 13. (1) In any of the circumstances described in paragraph (2) the Court may appoint a licensed trust corporation to be a guardian of the estate of a child provided that \u2014 (a) the appointment is to subsist only until the child reaches the age of 18; and (b) the consent of the child's parents has been signified to the Court or, in the opinion of the Court, cannot be obtained or may be dispensed with. (2) The circumstances referred to in paragraph (1) are \u2014 (a) where money is paid into Court on behalf of the child in accordance with directions given under rule 12(2); ORDER 80 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (b) where a Court or tribunal outside the Islands notifies the Court that it has ordered or intends to order that money be paid to the child; (c) where the child is absolutely entitled to proceeds of a pension fund; (d) where the child is absolutely entitled to a trust fund; or (e) where such an appointment seems desirable to the Court. (3) Rules 23 and 24 of this Order shall apply, mutatis mutandis, to a licensed trust corporation appointed under this rule as they apply to a receiver appointed under Part II of this Order, provided that an application for its removal may only be made by \u2014 (a) the child's parent; (b) if the child has no parents, by any guardian appointed under Section 7 of the Children Act (as amended and revised); or (c) the Solicitor General. 14. No rule (O.80, r.14) 14. No rule (O.80, r.14) 15. Proceedings under the Torts (Reform) Act (as amended and revised) - apportionment by Court (O.80, r.15) 15. (1) Where a single sum of money is paid into Court under O.22, r.1, in satisfaction of causes of action arising under the Torts (Reform) Act (as amended and revised) and the Estates Proceedings Act (as amended and revised) and that sum is accepted, the money shall be apportioned between the different causes of action by the Court either when giving directions for dealing with it under rule 10 (if that rule applies) or when authorising its payment out of Court. (2) Where, in an action in which a claim under the Torts (Reform) Act (as amended and revised) is made by or on behalf of more than one person, a sum in respect of damages is adjudged or ordered or agreed to be paid in satisfaction of the claim, or a sum of money paid into Court under O.22, r.1, is accepted in satisfaction of the cause of action under the Torts (Reform) Act (as amended and revised), then it shall be apportioned between those persons by the Court. The reference in this paragraph to a sum of money paid into Court shall be construed as including a reference to part of a sum so paid being the part apportioned by the Court under paragraph (1) to the cause of action under the Torts (Reform) Act (as amended and revised). 16. Service of certain documents on person under disability (O.80, r.16) 16. (1) Where in any proceedings a document is required to be served personally on any person and that person is a person under disability this rule shall apply. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 80 (2) Subject to the following provisions of this rule and to O.24, r.20(3), and O.26, r.6(3), the document must be served \u2014 (a) in the case of a child who is not also a patient, on the child\u2019s parent or guardian or, if the child has no parent or guardian, on the person with whom the child resides or in whose care the child is; (b) in the case of a patient, on the person (if any) who is authorised under Section 14 of the Grand Court Act (as amended and revised) to conduct in the name of the patient or on the patient\u2019s behalf the proceedings in connection with which the document is to be served or, if there is no person so authorised, on the person with whom the patient resides or in whose care the patient is, and must be served in the manner required by these Rules with respect to the document in question. (3) Notwithstanding anything in paragraph (2), the Court may order that a document which has been, or is to be, served on the person under disability or on a person other than a person mentioned in that paragraph shall be deemed to be duly served on the person under disability. (4) A judgment or order requiring a person to do, or refrain from doing, any act, a notice of motion or summons for the committal of any person, and a writ of subpoena against any person, must, if that person is a person under disability, be served personally on that person unless the Court otherwise orders. This paragraph shall not apply to an order for interrogatories or for discovery or inspection of documents. II. ADMINISTRATION OF PATIENT'S PROPERTY 17. Application to appoint receiver, etc. (O.80, r.17) 17. (1) Subject to rule 18, an application to appoint a receiver or other person under Section 13 of   the   Grand Court Act (as amended and revised) may be made by \u2014 (a) the patient themselves; (b) the patient's spouse or civil partner; (c) any guardian of the patient appointed under Section 14 of the Grand Court Act (as amended and revised); (d) any near relative of the patient as defined in Section 2 of the Law; or (e) the Solicitor General. (2) Subject to paragraph (3), an application under this rule shall be made by originating summons. ORDER 80 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (3) The Court may dispense with the need for issuing an originating summons whenever the Court considers that it is necessary for an application to be made urgently. (4) An application under this rule may be combined with an application under rule 27. 18. Power to direct application by officer of Court or Solicitor General (O.80, r.18) 18. Where in the opinion of the Court an application ought to be made for the appointment or discharge of a receiver or other person appointed under Section 14 of the Grand Court Act (as amended and revised) or for the exercise of any other power conferred on the Court with respect to the property and affairs of a patient, and there appears to the Court to be no other suitable person able and willing to make the application, or the Court for any other reason thinks fit, the Court may direct that the application be made by the Solicitor General. 19. Representation of patient by Solicitor General (O.80, r.19) 19. Where in any proceeding the Court considers that the interests of a patient are not adequately represented the Court may direct that the Solicitor General shall act as attorney for the patient either generally or in the proceedings or for any particular purpose connected with the proceedings, so, however, that it shall not be necessary to appoint the Solicitor General to be receiver or guardian ad litem for the patient. 20. Evidence to be filed on application under rule 17 (O.80, r.20) 20. (1) An application under rule 17 shall be supported by \u2014 (a) a report by a medical practitioner that the patient is incapable of managing and administering that patient\u2019s property and affairs; and (b) an affidavit giving particulars of the patient's relatives, property and affairs and of the circumstances giving rise to the application. (2) Whenever the Court thinks it expedient to do so, it may request the Chief Medical Officer to examine a patient and provide the Court with a further report for the purpose of \u2014 (a) certifying whether or not the patient is capable of managing the patient\u2019s property and affairs; or (b) answering such specific questions as may be put to the patient by the Court. (3) Whenever the Court proceeds in accordance with rule 17(3), the Court may dispense with the requirements of paragraphs (1) and (2). 21. Service on patient (O.80, r.21) 21. (1) An originating summons under rule 17 shall be served on \u2014 (a) the patient unless the Court is satisfied that service on the patient would be injurious to the patient\u2019s health; Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 80 (b) in the case of a child who is also a patient, on the child\u2019s parent or guardian or, if the child has no parent or guardian, on the person with whom the child resides or in whose care the child is; (c) any guardian appointed in respect of the patient under Section 14 of the Grand Court Act (as amended and revised); (d) any person with whom the patient resides; or (e) such other person as the Court may direct. (2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the Court may dispense with service altogether if it is satisfied that service on the patient or upon any person mentioned in paragraph (1) would be injurious to the patient's health. (3) Where service has been dispensed with under paragraph (2) the Court may request the Chief Medical Officer to visit the patient and report to the Court as to the patient\u2019s condition and welfare. (4) An affidavit of service showing where, when, how and by whom service was effected shall be filed as soon as practicable after service of a document has been effected in accordance with this rule. 22. Appointment of receiver (O.80, r.22) 22. (1) O.30, rr.2, 3 and 4, shall apply to the appointment of a receiver under this Part of this Order. (2) Where a receiver is appointed for a patient, the Court may allow the receiver remuneration for the receiver\u2019s services at such amount or at such rate as the Court considers reasonable and proper and any remuneration so allowed shall constitute a debt due to the receiver from the patient and the patient\u2019s estate. (3) An order for the appointment of a receiver shall contain such directions as the Court thinks fit including \u2014 (a) directions in respect of the investment and management of the patient's property; (b) directions in respect of the maintenance of the patient, the patient\u2019s dependants and the application of the patient\u2019s income; and (c) directions for the payment of the patient's debts. (4) The receiver may apply by summons in the proceedings for such further or other directions as the receiver considers necessary. 23. Receiver's accounts (O.80, r.23) 23. (1) Every receiver shall annually, or at such intervals as the Court may direct, deliver the receiver\u2019s accounts to the Court and attend at or within such time as the Court may appoint \u2018x \u2018 to have the accounts taken and passed. ORDER 80 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (2) On the passing of any accounts the Court shall make all proper allowances out of the patient's estate, including an allowance in respect of the reasonable and proper costs of the receiver of passing the accounts and of any other person allowed to attend. (3) The Court may, if it thinks fit, direct that a receiver need not account under this rule or may dispense with the passing of any accounts at any time at which they would otherwise require to be passed. (4) The balance found due from a receiver on the passing of the receiver\u2019s accounts or so much thereof as the Court may direct shall \u2014 (a) be paid by the receiver into Court to the credit of the proceedings and invested in such manner as the Court may direct; or (b) be invested or otherwise dealt with by the receiver in such manner as the Court may direct. (5) Unless otherwise directed, any money ordered to be paid by a receiver for maintenance shall be paid out of income and any costs ordered to be paid by a receiver may, when determined, be paid out of any monies coming into the receiver\u2019s hands, after providing for any maintenance and fees payable under these Rules. 24. Default by receiver (O.80, r.24) 24. (1) Where a receiver fails to comply with rule 23 or fails to pay into Court or invest or to otherwise deal with any money in accordance with any direction of the Court, the Court may disallow any remuneration which would otherwise be due to the receiver and, if the receiver has made default in paying into Court or investing in or otherwise dealing with any money, may charge the receiver with interest thereon at such rate as the Court may fix for the period of the receiver\u2019s default. (2) Any person who would be entitled to apply for the appointment of a receiver under rule 17 may apply for an order under paragraph (1) or for an order removing the receiver on the ground that \u2014 (a) the person is in default; or (b) the person is no longer willing, able or fit to perform the duties required of the person with respect to the patient. 25. Discharge of receiver (O.80, r.25) 25. (1) A receiver may apply to the Court for that receiver\u2019s discharge on the ground that \u2014 (a) the receiver desires to resign; (b) the patient has recovered and is capable of managing the patient\u2019s own affairs; or Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 80 (c) the patient has no significant property or income such that the services of a receiver are no longer required, provided that an order shall not be made under subparagraph (a) of this rule unless or until the Court is able to appoint a successor. (2) A patient may apply to the Court for the discharge of that patient\u2019s receiver on the grounds mentioned in subparagraph (1)(b) or (c). (3) Subject to applying for the receiver\u2019s final accounts to be passed, a receiver shall be discharged upon the death of the patient in respect of whom the receiver was appointed. (4) An order for the discharge of a receiver shall take effect from the date upon which the receiver\u2019s final accounts are passed by the Court. (5) A receiver who is removed pursuant to rule 24 shall not be discharged until any liability to the patient or the patient\u2019s estate has been satisfied and the receiver\u2019s final accounts have been passed by the Court. 26. Application for settlement or gift of patient's property or for execution of will of patient (O.80, r.26) 26. An application for an order for the settlement or gift of any property of a patient or an application for execution for a patient of a will, may be made only by \u2014 (a) the receiver or other person appointed for the patient under Section 14 of the Grand Court Act (as amended and revised); or (b) any person who has made an application for the appointment of a receiver or other person under Section 14 of the Grand Court Act (as amended and revised)  which has not yet been determined; or (c) any person who, under any known will of the patient or the patient\u2019s intestacy, may become entitled to any property of the patient or any interest therein; or (d) any person for whom the patient might be expected to provide if the patient were not mentally impaired. 27. Application to be heard in Chambers (O.80, r.27) 27. Every application under this Part of this Order shall be heard in Chambers unless the Court directs pursuant to O.32, r.13, that an application should be adjourned into open court. III. APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN ORDER 80 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 28. Application for appointment of guardian (O.80, r.28) 28. (1) An application for the appointment of a guardian under Section 14 of the Grand Court Act (as amended and revised) may be made by any of the persons mentioned in rule 17(1)(a),(b),(d) or (e). (2) Subject to paragraph (3), an application under this rule shall be made by originating summons. (3) The Court may dispense with the need for issuing an originating summons whenever the Court considers that it is necessary for an application to be made urgently. (4) Rules 18 and 19 shall apply, mutatis mutandis, to this Part of this Order. (5) An application under this rule may be combined with an application under rule 17. 29. Evidence in support of an application under rule 28 (O.80, r.29) 29. (1) An application under rule 28 shall be supported by \u2014 (a) a report by a medical practitioner certifying that the person is of unsound mind or suffering from mental illness; and (b) an affidavit giving particulars of the patient's relatives and of the circumstances giving rise to the application. (2) Whenever the Court thinks it expedient to do so, it may request the Chief Medical Officer to examine a person and provide the Court with a further report for the purpose of \u2014 (a) certifying whether or not the person is of unsound mind or suffering from mental illness; or (b) answering such specific questions as may be put to the person by the Court. (3) Whenever the Court proceeds in accordance with rule 28(3), the Court may dispense with the requirements of paragraphs (1) and (2). 30. Service (O.80, r.30) 30. Rule 21 shall apply to an application made under this Part of this Order. 31. Order appointing guardian (O.80, r.31) 31. (1) An order for the appointment of a guardian in respect of any person shall specify the duties to be performed by the guardian, provided that the guardian shall not have any duty in respect of the administration of a person's property generally unless the guardian is also appointed receiver. (2) The guardian may apply by summons in the proceedings for such further or other directions as the guardian considers necessary, including an application under rule 17 that the guardian be appointed receiver. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 80 32. Removal of guardian (O.80, r.32) 32. (1) A guardian may apply to the Court for the guardian\u2019s own removal on the ground that \u2014 (a) the guardian desires to resign; or (b) the patient has recovered, is of sound mind and no longer suffering from mental illness, provided that an order shall not be made under subparagraph (a) of this rule unless and until the Court is able to appoint a successor. (2) A patient or any person who would have been able to apply under rule 28(1) for the appointment of the guardian may apply to the Court for the guardian's removal on the ground \u2014 (a) mentioned in subparagraph (1)(b) of this rule; (b) that the guardian has failed to discharge the guardian\u2019s duty; or (c) that the guardian is no longer willing, able or fit to perform the duties required of the guardian with respect to the patient. ORDER 80 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) GCR 1995 (Revised) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 81 ORDER 81 PARTNERS I. GENERAL PARTNERSHIPS 1. Actions by and against firms within jurisdiction (O.81, r.1) 1. Subject to the provisions of any enactment, any two or more persons claiming to be entitled, or alleged to be liable, as partners in respect of a cause of action and carrying on business within the jurisdiction may sue, or be sued, in the name of the firm (if any) of which they were partners at the time when the cause of action accrued. 2. Disclosure of partners' names (O.81, r.2) 2. (1) Any defendant to an action brought by partners in the name of a firm may serve on the plaintiffs or their attorneys a notice requiring them or their attorneys forthwith to furnish the defendant with a written statement of the names and places of residence of all the persons who were partners in the firm at the time when the cause of action accrued; and if the notice is not complied with the Court may order the plaintiffs or their attorneys to furnish the defendant with such a statement and to verify it on oath or otherwise as may be specified in the order, or may order that further proceedings in the action be stayed on such terms as the Court may direct. (2) When the names of the partners have been declared in compliance with a notice or order given or made under paragraph (1), the proceedings shall continue in the name of the firm but with the same consequences as would have ensued if the persons whose names have been so declared had been named as plaintiffs in the writ. (3) Paragraph (1) shall have effect in relation to an action brought against partners in the name of a firm as it has effect in relation to an action brought by partners in the name of a firm but with the substitution, for references to the defendant and the plaintiffs, of references to the plaintiff and the defendants respectively, and with the omission of the words \\\"or may order\\\" to the end. 3. Service of writ (O.81, r.3) 3. (1) Where by virtue of rule 1 partners are sued in the name of a firm, the writ may, except in the case mentioned in paragraph (2), be served \u2014 (a) on any one or more of the partners; or (b) at the principal place of business of the partnership within the jurisdiction, on any person having at the time of service the control or management of the partnership business there, ORDER 81 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) and where service of the writ is effected in accordance with this paragraph, the writ shall be deemed to have been duly served on the firm, whether or not any member of the firm is out of the jurisdiction. (2) Where a partnership has, to the knowledge of the plaintiff, been dissolved before an action against the firm is begun, the writ by which the action is begun must be served on every person within the jurisdiction sought to be made liable in the action. (3) Every person on whom a writ is served under paragraph (1) must at the time of service be given a written notice stating whether the person is served as a partner or as a person having the control or management of the partnership business or both as partner and as such a person; and any person on whom a writ is so served but to whom no such notice is given shall be deemed to be served as a partner. 4. Acknowledgment of service in action against firm (O.81, r.4) 4. (1) Where persons are sued as partners in the name of their firm, service may not be acknowledged in the name of the firm but only by the partners thereof in their own names but the action shall nevertheless continue in the name of the firm. (2) Where in an action against a firm the writ by which the action is begun is served on a person as a partner, that person, if that person denies that that person was a partner or liable as such at any material time, may acknowledge service of the writ in the action and state in that person\u2019s acknowledgment that that person does so as a person served as a partner in the defendant firm but who denies that that person was a partner at any material time. An acknowledgment of service given in accordance with this paragraph shall, unless and until it is set aside, be treated as an acknowledgment by the defendant firm. (3) Where an acknowledgment of service has been given for a defendant in accordance with paragraph (2), then \u2014 (a) the plaintiff may either apply to the Court to set it aside on the ground that the defendant was a partner or liable as such at a material time or may leave that question to be determined at a later stage of the proceedings; (b) the defendant may either apply to the Court to set aside the service of the writ on the defendant on the ground that the defendant was not a partner or liable as such at a material time or may at the proper time serve a defence on the plaintiff denying in respect of the plaintiff's claim either the defendant\u2019s liability as a partner or the liability of the defendant firm or both. (4) The Court may at any stage of the proceedings in an action in which a defendant has acknowledged service in accordance with paragraph (2), on the application of the plaintiff or of that defendant, order that any question as to the liability of Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 81 that defendant or as to the liability of the defendant firm be tried in such manner and at such time as the Court directs. (5) Where in an action against a firm the writ by which the action is begun is served on a person as a person having the control or management of the partnership business, that person may not acknowledge service in the action unless that person is a member of the firm sued. 5. Enforcing judgment or order against firm (O.81, r.5) 5. (1) Where a judgment is given or order made against a firm, execution to enforce the judgment or order may, subject to rule 6, issue against any property of the firm within the jurisdiction. (2) Where a judgment is given or order made against a firm, execution to enforce the judgment or order may, subject to rule 6 and to the next following paragraphs, issue against any person who \u2014 (a) acknowledged service of the writ in the action as a partner; or (b) having been served as a partner with the writ failed to acknowledge service of the writ in the action; or (c) admitted in that person\u2019s pleading that that person is a partner; or (d) was adjudged to be a partner. (3) Execution to enforce a judgment or order given or made against a firm may not issue against a member of the firm who was out of the jurisdiction when the writ was issued unless the person \u2014 (a) acknowledged service of the writ in the action as a partner; or (b) was served within the jurisdiction with the writ as a partner; or (c) was, with the leave of the Court given under O.11, served out of the jurisdiction with the writ as a partner, and, except as provided by paragraph (1) and by the foregoing provisions to this paragraph, a judgment or order given or made against a firm shall not render liable, release or otherwise affect a member of the firm who was out of the jurisdiction when the writ was issued. (4) Where a party who has obtained a judgment or order against a firm claims that a person is liable to satisfy the judgment or order as being a member of the firm, and the foregoing provisions of this rule do not apply in relation to that person, that party may apply to the Court for leave to issue execution against that person, the application to be made by summons which must be served personally on that person. (5) Where the person against whom an application under paragraph (4) is made does not dispute that person\u2019s liability, the Court hearing the application may, subject to paragraph (3), give leave to issue execution against that person, and, where ORDER 81 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) that person disputes that person\u2019s liability, the Court may order that the liability of that person be tried and determined in any manner in which any issue or question in an action may be tried and determined. 6. Enforcing judgment or order in actions between partners, etc. (O.81, r.6) 6. (1) Execution to enforce a judgment or order given or made in \u2014 (a) an action by or against a firm in the name of the firm against or by a member of the firm; or (b) an action by a firm in the name of the firm against a firm in the name of the firm where those firms have one or more members in common, shall not issue except with the leave of the Court. (2) The Court hearing an application under this rule may give such directions, including directions as to the taking of accounts and the making of inquiries, as may be just. 7. Attachment of debts owed by firm (O.81, r.7) 7. (1) An order may be made under O.49, r.1, in relation to debts due or accruing due from a firm carrying on business within the jurisdiction notwithstanding that one or more members of the firm is resident out of the jurisdiction. (2) An order to show cause under the said rule 1 relating to such debts as aforesaid must be served on a member of the firm within the jurisdiction or on some other person having the control or management of the partnership business. (3) Where an order made under the said rule requires a firm to appear before the Court, an appearance by a member of the firm constitutes a sufficient compliance with the order. 8. Actions begun by originating summons (O.81, r.8) 8. Rules 2 to 7 shall, with the necessary modifications, apply in relation to an action by or against partners in the name of their firm begun by originating summons as they apply in relation to such an action begun by writ. 9. Application to person carrying on business in another name (O.81, r.9) 9. (1) An individual carrying on business within the jurisdiction in a name or style other than the individual\u2019s own name, may be sued in that name or style as if it were the name of a firm, and rules 2 to 8 shall, so far as applicable, apply as if the individual were a partner and the name in which the individual carries on business were the name of the individual\u2019s firm. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 81 10. Applications for orders charging partner's interest in partnership property, etc. (O.81, r.10) 10. (1) Every application to the Court by a judgment creditor of a partner for an order under Section 23 of the Partnership Act (as amended and revised) (which authorises the Court to make certain orders on the application of a judgment creditor of a partner, including an order charging the partner's interest in the partnership property), and every application to the Court by a partner of the judgment debtor made in consequence of the first-mentioned application must be made by summons. (2) Every summons issued by a judgment creditor under this rule, and every order made on such a summons, must be served on the judgment debtor and on such of the judgment debtor\u2019s partners as are within the jurisdiction. (3) Every summons issued by a partner of a judgment debtor under this rule, and every order made on such a summons, must be served \u2014 (a) on the judgment creditor; and (b) on the judgment debtor; and (c) on such of the other partners of the judgment debtor as do not join in the application and are within the jurisdiction. (4) A summons or order served in accordance with this rule, on some only of the partners of a partnership, shall be deemed to have been served on all the partners of that partnership. II. LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS 11. Definitions (O.81, r.11 11. In Part II of this Order \u2014 (a) \\\"ordinary limited partnership\\\" means a limited partnership registered in accordance with Section 49 of the Partnership Act (as amended and revised); (b) \\\"exempted limited partnership\\\" means a limited partnership registered in accordance with Section 9 of the Exempted Limited Partnership Act (as amended and revised); (c) \\\"general partner\\\" when used in relation to an ordinary limited partnership means a partner who is not a limited partner as defined by Section 46(2)(a) of the Partnership Act (as amended and revised), and when used in relation to an exempted limited partnership means a person who is named as such in the statement filed pursuant to Section 9 of the Exempted Limited Partnership Act (as amended and revised); ORDER 81 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (d) \\\"firm\\\" means an ordinary limited partnership or an exempted limited partnership. 12. Actions by and against firms within jurisdiction (O.81, r.12) 12. Any actions by or against an ordinary limited partnership or exempted limited partnership may be commenced in the name of the firm. 13. Service of writ (O.81, r.13) 13. Where an action is commenced against a firm, whether sued in the firm name or in the name of the general partner, the writ shall be served \u2014 (a) in the case of an ordinary limited partnership, by delivering the writ to its registered principal place of business; and (b) in the case of an exempted limited partnership, by delivering the writ to its registered office. 14. Acknowledgment of service in action against firm (O.81, r.14) 14. Where an ordinary limited partnership or exempted limited partnership is sued in its firm name, service may not be acknowledged in the name of the firm but only by the general partner thereof in the general partner\u2019s own name, but the action shall nevertheless continue in the name of the firm. 15. Enforcing judgment or order against firm (O.81, r.15) 15. (1) Where a judgment is given or order made against a firm, execution to enforce the judgment or order may be issued against any property of the firm within the jurisdiction. (2) Where a judgment is given or order made against a firm, execution to enforce the judgment or order may be issued against any person who \u2014 (a) acknowledged service of the writ in the action as a general partner; or (b) is registered as a general partner of the firm; or (c) was admitted in any pleading to be a general partner of the firm; or (d) was adjudged to be a general partner of the firm pursuant to Section 52(2) of the Partnership Act (as amended and revised), or Section 14 of the Exempted Limited Partnership Act (as amended and revised), as the case may be. (3) Except as provided by paragraph (2), where a judgment is given or order made against a firm, execution to enforce the judgment or order shall not be issued against any person who is registered as a limited partner. GCR 1995 (Revised) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 82 ORDER 82 DEFAMATION ACTIONS 1. Application (O.82, r.1) 1. These Rules apply to actions for libel or slander. 2. Indorsement of claim in libel action (O.82, r.2). 2. Before a writ in an action for libel is issued it must be indorsed with a statement giving sufficient particulars of the publications in respect of which the action is brought to enable them to be identified. 2A. Application for leave to institute defamation action (O.82, r.2A) 2A. (1) An application under Section 38 of the Limitation Act (as amended and revised) for leave to institute a defamation action shall be made by originating summons in Form No. 3 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) and shall be heard in Chambers. (2) The application must be supported by an affidavit setting out the grounds on which leave is sought and any facts necessary to substantiate those grounds. 3. Obligation to give particulars (O.82, r.3) 3. (1) Where in an action for libel or slander the plaintiff alleges that the words or matters complained of were used in a defamatory sense other than their ordinary meaning, the plaintiff must give particulars of the facts and matters on which the plaintiff relies in support of such sense. (2) Where in an action for libel or slander the defendant alleges that, insofar as the words complained of consist of statements of fact, they are true in substance and in fact, and, insofar as they consist of expressions of opinion, they are fair comment on a matter of public interest, or pleads to the like effect, the defendant must give particulars stating which of the words complained of the defendant alleges are statements of fact and of the facts and matters the defendant relies on in support of the allegation that the words are true. (2A) Without prejudice to O.18, r.8, but subject to paragraph (2B), where the defendant makes an allegation as described in paragraph (2), the plaintiff shall serve a reply specifically admitting or denying any such allegation raised by the defendant and specifying any fact or matter upon which the plaintiff relies in opposition to the defendant's allegations. (2B) No reply shall be required under paragraph (2A) where all the facts or matters on which the plaintiff intends to rely in opposition to the defendant's allegations ORDER 82 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) as described in paragraph (2) are already particularised elsewhere in the pleadings. (3) Where in an action for libel or slander the plaintiff alleges that the defendant maliciously published the words or matters complained of, the plaintiff need not in the plaintiff\u2019s statement of claim give particulars of the facts on which the plaintiff relies in support of the allegation of malice, but if the defendant pleads that any of those words or matters are fair comment on a matter of public interest or were published upon a privileged occasion and the plaintiff intends to allege that the defendant was actuated by express malice, the plaintiff must serve a reply giving particulars of the facts and matters from which the malice is to be inferred. (3A)  Without prejudice to O.18, r.12, the plaintiff must give full particulars in the statement of the facts and matters on which the plaintiff relies in support of the plaintiff\u2019s claim for damages, including details of any conduct by the defendant which it is alleged has increased the loss suffered and of any loss which is peculiar to the plaintiff's own circumstances. (4) This rule shall apply in relation to a counterclaim for libel or slander as if the party making the counterclaim were the plaintiff and the party against whom it is made the defendant. 3A. Ruling on meaning (O.82, r.3A) 3A. (1) At any time after the service of the statement of claim either party may apply to a judge in chambers for an order determining whether or not the words complained of are capable of bearing a particular meaning or meanings attributed to them in the pleadings. (2) If it appears to the judge on the hearing of an application under paragraph (1) that none of the words complained of are capable of bearing the meaning or meanings attributed to them in the pleadings, the Judge may dismiss the claim or make such other order or give such judgment in the proceedings as may be just. (3) Subject to paragraph (4), each party to the proceedings may make only one application under paragraph (1). (4) Where a party has made an application under paragraph (1) and the respondent to that application subsequently amends that respondent\u2019s pleadings to allege a new meaning, the Court may allow the other party to make a further application under paragraph (1) in relation to that new meaning. (5) This rule shall apply in relation to a counterclaim for libel or slander as if the party making the counterclaim were the plaintiff and the party against whom it is made the defendant, and as if the counterclaim were the statement of claim. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 82 4. Provisions as to payment into Court (O.82, r.4) 4. (1) Where in an action for libel or slander against several defendants sued jointly the plaintiff, in accordance with O.22, r.3(1), accepts money paid into Court by any of those defendants in satisfaction of the plaintiff\u2019s cause of action against that defendant, then, notwithstanding anything in rule 3(4) of that Order, the action shall be stayed as against that defendant only, but \u2014 (a) the sum recoverable under any judgment given in the plaintiff's favour against any other defendant in the action by way of damages shall not exceed the amount (if any) by which the amount of the damages exceeds the amount paid into Court by the defendant as against whom the action has been stayed; and (b) the plaintiff shall not be entitled to the plaintiff\u2019s costs of the action against the other defendant after the date of the payment into Court unless either the amount of the damages awarded to the plaintiff is greater than the amount paid into Court and accepted by the plaintiff or the Judge is of opinion that there was reasonable ground for the plaintiff to proceed with the action against the other defendant. (2) Where in an action for libel a party pleads the defence for which Section 10 of the Defamation Act (as amended and revised) provides, O.22, r.7, shall not apply in relation to that pleading. 5. Statement in open Court (O.82, r.5) 5. (1) Where a party accepts money paid into Court in satisfaction of a cause of action for libel or slander, malicious prosecution or false imprisonment, that party may apply to a Judge in Chambers by summons for leave to make in open Court a statement in terms approved by the Judge. (2) Where a party to an action for libel or slander, malicious prosecution or false imprisonment which is settled before trial desires to make a statement in open Court, an application must be made to a Judge in Chambers for an order that the action be set down for trial, and before the date fixed for the trial the statement must be submitted for the approval of the Judge before whom it is to be made. 6. Interrogatories not allowed in certain cases (O.82, r.6) 6. In an action for libel or slander where the defendant pleads that the words or matters complained of are fair comment on a matter of public interest or were published on a privileged occasion, no interrogatories as to the defendant's sources of information or grounds of belief shall be allowed. 7. No rule (O.82, r.7) 7. No rule (O.82, r.7) ORDER 82 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 8. Fulfilment of offer of amends under Section 11 of the Defamation Act (as amended and revised) (O.82, r.8) 8. (1) An application to the Court under Section 11 of the Defamation Act (as amended and revised) to determine any question as to the steps to be taken in fulfilment of an offer of amends made under that Section must, unless the application be made in the course of proceedings for libel or slander in respect of the publication to which the offer relates, be made to a Judge in Chambers. (2) An originating summons by which such application is made shall be in Form No. 3 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). GCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 20.01.97) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 83-84 ORDER 83-84 NO ORDERS GCR 1995 (Revised) ORDER 85 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 85 ADMINISTRATION AND SIMILAR ACTIONS 1. Interpretation (O.85, r.1) 1. In this Order \u2014 \\\"administration action\\\" means an action for the administration under the direction of the Court of the estate of a deceased person or for the execution under the direction of the Court of a trust; \\\"enforcer\\\" has the meaning ascribed to it by Part VIII of the Trusts Act (as amended and revised); \\\"special trust\\\" has the meaning ascribed to it Part VIII of the Trusts Act (as amended and revised); \\\"trust\\\" and \\\"trustee\\\" have the meanings ascribed to them in Section 2 of the Trusts Act (as amended and revised), and includes a special trust except where the context otherwise requires. 2. Determination of questions, etc., without administration (O.85, r.2) 2. (1) An action may be brought for the determination of any question or for any relief which could be determined or granted, as the case may be, in an administration action and a claim need not be made in the action for the administration or execution under the direction of the Court of the estate or trust in connection with which the question arises or the relief is sought. (2) Without prejudice to the generality of paragraph (1), an action may be brought for the determination of any of the following questions \u2014 (a) any question arising in the administration of the estate of a deceased person or in the execution of a trust; (b) any question as to the composition of any class of persons having a claim against the estate of a deceased person or a beneficial interest in the estate of such a person or in any property subject to a trust; (c) any question as to the rights or interests of a person claiming to be a creditor of the estate of a deceased person or to be entitled under a will or on the intestacy of a deceased person or to be beneficially entitled under a trust; or (d) any question as to the rights or duties of an enforcer. (3) Without prejudice to the generality of paragraph (1), an action may be brought for any of the following reliefs \u2014 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 85 (a) an order requiring an executor, administrator or trustee to furnish and, if necessary, verify accounts; (b) an order requiring the payment into Court of money held by a person in that person\u2019s capacity as executor, administrator or trustee; (c) an order directing a person to do or abstain from doing a particular act in that person\u2019s capacity as executor, administrator, trustee or enforcer; (d) an order approving any sale, purchase, compromise or other transaction by a person in that person\u2019s capacity as executor, administrator or trustee; (e) an order directing any act to be done in the administration of the estate of a deceased person or in the execution of a trust which the Court could order to be done if the estate or trust were being administered or executed, as the case may be, under the direction of the Court; or (f) the advice or opinion of the Court on any question respecting the management of the estate or trust or the enforcement of a special trust. (4) An action may be brought under this rule by \u2014 (a) any executor or administrator of an estate; (b) any trustee of a trust; (c) any beneficiary of an estate or trust, not being a special trust; or (d) any enforcer of a special trust. 3. Parties (O.85, r.3) 3. (1) All the executors or administrators of the estate or trustees of the trust, as the case may be, to which an administration action or such an action as is referred to in rule 2 relates must be parties to the action, and where the action is brought by executors, administrators or trustees, any of them who does not consent to being joined as a plaintiff must be made a defendant. (2) Notwithstanding anything in O.15, r.4(2), and without prejudice to the powers of the Court under that Order, all the persons having a beneficial interest in or claim against the estate or having a beneficial interest under the trust and all enforcers of a special trust, as the case may be, to which such an action as is mentioned in paragraph (1) relates need not be parties to the action; but the plaintiff may make such of those persons, whether all or any one or more of them, parties as, having regard to the nature of the relief or remedy claimed in the action, the plaintiff thinks fit. (3) For the purposes of this rule, a beneficiary of a special trust who is not also an enforcer, shall not be treated as having a beneficial interest under the trust. (4) Where, in proceedings under a judgment or order given or made in an action for the administration under the direction of the Court of the estate of a deceased person, a claim in respect of a debt or other liability is made against the estate by a person not a party to the action, no party other than the executors or ORDER 85 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) administrators of the estate shall be entitled to appear in any proceedings relating to that claim without the leave of the Court, and the Court may direct or allow any other party to appear either in addition to, or in substitution for, the executors or administrators on such terms as to costs or otherwise as it thinks fit. 4. Grant of relief in action begun by originating summons (O.85, r.4) 4. In an administration action or such an action as is referred to in rule 2, the Court may make any certificate or order and grant any relief to which the plaintiff may be entitled by reason of any breach of trust, wilful default or other misconduct of the defendant notwithstanding that the action was begun by originating summons, but the foregoing provision is without prejudice to the power of the Court to make an order under O.28, r.8, in relation to the action. 5. Judgments and orders in administration actions (O.85, r.5) 5. (1) A judgment or order for the administration or execution under the direction of the Court of an estate or trust need not be given or made unless in the opinion of the Court the questions at issue between the parties cannot properly be determined otherwise than under such a judgment or order. (2) Where an administration action is brought by a creditor of the estate of a deceased person or by a person claiming to be entitled under a will or on the intestacy of a deceased person or to be beneficially entitled under a trust, and the plaintiff alleges that no or insufficient accounts have been furnished by the executors, administrators or trustees, as the case may be, then, without prejudice to its other powers, the Court may \u2013 (a) order that proceedings in the action be stayed for a period specified in the order and that the executors, administrators or trustees, as the case may be, shall within that period furnish the plaintiff with proper accounts; (b) if necessary to prevent proceedings by other creditors or by other persons claiming to be entitled as aforesaid, give judgment or make an order for the administration of the estate to which the action relates and include therein an order that no proceedings are to be taken under the judgment or order, or under any particular account or inquiry directed without the leave of the Judge. 6. Conduct of sale of trust property (O.85, r.6) 6. Where in an administration action an order is made for the sale of any property vested in executors, administrators or trustees, those executors, administrators or trustees, as the case may be, shall have the conduct of the sale unless the Court otherwise directs. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 85 7. Ordinary application under Section 48 of the Trusts Act (as amended and revised) (O.85, r.7) 7. (1) Unless made by written submission under rule 8, an application by an executor, administrator, trustee or enforcer under Section 48 of the Trusts Act (as amended and revised) for the opinion, advice or direction of the Court upon any question respecting the management or administration of the estate or trust fund shall be made in accordance with this rule. (2) An application under this rule shall be made by originating summons in Form No. 3 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) or an ex parte originating summons in Form No. 4 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). (3) Every application under this rule shall be supported by an affidavit which shall \u2014 (a) have exhibited to it \u2014 (i) the will and order of probate; (ii) the letters of administration; (iii) the deed of settlement; or (iv) the declaration of trust, as the case may be; (b) contain full particulars of the beneficiaries or classes of beneficiaries and their respective interests; (c) define the question in respect of which the Court's opinion, advice or direction is sought; and (d) give a full and frank disclosure of all facts material to the application. 8. Written application under Section 48 of the Trusts Act (as amended and revised) (O.85, r.8) 8. (1) An application by an executor, administrator, trustee or enforcer under Section 48 of the Trusts Act (as amended and revised) for the opinion, advice or direction of the Court upon any question respecting the management or administration of the estate or trust fund may be made by written submission without any oral hearing. (2) An application under this rule shall be made by ex parte originating application in Form No. 57 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). (3) An application under this rule shall be supported by a written submission signed by the applicant's attorney which shall \u2014 (a) explain why the application is not made under rule 2 and served in accordance with rule 3; ORDER 85 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (b) define the question in respect of which the Court's opinion, advice or direction is sought; (c) identify and discuss all matters of law which are material to the application; and (d) give a full and frank disclosure of all facts material to the application. (4) An application under this rule may be supported by a statement of agreed facts signed by \u2014 (a) the executor, administrator or trustee, as the case may be; (b) all the adult beneficiaries of the estate or trust; or (c) all the adult enforcers of a special trust. (5) Unless supported by a statement of agreed facts signed in accordance with paragraph (4), an application under this rule shall be supported by an affidavit which shall \u2014 (a) contain full particulars of the beneficiaries or classes of beneficiaries and their respective interests; and (b) verify the statement of material facts contained in the written submission. (6) A statement of agreed facts or affidavit shall have exhibited to it a true copy of the will and grant of probate or the letters of administration or the deed of settlement or the declaration of trust, as the case may be. (7) Upon an application under this rule the Court may \u2014 (a) give its written opinion, advice or direction; or (b) give directions for the application to proceed in accordance with rule 2 or rule 7. (8) An application may not be made under this rule by an executor, administrator, trustee or enforcer acting in person. (9) Order 28 shall not apply to a written application under this rule unless the Court gives directions for the application to proceed in accordance with rule 2 or rule 7. (10) Order 42, rule 5, shall not apply to a written opinion, advice or direction given on an application under this rule, which shall be drawn up by the Judge and sent by the Clerk of the Court to the applicant's attorney. 9. Application for reformation of a special trust (O.85, r.9) 9. (1) An application under Section 103(4) or Section 104(1) of the Trusts Act (as amended and revised) to reform a special trust or settle a plan for its administration shall be made by originating summons in Form No. 3 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 85 (2) An application under this rule may be made by a trustee or an enforcer of a special trust. (3) Notwithstanding anything in O.15, r.4(2), and without prejudice to the powers of the Court under that Order, all the enforcers of a special trust in respect of which an application under this rule is made need not be parties to the application, but the applicant may make such of the enforcers parties as, having regard to the circumstances of the case, the applicant thinks fit. (4) Every application under this rule shall be supported by an affidavit. GCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 01.01.98) ORDER 86 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 86 ACTIONS FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE, ETC.: SUMMARY JUDGMENT 1. Application by plaintiff for summary judgment (O.86, r.1) 1. (1) In any action begun by writ indorsed with a claim \u2014 (a) for specific performance of an agreement (whether in writing or not) for the sale, purchase or exchange of any property or for the grant or assignment of a lease of any property with or without an alternative claim for damages; or (b) for rescission of such an agreement; or (c) for the forfeiture or return of any deposit made under such an agreement, the plaintiff may, on the ground that the defendant has no defence to the action, apply to the Court for judgment. (2) An application may be made against a defendant under this rule whether or not the defendant has acknowledged service of the writ in the action. 2. Manner in which application under rule 1 must be made (O.86, r.2) 2.    (1) An application under rule 1 must be made by summons supported by an affidavit made by some person who can swear positively to the facts verifying the cause of action and stating that in that person\u2019s belief there is no defence to the action. Unless the Court otherwise directs an affidavit for the purposes of this paragraph may contain statements of information or belief with the sources and grounds thereof. (2) The summons must set out or have attached thereto minutes of the judgment sought by the plaintiff. (3) The summons, a copy of the affidavit in support and of any exhibit referred to therein, must be served on the defendant not less than 4 clear days before the return day. 3. Judgment for plaintiff (O.86, r.3) 3. Unless on the hearing of an application under rule 1 either the Court dismisses the application or the defendant satisfies the Court that there is an issue or question in dispute which ought to be tried or that there ought for some other reason to be a trial of the action, the Court may give judgment for the plaintiff in the action. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 86 4. Leave to defend (O.86, r.4) 4. (1) A defendant may show cause against an application under rule 1 by affidavit or otherwise to the satisfaction of the Court. (2) The Court may give a defendant against whom such an application is made leave to defend the action either unconditionally or on such terms as to giving security or time or mode of trial or otherwise as it thinks fit. (3) On the hearing of such an application the Court may order a defendant showing cause or, where that defendant is a body corporate, any director, manager, secretary or other similar officer thereof, or any person purporting to act in any such capacity \u2014 (a) to produce any document; (b) if it appears to the Court that there are special circumstances which make it desirable that the defendant should do so, to attend and be examined on oath. 5. Directions (O.86, r.5) 5. Where the Court orders that a defendant have leave to defend the action, the Court shall give directions as to the further conduct of the action, and O.25, rr. 2 to 7, shall, with the omission of so much of rule 7(1) as requires parties to serve a notice specifying the orders and directions which they require and with any other necessary modifications, apply as if the application under rule 1 were a summons for directions. 6. Costs (O.86, r.6) 6. If the plaintiff makes an application under rule 1 where the case is not within this Order, or if it appears to the Court that the plaintiff knew that the defendant relied on the contention which would entitle the plaintiff to unconditional leave to defend, then, the Court may dismiss the application with costs and may, if the plaintiff is not a legally aided person, require the costs to be paid by the plaintiff forthwith. 7. Setting aside judgment (O.86, r.7) 7. Any judgment given against a defendant who does not appear at the hearing of an application under rule 1 may be set aside or varied by the Court on such terms as it thinks just. GCR 1995 (Revised) ORDER 87-91 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 87-91 NO ORDERS GCR 1995 (Revised) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 92 ORDER 92 LODGMENT, INVESTMENT, ETC., OF FUNDS IN COURT 1. Interpretation (O.92, r.1) 1. In this Order, the following expressions shall have the following meanings \u2014 \\\"the Bank\\\" means such bank or banks as may be designated by the Cabinet under Schedule 1, paragraph 1(2) of the Judicature Act (as amended and revised); \\\"the Court\\\" includes the Court of Appeal and the Summary Court; \\\"General Account\\\" means the non-interest bearing bank account established in accordance with rule 7(1); \\\"designated mutual fund\\\" means a mutual fund designated under Schedule 1, paragraph 3(1) of the Judicature Act (as amended and revised); \\\"funds\\\" or \\\"funds in Court\\\" means any money, securities, investments or other property standing or to be placed to the account of the Courts Administrator by virtue of Schedule 1, paragraph 1(1) of the Judicature Act (as amended and revised), or of any other person by virtue of rules made under subsection (6) of that Section; \\\"lodge in Court\\\" means to pay or transfer into Court or deposit in Court; \\\"lodgment schedule\\\" means a schedule to an order directing funds to be lodged to the account of the Court Administrator; \\\"Nominated Account\\\" means an interest bearing nominated bank account established in accordance with rule 7(3); \\\"payment schedule\\\" means a schedule to an order directing the payment of funds from the account of the Court Administrator; 2. Payment into Court under the Trusts Act (as amended and revised) (O.92, r.2) 2. (1) Any trustee wishing to pay a trust fund into Court under Section 69 of the Trusts Act (as amended and revised), must make an affidavit setting out \u2014 (a) a short description of the trust and the instrument creating it or, as the case may be, of the circumstances in which the trust arose; (b) the names of the persons interested in or entitled to the money or securities to be paid into Court with their addresses so far as known to the trustee; ORDER 92 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (c) the trustee\u2019s submission to answer all such inquiries relating to the application of such money or securities as the Court may make or direct; and (d) an address where the trustee may be served with any summons or order, or notice of any proceedings, relating to the money or securities paid into Court. (2) In the case of a trust fund which is the subject of a proceeding pending in Court, the affidavit required to be made under paragraph (1) shall be filed in Court and a copy of it shall be served on the Court Administrator. (3) In the case of a trust fund which is not the subject of any proceeding pending in the Court, the affidavit required to be made under paragraph (1) shall be filed with the Court Administrator. (4) An application under this rule shall be in Form No. 105 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). 3. Notice of lodgment (O.92, r.3) 3. Any person who has lodged money or securities in Court in accordance with rule 2 must forthwith send notice of the lodgment to every person appearing from the affidavit on which the lodgment was made to be entitled to, or to have an interest in, the money or securities lodged. 4. Applications with respect to funds in Court (O.92, r.4) 4. (1) Where an application is made to the Court \u2014 (a) for the payment or transfer to any person of any funds in Court standing to the credit of any cause or matter or for the transfer of any such funds to a separate account or for payment to any person of any dividend of or interest on any securities or money comprised in such funds; (b) for the investment or change of investment, of any funds in Court; (c) for payment of the dividends of or interest on any funds in Court representing or comprising money or securities lodged in Court under any enactment; or (d) for the payment or transfer out of Court of any such funds as are mentioned in subparagraph (c), the application may be disposed of in Chambers. (2) Subject to paragraph (3), any such application must be made by summons, and unless the application is made in a pending cause or matter or an application for the same purpose has previously been made by petition or originating summons, the summons must be an originating summons. (3) Where an application under subparagraph (1)(d) is required to be made by originating summons, then, if the funds to which the application relates do not Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 92 exceed CI$10,000.00 in value, and subject to any enactment, the application may be made ex parte and the Judge hearing it may either dispose of the application or may direct it to be served. (4) This rule does not apply to any application for an order under O.22. 5. Court Funds Office (O.92, r.5) 5. The office of the Courts Administrator or of any officer appointed by the Courts Administrator shall be known as the Courts Funds Office. 6. Discharge of the Court Administrator\u2019s functions (O.92, r.6) 6. The functions of the Courts Administrator under these Rules may be discharged, to such extent as the Courts Administrator may direct, by any officer appointed by the Court Administrator. 7. Bank accounts (O.92, r.7) 7. (1) The Courts Administrator shall establish accounts with the Bank (referred to as \\\"the General Account\\\") denominated in Cayman Islands Dollars, United States Dollars and such other currencies as may be required. (2) Any interest earned on money credited to the General Account shall be treated as Government revenue. (3) The Courts Administrator may from time to time establish with the Bank nominated interest bearing accounts (referred to as \\\"Nominated Accounts\\\") denominated in such currencies as may be appropriate. (4) All money lodged with the Court Funds Office shall be paid into the General Account unless the lodgment schedule requires that it be paid into a Nominated Account. (5) All Nominated Accounts shall be established in the name of \\\"The Courts Administrator of the Grand Court\\\" followed by such designation as may be appropriate to identify the trust, cause or matter to which it relates. (6) Interest shall accrue on Nominated Accounts from the date upon which they are established with the Bank and the rate of interest applicable shall be that which may be agreed from time to time between the Bank and the Court Administrator. 8. Lodgment schedule (O.92, r.8) 8. (1) Where a lodgment of funds in Court is directed by an order of any court, other than an attachment of earnings order, the Courts Administrator shall not make any such lodgment until the Courts Administrator has received a lodgment schedule in Form No. 101 or Form No. 102 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised), as may be appropriate. (2) Money payable by an employer pursuant to an attachment of earnings order shall be lodged in such manner as may be directed by the Court Administrator. ORDER 92 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 9. Payment schedule (O.92, r.9) 9. (1) Where an order, other than an attachment of earnings order, directs the manner in which any fund in Court is to be dealt with by the Court Administrator, a payment schedule in Form No. 201 or Form No. 202 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) signed by an authorised officer and bearing the seal of the Court shall be sufficient authority to the Courts Administrator to deal with a fund in accordance with the schedule. (2) An attachment of earnings order shall be sufficient authority for the Courts Administrator to pay to the judgment creditor sums of money received from the judgment debtor's employer. (3) For the purposes of giving effect to this rule the Chief Justice shall from time to time make practice directions specifying the authorised officers and the scope of their respective authority. (4) Every authorised officer shall sign a signature card in such form as shall be acceptable to the Court Administrator. 10. Preparation of schedules (O.92, r.10) 10. (1) In any proceedings in Court where an order is made for the lodgment of or dealing with funds in Court, the party having carriage of the order shall also be responsible for drawing up the necessary lodgment or payment schedule which shall be presented to the Clerk of the Court at the same time as the order to which it relates. (2) Where all the parties to a cause or matter are agreed upon the terms of a judgment or order to which O.42, r.5A applies and such judgment or order provides for the lodgment of or dealing with funds in Court, the necessary lodgment or payment schedule shall be presented to the Clerk of the Court at the same time as the consent order to which it relates. (3) Where funds have been paid into Court as security for costs and the amount of costs payable has been agreed without the need for a taxation, the parties may apply for payment out of Court by presenting the Clerk of the Court with a payment schedule together with written evidence of the parties' agreement thereto. 11. Lodgment of money in Court (O.92, r.11) 11. (1) Money to be lodged in Court shall be paid into the Court Funds Office and all cheques or other instruments shall be made payable to \\\"The Courts Administrator of the Grand Court\\\". (2) Money shall not be paid directly to the Bank save on the direction of the Court Administrator. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 92 12. Securities transferable by delivery and deposit of property (O.92, r.12) 12. (1) The lodgment in the Court of securities transferable by delivery and the deposit of property shall be made by delivery to the Court Funds Office. (2) Any person who deposits property in Court in accordance with paragraph (1)above shall provide the Courts Administrator with an inventory of that property signed and certified by that person as a true and accurate record. 13. Securities not transferable by delivery (O.92, r.13) 13. (1) Where any securities (other than securities transferable by delivery) are paid into Court, they shall be transferred into the name of the Courts Administrator together with such designation as may be appropriate. (2) Where securities have been transferred into the Court Administrator's name in the books of a bank or other company, the bank or other company, as the case may be, shall certify to the Courts Administrator that the securities have been transferred to the Court Administrator's name. 14. Appropriation (O.92, r.14) 14. (1) Where a defendant has lodged money in Court in accordance with O.14 as a condition of liberty to defend and desires to appropriate the whole or any part of such money in satisfaction of the whole or any part of the plaintiff's claim pursuant to O.22, r.8, the defendant shall lodge with the Courts Administrator a notice of appropriation in Form No. 104 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). (2) On receipt of a notice of appropriation the Courts Administrator shall note the relevant account accordingly. (3) If the plaintiff does not give notice of acceptance within 21 days after receiving notice of appropriation the Courts Administrator shall transfer the money to a Nominated Account designated in accordance with rule 7(5). 15. Withdrawal of money from Nominated Accounts (O.92, r.15) 15. Money shall only be withdrawn from a Nominated Account where the money, including any interest which has accrued at the time of withdrawal, is required to be withdrawn for the purpose of giving effect to a direction or order of the Court. 16. Range of investments (O.92, r.16) 16. Money under the control of, or subject to an order of the Court, may be invested or reinvested by the Court Administrator, in the following ways \u2014 (a) it may be credited to a Nominated Account; (b) it may be invested in any designated mutual fund. ORDER 92 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 17. Time for investment (O.92, r.17) 17. Subject to any directions of the Court, money required to be invested in an interest bearing account shall be credited to a Nominated Account as soon as it becomes available. 18. Designated mutual funds (O.92, r.18) 18. Where funds in Court are required to be invested in designated mutual funds or where funds so invested are required to be realised, the purchases or sales are to be effected on the first available valuation day. 19. Payment, transfer and delivery of funds out of Court (O.92, r.19) 19. (1) In this Rule the person entitled to the payment out of money is referred to as the \\\"payee\\\". (2) Subject to paragraphs (3) and (4) below, the payment out of money lodged in Court shall be made by crossed cheque which may be sent to the payee by post to the address specified in the payment schedule. (3) On receipt of a written request from the payee or a donee under a power of attorney given by the payee, the Courts Administrator may make payment to a bank in the Islands for the credit of the account of the payee at that bank or at a bank in the country in which the payee resides. (4) The Courts Administrator may, if the Courts Administrator thinks fit, refuse to make a payment until the Courts Administrator is satisfied as to the identity and entitlement of any person claiming to be the payee and the Courts Administrator may refuse to make a remittance by post in any individual case and may require the personal attendance of the payee at the Court Funds Office as a condition of payment. 20. Payment to representatives of deceased persons (O.92, r.20) 20. (1) Where a person entitled to a fund in Court either in that person\u2019s own right or as sole, or sole surviving executor dies, the Courts Administrator may, where the fund exceeds CI$5,000.00, pay it to the personal representative of the deceased on production of an office copy of the grant of probate or letters of administration in respect of the deceased's estate. (2) Where a person entitled to a fund in Court in the person\u2019s own right dies intestate and no grant of administration has been issued, the Courts Administrator may, where the assets of the deceased (including the fund in Court and after the deduction of debts and funeral expenses) do not exceed CI$5,000.00, pay the fund to the person who appears to the Courts Administrator to have the prior right to the grant of administration of the estate, on lodgment in the Court Funds Office of a written declaration of kinship. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 92 (3) Where two or more persons were entitled to payment of a fund in Court as personal representatives and any of them dies before the fund is dealt with, the Courts Administrator may pay the fund to the surviving personal representative(s) on proof of the death of the deceased personal representative; and where the fund does not exceed CI$5,000.00 the Courts Administrator may, unless a Court otherwise directs, pay the fund to any one of them. 21. Payment out without order of money lodged in satisfaction (O.92, r.21) 21. (1) In this rule and rule 22 a person in respect of whose cause of action a sum has been paid into Court in satisfaction, whether by way of claim or counterclaim, is referred to as a plaintiff and a person against whom such cause of action lies is referred to as a defendant. (2) A defendant wishing to pay a sum into Court pursuant to O.22, r.1, in satisfaction of a plaintiff's claim shall file with the Courts Administrator a request for lodgment in Form No. 103 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). (3) The Courts Administrator shall, on receipt of a request for payment in Form No. 203 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised), pay by cheque to the plaintiff money lodged in Court in satisfaction of a claim, or appropriated in accordance with rule 14, and accepted by the Courts Administrator in accordance with these Rules; provided that where an attorney is acting for the plaintiff in the proceedings in which the money was lodged or appropriated by virtue of a legal aid certificate issued in accordance with the Legal Aid Act (as amended and revised), the Courts Administrator shall pay the money to that attorney, provided that attorney is still so acting. 22. Payment out of interest on securities (O.92, r.22) 22. Where securities are lodged in Court under rule 12 or 13, any interest or dividends which accrue shall be credited by the Courts Administrator to a Nominated Account designated in the same manner as the designation of the securities. 23. Charges on purchase or sale of securities (O.92, r.23) 23. Subject to any directions of the Court \u2014 (a) where money in Court is invested in securities, the payment for the purchase shall include all applicable charges; and (b) where securities in Court are sold, all applicable charges shall be deducted from the proceeds of sale; provided that, if the schedule directing a purchase or sale also directs that charges are not to be deducted from the fund in Court, the transaction shall not be completed until such charges have been paid either to the stockbroker or to the Court Administrator, as the case may be. ORDER 92 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 24. Certificates of funds in Court, copies of accounts, etc. (O.92, r.24) 24. (1) The Courts Administrator may, on receipt of a written request from a person appearing to the Courts Administrator to be interested in a fund in Court, issue to the person a certificate as to lodgment in court, non-payment into Court under an order or any other dealing with the fund. (2) On receipt of a written request, the Courts Administrator may issue to a person appearing to the Courts Administrator to be interested in a Nominated Account a copy of the statements of account and any advice notes issued by the Bank in relation to it. (3) The Courts Administrator shall supply an annual statement of any fund in Court for the benefit of a child to that child\u2019s parent or guardian. 25. Transitional provisions (O.92, r.25) 25. (1) On the commencement date the Courts Administrator shall: (a) transfer to the General Account all funds then standing to the credit of the Government's \\\"Courts Office deposits subsidiary ledger\\\"; (b) establish a sub-account of the General Account to correspond with each entry in the \\\"Courts Office deposits subsidiary ledger\\\"; and (c) send to the Clerk of the Court details of all the sub-accounts established pursuant to this rule. (2) Within 14 days of the commencement date the Courts Administrator shall \u2014 (a) transfer to Nominated Accounts designated in accordance with rule 7(3) all funds then in Court and credited to interest bearing accounts; (b) send to the Clerk of the Court a list of all the Nominated Accounts established pursuant to this rule; (c) send to each of the persons appearing to be interested in the funds credited to the Nominated Accounts established pursuant to this rule, particulars of the account together with a statement of account issued by the Bank. (3) In the event of any uncertainty or dispute concerning funds paid into Court prior to the commencement date, the Courts Administrator shall apply to the Court for directions. GCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 22.01.96) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 93 ORDER 93 THE ELECTIONS ACT (as amended and revised) 1. Interpretation and application (O.93, r.1) 1. (1) In this Order \u2014 \\\"the Law\\\" means the Elections Act (as amended and revised), and any expressions used in this Order and in the Law have the same meanings in this Order as they have in the Law; \\\"election petition\\\" means a petition complaining of the undue election or undue return of a member of the Cayman Islands Parliament, under the Law; \\\"electoral district\\\" means the area to which the election petition relates; \\\"respondent\\\" in relation to an election petition, means the member whose election or return is complained of, or the returning officer, in a case in which the conduct of such returning officer is complained of; and \\\"returning officer\\\" means the returning officer of the electoral district to which the election petition relates. (2) Order 24 shall apply to proceedings under an election petition as if it were an action begun by writ. 2. Form, presentation and service of election petitions (O.93, r.2) 2. (1) An election petition shall be in Form No. 58 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) and shall state \u2014 (a) the capacity in which the petitioner or each of the petitioners presents the petition; (b) the date and result of the election to which the petition relates showing the date on which the return was made of the member declared to have been elected; (c) the grounds on which relief is sought, setting out with sufficient particularity the facts relied on but not the evidence by which they are to be proved; and shall conclude with a prayer setting out particulars of the relief claimed. (2) Subject to rule 3, an election petition shall be presented by filing it in accordance with O.5, r.1. (3) Every election petition shall be served on \u2014 (a) the respondent; (b) the Attorney General; and ORDER 93 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (c) the returning officer in any case in which the returning officer is not the respondent. (4) An affidavit of service shall be filed as soon as practicable after service has been effected. 3. Security for costs (O.93, r.3) 3. When presenting a petition under rule 2, the petitioner must at the same time pay the sum of $3,000 into Court as security for costs and the petition may not be served unless it is accompanied by a notice of payment into Court. 4. Publication of election petition (O.93, r.4) 4. A list of election petitions at issue shall be conspicuously displayed in the foyer of the Court office by the Clerk of the Court and shall be available for inspection by the public during office hours. 5. Fixing time for hearing election petition (O.93, r.5) 5. (1) Order 9, rule 4, shall not apply to election petitions. (2) Within 28 days after the date on which it was served, the petitioner shall apply by summons to a Judge for a date and time to be fixed for the trial of the petition and if the petitioner fails to do so, any respondent may within a further period of 28 days apply in the same manner as the petitioner could have done. (3) If no application to fix a date and time for the trial of an election petition is made in accordance with paragraph (2), the Clerk of the Court shall refer the matter to a Judge, who shall thereupon fix such a date and time. (4) The Clerk of the Court, not less than 7 days before the day so fixed for the trial, shall cause notice of the date and time of the trial to be displayed in a conspicuous place in the foyer of the Court office and shall serve a copy of such notice on \u2014 (a) the petitioner; and (b) the persons on whom the petition was served in accordance with rule 2(3). 6. Evidence to be filed (O.93, r.6) 6. (1) Where the election petition claims the seat for an unsuccessful candidate on the ground that the candidate had a majority of lawful votes, every party shall, not less than 7 days before the day fixed for the trial, file a list of the votes which that party contends were wrongly admitted or rejected, stating in respect of each such vote the grounds for that party\u2019s contention and serve a copy of the list on every other party and the Attorney General. (2) Where the respondent to an election petition complaining of an undue election and claiming the seat for some other person intends to give evidence to prove that the person was not duly elected, the respondent shall, not less than 7 days Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 93 before the date fixed for the trial of the election petition, file a list of the respondent\u2019s objections to the election of that person on which the respondent intends to rely and serve a copy of the list on the petitioner and the Attorney General. (3) Any party to the election petition may inspect and obtain an office copy of any list filed pursuant to this rule. (4) Except by leave of the Court \u2014 (a) no evidence shall be given by a party against the admission or rejection of any vote, or as to any ground of contention which is not specified in a list filed by that party pursuant to paragraph (1) of this rule; and (b) no evidence shall be given by a respondent of any objection to a person's election which is not specified in a list filed by that respondent pursuant to paragraph (2) of this rule. 7. Withdrawal of election petition (O.93, r.7) 7. (1) An application for leave to withdraw an election petition shall be made by motion to the Court on such date and time as the Court may appoint. (2) Not less than 7 days before the day so appointed the petitioner shall \u2014 (a) serve notice of the motion on the respondent, the returning officer and the Attorney General; (b) publish notice of the intended motion in a newspaper and the website of the Elections Office, <https:\/\/portal.elections.ky\/>. (3) The notice of motion shall state the grounds on which the application to withdraw is made and contain a statement to the effect that on the hearing of the application any person who might have been a petitioner in respect of the election may apply to the Court to be substituted as a petitioner. (4) The returning officer shall upon receipt of notice forthwith publish it in returning officer\u2019s electoral district. (5) Where on the hearing of the application a person is substituted as a petitioner, any security required to be given by that person shall be given within 3 days after the order of substitution. 8. Summary dismissal and stay of election petition (O.93, r.8) 8. (1) An application by a respondent to stay or dismiss a petition before the day fixed for the trial shall be made by motion to the Court on such date and time as the Court may appoint. (2) Not less than 7 days before the date so appointed the respondent shall serve notice of the motion stating the grounds thereof, on the petitioner, any other respondent, the returning officer and the Attorney General. ORDER 93 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 9. Death of petitioner (O.93, r.9) 9. (1) Where a petition is abated by the death of a sole petitioner or the survivor of several petitioners, the attorney acting for the sole petitioner in the proceedings at the date of that sole petitioner\u2019s death or, if that sole petitioner had no such attorney, any respondent learning of that sole petitioner\u2019s death shall \u2014 (a) lodge notice thereof with the Clerk of the Court; (b) serve notice thereof on the returning officer who shall forthwith publish it in the returning officer\u2019s electoral district; and (c) publish notice thereof in a newspaper circulating in the electoral district to which the petition relates. (2) Each such notice shall contain a statement that within 28 days after the publication of any notice referred to in this rule any person who might have been a petitioner in respect of the election may apply by motion to the Court on such date and time as the Court may appoint to be substituted as a petitioner. 10. Respondent's nature of non-opposition (O.93, r.10) 10. A respondent who does not intend to oppose the petition shall, not less than 7 days before the day fixed for trial serve notice to that effect on the petitioner and the Attorney General. GCR 1995 (Revised) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 94 ORDER 94 APPLICATIONS TO THE GRAND COURT UNDER VARIOUS STATUTES 1. Applications under the Bills of Sale Act (as amended and revised) (O.94, r.1) 1. (1) An application under Section 5 of the Bills of Sale Act (as amended and revised) for an order that a memorandum of satisfaction be entered by the Public Recorder upon the margin of the record of a bill of sale shall be made by an originating summons in Form No. 3 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). (2)  Every originating summons under this rule shall be entitled in the matter of the bill of sale in question and in the matter of the Bills of Sale Act (as amended and revised). (3)  Every person whose interest under the bill of sale is alleged to have been satisfied or discharged shall be joined as a defendant. (4)  The application shall be supported by an affidavit containing full particulars of the manner in which the debt arose and the manner in which it is alleged to have been satisfied or discharged. 2. Applications under the Building Societies Act (as amended and revised) (O.94, r.2) 2. (1)  Every application under Section 38 of the Building Societies Act (as amended and revised) for the appointment of an actuary or accountant and every application under Section 36 or Section 40 of the Building Societies Act (as amended and revised) for the appointment of an inspector shall be commenced by originating motion, notice of which shall be served upon the Building Society in question and upon the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority. (2)  Every originating motion under this rule shall be entitled in the matter of the Building Societies Act (as amended and revised) and in the matter of the Building Society in question and shall specify the full name and address of each applicant. (3)  Every application under this rule shall be supported by the following affidavits \u2014 (a)  separate affidavits sworn by or on behalf of each individual applicant containing full particulars of that applicant\u2019s interest in the Building Society and the period during which the applicant has had such interest; (b)  a composite affidavit sworn by or on behalf of all the applicants containing full particulars of the grounds upon which they claim that the Court should ORDER 94 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) order the appointment of an accountant, actuary or inspector, as the case may be; and (c) an affidavit of fitness containing the full name, business address and professional qualifications of the person or persons whom the applicants seek to have appointed as accountant, actuary or inspector, as the case may be. (4)  O.30, rr.2, 3, 4 and 5 shall apply to an accountant, actuary or inspector as if that person were a receiver appointed under that Order. (5)  In addition to the requirements of O.30, r.4, every order made under this rule shall be served upon the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority. 3. No rule (O.94, r.3) 3. No rule (O.94, r.3) 4. Application under Section 9 of the Strata Titles Registration Act (as amended and revised) (O.94, r.4) 4. An application for the appointment of an administrator pursuant to Section 9 of the Strata Titles Registration Act (as amended and revised) may be made by originating summons or motion and the provisions of O.30 shall apply as if the administrator was a receiver appointed pursuant to that Order. 5. Application under Section 17 of the Strata Titles Registration Act (as Amended and Revised) (O.94, r.5) 5. (1) In this rule \u2014 \\\"the Law\\\" means the Strata Titles Registration Act (as amended and revised), and any expressions used in this rule and in the Law have the same meanings in this rule as they have in the Law. (2)  An application for a declaration under Section 23(2)(b) of the Law and any consequential directions under Section 23(3) or winding up order under Section 23(6) shall be made by petition entitled in the matter of the strata plan concerned. (3)  A petition under this rule shall be served on \u2014 (a)  the strata corporation; (b)  the registered proprietor of every strata lot comprised in the strata plan; (c)  every insurer of the common property and every strata lot; (d)  the registered proprietor of any charge or other incumbrance over the common property and every strata lot; (e)  any administrator appointed pursuant to Section 9 of the Law; and (f)  the Registrar. (4)  A petition under this rule may be served in the following manner \u2014 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 94 (a)  in the case of the strata corporation, by posting it to the address shown on the strata plan or placing it in the receptacle maintained in accordance with Section 7(1) of the Law; (b)  in the case of the proprietor of a strata lot, by posting it to that proprietor\u2019s address appearing in the proprietorship section of the Land Register, or delivering it to that proprietor\u2019s unit; (c)  in the case of an insurer, in any manner allowed by O.65, r.5; (d)  in the case of the registered proprietor of any charge or incumbrance, by posting it to their address appearing in the Land Register; (e)  in the case of an administrator, in any manner allowed by O.65, r.5; and (f)  in the case of the Registrar, in any manner allowed by O.65, r.5. (5)  A petition under this rule shall be advertised. (6)  Where a petition under this rule seeks a winding up order, it must nominate a fit and proper person to be appointed as liquidator and must be supported by an affidavit of fitness. (7)  Every order made pursuant to this rule shall be served on the Registrar and advertised. (8)  The provisions of O.30, rr.2 to 8 shall apply to a liquidator appointed pursuant to this rule as if the liquidator was a receiver appointed pursuant to that Order. 6. Applications under the Married Women's Property Act (as amended and revised) (O.94, r.6) 6. (1) An application under Section 13 of the Married Women's Property Act (as amended and revised) for the determination of any question between husband, wife or civil partner as to the title to or possession of the property of either or both of them shall be made by originating summons in Form No. 2 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). (2)  The action shall be entitled in the matter of the property in question and in the matter of the Married Women's Property Act (as amended and revised). (3)  The application shall be supported by an affidavit containing full particulars of the property in issue and the facts and matters relied upon by the applicant in support of the applicant\u2019s application. GCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 16.03.15) ORDER 95 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 95 THE BANKS AND TRUST COMPANIES ACT (as amended and revised) 1. Definitions (O.95, r.1) 1. In this Order \u2014 (a) \\\"the Law\\\" means the Banks and Trust Companies Act (as amended and revised); (b) \\\"the Monetary Authority Law\\\" means the Monetary Authority Act (as amended and revised); (c) \\\"the Authority\\\" means the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority established under Section 5 of the Monetary Authority Act (as amended and revised); (d) \\\"licensee\\\" has the meaning ascribed to it by Section 2 of the Law. 2. Application by the Authority (O.95, r.2) 2. (1) An application by the Authority under Section 18(4) of the Law shall be made by ex parte originating summons in Form No. 4 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) entitled in the matter of the licensee concerned and in the matter of the Law. (2) An application under this rule shall be supported by an affidavit which shall \u2014 (a) identify the offence suspected of having been committed and specify the Authority's grounds for suspecting that such offence has been or is being committed; (b) identify the person or persons who are suspected of committing or to have committed the offence; (c) specify the Authority's reasons for believing that the interests of the depositors of any licensee or the beneficiaries of any trust administered by any licensee or the other creditors of any licensee are being or are likely to be prejudiced; and (d) stating what assets are held or are believed to be held by the person against whom relief is sought and stating precisely what action the Authority seeks to take in order to preserve such assets, except that subparagraph (c) shall not apply if the suspected offence is that of carrying on banking or trust business without a licence. (3) Upon an application under this rule the Court may \u2014 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 95 (a) grant the relief sought by the Authority in whole or in part either permanently or for such interim period as the Court may specify; (b) grant such other relief as the Court thinks fit; or (c) adjourn the application and direct that it be served upon the licensee and the person against whom relief is sought. (4) An order under subparagraph 3(a) or (b) shall provide that the licensee or the person against whom it is directed may apply, on not less than 3 clear days' prior notice to the Authority, by summons to discharge or vary the order. 3. Application by the Authority for a winding up order (O.95, r.3) 3. (1) An application by the Authority for an order to wind up any licensee under Section 18(4)(d) of the Law shall be made by petition entitled in the matter of the licensee concerned and in the matter of the Companies Act (as amended and revised). (2) A petition under this rule shall be supported by an affidavit verifying that the licensee's licence has been revoked, but need not give reasons for its revocation. (3) A petition under this rule shall be served upon the licensee and any controller appointed under Section 18(1)(v) of the Law. (4) Any shareholder, director or creditor of the licensee may be heard on a petition under this rule provided that that person shall have given to the Authority 7 clear days' prior notice of that person\u2019s intention to appear. (5) If the licensee intends to oppose the petition, its affidavit in opposition shall be filed in Court and served on the Authority not less than 7 clear days' prior to the date fixed for the hearing. (6) If the licensee has instituted an appeal against the revocation of its licence under Section 25 of the Law, the Court may adjourn the petition and may appoint a provisional liquidator pending the outcome of the appeal. (7) A winding up order or an order for the appointment of a provisional liquidator made under this rule shall be gazetted by the liquidator. 4. Application by the Authority for other relief (O.95, r.4) 4. (1) An application for a compulsory winding up order under Section 18(4) or an application for other relief under Section 25 of the Law shall be made by petition entitled in the matter of the licensee concerned and in the matter of the Companies Act (as amended and revised). (2) A petition under this rule shall be supported by a verifying affidavit sworn on behalf of the Authority which shall have exhibited to it any relevant report made by the Authority or any person appointed by Section 18(1)(iv) or (v) of the Law. (3) A petition under this rule shall be served on the licensee's voluntary liquidator. ORDER 95 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (4) Any shareholder or creditor of the licensee may be heard on a petition under this rule provided that that shareholder or creditor shall have given to the Authority 7 clear days' prior notice of that shareholder\u2019s or creditor\u2019s intention to appear. (5) If the voluntary liquidator of the licensee intends to oppose the petition, the voluntary liquidator\u2019s affidavit in opposition shall be filed and served on the Authority not less than 7 clear days prior to the date fixed for the hearing. (6) An order made upon an application under this rule shall be gazetted by the Authority. 5. Application for an order requiring a person to provide information, documents or assistance to the Authority (O.95, r.5) 5. (1) An application for an order requiring a person to provide information, documents or assistance under Section 34(9) of the Monetary Authority Act (as amended and revised) shall be made by originating notice of motion. (2) A notice of motion under this rule shall be served on the person or persons against whom an order is sought. (3) The Court may direct that a notice of motion under this rule shall also be served on any client of the person against whom the order is sought and to whom the person owes a duty of confidentiality. (4) An application under this rule shall be supported by an affidavit sworn on behalf the Authority; (5) In this rule \\\"person\\\" has the meaning ascribed by Section 34(8)(a) of the Monetary Authority Act (as amended and revised). GCR 1995 (Revised) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 96 ORDER 96 THE REGISTERED LAND ACT (as amended and revised) 1. Interpretation (O.96, r.1) 1. In this Order \u2014 \\\"the Law\\\" means the Registered Land Act (as amended and revised) and any expression used in this Order and in the Law shall have the same meaning in this Order as it has in the Law; \\\"charged land\\\" includes land comprised in a charged lease; and \\\"public auction\\\" includes the listing and marketing of the charged land for sale on a public multiple listing system approved by the Court. 2. Applications under Section 75(2) (O.96, r.2) 2. (1) An application by a chargee under Section 75(2) of the Law to recover possession of the charged land upon a bid being accepted at a public auction carried out pursuant to section 75(1) of the Law shall be made by originating summons in accordance with the provisions of this rule. (2)  The originating summons under this rule shall be in Form No. 78 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) and no acknowledgement of service shall be required. (3)  The chargee shall file in support of the originating summons an affidavit stating \u2014 (a)  the evidence that the chargee has complied with section 75(2) of the Law; and (b)  the names of the persons in occupation of the land, if known, and, unless the Court otherwise directs, any such affidavit may contain statements of information and belief and the sources and grounds thereof. (4)  The affidavit shall also exhibit \u2014 (a)  a copy of the land register for the charged land to which the application relates; and (b)  a copy of the charge to which the application relates, including any schedule or other attached document containing the terms of the power of sale exercised by the chargee under section 75(1) of the Law. (5)  The originating summons together with a copy of the affidavit shall be served on the person or persons in occupation of the land either \u2014 (a)  personally; or ORDER 96 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (b)  by affixing a copy of the summons and a copy of the affidavit to the main door or other conspicuous part of the main building on the charged land; or (c)  by placing stakes in the ground at conspicuous parts of the charged land, to each of which shall be affixed a sealed transparent envelope addressed to \\\"the occupiers\\\" and containing a copy of the originating summons and a copy of the affidavit; or (d)  in such other manner as the Court may direct. (6)  Without prejudice to O.15, rr.6 and 10, any person not named as a defendant who is in occupation of the land and wishes to be heard on the question whether an order for possession should be made may apply at any stage of the proceedings to be joined as a defendant. (7)  A final order for possession in proceedings under this rule shall not, except in case of emergency and by leave of the Court, be made \u2014 (a)  in the case of residential premises, less than 5 clear days after the date of the service; and (b)  in the case of other land, less than 2 clear days after the date of service. Nothing in this rule shall prevent the Court from ordering possession to be given on a specified date, in the exercise of any power which could have been exercised if possession had been claimed in an action begun by writ. (8)  Order 45, rule 3(2), shall not apply in relation to an order for possession under this rule but no writ of possession to enforce such an order shall be issued after the expiry of 3 months from the date of the order without leave of the Court. An application for leave may be made ex parte unless the Court otherwise directs. The writ of possession shall be in Form No. 79 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). (9)  The Court may, on such terms as it thinks just, set aside or vary any order made in proceedings under this rule. 3. Applications under Section 77 (O.96, r.3) 3. (1) An application under Section 77 of the Law, for an order seeking the Court's sanction of any variation of or addition to Sections 70(2) and (3), 72, 73, 74 or 75 of the Law, in their application to a charge registered under the Law, shall be made by originating summons in Form No. 2 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised), and, save as provided in this rule, the provisions of Orders 7 and 28 shall apply. (2) The originating summons under this rule shall be titled in the matter of an application under Section 77 of the Law, and shall state \u2014 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 96 (a)  with respect to the charged land to which the application relates (i)  the registration section, block number and parcel number; (ii)  the entry number or numbers on the land register of the charge or charges to which the application relates; (b)  the section or sections of the Law the variation of or addition to which the plaintiff seeks sanction; and (c)  the nature of the variations or additions sought. (3)  On every application under this rule all the registered proprietors of the charged land shall be named as parties to the application and, in addition to each defendant, the originating summons shall be served on the proprietors of every charge entered on the land register for the charged land. (4)  The affidavit supporting every application under this rule shall exhibit \u2014 (a)  a copy of the land register for the charged land to which the application relates; (b)  a copy of the charge to which the application relates, including any schedule or other attached document containing the variations of or additions to the provisions of the Law in respect of which the Court's sanction is sought. (5)  Where a chargee makes an application under this rule seeking the Court's sanction of a variation of or addition to the provisions of Section 75 of the Law to permit the sale of the charged land by private treaty, the affidavit supporting the application shall set out \u2014 (a)  the evidence that the chargee has complied with Section 72 of the Law; (b)  the steps taken by the chargee, if any, prior to the filing of the application, to sell the charged land by public auction; (c)  the reserve price or listing price which was adopted for the purposes of the public auction; (d)  details of every offer which the chargee received in the attempts to sell the charged land by public auction, and shall exhibit at least one written valuation report prepared in respect of the charged land by an independent professional real estate appraiser selected from the list of approved appraisers published from time to time by the Grand Court Rules Committee. (6)  A valuation report submitted for the purposes of this rule must have been prepared no more than three months prior to the date of the filing of the application. (7)  Without prejudice to the wide discretion conferred by Section 77 of the Law, the Court may, on the hearing of an application under this rule, give directions \u2013 ORDER 96 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (a)  as to service of notice of the application on any person who appears to have an interest in the charged land but who has not been served with the application; (b)  requiring the production of further evidence as to the valuation of the charged land; (c)  requiring the chargee to take further steps to sell the charged land by public auction on the open market; (d)  fixing a reserve or minimum price for the sale; (e)  prescribing such conditions to which the sale shall be subject as the Court deems fit. (8)  On an application made under this rule the Court may order that any person in possession of the charged land or in receipt of the rents or profits of the charged land deliver up vacant possession of the charged land or receipt of the rents and profits to such person and on such date as the Court may direct. (9)  Where, on an application made under this rule, a chargee seeks vacant possession of the charged land, the chargee shall provide evidence, to the best of the chargee's knowledge and belief, of the persons in occupation of the charged land and of their relationship, if any, to the chargor, and shall serve notice of the application for vacant possession on such person or persons in accordance with O.96, r.2(5). (10)  The provisions of rule 2 (6), (7), (8) and (9) of this Order shall apply to orders for possession made under this rule. 4. Application under Section 96 (O.96, r.4) 4. (1) An application under Section 96 of the Law to extinguish or modify any easement, restrictive agreement or profit shall be made by petition entitled in the matter of the servient land concerned. (2)  A petition under this rule shall be served on \u2014 (a)  every person having a registered interest in the dominant lands concerned whether registered in the appurtenances, proprietorship or incumbrances sections of the Land Register; (b)  any person, other than the petitioner, having a registered interest in the servient land whether registered in the appurtenances, proprietorship or incumbrances section of the Land Register; and (c)  any person who has registered a caution or restriction over any of the dominant lands. (3)  A petition under this rule may be served by posting it to the persons concerned at their addresses appearing in the Land Register and shall be deemed to have been received \u2014 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 96 (a)  in the case of a person whose address is within the Islands, 7 days after the date of posting; and (b)  in the case of a person whose address is outside the Islands, 21 days after the date of posting. (4)  A petition under this rule shall be advertised. (5)  A petition under this rule shall be supported by an affidavit giving full particulars of the facts and arguments relied upon by the petitioner. GCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 16.03.15) ORDER 97-98 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 97-98 NO ORDERS GCR 1995 (Revised) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 99 ORDER 99 PRIZE Whenever the Court is constituted as a Prize Court by commission issued pursuant to Section 2 of the United Kingdom\u2019s Prize Courts Act 1894 its proceedings shall be governed by the Prize Court Rules 1939. GCR 1995 (Revised) ORDER 100-101 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 100-101 NO ORDERS GCR 1995 (Revised) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 102 ORDER 102 APPLICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE COMPANIES ACT (as amended and revised) 1. Definitions and application (O.102, r.1) 1. (1) In this Order \u2014 \\\"the Law\\\" means the Companies Act (as amended and revised) and expressions used in this Order have the same meaning as in the Law. (2) This Order shall not apply to proceedings governed by the Companies Winding Up Rules (as amended and revised). 2. Applications to be made by originating summons (O.102, r.2) 2. (1) The following applications under the Law must be made by originating summons, namely \u2014 (a) under Section 44 of the Law, for an order to inspect the register of members of a company; (b) under Section 46 of the Law, for an order for rectification of the register of members of a company; (c) under Section 54 of the Law, for an order for inspection of a company's register of mortgages and charges; (d) under Section 201 of the Law, for an order approving changes to the charter documents of a registrant; (e) spent following the commencement of  Section 5 of the  Companies (Amendment)(No.3) Act, 2020 [Act 60 of 2020] (f) any other application under the Law not specifically provided for in this rule or rules 3 and 4. (2) An originating summons under this rule shall be in Form No. 3 of Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) except for applications referred to in subparagraphs (1)(a), (c) and (d) which may be made ex parte in Form No. 4 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). (3) All applications of the kind referred to in subparagraph (1)(e) shall be served upon the Registrar of Companies. 3. Applications to be made by originating motion (O.102, r.3) 3. The following applications under the Law must be made by originating motion, namely \u2014 ORDER 102 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (a) under Section 64 of the Law, for an order for the appointment of inspectors in respect of a company; (b) under Section 88 of the Law, for a declaration that a bidder is neither entitled nor bound to acquire compulsorily the shares of dissentient members of a company. 4. Applications to be made by petition (O.102, r.4) 4. The following applications under the Law must be made by petition, namely \u2014 (a) under Section 15 of the Law, for an order confirming a resolution for reducing the share capital of a company; (b) under Section 35 of the Law, for an order sanctioning the issue by a company of shares at a discount; (c) under Section 86 of the Law for an order sanctioning a compromise or arrangement between a company and its creditors or members or any class of them; (d) under Section 226 of the Law, for an Order relieving a director of a segregated portfolio company from personal liability; and (e) under Section 225 of the Law, for a receivership order in respect of a segregated portfolio of a segregated portfolio company. 5. Entitlement of proceedings (O.102, r.5) 5. Every originating summons, notice of originating motion and petition by which any such proceedings are begun and all affidavits, notices and other documents in those proceedings must be entitled in the matter of the company in question and in the matter of the Companies Act (as amended and revised). 6. Summons for directions (O.102, r.6) 6. (1) Upon the issue of a petition by which any such application as is mentioned in rule 4 is made, the petitioner must at the same time take out a summons for directions under this rule. (2) A summons for directions under this rule and the petition to which it relates must be served on the company at the same time. (3) On the hearing of the summons, the Court may by order give such directions as to the proceedings to be taken before the hearing of the petition as it thinks fit including, in particular, directions for the publication of notices and the making of any inquiry. (4) Where the application made by the petition is to confirm a reduction of the share capital of a company, then, without prejudice to the generality of paragraph (2) the Court may give directions under Section 15 of the Law \u2014 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 102 (a) for an inquiry to be made as to the debts of, and claims against, the company or as to any class or classes of such debts or claims; (b) as to the proceedings to be taken for settling the list of creditors entitled to object to the reduction and fixing the date by reference to which the list is to be made; and (c) the power of the Court under Section 15(3) of the Law to direct that Section 15(2) thereof shall not apply as regards any class of creditors may be exercised on any hearing of the summons. (5) Rules 6 to 11 shall have effect subject to any directions given by the Court under this rule. 7. Inquiry as to debts: company to make list of creditors (O.102, r.7) 7. (1) Where under rule 6 the Court orders such an inquiry as is mentioned in paragraph (3) thereof, the company in question must, within 7 days after the making of the order, file in Court an affidavit made by an officer of the company competent to make it, verifying a list containing \u2014 (a) the name and address of every creditor entitled to any debt or claim to which the inquiry extends; (b) the amount due to each creditor in respect of such debt or claim or, in the case of a debt or claim which is subject to any contingency or sounds only in damages or for some other reason does not bear a certain value, a just estimate of the value thereof; and (c) the total of those amounts and values. (2) The deponent must state in the affidavit the deponent\u2019s belief that at the date fixed by the Court as the date by reference to which the list is to be made there is no debt or claim which, if that date were the commencement of the winding up of the company, would be admissible in proof against the company, other than the debts or claims set out in the list and any debts or claims to which the inquiry does not extend, and must also state the deponent\u2019s means of knowledge of the matters deposed to. 8. Inspection of list of creditors (O.102, r.8) 8. (1) Copies of the list made under rule 7 with the omission, unless the Court otherwise directs, of the amount due to each creditor and the estimated value of any debt or claim to which any creditor is entitled, shall be kept at the registered office of the company and at the office of that company's attorneys, if any. (2) Any person shall be entitled during ordinary business hours to inspect the said list at any such office and to take extracts therefrom or copies thereof. ORDER 102 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 9. Notice to creditors (O.102, r.9) 9. Within 7 days after filing the affidavit required by rule 7 the company must send by post to each creditor named in the list exhibited to the affidavit, at that creditor\u2019s last known address, a notice stating \u2014 (a) the amount of the reduction sought to be confirmed; (b) the effect of the order directing an inquiry as to debts and claims; (c) the amount or value specified in the list as due or estimated to be due to that creditor; and (d) the time fixed by the Court within which, if that creditor claims to be entitled to a larger amount, that creditor must send particulars of that creditor\u2019s debt or claim and the name and address of that creditor\u2019s attorney, if any, to the company's attorney. 10. Advertisement of petition and list of creditors (O.102, r.10) 10. After filing the affidavit required by rule 7 the company must insert in such newspapers and at such times as the Court directs, a notice stating \u2014 (a) the date of issue of the petition and the amount of reduction thereby sought to be confirmed; (b) the inquiry ordered by the Court under rule 6; (c) the places where the list of creditors may be inspected in accordance with rule 9; and (d) the time within which any creditor not named in the list who claims to be entitled to any debt or claim to which the inquiry extends must send that creditor\u2019s name and address, the name and address of that creditor\u2019s attorney, if any, and particulars of that creditor\u2019s debt or claim to the company's attorney. 11. Affidavit as to claims made by creditors (O.102, r.11) 11. Within such time as the Court directs the company must file in Court an affidavit made by an officer of the company or other person competent to make it \u2014 (a) proving service of the notices mentioned in rule 9 and advertisement of the notice mentioned in rule 10; (b) verifying a list containing the names and addresses of the persons (if any) who in pursuance of such notice sent in particulars of debts or claims, specifying the amount of each debt or claim; (c) distinguishing in such list those debts or claims which are wholly, or as to any and what part thereof, admitted by the company, disputed by the company or alleged by the company to be outside the scope of the inquiry; and Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 102 (d) stating which of the persons named in the list made under rule 7 and which of the persons in the list made under this rule, have been paid or consent to the reduction sought to be confirmed. 12. Adjudication of disputed claims (O.102, r.12) 12. If the company contends that a person is not entitled to be entered in the list of creditors in respect of any debt or claim in respect of the full amount claimed by that person in respect of any debt or claim, then, unless the company is willing to secure payment of that debt or claim by appropriating the full amount of the debt or claim, the company must, if the Court so directs, send to that person by post at that person\u2019s last known address a notice requiring that person \u2014 (a) within such time as may be specified in the notice being not less than 4 clear days after service thereof, to file an affidavit proving that person\u2019s debt or claim or, as the case may be, so much thereof as is not admitted by the company; and (b) to attend the adjudication of that person\u2019s debt or claim at the place and time specified in the notice, being the time appointed by the Court for the adjudication of debts and claims. 13. Certifying lists of creditors entitled to object to reduction (O.102, r.13) 13. The list of creditors entitled to object to such reduction as is mentioned in rule 6(3) as settled by the Court under Section 15(2) of the Law, shall be certified and filed and the Court's certificate shall \u2014 (a) specify the debts or claims (if any) disallowed by the Court; (b) distinguish the debts or claims (if any), the full amount of which is admitted by the company, the debts or claims (if any), the full amount of which, though not admitted by the company, the company is willing to appropriate, the debts or claims (if any), the amount of which has been fixed by adjudication of the Court under Section 15(2) of the Law and other debts or claims; (c) specify the amount of debts or claims, payment of which has been secured by appropriation under the said Section 15(2); (d) show which creditors consent to the reduction and the total amount of their debts or claims; (e) specify the creditors who sought to prove their debts or claims under rule 11 and state which of such debts or claims were allowed. 14. Evidence of consent of creditor (O.102, r.14) 14. The consent of a creditor to such reduction as is mentioned in rule 6(3) may be proved in such manner as the Court thinks sufficient. ORDER 102 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 15. Time, etc., of hearing of petition for confirmation of reduction (O.102, r.15) 15. (1) A petition for the confirmation of any such reduction as is mentioned in rule 6(3) shall not, where the Court has directed an inquiry pursuant to that rule, be heard before the expiration of at least 8 clear days after the filing of the certificate mentioned in rule 13. (2) Before the hearing of such a petition, a notice specifying the day appointed for the hearing must be published at such times and in such newspapers as the Court may direct. 16. Service out of the jurisdiction without leave (O.102, r.16) 16. Any originating summons, originating motion or petition issued pursuant to rule 2, 3 or 4 may be served out of the jurisdiction upon any shareholder, director or creditor of the company concerned without the leave of the Court. 17. Restoration of companies to the register: Application by a company or a member thereof (O.102, r.17) 17. (1) An application by a company or any member thereof under Section 159 of the Law shall be made by originating application in Form No. 66 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). (2) The originating application shall be supported by an affidavit proving the following facts and matters \u2014 (a) the company\u2019s registration number and the date of its registration; (b) the date upon which the company was struck off the register of companies; (c) if the company was struck off the register more than two years prior to the date of the originating application, the Cabinet has no objection to its restoration to the register of companies; (d) the Registrar of Companies has no objection to the company\u2019s restoration to the register of companies; (e) the amount of the reinstatement fee payable and the amount of any outstanding annual return fees, the payment of which is sought by the Registrar of Companies; (f) the address of the premises which will become the company\u2019s registered office in the event that it is restored to the register of companies; (g) if the proposed registered office is the premises of a professional service provider, such person has agreed to provide registered office services to the company. (3) Every originating application under this rule shall be accompanied by a draft order (in triplicate) in Form No. 67 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 102 (4) Every originating application under this rule shall be determined by the Clerk of the Court without hearing the applicant. (5) If the Clerk of the Court is satisfied that the requirements of this rule and of Section 159 of the Law have been met, the Clerk of the Court shall make an order in Form No. 67 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). (6) If the Clerk of the Court is not satisfied that the requirements of this rule or Section 159 of the Law have been met, the Clerk of the Court may \u2014 (a) require the applicant to file further evidence; (b) direct that the application be served on the Registrar of Companies; (c) refer the application for an oral hearing before a judge; or (d) dismiss the application. 18. Restoration of companies to the register - Application by a creditor (O.102, r.18) 18. (1) An application by a creditor under Section 159 of the Law may be combined with an application under Section 94 of the Law and may be made by petition in Form No. 68 of Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised), in which case O.3 of the Companies Winding Up Rules (as amended and revised) shall apply. (2) A petition under this rule shall be served on \u2014 (a) the last known registered office of the company; and (b) the Registrar of Companies. (3) Unless the Court otherwise directs, a petition under this rule shall be advertised in accordance with O.3, r.6 of the Companies Winding Up Rules (as amended and revised). (4) The petition shall be verified by an affidavit that the statements in the petition are true, or are true to the best of the deponent\u2019s knowledge, information and belief. (5)   If the petitioner seeks a winding up order, the petition must be supported by an affidavit sworn by the person nominated for appointment as official liquidator and containing the information required by O.3, r.4 of the Companies Winding Up Rules (as amended and revised). 19. Application to restore rights attaching to bearer shares (O.102, r.19) 19. (1) An application under Section 229(7) of the Law by the holder of a bearer share certificate for an order that the rights attaching to such share be restored, shall be made by originating summons in Form No. 2 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). ORDER 102 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (2) Where the shares which are the subject of the application represented the whole of the company's issued share capital, the Financial Secretary shall be made party to the application. (3) Where the shares which are the subject of the application represented part only of the company's issued share capital, the originating summons shall be served on \u2014 (a) the company; and (b) subject to any direction given under paragraph (4), each shareholder of the company. (4) If the Court is satisfied that service upon each shareholder of the company is impractical, it shall consider making representation orders pursuant to O.15, r.12 and shall give directions for the application to be advertised in such manner as it thinks fit. (5) The originating summons shall be supported by an affidavit sworn by or on behalf of the applicant which \u2014 (a) explains why the share certificates were not deposited with a custodian; (b) states the address which is or will be the registered office of the company in the event that the rights attaching to the shares are restored; (c) states the names and addresses of the directors or the persons intended to be appointed as directors of the company in the event that the rights attaching to the shares are restored; (d) sets out full particulars of the company's assets and liabilities and the nature of its business; (e) sets out full particulars of all special resolutions passed by the company since 26th April, 2002; and (f) states the amount of the company's issued share capital and particulars of any changes which have occurred since 26th April, 2002. (6) The Court may direct the company's directors to swear and serve upon the applicant an affidavit complying with the requirements of sub-paragraphs (c) to (f) of paragraph (5). (7) The originating summons shall also be supported by an affidavit sworn by an authorised or recognised custodian stating that it has custody of the share certificates which are the subject of the application and that it has agreed with the applicant to hold the shares on the applicant\u2019s behalf in the event that the Court makes an order that the rights attaching to such shares be restored. (8) An order that the rights attaching to a bearer share be restored shall be in Form 70.1 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 102 1 (Note: Section 5 of the Companies (Amendment) (No. 3) Act, 2020 [Act 60 of 2020], which commenced on 1st March, 2021, prohibits the issue of bearer shares) 20. Schemes of Arrangement (O.102, r.20) 20. (1) An application under Section 86 of the Law for an order sanctioning a proposed compromise or arrangement between a company and its creditors or members or any class of them shall be commenced by petition. (2) Upon the presenting of a petition under paragraph (1), the petitioner must at the same time take out a summons for a direction convening the Court meeting(s). (3) The summons under paragraph (2) shall be supported by an affidavit which shall \u2014 (a) describe the purpose and effect of the proposed scheme; (b) contain such information as may be necessary to enable the Court to determine whether it should convene class meetings and, if so, the composition of the classes; (c) contain such information as may be necessary to enable the Court to determine whether the proposed time and place of the Court meeting(s) and the method of giving notice is appropriate in all the circumstances. (4) The following documents shall be exhibited to the supporting affidavit referred to in paragraph 3 \u2014 (a) the proposed scheme together with any supplementary documents to which it refers; (b) draft notice of the meeting(s); (c) draft proxy forms; (d) draft voting instructions for use by custodians; and (e) a draft explanatory memorandum or proxy statement which provides the shareholders or creditors with all the information reasonably necessary to enable them to make an informed decision about the merits of the proposed scheme. (5) If the proposed scheme relates to shares or debt instruments which are listed on a stock exchange, the summons under paragraph (2) shall be supported by an affidavit or expert report which sets out the relevant listing rules and practice and explains the steps which have been or will be taken to comply with such listing rules or practice. (6) The Court shall give such directions as may be necessary for the purpose of enabling it to determine whether or not the statutory majorities will have been achieved. If all or substantially all of the shares or debt instruments to which the ORDER 102 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) proposed scheme relates are registered in the name of one or more custodians or clearing houses, the Court may direct that \u2014 (a) such custodian or clearing house may cast votes both for and against the proposed scheme in accordance with the instructions of its clients; (b) such custodian or clearing house shall specify the number of votes cast in favour of the scheme and the number of clients or members on whose instructions they are cast and the number of votes cast against the proposed scheme and the number of clients or members on whose instructions they are cast. (7) The explanatory memorandum or proxy statement referred to in sub-paragraph (4)(e) above shall contain a timetable of principal events including \u2014 (a) the latest time for transmission to custodians or clearing houses of voting instructions for the Court meeting; (b) the latest time for lodging forms of proxy for the Court meeting; (c)  the date of the Court meeting; (d) the date of the hearing of the petition to sanction the scheme; and (e) the anticipated date upon which the scheme, if sanctioned, will become effective. (8) Within seven days after the date fixed for the Court meeting the petitioner shall file an affidavit sworn by the chairperson of the meeting verifying that \u2014 (a) notice of the meeting was duly sent in accordance with the order for directions; (b) the meeting was duly held in accordance with the order for directions; and (c) full particulars of the voting. (9) The hearing of the summons taken out in accordance with paragraph (2) shall be in chambers. (10) The final hearing of the petition shall be heard in open Court and any person who \u2014 (a) voted at the Court meeting(s); or (b) gave voting instructions to a custodian or clearing house who voted at the Court meeting(s), shall, be entitled to appear and be heard. GCR 1995 (Revised) (amended16.10.95) (amended 01.03.99) (amended 04.06.01) (amended 01.01.09) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 103 ORDER 103 THE CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION DISCLOSURE ACT (as amended and revised) 1. Definitions (O.103, r.1) 1. In this Order \u2014 \\\"the Law\\\" means the Confidential Information Disclosure Act (as amended and revised), and words and expressions used in the Law which are used in this Order shall have the same meaning as in the Law. 2. Applications under Section 4 (O.103, r.2) 2. (1) An application required to be made pursuant to Section 4 of the Law, including one required to be made pursuant to O.24, r.5(4), or O.26, r.5(4), shall be made by ex parte originating summons in Form No. 59 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). (2) An originating summons issued pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be entitled in the matter of the proceeding to which it relates and in the matter of the Law. 3. Service of summons (O.103, r.3) 3. (1) Every originating summons issued pursuant to rule 1 shall be served on the Attorney General. (2) Upon the first hearing of every originating summons issued pursuant to rule 1 the Court shall direct whether, and if so upon whom, it shall be served in addition to the Attorney General. 4. Affidavit evidence (O.103, r.4) 4. (1) Every application to which this Order applies shall be supported by an affidavit sworn by or on behalf of the applicant. (2) The supporting affidavit shall \u2014 (a) state the circumstances in which the applicant intends or is required to give evidence; (b) identify the relevant principals having an interest in the confidential information intended or required to be given in evidence by the applicant and explain the circumstances giving rise to the confidential relationship; (c) describe in general terms the nature of the evidence intended or required to be given and the reason why it constitutes confidential information; and(d) state the reasons why or to what extent the relevant principal objects ORDER 103 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) to disclosure by the applicant of the confidential information intended or required to be given in evidence. 5. Filing and service of affidavits (O.103, r.5) 5. (1) Every affidavit required to be sworn by rule 4 shall be filed and served on the Attorney General. (2) The Court shall direct on the first hearing of an originating summons issued in accordance with rule 2 whether, and if so, upon whom, the supporting affidavit shall be served. 6. Hearing of Section 4 applications (O.103, r.6) 6. Every application to which this Order applies shall be heard in Chambers. GCR 1995 (Revised) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 103 ORDER 104-111 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ORDER 104-111 NO ORDERS GCR 1995 (Revised) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 112 ORDER 112 APPLICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE STATUS OF CHILDREN ACT, 2003 [Law 23 of 2003] PART 1 - GENERAL 1. Definitions (O.112, r.1) 1. In this Order \u2014 \\\"the Law\\\" means the Status of Children Act, 2003 [Law 23 of 2003]; \\\"accredited laboratory\\\" means the Cayman Islands Forensic Science Laboratory; \\\"authorised forensic person\\\" means a person who is employed at an accredited laboratory and whom the medical director has authorised to take bodily samples by way of buccal swab; \\\"bodily sample\\\" has the meaning assigned to it by Section 2 of the Law; \\\"donor\\\" means the person required to provide a bodily sample for the purposes of a parentage testing procedure; \\\"medical director\\\" means the medical director of the Health Services Authority appointed by the Health Services Authority pursuant to the Health Services Authority Act (as amended and revised); \\\"nominated reporter\\\" means the person nominated by an accredited laboratory to prepare a report relating to the information obtained as a result of carrying out a parentage testing procedure; \\\"report\\\" means a report prepared in accordance with Rule 15; \\\"representative\\\" means \u2014 (a)  in relation to a donor under the age of 18 years: a parent or guardian of the donor, or (b)  in relation to a donor under a disability \u2014 (i) a person who is legally responsible for the care, welfare and development of the donor, or (ii)  a person appointed by the Grand Court to represent the donor. \\\"sample\\\" means a sample taken from a donor for the purposes of a parentage testing procedure; \\\"sampler\\\" means a person who takes (or proposes to take) a bodily sample from a donor for the purposes of a parentage testing procedure. ORDER 112 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) 2. Application for a declaration of paternity (O.112, r.2) 2. An application for a declaration of paternity pursuant to section 10 of the Law shall be made by writ or originating summons. 3. Application for a parentage testing order (O.112, r.3) 3. (1) Except with the leave of the Court, an application in any proceedings for a parentage testing order shall be made on notice to every party to the proceedings (other than the applicant) and to the donor. (2)  An application for a parentage testing order shall be made by summons supported by an affidavit. (3)  Any notice, summons or affidavit required by this rule to be served on a person who is not a party to the proceedings shall be served on that person personally. (4)  Unless the Court otherwise orders, the fee payable to the accredited laboratory shall be paid or reimbursed by the applicant. (5)  The Court may make orders for costs of such applications as it sees fit. (6)  Any order for a parentage testing order shall require that the sample to be given pursuant to the parentage testing order, and any information derived therefrom, and the identity of the donor shall not be disclosed by the accredited laboratory unless permitted by further order of the Court or operation of law. 4. Applications involving persons under a disability (O.112, r.4) 4. Where an application is made for a parentage testing order in respect of a proposed donor who is either \u2014 (a)  under the age of 18 years, or (b)  is mentally impaired within the meaning of Section 2 of the Mental Health Act (as amended and revised) and is incapable of understanding the nature and purpose of a parental testing procedure, the notice of application or summons shall state the name and address of the person having charge of the proposed donor and shall be served on that person instead of the proposed donor. 5. Joinder of person to be tested (O.112, r.5) 5. Where an application is made for a parentage testing order involving the taking of bodily samples from a proposed donor who is not a party to the proceedings in which the application is made, the Court may at any time direct that the proposed donor be made a party to the proceedings. 6. Service of copy report (O.112, r.6) 6. On receipt by the Court of a report pursuant to rule 16, the Clerk of the Court shall send forthwith a copy to every party to the proceedings and to the donor. If the donor Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 112 is a person to whom rule 4(a) or (b) of this Order applies, then the Clerk of the Court shall not send a copy of the report to the donor but shall send a copy of the report to the person having charge of the donor. PART 2 - PARENTAGE TESTING PROCEDURES AND REPORTS 7. Parentage testing procedures (O.112, r.7) 7. For the purposes of this order and for giving effect to the Law, DNA typing is a prescribed medical procedure. 8. Compliance with this order (O.112, r.8) 8. A parentage testing procedure is taken to be carried out in accordance with this order only if \u2014 (1)  it is carried out \u2014 (a)  in compliance with Part 3; and (b)  at an accredited laboratory, and (2)  it is supplemented by a report under Part 4, and (3)  any sample that is taken by way of buccal swab as part of the procedure is taken by an authorised forensic person; and (4)  any other bodily sample that is taken as part of the procedure is taken by a medical doctor or nurse who is registered under the Health Practice Act (as amended and revised). PART 3 \u2013 COLLECTION, STORAGE AND TESTING OF SAMPLES 9. Provision of information by donor or representative (O.112, r.9) 9. (1) A sampler must not take a bodily sample from a donor unless the donor or, if appropriate, a person described in rule 9(3), has \u2014 (a)  immediately before the sampler takes the bodily sample, sworn an affidavit in accordance with Form No. 401 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised), to which is attached a recent photograph of the donor named in the affidavit, and (b)  either \u2014 (i)  provided to the sampler a recent photograph of the donor, measuring approximately 2 inches by 1.5 inches, that shows a full face view of the donor\u2019s head and the donor\u2019s shoulders against a plain background, or (ii)  made a written arrangement with the sampler for a photograph of that kind to be taken. (2) The photograph required by rule 9(1)(b) is in ORDER 112 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) addition to the photograph that is required to be attached to Form No. 401 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). (3)  If the donor is under the age of 18 years, or is a person under a disability, the affidavit referred to in rule 9(1)(a) must be sworn by a representative of the donor. (4)  If the donor is under a disability for any reason other than being under the age of 18 years, a sampler shall not take a sample (other than one taken with a swab) unless a registered medical practitioner certifies that the giving of a bodily sample by the donor would not be prejudicial to the donor's proper care and treatment. (5)  If the sample is to be taken from an unborn foetus a sampler shall not take a sample unless a registered medical practitioner certifies that the giving of a bodily sample would not be prejudicial to the proper care and treatment of the foetus or its mother. (6)  A donor who attends a sampler for the taking of a sample may be accompanied by an attorney. 10. Collection of blood samples (O.112, r.10) 10. (1) A sampler may take a sample of blood from a donor only with a needle or syringe that \u2014 (a) has not been used for any purpose, and (b) is sterile, and (c) is disposable. (2)  Before taking a sample of blood from a donor, the sampler must ensure that the area of the donor\u2019s skin into which the needle is to be inserted to withdraw the blood has been cleaned with an antiseptic. 11. Collection of bodily samples for DNA typing (O.112, r.11) 11. (1) This rule applies to the taking of a bodily sample (other than a blood sample) from a donor for the purposes of a parentage testing procedure that is DNA typing. (2)  A sampler must not take a bodily sample from a donor with a swab unless the swab: (a)  has not been used for any purpose, and (b)  is sterile. (3)  A sampler must not take a bodily sample from a donor that is a skin scraping or hair root unless the implement used by the sampler to take the sample is sterile. Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 112 12. Container to be sealed and labelled (O.112, r.12) 12. If a bodily sample is taken from a donor, the sampler must ensure that \u2014 (a)  the sample is placed in a container: (i)  immediately after it is taken; and (ii)  in the presence of the donor (and, where relevant, the representative of the donor), and (b)  the container has not previously been used for any purpose, and (c)  the container is sealed in a way that, if it were opened after being sealed, that fact would be evident on inspection of the container, and (d)  the container is labelled in a way that: (i)  if the label, or part of the label, were removed, or (ii)  if the writing on the label were impaired by alteration or erasure, the removal of the label or the impairment would be evident on inspection of the container, and (e)  the particulars on the label are inscribed in ink and include: (i)  the full name of the donor, and (ii)  the date of birth and sex of the donor, and (iii)  the date and time at which the sample was taken, and (f)  the label inscribed with the particulars referred to in paragraph (e) is signed in ink by the sampler and by the donor or, where relevant, by the representative of the donor. 13. Statement by sampler (O.112, r.13) 13. After taking a bodily sample from a donor, the sampler must \u2014 (1)  complete a statement in accordance with Form No. 402 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised), and (2)  affix the photograph of the donor referred to in rule 9(1)(b) to that statement, and (3)  sign the sampler\u2019s name partly on the photograph and partly on the statement in a way that, if the photograph were later removed from the statement, the removal would be evident from inspection of the statement. 14. Packaging and storage (O.112, r.14) 14. (1) A bodily sample must be packed, stored and transported to a laboratory for testing in a manner that \u2014 (a)  will preserve the integrity of the sample, and ORDER 112 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (b)  ensures that the testing of the sample will produce the same results as would have been obtained if the sample had been tested immediately after collection. (2)  The sampler must ensure that the following documents are sent to the laboratory with the sample \u2014 (a)  the affidavit sworn under rule 9; and (b)  the statement completed under rule 13. 15. Testing of bodily samples (O.112, r.15) 15. A laboratory to which a bodily sample has been sent for testing must ensure that the testing is completed within a reasonable time after the sample is taken. PART 4 - REPORTS 16. Reports (O.112, r.16) 16. (1) A report must be prepared in accordance with this rule relating to the information obtained as a result of carrying out a parentage testing procedure. (2)  The report must be in accordance with Form No. 403 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). (3)  Part 1 of the report must be completed by the nominated reporter identified in the report. (4)  Part 2 of the report must be completed by \u2014 (a)  the person who carried out the parentage testing procedure; or (b)  the person under whose supervision the parentage testing procedure was carried out. (5)  Unless the Court otherwise orders, a report completed otherwise than in accordance with this rule is not admissible. GCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 21.10.13) Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 113 ORDER 113 SUMMARY PROCEEDINGS FOR POSSESSION OF LAND 1. Proceedings to be brought by originating summons (O.113, r.1) 1. Where a person claims possession of land which that person alleges is occupied solely by a person or persons (not being a tenant or tenants holding over after the termination of the tenancy) who entered into or remained in occupation without that person\u2019s licence or consent or that of any predecessor in title of that person\u2019s, the proceedings may be brought by originating summons in accordance with the provision of this Order. 1A. No rule (O.113, r.1A) 1A. No rule (O.113, r.1A) 2. Form of originating summons (O.113, r.2) 2. The originating summons shall be in Form No. 60 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) and no acknowledgment of service shall be required. 3. Affidavit in support (O.113, r.3) 3. The plaintiff shall file in support of the originating summons an affidavit stating \u2014 (a) the plaintiff\u2019s interest in the land; (b) the circumstances in which the land has been occupied without licence or consent and in which the plaintiff\u2019s claim to possession arises; and (c) that the plaintiff does not know the name of any person occupying the land who is not named in the summons, and, unless the Court otherwise directs, any such affidavit may contain statements of information and belief with the sources and grounds thereof. 4. Service of originating summons (O.113, r.4) 4. (1) Where any person in occupation of the land is named in the originating summons, the summons together with a copy of the affidavit in support shall be served on that person \u2014 (a) personally; or (b) by leaving a copy of the summons and of the affidavit, or sending them to that person, at the premises; or (c) in such other manner as the Court may direct. ORDER 113 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) (2) Where any person not named as a defendant is in occupation of the land, the summons shall be served (whether or not it is also required to be served in accordance with paragraph (1)), unless the Court otherwise directs, by \u2014 (a) affixing a copy of the summons and a copy of the affidavit to the main door or other conspicuous part of the premises; or (b) placing stakes in the ground at conspicuous parts of the occupied land, to each of which shall be affixed a sealed transparent envelope addressed to \\\"the occupiers\\\" and containing a copy of the summons and a copy of the affidavit. (3) Every copy of an originating summons for service under paragraph (1) or (2) shall be sealed with the seal of the Court. (4) Order 28, rule 3, shall not apply to proceedings under this Order. 5. Application by occupier to be made a party (O.113, r.5) 5. Without prejudice to O.15, rr.6 and 10, any person not named as a defendant who is in occupation of the land and wishes to be heard on the question whether an order for possession should be made may apply at any stage of the proceedings to be joined as a defendant. 6. Order for possession (O.113, r.6) 6. (1) A final order for possession in proceedings under this Order shall, except in case of emergency and by leave of the Court, not be made \u2014 (a) in the case of residential premises, less than 5 clear days after the date of the service; and (b) in the case of other land, less than 2 clear days after the date of service. (2) Nothing in this Order shall prevent the Court from ordering possession to be given on a specified date, in the exercise of any power which could have been exercised if possession had been claimed in an action begun by writ. 7. Writ of possession (O.113, r.7) 7. (1) Order 45, rule 3(2), shall not apply in relation to an order for possession under this Order but no writ of possession to enforce such an order shall be issued after the expiry of 3 months from the date of the order without leave of the Court. An application for leave may be made ex parte unless the Court otherwise directs. (2) The writ of possession shall be in Form No. 28 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision) ORDER 113 8. Setting aside order (O.113, r.8) 8. The Court may, on such terms as it thinks just, set aside or vary any order made in proceedings under this Order. GCR 1995 (Revised) ORDER 113 Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) Approved by the Rules Committee of the Grand Court this 21st day of October, 2022. Grand Court Rules - Orders 38 and 95 were approved by the Chief Justice this 21st day of October, 2022. Publication in consolidated form authorised by the Cabinet this 10th day of January, 2023. Kim Bullings Clerk of the Cabinet Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) ENDNOTES ENDNOTES Table of Grand Court Rules history: SL # Added or replaced Orders # Added or replaced Forms # Legislation Commencement Gazette 27\/2022 5, 63. 65 & 67 Grand Court (Amendment) (No. 1) Rules, 2022 10-Jul-2022 LG26\/2022\/s1 Consolidation) 20-Jan-2022 LG4\/2022\/s1 Grand Court Rules \u2013 Vol II \u2013 Forms (2022 Consolidation) 20-Jan-2022 LG4\/2022\/s2 80,r17, 94, r6 Civil Partnership Law, 2020 (Law 35 of 2020) 4-Sep-2020 LG64\/2020\/s1 54\/2016 Grand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2016 29-Mar-2016 GE78\/2016\/s2 6\/2015 94 & 96 78 & 79 Grand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2015 16-Mar-2015 G6\/2015\/s3 67\/2014 Grand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2014 12-Dec-2014 GE94\/2014\/s2 35\/2013 401 to 403 Grand Court (Amendment) (No. 2) Rules, 2013 21-Oct-2013 GE83\/2013\/s1 32\/2013 11, 72 & 73 6A, 9A, 76 &77 Grand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2013 1-Jul-2013 G13\/2013\/s2 4\/2013 Grand Court (Amendment) (No. 3) Rules, 2012 1-Feb-2013 G1\/2013\/s2 54\/2012 5 & 77A Grand Court (Amendment) (No. 2) Rules, 2012 6-Nov-2012 G23\/2012\/s1 31\/2012 7, 11 & 38 Grand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2012 1-Oct-2012 G19\/2012\/s1 17\/2011 Grand Court (Amendment) (No. 2) Rules, 2011 13-Jul-2011 GE54\/2011\/2011 10\/2011 11, 14 & 62 Grand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2011 1-Jun-2011 G11\/2011\/s2 30\/2009 1, 4, 5 & 72 71 to 75 Grand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2009 1-Nov-2009 GE63\/2009\/s2 6\/2008 1 & 102 Grand Court (Amendment) (No. 2) Rules, 2008 1-Mar-2009 GE5\/2009\/s2 27\/2008 Grand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2008 24-Nov-2008 G25\/2008\/s3 3\/2006 Grand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2006 30-Oct-2006 G22\/2006\/s1 2\/2003 Grand Court Rules, 1995 (Revised)* revised in 2003 8-Sept-2003 G24\/2003\/s1 32\/2002 Grand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2002 15-Jul-2002 G14\/2002\/s1 15\/2001 01 & 62 301 to 314 Court Cost Rules, 2001 01-Jan-2002 G12\/2001\/s3 29\/2001 50A, 95 &102 Grand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2001 04-Jun-2001 G22\/2001\/s1 8\/2000 Grand Court (Amendment) Rules 2000 1-Apr-2000 G6\/2000\/s6 15\/1999 18, 41, 42, 48, 53 & 102 30A, 66, 67 & 68 Grand Court (Amendment) Rules 1999 01-Mar-1999 G4\/1999\/s7 20\/1997 Grand Court (Amendment) (No.2) Rules 1997 01-Jan-1998 G26\/1997\/s1 19\/1997 64 & 65 Grand Court (Amendment) Rules 1997 1-Jun-1997 G10\/1997\/s3 11\/1996 14, 15, 18, 22, Grand Court (Amendment) Rules 1996 20-Jan-1997 G2\/1997\/s2 ENDNOTES Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision) SL # Added or replaced Orders # Added or replaced Forms # Legislation Commencement Gazette 28, 32 & 82 23\/1995 Grand Court (Amendment) (No. 2) Rules, 1995 22-Jan-1996 G2\/1996\/s7 22\/1995 1, 15 & 102 9, 11 & 33 Grand Court (Amendment) Rules 1995 16-Oct-1995 G21\/1995\/s1 19\/1995 Grand Court Rules, 1995 1-Jun-1995 GE9\/1995\/s1 (Price: $102.40)\", \"element\": \"section\", \"heading\": null}], \"meta\": {\"notes\": null, \"workflow\": null, \"lifecycle\": {\"source\": \"#cilegis\", \"eventRef\": [{\"eId\": \"e_commence_2023_01_01\", \"date\": \"2023-01-01\", \"type\": \"generation\", \"source\": \"#cilegis\"}]}, \"references\": {\"source\": \"#canary\", \"TLCRole\": [], \"TLCEvent\": [{\"eId\": \"ev_commencement\", \"href\": \"\/akn\/ontology\/canary\/event\/commencement\", \"showAs\": \"commencement\"}], \"TLCPerson\": [], \"TLCConcept\": [{\"eId\": \"inForce\", \"href\": \"\/akn\/ontology\/canary\/concept\/temporal\/in-force\", \"showAs\": \"in force\"}], \"TLCProcess\": [], \"TLCLocation\": [], \"TLCOrganization\": [{\"eId\": \"cilegis\", \"href\": \"\/akn\/ontology\/canary\/organization\/editor\/cilegis\", \"showAs\": \"Cayman Islands legislation mirror (kyleg)\"}]}, \"temporalData\": {\"source\": \"#cilegis\", \"temporalGroup\": [{\"eId\": \"tg_inforce_2023_01_01\", \"timeInterval\": [{\"end\": null, \"start\": \"#e_commence_2023_01_01\", \"duration\": null, \"refersTo\": \"#inForce\"}]}]}, \"classification\": null, \"identification\": {\"source\": \"#cilegis\", \"FRBRWork\": {\"FRBRuri\": \"\/akn\/ky\/act\/sl\/2003\/2\", \"FRBRdate\": [{\"date\": \"2023-01-01\", \"name\": \"generation\"}], \"FRBRthis\": \"\/akn\/ky\/act\/sl\/2003\/2\/!main\", \"FRBRalias\": [{\"name\": \"cmsId\", \"value\": \"2003-0002\"}], \"FRBRauthor\": [{\"as\": \"#editor\", \"href\": \"\/akn\/ontology\/canary\/organization\/editor\/cilegis\"}], \"FRBRnumber\": \"2 of 2003\", \"FRBRcountry\": \"ky\", \"FRBRsubtype\": \"subordinate\"}, \"FRBRExpression\": {\"FRBRuri\": \"\/akn\/ky\/act\/sl\/2003\/2\/eng@2023-01-01\", \"FRBRdate\": [{\"date\": \"2023-01-01\", \"name\": \"generation\"}], \"FRBRthis\": \"\/akn\/ky\/act\/sl\/2003\/2\/eng@2023-01-01\/!main\", \"FRBRauthor\": [{\"as\": \"#editor\", \"href\": \"\/akn\/ontology\/canary\/organization\/editor\/cilegis\"}], \"FRBRlanguage\": \"eng\"}, \"FRBRManifestation\": {\"FRBRuri\": \"\/akn\/ky\/act\/sl\/2003\/2\/eng@2023-01-01.xml\", \"FRBRdate\": [{\"date\": \"2026-06-22\", \"name\": \"generation\"}], \"FRBRthis\": \"\/akn\/ky\/act\/sl\/2003\/2\/eng@2023-01-01.xml\", \"FRBRauthor\": [{\"as\": \"#editor\", \"href\": \"\/akn\/ontology\/canary\/organization\/editor\/cilegis\"}], \"FRBRformat\": \"application\/xml\"}}}, \"name\": \"act\", \"header\": {\"title\": \"Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders\", \"actNumber\": \"2 of 2003\", \"longTitle\": null}}, \"doc\": null, \"bill\": null, \"judgment\": null}}","akn_full_text":"CAYMAN ISLANDS\n\nGrand Court Act\n(2015 Revision)\nGRAND COURT RULES\n(2023 Revision)\n\nVOLUME I - ORDERS\n\nSupplement No. 1 published with Legislation Gazette No. 3 dated 19th January, 2023.\n     (Published in electronic format only)\n\nPage 2\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nPUBLISHING DETAILS\n\nThe Grand Court Rules, 1995 made by the Rules Committee of the Court of Appeal on 8th\nApril 2009 and by the Rules Committee of the Grand Court on 14th September, 2009 as\namended by the Cayman Islands Constitution Order, 2009 [UKSI 1379\/2009], the Cayman\nIslands Constitution (Amendment) Order, 2020 [UKSI 1283\/2020], the Civil Partnership\nAct, 2020 [Law 35 of 2020] and the Citation of Acts of Parliament Act, 2020 [Act 56 of\n2020].\n\nConsolidated with \u2014\nGrand Court (Amendment) Rules 1995-13th September, 1995\nGrand Court (Amendment) (No. 2) Rules 1995-15th December, 1995\nGrand Court (Amendment) Rules 1996-23rd December, 1996\nGrand Court (Amendment) Rules 1997-9th April, 1997\nGrand Court (Amendment) (No. 2) Rules 1997-8th December, 1997\nGrand Court (Amendment) Rules 1999-28th January, 1999\nGrand Court (Amendment) Rules 2000-3rd March, 2000\nGrand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2001-15th May, 2001\nCourt Cost Rules, 2001-22nd October, 2001\nGrand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2002-4th July, 2002\nGrand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2006-13th October, 2006\nGrand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2008-31st October, 2008\nGrand Court (Amendment) (No. 2) Rules, 2008-15th December, 2008\nGrand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2009-14th September, 2009\nGrand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2011-14th April, 2011\nGrand Court (Amendment) (No. 2) Rules, 2011-12th July, 2011\nGrand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2012-29th August, 2012\nGrand Court (Amendment) (No. 2) Rules, 2012-19th October, 2012\nGrand Court (Amendment) (No. 3) Rules, 2012-17th December, 2012\nGrand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2013-7th June, 2013\nGrand Court (Amendment) (No. 2) Rules, 2013-26th September, 2013\nGrand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2014-20th November, 2014\nGrand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2015-19th February, 2015\nGrand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2016-14th March, 2016\nGrand Court (Amendment) (No. 1) Rules, 2022-21st June, 2022\n\nRevised under the authority of the Law Revision Act (2020 Revision).\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I \u2013 Orders (2023 Revision)\nPublication Details Continued\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 3\n\nConsolidated and revised this 31st day of December, 2022.\n\nNote (not forming part of these Rules): This revision replaces the 2022 Consolidation\nwhich should now be discarded.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\nArrangement of Rules - Orders\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 5\n\nCAYMAN ISLANDS\n\nGrand Court Act\n(2015 Revision)\nGRAND COURT RULES\n(2023 Revision)\nVOLUME I - ORDERS\nArrangement of Rules - Orders\nSection\nPage\n1.\nCitation .................................................................................................................................... 35\nPreamble\n37\nExplanatory Memorandum\n39\n1.\nIntroduction .............................................................................................................................. 39\n2.\nCommencement of Proceedings .............................................................................................. 39\n3.\nAssignment and Transfer of Existing Proceedings ................................................................... 40\n4.\nThe Register of Writs and Other Originating Process ............................................................... 40\n5.\nIssue and Service of Writs ....................................................................................................... 41\n6.\nAcknowledgment of Service ..................................................................................................... 41\n7.\nDefault Judgments ................................................................................................................... 42\n8.\nSummary Judgment ................................................................................................................. 43\n9.\nConsent Judgments ................................................................................................................. 43\n10.\nDiscovery ................................................................................................................................. 43\n11.\nInterlocutory Summonses and Motions .................................................................................... 44\n12.\nAffidavits and Exhibits .............................................................................................................. 44\n13.\nTrials and Final Hearings ......................................................................................................... 44\n14.\nExchange of Witness Statements ............................................................................................ 46\n15.\nDrawing Up and Filing Orders and Judgments ......................................................................... 46\n16.\nPaper, Printing, Binding and Copies ........................................................................................ 47\n17.\nCourt Fees ............................................................................................................................... 47\n\nArrangement of Rules - Orders\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 6\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n18.\nCourt Funds Office .................................................................................................................. 48\n19.\nExecution Generally................................................................................................................. 48\n20.\nExamination of Judgment Debtors ........................................................................................... 50\n21.\nImprisonment for Non-Payment of Debts ................................................................................. 50\n22.\nAttachment of Earnings Orders ................................................................................................ 51\n23.\nApplications Under Section 48 of the Trusts Act ...................................................................... 52\nORDER 1\n54\nCITATION, APPLICATION, COMMENCEMENT, INTERPRETATION AND FORMS\n54\n1.\nCitation (O.1, r.1) ..................................................................................................................... 54\n2.\nApplication (O.1, r.2) ................................................................................................................ 54\n3.\nCommencement and transitional provisions (O.1, r.3) .............................................................. 55\n4.\nRevocations (O.1, r.4) .............................................................................................................. 55\n5.\nNon application of English rules (O.1, r.5) ................................................................................ 56\n6.\nApplication of Interpretation Act (as amended and revised) (O.1, r.6) ...................................... 56\n7.\nDefinitions (O.1, r.7)................................................................................................................. 56\n8.\nConstruction of references to orders, rules, etc. (O.1, r.8) ........................................................ 59\n9.\nConstruction of references to action, etc. for possession of land (O.1, r.9) ............................... 59\n10.\nPrescribed forms (O.1, r.10) .................................................................................................... 59\n11.\nUse of English Practice Forms as precedents (O.1, r.11) ......................................................... 59\n12.\nPractice directions (O.1, r.12) .................................................................................................. 59\nORDER 2\n61\nEFFECT OF NON-COMPLIANCE\n61\n1.\nNon-compliance with rules (O.2, r.1) ........................................................................................ 61\n2.\nApplication to set aside for irregularity (O.2, r.2) ...................................................................... 61\nORDER 3\n62\nTIME\n62\n1.\n\"Month\" means calendar month (O.3, r.1) ................................................................................ 62\n2.\nReckoning periods of time (O.3, r.2) ........................................................................................ 62\n3.\nNo rule (O.3, r.3) ...................................................................................................................... 62\n4.\nTime expires on Saturday, Sunday, etc. (O.3, r.4) ................................................................... 62\n5.\nExtension, etc. of time (O.3, r.5) .............................................................................................. 62\n6.\nNotice of intention to proceed after six months' delay (O.3, r.6)................................................ 63\nORDER 4\n64\nASSIGNMENT, TRANSFER AND CONSOLIDATION OF PROCEEDINGS\n64\n1.\nAssignment of proceedings amongst divisions of the Court (O.4, r.1) ...................................... 64\n2.\nAssignment of proceedings to a particular Judge (O.4, r.2) ...................................................... 64\n3.\nTransfer of proceedings between divisions (O.4, r.3) ............................................................... 65\n4.\nConsolidation of causes or matters (O.4, r.4) ........................................................................... 65\nORDER 5\n66\nMODE OF BEGINNING PROCEEDINGS\n66\n1.\nMode of beginning civil proceedings (O.5, r.1) ......................................................................... 66\n2.\nProceedings which must be begun by writ (O. 5, r. 2) .............................................................. 68\n3.\nProceedings which must be begun by originating summons (O.5, r.3) ..................................... 68\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\nArrangement of Rules - Orders\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 7\n\n4.\nProceedings which may be begun by writ or originating summons (O.5, r.4) ............................ 68\n4A.\nProceedings which may be begun by petition or by writ (O.5, r.4A) .......................................... 69\n5.\nProceedings to be begun by motion or petition (O.5, r.5) ......................................................... 69\n6.\nRight to sue in person (O.5, r.6) ............................................................................................... 69\nORDER 6\n70\nWRITS OF SUMMONS: GENERAL PROVISIONS\n70\n1.\nForm of writ (O.6, r.1) .............................................................................................................. 70\n2.\nIndorsement of claim (O.6, r.2) ................................................................................................ 70\n3.\nIndorsement as to capacity (O.6, r.3) ....................................................................................... 71\n4.\nIndorsement as to insurers of motor vehicles (O.6, r.4) ............................................................ 71\n5.\nIndorsement as to attorney and address (O.6, r.5) ................................................................... 71\n6.\nOffice copies of writs (O.6, r.6) ................................................................................................. 72\n7.\nNo rule (O.6, rr.7-7A) ............................................................................................................... 72\n8.\nDuration and renewal of writ (O.6, r.8) ..................................................................................... 72\nORDER 7\n74\nORIGINATING SUMMONSES: GENERAL PROVISIONS\n74\n1.\nApplication (O.7, r.1) ................................................................................................................ 74\n2.\nForm of summons, etc. (O.7, r.2) ............................................................................................. 74\n3.\nContents of summons (O.7, r.3) ............................................................................................... 74\n4.\nOffice copy of summons (O.7, r.4) ........................................................................................... 74\n5.\nNo rule (O.7, r.5) ...................................................................................................................... 74\n6.\nDuration and renewal of summons (O.7, r.6) ............................................................................ 74\n7.\nEx parte Originating Summonses (O.7, r.7) ............................................................................. 75\nORDER 8\n76\nORIGINATING AND OTHER MOTIONS: GENERAL PROVISIONS\n76\n1.\nApplication (O.8, r.1) ................................................................................................................ 76\n2.\nNotice of motion (O.8, r.2) ........................................................................................................ 76\n3.\nForm and issue of notice of motion (O.8, r.3) ........................................................................... 76\n4.\nService of notice of motion with writ, etc. (O.8, r.4) .................................................................. 76\n5.\nAdjournment of hearing (O.8, r.5)............................................................................................. 77\nORDER 9\n78\nPETITIONS: GENERAL PROVISIONS\n78\n1.\nApplication (O.9, r.1) ................................................................................................................ 78\n2.\nContents of petition (O.9, r.2) ................................................................................................... 78\n3.\nNo rule (O.9, r.3) ...................................................................................................................... 78\n4.\nFixing time for hearing petition (O.9, r.4) .................................................................................. 78\n5.\nCertain applications not to be made by petition (O.9, r.5) ......................................................... 78\nORDER 10\n79\nSERVICE OF ORIGINATING PROCESS: GENERAL PROVISIONS\n79\n1.\nGeneral provisions (O.10, r.1) .................................................................................................. 79\n2.\nService of writ on agent of overseas principal (O.10, r.2) ......................................................... 79\n3.\nService of writ in pursuance of contract (O.10, r.3) ................................................................... 80\n4.\nService of writ in certain actions for possession of land (O.10, r.4) ........................................... 80\n\nArrangement of Rules - Orders\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 8\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n5.\nService of originating summons, notice of motion or petition (O.10, r.5) ................................... 81\nORDER 11\n82\nSERVICE OF PROCESS, ETC. OUT OF THE JURISDICTION\n82\n1.\nPrincipal cases in which service of writ out of jurisdiction is permissible (O.11, r.1) .................. 82\n2.\nNo rule (O.11, r.2) .................................................................................................................... 84\n3.\nNo rule (O.11, r.3) .................................................................................................................... 84\n4.\nApplication for, and grant of, leave to serve writ out of jurisdiction (O.11, r.4)........................... 84\n5.\nService of writ abroad; general (O.11, r.5) ............................................................................... 84\n6.\nService of writ abroad through foreign governments, judicial authorities and British\nconsuls (O.11, r.6) ................................................................................................................... 85\n7.\nService of process on a foreign state (O.11, r.7) ...................................................................... 87\n8.\nUndertaking to pay expenses of Governor (O.11, r.8) .............................................................. 87\n9.\nService of originating summons, petition, notice of motion, etc. (O.11, r.9) .............................. 88\nORDER 12\n89\nACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE TO WRIT OR ORIGINATING SUMMONS\n89\n1.\nMode of acknowledging service (O.12, r.1) .............................................................................. 89\n2.\nNo rule (O.12, r.2) .................................................................................................................... 89\n3.\nAcknowledgment of service (O.12, r.3) .................................................................................... 89\n4.\nProcedure on receipt of acknowledgment of service (O.12, r.4) ............................................... 90\n5.\nTime limited for acknowledging service (O.12, r.5) ................................................................... 90\n6.\nLate acknowledgment of service (O.12, r.6) ............................................................................. 90\n7.\nAcknowledgment not to constitute waiver (O.12, r.7) ............................................................... 91\n8.\nDispute as to jurisdiction (O.12, r.8) ......................................................................................... 91\n8A.\nApplication by defendant where writ not served (O.12, r.8A) .................................................... 92\n9.\nAcknowledgment of service of originating summons (O.12, r.9) ............................................... 92\n10.\nAcknowledgment of service to be treated as entry of appearance (O.12, r.10) ......................... 93\nORDER 13\n94\nFAILURE TO GIVE NOTICE OF INTENTION TO DEFEND\n94\n1.\nClaim for liquidated demand (O.13, r.1) ................................................................................... 94\n2.\nClaim for unliquidated damages (O.13, r.2) .............................................................................. 94\n3.\nClaim in detinue (O.13, r.3) ...................................................................................................... 94\n4.\nClaim for possession of land (O.13, r.4) ................................................................................... 95\n5.\nMixed claims (O.13, r.5) ........................................................................................................... 95\n6.\nOther claims (O.13, r.6) ........................................................................................................... 95\n6A.\nPrescribed time (O.13, r.6A) .................................................................................................... 95\n7.\nProof of service of writ (O.13, r.7) ............................................................................................ 96\n7A.\nJudgment against a State (O.13, r.7A) ..................................................................................... 96\n7B.\nNo rule (O.13, r.7B) ................................................................................................................. 97\n8.\nStay of execution on default judgment (O.13, r.8) .................................................................... 97\n9.\nSetting aside judgment (O.13, r.9) ........................................................................................... 97\nORDER 14\n98\nSUMMARY JUDGMENT\n98\n1.\nApplication by plaintiff for summary judgment (O.14, r.1) ......................................................... 98\n2.\nManner in which application under rule 1 must be made (O.14, r.2) ......................................... 98\n3.\nJudgment for plaintiff (O.14, r.3) .............................................................................................. 98\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\nArrangement of Rules - Orders\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 9\n\n4.\nLeave to defend (O.14, r.4) ...................................................................................................... 99\n5.\nApplication for summary judgment on counterclaim (O.14, r.5) ................................................ 99\n6.\nDirections (O.14, r.6) ............................................................................................................. 100\n7.\nCosts (O.14, r.7) .................................................................................................................... 100\n8.\nRight to proceed with residue of action or counterclaim (O.14, r.8) ........................................ 100\n9.\nJudgment for delivery up of chattel (O.14, r.9) ....................................................................... 101\n10.\nRelief against forfeiture (O.14, r.10) ....................................................................................... 101\n11.\nSetting aside judgment (O.14, r.11) ....................................................................................... 101\n12.\nApplication by defendant for summary judgment (O.14, r.12) ................................................. 101\n12A. Application by defendant to counterclaim for summary judgment (0.14, r.12A) ...................... 101\n13.\nManner in which application under rule 12 must be made (O.14, r.13) ................................... 102\n14.\nJudgment for defendant (O.14, r.14) ...................................................................................... 102\nORDER 14A\n104\nDISPOSAL OF CASE ON POINT OF LAW\n104\n1.\nDetermination of questions of law or construction (O.14A, r.1) ............................................... 104\n2.\nManner in which application under rule 1 may be made (O.14A, r.2) ..................................... 104\nORDER 15\n105\nCAUSES OF ACTION, COUNTERCLAIMS AND PARTIES\n105\n1.\nJoinder of causes of action (O.15, r.1) ................................................................................... 105\n2.\nCounterclaim against plaintiff (O.15, r.2) ................................................................................ 105\n3.\nCounterclaim against additional parties (O.15, r.3) ................................................................. 106\n4.\nJoinder of parties (O.15, r.4) .................................................................................................. 107\n5.\nCourt may order separate trials, etc. (O.15, r.5) ..................................................................... 107\n6.\nMisjoinder and nonjoinder of parties (O.15, r.6) ..................................................................... 107\n6A.\nProceedings against estates (O.15, r.6A) ............................................................................... 109\n7.\nChange of parties by reason of death, etc. (O.15, r.7) ............................................................ 110\n8.\nProvisions consequential on making of order under rule 6 or 7 (O.15, r.8) ............................. 111\n9.\nFailure to proceed after death of party (O.15, r.9) .................................................................. 111\n10.\nActions for possession of land (O.15, r.10) ............................................................................ 112\n10A. Actions in detinue, conversion or for trespass to goods (O.15, r.10A) .................................... 112\n11.\nRelator actions (O.15, r.11) .................................................................................................... 113\n12.\nRepresentative proceedings (O.15, r.12) ............................................................................... 113\n12A. Derivative actions (O.15, r.12A) ............................................................................................. 114\n13.\nRepresentation of interested person who cannot be ascertained, etc. (O.15, r.13) ................. 115\n13A. Notice of action to non-parties (O.15, r.13A) .......................................................................... 117\n14.\nRepresentation of beneficiaries by trustees, etc. (O.15, r.14) ................................................. 117\n15.\nRepresentation of deceased person interested in proceedings (O.15, r.15) ........................... 118\n16.\nDeclaratory judgment (O.15, r.16) .......................................................................................... 118\n17.\nConduct of proceedings (O.15, r.17) ...................................................................................... 118\nORDER 16\n119\nTHIRD PARTY AND SIMILAR PROCEEDINGS\n119\n1.\nThird party notice (O.16, r.1) .................................................................................................. 119\n2.\nApplication for leave to issue third party notice (O.16, r.2) ..................................................... 119\n3.\nIssue, service and acknowledgment of service, of third party notice (O.16, r.3) ...................... 120\n4.\nThird party directions (O.16, r.4) ............................................................................................ 120\n5.\nDefault of third party, etc. (O.16, r.5) ...................................................................................... 121\n\nArrangement of Rules - Orders\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 10\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n6.\nSetting aside third party proceedings (O.16, r.6) .................................................................... 122\n7.\nJudgment between defendant and third party (O.16, r.7) ....................................................... 122\n8.\nClaims and issues between a defendant and some other party (O.16, r.8) ............................. 122\n9.\nClaims by third and subsequent parties (O.16, r.9) ................................................................ 123\n10.\nOffer of contribution (O.16, r.10) ............................................................................................ 123\n11.\nCounterclaim by defendant (O.16, r.11) ................................................................................. 124\nORDER 17\n124\nINTERPLEADER\n124\n1.\nEntitlement to relief by way of interpleader (O.17, r.1) ............................................................ 124\n2.\nClaim to goods, etc., taken in execution (O.17, r.2) ................................................................ 125\n3.\nMode of application (O.17, r.3)............................................................................................... 125\n4.\nNo rule (O.17, r.4) .................................................................................................................. 126\n5.\nPowers of Court hearing summons (O.17, r.5) ....................................................................... 126\n6.\nPower to order sale of goods taken in execution (O.17, r.6) ................................................... 127\n7.\nPower to stay proceedings (O.17, r.7) .................................................................................... 127\n8.\nOther powers (O.17, r.8) ........................................................................................................ 127\n9.\nOne order in several causes or matters (O.17, r.9) ................................................................ 127\n10.\nDiscovery (O.17, r.10) ............................................................................................................ 127\n11.\nTrial of interpleader issue (O.17, r.11) .................................................................................... 128\n12.\nAppeal from judgment etc. of Judge in interpleader proceedings (O.17, r.12) ........................ 128\nORDER 18\n129\nPLEADINGS\n129\n1.\nService of statement of claim (O.18, r.1) ................................................................................ 129\n2.\nService of defence (O.18, r.2) ................................................................................................ 129\n3.\nService of reply and defence to counterclaim (O.18, r.3) ........................................................ 129\n4.\nPleadings subsequent to reply (O.18, r.4) .............................................................................. 130\n5.\nNo rule (O.18, r.5) .................................................................................................................. 130\n6.\nPleadings: formal requirements (O.18, r.6) ............................................................................ 130\n7.\nFacts, not evidence, to be pleaded (O.18, r.7) ....................................................................... 130\n7A.\nConviction, etc. to be adduced in evidence: matters to be pleaded (O.18, r.7A) ..................... 131\n8.\nMatters which must be specifically pleaded (O.18, r.8) .......................................................... 132\n9.\nMatter may be pleaded whenever arising (O.18, r.9) .............................................................. 132\n10.\nDeparture (O.18, r.10) ........................................................................................................... 132\n11.\nPoints of law may be pleaded (O.18, r.11) ............................................................................. 133\n12.\nParticulars of pleading (O.18, r.12) ........................................................................................ 133\n13.\nAdmissions and denials (O.18, r.13) ...................................................................................... 134\n14.\nDenial by joinder of issue (O.18, r.14) .................................................................................... 134\n15.\nStatement of Claim (O.18, r.15) ............................................................................................. 134\n16.\nDefence of tender (O.18, r.16) ............................................................................................... 135\n17.\nDefence of set-off (O.18, r.17) ............................................................................................... 135\n18.\nCounterclaim and defence to counterclaim (O.18, r.18) ......................................................... 135\n19.\nStriking out pleadings and indorsements (O.18, r.19) ............................................................. 135\n20.\nClose of pleadings (O.18, r.20) .............................................................................................. 136\n21.\nTrial without pleadings (O.18, r.21) ........................................................................................ 136\nORDER 19\n137\nDEFAULT OF PLEADINGS\n137\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\nArrangement of Rules - Orders\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 11\n\n1.\nDefault of service of statement of claim (O.19, r.1) ................................................................. 137\n2.\nDefault of defence: claim for liquidated demand (O.19, r.2) .................................................... 137\n3.\nDefault of defence: claim for unliquidated damages (O.19, r.3) .............................................. 137\n4.\nDefault of defence: claim in detinue (O.19, r.4) ...................................................................... 137\n5.\nDefault of defence: claim for possession of land (O.19, r.5) ................................................... 138\n6.\nDefault of defence: mixed claims (O.19, r.6) .......................................................................... 138\n7.\nDefault of defence: other claims (O.19, r.7) ............................................................................ 138\n8.\nDefault of defence to counterclaim (O.19, r.8) ........................................................................ 139\n9.\nSetting aside judgment (O.19, r.9) ......................................................................................... 139\nORDER 20\n141\nAMENDMENT\n141\n1.\nAmendment of writ without leave (O.20, r.1) .......................................................................... 141\n2.\nAmendment of acknowledgment of service (O.20, r.2) ........................................................... 141\n3.\nAmendment of pleadings without leave (O.20, r.3) ................................................................. 142\n4.\nApplication for disallowance of amendment made without leave (O.20, r.4) ........................... 142\n5.\nAmendment of writ or pleading with leave (O.20, r.5) ............................................................. 143\n6.\nNo rule (O.20, r.6) .................................................................................................................. 143\n7.\nAmendment of other originating process (O.20, r.7) ............................................................... 143\n8.\nAmendment of certain other documents (O.20, r.8) ................................................................ 144\n9.\nFailure to amend after order (O.20, r.9).................................................................................. 144\n10.\nMode of amendment of writ, etc. (O.20, r.10) ......................................................................... 144\n11.\nAmendment of judgments and orders (O.20, r.11) ................................................................. 144\n12.\nAmendment of pleadings by agreement (O.20, r.12) .............................................................. 144\n13.\nManner in which amendments should be shown (O.20, r.13) ................................................. 145\nORDER 21\n146\nWITHDRAWAL AND DISCONTINUANCE\n146\n1.\nWithdrawal of acknowledgment of service (O.21, r.1) ............................................................ 146\n2.\nDiscontinuance of action, etc., without leave (O.21, r.2) ......................................................... 146\n3.\nDiscontinuance of action, etc., with leave (O.21, r.3) .............................................................. 147\n4.\nEffect of discontinuance (O.21, r.4) ........................................................................................ 147\n5.\nStay of subsequent action until costs paid (O.21, r.5) ............................................................ 148\n6.\nWithdrawal of summons (O.21, r.6) ........................................................................................ 148\nORDER 22\n150\nPAYMENT INTO AND OUT OF COURT\n150\n1.\nPayment into Court (O.22, r.1) ............................................................................................... 150\n2.\nPayment in by defendant who has counterclaimed (O.22, r.2) ............................................... 151\n3.\nAcceptance of money paid into Court (O.22, r.3) ................................................................... 151\n4.\nOrder for payment out of money accepted required in certain cases (O.22, r.4) ..................... 152\n5.\nMoney remaining in Court (O.22, r.5) ..................................................................................... 153\n6.\nCounterclaim (O.22, r.6) ........................................................................................................ 153\n7.\nNon-disclosure of payment into Court (O.22, r.7) ................................................................... 153\n8.\nMoney paid into Court under order (O.22, r.8) ........................................................................ 153\n9.\nNo rule (O.22, r.9) .................................................................................................................. 154\n10.\nNo rule (O.22, r.10) ................................................................................................................ 154\n11.\nNo rule (O.22, r.11) ................................................................................................................ 154\n12.\nNo rule (O.22, r.12) ................................................................................................................ 154\n\nArrangement of Rules - Orders\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 12\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n13.\nInvestment of money in Court (O.22, r.13) ............................................................................. 154\n14.\nWritten offers \"without prejudice save as to costs\" (O.22, r.14) .............................................. 154\nORDER 23\n156\nSECURITY FOR COSTS\n156\n1.\nSecurity for costs of action, etc. (O.23, r.1) ............................................................................ 156\n2.\nManner of giving security (O.23, r.2) ...................................................................................... 156\n3.\nSaving for enactments (O.23, r.3) .......................................................................................... 157\nORDER 24\n158\nDISCOVERY\n158\n1.\nMutual discovery of documents (O.24, r.1) ............................................................................. 158\n2.\nDiscovery by parties without order (O.24, r.2) ........................................................................ 158\n3.\nOrder for discovery (O.24, r.3) ............................................................................................... 159\n4.\nOrders for determination of issue, etc., before discovery (O.24, r.4) ....................................... 160\n5.\nForm of list and affidavit (O.24, r.5) ........................................................................................ 160\n6.\nDefendant entitled to copy of co-defendant's list (O.24, r.6) ................................................... 160\n7.\nOrder for discovery of particular documents (O.24, r.7) .......................................................... 161\n8.\nDiscovery to be ordered only if necessary (O.24, r.8) ............................................................. 161\n9.\nInspection of documents referred to in list (O.24, r.9) ............................................................. 162\n10.\nInspection of documents referred to in pleadings and affidavits (O.24, r.10) .......................... 162\n11.\nOrder for production for inspection (O.24, r.11) ...................................................................... 162\n12.\nProvision of copies of documents (O.24, r.12)........................................................................ 163\n13.\nOrder for production to Court (O.24, r.13) .............................................................................. 163\n14.\nProduction to be ordered only if necessary, etc. (O.24, r.14) .................................................. 163\n15.\nProduction of business books (O.24, r.15) ............................................................................. 163\n16.\nOrder for Discovery by Oral Examination (O.24, r.16) ............................................................ 164\n17.\nConduct of examination (O.24, r.17) ...................................................................................... 164\n18.\nUse of transcripts (O.24, r.18) ................................................................................................ 165\n19.\nDisclosure which would be injurious to public interest: saving (O.24, r.19) ............................. 166\n20.\nFailure to comply with an order for discovery (O.24, r.20) ...................................................... 166\n21.\nRevocation and variation of orders (O.24, r.21) ...................................................................... 166\n22.\nUse of documents and transcripts (O.24, r.22) ....................................................................... 166\nORDER 25\n167\nSUMMONS FOR DIRECTIONS\n167\n1.\nSummons for directions (O.25, r.1) ........................................................................................ 167\n2.\nDuty to consider all matters (O.25, r.2) .................................................................................. 168\n3.\nParticular matters for consideration (O.25, r.3) ....................................................................... 169\n4.\nAdmissions and agreements to be made (O.25, r.4) .............................................................. 169\n5.\nLimitation of right of appeal (O.25, r.5) ................................................................................... 170\n6.\nDuty to give all information at hearing (O.25, r.6) ................................................................... 170\n7.\nDuty to make all interlocutory applications on summons for directions (O.25, r.7) .................. 170\n8.\nAutomatic directions in personal injury actions (O.25, r.8) ...................................................... 171\nORDER 26\n173\nINTERROGATORIES\n173\n1.\nDiscovery by interrogatories (O.26, r.1) ................................................................................. 173\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\nArrangement of Rules - Orders\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 13\n\n2.\nForm and nature of interrogatories (O.26, r.2) ........................................................................ 173\n3.\nInterrogatories without order (O.26, r.3) ................................................................................. 174\n4.\nOrdered interrogatories (O.26, r.4) ......................................................................................... 174\n5.\nObjections and insufficient answers (O.26, r.5) ...................................................................... 174\n6.\nFailure to comply with order (O.26, r.6) .................................................................................. 175\n7.\nUse of answers to interrogatories at trial (O.26, r.7) ............................................................... 175\n8.\nRevocation and variation of orders (O.26, r.8) ........................................................................ 175\nORDER 27\n177\nADMISSIONS\n177\n1.\nAdmission of case of other party (O.27, r.1) ........................................................................... 177\n2.\nNotice to admit (O.27, r.2) ...................................................................................................... 177\n3.\nJudgment on admissions (0.27, r.3) ....................................................................................... 177\n4.\nAdmission and production of documents specified in list of documents (O.27, r.4) ................. 177\n5.\nNotices to admit or produce documents (O.27, r.5) ................................................................ 178\nORDER 28\n179\nORIGINATING SUMMONS PROCEDURE\n179\n1.\nApplication (O.28, r.1) ............................................................................................................ 179\n1A.\nAffidavit evidence (O.28, r.1A) ............................................................................................... 179\n2.\nFixing time for attendance of parties before Court (O.28, r.2) ................................................. 180\n3.\nNotice of hearing (O.28, r.3)................................................................................................... 180\n4.\nDirections, etc., by Court (O.28, r.4) ....................................................................................... 181\n5.\nAdjournment of summons (O.28, r.5) ..................................................................................... 182\n6.\nApplications affecting party who has not acknowledged service (O.28, r.6) ............................ 182\n7.\nCounterclaim by defendant (O.28, r.7) ................................................................................... 182\n8.\nContinuation of proceedings as if cause or matter begun by writ (O.28, r.8) ........................... 183\n9.\nOrder for hearing or trial (O.28, r.9) ........................................................................................ 183\n10.\nFailure to comply with rules of Court orders (O.28, r.10) ........................................................ 184\n11.\nNo rule (O.28, r.11) ................................................................................................................ 184\nORDER 29\n185\nINTERLOCUTORY INJUNCTIONS, INTERIM PRESERVATION OF PROPERTY,\nINTERIM PAYMENTS, ETC.\n185\n1.\nApplication for injunction (O.29, r.1) ....................................................................................... 185\n1A.\nNo rule (O.29, 1A).................................................................................................................. 185\n2.\nDetention, preservation, etc., of subject matter of cause or matter (O.29, r.2) ........................ 185\n2A.\nNo rule (O.29, 2A).................................................................................................................. 186\n3.\nPower to order samples to be taken, etc. (O.29, r.3) .............................................................. 186\n4.\nSale of perishable property, etc. (O.29, r.4) ........................................................................... 186\n5.\nOrder for early trial (O.29, r.5) ................................................................................................ 186\n6.\nRecovery of personal property subject to lien, etc. (O.29, r.6) ................................................ 187\n7.\nDirections (O.29, r.7) ............................................................................................................. 187\n7A.\nNo rule (O.29, r.7A) ............................................................................................................... 187\n8.\nAllowance of income of property pending suit (O.29, r.8) ....................................................... 187\n9.\nInterpretation of Part II (O.29, r.9) .......................................................................................... 187\n10.\nApplication for interim payment (O.29, r.10) ........................................................................... 188\n11.\nOrder for interim payment in respect of damages (O.29, r.11) ................................................ 188\n12.\nOrder for interim payment in respect of sums other than damages (O.29, r.12) ..................... 189\n\nArrangement of Rules - Orders\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 14\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n13.\nManner of payment (O.29, r.13) ............................................................................................. 189\n14.\nDirections on application under rule 10 (O.29, r.14) ............................................................... 190\n15.\nNon-disclosure of interim payment (O.29, r.15) ...................................................................... 190\n16.\nPayment into Court in satisfaction (O.29, r.16) ....................................................................... 190\n17.\nAdjustment on final judgment or order or on discontinuance (O.29, r.17) ............................... 190\n18.\nCounterclaims and other proceedings (O.29, r.18) ................................................................. 190\nORDER 30\n191\nRECEIVERS\n191\n1.\nApplication for receiver and injunction (O.30, r.1) ................................................................... 191\n2.\nGiving of security by receiver (O.30, r.2) ................................................................................ 191\n3.\nRemuneration of receiver (O.30, r.3) ...................................................................................... 191\n4.\nService of order and notice (O.30, r.4) ................................................................................... 191\n5.\nReceiver's accounts (O.30, r.5) .............................................................................................. 192\n6.\nPayment into Court by receiver (O.30, r.6) ............................................................................. 192\n7.\nDefault by receiver (O.30, r.7) ................................................................................................ 192\n8.\nDirections to receivers (O.30, r.8) .......................................................................................... 192\nORDER 31\n193\nSALES, ETC., OF LAND BY ORDER OF COURT\n193\n1.\nCertifying result of sale (O.31, r.1) ......................................................................................... 193\n2.\nManner of carrying out sale (O.31, r.2) .................................................................................. 193\n3.\nCertifying result of sale (O.31, r.3) ......................................................................................... 193\n4.\nCharge, exchange or partition under order of the Court (O.31, r.4) ........................................ 194\n5.\nNo rule (O.31, r.5) .................................................................................................................. 194\n6.\nNo rule (O.31, r.6) .................................................................................................................. 194\n7.\nNo rule (O.31, r.7) .................................................................................................................. 194\n8.\nNo rule (O.31, r.8) .................................................................................................................. 194\nORDER 32\n195\nAPPLICATIONS AND PROCEEDINGS IN CHAMBERS\n195\n1.\nMode of making application (O.32, r.1) .................................................................................. 195\n2.\nIssue of summons (O.32, r.2)................................................................................................. 195\n3.\nService of summons (O.32, r.3) ............................................................................................. 195\n4.\nAdjournment of hearing (O.32, r.4)......................................................................................... 195\n5.\nProceeding in the absence of party failing to attend (O.32, r.5) .............................................. 196\n6.\nOrder made ex parte may be set aside (O.32, r.6) ................................................................. 196\n7.\nSubpoena for attendance of witness (O.32, r.7) ..................................................................... 196\n8.\nOfficers may administer oaths (O.32, r.8) ............................................................................... 196\n9.\nNo rule (O.32, r.9) .................................................................................................................. 196\n9A.\nApplications for a direction under the Limitation Act (as amended and revised) (O.32,\nr.9A) ...................................................................................................................................... 196\n10.\nNo rule (O.32, r.10) ................................................................................................................ 197\n11.\nNo rule (O.32, r.11) ................................................................................................................ 197\n12.\nNo rule (O.32, r.12) ................................................................................................................ 197\n13.\nPower to direct hearing in Court (O.32, r.13) .......................................................................... 197\n14.\nNo rule (O.32, r.14) ................................................................................................................ 197\n15.\nNo rule (O.32, r.15) ................................................................................................................ 197\n16.\nObtaining assistance of experts (O.32, r.16) .......................................................................... 197\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\nArrangement of Rules - Orders\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 15\n\n17.\nService and notice of affidavit (O.32, r.17) ............................................................................. 197\n18.\nNo rule (O.32, r.18) ................................................................................................................ 198\n19.\nDisposal of matters in Chambers (O.32, r.19) ........................................................................ 198\n20.\nNo rule (O.32, r.20) ................................................................................................................ 198\n21.\nPapers for use of Court, etc. (O.32, r.21) ............................................................................... 198\n22.\nNotes of proceedings in Chambers (O.32, r.22) ..................................................................... 198\n23.\nNo Rule (O.32, rr.23-26) ........................................................................................................ 198\n24.\nNo Rule (O.32, rr.23-26) ........................................................................................................ 198\n25.\nNo Rule (O.32, rr.23-26) ........................................................................................................ 198\n26.\nNo Rule (O.32, rr.23-26) ........................................................................................................ 199\n27.\nJudgments and orders in Chambers (O.32, r.27) ................................................................... 199\n28.\nApplications outside of Chambers, etc. (O.32, r.28) ............................................................... 199\nORDER 33\n200\nPLACE AND MODE OF TRIAL\n200\n1.\nPlace of trial (O.33, r.1) .......................................................................................................... 200\n2.\nMode of trial (O.33, r.2) .......................................................................................................... 200\n3.\nTime, etc. of trial of questions or issues (O.33, r.3) ................................................................ 200\n4.\nDetermining the place and mode of trial (O.33, r.4) ................................................................ 200\n4A.\nSplit trial: offer on liability (O.33, r.4A) .................................................................................... 201\n5.\nNo rule (O.33, r.5) .................................................................................................................. 201\n6.\nNo rule (O.33, r.6) .................................................................................................................. 201\n7.\nDismissal of action, etc. after decision of preliminary issue (O.33, r.7) ................................... 201\nORDER 34\n202\nFIXING A TRIAL DATE FOR ACTIONS BEGUN BY WRIT\n202\n1.\nApplication and interpretation (O.34, r.1) ................................................................................ 202\n2.\nOrder for action to be tried (O.34, r.2) .................................................................................... 202\n3.\nNotice to fix a trial date (O.34, r.3) ......................................................................................... 202\n4.\nDirections relating to fixing a trial date (O.34, r.4)................................................................... 203\n5.\nFurther provisions fixing a trial date (O.34, r.5) ...................................................................... 203\n6.\nNo rule (O.34, r.6) .................................................................................................................. 203\n7.\nNo rule (O.34, r.7) .................................................................................................................. 203\n8.\nNotification of relevant information (O.34 r.8) ......................................................................... 203\n9.\nNo rule (O.34, r.9) .................................................................................................................. 203\n10.\nDelivery of bundles to the Court (O.34, r.10) .......................................................................... 203\nORDER 35\n205\nPROCEEDINGS AT TRIAL\n205\n1.\nFailure to appear by both parties or one of them (O.35, r.1) ................................................... 205\n2.\nJudgment etc. given in absence of party may be set aside (O.35, r.2) ................................... 205\n3.\nAdjournment of trial (O.35, r.3) ............................................................................................... 205\n4.\nNo rule (O.35, r.4) .................................................................................................................. 205\n5.\nNo rule (O.35, r.5) .................................................................................................................. 205\n6.\nNo rule (O.35, r.6) .................................................................................................................. 205\n7.\nOrder of speeches (O.35, r.7) ................................................................................................ 205\n8.\nInspection by Judge or jury (O.35, r.8) ................................................................................... 206\n9.\nDeath of party before giving of judgment (O.35, r.9) ............................................................... 207\n10.\nNo rule (O.35, r.10) ................................................................................................................ 207\n\nArrangement of Rules - Orders\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 16\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n10A. No rule (O.35, r.10A) ............................................................................................................. 207\n11.\nList of Exhibits (O.35, r.11) .................................................................................................... 207\n12.\nCustody of exhibit after trial (O.35, r.12) ................................................................................ 207\n13.\nImpounded documents (O.35, r.13) ....................................................................................... 207\n14.\nOfficers may administer oaths (O.35, r.14) ............................................................................. 208\nORDER 36\n209\nNO ORDER\n209\nORDER 37\n210\nDAMAGES: ASSESSMENT AFTER JUDGMENT\n210\n1.\nAssessment of damages by a Judge (O.37, r.1) .................................................................... 210\n2.\nCertificate of amount of damages (O.37, r.2) ......................................................................... 210\n3.\nDefault judgment against some but not all defendants (O.37, r.3) .......................................... 210\n4.\nNo rule (O.37, r.4) .................................................................................................................. 210\n5.\nAssessment of value (O.37, r.5) ............................................................................................. 210\n6.\nAssessment of damages to time of assessment (O.37, r.6) ................................................... 210\nORDER 38\n211\nEVIDENCE\n211\n1.\nGeneral rule: witnesses to be examined orally (O.38, r.1) ...................................................... 211\n1A.\nInterpretation (O.38, r.1A) ...................................................................................................... 211\n2.\nEvidence by affidavit (O.38, r.2) ............................................................................................. 211\n2A.\nExchange of witnesses' statements (O.38, r.2A) .................................................................... 211\n3.\nEvidence of particular facts (O.38, r.3) ................................................................................... 214\n4.\nLimitation of expert evidence (O.38, r.4) ................................................................................ 214\n5.\nLimitation of plans, etc. in evidence (O.38, r.5) ...................................................................... 215\n6.\nRevocation or variation of orders under rules 2 to 5 (O.38, r.6) .............................................. 215\n7.\nEvidence of finding on foreign law (O.38, r.7) ........................................................................ 215\n8.\nApplication to trials of issues, references, etc. (O.38, r.8) ....................................................... 215\n9.\nDepositions: when receivable in evidence at trial (O.38, r.9) .................................................. 215\n10.\nCourt documents admissible or receivable in evidence (O.38, r.10) ....................................... 216\n11.\nEvidence of consent of new trustee to act (O.38, r.11) ........................................................... 216\n12.\nEvidence at trial may be used in subsequent proceedings (O.38, r.12) .................................. 216\n13.\nOrder to produce document at proceeding other than trial (O.38, r.13)................................... 216\n14.\nForm and issue of writ of subpoena (O.38, r.14) .................................................................... 217\n15.\nMore than one name may be included in one writ of subpoena (O.38, r.15) ........................... 217\n16.\nAmendment of writ of subpoena (O.38, r.16) ......................................................................... 217\n17.\nService of writ of subpoena (O.38, r.17) ................................................................................. 217\n18.\nDuration of writ of subpoena (O.38, r.18) ............................................................................... 217\n19.\nInspection of banker's books (O.38, r.19) ............................................................................... 217\n20.\nApplication (O.38, r.20) .......................................................................................................... 218\n21.\nNotice of intention to give certain statements in evidence (O.38, r.21) ................................... 218\n22.\nStatement admissible by virtue of Section 45 of the Law: contents of notice (O.38, r.22) ....... 219\n23.\nStatement admissible by virtue of Section 47 of the Law: contents of notice (O.38, r.23) ....... 219\n24.\nStatement admissible by virtue of Section 48 of the Law: contents of notice (O.38, r.24) ....... 220\n25.\nReasons for not calling a person as a witness (O.38, r.25) .................................................... 221\n26.\nCounter-notice requiring person to be called as a witness (O.38, r.26) .................................. 221\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\nArrangement of Rules - Orders\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 17\n\n27.\nDetermination of question whether person can or should be called as a witness (O.38,\nr.27) ....................................................................................................................................... 222\n28.\nDirections with respect to statement made in previous proceedings (O.38, r.28) .................... 222\n29.\nPower of Court to allow statement to be given in evidence (O.38, r.29) .................................. 222\n30.\nRestriction on adducing evidence as to credibility of maker, etc., of certain statements\n(O.38, r.30) ............................................................................................................................ 223\n31.\nNotice required of intention to give evidence of certain inconsistent statements (O.38,\nr.31) ....................................................................................................................................... 223\n32.\nCosts (O.38, r.32) .................................................................................................................. 224\n33.\nCertain powers exercisable in Chambers (O.38, r.33) ............................................................ 224\n34.\nStatements of opinion (O.38, r.34) ......................................................................................... 224\n35.\nInterpretation (O.38, r.35) ...................................................................................................... 224\n36.\nRestrictions on adducing expert evidence (O.38, r.36) ........................................................... 225\n37.\nDirection that expert report be disclosed (O.38, r.37) ............................................................. 225\n38.\nMeeting of experts (O.38, r.38) .............................................................................................. 225\n39.\nDisclosure of part of expert evidence (O.38, r.39) .................................................................. 225\n40.\nNo rule (O.38, r.40) ................................................................................................................ 225\n41.\nExpert evidence contained in statement (O.38, r.41) .............................................................. 225\n42.\nPutting in evidence expert report disclosed by another party (O.38, r.42) ............................... 226\n43.\nTime for putting expert report in evidence (O.38, r.43) ........................................................... 226\nORDER 39\n227\nEVIDENCE BY DEPOSITION: EXAMINERS OF THE COURT\n227\n1.\nPower to order depositions to be taken (O.39, r.1) ................................................................. 227\n2.\nWhere person to be examined is out of the jurisdiction (O.39, r.2) ......................................... 227\n3.\nOrder for issue of letter of request (O.39, r.3) ......................................................................... 227\n3A.\nExamination otherwise than on oath (O.39, r.3A) ................................................................... 228\n4.\nEnforcing attendance of witness at examination (O.39, r.4).................................................... 228\n5.\nRefusal of witness to attend, be sworn, etc. (O.39, r.5) .......................................................... 229\n6.\nAppointment of time and place for examination (O.39, r.6) ..................................................... 229\n7.\nExaminer to have certain documents (O.39, r.7) .................................................................... 229\n8.\nConduct of examination (O.39, r.8) ........................................................................................ 230\n9.\nExamination of additional witnesses (O.39, r.9) ..................................................................... 230\n10.\nObjection to questions (O.39, r.10) ........................................................................................ 230\n11.\nTaking of depositions (O.39, r.11) .......................................................................................... 230\n12.\nTime taken by examination to be indorsed on depositions (O.39, r.12) .................................. 231\n13.\nSpecial report by examiner (O.39, r.13) ................................................................................. 231\n14.\nOrder for payment of examiner's fees (O.39, r.14) ................................................................. 231\n15.\nPerpetuation of testimony (O.39, r.15) ................................................................................... 231\n16.\nExaminers of the Court (O.39, r.16) ....................................................................................... 232\n17.\nNo rule (O.39, r.17) ................................................................................................................ 232\n18.\nNo rule (O.39, r.18) ................................................................................................................ 232\n19.\nFees and expenses of examiners of the Court (O.39, r.19) .................................................... 232\nORDER 40\n233\nCOURT EXPERT\n233\n1.\nAppointment of expert to report on certain questions (O.40, r.1) ............................................ 233\n2.\nReport of Court expert (O.40, r.2) .......................................................................................... 233\n3.\nExperiments and tests (O.40, r.3) .......................................................................................... 233\n\nArrangement of Rules - Orders\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 18\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n4.\nCross-examination of Court expert (O.40, r.4) ........................................................................ 234\n5.\nRemuneration of Court expert (O.40, r.5) ............................................................................... 234\n6.\nCalling of expert witnesses (O.40, r.6) ................................................................................... 234\nORDER 41\n235\nAFFIDAVITS\n235\n1.\nForm of affidavit (O.41, r.1) .................................................................................................... 235\n2.\nAffidavit by two or more deponents (O.41, r.2) ....................................................................... 236\n3.\nAffidavit by illiterate or blind person (O.41, r.3) ....................................................................... 236\n4.\nUse of defective affidavit (O.41, r.4) ....................................................................................... 236\n5.\nContents of affidavit (O.41, r.5) .............................................................................................. 236\n6.\nScandalous, etc., matter in affidavit (O.41, r.6) ...................................................................... 236\n7.\nAlterations in affidavits (O.41, r.7) .......................................................................................... 237\n8.\nAffidavits to be sworn (O.41, r.8) ............................................................................................ 237\n9.\nFiling of affidavits (O.41, r.9) .................................................................................................. 237\n10.\nUse of original affidavit or office copy (O.41, r.10) .................................................................. 237\n11.\nDocument to be used in conjunction with affidavit to be exhibited to it (O.41, r.11)................. 237\n12.\nForm of documentary exhibits (O.41, r.12) ............................................................................. 238\n13.\nExhibits other than documents (O.41, r.13) ............................................................................ 239\n14.\nCourt documents not to be exhibited (O.41, r.14) ................................................................... 239\n15.\nReference to exhibits (O.41, r.15) .......................................................................................... 239\nORDER 42\n240\nJUDGMENTS AND ORDERS\n240\n1.\nForm of judgment, etc. (O.42, r.1) .......................................................................................... 240\n1A.\nNo rule (O.42, r.1A) ............................................................................................................... 240\n2.\nJudgment, etc., requiring act to be done: time for doing it (O.42, r.2) ..................................... 241\n3.\nDate from which judgment or order takes effect (O.42, r.3) .................................................... 241\n3A.\nJudgment against a State (O.42, r.3A) ................................................................................... 241\n4.\nOrders required to be drawn up (O.42, r.4) ............................................................................ 241\n5.\nDrawing up and filing of judgments and orders (O.42, r.5) ..................................................... 242\n5A.\nConsent judgments and orders (O.42, r.5A) ........................................................................... 243\n6.\nDefault judgments (O.42, r.6) ................................................................................................. 244\n7.\nOriginal and office copies of judgments etc. (O.42, r.7) .......................................................... 245\n8.\nJudgments given in foreign currencies (O.42, r.8) .................................................................. 245\n9.\nApplication in respect of orders of the Privy Council (O.42, r.9) .............................................. 245\nORDER 43\n246\nACCOUNTS AND INQUIRIES\n246\n1.\nSummary order for account (O.43, r.1) .................................................................................. 246\n2.\nCourt may direct taking of accounts, etc. (O.43, r.2) .............................................................. 246\n3.\nDirections as to manner of taking account or making inquiry (O.43, r.3) ................................. 246\n4.\nAccount to be made, verified etc. (O.43, r.4) .......................................................................... 247\n5.\nNotice to be given of alleged omissions, etc. in account (O.43, r.5)........................................ 247\n6.\nAllowances (O.43, r.6) ........................................................................................................... 247\n7.\nDelay in prosecution of accounts, etc. (O.43, r.7) ................................................................... 247\n8.\nDistribution of fund before all persons entitled are ascertained (O.43, r.8) ............................. 247\n9.\nNo rule (O.43, r.9) .................................................................................................................. 248\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\nArrangement of Rules - Orders\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 19\n\nORDER 44\n249\nPROCEEDINGS UNDER JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS\n249\n1.\nApplication to orders (O.44, r.1) ............................................................................................. 249\n2.\nService of notice of judgment on person not a party (O.44, r.2) .............................................. 249\n3.\nDirections by the Court (O.44, r.3) ......................................................................................... 249\n4.\nApplication of rr.5 to 8 (O.44, r.4) ........................................................................................... 250\n5.\nAdvertisements for creditors and other claimants (O.44, r.5) .................................................. 250\n6.\nExamination of claims (O.44, r.6) ........................................................................................... 250\n7.\nAdjudication on claims (O.44, r.7) .......................................................................................... 251\n8.\nNotice of adjudication (O.44, r.8) ........................................................................................... 251\n9.\nInterest on debts (O.44, r.9) ................................................................................................... 251\n10.\nInterest on legacies (O.44, r.10) ............................................................................................. 252\n11.\nNo rule (O.44, r.11) ................................................................................................................ 252\n12.\nNo rule (O.44, r.12) ................................................................................................................ 252\nORDER 45\n253\nENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS: GENERAL\n253\n1.\nEnforcement of judgment, etc., for payment of money (O.45, r.1) .......................................... 253\n2.\nNo rule (O.45, r.2) .................................................................................................................. 253\n3.\nEnforcement of judgment for possession of land (O.45, r.3) ................................................... 253\n4.\nEnforcement of judgment for delivery of goods (O.45, r.4) ..................................................... 254\n5.\nEnforcement of judgment to do or abstain from doing any act (O.45, r.5) ............................... 254\n6.\nJudgment, etc. requiring act to be done: order fixing time for doing (O.45, r.6) ....................... 255\n7.\nService of copy of judgment, etc., prerequisite to enforcement under r.5 (O.45, r.7) .............. 256\n8.\nCourt may order act to be done at expense of disobedient party (O.45, r.8) ........................... 257\n9.\nExecution by or against person not being a party (O.45, r.9) .................................................. 257\n10.\nConditional judgment: waiver (O.45, r.10) .............................................................................. 257\n11.\nMatters occurring after judgment: stay of execution, etc. (O.45, r.11) ..................................... 257\n12.\nForms of writs (O.45, r.12) ..................................................................................................... 258\n13.\nEnforcement of judgments and orders for recovery of money, etc. (O.45, r.13) ...................... 258\n14.\nNo rule (O.45, r.14) ................................................................................................................ 258\n15.\nNo rule (O.45, r.15) ................................................................................................................ 258\nORDER 46\n259\nWRITS OF EXECUTION: GENERAL\n259\n1.\nDefinition (O.46, r.1) .............................................................................................................. 259\n2.\nWhen leave to issue any writ of execution is necessary (O.46, r.2) ........................................ 259\n3.\nLeave required for issue of writ in aid of other writ (O.46, r.3) ................................................ 259\n4.\nApplication for leave to issue writ (O.46, r.4) .......................................................................... 259\n5.\nApplication for leave to issue writ of sequestration (O.46, r.5) ................................................ 260\n6.\nIssue of writ of execution (O.46, r.6) ...................................................................................... 260\n7.\nNo rule (O.46, r.7) .................................................................................................................. 261\n8.\nDuration and renewal of execution (O.46, r.8) ........................................................................ 261\n9.\nReturn of writ of execution (O.46, r.9) .................................................................................... 262\nORDER 47\n263\nWRITS OF FIERI FACIAS\n263\n1.\nPower to stay execution by writ of fieri facias (O.47, r.1) ........................................................ 263\n\nArrangement of Rules - Orders\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 20\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n2.\nNo rule (O.47, r.2) .................................................................................................................. 263\n3.\nSeparate writs to enforce payment of costs, etc. (O.47, r.3) ................................................... 264\nORDER 48\n266\nEXAMINATION OF JUDGMENT DEBTOR, ETC.\n266\n1.\nOrder for examination of judgment debtor (O.48, r.1) ............................................................. 266\n2.\nExamination of party liable to satisfy other judgment (O.48, r.2) ............................................. 267\n3.\nExaminer to make record of debtor's statement (O.48, r.3) .................................................... 267\nORDER 49\n268\nGARNISHEE PROCEEDINGS\n268\n1.\nAttachment of debt due to judgment debtor (O.49, r.1) .......................................................... 268\n2.\nApplication for order (O.49, r.2) .............................................................................................. 268\n3.\nService and effect of order to show cause (O.49, r.3) ............................................................ 268\n4.\nNo appearance or dispute of liability by garnishee (O.49, r.4) ................................................ 269\n5.\nDispute of liability by garnishee (O.49, r.5) ............................................................................. 269\n6.\nClaims of third persons (O.49, r.6) ......................................................................................... 269\n7.\nNo rule (O.49, r.7) .................................................................................................................. 269\n8.\nDischarge of garnishee (O.49, r.8) ......................................................................................... 269\n9.\nMoney in Court (O.49, r.9) ..................................................................................................... 270\n10.\nCosts (O.49, r.10) .................................................................................................................. 270\nORDER 50\n271\nCHARGING ORDERS, STOP ORDERS, ETC.\n271\n1.\nOrder imposing a charge on a beneficial interest (O.50, r.1) .................................................. 271\n1A.\nInterpretation (O.50, r.1A) ...................................................................................................... 272\n2.\nService of notice of order to show cause (O.50, r.2) ............................................................... 272\n3.\nOrder made on further consideration (O.50, r.3) .................................................................... 272\n4.\nOrder imposing a charge on an interest held by a trustee (O.50, r.4) ..................................... 273\n4A.\nRegistration of order imposing a charge on an interest in land (O.50, r.4A) ............................ 273\n5.\nEffect of order in relation to securities out of Court (O.50, r.5) ................................................ 274\n6.\nEffect of order in relation to funds in Court (O.50, r.6) ............................................................ 275\n7.\nDischarge, etc., of charging order (O.50, r.7) ......................................................................... 275\n8.\nEnforcement of order charging an interest in land (O.50, r.8) ................................................. 275\n9.\nEnforcement of order charging property other than land (O.50, r.9) ....................................... 276\n10.\nFunds in Court: stop order (O.50, r.10) .................................................................................. 276\n11.\nSecurities not in Court: stop notice (O.50, r.11) ...................................................................... 277\n12.\nEffect of stop notice (O.50, r.12) ............................................................................................ 277\n13.\nAmendment of stop notice (O.50, r.13) .................................................................................. 277\n14.\nWithdrawal etc. of stop notice (O.50, r.14) ............................................................................. 278\n15.\nOrder prohibiting transfer, etc. of securities (O.50, r.15) ......................................................... 278\nORDER 50A\n280\nATTACHMENT OF EARNINGS ORDERS\n280\n1.\nInterpretation (O.50A, r.1) ...................................................................................................... 280\n2.\nRegister of orders (O.50A, r.2) ............................................................................................... 280\n3.\nNon-resident debtors (O.50A, r.3) .......................................................................................... 280\n4.\nMode of applying (O.50A, r.4) ................................................................................................ 280\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\nArrangement of Rules - Orders\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 21\n\n5.\nService and reply (O.50A, r.5) ................................................................................................ 280\n6.\nNotice to employer (O.50A, r.6) ............................................................................................. 281\n7.\nAttachment of earnings order (O.50A, r.7) ............................................................................. 281\n8.\nFailure by debtor (O.50A, r.8) ................................................................................................ 282\n9.\nCosts (O.50A, r.9) .................................................................................................................. 283\n10.\nContents and service of order (O.50A, r.10) ........................................................................... 283\n11.\nApplication to determine whether particular payments are earnings (O.50A, r.11).................. 283\n12.\nNotice of cessation (O.50A, r.12) ........................................................................................... 283\n13.\nVariation and discharge by Court of own motion (O.50A, r.13) ............................................... 283\n14.\nExercise of power to obtain statement of earnings (O.50A, r.14) ............................................ 284\n15.\nOffenses (O.50A, r.15) ........................................................................................................... 285\n16.\nMaintenance orders (O.50A, r.16) .......................................................................................... 285\n17.\nCases in which consolidated order may be made (O.50A, r.17) ............................................. 285\n18.\nApplication for consolidated order (O.50A, r.18) ..................................................................... 286\n19.\nMaking of consolidated order by Court of its own motion (O.50A, r.19) .................................. 287\n20.\nExtension of consolidated order (O.50A, r.20) ........................................................................ 287\n21.\nPayments under consolidated order (O.50A, r.21) ................................................................. 287\nORDER 51\n288\nRECEIVERS: EQUITABLE EXECUTION\n288\n1.\nAppointment of receiver by way of equitable execution (O.51, r.1) ......................................... 288\n2.\nNo rule (O.51, r.2) .................................................................................................................. 288\n3.\nApplication of rules as to appointment of receiver, etc. (O.51, r.3) .......................................... 288\nORDER 52\n289\nCOMMITTAL\n289\n1.\nCommittal for contempt of Court (O.52, r.1) ........................................................................... 289\n2.\nNo rule (O.52, r.2) .................................................................................................................. 289\n3.\nNo rule (O.52, r.3) .................................................................................................................. 289\n4.\nApplication for committal (O.52, r.4) ....................................................................................... 289\n5.\nCommittal by the Court of its own motion (O.52, r.5) .............................................................. 289\n6.\nProvisions as to hearing (O.52, r.6) ........................................................................................ 289\n7.\nPower to suspend execution of committal order (O.52, r.7) .................................................... 290\n8.\nDischarge of person committed (O.52, r.8) ............................................................................ 290\n9.\nSaving for other powers (O.52, r.9) ........................................................................................ 291\n10.\nWarrant of committal (O.52, r.10) ........................................................................................... 291\n11.\nNo Rule (O.52, r.11) .............................................................................................................. 291\n12.\nApplication for committal (O.52, r.12) ..................................................................................... 291\n13.\nAttendance of debtor (O.52, r.13)........................................................................................... 292\n14.\nPayment of the judgment debt (O.52, r.14) ............................................................................ 292\n15.\nOrder for committal (O.52, r.15) ............................................................................................. 292\n16.\nDischarge of debtor (O.52, r.16) ............................................................................................ 293\nORDER 53\n294\nAPPLICATIONS FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW\n294\n1.\nCases appropriate for application for judicial review (O.53, r.1) .............................................. 294\n2.\nJoinder of claims for relief (O.53, r.2) ..................................................................................... 294\n3.\nGrant of leave to apply for judicial review (O.53, r.3) .............................................................. 294\n4.\nDelay in applying for relief (O.53, r.4) ..................................................................................... 296\n\nArrangement of Rules - Orders\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 22\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n5.\nMode of applying for judicial review (O.53, r.5) ...................................................................... 296\n6.\nStatements and affidavits (O.53, r.6) ...................................................................................... 297\n7.\nClaim for damages (O.53, r.7)................................................................................................ 297\n8.\nInterlocutory applications (O.53, r.8) ...................................................................................... 298\n9.\nHearing of application for judicial review (O.53, r.9) ............................................................... 298\n10.\nSaving for person acting in obedience to mandamus (O.53, r.10) .......................................... 298\n11.\nNo rule (O.53, r.11) ................................................................................................................ 299\n12.\nConsolidation of applications (O.53, r.12) .............................................................................. 299\n13.\nAppeal from Court's order (O.53, r.13) ................................................................................... 299\nORDER 54\n300\nAPPLICATIONS FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS\n300\n1.\n Application for writ of habeas corpus ad subjiciendum (O.54, r.1) ......................................... 300\n2.\nPower of Court to whom ex parte application is made (O.54, r.2) ........................................... 300\n3.\nCopies of affidavits to be supplied (O.54, r.3) ........................................................................ 300\n4.\nPower to order release of person restrained (O.54, r.4) ......................................................... 300\n5.\nDirections as to return to writ (O.54, r.5) ................................................................................ 301\n6.\nService of writ and notice (O.54, r.6) ...................................................................................... 301\n7.\nReturn to the writ (O.54, r.7) .................................................................................................. 301\n8.\nProcedure at hearing of writ (O.54, r.8) .................................................................................. 301\n9.\nBringing up prisoner to give evidence, etc. (O.54, r.9) ............................................................ 301\n10.\nForm of writ (O.54, r.10)......................................................................................................... 302\nORDER 55\n303\nAPPEALS TO GRAND COURT FROM THE CABINET, REGISTRAR OF LANDS,\nTRIBUNAL OR OTHER PERSON: GENERAL\n303\n1.\nApplication (O.55, r.1) ............................................................................................................ 303\n2.\nCourt to hear appeal (O.55, r.2) ............................................................................................. 303\n3.\nBringing of appeal (O.55, r.3) ................................................................................................. 303\n4.\nService of notice of motion and entry of appeal (O.55, r.4) ..................................................... 304\n5.\nDate of hearing of appeal (O.55, r.5) ...................................................................................... 304\n6.\nAmendment of grounds of appeal, etc. (O.55, r.6) ................................................................. 304\n7.\nPowers of Court hearing appeal (O.55, r.7) ............................................................................ 305\n8.\nRight of the Cabinet to appear and be heard (O.55, r.8)......................................................... 305\nORDER 56\n306\nAPPEALS TO COURT BY CASE STATED: GENERAL\n306\n1.\nNo rule (O.56, r.1) .................................................................................................................. 306\n2.\nNo rule (O.56, r.2) .................................................................................................................. 306\n3.\nNo rule (O.56, r.3) .................................................................................................................. 306\n4.\nNo rule (O.56, r.4) .................................................................................................................. 306\n5.\nNo rule (O.56, r.5) .................................................................................................................. 306\n6.\nNo rule (O.56, r.1) .................................................................................................................. 306\n7.\nCase stated by the Cabinet, the Registrar of Lands, tribunal or other person (O.56, r.7) ........ 306\n8.\nApplication for order to state a case (O.56, r.8) ...................................................................... 307\n9.\nSigning and service of case (O.56, r.9) .................................................................................. 307\n10.\nProceedings for determination of case (O.56, r.10) ................................................................ 307\n11.\nAmendment of case (O.56, r.11) ............................................................................................ 308\n12.\nRight of the Cabinet, etc. to appear and be heard (O.56, r.12) ............................................... 308\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\nArrangement of Rules - Orders\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 23\n\n12A. No Rule (O.56, r.12A) ............................................................................................................ 308\n13.\nNo Rule (O.56, r.13) .............................................................................................................. 309\nORDER 57-61\n310\nNO ORDERS\n310\nORDER 62\n311\nCOSTS\n311\n1.\nApplication (O.62, r.1) ............................................................................................................ 311\n2.\nTransitional provisions (O.62, r.2) .......................................................................................... 311\n3.\nDefinitions (O.62, r.3) ............................................................................................................. 311\n4.\nGeneral principles (O.62, r.4) ................................................................................................. 312\n5.\nCases where order for costs deemed to have been made (O.62, r.5) .................................... 314\n6.\nCases where costs do not follow the event (O.62, r.6) ........................................................... 315\n7.\nClaim for fixed costs (O.62, r.7) ............................................................................................. 316\n8.\nAssessment of Costs (O.62, r.8) ............................................................................................ 317\n9.\nStage of proceedings at which costs to be taxed (O.62, r.9) .................................................. 317\n10.\nMatters to be taken into account in exercising discretion (O.62, r.10) ..................................... 318\n11.\nPersonal liability of attorney for costs (O.62, r.11) .................................................................. 318\n12.\nApplication for wasted costs orders (O.62, r.12) ..................................................................... 318\n13.\nBasis of taxation (O.62, r.13) ................................................................................................. 319\n14.\nCosts payable to a trustee, personal representative or official liquidator out of any fund\n(O.62, r.14) ............................................................................................................................ 320\n15.\nCosts payable to an attorney where money claimed by or on behalf of a person under\ndisability (O.62, r.15) .............................................................................................................. 320\n16.\nAmount of costs (O.62, r.16) .................................................................................................. 321\n17.\nAllowance or disallowance of items and allowance of increased sums (O.62, r.17) ................ 322\n18.\nForeign lawyers (O.62, r.18) .................................................................................................. 322\n19.\nLitigants in person (O.62, r.19) ............................................................................................... 323\n20.\nPowers of taxing officers (O.62, r.20) ..................................................................................... 323\n21.\nExtensions of time (O.62, r.21) .............................................................................................. 324\n22.\nCosts Certificates (O.62, r.22) ................................................................................................ 324\n23.\nPower of taxing officer to effect set offs (O.62, r.23) ............................................................... 325\n24.\nTaxation of bill of costs comprised in an account (O.62, r.24) ................................................ 325\n25.\nPowers of taxing officers on taxation of costs out of a fund (O.62, r.25) ................................. 325\n26.\nPowers of taxing officers in relation to costs of taxation proceedings (O.62, r.26) .................. 326\n27.\nService of a bill of costs (O.62, r.27) ...................................................................................... 326\n28.\nCommencement of taxation proceedings (O.62, r.28) ............................................................ 327\n29.\nSubsequent procedure (O.62, r.29) ........................................................................................ 327\n30.\nReview by the Judge (O.62, r.30)........................................................................................... 329\n31.\nAppeal to the Court of Appeal on points of construction (O.62, r.31) ...................................... 330\nORDER 63\n331\nOFFICE OF THE GRAND COURT\n331\n1.\nDistribution of business in the Court (O.63, r.1) ...................................................................... 331\n2.\nCourt files (O.63, r.2) ............................................................................................................. 331\n3.\nFiling of documents (O.63, r.3) ............................................................................................... 331\n3A.\nFiling of documents by electronic means (O. 63, r. 3A) .......................................................... 332\n4.\nRestriction on removal of documents (O.63, r.4) .................................................................... 332\n\nArrangement of Rules - Orders\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 24\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n5.\nIdentity of party filing documents (O.63, r.5) ........................................................................... 332\n6.\nDeposit of documents (O.63, r.6) ........................................................................................... 333\n7.\nRegister of judgments (O.63, r.7) ........................................................................................... 333\n8.\nRegister of writs and other originating processes (O.63, r.8) .................................................. 333\n9.\nOffice hours (O.63, r.9) .......................................................................................................... 334\nORDER 64\n336\nNO ORDER\n336\nORDER 65\n337\nSERVICE OF DOCUMENTS\n337\n1.\nWhen personal service required (O.65, r.1) ........................................................................... 337\n2.\nPersonal service: how effected (O.65, r.2) ............................................................................. 337\n3.\nService on body corporate (O.65, r.3) .................................................................................... 337\n4.\nSubstituted service (O.65, r.4) ............................................................................................... 337\n5.\nOrdinary service: how effected (O.65, r.5) .............................................................................. 337\n5A.\nService by electronic means (O. 65, r. 5A) ............................................................................. 339\n6.\nService on the Cabinet, etc., in proceedings which are not by or against the Crown (O.65,\nr.6) ......................................................................................................................................... 339\n7.\nEffect of service after certain hours (O.65, r.7) ....................................................................... 339\n8.\nAffidavit of service (O.65, r.8)................................................................................................. 339\n9.\nNo service required in certain cases (O.65, r.9) ..................................................................... 339\n10.\nService of process on Sunday (O.65, r.10) ............................................................................ 340\nORDER 66\n341\nPAPER, PRINTING, BINDING AND COPIES\n341\n1.\nQuality and size of paper (O.66, r.1) ...................................................................................... 341\n2.\nRegulations as to printing, etc. (O.66, r.2) .............................................................................. 341\n3.\nCopies of documents for other party (O.66, r.3) ..................................................................... 341\n4.\nRequirements as to copies (O.66, r.4) ................................................................................... 342\n5.\nRequirements as to binding (O.66, r.5) .................................................................................. 342\nORDER 67\n343\nATTORNEYS-AT-LAW\n343\n1.\nNotice of change of attorney (O.67, r.1) ................................................................................. 343\n2.\nNo rule (O.67, r.2) .................................................................................................................. 343\n3.\nNotice of appointment of attorney (O.67, r.3) ......................................................................... 343\n4.\nNotice of intention to act in person (O.67, r.4) ........................................................................ 343\n5.\nRemoval of attorney from record at instance of another party (O.67, r.5) ............................... 343\n6.\nWithdrawal of attorney who has ceased to act for party (O.67, r.6) ........................................ 344\n7.\nAddress for service of party whose attorney is removed, etc. (O.67, r.7) ................................ 345\n8.\nCopy of notice to be filed (O.67, r.8) ...................................................................................... 345\n9.\nCommencement and service of Proceedings (O. 67, r. 9) ...................................................... 345\n10.\nAcknowledgment of Service (O. 67, r. 10) .............................................................................. 346\n11.\nCase management (O. 67, r. 11) ........................................................................................... 346\n12.\nTrial (O. 67, r. 12) .................................................................................................................. 346\n13.\nConfidentiality of proceedings (O. 67, r. 13) ........................................................................... 347\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\nArrangement of Rules - Orders\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 25\n\nORDER 68\n348\nNO ORDER\n348\nORDER 69\n349\nPROVISIONS AS TO FOREIGN PROCEEDINGS; SERVICE OF FOREIGN PROCESS\n349\n1.\nDefinitions (O.69, r.1) ............................................................................................................. 349\n2.\nApplications (O.69, r.2) .......................................................................................................... 349\n3.\nService of process (O.69, r.3) ................................................................................................ 349\n4.\nService of process by private process server (O.69, r.4) ........................................................ 350\nORDER 70\n351\nOBTAINING EVIDENCE FOR FOREIGN COURTS, ETC.\n351\n1.\nInterpretation (O.70, r.1) ........................................................................................................ 351\n2.\nApplication for order (O.70, r.2) .............................................................................................. 351\n3.\nApplication by Attorney General in certain cases (O.70, r.3) .................................................. 351\n4.\nPerson to take and manner of taking examination (O.70, r.4)................................................. 351\n5.\nDealing with deposition (O.70, r.5) ......................................................................................... 352\n6.\nClaim to privilege (O.70, r.6) .................................................................................................. 352\nORDER 71\n354\nFOREIGN JUDGMENTS RECIPROCAL ENFORCEMENT ACT (as amended and revised)\n354\n1.\nInterpretation (O.71, r.1) ........................................................................................................ 354\n2.\nApplication for registration (O.71, r.2) .................................................................................... 354\n3.\nEvidence in support of application (O.71, r.3)......................................................................... 354\n4.\nSecurity for costs (O.71, r.4) .................................................................................................. 354\n5.\nOrder for registration (O.71, r.5) ............................................................................................. 355\n6.\nFiling of judgments (O.71, r.6) ................................................................................................ 355\n7.\nNotice of registration (O.71, r.7) ............................................................................................. 355\n8.\nNo rule (O.71, r.8) .................................................................................................................. 355\n9.\nApplication to set aside registration (O.71, r.9) ....................................................................... 356\n10.\nIssue of execution (O.71, r.10) ............................................................................................... 356\n11.\nNo rule (O.71, r.11) ................................................................................................................ 356\n12.\nNo rule (O.71, r.12) ................................................................................................................ 356\n13.\nCertified copy of Grand Court judgment (O.71, r.13) .............................................................. 356\nORDER 72\n358\nFINANCIAL SERVICES PROCEEDINGS\n358\n1.\nApplication and Interpretation (O.72, r.1) ............................................................................... 358\n2.\nCommencement of Financial Services Proceedings (O.72, r.2) ............................................. 359\n3.\nTransfer of Proceedings (O.72, r.3) ........................................................................................ 360\n4.\nCase management and summonses for directions (O.72, r.4) ................................................ 361\n5.\nListing interlocutory hearings and trials (O.72, r.5) ................................................................. 362\n6.\nTransitional Provisions (O.72, r.6) .......................................................................................... 362\nORDER 73\n364\nARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS\n364\n1.\nThe overriding objective (O.73, r.1) ........................................................................................ 364\n2.\nMeaning of arbitration application (O.73, r.2) ......................................................................... 364\n\nArrangement of Rules - Orders\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 26\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n3.\nInterpretation (O.73, r.3) ........................................................................................................ 364\n4.\nForm and content of arbitration application (O.73, r.4) ........................................................... 365\n5.\nIssue of application (O.73, r.5) ............................................................................................... 366\n6.\nStay of legal proceedings (O.73, r.6) ...................................................................................... 366\n7.\nService of arbitration application (O.73, r.7) ........................................................................... 366\n8.\nService out of the jurisdiction (O.73, r.8) ................................................................................ 367\n9.\nAffidavit in support of arbitration application (O.73, r.9) .......................................................... 368\n10.\nRequirements as to notice (O.73, r.10) .................................................................................. 368\n11.\nAcknowledgment of service by respondent (O.73, r.11) ......................................................... 369\n12.\nAcknowledgment of service, etc., by arbitrator (O.73, r.12) .................................................... 369\n13.\nAutomatic directions (O.73, r.13) ........................................................................................... 370\n14.\nDirections by the Court (O.73, r.14) ....................................................................................... 371\n15.\nNo rule (O.73, r.15) ................................................................................................................ 371\n16.\nSecuring the attendance of witnesses (O.73, r.16) ................................................................. 372\n17.\nSecuring for costs (O.73, r.17) ............................................................................................... 372\n18.\nPowers exercisable in support of arbitral proceedings (O.73, r.18)......................................... 372\n19.\nApplications under Sections 27(9) and 71 of the 2012 Law (O.73, r.19) ................................. 372\n20.\nApplications for leave to appeal (O.73, r.20) .......................................................................... 373\n21.\nExtension of time: applications under Section 13 (O.73, r.21) ................................................ 373\n22.\nTime limit for challenges to or appeals from awards (O.73, r.22) ............................................ 373\n23.\nNo rule (O.73, r.23) ................................................................................................................ 374\n24.\nNo rule (O.73, r.24) ................................................................................................................ 374\n25.\nNo rule (O.73, r.25) ................................................................................................................ 374\n26.\nNo rule (O.73, r.26) ................................................................................................................ 374\n27.\nNo rule (O.73, r.27) ................................................................................................................ 374\n28.\nNo rule (O.73, r.28) ................................................................................................................ 374\n29.\nNo rule (O.73, r.29) ................................................................................................................ 375\n30.\nNo rule (O.73, r.30) ................................................................................................................ 375\n31.\nEnforcement of awards (O.73, r.31) ....................................................................................... 375\n32.\nInterest on awards (O.73, r.32) .............................................................................................. 376\n33.\nNo rule (O.73, r.33) ................................................................................................................ 376\n34.\nRegistration of awards under 1967 Order (O.73, r.34) ........................................................... 377\n35.\nRegistration of awards under the 1988 Order (O.73, r.35) ...................................................... 378\n36.\nArbitrations conducted under the 1974 Law (O.73, r.36) ........................................................ 378\nORDER 74\n379\nAPPLICATIONS AND APPEALS UNDER THE MERCHANT SHIPPING ACTS\n379\n1.\nInterpretation (O.74, r.1) ........................................................................................................ 379\n2.\nRehearing of and appeal from inquiries and investigations (O.74, r.2) ................................... 379\n3.\nOrder for sale on transmission of a ship to an unqualified person (O.74, r.3) ......................... 379\n4.\nProceedings on forfeiture of ship (O.74, r.4) .......................................................................... 379\n5.\nProceedings before Courts of Survey (O.74, r.5) ................................................................... 380\n6.\nAwards of wreck commissioners (O.74, r.6) ........................................................................... 380\nORDER 75\n381\nADMIRALTY PROCEEDINGS\n381\n1.\nApplication and interpretation (O.75, r.1)................................................................................ 381\n2.\nForms (O.75, r.2) ................................................................................................................... 382\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\nArrangement of Rules - Orders\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 27\n\n2A.\nProceedings against, or concerning, the International Oil Pollution Compensation Fund\n(O.75, r.2A) ............................................................................................................................ 382\n3.\nIssue of writ and acknowledgment of service (O.75, r.3) ........................................................ 382\n4.\nService of writ out of jurisdiction (O.75, r.4) ............................................................................ 383\n5.\nWarrant of arrest (O.75, r.5) ................................................................................................... 383\n6.\nCaveat against arrest (O.75, r.6) ............................................................................................ 385\n7.\nRemedy where property protected by caveat is arrested without good and sufficient\nreason (O.75, r.7) .................................................................................................................. 385\n8.\nService of writ in action in rem (O.75, r.8) .............................................................................. 385\n9.\nCommittal of attorney failing to comply with undertaking (O.75, r.9) ....................................... 386\n10.\nExecution, etc., of warrant of arrest (O.75, r.10) ..................................................................... 387\n11.\nService on ships, etc.: how effected (O.75, r.11) .................................................................... 387\n12.\nDirections with respect to property under arrest (O.75, r.12) .................................................. 387\n13.\nRelease of property under arrest (O.75, r.13)......................................................................... 388\n14.\nCaveat against release, etc. (O.75, r.14) ................................................................................ 389\n15.\nDuration of caveats (O.75, r.15) ............................................................................................. 389\n16.\nBail (O.75, r.16) ..................................................................................................................... 389\n17.\nInterveners (O.75, r.17).......................................................................................................... 390\n18.\nPreliminary acts (O.75, r.18) .................................................................................................. 390\n19.\nFailure to file preliminary act: proceedings against party in default (O.75, r.19) ...................... 391\n20.\nSpecial provisions as to pleadings in collision, etc., actions (O.75, r.20) ................................ 392\n21.\nJudgment by default (O.75, r.21) ........................................................................................... 393\n22.\nOrder for sale of ship: determination of priority of claims (O.75, r.22) ..................................... 394\n23.\nAppraisement and sale of property (O.75, r.23) ..................................................................... 395\n23A. Undertakings as to expenses, etc. (O.75, r.23A) .................................................................... 395\n24.\nPayment into and out of Court (O.75, r.24) ............................................................................ 396\n25.\nSummons for directions (O.75, r.25) ...................................................................................... 396\n26.\nFixing date for trial, etc. (O.75, r.26) ....................................................................................... 396\n27.\nStay of proceedings in collision, etc., actions until security given (O.75, r.27) ........................ 397\n28.\nInspection of ship, etc. (O.75, r.28) ........................................................................................ 397\n29.\nNo rule (O.75, r.29) ................................................................................................................ 397\n30.\nExamination of witnesses and other persons (O.75, r.30) ...................................................... 398\n31.\nTrial without pleadings (O.75, r.31) ........................................................................................ 398\n32.\nFurther provisions with respect to evidence (O.75, r.32) ........................................................ 399\n33.\nProceedings for apportionment of salvage (O.75, r.33) .......................................................... 399\n33A. No rule (O.75, r.33A) ............................................................................................................. 399\n34.\nNotice of motion in actions in rem (O.75, r.34) ....................................................................... 399\n35.\nAgreement between attorneys may be made an order of Court (O.75, r.35)........................... 399\n36.\nNo rule (O.75, r.36) ................................................................................................................ 399\n37.\nLimitation action: parties (O.75, r.37) ..................................................................................... 400\n37A. Limitation action: payment into Court (O.75, r.37A) ................................................................ 400\n38.\nLimitation action: summons for decree or directions (O.75, r.38) ............................................ 401\n39.\nLimitation action: proceedings under decree (O.75, r.39) ....................................................... 402\n40.\nLimitation action: proceedings to set aside decree (O.75, r.40) .............................................. 403\n41.\nNo rule (O.75, r.41) ................................................................................................................ 404\n42.\nNo rule (O.75, r.42) ................................................................................................................ 404\n43.\nNo rule (O.75, r.43) ................................................................................................................ 404\n44.\nNo rule (O.75, r.44) ................................................................................................................ 404\n45.\nDrawing up and filing judgments and orders (O.75, r.45) ....................................................... 404\n\nArrangement of Rules - Orders\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 28\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 76\n405\nCONTENTIOUS PROBATE PROCEEDINGS\n405\n1.\nApplication and interpretation (O.76, r.1)................................................................................ 405\n2.\nRequirements in connection with issue of writ (O.76, r.2) ....................................................... 405\n3.\nParties to action to revocation of grant (O.76, r.3) .................................................................. 405\n4.\nNo rule (O.76, r.4) .................................................................................................................. 405\n5.\nAffidavit of testamentary scripts (O.76, r.5) ............................................................................ 406\n6.\nFailure to acknowledge service (O.76, r.6) ............................................................................. 406\n7.\nService of statement of claim (O.76, r.7) ................................................................................ 407\n8.\nCounterclaim (O.76, r.8) ........................................................................................................ 407\n9.\nContents of pleadings (O.76, r.9) ........................................................................................... 407\n10.\nDefault of pleadings (O.76, r.10) ............................................................................................ 408\n11.\nDiscontinuance and dismissal (O.76, r.11) ............................................................................. 408\n12.\nCompromise of action: trial on affidavit evidence (O.76, r.12) ................................................ 408\n13.\nApplication for order to bring will, etc. (O.76, r.13) ................................................................. 408\n14.\nAdministration pending suit (O.76, r.14) ................................................................................. 409\n15.\nProbate counterclaim in other proceedings (O.76, r.15) ......................................................... 409\n16.\nNo Rule (O.76, r.16) .............................................................................................................. 409\nORDER 77\n410\nPROCEEDINGS BY AND AGAINST THE CROWN\n410\n1.\nApplication and interpretation (O.77, r.1)................................................................................ 410\n2.\nNo rule (O.77, r.2) .................................................................................................................. 410\n3.\nParticulars to be included in indorsement of claim (O.77, r.3)................................................. 410\n4.\nService on the Crown (O.77, r.4) ........................................................................................... 411\n5.\nNo rule (O.77, r.5) .................................................................................................................. 411\n6.\nCounterclaim and set-off (O.77, r.6) ....................................................................................... 411\n7.\nSummary judgment (O.77, r.7) ............................................................................................... 411\n8.\nNo rule (O.77, r.8) .................................................................................................................. 412\n8A.\nNo rule (O.77, r.8A) ............................................................................................................... 412\n9.\nJudgment in default (O.77, r.9) .............................................................................................. 412\n10.\nThird party notices (O.77, r.10) .............................................................................................. 412\n11.\nInterpleader: application for order against Crown (O.77, r.11) ................................................ 413\n12.\nDiscovery and interrogatories (O.77, r.12) ............................................................................. 413\n13.\nNo rule (O.77, r.13) ................................................................................................................ 413\n14.\nEvidence (O.77, r.14) ............................................................................................................. 413\n15.\nExecution and satisfaction of orders (O.77, r.15) ................................................................... 413\n16.\nAttachment of debts (O.77, r.16) ............................................................................................ 413\n17.\nNo rule (O.77, r.17) ................................................................................................................ 414\n18.\nApplication under Section 20 of the Crown Proceedings Act (as amended and revised)\n(O.77, r.18) ............................................................................................................................ 414\nORDER 77A\n416\nPROCEEDINGS UNDER SECTIONS 23 AND 26 OF THE CONSTITUTION\n416\n1.\nDefinitions  (O.77A, r.1) ......................................................................................................... 416\n2.\nGeneral (O.77A, r.2) .............................................................................................................. 416\n3.\nProceedings under Section 23 of the Constitution (O.77A, r.3) .............................................. 417\n4.\nProceedings under Section 26(1) of the Constitution (O.77A, r.4) .......................................... 418\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\nArrangement of Rules - Orders\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 29\n\n5.\nReference to the Court under Section 26(2) of the Constitution; general provisions\n(O.77A, r.5) ............................................................................................................................ 418\n6.\nProcedure to be applied for a reference by a Lower Court to the Court under Section\n26(2) of the Constitution (O.77A, r.6) ..................................................................................... 420\n7.\nSigning and service of reference by a tribunal (O.77A, r.7) .................................................... 421\n8.\nService of petition under GCR O.77A, rule 5(3) (O.77A, r.8) .................................................. 421\n9.\nAmendment of reference (O.77A, r.9) .................................................................................... 421\n10.\nRight of Governor, the Cabinet, etc. to appear and be heard (O.77A, r.10) ............................ 422\nORDER 78-79\n423\nNO ORDERS\n423\nORDER 80\n424\nDISABILITY\n424\n1.\nInterpretation (O.80, r.1) ........................................................................................................ 424\n2.\nPerson under disability must sue, etc., by next friend or guardian ad litem (O.80, r.2) ............ 424\n3.\nAppointment of next friend or guardian ad litem (O.80, r.3) .................................................... 424\n4.\nNo rule (O.80, r.4) .................................................................................................................. 426\n5.\nNo rule (O.80, r.5) .................................................................................................................. 426\n6.\nAppointment of guardian where person under disability does not acknowledge service\n(O.80, r.6) .............................................................................................................................. 426\n7.\nApplication to discharge or vary certain orders (O.80, r.7) ...................................................... 427\n8.\nAdmission not to be implied from pleading of person under disability (O.80, r.8) .................... 428\n9.\nDiscovery and interrogatories (O.80, r.9) ............................................................................... 428\n10.\nCompromise, etc. by person under disability (O.80, r.10) ....................................................... 428\n11.\nApproval of settlement (O.80, r.11) ........................................................................................ 428\n12.\nControl of money recovered by person under disability (O.80, r.12) ....................................... 428\n13.\nAppointment of guardian of child's estate (O.80, r.13) ............................................................ 429\n14.\nNo rule (O.80, r.14) ................................................................................................................ 430\n15.\nProceedings under the Torts (Reform) Act (as amended and revised) - apportionment by\nCourt (O.80, r.15)................................................................................................................... 430\n16.\nService of certain documents on person under disability (O.80, r.16) ..................................... 430\n17.\nApplication to appoint receiver, etc. (O.80, r.17) .................................................................... 431\n18.\nPower to direct application by officer of Court or Solicitor General (O.80, r.18) ...................... 432\n19.\nRepresentation of patient by Solicitor General (O.80, r.19) .................................................... 432\n20.\nEvidence to be filed on application under rule 17 (O.80, r.20) ................................................ 432\n21.\nService on patient (O.80, r.21) ............................................................................................... 432\n22.\nAppointment of receiver (O.80, r.22) ...................................................................................... 433\n23.\nReceiver's accounts (O.80, r.23) ............................................................................................ 433\n24.\nDefault by receiver (O.80, r.24) .............................................................................................. 434\n25.\nDischarge of receiver (O.80, r.25) .......................................................................................... 434\n26.\nApplication for settlement or gift of patient's property or for execution of will of patient\n(O.80, r.26) ............................................................................................................................ 435\n27.\nApplication to be heard in Chambers (O.80, r.27) .................................................................. 435\n28.\nApplication for appointment of guardian (O.80, r.28) .............................................................. 436\n29.\nEvidence in support of an application under rule 28 (O.80, r.29) ............................................ 436\n30.\nService (O.80, r.30) ............................................................................................................... 436\n31.\nOrder appointing guardian (O.80, r.31) .................................................................................. 436\n32.\nRemoval of guardian (O.80, r.32) ........................................................................................... 437\n\nArrangement of Rules - Orders\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 30\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 81\n439\nPARTNERS\n439\n1.\nActions by and against firms within jurisdiction (O.81, r.1) ...................................................... 439\n2.\nDisclosure of partners' names (O.81, r.2) ............................................................................... 439\n3.\nService of writ (O.81, r.3) ....................................................................................................... 439\n4.\nAcknowledgment of service in action against firm (O.81, r.4) ................................................. 440\n5.\nEnforcing judgment or order against firm (O.81, r.5) .............................................................. 441\n6.\nEnforcing judgment or order in actions between partners, etc. (O.81, r.6) .............................. 442\n7.\nAttachment of debts owed by firm (O.81, r.7) ......................................................................... 442\n8.\nActions begun by originating summons (O.81, r.8) ................................................................. 442\n9.\nApplication to person carrying on business in another name (O.81, r.9) ................................. 442\n10.\nApplications for orders charging partner's interest in partnership property, etc. (O.81, r.10) ... 443\n11.\nDefinitions (O.81, r.11 ............................................................................................................ 443\n12.\nActions by and against firms within jurisdiction (O.81, r.12) .................................................... 444\n13.\nService of writ (O.81, r.13) ..................................................................................................... 444\n14.\nAcknowledgment of service in action against firm (O.81, r.14) ............................................... 444\n15.\nEnforcing judgment or order against firm (O.81, r.15) ............................................................ 444\nORDER 82\n445\nDEFAMATION ACTIONS\n445\n1.\nApplication (O.82, r.1) ............................................................................................................ 445\n2.\nIndorsement of claim in libel action (O.82, r.2). ...................................................................... 445\n2A.\nApplication for leave to institute defamation action (O.82, r.2A) ............................................. 445\n3.\nObligation to give particulars (O.82, r.3) ................................................................................. 445\n3A.\nRuling on meaning (O.82, r.3A) ............................................................................................. 446\n4.\nProvisions as to payment into Court (O.82, r.4) ...................................................................... 447\n5.\nStatement in open Court (O.82, r.5) ....................................................................................... 447\n6.\nInterrogatories not allowed in certain cases (O.82, r.6) .......................................................... 447\n7.\nNo rule (O.82, r.7) .................................................................................................................. 447\n8.\nFulfilment of offer of amends under Section 11 of the Defamation Act (as amended and\nrevised) (O.82, r.8)................................................................................................................. 448\nORDER 83-84\n449\nNO ORDERS\n449\nORDER 85\n450\nADMINISTRATION AND SIMILAR ACTIONS\n450\n1.\nInterpretation (O.85, r.1) ........................................................................................................ 450\n2.\nDetermination of questions, etc., without administration (O.85, r.2) ........................................ 450\n3.\nParties (O.85, r.3) .................................................................................................................. 451\n4.\nGrant of relief in action begun by originating summons (O.85, r.4) ......................................... 452\n5.\nJudgments and orders in administration actions (O.85, r.5) ................................................... 452\n6.\nConduct of sale of trust property (O.85, r.6) ........................................................................... 452\n7.\nOrdinary application under Section 48 of the Trusts Act (as amended and revised) (O.85,\nr.7) ......................................................................................................................................... 453\n8.\nWritten application under Section 48 of the Trusts Act (as amended and revised) (O.85,\nr.8) ......................................................................................................................................... 453\n9.\nApplication for reformation of a special trust (O.85, r.9) ......................................................... 454\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\nArrangement of Rules - Orders\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 31\n\nORDER 86\n456\nACTIONS FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE, ETC.: SUMMARY JUDGMENT\n456\n1.\nApplication by plaintiff for summary judgment (O.86, r.1) ....................................................... 456\n2.\nManner in which application under rule 1 must be made (O.86, r.2) ....................................... 456\n3.\nJudgment for plaintiff (O.86, r.3) ............................................................................................ 456\n4.\nLeave to defend (O.86, r.4) .................................................................................................... 457\n5.\nDirections (O.86, r.5) ............................................................................................................. 457\n6.\nCosts (O.86, r.6) .................................................................................................................... 457\n7.\nSetting aside judgment (O.86, r.7) ......................................................................................... 457\nORDER 87-91\n458\nNO ORDERS\n458\nORDER 92\n459\nLODGMENT, INVESTMENT, ETC., OF FUNDS IN COURT\n459\n1.\nInterpretation (O.92, r.1) ........................................................................................................ 459\n2.\nPayment into Court under the Trusts Act (as amended and revised) (O.92, r.2) ..................... 459\n3.\nNotice of lodgment (O.92, r.3) ................................................................................................ 460\n4.\nApplications with respect to funds in Court (O.92, r.4) ............................................................ 460\n5.\nCourt Funds Office (O.92, r.5) ................................................................................................ 461\n6.\nDischarge of the Court Administrator\u2019s functions (O.92, r.6) ................................................... 461\n7.\nBank accounts (O.92, r.7) ...................................................................................................... 461\n8.\nLodgment schedule (O.92, r.8) .............................................................................................. 461\n9.\nPayment schedule (O.92, r.9) ................................................................................................ 462\n10.\nPreparation of schedules (O.92, r.10) .................................................................................... 462\n11.\nLodgment of money in Court (O.92, r.11) ............................................................................... 462\n12.\nSecurities transferable by delivery and deposit of property (O.92, r.12) .................................. 463\n13.\nSecurities not transferable by delivery (O.92, r.13) ................................................................. 463\n14.\nAppropriation (O.92, r.14) ...................................................................................................... 463\n15.\nWithdrawal of money from Nominated Accounts (O.92, r.15) ................................................. 463\n16.\nRange of investments (O.92, r.16) ......................................................................................... 463\n17.\nTime for investment (O.92, r.17) ............................................................................................ 464\n18.\nDesignated mutual funds (O.92, r.18) .................................................................................... 464\n19.\nPayment, transfer and delivery of funds out of Court (O.92, r.19) ........................................... 464\n20.\nPayment to representatives of deceased persons (O.92, r.20) ............................................... 464\n21.\nPayment out without order of money lodged in satisfaction (O.92, r.21) ................................. 465\n22.\nPayment out of interest on securities (O.92, r.22) .................................................................. 465\n23.\nCharges on purchase or sale of securities (O.92, r.23) .......................................................... 465\n24.\nCertificates of funds in Court, copies of accounts, etc. (O.92, r.24) ........................................ 466\n25.\nTransitional provisions (O.92, r.25) ........................................................................................ 466\nORDER 93\n467\nTHE ELECTIONS ACT (as amended and revised)\n467\n1.\nInterpretation and application (O.93, r.1) ................................................................................ 467\n2.\nForm, presentation and service of election petitions (O.93, r.2) .............................................. 467\n3.\nSecurity for costs (O.93, r.3) .................................................................................................. 468\n4.\nPublication of election petition (O.93, r.4) ............................................................................... 468\n5.\nFixing time for hearing election petition (O.93, r.5) ................................................................. 468\n\nArrangement of Rules - Orders\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 32\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n6.\nEvidence to be filed (O.93, r.6) .............................................................................................. 468\n7.\nWithdrawal of election petition (O.93, r.7) .............................................................................. 469\n8.\nSummary dismissal and stay of election petition (O.93, r.8) ................................................... 469\n9.\nDeath of petitioner (O.93, r.9) ................................................................................................ 470\n10.\nRespondent's nature of non-opposition (O.93, r.10) ............................................................... 470\nORDER 94\n471\nAPPLICATIONS TO THE GRAND COURT UNDER VARIOUS STATUTES\n471\n1.\nApplications under the Bills of Sale Act (as amended and revised) (O.94, r.1) ....................... 471\n2.\nApplications under the Building Societies Act (as amended and revised) (O.94, r.2) .............. 471\n3.\nNo rule (O.94, r.3) .................................................................................................................. 472\n4.\nApplication under Section 9 of the Strata Titles Registration Act (as amended and\nrevised) (O.94, r.4)................................................................................................................. 472\n5.\nApplication under Section 17 of the Strata Titles Registration Act (as Amended and\nRevised) (O.94, r.5) ............................................................................................................... 472\n6.\nApplications under the Married Women's Property Act (as amended and revised) (O.94,\nr.6) ......................................................................................................................................... 473\nORDER 95\n474\nTHE BANKS AND TRUST COMPANIES ACT (as amended and revised)\n474\n1.\nDefinitions (O.95, r.1) ............................................................................................................. 474\n2.\nApplication by the Authority (O.95, r.2) .................................................................................. 474\n3.\nApplication by the Authority for a winding up order (O.95, r.3) ................................................ 475\n4.\nApplication by the Authority for other relief (O.95, r.4) ............................................................ 475\n5.\nApplication for an order requiring a person to provide information, documents or\nassistance to the Authority (O.95, r.5) .................................................................................... 476\nORDER 96\n477\nTHE REGISTERED LAND ACT (as amended and revised)\n477\n1.\nInterpretation (O.96, r.1) ........................................................................................................ 477\n2.\nApplications under Section 75(2) (O.96, r.2) .......................................................................... 477\n3.\nApplications under Section 77 (O.96, r.3) ............................................................................... 478\n4.\nApplication under Section 96 (O.96, r.4) ................................................................................ 480\nORDER 97-98\n482\nNO ORDERS\n482\nORDER 99\n483\nPRIZE\n483\nORDER 100-101\n484\nNO ORDERS\n484\nORDER 102\n485\nAPPLICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE COMPANIES ACT (as amended and revised)\n485\n1.\nDefinitions and application (O.102, r.1) .................................................................................. 485\n2.\nApplications to be made by originating summons (O.102, r.2) ................................................ 485\n3.\nApplications to be made by originating motion (O.102, r.3) .................................................... 485\n4.\nApplications to be made by petition (O.102, r.4) ..................................................................... 486\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\nArrangement of Rules - Orders\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 33\n\n5.\nEntitlement of proceedings (O.102, r.5).................................................................................. 486\n6.\nSummons for directions (O.102, r.6) ...................................................................................... 486\n7.\nInquiry as to debts: company to make list of creditors (O.102, r.7) ......................................... 487\n8.\nInspection of list of creditors (O.102, r.8) ................................................................................ 487\n9.\nNotice to creditors (O.102, r.9) ............................................................................................... 488\n10.\nAdvertisement of petition and list of creditors (O.102, r.10) .................................................... 488\n11.\nAffidavit as to claims made by creditors (O.102, r.11) ............................................................ 488\n12.\nAdjudication of disputed claims (O.102, r.12) ......................................................................... 489\n13.\nCertifying lists of creditors entitled to object to reduction (O.102, r.13) ................................... 489\n14.\nEvidence of consent of creditor (O.102, r.14) ......................................................................... 489\n15.\nTime, etc., of hearing of petition for confirmation of reduction (O.102, r.15) ........................... 490\n16.\nService out of the jurisdiction without leave (O.102, r.16) ....................................................... 490\n17.\nRestoration of companies to the register: Application by a company or a member thereof\n(O.102, r.17) .......................................................................................................................... 490\n18.\nRestoration of companies to the register - Application by a creditor (O.102, r.18) .................. 491\n19.\nApplication to restore rights attaching to bearer shares (O.102, r.19) ..................................... 491\n20.\nSchemes of Arrangement (O.102, r.20) ................................................................................. 493\nORDER 103\n495\nTHE CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION DISCLOSURE ACT (as amended and revised)\n495\n1.\nDefinitions (O.103, r.1) ........................................................................................................... 495\n2.\nApplications under Section 4 (O.103, r.2) ............................................................................... 495\n3.\nService of summons (O.103, r.3) ........................................................................................... 495\n4.\nAffidavit evidence (O.103, r.4) ................................................................................................ 495\n5.\nFiling and service of affidavits (O.103, r.5) ............................................................................. 496\n6.\nHearing of Section 4 applications (O.103, r.6) ........................................................................ 496\nORDER 104-111\n498\nNO ORDERS\n498\nORDER 112\n499\nAPPLICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE STATUS OF CHILDREN ACT, 2003 [Law 23 of\n2003]\n499\n1.\nDefinitions (O.112, r.1) ........................................................................................................... 499\n2.\nApplication for a declaration of paternity (O.112, r.2) ............................................................. 500\n3.\nApplication for a parentage testing order (O.112, r.3) ............................................................. 500\n4.\nApplications involving persons under a disability (O.112, r.4) ................................................. 500\n5.\nJoinder of person to be tested (O.112, r.5) ............................................................................. 500\n6.\nService of copy report (O.112, r.6) ......................................................................................... 500\n7.\nParentage testing procedures (O.112, r.7) ............................................................................. 501\n8.\nCompliance with this order (O.112, r.8) .................................................................................. 501\n9.\nProvision of information by donor or representative (O.112, r.9) ............................................ 501\n10.\nCollection of blood samples (O.112, r.10) .............................................................................. 502\n11.\nCollection of bodily samples for DNA typing (O.112, r.11) ...................................................... 502\n12.\nContainer to be sealed and labelled (O.112, r.12) .................................................................. 503\n13.\nStatement by sampler (O.112, r.13) ....................................................................................... 503\n14.\nPackaging and storage (O.112, r.14) ..................................................................................... 503\n15.\nTesting of bodily samples (O.112, r.15).................................................................................. 504\n16.\nReports (O.112, r.16) ............................................................................................................. 504\n\nArrangement of Rules - Orders\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 34\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 113\n505\nSUMMARY PROCEEDINGS FOR POSSESSION OF LAND\n505\n1.\nProceedings to be brought by originating summons (O.113, r.1) ............................................ 505\n1A.\nNo rule (O.113, r.1A) ............................................................................................................. 505\n2.\nForm of originating summons (O.113, r.2) .............................................................................. 505\n3.\nAffidavit in support (O.113, r.3) .............................................................................................. 505\n4.\nService of originating summons (O.113, r.4) .......................................................................... 505\n5.\nApplication by occupier to be made a party (O.113, r.5) ......................................................... 506\n6.\nOrder for possession (O.113, r.6) .......................................................................................... 506\n7.\nWrit of possession (O.113, r.7) .............................................................................................. 506\n8.\nSetting aside order (O.113, r.8) .............................................................................................. 507\nENDNOTES\n509\nTable of Grand Court Rules history: ................................................................................................ 509\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\nRule 1\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2021\nPage 35\n\nCAYMAN ISLANDS\n\nGrand Court Act\n(2015 Revision)\nGRAND COURT RULES\n(2023 Revision)\nVOLUME I - ORDERS\n\n1.\nCitation\n1.\nThese Rules may be cited as the Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision).\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nPreamble\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 37\n\nPreamble\n1.\nThe Overriding objective\n1.1 The overriding objective of these Rules is to enable the Court to deal with every\ncause or matter in a just, expeditious and economical way.\n1.2 Dealing with a cause or matter justly includes, as far as is practicable \u2014\n(a)\nensuring that the substantive law is rendered effective and that it is carried\nout;\n(b) ensuring that the normal advancement of the proceeding is facilitated\nrather than delayed;\n(c)\nsaving expense;\n(d) dealing with the cause or matter in ways which are proportionate\n(i)\nto the amount of money involved;\n(ii) to the importance of the case; and\n(iii) to the complexity of the issues;\n(e)\nallotting to it an appropriate share of the Court\u2019s resources, while taking\ninto account the need to allot resources to other proceedings.\n2.\nApplication by the Court of the overriding objective\n2.1 The Court must seek to give effect to the overriding objective when it\n(a)\napplies, or exercises any discretion given to it by these Rules; or\n(b) interprets the meaning of any Rule.\n2.2 These Rules shall be liberally construed to give effect to the overriding objective\nand, in particular, to secure the just, most expeditious and least expensive\ndetermination of every cause or matter on its merits.\n3.\nDuty of the parties\nThe parties are obliged to help the Court to further the overriding objective. In\napplying the Rules to give effect to the overriding objective the Court may take into\naccount a party\u2019s failure to help in this respect.\n4.\nCourt\u2019s duty to manage proceedings\n4.1 The Court must further the overriding objective by actively managing\nproceedings.\n4.2 This may include \u2014\n(a)\nidentifying the issues at an early stage;\n(b) deciding promptly which issues need full investigation and trial and\naccordingly disposing summarily of the others;\n\nPreamble\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 38\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(c)\nencouraging the parties to co-operate with each other in the conduct of the\nproceedings;\n(d) helping the parties to settle the whole or part of the proceeding;\n(e)\ndeciding the order in which issues are to be resolved;\n(f)\nfixing timetables or otherwise controlling the progress of the proceeding;\n(g) considering whether the likely benefits of taking a particular step will\njustify the cost of taking it;\n(h) dealing with as many aspects of the proceeding as is practicable on the\nsame occasion;\n(i)\ndealing with the proceeding without the parties needing to attend at court;\n(j)\nconducting procedural hearings by means of telephone conference calls;\n(k) making appropriate use of technology; and\n(l)\ngiving directions to ensure that the trial proceeds quickly and efficiently.\n4.3 Whenever a proceeding comes before the Court, whether on a summons for\ndirections or otherwise, the Court will consider making orders on its own motion\nfor the purpose of giving effect to the overriding objectives of the rules.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 19.11.2003)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nExplanatory Memorandum\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 39\n\nExplanatory Memorandum\n\n1.\nIntroduction\n1.\n(1) The purpose of this Memorandum was to draw to the attention of legal\npractitioners and Court staff the key features of the Grand Court Rules (2023\nRevision) (\"the Rules\") which originally came into force on the 1st June, 1995,\nwere published in revised form on 30th June, 2003 and in consolidated form on\n20th January, 2022..\n\n(2) The purpose of this 2023 Revision of the Memorandum is to draw attention to\nimportant changes in the way in which the Court's civil caseload is organised,\nwith effect from 1st November 2009.The overall purpose and effect of the\nGrand Court (Amendment) Rules 2009 were to divide the Court's business\namongst separate divisions, namely the Civil Division, the Family Division, the\nAdmiralty Division, the Financial Services Division and the Criminal Division.\n(3) The Grand Court (Civil Procedure) Rules 1976 and the Rules of the Supreme\nCourt 1965 ceased to apply to any proceeding commenced in the Grand Court\non or after the 1st June, 1995 and ceased to apply in respect of any step taken or\nrequired to be taken after that date in every proceeding which was pending on\nthat date.\n(4)` The Rules follow the layout of the Rules of the Supreme Court and are designed\nso that the notes contained in the Supreme Court Practice 1999 can be used as\nan aid to the interpretation and application of these Rules where they are the\nsame or similar to the Rules of Supreme Court, as they existed prior to the\nenactment of the Civil Procedure Rules 1998.\n(5) This Memorandum is not intended to be a comprehensive guide. Nor is it to be\nregarded as a substitute for the Rules.\n2.\nCommencement of Proceedings\n2.\n(1) With effect from 1st November 2009 every new proceeding must be\ncommenced in the appropriate division of the Court. The fixed fee payable upon\nissuing the originating process will vary according to the division in which it is\nissued. In addition to the fixed fee, an ad valorem fee may be payable if the\nproceeding is commenced in the Civil Division.\n(2) All \u201cfamily proceedings\u201d (as defined in O.1, r.7) must be commenced in the\nFamily Division. Every family proceeding which is pending on 1st November\n2009 will be treated as having been transferred automatically to the Family\nDivision.\n\nExplanatory Memorandum\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 40\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(3) All \"admiralty proceedings\" (as defined in O.1, r.7) must be commenced in\nthe Admiralty Division. At present, this division exists in name only because\nthere are no admiralty proceedings pending before the Court.\n(4) All \"financial services proceedings\" (as defined in O.72, r.1(2) must be\ncommenced in the Financial Services Division. Every proceeding commenced\nin or transferred to the Financial Services Division will be assigned to a specific\nCommercial Judge under O.4, r.2(2) and that Commercial Judge\u2019s initials will\nbe added as a suffix to the cause number. The Commercial Judge assigned to a\nfinancial services proceeding is responsible for managing every aspect of the\ncase, including the adjudication of all interlocutory applications and the trial of\nthe matter.\n(5) All other \"civil proceedings\", which do not fall within the definition of family,\nadmiralty or financial services proceedings, must be commenced in the Civil\nDivision.\n3.\nAssignment and Transfer of Existing Proceedings\n3.\n(1) Every proceeding (including every civil appeal from the Summary Court) which\nis pending before the Court immediately before the commencement of the\nGrand Court (Amendment) Rules 2009 on 1st November 2009, is treated as\nhaving been assigned to the Civil Division unless it is a family proceeding, in\nwhich case it will be assigned automatically to the Family Division.\n(2) The financial services proceedings which are pending before the Court on 1st\nNovember 2009 will not be assigned automatically to the Financial Services\nDivision. Such proceedings may be transferred to the Financial Services\nDivision only pursuant to an order which may be made by the Registrar \u2014\n(a)\nupon the application of any party made in Form No. 73 of the Grand Court\nRules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised); or\n(b) on the Registrar\u2019s own motion pursuant to O.72, r.6(3).\n(3) When a financial services proceeding is ordered to be transferred to the\nFinancial Services Division, a transfer fee may be payable in accordance with\nRule 3(5) of the Court Fees Rules (as amended and revised). In principle, the\ntransfer fee is the difference between the fees actually paid when the proceeding\nwas commenced and the fixed fee of CI$15,000 which would have been paid\nhad the proceeding been commenced in the Financial Services Division. It\nfollows that no transfer fee will be payable if the maximum ad valorem fee has\nalready been paid.\n4.\nThe Register of Writs and Other Originating Process\n4.\n(1) The Grand Court Cause Book was abolished in 1995.\n(2) It was replaced by the Register of Writs and other Originating Process\n(\"Register of Writs\") (O.63, r.8). With effect from 1st November 2009, the\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nExplanatory Memorandum\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 41\n\nRegister will be divided into separate sections, one for each division of the\nCourt. The section relating to each division will have its own numbering\nsequence.\n(3) The Register of Writs takes the form of a series of ring binders into which an\noffice copy of every originating process (i.e. every writ, petition, originating\nsummons or originating motion) is to be placed in numerical cause number order\nwith the exception of any originating process filed in the Family Division. There\nis to be an index at the front of each binder containing summarised details of the\ntitle of each proceeding in similar form to that previously entered into the Cause\nBook.\n(4) In order to issue any originating process the Clerk of the Court must be presented\nwith at least three copies, i.e. one to be placed in the Court File; one to be placed\non the Register of Writs; and a service copy for use of the party issuing it (O.5,\nr.1).\n (5) The Register of Writs is open to public inspection upon payment of the\nprescribed fee (O.63, r.8(3)) except for the section relating to the Family\nDivision.\n5.\nIssue and Service of Writs\n5.\n(1) Writs must be in Form No. 1 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as\namended and revised). Since the writ no longer takes the form of a command\nby His Majesty, it may be served out of the jurisdiction subject to obtaining the\nleave of the Court in accordance with O.11.\n(2) Writs must be endorsed with the information contained in O.6, r.2, r.3 and r.4.\nFailure to comply with these Rules will prevent a plaintiff from obtaining a\ndefault judgment either at all or for the full extent of the relief to which the\nplaintiff might otherwise be entitled.\n(3) A writ is not validly served unless it is accompanied by an acknowledgment of\nservice form in Form No. 8 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as\namended and revised).\n(4)  With effect from 1st November 2009, the title of every proceeding must identify\nthe division of the Court in which it is pending.\n6.\nAcknowledgment of Service\n6.\n(1) The concept of entering an appearance was abolished in 1995.\n(2) The defendant to a proceeding commenced by writ must be served with an\nacknowledgment of service in Form No. 8 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II -\nForms (as amended and revised). The defendant to a proceeding commenced\nby originating summons must be served with an acknowledgment of service in\nForm No. 9 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised).\nDelivery to the defendant of a writ or originating summons alone does not\n\nExplanatory Memorandum\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 42\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nconstitute good service. It must be accompanied by an acknowledgment of\nservice in Form No. 8 or Form No. 9 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms\n(as amended and revised), as appropriate.\n(3) The defendant to a proceeding commenced by writ or originating summons must\ncomplete and file the acknowledgment of service within 14 days calculated from\nthe date of service.\n(4) Filing a completed acknowledgment of service does not constitute a waiver of\nthe defendant's right to challenge the jurisdiction or apply to set aside the writ\nor originating summons on grounds of irregularity.\n(5) A defendant wishing to challenge the jurisdiction must take out a summons or\nmotion within the period for serving a defence.\n(6) An acknowledgment of service form in Form No. 8 or Form No. 9 of the Grand\nCourt Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) must be served on every\nperson against whom a counterclaim is made or against whom a third party\nclaim is made, unless that person is already a party to the action.\n(7) A copy of every acknowledgment of service filed in the Court Office will be\nsent by the Clerk of the Court to the plaintiff or other claimant, as the case may\nbe.\n7.\nDefault Judgments\n7.\n(1) Applications for default judgments under O.13 or O.19 are made to the Clerk of\nthe Court in Form No. 20 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended\nand revised) and must be accompanied by a draft order in Form No. 21 or Form\nNo. 22 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised).\n(2) Upon filing an application for a default judgment, the Court file is deemed to be\nclosed (O.42, r.6) until the application is either granted or rejected. During the\nperiod when the Court file is closed, no step may be taken in the action by either\nparty\n(3) Applications for default judgments are processed administratively without the\nneed for any appearance by or on behalf of the plaintiff.\n(4) Default judgments may be final (i.e. in Form No. 21 of the Grand Court Rules\n- Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised)) or interlocutory (i.e. in Form No. 22\nof the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised)).\n(5) A plaintiff seeking a default judgment may also seek interest provided that the\nplaintiff\u2019s writ has been endorsed with a claim in compliance with O.6, r.2(e)\n(i.e. contractual interest) or r.2(f) (i.e. statutory interest) calculated in\naccordance with the rates prescribed by the Judgment Debts (Rates of Interest)\nRules (as amended and revised). The prescribed rates are varied from time to\ntime in line with changes in the published LIBOR rates for the relevant\ncurrencies.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nExplanatory Memorandum\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 43\n\n (6) A default judgment may include fixed costs calculated in accordance with O.62,\nr.7, provided that the writ has been endorsed with a claim in accordance with\nO.6, r.2(g).\n(7) Failure to endorse a writ in accordance with O.6, r.2 will prevent the plaintiff\nfrom obtaining a default judgment.\n8.\nSummary Judgment\n8.\n(1) Application for summary judgment may be made by a plaintiff pursuant to O.14\nonly if a statement of claim has been served. It matters not that the statement of\nclaim is endorsed on the writ or served separately.\n(2) An application for summary judgment may also be made by defendants, but\nonly if a defence has been served.\n(3) In either case, an application for summary judgment must be supported by an\naffidavit complying with the requirements of r.2 or r.13, as the case may be.\n9.\nConsent Judgments\n9.\n(1) Consent judgments and orders (i.e. final orders) to which the parties are entitled\nas of right are obtained administratively in accordance with O.42, r.5A, without\nthe need for any party to appear before a Judge.\n\n(2) Most interlocutory orders involve the exercise of a judicial discretion and are\ntherefore excluded from O.42 r.5A.\n10.\nDiscovery\n10. (1) With effect from 8th September 2003, discovery has encompassed two\nelements. O.24, Part I deals with documentary discovery which occurs\nautomatically in every action begun by writ unless the Court orders otherwise.\nIn addition, the Court may order discovery by oral examination pursuant to Part\nII of O.24.\n(2) If a party wishes to claim that any discoverable document in that party\u2019s\npossession, custody or control contains confidential information in respect of\nwhich the relevant principal is someone other than an opposing party, the claim\nmust be made in paragraph 3 and Schedule 1, Part III of the List.\n(3) Where such a claim is made, the party making it may be required by the\nopposing party to make a \"Section 4 application\". See O.24, r.5(4).\n(4) Interrogatories may be served without first obtaining the leave of the Court. See\nO.26, r.3.\n\nExplanatory Memorandum\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 44\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n11.\nInterlocutory Summonses and Motions\n11. (1) Every interlocutory summons must be in Form No. 17 of the Grand Court Rules\n- Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). Every interlocutory summons issued\nin the Financial Services Division must specify the Commercial Judge to which\nthe cause or matter has been assigned.\n(2) Every interlocutory summons must be endorsed with a realistic time estimate in\ncompliance with O.32, r.2(4).\n(3) Every interlocutory summons will be heard in Chambers, but the Judge may\nadjourn the hearing or the delivery of the Judge\u2019s ruling into open Court if it is\nconsidered to be of some general importance (O.32, r.13).\n(4) Every interlocutory motion will be heard in open court, the listing of which\nrequires a special appointment to be arranged with the Clerk of the Court.\n12.\nAffidavits and Exhibits\n12. (1) O.41 applies to all proceedings, including matrimonial proceedings, winding up\nproceedings, bankruptcy proceedings and civil appeals from the summary court.\n(2) Every affidavit must comply with the formal requirements of O.41, r.1 and O.66,\nr.1.\n(3) Documents for use in conjunction with affidavits must be exhibited, not\nannexed, i.e. United States procedure is not acceptable. See O.41, r.11.\n(4) Documentary exhibits must be prepared in accordance with the formal\nrequirements of O.41, r.12.\n(5) Copies of the same document shall not be exhibited twice in any one proceeding.\nSee O.41, r.15.\n(6) Where a deponent swears more than one affidavit to which there are exhibits,\nthe numbering of such exhibits shall run consecutively throughout and shall not\nbegin again with each affidavit. See O.41, r.12(3).\n(7) The rule that affidavits may only be sworn before Justices of the Peace is\nabolished. Affidavits may now be sworn either before a Justice of the Peace\n(including the Clerk of the Court and other ex-officio justices) or a Notary\nPublic (except one who is the party's attorney) as may be convenient.\n13.\nTrials and Final Hearings\nA.\nActions Begun by Writ (O.34)\n13. (1) An application to the Clerk of the Court to fix a date for the trial of an action\ncommenced by writ must be in Form No. 63 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II\n- Forms (as amended and revised) and must be supported by an agreed\nstatement, or in the absence of agreement, two statements containing reasoned\ntime estimates (O.34, r.3).\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nExplanatory Memorandum\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 45\n\n(2) This procedure does not apply to the Financial Services Division, in which a\ntrial date will be fixed by the Commercial Judge at a case management\nconference convened in accordance with O.72, r.4(5).\n(3) Trial bundles containing the documents, and only the documents, specified in\nO.34, r.10, must be delivered to the Clerk of the Court between 2 and 14 days\nprior to the trial. Trial bundles which constitute a photocopy of the Court file\nare unacceptable.\n(4) The trial of every action begun by writ will take place in open court.\nB.\nActions Begun by Originating Summons (O.28)\n(5) An application to the Clerk of the Court to fix a date for the trial of an originating\nsummons in Form No. 2 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended\nand revised) must be made in Form No. 63 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II -\nForms (as amended and revised) (as in paragraph 13.1 above). Notice of hearing\nin Form No. 5 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and\nrevised) must be served. In the case of an originating summons pending in the\nFinancial Services Division, the hearing date will be fixed by the Commercial\nJudge at a case management conference.\n(6) An application to the Clerk of the Court to fix a date for the hearing of an ex\nparte originating summons or one in Form No. 3 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol\nII - Forms (as amended and revised) should be made informally at the time of\nissuing the summons.\n(7) It is only necessary to prepare indexes and trial bundles in cases in which the\nCourt will be referred to large numbers of affidavits, exhibits, orders, etc.\n(8) The hearing of originating summonses in Form No. 3 (i.e.expedited form) or ex\nparte originating summons will take place in Chambers unless the Court directs\notherwise. Trials of contested originating summonses in Form No. 2 will take\nplace in open Court unless the Court directs otherwise. All uncontested\noriginating summonses will usually be heard in Chambers or adjourned into\nChambers.\nC.\nProceedings Begun by Originating Motion\n(9) Proceedings may only be begun by originating motion if required or authorised\nby the Rules (O.5, r.5). For example, O.103, r.3 requires that certain applications\nunder the Confidential Information Disclosure Act (as amended and revised) be\ncommenced by originating motion.\n(10) An application to fix a date for the hearing of an originating notice of motion\nshould be made informally at the time of issuing it.\n(11) The hearing of every notice of motion must take place in open court.\nD.\nProceedings Begun by Petition\n\nExplanatory Memorandum\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 46\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(12) Proceedings may only be begun by petition if required or authorised by the\nRules (O.5, r.5), for example winding up petitions (which are governed by the\nCompanies Winding Up Rules (as amended and revised); certain other\napplications under the Companies Act (as amended and revised) (O.102, r.4);\nand applications under certain other statutes (O.94, r.5). In principle,\napplications are made by petition if the resulting order will be binding upon \"the\nwhole world\" or upon a substantial class of persons, whether or not they were\naware of the petition or participated in the hearing. It is for this reason that the\nRules generally require that notice of the hearing of a petition must be\nadvertised.\n(13) The procedure relating to divorce petitions is governed by the Matrimonial\nCauses Rules (as amended and revised) Divorce petitions are served without\nspecifying any hearing date.\n(14) The procedure relating to winding up petitions is governed by the Companies\nWinding Up Rules (as amended and revised). Part II deals with creditor's\npetitions; Part III deals with contributory's petitions; and Part IV deals with\npetitions presented by the Monetary Authority.\n(15) In the case of a creditor's winding up petition, the hearing date must be fixed\nwith the Registrar of the Financial Services Division upon issuing the petition.\nA creditor's petition may not be served unless the hearing date is endorsed upon\nit or stated in a notice of hearing served with it (CWR O.3, r.5). The hearing\ndate also requires to be advertised (See CWR O.3, r.6).\n(16)  In the case of a contributory's petition and a petition issued by the Monetary\nAuthority, a summons for directions must be issued at the same time as the\npetition and served with it. The date for the hearing of the petition will be fixed\nby the Commercial Judge to whom the matter is assigned, either upon hearing\nthe summons for directions or upon a subsequent application made after the\nparties have complied with the order for directions.\n14.\nExchange of Witness Statements\n14. On every summons for directions in actions commenced by writ the Court will\nconsider whether or not it is appropriate to order the exchange of witness statements\nin advance of the trial in accordance with O.38, r.2(A).\n15.\nDrawing Up and Filing Orders and Judgments\n15. (1) O.42 applies to all civil proceedings pending in the Civil, Family, Admiralty\nand Financial Services Divisions of the Court.\n(2) Every order or judgment must comply with the formal requirements of O.42,\nr.1. See Form Nos. 22, 24, 24A, 25 and 30 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II -\nForms (as amended and revised) for examples.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nExplanatory Memorandum\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 47\n\n(3) The procedure for drawing up, signing and filing orders and judgments is\ncontained in O.42, r.5.\n(4) The procedure for obtaining default judgments is contained in O.42, r.6. This is\ndone administratively without the need for any appearance by the plaintiff\nbefore the Court.\n(5) Consent orders or judgments of a kind which do not involve the exercise of\njudicial discretion should also be obtained administratively in accordance with\nO.42, r.5(A). See paragraph 7 above.\n(6) Note that money judgments may continue to be made in foreign currencies.\nO.42, r.8.\n(7) Judgments or orders of a kind which are or can be made in open Court are placed\non the Register of Judgments which is open to public inspection upon payment\nof the prescribed fee. See O.63, r.7.\n16.\nPaper, Printing, Binding and Copies\n16. (1) Legal size and fools-cap paper may not be used.\n\n(2) All documents requiring to be filed in Court must be produced on letter size\npaper, 11\" long and 8-1\/2\" wide.\n\n(3) A-4 paper (which is not generally available in the United States or Cayman\nIslands) may be used only if unavoidable and then only if the document is\nproduced with sufficient margins at the top and bottom of each page to enable\nit to be photocopied on to letter size paper.\n\n(4) Ring binders must be used for all documents of more than 50 pages.\n17.\nCourt Fees\n17. (1) The Court Fees Rules (as amended and revised) came into effect on the 1st\nNovember 2009. There are three types of fees, namely fixed fees, ad valorem\nfees and Court hearing fees. The incidence and amount of these fees depends\nupon the division of the Court in which the proceeding is pending. The transfer\nof a proceeding from the Civil Division to the Financial Services Division may\nresult in liability for payment of a transfer fee.\n(2) Fixed fees are payable in all the divisions of the Court.\n(3) The fixed fees payable in the Civil and Family Divisions are specified in Part A\nof the First Schedule to the Rules. A fixed fee of CI$200 is payable upon issuing\nthe originating process by which every proceeding is commenced. Additional\nfixed fees are payable upon issuing interlocutory applications and filing\npleadings, affidavits and orders.\n(4) The fixed fees payable in the Financial Services and Admiralty Divisions are\nspecified in Part B of the First Schedule to the Rules. Subject to certain\n\nExplanatory Memorandum\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 48\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nexceptions, a fixed fee of CI$15,000 is payable upon issuing the originating\nprocess by which the proceeding is commenced. No other fixed fees are payable.\n(5) Ad valorem fees are payable only in the Civil Division. The amount payable is\na percentage of (a) the amount claimed in the writ and (b) the amount awarded\nin the final judgment, subject to a maximum of CI$15,000. The percentage\namounts payable and the method of calculation is set out in rule 4 and the\nSecond Schedule to the Rules.\n(6) Court hearing fees are payable in respect of proceedings pending in the Civil,\nAdmiralty and Financial Services Divisions. No Court hearing fees are payable\nin respect of any proceedings pending in the Family Division.\n(7) A Court hearing fee of CI$250 per day or part of a day is payable in the Civil\nDivision after the first 3 days. If a proceeding involves a single hearing lasting\nmore than 3 days, a Court hearing fee is payable in respect of the 4th and every\nsubsequent day of the hearing. If a proceeding involves a series of interlocutory\nhearings, each of which lasts one day or less, a Court hearing fee of CI$250 will\nbecome payable in respect of the 4th hearing and every subsequent day in court.\n(8) A Court hearing fee of CI$750 per day or part of a day is payable in the\nAdmiralty and Financial Services Divisions after the first 20 days. The method\nof calculation is the same as in the Civil Division.\n18.\nCourt Funds Office\n18. (1) All payments into Court must be made to the Courts Administrator of the Grand\nCourt whose office is at the Law Courts, George Town. See O.22 and O.92.\n(2) All payments into Court should be made using the forms contained in the Grand\nCourt Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). These forms may be\nphotocopied and completed in ink.\n19.\nExecution Generally\n19. (1) Since 1995 the jurisdiction of the Grand Court to enforce judgments has been\nsubstantially, but not exactly, the same as that of the English High Court and\nCounty Courts.\n(2) A money judgment may be enforced by \u2014\n(a)\na writ of fieri facias (O.47 and Form No. 26 of the Grand Court Rules -\nVol II - Forms (as amended and revised)) resulting in the sale of the\njudgment debtor's goods and chattels;\n(b) garnishee proceedings (O.49 and Forms Nos. 31 and 32) resulting in the\nattachment of bank account balances and other debts;\n(c)\na charging order (O.50 and Forms Nos. 33 and 34) resulting in the\nimposition of a statutory charge over the debtor's land or securities which\ncan then be enforced by an order for sale;\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nExplanatory Memorandum\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 49\n\n(d) the appointment of a receiver (O.30);\n(e)\nan order for committal (O.52, Part II and Form Nos. 49, 50, 51 and 52 of\nthe Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised))\nresulting in the debtor being sentenced to a term of imprisonment (or\nsuccessive terms of imprisonment) not exceeding 6 weeks;\n(f)\na writ of sequestration (Form No. 29) which empowers a sequestrator to\nseize all the debtor's real and personal property; and\n(g) an attachment of earnings order (O.50A and Form Nos. 35 to 47 of the\nGrand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised)) resulting\nin the debtor's employer being required to deduct specific amounts from\nthe debtor\u2019s wages each week or month and pay it over to the Courts\nAdministrator of the Grand Court for the credit of the judgment creditor.\n(3) Judgments requiring a person to do or refrain from doing something other than\npay money may be enforced by \u2014\n(a)\na writ of possession (O.45, r.3 and Form No. 28 of the Grand Court Rules\n- Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised)) requiring a person to deliver\nup possession of land;\n(b) a writ of delivery (O.45, r.4) requiring a person to deliver up goods or, in\nthe alternative, pay their assessed value;\n(c)\na writ of specific delivery (O.45, r.4) requiring a person to deliver up goods\nwithout the alternative of paying their assessed value;\n(d) a writ of sequestration (O.46, r.5);\n(e)\nan order for committal (O.52, Part I and Form No. 48 of the Grand Court\nRules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised)); and\n(f)\nthe appointment of a receiver by way of equitable execution (O.51).\n(4) Note that all these remedies are available to enforce orders made in matrimonial\nproceedings.\n(5) Note that a receiver may be appointed for the purposes of collecting money (e.g.\nrents) or to carry out some other act (e.g. the execution of a contract or document\nof title).\n(6) Note that judgments may be given on orders made by the Summary Court by\nmeans which are not available in the Summary Court (e.g. orders for committal,\nsequestration orders or the appointment of a receiver).\n(7) The only means of enforcement available in the Summary Court are \u2014\n(a)\nan attachment of earnings order pursuant to GCR O.50A which is applied\nin the Summary Court by virtue of SCR rule 12(1);\n(b) a writ of fieri facias pursuant to GCR O.46 and O.47 which are applied in\nthe Summary Court pursuant to SCR rule 12(2); or\n\nExplanatory Memorandum\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 50\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(c)\na garnishee order pursuant to O.39 which is applied in the Summary Court\npursuant to SCR rule 12(3).\n(8) The Summary Court only has power to commit a person to prison by virtue of\nspecific statutory provisions, e.g. Schedule 2 of the Judicature Act (as amended\nand revised) and O.50A (i.e. in connection with attachment of earnings orders);\nunder the Protection from Domestic Violence Act (as amended and revised); but\nnot otherwise.\n(9) An application to the Grand Court pursuant to Section 34 of the Summary\nJurisdiction Act (as amended and revised), as amended, for enforcement of a\njudgment given or order made by the Summary Court must be made in\naccordance with SCR rule 12(4).\n20.\nExamination of Judgment Debtors\n20. (1) The commitment summons procedure was abolished in both the Grand Court\nand the Summary Court in 1995.\n(2) A judgment creditor wishing to conduct post judgment discovery must make\napplication under O.48 for an order for the examination of the judgment debtor\nin Form No. 30 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and\nrevised).\n(3) Orders for examination will not normally be made against individuals if the\nCourt considers that an attachment of earnings order is likely to be an\nappropriate and effective remedy.\n(4) In the case of corporate judgment debtors, orders for examination may be made\nagainst any officer.\n21.\nImprisonment for Non-Payment of Debts\n21. (1) An application to commit a judgment debtor to prison is considered to be an\nextraordinary remedy which is only available if it can be demonstrated that the\njudgment debtor has the means to pay but is refusing to do so.\n(2) A judgment creditor who has reasonable grounds for believing that a judgment\ndebtor can pay but is willfully refusing to do so, may apply to the Grand Court\n(but not the Summary Court) for an order that the judgment debtor be sentenced\nto a term of imprisonment not exceeding 6 weeks. See O.52, Part II.\n(3) Applications must be made by notice of motion in Form No. 50 of the Grand\nCourt Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised), supported by an\naffidavit. Like all other notices of motion, it must be heard in open court.\n(4) The notice of motion will not be validly served unless it is accompanied by a\nstatement of means form in Form No. 30 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II -\nForms (as amended and revised). This form is designed to be photocopied. The\njudgment creditor's attorney should insert the Cause No.; the title (or\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nExplanatory Memorandum\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 51\n\nabbreviated title) of the action; and the judgment debtor's name. The judgment\ndebtor must complete the form and return it to the Court Office within 8 days of\nthe date of service.\n(5) Since such applications involve the liberty of the subject, the Court will insist\nupon strict adherence to the Rules and Forms.\n22.\nAttachment of Earnings Orders\n22. (1) Attachment of earnings orders may be made pursuant to the Second Schedule\nof the Judicature Act (as amended and revised) by both the Grand Court and the\nSummary Court. The procedure applicable in the Summary Court is the same as\nthat applicable in the Grand Court.\n(2) Applications for attachment of earnings orders in respect of judgments or\nmaintenance orders made by the Summary Court must be made in accordance\nwith O.50A and the relevant forms contained in the Grand Court Rules - Vol II\n- Forms (as amended and revised).\n(3) Applications for attachment of earnings orders to enforce money judgments of\nCI$500 or more are made in Form No. 35 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II -\nForms (as amended and revised) and must be accompanied by an affidavit in\naccordance with O.50A, r.4.\n(4) Applications for attachment of earnings orders to enforce maintenance orders\nwhich are in arrears are made in Form No. 44 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II\n- Forms (as amended and revised) and must be supported by an affidavit proving\nthe amount of the arrears.\n(5) The applications must be served on the debtor together with a statement of\nmeans form in Form No. 36 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as\namended and revised).\n(6) Upon receipt of a completed statement of means form the Clerk of the Court\nwill place the file before a Judge or Magistrate, as the case may be, who will\nnormally make an attachment of earnings order in accordance with O.50A, r.7,\nwithout the need for the parties to attend before the Court. If either party is\ndissatisfied with an order made in their absence, the party may ask the Clerk of\nthe Court to issue a notice of hearing in Form No. 39 of the Grand Court Rules\n- Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) for a reconsideration of the order.\n(7)  If the judgment debtor fails to deliver a completed statement of means form to\nthe Court Office within 8 days of service, the Clerk of the Court will of the Clerk\nof the Court\u2019s own motion issue a notice in Form No. 41 of the Grand Court\nRules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) requiring the judgment debtor\nto attend Court in person and explain why the judgment debtor should not be\ncommitted to prison for contempt of court. In addition to sentencing the\njudgment debtor to a term of imprisonment, the Court may make an attachment\nof earnings order.\n\nExplanatory Memorandum\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 52\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(8) Attachment of earnings orders will be made in Form No. 38 (Judgment Debts)\nor Form No. 45 (Maintenance Orders) of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms\n(as amended and revised). In the case of judgment debts, the installments shall\nbe deemed to include interest calculated in accordance with Grand Court\nPractice Direction No. 2\/95.\n(9) In cases where the judgment creditor is legally represented the judgment\ncreditor\u2019s attorney will be expected to serve the attachment of earnings order\nupon the employer and the judgment debtor. In addition to the order, the\nemployer must also be served with a book of preprinted carbonised\nlodgment\/receipt forms which will be issued by the Clerk of the Court in\naccordance with Grand Court Practice Direction No. 3\/95. In cases where the\njudgment creditor is not legally represented, the Clerk of the Court will serve\nthe order.\n(10) Before applying for an attachment of earnings order, the applicant should check\nthe Register of Attachment of Earnings Orders to ascertain whether or not the\njudgment debtor is already the subject of an order, in which case it will be\nappropriate to apply in Form No. 46 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms\n(as amended and revised) for a consolidated order pursuant to O.50A, r.18. For\nthis purpose Summary Court proceedings and Grand Court proceedings may be\nconsolidated.\n23.\nApplications Under Section 48 of the Trusts Act\n23. (1) O.85, rr.7 and r.8 create two alternative methods by which an executor,\nadministrator or trustee may make application under Section 48 of the Trusts\nAct (as amended and revised) for the opinion, advice or direction of the Court\nupon any question respecting the management or administration of the estate or\ntrust fund.\n(2) An ordinary application under r.7 is made by an inter partes originating\nsummons in Form No. 3 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended\nand revised) or an ex parte originating summons in Form No. 4 of the Grand\nCourt Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised), as may be appropriate\nand the originating summons procedure contained in O.28 will apply.\n(3) A written application under r.8 is made by an ex parte originating application in\nForm No. 57 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and\nrevised). O.26 shall not apply to such applications.\n(4) Written applications under r.7 are intended as an expeditious and economical\nmeans by which executors, administrators or trustees may obtain the opinion,\nadvice or direction of the Court in non-contentious cases.\n\nDated this 1st day of November, 2009\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nExplanatory Memorandum\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 53\n\nThe Honourable Margaret Ramsay-Hale, Chief Justice\nThe Honourable Samuel Bulgin KC, Attorney General\nColette Wilkins KC, Legal Practitioner\nColin McKie KC, Legal Practitioner\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 08.09.03) (amended 01.11.09)\n\nORDER 1\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 54\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 1\nCITATION, APPLICATION, COMMENCEMENT, INTERPRETATION\nAND FORMS\n\n1.\nCitation (O.1, r.1)\n1.\n(1) These Rules may be cited as the Grand Court Rules (2023 Revision).\n(2) An individual rule may be cited using the abbreviation \"GCR\".\n2.\nApplication (O.1, r.2)\n2.\n(1) Subject to the following provisions of this rule, these Rules shall apply in\nrelation to all proceedings in the Court.\n(2) Except for Part I of O.52 (Committal), O.53 (Applications for Judicial Review),\nPart III of O.62 (Wasted Costs Orders) and O.103 (Confidential Information\nDisclosure Act, 2016, these Rules shall not apply to any criminal proceedings.\n(3) The Probate Registry established pursuant to Rule 3 of the Probate and\nAdministration Rules (as amended and revised) shall continue as part of the\nCivil Division of the Grand Court but these Rules shall not apply to any\napplication made under the Probate and Administration Rules (as amended and\nrevised)\n(4) Except for Orders 3 (Time), 4 (Assignment, Transfer and Consolidation of\nProceedings), 5 (Mode of Beginning Proceedings), 38 Part II (Writs of\nSubpoena), 39 (Evidence by Deposition), 62 (Costs), 67 (Change of Attorney),\n45-51 (Enforcement) and 52 (Committal) these Rules shall not apply to any\nproceedings which are \u2014\n(a)\ngoverned by the Matrimonial Causes Rules (as amended and revised),\n(b) governed by the Grand Court (Bankruptcy) Rules (as amended and\nrevised),\n(c)\ngoverned by the Companies Winding Up Rules (as amended and revised);\nor\n(d) on appeal from civil proceedings in the Summary Court.\n(5) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraphs (2) to (4) of this rule \u2014\n(a)\nevery affidavit or other document filed in the Court office shall comply\nwith the requirements of Orders 41 and 66;\n(b) every judgment and order made by the Court shall comply with the\nrequirements of O.42;\n(c)\nexcept in the case of petitions in proceedings governed by the Matrimonial\nCauses Rules (as amended and revised), every originating process or other\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 1\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 55\n\ndocument required to be served by these Rules or any other rules in\nconnection with any civil proceedings shall be served in accordance with\nOrders 10 and 65;\n(d) Part I of O.80 shall apply to every proceeding to which a person under\ndisability is a party; and\n(e)\nevery interlocutory summons issued by the Court, including summonses\nissued in proceedings governed by the Matrimonial Causes Rules (as\namended and revised) and those issued in proceedings under the\nCompanies Winding Up Rules (as amended and revised), shall be\nendorsed in accordance with O.32, r.2(4), and O.32, rr.2 to 8 shall apply to\nthe hearing of such summonses.\n(6) All funds required to be paid into or out of Court, whether by order of the Court\nof Appeal, the Court, the Summary Court or otherwise, in both criminal and\ncivil proceedings, shall be lodged, paid, invested and dealt with in accordance\nwith the provisions of O.92.\n3.\nCommencement and transitional provisions (O.1, r.3)\n3.\n(1) These Rules came into operation on the 1st day of June, 1995, referred to in this\nOrder as the \"commencement date\".\n(2) These Rules shall apply to \u2014\n(a)\nevery proceeding commenced on or after the commencement date; and\n(b) every step taken or required to be taken after the commencement date in\nany proceeding pending on that date.\n(3) No step taken or required to be taken before the commencement date shall be\ntreated as a non-compliance with these Rules provided that it complied with the\nrules then in force.\n(4) Order 6, rule 8 shall have no application to writs issued prior to the\ncommencement date.\n4.\nRevocations (O.1, r.4)\n4.\nThe following rules are hereby revoked with effect from the commencement date \u2014\n(a)\nthe Grand Court (Civil Procedure) Rules 1976, as amended;\n(b) the Grand Court (Admiralty) Rules 1977;\n(c)\nthe Grand Court (Forms and Miscellaneous) Rules 1976;\n(d) the Civil Evidence Rules 1978;\n(e)\nthe Grand Court (Proceedings by and against the Crown) Rules 1977;\n(f)\nPart IV of the Succession Law (Probate and Administration) Rules 1977,\nas amended;\n\nORDER 1\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 56\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(g) the Grand Court (Applications for Orders of Mandamus, Prohibition,\nCertiorari and Habeas Corpus) Rules 1977;\n(h) the Grand Court (Foreign Process) Rules 1977 (as amended); and\n(i)\nthe Grand Court (Foreign Judgments) (Reciprocal Enforcement) Rules\n1977.\n5.\nNon application of English rules (O.1, r.5)\n5.\n(1) Except as provided in O.75, r.2, the Rules of the Supreme Court 1965 shall cease\nto have any application to \u2013\n(a)\nevery proceeding commenced on or after the commencement date; and\n(b) any step taken or required to be taken after the commencement date in any\nproceeding pending on that date.\n(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), The Supreme Court Practice 1999 may be relied\nupon where appropriate as an aid to the interpretation and application of these\nRules.\n6.\nApplication of Interpretation Act (as amended and revised) (O.1, r.6)\n6.\nThe Interpretation Act (as amended and revised) shall apply to the interpretation of\nthese Rules as it applies to the interpretation of a Law.\n7.\nDefinitions (O.1, r.7)\n7.\n(1) In these Rules, unless the context otherwise requires \u2014\n\" Courts Administrator\" means the Courts Administrator of the Grand Court\nappointed under paragraph 1 of the First Schedule of the Judicature Act (as\namended and revised) or an officer appointed by the Courts Administrator under\nO.92, r.6;\n\"Admiralty Judge\" means a Judge who is appointed to try admiralty\nproceedings commenced in or transferred to the Admiralty Division of the\nCourt;\n\"admiralty proceeding\" shall mean any admiralty action, limitation action or\nother proceeding governed by Orders 74 or 75;\n\"an action for personal injuries\" means an action in which there is a claim for\ndamages in respect of personal injuries to the plaintiff or any other person or in\nrespect of a person's death, and \"personal injuries\" includes any disease and\nany impairment of a person's physical or mental condition;\n\"attorney\" means a person admitted or otherwise entitled to practise as an\nattorney-at-law in the Cayman Islands either generally or in respect of a\nparticular cause or matter and includes Crown Counsel;\n\"Bailiff\" means the person appointed as such under Section 7(1) of the Grand\nCourt Act (as amended and revised), and includes any assistant bailiffs;\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 1\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 57\n\n\"Chief Justice\" means the Chief Justice of the Cayman Islands or any other\nJudge authorised to act as Chief Justice;\n\"Chief Marshall\" means the person appointed as such under Section 7(1) of the\nGrand Court Act (as amended and revised) and includes any deputies and\nassistants;\n\"Clerk of the Court\" means the person appointed as such under Section 7(1) of\nthe Grand Court Act (as amended and revised), and includes any deputies;\n\"Commercial Judge\" means a Judge who is appointed to try financial services\nproceedings commenced in or transferred to the Financial Services Division of\nthe Court;\n\"the Court\" means the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands constituted pursuant\nto the Constitution and Section 3 of the Grand Court Act (as amended and\nrevised) whether sitting as the Grand Court or as the Chief Court of Bankruptcy\nor as a Colonial Court of Admiralty;\n\"Court Funds Office\" means the office of the Courts Administrator or of an\nofficer appointed by the Courts Administrator under O.92, r.6;\n\"Court office\" is the office established pursuant to Section 10 of the Grand\nCourt Act (as amended and revised);\n\"Court file\" means the file established in respect of every proceeding in\naccordance with O.63, r.2;\n\"family proceeding\" shall include \u2014\n(a)\nany petition for divorce, judicial separation or nullity of marriage\npresented pursuant to the Matrimonial Causes Act (as amended and\nrevised) and any ancillary proceeding arising thereunder;\n(b) any application under Part I, Part II, Part IV or Part V of the Children Act\n(as amended and revised), the Adoption of Children Act (as amended and\nrevised), the Marriage Act (as amended and revised) or the Civil\nPartnership Act (as amended and revised);\n(c)  any application under the Protection from Domestic Violence Act (as\namended and revised);\n(d)  any application under the Child Abduction and Custody (Cayman Islands)\nOrder 1997 [UKSI 2754\/1997];\n(e)\nproceedings under the inherent jurisdiction of the Grand Court in relation\nto children; or\n(f)\nany appeal from an order of the Summary Court made under Part I, Part\nII, or Part IV of the Children Act (as amended and revised); the Protection\nfrom Domestic Violence Act (as amended and revised), the Affiliation Act\n(as amended and revised); the Maintenance Act (as amended and revised)\nthe Marriage Act (as amended and revised) or the Civil Partnership Act\n(as amended and revised);\n\nORDER 1\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 58\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n\"financial services proceeding\" shall have the meaning ascribed to it by O. 72,\nr.1(2)\n\"Grand Court Act\" means the Grand Court Act (as amended and revised);\n\"Judicature Act\" means the Judicature Act (as amended and revised);\n\"Judge\" means any judge or acting judge of the Court;\n\"notice of intention to defend\" means an acknowledgment of service\ncontaining a statement to the effect that the person by whom or on whose behalf\nit is signed intends to contest the proceedings to which the acknowledgment\nrelates;\n\"originating summons\" means every summons other than a summons in a\npending cause or matter;\n\"pleading\" does not include a petition, summons or preliminary act;\n\"practice form\" means a form contained in a practice direction issued pursuant\nto O.1, r.12;\n\"prescribed fee\" means the fee prescribed by the Court Fees Rules (as amended\nand revised);\n\"prescribed form\" means a form prescribed by these Rules and contained in the\nAppendices;\n\"prescribed rate\" means the applicable rate of interest prescribed from time to\ntime by the Rules Committee pursuant to Section 34 of the Judicature Act (as\namended and revised);\n\"probate action\" has the meaning assigned by O.76;\n\"receiver\" includes a manager;\n\"Register of Judgments\" means the file maintained in accordance with Order\n63, rule 7;\n\"Register of Writs\" means the file maintained in accordance with O.63, r.8;\n\"State Immunity Act 1978\" means the United Kingdom\u2019s State Immunity Act\n1978 as applied to the Cayman Islands by the State Immunity (Overseas\nTerritories) Order 1979 [UKSI 1979\/458]; and\n\"writ\" means a writ of summons.\n(2) In these Rules, unless the context otherwise requires, \"the Court\" means the\nGrand Court or any one or more Judges thereof, whether sitting in open Court\nor in chambers.\n(3) In these Rules, unless the context otherwise requires, a reference to\nacknowledging service of a document or giving notice of intention to defend\nany proceedings is a reference to lodging in the Court office an acknowledgment\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 1\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 59\n\nof service of that document or, as the case may be, a notice to defend those\nproceedings.\n8.\nConstruction of references to orders, rules, etc. (O.1, r.8)\n8.\n(1) Unless the context otherwise requires, any reference in these Rules to a specified\nOrder, rule or form in the Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (as amended and\nrevised) and the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised)\nis a reference to that Order or rule of these Rules and any reference to a specified\nrule, paragraph or subparagraph is a reference to that rule of the Order, that\nparagraph of the rule, or that subparagraph of the paragraph, in which the\nreference occurs.\n(2) Any reference in these Rules to anything done under a rule of these Rules\nincludes a reference to the same thing done before the commencement date\nunder any corresponding rule of Court ceasing to have effect on the\ncommencement date.\n(3) Except where the context otherwise requires, any reference in these Rules to any\nLaw shall be construed as a reference to the Law as amended, extended or\napplied by or under any other Law.\n9.\nConstruction of references to action, etc. for possession of land (O.1, r.9)\n9.\nExcept where the context otherwise requires, references in these Rules to an action or\nclaim for the possession of land shall be construed as including references to\nproceedings against the Crown for an order declaring that the plaintiff is entitled as\nagainst the Crown to the land or to the possession thereof.\n10.\nPrescribed forms (O.1, r.10)\n10. The forms in the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) shall\nbe used where applicable with such variations as the circumstances of the particular\ncase require.\n11.\nUse of English Practice Forms as precedents (O.1, r.11)\n11. The Queens Bench and Chancery Masters' Practice Forms contained in Part 2 of The\nSupreme Court Practice 1999 are not incorporated in these Rules, but they shall be\nregarded as approved precedents to be used, with all necessary variations, whenever\nit is practical and appropriate to do so.\n12.\nPractice directions (O.1, r.12)\n12. (1) The Chief Justice may issue practice directions for the purpose of \u2014\n (a) supplementing these Rules, provided that no practice direction shall\nrevoke or vary any rule;\n\nORDER 1\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 60\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(b) establishing forms to be known as \"practice forms\" in respect of any\nmatter in which no prescribed form is contained in the Grand Court Rules\n- Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised); and\n(c)\nproviding for the practice and procedure of the Court in respect of any\nmatter not governed by these or any other rules.\n(2) The Rules Committee shall from time to time issue practice directions\ncontaining guidelines relating to the matters referred to in O.62, r.16.\n(3) The Courts Administrator may, with the concurrence of the Chief Justice, issue\npractice directions for the purpose of supplementing the provisions of O.92 and\nestablish practice forms in respect of any matter relating to O.92 for which no\nprescribed form is contained in the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as\namended and revised).\n(4) All practice directions and practice forms issued pursuant to this rule shall be\ngazetted.\n(5) Any practice direction or practice form issued pursuant to this rule may be\nvaried or revoked by the Chief Justice in the case of those issued by the Chief\nJustice or by the Courts Administrator in the case of those issued by the Courts\nAdministrator.\n(6) Any practice direction or practice form may be revoked by the Rules\nCommittee.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 16.10.95) (amended 22.01.96) (amended 01.01.02) (amended 01.01.09)\n(amended 01.11.09)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 2\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 61\n\nORDER 2\nEFFECT OF NON-COMPLIANCE\n\n1.\nNon-compliance with rules (O.2, r.1)\n1.\n(1) Where, in beginning or purporting to begin any proceedings or at any stage in\nthe course of or in connection with any proceedings, there has, by reason of\nanything done or left undone, been a failure to comply with the requirements of\nthese Rules, whether in respect of time, place, manner, form or content or in any\nother respect, the failure shall be treated as an irregularity and shall not nullify\nthe proceedings, any step taken in the proceedings, or any document, judgment\nor order therein.\n(2) Subject to paragraph (3), the Court may, on the ground that there has been such\na failure as is mentioned in paragraph (1) and on such terms as to costs or\notherwise as it thinks just, set aside either wholly or in part the proceedings in\nwhich the failure occurred, any step taken in those proceedings or any\ndocument, judgment or order therein or exercise its powers under these Rules to\nallow such amendments (if any) to be made and to make such order (if any)\ndealing with the proceedings generally as it thinks fit.\n(3) The Court shall not wholly set aside any proceedings or the writ or other\noriginating process by which they were begun on the ground that the\nproceedings were required by any of these Rules to be begun by an originating\nprocess other than the one employed.\n2.\nApplication to set aside for irregularity (O.2, r.2)\n2.\n(1) An application to set aside for irregularity any proceedings, any step taken in\nany proceedings or any document, judgment or order therein shall not be\nallowed unless it is made within a reasonable time and before the party applying\nhas taken any fresh step after becoming aware of the irregularity.\n (2) An application under this rule may be made by summons or motion and the\ngrounds of objection must be stated in the summons or notice of motion.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nORDER 3\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 62\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 3\nTIME\n\n1.\n\"Month\" means calendar month (O.3, r.1)\n1.\nWithout prejudice to Section 3 of the Interpretation Act (as amended and revised) the\nword \"month\", where it occurs in any judgment, order, direction or other document\nforming part of any proceedings in the Court, means a calendar month unless the\ncontext otherwise requires.\n2.\nReckoning periods of time (O.3, r.2)\n2.\n(1) Any period of time fixed by these Rules or by any judgment, order or direction\nfor doing any act shall be reckoned in accordance with the following provisions\nof this rule.\n(2) Where the act is required to be done within a specified period after or from a\nspecified date, the period begins immediately after that date.\n(3) Where the act is required to be done within or not less than a specified period\nbefore a specified date, the period ends immediately before that date.\n(4) Where the act is required to be done a specified number of clear days before or\nafter a specified date, at least that number of days must intervene between the\nday on which the act is done and that date.\n(5) Where, apart from this paragraph, the period in question, being a period of 7\ndays or less, would include a Saturday or a Sunday or a public general holiday,\nthat day shall be excluded.\n3.\nNo rule (O.3, r.3)\n3.\nNo rule (O.3, r.3)\n4.\nTime expires on Saturday, Sunday, etc. (O.3, r.4)\n4.\nWhere the time prescribed by these Rules, or by any judgment, order or direction, for\ndoing any act at the Court office expires on a Saturday, a Sunday or other day on\nwhich the Court office is closed, and by reason thereof that act cannot be done on that\nday, the act shall be in time if done on the next day on which the Court office is open.\n5.\nExtension, etc. of time (O.3, r.5)\n5.\n(1) The Court may, on such terms as it thinks just, by order extend or abridge the\nperiod within which a person is required or authorised by these Rules, or by any\njudgment, order or direction, to do any act in any proceedings.\n(2) The Court may extend any such period as is referred to in paragraph (1) although\nthe application for extension is not made until after the expiration of that period.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 3\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 63\n\n(3) The period within which a person is required by these Rules, or by any order or\ndirection, to serve, file or amend any pleading or other document may be\nextended by consent (given in writing) without an order of the Court being made\nfor that purpose.\n6.\nNotice of intention to proceed after six months' delay (O.3, r.6)\n6.\nWhere a period of 6 months or more has elapsed since the last proceeding in a cause\nor matter, the party who desires to proceed must give to every other party not less\nthan 1 month's notice of that party\u2019s intention to proceed.\nA summons on which no order was made is not a proceeding for the purposes of this\nrule.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nORDER 4\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 64\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 4\nASSIGNMENT, TRANSFER AND CONSOLIDATION OF\nPROCEEDINGS\n\n1.\nAssignment of proceedings amongst divisions of the Court (O.4, r.1)\n1.\nEvery civil proceeding (including every civil appeal from the Summary Court) shall\nbe commenced in the Civil Division unless \u2014\n(a)\nit is a family proceeding in which case it shall be commenced in the Family\nDivision;\n(b) it is an admiralty proceeding, in which case it shall be commenced in the\nAdmiralty Division; or\n(c)\nit is a financial services proceeding, in which case it shall be commenced\nin the Financial Services Division.\n2.\nAssignment of proceedings to a particular Judge (O.4, r.2)\n2.\n(1) Any proceeding pending in the Civil Division or Family Division may be\nreserved to a particular Judge of that division if the Judge trying the matter is\nsatisfied that the interests of justice require that it be reserved to that Judge.\n(2) Every proceeding commenced in or transferred to the Financial Services\nDivision shall be assigned to a Commercial Judge who shall adjudicate the trial\nof the matter and every interlocutory application arising before or after the trial\nof the matter.\n(3) Every proceeding commenced in or transferred to the Admiralty Division shall\nbe assigned to an Admiralty Judge who shall adjudicate the trial of the matter\nand every interlocutory application arising before or after the trial of the matter.\n(4)  (a)    In the event that the Judge to whom a cause or matter is reserved or assigned\n(i)    dies;\n(ii)    ceases to be a Judge; or\n(iii)    is unable to adjudicate upon the matter in a timely manner by reason\nof that Judge\u2019s ill health or absence from the Islands; or\n (b) In the event that the administration of justice otherwise requires, the Chief\nJustice shall nominate some other Judge to whom the application shall be\nmade or by whom the jurisdiction shall be exercised.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 4\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 65\n\n3.\nTransfer of proceedings between divisions (O.4, r.3)\n3.\n(1) Any civil proceeding pending in the Court (including proceedings commenced\nprior to the establishment of the Divisions of the Court) may be transferred from\none Division to another by order of the Court on the grounds that \u2014\n(a)\nthe proceeding has been commenced in the wrong Division and ought\nproperly to be transferred; or\n(b) the Court is satisfied that it would be appropriate in all the circumstances\nfor the cause or matter to be tried by a Commercial Judge or an Admiralty\nJudge.\n(2) When a proceeding is ordered to be transferred to the Financial Services\nDivision or the Admiralty Division, the Court shall determine the amount of the\ntransfer fee payable in accordance with Rule 3(5) of the Court Fees Rules (as\namended and revised).\n4.\nConsolidation of causes or matters (O.4, r.4)\n4.\n(1) Where two or more causes or matters are pending in the same Division of the\nCourt and it appears to the Court that \u2014\n(a)\nsome common question of law or fact arises in both or all of them; or\n(b) the rights or relief claimed are in respect of or arise out of the same\ntransaction or series of transactions; or\n(c)\nfor some other reason it is desirable to make an order under this Rule,\n\nthe Court may order those causes or matters to be consolidated on such terms as\nit thinks just or may order them to be tried at the same time or one immediately\nafter another or may order any of them to be stayed until after the determination\nof any other of them.\n(2) When the Court makes an order under paragraph (1) that two or more causes or\nmatters are to be tried at the same time but no order is made for those causes or\nmatters to be consolidated, then, a party to one of those causes or matters may\nbe treated as if that party were a party to any other of those causes or matters for\nthe purpose of making an order for costs against that party or in that party\u2019s\nfavour.\n(3) Nothing in this rule shall prevent two or more causes or matters being\nconsolidated pursuant to O.50, r.1(6).\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 01.11.09)\n\nORDER 5\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 66\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 5\nMODE OF BEGINNING PROCEEDINGS\n\n1.\nMode of beginning civil proceedings (O.5, r.1)\n1.\n(1) Subject to the provision of any Act and of these Rules, civil proceedings in the\nCourt may be begun by writ, originating summons, originating motion, petition,\narbitration application, or written application, which are referred to collectively\nin these Rules (save where the context otherwise requires) as \u201coriginating\nprocess\u201d.\n(2) A \"written application\" means \u2014\n(a)\na stop notice under O.50, r.11;\n(b) an application under O.85, r.8;\n(c)\nan application under O.102, r.17; and\n(d) any other application which is required by these Rules to be made and\ndetermined in  writing without any oral hearing.\n(2A) An \u201carbitration application\u201d means an application under Order 73 and has the\nsame meaning as provided for in Order 73, rule 2.\n(2B) Subject to the provision of any Act and of these Rules, civil proceedings may\nbe begun by electronic filing of any originating process and these Rules will be\nread and construed accordingly\n(3) The Clerk of the Court shall not affix the seal of the Court to any originating\nprocess without:\n(a)\nhaving first determined the amount of the prescribed fee payable in\naccordance with the First Schedule of the Court Fees Rules (as amended\nand revised); and\n(b) being satisfied that the prescribed fee has been paid.\nAt the same time as affixing the seal of the Court to any originating process the\nClerk of the Court shall affix a seal indicating the date upon which the seal of\nthe Court was affixed thereto.\n(4) Any person seeking the sealing of an originating process shall provide it to the\nClerk of the Court either electronically or on paper.  The originating process\nshall be signed by the plaintiff, applicant, petitioner, or appellant (the\n\u201cclaimant\u201d), or by the attorney stated in the originating process as acting for the\nclaimant, as the case may be.  If the originating process is provided\nelectronically then it shall be provided to the Clerk of the Court pursuant to the\nCourt\u2019s instructions for electronic filing as published, from time to time, on\nwww.judicial.ky.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 5\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 67\n\n (5) If, pursuant to paragraph 1(4), an originating process is provided on paper to the\nClerk of the Court, the Clerk of the Court shall:\n(a)  scan and upload the document electronically into the appropriate court\nelectronic database record;\n(b)  affix electronically the seal of the Grand Court to the originating process\ntogether with a seal indicating the date upon which the seal of the Court\nwas affixed thereto;\n(c)  forthwith provide to the claimant, or the claimant\u2019s attorney, the\noriginating process with the aforesaid court seals duly affixed:\n(i)\nif the process was originally provided by the claimant\u2019s attorney to\nthe Clerk of the Court, by delivery of a paper copy of the\nelectronically sealed duplicate to the claimant\u2019s attorney\u2019s collection\nbox maintained by the court\u2019s registry; or\n(ii)  if the originating process was originally provided by the claimant in\nperson to the Clerk of the Court, by returning a paper copy of the\nelectronically sealed duplicate to the claimant.\n(6) If, pursuant to paragraph 1(4), an originating process is provided electronically\nto the Clerk of the Court, the Clerk of the Court shall:\n(a)\nupload the document electronically into the appropriate court electronic\ndatabase record;\n(b)  affix electronically the seal of the Grand Court to the originating process\ntogether with a seal indicating the date upon which the seal of the Court\nwas affixed thereto;\n(c)\nforthwith provide electronically to the claimant, or the claimant\u2019s attorney,\nthe originating process with the aforesaid court seals duly affixed.\n(7) In every case where an originating process is provided (electronically or on\npaper) to the Clerk of the Court pursuant to paragraph 1(4), the following steps\nwill be taken.  Upon the affixing of the aforesaid seals of the Grand Court to the\noriginating process the Clerk of the Court shall immediately thereafter:\n(a)\nassign the proceedings to the appropriate Division of the Court;\n(b) assign to it a cause number, using chronological sequences for each\nDivision, commencing on the 1st January of each year;\n(c)\nestablish a court file in respect of the proceedings in accordance with Order\n63, rule 2 by generating a paper duplicate from the electronic record and\nplacing it on the file.\n(8) Pursuant to Order 63, the Clerk of the Court shall upload electronically a copy\nof the sealed originating process to either the Register of Writs and other\nOriginating Processes or a Restricted Register of Writs and other Originating\nProcesses, as maintained in accordance with Order 63. 2.\n\nORDER 5\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 68\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(9) In the event that the Clerk of the Court, pursuant to Order 72, assigns an\noriginating process to the Financial Services Division, the Registrar of that\nDivision, acting in consultation with the Chief Justice, shall assign the\nproceeding to a particular Commercial Judge.  Upon the Registrar assigning the\nproceedings to a particular Commercial Judge, the Registrar shall inform the\nClerk of the Court of that assignment and the Clerk of the Court shall thereupon\nimmediately inform the claimant, or the claimant\u2019s attorney, of that assignment\nand shall include the initials of the relevant Commercial Judge in the title of the\nproceedings and make any necessary changes to the Court file.\n\n2.\nProceedings which must be begun by writ (O. 5, r. 2)\n2.\nSubject to any provisions of a Law, or of these Rules, by virtue of which any\nproceedings are expressly required to be begun otherwise than by writ, the following\nproceedings must, notwithstanding anything in rule 4, be begun by writ, that is to say,\nproceedings \u2014\n(a)\nin which a claim is made by the plaintiff for any relief or remedy for any\ntort, other than trespass to land;\n(b) in which any claim by the plaintiff is based on an allegation of fraud;\n(c)\nin which a claim is made by the plaintiff for damages for breach of duty\n(whether the duty exists by virtue of a contract or of a provision made by\nor under any Law or independently of any contract or any such provision)\nwhere the damages claimed consist of or include damages in respect of the\ndeath of any person or in respect of personal injuries to any person or in\nrespect of damage to any property;\n(d) in which a claim is made by the plaintiff in respect of the infringement of\na patent; and\n(e)\nwhich are a probate action.\n3.\nProceedings which must be begun by originating summons (O.5, r.3)\n3.\n(1) Proceedings by which an application is to be made to the Court or a Judge\nthereof under any Law must be begun by originating summons except where by\nthese Rules or by or under any Law the application in question is expressly\nrequired or authorised to be made by some other means.\n(2) This rule does not apply to an application made in pending proceedings.\n4.\nProceedings which may be begun by writ or originating summons (O.5, r.4)\n4.\n(1) Except in the case of proceedings which by these Rules or by or under any Law\nare required to be begun by originating motion or petition, proceedings may be\nbegun either by writ or by originating summons as the plaintiff considers\nappropriate.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 5\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 69\n\n(2) Proceedings \u2014\n(a)\nin which the sole or principal question at issue is, or is likely to be, one of\nthe construction of any Law or of any deed, will, contract or other\ndocument, or some other question of law; or\n(b) in which there is unlikely to be any substantial dispute of fact,\nare appropriate to be begun by originating summons unless the plaintiff intends\nin those proceedings to apply for judgment under O.14 or O.86 or for any other\nreason considers the proceedings more appropriate to be begun by writ.\n4A.\nProceedings which may be begun by petition or by writ (O.5, r.4A)\n4A. (1) Proceedings under Section 23 or 26(1) of the Cayman Islands Constitution\nOrder 2009 (as amended) shall be begun by petition or writ.\n(2) Such proceedings \u2014\n(a)\nin which the sole or principal question at issue is, or is likely to be, one of\nthe construction of any Law or of any deed, will, contract or other\ndocument, or some other question of law; or\n(b) in which there is unlikely to be any substantial dispute of fact,\nare appropriate to be begun by petition unless the applicant for any reason\nconsiders it more appropriate to begin the proceedings by writ.\n5.\nProceedings to be begun by motion or petition (O.5, r.5)\n5.\nProceedings may be begun by originating motion or petition if, but only if, by these\nRules or by or under any Law the proceedings in question are required or authorised\nto be so begun.\n6.\nRight to sue in person (O.5, r.6)\n6.\n(1) Subject to paragraph (2) and to O.80, r.2, any person (whether or not the person\nsues as a trustee or personal representative or in any other representative\ncapacity) may begin and carry on proceedings in the Court by an attorney or in\nperson.\n (2) Except as expressly provided by or under any Law, a body corporate may not\nbegin or carry on or defend any such proceedings otherwise than by an attorney.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 01.11.09) (amended 06.11.12) (replaced 10.07.22)\n\nORDER 6\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 70\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 6\nWRITS OF SUMMONS: GENERAL PROVISIONS\n\n1.\nForm of writ (O.6, r.1)\n1.\nEvery writ must be in Form No. 1 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as\namended and revised).\n2.\nIndorsement of claim (O.6, r.2)\n2.\nBefore a writ is issued it must be indorsed \u2014\n(a)\nwith a statement of claim or, if the statement of claim is not indorsed on\nthe writ, with a concise statement of the nature of the claim made or the\nrelief or remedy required in the action begun thereby;\n(b) where the claim made by the plaintiff is for a debt or liquidated demand\nonly, with a statement of the amount claimed in respect of the debt or\ndemand and for costs and also with a statement that further proceedings\nwill be stayed if, within the time limited for acknowledging service, the\ndefendant pays the amount so claimed to the plaintiff, the plaintiff\u2019s\nattorney or agent;\n(c)\nwhere the action is brought to enforce a right to recover possession of\ngoods, with a statement showing the value of the goods;\n(d) where the claim made by the plaintiff is for a debt or liquidated demand it\nmust specify the currency of the debt or liquidated demand.\n(e)\nwhere a claim is made for interest pursuant to the terms of any contract,\nwith a statement of  \u2014\n(i)\nthe relevant contractual term(s);\n(ii) the agreed rate of interest;\n(iii) the date(s) from which it is payable;\n(iv) the total amount of interest claimed; and\n(v) the amount of interest accruing due each day;\n(f)\nwhere a claim is made for interest pursuant to Section 34 of the Judicature\nAct (as amended and revised) or any other statute, with a statement of \u2014\n(i)\nthe prescribed rate(s);\n(ii) the date(s) from which it is calculated;\n(iii) the total amount of interest claimed as at the date of the issue of the\nwrit; and\n(iv) the amount of interest accruing each day thereafter;\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 6\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 71\n\n(g) where the claim made by the plaintiff includes a claim for fixed costs\npursuant to O.62, r.1, with a statement of the amount payable in accordance\nwith the scale and the amount of the prescribed fee payable upon issue of\nthe writ.\n3.\nIndorsement as to capacity (O.6, r.3)\n3.\nBefore a writ is issued it must be indorsed \u2014\n(a)\nwhere the plaintiff sues in a representative capacity, with a statement of\nthe capacity in which that plaintiff sues;\n(b) where a defendant is sued in a representative capacity, with a statement of\nthe capacity in which that defendant is sued.\n4.\nIndorsement as to insurers of motor vehicles (O.6, r.4)\n4.\n(1) Any writ which includes a claim for damages arising out of the use of a motor\nvehicle or vehicles on any road shall be endorsed with the name and address of\nthe insurer or insurers of such vehicles.\n(2) The Clerk of the Court shall send a copy of any writ indorsed in accordance with\nparagraph (1) to the insurer or insurers whose names are indorsed thereon within\n10 days of the date upon which such writ is issued.\n5.\nIndorsement as to attorney and address (O.6, r.5)\n5.\n(1) Before a writ is issued, it must be indorsed \u2014\n(a)\nwhere the plaintiff sues by an attorney, with the plaintiff's address and the\nattorney's name or firm and a business address of the plaintiff\u2019s attorney\nwithin the jurisdiction; or\n(b) where the plaintiff sues in person, with the address of the plaintiff\u2019s place\nof residence and, if the plaintiff\u2019s place of residence is not within the\njurisdiction or if the plaintiff has no place of residence, the address of a\nplace within the jurisdiction at or to which documents for the plaintiff may\nbe delivered or sent.\n(2) The address for service of a plaintiff shall be \u2014\n(a)\nwhere the plaintiff sues by an attorney, the business address of the attorney\nindorsed on the writ; or\n(b) where the plaintiff sues in person, the plaintiff\u2019s address within the\njurisdiction indorsed on the writ.\n(3) Where the name of an attorney is indorsed on a writ, the attorney must, if any\ndefendant who has been served with or who has acknowledged service of the\nwrit requests the attorney in writing so to do, declare in writing whether the writ\nwas issued by the attorney or with the attorney\u2019s authority or privity.\n\nORDER 6\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 72\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(4) If an attorney whose name is indorsed on a writ declares in writing that the writ\nwas not issued by that attorney or with that attorney\u2019s authority or privity, the\nCourt may on the application of any defendant who has been served with or who\nhas acknowledged service of the writ, stay all proceedings in the action begun\nby the writ.\n6.\nOffice copies of writs (O.6, r.6)\n6.\n(1) One or more office copies of a writ may, at the request of the plaintiff, be issued\nat the time when the original writ is issued or at any time thereafter before the\noriginal writ ceases to be valid.\n(2) Without prejudice to the generality of paragraph (1) a writ for service within the\njurisdiction may be issued as an office copy writ with one which is to be served\nout of the jurisdiction and a writ which is to be served out of the jurisdiction\nmay be issued as an office copy writ with one for service within the jurisdiction.\n(3) An office copy of a writ is a true copy of the original writ with such differences\nonly (if any) as are necessary having regard to the purpose for which the writ is\nissued and which has been sealed.\n7.\nNo rule (O.6, rr.7-7A)\n7.\nNo rule (O.6, rr.7-7A)\n8.\nDuration and renewal of writ (O.6, r.8)\n8.\n(1) For the purpose of service, a writ (other than an office copy of a writ) is valid in\nthe first instance \u2014\n(a)\nwhere leave to serve the writ out of the jurisdiction is required under Order\n11, for 6 months; and\n(b) in any other case, for 4 months,\nbeginning with the date of its issue and an office copy of a writ is valid in the\nfirst instance for the period of validity of the original writ which is unexpired at\nthe date of issue of the office copy.\n(2) Subject to paragraph (3), where a writ has not been served on a defendant, the\nCourt may by order extend the validity of the writ from time to time for such\nperiod, not exceeding 4 months at any one time, beginning with the day next\nfollowing that on which it would otherwise expire, as may be specified in the\norder, if an application for extension is made to the Court before that day or such\nlater day (if any) as the Court may allow.\n(3) Where the Court is satisfied on an application under paragraph (2) that, despite\nthe making of all reasonable efforts, it may not be possible to serve the writ\nwithin 4 months, the Court may, if it thinks fit, extend the validity of the writ\nfor such period, not exceeding 12 months, as the Court may specify.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 6\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 73\n\n(4) Before a writ, the validity of which has been extended under this rule, is served,\nit must be marked with an official stamp showing the period for which the\nvalidity of the writ has been so extended.\n(5) Where the validity of a writ is extended by order made under this rule, the order\nshall operate in relation to any other writ (whether original or office copy) issued\nin the same action which has not been served so as to extend the validity of that\nother writ until the expiration of the period specified in the order.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nORDER 7\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 74\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 7\nORIGINATING SUMMONSES: GENERAL PROVISIONS\n\n1.\nApplication (O.7, r.1)\n1.\nThe provisions of this Order apply to all originating summonses subject, in the case\nof originating summonses of any particular class, to any special provisions relating to\noriginating summonses of that class made by these Rules or by or under any Law.\n2.\nForm of summons, etc. (O.7, r.2)\n2.\n(1) Every originating summons (other than an ex parte summons) shall be in Form\nNo. 2 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) or,\nif so authorised or required, in Form No. 3 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II -\nForms (as amended and revised) and every ex parte originating summons shall\nbe in Form No. 4 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and\nrevised).\n (2)    The party taking out an originating summons (other than an ex parte summons)\nshall be described as a plaintiff, and the other parties shall be described as\ndefendants.\n3.\nContents of summons (O.7, r.3)\n3.\n(1) Every originating summons must include a statement of the questions on which\nthe plaintiff seeks the determination or direction of the Court or, as the case may\nbe, a concise statement of the relief or remedy claimed in the proceedings begun\nby the originating summons with sufficient particulars to identify the cause or\ncauses of action in respect of which the plaintiff claims that relief or remedy.\n (2)   O.6, rr.3 and 5, shall apply in relation to an originating summons as they apply\nin relation to a writ.\n4.\nOffice copy of summons (O.7, r.4)\n4.\nO.6, r.6, shall apply in relation to an originating summons as it applies in relation to\na writ.\n5.\nNo rule (O.7, r.5)\n5.\nNo rule (O.7, r.5)\n6.\nDuration and renewal of summons (O.7, r.6)\n6.\nO.6, r.8, shall apply in relation to an originating summons as it applies in relation to\na writ.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 7\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 75\n\n7.\nEx parte Originating Summonses (O.7, r.7)\n7.\nRules 2(1) and 3(1) shall, so far as applicable, apply to ex parte originating\nsummonses; but, save as aforesaid, the foregoing Rules of this Order shall not apply\nto ex parte originating summonses.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 01.10.12)\n\nORDER 8\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 76\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 8\nORIGINATING AND OTHER MOTIONS: GENERAL PROVISIONS\n\n1.\nApplication (O.8, r.1)\n1.\nThe provisions of this Order apply to all motions subject, in the case of originating\nmotions of any particular class, to any special provisions relating to motions of that\nclass made by these Rules or by or under any Law.\n2.\nNotice of motion (O.8, r.2)\n2.\n(1) Except where an application by motion may properly be made ex parte, no\nmotion shall be made without previous notice to the parties affected thereby, but\nthe Court, if satisfied that the delay caused by proceedings in the ordinary way\nwould or might entail irreparable or serious mischief may make an order ex\nparte on such terms as to costs or otherwise, and subject to such undertaking, if\nany, as it thinks just; and any party affected by such order may apply to the\nCourt to set it aside.\n(2) Unless the Court gives leave to the contrary, there must be at least 4 clear days\nbetween the service of notice of a motion and the day named in the notice for\nhearing the motion.\n(3) A day and time for the hearing of a motion shall be fixed by the Clerk of the\nCourt at the time of its issue.\n3.\nForm and issue of notice of motion (O.8, r.3)\n3.\n(1) The notice of an originating motion must be in Form No. 6 of the Grand Court\nRules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised). When leave has been given\nunder r.2(2) to serve short notice of motion, that fact must be stated in the notice.\nThe notice of a motion must include a concise statement of the nature of the\nclaim made or the relief or remedy required.\n (2) Order 6, rule 5, shall, with the necessary modifications, apply in relation to\nnotice of an originating motion as it applies in relation to a writ.\n4.\nService of notice of motion with writ, etc. (O.8, r.4)\n4.\nNotice of motion to be made in an action may be served by the plaintiff on the\ndefendant with the writ of summons or originating summons or at any time after\nservice of such writ or summons, whether or not the defendant has acknowledged\nservice in the action.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 8\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 77\n\n5.\nAdjournment of hearing (O.8, r.5)\n5.\nThe hearing of any motion may be adjourned from time to time on such terms, if any,\nas the Court thinks fit.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nORDER 9\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 78\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 9\nPETITIONS: GENERAL PROVISIONS\n\n1.\nApplication (O.9, r.1)\n1.\nRules 2 and 4 apply to petitions by which civil proceedings in the Court are begun,\nsubject, in the case of petitions of any particular class, to any special provisions\nrelating to petitions of that class made by these Rules or by or under any Law or any\nrules under any Law.\n2.\nContents of petition (O.9, r.2)\n2.\n(1) Every petition (except an election petition) shall be in Form No. 7 of the Grand\nCourt Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) and shall include a\nconcise statement of the nature of the claim made or the relief or remedy\nrequired in the proceedings begun by the petition.\n(2) Every petition must include at the end thereof a statement of the names of the\npersons, if any, required to be served therewith or, if no person is required to be\nserved, a statement to that effect.\n(3) O.6, r.5, shall, with the necessary modifications, apply in relation to a petition\nas it applies in relation to a writ.\n3.\nNo rule (O.9, r.3)\n3.\nNo rule (O.9, r.3)\n4.\nFixing time for hearing petition (O.9, r.4)\n4.\n(1) A day and time for the hearing of a petition which is required to be heard shall\nbe fixed by the Clerk of the Court at the time of its issue.\n(2) If a petition is required to be served on any person, it shall be indorsed with the\nhearing date or accompanied by a notice of hearing.\n(3) Unless the Court otherwise directs, a petition which is required to be served on\nany person must be served on the person not less than 14 days before the day\nfixed for the hearing of the petition.\n5.\nCertain applications not to be made by petition (O.9, r.5)\n5.\nNo application in any cause or matter may be made by petition.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 10\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 79\n\nORDER 10\nSERVICE OF ORIGINATING PROCESS: GENERAL PROVISIONS\n\n1.\nGeneral provisions (O.10, r.1)\n1.\n(1) A writ must be served personally on each defendant by the plaintiff or the\nplaintiff\u2019s agent.\n(2) Where a defendant's attorney indorses on the writ a statement that that\ndefendant's attorney accepts service of the writ on behalf of that defendant, the\nwrit shall be deemed to have been duly served on that defendant and to have\nbeen so served on the date on which the indorsement was made.\n(3) Subject to O.12, r.7, where a writ is not duly served on a defendant but the\ndefendant acknowledges service of it, the writ shall be deemed, unless the\ncontrary is shown, to have been served on the defendant and to have been so\nserved on the date on which the defendant acknowledges service.\n(4) Every copy of a writ for service on a defendant shall be sealed with the seal of\nthe Court and shall be accompanied by a form of acknowledgment of service in\nForm No. 8 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised)\nin which the title of the action and its number have been entered.\n(5) This rule shall have effect subject to the provision of any Law and these Rules\nand in particular to any Law which provides for the manner in which documents\nmay be served on bodies corporate.\n2.\nService of writ on agent of overseas principal (O.10, r.2)\n2.\n(1) Where the Court is satisfied on an ex parte application that \u2014\n(a)\na contract has been entered into within the jurisdiction with or through an\nagent who is either an individual residing in or carrying on business within\nthe jurisdiction or a body corporate having a registered office or a place of\nbusiness within the jurisdiction; and\n(b) the principal for whom the agent was acting was at the time the contract\nwas entered into and is at the time of the application neither such an\nindividual nor such a body corporate; and\n(c)\nat the time of the application either the agent's authority has not been\ndetermined or the agent is still in a business relationship with the agent's\nprincipal,\nthe Court may authorise service of a writ beginning an action relating to the\ncontract to be effected on the agent instead of the principal.\n\nORDER 10\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 80\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(2) An order under this rule authorising service of a writ on a defendant's agent must\nlimit a time within which the defendant must acknowledge service.\n(3) Where an order is made under this rule authorising service of a writ on a\ndefendant's agent, a copy of the order and of the writ must be sent by post to the\ndefendant at the defendant\u2019s address out of the jurisdiction.\n3.\nService of writ in pursuance of contract (O.10, r.3)\n3.\n(1) Where  \u2014\n(a)\na contract contains a term to the effect that the Court shall have jurisdiction\nto hear and determine any action in respect of a contract or, apart from any\nsuch term, the Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine any such action;\nand\n (b) the contract provides that, in the event of any action in respect of the\ncontract being begun, the process by which it is begun may be served on\nthe defendant, or on such other person on the defendant\u2019s behalf as may be\nspecified in the contract, in such manner, or at such place (whether within\nor out of the jurisdiction), as may be so specified,\nthen, if an action in respect of the contract is begun in the Court and the writ by\nwhich it is begun is served in accordance with the contract, the writ shall, subject\nto paragraph (2) be deemed to have been duly served on the defendant.\n(2) A writ which is served out of the jurisdiction in accordance with a contract shall\nnot be deemed to have been duly served on the defendant by virtue of paragraph\n(1) unless leave to serve the writ out of the jurisdiction has been granted under\nO.11.\n4.\nService of writ in certain actions for possession of land (O.10, r.4)\n4.\nWhere a writ is indorsed with a claim for the possession of land, the Court may,\nsubject to the provisions of Section 153 of the Registered Land Act (as amended and\nrevised) \u2014\n(a)\nif satisfied on an ex parte application that no person appears to be in\npossession of the land and that service cannot be otherwise effected on any\ndefendant, authorise service on that defendant to be effected by affixing a\ncopy of the writ to some conspicuous part of the land; or\n(b) if satisfied on such an application that no person appears to be in\npossession of the land and that service could not otherwise have been\neffected on any defendant, order that service already effected by affixing\na copy of the writ to some conspicuous part of the land shall be treated as\ngood service on that defendant.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 10\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 81\n\n5.\nService of originating summons, notice of motion or petition (O.10, r.5)\n5.\n(1) The foregoing rules of this Order shall apply, with any necessary modifications\nin relation to an originating summons (other than an ex parte originating\nsummons, or an originating summons under O.113) as they apply in relation to\na writ, except that an acknowledgment of service shall be in Form No. 9 of the\nGrand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised).\n(2) Paragraphs (1) and (2) of rule 1 shall apply, with any necessary modifications,\nin relation to a notice of an originating motion and a petition as they apply in\nrelation to a writ.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nORDER 11\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 82\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 11\nSERVICE OF PROCESS, ETC. OUT OF THE JURISDICTION\n\n1.\nPrincipal cases in which service of writ out of jurisdiction is permissible\n(O.11, r.1)\n1.\n(1) Provided that the writ does not contain any claim mentioned in O.75, r.1(3),\nservice of a writ out of the jurisdiction is permissible with the leave of the Court\nif in the action begun by the writ \u2014\n(a)\nrelief is sought against a person who \u2014\n(i)\nhas the right to reside permanently in the Islands; or\n(ii) has a right to work in the Islands; or\n(iii) is resident in and the nature and circumstances of the person\u2019s\nresidence indicate that the person has a substantial connection with\nthe Islands;\n(b) an injunction is sought ordering the defendant to do or refrain from doing\nanything within the jurisdiction (whether or not damages are also claimed\nin respect of a failure to do or the doing of that thing);\n(c)\nthe claim is brought against a person who has been or will be duly served\nwithin or out of the jurisdiction and a person out of the jurisdiction is a\nnecessary or proper party thereto;\n(d) the claim is brought to enforce, rescind, dissolve, annul or otherwise affect\na contract, or to recover damages or obtain other relief in respect of the\nbreach of a contract, being (in either case) a contract which \u2014\n(i)\nwas made within the jurisdiction; or\n(ii) was made by or through an agent trading or residing within the\njurisdiction on behalf of a principal trading or residing out of the\njurisdiction; or\n(iii) is by its terms, or by implication, governed by the law of the Islands;\nor\n(iv) contains a term to the effect that the Court shall have jurisdiction to\nhear and determine any action in respect of the contract;\n(e)\nthe claim is brought in respect of a breach committed within the\njurisdiction of a contract made within or out of the jurisdiction, and\nirrespective of the fact, if such be the case, that the breach was preceded\nor accompanied by a breach committed out of the jurisdiction that rendered\nimpossible the performance of so much of the contract as ought to have\nbeen performed within the jurisdiction;\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 11\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 83\n\n(f)\nthe claim is founded on a tort, fraud or breach of duty whether statutory at\nlaw or in equity and the damage was sustained, or resulted from an act\ncommitted, within the jurisdiction;\n(ff) the claim is brought against a person who is or was a director, officer or\nmember of a company registered within the jurisdiction or who is or was\na partner of a partnership, whether general or limited, which is governed\nby the laws of the Islands and the subject matter of the claim relates in any\nway to such company or partnership or to the status, rights or duties of\nsuch director, officer, member or partner in relation thereto;\n(g) the whole subject-matter of the action is land situate within the jurisdiction\n(with or without rents or profits) or the perpetuation of testimony relating\nto land so situate;\n(h) the claim is brought to construe, rectify, set aside or enforce an act, deed,\nwill, contract, obligation or liability affecting land situate within the\njurisdiction;\n(i)\nthe claim is made for a debt secured on immovable property or is made to\nassert, declare or determine proprietary or possessory rights, or rights of\nsecurity, in or over movable property, or to obtain authority to dispose of\nmovable property, situate within the jurisdiction;\n(j)\nthe claim is brought for any relief or remedy in respect of any trust,\nwhether express, implied or constructive, that is governed by or ought to\nbe executed according to the laws of the Islands or in respect of the status,\nrights or duties of any trustee thereof in relation thereto;\n(k) the claim is made for the administration of the estate of a person who died\ndomiciled within the jurisdiction or for any relief or remedy which might\nbe obtained in any such action;\n(1) the claim is brought in a probate action within the meaning of O.76; or\n(m) the claim is brought to enforce any judgment or arbitral award (within the\nmeaning of Section 2(1) of the Arbitration Act, 2012 [Law 3 of 2012]) or\ninterim measure (within the meaning of Part VIII of the Arbitration Act,\n2012[Law 3 of 2012]); or\n(n) the claim is brought for any relief or remedy pursuant to Section 11A of\nthe  Grand Court Act (as amended and revised).\n\n(2) Service of a writ out of the jurisdiction is permissible without the leave of the\nCourt if every claim made in the action begun by the writ is one which by virtue\nof a Law or these Rules the Court has power to hear and determine\nnotwithstanding that the person against whom the claim is made is not within\nthe jurisdiction of the Court or that the wrongful act, neglect or default giving\nrise to the claim did not take place within the jurisdiction, including, for the\navoidance of doubt, applications made pursuant to Sections 48, 63, 64, 67, 68,\n72, 103 or 104 of the Trusts Act (as amended and revised) or O.85.\n\nORDER 11\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 84\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(3) Where a writ is to be served out of the jurisdiction pursuant to an order under\nparagraph (1), the time to be inserted in the writ within which the defendant\nserved therewith must acknowledge service shall be such time as may be fixed\nby the Court.\n(4) Where a writ is to be served out of the jurisdiction under paragraph (2), the time\nto be inserted in the writ within which the defendant served therewith must\nacknowledge service shall be 28 days.\n2.\nNo rule (O.11, r.2)\n2.\nNo rule (O.11, r.2)\n3.\nNo rule (O.11, r.3)\n3.\nNo rule (O.11, r.3)\n4.\nApplication for, and grant of, leave to serve writ out of jurisdiction (O.11, r.4)\n4.\n(1) An application for the grant of leave under rule 1(1) must be supported by an\naffidavit stating \u2014\n(a)\nthe grounds on which the application is made;\n(b) that in the deponent's belief the plaintiff has a good cause of action;\n(c)\nin what place or country the defendant is, or probably may be found;\n(d) where the application is made under rule 1(1)(c), the grounds for the\ndeponent's belief that there is between the plaintiff and the person on\nwhom a writ has been served a real issue which the plaintiff may\nreasonably ask the Court to try; and\n(e)\nif service is not to be effected personally the method or methods of service\nwhich are in accordance with the law of the country in which service is to\nbe effected.\n(2) No such leave shall be granted unless it shall be made sufficiently to appear to\nthe Court that the case is a proper one for service out of the jurisdiction under\nthis Order.\n(3) An order granting leave to serve a writ out of the jurisdiction under rule 1 must\nlimit a time within which the defendant to be served must acknowledge service.\n5.\nService of writ abroad; general (O.11, r.5)\n5.\n(1) Subject to the following provisions of this rule, O.10, rr.1(1), (2), (3) and (4)\nand O.65, r.4, shall apply in relation to the service of a writ, notwithstanding\nthat the writ is to be served out of the jurisdiction, save that the accompanying\nform of acknowledgment of service shall be modified in such manner as may be\nappropriate.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 11\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 85\n\n(2) Nothing in this rule or in any order or direction of the Court made by virtue of\nit shall authorise or require the doing of anything in a country in which service\nis to be effected which is contrary to the law of that country.\n(3) A writ which is to be served out of the jurisdiction \u2014\n(a)\nneed not be served personally on the person required to be served so long\nas it is served on the person in accordance with the law of the country in\nwhich service is effected; and\n(b) need not be served by the plaintiff or the plaintiff\u2019s agent if it is served by\na method provided for by rule 6 or rule 7.\n(4) An official certificate stating that a writ as regards which rule 6 has been\ncomplied with has been served on a person personally, or in accordance with\nthe law of the country in which service was effected, on a specified date, being\na certificate \u2014\n(a)\nby a British consular authority in that country; or\n(b) the government or judicial authorities of that country; or\n(c)\nby any other authority designated in respect of that country under the\nHague Convention,\nshall be evidence of the facts so stated.\n(5) An official certificate by the Secretary of State stating that a writ has been duly\nserved on a specified date in accordance with a request made under rule 7 shall\nbe evidence of that fact.\n(6) A document purporting to be such a certificate as is mentioned in paragraphs\n(4) and (5) shall, until the contrary is proved, be deemed to be such a certificate.\n(7) In this rule and rule 6 \"the Hague Convention\" means the convention on the\nservice abroad of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial\nmatters signed at the Hague on November 15, 1965.\n6.\nService of writ abroad through foreign governments, judicial authorities and\nBritish consuls (O.11, r.6)\n6.\n(1) Save where a writ is to be served pursuant to paragraph (3), this rule does not\napply to service in \u2014\n(a)  the United Kingdom, including the Isle of Man and the Channel Islands;\n(b) any independent Commonwealth country;\n(c)\nany associated state;\n(d) any dependent territory of the United Kingdom; or\n(e)\nthe Republic of Ireland.\n(2) Where in accordance with these Rules a writ is to be served on a defendant in\nany country with respect to which there subsists a Civil Procedure Convention\n\nORDER 11\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 86\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(other than the Hague Convention) providing for service in that country of\nprocess of the Court, the writ may be served \u2014\n(a)\nthrough the judicial authorities of that country; or\n(b) through a British consular authority in that country (subject to any\nprovision of the convention as to the nationality of persons who may be so\nserved).\n(3) Where in accordance with these Rules a writ is to be served on a defendant in\nany country which is party to the Hague Convention, the writ may be served \u2014\n(a)\nthrough the authority designated under the Convention in respect of that\ncountry; or\n(b) if the law of that country permits \u2014\n(i)\nthrough the judicial authorities of that country; or\n(ii) through a British consular authority in that country.\n(4) Where in accordance with these Rules a writ is to be served on a defendant in\nany country with respect to which there does not subsist a Civil Procedure\nConvention providing for service in that country of process of the Court, the\nwrit may be served \u2014\n(a)\nthrough the government of that country, where the government is willing\nto effect service; or\n(b) through a British consular authority in that country, except where service\nthrough such an authority is contrary to the law of that country.\n(5) A person who wishes to serve a writ by a method specified in paragraph (2), (3)\nor (4) must deliver to the Clerk of the Court a request for service of the writ by\nthat method, together with a copy of the writ and an additional copy thereof for\neach person to be served.\n(6) Every copy of a writ delivered under paragraph (5) must be accompanied by a\ntranslation of the writ in the official language of the country in which service is\nto be effected or, if there is more than one official language of that country, in\nany one of those languages which is appropriate to the place in that country\nwhere service is to be effected:\nProvided that this paragraph shall not apply in relation to a copy of a writ which\nis to be served in a country the official language of which is, or the official\nlanguages of which include, English, or is to be served in any country by a\nBritish consular authority on a British subject, unless the service is to be effected\nunder paragraph (2) and the Civil Procedure Convention with respect to that\ncountry expressly requires the copy to be accompanied by a translation.\n(7) Every translation delivered under paragraph (6) must be certified by the person\nmaking it to be a correct translation; and the certificate must contain a statement\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 11\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 87\n\nof that person's full name, of that person\u2019s address and of that person\u2019s\nqualifications for making the translation.\n(8) Documents duly delivered under paragraph (5) shall be sent by the Clerk of the\nCourt to the Governor with a request that the Governor forward them to the\nSecretary of State asking the Secretary of State to arrange for the writ to be\nserved by the method indicated in the request delivered under paragraph (5) or,\nwhere alternative methods are so indicated, by such one of those methods as is\nmost convenient.\n7.\nService of process on a foreign state (O.11, r.7)\n7.\n(1) Subject to paragraph (4) where a person to whom leave has been granted under\nrule 1 to serve a writ on a State, as defined in Section 14 of the United\nKingdom\u2019s State Immunity Act 1978, wishes to have the writ served on that\nState, the person must deliver with the Clerk of the Court \u2014\n(a)\na request for service to be arranged by the Secretary of State;\n(b) a copy of the writ; and\n(c)\nexcept where the official language of the State is, or the official languages\nof that State include, English, a translation of the writ in the official\nlanguage or one of the official languages of the State.\n(2) Rule 6(7) shall apply in relation to a translation delivered under paragraph (1)\nof this rule as it applies in relation to a translation delivered under paragraph (6)\nof that rule.\n(3) Documents duly delivered under this rule shall be sent by the Clerk of the Court\nto the Governor with a request that the Secretary of State be asked to arrange\nfor the writ to be served on the State or the government in question, as the case\nmay be.\n(4) Where Section 12(6) of the United Kingdom\u2019s State Immunity Act 1978 applies\nand the State has agreed to a method of service other than that provided by the\npreceding paragraph, the writ may be served either by the method agreed or in\naccordance with the preceding paragraphs of this rule.\n8.\nUndertaking to pay expenses of Governor (O.11, r.8)\n8.\nEvery request delivered under rule 6(5) or rule 7 must contain an undertaking by the\nperson making the request to be responsible personally for all expenses incurred by\nthe Governor in respect of the service requested including the expenses incurred by\nthe Governor in making any request of the Secretary of State and, on receiving due\nnotification of the amount of those expenses, to pay that amount to the Financial\nSecretary and to produce a receipt for such payment to the Clerk of the Court.\n\nORDER 11\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 88\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n9.\nService of originating summons, petition, notice of motion, etc. (O.11, r.9)\n9.\n(1) Subject to O.73, r.8, and O.102, rr.16 and 1 of this Order shall apply to the\nservice out of the jurisdiction of an originating summons, notice of motion or\npetition as it applies to the service of a writ.\n(2) Service out of the jurisdiction of any summons, notice or order issued, given or\nmade in any proceedings is permissible with the leave of the Court, but leave\nshall not be required for such service in any proceedings in which the writ,\noriginating summons, motion or petition may by these Rules or under any Law\nbe served without leave.\n(3) Rule 4(1) and (2) shall, so far as applicable, apply in relation to an application\nfor the grant of leave under this rule as they apply in relation to an application\nfor the grant of leave under rule 1.\n(4) An order under this rule granting leave to serve an originating summons out of\nthe jurisdiction must limit a time within which the defendant to be served with\nthe summons must acknowledge service.\n(5) Rules 5, 6 and 8 shall apply in relation to any document in respect of which\nleave to serve out of the jurisdiction has been granted under this rule as they\napply in relation to a writ.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 01.06.11) (amended 01.10.12) (amended 01.07.13) (amended 12.12.14)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 12\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 89\n\nORDER 12\nACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE TO WRIT OR ORIGINATING\nSUMMONS\n\n1.\nMode of acknowledging service (O.12, r.1)\n1.\n(1) Subject to paragraph (2) and to O.80, r.2, a defendant to an action begun by writ\nmay (whether or not the defendant is sued as a trustee or personal representative\nor in any other representative capacity) acknowledge service of the writ and\ndefend the action by an attorney or in person.\n(2) The defendant to such an action who is a body corporate may acknowledge\nservice of the writ and give notice of intention to defend the action either by an\nattorney or by a person duly authorised to act on the defendant's behalf but,\nexcept as aforesaid or as expressly provided by any Law, such a defendant may\nnot take steps in the action otherwise than by an attorney.\n(3) Service of a writ may be acknowledged by properly completing an\nacknowledgment of service, as defined by rule 2, and handing it in at the Court\noffice, or sending it by post to the Clerk of the Court.\n(4) If two or more defendants to an action acknowledge service by the same attorney\nand at the same time, only one acknowledgment of service need be completed\nand delivered for those defendants.\n(5) The date on which service is acknowledged is the date on which the\nacknowledgment of service is received by the Clerk of the Court.\n2.\nNo rule (O.12, r.2)\n2.\nNo rule (O.12, r.2)\n3.\nAcknowledgment of service (O.12, r.3)\n3.\n(1) An acknowledgment of service shall be in Form No. 8 or Form No. 9 of the\nGrand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised), whichever is\nappropriate, and except as provided in rule 1(2) must be signed by the attorney\nacting for the defendant specified in the acknowledgment or, if the defendant is\nacting in person, by that defendant.\n(2) An acknowledgment of service must specify \u2014\n(a)\nin the case of a defendant acknowledging service in person, the address of\nthe defendant\u2019s place of residence and, if the defendant\u2019s place of\nresidence is not within the jurisdiction or if the defendant has no place of\nresidence, the address of a place within the jurisdiction at or to which\ndocuments for the defendant may be delivered or sent; and\n\nORDER 12\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 90\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(b) in the case of a defendant acknowledging service by an attorney a business\naddress of the defendant\u2019s attorney within the jurisdiction,\nand where the defendant acknowledges service in person, the address within the\njurisdiction specified under subparagraph (a) shall be the defendant\u2019s address\nfor service, but otherwise the business address of the defendant\u2019s attorney shall\nbe the defendant\u2019s address for service.\nIn relation to a body corporate the references in subparagraph (a) to the\ndefendant's place of residence shall be construed as references to the defendant's\nregistered office.\n(3) If an acknowledgment of service does not specify the defendant's address for\nservice or the Court is satisfied that any address specified in the\nacknowledgment of service is not genuine, the Court may on application by the\nplaintiff set aside the acknowledgment or order the defendant to give an address\nor, as the case may be, a genuine address for service and may in any case direct\nthat the acknowledgment shall nevertheless have effect for the purposes of O.10,\nr.1(3) and O.65, r.9.\n4.\nProcedure on receipt of acknowledgment of service (O.12, r.4)\n4.\nOn receiving an acknowledgment of service the Clerk of the Court must \u2014\n(a)\naffix to the acknowledgment an official stamp showing the date on which\nthe Clerk of the Court received it;\n(b) file the acknowledgment of service on the Court file; and\n(c)\nmake a copy of the acknowledgment, having affixed to it an official stamp\nshowing the date on which the Clerk of the Court received the\nacknowledgment and send it to the plaintiff or, as the case may be, the\nplaintiff\u2019s attorney at the plaintiff's address for service.\n5.\nTime limited for acknowledging service (O.12, r.5)\n5.\nReferences in these Rules to the time limited for acknowledging service are\nreferences \u2014\n(a)\nin the case of a writ served within the jurisdiction, to 14 days after service\nof the writ (including the day of service) or, where that time has been\nextended by or by virtue of these Rules, to that time as so extended; and\n(b) in the case of a writ served out of the jurisdiction, to the time limited under\nO.10, r.2(2), O.11, r.1(3) or O.11, r.4(3) or, where that time has been\nextended as aforesaid, to that time as so extended.\n6.\nLate acknowledgment of service (O.12, r.6)\n6.\n(1) Except with the leave of the Court, a defendant may not give notice of intention\nto defend in an action after judgment has been obtained therein.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 12\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 91\n\n(2) Except as provided by paragraph (1) nothing in these Rules or any writ or order\nthereunder shall be construed as precluding a defendant from acknowledging\nservice in an action after the time limited for so doing, but if a defendant\nacknowledges service after that time, the defendant shall not, unless the Court\notherwise orders, be entitled to serve a defence or do any other act later than if\nthe defendant had acknowledged service within that time.\n7.\nAcknowledgment not to constitute waiver (O.12, r.7)\n7.\nThe acknowledgment by a defendant of service of a writ shall not be treated as a\nwaiver by the defendant of any irregularity in the writ or service thereof or in any\norder giving leave to serve the writ out of the jurisdiction or extending the validity of\nthe writ for the purpose of service.\n8.\nDispute as to jurisdiction (O.12, r.8)\n8.\n(1) A defendant who wishes to dispute the jurisdiction of the Court in the\nproceedings by reason of any such irregularity as is mentioned in rule 7 or on\nany other ground shall give notice of intention to defend the proceedings and\nshall within the time limited for service of a defence, apply to the Court for \u2014\n(a)\nan order setting aside the writ or service of the writ on the defendant;\n(b) an order declaring that the writ has not been duly served on the defendant;\n(c)\nthe discharge of any order giving leave to serve the writ on the defendant\nout of the jurisdiction;\n(d) the discharge of any order extending the validity of the writ for the purpose\nof service;\n(e)\nthe protection or release of any property of the defendant seized or\nthreatened with seizure, in the proceedings;\n(f)\nthe discharge of any order made to prevent any dealing with any property\nof the defendant;\n(g) a declaration that in the circumstances of the case the Court has no\njurisdiction over the defendant in respect of the subject matter of the claim\nor the relief or remedy sought in the action; or\n(h) such other relief as may be appropriate.\n(2) An application under paragraph (1) must be made \u2014\n(a) in an admiralty action in rem, by motion; or\n(b) in any other action, by summons or motion,\nand the summons or notice of motion must state the grounds of the application.\n(3) An application under paragraph (1) must be supported by an affidavit verifying\nthe facts on which the application is based and a copy of the affidavit must be\nserved with the notice of motion or summons by which the application is made.\n\nORDER 12\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 92\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(4) Upon hearing an application under paragraph (1) the Court, if it does not dispose\nof the matter in dispute, may give such directions for its disposal as may be\nappropriate, including directions for the trial thereof as a preliminary issue.\n(5) A defendant who makes an application under paragraph (1) shall not be treated\nas having submitted to the jurisdiction of the Court by reason of the defendant\u2019s\nhaving given notice of intention to defend the action; and if the Court makes no\norder on the application or dismisses it, the notice shall cease to have effect, but\nthe defendant may, subject to rule 6(1), file a further acknowledgment of service\nwithin 14 days or such other period as the Court may direct and in that case\nparagraph (6) shall apply as if the defendant had not made any such application.\n(6) Except where the defendant makes an application in accordance with paragraph\n(1) the acknowledgment by a defendant of service of a writ shall, unless the\nacknowledgment is withdrawn by leave of the Court under O.21, r.1, be treated\nas a submission by the defendant to the jurisdiction of the Court in the\nproceedings.\n8A.\nApplication by defendant where writ not served (O.12, r.8A)\n8A. (1) Any person named as a defendant in a writ which has not been served on the\nperson may serve on the plaintiff a notice requiring the plaintiff within a\nspecified period not less than 14 days after service of the notice either to serve\nthe writ on the defendant or to discontinue the action as against the person.\n(2) Where the plaintiff fails to comply with a notice under paragraph (1) within the\ntime specified the Court may, on the application of the defendant by summons,\norder the action to be dismissed or make such other order as it thinks fit.\n(3) A summons under paragraph (2) shall be supported by an affidavit verifying the\nfacts on which the application is based and stating that the defendant intends to\ncontest the proceedings and a copy of the affidavit must be served with the\nsummons.\n(4) Where the plaintiff serves the writ in compliance with a notice under paragraph\n(1) or with an order under paragraph (2) the defendant must acknowledge\nservice within the time limited for so doing.\n9.\nAcknowledgment of service of originating summons (O.12, r.9)\n9.\n(1) Each defendant named in and served with an originating summons (other than\nan ex parte originating summons) must acknowledge service as if it were a writ.\n(2) The foregoing rules of this Order shall apply in relation to an originating\nsummons (other than an ex parte summons) as they apply to a writ except that\nafter the word \"extended\", wherever it occurs in rule 5(a) there shall be inserted\nthe words \"or abridged\" and for the reference in rule 5(b) to O.11, r.1(3) and\n4(3) there shall be substituted a reference to O.11, r.9(4).\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 12\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 93\n\n10.\nAcknowledgment of service to be treated as entry of appearance (O.12, r.10)\n10. For the purpose of any Law referring expressly or impliedly to the entry of appearance\nas a procedure provided by rules of Court for responding to a writ or other process\nissuing out of the Court, or of any rule of law, the acknowledgment of service of the\nwrit or other process in accordance with these Rules shall be treated as the entry of\nan appearance to it, and related expressions shall be construed accordingly.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nORDER 13\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 94\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 13\nFAILURE TO GIVE NOTICE OF INTENTION TO DEFEND\n\n1.\nClaim for liquidated demand (O.13, r.1)\n1.\n(1) Where a writ is indorsed with a claim against a defendant for a liquidated\ndemand only, then, if that defendant fails to give notice of intention to defend,\nthe plaintiff may, after the prescribed time enter final judgment against that\ndefendant for a sum not exceeding \u2014\n(a)\nthe principal sum claimed in the writ;\n(b) interest, provided that the writ has been indorsed with a claim pursuant to\nO.6, r.2(e) or (f), as the case may be; and\n(c)\nfixed costs,\nand proceed with the action against the other defendants, if any.\n(2) A claim shall not be prevented from being treated for the purposes of this rule\nas a claim for a liquidated demand by reason only that part of the claim is for\ninterest under Section 34 of the Judicature Act (as amended and revised).\n2.\nClaim for unliquidated damages (O.13, r.2)\n2.\nWhere a writ is indorsed with a claim against a defendant for unliquidated damages\nonly, then, if that defendant fails to give notice of intention of defend, the plaintiff\nmay, after the prescribed time, enter interlocutory judgment against that defendant\nfor damages to be assessed and costs, and proceed with the action against the other\ndefendants, if any.\n3.\nClaim in detinue (O.13, r.3)\n3.\nWhere a writ is indorsed with a claim against a defendant relating to the detention of\ngoods only, then, if that defendant fails to give notice of intention to defend the\nplaintiff may, after the prescribed time, at the plaintiff\u2019s option enter either \u2014\n(a)\ninterlocutory judgment against the defendant for delivery of the goods or\ntheir value to be assessed and costs; or\n(b) interlocutory judgment for the value of the goods to be assessed and costs,\nand proceed with the action against the other defendants, if any.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 13\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 95\n\n4.\nClaim for possession of land (O.13, r.4)\n4.\n(1) Where a writ is indorsed with a claim against a defendant for possession of land\nonly, then, if that defendant fails to give notice of intention to defend the plaintiff\nmay, after the prescribed time enter judgment for possession of the land as\nagainst that defendant and costs, and proceed with the action against the other\ndefendants, if any.\n(2) Where there is more than one defendant, judgment entered under this rule shall\nnot be enforced against any defendant unless and until judgment for possession\nof the land has been entered against all the defendants.\n5.\nMixed claims (O.13, r.5)\n5.\nWhere a writ issued against any defendant is indorsed with two or more of the claims\nmentioned in the foregoing rules, and no other claim, then, if that defendant fails to\ngive notice of intention to defend, the plaintiff may, after the prescribed time, enter\nagainst that defendant such judgment in respect of any such claim as the plaintiff\nwould be entitled to enter under those rules if that were the only claim indorsed on\nthe writ, and proceed with the action against the other defendants, if any.\n6.\nOther claims (O.13, r.6)\n6.\n(1) Where a writ is indorsed with a claim of a description not mentioned in rules 1\nto 4 then, if any defendant fails to give notice of intention to defend, the plaintiff\nmay, after the prescribed time and, if that defendant has not acknowledged\nservice, upon filing an affidavit proving due service of the writ on the defendant\nand, where the statement of claim was not indorsed on or served with the writ,\nupon serving a statement of claim on the defendant, proceed with the action as\nif that defendant had given notice of intention to defend.\n(2) Where a writ issued against a defendant is indorsed as aforesaid, but by reason\nof the defendant's satisfying the claim or complying with the demands thereof\nor any other like reason it has become unnecessary for the plaintiff to proceed\nwith the action, then, if the defendant fails to give notice of intention to defend,\nthe plaintiff may, after the prescribed time, enter judgment with the leave of the\nCourt against that defendant for costs.\n(3) An application for leave to enter judgment under paragraph (2) shall be by\nsummons which must, unless the Court otherwise orders, and notwithstanding\nanything in O.65, r.9, be served on the defendant against whom it is sought to\nenter judgment.\n6A.\nPrescribed time (O.13, r.6A)\n6A. In the foregoing rules of this Order \"the prescribed time\" in relation to a writ issued\nagainst a defendant means the time limited for the defendant to acknowledge service\nof the writ or, if within that time the defendant has returned to the Clerk of the Court\nan acknowledgement of service containing a statement to the effect that the defendant\n\nORDER 13\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 96\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n does not intend to contest the proceedings, the date on which the acknowledgement\nwas received by the Clerk of the Court.\n7.\nProof of service of writ (O.13, r.7)\n7.\n(1) Judgment shall not be entered against a defendant under this Order unless \u2014\n(a)\nthe defendant has acknowledged service on the defendant of the writ; or\n(b) an affidavit is filed by or on behalf of the plaintiff proving due service of\nthe writ on the defendant; or\n(c)\nthe Bailiff has indorsed on a copy of the writ that the Bailiff has served it\non the defendant; or\n(d) the plaintiff produces the writ indorsed by the defendant's attorney with a\nstatement that the defendant's attorney accepts service of the writ on the\ndefendant's behalf.\n(2) Where, in an action begun by writ, an application is made to the Court for an\norder affecting a party who has failed to acknowledge service, the Court hearing\nthe application may require to be satisfied in such manner as it thinks fit that the\nparty is in default of acknowledgment of service.\n7A.\nJudgment against a State (O.13, r.7A)\n7A. (1) In this rule \"the Act\" means the United Kingdom\u2019s State Immunity Act 1978.\n(2) Where the defendant is a State, as defined in Section 14 of the Act the plaintiff\nshall not be entitled to enter judgment under this Order except with the leave of\nthe Court.\n(3) An application for leave to enter judgment shall be supported by an affidavit \u2014\n(a)\nstating the grounds of the application;\n(b) verifying the facts relied on as exempting the State from the immunity\nconferred by Section 1 of the Act; and\n(c)\nverifying that the writ has been served by being transmitted through the\nSecretary of State to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the State or in such\nother manner as may have been agreed to by the State, and that the time\nfor acknowledging service, as extended by Section 12(2) of the Act (by 2\nmonths) where applicable, has expired.\n(4) The application may be made ex parte but the Court hearing the application may\ndirect a summons to be issued and served on the State, for which purpose such\na direction shall include leave to serve the summons and a copy of the affidavit\nout of the jurisdiction.\n(5) Unless the Court otherwise directs, an affidavit for the purpose of this rule may\ncontain statements of information or belief with the sources and grounds thereof,\nand the grant of leave to enter judgment under this Order shall include leave to\nserve out of the jurisdiction \u2014\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 13\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 97\n\n(a)\na copy of the judgment; and\n(b) a copy of the affidavit, where not already served.\n(6) The procedure of effecting service out of the jurisdiction pursuant to leave\ngranted in accordance with the rule shall be the same as for the service of the\nwrit under O.11, r.7(1) except where Section 12(6) of the Act applies and an\nalternative method of service has been agreed.\n7B.\nNo rule (O.13, r.7B)\n7B. No rule (O.13, r.7B)\n8.\nStay of execution on default judgment (O.13, r.8)\n8.\nWhere judgment for a debt or liquidated demand is entered under this Order against\na defendant who has returned to the Clerk of the Court an acknowledgment of service\ncontaining a statement to the effect that, although the defendant does not intend to\ncontest the proceedings, the defendant intends to apply for a stay of execution of the\njudgment by writ of fieri facias, execution of the judgment by such a writ shall be\nstayed for a period of 14 days from the acknowledgment of service and, if within that\ntime the defendant issues and serves on the plaintiff a summons for such a stay\nsupported by an affidavit in accordance with O.47, r.1, the stay imposed by this rule\nshall continue until the summons is heard or otherwise disposed of, unless the Court\nafter giving the parties an opportunity of being heard otherwise directs.\n9.\nSetting aside judgment (O.13, r.9)\n9.\nThe Court may, on such terms as it thinks just, set aside or vary any judgment entered\nin pursuance of this Order.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nORDER 14\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 98\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 14\nSUMMARY JUDGMENT\n\nI. APPLICATION BY PLAINTIFF\n1.\nApplication by plaintiff for summary judgment (O.14, r.1)\n1.\n(1) Where in an action to which this rule applies a statement of claim has been\nserved on a defendant and that defendant has given notice of intention to defend\nthe action, the plaintiff may, on the ground that the defendant has no defence to\na claim included in the writ, or to a particular part of such a claim, or has no\ndefence to such a claim or part except as to the amount of any damages claimed,\napply to the Court for judgment against the defendant.\n\n(2) This rule applies to every action begun by writ in the Court other than \u2014\n(a)\nan action which includes a claim by the plaintiff for libel, slander,\nmalicious prosecution or false imprisonment;\n(b) an admiralty action in rem; or\n(c)\nan action to which Order 86 applies.\n2.\nManner in which application under rule 1 must be made (O.14, r.2)\n2.\n(1) An application under rule 1 must be made by summons supported by an affidavit\nverifying the facts on which the claim, or the part of the claim, to which the\napplication relates is based and stating that in the deponent's belief there is no\ndefence to that claim or part, as the case may be, or no defence except as to the\namount of any damages claimed.\n(2) Unless the Court otherwise directs, an affidavit for the purpose of this rule may\ncontain statements of information or belief with the sources and grounds thereof.\n(3) The summons, a copy of the affidavit in support and of any exhibits referred to\ntherein must be served on the defendant not less than 10 clear days before the\nreturn day.\n3.\nJudgment for plaintiff (O.14, r.3)\n3.\n(1) Unless on the hearing of an application under rule 1 either the Court dismisses\nthe application or the defendant satisfies the Court with respect to the claim, or\nthat part of the claim, to which the application relates that there is an issue or\nquestion in dispute which ought to be tried, the Court may give such judgment\nfor the plaintiff against that defendant on that claim or part as may be just having\nregard to the nature of the remedy or relief claimed.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 14\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 99\n\n(2) The Court may by order, and subject to such conditions, if any, as may be just,\nstay execution of any judgment given against a defendant under this rule until\nafter the trial of any counterclaim made or raised by the defendant in the action.\n4.\nLeave to defend (O.14, r.4)\n4.\n(1) A defendant may show cause against an application under rule 1 by affidavit or\notherwise to the satisfaction of the Court.\n(2) Rule 2(2) applies for the purpose of this rule as it applies for the purposes of that\nrule.\n(3) The Court may give a defendant against whom such an application is made leave\nto defend the action with respect to the claim, or the part of a claim, to which\nthe application relates either unconditionally or on such terms as to giving\nsecurity or time or mode of trial or otherwise as it thinks fit.\n(4) On the hearing of such an application the Court may order a defendant showing\ncause or, where that defendant is a body corporate, any director, manager,\nsecretary or other similar officer thereof, or any person purporting to act in any\nsuch capacity \u2014\n(a)\nto produce any document;\n(b) if it appears to the Court that there are special circumstances which make\nit desirable that the defendant should do so, to attend and be examined on\noath.\n5.\nApplication for summary judgment on counterclaim (O.14, r.5)\n5.\n(1) Where a defendant to an action begun by writ has served a counterclaim on the\nplaintiff, then, subject to paragraph (3) the defendant may, on the ground that\nthe plaintiff has no defence to a claim made in the counterclaim, or to a particular\npart of such a claim, apply to the Court for judgment against the plaintiff on that\nclaim or part.\n\n(2) Rules 2, 3 and 4 shall apply in relation to an application under this rule as they\napply in relation to an application under rule 1 but with the following\nmodifications, that is to say \u2014\n(a)\nreferences to the plaintiff and defendant shall be construed as references\nto the defendant and plaintiff respectively;\n(b)  the words in rule 3(2) \"any counterclaim made or raised by the defendant\nin\" shall be omitted; and\n(c)\nthe reference in rule 4(3) to the action shall be construed as a reference to\nthe counterclaim to which the application under this rule relates.\n(3) This rule shall not apply to a counterclaim which includes any such claim as is\nreferred to in rule 1(2).\n\nORDER 14\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 100\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n6.\nDirections (O.14, r.6)\n6.\nWhere the Court \u2014\n(a)\norders that a defendant or a plaintiff have leave (whether conditional or\nunconditional) to defend an action or counterclaim, as the case may be,\nwith respect to a claim or a part of a claim; or\n(b) gives judgment for a plaintiff or a defendant on a claim or part of a claim\nbut also orders that execution of the judgment be stayed pending the trial\nof a counterclaim or of the action, as the case may be,\n\nthe Court shall give directions as to the further conduct of the action and O.25, rr.2 to\n7 shall, with the omission of so much of rule 7(1) as requires parties to serve a notice\nspecifying the orders and directions which they require and with any other necessary\nmodifications, apply as if the application under rule 1 of this Order or rule 5, as the\ncase may be, on which the order was made were a summons for directions.\n7.\nCosts (O.14, r.7)\n7.\n(1) If the plaintiff makes an application under rule 1 where the case is not within\nthis Order or if it appears to the Court that the plaintiff knew that the defendant\nrelied on a contention which would entitle the defendant to unconditional leave\nto defend, then, the Court may dismiss the application with costs and may, if the\nplaintiff is not a legally aided person, require the costs to be paid by the plaintiff\nforthwith.\n(2) The Court shall have the same power to dismiss an application under rule 5 as\nit has under paragraph (1) to dismiss an application under rule 1, and that\nparagraph shall apply accordingly with the necessary modifications.\n8.\nRight to proceed with residue of action or counterclaim (O.14, r.8)\n8.\n(1) Where on an application under rule 1 the plaintiff obtains judgment on a claim\nor a part of a claim against any defendant, the plaintiff may proceed with the\naction as respects any other claim or as respects the remainder of the claim or\nagainst any other defendant.\n(2) Where on an application under rule 5 a defendant obtains judgment on a claim\nor part of a claim made in a counterclaim against the plaintiff, the defendant\nmay proceed with the counterclaim as respects any other claim or as respects\nthe remainder of the claim or against any other defendant to the counterclaim.\n(3) Where on an application under rule 12A a defendant to counterclaim obtains\njudgment on a counterclaim or part of a counterclaim against any defendant, the\ndefendant may proceed with the counterclaim as respects any other\ncounterclaim or as respects the remainder of the counterclaim or against any\nother defendant to counterclaim.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 14\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 101\n\n9.\nJudgment for delivery up of chattel (O.14, r.9)\n9.\nWhere the claim to which an application under rule 1 or rule 5 relates is for the\ndelivery of a specific chattel and the Court gives judgment under this Order for the\napplicant, it shall have the same power to order the party against whom judgment is\ngiven to deliver up the chattel without giving the party an option to retain it on paying\nthe assessed value thereof as if the judgment had been given after trial.\n10.\nRelief against forfeiture (O.14, r.10)\n10. A tenant shall have the same right to apply for relief after judgment for possession of\nland on the ground of forfeiture for non-payment of rent has been given under this\nOrder as if the judgment had been given after trial.\n11.\nSetting aside judgment (O.14, r.11)\n11. Any judgment given against a party who does not appear at the hearing of an\napplication under rule 1 or rule 5 may be set aside or varied by the Court on such\nterms as it thinks just.\n\nII. APPLICATION BY DEFENDANT AND BY DEFENDANT TO COUNTERCLAIM\n12.\nApplication by defendant for summary judgment (O.14, r.12)\n12. (1) Where in an action to which this rule applies a defence has been served by any\ndefendant, that defendant may, on the ground that the whole or part of the\nplaintiff\u2019s claim has no prospect of success or, in respect of a claim for damages,\nthat the plaintiff has no prospect of recovering more than nominal damages,\napply to the Court for the plaintiff\u2019s claim to be dismissed and judgment entered\nfor the defendant on the whole or part of the claim.\n(2) This rule applies to every action begun by writ in the Court other than one of a\nkind mentioned in rule 1(2).\n12A. Application by defendant to counterclaim for summary judgment (0.14,\nr.12A)\n12A. (1) Where in an action to which this rule applies a counterclaim has been served by\nany defendant then, subject to paragraph (2) the defendant to counterclaim may,\non the ground that the whole or part of the defendant's counterclaim has no\nprospect of success or, in respect of a counterclaim for damages, that the\ndefendant has no prospect of recovering more than nominal damages, apply to\nthe Court for the defendant's counterclaim to be dismissed and judgment entered\nfor the defendant to counterclaim on the whole or part of the counterclaim.\n(2)  This rule applies to every action begun by writ other than \u2013\n(a)  an action which includes a counterclaim by the defendant for libel, slander,\nmalicious prosecution or false imprisonment;\n\nORDER 14\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 102\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(b)  an admiralty action which includes a counterclaim by the defendant in rem;\nor\n(c)  an action which includes a counterclaim to which O.86 applies.\n13.\nManner in which application under rule 12 must be made (O.14, r.13)\n13. (1) An application under rule 12 must be made by summons supported by an\naffidavit verifying the facts pleaded in the defence and stating the deponent's\nbelief that the plaintiff\u2019s claim has no prospect of success or, in respect of a\nclaim for damages, that the plaintiff has no prospect of recovering more than\nnominal damages, as the case may be.\n(1A) An application under rule 12A must be made by summons supported by an\naffidavit verifying the facts pleaded in the defence to counterclaim and stating\nthe deponent's belief that the defendant's counterclaim has no prospect of\nsuccess or, in respect of a counter claim for damages, the defendant has no\nprospect of recovering more than nominal damages, as the case may be.\n(2) Rule 2(2) shall apply to applications under rule 12 or rule 12A.\n(3) A plaintiff may show cause against an application under rule 12 by \u2014\n(a)\nfiling and serving a reply; or\n(b) filing and serving an affidavit in reply.\n(4)  A defendant may show cause against an application under rule 12A by filing\nand serving an affidavit in reply.\n14.\nJudgment for defendant (O.14, r.14)\n14. (1) Unless on the hearing of an application under rule 12 or rule 12A \u2014\n(a)  the Court dismisses the application or\n(b)  on an application under rule 12 the plaintiff satisfies the Court that the\nplaintiff has a prospect of succeeding on the whole or part of the plaintiff\u2019s\nclaim and, where the claim includes a claim for damages, that the plaintiff\nhas a prospect of recovering more than nominal damages, or\n(c)  on an application under rule 12A the defendant satisfies the Court that the\ndefendant has a prospect of succeeding on the whole or part of the\ndefendant\u2019s counterclaim and, where the counterclaim includes a claim for\ndamages, that the defendant has a prospect of recovering more than\nnominal damages,\n\nthe Court may dismiss the whole or part of a claim or counterclaim and give\njudgment for the defendant or defendant to counterclaim respectively.\n(2) Where the Court dismisses an application under rule 12 or rule 12A and allows\nthe plaintiff to proceed with the plaintiff\u2019s claim or the defendant to proceed\nwith the defendant\u2019s counterclaim as the case may be, it shall give directions as\nto the further conduct of the action and O.25, rr.2 to 7 shall, with the omission\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 14\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 103\n\nof so much of rule 7(1) as requires parties to serve a notice specifying the orders\nand directions which they require and with any other necessary modifications,\napply as if the application under rule 12 or 12A, as the case may be, on which\nthe order was made were a summons for directions.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 31.10.08) (amended 01.06.11)\n\nORDER 14A\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 104\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 14A\nDISPOSAL OF CASE ON POINT OF LAW\n\n1.\nDetermination of questions of law or construction (O.14A, r.1)\n1.\n(1) The Court may, upon the application of a party or of its own motion, determine\nany question of law or construction of any document arising in any cause or\nmatter at any stage of the proceedings where it appears to the Court that \u2014\n(a)\nsuch question is suitable for determination without a full trial of the action;\nand\n(b) such determination will finally determine (subject only to any possible\nappeal) the entire cause or matter or any claim or issue therein.\n(2) Upon such determination the Court may dismiss the cause or matter or make\nsuch order or judgment as it thinks just.\n(3) The Court shall not determine any question under this Order unless the parties\nhave either \u2014\n(a)\nhad an opportunity of being heard on the question; or\n(b) consented to an order or judgment on such determination.\n(4) Nothing in this Order shall limit the powers of this Court under O.18, r.19 or\nany other provision of these Rules.\n2.\nManner in which application under rule 1 may be made (O.14A, r.2)\n2.\nAn application under rule 1 may be made by summons or motion or (notwithstanding\nO.32, r.1) may be made orally in the course of an interlocutory application to the\nCourt.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 15\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 105\n\nORDER 15\nCAUSES OF ACTION, COUNTERCLAIMS AND PARTIES\n\n1.\nJoinder of causes of action (O.15, r.1)\n1.\n(1) Subject to rule 5(1), a plaintiff may in one action claim relief against the same\ndefendant in respect of more than one cause of action \u2014\n(a)\nif the plaintiff claims, and the defendant is alleged to be liable, in the same\ncapacity in respect of all the causes of action; or\n(b) if the plaintiff claims or the defendant is alleged to be liable in the capacity\nof executor or administrator of an estate in respect of one or more of the\ncauses of action and in the defendant\u2019s personal capacity but with\nreference to the same estate in respect of all the others; or\n(c)\nwith leave of the Court.\n(2) An application for leave under this rule must be made ex parte by affidavit\nbefore the issue of the writ or originating summons, as the case may be, and the\naffidavit must state the grounds of the application.\n2.\nCounterclaim against plaintiff (O.15, r.2)\n2.\n(1) Subject to rule 5(2), a defendant in any action who alleges that the defendant\nhas any claim or is entitled to any relief or remedy against a plaintiff in the action\nin respect of any matter (whenever and however arising) may, instead of\nbringing a separate action, make a counterclaim in respect of that matter, and\nwhere the defendant does so the defendant must add the counterclaim to the\ndefendant\u2019s defence.\n(2) Rule 1 shall apply in relation to a counterclaim as if the counterclaim were a\nseparate action and as if the person making the counterclaim were the plaintiff\nand the person against whom it is made a defendant.\n(3) A counterclaim may be proceeded with notwithstanding that judgment is given\nfor the plaintiff in the action or that the action is stayed, discontinued or\ndismissed.\n(4) Where a defendant establishes a counterclaim against the claim of the plaintiff\nand there is a balance in favour of one of the parties, the Court may give\njudgment for the balance, so, however, that the provision shall not be taken as\naffecting the Court's discretion with respect to costs.\n\nORDER 15\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 106\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n3.\nCounterclaim against additional parties (O.15, r.3)\n3.\n(1) Where a defendant to an action who makes a counterclaim against the plaintiff\nalleges that any other person (whether or not a party to the action) is liable to\nthe defendant along with the plaintiff in respect of the subject matter of the\ncounterclaim, or claims against such other person any relief relating to or\nconnected with the original subject matter of the action, then, subject to rule 5(2)\nthe defendant may join that other person as a party against whom the\ncounterclaim is made.\n(2) Where a defendant joins a person as a party against whom the defendant makes\na counterclaim, the defendant must add that person's name to the title of the\naction and serve on that person a copy of the counterclaim and, in the case of a\nperson who is not already a party to the action, a form of acknowledgment of\nservice in form No. 8 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended\nand revised) with such modification as the circumstances may require; and a\nperson on whom a copy of a counterclaim is served under this paragraph shall,\nif the person is not already a party to the action, become a party to it as from the\ntime of service with the same rights in respect of the person\u2019s defence to the\ncounterclaim and otherwise as if the person had been duly sued in the ordinary\nway by the party making the counterclaim.\n(3) A defendant who is required by paragraph (2) to serve a copy of the\ncounterclaim made by the defendant on any person who before service is already\na party to the action must do so within the period within which, by virtue or\nO.18, r.2, the defendant must serve on the plaintiff the defence to which the\ncounterclaim is added.\n\n(4) [No rule]\n(5) Where by virtue of paragraph (2) a copy of a counterclaim is required to be\nserved on a person who is not already a party to the action, the following\nprovision of these Rules, namely, O.5, r.1, Orders.10 to 13 and O.75, r.4, shall,\nsubject to the last foregoing paragraph, apply in relation to the counterclaim and\nthe proceedings arising from it as if \u2014\n(a)\nthe counterclaim were a writ and the proceedings arising from it an action;\nand\n(b) the party making the counterclaim were a plaintiff and the party against\nwhom it is made a defendant in that action.\n(5A)  Where by virtue of paragraph (2) a copy of a counterclaim is required to be\nserved on any person other than the plaintiff who, before service is already a\nparty to the action, the provisions of O.14, r.5, shall apply in relation to the\ncounterclaim and the proceedings arising therefrom, as if the party against\nwhom the counterclaim is made were the plaintiff in the action.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 15\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 107\n\n(6) A copy of a counterclaim required to be served on a person who is not already\na party to the action must be indorsed with a notice in Form No. 10 of the Grand\nCourt Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) addressed to that person.\n\n4.\nJoinder of parties (O.15, r.4)\n4.\n(1) Subject to rule 5(1) two or more persons may be joined together in one action\nas plaintiffs or as defendants with the leave of the Court or where \u2014\n(a)\nif separate actions were brought by or against each of them, as the case\nmay be, some common question of law or fact would arise in all the\nactions; and\n(b) all rights to relief claimed in the action (whether they are joint, several or\nalternative) are in respect of or arise out of the same transaction or series\nof transactions.\n(2) Where the plaintiff in any action claims any relief to which any other person is\nentitled jointly with the plaintiff, all persons so entitled must, subject to the\nprovisions of any Law and unless the Court gives leave to the contrary, be\nparties to the action and any of them who do not consent to being joined as a\nplaintiff must, subject to any order made by the Court on an application for leave\nunder this paragraph, be made a defendant. This paragraph shall not apply to a\nprobate action.\n5.\nCourt may order separate trials, etc. (O.15, r.5)\n5.\n(1) If claims in respect of two or more causes of action are included by a plaintiff\nin the same action or by a defendant in a counterclaim, or if two or more\nplaintiffs or defendants are parties to the same action, and it appears to the Court\nthat the joinder of causes of action or of parties, as the case may be, may\nembarrass or delay the trial or is otherwise inconvenient, the Court may order\nseparate trials or make such other order as may be expedient.\n(2) If it appears on the application of any party against who a counterclaim is made\nthat the subject matter of the counterclaim ought for any reason be disposed of\nby a separate action, the Court may order the counterclaim to be struck out or\nmay order it to be tried separately or may make such other order as may be\nexpedient.\n6.\nMisjoinder and nonjoinder of parties (O.15, r.6)\n6.\n(1) No cause or matter shall be defeated by reason of the misjoinder or nonjoinder\nof any party; and the Court may in any cause or matter determine the issues or\nquestions in dispute so far as they affect the rights and interest of the persons\nwho are parties to the cause or matter.\n\nORDER 15\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 108\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(2) Subject to the provisions of this rule, at any stage of the proceedings in any\ncause or matter the Court may on such terms as it thinks just and either of its\nown motion or on application \u2014\n(a)\norder any person who has been improperly or unnecessarily made a party\nor who has for any reason ceased to be a proper or necessary party, to cease\nto be a party;\n(b) order any of the following persons to be added as a party, namely \u2014\n(i)\nany person who ought to have been joined as a party or whose\npresence before the Court is necessary to ensure that all matters in\ndispute in the cause or matter may be effectually and completely\ndetermined and adjudicated upon; or\n(ii) any person between whom and any party to the cause or matter there\nmay exist a question or issue arising out of or relating to or connected\nwith any relief or remedy claimed in the cause or matter which in the\nopinion of the Court it would be just and convenient to determine as\nbetween the person and that party as well as between the parties to\nthe cause or matter.\n (3) An application by any person for an order under paragraph (2) adding the person\nas a party must, except with the leave of the Court, be supported by an affidavit\nshowing the person\u2019s interest in the matters in dispute in the cause or matter or,\nas the case may be, the question or issue to be determined as between the person\nand any party to the cause or matter.\n(4) No person shall be added as a plaintiff without the person\u2019s consent signified in\nwriting or in such other manner as may be authorised.\n(5) No person shall be added or substituted as a party after the expiry of any relevant\nstatutory period of limitation unless either \u2014\n(a)\nthe relevant period was current at the date when proceedings were\ncommenced and it is necessary for the determination of the action that the\nnew party should be added, or substituted; or\n(b) the relevant period arises under the provisions of Section 13 or 16 of the\nLimitation Act (as amended and revised) and the Court directs that those\nprovisions should not apply to the action by or against the new party.\n\nIn this paragraph \"any relevant period of limitation\" means a time limit under\nthe Limitation Act (as amended and revised).\n(6) The addition or substitution of a new party shall be treated as necessary for the\npurposes of paragraph (5) if, and only if, the Court is satisfied that \u2014\n(a)\nthe new party is a necessary party to the action in that property is vested in\nthe new party at law or in equity and the plaintiff's claim in respect of an\nequitable interest in that property is liable to be defeated unless the new\nparty is joined; or\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 15\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 109\n\n(b) the relevant cause of action is vested in the new party and the plaintiff\njointly but not severally; or\n(c)\nthe new party is the Attorney General and the proceedings should have\nbeen brought by relator proceedings in this name; or\n(d) the new party is a company in which the plaintiff is a shareholder and on\nwhose behalf the plaintiff is suing to enforce a right vested in the company;\nor\n(e)\nthe new party is sued jointly with the defendant and is not also liable\nseverally with the defendant and failure to join the new party might render\nthe claim unenforceable.\n6A.\nProceedings against estates (O.15, r.6A)\n6A. (1) Where any person against whom an action would have lain has died but the\ncause of action survives, the action may, if no grant of probate or administration\nhas been made, be brought against the estate of the deceased.\n(2) Without prejudice to the generality of paragraph (1), an action brought against\n\"the personal representatives of A.B. deceased\" shall be treated, for the\npurpose of that paragraph, as having been brought against that person\u2019s estate.\n(3) An action purporting to have been commenced against a person shall be treated,\nif the person was dead at its commencement, as having been commenced against\nthe person\u2019s estate in accordance with paragraph (1) whether or not a grant of\nprobate or administration was made before its commencement.\n(4) In any such action as is referred to in paragraph (1) or (3) \u2014\n(a)\nthe plaintiff shall, during the period of validity for service of the writ or\noriginating summons, apply to the Court for an order appointing a person\nto represent the deceased's estate for the purpose of the proceedings or, if\na grant of probate or administration has been made, for an order that the\npersonal representative of the deceased be made a party to the proceedings,\nand in either case of an order that the proceedings be carried on against the\nperson appointed or, as the case may be, against the personal\nrepresentative, as if the personal representative had been substituted for\nthe estate;\n(b)  the Court may, at any stage of the proceedings and on such terms as it\nthinks just and whether of its own motion or on application, make any such\norder as is mentioned in subparagraph (a) and allow such amendments (if\nany) to be made and make such other order as the Court thinks necessary\nin order to ensure that all matters in dispute in the proceedings may be\neffectually and completely determined and adjudicated upon.\n(5) Before making an order under paragraph (4) the Court may require notice to be\ngiven to any insurer of the deceased who has an interest in the proceedings and\nto such (if any) of the persons having an interest in the estate as it thinks fit.\n\nORDER 15\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 110\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(6) Where an order is made under paragraph (4), rules 7(4) and 8(3) and (4) shall\napply as if the order had been made under rule 7 on the application of the\nplaintiff.\n(7) Where no grant of probate or administration has been made, any judgment or\norder given or made in the proceedings shall bind the estate to the same extent\nas it would have been bound if a grant had been made and a personal\nrepresentative of the deceased had been a party to the proceedings.\n7.\nChange of parties by reason of death, etc. (O.15, r.7)\n7.\n(1) Where a party to an action dies or become bankrupt but the cause of action\nsurvives, the action shall not abate by reason of the death or bankruptcy.\n(2) Where at any stage of the proceedings in any cause or matter the interest or\nliability of any party is assigned or transmitted to or devolves upon some other\nperson, the Court may, if it thinks it necessary in order to ensure that all matters\nin dispute in the cause or matter may be effectually and completely determined\nand adjudicated upon, order that other person to be made a party to the cause or\nmatter and the proceedings to be carried on as if the other person had been\nsubstituted for the first mentioned party.\n\nAn application for an order under this paragraph may be ex parte.\n(3) An order may be made under this rule for a person to be made a party to a cause\nor matter notwithstanding that the person is already a party to it on the other side\nof the record, or on the same side but in a different capacity; but \u2014\n(a)\nif the person is already a party on the other side, the order shall be treated\nas containing a direction that the person shall cease to be a party on that\nother side; and\n(b) if the person is already a party on the same side but in another capacity,\nthe order may contain a direction that the person shall cease to be a party\nin that other capacity.\n(4) The person on whose application an order is made under this rule must procure\nthe order to be filed in the Register of Writs, and after the order has been filed\nthat person must, unless the Court otherwise directs, serve the order on every\nother person who is a party to the cause or matter or who becomes or ceases to\nbe a party by virtue of the order and serve with the order on any person who\nbecomes a defendant a copy of the writ or originating summons by which the\ncause or matter was begun and a form of acknowledgment of service in Form\nNo. 8 or Form No. 9 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended\nand revised), whichever is appropriate.\nAny application to the Court by a person served with an order made ex parte\nunder this rule for the discharge or variation of the order must be made within\n14 days after the service of the order on that person.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 15\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 111\n\n8.\nProvisions consequential on making of order under rule 6 or 7 (O.15, r.8)\n8.\n(1) Where an order is made under rule 6 the writ by which the action in question\nwas begun must be amended accordingly and must be indorsed with \u2014\n(a)\na reference to the order in pursuance of which the amendment is made; and\n(b) the date on which the amendment is made,\nand the amendment must be made within such period as may be specified in that\norder or, if no period is so specified, within 14 days after the making of the\norder.\n(2) Where by an order under rule 6 a person is to be made a defendant, the rules as\nto service of a writ shall apply accordingly to service of the amended writ on the\nperson, but before serving the writ on the person the person on whose\napplication the order was made must procure the order to be filed in the Register\nof Writs.\n(3) Where by an order under rule 6 or 7 a person is to be made a defendant the rules\nas to acknowledgment of service shall apply accordingly to acknowledgment of\nservice by the person subject, in the case of a person to be made a defendant by\nan order under rule 7, to the modification that the time limited for\nacknowledging service shall begin with the date on which the order is served on\nthe person under rule 7(4) or, if the order is not required to be served on the\nperson, with the date on which the order is to be filed in the Register of Writs.\n(4) Where by an order under rule 6 or 7 a person is to be added as a party or is to be\nmade a party in substitution for some other party, that person shall not become\na party until \u2014\n(a)\nwhere the order is made under rule 6, the writ has been amended in relation\nto that person under this rule and (if that person is a defendant) has been\nserved on that person; or\n(b) where the order is made under rule 7, the order has been served on that\nperson under rule 7(4) or, if the order is not required to be served on that\nperson, the order has been filed in the Register of Writs,\nand where by virtue of the foregoing provision a person becomes a party in\nsubstitution for some other party, all things done in the course of the proceedings\nbefore the making of the order shall have effect in relation to the new party as\nthey had in relation to the old, except that acknowledgment of service by the old\nparty shall not dispense with acknowledgment of service by the new.\n(5) The foregoing provisions of this rule shall apply in relation to an action begun\nby originating summons as they apply in relation to an action begun by writ.\n9.\nFailure to proceed after death of party (O.15, r.9)\n9.\n(1) If after the death of a plaintiff or defendant in any action the cause of action\nsurvives, but no order under rule 7 is made substituting as plaintiff any person\n\nORDER 15\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 112\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nin whom the cause of action vests or, as the case may be, the personal\nrepresentative of the deceased defendant, the defendant or, as the case may be,\nthose representatives may apply to the Court for an order that unless the action\nis proceeded with within such time as may be specified in the order the action\nshall be struck out as against the plaintiff or the defendant, as the case may be,\nwho has died; but where it is the plaintiff who has died the Court shall not make\nan order under this rule unless satisfied that due notice of the application has\nbeen given to the personal representatives (if any) of the deceased plaintiff and\nto any other interested persons who, in the opinion of the Court, should be\nnotified.\n(2) Where in any action a counterclaim is made by a defendant, this rule shall apply\nin relation to the counterclaim as if the counterclaim were a separate action and\nas if the defendant making the counterclaim were the plaintiff and the person\nagainst whom it is made a defendant.\n10.\nActions for possession of land (O.15, r.10)\n10. (1) Without prejudice to rule 6, the Court may at any stage of the proceedings in an\naction for possession of land order any person not a party to the action who is\nin possession of the land (whether in actual possession or by a tenant) to be\nadded as a defendant.\n(2) An application by any person for an order under this rule may be made ex parte,\nsupported by an affidavit showing that the person is in possession of the land in\nquestion and if by a tenant, naming the person. The affidavit shall specify the\napplicant's address for service and O.12, rr.3(2) and (3) shall apply as if the\naffidavit were an acknowledgment of service.\n(3) A person added as a defendant by an order under this rule shall serve a copy of\nthe order on the plaintiff giving the added defendant's address for the service\nspecified in accordance with paragraph (2).\n10A. Actions in detinue, conversion or for trespass to goods (O.15, r.10A)\n10A. (1) Where the plaintiff in an action in detinue, conversion or for trespass to goods\nis one of two or more persons having or claiming any interest in the goods, then,\nunless the plaintiff has the written authority of every other such person to sue\non the latter's behalf, the writ or originating summons by which the action was\nbegun shall be indorsed with a statement giving particulars of the plaintiff's title\nand identifying every other person who to the plaintiff\u2019s knowledge, has or\nclaims any interest in the goods.\nThis paragraph shall not apply to an action arising out of an accident on land\ndue to collision or apprehended collision involving a vehicle.\n(2) A defendant to an action in detinue, conversion or for trespass to goods who\ndesires to show that a third party has a better right than the plaintiff as respects\nall or any part of the interest claimed by the plaintiff may, at any time after\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 15\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 113\n\ngiving notice of intention to defend, and before any judgment or order is given\nor made on the plaintiff's claim, apply for directions as to whether any person\nnamed in the application (not being a person whose written authority the\nplaintiff has to sue on the person\u2019s behalf) should be joined with a view to\nestablishing whether the person has a better right than the plaintiff, or has a\nclaim as a result of which the defendant might be doubly liable.\n(3) An application under paragraph (2) shall be made by summons, which shall be\nserved personally on every person named in it as well as being served on the\nplaintiff.\n(4) Where a person named in an application under paragraph (2) fails to appear on\nthe hearing of the summons or to comply with any direction given by the Court\non the application, the Court may by order deprive the person of any right of\naction against the defendant for the wrong, either unconditionally or subject to\nsuch terms and conditions as the Court thinks fit.\n11.\nRelator actions (O.15, r.11)\n11. Before the name of any person is used in any action as a relator, that person must give\na written authorisation so to use that person\u2019s name to that person\u2019s attorney and the\nauthorisation must be filed in the Court office.\n12.\nRepresentative proceedings (O.15, r.12)\n12. (1) Where numerous persons have the same interest in any proceedings, not being\nsuch proceedings as are mentioned in rule 13, the proceedings may be begun,\nand, unless the Court otherwise orders, continued, by or against any one or more\nof them as representing all or as representing all except one or more of them.\n(2) At any stage of proceedings under this rule the Court may, on the application of\nthe plaintiff, and on such terms, if any, as it thinks fit, appoint any one or more\nof the defendants or other persons as representing whom the defendants are sued\nto represent all, or all except one or more, of those persons in the proceedings;\nand where in exercise of the power conferred by this paragraph, the Court\nappoints a person not named as a defendant, it shall make an order under rule 6\nadding that person as a defendant.\n(3) A judgment or order given in proceedings under this rule shall be binding on all\nthe persons as representing whom the plaintiffs sue or, as the case may be, the\ndefendants who are sued, but shall not be enforced against any person not a party\nto the proceedings except with the leave of the Court.\n(4) An application for the grant of leave under paragraph (3) must be made by\nsummons which must be served personally on the person against whom it is\nsought to enforce the judgment or order.\n(5) Notwithstanding that a judgment or order to which any such application relates\nis binding on the person against whom the application is made, that person may\n\nORDER 15\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 114\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\ndispute liability to have the judgment or order enforced against that person on\nthe ground that by reason of facts and matters particular to this case that person\nis entitled to be exempted from such liability.\n(6) The Court hearing an application for the grant of leave under paragraph (3) may\norder the question whether the judgment or order is enforceable against the\nperson against whom the application is made to be tried and determined in any\nmanner in which any issue or question in an action may be tried and determined.\n12A. Derivative actions (O.15, r.12A)\n12A. (1) This rule applies to every action begun by writ by one or more shareholders of\na company where the cause of action is vested in the company and relief is\naccordingly sought on its behalf (referred to in this rule as a \"derivative\naction\").\n(2) Where a defendant in a derivative action has given notice of intention to defend,\nthe plaintiff must apply to the Court for leave to continue the action.\n(3) The application must be supported by an affidavit verifying the facts on which\nthe claim and the entitlement to sue on behalf of the company are based.\n(4) Unless the Court otherwise orders, the application must be issued within 21 days\nafter the relevant date, and must be served, together with the affidavit in support\nand any exhibits to the affidavit, not less than 10 clear days before the return\nday on all defendants who have given notice of intention to defend; any\ndefendant so served may show cause against the application by affidavit or\notherwise.\n(5) In paragraph (4), the relevant date means the later of \u2014\n(a)\nthe date of service of the statement of claim;\n(b) the date when notice of intention to defend was given, provided that, where\nmore than one notice of intention to defend is given, that date shall be the\ndate when the first notice was given.\n(6) Nothing in this rule shall prevent the plaintiff from applying for interlocutory\nrelief pending the determination of an application for leave to continue the\naction.\n(7) In a derivative action, O.18, r.2(1) (time for service of defence) shall not have\neffect unless the Court grants leave to continue the action and, in that case, shall\nhave effect as if it required the defendant to serve a defence within 14 days after\nthe order giving leave to continue, or within such other period as the Court may\nspecify.\n(8) On the hearing of the application under paragraph (2), the Court may \u2014\n(a)\ngrant leave to continue the action, for such period and upon such terms as\nthe Court may think fit;\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 15\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 115\n\n(b) subject to paragraph (11), dismiss the action;\n(c)\nadjourn the application and give such direction as to joinder of parties, the\nfiling of further evidence, discovery, cross examination of deponents and\notherwise as it may consider expedient.\n(9) If the plaintiff does not apply for leave to continue the action as required by\nparagraph (2) within the time laid down in paragraph (4), any defendant who\nhas given notice of intention to defend may apply for an order to dismiss the\naction or any claim made in it by way of derivative action.\n(10)  On the hearing of such an application for dismissal, the Court may \u2014\n(a)\nsubject to paragraph (11), dismiss the action;\n(b) if the plaintiff so requests, grant the plaintiff (on such terms as to costs or\notherwise as the Court may think fit) an extension of time to apply for\nleave to continue the action; or\n(c)\nmake such other order as may in the circumstances be appropriate.\n(11) Where only part of the relief claimed in that action is sought on behalf of the\ncompany, the Court may dismiss the claim for that part of the relief under\nparagraphs (8) and (10), without prejudice to the plaintiff's right to continue the\naction as to the remainder of the relief and O.18, r.2(1) shall apply as modified\nby paragraph (7).\n(12) If there is a material change in circumstances after the Court has given leave to\nthe plaintiff to continue the action in pursuance of an application under\nparagraph (2), any defendant who has given notice of intention to defend may\nmake an application supported by affidavit requiring the plaintiff to show cause\nwhy the Court should not dismiss the action or any claim made in it by way of\nderivative action. On such application the Court shall have the same powers as\nit would have had upon an application under paragraph (2).\n(13) The plaintiff may include in an application under paragraph (2) an application\nfor an indemnity out of the assets of the company in respect of costs incurred or\nto be incurred in the action and the Court may grant such indemnity upon such\nterms as may in the circumstances be appropriate.\n(14) So far as possible, any application under paragraph (13) and any application by\nthe plaintiff under O.14 shall be made so as to be heard at the same time as the\napplication under paragraph (2).\n13.\nRepresentation of interested person who cannot be ascertained, etc. (O.15,\nr.13)\n13. (1) In any proceedings concerning \u2014\n(a)\nthe estate of a deceased person; or\n(b) property subject to a trust; or\n\nORDER 15\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 116\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(c)\nthe construction of a written instrument, including a Law,\n\nthe Court, if satisfied that it is expedient so to do, and that one or more of the\nconditions specified in paragraph (2) are satisfied, may appoint one or more\npersons to represent any person (including an unborn person) or class who is or\nmay be interested (whether presently or for any future contingent or\nunascertained interest) in or affected by the proceedings.\n(2) The conditions of the exercise of the power conferred by paragraph (1) are as\nfollows \u2014\n(a)\nthat the person, the class or some member of the class, cannot be\nascertained or cannot readily be ascertained;\n(b) that the person, class or some member of the class, though ascertained,\ncannot be found;\n(c)\nthat, though the person or the class and the members thereof can be\nascertained and found, it appears to the Court expedient (regard being had\nto all the circumstances, including the amount at stake and the degree of\ndifficulty of the point to be determined) to exercise the power for the\npurpose of saving expense.\n(3) Where in any proceedings to which paragraph (1) applies, the Court exercises\nthe power conferred by that paragraph, a judgment or order of the Court given\nor made when the person or persons appointed in exercise of that power are\nbefore the Court shall be binding on the person or class represented by the\nperson or persons so appointed.\n(4) Where, in any such proceedings, a compromise is proposed and some of the\npersons who are interested in, or who may be affected by, the compromise are\nnot parties to the proceedings (including unborn or unascertained persons)\nbut \u2014\n(a)\nthere is some other person in the same interest before the Court who\nassents to the compromise or on whose behalf the Court sanctions the\ncompromise; or\n(b) the absent persons are represented by a person appointed under paragraph\n(1) who so assents,\nthe Court, if satisfied that the compromise will not be for the benefit of the\nabsent persons and that it is expedient to exercise this power, may approve the\ncompromise and order that it shall be binding on the absent persons, and they\nshall be bound accordingly except where the order has been obtained by fraud\nor non-disclosure of material facts.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 15\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 117\n\n13A. Notice of action to non-parties (O.15, r.13A)\n13A. (1) At any stage in an action to which this rule applies, the Court may, on the\napplication of any party or of its own motion, direct that notice of the action be\nserved on any person who is not a party thereto but who will or may be affected\nby any judgment given therein.\n(2) An application under this rule may be made ex parte and shall be supported by\nan affidavit stating the grounds of the application.\n(3) Every notice of an action under this rule shall be in Form No. 11 of the Grand\nCourt Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) and accompanied by a\ncopy of the originating summons or writ and a form of acknowledgment of\nservice in Form No. 8 or Form No. 9 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms\n(as amended and revised) with such modifications as may be appropriate.\n(4) A person may, within 14 days of service on that person of a notice under this\nrule, acknowledge service of the writ or originating summons and shall\nthereupon become a party to the action, but in default of such acknowledgment\nand subject to paragraph (5) shall be bound by any judgment given in the action\nas if that person were a party thereto.\n(5) If at any time after service of such notice on any person the writ or originating\nsummons is amended so as substantially to alter the relief claimed the Court\nmay direct that the judgment shall not bind such person unless a further notice\ntogether with a copy of the amended writ or originating summons is served on\nsuch person under this rule.\n(6) This rule applies to any action relating to \u2014\n(a)\nthe estate of a deceased person; or\n(b) property subject to a trust.\n14.\nRepresentation of beneficiaries by trustees, etc. (O.15, r.14)\n14. (1) Any proceedings, including proceedings to enforce a security by foreclosure or\notherwise, may be brought by or against trustees, executors or administrators in\ntheir capacity as such without joining any of the persons having a beneficial\ninterest in the trust or estate, as the case may be and any judgment or order given\nor made in those proceedings shall be binding on those persons unless the Court\nin the same or other proceedings otherwise orders on the ground that the trustees,\nexecutors or administrators, as the case may be, could not or did not in fact\nrepresent the interests of those persons in the first-mentioned proceedings.\n(2) Paragraph (1) is without prejudice to the power of the Court to order any person\nhaving such an interest as aforesaid to be made a party to the proceedings or to\nmake an order under rule 13.\n\nORDER 15\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 118\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n15.\nRepresentation of deceased person interested in proceedings (O.15, r.15)\n15. (1) Where in any proceedings it appears to the Court that a deceased person was\ninterested in the matter in question in the proceedings and that the deceased\nperson has no estate representative, the Court may, on the application of any\nparty to the proceedings, proceed in the absence of a person representing the\nestate of the deceased person or may by order appoint a person to represent that\n\nestate for the purposes of the proceedings; and any such order, and any judgment\nor order subsequently given or made in the proceedings, shall bind the estate of\nthe deceased to the same extent as it would have been bound had an estate\nrepresentative of that person been a party to the proceedings.\n(2) Before making an order under this rule, the Court may require notice of the\napplication for the order to be given to such (if any) of the persons having an\ninterest in the estate as it thinks fit.\n16.\nDeclaratory judgment (O.15, r.16)\n16. No action or other proceeding shall be open to objection on the ground that a merely\ndeclaratory judgment or order is sought thereby, and the Court may make binding\ndeclarations of right whether or not any consequential relief is or could be claimed.\n17.\nConduct of proceedings (O.15, r.17)\n17. The Court may give the conduct of any action, inquiry or other proceedings to such\nperson as it thinks fit.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 16.10.95) (amended 20.01.97)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 16\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 119\n\nORDER 16\nTHIRD PARTY AND SIMILAR PROCEEDINGS\n\n1.\nThird party notice (O.16, r.1)\n1.\n(1) Where in any action a defendant who has given notice of intention to defend \u2014\n(a)\nclaims against a person not already a party to the action any contribution\nor indemnity; or\n(b) claims against such a person any relief or remedy relating to or connected\nwith the original subject matter of the action and substantially the same as\nsome relief or remedy claimed by the plaintiff; or\n(c)\nrequires that any question or issue relating to or connected with the original\nsubject matter of the action should be determined not only as between the\nplaintiff and the defendant but also as between either or both of them and\na person not already a party to the action,\n\nthen, subject to paragraph (2), the defendant may issue a notice in Form No. 12\nor Form No. 13 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and\nrevised), whichever is appropriate, (in this Order referred to as a third party\nnotice) containing a statement of the nature of the claim made against the\ndefendant and, as the case may be, either of the nature and grounds of the claim\nmade by the defendant or the question or issue required to be determined.\n(2) A defendant to an action may not issue a third party notice without the leave of\nthe Court unless the action was begun by writ and the defendant issues the notice\nbefore serving that defendant\u2019s defence on the plaintiff.\n(3) Where a third party notice is served on the person against whom it is issued, the\nperson shall as from the time of service be a party to the action (in this Order\nreferred to as a third party) with the same rights in respect of the person\u2019s\ndefence against any claim made against the person in the notice and otherwise\nas if the person had been duly sued in the ordinary way by the defendant by\nwhom the notice is issued.\n2.\nApplication for leave to issue third party notice (O.16, r.2)\n2.\n(1) Application for leave to issue a third party notice may be made ex parte but the\nCourt may direct a summons for leave to be issued.\n(2) An application for leave to issue a third party notice must be supported by an\naffidavit stating \u2014\n(a)\nthe nature of the claim made by the plaintiff in the action;\n(b) the stage which proceedings in the action have reached;\n\nORDER 16\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 120\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(c)\nthe nature of the claim made by the applicant or particulars of the question\nor issue required to be determined, as the case may be, and the facts on\nwhich the proposed third party notice is based; and\n(d) the name and address of the person against whom the third party notice is\nto be issued.\n3.\nIssue, service and acknowledgment of service, of third party notice (O.16,\nr.3)\n3.\n(1) The order granting leave to issue a third party notice may contain directions as\nto the period within which the notice is to be issued.\n(2) There must be served with every third party notice \u2014\n(a)\na copy of the writ or originating summons by which the action was begun;\n(b) a copy of the pleadings (if any) served in the action; and\n(c)\na form of acknowledgment of service in Form No. 8 of the Grand Court\nRules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) with such modification\nas may be appropriate.\n(3) The appropriate office for acknowledging service of a third party notice is the\nCourt office.\n(4) Subject to the foregoing provisions of this rule, the following provisions of these\nRules, namely, O.5, rr.1(2) and (3), O.10 to O.12 and O.75, r.4, shall apply in\nrelation to a third party notice and to the proceedings begun thereby as if \u2014\n(a)\nthe third party notice were a writ and the proceeding begun thereby an\naction; and\n(b) the defendant issuing the third party notice were a plaintiff and the person\nagainst whom it is issued a defendant in that action,\nprovided that in the application of O.11, r.1(1)(c) leave may be granted to serve\na third party notice outside the jurisdiction on any necessary or proper party to\nthe proceedings brought against the defendant.\n4.\nThird party directions (O.16, r.4)\n4.\n(1) If the third party gives notice of intention to defend, the defendant who issues\nthe third party notice must, by summons to be served on all the other parties to\nthe action, apply to the Court for directions.\n(2) A summons for third party directions shall be in Form No. 61 of the Grand\nCourt Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised).\n(3) If no summons is served on the third party under paragraph (1) the third party\nmay, not earlier than 7 days after giving notice of intention to defend by\nsummons to be served on all the other parties to the action, apply to the Court\nfor directions or for an order to set aside the third party notice.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 16\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 121\n\n(4) On an application for directions under this rule the Court may \u2014\n(a)\nif the liability of the third party to the defendant who issued the third party\nnotice is established on the hearing, order such judgment as the nature of\nthe case may require to be entered against the third party in favour of the\ndefendant; or\n(b) order any claim, question or issue stated in the third party notice to be tried\nin such manner as the Court may direct; or\n(c)\ndismiss the application and terminate the proceedings on the third party\nnotice,\nand may do so either before or after any judgment in the action has been signed\nby the plaintiff against the defendant.\n(5) On an application for directions under this rule the Court may give the third\nparty leave to defend the action, either alone or jointly with any defendant, upon\nsuch terms as may be just, or to appear at the trial and to take such part therein\nas may be just, and generally may make such orders and give such directions as\nappear to the Court proper for having the rights and liabilities of the parties most\nconveniently determined and enforced and as to the extent to which the third\nparty is to be bound by any judgment or decision in the action.\n(6) An order for third party directions shall be in Form No. 62 of the Grand Court\nRules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised).\n(7) Any order made or direction given under this rule may be varied or rescinded\nby    the Court at any time.\n5.\nDefault of third party, etc. (O.16, r.5)\n5.\n(1) If a third party does not give notice of intention to defend or, having been\nordered to serve a defence, fails to do so \u2014\n (a) the third party shall be deemed to admit any claim stated in the third party\nnotice and shall be bound by any judgment (including judgment by\nconsent) or decision in the action insofar as it is relevant to any claim,\nquestion or issue stated in that notice; and\n(b) the defendant by whom the third party notice was issued may, if judgment\nin default is given against the defendant in the action, at any time after\nsatisfaction of that judgment and, with the leave of the Court, before\nsatisfaction thereof, enter judgment against the third party in respect of any\ncontribution or indemnity claimed in the notice, and, with the leave of the\nCourt, in respect of any other relief or remedy claimed therein.\n(2) If a third party or the defendant by whom a third party notice was issued makes\ndefault in serving any pleading which that third party is ordered to serve, the\nCourt may, on the application by summons of that defendant or the third party,\nas the case may be, order such judgment to be entered for the applicant as the\n\nORDER 16\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 122\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\napplicant is entitled to on the pleadings or may make such other orders as may\nappear to the Court necessary to do justice between the parties.\n(3) The Court may at any time set aside or vary a judgment entered under\nsubparagraph (1)(b) or paragraph (2) on such terms (if any) as it thinks just.\n6.\nSetting aside third party proceedings (O.16, r.6)\n6.\nProceedings on a third party notice may, at any stage of the proceedings, be set aside\nby the Court.\n\n7.\nJudgment between defendant and third party (O.16, r.7)\n7.\n(1) Where in any action a defendant has served a third party notice, the Court may\nat or after trial of the action or, if the action is decided otherwise than by trial,\non an application by summons or motion, order such judgment as the nature of\nthe case may require to be entered for the defendant against the third party or\nfor the third party against the defendant.\n(2) Where judgment is given for the payment of any contribution or indemnity to a\nperson who is under a liability to make a payment in respect of the same debt or\ndamage, execution shall not issue on the judgment without the leave of the Court\nuntil that liability has been discharged.\n(3) For the purpose of paragraph (2) \"liability\" includes liability under a judgment\nin the same or other proceedings.\n8.\nClaims and issues between a defendant and some other party (O.16, r.8)\n8.\n(1) Where in any action a defendant who has given notice of intention to defend \u2014\n(a)\nclaims against a person who is already a party to the action any\ncontribution or indemnity; or\n(b) claims against such a person any relief or remedy relating to or connected\nwith the original subject matter of the action and substantially the same as\nsome relief or remedy claimed by the plaintiff; or\n(c)\nrequires that any question or issue relating to or connected with the original\nsubject matter of the action should be determined not only as between the\nplaintiff and themselves but also as between either or both of them and\nsome other person who is already a party to the action,\nthen, subject to paragraph (2) the defendant may, without leave, issue and serve\non that person a notice containing a statement of the nature and grounds of the\ndefendant\u2019s claim or, as the case may be, of the question or issue required to be\ndetermined.\n(2) Where a defendant makes such a claim as is mentioned in paragraph (1) and that\nclaim could be made by the defendant by counterclaim in the action, paragraph\n(1) shall not apply in relation to the claim.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 16\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 123\n\n(3) No acknowledgment of service of such a notice shall be necessary if the person\non whom it is served has acknowledged service of the writ or originating\nsummons in the action or is a plaintiff therein, and the same procedure shall be\nadopted for the determination between the defendant by whom, and the person\non whom, such a notice is served of the claim, question or issue stated in the\nnotice as would be appropriate under this Order if the person served with the\nnotice were a third party and (where the person has given notice of intention to\ndefend the action or is a plaintiff) had given notice of intention to defend the\nclaim, question or issue.\n(4) Rule 4(3) shall have effect in relation to proceedings on a notice issued under\nthis rule as if for the words \"7 days after giving notice of intention to defend\"\nthere were substituted the words \"14 days after service of the notice on the\nperson\".\n9.\nClaims by third and subsequent parties (O.16, r.9)\n9.\n(1) Where a defendant has served a third party notice and the third party makes such\na claim or requirement as is mentioned in rule 1 or rule 8, this Order shall, with\nthe modification mentioned in paragraph (2) and any other necessary\nmodifications, apply as if the third party were a defendant; and similarly where\nany further person to whom by virtue of this rule this Order applies as if that\nfurther person were a third party makes such a claim or requirement.\n(2) The modification referred to in paragraph (1) is that paragraph (3) shall have\neffect in relation to the issue of a notice under rule 1 by a third party in\nsubstitution for rule 1(2).\n(3) A third party may not issue a notice under rule 1 without the leave of the Court\nunless the action in question was begun by writ and the third party issues the\nnotice before the expiration of 14 days after the time limited for acknowledging\nservice of the notice issued against that third party.\n10.\nOffer of contribution (O.16, r.10)\n10. (1) If, at any time after a party has acknowledged service, a party to an action who\nstands to be held liable in the action to another party to contribute towards any\ndebt or damages which may be recovered against that other party in the action,\nmakes (without prejudice to that party\u2019s defence) a written offer to that other\nparty to contribute to a specified extent to the debt or damages, then, subject to\nparagraph (2) and notwithstanding that the other party reserves the right to bring\nthe offer to the attention of the Judge at the trial, the offer shall not be brought\nto the attention of the Judge until after all questions of liability and amount of\ndebt or damages have been decided.\n(2) Where the question of the costs of the issue of liability falls to be decided, that\nissue having been tried and an issue or question concerning the amount of the\ndebt or damages remaining to be tried separately, any party may bring to the\n\nORDER 17\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 124\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nattention of the Judge the fact that a written offer under paragraph (1) has or has\nnot been made and the date (but not the amount) of such offer or of the first such\noffer if more than one.\n11.\nCounterclaim by defendant (O.16, r.11)\n11. Where in any action a counterclaim is made by a defendant, the foregoing provisions\nof this Order shall apply in relation to the counterclaim as if the subject matter of the\ncounterclaim were the original subject matter of the action, and as if the person\nmaking the counterclaim were the plaintiff and the person against whom it is made a\ndefendant.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\nORDER 17\nINTERPLEADER\n\n1.\nEntitlement to relief by way of interpleader (O.17, r.1)\n1.\nWhere \u2014\n (a) a person is under a liability in respect of a debt or in respect of any money,\ngoods or chattels and the person is, or expects to be, sued for or in respect\nof that debt or money or those goods or chattels by two or more persons\nmaking adverse claims thereto; or\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 17\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 125\n\n (b) claim is made to any money, goods or chattels taken or intended to be taken\nby the Bailiff in execution under any process, or to the proceeds or value\nof any such goods or chattels, by a person other than the person against\nwhom the process is issued,\nthe person under liability as mentioned in subparagraph (a) or (subject to rule 2)\nthe Bailiff may apply to the Court for relief by way of interpleader.\n2.\nClaim to goods, etc., taken in execution (O.17, r.2)\n2.\n(1) Any person making a claim to or in respect of any money, goods or chattels\ntaken or intended to be taken in execution under process of the Court, or to the\nproceeds or value of any such goods or chattels, must give notice of their claim\nto the Bailiff charged with the execution of the process and must include in their\nnotice a statement of their address, and that address shall be that person\u2019s\naddress for service.\n(2) On receipt of a claim made under this rule the Bailiff on whom notice in\naccordance with paragraph (1) has been given must forthwith give notice thereof\nto the execution creditor and the execution creditor must, within 7 days after\nreceiving the notice, give notice to that Bailiff informing that Bailiff whether\nthe execution creditor admits or disputes the claim.\nAn execution creditor who gives notice in accordance with this paragraph\nadmitting a claim shall only be liable for any fees and expenses incurred by the\nBailiff before receipt of that notice.\n\n(3) Where \u2014\n(a)\nthe Bailiff receives a notice from an execution creditor under paragraph\n(2) disputing a claim, or the execution creditor fails, within the period\nmentioned in that paragraph, to give the required notice; and\n(b) the claim made under this rule is not withdrawn, the Bailiff may apply to\nthe Court for relief under this Order.\n(4) The Bailiff who receives a notice from an execution creditor under paragraph\n(2) admitting a claim made under this rule shall withdraw from possession of\nthe money, goods or chattels claimed and may apply to the Court for relief under\nthis Order of the following kind, that is to say, an order restraining the bringing\nof an action against the Bailiff for or in respect of the Bailiff having taken\npossession of that money or those goods or chattels.\n3.\nMode of application (O.17, r.3)\n3.\n(1) An application for relief under this Order must be made by originating summons\nunless made in a pending action, in which case it must be made by summons in\nthe action.\n(2) Where the applicant is the Bailiff who has withdrawn from possession of money,\ngoods or chattels taken in execution and who is applying for relief under rule\n\nORDER 17\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 126\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n2(4) the summons must be served on any person who made a claim under that\nrule to or in respect of that money or those goods or chattels, and that person\nmay attend the hearing of the application.\n(3) An originating summons under this rule shall be in Form No. 3 of the Grand\nCourt Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised).\n(4) Subject to paragraph (5) a summons under this rule must be supported by\nevidence that the applicant \u2014\n(a)\nclaims no interest in the subject matter in dispute other than for charges or\ncosts;\n(b) does not collude with any of the claimants to that subject matter; and\n(c)\nis willing to pay or transfer that subject matter into Court or to dispose of\nit as the Court may direct.\n(5) Where the applicant is the Bailiff, the Bailiff shall not provide such evidence as\nis referred to in paragraph (4) unless directed by the Court so to do.\n(6) Any person who makes a claim under rule 2 and who is served with a summons\nunder this rule shall within 14 days serve on the execution creditor and the\nBailiff an affidavit specifying any money and describing any goods and chattels\nclaimed and setting out the grounds upon which such claim is based.\n(7) Where the applicant is the Bailiff a summons under this rule must give notice of\nthe requirement in paragraph (6).\n4.\nNo rule (O.17, r.4)\n4.\nNo rule (O.17, r.4)\n5.\nPowers of Court hearing summons (O.17, r.5)\n5.\n(1) Where on the hearing of a summons under this Order all the persons by whom\nadverse claims to the subject matter in dispute (hereafter in this Order referred\nto as \"the claimants\") appear, the Court may order \u2014\n(a)\nthat any claimant be made a defendant in any action pending with respect\nto the subject matter in dispute in substitution for or in addition to the\napplicant for relief under this Order; or\n(b) that an issue between the claimants be stated and tried and may direct\nwhich of the claimants is to be plaintiff and which defendant.\n(2) Where \u2014\n(a)\nthe applicant on a summons under this Order is the Bailiff; or\n(b) all the claimants consent or any of them so request; or\n(c)\nthe question at issue between the claimants is a question of law and the\nfacts are not in dispute,\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 17\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 127\n\nthe Court may summarily determine the question at issue between the claimants\nand make an order accordingly on such terms as may be just.\n(3) Where a claimant, having been duly served with a summons for relief under this\nOrder, does not appear on the hearing of the summons or, having appeared, fails\nor refuses to comply with an order made in the proceedings, the Court may make\nan order declaring the claimant, and all persons claiming under the claimant,\nforever barred from prosecuting the claim against the applicant for such relief\nand all persons claiming under the claimant, but such an order shall not affect\nthe rights of the claimants as between themselves.\n6.\nPower to order sale of goods taken in execution (O.17, r.6)\n6.\nWhere an application for relief under this Order is made by the Bailiff who has taken\npossession of any goods or chattels in execution under any process, and a claimant\nalleges that that claimant is entitled, under a bill of sale or otherwise, to the goods or\nchattels by way of security for debts, the Court may order those goods or chattels or\nany part thereof to be sold and may direct that the proceeds of sale be applied in such\nmanner and on such terms as may be just and as may be specified in the order.\n7.\nPower to stay proceedings (O.17, r.7)\n7.\nWhere a defendant to an action applies for relief under this Order in the action, the\nCourt may by order stay all further proceedings in the action.\n8.\nOther powers (O.17, r.8)\n8.\nSubject to the foregoing rules of this Order, the Court may in or for the purposes of\nany interpleader proceedings make such order as to costs or any other matter as it\nthinks just.\n9.\nOne order in several causes or matters (O.17, r.9)\n9.\nWhere the Court considers it necessary or expedient to make an order in any\ninterpleader proceedings in several causes or matters pending before different\n\n Judges\u2014\n(a)\nthe Court may make such an order; and\n(b) the order shall be entitled in all those causes or matters; and\n(c)\nthe order shall be binding on all the parties to those causes or matters.\n10.\nDiscovery (O.17, r.10)\n10. Orders 24 and 26 shall, with the necessary modifications, apply in relation to an\ninterpleader issue as they apply in relation to any other cause or matter.\n\nORDER 17\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 128\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n11.\nTrial of interpleader issue (O.17, r.11)\n11. (1) Order 35 shall, with the necessary modifications, apply to the trial of an\ninterpleader issue as it applies to the trial of an action.\n(2) The Court by whom an interpleader issue is tried may give such judgment or\nmake such order as finally to dispose of all questions arising in the interpleader\nproceedings.\n12.\nAppeal from judgment etc. of Judge in interpleader proceedings (O.17, r.12)\n12. (1) Any judgment, order or decision of a Judge given or made in summarily\ndetermining under rule 5(2)(b) or (c) any question at issue between claimants in\ninterpleader proceedings shall be final and conclusive against the claimants and\nall persons claiming under them unless leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal is\ngiven by the Judge or the Court of Appeal.\n(2) Where an interpleader issue is tried by a Judge an appeal shall lie to the Court\nof Appeal, without the leave of the Judge or that Court, from any judgment,\norder or decision given or made by the Judge on the trial.\n(3) The time within which notice of appeal under this rule must be served shall be\nthe same as in the case of an appeal from an interlocutory order.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 18\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 129\n\nORDER 18\nPLEADINGS\n\n1.\nService of statement of claim (O.18, r.1)\n1.\nUnless the Court gives leave to the contrary or a statement of claim is indorsed on the\nwrit, the plaintiff must serve a statement of claim on the defendant or, if there are two\nor more defendants, on each defendant, and must do so either when the writ is served\non that defendant or at any time after service of the writ but before the expiration of\n14 days after that defendant gives notice of intention to defend.\n2.\nService of defence (O.18, r.2)\n2.\n(1) Subject to paragraph (2), a defendant who gives notice of intention to defend an\naction must, unless the Court gives leave to the contrary, serve a defence on the\nplaintiff before the expiration of 14 days after the time limited for\nacknowledging service of the writ or after the statement of claim is served on\nthe defendant, whichever is the later.\n(2) If a summons under O.14, r.1 or under O.86, r.1 is served on a defendant before\nthe defendant serves their defence, paragraph (1) shall not have effect in relation\nto the defendant unless by the order made on the summons the defendant is\ngiven leave to defend the action and, in that case, shall have effect as if it\nrequired the defendant to serve their defence within 14 days after the making of\nthe order or within such other period as may be specified therein.\n(3) Where an application is made by a defendant under O.12, r.8(1), paragraph (1)\nof this rule shall not have effect in relation to the defendant unless the\napplication is dismissed or no order is made on the application and, in that case,\nparagraph (1) shall have effect as if it required the defendant to serve their\ndefence within 14 days after the final determination of the application or within\nsuch other period as may be specified by the Court.\n(4) Paragraph (1) is subject to the provisions of O.15, r.12A(7) (derivative actions).\n3.\nService of reply and defence to counterclaim (O.18, r.3)\n3.\n(1) A plaintiff on whom a defendant serves a defence must serve a reply on that\ndefendant if it is needed for compliance with rule 8, and if no reply is served,\nrule 14(1) will apply.\n(2) A plaintiff on whom a defendant serves a counterclaim must, if the plaintiff\nintends to defend it, serve on that defendant a defence to counterclaim.\n(3) Where a plaintiff serves both a reply and a defence to counterclaim on any\ndefendant, the plaintiff must include them in the same document.\n\nORDER 18\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 130\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(4) A reply to any defence must be served by the plaintiff before the expiration of\n14 days after the service on the plaintiff of that defence, and a defence to\ncounterclaim must be served by the plaintiff before the expiration of 14 days\nafter the service on the plaintiff of the counterclaim to which it relates.\n4.\nPleadings subsequent to reply (O.18, r.4)\n4.\nNo pleading subsequent to a reply or a defence to counterclaim shall be served except\nwith the leave of the Court.\n\n5.\nNo rule (O.18, r.5)\n5.\nNo rule (O.18, r.5)\n6.\nPleadings: formal requirements (O.18, r.6)\n6.\n(1) Every pleading in an action must bear on its face \u2014\n(a)\nthe cause number;\n(b) the title of the action; and\n(c)\nthe date on which it was filed.\n(2) Every pleading must, if necessary, be divided into paragraphs numbered\nconsecutively, each allegation being so far as convenient contained in a separate\nparagraph.\n(3) Dates, sums and other numbers must be expressed in a pleading in figures and\nnot in words.\n(4) Every pleading of a party must be indorsed \u2014\n(a)\nwhere the party sues or defends in person, with the party\u2019s name and\naddress;\n(b) in any other case, with the name or firm and business address of the\nattorney by whom it was served.\n(5) Every pleading of a party must be signed by an attorney or firm of attorneys, if\nsettled by an attorney or firm of attorneys, or by the party, if the party sues or\ndefends in person.\n7.\nFacts, not evidence, to be pleaded (O.18, r.7)\n7.\n(1) Subject to the provisions of this rule, and rules 7A, 10, 11 and 12, every pleading\nmust contain, and contain only, a statement in a summary form of the material\nfacts on which the party pleading relies for their claim or defence, as the case\nmay be, but not the evidence by which those facts are to be proved, and the\nstatement must be as brief as the nature of the case admits.\n (2) Without prejudice to paragraph (1), the effect of any document or the purport of\nany conversation referred to in the pleading must, if material, be briefly stated,\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 18\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 131\n\nand the precise words of the document or conversation shall not be stated, except\ninsofar as those words are themselves material.\n(3) A party need not plead any fact if it is presumed by law to be true or the burden\nof disproving it lies on the other party, unless the other party has specifically\ndenied it in that party\u2019s pleading.\n(4) A statement that a thing has been done or that an event has occurred, being a\nthing or event the doing or occurrence of which, as the case may be, constitutes\na condition precedent necessary for the case of a party is to be implied in that\nparty\u2019s pleading.\n7A.\nConviction, etc. to be adduced in evidence: matters to be pleaded (O.18, r.7A)\n7A. (1) If in any action which is to be tried with pleadings any party intends, in reliance\non Section 35 of the Evidence Act (as amended and revised) to adduce evidence\nthat a person was convicted of an offence by or before the Court or the Summary\nCourt, that person must include in their pleading a statement of their intention\nwith particulars of \u2014\n(a)\nthe conviction and the date thereof;\n(b) the Court which made the conviction; and\n(c)\nthe issue in the proceedings to which the conviction is relevant.\n(1A) If in any action to which paragraph (1) of this rule applies the relevant conviction\nhas been expunged pursuant to the Criminal Records (Spent Convictions) Act\n(as amended and revised), and the relevant expunction has not been revoked\npursuant to section 40 of that Act, then the party seeking to adduce evidence of\nthat expunged conviction must include in the pleading particulars of the\nexceptional circumstances that require the admission of the expunged\nconviction.\n(2) If in any action which is to be tried with pleadings any party intends in reliance\non Section 53 of the Evidence Act (as amended and revised) to adduce evidence\nthat a person was found guilty of adultery in matrimonial proceedings before\nthe Court or has been adjudged to be the father of a child in affiliation or\nmaintenance proceedings before the Court or the Summary Court, the person\nmust include in their pleading a statement of their intention with particulars\nof \u2014\n(a)\nthe finding or adjudication and the date thereof;\n(b) the Court which made the finding or adjudication and the proceedings in\nwhich it was made; and\n(c)\nthe issue in the proceedings to which the finding or adjudication is\nrelevant.\n(3) Where a party's pleading includes such a statement as is mentioned in paragraph\n(1) or (2), then if the opposite party \u2014\n\nORDER 18\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 132\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(a)\ndenies the conviction or finding of adultery or adjudication of paternity to\nwhich the statement relates;\n(b) alleges that the conviction, finding or adjudication was erroneous; or\n(c)\ndenies that the conviction, finding or adjudication is relevant to any issue\nin the proceedings, the party must make the denial or allegation in their\npleading.\n8.\nMatters which must be specifically pleaded (O.18, r.8)\n8.\n(1) A party must in any pleading subsequent to a statement of claim plead\nspecifically any matter, for example, performance, release, any relevant statute\nof limitation, fraud or any fact showing illegality \u2014\n(a)\nwhich the party alleges makes any claim or defence of the opposite party\nnot maintainable; or\n(b) which, if not specifically pleaded, must take the opposite party by surprise;\nor\n(c)\nwhich raises issues of fact not arising out of the preceding pleading.\n(2) Without prejudice to paragraph (1), a defendant to an action for the recovery of\nland must plead specifically every ground of defence on which the defendant\nrelies, and a plea that the defendant is in possession of the land by themselves\nor their tenant is not sufficient.\n(3) A claim for exemplary damages must be specifically pleaded together with the\nfacts on which the party pleading relies.\n(4) A party must plead specifically any claim for interest under Section 34 of the\nJudicature Act (as amended and revised) or otherwise and \u2014\n(a)\nthe claim for interest must be pleaded in the body of the pleading and\nshould be repeated in the prayer;\n(b) the ground or basis on which interest is claimed must be identified\nprecisely; and\n(c)\nwherever possible, the date from which and the rate at which interest is\nclaimed must be stated.\n9.\nMatter may be pleaded whenever arising (O.18, r.9)\n9.\nSubject to rules 7(1), 10 and 15(2), a party may in any pleading plead any matter\nwhich has arisen at any time, whether before or since the issue of the writ.\n10.\nDeparture (O.18, r.10)\n10. (1) A party shall not in any pleading make an allegation of fact, or raise any new\nground or claim, inconsistent with a previous pleading of that party.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 18\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 133\n\n(2) Paragraph (1) shall not be taken as prejudicing the right of a party to amend, or\napply for leave to amend, that party\u2019s previous pleading so as to plead the\nallegations or claims in the alternative.\n11.\nPoints of law may be pleaded (O.18, r.11)\n11. A party may by that party\u2019s pleading raise any point of law.\n12.\nParticulars of pleading (O.18, r.12)\n12. (1) Every pleading must contain the necessary particulars of any claim, defence or\nother matter pleaded including, without prejudice to the generality of the\nforegoing words \u2014\n(a)\nparticulars of any misrepresentation, fraud, breach of trust, wilful default\nor undue influence on which the party pleading relies; and\n(b) where a party pleading alleges any condition of the mind of any person,\nwhether any impairment or disability of mind or any malice, fraudulent\nintention or other condition of mind except knowledge, particulars of the\nfacts on which the party relies.\n(2) The Court may order a party to serve on any other party particulars of any claim,\ndefence or other matter stated in that party\u2019s pleading, or in any affidavit of that\nparty\u2019s ordered to stand as a pleading, or a statement of the nature of the case\non which the party relies, and the order may be made on such terms as the Court\nthinks just.\n(3) Where a party alleges as a fact that a person had knowledge or notice of some\nfact, matter or thing, then, without prejudice to the generality of paragraph (2),\nthe Court may, on such terms as it thinks just, order that party to serve on any\nother party \u2014\n(a)\nwhere the party alleges knowledge, particulars of the facts on which the\nparty relies; and\n(b) where the party alleges notice, particulars of the notice.\n(4) An order under this rule shall not be made before service of the defence unless,\nin the opinion of the Court, the order is necessary or desirable to enable the\ndefendant to plead or for some other special reason.\n(5) Where the applicant for an order under this rule did not apply by letter for the\nparticulars the applicant requires, the Court may refuse to make the order unless\nof opinion that there were sufficient reasons for an application by letter not\nhaving been made.\n(6) Where particulars are given pursuant to a request, or order of the Court, the\nrequest or order shall be incorporated with the particulars, each item of the\nparticulars following immediately after the corresponding item of the request or\norder.\n\nORDER 18\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 134\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n13.\nAdmissions and denials (O.18, r.13)\n13. (1) Subject to paragraph (4), any allegation of fact made by a party in the party\u2019s\npleading is deemed to be admitted by the opposite party unless it is traversed by\nthat party in their pleading or a joinder of issue under rule 14 operates as a denial\nof it.\n(2) A traverse may be made either by a denial or by a statement of non-admission\nand either expressly or by necessary implication.\n(3) Subject to paragraph (4), every allegation of fact made in a statement of claim\nor counterclaim which the party on whom it is served does not intend to admit\nmust be specifically traversed by that party in their defence or defence to\ncounterclaim, as the case may be; and a general denial of such allegations, or a\ngeneral statement of non-admission of them is not a sufficient traverse of them.\n(4) Any allegation that a party has suffered damage and any allegation as to the\namount of damages is deemed to be traversed unless specifically admitted.\n14.\nDenial by joinder of issue (O.18, r.14)\n14. (1) If there is no reply to a defence, there is an implied joinder of issue on that\ndefence.\n\n(2) Subject to paragraph (3) \u2014\n(a)\nthere is at the close of pleadings an implied joinder of issue on the pleading\nlast served; and\n(b) a party may in their pleading expressly join issue on the next preceding\npleading.\n(3) There can be no joinder of issue, implied or express, on a statement of claim or\ncounterclaim.\n(4) A joinder of issue operates as a denial of every allegation of fact made in the\npleading on which there is an implied or express joinder of issue unless, in the\ncase of an express joinder of issue, any such allegation is excepted from the\njoinder and is stated to be admitted, in which case the express joinder of issue\noperates as a denial of every other such allegation.\n15.\nStatement of Claim (O.18, r.15)\n15. (1) A statement of claim must state specifically the relief or remedy which the\nplaintiff claims; but costs need not be specifically claimed.\n(2) A statement of claim must not contain any allegation or claim in respect of a\ncause of action unless that cause of action is mentioned in the writ or arises from\nfacts which are the same as, or include or form part of, facts giving rise to a\ncause of action so mentioned; but, subject to that, a plaintiff may in the\nplaintiff\u2019s statement of claim, alter, modify or extend any claim made by the\nplaintiff in the indorsement of the writ without amending the indorsement.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 18\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 135\n\n(3) Every statement of claim must bear on its face a statement of the date on which\nthe writ in the action was issued.\n16.\nDefence of tender (O.18, r.16)\n16. Where in any action a defence of tender before action is pleaded, the defendant must\npay into Court in accordance with O.22 the amount alleged to have been tendered,\nand the tender shall not be available as a defence unless and until payment into Court\nhas been made.\n17.\nDefence of set-off (O.18, r.17)\n17. Where a claim by a defendant to a sum of money (whether of an ascertained amount\nor not) is relied on as a defence to the whole or part of a claim made by the plaintiff,\nit may be included in the defence and set-off against the plaintiff's claim, whether or\nnot it is also added as a counterclaim.\n18.\nCounterclaim and defence to counterclaim (O.18, r.18)\n18. Without prejudice to the general application of this Order to a counterclaim and a\ndefence to counterclaim, or to any provision thereof which applies to either of those\npleadings specifically \u2014\n (a) rule 15(1) shall apply to a counterclaim as if the counterclaim were a\nstatement of claim and the defendant making it a plaintiff; and\n(b) rules 8(2), 16 and 17 shall, with the necessary modifications, apply to a\ndefence to counterclaim as they apply to a defence.\n19.\nStriking out pleadings and indorsements (O.18, r.19)\n19. (1) The Court may at any stage of the proceedings order to be struck out or amended\nany pleading or the indorsement of any writ in the action, or anything in any\npleading or in the indorsement, on the ground that \u2014\n(a)\nit discloses no reasonable cause of action or defence, as the case may be;\nor\n(b) it is scandalous, frivolous or vexatious; or\n(c)\nit may prejudice, embarrass or delay the fair trial of the action; or\n(d) it is otherwise an abuse of the process of the court,\nand may order the action to be stayed or dismissed or judgment to be entered\naccordingly, as the case may be.\n(2) No evidence shall be admissible on an application under subparagraph (1)(a).\n(3) This rule shall, so far as applicable, apply to an originating summons and a\npetition as if the summons or petition, as the case may be, were a pleading.\n\nORDER 18\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 136\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n20.\nClose of pleadings (O.18, r.20)\n20. (1) The pleadings in an action are deemed to be closed \u2014\n(a)\nat the expiration of 14 days after service of the reply or, if there is no reply\nbut only a defence to counterclaim, after service of the defence to\ncounterclaim; or\n(b) if neither a reply nor a defence to counterclaim is served, at the expiration\nof 14 days after service of the defence.\n(2) The pleadings in an action are deemed to be closed at the time provided by\nparagraph (1) notwithstanding that any request or order for particulars has been\nmade but has not been complied with at that time.\n21.\nTrial without pleadings (O.18, r.21)\n21. (1) Where in an action to which this rule applies any defendant has entered an\nappearance in the action, the plaintiff or that defendant may apply to the Court\nby summons for an order that the action shall be tried without pleadings or\nfurther pleadings, as the case may be.\n(2) If, on the hearing of an application under this rule, the Court is satisfied that the\nissues in dispute between the parties can be defined without pleadings or further\npleadings, or that for any reason the action can properly be tried without\npleadings or further pleadings, as the case may be, the Court shall order the\naction to be so tried, and may direct the parties to prepare a statement of the\nissues in dispute or, if the parties are unable to agree such a statement, may settle\nthe statement itself.\n(3) Where the Court makes an order under paragraph (2), it shall, and where it\ndismisses an application for such an order, it may, give such directions as to the\nfurther conduct of the action as may be appropriate, and O.25, rr.2 to 7, shall,\nwith the omission of so much of rule 7(1) as requires parties to serve a notice\nspecifying the orders and direction which they desire and with any other\nnecessary modifications, apply as if the application under this rule were a\nsummons for directions.\n(4) This rule applies to every action begun by writ other than one which includes \u2014\n(a)\na claim by the plaintiff for libel, slander, malicious prosecution or false\nimprisonment; or\n(b) a claim by the plaintiff based on an allegation of fraud.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 19\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 137\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\nORDER 19\nDEFAULT OF PLEADINGS\n\n1.\nDefault of service of statement of claim (O.19, r.1)\n1.\nWhere the plaintiff is required by these Rules to serve a statement of claim on a\ndefendant and the plaintiff fails to serve it on the defendant, the defendant may, after\nthe expiration of the period fixed by or under these Rules for service of the statement\nof claim, apply to the Court for an order to dismiss the action, and the Court may by\norder dismiss the action or make such other order on such terms as it thinks just.\n2.\nDefault of defence: claim for liquidated demand (O.19, r.2)\n2.\n(1) Where the plaintiff's claim against a defendant is for a liquidated demand only,\nthen, if that defendant fails to serve a defence on the plaintiff, the plaintiff may,\nafter the expiration of the period fixed by or under these Rules for service of the\ndefence, enter final judgment against that defendant for a sum not exceeding \u2014\n(a)\nthe principal sum claimed in the writ;\n(b) interest, provided that the writ has been indorsed with a claim pursuant to\nO.6, r.2(e) or (f), as the case may be; and\n(c)\nfixed costs,\nand proceed with the action against the other defendants, if any.\n(2) O.13, r.1(2), shall apply for the purposes of this rule as it applies for the purposes\nof that rule.\n3.\nDefault of defence: claim for unliquidated damages (O.19, r.3)\n3.\nWhere the plaintiff's claim against a defendant is for unliquidated damages only, then,\nif that defendant fails to serve a defence on the plaintiff, the plaintiff may, after the\nexpiration of the period fixed by or under these Rules for service of the defence, enter\ninterlocutory judgment against that defendant for damages to be assessed and costs,\nand proceed with the action against the other defendants, if any.\n4.\nDefault of defence: claim in detinue (O.19, r.4)\n4.\nWhere the plaintiff's claim against a defendant relates to the detention of goods only,\nthen, if that defendant fails to serve a defence on the plaintiff, the plaintiff may, after\nthe expiration of the period fixed by or under these Rules for the service of the defence\nat the plaintiff\u2019s option enter either \u2014\n\nORDER 19\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 138\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(a)\ninterlocutory judgment against that defendant for delivery of the goods or\ntheir value to be assessed and costs; or\n(b) interlocutory judgment for the value of the goods to be assessed and costs,\nand proceed with the action against the other defendants, if any.\n5.\nDefault of defence: claim for possession of land (O.19, r.5)\n5.\n(1) Where the plaintiff's claim against a defendant is for possession of land only,\nthen if that defendant fails to serve a defence on the plaintiff, the plaintiff may,\nafter the expiration of the period fixed by or under these Rules for service of the\ndefence, enter judgment for possession of the land as against that defendant and\nfor costs, and proceed with the action against the other defendants, if any.\n(2) Where there is more than one defendant, judgment entered under this rule shall\nnot be enforced against any defendant unless and until judgment for possession\nof the land has been entered against all the defendants.\n6.\nDefault of defence: mixed claims (O.19, r.6)\n6.\nWhere the plaintiff makes against a defendant two or more of the claims mentioned\nin rules 2 to 5, and no other claim, then, if that defendant fails to serve a defence on\nthe plaintiff, the plaintiff may, after the expiration of the period fixed by or under\nthese Rules for service of the defence, enter against that defendant such judgment in\nrespect of any such claim as the plaintiff would be entitled to enter under those rules\nif that were the only claim made, and proceed with the action against the other\ndefendants, if any.\n7.\nDefault of defence: other claims (O.19, r.7)\n7.\n(1) Where the plaintiff makes against a defendant or defendants a claim of a\ndescription not mentioned in rules 2 to 5, then, if the defendant or all the\ndefendants (where there is more than one) fails or fail to serve a defence on the\nplaintiff, the plaintiff may, after the expiration of the period fixed by or under\nthese Rules for service of the defence, apply to the Court for judgment, and on\nthe hearing of the application the Court shall give such judgment as the plaintiff\nappears entitled to on the plaintiff\u2019s statement of claim.\n(2) Where the plaintiff makes such a claim as is mentioned in paragraph (1) against\nmore than one defendant, then, if one of the defendants makes default as\nmentioned in that paragraph, the plaintiff may \u2014\n(a)\nif the plaintiff\u2019s claim against the defendant in default is severable from\nthe plaintiff\u2019s claim against the other defendants, apply under that\nparagraph for judgment against that defendant, and proceed with the action\nagainst the other defendants; or\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 19\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 139\n\n(b) set down the action on motion for judgment against the defendant in\ndefault at the time when the action is set down for trial, or is set down on\nmotion for judgment, against the other defendants.\n(3) An application under paragraph (1) must be by summons or motion.\n8.\nDefault of defence to counterclaim (O.19, r.8)\n8.\nA defendant who counterclaims against a plaintiff shall be treated for the purposes of\nrules 2 to 7 as if the defendant were a plaintiff who had made against a defendant the\nclaim made in the counterclaim and, accordingly, where the plaintiff or any other\nparty against whom the counterclaim is made fails to serve a defence to counterclaim,\nthose rules shall apply as if the counterclaim were a statement of claim, the defence\nto counterclaim a defence and the parties making the counterclaim and against whom\nit is made were plaintiffs and defendants respectively, and as if references to the\nperiod fixed by or under these Rules for service of the defence were references to the\nperiod so fixed for service of the defence to counterclaim.\n9.\nSetting aside judgment (O.19, r.9)\n9.\nThe Court may, on such terms as it thinks just, set aside or vary any judgment entered\nin pursuance of this Order.\n\nORDER 19\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 140\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 20\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 141\n\nORDER 20\nAMENDMENT\n\n1.\nAmendment of writ without leave (O.20, r.1)\n1.\n(1) Subject to paragraph (3), the plaintiff may, without the leave of the Court, amend\nthe writ once at any time before the pleadings in the action begun by the writ\nare deemed to be closed.\n(2) Where a writ is amended under this rule after service thereof, then, unless the\nCourt otherwise directs on an application made ex parte, the amended writ must\nbe served on each defendant to the action.\n(3) This rule shall not apply in relation to an amendment which consists of \u2014\n(a)\nthe addition, omission or substitution of a party to the action or an\nalteration of the capacity in which a party to the action sues or is sued; or\n(b) the addition or substitution of a new cause of action; or\n(c)\nwithout prejudice to rule 3(1) an amendment of the statement of claim (if\nany) indorsed on the writ,\nunless the amendment is made before service of the writ on any party to the\naction.\n2.\nAmendment of acknowledgment of service (O.20, r.2)\n2.\n(1) Subject to paragraph (2) a party may not amend the party\u2019s acknowledgment of\nservice without the leave of the Court.\n\n(2) A party whose acknowledgment of service contains a statement to the effect\nthat \u2014\n(a)\nthe party does; or\n(b) the party does not,\nintend to contest the proceedings to which the acknowledgment relates may,\nwithout the leave of the Court, amend the acknowledgment by substituting for\nthat statement a statement to the opposite effect, provided that in a case falling\nunder subparagraph (b) the amendment is made before judgment has been\nobtained in the proceedings.\n(3) Where an acknowledgment of service is authorised to be amended under this\nrule, a fresh acknowledgment, amended as so authorised, must be handed in at\nthe Court office or sent by post to the Clerk of the Court, and O.12, r.3, shall\napply accordingly.\n\nORDER 20\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 142\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n3.\nAmendment of pleadings without leave (O.20, r.3)\n3.\n(1) A party may, without the leave of the Court, amend any pleading of the party\u2019s\nonce at any time before the pleadings are deemed to be closed and, where the\nparty does so, the party must serve the amended pleading on the opposite party.\n(2) Where an amended statement of claim is served on a defendant \u2014\n(a)\nthe defendant, if the defendant has already served a defence on the\nplaintiff, may amend that defendant\u2019s defence; and\n(b) the period for service of the defendant\u2019s defence or amended defence, as\nthe case may be, shall be either the period fixed by or under these Rules\nfor service of the defendant\u2019s defence or a period of 14 days after the\namended statement of claim is served on the defendant, whichever expires\nlater.\n(3) Where an amended defence is served on the plaintiff by a defendant -\n(a)\nthe plaintiff, if the plaintiff has already served a reply on that defendant,\nmay amend the plaintiff\u2019s reply; and\n(b) the period for service of the plaintiff\u2019s reply or amended reply, as the case\nmay be, shall be 14 days after the amended defence is served on the\nplaintiff.\n(4) In paragraphs (2) and (3) references to a defence and a reply include references\nto a counterclaim and a defence to counterclaim respectively.\n(5) Where an amended counterclaim is served by a defendant on a party (other than\nthe plaintiff) against whom the counterclaim is made, paragraph (2) shall apply\nas if the counterclaim were a statement of claim and as if the party by whom the\ncounterclaim is made were the plaintiff and the party against whom it is made a\ndefendant.\n(6) Where a party has pleaded to a pleading which is subsequently amended and\nserved on the party under paragraph (1), then, if that party does not amend that\nparty\u2019s pleading under the foregoing provisions of this rule, the party shall be\ntaken to rely on it in answer to the amended pleading, and O.18, r.14(2), shall\nhave effect in such a case as if the amended pleading had been served at the time\nwhen that pleading, before its amendment under paragraph (1), was served.\n4.\nApplication for disallowance of amendment made without leave (O.20, r.4)\n4.\n(1) Within 14 days after the service on a party of a writ amended under rule 1 or of\na pleading amended under rule 3(1), that party may apply to the Court to\ndisallow the amendment.\n(2) Where the Court hearing an application under this rule is satisfied that if an\napplication for leave to make the amendment in question had been made under\nrule 5 at the date when the amendment was made under rule 1(1) or rule 3(1)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 20\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 143\n\nleave to make the amendment or part of the amendment would have been\nrefused, it shall order the amendment or that part to be struck out.\n(3) Any order made on an application under this rule may be made on such terms\nas to costs or otherwise as the Court thinks just.\n5.\nAmendment of writ or pleading with leave (O.20, r.5)\n5.\n(1) Subject to O.15, rr.6, 6A, 7 and 8 and the following provisions of this rule, the\nCourt may at any stage of the proceedings allow the plaintiff to amend the\nplaintiff\u2019s writ, or any party to amend that party\u2019s pleading, on such terms as to\ncosts or otherwise as may be just and in such manner (if any) as it may direct.\n(2) Where an application to the Court for leave to make the amendment mentioned\nin paragraph (3), (4) or (5) is made after any relevant period of limitation current\nat the date of issue of the writ has expired, the Court may nevertheless grant\nsuch leave in the circumstances mentioned in that paragraph if it thinks it just to\ndo so.\n(3) An amendment to correct the name of a party may be allowed under paragraph\n(2) notwithstanding that it is alleged that the effect of the amendment will be to\nsubstitute a new party if the Court is satisfied that the mistake sought to be\ncorrected is a genuine mistake and was not misleading or such as to cause any\nreasonable doubt as to the identity of the person intending to sue or, as the case\nmay be, intended to be sued.\n(4) An amendment to alter the capacity in which a party sues may be allowed under\nparagraph (2) if the new capacity is one which that party had at the date of the\ncommencement of the proceedings or has since acquired.\n(5) An amendment may be allowed under paragraph (2) notwithstanding that the\neffect of the amendment will be to add or substitute a new cause of action if the\nnew cause of action arises out of the same facts or substantially the same facts\nas a cause of action in respect of which relief has already been claimed in the\naction by the party applying for leave to make the amendment.\n6.\nNo rule (O.20, r.6)\n6.\nNo rule (O.20, r.6)\n7.\nAmendment of other originating process (O.20, r.7)\n7.\nRule 5 shall have effect in relation to an originating summons, a petition and a notice\nof originating motion as it has effect in relation to a writ.\n\nORDER 20\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 144\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n8.\nAmendment of certain other documents (O.20, r.8)\n8.\n(1) For the purpose of determining the real question in controversy between the\nparties to any proceedings, or of correcting any defect or error in any\nproceedings, the Court may at any stage of the proceedings and either of its own\nmotion or on the application of any party to the proceedings order any document\nin the proceedings to be amended on such terms as to costs or otherwise as may\nbe just and in such manner (if any) as it may direct.\n(2) This rule shall not have effect in relation to a judgment or order.\n9.\nFailure to amend after order (O.20, r.9)\n9.\nWhere the Court makes an order under this Order giving any party leave to amend a\nwrit, pleading or other document, then, if that party does not amend the document in\naccordance with the order before the expiration of the period specified for that\npurpose in the order or, if no period is so specified, of a period of 14 days after the\norder was made, the order shall cease to have effect, without prejudice, however, to\nthe power of the Court to extend the period.\n10.\nMode of amendment of writ, etc. (O.20, r.10)\n10. (1) Any amendments authorised under any rule of this order to be made in a writ,\npleading or other document shall be given effect by preparing a fresh document,\nunless the Court directs otherwise in any case where the amendment is minimal.\n(2) An amended writ or other originating process shall be re-issued and any\namended pleading shall be re-filed.\n(3) A writ, pleading or other document which has been amended under this Order\nmust be indorsed with a statement that it has been amended, specifying the date\non which it was amended, the name of the Judge by whom the order (if any)\nauthorising the amendment was made and the date thereof, or, if no such order\nwas made, the number of the rule of this Order in pursuance of which the\namendment was made.\n11.\nAmendment of judgments and orders (O.20, r.11)\n11. Clerical mistakes in judgments or orders, or errors arising therein from any accidental\nslip or omission, may at any time be corrected by the Court on motion or summons\nwithout an appeal.\n12.\nAmendment of pleadings by agreement (O.20, r.12)\n12. (1) Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Order any pleading in any\ncause or matter may, by written agreement between the parties, be amended at\nany stage of the proceedings.\n(2) This rule shall not have effect in relation to an amendment to a counterclaim\nwhich consists of the addition, omission or substitution of a party.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 20\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 145\n\n13.\nManner in which amendments should be shown (O.20, r.13)\n13. (1) In all cases in which a writ, pleading or other document is amended, the\namended copy which is filed should make it clear what has been deleted and\nwhat has been added or altered so that the Court, when reading the amended\ndocument, shall be able to see at once the exact nature and extent of the\namendments made.\n(2) Any amendments made should be shown in the following different coloured\ninks, namely \u2014\n(a)\na first amendment in red;\n(b) a second or re-amendment in green;\n(c)\na third or re-re-amendment in violet; and\n(d) a fourth or re-re-re-amendment in yellow.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nORDER 21\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 146\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 21\nWITHDRAWAL AND DISCONTINUANCE\n\n1.\nWithdrawal of acknowledgment of service (O.21, r.1)\n1.\nA party who has acknowledged service in an action may withdraw the\nacknowledgment at any time with the leave of the Court.\n2.\nDiscontinuance of action, etc., without leave (O.21, r.2)\n2.\n(1) Subject to paragraph (2A), the plaintiff in an action begun by writ may, without\nthe leave of the Court, discontinue the action, or withdraw any particular claim\nmade by the plaintiff therein, as against any or all of the defendants at any time\nnot later than 14 days after service of the defence on the plaintiff or, if there are\ntwo or more defendants, of the defence last served, by serving a notice to that\neffect on the defendant concerned.\n(2) Subject to paragraph (2A), a defendant to an action begun by writ may, without\nthe leave of the Court \u2014\n(a)\nwithdraw the defendant\u2019s defence or any part of it at any time; or\n(b) discontinue a counterclaim, or withdraw any particular claim made by the\ndefendant therein, as against any or all of the parties against whom it is\nmade, at any time not later than 14 days after service on the defendant of\na defence to counterclaim or, if the counterclaim is made against two or\nmore parties, of the defence to counterclaim last served,\nby serving a notice to that effect on the plaintiff or other party concerned.\n(2A)  A party in whose favour an interim payment has been ordered, in accordance\nwith O.29, r.11, may not discontinue any action or counterclaim, or withdraw\nany particular claim therein, except with the leave of the Court or the consent of\nall the other parties.\n(3) Where there are two or more defendants to an action not all of whom serve a\ndefence on the plaintiff, and the period fixed by or under these Rules for service\nby any of those defendants of their defence expires after the latest date on which\nany other defendant serves that defendant\u2019s defence, paragraph (1) shall have\neffect as if the reference therein to the service of the defence last served were a\nreference to the expiration of that period.\n\nThis paragraph shall apply in relation to a counterclaim as it applies in relation\nto an action with the substitution for references to a defence, to the plaintiff and\nto paragraph (1), of references to a defence to counterclaim, to the defendant\nand to paragraph (2) respectively.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 21\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 147\n\n(3A) The plaintiff in an action begun by originating summons may, without the leave\nof the Court, discontinue the action or withdraw any particular question or claim\nin the originating summons, as against any or all of the defendants at any time\nnot later than 14 days after service on the plaintiff of the defendant's affidavit\nevidence filed pursuant to O.28, r.1A(4) or, if there are two or more defendants,\nof such evidence last served, by serving a notice to that effect on the defendant\nconcerned.\n(3B) When there are two or more defendants to an action begun by originating\nsummons not all of whom serve affidavit evidence on the plaintiff and the period\nfixed by order under these Rules for service by any of those defendants of their\naffidavit evidence, paragraph (3A) shall have effect as if the reference therein\nto the service of the affidavit evidence last served were a reference to the\nexpiration of that period.\n(4) If all the parties to an action consent, the action may be withdrawn without the\nleave of the Court at any time before trial by producing to the Clerk of the Court\na written consent to the action being withdrawn signed by all the parties.\n3.\nDiscontinuance of action, etc., with leave (O.21, r.3)\n3.\n(1) Except as provided by rule 2, a party may not discontinue an action (whether\nbegun by writ or otherwise) or counterclaim, or withdraw any particular claim\nmade by the party therein, without the leave of the Court, and the Court hearing\nan application for the grant of such leave may order the action or counterclaim\nto be discontinued, or any particular claim made therein to be struck out, as\nagainst any or all of the parties against whom it is brought or made on such\nterms as to costs, the bringing of a subsequent action or otherwise as it thinks\njust.\n(2) An application for the grant of leave under this rule may be made by summons\nor motion or by notice under O.25, r.7.\n4.\nEffect of discontinuance (O.21, r.4)\n4.\nSubject to any terms imposed by the Court in granting leave under rule 3, the fact that\na party has discontinued an action or counterclaim or withdrawn a particular claim\nmade by the party therein shall not be a defence to the subsequent action for the same,\nor substantially the same, cause of action.\n\nORDER 21\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 148\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n5.\nStay of subsequent action until costs paid (O.21, r.5)\n5.\n(1) Where a party has discontinued an action or counterclaim or withdrawn any\nparticular claim made by the party therein and the party is liable to pay any other\nparty's costs of the action or counterclaim or the costs occasioned to any other\nparty by the claim withdrawn, then, if, before payment of those costs, the party\nsubsequently brings an action for the same, or substantially the same, cause of\naction, the Court may order the proceedings in that action to be stayed until\nthose costs are paid.\n(2) An application for an order under this rule may be made by summons or motion,\nor by notice under O.25, r.7.\n6.\nWithdrawal of summons (O.21, r.6)\n6.\nA party who has taken out a summons in a cause or matter may not withdraw it\nwithout the leave of the Court.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 21\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 149\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nORDER 22\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 150\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 22\nPAYMENT INTO AND OUT OF COURT\n\n1.\nPayment into Court (O.22, r.1)\n1.\n(1) In any action for a debt or damages any defendant may at any time pay into\nCourt a sum of money in satisfaction of the cause of action in respect of which\nthe plaintiff claims or, where two or more causes of action are joined in the\naction, a sum or sums of money in satisfaction of any or all of those causes of\naction.\n(2) On making any payment into Court under this rule, and on increasing any such\npayment already made, the defendant must give notice thereof in Form No. 14\nof the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) to the\nplaintiff and every other defendant (if any); and within 3 days after receiving\nthe notice the plaintiff must send the defendant a written acknowledgment of its\nreceipt.\n(3) A defendant may, without leave, give notice of an increase in a payment made\nunder this rule but, subject to that and without prejudice to paragraph (5), a\nnotice of payment may not be withdrawn or amended without the leave of the\nCourt which may be granted on such terms as may be just.\n(4) Where two or more causes of action are joined in the action and money is paid\ninto Court under this rule in respect of all, or some only of, those causes of\naction, the notice of payment \u2014\n (a) must state that the money is paid in respect of all those causes of action,\nor, as the case may be, must specify the cause or causes of action in respect\nof which the payment is made; and\n(b) where the defendant makes separate payments in respect of each, or any\ntwo or more of those causes of action, must specify the sum paid in respect\nof that cause or, as the case may be, those causes of action.\n(5) Where a single sum of money is paid into Court under this rule in respect of two\nor more causes of action, then, if it appears to the Court that the plaintiff is\nembarrassed by the payment, the Court may, subject to paragraph (6), order the\ndefendant to amend the notice of payment so as to specify the sum paid in\nrespect of each cause of action.\n(6) Where a cause of action under the Torts (Reform) Act (as amended and revised)\nand a cause of action under the Estates Proceedings Act (as amended and\nrevised) are joined in the action, with or without any other cause of action, the\ncauses of action under the said Laws shall, for the purpose of paragraph (5) be\ntreated as one cause of action.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 22\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 151\n\n(7)  For the purposes of this rule, the plaintiff's cause of action in respect of a debt\nor damages shall be construed as a cause of action in respect, also, of such\ninterest as might be included in the judgment, whether under Section 34 of the\nJudicature Act (as amended and revised) or otherwise, if judgment were given\nat the date of the payment into Court.\n2.\nPayment in by defendant who has counterclaimed (O.22, r.2)\n2.\nWhere a defendant, who makes by counterclaim a claim against the plaintiff for a\ndebt or damages, pays a sum or sums of money into Court under rule 1, the notice of\npayment must state, if it be the case, that in making the payment the defendant has\ntaken into account and intends to satisfy \u2014\n(a)\nthe cause of action in respect of which the defendant claims; or\n(b) where two or more causes of action are joined in the counterclaim, all those\ncauses of action or, if not all, which of them.\n3.\nAcceptance of money paid into Court (O.22, r.3)\n3.\n(1) Where money is paid into Court under rule 1, then, subject to paragraph (2),\nwithin 21 days after receipt of the notice of payment, or, where more than one\npayment has been made or the notice has been amended, within 21 days after\nreceipt of the notice of the last payment or the amended notice but, in any case,\nbefore the trial or hearing of the action begins, the plaintiff may \u2014\n(a)\nwhere the money was paid in respect of the cause of action or all the causes\nof action in respect of which the plaintiff claims, accept the money in\nsatisfaction of that cause of action or those causes of action, as the case\nmay be; or\n(b) where the money was paid in respect of some only of the causes of action\nin respect of which the plaintiff claims, accept in satisfaction of any such\ncause or causes of action the sum specified in respect of that cause or those\ncauses of action in the notice of payment,\nby giving notice in Form No. 15 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as\namended and revised) to every defendant to the action.\n(2) Where after the trial or hearing of an action has begun \u2014\n(a)\nmoney is paid into Court under rule 1; or\n(b) money in Court is increased by a further payment into Court under that\nrule,\nthe plaintiff may accept the money in accordance with paragraph (1) within 2\ndays after receipt of the notice of payment or notice of the further payment, as\nthe case may be, but, in any case, before the Judge begins to deliver judgment\nor, if the trial is with a jury, before the Judge begins the Judge\u2019s summing up.\n\nORDER 22\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 152\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(3) Rule 1(5) shall not apply in relation to money paid into Court in an action after\nthe trial or hearing of the action has begun.\n(4) On the plaintiff accepting any money paid into Court all further proceedings in\nthe action or in respect of the specified cause or causes of action, as the case\nmay be, to which the acceptance relates, both against the defendant making the\npayment and against any other defendant sued jointly with or in the alternative\nto the defendant, shall be stayed.\n(5) Where money is paid into Court by a defendant who made a counterclaim and\nthe notice of payment stated, in relation to any sum paid, that in making the\npayment the defendant had taken into account and satisfied the cause or causes\nof action, or the specified cause or causes of action, in respect of which the\nplaintiff claimed, then, on the plaintiff accepting that sum all further proceedings\non the counterclaim or in respect of the specified cause or causes of action, as\nthe case may be, against the plaintiff shall be stayed.\n(6) A plaintiff who has accepted any sum paid into Court shall, subject to rule 4 and\nO.80, r.12, be entitled to receive payment of that sum in satisfaction of the cause\nor causes of action to which the acceptance relates.\n4.\nOrder for payment out of money accepted required in certain cases (O.22,\nr.4)\n4.\n(1) Where a plaintiff accepts any sum paid into Court and that sum was paid into\nCourt \u2014\n(a)\nby some but not all of the defendants sued jointly or in the alternative by\nthe plaintiff; or\n(b) with a defence of tender before action; or\n(c)\nin satisfaction either of causes of action arising under the Torts (Reform)\nAct (as amended and revised) and the Estates Proceedings Act (as\namended and revised) or of a cause of action arising thereunder where\nmore than one person is entitled to the money,\nthe money in Court shall not be paid out except under paragraph (2) or in\npursuance of an order of the Court, and the order shall deal with the whole costs\nof the action or of the cause of action to which the payment relates, as the case\nmay be.\n(2) Where an order of the Court is required under paragraph (1) by reason only of\nsubparagraph (1)(a), then if, either before or after accepting the money paid into\nCourt by some only of the defendants sued jointly or in the alternative by the\nplaintiff, the plaintiff discontinues the action against all other defendants and\nthose defendants consent in writing to the payment out of that sum, it may be\npaid out without an order of the Court.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 22\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 153\n\n(3) Where after the trial or hearing of an action has begun a plaintiff accepts any\nmoney paid into Court and all further proceedings in the action or in respect of\nthe specified cause or causes of action, as the case may be, to which the\nacceptance relates are stayed by virtue of rule 3(4), then, notwithstanding\nanything in paragraph (2), the money shall not be paid out except in pursuance\nof an order of the Court, and the order shall deal with the whole costs of the\naction.\n5.\nMoney remaining in Court (O.22, r.5)\n5.\nIf any money paid into Court in an action is not accepted in accordance with rule 3,\nthe money remaining in Court shall not be paid out except in pursuance of an order\nof the Court which may be made at any time before, or after the trial or hearing of the\naction; and where such an order is made before the trial or hearing the money shall\nnot be paid out except in satisfaction of the cause or causes of action in respect of\nwhich it was paid in.\n6.\nCounterclaim (O.22, r.6)\n6.\nA plaintiff against whom a counterclaim is made and any other defendant to the\ncounterclaim may pay money into Court in accordance with rule 1, and that rule and\nrules 3 (except paragraph (5)), 4 and 5 shall apply accordingly with the necessary\nmodifications.\n7.\nNon-disclosure of payment into Court (O.22, r.7)\n7.\n(1) Except in an action to which a defence of tender before action is pleaded, and\nexcept in an action all further proceedings in which are stayed by virtue of rule\n3(4) after the trial or hearing has begun and subject to paragraph (2), the fact\nthat money has been paid into Court under the foregoing provisions of this Order\nshall not be pleaded and no communication of that fact shall be made to the\nCourt at the trial or hearing of the action or counterclaim or of any question or\nissue as to the debt or damages until all questions of liability and of the amount\nof debt or damages have been decided.\n(2) Where the question of the costs of the issue of liability falls to be decided, that\nissue having been tried and an issue or question concerning the amount of the\ndebt or damages remaining to be tried separately, any party may bring to the\nattention of the Court the fact that a payment into Court has or has not been\nmade and the date (but not the amount) of such payment or of the first payment\nif more than one.\n8.\nMoney paid into Court under order (O.22, r.8)\n8.\n(1) On making any payment into Court under an order of the Court or certificate of\nthe Clerk of the Court, a party must give notice thereof to every other party to\nthe proceedings.\n\nORDER 22\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 154\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(2) Subject to paragraph (3), money paid into Court under an order of the Court or\na certificate of the Clerk of the Court shall not be paid out except in pursuance\nof an order of the Court.\n(3) Unless the Court otherwise orders, a party who has paid money into Court in\npursuance of an order made under O.14 \u2014\n(a)\nmay by notice to the other party appropriate the whole or any part of the\nmoney and any additional payment, if necessary, to any particular claim\nmade in the writ or counterclaim, as the case may be, and specified in the\nnotice; or\n(b) if the party pleads a tender, may by the party\u2019s pleading appropriate the\nwhole or any part of the money as payment into Court of the money alleged\nto have been tendered,\nand money appropriated in accordance with this rule shall be deemed to be\nmoney paid into Court in accordance with rule 1 or money paid into Court with\na plea of tender, as the case may be, and this Order shall apply accordingly.\n(4) If the Court so orders, paragraph (3) shall apply, with the necessary\nmodifications, where a party has paid money to another person to abide the\noutcome of the action.\n9.\nNo rule (O.22, r.9)\n9.\nNo rule (O.22, r.9)\n10.\nNo rule (O.22, r.10)\n10. No rule (O.22, r.10)\n11.\nNo rule (O.22, r.11)\n11. No rule (O.22, r.11)\n12.\nNo rule (O.22, r.12)\n12. No rule (O.22, r.12)\n13.\nInvestment of money in Court (O.22, r.13)\n13. Cash under the control of or subject to the order of the Court shall be invested in\naccordance with the provisions of Order 92.\n14.\nWritten offers \"without prejudice save as to costs\" (O.22, r.14)\n14. (1) A party to proceedings may at any time make a written offer to any other party\nto those proceedings which is expressed to be \"without prejudice save as to\ncosts\" and which relates to any issue in the proceedings.\n(2) Where an offer is made under paragraph (1), the fact that such an offer has been\nmade shall not be communicated to the Court until the question of costs falls to\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 22\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 155\n\nbe decided and the Court shall take into account any offer which has been\nbrought to its attention when making an order for costs.\nProvided that the Court shall not take such offer into account if, at the time it is\nmade, the party making it could have protected that party\u2019s position as to costs\nby means of a payment into Court under Order 22.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 20.01.97)\n\nORDER 23\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 156\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 23\nSECURITY FOR COSTS\n\n1.\nSecurity for costs of action, etc. (O.23, r.1)\n1.\n(1) Where, on the application of a defendant to an action or other proceedings it\nappears to the Court \u2014\n(a)\nthat the plaintiff is ordinarily resident out of the jurisdiction; or\n(b) that the plaintiff (not being a plaintiff who is suing in a representative\ncapacity) is a nominal plaintiff who is suing for the benefit of some other\nperson and that there is reason to believe that the plaintiff will be unable\nto pay the costs of the defendant if ordered to do so; or\n(c)\nsubject to paragraph (3), that the plaintiff's address is not stated in the writ\nor other originating process or is incorrectly stated therein; or\n(d) that the plaintiff has changed the plaintiff\u2019s address during the course of\nthe proceedings with a view to evading the consequences of the litigation,\n\nthen if, having regard to all the circumstances of the case, the Court thinks it just\nto do so, it may order the plaintiff to give such security for the defendant's costs\nof the action or other proceedings as it thinks just.\n(2) For the purposes of this rule a person is deemed to be ordinarily resident out of\nthe jurisdiction if the person does not have the right either to reside permanently\nin the Islands or have the right to work in the Islands.\n(3) The Court shall not require a plaintiff to give security by reason only of\nsubparagraph (1)(c) if the plaintiff satisfies the Court that the failure to state the\nplaintiff\u2019s address or the mis-statement thereof was made innocently and\nwithout intention to deceive.\n(4) The references in the foregoing paragraphs to a plaintiff and a defendant shall\nbe construed as references to the person (howsoever described on the record)\nwho is in the position of plaintiff or defendant, as the case may be, in the\nproceedings in question, including a proceeding on a counterclaim.\n2.\nManner of giving security (O.23, r.2)\n2.\nWhere an order is made requiring any party to give security for costs, security shall\nbe given in such manner, at such time, and on such terms (if any), as the Court may\ndirect.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 23\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 157\n\n3.\nSaving for enactments (O.23, r.3)\n3.\nThis Order is without prejudice to the provisions of any Law which empowers the\nCourt to require security to be given for the costs of any proceedings.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nORDER 24\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 158\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 24\nDISCOVERY\n\nI. DOCUMENTARY DISCOVERY\n1.\nMutual discovery of documents (O.24, r.1)\n1.\n(1) After the close of pleadings in an action begun by writ there shall, subject to and\nin accordance with the provisions of this Order, be discovery by the parties to\nthe action of the documents which are or have been in their possession, custody\nor power relating to matters in question in the action.\n(2) Nothing in this Order shall be taken as preventing the parties to an action\nagreeing to dispense with or limit the discovery of documents which they would\notherwise be required to make to each other.\n2.\nDiscovery by parties without order (O.24, r.2)\n2.\n(1) Subject to the provisions of this rule and of rule 4, the parties to an action\nbetween whom pleadings are closed must make discovery by exchanging lists\nof documents and, accordingly, each party must, within 14 days after the\npleadings in the action are deemed to be closed as between that party and any\nother party, make and serve on that other party a list of the documents which are\nor have been in the party\u2019s possession, custody or power relating to any matter\nin question between them in the action.\n\nWithout prejudice to any directions given by the Court under O.16, r.4, this\nparagraph shall not apply in third party proceedings, including proceedings\nunder that Order involving fourth or subsequent parties.\n(2) Unless the Court otherwise orders, a defendant to an action arising out of an\naccident on land due to a collision or apprehended collision involving a vehicle\nshall not make discovery of any documents to the plaintiff under paragraph (1).\n(3) Paragraph (1) shall not be taken as requiring a defendant to an action for the\nrecovery of any penalty recoverable by virtue of any enactment to make\ndiscovery of any documents.\n(4) Paragraphs (2) and (3) shall apply in relation to a counterclaim as they apply in\nrelation to an action but with the substitution, for the reference in paragraph (2)\nto the plaintiff, of a reference to the party making the counterclaim.\n(5) On the application of any party required by this rule to make discovery of\ndocuments, the Court may \u2014\n(a)\norder that the parties to the action or any of them shall make discovery\nunder paragraph (1) of such documents or classes of documents only, or\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 24\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 159\n\nas to such only of the matters in question, as may be specified in the order;\nor\n(b) if satisfied that discovery by all or any of the parties is not necessary, or\nnot necessary at that stage of the action, order that there shall be no\ndiscovery of documents by any or all of the parties either at all or at that\nstage,\n\nand the Court shall make such an order if and so far as it is of opinion that\ndiscovery is not necessary either for disposing fairly of the action or for saving\ncosts.\n(6) An application for an order under paragraph (5) must be by summons, and the\nsummons must be taken out before the expiration of the period within which by\nvirtue of this rule discovery of documents in the action is required to be made.\n(7) Any party to whom discovery of documents is required to be made under this\nrule may, at any time before the summons for directions in the action is taken\nout, serve on the party required to make such discovery a notice requiring that\nparty to make an affidavit verifying the list the party is required to make under\nparagraph (1), and the party on whom such a notice is served must, within 14\ndays after service of the notice, make and file an affidavit in compliance with\nthe notice and serve a copy of the affidavit on the party by whom the notice was\nserved.\n3.\nOrder for discovery (O.24, r.3)\n3.\n(1) Subject to the provisions of this rule and of rules 4 and 8, the Court may order\nany party to a cause or matter (whether begun by writ, originating summons or\notherwise) to make and serve on any other party a list of the documents which\nare or have been in the party\u2019s possession, custody or power relating to any\nmatter in question in the cause or matter, and may at the same time or\nsubsequently also order the party to make and file an affidavit verifying such a\nlist and to serve a copy thereof on the other party.\n(2) Where a party who is required by rule 2 to make discovery of documents fails\nto comply with any provision of that rule, the Court on the application of any\nparty to whom discovery was required to be made may make an order against\nthe first mentioned party under paragraph (1) of this rule or, as the case may be,\nmay order that party to make and file an affidavit verifying the list of documents\nthat party is required to make under rule 2 and to serve a copy thereof on the\napplicant.\n(3) An order under this rule may be limited to such documents or classes of\ndocuments only or to such only of the matters in question in the cause or matter,\nas may be specified in the order.\n\nORDER 24\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 160\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n4.\nOrders for determination of issue, etc., before discovery (O.24, r.4)\n4.\n(1) Where on an application for an order under rule 2 or 3 it appears to the Court\nthat any issue or question in the cause or matter should be determined before\nany discovery of documents is made by the parties, the Court may order that\nthat issue or question be determined first.\n(2) Where in an action begun by writ an order is made under this rule for the\ndetermination of an issue or question, O.25, rr.2 to 7 shall, with the omission of\nso much of rule 7(1) as requires parties to serve a notice specifying the orders\nand directions which they desire and with any other necessary modifications,\napply as if the application on which the order was made were a summons for\ndirections.\n5.\nForm of list and affidavit (O.24, r.5)\n5.\n(1) A list of documents made in compliance with rule 2 or with an order under rule\n3 must be in Form No. 16 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended\nand revised), and must enumerate the documents in a convenient order and as\nshortly as possible but describing each of them or, in the case of bundles of\ndocuments of the same nature, each bundle, sufficiently to enable it to be\nidentified.\n(2) If it is desired to claim that any documents are privileged from production, the\nclaim must be made in the list of documents with a sufficient statement of the\ngrounds of the privilege.\n(3) If it is desired to claim that any documents contain confidential information\nwithin the meaning of Section 2 of the Confidential Information Disclosure Act\n(as amended and revised), and that the relevant principal in relation to such\nconfidential information is someone other than the party or parties on whom the\nlist of documents is to be served, the claim must be made in the list of documents\nwith a sufficient statement of the grounds of the claim.\n(4) Where a claim is made under paragraph (3) of this rule, any party to whom\ndiscovery was required to be made may serve a notice on the party making\ndiscovery, requiring that party to make an application to the Court under Section\n4 of the Confidential Information Disclosure Act (as amended and revised), and\nsuch application shall be made within 14 days of receipt of the notice.\n6.\nDefendant entitled to copy of co-defendant's list (O.24, r.6)\n6.\n(1) A defendant who has pleaded in an action shall be entitled to have a copy of any\nlist of documents served under any of the foregoing rules of this Order on the\nplaintiff by any other defendant to the action; and a plaintiff against whom a\ncounterclaim is made in an action begun by writ shall be entitled to have a copy\nof any list of documents served under any of those rules on the party making the\ncounterclaim by any other defendant to the counterclaim.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 24\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 161\n\n(2) A party required by virtue of paragraph (1) to supply a copy of a list of\ndocuments must supply it free of charge on a request made by the party entitled\nto it.\n(3) Where in an action begun by originating summons the Court makes an order\nunder rule 3 requiring a defendant to the action to serve a list of documents on\nthe plaintiff, it may also order the defendant to supply any other defendant to\nthe action with a copy of that list.\n(4)  In this rule \"list of documents\" includes an affidavit verifying a list of\ndocuments.\n7.\nOrder for discovery of particular documents (O.24, r.7)\n7.\n(1) Subject to rule 8, the Court may at any time, on the application of any party to\na cause or matter, make an order requiring any other party to make an affidavit\nstating whether any document specified or described in the application or any\nclass of documents so specified or described is, or has at any time been in that\nother party\u2019s possession, custody or power, and if not then in that other party\u2019s\npossession, custody or power when that other party parted with it and what has\nbecome of it.\n(2) An order may be made against a party under this rule notwithstanding that the\nparty may already have made or been required to make a list of documents or\naffidavit under rule 2 or 3.\n(3) An application for an order under this rule must be supported by an affidavit\nstating the belief of the deponent that the party from whom discovery is sought\nunder this rule has, or at some time had, in the deponent\u2019s possession custody\nor power the document, or class of documents specified or described in the\napplication and that it relates to one or more of the matters in question in the\ncause or matter.\n8.\nDiscovery to be ordered only if necessary (O.24, r.8)\n8.\nOn the hearing of an application for an order under rule 3 or 7 the Court, if satisfied\nthat discovery is not necessary, or not necessary at that stage of the cause or matter,\nmay dismiss or, as the case may be, adjourn the application and shall in any case\nrefuse to make such an order if and so far as it is of opinion that discovery is not\nnecessary either for disposing fairly of the cause or matter or for saving costs.\n\nORDER 24\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 162\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n9.\nInspection of documents referred to in list (O.24, r.9)\n9.\nA party who has served a list of documents on any other party, whether in compliance\nwith rule 2 or with an order under rule 3, must allow the other party to inspect the\ndocuments referred to in the list (other than any which the party objects to produce)\nand to take copies thereof, and, accordingly, the party must when the party serves the\nlist on the other party also serve on that party a notice stating a time within 7 days\nafter the service thereof at which the said documents may be inspected at a place in\nthe notice.\n10.\nInspection of documents referred to in pleadings and affidavits (O.24, r.10)\n10. (1) Any party to a cause or matter shall be entitled at any time to serve a notice on\nany other party in whose pleadings or affidavits reference is made to any\ndocument requiring that party to produce that document for the inspection of the\nparty giving the notice and to permit the party to take copies thereof.\n(2) The party on whom a notice is served under paragraph (1) must, within 4 days\nafter service of the notice, serve on the party giving the notice a notice stating a\ntime within 7 days after the service thereof at which the documents, or such of\nthem as the party does not object to produce, may be inspected at a place\nspecified in the notice, and stating which (if any) of the documents the party\nobjects to produce and on what grounds.\n11.\nOrder for production for inspection (O.24, r.11)\n11. (1) If a party who is required by rule 9 to serve such a notice as is therein mentioned\nor who is served with a notice under rule 10(1) \u2014\n(a)\nfails to serve a notice under rule 9 or, as the case may be, rule 10(2); or\n(b) objects to produce any document for inspection; or\n(c)\noffers inspection at a time or place such that, in the opinion of the Court,\nit is unreasonable to offer inspection then, or, as the case may be, there,\n\nthen, subject to rule 14(1), the Court may, on the application of the party entitled\nto inspection, make an order for production of the documents in question for\ninspection at such time and place, and in such manner, as it thinks fit.\n(2) Without prejudice to paragraph (1), but subject to rule 14(1) the Court may, on\nthe application of any party to a cause or matter, order any other party to permit\nthe party applying to inspect any documents in the possession, custody or power\nof that other party relating to any matter in question in the cause or matter.\n(3) An application for an order under paragraph (2) must be supported by an\naffidavit specifying or describing the documents of which inspection is sought\nand stating the belief of the deponent that they are in the possession, custody or\npower of the other party and that they relate to a matter in question in the cause\nor matter.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 24\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 163\n\n12.\nProvision of copies of documents (O.24, r.12)\n12. (1) Any party who is entitled to inspect any documents under any provision of this\nOrder or any order made thereunder may at or before the time when inspection\ntakes place serve on the party who is required to produce such documents for\ninspection a notice (which shall contain an undertaking to pay the reasonable\ncharges) requiring the party to supply a true copy of any such document as is\ncapable of being copied by photographic or similar process.\n(2) The party on whom such a notice is served must within 7 days of receipt thereof\nsupply the copy required together with an account of the reasonable charges.\n(3) When a party fails to supply to another party a copy of any document under\nparagraph (2), the Court may on the application of either party, make such order\nas to the supply of that document as it thinks fit.\n13.\nOrder for production to Court (O.24, r.13)\n13. At any stage of the proceedings in any cause or matter the Court may, subject to rule\n14(1), order any party to produce to the Court any document in that party\u2019s\npossession, custody or power relating to any matter in question in the cause or matter\nand the Court may deal with the document when produced in such manner as it thinks\nfit.\n14.\nProduction to be ordered only if necessary, etc. (O.24, r.14)\n14. (1) No order for the production of any documents for inspection or to the Court or\nfor the supply of a copy of any document shall be made under any of the\nforegoing rules unless the Court is of opinion that the order is necessary either\nfor disposing fairly of the cause or matter or for saving costs.\n (2) Where on an application under this Order for production of any document for\ninspection or to the Court or for the supply of a copy of a document privileged\nfrom such production or supply is claimed or objection is made to such\nproduction or supply on the ground that it contains confidential information or\non any other ground, the Court may inspect the document for the purpose of\ndeciding whether the claim or objection is valid.\n15.\nProduction of business books (O.24, r.15)\n15. (1) Where production of any business books for inspection is applied for under any\nof the foregoing rules, the Court may, instead of ordering production of the\noriginal books for inspection, order a copy of any entries therein to be supplied\nand verified by an affidavit of some person who has examined the copy with the\noriginal books.\n(2) Any such affidavit shall state whether or not there are in the original books any\nand what erasures, interlineations or alterations.\n\nORDER 24\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 164\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(3) Notwithstanding that a copy of any entries in any book has been supplied under\nthis rule, the Court may order production of the book from which the copy was\nmade.\n\nII. DISCOVERY BY ORAL EXAMINATION\n16.\nOrder for Discovery by Oral Examination (O.24, r.16)\n16. (1) In an action begun by Writ, the Court may make an order for discovery by oral\nexamination of any party or, if the party is a body corporate, any officer thereof.\n\n(2) On the hearing of an application for an order under this rule, the Court may\nmake such an order if and so far as it is of opinion that discovery by oral\nexamination is necessary either for disposing fairly of the cause or matter or for\nsaving costs.\n(3) An order shall not be made under this rule until after the parties have given\ndiscovery of documents in accordance with rules 2 or 3 or until after the Court\nhas determined in accordance with rule 8 that discovery of documents is not\nnecessary.\n(4) An order for examination under this rule shall specify \u2014\n(a)\nthe time and place of the examination;\n(b) the maximum duration of the examination; and\n(c)\nthe party having responsibility for engaging the services of a Court\nreporter.\n17.\nConduct of examination (O.24, r.17)\n17. (1) An examination for discovery shall be taken down by a Court reporter in the\nform of questions and answers and the transcript shall be certified as an accurate\ntranscription by the Court reporter.\n(2) The Court reporter shall record the names and addresses of all the persons\npresent and the time(s) at which the examination commenced and finished.\n(3) The examination shall be done under oath and the Court reporter shall be\nempowered to administer the oath.\n(4) The examination of a person for discovery shall be in the nature of a crossexamination and the person examined may be re-examined on that person\u2019s own\nbehalf or on behalf of another party not adverse in interest to that person in\nrelation to any matter respecting which that person has been examined.\n(5) Documents referred to during an examination for discovery shall be retained by\nthe parties and shall be exhibited to the transcript only if all parties agree that it\nis necessary to do so.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 24\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 165\n\n(6) Unless the Court otherwise orders, a person being examined for discovery shall\n(subject to any claim of privilege) answer any question within that person\u2019s\nknowledge or means of knowledge regarding any matter in question in the\naction and is compellable to give the names and addresses of all persons who\nreasonably might be expected to have knowledge relating to any matter in\nquestion in the action.\n(7) A person ordered to be examined for discovery shall take all such steps as may\nbe reasonably necessary to inform themselves of the matters in question in the\naction and the examination may be adjourned for that purpose.\n(8) Where a person under examination objects to answering any questions put to\nthe person, or if objection is taken to any such question, that question, the ground\nfor the objection and the answer to the question to which objection is taken must\nbe taken down and recorded.\n(9) The validity of the ground for objecting to answer any such question or for\nobjecting to any such question shall be decided by the Court.\n(10) If the Court decides against the person taking the objection it may order the\nperson to submit to further examination and to pay the costs occasioned by that\nperson\u2019s objection.\n18.\nUse of transcripts (O.24, r.18)\n18. (1) Certified copies of transcripts of oral examinations for discovery (which may be\nordered by any party) shall be served on all the parties to the action within 14\ndays after completion of the transcript of the examination.\n(2) At the trial of an action any party may use in evidence as part of that party\u2019s\ncase, if otherwise admissible, the whole or part of the examination for discovery\nof a party having an adverse interest (the \"adverse party\") in the following\nmanner.\n(3) A party may read in evidence as part of that party\u2019s case, any portion of any\nadverse party's discovery, subject to the Court ordering that any further passage\nshould be read in, as a matter of fairness, to fully explain or qualify any answer\ngiven.\n(4) A party may put to an adverse party in cross examination any questions and\nanswers contained in the transcript of the adverse party\u2019s examination.\n(5) If the adverse party does not testify personally or call any evidence, then the\nother parties may read in evidence any portion of the transcript of the adverse\nparty's examination, as evidence for that party's case, subject to the Court\nordering that any further passage should be read in, as a matter of fairness, to\nfully explain or qualify any answer given.\n\nORDER 24\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 166\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nIII. GENERAL PROVISIONS\n19.\nDisclosure which would be injurious to public interest: saving (O.24, r.19)\n19. The foregoing provisions of this Order shall be without prejudice to any rule of law\nwhich authorises or requires the withholding of any document or information on the\nground that the disclosure of it would be injurious to the public interest.\n20.\nFailure to comply with an order for discovery (O.24, r.20)\n20. (1) Where the Court has made an order for discovery (either of documents or by\nway of oral examination) against any party and such party fails to comply, the\nCourt may make such order as it thinks just, including, in particular, an order\nthat the action be dismissed or, as the case may be order that the defence be\nstruck out and final judgment entered accordingly.\n(2) If any party against whom an order for discovery is made fails to comply with\nit, then, without prejudice to paragraph (1), the party shall be liable to committal\nor, where the party is a body corporate, its responsible officer(s) shall be liable\nto committal.\n(3) Service on a party's attorney of an order for discovery made against that party\nshall be sufficient service to found an application for committal of the party\ndisobeying the order but the party may show cause in answer to the application\nthat the party had no notice or knowledge of the order.\n(4) An attorney on whom an order made against that attorney\u2019s client is served and\nwho fails without reasonable excuse to give notice thereof to that attorney\u2019s\nclient shall be liable to committal.\n21.\nRevocation and variation of orders (O.24, r.21)\n21. Any order made under this Order (including an order made on appeal) may, on\nsufficient cause being shown, be revoked or varied by a subsequent order or direction\nof the Court made or given at or before the trial of the cause or matter in connection\nwith which the original order was made.\n22.\nUse of documents and transcripts (O.24, r.22)\n22. Any undertaking, whether expressed or implied, not to use a document or transcript\nfor any purposes other than the proceedings in which it is disclosed or made shall\ncease to apply to such document or transcript after it has been read to or by the Court,\nor referred to in open Court, unless the Court for special reasons has otherwise\nordered on the application of a party or of the person to whom the document belongs\nor by whom the oral evidence was given.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 08.09.03)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 25\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 167\n\nORDER 25\nSUMMONS FOR DIRECTIONS\n\n1.\nSummons for directions (O.25, r.1)\n1.\n(1) With a view to providing, in every action to which this rule applies, an occasion\nfor the consideration by the Court of the preparations for the trial of the action,\nso that \u2014\n(a)\nall matters which must or can be dealt with on interlocutory applications\nand have not already been dealt with may so far as possible be dealt with;\nand\n(b) such directions may be given as to the future course of the action as appear\nbest adapted to secure the just, expeditious and economical disposal\nthereof,\nthe plaintiff must, within 1 month after the pleadings in the action are deemed\nto be closed, take out a summons (in these Rules referred to as a summons for\ndirections) returnable in not less than 14 days.\n(2) This rule applies to all actions begun by writ except \u2014\n(a)\nactions in which the plaintiff or defendant has applied for judgment under\nO.14, or in which the plaintiff applied for judgment under O.86 and\ndirections have been given under the relevant Orders;\n(b) actions in which the plaintiff or defendant has applied under O.18, r.21,\nfor trial without pleadings or further pleadings and directions have been\ngiven under that rule;\n(c)\nactions in which an order has been made under O.24, r.4, for the trial of an\nissue or question before discovery;\n(d) actions in which directions have been given under O.29, r.7;\n(e)\nactions in which an order for the taking of an account has been made under\nO.43, r.1;\n(f)\nactions for the infringement of a patent; and\n(g) actions for personal injuries for which automatic directions are provided\nby rule 8.\n(3) Where, in the case of any action in which discovery of documents is required to\nbe made by any party under O.24, r.2, the period of 14 days referred to in\nparagraph (1) of that rule is extended, whether by consent or by order of the\nCourt or both by consent and by order, paragraph (1) of this rule shall have effect\nin relation to that action as if for the reference therein to 1 month after the\n\nORDER 25\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 168\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\npleadings in the action are deemed to be closed there were substituted a\nreference to 14 days after the expiration of the period referred to in paragraph\n(1) of the said rule 2 as so extended.\n(4) If the plaintiff does not take out a summons for directions in accordance with\nthe foregoing provisions of this rule, the defendant or any defendant may do so\nor apply for an order to dismiss the action.\n(5) On an application by a defendant to dismiss the action under paragraph (4) the\nCourt may either dismiss the action on such terms as may be just or deal with\nthe application as if it were a summons for directions.\n(6) In the case of an action which is proceeding only as respects a counterclaim,\nreferences in this rule to the plaintiff and defendant shall be construed\nrespectively as references to the party making the counterclaim and the\ndefendant to the counterclaim.\n(7) Notwithstanding anything in paragraph (1) \u2014\n(a)\nany party to the action to which this rule applies may take out a summons\nfor directions at any time after the defendant has given notice of intention\nto defend, or, if there are two or more defendants, at least one of them has\ngiven such notice; and\n(b) the Court may make directions of its own motion at any time provided that\nthe parties have been given such notice, if any, as may be appropriate\nhaving regard to the nature of the directions intended to be given by the\nCourt.\n2.\nDuty to consider all matters (O.25, r.2)\n2.\n(1) When the summons for directions first comes to be heard, the Court shall\nconsider whether \u2014\n(a)\nit is possible to deal then with all the matters which, by the subsequent\nrules of this Order, are required to be considered on the hearing of the\nsummons for directions; or\n(b) it is expedient to adjourn the consideration of all or any of those matters\nuntil a later stage.\n(2) If, when the summons for directions first comes to be heard, the Court considers\nthat it is possible to deal with all the said matters, it shall deal with them\nforthwith and shall endeavour to secure that all other matters which must or can\nbe dealt with on interlocutory applications and have not already been dealt with\nare also then dealt with.\n(3) If, when the summons for directions first comes to be heard, the Court considers\nthat it is expedient to adjourn the consideration of all or any of the matters which,\nby the subsequent rules of this Order, are required to be considered on the\nhearing of the summons, the Court shall deal forthwith with such of those\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 25\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 169\n\nmatters as it considers can conveniently be dealt with forthwith and adjourn the\nconsideration of the remaining matters and shall endeavour to secure that all\nother matters which must or can be dealt with on interlocutory applications and\nhave not already been dealt with are dealt with either then or at a resumed\nhearing of the summons for directions.\n(4) If the hearing of the summons for directions is adjourned without a day being\nfixed for the resumed hearing thereof, any party may restore it to the list on 4\ndays' notice to the other parties.\n3.\nParticular matters for consideration (O.25, r.3)\n3.\nOn the hearing of the summons for directions, or when giving directions of its own\nmotion, the Court shall in particular consider (if necessary of its own motion) whether\nany order should be made or direction given in respect of any of the following\nmatters \u2014\n(a)\nfixing a trial date and\/or a timetable for future steps in the action;\n(b) making orders for the disposal of the whole or part of the cause or matter\npursuant to O.14A and\/or striking out the whole or part of any pleading\npursuant to O.18, r.19;\n(c)\namendment of the writ or any pleading pursuant to O.20, r.5;\n(d) directions pursuant to O.38, r.2 to r.7 in relation to evidence generally;\n(e)\ndirections pursuant to O.38, r.21 to r.31 relating to hearsay evidence;\n(f)\ndirections pursuant to O.38, r.36 to r.43 relating to expert evidence;\n(g) directions for the determination of preliminary issues pursuant to O.33, r.3\nor a split trial pursuant to O.33, r.4A;\n(h) orders pursuant to O.24 relating to discovery including an order pursuant\nto rule 20 that an action be dismissed or, as the case may be, that the\ndefence be struck out and final judgment entered accordingly;\n(i)\ngive directions which facilitate alternative dispute resolutions.\n4.\nAdmissions and agreements to be made (O.25, r.4)\n4.\nAt the hearing of the summons for directions the Court shall endeavour to secure that\nthe parties make all admissions and all agreements as to the conduct of the\nproceedings which ought reasonably to be made by them and may cause the order on\nthe summons to record any admissions or agreements so made, and (with a view to\nsuch special order, if any, as to costs as may be just being made at the trial) any refusal\nto make any admission or agreement.\n\nORDER 25\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 170\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n5.\nLimitation of right of appeal (O.25, r.5)\n5.\nNothing in rule 4 shall be construed as requiring the Court to endeavour to secure that\nthe parties shall agree to exclude or limit any right of appeal, but the order made on\nthe summons for directions may record any such agreement.\n6.\nDuty to give all information at hearing (O.25, r.6)\n6.\n(1) Subject to paragraph (2), no affidavit shall be used on the hearing of the\nsummons for directions except by the leave or direction of the Court, but, subject\nto paragraph (4), it shall be the duty of the parties to the action and their advisers\nto give all such information and produce all such documents on any hearing of\nthe summons as the Court may reasonably require for the purposes of enabling\nit properly to deal with the summons.\n\nThe Court may, if it appears proper so to do in the circumstances, authorise any\nsuch information or documents to be given or produced to the Court without\nbeing disclosed to the other parties but, in the absence of such authority, any\ninformation or document given or produced under this paragraph shall be given\nor produced to all the parties present or represented on the hearing of the\nsummons as well as to the Court.\n(2) No leave shall be required by virtue of paragraph (1) for the use of an affidavit\nby any party on the hearing of the summons for directions in connection with\nany application thereat for any order if, under any of these Rules, an application\nfor such an order is required to be supported by an affidavit.\n(3) If the Court on any hearing of the summons for directions requires a party to the\naction or the party\u2019s attorney to give any information or produce any document\nand that information or document is not given or produced, then, subject to\nparagraph (4), the Court may \u2014\n(a)\ncause the facts to be recorded in the order with a view to such special order,\nif any, as to costs as may be just being made at the trial; or\n(b) if it appears to the Court to be just so to do, order the whole or any part of\nthe pleadings of the party concerned to be struck out, or, if the party is\nplaintiff or the claimant under a counterclaim, order the action or\ncounterclaim to be dismissed on such terms as may be just.\n(4) Notwithstanding anything in the foregoing provisions of this rule, no\ninformation or documents which are confidential or privileged from disclosure\nshall be required to be given or produced under this rule by or by the attorneys\nof any party otherwise than with the consent of that party.\n7.\nDuty to make all interlocutory applications on summons for directions (O.25,\nr.7)\n7.\n(1) Any party to whom the summons for directions is addressed must so far as\npracticable apply at the hearing of the summons for any order or directions\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 25\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 171\n\nwhich the party may desire as to any matter capable of being dealt with on an\ninterlocutory application in the action and must, not less than 7 days before the\nhearing of the summons, serve on the other parties a notice specifying those\norders and directions insofar as they differ from the orders and directions asked\nfor by the summons.\n(2) If the hearing of the summons for directions is adjourned and any party to the\nproceedings desires to apply at the resumed hearing for any order or directions\nnot asked for by the summons or in any notice given under paragraph (1), the\nparty must, not less than 7 days before the resumed hearing of the summons,\nserve on the other parties a notice specifying those orders and directions insofar\nas they differ from the orders and directions asked for by the summons or in any\nsuch notice as aforesaid.\n(3) Any application subsequent to the summons for directions and before judgment\nas to any matter capable of being dealt with on an interlocutory application in\nthe action must be made under the summons by 4 clear days' notice to the other\nparty stating the grounds of the application.\n8.\nAutomatic directions in personal injury actions (O.25, r.8)\n8.\n(1) When the pleadings in any action to which this rule applies are deemed to be\nclosed the following directions shall take effect automatically \u2014\n(a)\nthere shall be discovery of documents within 14 days in accordance with\nO.24, r.2, and inspection within 7 days thereafter, save that where liability\nis admitted, or where the action arises out of a road accident, discovery\nshall be limited to disclosure by the plaintiff of any documents relating to\nspecial damages;\n(b) subject to paragraph (2), when any party intends to place reliance at the\ntrial on expert evidence, the party shall, within 10 weeks disclose the\nsubstance of that evidence to the other parties in the form of a written\nreport, which shall be agreed if possible;\n(c)\nunless such reports are agreed, the parties shall be at liberty to call as expert\nwitnesses those witnesses, the substance of whose evidence has been\ndisclosed in accordance with the preceding subparagraph, except that the\nnumber of expert witnesses shall be limited in any case to two medical\nexperts and one expert of any other kind;\n(d) photographs, a sketch plan and the contents of any police accident report\nbook shall be receivable in evidence at the trial, and shall be agreed if\npossible;\n(e)\nthe action shall be tried by Judge alone and shall be set down within 6\nmonths;\n(f)\nthe Court shall be notified, on setting down, of the estimated length of the\ntrial.\n\nORDER 25\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 172\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(2) When subparagraph (1)(b) applies to more than one party the reports shall be\ndisclosed by mutual exchange, medical for medical and non-medical for nonmedical, within the time provided or as soon thereafter as the reports on each\nside are available.\n(3) Nothing in paragraph (1) shall prevent any party to an action to which this rule\napplies from applying to Court for such further or different directions or orders\nas may, in the circumstances, be appropriate.\n(4) For the purposes of this rule \u2014\n(a)\n\"road accident\" means an accident on land due to a collision or\napprehended collision involving a vehicle; and\n(b) \"documents relating to special damages\" include \u2014\n(i)\ndocuments relating to any industrial injury, industrial disablement or\nsickness benefit rights; and\n(ii) when the claim is made under the Torts (Reform) Act (as amended\nand revised) documents relating to any claim for dependency on the\ndeceased.\n(5) This rule applies to any action for personal injuries except \u2014\n(a)\nany admiralty action; and\n(b) any action where the pleadings contain an allegation of a negligent act or\nomission in the course of medical treatment.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 08.09.03)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 26\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 173\n\nORDER 26\nINTERROGATORIES\n\n1.\nDiscovery by interrogatories (O.26, r.1)\n1.\n(1) A party to any cause or matter may in accordance with the following provisions\nof this Order serve on any other party interrogatories relating to any matter in\nquestion between the applicant and that other party in the cause or matter which\nare necessary either \u2014\n(a)\nfor disposing fairly of the cause or matter; or\n(b) for saving costs.\n(2) Without prejudice to the provisions of paragraph (1), a party may apply to the\nCourt for an order giving the party leave to serve on any other party\ninterrogatories relating to any matter in question between the applicant and that\nother party in the cause or matter.\n(3) A proposed interrogatory which does not relate to such a matter as is mentioned\nin paragraph (1) may not be administered notwithstanding that it might be\nadmissible in oral cross-examination of a witness.\n(4) In this Order \u2014\n(a)\n\"interrogatories without order\" means interrogatories served under\nparagraph (1); and\n(b) \"ordered interrogatories\" means interrogatories served under paragraph\n(2) or interrogatories which are required to be answered pursuant to an\norder made on an application under rule 3(2) and, where such an order is\nmade the interrogatories shall not, unless the Court orders otherwise, be\ntreated as interrogatories without order for the purposes of rule 3(1).\n(5) Unless the context otherwise requires, the provisions of this Order apply to both\ninterrogatories without order and ordered interrogatories.\n2.\nForm and nature of interrogatories (O.26, r.2)\n2.\n(1) Where interrogatories are served, a note at the end of the interrogatories shall\nspecify \u2014\n(a)\na period of time (not being less than 28 days from the date of service)\nwithin which the interrogatories are to be answered;\n(b) where the party to be interrogated is a body corporate or unincorporate\nwhich is empowered by law to sue or be sued whether in its own name or\nin the name of an officer or other person, the officer or member on whom\nthe interrogatories are to be served; and\n\nORDER 26\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 174\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(c)\nwhere the interrogatories are to be served on two or more parties or are\nrequired to be answered by an agent or servant of a party, which of the\ninterrogatories each party or, as the case may be, an agent or servant is\nrequired to answer, and which agent or servant.\n(2) Subject to rule 5(1), a party on whom interrogatories are served shall, unless the\nCourt orders otherwise on an application under rule 3(2), be required to give\nwithin the period specified under rule 2(1)(a) answers, which shall (unless the\nCourt directs otherwise) be on affidavit.\n3.\nInterrogatories without order (O.26, r.3)\n3.\n(1) Interrogatories without order may be served on a party not more than twice.\n(2) A party on whom interrogatories without order are served may, within 14 days\nof the service of the interrogatories, apply to the Court for the interrogatories to\nbe varied or withdrawn and, on any such application, the Court may make such\norder as it thinks fit (including an order that the party who served the\ninterrogatories shall not serve further interrogatories without order).\n(3) Interrogatories without order shall not be served on the Crown.\n4.\nOrdered interrogatories (O.26, r.4)\n4.\n(1) Where an application is made for leave to serve interrogatories, a copy of the\nproposed interrogatories shall be served with the summons or the notice under\nO.25, r.7, by which the application is made.\n(2) In deciding whether to give leave to serve interrogatories, the Court shall take\ninto account any offer made by the party to be interrogated to give particulars,\nmake admissions or produce documents relating to any matter in question and\nwhether or not interrogatories without order have been administered.\n5.\nObjections and insufficient answers (O.26, r.5)\n5.\n(1) Without prejudice to rule 3(2), where a person objects to answering any\ninterrogatory on the ground of privilege the person may take the objection in\nthat person\u2019s answer.\n(2) Where any person on whom ordered interrogatories have been served answers\nany of them insufficiently, the Court may make an order requiring the person to\nmake a further answer, either by affidavit or on oral examination as the Court\nmay direct.\n(3) Where any person on whom interrogatories without order have been served\nanswers any of them insufficiently, the party serving the interrogatories may ask\nfor further and better particulars of the answer given and any such request shall\nnot be treated as service of further interrogatories for the purposes of rule 3(1).\n(4) If it is desired to claim that the answer to any interrogatory constitutes\nconfidential information within the meaning of Section 2 of the Confidential\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 26\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 175\n\nInformation Disclosure Act (as amended and revised), and that the relevant\nprincipal in relation to such confidential information is someone other than the\nparty or parties on whom the answers to the interrogatories are to be served, the\nclaim must be made in the answer with a sufficient statement of the grounds of\nthe claim.\n(5) Where a claim is made under paragraph (4) of this rule, any party on whom the\nanswers to the interrogatories are required to be served may serve a notice on\nthe party answering the interrogatories, requiring that party to make an\napplication to the Court under Section 4 of the Confidential Information\nDisclosure Act (as amended and revised), and such application shall be made\nwithin 14 days of receipt of the notice.\n6.\nFailure to comply with order (O.26, r.6)\n6.\n(1) If a party fails to answer interrogatories or to comply with an order made under\nrule 5(2) or a request made under rule 5(3), the Court may make such order as\nit thinks just including, in particular, an order that the action be dismissed or, as\nthe case may be, an order that the defence be struck out and judgment be entered\naccordingly.\n(2) Without prejudice to paragraph (1), where a party fails to answer ordered\ninterrogatories or to comply with an order made under rule 5(2), the party shall\nbe liable to committal.\n(3) Service on a party's attorney of an order to answer interrogatories made against\nthe party shall be sufficient service to found an application for committal of the\nparty disobeying the order, but the party may show in answer to the application\nthat the party had no notice or knowledge of the order.\n(4) An attorney on whom an order to answer interrogatories made against that\nattorney\u2019s client is served and who fails without reasonable excuse to give notice\nthereof to that attorney\u2019s client shall be liable to committal.\n7.\nUse of answers to interrogatories at trial (O.26, r.7)\n7.\nA party may put in evidence at the trial of a cause or matter, or of any issue therein,\nsome only of the answers to interrogatories, or part only of such an answer, without\nputting in evidence the other answers or, as the case may be, the whole of that answer,\nbut the Court may look at the whole of the answers and if of opinion that any other\nanswer or other part of an answer is so connected with an answer or part thereof used\nin evidence that the one ought not to be used without the other, the Court may direct\nthat that other answer or part shall be put in evidence.\n8.\nRevocation and variation of orders (O.26, r.8)\n8.\nAny order made under this Order (including an order made on appeal) may, on\nsufficient cause being shown, be revoked or varied by a subsequent order or direction\n\nORDER 26\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 176\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nof the Court made or given at or before the trial of the cause or matter in connection\nwith which the original order was made.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 27\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 177\n\nORDER 27\nADMISSIONS\n\n1.\nAdmission of case of other party (O.27, r.1)\n1.\nWithout prejudice to O.18, r.13, a party to a cause or matter may give notice, by that\nparty\u2019s pleading or otherwise in writing, that the party admits the truth of the whole\nor any part of the case of any other party.\n2.\nNotice to admit (O.27, r.2)\n2.\n(1) A party to a cause or matter may not later than 21 days after the cause or matter\nis set down for trial serve on any other party a notice requiring the party to admit,\nfor the purpose of that cause or matter only, the facts specified in the notice.\n(2) An admission made in compliance with a notice under this rule shall not be used\nagainst the party by whom it was made in any cause or matter other than the\ncause or matter for the purpose of which it was made or in favour of any person\nother than the person by whom the notice was given, and the Court may at any\ntime allow a party to amend or withdraw an admission so made by the party on\nsuch terms as may be just.\n3.\nJudgment on admissions (0.27, r.3)\n3.\nWhere admissions of fact are made by a party to a cause or matter either by the party\u2019s\npleadings or otherwise, any other party to the cause or matter may apply to the Court\nfor such judgment or order as upon those admissions the other party may be entitled\nto, without waiting for the determination of any other question between the parties,\nand the Court may give such judgment, or make such order on the application as it\nthinks just.\nAn application for an order under this rule may be made by motion or summons.\n4.\nAdmission and production of documents specified in list of documents\n(O.27, r.4)\n4.\n(1) Subject to paragraph (2) and without prejudice to the right of a party to object\nto the admission in evidence of any document, a party on whom a list of\ndocuments is served in pursuance of any provision of O.24 shall, unless the\nCourt otherwise orders, be deemed to admit \u2014\n(a)\nthat any document described in the list as an original document is such a\ndocument and was printed, written, signed or executed as it purports\nrespectively to have been; and\n(b) that any document described therein as a copy is a true copy.\n\nORDER 27\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 178\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nThis paragraph does not apply to a document the authenticity of which the party\nhas denied in the party\u2019s pleading.\n(2) If before the expiration of 21 days after inspection of the documents specified\nin a list of documents or after the time limited for inspection of those documents\nexpires, whichever is the later, the party on whom the list is served serves on the\nparty whose list it is a notice stating, in relation to any document specified\ntherein, that the party does not admit the authenticity of that document and\nrequires it to be proved at the trial, the party shall not be deemed to make any\nadmission in relation to that document under paragraph (1).\n(3) A party to a cause or matter by whom a list of documents is served on any other\nparty in pursuance of any provision of O.24 shall be deemed to have been served\nby that other party with a notice requiring the party to produce at the trial of the\ncause or matter such of the documents specified in the list as are in the party\u2019s\npossession, custody or power.\n(4) The foregoing provisions of this rule apply in relation to an affidavit made in\ncompliance with an order under O.24, r.7, as they apply in relation to a list of\ndocuments served in pursuance of any provision of that Order.\n5.\nNotices to admit or produce documents (O.27, r.5)\n5.\n(1) Except where rule 4(1) applies, a party to a cause or matter may within 21 days\nafter the cause or matter is set down for trial serve on any other party a notice\nrequiring the party to admit the authenticity of the documents specified in the\nnotice.\n(2) If a party on whom a notice under paragraph (1) is served desires to challenge\nthe authenticity of any document therein specified the party must, within 21 days\nafter service of the notice, serve on the party by whom it was given a notice\nstating that the party does not admit the authenticity of the document and\nrequires it to be proved at the trial.\n(3) A party who fails to give a notice of non-admission in accordance with\nparagraph (2) in relation to any document shall be deemed to have admitted the\nauthenticity of that document unless the Court otherwise orders.\n(4) Except where rule 4(3) applies, a party to a cause or matter may serve on any\nother party a notice requiring the other party to produce the documents specified\nin the notice at the trial of the cause or matter.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 28\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 179\n\nORDER 28\nORIGINATING SUMMONS PROCEDURE\n\n1.\nApplication (O.28, r.1)\n1.\nThe provisions of this Order apply to all originating summonses subject, in the case\nof originating summonses of any particular class, to any special provisions relating to\noriginating summonses of that class made by these Rules or by or under any Law;\nand, subject as aforesaid, O.32, r.5, shall apply in relation to originating summonses\nas it applies in relation to other summonses.\n1A.\nAffidavit evidence (O.28, r.1A)\n1A. (1) In any cause or matter begun by originating summons (not being an ex parte\nsummons) the plaintiff must, before the expiration of 14 days after the defendant\nhas acknowledged service, or, if there are two or more defendants, at least one\nof them has acknowledged service, file the affidavit evidence on which the\nplaintiff intends to rely.\n(2) In the case of an ex parte summons, the applicant must file the applicant\u2019s\naffidavit evidence not less than 4 clear days before the day fixed for the hearing.\n(3) Copies of the affidavit evidence filed in Court under paragraph (1) must be\nserved by the plaintiff on the defendant, or, if there are two or more defendants,\non each defendant, before the expiration of 14 days after service has been\nacknowledged by that defendant.\n(4) When a defendant who has acknowledged service wishes to adduce affidavit\nevidence the defendant must within 28 days after service on the defendant of\ncopies of the plaintiff's affidavit evidence under paragraph (3) file the\ndefendant\u2019s own affidavit evidence and serve copies thereof on the plaintiff and\non any other defendant who is affected thereby.\n(5) A plaintiff on whom a copy of a defendant's affidavit evidence has been served\nunder paragraph (4) may within 14 days of such service file further affidavit\nevidence in reply and shall in that event serve copies thereof on that defendant.\n(6) No other affidavit shall be received in evidence without leave of the Court.\n(7) Where an affidavit is required to be served by one party on another party it shall\nbe served without prior charge.\n(8) The provisions of this rule apply subject to any directions by the Court to the\ncontrary.\n(9) In this rule references to affidavits and copies of affidavits include references to\nexhibits to affidavits and copies of such exhibits.\n\nORDER 28\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 180\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n2.\nFixing time for attendance of parties before Court (O.28, r.2)\n2.\n(1) In the case of an originating summons which is in Form No. 2 of the Grand\nCourt Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised), the plaintiff must, within\n1 month of the expiry of the time within which copies of affidavit evidence may\nbe served under rule 1A, make an application to fix an appointment in\naccordance with the provisions of O.34, r.3.\n(2) A day and time fixed for the attendance of the parties before the Court for the\nhearing of an originating summons which is in Form No. 3 of the Grand Court\nRules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised), or for the hearing of an ex\nparte originating summons, may be fixed on the application of the plaintiff or\napplicant, as the case may be and, in the case of a summons which is required\nto be served, the time limited for acknowledging service shall, where\nappropriate, be abridged so as to expire on the next day but one before the day\nso fixed, and the time limits for filing affidavits under rule 1A(2) and (3) shall,\nwhere appropriate, be abridged so as to expire, respectively, on the fifth day\nbefore, and the next day but one before, the day so fixed.\n(3) Where a plaintiff fails to apply for an appointment under paragraph (1), any\ndefendant may, with the leave of the Court, obtain an appointment in accordance\nwith that paragraph provided that that defendant has acknowledged service of\nthe originating summons.\n3.\nNotice of hearing (O.28, r.3)\n3.\n(1) Not less than 14 clear days before the day fixed under rule 2 for the attendance\nof the parties before the Court for the hearing of an originating summons which\nis in Form No. 2 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and\nrevised), the party on whose application the day was fixed must serve a copy of\nthe notice fixing it on every other party who has acknowledged service of the\noriginating summons and, if the first mentioned party is a defendant, on the\nplaintiff.\n(2) Not less than 4 clear days before the day fixed under rule 2 for the hearing of an\noriginating summons, which is in Form No. 3 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II\n- Forms (as amended and revised), the plaintiff must serve the summons on\nevery defendant or, if any defendant has already been served with the summons,\nmust serve on that defendant notice of the day fixed for hearing.\n(3) Where notice in Form No. 5 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as\namended and revised) is served in accordance with paragraph (1), such notice\nshall specify what orders or directions the party serving the notice intends to\nseek at the hearing; and any party served with such notice who wishes to seek\ndifferent orders or directions must, not less than 7 days before the hearing, serve\non every other party a notice specifying the other orders and directions that party\nintends to seek.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 28\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 181\n\n(4) If the hearing of an originating summons which is in Form No. 2 or Form No. 3\nof the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) is adjourned\nand any party to the proceedings desires to apply at the resumed hearing for any\norder or direction not previously asked for that party must not less than 7 days\nbefore the resumed hearing of the summons serve on every other party a notice\nspecifying those orders and directions.\n(5) Where a party is required by any provision of this rule or rule 5(2) to serve a\nnotice or a copy of a notice on \"every other party\" the party must \u2014\n(a)\nwhere the party is the plaintiff, serve it on every defendant who has\nacknowledged service of the originating summons; and\n(b) where the party is a defendant, serve it on the plaintiff and on every other\ndefendant affected thereby.\n4.\nDirections, etc., by Court (O.28, r.4)\n4.\n(1) The Court by whom an originating summons is heard may, if the liability of the\ndefendant to the plaintiff in respect of any claim made by the plaintiff is\nestablished, make such order in favour of the plaintiff as the nature of the case\nmay require, but where the Court makes an order under this paragraph against a\ndefendant who does not appear at the hearing, the order may be varied or\nrevoked by a subsequent order of the Court on such terms as it thinks just.\n (2) Unless on the first hearing of an originating summons the Court disposes of the\nsummons altogether or makes an order under rule 8, the Court shall give such\ndirections as to the further conduct of the proceedings as it thinks best adapted\nto secure the just, expeditious and economical disposal thereof.\n(3) Without prejudice to the generality of paragraph (2), the Court shall, at as early\na stage of the proceedings on the summons as appears to it to be practicable,\nconsider whether there is or may be a dispute as to fact and whether the just,\nexpeditious and economical disposal of the proceedings can accordingly best be\nsecured by hearing the summons on oral evidence or mainly on oral evidence,\nand, if it thinks fit, may order that no further evidence shall be filed and that the\nsummons shall be heard on oral evidence or partly on oral evidence and partly\non affidavit evidence, with or without cross-examination of any of the\ndeponents, as it may direct.\n(4) Without prejudice to the generality of paragraph (2), and subject to paragraph\n(3), the Court may give directions as to the filing of evidence and as to the\nattendance of deponents for cross-examination and any directions which it could\ngive under O.25 if the cause or matter had been begun by writ and the summons\nwere a summons for directions under that Order.\n(5) The Court may at any stage of the proceedings order that any affidavit, or any\nparticulars of any claim, defence or other matter stated in any affidavit, shall\n\nORDER 28\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 182\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nstand as pleadings or that points of claim, defence or reply be delivered and\nstand as pleadings.\n5.\nAdjournment of summons (O.28, r.5)\n5.\n(1) The hearing of the summons by the Court may, if necessary, be adjourned from\ntime to time, either generally or to a particular date, as may be appropriate, and\nthe powers of the Court under rule 4 may be exercised at any resumed hearing.\n(2) If the hearing of the summons is adjourned generally, any party may restore it\nto the list on 14 days' notice to every other party, and rule 3(4) shall apply to\nany adjourned hearing.\n6.\nApplications affecting party who has not acknowledged service (O.28, r.6)\n6.\nWhere in a cause or matter begun by originating summons an application is made to\nthe Court for an order affecting a party who has failed to acknowledge service, the\nCourt hearing the application may require to be satisfied in such manner as it thinks\nfit that the party has so failed.\n7.\nCounterclaim by defendant (O.28, r.7)\n7.\n(1) A defendant to an action begun by originating summons who has acknowledged\nservice of the summons and who alleges that the defendant has any claim or is\nentitled to any relief or remedy against the plaintiff in respect of any matter\n(whenever and however arising) may make a counterclaim in the action in\nrespect of that matter instead of bringing a separate action.\n(2) A defendant who wishes to make a counterclaim under this rule must at the first\nor any resumed hearing of the originating summons by the Court but, in any\ncase, at as early a stage in the proceedings as is practicable, inform the Court of\nthe nature of the defendant\u2019s claim and, without prejudice to the powers of the\nCourt under paragraph (3), the claim shall be made in such manner as the Court\nmay direct under rule 4 or 8.\n(3) If it appears on the application of a plaintiff against whom a counterclaim is\nmade under this rule that the subject matter of the counterclaim ought for any\nreason to be disposed of by a separate action, the Court may order the\ncounterclaim to be struck out or may order it to be tried separately or make such\nother order as may be expedient.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 28\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 183\n\n8.\nContinuation of proceedings as if cause or matter begun by writ (O.28, r.8)\n8.\n(1) Where, in the case of a cause or matter begun by originating summons, it appears\nto the Court at any stage of the proceedings that the proceedings should for any\nreason be continued as if the cause or matter had been begun by writ, it may\norder the proceedings to continue as if the cause or matter had been so begun\nand may, in particular, order that any affidavits shall stand as pleadings, with or\nwithout liberty to any of the parties to add thereto or to apply for particulars\nthereof.\n(2) Where the Court decides to make such an order, O.25, rr.2 to 7 shall, with the\nomission of so much of rule 7(1) as requires parties to serve a notice specifying\nthe orders and directions which they require and, with any other necessary\nmodifications, apply as if there had been a summons for directions in the\nproceedings and that order were one of the orders to be made thereon.\n(3) This rule applies notwithstanding that the cause or matter in question could not\nhave been begun by writ.\n(4) Any reference in these Rules to an action begun by writ, shall, unless the context\notherwise requires, be construed as including a reference to a cause or matter,\nproceedings in which are ordered under this rule to continue as if the cause or\nmatter had been so begun.\n9.\nOrder for hearing or trial (O.28, r.9)\n9.\n(1) Except where the Court disposes of a cause or matter begun by originating\nsummons in Chambers or makes an order in relation to it under rule 8 or some\nother provision of these Rules, the Court shall, on being satisfied that the cause\nor matter is ready for determination, make an order for the hearing or trial of the\ncause or matter as may be appropriate.\n(2) The Court shall by order determine the place and mode of the trial, but any such\norder may be varied by a subsequent order of the Court made at or before the\ntrial.\n(3) O.33, r.4(2), and O.34, rr.1 to 5, shall apply in relation to a cause or matter begun\nby originating summons and to an order made therein under this rule as they\napply in relation to an action begun by writ and to an order made therein under\nthe said rule 4 and shall have effect accordingly with the necessary\nmodifications and with the further modification that for references therein to the\nsummons for directions there shall be substituted references to the first or any\nresumed hearing of the originating summons by the Court.\n(4) The Court may order the Plaintiff to deliver to the Court office bundles\ncomprising documents of the kind specified in O.34, r.10, but O.34, r.10 shall\nnot otherwise apply to any cause or matter begun by originating summons.\n\nORDER 28\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 184\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n10.\nFailure to comply with rules of Court orders (O.28, r.10)\n10. If any party to a cause or matter begun by originating summons, or a counterclaim\nunder rule 7, does not comply with this Order, or with any order or direction of the\nCourt as to the conduct of the proceedings, the Court may order that the cause or\nmatter or counterclaim be dismissed or, as the case may be, the defendant be debarred\nfrom adducing such evidence in the cause or matter or counterclaim as the Court may\nspecify, or (if it thinks appropriate) that the defence or counterclaim be struck out and\njudgment entered accordingly.\n11.\nNo rule (O.28, r.11)\n11. No rule (O.28, r.11)\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 20.01.07)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 29\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 185\n\nORDER 29\nINTERLOCUTORY INJUNCTIONS, INTERIM PRESERVATION OF\nPROPERTY, INTERIM PAYMENTS, ETC.\n\nI. INTERLOCUTORY INJUNCTIONS, INTERIM\nPRESERVATION OF PROPERTY, ETC.\n1.\nApplication for injunction (O.29, r.1)\n1.\n(1) An application for the grant of an injunction may be made by any party to a\ncause or matter before or after the trial of the cause or matter, whether or not a\nclaim for the injunction was included in that party's writ, originating summons,\ncounterclaim or third party notice, as the case may be.\n\n(2) Where the applicant is the plaintiff and the case is one of urgency such\napplication may be ex parte on affidavit but, except as aforesaid, such\napplication must be made by motion or summons.\n\n(3) The plaintiff may not make such an application before the issue of the writ or\noriginating summons by which the cause or matter is to be begun except where\nthe case is one of urgency, and in that case the injunction applied for may be\ngranted on terms providing for the issue of the writ or summons and such other\nterms, if any, as the Court thinks fit.\n1A.\nNo rule (O.29, 1A)\n1A. No rule (O.29, 1A)\n2.\nDetention, preservation, etc., of subject matter of cause or matter (O.29, r.2)\n2.\n(1) On the application of any party to a cause or matter the Court may make an order\nfor the detention, custody or preservation of any property which is the subject\nmatter of the cause or matter, or as to which any question may arise therein, or\nfor the inspection of any such property in the possession of a party to the cause\nor matter.\n(2) For the purpose of enabling any order under paragraph (1) to be carried out the\nCourt may by the order authorise any person to enter upon any land or building\nin the possession of any party to the cause or matter.\n(3) Where the right of any party to a specific fund is in dispute in a cause or matter,\nthe Court may, on the application of a party to the cause or matter, order the\nfund to be paid into Court or otherwise secured.\n(4) An order under this rule may be made on such terms, if any, as the Court thinks\njust.\n\nORDER 29\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 186\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(5) An application for an order under this rule must be made by summons or by\nnotice under O.25, r.7.\n(6) Unless the Court otherwise directs, an application by a defendant for such an\norder may not be made before the defendant acknowledges service of the writ\nor originating summons by which the cause or matter was begun.\n2A.\nNo rule (O.29, 2A)\n2A. No rule (O.29, 2A)\n3.\nPower to order samples to be taken, etc. (O.29, r.3)\n3.\n(1) Where it considers it necessary or expedient for the purpose of obtaining full\ninformation or evidence in any cause or matter, the Court may, on the\napplication of a party to the cause or matter, and on such terms, if any, as it\nthinks just, by order authorise or require any sample to be taken of any property\nwhich is the subject matter of the cause or matter or as to which any question\nmay arise therein, any observation to be made on such property or any\nexperiment to be tried on or with such property.\n(2) For the purpose of enabling any order under paragraph (1) to be carried out the\nCourt may by order authorise any person to enter upon any land or building in\nthe possession of any party to the cause or matter.\n(3) Rule 2(5) and (6) shall apply in relation to an application for an order under this\nrule as they apply in relation to an application for an order under that rule.\n4.\nSale of perishable property, etc. (O.29, r.4)\n4.\n(1) The Court may, on the application of any party to a cause or matter, make an\norder for the sale by such person, in such manner and on such terms (if any) as\nmay be specified in the order of any property (other than land) which is the\nsubject matter of the cause or matter or as to which any question arises therein\nand which is of a perishable nature or likely to deteriorate if kept or which for\nany other good reason it is desirable to sell forthwith.\n\nIn this paragraph \"land\" includes any interest in, or right over, land.\n(2) Rule 2(5) and (6) shall apply in relation to an application for an order under this\nrule as they apply in relation to an application for an order under that rule.\n5.\nOrder for early trial (O.29, r.5)\n5.\nWhere on the hearing of an application, made before the trial of a cause or matter, for\nan injunction or the appointment of a receiver or an order under rule 2, 3 or 4 it appears\nto the Court that the matter in dispute can be better dealt with by an early trial than\nby considering the whole merits thereof for the purposes of the application, the Court\nmay make an order accordingly and may also make such order as respects the period\nbefore the trial as the justice of the case requires.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 29\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 187\n\nWhere the Court makes an order for early trial it shall by the order determine the place\nand mode of the trial.\n6.\nRecovery of personal property subject to lien, etc. (O.29, r.6)\n6.\nWhere the plaintiff, or the defendant by way of counterclaim, claims the recovery of\nspecific property (other than land) and the party from whom recovery is sought does\nnot dispute the title of the party making the claim but claims to be entitled to retain\nthe property by virtue of a lien or otherwise as security for any sum of money, the\nCourt, at any time after the claim to be so entitled appears from the pleadings (if any)\nor by affidavit or otherwise to its satisfaction, may order that the party seeking to\nrecover the property be at liberty to pay into Court, to abide the event of the action,\nthe amount of money in respect of which the security is claimed and such further sum\n(if any), for interest and costs as the Court may direct and that, upon such payment\nbeing made, the property claimed be given up to the party claiming it.\n7.\nDirections (O.29, r.7)\n7.\n(1) Where an application is made under any of the foregoing provisions of this\nOrder, the Court may give directions as to the further proceedings in the cause\nor matter.\n(2) If, in an action begun by writ, not being any such action as is mentioned in\nsubparagraphs (a) to (c) and (e) to (g) of O.25, r.1(2), the Court thinks fit to give\ndirections under this rule before the summons for directions, rules 2 to 7 of that\nOrder shall, with the omission of so much of rule 7(1) as requires parties to serve\na notice specifying the orders and directions which they desire and with any\nother necessary modifications, apply as if the application were a summons for\ndirection.\n7A.\nNo rule (O.29, r.7A)\n7A. No rule (O.29, r.7A)\n8.\nAllowance of income of property pending suit (O.29, r.8)\n8.\nWhere any real or personal property forms the subject matter of any proceedings, and\nthe Court is satisfied that it will be more than sufficient to answer all the claims\nthereon for which provision ought to be made in the proceedings, the Court may at\nany time allow the whole or part of the income of the property to be paid, during such\nperiod as it may direct, to any or all of the parties who have an interest therein or may\ndirect that any part of the personal property be transferred or delivered to any or all\nof such parties.\nII. INTERIM PAYMENTS\n9.\nInterpretation of Part II (O.29, r.9)\n9.\nIn this Part of this Order \u2014\n\nORDER 29\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 188\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n\"interim payments\" in relation to a defendant, means a payment on account of any\ndamages, debt or other sum (excluding costs) which the defendant may be held liable\nto pay to or for the benefit of the plaintiff and any reference to the plaintiff or\ndefendant includes a reference to any person who, for the purpose of the proceedings\nacts as next friend of the plaintiff or guardian of the defendant.\n10.\nApplication for interim payment (O.29, r.10)\n10. (1) The plaintiff may, at any time after the writ has been served on a defendant and\nthe time limited for the defendant to acknowledge service has expired, apply to\nthe Court for an order requiring that defendant to make an interim payment.\n(2) An application under this rule shall be made by summons but may be included\nin a summons for summary judgment under O.14 or O.86.\n(3) An application under this rule shall be supported by an affidavit which shall \u2014\n(a)\nverify the amount of the damages, debt or other sum the application relates\nto and the grounds of the application; and\n(b) exhibit any documentary evidence relied on by the plaintiff in support of\nthe application.\n(4) The summons and a copy of the affidavit in support and any documents\nexhibited thereto shall be served on the defendant against whom the order is\nsought not less than 10 clear days before the return day.\n(5) Notwithstanding the making or refusal of an order for an interim payment, a\nsecond or subsequent application may be made upon cause shown.\n11.\nOrder for interim payment in respect of damages (O.29, r.11)\n11. (1) If, on the hearing of an application under rule 10 in an action for damages, the\nCourt is satisfied \u2014\n(a)\nthat the defendant against whom the order is sought (in this paragraph\nreferred to as \"the respondent\") has admitted liability for the plaintiff's\ndamages; or\n(b) that the plaintiff has obtained judgment against the respondent for damages\nto be assessed; or\n(c)\nthat if the action proceeded to trial, the plaintiff would obtain judgment for\nsubstantial damages against the respondent or, where there are two or more\ndefendants, against any of them,\nthe Court may, if it thinks fit and subject to paragraph (2), order the respondent\nto make an interim payment of such amount as it thinks just, not exceeding a\nreasonable proportion of the damages which in the opinion of the Court are\nlikely to be recovered by the plaintiff after taking into account any relevant\ncontributory negligence and any set-off, cross-claim or counterclaim on which\nthe respondent may be entitled to rely.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 29\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 189\n\n(2) No order shall be made under paragraph (1), in an action for personal injuries if\nit appears to the Court that the defendant is not a person falling within one of\nthe following categories, namely \u2014\n(a)\na person who is insured in respect of the plaintiff's claim;\n(b) a public authority; or\n(c)\na person whose means and resources are such as to enable the defendant\nto make the interim payment.\n12.\nOrder for interim payment in respect of sums other than damages (O.29, r.12)\n12. If on the hearing of an application under rule 10, the Court is satisfied \u2014\n(a)\nthat the plaintiff has obtained an order for an account to be taken as\nbetween themselves and the defendant and for any amount certified due on\ntaking the account to be paid; or\n(b) that the plaintiff's action includes a claim for possession of land and, if the\naction proceeded to trial, the defendant would be held liable to pay to the\nplaintiff a sum of money in respect of the defendant's use and occupation\nof the land during the pendency of the action, even if a final judgment or\norder were given or made in favour of the defendant; or\n(c)\nthat if the action proceeded to trial the plaintiff would obtain judgment\nagainst the defendant for a substantial sum of money apart from any\ndamages or costs, the Court may, if it thinks fit, and without prejudice to\nany contentions of the parties as to the nature or character of the sum to be\npaid by the defendant, order the defendant to make an interim payment of\nsuch amount as it thinks just, after taking into account any set-off, crossclaim or counterclaim on which the defendant may be entitled to rely.\n13.\nManner of payment (O.29, r.13)\n13. (1) Subject to O.80, r.12, the amount of any interim payment ordered to be made\nshall be paid to the plaintiff unless the order provides it to be paid into Court,\nand where the amount is paid into Court, the Court may, on the application of\nthe plaintiff, order the whole or any part of it to be paid out to the plaintiff at\nsuch time or times as the Court thinks fit.\n(2) An application under the preceding paragraph for money in Court to be paid out\nmay be made ex parte, but the Court hearing the application may direct a\nsummons to be issued.\n(3) An interim payment may be ordered to be made in one sum or by such\ninstalments as the Court thinks fit.\n(4) Where a payment is ordered in respect of the defendant's use and occupation of\nland the order may provide for periodical payments to be made during the\npendency of the action.\n\nORDER 29\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 190\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n14.\nDirections on application under rule 10 (O.29, r.14)\n14. Where an application is made under rule 10, the Court may give instructions as to the\nfurther conduct of the action, and, so far as may be applicable, O.25, rr.2 to 7, shall,\nwith the omission of so much of rule 7(1) as requires the parties to serve a notice\nspecifying the orders and directions which they require and with any other necessary\nmodifications, apply as if the application were a summons for directions, and, in\nparticular, the Court may order an early trial of the action.\n15.\nNon-disclosure of interim payment (O.29, r.15)\n15. The fact that an order has been made under rule 11 or 12 shall not be pleaded and,\nunless the defendant consents or the Court so directs, no communication of that fact\nor the fact that an interim payment has been made, whether voluntarily or pursuant to\nan order, shall be made to the Court at the trial, or hearing, of any question or issue\nas to liability or damages until all questions of liability and amount have been\ndetermined.\n16.\nPayment into Court in satisfaction (O.29, r.16)\n16. Where, after making an interim payment, whether voluntarily or pursuant to an order,\na defendant pays a sum of money into Court under O.22, r.1, the notice of payment\nmust state that the defendant has taken into account the interim payment.\n17.\nAdjustment on final judgment or order or on discontinuance (O.29, r.17)\n17. Where a defendant has been ordered to make an interim payment or has in fact made\nan interim payment, whether voluntarily or pursuant to an order, the Court may, in\ngiving or making a final judgment or order or granting the plaintiff leave to\ndiscontinue the plaintiff\u2019s action or to withdraw the claim in respect of which the\ninterim payment has been made, or at any other stage of the proceedings on the\napplication of any party, make an order with respect to the interim payment as may\nbe just, and in particular \u2014\n(a)\nan order for the repayment by the plaintiff of all or part of the interim\npayment; or\n(b) an order for the payment to be varied or discharged; or\n(c)\nan order for the payment by any other defendant of any part of the interim\npayment which the defendant who made it is entitled to recover from the\nother defendant by way of contribution or indemnity or in respect of any\nremedy or relief relating to or connected with the plaintiff's claim.\n18.\nCounterclaims and other proceedings (O.29, r.18)\n18. The preceding rules in this Part of this Order shall apply with the necessary\nmodifications, to any counterclaim or proceeding otherwise than by writ, where one\nparty seeks an order for an interim payment to be made by another.\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 30\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 191\n\nORDER 30\nRECEIVERS\n\n1.\nApplication for receiver and injunction (O.30, r.1)\n1.\n(1) An application for the appointment of a receiver may be made by summons or\nmotion.\n(2) An application for an injunction ancillary or incidental to an order appointing a\nreceiver may be joined with the application for such order.\n(3) Where the applicant wishes to apply for the immediate grant of such an\ninjunction, the applicant may do so ex parte on affidavit.\n(4) The Court hearing an application under paragraph (3) may grant an injunction\nrestraining the party beneficially entitled to any interest in the property of which\na receiver is sought from assigning, charging or otherwise dealing with that\nproperty until after the hearing of a summons for the appointment of the receiver\nand may require such a summons, returnable on such date as the Court may\ndirect, to be issued.\n2.\nGiving of security by receiver (O.30, r.2)\n2.\n(1) A judgment or order directing the appointment of a receiver may include such\ndirections as the Court thinks fit for the giving of security by the person\nappointed.\n(2) Where by virtue of any judgment or order appointing a person named therein to\nbe receiver, a person is required to give security in accordance with this rule that\nperson must give security approved by the Court duly to account for what that\nperson receives as receiver and to deal with it as the Court directs.\n(3) Unless the Court otherwise directs, the security shall be by guarantee.\n(4) The guarantee shall be submitted for approval by the Clerk of the Court and\nshall then be filed.\n3.\nRemuneration of receiver (O.30, r.3)\n3.\nA person appointed receiver shall be allowed such proper remuneration, if any, as\nmay be authorised by the Court and the Court may direct that such remuneration shall\nbe fixed by reference to such scales or rates of professional charges as it thinks fit.\n4.\nService of order and notice (O.30, r.4)\n4.\nA copy of the order or judgment appointing a receiver shall be served by the party\nhaving conduct of the proceedings on the receiver and all other parties to the cause or\nmatter in which the receiver has been appointed.\n\nORDER 30\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 192\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n5.\nReceiver's accounts (O.30, r.5)\n5.\n(1) A receiver shall submit accounts to the Court at such intervals or on such dates\nas the Court may direct in order that they may be passed.\n(2) Any party to whom a receiver is required to submit accounts may, on giving\nreasonable notice to the receiver, inspect, either personally or by an agent, the\nbooks and other papers relating to the accounts.\n(3) Any party who is dissatisfied with the accounts of the receiver may give notice\nspecifying the item or items to which objection is taken and requiring the\nreceiver within 14 days to file the receiver\u2019s accounts with the Court.\n(4) Following an examination by or on behalf of the Court of an item or items in an\naccount to which objection is taken the result of such examination must be\ncertified by the examiner and an order may thereupon be made as to the\nincidence of any costs or expenses incurred.\n6.\nPayment into Court by receiver (O.30, r.6)\n6.\nThe Court may fix the amounts and frequency of payments into Court to be made by\na receiver.\n7.\nDefault by receiver (O.30, r.7)\n7.\n(1) Where a receiver fails to attend for the examination of any account of the\nreceiver\u2019s, or fails to submit any account, provide access to any books or papers\nor do any other thing which the receiver is required to submit, provide or do, the\nreceiver and any or all of the parties to the cause or matter in which the receiver\nis appointed may be required to attend in Chambers to show cause for the failure,\nand the Court may, either in Chambers or after adjournment into Court, give\nsuch directions as it thinks proper including, if necessary, directions for the\ndischarge of the receiver and the appointment of another and the payment of\ncosts.\n(2) Without prejudice to paragraph (1) where a receiver fails to attend for the\nexamination of any account of the receiver\u2019s or fails to submit any account or\nfails to pay into Court on the day fixed by the Court any sum required to be so\npaid, the Court may disallow any remuneration claimed by the receiver and may,\nwhere the receiver has failed to pay any such sum into Court, charge the receiver\nwith interest at the rate currently payable in respect of judgments of the Court\non that sum while in the receiver\u2019s possession as receiver.\n8.\nDirections to receivers (O.30, r.8)\n8.\nA receiver may at any time request the Court to give the receiver directions and such\na request shall state in writing the matter with regard to which directions are required.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 31\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 193\n\nORDER 31\nSALES, ETC., OF LAND BY ORDER OF COURT\n\n1.\nCertifying result of sale (O.31, r.1)\n1.\nWhere, in any cause or matter relating to any land, it appears necessary or expedient\nfor the purposes of the cause or matter that the land or any part thereof should be sold,\nthe Court may order that land or part thereof to be sold, and any party bound by the\norder and in possession of that land or part, or in receipt of the rents and profits\nthereof, may be compelled to deliver up such possession or receipt to the purchaser\nor to such other person as the Court may direct.\n\nIn this Order \"land\" includes any interest in, or right over, land.\n2.\nManner of carrying out sale (O.31, r.2)\n2.\n(1) Where an order is made, whether in Court or in Chambers, directing any land to\nbe sold, the Court may permit the party or person having the conduct of the sale\nto sell the land in such manner as the party or person thinks fit, or may direct\nthat the land be sold in such manner as the Court may either by the order or\nsubsequently direct for the best price that can be obtained, and all proper parties\nshall join in the sale and transfer as the Court shall direct.\n(2) The Court may give such directions as it thinks fit for the purpose of effecting\nthe sale, including, without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing words,\ndirections \u2014\n(a)\nappointing the party or person who is to have the conduct of the sale;\n(b) fixing the manner of sale, whether by contract conditional on the approval\nof the Court, private treaty, public auction, tender or some other manner;\n(c)\nfixing a reserve or minimum price;\n(d) requiring payment of the purchase money into Court or to trustees or other\npersons;\n(e)\nfor settling the particulars and conditions of sale;\n(f)\nfor obtaining evidence of the value of the property;\n(g) fixing the security (if any) to be given by the auctioneer, if the sale is to be\nby public auction, and the remuneration to be allowed the auctioneer.\n3.\nCertifying result of sale (O.31, r.3)\n3.\n(1) If either the Court has directed payment of the purchase money into Court or the\nCourt so directs, the result of sale by order of the Court must be certified \u2014\n\nORDER 31\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 194\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(a)\nin the case of a sale by public auction, by the auctioneer who conducted\nthe sale; and\n(b) in any other case, by the attorney of the party or person having the conduct\nof the sale, and the Court may require the certificate to be verified by the\naffidavit of the auctioneer or attorney, as the case may be.\n(2) The attorney of the party or person having the conduct of the sale must file the\ncertificate and any affidavit.\n4.\nCharge, exchange or partition under order of the Court (O.31, r.4)\n4.\nRules 2 and 3 shall, so far as applicable and with the necessary modifications, apply\nin relation to the charge, exchange or partition of any land under an order of the Court\nas they apply in relation to the sale of any land under such an order.\n5.\nNo rule (O.31, r.5)\n5.\nNo rule (O.31, r.5)\n6.\nNo rule (O.31, r.6)\n6.\nNo rule (O.31, r.6)\n7.\nNo rule (O.31, r.7)\n7.\nNo rule (O.31, r.7)\n8.\nNo rule (O.31, r.8)\n8.\nNo rule (O.31, r.8)\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 32\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 195\n\nORDER 32\nAPPLICATIONS AND PROCEEDINGS IN CHAMBERS\n\n1.\nMode of making application (O.32, r.1)\n1.\nExcept as provided by O.25, r.7, every application in Chambers not made ex parte\nmust be made by summons.\n2.\nIssue of summons (O.32, r.2)\n2.\n(1) Issue of a summons by which an application in Chambers is to be made takes\nplace on its being sealed and filed by the Clerk of the Court.\n(2) No summons may be issued unless it specifies a date and time at which the\nhearing will take place.\n(3) A summons may not be amended after issue without leave of the Court.\n(4) Every summons must have indorsed upon it by the party issuing it the party\u2019s\nestimate of the length of the hearing and it shall be that party's duty to notify the\nClerk of the Court if for whatever reason the party\u2019s estimate is no longer\nconsidered to be accurate.\n(5) Every summons shall be in Form No. 17 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II -\nForms (as amended and revised).\n3.\nService of summons (O.32, r.3)\n3.\n(1) A summons asking only for extension or abridgement of any period of time may\nbe served on the day before the day specified in the summons for the hearing of\nthe application.\n(2) Except as provided by paragraph (1), and unless the Court otherwise orders or\nany of these rules otherwise provides \u2014\n (a) a summons must be served on every other party not less than four days\nbefore the day specified in the summons for the hearing of the application;\n (b) any evidence relied on in support of the application must be served with\nthe summons.\n4.\nAdjournment of hearing (O.32, r.4)\n4.\n(1) The hearing of a summons may be adjourned from time to time either generally\nor to a particular date, as may be appropriate.\n(2) If the hearing is adjourned generally, the party by whom the summons was taken\nout may restore it to the list on 4 clear days' notice to all the other parties on\nwhom the summons was served.\n\nORDER 32\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 196\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n5.\nProceeding in the absence of party failing to attend (O.32, r.5)\n5.\n(1) Where any party to a summons fails to attend on the first or any resumed hearing\nthereof, the Court may proceed in the party\u2019s absence if, having regard to the\nnature of the application, it thinks it expedient so to do.\n(2) Before proceeding in the absence of any party the Court may require to be\nsatisfied that the summons or, as the case may be, notice of the time appointed\nfor the resumed hearing was duly served on that party.\n(3) Where the Court hearing a summons proceeds in the absence of a party, then,\nprovided that any order made on the hearing has not been perfected, the Court,\nif satisfied that it is just to do so, may re-hear the summons.\n(4) Where an application made by summons has been dismissed without a hearing\nby reason of the failure of the party who took out the summons to attend the\nhearing, the Court, if satisfied that it is just to do so, may allow the summons to\nbe restored to the list.\n6.\nOrder made ex parte may be set aside (O.32, r.6)\n6.\nThe Court may set aside an order made ex parte.\n7.\nSubpoena for attendance of witness (O.32, r.7)\n7.\nA writ of subpoena ad testificandum or a writ of subpoena duces tecum to compel the\nattendance of a witness for the purposes of proceedings in Chambers may be issued\nby the Clerk of the Court, if the Judge so authorises.\n8.\nOfficers may administer oaths (O.32, r.8)\n8.\nThe following persons shall have authority to administer oaths in proceedings in\nChambers namely \u2014\n(a)\na Judge;\n(b) the Clerk of the Court;\n(c)  the Chief Marshall; or\n(d) a Court usher.\n9.\nNo rule (O.32, r.9)\n9.\nNo rule (O.32, r.9)\n9A.\nApplications for a direction under the Limitation Act (as amended and\nrevised) (O.32, r.9A)\n9A. (1) The jurisdiction to direct, under Section 39 of the Limitation Act (as amended\nand revised), that Section 13 or Section 16 of that Law should not apply to an\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 32\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 197\n\n action or to any specified cause of action to which the action relates shall be\nexercisable by the Judge in Chambers.\n (2) An application for a direction under paragraph (1) above shall be by originating\nsummons and must be supported by an affidavit setting out the grounds on\nwhich such leave is sought and any facts necessary to substantiate those\ngrounds.\n10.\nNo rule (O.32, r.10)\n10. No rule (O.32, r.10)\n11.\nNo rule (O.32, r.11)\n11. No rule (O.32, r.11)\n12.\nNo rule (O.32, r.12)\n12. No rule (O.32, r.12)\n13.\nPower to direct hearing in Court (O.32, r.13)\n13. (1) The Judge in Chambers may direct that any summons, application or appeal\nshall be heard in Court or shall be adjourned into Court to be so heard if the\nJudge considers that by reason of its importance or for any other reason it should\nbe so heard.\n (2) Any matter heard in Court by virtue of a direction under paragraph (1) above\nmay be adjourned from Court into Chambers.\n14.\nNo rule (O.32, r.14)\n14. No rule (O.32, r.14)\n15.\nNo rule (O.32, r.15)\n15. No rule (O.32, r.15)\n16.\nObtaining assistance of experts (O.32, r.16)\n16. If the Court thinks it expedient in order to enable it better to determine matters arising\nin proceedings in Chambers, it may obtain the assistance of any person specifically\nqualified to advise on that matter and may act upon the person\u2019s opinion.\n17.\nService and notice of affidavit (O.32, r.17)\n17. (1) Any party filing an affidavit intended to be used by the party in any proceedings\nin Chambers shall serve a copy of such affidavit on every other party to the\nproceedings.\n (2) Any party intending to use in such proceedings any affidavit filed by the party\nin previous proceedings shall give notice to every other party of the party\u2019s\n\nORDER 32\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 198\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nintention so to do and serve a copy of such affidavit on every other party to the\nproceedings.\n18.\nNo rule (O.32, r.18)\n18. No rule (O.32, r.18)\n19.\nDisposal of matters in Chambers (O.32, r.19)\n19. The judge may by any judgment or order made in Court in any proceedings direct\nthat such matters (if any) in the proceedings as the Judge may specify shall be\ndisposed of in Chambers.\n20.\nNo rule (O.32, r.20)\n20. No rule (O.32, r.20)\n21.\nPapers for use of Court, etc. (O.32, r.21)\n21. (1) Copies of documents may be used in evidence in proceedings in Chambers\nprovided that such copies are exhibited to an affidavit stating that such copies\nare or are believed to be true copies of the originals.\n(2) Any party upon whom is served an affidavit to which are exhibited copies of\ndocuments may serve a notice requiring the party intending to rely upon such\naffidavit to produce for inspection within 4 days the original of any such copies.\n(3) Any party who fails to produce for inspection the original of any document\nrequired to be produced pursuant to paragraph (2) shall be permitted to use the\ncopy thereof in evidence only with the leave of the Court.\n22.\nNotes of proceedings in Chambers (O.32, r.22)\n22. (1) A note shall be kept of all proceedings in Chambers with the dates thereof so\nthat all such proceedings in any cause or matter are noted in chronological order\nwith a short statement of the matter decided at each hearing.\n(2) The Clerk of the Court shall provide any party to the proceeding with a\nphotocopy or typed transcript of such note if requested to do so unless the Judge\notherwise orders.\n23.\nNo Rule (O.32, rr.23-26)\n23. No Rule (O.32, rr.23-26)\n24.\nNo Rule (O.32, rr.23-26)\n24. No Rule (O.32, rr.23-26)\n25.\nNo Rule (O.32, rr.23-26)\n25. No Rule (O.32, rr.23-26)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 32\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 199\n\n26.\nNo Rule (O.32, rr.23-26)\n26. No Rule (O.32, rr.23-26)\n27.\nJudgments and orders in Chambers (O.32, r.27)\n27. (1) On the making of any judgment or order in Chambers the Judge may direct that\nan office copy of such judgment or order is to be filed in the Register of\nJudgments to be kept pursuant to O.63, r.7(1).\n(2) A direction pursuant to paragraph (1) that an office copy of any judgment or\norder is to be filed in the Register of Judgments shall be noted in writing on such\njudgment or order and all copies thereof for filing.\n28.\nApplications outside of Chambers, etc. (O.32, r.28)\n28. (1) For the avoidance of doubt, nothing in this Order shall prevent a Judge from\nhearing an interlocutory application without the Judge being physically present\nin the Judge\u2019s Chambers.  In an appropriate case a Judge may hear any\ninterlocutory application \u2014\n(a)\nwhere the Judge is present by telephone, by video-link or via other\nelectronic means (and whether the Judge is physically in the Islands or\noutside the Islands);\n(b) elsewhere in the Islands; or\n(c)\nany place outside the Islands.\nWithout limitation, an appropriate case would ordinarily include cases where a\nJudge has already been assigned to the cause or matter and it is not convenient\n(having regard to the Overriding Objective) to assign a different Judge to hear\nthe application.\n(2) Notwithstanding O.1, r.2(4), this Rule shall apply to any proceedings that are:\ngoverned by the Matrimonial Causes Rules (as amended and revised); governed\nby the Grand Court (Bankruptcy) Rules (as amended and revised); governed by\nthe Companies Winding Up Rules (as amended and revised); on appeal from\nCivil Proceedings in the Summary Court.\n(3) Order 33 shall continue to apply in respect of the place of any trial of a cause or\nmatter, or any question or issue arising therein.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 13.07.2011)\n\nORDER 33\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 200\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 33\nPLACE AND MODE OF TRIAL\n\n1.\nPlace of trial (O.33, r.1)\n1.\n(1) Subject to the provisions of these Rules, the place of trial of a cause or matter,\nor of any question or issue arising therein, shall be the Law Courts, George\nTown, Grand Cayman, or any other building in George Town at which sittings\nof the Court are authorised by the Chief Justice to be held, unless for some\nspecial reason the Court orders that the trial of a cause or matter, or any question\nor issue arising therein shall be heard \u2014\n (a) elsewhere in the Islands; or\n(b) in any place outside the Islands.\n(2) No order shall be made under subparagraph (1)(b) unless the Secretary of State\nfor Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs has certified that neither that Secretary\nof State nor the authorities in the country concerned have any objection to the\nCourt sitting in such country.\n2.\nMode of trial (O.33, r.2)\n2.\n(1) The Court may, on application by any party pursuant to Section 21 of the\nJudicature Act (as amended and revised), order any cause or matter, or any\nquestion or issue arising therein, to be tried before a jury.\n\n(2) An application under paragraph (1) shall be made by summons supported by an\naffidavit setting out the reasons why, in the applicant's opinion, the cause or\nmatter or question or issue arising therein can with advantage be so tried.\n3.\nTime, etc. of trial of questions or issues (O.33, r.3)\n3.\nThe Court may order any question or issue arising in a cause or matter, whether of\nfact or law or partly of fact and partly of law, and whether raised by the pleadings or\notherwise, to be tried before, at or after the trial of the cause or matter, and may give\ndirections as to the manner in which the question or issue shall be stated.\n4.\nDetermining the place and mode of trial (O.33, r.4)\n4.\n(1) In every action begun by writ, an order made on the summons for directions\nshall determine the place and mode of the trial; and any such order may be varied\nby a subsequent order of the Court made at or before the trial.\n(2) In any such action different questions or issues may be ordered to be tried by\ndifferent modes of trial and one or more questions or issues may be ordered to\nbe tried before the others.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 33\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 201\n\n(3) The references in this Order to the summons for directions include references to\nany summons or application to which, under any of these Rules, O.25, rr.2 to 7,\nare to apply, with or without modifications.\n4A.\nSplit trial: offer on liability (O.33, r.4A)\n4A. (1) This rule applies where an order is made under rule 4(2) for the issue of liability\nto be tried before any issue or question concerning the amount of damages to be\nawarded if liability is established.\n(2) After the making of an order to which paragraph (1) applies, any party against\nwhom a finding of liability is sought may (without prejudice to the party\u2019s\ndefence) make a written offer to the other party to accept liability up to a\nspecified proportion.\n(3) Any offer made under the preceding paragraph may be brought to the attention\nof the Judge after the issue of liability has been decided, but not before.\n5.\nNo rule (O.33, r.5)\n5.\nNo rule (O.33, r.5)\n6.\nNo rule (O.33, r.6)\n6.\nNo rule (O.33, r.6)\n7.\nDismissal of action, etc. after decision of preliminary issue (O.33, r.7)\n7.\nIf it appears to the Court that the decision of any question or issue arising in a cause\nor matter and tried separately from the cause or matter substantially disposes of the\ncause or matter or renders the trial of the cause or matter unnecessary, it may dismiss\nthe cause or matter or make such other order or give such judgment as may be just.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nORDER 34\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 202\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 34\nFIXING A TRIAL DATE FOR ACTIONS BEGUN BY WRIT\n\n1.\nApplication and interpretation (O.34, r.1)\n1.\nThis Order applies to actions begun by writ and accordingly, references in this Order\nto an action shall be construed as references to an action so begun.\n2.\nOrder for action to be tried (O.34, r.2)\n2.\n(1) Every order made in an action which provides for trial before a Judge shall,\nwhether the trial is to be with or without a jury, fix a period within which the\nplaintiff is to apply to the Clerk of the Court to fix a trial date.\n(2) Where the plaintiff does not, within the period fixed under paragraph (1), apply\nto the Clerk of the Court to fix a trial date, the defendant may so apply or may\napply to the Court to dismiss the action for want of prosecution and, on the\nhearing of any such application, the Court may order the action to be dismissed\naccordingly or may make such other order as it thinks just.\n3.\nNotice to fix a trial date (O.34, r.3)\n3.\n(1) An application to fix a trial date shall be made by notice in Form No. 63 of the\nGrand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) addressed to the\nClerk of the Court, referred to in this Order as a \"notice to fix a trial date\",\ncopies of which shall be served on all the other parties to the action.\n(2) Within 14 days of receipt of a notice to fix a trial date the Clerk of the Court\nshall fix an appointment at the Clerk of the Court\u2019s office to be attended by the\nattorneys for all the parties, or the parties themselves if acting in person, at which\nthe trial date shall be fixed.\n(3) Not less than 3 days prior to the appointment with the Clerk of the Court, the\nparties shall deliver to the Clerk of the Court the following documents \u2014\n (a) a statement by each party of the name, address, telephone and facsimile\nnumber of all overseas counsel who may be instructed to appear at the trial;\nand\n (b) an agreed statement containing a reasoned estimate of the length of the\ntrial; or\n (c) in the absence of agreement, separate statements by each party containing\nthe party\u2019s reasoned estimate of the length of the trial.\n (4) Any party who has delivered a statement of the party\u2019s intention to instruct\noverseas counsel at the trial may arrange for such counsel's clerk to participate\nin the appointment by telephone.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 34\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 203\n\n4.\nDirections relating to fixing a trial date (O.34, r.4)\n4.\nNothing in this Order shall prejudice any powers of the Judge to give directions \u2014\n(a)\nproviding for the determination of a date for the trial of any action or a date\nbefore which the trial thereof is not to take place; or\n(b) as to the making of applications to fix, vacate or alter any trial date or the\nestimate of the length of any trial.\n5.\nFurther provisions fixing a trial date (O.34, r.5)\n5.\nAt any time after a trial date has been fixed in respect of any action, the Court may\nrequire the parties to furnish the Court, by personal attendance or otherwise, with\nsuch information as may be necessary to show whether the action is ready for trial,\nand if any party fails to comply with any such requirement, the Court may \u2014\n(a)\nof its own motion, on 7 days' notice to the parties, direct that the fixture be\nvacated; or\n(b) on the application of any party, dismiss the action for want of prosecution\nor strike out the defence or counterclaim or make such other order as the\nCourt thinks fit.\n6.\nNo rule (O.34, r.6)\n6.\nNo rule (O.34, r.6)\n7.\nNo rule (O.34, r.7)\n7.\nNo rule (O.34, r.7)\n8.\nNotification of relevant information (O.34 r.8)\n8.\nIt shall be the duty of all parties to an action in respect of which a trial date has been\nfixed to furnish without delay to the Clerk of the Court all available information as to\nthe action being or being likely to be settled, or affecting the estimated length of the\ntrial, and, if the action is settled or withdrawn, to notify the Clerk of the Court of the\nfact without delay.\n9.\nNo rule (O.34, r.9)\n9.\nNo rule (O.34, r.9)\n10.\nDelivery of bundles to the Court (O.34, r.10)\n10. (1) Not less than 14 days prior to the trial date, the plaintiff shall deliver to the Clerk\nof the Court one set of bundles comprising the following documents \u2014\n(a)\na bundle containing the writ and all relevant pleadings, affidavits,\ninterrogatories and orders;\n(b) a core bundle containing those documents central to the plaintiff's case and\nthose documents which the defendant wishes to have included;\n\nORDER 34\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 204\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(c)\nwhenever witness statements have been exchanged whether by agreement\nor pursuant to a direction, a bundle containing all such statements, together\nwith a note specifying which, if any, of such statements are agreed;\n(d) a bundle of all experts' reports which have been exchanged, together with\na note stating which, if any, of such reports have been agreed; and\n(e)\na note agreed by the parties or, failing agreement, a note by each party\ngiving (in the following order) \u2014\n(i)\na summary of the issues involved;\n(ii) a summary of any propositions of law to be advanced together with\na list of the authorities to be cited;\n(iii) a chronology of the relevant events; and\n(iv) a reading guide for the Judge.\n(2) Not less than 2 days before the trial date, the plaintiff shall deliver to the Clerk\nof the Court one set of bundles comprising all the documents, except for those\nalready contained in the core bundle, intended to be used at the trial.\n(3) All such bundles shall be indexed, paginated and contained in ring binders or\nbound in such other manner as may be agreed with the Clerk of the Court.\n(4) Nothing in this rule shall prevent the Court from giving, whether before or after\nthe bundles have been delivered, such further or different directions as to the\ndocuments to be delivered as may, in the circumstances, be appropriate.\n(5) For the purposes of this rule, \"plaintiff\" includes a defendant where an action is\nproceeding on a counterclaim and, \"defendant\" includes any other party who is\nentitled under any order of the Court or otherwise to be heard at the trial.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 35\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 205\n\nORDER 35\nPROCEEDINGS AT TRIAL\n\n1.\nFailure to appear by both parties or one of them (O.35, r.1)\n1.\n(1) If, when the trial of an action is called on, neither party appears, the action may\nbe struck out, without prejudice, however, to the restoration thereof, on the\ndirection of a Judge.\n(2) If, when the trial of an action is called on, on the first or any subsequent day of\nthe trial, one party does not appear, the Judge may proceed with the trial of the\naction or any counterclaim in the absence of that party.\n2.\nJudgment etc. given in absence of party may be set aside (O.35, r.2)\n2.\n(1) Any judgment, order or verdict obtained where one party does not appear at the\ntrial may be set aside by the Court, on the application of that party, on such\nterms as it thinks just.\n(2) An application under this rule must be made within 7 days after the trial.\n3.\nAdjournment of trial (O.35, r.3)\n3.\nThe Judge may, if the Judge thinks it expedient in the interest of justice, adjourn a\ntrial for such time and upon such terms, if any, as the Judge thinks fit.\n4.\nNo rule (O.35, r.4)\n4.\nNo rule (O.35, r.4)\n5.\nNo rule (O.35, r.5)\n5.\nNo rule (O.35, r.5)\n6.\nNo rule (O.35, r.6)\n6.\nNo rule (O.35, r.6)\n7.\nOrder of speeches (O.35, r.7)\n7.\n(1) The Judge before whom an action is tried (whether with or without a jury) may\ngive directions as to the party to begin and the order of speeches at the trial, and,\nsubject to any such directions, the party to begin and the order of speeches shall\nbe that provided by this rule.\n(2) Subject to paragraph (6) the plaintiff shall begin by opening the plaintiff\u2019s case.\n(3) If the defendant elects not to adduce evidence, then, whether or not the\ndefendant has in the course of cross-examination of a witness for the plaintiff or\n\nORDER 35\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 206\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\notherwise put in a document, the plaintiff may, after the evidence on the\nplaintiff\u2019s behalf has been given, make a second speech closing the plaintiff\u2019s\ncase and the defendant shall then state the defendant\u2019s case.\n(4) If the defendant elects to adduce evidence, the defendant may, after any\nevidence on behalf of the plaintiff has been given, open the defendant\u2019s case\nand, after the evidence on the defendant\u2019s behalf has been given, make a second\nspeech closing the defendant\u2019s case, and at the close of the defendant's case the\nplaintiff may make a speech in reply.\n(5) Where there are two or more defendants who appear separately or are separately\nrepresented, then \u2014\n(a)\nif none of them elects to adduce evidence, each of them shall state their\ncase in the order in which their name appears on the record;\n(b) if each of them elects to adduce evidence, each of them may open their\ncase and the evidence on behalf of each of them shall be given in the order\naforesaid and the speech of each of them closing their case shall be made\nin that order after the evidence on behalf of all the defendants has been\ngiven;\n(c)\nif some of them elect to adduce evidence and some do not, those who do\nnot shall state their cases in the order aforesaid after the speech of the\nplaintiff in reply to the other defendants.\n (6) Where the burden of proof of all the issues in the action lies on the defendant\nor, where there are two or more defendants and they appear separately or are\nseparately represented, on one of the defendants, the defendant or that\ndefendant, as the case may be, shall be entitled to begin and in that case\nparagraphs (2), (3) and (4) shall have effect in relation to, and as between the\ndefendant and the plaintiff as if for references to the plaintiff and the defendant\nthere were substituted references to the defendant and the plaintiff respectively.\n(7) Where, as between the plaintiff and any defendant, the party who would, but for\nthis paragraph, be entitled to make the final speech raises any fresh point of law\nin that speech or cites in that speech any authority not previously cited, the\nopposite party may make a further speech in reply, but only in relation to that\npoint of law or that authority, as the case may be.\n8.\nInspection by Judge or jury (O.35, r.8)\n8.\n(1) The Judge by whom any cause or matter is tried may inspect any place or thing\nwith respect to which any question arises in the cause or matter.\n(2) Where a cause or matter is tried with a jury and the Judge inspects any place or\nthing under paragraph (1), the Judge may authorise the jury to inspect it also.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 35\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 207\n\n9.\nDeath of party before giving of judgment (O.35, r.9)\n9.\nWhere a party to any action dies after the verdict or finding of the issues of fact and\nbefore judgment is given, judgment may be given notwithstanding the death, but the\nforegoing provision shall not be taken as affecting the power of the Judge to make an\norder under O.15, r.7(2), before giving judgment.\n10.\nNo rule (O.35, r.10)\n10. No rule (O.35, r.10)\n10A. No rule (O.35, r.10A)\n10A. No rule (O.35, r.10A)\n11.\nList of Exhibits (O.35, r.11)\n11. (1) The Clerk of the Court shall take charge of every document or object put in as\nan exhibit during the trial of any action and shall mark or label every exhibit\nwith a letter or letters indicating the party by whom the exhibit is put in or the\nwitness by whom it is proved, and with a number.\n\nIn this paragraph a witness by whom an exhibit is proved includes a witness in\nthe course of whose evidence the exhibit is put in.\n(2) The Clerk of the Court shall cause a list to be made of all the exhibits in the\naction, and any party may, on payment of the prescribed fee, have an office copy\nof that list.\n(3) The list of exhibits when completed shall be attached to the pleadings and shall\nform part of the record of the action.\n(4) For the purpose of this rule a bundle of documents may be treated and counted\nas one exhibit.\n12.\nCustody of exhibit after trial (O.35, r.12)\n12. It shall be the duty of every party to an action who has put in any exhibit to apply to\nthe Clerk of the Court immediately after the trial for the return of the exhibit, and, so\nfar as is practicable, regard being had to the nature of the exhibit, to keep it duly\nmarked and labelled as before, so that in the event of an appeal, the party may be able\nto produce the exhibit so marked and labelled at the hearing of the appeal in case the\nparty is required to do so.\n13.\nImpounded documents (O.35, r.13)\n13. (1) Documents impounded by order of the Court shall not be delivered out of the\ncustody of the Court except in compliance with an order made by a Judge on an\napplication made by motion:\n\nORDER 35\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 208\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nProvided that where the Attorney General makes a written request in that behalf,\ndocuments so impounded shall be delivered into the Attorney General\u2019s\ncustody.\n(2) Documents impounded by order of the Court, while in the custody of the Court,\nshall not be inspected except by a person authorised to do so by an order signed\nby a Judge.\n14.\nOfficers may administer oaths (O.35, r.14)\n14. Order 32, rule 8 shall apply to proceedings in Court as it applies to proceedings in\nChambers.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 36\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 209\n\nORDER 36\nNO ORDER\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nORDER 37\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 210\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 37\nDAMAGES: ASSESSMENT AFTER JUDGMENT\n\n1.\nAssessment of damages by a Judge (O.37, r.1)\n1.\n(1) Where judgment is given in the Court for damages to be assessed and no\nprovision is made in the judgment as to how they are to be assessed, the damages\nshall be assessed by a Judge, and the party entitled to the benefit of the judgment\nmay, after obtaining the necessary appointment from the Judge, and at least 7\ndays before the date of the appointment, serving notice of the appointment on\nthe party against whom the judgment is given, proceed accordingly.\n(2) Notwithstanding anything in O.65, r.9, a notice under this rule must be served\non the party against whom the judgment is given.\n2.\nCertificate of amount of damages (O.37, r.2)\n2.\nWhere in pursuance of this Order or otherwise damages are assessed by a Judge, the\nJudge shall certify the amount of the damages, and the certificate shall be filed in the\nCourt office.\n\n3.\nDefault judgment against some but not all defendants (O.37, r.3)\n3.\nWhere any such judgment as is mentioned in rule 1 is given for failure to give notice\nof intention to defend or in default of defence, and the action proceeds against other\ndefendants, the damages under the judgment shall be assessed at the trial unless the\nCourt otherwise orders.\n4.\nNo rule (O.37, r.4)\n4.\nNo rule (O.37, r.4)\n5.\nAssessment of value (O.37, r.5)\n5.\nThe foregoing provisions of this Order shall apply in relation to a judgment for the\nvalue of goods to be assessed, with or without damages to be assessed, and references\nin those provisions to the assessment of damages shall be construed accordingly.\n6.\nAssessment of damages to time of assessment (O.37, r.6)\n6.\nWhere damages are to be assessed (whether under this Order or otherwise) in respect\nof any continuing cause of action, they shall be assessed down to the time of the\nassessment.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 38\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 211\n\nORDER 38\nEVIDENCE\n\nI. GENERAL RULES\n1.\nGeneral rule: witnesses to be examined orally (O.38, r.1)\n1.\nSubject to the provisions of these Rules and of the Law, and any other law relating to\nevidence, any fact required to be proved at the trial of any action begun by writ by\nthe evidence of witnesses shall be proved by the examination of the witnesses orally\nand in open Court.\n1A.\nInterpretation (O.38, r.1A)\n1A. In this Order \u2014\n\n\"the Law\" means the Evidence Act (as amended and revised), and any expressions\nused in this Order and in the Law have the same meanings in this Order as they have\nin the Law.\n2.\nEvidence by affidavit (O.38, r.2)\n2.\n(1) The Court may, at or before the trial of an action begun by writ, order that the\naffidavit of any witness may be read at the trial if in the circumstances of the\ncase it thinks it reasonable so to order.\n(2) An order under paragraph (1) may be made on such terms as to the filing and\ngiving of copies of the affidavits and as to the production of the deponents for\ncross-examination as the Court thinks fit but, subject to any such terms and to\nany subsequent order of the Court, the deponents shall not be subject to crossexamination and need not attend the trial for that purpose.\n(3) In any cause or matter begun by originating summons, originating motion or\npetition, and on any application made by summons or motion, evidence may be\ngiven by affidavit unless in the case of any such cause, matter or application any\nprovision of these Rules otherwise provides or the Court otherwise directs, but\nthe Court may, on the application of any party, order the attendance for crossexamination of the person making any such affidavit, and where, after such an\norder has been made, the person in question does not attend, the person\u2019s\naffidavit shall not be used as evidence without leave of the Court.\n2A.\nExchange of witnesses' statements (O.38, r.2A)\n2A. (1) The powers of the Court under this rule may be exercised for the purpose of\ndisposing fairly and expeditiously of the cause or matter before it, and saving\ncosts, having regard to all the circumstances of the case, including (but not\nlimited to) \u2014\n\nORDER 38\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 212\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(a)\nthe extent to which the facts are in dispute or have been admitted;\n(b) the extent to which the issues of fact are defined by the pleadings;\n(c)\nthe extent to which information has been or is likely to be provided by\nfurther and better particulars, answers to interrogatories or otherwise.\n(2) At the summons for directions in an action commenced by writ the Court may\ndirect every party to serve on the other parties, within 14 weeks (or such other\nperiod as the Court may specify) of the hearing of the summons and on such\nterms as the Court may specify, written statements of the oral evidence which\nthe party intends to adduce on any issues of fact to be decided at the trial.\n\nThe Court may give a direction to any party under this paragraph at any other\nstage of such an action and at any stage of any other cause or matter.\n(3) Directions under paragraph (2) or (17) may make different provision with regard\nto different issues of fact or different witnesses.\n(4) Statements served under this rule shall \u2014\n(a)\nbe dated and, except for good reason (which should be specified by letter\naccompanying the statement), be signed by the intended witness and shall\ninclude a statement by the intended witness that the contents are true to the\nbest of that witness\u2019s knowledge and belief;\n(b) sufficiently identify any documents referred to therein; and\n(c)\nwhere they are to be served by more than one party, be exchanged\nsimultaneously.\n(5) Where a party is unable to obtain a written statement from an intended witness\nin accordance with paragraph (4)(a), the Court may direct the party wishing to\nadduce that witness' evidence to provide the other party with the name of the\nwitness and (unless the Court otherwise orders) a statement of the nature of the\nevidence intended to be adduced.\n(6) Subject to paragraph (9), where the party serving a statement under this rule\ndoes not call the witness to whose evidence it relates, no other party may put the\nstatement in evidence at the trial.\n(7) Subject to paragraph (9), where the party serving the statement does call such a\nwitness at a trial \u2014\n(a)\nexcept where the trial is with a jury, the Court may, on such terms as it\nthinks fit, direct that the statement served, or part of it, shall stand as the\nevidence in chief of the witness or part of such evidence;\n(b) the party may not without the consent of the other parties or the leave of\nthe Court adduce evidence from that witness, the substance of which is not\nincluded in the statement served, except \u2014\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 38\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 213\n\n(i)\nwhere the Court's directions under paragraph (2) or (17) specify that\nstatements should be exchanged in relation to only some issues of\nfact, in relation to any other issues;\n(ii) in relation to new matters which have arisen since the statement was\nserved on the other party;\n(c)\nwhether or not the statement or any part of it referred to during the\nevidence in chief of the witness, any party may put the statement or any\npart of it in cross-examination of that witness.\n(8) Nothing in this rule shall make admissible evidence which is otherwise\ninadmissible.\n(9) Where any statement served is one to which the Law applies, paragraphs (6) and\n(7) shall take effect subject to the provisions of that Law and Parts III and IV of\nthis Order.\nThe service of a witness statement under this rule shall not, unless expressly so\nstated by the party serving the same, be treated as a notice under the Law; and\nwhere a statement or any part thereof would be admissible in evidence by virtue\nonly of the Law the appropriate notice under Part III or Part IV of this Order\nshall be served with the statement notwithstanding any provision of those Parts\nas to the time for serving such a notice. Where such a notice is served a counternotice shall be deemed to have been served under rule 26(1).\n(10) Where a party fails to comply with a direction for the exchange of witness\nstatements the party shall not be entitled to adduce evidence to which the\ndirection relates without leave of the Court.\n(11) Where a party serves a witness statement under this rule, no other person may\nmake use of that statement for any purpose other than the purpose of the\nproceedings in which it was served \u2014\n(a)\nunless and to the extent that the party serving it gives the party\u2019s consent\nin writing or the Court gives leave; or\n (b) unless and to the extent that it has been put in evidence (whether pursuant\nto a direction under paragraph (7)(a) or otherwise).\n(12) Subject to paragraph (13), the Judge shall, if any person so requests during the\ncourse of the trial, direct that any witness statement which was ordered to stand\nas evidence in chief under paragraph (7)(a) shall be open to public inspection.\n\nA request under this paragraph shall be made orally or in writing.\n(13) The Judge may refuse to give a direction under paragraph (12) in relation to a\nwitness statement, or may exclude from such a direction any words or passages\nin a statement, if the Judge considers that inspection should not be available \u2014\n(a)\nin the interests of justice or national security;\n(b) because of the nature of any expert medical evidence in the statement; or\n\nORDER 38\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 214\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(c)\nfor any other sufficient reason.\n(14)  Where a direction is made under paragraph (12) the Judge shall direct the Clerk\nof the Court to \u2014\n(a)\nprepare a certificate which shall be attached to a copy (\"the certified copy\")\nof that witness statement; and\n(b) make the certified copy available for inspection.\n(15)  Subject to any conditions which the Court may by special or general direction\nimpose, any person may inspect and (subject to payment of the prescribed fee)\ntake a copy of the certified copy of a witness statement from the time when the\ndirection is given until the end of 7 days after the conclusion of the trial.\n(16)  In this rule \u2014\n(a)\nany reference in paragraphs (12) to (15) to a witness statement shall, in\nrelation to a witness statement of which only part has been ordered to stand\nas evidence in chief under paragraph (7)(a), be construed as a reference to\nthat part;\n(b) any reference to inspecting or copying the certified copy of a witness\nstatement shall be construed as including a reference to inspecting or\ncopying a copy of that certified copy.\n(17)  The Court shall have power to vary or override any of the provisions of this rule\n(except paragraphs (1), (8) and (12) to (16)) and to give such alternative\ndirections as it thinks fit.\n3.\nEvidence of particular facts (O.38, r.3)\n3.\n(1) Without prejudice to rule 30, the Court may, at or before the trial of any action,\norder that evidence of any particular fact shall be given at the trial in such a\nmanner as may be specified by the order.\n(2) The power conferred by paragraph (1) extends in particular to ordering that\nevidence of any particular fact may be given at the trial \u2014\n(a)\nby statement on oath of information or belief; or\n(b) by the production of documents or entries in books; or\n(c)\nby copies of documents or entries in books; or\n(d) in the case of a fact which is or was a matter of common knowledge either\ngenerally or in a particular district, by the production of a specific\nnewspaper which contains a statement of that fact.\n4.\nLimitation of expert evidence (O.38, r.4)\n4.\nThe Court may, at or before the trial of any action, order that the number of medical\nor other expert witnesses who may be called at the trial shall be limited as specified\nby the order.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 38\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 215\n\n5.\nLimitation of plans, etc. in evidence (O.38, r.5)\n5.\nUnless, at or before the trial, the Court for special reasons otherwise orders, no plan,\nphotograph or model shall be receivable in evidence at the trial of an action unless at\nleast 10 days before the commencement of the trial the parties, other than the party\nproducing it, have been given an opportunity to inspect it and to agree to the\nadmission thereof without further proof.\n6.\nRevocation or variation of orders under rules 2 to 5 (O.38, r.6)\n6.\nAny order under rules 2 to 5 (including an order made on appeal) may, on sufficient\ncause being shown, be revoked or varied by a subsequent order of the Court made at\nor before the trial.\n\n7.\nEvidence of finding on foreign law (O.38, r.7)\n7.\n(1) A party to any cause or matter who intends to adduce in evidence a finding or\ndecision on a question of foreign law contained in a judgment of the Court or\nthe Court of Appeal where such judgment is in citable form shall \u2014\n(a)\nin the case of an action to which O.25, r.1, applies, within 14 days after the\npleadings in the action are deemed to be closed; and\n(b) in the case of any other cause or matter, within 21 days after the date on\nwhich an appointment for the first hearing of the cause or matter is\nobtained,\nor in either case, within such other period as the Court may specify, serve notice\nof the party\u2019s intention on every other party to the proceedings,\n(2) The notice shall specify the question on which the finding or decision was given\nor made and specify the document in which it is reported or recorded in citable\nform.\n(3) In any cause or matter in which evidence may be given by affidavit, an affidavit\nspecifying the matters contained in paragraph (2) shall constitute notice under\nparagraph (1) if served within the period mentioned in that paragraph.\n8.\nApplication to trials of issues, references, etc. (O.38, r.8)\n8.\nThe foregoing rules of this Order shall apply to trials of issues or questions of fact or\nlaw, references, inquiries and assessments of damages as they apply to the trial of\nactions.\n9.\nDepositions: when receivable in evidence at trial (O.38, r.9)\n9.\n(1) No deposition taken in any cause or matter shall be received in evidence at the\ntrial of the cause or matter unless \u2014\n\nORDER 38\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 216\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(a)\nthe deposition was taken in pursuance of an order under O.39, r.1; and\n(b) either the party against whom the evidence is offered consents or it is\nproved to the satisfaction of the Court that the deponent is dead, or beyond\nthe jurisdiction of the Court or unable from sickness or other infirmity to\nattend the trial.\n(2) A party intending to use any deposition in evidence at the trial of a cause or\nmatter must, a reasonable time before the trial, give notice of the party\u2019s\nintention to do so to the other party.\n (3) A deposition purporting to be signed by the person before whom it was taken\nshall be receivable in evidence without proof of the signature being the signature\nof that person.\n10.\nCourt documents admissible or receivable in evidence (O.38, r.10)\n10. (1) Certified copies of writs, records, pleadings and documents filed in the Court\nshall be admissible in evidence in any cause or matter and between all parties to\nthe same extent as the original would be admissible.\n(2) Without prejudice to the provisions of any enactment, every document\npurporting to be sealed with the seal of the Court shall be received in evidence\nwithout further proof, and any document purporting to be so sealed and to be a\ncopy of a document filed in, or issued out of, the Court shall be deemed to be an\noffice copy of that document without further proof unless the contrary is shown.\n11.\nEvidence of consent of new trustee to act (O.38, r.11)\n11. A document purporting to contain the written consent of a person to act as trustee and\nto bear the person\u2019s signature verified by some other person shall be evidence of such\nconsent.\n12.\nEvidence at trial may be used in subsequent proceedings (O.38, r.12)\n12. Any evidence taken at the trial of any cause or matter may be used in any subsequent\nproceedings in that cause or matter.\n13.\nOrder to produce document at proceeding other than trial (O.38, r.13)\n13. (1) At any stage in a cause or matter the Court may order any person to attend any\nproceeding in the cause or matter and produce any document, to be specified or\ndescribed in that order, the production of which appears to the Court to be\nnecessary for the purpose of that proceeding.\n(2) No person shall be compelled by an order under paragraph (1) to produce any\ndocument at the proceeding in a cause or matter which the person could not be\ncompelled to produce at the trial of that cause or matter.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 38\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 217\n\nII. WRITS OF SUBPOENA\n14.\nForm and issue of writ of subpoena (O.38, r.14)\n14. (1) A writ of subpoena ad testificandum or a writ of subpoena duces tecum must be\nin Form No. 18 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and\nrevised).\n(2) Issue of a writ of subpoena takes place upon its being sealed by the Clerk of the\nCourt.\n(3) Before a writ of subpoena is issued a praecipe for the issue of the writ must be\nfiled; and the praecipe must contain the name and address of the party issuing\nthe writ, if the party is acting in person, or the name or firm and business address\nof that party's attorney.\n15.\nMore than one name may be included in one writ of subpoena (O.38, r.15)\n15. The names of two or more persons may be included in one writ of subpoena ad\ntestificandum.\n16.\nAmendment of writ of subpoena (O.38, r.16)\n16. Where there is a mistake in any person's name or address in a writ of subpoena, then,\nif the writ has not been served, the party by whom the writ was issued may have the\nwrit resealed in correct form by filing a second praecipe under rule 14(3) indorsed\nwith the words \"Amended and re-sealed\".\n17.\nService of writ of subpoena (O.38, r.17)\n17. A writ of subpoena must be served personally and the service shall not be valid unless\neffected within 12 weeks after the date of issue of the writ and not less than 4 days or\nsuch other period as the Court may fix, before the day on which attendance before the\nCourt is required.\n18.\nDuration of writ of subpoena (O.38, r.18)\n18. A writ of subpoena continues to have effect until the conclusion of the trial or other\nproceeding at which the attendance of the witness is required.\n19.\nInspection of banker's books (O.38, r.19)\n19. (1) An application under Section 8 of the Law for an order that a party be at liberty\nto inspect and take copies of any matter in a banker's book shall be made by\nsummons to a Judge in Chambers.\n(2) An application under paragraph (1) may be made ex parte.\n(3) The application shall be supported by an affidavit stating \u2014\n(a)\nthe nature of the proceedings and the reasons why the inspection is\nnecessary;\n\nORDER 38\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 218\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(b) how the entries of which inspection is sought will be admissible in\nevidence at the trial of the action;\n(c)\nthe period over which it is proposed that the inspection should extend; and\n(d) where the accountholder has consented to the inspection and, if not,\nwhether any relevant directions have been made under Section 4 of the\nConfidential Information Disclosure Act (as amended and revised).\n\nIII. HEARSAY EVIDENCE\n20.\nApplication (O.38, r.20)\n20. This Part of this Order shall apply in relation to the trial or hearing of an issue or\nquestion arising in a cause or matter, and to a reference, inquiry and assessment of\ndamages, as it applies in relation to the trial or hearing of a cause or matter.\n21.\nNotice of intention to give certain statements in evidence (O.38, r.21)\n21. (1) Subject to the provisions of this rule, a party to a cause or matter who desires to\ngive in evidence at the trial or hearing of the cause or matter any statement which\nis admissible in evidence by virtue of Section 45, 47 or 48 of the Law must \u2014\n(a)\nin the case of a cause or matter which is required to be set down for trial\nor hearing or adjourned into Court, within 21 days after it is set down or\nso adjourned, or within such other period as the Court may specify; and\n(b) in the case of any other cause or matter, within 21 days after the date on\nwhich an appointment for the first hearing of the cause or matter is\nobtained, or within such other period as the Court may specify, serve on\nevery other party to the cause or matter notice of the party\u2019s desire to do\nso, and the notice must comply with the provisions of rule 22, 23 or 24, as\nthe circumstances of the case require.\n(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply in relation to any statement which is admissible as\nevidence of any act stated therein by virtue not only of the said Section 45, 47\nor 48 but by virtue also of any other Law.\n(3) Paragraph (1) shall not apply in relation to any statement which any party to a\nprobate action desires to give in evidence at the trial of that action and which is\nalleged to have been made by the deceased person whose estate is the subject of\nthe action.\n(4) Where by virtue of any provision of these Rules or of any order or direction of\nthe Court the evidence in any proceedings is to be given by affidavit then,\nwithout prejudice to paragraph (2), paragraph (1) shall not apply in relation to\nany statement which any party to the proceedings desires to have included in\nany affidavit to be used on the party\u2019s behalf in the proceedings, but nothing in\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 38\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 219\n\nthis paragraph shall affect the operation of O.41, r.5, or the powers of the Court\nunder rule 3.\n (5) Order 65, rule 9, shall not apply to a notice under this rule but the Court may\ndirect that the notice need not be served on any party who at the time when\nservice is to be effected is in default as to entry of appearance or who has no\naddress for service.\n22.\nStatement admissible by virtue of Section 45 of the Law: contents of notice\n(O.38, r.22)\n22. (1) If the statement is admissible by virtue of Section 45 of the Law, and was made\notherwise than in a document, the notice must contain particulars of \u2014\n(a)\nthe time, place and circumstances at or in which the statement was made;\n(b) the person by whom and the person to whom, the statement was made; and\n(c)\nthe substance of the statement or if material, the words used.\n(2) If the statement is admissible by virtue of the said Section 45 and was made in\na document, a copy or transcript of the document, or of the relevant part thereof,\nmust be annexed to the notice, and the notice must contain such (if any) of the\nparticulars mentioned in paragraphs 1(a) and (b) as are not apparent on the face\nof the document or part.\n(3) If the party giving the notice alleges that any person, particulars of whom are\ncontained in the notice, cannot or should not be called as a witness at the trial or\nhearing for any of the reasons specified in rule 25, the notice must contain a\nstatement to that effect specifying the reason relied on.\n23.\nStatement admissible by virtue of Section 47 of the Law: contents of notice\n(O.38, r.23)\n23. (1) If the statement is admissible by virtue of Section 47 of the Law, the notice must\nhave annexed to it a copy or transcript of the document containing the statement,\nor of the relevant part thereof, and must contain \u2014\n (a) particulars of \u2014\n(i)\nthe person by whom the record containing the statement was\ncompiled;\n(ii) the person who originally supplied the information from which the\nrecord was compiled; and\n(iii) any other person through whom that information was supplied to the\ncompiler of that record,\nand, in the case of any such person as is referred to in (i) or (iii) above, a\ndescription of the duty under which that person was acting when compiling that\nrecord or supplying information from which that record was compiled, as the\ncase may be;\n\nORDER 38\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 220\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(b) if not apparent on the face of the document annexed to the notice, a\ndescription of the nature of the record which, or part of which, contains the\nstatement; and\n(c)\nparticulars of the time, place and circumstances at or in which that record\nor part was compiled.\n(2) If the party given the notice alleges that any person, particulars of whom are\ncontained in the notice, cannot or should not be called as a witness at the trial or\nhearing for any of the reasons specified in rule 25, the notice must contain a\nstatement to that effect specifying the reason relied on.\n24.\nStatement admissible by virtue of Section 48 of the Law: contents of notice\n(O.38, r.24)\n24. (1) If the statement is contained in a document produced by a computer and is\nadmissible by virtue of Section 48 of the Law, the notice must have annexed to\nit a copy or transcript of the document containing the statement, or of the\nrelevant part thereof, and must contain particulars of \u2014\n(a)\na person who occupied a responsible position in relation to the\nmanagement of the relevant activities for the purpose of which the\ncomputer was used regularly during the material period to store or process\ninformation;\n(b) a person who at the material time occupied such a position in relation to\nthe supply of information to the computer, being information which is\nreproduced in the statement or information from which the information\ncontained in the statement is derived;\n(c)\na person who occupied such a position in relation to the operation of the\ncomputer during the material period,\nand where there are two or more persons who fall within any of the foregoing\nsubparagraphs and some only of those persons are at the date of service of the\nnotice capable of being called as witnesses at the trial or hearing, the person,\nparticulars of whom are to be contained in the notice, must be such one of those\npersons as is at the date so capable.\n(2) The notice must also state whether the computer was operating properly\nthroughout the material period and, if not, whether any respect in which it was\nnot operating properly or was out of operation during any part of that period was\nsuch as to affect the production of the document in which the statement is\ncontained or the accuracy of its contents.\n(3) If the party giving the notice alleges that any person, particulars of whom are\ncontained in the notice, cannot or should not be called as a witness at the trial or\nhearing for any of the reasons specified in rule 25, the notice must contain a\nstatement to that effect specifying the reason relied on.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 38\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 221\n\n25.\nReasons for not calling a person as a witness (O.38, r.25)\n25. The reasons referred to in rules 22(3), 23(2) and 24(3) are that the person in question\nis dead, or beyond the seas or unfit by reason of the person\u2019s bodily or mental\ncondition to attend as a witness or that despite the exercise of reasonable diligence it\nhas not been possible to identify or find the person or that the person cannot\nreasonably be expected to have any recollection of matters relevant to the accuracy\nor otherwise of the statement to which the notice relates.\n26.\nCounter-notice requiring person to be called as a witness (O.38, r.26)\n26. (1) Subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), any party to a cause or matter on whom a\nnotice under rule 21 is served may within 21 days after service of the notice on\nthe party serve on the party who gave the notice a counter notice requiring that\nparty to call as a witness at the trial or hearing of the cause or matter any person\n(naming the person) particulars of whom are contained in the notice.\n(2) Where any notice under rule 21 contains a statement that any person, particulars\nof whom are contained in the notice, cannot or should not be called as a witness\nfor the reason specified therein, a party shall not be entitled to serve a counternotice under this rule requiring that person to be called as a witness at the trial\nor hearing of the cause or matter unless the party contends that that person can\nor, as the case may be, should be called, and in that case the party must include\nin the party\u2019s counter-notice a statement to that effect.\n(3) Where a statement to which a notice under rule 21 relates is one to which rule\n28 applies, no party on whom the notice is served shall be entitled to serve a\ncounter-notice under this rule in relation to that statement, but the foregoing\nprovision is without prejudice to the right of any party to apply to the Court\nunder rule 28 for directions with respect to the admissibility of that statement.\n(4) If any party to a cause or matter by whom a notice under rule 21 is served fails\nto comply with a counter-notice duly served on the party under this rule, then\nunless any of the reasons specified in rule 25 applies in relation to the person\nnamed in the counter-notice, and without prejudice to the powers of the Court\nunder rule 29, the statement to which the notice under rule 21 relates shall not\nbe admissible at the trial or hearing of the cause or matter as evidence of any\nfact stated therein by virtue of Section 45, 47 or 48 of the Law, as the case may\nbe.\n\nORDER 38\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 222\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n27.\nDetermination of question whether person can or should be called as a\nwitness (O.38, r.27)\n27. (1) Where in any cause or matter a question arises whether any of the reasons\nspecified in rule 25 applies in relation to a person, particulars of whom are\ncontained in a notice under rule 21, the Court may, on the application of any\nparty to the cause or matter, determine the question before the trial or hearing\nof the cause or matter or give directions for it to be determined before the trial\nor hearing and for the manner in which it is to be so determined.\n(2) Unless the Court otherwise directs, the summons by which an application under\nparagraph (1) is made must be served by the party making the application on\nevery other party to the cause or matter.\n(3) Where any such question as is referred to in paragraph (1) has been determined\nunder or by virtue of that paragraph, no application to have it determined afresh\nat the trial or hearing of the cause or matter may be made unless the evidence\nwhich it is sought to adduce in support of the application could not with\nreasonable diligence have been adduced at the hearing which resulted in the\ndetermination.\n28.\nDirections with respect to statement made in previous proceedings (O.38,\nr.28)\n28. Where a party to a cause or matter has given notice in accordance with rule 21 that\nthe party desires to give in evidence at the trial or hearing of the cause or matter \u2014\n(a)\na statement falling with Section 45(1) of the Law which was made by a\nperson, whether orally or in a document, in the course of giving evidence\nin some other legal proceedings (whether civil or criminal); or\n(b) a statement falling within Section 47(1) of the said Law which is contained\nin a record of direct oral evidence given in some other legal proceedings\n(whether civil or criminal),\nany party to the cause or matter may apply to the Court for directions under this\nrule, and the Court hearing such an application may give directions as to\nwhether, and if so on what conditions, the party desiring to give the statement\nin evidence will be permitted to do so and (where applicable) as to the manner\nin which that statement and any other evidence given in those other proceedings\nis to be proved.\n29.\nPower of Court to allow statement to be given in evidence (O.38, r.29)\n29. (1) Without prejudice to Sections 45(2)(a) and 47(2)(a) of the Law and rule 28, the\nCourt may, if it thinks it just to do so, allow a statement falling within Section\n45(1), 47(1) or 48(1) to be given in evidence at the trial or hearing of a cause or\nmatter notwithstanding \u2014\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 38\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 223\n\n(a)\nthat the statement is one in relation to which rule 21(1) applies and that the\nparty desiring to give the statement in evidence has failed to comply with\nthat rule; or\n(b) that that party has failed to comply with any requirement of a counter\nnotice relating to that statement which was served on that party in\naccordance with rule 26.\n(2) Without prejudice to the generality of paragraph (1), the Court may exercise its\npower under that paragraph to allow a statement to be given in evidence at the\ntrial or hearing of a cause or matter if a refusal to exercise that power might\noblige the party desiring to give the statement in evidence to call as a witness at\nthe trial or hearing an opposite party or person who is or was at the material time\nthe servant or agent of an opposite party.\n30.\nRestriction on adducing evidence as to credibility of maker, etc., of certain\nstatements (O.38, r.30)\n30. Where \u2014\n(a)\na notice given under rule 21 in a cause or matter relates to a statement\nwhich is admissible by virtue of Section 45 or 47 of the Law; and\n(b) the person who made the statement, or, as the case may be, the person who\noriginally supplied the information from which the record containing the\nstatement was compiled, is not called as a witness at the trial or hearing of\nthe cause or matter; and\n(c)\nnone of the reasons mentioned in rule 25 applies so as to prevent the party\nwho gave the notice from calling that person as a witness,\n\nno other party to the cause or matter shall be entitled, except with the leave of\nthe Court, to adduce in relation to that person any evidence which could\notherwise be adduced by that party by virtue of Section 50 of the Law unless\nthat party gave a counter-notice under rule 26 in respect of that person or applied\nunder rule 28 for a direction that that person be called as a witness at the trial or\nhearing of the cause or matter.\n31.\nNotice required of intention to give evidence of certain inconsistent\nstatements (O.38, r.31)\n31. (1) Where a person, particulars of whom were contained in a notice given under\nrule 21 in a cause or matter, is not to be called as a witness at the trial or hearing\nof the cause or matter, any party to the cause or matter who is entitled and\nintends to adduce in relation to that person any evidence which is admissible for\nthe purpose mentioned in Section 50(b) of the Law must, not more than 21 days\nafter service of that notice on the party, serve on the party who gave that notice,\nnotice of the party\u2019s intention to do so.\n\nORDER 38\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 224\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(2) Rule 22(1) and (2) shall apply to a notice under this rule as if the notice were a\nnotice under rule 21 and the statement to which the notice relates were a\nstatement admissible by virtue of Section 45 of the Law.\n(3) The Court may, if it thinks it just to do so, allow a party to give in evidence at\nthe trial or hearing of a cause or matter any evidence which is admissible for the\npurpose mentioned in the said Section 50(b) notwithstanding that that party has\nfailed to comply with the provisions of paragraph (1).\n32.\nCosts (O.38, r.32)\n32. If \u2014\n (a) a party to a cause or matter serves a counter-notice under rule 26 in respect\nof any person who is called as a witness at the trial of the cause or matter\nin compliance with a requirement of the counter-notice; and\n(b) it appears to the Court that it was unreasonable to require that person to be\ncalled as a witness,\n\nthen the Court may direct that any costs to that party in respect of the\npreparations and service of the counter-notice shall not be allowed to the party\nand that any costs occasioned by the counter-notice to any other party shall be\npaid by the party to that other party.\n33.\nCertain powers exercisable in Chambers (O.38, r.33)\n33. The jurisdiction of the Court under Section 45(2)(a), 45(3), 47(2)(a) and 49(1) of the\nLaw may be exercised in Chambers.\n34.\nStatements of opinion (O.38, r.34)\n34. When a party to a cause or matter desires to give in evidence by virtue of Part IV of\nthe Law a statement of opinion other than a statement to which Part IV of this Order\napplies, the provisions of rules 20 to 23 and 25 to 33 shall apply with such\nmodifications as the Court may direct or the circumstances may require.\n\nIV. EXPERT EVIDENCE\n35.\nInterpretation (O.38, r.35)\n35. In this Part of this Order a reference to a summons for directions includes a reference\nto any summons or application to which, under any of these Rules, O.25, rr.2 to 7,\napply.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 38\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 225\n\n36.\nRestrictions on adducing expert evidence (O.38, r.36)\n36. (1) Except with the leave of the Court or where all parties agree, no expert evidence\nmay be adduced at the trial or hearing of any cause or matter unless the party\nseeking to adduce the evidence has applied to the Court to determine whether a\ndirection should be given under rule 37 or 41 (whichever is appropriate) or has\ncomplied with automatic directions taking effect under O.25, r.8(1)(b).\n(2) Nothing in paragraph (1) shall apply to evidence which is permitted to be given\nby affidavit or shall affect the enforcement under any other provision of these\nRules (except O.45, r.5) of a direction given under this Part of this Order.\n\n37.\nDirection that expert report be disclosed (O.38, r.37)\n37. Where in any cause or matter an application is made under rule 36(1) in respect of\noral expert evidence, then unless the Court considers that there are special reasons for\nit not doing so, it shall direct that the substance of the evidence be disclosed in the\nform of a written report or reports to such other parties and within such period as the\nCourt may specify.\n38.\nMeeting of experts (O.38, r.38)\n38. In any cause or matter the Court may, if it thinks fit, direct that there be a meeting\n\"without prejudice\" of such experts within such periods before or after the disclosure\nof their reports as the Court may specify, for the purpose of identifying those parts of\ntheir evidence which are in issue. Where such a meeting takes place the experts may\nprepare a joint statement indicating those parts of their evidence on which they are,\nand those on which they are not, in agreement.\n39.\nDisclosure of part of expert evidence (O.38, r.39)\n39. Where the Court considers that any circumstances rendering it undesirable to give a\ndirection under rule 37 relating to part only of the evidence sought to be adduced, the\nCourt may, if it thinks fit, direct disclosure of the remainder.\n40.\nNo rule (O.38, r.40)\n40. No rule (O.38, r.40)\n41.\nExpert evidence contained in statement (O.38, r.41)\n41. Where an application is made under rule 36 in respect of expert evidence contained\nin a statement and the applicant alleges that the maker of the statement cannot or\nshould not be called as a witness, the Court may direct that the provisions of rules 20\nto 23 and 25 to 33 shall apply with such modifications as the Court thinks fit.\n\nORDER 38\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 226\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n42.\nPutting in evidence expert report disclosed by another party (O.38, r.42)\n42. A party to any cause or matter may put in evidence any expert report disclosed to the\nparty by any other party in accordance with this Part of this Order.\n43.\nTime for putting expert report in evidence (O.38, r.43)\n43. Where a party to any cause or matter calls as a witness the maker of a report which\nhas been disclosed in accordance with a direction given under rule 37, the report may\nbe put in evidence at the commencement of its maker's examination in chief or at such\nother time as the Court may direct.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 01.10.12)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 39\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 227\n\nORDER 39\nEVIDENCE BY DEPOSITION: EXAMINERS OF THE COURT\n\n1.\nPower to order depositions to be taken (O.39, r.1)\n1.\n(1) The Court may, in any cause or matter where it appears necessary for the\npurposes of justice, make an order for the examination on oath before a Judge,\nthe Clerk of the Court, an attorney or some other person at any place, of any\nperson.\n(2) An order under paragraph (1) may be made on such terms (including, in\nparticular, terms as to the giving of discovery before the examination takes\nplace) as the Court thinks fit and may contain an order for the production of any\ndocument which appears to the Court to be necessary for the purpose of the\nexamination.\n2.\nWhere person to be examined is out of the jurisdiction (O.39, r.2)\n2.\n(1) Where the person in relation to whom an order under rule 1 is required is out of\nthe jurisdiction, an application may be made \u2014\n (a) for an order under that rule for the issue of a letter of request to the judicial\nauthorities of the country in which that person is to take, or cause to be\ntaken, the evidence of that person; or\n(b) if the government of that country allows a person in that country to be\nexamined before a person appointed by the Court, for an order under that\nrule appointing a special examiner to take the evidence of that person in\nthat country.\n(2) An application may be made for the appointment as special examiner of a British\nConsul in the country in which the evidence is to be taken or that special\nexaminer\u2019s deputy \u2014\n(a)\nif there subsists with respect to that country a Civil Procedure Convention\nproviding for the taking of the evidence of any person in that country for\nthe assistance of proceedings in the Court; or\n(b) with the consent of the Secretary of State for Commonwealth and Foreign\nAffairs.\n3.\nOrder for issue of letter of request (O.39, r.3)\n3.\n(1) Where an order is made under rule 1 for the issue of a letter of request to the\njudicial authorities of a country to take, or cause to be taken, the evidence of any\nperson in that country the following provisions of this rule shall apply.\n\nORDER 39\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 228\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(2) The party obtaining the order must draw up the letter of request in Form No. 19\nof the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) with such\namendments as the order may require and present it to the Clerk of the Court\ntogether with one copy thereof.\n(3) If the evidence of the person to be examined is to be obtained by means of\nwritten questions, the party obtaining the order must draw up the list of the\ninterrogatories and cross-interrogatories and present them to the Clerk of the\nCourt together with one copy thereof.\n(4) Each document presented to the Clerk of the Court under paragraph (2) or (3)\nmust be accompanied by a translation of the document in the official language\nof that country, or if there is more than one official language of that country, in\nany one of those languages which is appropriate to the place in that country\nwhere the examination is to be taken, together with one copy thereof, unless the\nofficial language or one of the official languages of that country is English.\n(5) Every translation presented to the Clerk of the Court under paragraph (4) must\nbe certified by the person making it to be a correct translation; and the certificate\nmust contain a statement of the person's full name, of the person\u2019s address and\nof the person\u2019s qualifications for making the translation.\n(6) The party obtaining the order must, when the party presents to the Clerk of the\nCourt the documents mentioned in paragraphs (2) to (5), also file an undertaking\nsigned by the party or the party\u2019s attorney to be responsible personally for all\nexpenses incurred by the Secretary of State in respect of the letter of request\nand, on receiving due notification of the amount of those expenses, to pay that\namount to the Financial Secretary on behalf of the Secretary of State and to\nproduce a receipt for the payment to the Clerk of the Court.\n(7) Upon being presented with a letter of request and other documents referred to\nin paragraphs (2) to (6), the Clerk of the Court shall present the letter of request\nto a Judge for the Judge\u2019s signature.\n(8) As soon as the letter of request has been signed by a Judge, the Clerk of the\nCourt shall send it to the relevant judicial authority and file the copy thereof.\n3A.\nExamination otherwise than on oath (O.39, r.3A)\n3A. Notwithstanding the provisions of rule 1, where the person to be examined is out of\nthe jurisdiction that person may be examined on oath or affirmation or otherwise in\naccordance with the procedure of the country in which the examination is to take\nplace.\n4.\nEnforcing attendance of witness at examination (O.39, r.4)\n4.\nWhere an order has been made under rule 1 \u2014\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 39\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 229\n\n(a)\nfor the examination of any person before the Clerk of the Court, an attorney\nor some other person (in this rule and rules 5 to 14 referred to as \"the\nexaminer\"); or\n(b) for the cross-examination before the examiner of any person who has made\nan affidavit which is to be used in any cause or matter,\nthe attendance of that person before the examiner and the production by the\nperson of any document at the examination may be enforced by writ of subpoena\nin like manner as the attendance of a witness and the production by a witness of\na document at a trial may be enforced.\n5.\nRefusal of witness to attend, be sworn, etc. (O.39, r.5)\n5.\n(1) If any person, having been duly summoned by writ of subpoena to attend before\nthe examiner, refuses or fails to attend or refuses to be sworn for the purpose of\nthe examination or to answer any lawful question or produce any document\ntherein, a certificate of the person\u2019s refusal or failure, signed by the examiner,\nmust be filed in the Court, and upon the filing of the certificate the party by\nwhom the attendance of that person was required may apply to the Court for an\norder requiring that person to attend, or to be sworn or to answer any question\nor produce any document, as the case may be.\n(2) An application for an order under this rule may be made ex parte.\n(3) If the Court makes an order under this rule it may order the person against whom\nthe order is made to pay any costs occasioned by the person\u2019s refusal or failure.\n(4) A person who wilfully disobeys any order made against the person under\nparagraph (1) is guilty of contempt of court.\n6.\nAppointment of time and place for examination (O.39, r.6)\n6.\n(1) The examiner must give the party on whose application the order for\nexamination was made a notice appointing the place and time at which, subject\nto any application by the parties, the examination shall be taken, and such time\nshall, having regard to the convenience of the persons to be examined and all\nthe circumstances of the case, be as soon as practicable after the making of the\norder.\n(2) The party to whom a notice under paragraph (1) is given must on receiving it\nforthwith give notice of the appointment to all the other parties.\n7.\nExaminer to have certain documents (O.39, r.7)\n7.\nThe party on whose application the order for examination before the examiner was\nmade must furnish the examiner with copies of such of the documents in the cause or\nmatter as are necessary to inform the examiner of the questions at issue in the cause\nor matter.\n\nORDER 39\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 230\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n8.\nConduct of examination (O.39, r.8)\n8.\n(1) Subject to any directions contained in the order for examination \u2014\n(a)\nany person ordered to be examined before the examiner may be crossexamined and re-examined; and\n(b) the examination, cross-examination and re-examination of persons before\nthe examiner shall be conducted in like manner as at the trial of a cause or\nmatter.\n(2) The examiner may put any question to any person examined before the examiner\nas to the meaning of any answer made by that person or as to any matter arising\nin the course of the examination.\n(3) The examiner may, if necessary, adjourn the examination from time to time.\n9.\nExamination of additional witnesses (O.39, r.9)\n9.\nThe examiner may, with the written consent of all the parties to the cause or matter,\ntake the examination of any person in addition to those named or provided for in the\norder for examination, and must annex such consent to the original deposition of that\nperson.\n10.\nObjection to questions (O.39, r.10)\n10. (1) If any person being examined before the examiner objects to answer any\nquestions put to the person, or if objection is taken to any such question, that\nquestion, the ground for the objection and the answer to any such question to\nwhich objection is taken must be set out in the deposition of that person or in a\nstatement annexed thereto.\n(2) The validity of the ground for objecting to answer any such question or for\nobjecting to any such question shall be decided by the Court and not by the\nexaminer, but the examiner must state to the parties the examiner\u2019s opinion\nthereon, and the statement of the examiner\u2019s opinion must be set out in the\ndeposition or in a statement annexed thereto.\n(3) If the Court decides against the person taking the objection it may order the\nperson to pay the costs occasioned by the person\u2019s objection.\n11.\nTaking of depositions (O.39, r.11)\n11. (1) The deposition of any person examined before the examiner must be taken down\nby the examiner or a shorthand writer or some other person in the presence of\nthe examiner but, subject to paragraph (2) and rule 10(1), the deposition need\nnot set out every question and answer so long as it contains as nearly as may be\nthe statement of the person examined.\n(2) The examiner may direct the exact words of any particular question and the\nanswer thereto to be set out in the deposition if that question and answer appear\nto the examiner to have special importance.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 39\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 231\n\n(3) The deposition of any person shall be read to the person, and the person shall be\nasked to sign it, in the presence of such of the parties as may attend, but the\nparties may agree in writing to dispense with the foregoing provision.\n If a person refuses to sign a deposition when asked under this paragraph to do\nso, the examiner must sign the deposition.\n(4) The original deposition of any person, authenticated by the signature of the\nexaminer before whom it was taken, must be sent by the examiner to the Clerk\nof the Court and shall be filed.\n12.\nTime taken by examination to be indorsed on depositions (O.39, r.12)\n12. Before sending any deposition to the Clerk of the Court under rule 11(4), the examiner\nmust indorse on the deposition a statement signed by the examiner of the time\noccupied in taking the examination and the fees received in respect thereof.\n13.\nSpecial report by examiner (O.39, r.13)\n13. The examiner may make a special report to the Court with regard to any examination\ntaken before the examiner and with regard to the absence or conduct of any person\nthereof and the Court may direct such proceedings to be taken, or make such order,\non the report as it thinks fit.\n14.\nOrder for payment of examiner's fees (O.39, r.14)\n14. (1) If the fees and expenses due to an examiner are not paid the examiner may report\nthat fact to the Court and the Court may direct the Clerk of the Court to apply\nfor an order against the party on whose application the order for examination\nwas made to pay the examiner the fees and the expenses due the examiner in\nrespect of the examination.\n(2) An order under this rule shall not prejudice any determination on the taxation of\ncosts or otherwise as to the party by whom the costs of the examination are\nultimately to be borne.\n15.\nPerpetuation of testimony (O.39, r.15)\n15. (1) Witnesses shall not be examined to perpetuate testimony unless an action has\nbeen begun for the purpose.\n(2) Any person who would under the circumstances alleged by the person to exist\nbecome entitled, upon the happening of any future event, to any honour, title,\ndignity or office, or to any estate or interest in any real or personal property, the\nright or claim to which cannot be brought to trial by the person before the\nhappening of such event, may begin an action to perpetuate any testimony which\nmay be material for establishing such right or claim.\n (3) No action to perpetuate the testimony of witnesses shall be set down for trial.\n\nORDER 39\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 232\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n16.\nExaminers of the Court (O.39, r.16)\n16. A sufficient number of attorneys, of not less than 3 years standing, may be appointed\nby the Chief Justice to act as examiners of the Court for a period not exceeding 5\nyears at a time, but the Chief Justice may at any time revoke any such appointment.\n17.\nNo rule (O.39, r.17)\n17. No rule (O.39, r.17)\n18.\nNo rule (O.39, r.18)\n18. No rule (O.39, r.18)\n19.\nFees and expenses of examiners of the Court (O.39, r.19)\n19. (1) The fees of examiners of Court shall be agreed with and paid by the party\nprosecuting the order.\n(2) If such party is unable to reach agreement with the examiner of Court that party\nmay apply to the Court for an order fixing the amount or rate of fees to be paid.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 40\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 233\n\nORDER 40\nCOURT EXPERT\n\n1.\nAppointment of expert to report on certain questions (O.40, r.1)\n1.\n(1) In any cause or matter which is to be tried without a jury and in which any\nquestion for an expert witness arises the Court may at any time, on the\napplication of any party, appoint an independent expert or, if more than one such\nquestion arises, two or more such experts, to inquire and report upon any\nquestion of fact or opinion not involving questions of law or of construction.\n\nAn expert appointed under this paragraph is referred to in this Order as a \"Court\nexpert\".\n(2) Any Court expert in a cause or matter shall, if possible, be a person agreed\nbetween the parties and, failing agreement, shall be nominated by the Court.\n(3) The question to be submitted to the Court expert and the instructions (if any)\ngiven to the Court expert shall, failing agreement between the parties, be settled\nby the Court.\n(4) In this rule \"expert\", in relation to any question arising in a cause or matter,\nmeans any person who has such knowledge or experience of or in connection\nwith that question that the person\u2019s opinion on it would be admissible in\nevidence.\n2.\nReport of Court expert (O.40, r.2)\n2.\n(1) The Court expert must send the Court expert\u2019s report to the Court, together with\nsuch number of copies thereof as the Court may direct, and the Clerk of the\nCourt must send copies of the report to the parties or their attorneys.\n(2) The Court may direct the Court expert to make a further or supplemental report.\n(3) Any part of a Court expert's report which is not accepted by all the parties to the\ncause or matter in which it is made shall be treated as information furnished to\nthe Court and be given such weight as the Court thinks fit.\n3.\nExperiments and tests (O.40, r.3)\n3.\nIf the Court expert is of opinion that an experiment or test of any kind (other than one\nof a trifling character) is necessary to enable the Court expert to make a satisfactory\nreport, the Court expert shall inform the parties or their attorneys and, if possible,\nmake an arrangement with them as to the expenses involved, the persons to attend\nand other relevant matters; and if the parties are unable to agree on any of those\nmatters it shall be settled by the Court.\n\nORDER 40\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 234\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n4.\nCross-examination of Court expert (O.40, r.4)\n4.\nAny party may, within 14 days after receiving a copy of the Court expert\u2019s report,\napply to the Court for leave to cross-examine the Court expert on that report, and on\nthat application the Court shall make an order for the cross-examination of the Court\nexpert by all the parties either \u2014\n(a)\nat the trial; or\n(b) before an examiner or Judge at such time and place as may be specified in\nthe order.\n5.\nRemuneration of Court expert (O.40, r.5)\n5.\n(1) The remuneration of the Court expert shall be fixed by the Court and shall\ninclude a fee for the Court expert\u2019s report and a proper sum for each day during\nwhich the Court expert is required to be present either in Court or before an\nexaminer.\n(2) Without prejudice to any order providing for payment of the Court expert's\nremuneration as part of the costs of the cause or matter, the parties shall be\njointly and severally liable to pay the amount fixed by the Court for the Court\nexpert\u2019s remuneration but, where the appointment of a Court expert is opposed,\nthe Court may, as a condition of making the appointment, require the party\napplying for the appointment to give such security for the remuneration of the\nCourt expert as the Court thinks fit.\n6.\nCalling of expert witnesses (O.40, r.6)\n6.\nWhere a Court expert is appointed in a cause or matter, any party may, on giving to\nthe other parties a reasonable time before the trial notice of the party\u2019s intention to do\nso, call one expert witness to give evidence on the question reported on by the Court\nexpert but no party may call more than one such witness without the leave of the\nCourt, and the Court shall not grant leave unless it considers the circumstances of the\ncase to be exceptional.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 41\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 235\n\nORDER 41\nAFFIDAVITS\n\n1.\nForm of affidavit (O.41, r.1)\n1.\n(1) Subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), every affidavit sworn in a cause or matter\nmust be entitled in that cause or matter.\n(2) Where a cause or matter is entitled in more than one matter, it shall be sufficient\nto state the first matter followed by the words \"and other matters\", and where a\ncause or matter is entitled in a matter or matters and between parties, that part\nof the title which consists of the matter or matters may be omitted.\n(3) Where there are more plaintiffs than one, it shall be sufficient to state the full\nname of the first followed by the words \"and others\", and similarly with respect\nto defendants.\n(4) Every affidavit must be expressed in the first person and must state the place of\nresidence or business of the deponent and the deponent\u2019s occupation or, if the\ndeponent has none, the deponent\u2019s description, and if the deponent is, or is\nemployed by, a party to the cause or matter in which the affidavit is sworn, the\naffidavit must state that fact.\n\nIn the case of a deponent who is giving evidence in a professional, business or\nother occupational capacity the affidavit may, instead of stating the deponent's\nresidence, state the address at which the deponent works, the position the\ndeponent holds and the name of the deponent\u2019s firm or employer, if any.\n(5) Every affidavit must follow continuously from page to page.\n(6) Every affidavit must be divided into paragraphs numbered consecutively, each\nparagraph being as far as possible confined to a distinct portion of the subject\nand each paragraph or group of paragraphs may be preceded by headings and\nsub-headings.\n(7) Dates, sums and other numbers must be expressed in an affidavit in figures and\nnot in words.\n(8) Every affidavit must be signed by the deponent and the jurat must be completed\nand signed by the person before whom it is sworn.\n(9) At the top right hand corner of the first page of every affidavit there shall be\nwritten \u2014\n(a)\nthe party on whose behalf it is filed;\n(b)  the initials and surname of the deponent;\n(c)\nthe number of the affidavit in relation to the deponent; and\n\nORDER 41\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 236\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(d) the date when it was sworn.\n2.\nAffidavit by two or more deponents (O.41, r.2)\n2.\nWhere an affidavit is made by two or more deponents, the names of the persons\nmaking the affidavit must be inserted in the jurat except that, if the affidavit is sworn\nby both or all the deponents at one time before the same person, it shall be sufficient\nto state that it was sworn by both (or all) of the \"above-named\" deponents.\n3.\nAffidavit by illiterate or blind person (O.41, r.3)\n3.\nWhere it appears to the person administering the oath that the deponent is illiterate or\nblind, that person must certify in the jurat that \u2014\n(a)\nthe affidavit was read in that person\u2019s presence to the deponent;\n(b) the deponent seemed perfectly to understand it; and\n(c)\nthe deponent made the deponent\u2019s signature or mark in that person\u2019s\npresence,\nand the affidavit shall not be used in evidence without such a certificate unless\nthe Court is otherwise satisfied that it was read to and appeared to be perfectly\nunderstood by the deponent.\n4.\nUse of defective affidavit (O.41, r.4)\n4.\nAn affidavit may, with the leave of the Court, be filed or used in evidence\nnotwithstanding any irregularity in the form thereof.\n5.\nContents of affidavit (O.41, r.5)\n5.\n(1) Subject to O.14, rr.2(2) and 4(2), to O.86, r.2(1), to paragraph (2) of this rule\nand to any order made under O.38, r.3, an affidavit may contain only such facts\nas the deponent is able of the deponent\u2019s own knowledge to prove.\n(2) An affidavit sworn for the purpose of being used in interlocutory proceedings\nmay contain statements of information or belief with the sources and grounds\nthereof.\n(3) An affidavit sworn by an attorney shall not be admissible in any cause or matter\nunless the attorney has direct personal knowledge of the facts and matters to\nwhich the attorney deposes and does not appear as advocate in the cause or\nmatter.\n6.\nScandalous, etc., matter in affidavit (O.41, r.6)\n6.\nThe Court may order to be struck out of any affidavit any matter which is scandalous,\nirrelevant or otherwise oppressive.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 41\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 237\n\n7.\nAlterations in affidavits (O.41, r.7)\n7.\nAn affidavit which has in the jurat or body thereof an interlineation, erasure or other\nalteration shall not be filed or used in any proceeding without the leave of the Court\nunless the person before whom the affidavit was sworn has initialled the alteration\nand, in the case of an erasure, has re-written in the margin of the affidavit any words\nor figures written on the erasure and has signed or initialled them.\n8.\nAffidavits to be sworn (O.41, r.8)\n8.\n(1) Subject to paragraph (2), every affidavit shall be sworn before a justice of the\npeace or a notary public.\n(2) No affidavit shall be admissible if sworn before an attorney who will also appear\non behalf of the party on whose behalf the affidavit is to be used.\n(3) A document purporting to have affixed or impressed thereon or subscribed\nthereto the seal or signature of a court, judge, notary public or person having\nauthority to administer oaths outside the Islands in testimony of an affidavit\nbeing sworn before it or that person shall be admitted in evidence without proof\nof the seal or signature being the seal or signature of that court, judge, notary\npublic or person.\n9.\nFiling of affidavits (O.41, r.9)\n9.\n(1) Every affidavit used in a cause or matter proceeding in the Court must be filed.\n(2) The exhibits to an affidavit shall not be filed and it shall be the duty of the party\non whose behalf an affidavit is filed to preserve the exhibits for use by the Court.\n10.\nUse of original affidavit or office copy (O.41, r.10)\n10. (1) Subject to paragraph (2), an original affidavit may be used in any proceedings\nwithout leave of the Court notwithstanding that it has not been filed in\naccordance with rule 9.\n(2) Where an original affidavit is used, the party using it must undertake to file it.\n(3) Where an affidavit has been filed, an office copy thereof may be used in any\nproceedings.\n(4) Where an affidavit has been sworn outside the Islands, a copy transmitted by\nfacsimile to the Islands may be used, unless the Court directs otherwise, upon\nthe party's attorney undertaking to file the original.\n11.\nDocument to be used in conjunction with affidavit to be exhibited to it (O.41,\nr.11)\n11. (1) Any document to be used in conjunction with an affidavit must be exhibited,\nand not annexed, to the affidavit.\n\nORDER 41\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 238\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(2) Any exhibit to an affidavit must be identified by a certificate of the person before\nwhom the affidavit is sworn. The certificate must be entitled in the same manner\nas the affidavit and rule 1(1), (2) and (3) shall apply accordingly.\n12.\nForm of documentary exhibits (O.41, r.12)\n12. (1) Every documentary exhibit shall have attached to it a frontsheet entitled in the\ncause or matter and specifying \u2014\n(a)\nthe affidavit to which it is exhibited;\n(b) the exhibit number; and\n(c)\nat the top right hand corner the information specified in rule 1(9).\n(2) Every exhibit shall bear a number comprising the initials of the deponent.\n(3) Where a deponent swears more than one affidavit to which there are exhibits,\nthe numbering of such exhibits shall run consecutively throughout and shall not\nbegin again with each affidavit.\n(4) Clearly legible photographic copies of original documents may be exhibited\nprovided that the originals are made available at the hearing if required to be\nproduced by notice served by any other party not less than 2 clear days prior to\nthe hearing.\n(5) Any document which the Court is being asked to construe or enforce or the trusts\nof which it is being asked to vary, shall be separately exhibited and not included\nin any bundle of documents.\n(6) Where a number of documents are contained in one exhibit they shall be\narranged in chronological order; be paginated; and the frontsheet shall contain\nan index.\n(7) Letters shall not be made separate exhibits.\n(8) Exhibits comprising letters shall be collected together in bundles; arranged in\nchronological order; be paginated; and the frontsheet shall contain an index\nlisting each letter and specifying whether it is an original (or copy of an original)\nor copy (or copy of a copy).\n(9) Documentary exhibits may be \u2014\n(a)\nfirmly stapled;\n(b) bound together;\n(c)\nplaced in ring binders provided that they are clearly separated by dividers;\nor\n(d) tied with tape,\nas may be convenient, provided that bundles are firmly held together and the\npages easily turned.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 41\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 239\n\n13.\nExhibits other than documents (O.41, r.13)\n13. (1) Exhibits other than documents must be clearly marked with labels firmly\nattached to the item.\n(2) Exhibit labels must contain the information, in abbreviated form if necessary,\nrequired by rule 12(1) and shall be numbered in the manner required by rule\n12(2) and (3).\n14.\nCourt documents not to be exhibited (O.41, r.14)\n14. (1) Copies of originating process, pleadings, affidavits and other documents filed\nin Court shall not be exhibited to affidavits.\n(2) A party wishing to refer to a document contained in a Court file shall serve\nnotice of the party\u2019s intention to do so and shall provide the opposing party with\nan office copy thereof.\n15.\nReference to exhibits (O.41, r.15)\n15. (1) Copies of the same document shall not be exhibited twice in any proceeding.\n(2) Where a deponent wishes to refer to a document already exhibited to some other\ndeponent's affidavit, the deponent shall not also exhibit it to the deponent\u2019s own\naffidavit, but must identify it by reference to its number and the affidavit to\nwhich it is exhibited.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 01.03.99) (amended 08.09.03)\n\nORDER 42\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 240\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 42\nJUDGMENTS AND ORDERS\n\n1.\nForm of judgment, etc. (O.42, r.1)\n1.\n(1) Every judgment or order made by a Judge shall contain the following\ninformation in addition to its operative parts \u2014\n(a)\nthe name of the Judge who made it;\n(b) whether it was made in open Court or in Chambers;\n(c)\nthe date from which it takes effect;\n(d) the date upon which it was filed;\n(e)\nthe summons, notice or other application in respect of which it was made;\n(f)\nthe identity of those parties who appeared and those who did not appear\nand in the case of those who appeared, whether they appeared in person or\nby an attorney;\n(g) except in the case of a judgment given in the trial of an action begun by\nwrit, a statement of the affidavits read and witnesses who gave oral\nevidence;\n(h) if it was made upon any undertaking given by any party or parties, the full\nterms of such undertaking or undertakings; and\n(i)\nat the foot of its last page, the name and address of the party by whom it\nwas drawn up and presented for filing.\n(2) If, in the case of any judgment, a form thereof is prescribed by the Grand Court\nRules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) the judgment must be in that\nform.\n(3) Every judgment or order shall be signed by the Judge who made it except that\nthe Clerk of the Court may sign it if the Judge is unable to do so by reason of\nthat Judge\u2019s subsequent death, illness or absence from the Islands.\n(4) This Clerk of the Court shall be authorised to sign \u2014\n(a)\nany consent judgment or order to which rule 5A applies; and\n(b) any default judgment or order to which rule 6 applies.\n1A.\nNo rule (O.42, r.1A)\n1A. No rule (O.42, r.1A)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 42\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 241\n\n2.\nJudgment, etc., requiring act to be done: time for doing it (O.42, r.2)\n2.\n(1) Subject to paragraph (2), a judgment or order which requires a person to do an\nact must specify the time after service of the judgment or order, or some other\ntime, within which the act is to be done.\n(2) Where the act which any person is required by any judgment or order to do is to\npay money to some other person, give possession of any land or deliver any\ngoods, a time within which the act is to be done need not be specified in the\njudgment or order by virtue of paragraph (1) but the foregoing provision shall\nnot affect the power of the Court to specify such a time and to adjudge or order\naccordingly.\n3.\nDate from which judgment or order takes effect (O.42, r.3)\n3.\n(1) Subject to the provisions of rule 3A, a judgment or order of the Court takes\neffect from the day of its date.\n(2) Such judgment or order shall be dated as of the day on which it is pronounced,\ngiven or made, unless the Court orders it to be dated as of some earlier or later\nday, in which case it shall be dated as of that other day.\n(3) Whenever any judgment or order is drawn up and filed after the date upon which\nit is pronounced, given or made, it shall bear the date of filing in addition to the\ndate upon which it was pronounced, given or made.\n(4) It shall be the duty of the attorney drawing up a judgment or order to include in\nit the date upon which it was pronounced, given or made and it shall be the duty\nof the Clerk of the Court to include in it the date of filing.\n3A.\nJudgment against a State (O.42, r.3A)\n3A. When a judgment on failure to acknowledge service has been entered against a State,\nas defined in Section 14 of the United Kingdom\u2019s State Immunity Act 1978, the\njudgment shall not take effect until 2 months after service on the State of \u2014\n(a)\na copy of the judgment; and\n(b) a copy of the affidavit in support of the application for leave to enter\njudgment, unless one has already been served pursuant to a direction under\nO.13, r.7A(4).\n4.\nOrders required to be drawn up (O.42, r.4)\n4.\n(1) Subject to paragraph (2), every order of the Court shall be drawn up and filed\nunless the Court otherwise directs.\n(2) An order \u2014\n(a)\nwhich \u2014\n(i)\nextends the period within which a person is required or authorised by\nthese Rules, or by any judgment, order or direction, to do any act; or\n\nORDER 42\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 242\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(ii) grants leave for the doing of any of the acts mentioned in paragraph\n(3); and\n(b) which neither imposes any special terms nor includes any special\ndirections other than a direction as to costs,\nneed not be drawn up and filed unless the Court otherwise directs.\n(3) The acts referred to in subparagraph (2)(a)(ii) are \u2014\n(a)\nthe issue of any writ, other than a writ for service out of the jurisdiction;\n(b) the amendment of a writ or other originating process or a pleading;\n(c)\nthe filing of any document;\n(d) any act to be done by the Clerk of the Court.\n5.\nDrawing up and filing of judgments and orders (O.42, r.5)\n5.\n(1) The party seeking to have any judgment or order filed must draw up the\njudgment or order and present it to the Clerk of the Court together with the\nnumber of copies required by paragraph (8) or (9), as the case may be.\n(2) In the event that any judgment or order requires that any money be paid into or\nout of Court, the party seeking to have it filed must also draw up the necessary\nlodgment or payment schedule in accordance with O. 92, r.10, and present it to\nthe Clerk of the Court at the same time as presenting the judgment or order.\n(3) It shall be the duty of the Clerk of the Court to provide at the request of any\nparty a copy of any minute of order.\n(4) A party presenting a judgment or order for filing (other than one in default or\nby consent) must identify to the Clerk of the Court the relevant cause number.\n(5) Where more than one party has appeared in a proceeding in which a judgment\nor order has been made and all those parties are represented by attorneys, the\nattorney for the successful party shall draw up the judgment or order and\ncirculate it to the attorneys for the other parties who shall indorse it \"approved\nas to form and content\".\n(6) Upon being presented with a judgment or order complying with rule 5A or rule\n6 or indorsed in accordance with paragraph (5), the Clerk of the Court shall sign\nit and file it by sealing it and placing it on the Court file.\n(7) Upon being presented with an ex parte order or an inter partes order which has\nnot been indorsed in accordance with paragraph (5), the Clerk of the Court shall\npresent it to the judge for signature.\n(8) The Clerk of the Court shall notify the party who drew up the judgment or order\nwhen it has been filed and shall provide such party with as many sealed copies\nas such party may require upon payment of the prescribed fee.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 42\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 243\n\n(9) A party seeking to file a final judgment or order or a default judgment shall\nprovide the Clerk of the Court with at least three copies, two of which shall be\nretained for filing.\n(10) A party seeking to file an interlocutory judgment or order other than a final one\nshall provide the Clerk of the Court with at least two copies, one of which shall\nbe retained for filing.\n(11) An office copy of every judgment or order of the kind specified in paragraph (9)\nshall be placed by the Clerk of the Court on the Register of Judgments\nmaintained in accordance with O.63, r.7.\n5A.\nConsent judgments and orders (O.42, r.5A)\n5A. (1) Subject to paragraphs (2), (3) and (4), where all the parties to a cause or matter\nare agreed upon the terms in which a judgment should be given or an order\nshould be made, a judgment or order in such terms may be given effect as a\njudgment or order of the Court by the procedure provided in rule 5 without the\nneed for any party to appear before a Judge.\n(2) This rule applies to any judgment or order which consists of one or more of the\nfollowing \u2014\n(a)\nany judgment or order for \u2014\n(i)\nthe payment of a liquidated sum, or damages to be assessed, or the\nvalue of goods to be assessed;\n(ii) the delivery up of goods, with or without the option of paying the\nvalue of the goods to be assessed, or the agreed value; or\n(iii) the possession of land;\n(b) any order for \u2014\n(i)\nthe dismissal, discontinuance or withdrawal of any proceedings,\nwholly or in part;\n(ii) the stay of proceedings, either unconditionally or upon conditions as\nto the payment of money;\n(iii) the stay of proceedings upon terms which are scheduled to the order\nbut which are not otherwise part of it (a \"Tomlin order\");\n(iv) the stay of enforcement of a judgment, either unconditionally or upon\ncondition that money due under judgment is paid by instalments\nspecified in the order;\n(v) the setting aside of a judgment in default;\n(vi) the payment out of money in Court;\n(vii) the discharge from liability of any party; or\n(viii) the payment, taxation or waiver of costs, or such other provision for\ncosts as may be agreed;\n\nORDER 42\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 244\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(c)\nany order, to be included in a judgment or order to which the preceding\nsubparagraphs apply, for \u2014\n(i)\nthe extension of the period required for the service or filing of any\npleading or other document;\n(ii) the withdrawal of the record; or\n(iii) liberty to apply, or to restore.\n(3) Before any judgment, or order to which this rule applies may be filed, it must\nbe drawn up in terms agreed and entitled \"Consent Order\" and it must be\nindorsed by attorneys acting for each of the parties.\n(4) This rule shall not apply to any judgment or order in proceedings in which any\nof the parties is a litigant in person or a person under disability.\n6.\nDefault judgments (O.42, r.6)\n6.\n(1) A party seeking to have a default judgment entered pursuant to O.13 or O.19\nshall make an application to the Clerk of the Court in Form No. 20 of the Grand\nCourt Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) referred to in this rule as\nan \"application for default judgment\".\n(2) An application for default judgment shall be accompanied by a draft of the\njudgment sought together with such number of copies specified in rule 5(9).\n(3) When an application for default judgment has been filed the Court file shall be\ndeemed to be closed and no notice of intention to defend, pleading, summons or\nother document shall be filed until after the default judgment has been made or,\nif the application for default judgment is found to be irregular, until after it has\nbeen rejected.\n(4) Upon receipt of an application for default judgment the Clerk of the Court\nshall \u2014\n(a)\nif it appears to the Clerk of the Court that the requirements of O.13 or O.19\nhave been met, sign the judgment and file it in accordance with rule 5(6)\nand notify the applicant in accordance with rule 5(8); or\n(b) if it appears to the Clerk of the Court that the requirements of O.13 or O.19\nhave not been met or that it is otherwise irregular, indorse the application\nto the effect that it is irregular specifying the reason, whereupon the Court\nfile shall be deemed to be open and the Clerk of the Court shall return the\nnotice of application for default judgment to the applicant.\n(5) Any notice of intention to defend or pleading which purports to have been filed\nwhilst the Court file is closed pursuant to paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be a\nnullity, unless the application for default judgment is rejected, whereupon it\nshall be deemed to have been filed on such date of such rejection.\n(6) A party seeking to file \u2014\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 42\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 245\n\n(a)\na judgment or order made in open Court including such a judgment or\norder made by consent; or\n(b) a default judgment; or\n(c)\na judgment or order made in Chambers which by the direction of the Judge\npursuant to O.32, r.27 or by the consent of all the parties noted thereon is\nto be filed on the Register of Judgments under O.63, r.7(1),\nshall provide the Clerk of the Court with at least three copies, two of which shall\nbe retained for filing.\n(7) A party seeking to file a judgment or order made in Chambers other than such a\njudgment or order referred to in subparagraph (6)(c) shall provide the Clerk of\nthe Court with at least two copies, one of which shall be retained for filing.\n7.\nOriginal and office copies of judgments etc. (O.42, r.7)\n7.\n(1) The original of any judgment or order is that which bears the Judge's or Clerk\nof the Court's signature as the case may be and shall be filed on the Court file.\n(2) An office copy of any judgment or order is one which bears the official facsimile\nof the signature of the Judge who signed the original.\n(3) The Clerk of the Court may issue any number of office copies.\n(4) Both original and office copies of judgments and orders must be sealed with the\nCourt seal.\n(5) A duplicate original of any judgment or order may be signed only if the Judge\nconsiders that there is some special reason for doing so.\n8.\nJudgments given in foreign currencies (O.42, r.8)\n8.\n(1) Every judgment providing for payment of any sum of money shall specify the\ncurrency or currencies in which judgment is given.\n(2) A judgment expressed only in \"dollars\" or \"$\" shall be deemed to mean Cayman\nIslands dollars.\n9.\nApplication in respect of orders of the Privy Council (O.42, r.9)\n9.\nAn application to make an order of the Privy Council an order of the Grand Court\nmay be made ex parte by affidavit to the Court.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 01.03.99) (amended 01.04.00) (amended 08.09.03)\n\nORDER 43\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 246\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 43\nACCOUNTS AND INQUIRIES\n\n1.\nSummary order for account (O.43, r.1)\n1.\n(1) Where a writ is indorsed with a claim for an account or a claim which\nnecessarily involves taking an account, the plaintiff may, at any time after the\ndefendant has acknowledged service or after the time limited for acknowledging\nservice, apply for an order under this rule.\n(1A) A defendant to an action begun by writ who has served a counterclaim, which\nincludes a claim for an account or a claim which necessarily involves taking an\naccount, on \u2014\n(a)\nthe plaintiff; or\n(b) any other party; or\n(c)\nany person who becomes a party by virtue of such service, may apply for\nan order under this rule.\n(2) An application under this rule must be made by summons and, if the Court so\ndirects, must be supported by affidavit or other evidence.\n(3) On the hearing of the application, the Court may, unless satisfied by the\ndefendant by affidavit or otherwise that there is some preliminary question to\nbe tried, order that an account be taken and may also order that any amount\ncertified on taking the account to be due to either party be paid to that party\nwithin a time specified in the order.\n2.\nCourt may direct taking of accounts, etc. (O.43, r.2)\n2.\n(1) The Court may, on an application made by summons at any stage of the\nproceedings in a cause or matter, direct any necessary accounts or inquiries to\nbe taken or made.\n(2) Every direction for the taking of an account or the making of an inquiry shall be\nnumbered in the judgment or order so that, as far as may be, each distinct\naccount and inquiry may be designated by a number.\n3.\nDirections as to manner of taking account or making inquiry (O.43, r.3)\n3.\n(1) Where the Court orders an account to be taken or inquiry to be made it may by\nthe same or a subsequent order give directions with regard to the manner in\nwhich the account is to be taken or vouched or the inquiry is to be made.\n(2) Without prejudice to the generality of paragraph (1), the Court may direct that\nin taking an account the relevant books of account shall be evidence of the\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 43\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 247\n\nmatters contained therein with liberty to the parties interested to take such\nobjection thereto as they think fit.\n4.\nAccount to be made, verified etc. (O.43, r.4)\n4.\n(1) Where an account has been ordered to be taken, the accounting party must make\nout the accounting party\u2019s account and, unless the Court otherwise directs,\nverify it by an affidavit to which the account must be exhibited.\n(2) The items on each side of the account must be numbered consecutively.\n(3) Unless the order for the taking of the account otherwise directs, the accounting\nparty must file the account with the Court and must at the same time notify the\nother parties that the accounting party has done so and of the filing of any\naffidavit verifying the account and of any supporting affidavit.\n5.\nNotice to be given of alleged omissions, etc. in account (O.43, r.5)\n5.\nAny party who seeks to charge an accounting party with an amount beyond that which\nthe accounting party has by the accounting party\u2019s account admitted to have received\nor who alleges that any amount in the accounting party\u2019s account is erroneous in\nrespect of amount or in any other respect must give the accounting party notice thereof\nstating, so far as the party is able, the amount sought to be charged with brief\nparticulars thereof or, as the case may be, the grounds for alleging that the item is\nerroneous.\n6.\nAllowances (O.43, r.6)\n6.\nIn taking any account directed by any judgment or order all just allowance shall be\nmade without any direction to that effect.\n7.\nDelay in prosecution of accounts, etc. (O.43, r.7)\n7.\n(1) If it appears to the Court that there is undue delay in the prosecution of any\naccounts or inquiries, or any other proceedings under any judgment or order, the\nCourt may require the party having the conduct of the proceedings or any other\nparty to explain the delay and may then make such order for staying the\nproceedings or for expediting them or for the conduct thereof and for costs as\nthe circumstances require.\n(2) The Court may direct any party to take over the conduct of the proceedings in\nquestion and to carry out any directions made by an order under this rule.\n8.\nDistribution of fund before all persons entitled are ascertained (O.43, r.8)\n8.\nWhere some of the persons entitled to share in a fund are ascertained, and difficulty\nor delay has occurred or is likely to occur in ascertaining the other persons so entitled,\nthe Court may order or allow immediate payment of their shares to the persons\nascertained without reserving any part of those shares to meet the subsequent costs of\nascertaining those other persons.\n\nORDER 43\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 248\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n9.\nNo rule (O.43, r.9)\n9.\nNo rule (O.43, r.9)\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 44\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 249\n\nORDER 44\nPROCEEDINGS UNDER JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS\n\n1.\nApplication to orders (O.44, r.1)\n1.\nIn this Order references to a judgment include references to an order.\n2.\nService of notice of judgment on person not a party (O.44, r.2)\n2.\n(1) Where in an action for \u2014\n(a)\nthe administration of the estate of a deceased person; or\n(b) the execution of a trust; or\n(c)\nthe sale of any property,\nthe Court gives a judgment or makes a direction which affects persons not\nparties to the action, the Court may when giving the judgment or at any stage of\nthe proceedings under the judgment direct notice of the judgment to be served\non any such person and any person so served shall, subject to paragraph (4), be\nbound by the judgment as if the person had originally been made a party to the\naction.\n(2) If it appears that it is not practicable to serve notice of a judgment on a person\ndirected to be served the Court may dispense with service and may also order\nthat such person be bound by the judgment.\n(3) Every notice of a judgment for service under this rule must be indorsed with a\nmemorandum in Form No. 9 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as\namended and revised) with such modifications as may be appropriate.\n(4) A person served with notice of a judgment may, within 1 month after service of\nthe notice on the person, and after acknowledging service, apply to the Court to\ndischarge, vary or add to the judgment.\n(5) A person served with notice of a judgment may, after acknowledging service of\nthe notice, attend the proceedings under the judgment.\n(6) Order 12, rules 1 to 4, shall apply in relation to the acknowledgment of service\nof a notice of judgment as if the judgment were a writ, the person by whom the\nnotice is served were the plaintiff and the person on whom it is served were a\ndefendant.\n3.\nDirections by the Court (O.44, r.3)\n3.\n(1) Where a judgment given in a cause or matter contains directions which make it\nnecessary to proceed in Chambers under the judgment, the Court hearing the\nsummons to proceed shall give directions with respect to the proceedings to be\n\nORDER 44\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 250\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\ntaken under the judgment and the conduct thereof, including, in particular,\ndirections with respect to \u2014\n(a)\nthe manner in which any account or inquiry is to be prosecuted;\n(b) the evidence to be adduced in support thereof;\n(c)\nthe preparation and service on the parties to be bound thereby of the draft\nof any deed or other instrument which is directed by the judgment to be\nsettled by the Court and the service of any objections to the draft;\n(d) without prejudice to O.15, r.17, the parties required to attend all or any part\nof the proceedings;\n(e)\nthe representation by the same attorney of parties who constitute a class\nand by different attorneys of parties who ought to be separately\nrepresented; and\n(f)\nthe time within which each proceeding is to be taken,\nand may fix a day or days for the further attendance of the parties.\n(2) The Court may revoke or vary any directions given under this rule.\n4.\nApplication of rr.5 to 8 (O.44, r.4)\n4.\nRules 5 to 8 apply \u2014\n(a)\nwhere in proceedings for the administration under the direction of the\nCourt of the estate of a deceased person the judgment directs any account\nof debts or other liabilities of the deceased's estate to be taken or any\ninquiry for next of kin or other unascertained claimants to be made; and\n(b) where in proceedings for the execution under the direction of the Court of\na trust the judgment directs any such inquiry to be made,\nand those rules shall, with the necessary modifications, apply where in any other\nproceedings the judgment directs any account of debts or other liabilities to be\ntaken or any inquiry to be made.\n5.\nAdvertisements for creditors and other claimants (O.44, r.5)\n5.\nThe Court may, when giving a judgment, give directions for the issue of\nadvertisements for creditors or other claimants and may fix the time within which\ncreditors and claimants may respond.\n6.\nExamination of claims (O.44, r.6)\n6.\n(1) Where an account of debts or other liabilities of the estate of a deceased person\nhas been directed, such party as the Court may direct must \u2014\n(a)\nexamine the claims of persons claiming to be creditors of the estate;\n(b) determine, so far as the party is able, to which of such claims the estate is\nliable; and\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 44\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 251\n\n(c)\nat least 7 clear days before the time appointed for adjudicating on claims,\nmake an affidavit stating such party\u2019s findings and such party\u2019s reasons for\nthem and listing all the other debts of the deceased which are or may still\nbe due.\n(2) Where an inquiry for next of kin or other unascertained claimants has been\ndirected, such party as the Court may direct must \u2014\n(a)\nexamine the claims;\n(b) determine, so far as the party is able, to which of such claims the estate is\nliable; and\n(c)\nat least 7 clear days before the time appointed for adjudicating on claims,\nmake an affidavit stating such party\u2019s findings and such party\u2019s reasons for\nthem.\n(3) If the personal representatives or trustees concerned are not the parties directed\nby the Court to examine claims, they must join with the party directed to\nexamine them in making the affidavit required by this rule.\n7.\nAdjudication on claims (O.44, r.7)\n7.\nFor the purpose of adjudicating on claims the Court may \u2014\n(a)\nallow any claim after or without proof thereof;\n(b) direct any claim to be investigated in such manner as it thinks fit; or\n(c)\nrequire any claimant to attend and prove the claimant\u2019s claim or to furnish\nfurther particulars or evidence of it.\n8.\nNotice of adjudication (O.44, r.8)\n8.\nThe Court shall give directions that there be served on every creditor whose claim or\nany part thereof has been allowed or disallowed, and who did not attend when the\nclaim was disposed of, a notice informing the creditor of that fact.\n9.\nInterest on debts (O.44, r.9)\n9.\n(1) Where an account of the debts of a deceased person is directed by any judgment,\nthen, unless the deceased's estate is insolvent or the Court otherwise orders,\ninterest shall be allowed \u2014\n(a)\non any such debt as carries interest, at the rate it carries; and\n(b) on any other debt, from the date of the judgment at the rate payable on\njudgment debts at that date.\n(2) A creditor who has established the creditor\u2019s debt in proceedings under the\njudgment and whose debt does not carry interest shall be entitled to interest on\nthe creditor\u2019s debt in accordance with subparagraph (1)(b) out of any assets\nwhich may remain after satisfying the costs of the cause or matter, the debts\n\nORDER 44\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 252\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nwhich have been established and the interest on such of those debts as by law\ncarry interest.\n (3) For the purposes of this rule \"debt\" includes funeral, testamentary or\nadministration expenses and, in relation to expenses incurred after the judgment,\nfor the reference in subparagraph (1)(b) to the date of the judgment there shall\nbe substituted a reference to the date when the expenses became payable.\n10.\nInterest on legacies (O.44, r.10)\n10. When an account of legacies is directed by any judgment, then, subject to any\ndirections contained in the will or codicil in question and to any order made by the\nCourt, interest shall be allowed on each legacy at the prescribed rate beginning at the\nexpiration of 1 year after the testator's death.\n11.\nNo rule (O.44, r.11)\n11. No rule (O.44, r.11)\n12.\nNo rule (O.44, r.12)\n12. No rule (O.44, r.12)\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 45\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 253\n\nORDER 45\nENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS: GENERAL\n\n1.\nEnforcement of judgment, etc., for payment of money (O.45, r.1)\n1.\n(1) Subject to the provisions of these Rules, a judgment or order for the payment of\nmoney, not being a judgment or order for the payment of money into Court, may\nbe enforced by one or more of the following means, that is to say \u2014\n(a)\nwrit of fieri facias;\n(b) garnishee proceedings;\n(c)\na charging order;\n(d) the appointment of a receiver;\n(e)\nan order for committal;\n(f)\nwrit of sequestration;\n(g) an attachment of earnings order.\n(2) Subject to the provisions of these Rules, a judgment or order for the payment of\nmoney into Court may be enforced by one or more of the following means, that\nis to say \u2014\n(a)\nthe appointment of a receiver;\n(b) an order of committal;\n(c)\nwrit of sequestration.\n(3) Paragraphs (1) and (2) are without prejudice to the enactments relating to\nbankruptcy or the winding up of companies.\n(4) In this Order references to any writ shall be construed as including references to\nany further writ in aid of the first mentioned writ.\n2.\nNo rule (O.45, r.2)\n2.\nNo rule (O.45, r.2)\n3.\nEnforcement of judgment for possession of land (O.45, r.3)\n3.\n(1) Subject to the provisions of these Rules, a judgment or order for the giving of\npossession of land may be enforced by one or more of the following means, that\nis to say \u2014\n(a)\nwrit of possession;\n(b) in a case in which rule 5 applies, an order of committal;\n(c)\nin such a case, writ of sequestration.\n\nORDER 45\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 254\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(2) A writ of possession to enforce a judgment or order for the giving of possession\nof any land shall not be issued without the leave of the Court.\n(3) Such leave shall not be granted unless it is shown that every person in actual\npossession of the whole or any part of the land has received such notice of the\nproceedings as appears to the Court sufficient to enable the person to apply to\nthe Court for any relief to which the person may be entitled.\n(4) A writ of possession may include provision for enforcing the payment of any\nmoney adjudged or ordered to be paid by the judgment or order which is to be\nenforced by the writ.\n4.\nEnforcement of judgment for delivery of goods (O.45, r.4)\n4.\n(1) Subject to the provisions of these Rules, a judgment or order for the delivery of\nany goods which does not give a person against whom the judgment is given or\norder made the alternative of paying the assessed value of the goods may be\nenforced by one or more of the following means, that is to say  \u2014\n(a)\nwrit of delivery to recover the goods without alternative provision for\nrecovery of the assessed value thereof (hereafter in this rule referred to as\na \"writ of specific delivery\");\n(b) in a case in which rule 5 applies, an order of committal;\n(c)\nin such a case, writ of sequestration.\n(2) Subject to the provisions of these Rules, a judgment or order for the delivery of\nany goods or payment of their assessed value may be enforced by one or more\nof the following means, that is to say \u2014\n(a)\nwrit of delivery to recover the goods or their assessed value;\n(b) with the leave of the Court, writ of specific delivery;\n(c)\nin a case in which rule 5 applies, writ of sequestration.\n\nAn application for an order under subparagraph (b) shall be made by summons,\nwhich must, notwithstanding O.65, r.9, be served on the defendant against\nwhom the judgment or order sought to be enforced was given or made.\n (3) A writ of specific delivery, and a writ of delivery to recover any goods or their\nassessed value, may include provision for enforcing the payment of any money\nadjudged or ordered to be paid by the judgment or order which is to be enforced\nby the writ.\n(4) A judgment or order for the payment of the assessed value of any goods may be\nenforced by the same means as any other judgment or order for the payment of\nmoney.\n5.\nEnforcement of judgment to do or abstain from doing any act (O.45, r.5)\n5.\n(1) Where \u2014\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 45\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 255\n\n(a)\na person required by a judgment or order to do an act within a time\nspecified in the judgment or order refuses or neglects to do it within that\ntime, or, as the case may be, within that time as extended or abridged under\nO.3, r.5; or\n(b) a person disobeys a judgment or order requiring the person to abstain from\ndoing an act,\nthen, subject to the provisions of these Rules, the judgment or order may be\nenforced by one or more of the following means, that is to say \u2014\n(i)\nwith the leave of the Court, writ of sequestration against the property\nof that person;\n(ii) where that person is a body corporate, with the leave of the Court, a\nwrit of sequestration against the property of any director or other\nofficer of the body corporate;\n(iii) an order of committal against that person or, where that person is a\nbody corporate, against any such officer.\n(2) Where a judgment or order requires a person to do an act within a time therein\nspecified and an order is subsequently made under rule 6 requiring the act to be\ndone within some other time, references in paragraph (1) of this rule to a\njudgment or order shall be construed as references to the order made under rule\n6.\n(3) Where under any judgment or order requiring the delivery of any goods the\nperson liable to execution has the alternative of paying the assessed value of the\ngoods, the judgment or order shall not be enforceable by order of committal\nunder paragraph (1), but the Court may, on the application of the person entitled\nto enforce judgment or order, make an order requiring the first mentioned person\nto deliver the goods to the applicant within a time specified in the order, and that\norder may be so enforced.\n6.\nJudgment, etc. requiring act to be done: order fixing time for doing (O.45,\nr.6)\n6.\n(1) Notwithstanding that a judgment or order requiring a person to do an act\nspecifies a time within which the act is to be done, the Court shall, without\nprejudice to O.3, r.5, have power to make an order requiring the act to be done\nwithin another time, being such time after service of that order, or such other\ntime, as may be specified therein.\n(2) Where, notwithstanding O.42, r.2(1), or by reason of O.42, r.2(2), a judgment\nor order requiring a person to do an act does not specify a time within which the\nact is to be done, the Court shall have power subsequently to make an order\nrequiring the act to be done within such time after service of that order, or such\nother time, as may be specified therein.\n\nORDER 45\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 256\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(3) An application for an order under this rule must be made by summons and the\nsummons must, notwithstanding anything in O.65, r.9, be served on the person\nrequired to do the act in question.\n7.\nService of copy of judgment, etc., prerequisite to enforcement under r.5\n(O.45, r.7)\n7.\n(1) In this rule references to an order shall be construed as including references to\na judgment.\n(2) Subject to O.24, r.20(3), O.26, r.6(3), and paragraphs (6) and (7) of this rule, an\norder shall not be enforced under rule 5 unless \u2014\n(a)\na copy of the order has been served personally on the person required to\ndo or abstain from doing the act in question; and\n(b) in the case of an order requiring a person to do an act, the copy has been\nso served before the expiration of the time within which the person was\nrequired to do the act.\n(3) Subject as aforesaid, an order requiring a body corporate to do or abstain from\ndoing an act shall not be enforced as mentioned in rule 5(1), (ii) or (iii) unless \u2014\n(a)\na copy of the order has also been served personally on the officer against\nwhose property leave is sought to issue a writ of sequestration or against\nwhom an order of committal is sought; and\n(b) in the case of an order requiring the body corporate to do an act, the copy\nhas been so served before the expiration of the time within which the body\nwas required to do the act.\n(4) There must be indorsed on the copy of an order served under this rule a notice\ninforming the person on whom the copy is served \u2014\n(a)\nin the case of service under paragraph (2), that if the person neglects to\nobey the order within the time specified therein, or, if the order is to abstain\nfrom doing an act, that if the person disobeys the order, the person is liable\nto process of execution to compel the person to obey it; and\n(b) in the case of service under paragraph (3), that if the body corporate\nneglects to obey the order within the time so specified or, if the order is to\nabstain from doing an act, that if the body corporate disobeys the order,\nthe body corporate is liable to process of execution to compel the body to\nobey it.\n(5) With the copy of an order required to be served under this rule, being an order\nrequiring a person to do an act, there must also be served a copy of any order\nmade under O.3, r.5, extending or abridging the time for doing the act and,\nwhere the first mentioned order was made under rule 5(3) or 6 of this Order, a\ncopy of the previous order requiring the act to be done.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 45\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 257\n\n(6) An order requiring a person to abstain from doing an act may be enforced under\nrule 5 notwithstanding that service of a copy of the order has not been effected\nin accordance with this rule if the Court is satisfied that, pending such service,\nthe person against whom or against whose property it is sought to enforce the\norder has had notice thereof either \u2014\n(a)\nby being present when the order was made; or\n(b) by being notified of the terms of the order, whether by telephone, telegram\nor otherwise.\n(7) Without prejudice to its powers under O.65, r.4, the Court may dispense with\nservice of a copy of an order under this rule if it thinks it just to do so.\n8.\nCourt may order act to be done at expense of disobedient party (O.45, r.8)\n8.\nIf an order of mandamus, a mandatory order, an injunction or a judgment or order for\nthe specific performance of a contract is not complied with, then, without prejudice\nto any other power it may have including its powers to punish the disobedient party\nfor contempt, the Court may direct that the act required to be done may, so far as\npracticable, be done by the party by whom the order or judgment was obtained or\nsome other person appointed by the Court, at the cost of the disobedient party, and\nupon the act being done the expenses incurred may be ascertained in such manner as\nthe Court may direct and execution may issue against the disobedient party for the\namount so ascertained and for costs.\n9.\nExecution by or against person not being a party (O.45, r.9)\n9.\n(1) Any person, not being a party to a cause or matter, who obtains any order or in\nwhose favour any order is made, shall be entitled to enforce obedience to the\norder by the same process as if the person were a party.\n(2) Any person, not being a party to a cause or matter, against whom obedience to\nany judgment or order may be enforced, shall be liable to the same process for\nenforcing obedience to the judgment or order as if the person were a party.\n10.\nConditional judgment: waiver (O.45, r.10)\n10. A party entitled under any judgment or order to any relief subject to the fulfilment of\nany condition who fails to fulfil that condition is deemed to have abandoned the\nbenefit of the judgment or order, and, unless the Court otherwise directs, any other\nperson interested may take any proceedings which either are warranted by the\njudgment or order or might have been taken if the judgment or order had not been\ngiven or made.\n11.\nMatters occurring after judgment: stay of execution, etc. (O.45, r.11)\n11. Without prejudice to O.47, r.1, a party against whom a judgment has been given or\nan order made may apply to the Court for a stay of execution of the judgment\n\nORDER 45\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 258\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nor order or other relief on the ground of matters which have occurred since the date\nof the judgment or order, and the Court may by order grant such relief, and on such\nterms, as it thinks just.\n12.\nForms of writs (O.45, r.12)\n12. (1) A writ of fieri facias must be in Form No. 26 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II\n- Forms (as amended and revised), adapted as may be appropriate to meet the\ncircumstances of the particular case or in Form No. 27 of the Grand Court Rules\n- Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised).\n(2) A writ of possession must be in Form No. 28 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II\n- Forms (as amended and revised).\n(3) A writ of sequestration must be in Form No. 29 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol\nII - Forms (as amended and revised).\n13.\nEnforcement of judgments and orders for recovery of money, etc. (O.45, r.13)\n13. (1) Rule 1(1) of this Order, with the omission of subparagraphs (e) and (f) thereof,\nand Orders 46 to 51 shall apply in relation to a judgment or order for the\nrecovery of money as they apply in relation to a judgment or order for the\npayment of money.\n(2) Rule 3 of this Order, with the omission of subparagraphs (1)(b) and (c) thereof,\nand O.47, r.3(2), shall apply in relation to a judgment or order that a person do\nhave a return of any goods and to a judgment or order for the recovery of\npossession of land as they apply in relation to judgment or order for the giving\nor delivery of possession of land.\n(3) Rule 4 of this Order, with the omission of subparagraphs 1(b) and (c) and (2)(c)\nthereof, and O.47, r.3(2) shall apply in relation to a judgment or order that a\nperson do have a return of any goods and to a judgment or order that a person\ndo have a return of any goods or do recover the assessed value thereof as they\napply in relation to a judgment or order for the delivery of any goods and a\njudgment or order for the delivery of any goods or payment of the assessed value\nthereof respectively.\n14.\nNo rule (O.45, r.14)\n14. No rule (O.45, r.14)\n15.\nNo rule (O.45, r.15)\n15. No rule (O.45, r.15)\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 46\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 259\n\nORDER 46\nWRITS OF EXECUTION: GENERAL\n\n1.\nDefinition (O.46, r.1)\n1.\nIn this Order, unless the context otherwise requires, \"writ of execution\" includes a\nwrit of fieri facias, a writ of possession, a writ of delivery, a writ of sequestration and\nany further writ in aid of any of the aforementioned writs.\n2.\nWhen leave to issue any writ of execution is necessary (O.46, r.2)\n2.\n(1) A writ of execution to enforce a judgment or order may not issue without the\nleave of the Court in the following cases, that is to say \u2014\n(a)\nwhere 6 years or more have elapsed since the date of the judgment or order;\n(b) where any change has taken place, whether by death or otherwise, in the\nparties entitled or liable to execution under the judgment or order;\n(c)\nwhere the judgment or order is against the assets of a deceased person\ncoming to the hands of  the deceased person\u2019s executors or administrators\nafter the date of the judgment or order, and it is sought to issue execution\nagainst such assets;\n(d) where under the judgment or order any person is entitled to relief subject\nto the fulfilment of any condition which it is alleged has been fulfilled;\n(e)\nwhere any goods or land sought to be seized under a writ of execution are\nin the hands of a receiver appointed by the Court or a sequestrator.\n(2) Paragraph (1) is without prejudice to any enactment or rule by virtue of which\na person is required to obtain the leave of the Court for the issue of a writ of\nexecution or to proceed to execution on or otherwise to the enforcement of a\njudgment or order.\n(3) Where the Court grants leave, whether under this rule or otherwise, for the issue\nof a writ of execution and the writ is not issued within 1 year after the date of\nthe order granting such leave, the order shall cease to have effect, without\nprejudice, however, to the making of a fresh order.\n3.\nLeave required for issue of writ in aid of other writ (O.46, r.3)\n3.\nA writ of execution in aid of any other writ of execution shall not issue without the\nleave of the Court.\n4.\nApplication for leave to issue writ (O.46, r.4)\n4.\n(1) An application for leave to issue a writ of execution may be made ex parte unless\nthe Court directs it to be made by summons.\n\nORDER 46\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 260\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(2) Such an application must be supported by an affidavit \u2014\n(a)\nidentifying the judgment or order to which the application relates and, if\nthe judgment or order is for the payment of money, stating the amount\noriginally due thereunder and the amount due thereunder at the date of the\napplication;\n(b) stating, where the case falls within rule 2(1)(a), the reason for the delay in\nenforcing the judgment or order;\n(c)\nstating, where the case falls within rule 2(1)(b), the change which has taken\nplace in the parties entitled or liable to execution since the date of the\njudgment or order;\n(d) stating, where the case falls within rule 2(1)(c) or (d), that a demand to\nsatisfy the judgment or order was made on the person liable to satisfy it\nand that the person has refused or failed to do so; and\n(e)\ngiving such other information as is necessary to satisfy the Court that the\napplicant is entitled to proceed to execution on the judgment or order in\nquestion and that the person against whom it is sought to issue execution\nis liable to execution on it.\n(3) The Court hearing such application may grant leave in accordance with the\napplication or may order that any issue or question, a decision on which is\nnecessary to determine the rights of the parties, be tried in any manner in which\nany question of fact or law arising in an action may be tried and, in either case\nmay impose such terms as to costs or otherwise as it thinks just.\n5.\nApplication for leave to issue writ of sequestration (O.46, r.5)\n5.\n(1) Notwithstanding anything in rules 2 and 4, an application for leave to issue a\nwrit of sequestration must be made to a Judge by motion.\n(2) Subject to paragraph (3), the notice of motion, stating the grounds of the\napplication and accompanied by a copy of the affidavit in support of the\napplication, must be served personally on the person against whose property it\nis sought to issue the writ.\n(3) Without prejudice to its powers under O.65, r.4, the Court may dispense with\nservice of the notice of motion under this rule if it thinks it just to do so.\n(4) The Judge hearing an application for leave to issue a writ of sequestration may\nsit in private in any case in which, if the application were for an order of\ncommittal, the Judge would be entitled to do so by virtue of O.52, r.6, but except\nin such a case, the application shall be heard in open Court.\n6.\nIssue of writ of execution (O.46, r.6)\n6.\n(1) Issue of a writ of execution takes place on its being sealed by the Clerk of the\nCourt.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 46\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 261\n\n(2) Before such a writ is issued a praecipe for its issue must be filed.\n(3) The praecipe must be signed by the attorney of the person entitled to execution\nor, if that person is acting in person, by the person entitled to execution.\n(4) No such writ shall be sealed unless at the time of the tender thereof for sealing \u2014\n(a)\nthe person tendering it identifies in the Court file \u2014\n(i)\nthe judgment or order on which the writ is to issue, or an office copy\nthereof;\n(ii) where the writ may not issue without the leave of the Court, the order\ngranting such leave or evidence of the granting of it;\n(b) where judgment on failure to acknowledge service has been entered\nagainst a State, as defined in Section 14 of the United Kingdom\u2019s State\nImmunity Act 1978, the person tendering it produces evidence that the\nState has been served in accordance with O.42, r.3A and that the judgment\nhas taken effect; and\n(c)\nthe Clerk of the Court is satisfied that the period, if any, specified in the\njudgment or order for the payment of any money or the doing of any other\nact thereunder has expired.\n(5) Every writ of execution shall bear the date of the day on which it is issued.\n7.\nNo rule (O.46, r.7)\n7.\nNo rule (O.46, r.7)\n8.\nDuration and renewal of execution (O.46, r.8)\n8.\n(1) For the purpose of execution, a writ of execution is valid in the first instance for\n12 months beginning with the date of its issue.\n(2) Where a writ has not been wholly executed the Court may by order extend the\nvalidity of the writ from time to time for a period of 12 months at any time\nbeginning with the day on which the order is made, if an application for\nextension is made to the Court before the day next following that on which the\nwrit would otherwise expire or such later day, if any, as the Court may allow.\n(3) Before a writ, the validity of which has been extended under paragraph (2), is\nexecuted either the writ must be sealed with the seal of the Court showing the\ndate on which the order extending its validity was made or the applicant for the\norder must serve a notice, sealed as aforesaid, on the Bailiff to whom the writ is\ndirected informing the Bailiff of the making of the order and the date thereof.\n(4) The priority of a writ, the validity of which has been extended under this rule,\nshall be determined by reference to the date on which it was originally delivered\nto the Bailiff.\n(5) The production of a writ of execution, or of such a notice as is mentioned in\nparagraph (3), purporting in either case to be sealed as mentioned in that\n\nORDER 46\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 262\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nparagraph, shall be evidence that the validity of that writ or, as the case may be,\nof the writ referred to in that notice, has been extended under paragraph (2).\n9.\nReturn of writ of execution (O.46, r.9)\n9.\n(1) Any party at whose instance a writ of execution was issued may serve a notice\non the Bailiff to whom the writ was directed requiring the Bailiff, within such\ntime as may be specified in the notice, to indorse on the writ a statement of the\nmanner in which the Bailiff has executed it and to send to that party a copy of\nthe statement.\n(2) If the Bailiff on whom such a notice is served fails to comply with it the party\nby whom it was served may apply to the Court for an order directing the Bailiff\nto comply with the notice.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 47\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 263\n\nORDER 47\nWRITS OF FIERI FACIAS\n\n1.\nPower to stay execution by writ of fieri facias (O.47, r.1)\n1.\n(1) Where a judgment is given or an order made for the payment by any person of\nmoney, and the Court is satisfied, on an application made at the time of the\njudgment or order, or at any time thereafter, by the judgment debtor or other\nparty liable to execution \u2014\n (a) that there are special circumstances which render it inexpedient to enforce\nthe judgment or order; or\n(b) that the applicant is unable from any cause to pay the money,\n\nthen, notwithstanding anything in rule 2 or 3, the Court may by order stay the\nexecution of the judgment or order by writ of fieri facias either absolutely or for\nsuch period and subject to such conditions as the Court thinks fit.\n(2) An application under this rule, if not made at the time the judgment is given or\norder made, must be made by summons and may be so made notwithstanding\nthat the party liable to execution did not acknowledge service of the writ or\noriginating summons in the action or did not state in the party\u2019s\nacknowledgment of service that the party intends to apply for a stay of execution\nunder this rule pursuant to O.13, r.8.\n(3) An application made by summons must be supported by an affidavit made by\nor on behalf of the applicant stating the grounds of the application and the\nevidence necessary to substantiate them and, in particular, where such\napplication is made on the grounds of the applicant's inability to pay, disclosing\nthe applicant\u2019s income, the nature and value of any property, whether real or\npersonal, of the applicant\u2019s and the amount of any other liabilities of his.\n(4) The summons and a copy of the supporting affidavit must, not less than 4 clear\ndays before the return day, be served on the party entitled to enforce the\njudgment or order.\n(5) An order staying execution under this rule may be varied or revoked by a\nsubsequent order.\n2.\nNo rule (O.47, r.2)\n2.\nNo rule (O.47, r.2)\n\nORDER 47\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 264\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n3.\nSeparate writs to enforce payment of costs, etc. (O.47, r.3)\n3.\n(1) Where only the payment of money, together with costs to be taxed, is adjudged\nor ordered, then, if when the money becomes payable under the judgment or\norder the costs have not been taxed, the party entitled to enforce that judgment\nor order may issue a writ of fieri facias to enforce payment of the sum (other\nthan for costs) adjudged or ordered and, not less than 8 days after the issue of\nthat writ, the party may issue a second writ to enforce payment of the taxed\ncosts.\n(2)  A party entitled to enforce a judgment or order for the delivery of possession of\nany property (other than money) may, if the party so elects, issue a separate writ\nof fieri facias to enforce payment of any damages or costs awarded to the party\nby that judgment or order.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 47\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 265\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nORDER 48\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 266\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 48\nEXAMINATION OF JUDGMENT DEBTOR, ETC.\n\n1.\nOrder for examination of judgment debtor (O.48, r.1)\n1.\n(1) Where a person has obtained a judgment or order for the payment by some other\nperson (hereinafter referred to as \"the judgment debtor\") of money, the Clerk of\nthe Court may, on an application made by the person entitled to enforce the\njudgment or order, order the judgment debtor or, if the judgment debtor is a\nbody corporate, an officer thereof, to attend before a Judge and be orally\nexamined on the question \u2014\n(a)\nwhether any and, if so, what debts are owing to the judgment debtor, and\n(b) whether the judgment debtor has any and, if so, what other property or\nmeans of satisfying the judgment or order, and the Court may also order\nthe judgment debtor or officer to produce any books or documents in the\npossession of the judgment debtor relevant to the questions aforesaid at the\ntime and place appointed for the examination.\n(2) An application under this rule shall be made in Form No. 30A of the Grand\nCourt Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) and shall be determined\nby the Clerk of the Court without hearing the applicant.\n(3) The application must be supported by an affidavit \u2014\n(a)\nidentifying the judgment or order and stating the amount unpaid at the time\nof the application;\n(b) stating the date and place at which the judgment or order was served upon\nthe judgment debtor;\n(c)\ngiving particulars of the document sought to be produced and the reasons\nfor believing that such documents are in the possession of the judgment\ndebtor; and\n(d) where the judgment debtor is a body corporate, particulars of its\nrelationship with the person to be summoned for examination.\n(4) An order under this rule must be in Form No. 30 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol\nII - Forms (as amended and revised) and must be served personally on the\njudgment debtor and on any officer of a body corporate ordered to attend for\nexamination.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 48\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 267\n\n2.\nExamination of party liable to satisfy other judgment (O.48, r.2)\n2.\nWhere any difficulty arises in or in connection with the enforcement of any judgment\nor order, other than such a judgment or order as is mentioned in rule 1, the Court may\nmake an order under that rule for the attendance of the party liable to satisfy the\njudgment or order and for the party\u2019s examination on such questions as may be\n\nspecified in the order, and that rule shall apply accordingly with the necessary\nmodifications.\n3.\nExaminer to make record of debtor's statement (O.48, r.3)\n3.\nThe Judge shall take down, or cause to be taken down, in writing the statement made\nby the judgment debtor or other person at the examination. The Judge shall certify the\naccuracy of the statement by signing it.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 01.03.99)\n\nORDER 49\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 268\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 49\nGARNISHEE PROCEEDINGS\n\n1.\nAttachment of debt due to judgment debtor (O.49, r.1)\n1.\n(1) Where a person (in this Order referred to as \"the judgment creditor\") has\nobtained a judgment or order for the payment by some other person (in this\nOrder referred to as \"the judgment debtor\") of money, not being a judgment or\norder for the payment of money into Court, and any other person within the\njurisdiction (in this Order referred to as \"the garnishee\") is indebted to the\njudgment debtor, the Court may, subject to the provisions of this Order and of\nany enactment, order the garnishee to pay the judgment creditor the amount of\nany debt due or accruing due to the judgment debtor from the garnishee, or so\nmuch thereof as is sufficient to satisfy that judgment or order and the costs of\nthe garnishee proceedings.\n(2) An order under this rule shall in the first instance be an order to show cause,\nspecifying the time and place for further consideration of the matter, and in the\nmeantime attaching such debt as is mentioned in paragraph (1) or so much\nthereof as may be specified in the order, to answer the judgment or order\nmentioned in that paragraph and the costs of the garnishee proceedings.\n2.\nApplication for order (O.49, r.2)\n2.\nAn application for an order under rule 1 must be made ex parte supported by an\naffidavit \u2014\n(a)\nstating the name and last known address of the judgment debtor;\n(b) identifying the judgment or order to be enforced and stating the amount\nremaining unpaid under it at the time of the application; and\n(c)\nstating that to the best of the information or belief of the deponent the\ngarnishee (naming the garnishee) is within the jurisdiction and is indebted\nto the judgment debtor and stating the sources of the deponent's\ninformation or the grounds for the deponent\u2019s belief.\n3.\nService and effect of order to show cause (O.49, r.3)\n3.\n(1) Unless the Court otherwise directs, an order under rule 1 to show cause must be\nserved \u2014\n (a) on the garnishee personally, at least 14 days before the day appointed\nthereby for the further consideration of the matter; and\n (b) on the judgment debtor, at least 7 days after the order has been served on\nthe garnishee and at least 7 days before the day appointed for the further\nconsideration of the matter.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 49\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 269\n\n(2) Such an order shall bind in the hands of the garnishee as from the service of the\norder on the garnishee any debt specified in the order or so much thereof as may\nbe so specified.\n4.\nNo appearance or dispute of liability by garnishee (O.49, r.4)\n4.\n(1) Where on the further consideration of the matter the garnishee does not attend\nor does not dispute the debt due or claimed to be due from the garnishee to the\njudgment debtor, the Court may make an order absolute under rule 1 against the\ngarnishee.\n(2) An order absolute under rule 1 against the garnishee may be enforced in the\nsame manner as any other order for the payment of money.\n5.\nDispute of liability by garnishee (O.49, r.5)\n5.\nWhere on the further consideration of the matter the garnishee disputes liability to\npay the debt due or claimed to be due from the garnishee to the judgment debtor, the\nCourt may summarily determine the question at issue or order that any question\nnecessary for determining the liability of the garnishee be tried in any manner in\nwhich any question or issue in an action may be tried.\n6.\nClaims of third persons (O.49, r.6)\n6.\n(1) If in garnishee proceedings it is brought to the notice of the Court that some\nother person than the judgment debtor is or claims to be entitled to the debt\nsought to be attached or has or claims to have a charge or lien upon it, the Court\nmay order that person to attend before the Court and state the nature of the claim\nwith particulars thereof.\n(2) After hearing any person who attends before the Court in compliance with an\norder under paragraph (1), the Court may summarily determine the questions at\nissue between the claimants or make such other order as it thinks just, including\nan order that any question or issue necessary for determining the validity of the\nclaim of such other person as is mentioned in paragraph (1) be tried in such\nmanner as is mentioned in rule 5.\n7.\nNo rule (O.49, r.7)\n7.\nNo rule (O.49, r.7)\n8.\nDischarge of garnishee (O.49, r.8)\n8.\nAny payment made by a garnishee in compliance with an order absolute under this\nOrder, and any execution levied against the garnishee in pursuance of such an order,\nshall be a valid discharge of the garnishee\u2019s liability to the judgment debtor to the\nextent of the amount paid or levied notwithstanding that the garnishee proceedings\nare subsequently set aside or the judgment or order from which they arose reversed.\n\nORDER 49\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 270\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n9.\nMoney in Court (O.49, r.9)\n9.\n(1) Where money is standing to the credit of the judgment debtor in Court, the\njudgment creditor shall not be entitled to take garnishee proceedings in respect\nof that money but may apply to the Court by summons for an order that the\nmoney or so much thereof as is sufficient to satisfy the judgment or order sought\nto be enforced and the costs of the application be paid to the judgment creditor.\n(2) Unless the Court otherwise directs, the summons must be served on the\njudgment debtor at least 7 days before the day named therein for the hearing of\nit.\n(3) Subject to O.75, r.24, the Court hearing an application under this rule may make\nsuch order with respect to the money in Court as it thinks just.\n10.\nCosts (O.49, r.10)\n10. The costs of any application for an order under rule 1 or 9 and of any proceedings\narising therefrom or incidental thereto, shall, unless the Court otherwise directs, be\nretained by the judgment creditor out of the money recovered by the judgment\ncreditor under the order and in priority to the judgment debt.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 50\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 271\n\nORDER 50\nCHARGING ORDERS, STOP ORDERS, ETC.\n\n1.\nOrder imposing a charge on a beneficial interest (O.50, r.1)\n1.\n(1) The power to make a charging order under paragraph 1 of the Law shall be\nexercisable by the Court.\n(2) An application by a judgment creditor for a charging order in respect of a\njudgment debtor's beneficial interest in any property may be made by an ex parte\noriginating motion, and any order made on such an application shall in the first\ninstance be an order, made in Form No. 33 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II -\nForms (as amended and revised), to show cause, specifying the time and place\nfor further consideration of the matter and imposing the charge in any event until\nthat time.\n(3) The application shall be supported by an affidavit \u2014\n(a)\nidentifying the judgment or order to be enforced and stating the amount\nunpaid at the date of the application;\n(b) stating the name of the judgment debtor and of any creditor of whom the\napplicant can identify;\n(c)\ngiving full particulars of the subject matter of the intended charge,\nincluding \u2014\n(i)\nin the case of securities other than securities in Court, the full title of\nthe securities, their amount and the name in which they stand;\n(ii) and, in the case of funds in Court, the number of the account; and\n(iii) in the case of land, the registration details.\n(d) verifying that the interest to be charged is owned beneficially by the\njudgment debtor.\n(4) In any case where the subject matter of the intended charge is an interest in land,\nthe supporting affidavit shall have exhibited to it an uncertified extract of the\nrelevant Land Register.\n(5) Unless the Court otherwise directs, an affidavit for the purposes of this rule may\ncontain statements of information or belief with the sources and grounds thereof.\n(6) An application may be made for a single charging order in respect of more than\none judgment or order against the debtor provided that an order is first made\npursuant to O.4, r.4, for all the causes or matters to be consolidated.\n\nORDER 50\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 272\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n1A.\nInterpretation (O.50, r.1A)\n1A. (1) In this Order \u2014\n\n\"the Law\" means Schedule 3 of the Judicature Act (as amended and revised)\nand any expressions used in this Order and in the Law have the same meanings\nin this Order as they have in the Law.\n(2) References to \"Form RL10\", \"Form RL12\" and \"Form RL13\" are references to\nsuch forms as prescribed in the Third Schedule of the Registered Land Rules (as\namended and revised).\n2.\nService of notice of order to show cause (O.50, r.2)\n2.\n(1) On the making of an order to show cause, notice of the order shall, unless the\nCourt otherwise directs, be served as follows \u2014\n(a)\na copy of the order, together with a copy of the affidavit in support, shall\nbe served on the judgment debtor;\n(b) where the order relates to securities, other than securities in Court, copies\nof the order shall also be served \u2014\n(i)\nin the case of securities issued by or on behalf of the government of\nthe Islands, on the Financial Secretary and the stock transfer agent (if\nany);\n(ii) in the case of shares in any company, not being a registered mutual\nfund, upon its registered office and share transfer agent (if any);\n(iii) in the case of shares or units of any registered mutual fund, upon its\nlicensed mutual fund administrator and its share transfer agent (if\nany);\n(c)\nwhere the order relates to a fund in Court, a copy of the order shall be\nserved on the Courts Administrator at the Court Funds Office; and\n(d) where the order relates to an interest under a trust, not being a registered\nmutual fund, copies of the order shall be served on such of the trustees as\nthe Court may direct.\n(2) Without prejudice to the provisions of paragraph (1), the Court may, on the\nmaking of the order to show cause, direct the service of copies of the order, and\nof the affidavit in support, on any other creditor of the judgment debtor or on\nany other interested person as may be appropriate in the circumstances.\n(3) Documents to be served under this rule must be served at least 7 days before the\ntime appointed for the further consideration of the matter.\n3.\nOrder made on further consideration (O.50, r.3)\n3.\n(1) On the further consideration of the matter the Court shall, either make the order\nabsolute, with or without modifications, or discharge it.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 50\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 273\n\n(2) Where the order is made absolute, it shall be made in Form No. 34 of the Grand\nCourt Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised), and where it is\ndischarged, the provisions of rule 7, regarding the service of copies of the order\nof discharge, shall apply.\n4.\nOrder imposing a charge on an interest held by a trustee (O.50, r.4)\n4.\n(1) Save as provided by this rule, the provisions of rules 1, 2 and 3 shall apply to an\norder charging an interest held by a trustee as they apply to an order charging\nthe judgment debtor's beneficial interest.\n(2) Instead of verifying the judgment debtor's beneficial ownership of the interest\nto be charged, the affidavit required by rule 1(3) shall state the ground on which\nthe application is based and shall verify the material facts.\n(3) On making the order to show cause, the Court shall give directions for copies of\nthe order, and of the affidavit in support, to be served on such of the trustees and\nbeneficiaries, if any, as may be appropriate.\n(4) Rules 5, 6 and 7 shall apply to an order charging an interest held by a trustee as\nthey apply to an order charging the judgment debtor's beneficial interest, except\nthat, where the order is made under subsection (ii) or (iii) of paragraph 2(1)(b)\nof the Law references in those rules to \"the judgment debtor\" shall be references\nto the trustee.\n(5) Form Nos. 33 and 34 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended\nand revised) shall be modified so as to indicate that the interest is held by the\ndebtor as trustee or, as the case may be, that it is held by a trustee (to be named\nin the order) on trust for the debtor beneficially.\n4A.\nRegistration of order imposing a charge on an interest in land (O.50, r.4A)\n4A. (1) An order made under rule 1 in respect of any interest in land shall be registered\nin the encumbrances section of the relevant land register.\n(2)  When making an order, in Form 33 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms\n(as amended and revised), to which this rule applies the Judge shall also sign an\norder in Form RL10 and it shall be the judgment creditor's duty to present the\noriginal of such order, together with at least three copies, to the Registrar of\nLands for registration.\n(3) When the judgment creditor receives back from the Registrar of Lands the\nreceipted copies of the order, the judgment creditor shall forthwith file one copy\nin Court and serve one copy on the judgment debtor.\n(4) If an order nisi to which this rule applies \u2014\n(a)\nis made absolute without any modification, the fact that it is made absolute\nshall not be registered;\n\nORDER 50\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 274\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(b) is made absolute with modifications, a variation of charge order in Form\nRL13 shall be signed by the Judge; or\n(c)\nis discharged, a discharge of charge order in Form RL12 shall be signed\nby the Judge,\n\nand it shall be the duty of the judgment creditor to present such order together\nwith the appropriate number of copies to the Registrar of Lands and file and\nserve the receipted copies in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (3) of\nthis rule.\n(5) If an order to which this rule applies relates to more than one registered parcel\nof land, the Judge shall sign separate orders, Form RL10 or RL12 or RL13, as\nthe case may be, in respect of each parcel.\n(6) A charging order or variation of charge or discharge of a charging order to which\nthis rule applies shall take effect from the date upon which it is registered in the\nincumbrances section of the relevant land register.\n5.\nEffect of order in relation to securities out of Court (O.50, r.5)\n5.\n(1) No disposition by the judgment debtor of the judgment debtor\u2019s interest in any\nsecurities to which an order to show cause relates made after the making of that\norder shall, so long as that order remains in force, be valid as against the\njudgment creditor.\n(2) Until such order is discharged or made absolute, any person or body served in\naccordance with rule 2(1)(b) shall not permit any transfer of any of the securities\nspecified in the order, or pay any dividend, interest or redemption payment in\nrelation thereto, except with the authority of the Court, and, if it does so, shall\nbe liable to pay the judgment creditor the value of the securities transferred or,\nas the case may be, the amount of the payment made or, if that value or amount\nis more than sufficient to satisfy the judgment or order to which such order\nrelates, so much thereof as is sufficient to satisfy it.\n(3) If the Court makes the order absolute, a copy of the order, including a stop notice\nas provided in Form No. 34 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as\namended and revised), shall be served on such person or body specified in rule\n2(1)(b) as may be appropriate and, save as provided in rule 7(5), rules 11 to 14\nshall apply to such a notice as they apply to a stop notice made and served under\nrule 11.\n(4) This rule does not apply to orders in respect of securities in Court.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 50\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 275\n\n6.\nEffect of order in relation to funds in Court (O.50, r.6)\n6.\n(1) Where an order to show cause has been made in relation to funds in Court\n(including securities in Court) and a copy thereof has been served on the Courts\nAdministrator in accordance with rule 2, no disposition by the judgment debtor\nof any interest to which the order relates, made after the making of that order,\nshall, so long as the order remains in force, be valid as against the judgment\ncreditor.\n(2) If the Court makes the order absolute, a copy of the order shall be served on the\nCourts Administrator at the Court Funds Office.\n\n7.\nDischarge, etc., of charging order (O.50, r.7)\n7.\n(1) Subject to paragraph (2), on the application of the judgment debtor or any other\nperson interested in the subject matter of the charge, the Court may, at any time,\nwhether before or after the order is made absolute, discharge or vary the order\non such terms (if any) as to costs or otherwise as it thinks fit.\n(2) Notice of the application for the discharge or variation of the order shall be\nserved on such interested parties as the Court may direct.\n(3) Where an order is made for the discharge or variation of a charging order in\nrespect of funds in Court, a copy thereof shall be served on the Courts\nAdministrator at the Court Funds Office.\n(4) Where an order is made for the discharge or variation of a charging order in\nrespect of securities other than securities in Court, a copy thereof shall be served\non the body or person specified in rule 2(1)(b) as may be appropriate, and the\nservice thereof shall discharge, or, as the case may be, vary any stop notice in\nrespect of such securities which may be in force pursuant to the original order.\n(5) Where an order is made under this rule for the discharge or variation of a charge\nof an interest in land, the provisions of rule 4A shall apply.\n8.\nEnforcement of order charging an interest in land (O.50, r.8)\n8.\n(1) A registered charge of an interest in land may be enforced by sale or the\nappointment of a receiver only if an order absolute has been made in accordance\nwith rule 3.\n(2) A judgment creditor may exercise that judgment creditor\u2019s power of sale in\nrespect of a charge to which this rule applies by public auction in accordance\nwith Section 75 of the Registered Land Act (as amended and revised) without\napplying to the Court for an order for sale and without giving any notice in\naccordance with Section 72 of the Registered Land Act (as amended and\nrevised).\n\nORDER 50\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 276\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(3) A judgment creditor may apply to the Court for an order for sale by private\ntreaty, tender or any other means and upon such application the Court shall give\ndirections for sale in accordance with O.31, r.2.\n(4) An application for an order for sale under this rule shall be supported by an\naffidavit \u2014\n(a)\nidentifying the charging order sought to be enforced and giving full\nparticulars of the registered title of the land;\n(b) specifying the amount in respect of which the charge was imposed and the\nbalance outstanding at the date of the affidavit;\n(c)\nidentifying any persons having a prior interest registered in the\nencumbrances section in the relevant land register; and\n(d) setting out the judgment creditor's proposals as to the manner of sale.\n(5) Order 31, rule 3, shall apply to sales made pursuant to paragraph (2) or pursuant\nto an order made under paragraph (3) of this rule.\n9.\nEnforcement of order charging property other than land (O.50, r.9)\n9.\n(1) An application for an order for sale of any property other than land made subject\nto a charging order shall be made by summons and O.31 shall apply, with such\nvariations as may be necessary, as if the charged property were land.\n(2) An application for the appointment of a receiver of property other than land shall\nbe made by summons and O.30 shall apply.\n10.\nFunds in Court: stop order (O.50, r.10)\n10. (1) The Court, on the application of any person \u2014\n(a)\nwho has a charge on the interest of any person in funds in Court; or\n(b) to whom that interest has been assigned; or\n(c)\nwho is a judgment creditor of the person entitled to that interest, may make\nan order prohibiting the transfer, sale, delivery out, payment or other\ndealing with such funds, or any part thereof, or the income thereon, without\nnotice to the applicant.\n(2) An application for an order under this rule must be made by summons in the\ncause or matter relating to the funds in Court, or, if there is no cause or matter,\nby originating summons.\n(3) The summons must be served on every person whose interest may be affected\nby the order applied for and on the Courts Administrator but shall not be served\non any other person.\n(4) Without prejudice to the Court's powers and discretion as to costs, the Court\nmay order the applicant for an order under this rule to pay the costs of any party\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 50\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 277\n\nto the cause or matter relating to the funds in question, or of any person\ninterested in those funds, occasioned by the application.\n11.\nSecurities not in Court: stop notice (O.50, r.11)\n11. (1) Any person claiming to be beneficially entitled to an interest in any securities\nof the kinds set out in paragraph 2(2)(b) of the Law, other than securities in\nCourt, who wishes to be notified of any proposed transfer or payment of those\nsecurities may avail themselves of the provisions of this rule.\n(2) A person claiming to be so entitled must file in Court \u2014\n(a)\nan affidavit identifying the securities in question and describing the\nperson\u2019s interest therein by reference to the document under which it\narises; and\n(b) a notice in Form No. 34A of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as\namended and revised) (a stop notice) signed by the deponent to the\naffidavit, and annexed to it, addressed to the person, body, state, territory\nor mutual fund concerned and must serve an office copy of the affidavit,\nand a sealed copy of the notice, on the other person or body, as provided\nin rule 2(1)(b).\n(3) There must be indorsed on the affidavit filed under this rule a note stating the\naddress to which any such notice as is referred to in rule 12 is to be sent and,\nsubject to paragraph (4), that address shall for the purposes of that rule be the\naddress for service of the person on whose behalf the affidavit is filed.\n(4) A person on whose behalf an affidavit under this rule is filed may change the\nperson\u2019s address for service for the purpose of rule 12 by serving on the other\nperson or body, a notice to that effect, and, as from the date of service of such a\nnotice, the address stated therein shall for the purposes of that rule be the address\nfor service of that person.\n12.\nEffect of stop notice (O.50, r.12)\n12. Where a stop notice has been served in accordance with rule 11, then, so long as the\nstop notice is in force, the person or body on which it is served shall not register a\ntransfer of the securities or take any other steps restrained by the stop notice until 14\ndays after sending notice thereof, by post, to the person on whose behalf the stop\nnotice was filed, but shall not by reason only of that notice refuse to register a transfer,\nor to take any other step, after the expiry of that period.\n13.\nAmendment of stop notice (O.50, r.13)\n13. If any securities are incorrectly described in a stop notice which has been filed and of\nwhich a sealed copy has been served in accordance with rule 11, an amended stop\nnotice may be filed and served in accordance with the same procedure and shall take\neffect as a stop notice on the day on which the sealed copy of the amended notice is\nserved.\n\nORDER 50\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 278\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n14.\nWithdrawal etc. of stop notice (O.50, r.14)\n14. (1) The person on whose behalf a stop notice was filed may withdraw it by serving\na request for its withdrawal on the person or body on whom the notice was\nserved.\n(2) Such request must be signed by the person on whose behalf the notice was filed\nand the person\u2019s signature must be witnessed by a notary public, Justice of the\nPeace or attorney at law and O.41, rule 8(3) shall apply.\n(3) The Court, on the application of any person claiming to be beneficially entitled\nto an interest in the securities to which a stop notice relates, may by order\ndischarge the notice.\n(4) An application for an order under paragraph (3) must be made \u2014\n(a)\nby filing a consent order signed by on or behalf of the applicant and the\nperson(s) claiming to be beneficially interested in the securities; or\n(b) by an application made by originating summons in Form No.3 of the\nGrand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised).\n(5) O.42, r.5A(4) shall not apply to a consent order filed under this rule which may\nbe signed by persons not represented by an attorney provided only that such\npersons' signatures have been witnessed by a notary public, Justice of the Peace\nor attorney at law and O.41, r.8(3) shall apply.\n15.\nOrder prohibiting transfer, etc. of securities (O.50, r.15)\n15. (1) The Court, on the application of any person claiming to be beneficially entitled\nto an interest in any securities of the kinds set out in paragraph 2(2)(b) of the\nLaw, may by order prohibit the person or body concerned from registering any\ntransfer of the securities or taking any other step to which paragraph 4(4) of the\nLaw applies.\n\nThe order shall specify the securities to which the prohibition relates, the name\nin which they stand and the steps which must not be taken, and shall state\nwhether the prohibition applies to the securities only or to the dividends or\ninterest as well.\n(2) An application for an order under this rule must be made by motion.\n(3) The Court, on the application of any person claiming to be entitled to an interest\nin any securities to which an order under this rule relates, may discharge or vary\nthe order on such terms (if any) as to costs or otherwise as it thinks fit.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 50\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 279\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 13.10.06)\n\nORDER 50A\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 280\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 50A\nATTACHMENT OF EARNINGS ORDERS\n\n1.\nInterpretation (O.50A, r.1)\n1.\nIn this Order \u2014\n\"the Law\" means Schedule 2 of the Judicature Act (as amended and revised)\nand, unless the context otherwise requires, expressions used in Schedule 2 of\nthat Law have the same meaning as in that Law; and\n\"maintenance order\" means an order of a kind mentioned in paragraph 1(1)(b)\nof the Law.\n2.\nRegister of orders (O.50A, r.2)\n2.\n(1) The Clerk of the Court shall create a file containing, in chronological order, an\noffice copy of every attachment of earnings order, including consolidated\norders, made by the Court, which shall be referred to as the Register of\nAttachment of Earnings Orders.\n\n(2) The Clerk of the Court shall, on the request of any person having a judgment or\norder against a person, cause a search to be made in the Register and shall issue\na certificate of the result of the search.\n3.\nNon-resident debtors (O.50A, r.3)\n3.\nAn application for an attachment of earnings order may be made to the Court\nnotwithstanding that the judgment debtor does not reside within the Islands.\n4.\nMode of applying (O.50A, r.4)\n4.\n(1) An application by a judgment creditor for an attachment of earnings order shall\nbe in Form No. 35 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and\nrevised).\n\n(2) The application shall be supported by an affidavit \u2014\n(a)\nidentifying the judgment or order in respect of which the attachment of\nearnings order is sought;\n(b) verifying the amount due under the judgment or order; and\n(c)\nstating whether a writ of execution has been issued to enforce it.\n5.\nService and reply (O.50A, r.5)\n5.\n(1) The application, together with a form of reply as to the debtor's means in Form\nNo. 36 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised),\nshall be served on the debtor in the manner prescribed by O.65.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 50A\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 281\n\n(2) The debtor shall within 8 days after service on the debtor of the documents\nmentioned in paragraph (1), file a statement of means in the form provided, and\nthe instruction to that effect in the notice to the debtor shall constitute a\nrequirement imposed by virtue of paragraph 10(3) of the Law:\n\nProvided that no proceedings shall be taken for an offence alleged to have been\ncommitted under paragraph 14(1)(c) or (f) of the Law in relation to the\nrequirement unless the said documents have been served on the debtor\npersonally or the Court is satisfied that they came to the debtor\u2019s knowledge in\nsufficient time for the debtor to comply with the requirement.\n(3) Nothing in paragraph (2) shall require a defendant to file a statement of means\nif, within the period of time mentioned in that paragraph, the defendant pays to\nthe judgment creditor the money remaining due under the judgment or order\nand, where such payment is made, the judgment creditor shall so inform the\nClerk of the Court.\n(4) On receipt of a statement of means the Clerk of the Court shall send a copy to\nthe applicant.\n6.\nNotice to employer (O.50A, r.6)\n6.\nWithout prejudice to the powers conferred by paragraph 10(1) of the Law, the Court\nmay of its own motion, at any stage of the proceedings, send to any person appearing\nto have the debtor in the person\u2019s employment a notice in Form No. 37 of the Grand\nCourt Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) requesting the person to give\nto the Court, within such period as may be specified in the notice, a statement of the\ndebtor's earnings and anticipated earnings with such particulars as may be specified.\n7.\nAttachment of earnings order (O.50A, r.7)\n7.\n(1) On receipt of the debtor's reply, the Judge may, if the Judge has sufficient\ninformation to do so, make an attachment of earnings order in Form No. 38 of\nthe Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) and a copy of\nthe order shall be sent to the parties and the debtor's employer.\n(2) Where an order is made under paragraph (1), the judgment creditor or the debtor\nmay, within 14 days of service of the order on the judgment creditor or the\ndebtor and giving their reasons, make an application for the order to be\nreconsidered and, upon receipt of any such application (in whatever form), the\nClerk of the Court shall fix a day for the hearing of the application and give\nnotice of hearing in Form No. 39 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as\namended and revised) to the judgment creditor and the debtor.\n(3) On hearing an application under paragraph (2), the Judge may confirm the order\nor set it aside and make such new order as the Judge thinks fit and the order so\nmade shall be filed in accordance with O.42, r.5.\n\nORDER 50A\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 282\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(4) Where the Judge does not determine the application under paragraph (1), the\nJudge shall direct that a day be fixed for the hearing of the application\nwhereupon the Clerk of the Court shall fix such a day and give notice of hearing\nin Form No. 40 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and\nrevised) to the judgment creditor and the debtor.\n(5) If the creditor does not appear at the hearing of the application under paragraph\n(4), but the creditor requests the Court in writing to proceed in the creditor\u2019s\nabsence, the Court may, notwithstanding anything in O.35, r.1, proceed to hear\nthe application and to make an order thereon.\n(6) An attachment of earnings order may be made to secure the payment of a\njudgment debt if the debt is \u2014\n(a)\nnot less than $100; or\n(b) for the amount remaining payable under a judgment for a sum of not less\nthan $100.\n8.\nFailure by debtor (O.50A, r.8)\n8.\n(1) If the debtor fails to comply with rule 5(2) or to make payment to the judgment\ncreditor, the Court of its own motion shall issue a notice in Form No. 41 of the\nGrand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) calling on the\ndebtor to show good reason why the debtor should not be imprisoned or fined\nand such notice shall be served on the debtor personally not less than 5 days\nbefore the hearing.\n(2) Order 52, rule 12, shall apply where a notice is issued under paragraph (1).\n(3) On a hearing under paragraph (1), the Judge may, if the Judge has sufficient\ninformation to do so, determine the application for an attachment of earnings\norder or may direct that a day be fixed for the hearing of the application,\nwhereupon the Clerk of the Court shall fix such a day and give to the judgment\ncreditor and the debtor not less than 8 days' notice of the day so fixed.\n(4) An application by a debtor for the revocation of an order committing the debtor\nto prison and, if the debtor is already in custody, for the debtor\u2019s discharge shall\nbe made to the Judge ex parte in writing showing the reasons for the debtor's\nfailure to attend the Court or the debtor\u2019s refusal to be sworn or to give evidence,\nas the case may be, and containing an undertaking by the debtor to attend the\nCourt or to be sworn or to give evidence when next ordered or required to do\nso.\n(5) Before dealing with the application the Judge may, if the Judge thinks fit, cause\nnotice to be given to the judgment creditor that the application has been made\nand of a day and hour when the judgment creditor may attend and be heard.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 50A\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 283\n\n9.\nCosts (O.50A, r.9)\n9.\nOn the hearing of an application for an attachment of earnings order, the Court may\naward costs against the judgment debtor and such costs shall be assessed in\naccordance with Order 62.\n10.\nContents and service of order (O.50A, r.10)\n10. (1) An attachment of earnings order shall be in Form No. 38 or Form No. 45 of the\nGrand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) and shall\ncontain such of the following particulars relating to the debtor as are known to\nthe Court \u2014\n(a)\nthe debtor\u2019s full name and address;\n(b) the debtor\u2019s employer's name and address;\n(c)\nthe nature of the debtor\u2019s work; and\n(d) where the debtor has a work permit, the work permit's number,\nand those particulars shall be the prescribed particulars for the purposes of\nparagraph 3(3) of the Law.\n(2) An attachment of earnings order and any order varying or discharging such an\norder shall be served on the debtor and on the person to whom the order is\ndirected, and O.65, r.5, shall apply.\n11.\nApplication to determine whether particular payments are earnings (O.50A,\nr.11)\n11. An application to the Court under paragraph 12 of the Law to determine whether\npayments to the debtor of a particular class or description are earnings for the\npurposes of an attachment of earnings order may be made by summons supported by\nan affidavit, which shall be served on the persons mentioned in the said paragraph\n12(2)(a), (b) and (c).\n12.\nNotice of cessation (O.50A, r.12)\n12. Where an attachment of earnings order ceases to have effect under paragraph 6(2) of\nthe Law, the Clerk for the Court shall give notice of its cessation to the person to\nwhom the order was directed.\n13.\nVariation and discharge by Court of own motion (O.50A, r.13)\n13. (1) The powers conferred by paragraph 7(1) of the Law may be exercised by the\nCourt of its own motion in the circumstances mentioned in the following\nparagraphs.\n(2) Where it appears to the Court that a person served with an attachment of\nearnings order directed to the person does not have the debtor in the person\u2019s\nemployment, the Court may discharge the order.\n\nORDER 50A\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 284\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(3) Where an attachment of earnings order which has lapsed under paragraph 7(4)\nof the Law is again directed to a person who appears to the Court to have the\ndebtor in the person\u2019s employment, the Court may make such consequential\nvariations in the order as it thinks fit.\n(4) Where, after making an attachment of earnings order, the Court makes or is\nnotified of the making of another such order in respect of the same debtor, the\nCourt may discharge or vary the first mentioned order.\n(5) Where it appears to the Court that a bankruptcy order has been made against a\nperson in respect of whom an attachment of earnings order is in force to secure\nthe payment of a judgment debt, the Court may discharge the attachment of\nearnings order.\n(6) Where an attachment of earnings order has been made to secure the payment of\na judgment debt and the Court grants leave to issue execution for the recovery\nof the debt, the Court may discharge the order.\n(7) Before varying or discharging an attachment of earnings order of its own motion\nunder any of the foregoing paragraphs of this rule, the Court shall, unless it\nthinks it unnecessary in the circumstances to do so, give the debtor and the\nperson on whose behalf the order was made an opportunity of being heard on\nthe question whether the order should be varied or discharged, and for that\npurpose the Clerk of the Court may give them notice of a date and time when\nthe question will be considered.\n14.\nExercise of power to obtain statement of earnings (O.50A, r.14)\n14. (1) An order under paragraph 10(1)(b) of the Law shall be in Form No. 42 of the\nGrand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) and shall be\nindorsed with or incorporate a notice warning the person to whom it is directed\nof the consequences of disobedience to the order and shall be served on the\nperson personally.\n(2) If a person served with an order made pursuant to paragraph (1) fails to obey it,\nthe Court of its own motion shall issue a notice in Form No. 43 of the Grand\nCourt Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) calling on that person to\nshow good reason why the person should not be imprisoned or fined and such\nnotice shall be served on that person personally not less than 5 days before the\nhearing.\n(3) In this rule \"statement of earnings\" means a statement given under paragraph\n10(1)(b) of the Law, specifying \u2014\n(a)\nthe nature of the debtor's employment;\n(b) if the debtor's employment is temporary, the anticipated length of\nemployment;\n(c)\nif the debtor is paid a salary, the weekly or monthly amount;\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 50A\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 285\n\n(d) if the debtor is paid overtime, the average amount of such payments over\nthe preceding 3 months;\n(e)\nif the debtor is paid by the hour, the hourly rate(s) and the debtor\u2019s average\nearnings over the preceding 6 weeks; and\n(f)\nparticulars of any other benefits to which the debtor is entitled under the\ndebtor\u2019s contract of employment.\n15.\nOffenses (O.50A, r.15)\n15. (1) Where it is alleged that a person has committed any offence under paragraph\n14(1)(a), (b), (c), (d), (e) or (f) of the Law in relation to proceedings in, or to an\nattachment of earnings order made by the Court, the Clerk of the Court shall\nissue a summons in accordance with Section 15 of the Criminal Procedure Code\n(as amended and revised) to compel the attendance of that person before a\nSummary Court, unless the Court shall have dealt with such person pursuant to\na notice to show cause served in accordance with rule 14.\n(2) The summons shall be served on the alleged offender in accordance with\nSections 18, 18A or 19 of the Criminal Procedure Code (as amended and\nrevised), as the case may be.\n16.\nMaintenance orders (O.50A, r.16)\n16. (1) An application for an attachment of earnings order to secure payments under a\nmaintenance order may be made on the making of the maintenance order or an\norder varying the maintenance order, in which case rules 4 and 5 shall not apply.\n(2) In a case in which no attachment of earnings order was made in accordance with\nparagraph (1), an application for an attachment of earnings order to secure\npayments under a maintenance order may be made whenever the payments are\nin arrears.\n(3) An application under paragraph (2) shall be in Form No. 44 of the Grand Court\nRules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised).\n(4) Rule 13 shall have effect as if for paragraphs (4) to (6) there were substituted\nthe following paragraph \u2014\n\"(4)    Where an attachment of earnings order has been made and it appears to\nthe Court that the related maintenance order has ceased to have effect, whether\nby virtue of the terms of the maintenance order, or otherwise, the Court may\ndischarge or vary the attachment of earnings order.\"\n(5) An attachment of earnings order made under this rule shall be in Form No. 45\nof the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised).\n17.\nCases in which consolidated order may be made (O.50A, r.17)\n17. Subject to the provisions of rules 18 to 21, a Court may make a consolidated\nattachment order where \u2014\n\nORDER 50A\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 286\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(a)\ntwo or more attachment of earnings orders are in force to secure payment\nof judgment debts by the same debtor; or\n(b) on an application for an attachment of earnings order to secure the payment\nof a judgment debt, or for a consolidated attachment order to secure the\npayment of two or more judgment debts, it appears to the Court that an\nattachment of earnings order is already in force to secure the payment of a\njudgment debt by the same debtor.\n18.\nApplication for consolidated order (O.50A, r.18)\n18. (1) An application for a consolidated attachment order may be made \u2014\n(a)\nby the debtor in respect of whom the order is sought; or\n(b) by any person who has obtained or is entitled to apply for an attachment\nof earnings order to secure the payment of a judgment debt by the same\ndebtor,\nprovided that an order is first made pursuant to O.4, r.4, for all the causes or\nmatters to be consolidated.\n(2) An application under paragraph (1) may be made in the proceedings in which\nany attachment of earnings order is in force. The application shall be in Form\nNo. 46 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) and\nrules 4 and 5 of this Order shall not apply.\n(3) Where an application for a consolidated attachment order is made, the Clerk of\nthe Court shall \u2014\n(a)\nnotify any party who may be affected by the application of its terms; and\n(b) require the party to notify the Court in writing, within 14 days of service\nof notification upon the party, giving the party\u2019s reasons for any objection\nthe party may have to the granting of the application.\n(4) If notice of any objection is not given within the time stated, the Clerk of the\nCourt shall make a consolidated attachment of earnings order.\n(5) If any party objects to the making of a consolidated attachment of earnings\norder, the Judge, after considering the objection made and the reasons given,\nmay grant the application or may cause notice to be given to any party affected\nby the application of a day and hour when the party may attend and be heard.\n(6) In the foregoing paragraphs of this rule, a party affected by the application\nmeans \u2014\n(a)\nwhere the application is made by the debtor, the creditor in the proceedings\nin which the application is made and any other creditor who has obtained\nan attachment of earnings order which is in force to secure the payment of\na judgment debt by the debtor;\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 50A\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 287\n\n(b) where the application is made by the judgment creditor, the debtor, and\nevery person who, to the knowledge of the applicant, has obtained an\nattachment of earnings order which is in force to secure the payment of a\njudgment debt by the debtor.\n(7) A person to whom two or more attachment of earnings orders are directed to\nsecure the payment of judgment debts by the same debtor may make an\napplication in Form No. 46 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as\namended and revised) for the Court to make a consolidated attachment order to\nsecure the payment of those debts, and on receipt of such an application\nparagraphs (4) to (7) shall apply, with the necessary modifications, as if the\nrequest were an application by the judgment creditor.\n(8) A consolidated attachment of earnings order shall be in Form No. 47 of the\nGrand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised).\n19.\nMaking of consolidated order by Court of its own motion (O.50A, r.19)\n19. Where an application is made for an attachment of earnings order to secure the\npayment of a judgment debt by a debtor in respect of whom an attachment of earnings\norder is already in force to secure the payment of another judgment debt and no\napplication is made for a consolidated order, the Court of its own motion may make\nsuch an order after giving all persons concerned an opportunity of submitting written\nobjections and the provisions of rule 18 shall apply with the necessary modifications.\n20.\nExtension of consolidated order (O.50A, r.20)\n20. Where a consolidated attachment order is in force to secure payment of one or more\njudgment debts, any creditor to whom another judgment debt is owed by the same\njudgment debtor may apply to the Court in Form No. 46 of the Grand Court Rules -\nVol II - Forms (as amended and revised) for the order to be extended so as to secure\nthe payment of that debt as well as the first mentioned debts and, if the application is\ngranted, the Court may either vary the order accordingly or may discharge it and make\na new consolidated attachment order to secure payment of all the aforesaid judgment\ndebts.\n21.\nPayments under consolidated order (O.50A, r.21)\n21. Where payments are made in compliance with a consolidated attachment order, the\nsums paid shall be treated as if they had been paid by the debtor to satisfy the relevant\nadjudications in proportion to the amounts payable thereunder, and for that purpose\ndividends may from time to time be declared and distributed among the creditors\nentitled thereto.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 04.06.01)\n\nORDER 51\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 288\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 51\nRECEIVERS: EQUITABLE EXECUTION\n\n1.\nAppointment of receiver by way of equitable execution (O.51, r.1)\n1.\nWhere an application is made for the appointment of a receiver by way of equitable\nexecution, the Court in determining whether it is just or convenient that the\nappointment should be made shall have regard to the amount claimed by the judgment\ncreditor, to the amount likely to be obtained by the receiver and to the probable costs\nof the receiver\u2019s appointment and may direct an inquiry on any of these matters or\nany other matter before making the appointment.\n2.\nNo rule (O.51, r.2)\n2.\nNo rule (O.51, r.2)\n3.\nApplication of rules as to appointment of receiver, etc. (O.51, r.3)\n3.\nAn application for the appointment of a receiver by way of equitable execution may\nbe made in accordance with O.30, r.1 and rr.2 to 6 of that Order shall apply in relation\nto a receiver appointed by way of equitable execution as they apply in relation to a\nreceiver appointed for any other purpose.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 52\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 289\n\nORDER 52\nCOMMITTAL\n\nI. GENERAL PROVISIONS\n1.\nCommittal for contempt of Court (O.52, r.1)\n1.\nThe power of the Court to punish for contempt of Court may be exercised by an order\nof committal.\n2.\nNo rule (O.52, r.2)\n2.\nNo rule (O.52, r.2)\n3.\nNo rule (O.52, r.3)\n3.\nNo rule (O.52, r.3)\n4.\nApplication for committal (O.52, r.4)\n4.\n(1) An application to the Court for an order of committal must be made by notice\nof motion in Form No. 48 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended\nand revised) and be supported by an affidavit.\n(2) Subject to paragraph (3), the notice of motion stating the grounds of the\napplication and accompanied by a copy of the affidavit in support of the\napplication, must be served personally on the person sought to be committed.\n(3) Without prejudice to its power under Order 65, rule 4, the Court may dispense\nwith the service of the notice of motion under this rule if it thinks it just so to\ndo.\n5.\nCommittal by the Court of its own motion (O.52, r.5)\n5.\nNothing in the foregoing provisions of this Order shall be taken as affecting the power\nof the Court to make an order of committal of its own motion against a person guilty\nof contempt of court.\n6.\nProvisions as to hearing (O.52, r.6)\n6.\n(1) Subject to paragraph (2), the Court hearing an application for an order of\ncommittal may sit in private in the following cases, that is to say \u2014\n (a) where the application arises out of proceedings relating to the wardship or\nadoption of an infant or wholly or mainly to the guardianship, custody,\nmaintenance or upbringing of a child, or rights of access to a child;\n(b) where the application arises out of proceedings relating to a person who is\nor appears to be mentally impaired within the meaning of Section 2 of the\nMental Health Act (as amended and revised);\n\nORDER 52\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 290\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(c)\nwhere the application arises out of proceedings in which a secret process,\ndiscovery or invention was in issue; or\n(d) where it appears to the Court that in the interests of the administration of\njustice or for reasons of national security the application should be heard\nin private, but, except as aforesaid, the application shall be heard in open\nCourt.\n(2) If the Court hearing an application in private by virtue of paragraph (1) decides\nto make an order of committal against the person sought to be committed, it\nshall in open Court state \u2014\n(a)\nthe name of that person;\n(b) in general terms the nature of the contempt of Court in respect of which\nthe order of committal is being made; and\n(c)\nthe length of the period for which the person is being committed.\n(3) Except with the leave of the Court hearing an application for an order of\ncommittal, no grounds shall be relied upon at the hearing except the grounds set\nout in the notice of motion under rule 4.\n\nThe foregoing provision is without prejudice to the powers of the Court under\nO.20, r.8.\n(4) If on the hearing of the application the person sought to be committed expresses\na wish to give oral evidence on the person\u2019s own behalf, the person shall be\nentitled to do so.\n7.\nPower to suspend execution of committal order (O.52, r.7)\n7.\n(1) The Court by whom an order of committal is made may by order direct that the\nexecution of the order of committal shall be suspended for such period or on\nsuch terms or conditions as it may specify.\n(2) Where execution of an order of committal is suspended by an order under\nparagraph (1), the applicant for the order of committal must, unless the Court\notherwise directs, serve on the person against whom it was made a notice\ninforming the person of the making and terms of the order under that paragraph.\n8.\nDischarge of person committed (O.52, r.8)\n8.\n(1) The Court may, on the application of any person committed to prison for any\ncontempt of court, discharge that person.\n(2) Where a person has been committed for failing to comply with a judgment or\norder requiring the person to deliver anything to some other person or to deposit\nit in Court or elsewhere, and a writ of sequestration has also been issued to\nenforce that judgment or order, then, if the thing is in the custody or power of\nthe person committed, the commissioners appointed by the writ of sequestration\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 52\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 291\n\nmay take possession of it as if it were the property of that person and, without\nprejudice to the generality of paragraph (1), the Court may discharge the person\ncommitted and may give such directions for dealing with the thing taken by the\ncommissioners as it thinks fit.\n9.\nSaving for other powers (O.52, r.9)\n9.\nNothing in the foregoing provisions of this Order shall be taken as affecting the power\nof Court to make an order requiring a person guilty of contempt of court, or a person\npunishable by virtue of any enactment in like manner as if the person had been guilty\nof contempt of the Court, to pay a fine or to give security for the person\u2019s good\nbehaviour, and those provisions, so far as applicable, and with the necessary\nmodifications, shall apply in relation to an application for such an order as they apply\nin relation to an application for an order of committal.\n10.\nWarrant of committal (O.52, r.10)\n10. If an order is made for the committal of a person to prison with immediate effect, the\nCourt shall issue a warrant of committal in Form No. 49 of the Grand Court Rules -\nVol II - Forms (as amended and revised).\n\nII. IMPRISONMENT FOR NON-PAYMENT OF JUDGMENT DEBTS\n11.\nNo Rule (O.52, r.11)\n11. No Rule (O.52, r.11)\n12.\nApplication for committal (O.52, r.12)\n12. (1) An application to commit a debtor to a term of imprisonment shall be made by\nmotion in Form No. 50 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended\nand revised).\n(2) Notice of a motion under this rule must be served on the debtor personally and\nO.65, rr.4 and 5 shall not apply.\n(3) A notice of motion under this rule must be accompanied by a statement of means\nform in Form No. 36 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended\nand revised) which shall be completed and returned to the Court office within 8\ndays from the date of service.\n(4) A notice of motion under this rule must be supported by an affidavit verifying\nthe amount owing by the debtor and explaining why the applicant believes the\nconditions specified in Section 30(1) of the Judicature Act (as amended and\nrevised) to be satisfied.\n(5) If a suspended order has been made pursuant to rule 15(1)(b) and the debtor has\nfailed to comply with the conditions of the order, an application for the issue of\n\nORDER 52\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 292\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\na warrant of committal may be made ex parte by motion, supported by an\naffidavit verifying non-compliance with the conditions of the order.\n13.\nAttendance of debtor (O.52, r.13)\n13. (1) The debtor shall attend before the Court at the time and date specified in the\nnotice of motion.\n(2) A debtor who has failed to complete and return a statement of means in\naccordance with rule 12(3) may do so at the hearing of the notice of motion.\n(3) The debtor may give oral evidence to explain why the debtor is in default of\npayment of any sum due and the applicant may cross-examine the debtor upon\nthe debtor\u2019s statement of means.\n(4) The Court may issue a warrant for the arrest of a debtor who, having been served\nwith a notice of motion in accordance with rule 12, fails to attend before the\nCourt at the time and on the date specified.\n14.\nPayment of the judgment debt (O.52, r.14)\n14. (1) The provisions of rule 13 shall not apply in the case of any debtor who satisfies\nthe judgment debt in full by paying the amount due into Court and complying\nwith the requirements of O.22, r.1, prior to the date specified in the notice or\nmotion for the debtor\u2019s attendance before the Court and the application for the\ndebtor\u2019s committal shall be dismissed.\n (2) No order for costs shall be made against a debtor who satisfies the judgment\ndebt in full in accordance with paragraph (1).\n15.\nOrder for committal (O.52, r.15)\n15. (1) If the Court is satisfied as to the matters specified in Section 30(1) of the\nJudicature Act (as amended and revised), it may \u2014\n(a)\nsentence the debtor to a fixed term of imprisonment with immediate effect;\n(b) sentence the debtor to a fixed term of imprisonment, suspended on terms\nthat the debtor pays the debt or any instalment thereof within a fixed period\nnot exceeding 28 days;\n(c)\nmake an attachment of earnings order in accordance with O.50A; or\n(d) make no order.\n(2) An order made under paragraph 1(a) shall be in Form No. 51 of the Grand Court\nRules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) and an order made under\nparagraph 1(b) shall be in Form No. 51A of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II -\nForms (as amended and revised).\n(3) If an order is made under paragraph (1)(a) the Court shall issue a warrant of\ncommittal in Form No. 49 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as\namended and revised).\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 52\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 293\n\n(4) In every case where an order is made under this rule, the Court shall award costs\nto the judgment creditor which shall be assessed by the Judge in accordance\nwith O. 62, r.3.\n16.\nDischarge of debtor (O.52, r.16)\n16. A debtor who has been sentenced to a term of imprisonment in accordance with rule\n15(1)(a) and satisfies the judgment debt by paying the full amount into Court in\naccordance with rule 14(1) prior to the expiry of the term of imprisonment shall be\ndischarged forthwith and the Court shall issue a warrant of discharge in Form No. 52\nof the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised).\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nORDER 53\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 294\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 53\nAPPLICATIONS FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW\n\n1.\nCases appropriate for application for judicial review (O.53, r.1)\n1.\n(1) An application for \u2014\n(a)\nan order of mandamus, prohibition or certiorari; or\n(b) an injunction restraining a person from acting in any substantive office of\na public nature and permanent character which is held under the Crown or\nwhich has been created by any statutory provision, regulation or directive,\nshall be made by way of an application for judicial review in accordance with\nthe provisions of this Order.\n(2) An application for a declaration or an injunction (not being an injunction\nmentioned in subparagraph (1)(b)) may be made by way of an application for\njudicial review, and on such an application the Court may grant the declaration\nor injunction claimed if it considers that, having regard to \u2014\n(a)\nthe nature of the matters in respect of which relief may be granted by way\nof an order of mandamus, prohibition or certiorari;\n(b) the nature of the persons and bodies against whom relief may be granted\nby way of such an order; and\n(c)\nall the circumstances of the case,\nit would be just and convenient for the declaration or injunction to be granted\non an application for judicial review.\n2.\nJoinder of claims for relief (O.53, r.2)\n2.\nOn an application for judicial review any relief mentioned in rule 1(1) or (2) may be\nclaimed as an alternative or in addition to any other relief so mentioned if it arises out\nof or relates to or is connected with the same matter.\n3.\nGrant of leave to apply for judicial review (O.53, r.3)\n3.\n(1) No application for judicial review shall be made unless the leave of the Court\nhas been obtained in accordance with this rule.\n(2) An application for leave must be made ex parte to a Judge by filing \u2014\n(a)\na notice in Form No. 53 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as\namended and revised) containing a statement of \u2014\n(i)\nthe name and description of the applicant;\n(ii) the relief sought and the grounds upon which it is sought;\n(iii) the name and address of the applicant's attorney (if any); and\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 53\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 295\n\n(iv) the applicant's address for service; and\n(b) an affidavit which verifies the facts relied on.\n(3) The Judge may determine the application without a hearing, unless a hearing is\nrequested in the notice of application, and need not sit in open Court; in any\ncase, the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of the Judge's order on the\napplicant.\n(4) Where the application for leave is refused by the Judge, or is granted on terms,\nthe applicant may renew it by applying to a single Judge sitting in open Court:\n\nProvided that no application for leave may be renewed in any non-criminal\ncause or matter in which the Judge has refused leave under paragraph (3) after\na hearing.\n(5) In order to renew the applicant\u2019s application for leave the applicant must within\n10 days of being served with notice of the Judge's refusal, file notice of the\napplicant\u2019s intention in Form No. 54 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms\n(as amended and revised).\n(6) Without prejudice to its powers under O.20, r.8, the Court hearing an application\nfor leave may allow the applicant's statement to be amended, whether by\nspecifying different or additional grounds of relief or otherwise, on such terms,\nif any, as it thinks fit.\n(7) The Court shall not grant leave unless it considers that the applicant has a\nsufficient interest in the matter to which the application relates.\n(8) Where leave is sought to apply for an order of certiorari to remove for the\npurpose of its being quashed any judgment, order, conviction or other\nproceeding which is subject to appeal and a time is limited for the bringing of\nthe appeal, the Court may adjourn the application for leave until the appeal is\ndetermined or the time for appealing has expired.\n(9) If the Court grants leave, it may impose such terms as to costs and as to giving\nsecurity as it thinks fit.\n(10) Where leave to apply for judicial review is granted, then \u2014\n(a)\nif the relief sought is an order of prohibition or certiorari and the Court so\ndirects, the grant shall operate as a stay of the proceedings to which the\napplication relates until the determination of the application or until the\nCourt otherwise orders;\n(b) if any other relief is sought, the Court may at any time grant in the\nproceedings such interim relief as could be granted in an action begun by\nwrit.\n\nORDER 53\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 296\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n4.\nDelay in applying for relief (O.53, r.4)\n4.\n(1) An application for leave to apply for judicial review shall be made promptly and\nin any event within 3 months from the date when grounds for the application\n\nfirst arose unless the Court considers that there is good reason for extending the\nperiod within which the application shall be made.\n(2) Where the relief sought is an order of certiorari in respect of any judgment,\norder, conviction or other proceeding, the date when grounds for the application\nfirst arose shall be taken to be the date of that judgment, order, conviction or\nproceeding.\n(3) The preceding paragraphs are without prejudice to any statutory provision\nwhich has the effect of limiting the time within which an application for judicial\nreview may be made.\n5.\nMode of applying for judicial review (O.53, r.5)\n5.\n(1) In any cause or matter, where leave has been granted to make an application for\njudicial review, the application shall be made by originating motion to a Judge\nsitting in open Court, unless the Court directs that it shall be made to a Judge in\nChambers. Any such direction shall be without prejudice to the Judge's powers\nunder O.32, r.13.\n(2) Within 7 days of being granted leave, the applicant shall serve copies of \u2014\n(a)\nthe notice of motion;\n(b) the supporting affidavits;\n(c)\nthe order for leave; and\n(d) the Form No. 53 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended\nand revised) application\nupon the defendant and all other persons directly affected.\n(3) Where the application relates to any proceedings in or before a Court and the\nobject of the application is either to compel the Court or an officer of the Court\nto do any act in relation to the proceedings or to quash them or any order made\ntherein, the documents specified in paragraph (2) must also be served on the\nClerk or Registrar of the Court and, where any objection to the conduct of a\nJustice of the Peace or Magistrate is made, on such Justice of the Peace or\nMagistrate.\n(4) Unless the defendant and all other persons served agree, the first hearing of the\nnotice of motion shall be treated as a directions hearing.\n(5) Unless the Court granting leave has otherwise directed, there must be at least 14\ndays between the service of the notice of motion and the first hearing.\n(6) An affidavit giving the names and addresses of, and the places and dates of\nservice on, all persons who have been served with the notice of motion must be\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 53\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 297\n\nfiled before the motion is listed for hearing and, if any person who ought to be\nserved under this rule has not been served, the affidavit must state that fact and\nthe reason for it.\n(7) If on the hearing of the motion the Court is of opinion that any person who\nought, whether under this rule or otherwise, to have been served has not been\nserved, the Court may adjourn the hearing on such terms (if any) as it may direct\nin order that the notice may be served on that person.\n6.\nStatements and affidavits (O.53, r.6)\n6.\n(1) Copies of the statement in support of an application for leave under rule 3 must\nbe served with the notice of motion and, subject to paragraph (2), no grounds\nshall be relied upon or any relief sought at the hearing except the grounds and\nrelief set out in the statement.\n(2) The Court may on the hearing of the motion allow the applicant to amend the\napplicant\u2019s statement, whether by specifying different or additional grounds of\nrelief or otherwise, on such terms, if any, as it thinks fit and may allow further\naffidavits to be used if they deal with new matters arising out of an affidavit of\nany other party to the application.\n(3) Where the applicant intends to ask to be allowed to amend the applicant\u2018s\nstatement or to use further affidavits, the applicant shall give notice of the\napplicant\u2019s intention and of any proposed amendment to every other party and\nthe affidavit shall be before the Court on the hearing of the motion.\n(4) Any respondent who intends to use an affidavit at the hearing shall file it as soon\nas practicable and in any event, unless the Court otherwise directs, within 56\ndays after service upon the respondent of the documents required to be served\nby paragraph (1).\n(5) Each party to the application must supply to every other party on demand and\non payment of the proper charges copies of every affidavit which the party\nproposes to use at the hearing, including, in the case of the applicant, the\naffidavit in support of the application for leave under rule 3.\n7.\nClaim for damages (O.53, r.7)\n7.\n(1) On an application for judicial review the Court may, subject to paragraph (2),\naward damages to the applicant if \u2014\n(a)\nthe applicant has included in the statement in support of the applicant\u2018s\napplication for leave under rule 2 a claim for damages arising from any\nmatter to which the application relates; and\n(b) the Court is satisfied that, if the claim had been made in an action begun\nby the applicant at the time of making the applicant\u2019s application, the\napplicant could have been awarded damages.\n\nORDER 53\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 298\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(2) Order 18, rule 12, shall apply to a statement relating to a claim for damages as\nit applies to a pleading.\n\n8.\nInterlocutory applications (O.53, r.8)\n8.\n(1) Unless the Court otherwise directs, any interlocutory applications shall be made\nat the first hearing of the notice of motion.\n(2) In this rule \"interlocutory applications\" includes an application under O.24,\nO.26, O.38, r.2(3) or for an order granting relief or dismissing the proceedings\nby consent of the parties.\n9.\nHearing of application for judicial review (O.53, r.9)\n9.\n(1) On the hearing of any motion under rule 5, any person who desires to be heard\nin opposition to the motion, and appears to the Court to be a proper person to be\nheard, shall be heard, notwithstanding that the person has not been served with\nnotice of the motion.\n(2) Where the relief sought is or includes an order of certiorari to remove any\nproceedings for the purpose of quashing them, the applicant may not question\nthe validity of any order, warrant, commitment, conviction, inquisition or record\nunless before the hearing of the motion the applicant has filed a copy thereof\nverified by affidavit or accounts for the applicant\u2019s failure to do so to the\nsatisfaction of the Court hearing the motion.\n(3) Where an order for certiorari is made in any such case as is referred to in\nparagraph (2) the order shall, subject to paragraph (4), direct that the\nproceedings shall be quashed forthwith on their removal into the Court.\n(4) Where the relief sought is an order of certiorari and the Court is satisfied that\nthere are grounds for quashing the decision to which the application relates, the\nCourt may, in addition to quashing it, remit the matter to the Court, tribunal or\nauthority concerned with a direction to reconsider it and reach a decision in\naccordance with the findings of the Court.\n (5) Where the relief sought is a declaration, an injunction or damages and the Court\nconsiders that it should not be granted on an application for judicial review but\nmight have been granted if it had been sought in an action begun by writ by the\napplicant at the time of making the applicant\u2019s application, the Court may,\ninstead of refusing the application, order the proceedings to continue as if they\nhad been begun by writ.\n10.\nSaving for person acting in obedience to mandamus (O.53, r.10)\n10. No action or proceeding shall be begun or prosecuted against any person in respect\nof anything done in obedience to an order of mandamus.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 53\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 299\n\n11.\nNo rule (O.53, r.11)\n11. No rule (O.53, r.11)\n12.\nConsolidation of applications (O.53, r.12)\n12. Where there is more than one application pending against several persons in respect\nof the same offence, and on the same grounds, the Court may order the applications\nto be consolidated.\n13.\nAppeal from Court's order (O.53, r.13)\n13. No appeal shall lie from an order made under paragraph (3) of rule 3 on an\napplication for leave which may be renewed under paragraph (4) of that rule.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 01.03.99)\n\nORDER 54\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 300\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 54\nAPPLICATIONS FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS\n\n1.\n Application for writ of habeas corpus ad subjiciendum (O.54, r.1)\n1.\n(1) An application for a writ of habeas corpus ad subjiciendum shall be made to the\nCourt, except that an application on behalf of a minor must be made in the first\ninstance to a Judge in Chambers.\n(2) An application for such writ may be made ex parte and, subject to paragraph\n(3), must be supported by an affidavit by the person restrained showing that it\nis made at the person\u2019s  instance and setting out the nature of the restraint.\n(3) When the person restrained is unable for any reason to make the affidavit\nrequired by paragraph (2) the affidavit may be made by some other person on\nthe person\u2019s behalf and that affidavit must state that the person restrained is\nunable to make the affidavit themselves and for what reason.\n2.\nPower of Court to whom ex parte application is made (O.54, r.2)\n2.\n(1) The Court or Judge to whom an application under rule 1 is made ex parte may\nmake an order forthwith for the writ to issue, or may \u2014\n(a)\nwhere the application is made to a Judge in Chambers, direct that an\noriginating summons for the writ be issued, or that an application therefor\nbe made by originating motion to the Court;\n(b) where the application is made to the Court, adjourn the application so that\nnotice thereof may be given or direct that an application be made by\noriginating motion.\n (2) The summons or notice of motion must be served on the person against whom\nthe issue of the writ is sought and on such other persons as the Judge may direct,\nand, unless the Judge otherwise directs, there must be at least 8 clear days\nbetween the service of the summons or notice and the date named therein for\nthe hearing of the application.\n3.\nCopies of affidavits to be supplied (O.54, r.3)\n3.\nEvery party to an application under rule 1, must supply to every other party on\ndemand and on payment of the proper charges copies of the affidavits which the party\nproposes to use at the hearing of the application.\n4.\nPower to order release of person restrained (O.54, r.4)\n4.\nWithout prejudice to rule 2(1) the Court or Judge hearing an application for a writ of\nhabeas corpus ad subjiciendum may in its or the Judge\u2019s discretion order that the\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 54\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 301\n\nperson restrained be released, and such order shall be sufficient warrant to any prison\nofficer, constable or other person for the release of the person under restraint.\n5.\nDirections as to return to writ (O.54, r.5)\n5.\nWhere a writ of habeas corpus ad subjiciendum is ordered to issue the Judge by whom\nthe order is made shall give directions as to the Judge before whom, and the date on\nwhich the writ is returnable.\n6.\nService of writ and notice (O.54, r.6)\n6.\n(1) Subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), a writ of habeas corpus ad subjiciendum must\nbe served personally on the person to whom it is directed.\n(2) If it is not possible to serve such a writ personally, or if it is directed to a prison\nofficer or constable, it must be served by leaving it with a servant or agent of\nthe person to whom the writ is directed at the place where the person restrained\nis confined or restrained.\n(3) If the writ is directed to more than one person, the writ must be served in the\nmanner provided by this rule on the person first named in the writ, and copies\nmust be served on each of the other persons in the same manner as the writ.\n(4) There must be served with the writ a notice stating the Judge before whom and\nthe date on which the person restrained is to be brought and that in default of\nobedience proceedings for committal of the party disobeying will be taken.\n7.\nReturn to the writ (O.54, r.7)\n7.\n(1) The return to a writ of habeas corpus ad subjiciendum must be indorsed on or\nannexed to the writ and must state all the causes of the detainer of the person\nrestrained.\n (2) The return may be amended or another return substituted therefor, by leave of\nthe Judge before whom the writ is returnable.\n8.\nProcedure at hearing of writ (O.54, r.8)\n8.\nWhen a return to a writ of habeas corpus ad subjiciendum is made, the return shall\nfirst be read, and motion then made for discharging or remanding the person\nrestrained or amending or quashing the return, and where that person is brought up in\naccordance with the writ, the person\u2019s attorney shall be heard first, then the attorney\nfor the Crown and then the attorney for the person restrained in reply.\n9.\nBringing up prisoner to give evidence, etc. (O.54, r.9)\n9.\n(1) An application for a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum or habeas corpus\nad respondendum must be made on affidavit to a Judge in Chambers.\n(2) An application for an order to bring up a prisoner, otherwise than by writ of\nhabeas corpus, to give evidence in any civil cause or matter before any Court,\n\nORDER 54\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 302\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\ntribunal or justice, must be made on affidavit to a Judge in Chambers.\n10.\nForm of writ (O.54, r.10)\n10. A writ of habeas corpus ad subjiciendum must be in Form No. 55 of Grand Court\nRules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised).\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 55\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 303\n\nORDER 55\nAPPEALS TO GRAND COURT FROM THE CABINET, REGISTRAR\nOF LANDS, TRIBUNAL OR OTHER PERSON: GENERAL\n\n1.\nApplication (O.55, r.1)\n1.\n(1) Subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), this Order shall apply to every appeal which\nby or under any enactment lies to the Court from the Cabinet, the Registrar of\nLands, any tribunal or person.\n\n (2) This Order shall not apply \u2014\n(a)\nto any appeal to which O.73 applies;\n(b) to any appeal under the Criminal Procedure Code (as amended and\nrevised);\n(c)\nto any appeal under the Summary Jurisdiction Act (as amended and\nrevised);\n(d) to an appeal by case stated.\n(3) The following rules of this Order shall, in relation to an appeal to which this\nOrder applies, have effect subject to any provision made in relation to that\nappeal by any other provision of these Rules or by or under any enactment.\n(4) In this Order references to a tribunal shall be construed as references to any\ntribunal, board or authority constituted by or under any enactment other than\nany of the ordinary courts of law.\n2.\nCourt to hear appeal (O.55, r.2)\n2.\nExcept where it is otherwise provided by these Rules or by any enactment an appeal\nto which this order applies shall be heard and determined by a single Judge.\n3.\nBringing of appeal (O.55, r.3)\n3.\n(1) An appeal to which this Order applies shall be by way of rehearing and must be\nbrought by originating motion.\n(2) Every notice of the motion by which such an appeal is brought must state the\ngrounds of the appeal and, if the appeal is against part only of any order,\ndetermination, award or other decision, must state whether the appeal is against\nthe whole or part of that order, determination, award or other decision and, if\nagainst a part only, must specify the part.\n(3) The bringing of such an appeal shall not operate as a stay of proceedings on the\norder, determination, award or other decision against which the appeal is\n\nORDER 55\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 304\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nbrought unless the Court by which the appeal is to be heard or the Cabinet, the\nRegistrar of Lands, tribunal, arbitrator or person by which or by whom the\ndecision was given so orders.\n4.\nService of notice of motion and entry of appeal (O.55, r.4)\n4.\n(1) The persons to be served with notice of the motion by which an appeal against\nan order, determination, award or other decision of the Cabinet, the Registrar of\nLands, any tribunal or person is brought, are the Cabinet Secretary, the Registrar\nof Lands, the chairperson of the tribunal or person, as the case may be, and every\nparty to the proceedings in which the decision was given who is directly affected\nby the appeal.\n(2) In the absence of any other statutory time limit, the notice must be served, and\nthe appeal entered, within 28 days after the date of the order, determination,\naward or other decision against which the appeal is brought.\n(3) The period specified in paragraph (2) shall be calculated from the date on which\nnotice of the order, decision, determination or award was given to the appellant\nby the person or persons who made it or by a person authorised in that behalf to\ndo so.\n5.\nDate of hearing of appeal (O.55, r.5)\n5.\nUnless the Court otherwise directs, an appeal to which this Order applies shall not be\nheard sooner than 21 days after service of notice of the motion by which the appeal\nis brought.\n6.\nAmendment of grounds of appeal, etc. (O.55, r.6)\n6.\n(1) The notice of the motion by which an appeal to which this Order applies is\nbrought may be amended by the appellant, without leave, by supplementary\nnotice filed and served not less than 7 days before the day appointed for the\nhearing of the appeal, on each of the persons on whom the notice to be amended\nwas served.\n(2) Except with the leave of the Court no grounds other than those stated in the\nnotice of the motion by which the appeal is brought or any supplementary notice\nunder paragraph (1) may be relied upon by the appellant at the hearing; but the\nCourt may amend the grounds so stated or make any other order, on such terms\nas it thinks just, to ensure the determination of the merits of the real question in\ncontroversy between the parties.\n(3) The foregoing provisions of this rule are without prejudice to the powers of the\nCourt under O.20.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 55\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 305\n\n7.\nPowers of Court hearing appeal (O.55, r.7)\n7.\n(1) In addition to the power conferred by rule 6(2), the Court when hearing an\nappeal to which this Order applies shall have the powers conferred by the\nfollowing provisions of this rule.\n(2) The Court shall have power to receive further evidence on questions of fact, and\nthe evidence may be given in such manner as the Court may direct either by oral\nexamination in Court, by affidavit, by deposition taken before an examiner or\nin some other manner.\n(3) The Court shall have power to draw any inferences of fact which might have\nbeen drawn in the proceedings out of which the appeal arose.\n(4) It shall be the duty of the appellant to apply to the person presiding at the\nproceedings in which the decision appealed against was given for a signed copy\nof any note made by that presiding person of the proceedings and to furnish that\ncopy for the use of the Court; and in default of production of such note, or, if\nsuch note is incomplete, in addition to such note, the Court may hear and\ndetermine the appeal on any other evidence or statement of what occurred in\nthose proceedings as appears to the Court to be sufficient.\n\nExcept where the Court otherwise directs, an affidavit or note by a person\npresent at the proceedings shall not be used in evidence under this paragraph\nunless it was previously submitted to the person presiding at the proceedings for\nthe person\u2019s comments.\n(5) The Court may give any judgment or decision or make any order which ought\nto have been given or made by the Cabinet, the Registrar of Lands, tribunal or\nother person and make such further or other order as the case may require or\nmay remit the matter with the opinion of the Court for rehearing and\ndetermination by it or that person.\n(6) The Court may, in special circumstances, order that such security shall be given\nfor the costs of the appeal as may be just.\n(7) The Court shall not be bound to allow the appeal on the ground merely of\nmisdirection, or of the improper admission or rejection of evidence, unless in\nthe opinion of the Court substantial wrong or miscarriage has been thereby\noccasioned.\n8.\nRight of the Cabinet to appear and be heard (O.55, r.8)\n8.\nWhere an appeal to which this Order applies is against an order, determination or\nother decision of the Cabinet, the Registrar of Lands or other person, that person shall\nbe entitled to appear and be heard in the proceedings on the appeal.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nORDER 56\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 306\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 56\nAPPEALS TO COURT BY CASE STATED: GENERAL\n\n1.\nNo rule (O.56, r.1)\n1.\nNo rule (O.56, r.1)\n2.\nNo rule (O.56, r.2)\n2.\nNo rule (O.56, r.2)\n3.\nNo rule (O.56, r.3)\n3.\nNo rule (O.56, r.3)\n4.\nNo rule (O.56, r.4)\n4.\nNo rule (O.56, r.4)\n5.\nNo rule (O.56, r.5)\n5.\nNo rule (O.56, r.5)\n6.\nNo rule (O.56, r.1)\n6.\nNo rule (O.56, r.1)\n7.\nCase stated by the Cabinet, the Registrar of Lands, tribunal or other person\n(O.56, r.7)\n7.\n(1) The jurisdiction of the Court under any enactment to hear and determine a case\nstated by the Cabinet, the Registrar of Lands, tribunal or other person, or\nquestion of law referred to the Court by the Cabinet, the Registrar of Lands,\ntribunal or other person by way of case stated, shall be exercised by a single\nJudge, except where it is otherwise provided by these Rules or by or under any\nenactment.\n(2) The following rules of this Order shall apply to proceedings for the\ndetermination of such a case, question or application and, in relation to any such\nproceedings, shall have effect subject to any provision made in relation to those\nproceedings by any other provision of these Rules or by or under any enactment.\n(3) In this Order references to a tribunal shall be construed as references to any\ntribunal, board or authority constituted by or under any enactment other than\nany of the ordinary Courts of law.\n(4) In the following rules and in this rule \"case\" includes a special case.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 56\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 307\n\n8.\nApplication for order to state a case (O.56, r.8)\n8.\n(1) An application to the Court for an order directing the Cabinet, the Registrar of\nLands, tribunal or other person to state a case for determination by the Court or\nto refer a question of law to the Court by way of case stated must be made by\noriginating motion; and the persons to be served with notice thereof are the\nCabinet Secretary, the Registrar of Lands, secretary of the tribunal or other\nperson, as the case may be, and every party (other than the applicant) to the\nproceedings to which the application relates.\n(2) The notice of motion must state the grounds of the application, the question of\nlaw on which it is sought to have the case stated and any reasons given by the\nCabinet, the Registrar of Lands, tribunal or other person for that person\u2019s or its\nrefusal to state a case.\n(3) The motion must be entered for hearing, and the notice thereof served, within\n14 days after receipt by the applicant of notice of the refusal of the applicant\u2019s\nrequest to state a case.\n9.\nSigning and service of case (O.56, r.9)\n9.\n(1) A case stated by the Cabinet, must be signed by the Cabinet Secretary.\n(2) A case stated by a tribunal must be signed by the chairperson or president of the\ntribunal, and a case stated by the Registrar of Lands or any other person must\nbe signed by that person or by a person authorised in that behalf to do so.\n(3) The case must be served on the party at whose request, or as a result of whose\napplication to the Court, the case was stated; and if the Cabinet, the Registrar of\nLands, tribunal, arbitrator or other person is entitled by virtue of any enactment\nto state a case, or to refer a question of law by way of case stated, for\ndetermination by the Court without request being made by any party to the\nproceedings before that person, the case must be served on such party to those\nproceedings as the Cabinet, the Registrar of Lands, secretary of the tribunal,\narbitrator or other person, as the case may be, thinks appropriate.\n(4) When a case is served on any party under paragraph (3) notice must be given to\nevery other party to the proceedings in question that the case has been served on\nthe party named, and on the date specified, in the notice.\n10.\nProceedings for determination of case (O.56, r.10)\n10. (1) Proceedings for the determination by the Court of a case stated, or a question of\nlaw referred by way of case stated, by the Cabinet, the Registrar of Lands,\ntribunal, arbitrator, or other person must be begun by originating motion by the\nperson on whom the case was served in accordance with rule 9(3) or, when the\ncase is stated without a request being made, by the Cabinet, the Registrar of\nLands, secretary of the tribunal, arbitrator or other person by whom the case is\nstated.\n\nORDER 56\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 308\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(2) The applicant shall serve notice of a motion under paragraph (1) together with\na copy of the case on \u2014\n(a)\nthe Cabinet Secretary, the Registrar of Lands, secretary of the tribunal,\narbitrator or other person by whom the case was stated, unless the Cabinet,\nthe Registrar of Lands, tribunal, arbitrator or other person is the applicant;\nand\n(b) every party (other than the applicant) to the proceedings in which the\nquestion of law to which the case relates arose; and\n(c)\nany other person (other than the applicant) served with the case under rule\n9(3).\n(3) The notice of such motion must set out the applicant's contentions on the\nquestion of law to which the case stated relates.\n(4) The motion must be entered for hearing and the notice thereof served, within 14\ndays after the case stated was served on the applicant.\n(5) If the applicant fails to enter the motion within the period specified in paragraph\n(4) then, after obtaining a copy of the case from the Cabinet, the Registrar of\nLands, tribunal, arbitrator or other person by whom the case was stated, any\nother party to the proceedings in which the question of law to which the case\nrelates arose may, within 14 days after the expiration of the period so specified,\nbegin proceedings for the determination of the case, and paragraphs (1) to (4)\nshall have effect accordingly with the necessary modifications.\nThe references in this paragraph to the period specified in paragraph (4) shall be\nconstrued as including references to that period as extended by any order of the\nCourt.\n(6) Unless the Court otherwise directs, the motion shall not be heard sooner than 7\ndays after service of notice of the motion.\n11.\nAmendment of case (O.56, r.11)\n11. The Court hearing a case stated by the Cabinet, the Registrar of Lands, tribunal,\narbitrator or other person may amend the case or order it to be returned to that person\nfor amendment, and may draw inferences of fact from the facts stated in the case.\n12.\nRight of the Cabinet, etc. to appear and be heard (O.56, r.12)\n12. In proceedings for the determination of a case stated, or of a question of law referred\nby case stated, the Cabinet, the Registrar of Lands, chairperson or president of the\ntribunal, arbitrator or other person by whom the case was stated shall be entitled to\nappear and be heard.\n12A. No Rule (O.56, r.12A)\n12A. No Rule (O.56, r.12A)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 56\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 309\n\n13.\nNo Rule (O.56, r.13)\n13. No Rule (O.56, r.13)\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nORDER 57-61\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 310\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 57-61\nNO ORDERS\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 62\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 311\n\nORDER 62\nCOSTS\n\nPART I: PRELIMINARY\n1.\nApplication (O.62, r.1)\n1.\n(1) This Order shall have effect, with such modifications as may be necessary,\nwhere by virtue of any Law the costs of any proceedings before an arbitrator or\numpire or before a tribunal or other body constituted by or under any Law not\nbeing proceedings in the Court, are taxable in the Court.\n(2)  The powers and discretion of the Court under Sections 24 and 24A of the\nJudicature Act (as amended and revised) (which relates to the costs of\nproceedings in the Court) shall be exercised subject to and in accordance with\nthis Order.\n2.\nTransitional provisions (O.62, r.2)\n2.\n(1)-(7) [spent]\n3.\nDefinitions (O.62, r.3)\n3.\n(1) In this Order, unless the context otherwise requires \u2014\n\"assessed costs\" means costs assessed by a Judge in accordance with rule 8 or\nby a taxing officer in accordance with rule 26(2);\n\"assisted person\" means a person to whom a legal aid Certificate has been\ngranted pursuant to the Legal Aid Act (as amended and revised) in respect of the\nrelevant proceedings;\n\"Court\" includes the Court of Appeal;\n\"foreign lawyer\" means a person who is engaged in practice as a professional\nlawyer in any country outside the Islands;\n\"the Guidelines\" means the guidelines made from time to time by the Rules\nCommittee pursuant to rule 16;\n\"party\", in relation to a cause or matter, includes a party who is treated as being\na party to that cause or matter by virtue of O.4, r.3(2) and an appellant or\nrespondent to any appeal;\n\"paying party\" includes, in the case of taxation of costs payable out of a fund,\nany person to whom the Court has directed that notice of the appointment for\ntaxation be given;\n\"person under disability\" has the same meaning as in O.80, r.1;\n\nORDER 62\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 312\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n\"proceedings\" includes any cause or matter or any step in any cause or matter\nand any appeal and any step in any appeal;\n\"successful party\" means a party in whose favour an order for costs is made or\nwho is otherwise entitled to receive costs from another party or out of a fund;\n\"the standard basis\" and \"the indemnity basis\" have the meanings assigned\nto them by rules 13(1) and (3), respectively;\n\"taxed costs\" means costs taxed in accordance with this Order;\n\"taxing officer\" means any person appointed as a taxing officer by the Chief\nJustice and includes every Judge who shall be ex officio taxing officers.\n(2)  References to a fund, being a fund out of which costs are to be paid or which is\nheld by a trustee or personal representative, include references to \u2014\n(a)  any estate or property, whether real or personal, held for the benefit of any\nperson or class of persons; and\n(b)  the assets of a company or partnership which is the subject of a winding\nup proceeding,\nand references to a fund held by a trustee or personal representative include\nreferences to any fund to which the trustee or personal representative  is entitled\n(whether alone or together with any other person) in that capacity, whether the\nfund is for the time being in the trustee\u2019s or personal representative\u2019s possession\nor not.\n(3)  References to costs shall be construed as including references to fees, charges,\ndisbursements, expenses and remuneration in relation to proceedings (including\ntaxation proceedings) and shall include references to costs of or incidental to\nthose proceedings.\n(4)  References to \"$\" means Cayman Islands dollars but shall be interpreted to\ninclude the United States dollar equivalent.\n(5)  Bills of costs may be drawn up either in Cayman Islands dollars or United States\ndollars.\n\nPART II: ENTITLEMENT TO COSTS\n4.\nGeneral principles (O.62, r.4)\n4.\n(1) This rule shall have effect unless otherwise provided by any Law.\n(2)  The overriding objective of this Order is that a successful party to any\nproceeding should recover from the opposing party the reasonable costs\nincurred by successful party in conducting that proceeding in an economical,\nexpeditious and proper manner unless otherwise ordered by the Court.\n(3)  A person who claims to be entitled pursuant to a contract to recover the legal\nfees and expenses incurred in enforcing that contract shall be entitled to\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 62\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 313\n\njudgment for the amount found due under the contract and such amount shall\nnot be subject to taxation pursuant to this Order.\n(4)  Except as provided in paragraph (3), no party to any proceedings shall be\nentitled to recover any of the costs of those proceedings from any other party to\nthose proceedings except under an order of the Court.\n(5)  If the Court in the exercise of its discretion sees fit to make any order as to the\ncosts of any proceedings, the Court shall order the costs to follow the event,\nexcept when it appears to the Court that in the circumstances of the case some\nother order should be made as to the whole or any part of the costs.\n(6)  The amount of the costs which a successful party shall be entitled to recover\nfrom any other party is \u2014\n(a)  the fixed costs prescribed in rule 7;\n(b)  the amount assessed by the Judge in accordance with rule 8;\n(c)  the amount allowed after taxation on the standard basis; or\n(d)  the amount allowed after taxation on the indemnity basis.\n(7)  The orders which the Court may make under this rule include an order that a\nparty must pay \u2014\n(a)  a proportion of another party\u2019s costs;\n(b)  a stated amount in respect of another party\u2019s costs;\n(c)  costs from or until a certain date only;\n(d)  costs incurred before proceedings have begun;\n(e)  costs relating to particular steps taken in the proceedings;\n(f)  costs relating only to a distinct part of the proceedings;\n(g)  interest on costs (at the prescribed rate for Cayman Islands dollars) from\nor until a certain date, including a date before judgment; and\n(h)  where the Court orders the paying party to pay costs subject to taxation, a\nreasonable sum on account of costs, such sum to be assessed summarily.\n(8)  No order for costs shall be made against an assisted person.\n(9)  A term mentioned in the first column of the table below, when used in an order\nfor costs, shall have the effect indicated in the second column of the table.\nTerm\nEffect\nCosts or Costs in any event  The party in whose favour the order is made is entitled to the\ncosts in respect of the part of the proceedings to which the\norder relates whatever other costs orders are made in the\nproceedings\nCosts reserved\nThe issue of costs will be determined on a subsequent\napplication.\n\nORDER 62\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 314\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nTerm\nEffect\nCosts here and below\n\nThe party in whose favour the costs order is made shall be\nentitled not only to the party\u2019s costs in respect of the\nproceedings in which it is made but also to the party\u2019s costs\nof the same proceedings in any lower court, save that where\nsuch an order is made by the Court of Appeal on an appeal\nfrom the Grand Court the party shall not be entitled by virtue\nof that order to any costs which the party has incurred in any\nCourt below the Grand Court.\nCosts in the cause or\nCosts in the application\nThe party in whose favour the Court makes an order for\ncosts at the end of the proceedings is entitled to the party\u2019s\ncosts of the part of the proceedings to which the order\nrelates.\nPlaintiff\u2019s costs in the cause\nor Defendant\u2019s costs in the\ncause\nIf the party in whose favour the costs order is made is\nawarded costs at the end of the proceedings, that party is\nentitled to the party\u2019s costs of the part of the proceedings to\nwhich the order relates. If any other party is awarded costs\nat the end of the proceedings, the party in whose favour the\nfinal costs order is made is not liable to pay the costs of any\nother party in respect of the part of the proceedings to which\nthe order relates.\nCosts thrown away\nWhere proceedings or any part of them have been\nineffective or have been subsequently set aside, the party in\nwhose favour this order is made shall be entitled to the\nparty\u2019s costs of those proceedings or that part of the\nproceedings in respect of which it is made.\nNo order for costs\nEach party is to bear the party\u2019s own costs of the part of the\nproceedings to which the order relates whatever costs order\nthe Court makes at the end of the proceedings.\n\n(10)  When used in an order of the Court, the expressions \"Costs\", \"Order for costs\"\nand \"Costs to be taxed if not agreed\" shall mean costs to be taxed on the\nstandard basis.\n(11)  The Court may make an inter partes order for costs to be taxed on the indemnity\nbasis only if it is satisfied that the paying party has conducted the proceedings,\nor that part of the proceedings to which the order relates, improperly,\nunreasonably or negligently.\n5.\nCases where order for costs deemed to have been made (O.62, r.5)\n5.\n(1) In each of the circumstances mentioned in this rule an order for costs shall be\ndeemed to have been made to the effect respectively described in the following\nparagraphs of this rule.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 62\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 315\n\n(2)  Where a party by notice in writing and without leave discontinues an action or\ncounterclaim or withdraws any particular claim made by the party as against any\nother party (except for the purpose of obtaining a default judgment), that other\nparty shall be entitled to the other party\u2019s costs of the action or counterclaim or\nthe other party\u2019s costs occasioned by the claim withdrawn, as the case may be,\nincurred to the time of receipt of the notice of discontinuance or withdrawal.\n(3)  Where a plaintiff by notice in writing in accordance with O.22, r.3(1), accepts\nmoney paid into Court in satisfaction of the cause of action or of all the causes\nof action in respect of which the plaintiff claims, or accepts money paid in\nsatisfaction of one or more specified causes of action and gives notice that the\nplaintiff abandons the others, the plaintiff shall be entitled to the plaintiff\u2019s costs\nof the action incurred up to the time of giving notice of acceptance.\n(4)  Where in an action for libel or slander against several defendants sued jointly a\nplaintiff, by notice in writing in accordance with O.22, r.3(1), accepts money\npaid into Court by one of the defendants the plaintiff shall be entitled to the\nplaintiff\u2019s costs of the action against that defendant incurred up to the time of\ngiving notice of acceptance.\n(5)  A defendant who has counterclaimed shall be entitled to the costs of the\ncounterclaim if \u2014\n(a)  the defendant pays money into Court and the defendant\u2019s notice of\npayment in states that the defendant has taken into account and satisfied\nthe causes of action in respect of which the defendant counterclaims; and\n(b)  the plaintiff accepts the money paid in,\nbut the costs of such counterclaim shall be limited to those incurred up to the\ntime when the defendant receives notice of acceptance by the plaintiff of the\nmoney paid into Court.\n6.\nCases where costs do not follow the event (O.62, r.6)\n6.\n(1) The provisions of this rule shall apply in the circumstances mentioned in this\nrule unless the Court orders otherwise.\n(2)  Where a person is or has been a party to any proceedings in the capacity of\ntrustee, personal representative, mortgagee, chargee or official liquidator the\nperson shall be entitled to the costs of those proceedings, insofar as they are not\nrecovered from or paid by any other person, out of the fund and the Court may\norder otherwise only on the ground that the person has acted unreasonably or,\nin the case of a trustee, personal representative or official liquidator has in\nsubstance acted for the person\u2019s own benefit rather than for the benefit of the\nfund or the creditors as the case may be.\n(3)  Where any person claiming to be a creditor \u2014\n\nORDER 62\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 316\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(a)  seeks to establish any claim to a debt under any judgment or order in\naccordance with O.44, or\n(b)  comes in to prove the person\u2019s title, debt or claim in relation to a company\nin pursuance of any such procedure as is mentioned in O.102, r.12,\nthe person shall, if the person\u2019s claim succeeds, be entitled to the person\u2019s costs\nincurred in establishing it: and, if the person\u2019s claim or any part of it fails, the\nperson may be ordered to pay the costs of any person incurred in opposing it.\n(4)  Where a claimant (other than a person claiming to be creditor) has established a\nclaim to be entitled under a judgment or order in accordance with O.44 and has\nbeen served with notice of the judgment or order pursuant to rule 2 of that Order,\nthe claimant shall, if the claimant acknowledges service of that notice, be\nentitled as part of the claimant\u2019s costs of action (if allowed) to costs incurred in\nestablishing the claimant\u2019s claim; and where such a claimant fails to establish\nthe claimant\u2019s claim or any part of it the claimant may be ordered to pay the\ncosts of any person incurred in opposing it.\n(5)  The costs of any amendment made without leave in the writ or any pleadings\nshall be borne by the party making the amendment.\n(6)  The costs of any application to extend the time fixed by these rules or by any\ndirection or order thereunder shall be borne by the party making the application.\n(7)  If a party on whom a notice to admit facts is served under O.27, r.2, refuses or\nneglects to admit the facts within 14 days after the service on the party of the\nnotice or such longer time as may be allowed by the Court, the costs of proving\nthe facts and the costs occasioned by and thrown away as a result of the party\u2019s\nfailure to admit the facts shall be borne by the party.\n(8)  If a party \u2014\n(a)  on whom a list of documents is served under O.24, or\n(b)  on whom a notice to admit documents is served under O.27, r.5,\ngives notice of non-admission of any of the documents in accordance with O.27,\nrr.4(2) or 5(2), as the case may be, the costs of proving that document and the\ncosts occasioned by and thrown away as a result of the party\u2019s non-admission\nshall be borne by that party.\n7.\nClaim for fixed costs (O.62, r.7)\n7.\n(1) Where a writ is indorsed with a claim for a liquidated sum only, it may include\na claim for fixed costs on the following scale \u2014\n(a)  the sum of $50 where the principal sum claimed does not exceed $2,000;\n(b)  the sum of $250 where the principal sum claimed exceeds $2,000 but does\nnot exceed $10,000;\n(c)  the sum of $500 where the principal sum claimed exceeds $10,000,\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 62\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 317\n\nplus in each case the prescribed fee paid upon issue of the writ.\n(2)  Where a writ is indorsed with a claim of the kind mentioned in O.13, rr.2, 3 or\n4 and O.19, rr.3, 4 or 5, it may include a claim for fixed costs in the sum of $250.\n(3)  Nothing in this rule shall preclude a plaintiff from waiving the plaintiff\u2019s right\nto claim fixed costs and instead claiming costs to be assessed or taxed.\n8.\nAssessment of Costs (O.62, r.8)\n8.\n(1) The amount of costs which a successful party is entitled to recover against\nanother party shall be assessed if the order is made in respect of \u2014\n(a)  an appeal from the Summary Court; or\n(b)  an action in which the writ is indorsed only with a claim for a liquidated\nsum not exceeding $25,000 (or where other relief claimed is abandoned).\n(2)  Except in a case to which paragraph (1) applies, whenever the Court makes an\norder for costs, the party entitled to the benefit of the order shall be entitled, at\nthe party\u2019s option \u2014\n(a)  to an order that such costs shall be taxed if not agreed; or\n(b)  to have the amount of such costs assessed by the Judge.\n(3)  Subject to paragraph (4), where the Court is required to assess costs the Judge\nshall make the Judge\u2019s own summary assessment of the amount of legal fees\nand disbursements which the  Judge considers that a reasonable litigant is likely\nto have incurred and award that amount.\n(4)  The amount of costs payable by any party pursuant to an order for costs to be\nassessed shall not exceed \u2014\n(a)  $1,000 where the order relates to the costs of an interlocutory application;\nor\n(b)  $10,000 where the order relates to the costs of an entire proceeding,\ntogether with the Court fees which have been paid by the successful party.\n9.\nStage of proceedings at which costs to be taxed (O.62, r.9)\n9.\n(1) Subject to paragraph (2), the costs of any proceedings shall not be taxed until\nthe conclusion of the cause or matter in which the proceedings arise.\n(2)  If it appears to the Court when making an order for costs that all or any part of\nthe costs ought to be taxed at an earlier stage it may order accordingly.\n(3)  In the case of an appeal the costs of the proceedings giving rise to the appeal, as\nwell as the costs of the appeal, may be dealt with by the Court hearing the appeal.\n(4)  Where it appears to the Court on application that there is no likelihood of any\nfurther order being made in a cause or matter, it may forthwith order the costs\nof any interlocutory proceedings which have taken place to be taxed.\n\nORDER 62\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 318\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n10.\nMatters to be taken into account in exercising discretion (O.62, r.10)\n10. The Court in exercising its discretion to make an order for costs shall take into\naccount \u2014\n(a)  any offer of contribution brought to its attention in accordance with Order\n16, rule 10;\n(b)  any payment of money into Court and the amount of such payment;\n(c)  any written offer made under O.33, r.4A(2); and\n(d)  any written offer made under O.22, r.14.\n\nPART III: WASTED COSTS ORDERS\n11.\nPersonal liability of attorney for costs (O.62, r.11)\n11. (1) In Part III of this Order the expression \"attorney\" shall include a \"foreign\nlawyer\".\n(2)  Where it appears to the Court in any proceedings that anything has been done\nor that any omission has been made improperly, unreasonably or negligently by\nor on behalf of any party, the Court may order that the costs of that party in\nrespect of the act or omission, as the case may be, shall not be allowed and that\nany costs occasioned by it to any other party shall be paid by that party to that\nother party.\n(3)  Subject to the following provisions of this rule, where it appears to the Court\nthat costs have been incurred improperly, unreasonably or negligently in any\nproceedings or have been wasted by failure to conduct proceedings with\nreasonable competence and expedition, the Court may order \u2014\n(a)  the attorney whom it considers to be responsible (whether personally or\nthrough an employee or agent) to repay to that attorney\u2019s client costs which\nthe client has been ordered to pay to any other party to the proceedings; or\n(b)  the attorney personally to indemnify such other parties against costs\npayable by them.\n(4)  The amount payable under a wasted costs order made under paragraph 3(b) of\nthis rule shall be taxed on the indemnity basis.\n12.\nApplication for wasted costs orders (O.62, r.12)\n12. (1) A wasted costs order may be made by the Court of its own motion if the\nattorney\u2019s liability is plain and obvious and can fairly be determined without the\nneed for extensive evidence or any extensive investigation of the circumstances\ngiving rise to that liability.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 62\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 319\n\n(2)  Subject to paragraph (3), before an order may be made under paragraph (1) of\nthis rule the Court shall give the attorney a reasonable opportunity to appear and\nshow cause why an order should not be made.\n(3)  The Court shall not be obliged to give the attorney a reasonable opportunity to\nappear and show cause where proceedings fail, cannot conveniently proceed or\nare adjourned without useful progress being made because the attorney \u2014\n(a)  fails to attend in person or by a proper representative;\n(b)  fails to deliver any document for the use of the Court, which ought to have\nbeen delivered or to be prepared with any proper evidence or account, or\n(c)  otherwise fails to proceed.\n(4)  In any other case, an application for a wasted costs order shall be made by\nsummons setting out the grounds of the application which shall be supported by\nan affidavit containing full particulars of all the facts and matters relied upon by\nthe applicant.\n(5)  A copy of a summons issued under this rule and the supporting affidavit must\nbe served \u2014\n(a)  on the attorney personally; or\n(b)  in the case of an application against Crown Counsel or any other attorney\nacting on behalf of the Attorney General, on the Attorney General.\n(6)  The Court may direct that notice of any proceedings or order against an attorney\nunder this rule be given to the attorney\u2019s client in such manner as may be\nspecified in the direction.\n(7)  The Court shall direct that notice of any proceedings or order under this rule\nagainst Crown Counsel shall be given to the Attorney General.\n\nPART IV: TAXATION OF COSTS\n13.\nBasis of taxation (O.62, r.13)\n13. (1) On a taxation of costs on the standard basis there shall be allowed a reasonable\namount in respect of all costs reasonably incurred and any doubts which the\ntaxing officer may have as to whether the costs were reasonably incurred or\nwere reasonable in amount shall be resolved in favour of the paying party; and\nin these rules the term \"the standard basis\" in relation to the taxation of costs\nshall be construed accordingly.\n (2)  Where the amount of costs is to be taxed on the standard basis, the taxing officer\nwill only allow costs which are not only reasonable but are also proportionate\nto the matters in issue having regard to \u2014\n(a)  the amount of money involved;\n(b)  the importance of the case; and\n\nORDER 62\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 320\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(c)  the complexity of the issues.\n(3)  On a taxation on the indemnity basis all costs shall be allowed except insofar as\nthey are of an unreasonable amount or have been unreasonably incurred and any\ndoubts which the taxing officer may have as to whether the costs were\nreasonably incurred or were reasonable in amount shall be resolved in favour of\nthe receiving party; and in these rules the term \"the indemnity basis\" in relation\nto the taxation of costs shall be construed accordingly.\n(4)  Where the Court makes an order for costs without indicating the basis of\ntaxation or an order that costs be taxed on a basis other than the standard basis\nor the indemnity basis, the costs shall be taxed on the standard basis.\n14.\nCosts payable to a trustee, personal representative or official liquidator out\nof any fund (O.62, r.14)\n14. (1) Unless the Court otherwise orders, every taxation of a trustee's, personal\nrepresentative's or official liquidator\u2019s costs where \u2014\n(a)  that person is or has been a party to any proceedings in that capacity; and\n(b)  that person is entitled to be paid that person\u2019s costs out of any fund, shall\nbe on the indemnity basis.\n(2)  On a taxation to which this rule applies, costs shall be taxed on the indemnity\nbasis but shall be presumed to have been unreasonably incurred if they were\nincurred contrary to the duty of the trustee or personal representative or official\nliquidator as such.\n15.\nCosts payable to an attorney where money claimed by or on behalf of a\nperson under disability (O.62, r.15)\n15. (1) This rule applies to any proceedings in which \u2014\n(a)  money is claimed or recovered by or on behalf of, or adjudged, or ordered,\nor agreed to be paid to, or for the benefit of, a person under disability, or\n(b)  money paid into Court is accepted by or on behalf of a person under\ndisability.\n(2)  The costs of proceedings to which this rule applies which are payable by any\nplaintiff to the paintiff\u2019s attorney shall, unless the Court otherwise orders, be\ntaxed on the indemnity basis but shall be presumed \u2014\n(a)  to have been reasonably incurred if they were incurred with the express or\nimplied approval of the client, and\n(b)  to have been reasonable in amount if their amount was expressly or\nimpliedly approved by the client, and\n(c)  to have been unreasonably incurred if in the circumstances of the case they\nare of an unusual nature unless the attorney satisfies the taxing officer that\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 62\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 321\n\nprior to their being incurred the attorney informed the attorney\u2019s client that\nthey might not be allowed on a taxation of costs inter partes;\nand for purposes of this rule \"plaintiff\" shall include any person acting on behalf\nof such person under disability.\n(3)  On a taxation under paragraph (2), the taxing officer shall also tax any costs\npayable to that client in those proceedings and shall certify \u2014\n(a)  the amount allowed on the taxation of the attorney's bill to the attorney's\nown client, and\n(b)  the amount allowed on the taxation of any costs payable to that plaintiff in\nthose proceedings, and\n(c)  the amount (if any) by which the amount mentioned in sub-paragraph (a)\nexceeds the amount mentioned in sub-paragraph (b), and\n(d)  where necessary, the proportion of the amount of such excess payable by,\nor out of money belonging to, respectively any claimant who is a person\nunder disability or patient and any other party.\n(4)  Nothing in the foregoing provisions of this rule shall prejudice any attorney's\nlien for costs.\n(5)  The foregoing provisions of this rule shall apply in relation to \u2014\n(a)  a counterclaim by or on behalf of a person who is a person under disability;\nand\n(b)  a claim made by or on behalf of a person who is a person under disability\nin an action by any other person for relief under Section 504 of the United\nKingdom\u2019s Merchant Shipping Act 1894,\nas if for references to a plaintiff there were substituted references to a defendant.\n16.\nAmount of costs (O.62, r.16)\n16. (1) The amount of costs to be allowed on taxation shall (subject to rule 17 and to\nany order of the Court fixing the costs to be allowed) be in the discretion of the\ntaxing officer.\n (2)  In exercising the taxing officer\u2019s discretion the taxing officer shall have regard\nto the Guidelines issued by the Rules Committee pursuant to paragraph (3), to\nall the relevant circumstances, and in particular to \u2014\n(a)  the circumstances of the item or of the cause or matter in which it arises\nand the difficulty or novelty of the questions involved;\n(b)  the skill, specialised knowledge and responsibility required of, and the\ntime and labour expended by, the attorney;\n(c)  the number and importance of the relevant documents (however brief),\nproperly prepared or perused;\n(d)  where money or property is involved, its amount or value;\n\nORDER 62\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 322\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(3)  The Rules Committee may issue guidelines relating to \u2014\n(a)  the procedure in respect of taxation;\n(b)  the form and content of bills of costs; and\n(c)  the nature and amount of fees, charges, disbursements, expenses or\nremuneration which may be allowed on taxation, and, for the avoidance of\ndoubt, including the maximum rates that may be allowed on a taxation.\n17.\nAllowance or disallowance of items and allowance of increased sums (O.62,\nr.17)\n17. (1) Where the costs of any action or matter are to be taxed the Court may, if it thinks\nfit, direct that any item of work shall be allowed, disallowed, restricted or\nqualified on taxation.\n(2)  An application for a direction under paragraph (1) may be made at the trial or\nhearing of the proceeding or on notice to be served on the party by whom the\ncosts are payable within 14 days after the making of the order for their payment,\nprovided that where an application which could have been made at the trial or\nhearing is made subsequent thereto, the Court may refuse the application on the\nground that it ought to have been made at the trial or hearing.\n18.\nForeign lawyers (O.62, r.18)\n18. (1) Work done by foreign lawyers may be recovered on taxation under these rules\non the standard basis provided that \u2014\n(a)  the foreign lawyer has been temporarily admitted as an attorney; and\n(b)  the work was done after the foreign lawyer was admitted.\n(2)  Work done by foreign lawyers who are temporarily admitted must be fully\nitemised in the bill of costs and may not be treated as a disbursement.\n(3)  Whenever a claim is made for work done by foreign lawyers, the taxing officer\nwill investigate whether it has resulted in a duplication or increase in the cost of\nthe proceedings and any such increase shall be disallowed.\n(4)  Work done by local attorneys for the purpose of instructing foreign lawyers and\nvice versa shall be disallowed.\n(5)  The taxing officer shall disallow any item which appears to have been incurred,\nor the costs of which appears to have been increased, because the successful\nparty has engaged both local attorneys and foreign attorneys.\n(6)  Time spent and disbursements incurred in respect of written and oral\ncommunication between foreign lawyers and local attorneys will be disallowed.\n(7)  The overriding principle is that a paying party should not be required to pay\nmore because the successful party has engaged a foreign lawyer than the paying\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 62\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 323\n\nparty would have been required to pay if the successful party had employed only\nlocal attorneys.\n19.\nLitigants in person (O.62, r.19)\n19. (1) The costs of a litigant in person to be taxed on the standard basis shall be taxed\nsubject to the provisions of this rule.\n(2)  Where it appears to the taxing officer that the litigant in person has suffered\npecuniary loss in doing any item of work to which the costs relate, there may be\nallowed such costs as would have been allowed if the work and disbursements\nto which the costs relate had been done or made by an attorney on the litigant's\nbehalf together with any payments reasonably made by the litigant for legal\nadvice relating to the conduct of or the issues raised by the proceedings,\nprovided that the amount allowed in respect of any such item of work shall be\nsuch sum as the taxing officer thinks fit but not exceeding, except in the case of\na disbursement or expense, two-thirds of the sum which would have been\nallowed in respect of that item of work if an attorney had been employed or the\nactual amount of pecuniary loss suffered, whichever is the less.\n(3)  Where it appears to the taxing officer that the litigant has not suffered any\npecuniary loss in doing any item of work to which the costs relate, the litigant\nshall be allowed in respect of the time reasonably spent by the litigant on that\nitem an amount not exceeding $30 per hour.\n(4)  A litigant who is allowed costs in respect of a pre-trial examination or of\nattending Court to conduct the litigant\u2019s case shall not be entitled to a witness\npayment or allowance in addition.\n(5)  For the purposes of this rule a \"litigant in person\" includes a litigant who is a\npractising attorney.\n(6)  For the purposes of this rule, a company acting without an attorney is to be\ntreated as a litigant in person.\n\nPART V: POWERS OF TAXING OFFICERS\n20.\nPowers of taxing officers (O.62, r.20)\n20. A taxing officer shall have power to tax \u2014\n(a)  the costs of or arising out of any proceedings to which this Order applies,\n(b)  the costs ordered by an award made on a reference to arbitration under any\nLaw or payable pursuant to an arbitration agreement, and\n(c)  any other costs the taxation of which is ordered by the Court.\n\nORDER 62\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 324\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n21.\nExtensions of time (O.62, r.21)\n21. (1) The Court or the taxing officer may extend the period within which a party is\nrequired by or under this Order to commence proceedings for taxation or within\nwhich a party is required to do anything in or in connection with such\nproceedings on such terms (if any) as it thinks just and the Court or the taxing\nofficer may do so although the application for such extension is not made until\nafter the expiration of that period.\n(2)  Where no period is specified by or under this Order or by the Court for the doing\nof anything in or in connection with proceedings for taxation a taxing officer\nmay specify the period within which the thing is to be done.\n22.\nCosts Certificates (O.62, r.22)\n22. (1) The taxing officer \u2014\n(a)  shall, at the conclusion of taxation proceedings before the taxing officer,\nissue a certificate in Form No. 305 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II -\nForms (as amended and revised) for the net amount of the costs allowed\nby the taxing officer (after making such set-offs as may be required);\n(b) may from time to time in the course of the taxation issue an interim\ncertificate in Form No. 308 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as\namended and revised) for any part of the costs which have been taxed or\nagreed;\n(c)  may correct any clerical mistake in any certificate issued by the taxing\nofficer or any error arising therein from any accidental slip or omission.\n(2) ` If the successful party and paying party agree the amount of costs, either party\nmay apply to the taxing officer for a costs certificate (either interim or final) for\nthe amount agreed.\n(3)  The successful party may apply to the taxing officer for the issue of a default\ncosts certificate in Form No. 309 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as\namended and revised) if the paying party fails to comply with any time limit\nprescribed by the rules or the Guidelines or fixed by the taxing officer.\n(4)  A default costs certificate \u2014\n(a)  must be set aside by the taxing officer if it appears to the taxing officer that\nthe successful party was not entitled to it; and\n(b)  in any other case, may be set aside by the taxing officer if it appears to the\ntaxing officer that there is some good reason why the taxing officer should\nconduct a taxation.\n(5)  A paying party who seeks to set aside a default costs certificate shall within 14\ndays of service of the default costs certificate \u2014\n(a)  lodge an application in Form No. 313 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II -\nForms (as amended and revised);\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 62\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 325\n\n(b)  lodge the bill of costs signed and completed in accordance with rule 27(3);\n(c)  lodge an affidavit explaining the reasons for the paying party\u2019s default;\nand\n(d)  pay into Court the whole amount specified in the certificate.\n(6)  A costs certificate shall be enforceable as if it were a judgment or order of the\nCourt.\n23.\nPower of taxing officer to effect set offs (O.62, r.23)\n23. (1) Where a party entitled to be paid costs is also liable to pay costs, the taxing\nofficer shall \u2014\n(a)  tax the costs which the party is liable to pay and set off the amount allowed\nagainst the amount the party is entitled to be paid and certify payment of\nany balance; or\n(b)  delay the issue of a certificate for the costs the party is entitled to be paid,\nuntil the party has paid or tendered the amount the party is liable to pay.\n24.\nTaxation of bill of costs comprised in an account (O.62, r.24)\n24. (1) Where the Court orders an account to be taken and the account consists in part\nof costs, the Court may direct a taxing officer to tax those costs and the taxing\nofficer shall after taxation of the bill of costs return it, together with the taxing\nofficer\u2019s report on it, to the Court.\n(2)  A taxing officer taxing a bill of costs in accordance with a direction under\nparagraph (1) shall have the same powers, and the same fee shall be payable in\nconnection with the taxation, as if an order for taxation of the costs had been\nmade by the Court.\n25.\nPowers of taxing officers on taxation of costs out of a fund (O.62, r.25)\n25. (1) Where any costs are to be paid out of a fund the Court may give directions as to\nthe parties who are entitled to receive notice of the taxation of those costs.\n(2)  Where the Court has directed that a bill of costs be taxed for the purpose of\nbeing paid out of a fund it may direct the party whose bill is to be taxed to send\nto any person entitled to notice of the taxation a copy of the bill, or of any part\nthereof, free of charge, together with the following information, that is to say \u2014\n(a)  that the bill of costs, a copy of which or of part of which is sent has been\nreferred to a taxing officer for taxation;\n(b)  the time appointed by the taxing officer at which an oral hearing will take\nplace or be continued; and\n(c)  such other information, if any, as the Court may direct.\n\nORDER 62\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 326\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n26.\nPowers of taxing officers in relation to costs of taxation proceedings (O.62,\nr.26)\n26. (1) Subject to the provisions of this Order, the party whose bill is being taxed shall\nbe entitled to that party\u2019s costs of the taxation proceedings which shall be\nassessed by the taxing officer.\n(2)  Subject to paragraph (3) the taxing officer shall make the taxing officer\u2019s own\nassessment of the costs which the taxing officer considers that a reasonable\nlitigant is likely to have incurred in preparing the litigant\u2019s bill of costs and\nattending the taxation and award that amount.\n(3)  The amount of costs payable by any party pursuant to an order made by a taxing\nofficer under this rule shall not exceed \u2014\n(a)  $5,000 in the case of taxations conducted by a Judge;\n(b)  $2,000 in all other cases.\n(4)  Where an order is made in favour of the paying party, the amount shall be\ndeducted from the costs ordered to be paid by the paying party and a certificate\nissued for the balance.\n(5)  The party liable to pay the costs of the proceedings which gave rise to the\ntaxation proceedings may make a written offer to pay a specified sum in\nsatisfaction of those costs which is expressed to be \"without prejudice save as\nto the costs of taxation\" at any time before the expiration of 14 days after the\ndelivery to that party of a copy of the bill of costs under rule 31(3) and, where\nsuch an offer is made, the fact that it has been made shall not be communicated\nto the taxing officer until question of the costs of the taxation proceedings falls\nto be decided.\n(6)  The taxing officer may take into account any offer made under paragraph (5)\nwhich has been brought to the taxing officer\u2019s attention.\n\nPART VI: PROCEDURE ON TAXATION\n27.\nService of a bill of costs (O.62, r.27)\n27. (1) The successful party shall prepare a bill of costs in Form No. 314 of the Grand\nCourt Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) and serve it on the paying\nparty.\n(2)  Where more than one party is liable jointly or severally to pay the whole or part\nof the costs, a copy of the bill of costs shall be served on every party.\n(3)  The paying party shall state the extent to which the paying party agrees with and\naccepts liability to pay the amounts claimed in the bill of costs by completing\ncolumn 4 and returning the completed bill of costs to the successful party within\n21 days or such longer period as may be agreed.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 62\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 327\n\n(4)  In addition to completing column 4, the paying party may also serve a written\nstatement of objections.\n28.\nCommencement of taxation proceedings (O.62, r.28)\n28. (1) Proceedings for the taxation of costs shall be commenced by lodging the\nfollowing documents with the taxing officer \u2014\n(a)  an application for taxation in such of Forms 301 to 304 as may be\nappropriate;\n(b)  a bill of costs completed and signed by each of the paying parties in\naccordance with rule 27(3);\n(c)  any statement of objections received from the paying party;\n(d)  any reply to the Statement of Objections relied upon by the successful\nparty;\n(e)  where a party is entitled to require taxation of any costs directed to be paid\nby any award made on an arbitration under any Law or pursuant to any\narbitration agreement and no order of the Court for enforcement of the\naward has been made, a true copy of the award; and\n(f)  where a party is entitled to require taxation of any costs directed to be paid\nby any order, award or other determination of any tribunal or other body\nconstituted by or under any Law or Regulation, a true copy of the order,\naward or determination, as the case may be.\n(2)  Where a party is entitled to recover taxed costs or to require any costs to be\ntaxed by virtue of \u2014\n(a)  a judgment, direction or order given or made in proceedings in the Court;\nor\n(b)  rule 5; or\n(c)  an award made on an arbitration under any Law or pursuant to an\narbitration agreement; or\n(d)  an order, award or other determination of a tribunal or other body\nconstituted by or under any Law,\nthe party must commence proceedings for the taxation of those costs either\nwithin 3 months after the judgment, direction, or order was filed or the award or\nother determination was signed or otherwise perfected or, within 3 months after\nthe party\u2019s right to taxation arose in accordance with rule 9, whichever is the\nlater.\n(3)  The taxing officer may summarily dismiss any application for taxation which is\nmade out of time.\n29.\nSubsequent procedure (O.62, r.29)\n29. (1) A taxation shall be inquisitorial in nature.\n\nORDER 62\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 328\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(2)  The taxing officer shall enquire into the bill of costs and determine the amount\nto be paid in accordance with this Order and the Guidelines for which purpose\nthe taxing officer shall obtain such written explanations from the successful\nparty and\/or such written submissions on behalf of the paying party as may be\nappropriate to enable the taxing officer to make such determination fairly.\n(3)  If the taxing officer considers that the taxing officer cannot properly tax a bill\nof costs or complete the taxing officer\u2019s taxation of a bill of costs without\nhearing an oral submission from the successful party and\/or the paying party,\nthe taxing officer shall fix a hearing date and send a notice of appointment to \u2014\n(a)  the successful party; and\n(b)  every paying party who has completed column 4 and signed the bill of\ncosts;\n(4)  The taxing officer may require the successful party to produce the following\ndocuments \u2014\n(a)  the engagement letters or other documents which evidence the terms upon\nwhich the successful party engaged the successful party\u2019s attorneys and\nforeign lawyers;\n(b)  the invoices (and detailed versions of the invoices) rendered on the\nsuccessful party by the successful party\u2019s attorneys and foreign lawyers;\n(c)  an index and\/or bundle of the pleadings, affidavits and orders relating to\nthe proceeding before the Court;\n(d)  the invoice, account or other document evidencing the payment of any\ndisbursement;\n(e)  time records relating to legal fees;\n(f)  instructions, briefs, opinions or reports;\n(g)  the whole or any part of the correspondence files of the successful party\u2019s\nattorneys and foreign lawyers;\n(h)  any other documents which the taxing officer considers relevant for the\npurpose of justifying the amounts claimed in the bill of costs.\n(5)  The taxing officer may require that any document produced by the successful\nparty is made available for inspection by the paying party, provided that the\ndocument in question is not privileged.\n(6)  The taxing officer shall not give reasons for any of the taxing officer\u2019s decisions.\n(7)  The taxing officer shall send an office copy of the taxing officer\u2019s costs\ncertificate to each of the successful and paying parties.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 62\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 329\n\nPART VII: REVIEW OF TAXATION AND APPEAL ON POINTS\nOF CONSTRUCTION\n30.\nReview by the Judge (O.62, r.30)\n30. (1) Any party who is dissatisfied with the amount of any costs certificate may apply\nto a Judge to review the taxing officer\u2019s decision.\n(2)  In the event that the taxation was conducted by a Judge in the Judge\u2019s capacity\nas an ex officio taxing officer, the review shall be conducted by a different Judge.\n(3)  An application under this rule for review of the taxing officer\u2019s decision must\nbe made within 14 days after the decision to be reviewed or within such other\nperiod as may be fixed by the taxing officer.\n(4)  Every applicant for review under this rule must at the time of making the\napplicant\u2019s application \u2014\n(a)  deliver to the Judge the applicant\u2019s objections in writing specifying what\nis objected to and stating concisely the nature and grounds of the objection\nin each case;\n(b)  deliver a copy of the objections to all parties affected by the application;\n(c)  if the applicant is the paying party, pay the amount as taxed into Court;\nand\n(d)  serve notice of payment into Court on every party referred to in\nsubparagraph (b) above.\n(5)  Any party to whom a copy of the objections is delivered under this rule may,\nwithin 14 days after delivery of the copy to that party or such other period as\nmay be fixed by the Judge, deliver to the Judge answers in writing to the\nobjections stating concisely the grounds on which that party will oppose the\nobjections and must at the same time deliver a copy of the answers to the party\napplying for review and to any other party who was entitled to receive notice\nunder paragraph (4).\n(6)  A review under this rule shall be inquisitional in nature and the Judge may\nreceive further evidence and may exercise all the powers which the Judge might\nhave exercised on an original taxation, including the power to award costs of\nthe proceedings before the Judge.\n(7)  In the event that the Judge considers that the Judge cannot properly review the\ntaxing officer's decision without hearing oral submissions, the Judge shall fix a\nhearing date and any party to whom a copy of the objections was delivered under\nparagraph (4) shall be entitled to be heard in respect of all or any of the\nobjections notwithstanding that that party did not deliver written answers to the\nobjections under paragraph (5).\n\nORDER 62\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 330\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n31.\nAppeal to the Court of Appeal on points of construction (O.62, r.31)\n31. (1) A party to any taxation proceeding who is dissatisfied with any decision of a\nJudge (whether or not such decision has been reviewed in accordance with rule\n30) may apply to the Judge for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal which\nshall be granted only if the Judge is satisfied that the proposed appeal involves\na point of construction of general importance.\n(2)  There shall be no other right of appeal to the Court of Appeal in respect of a\ndecision made by a Judge, whether acting as an ex officio taxing officer or\nconducting a review under rule 30.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 01.01.02) (amended 01.06.11) (amended 29.03.16)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 63\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 331\n\nORDER 63\nOFFICE OF THE GRAND COURT\n\n1.\nDistribution of business in the Court (O.63, r.1)\n1.\nThe office of the Court shall be divided into such departments and the business\nperformed in the office of the Court shall be distributed amongst the departments in\nsuch manner as the Chief Justice may direct.\n2.\nCourt files (O.63, r.2)\n2.\n(1) The Clerk of the Court shall create a Court file in respect of every proceeding\nimmediately prior to sealing the originating process by which such proceeding\nis commenced.  For the purpose of rules 2 and 3 of this Order an \"originating\nprocess\" includes an application pursuant to Order 53, rule 3.\n(2) The Court file shall be identified by the cause number and, subject to paragraph\n(3), the full title of the proceeding to which it relates.\n(3) If the full title of the proceeding is too long to be typed or printed on one sheet\nof 11\" x 8\u00bd\" paper, the Court file shall be given an abbreviated title.\n(4) If the Court file comprises more than one volume, each volume shall be\nidentified by the cause number, the full or abbreviated title of the proceeding,\nas appropriate, the volume number in a chronological sequence and the period\nof time to which the volume relates.\n3.\nFiling of documents (O.63, r.3)\n3.\n(1) Every document required to be filed in any proceeding shall be provided to the\nClerk of the Court whereupon the Clerk of the Court shall take the same steps,\nmutatis mutandis, as apply to originating processes provided pursuant to Order\n5, rule 1(5) and (6).\n(2) Any document required to be filed which is more than 50 pages long (and not\nfiled electronically) shall be placed in a ring binder or otherwise suitably bound\nand be kept with and deemed to form part of the Court file.\n(3) Subject to paragraphs (4) and (5), the Court file relating to any proceeding shall\nbe open to inspection only by the parties to that proceeding.\n(4) The Court may order that the Court file relating to any proceeding or any\nspecific document therein be closed and not open to inspection by any party or\nother person except with the prior leave of the Court.\n(5) The Court may give leave on application to any person not being a party to the\nproceedings to inspect the Court file or to take a copy of any document on the\nCourt file relating to those proceedings.\n\nORDER 63\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 332\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(6) This rule shall have no application to Court files in respect of proceedings\nrelating to \u2014\n(a)\nthe estate of any deceased person;\n(b) the winding up of any company; or\n(c)\nthe bankruptcy of any person,\nwhich shall be open to inspection in accordance with the Probate and\nAdministration Rules (as amended and revised) made under the Succession Act\n(as amended and revised); the Companies Winding Up Rules (as amended and\nrevised); and the Grand Court (Bankruptcy) Rules (as amended and revised),\nrespectively.\n3A.\nFiling of documents by electronic means (O. 63, r. 3A)\n3A. (1) Every document required to be filed in any proceedings shall be filed by\nelectronic means unless it is not practicable for the person filing the document\nto do so, having regard to Practice Directions 5, 5A, 5B, 5C, and 5D of 2020\nand 11 of 2020 and any subsequent related Practice Directions replacing,\namending or supplementing the same.\n(2) For the purposes of rule 2 and Order 5, rule 1(3) documents filed by electronic\nmeans insofar as they are required by the Rules to be filed, shall comprise or\notherwise form part of the Court file in respect of the proceedings to which they\nrelate.\n(3) This rule applies to documents filed by electronic means and to the Court file in\nall respects as they would apply to paper documents and files.\n4.\nRestriction on removal of documents (O.63, r.4)\n4.\n(1) No document shall be removed from a Court file except \u2014\n(a)\nby order of the Court; or\n(b) by the Clerk of the Court in the event that it has been mistakenly placed\non the wrong Court file.\n(2) A document may be temporarily removed from the Court file by or with the\npermission of the Clerk of the Court for the purpose of photocopying it.\n(3) When a Court file is contained in more than one volume, the volumes shall not\nbe separated unless they are so numerous or so large that it is inconvenient for\nthe Judge using such file to have before the Judge the whole of it.\n5.\nIdentity of party filing documents (O.63, r.5)\n5.\nEvery document filed in or document sealed by the Court office shall contain a\nstatement (at the foot of each page) of the name and address of the party or the party\u2019s\nattorney responsible for filing or causing it to be sealed, as the case may be.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 63\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 333\n\n6.\nDeposit of documents (O.63, r.6)\n6.\n(1) Where the Court orders any documents to be deposited in Court they must,\n\nunless otherwise directed, be deposited with the Clerk of the Court.\n(2) No document deposited in accordance with paragraph (1) shall be taken out of\nthe Court office without the leave of the Court.\n7.\nRegister of judgments (O.63, r.7)\n7.\n(1) The Clerk of the Court shall create a file upon which shall be placed an office\ncopy of every final judgment given or made by the Court of the kind referred to\nin Order 42, rule 5(8), unless otherwise directed by the Court, which shall be\nreferred to as the \u2018Register of Judgments\u2019.\n(1A) With effect from 1 January 2022 every document entered on the Register of\nJudgments will be an electronic copy and the Register of Judgments will\nthereafter be maintained in electronic form only.\n(2) The Register of Judgments shall be open to public inspection upon payment of\nthe prescribed fee, if any.\n(3) Any person shall be entitled, upon payment of the prescribed fee, to obtain from\nthe Clerk of the Court a certified paper copy of any judgment or order contained\nin the Register of Judgments.\n8.\nRegister of writs and other originating processes (O.63, r.8)\n8.\n(1) Subject to paragraph (1A), the Clerk of the Court shall create a file containing,\nin chronological order, an office copy of every writ and every other originating\nprocess and every third-party notice, including amendments thereto, sealed by\nthe Court, which shall be referred to as the \"Register of Writs and other\nOriginating Processes\".  For the avoidance of doubt, the Register of Writs and\nOther Originating Processes shall include every ex parte originating summons\nand ex parte originating motion but it shall not include any application made\npursuant to Order 53, rule 3.\n(1A) Unless otherwise directed by the Court, any originating process issued pursuant\nto the following Acts or rules shall not be included in the Register of Writs and\nother Originating Processes but shall be maintained on separate registers,\ncollectively referred to as Restricted Registers of Writs and other Originating\nProcesses:\n(a)\nProceeds of Crime Act (as amended and revised);\n(b) Misuse of Drugs Act (as amended and revised);\n(c)\nCriminal Justice (International Cooperation) Act (as amended and\nrevised);\n(d) Tax Information Authority Act (as amended and revised);\n\nORDER 63\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 334\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(e)\nMutual Legal Assistance (United States of America) Act (as amended and\nrevised);\n(f)  Order 70, rule 3;\n(g) family proceedings;\n(h) any application seeking to make a child a ward of court;\n(i)  any application seeking a declaration of paternity pursuant to the Status of\nChildren Act, 2003;\n(j)  any application seeking any order pursuant to the Mental Health Act (as\namended and revised);\n(k) any application pursuant to section 7 of the Legal Practitioners Act (as\namended and revised).\n(1B) With effect from 1 January 2022 every document entered on the Register of\nWrits and other Originating Processes and on the Restricted Registers of Writs\nand other Originating Processes (together, the \u201cRegisters\u201d) will be an electronic\ncopy and the Registers will thereafter be maintained in electronic form only.\n(2) The Register of Writs and other Originating Process shall be open to public\ninspection upon payment of the prescribed fee.\n(3) Any person shall be entitled, upon payment of the prescribed fee, to obtain from\nthe Clerk of the Court a certified copy of any writ and every other originating\nprocess and third-party notice, including amendments thereto, contained in the\nRegister of Writs and other Originating Processes.\n(4) The parties to proceedings referred to in paragraph (1A), or their attorneys, may,\nupon payment of the prescribed fee or fees, inspect and take copies of documents\ncontained on the Restricted Registers of Writs and other Originating Processes.\nSave as aforesaid, no person may inspect, or take copies of, documents\ncontained on any of the Restricted Registers of Writs and other Originating\nProcesses without the leave of the Court.  Any such application for leave to\ninspect or take copies of such documents shall be made on notice to all of the\nparties to the proceedings.\n(5) Nothing in paragraph (1A) of this rule shall limit the right of the Attorney\nGeneral to inspect and take copies of any documents contained in the Restricted\nRegisters of Writs and other Originating Processes.\n9.\nOffice hours (O.63, r.9)\n9.\nThe office of the Court shall be open on every day of the year except \u2014\n(a)\nSaturdays and Sundays; and\n(b) public holidays.\nThe hours during which the office of the Court shall be open to the public shall\nbe such as the Chief Justice may from time to time direct.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 63\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 335\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 01.02.13) (replaced 10.07.22)\n\nORDER 64\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 336\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 64\nNO ORDER\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 65\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 337\n\nORDER 65\nSERVICE OF DOCUMENTS\n\n1.\nWhen personal service required (O.65, r.1)\n1.\n(1) Any document which by virtue of these Rules is required to be served on any\nperson need not be served personally unless the document is one which by an\nexpress provision of these Rules or by order of the Court is required to be so\nserved.\n\n(2) Paragraph (1) shall not affect the power of the Court under any provision of\nthese Rules to dispense with the requirement for personal service.\n2.\nPersonal service: how effected (O.65, r.2)\n2.\nPersonal service of a document is effected by leaving a copy of the document with\nthe person to be served.\n3.\nService on body corporate (O.65, r.3)\n3.\nPersonal service of a document on a body corporate other than a company registered\nunder the Companies Act (as amended and revised) may, in cases for which provision\nis not otherwise made by any enactment, be effected by serving it in accordance with\nrule 2 on the chairperson or president of the body corporate or the secretary, treasurer\nor other similar officer thereof.\n4.\nSubstituted service (O.65, r.4)\n4.\n(1) If, in the case of any document which by virtue of any provision of these Rules\nis required to be served personally on any person, it appears to the Court that it\nis impracticable for any reason to serve that document personally on that person,\nthe Court may make an order for substituted service of that document.\n(2) An application for an order for substituted service may be made by an affidavit\nstating the facts on which the application is founded. The affidavit shall set out\nthe means by which it is proposed to bring the document to the notice of the\nperson to be served, including electronic means if reasonably practicable.\n(3) Substituted service of a document, in relation to which an order is made under\nthis rule, is effected by taking such steps as the Court may direct to bring the\ndocument to the notice of the person to be served.\n5.\nOrdinary service: how effected (O.65, r.5)\n5.\n(1) Service of any document, not being a document which by virtue of any provision\nof these Rules is required to be served personally, may be effected \u2014\n(a)\nby leaving the document at the proper address of the person to be served;\n\nORDER 65\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 338\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(b) by post;\n(c)\nby facsimile, in accordance with paragraph (2); or\n(d) in such other manner as the Court may direct.\n(2) Service by facsimile may be effected only where \u2014\n(a)\nthe party serving the document acts by an attorney;\n(b) the party on whom the document is served acts by an attorney and service\nis effected by transmission to the business address of such an attorney;\n(c)\nthe attorney acting for the party on whom the document is served has\nindicated in writing to the attorney serving the document that the attorney\nacting for the party on whom the document is served is willing to accept\nservice by facsimile at a specified facsimile number and the document is\ntransmitted to that number; and for this purpose the inscription of a\nfacsimile number on the writing paper of an attorney shall be deemed to\nindicate that such an attorney is willing to accept service in accordance\nwith this paragraph unless the attorney acting for the party on whom the\ndocument is served states otherwise in writing; and\n(d) as soon as practicable after service by facsimile, the attorney acting for the\nparty serving the document despatches a copy of it to the attorney acting\nfor the other party by any of the methods described for service by\nparagraph (1), and if the attorney acting for the party serving the document\nfails to do so the document shall be deemed never to have been served by\nfacsimile.\n(3) Where a facsimile is transmitted on a business day before 4 p.m., it shall, unless\nthe contrary is shown, be deemed to be served on that day, and, in any other\ncase, on the business day next following.\n(4) For the purposes of this rule and Section 53 of the Interpretation Act (as\namended and revised), in its application to this rule, the proper address of any\nperson on whom a document is to be served in accordance with this rule shall\nbe the address for service of that person, but if at the time when service is\neffected that person has no address for service that person\u2019s address for the\npurposes aforesaid shall be \u2014\n(a)\nin any case, the business address of the attorney (if any) who is acting for\nthe person in the proceedings in connection with which service of the\ndocument in question is to be effected; or\n(b) in the case of an individual, that person\u2019s usual or last known address; or\n(c)\nin the case of individuals who are suing or being sued in the name of a\nfirm, the principal or last known place of business of the firm within the\njurisdiction; or\n(d) in the case of a body corporate, the registered or principal office of the\nbody.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 65\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 339\n\n(5) Nothing in this rule shall be taken as prohibiting the personal service of any\ndocument or as affecting any enactment which provides for the manner in which\ndocuments may be served on bodies corporate.\n5A.\nService by electronic means (O. 65, r. 5A)\n5A. Any document which pursuant to these Rules is required to be served on any person\nmay be served by electronic means where an address for service by electronic means\nis, or has been, provided by that person for those purposes.  For the avoidance of\ndoubt, in such circumstances no prior order for substituted service is required.\n6.\nService on the Cabinet, etc., in proceedings which are not by or against the\nCrown (O.65, r.6)\n6.\nWhere for the purpose of or in connection with any proceedings in the Court, not\nbeing civil proceedings by or against the Crown within the meaning of the Crown\nProceedings Act (as amended and revised), any document is required by any\nenactment or these Rules to be served on a government department or on the Attorney\nGeneral, Section 12 of the said Law and O.77, r.4, shall apply in relation to the service\nof the document as they apply in relation to the service of documents required to be\nserved on the Crown for the purpose of or in connection with any civil proceedings\nby or against the Crown.\n7.\nEffect of service after certain hours (O.65, r.7)\n7.\nAny document (other than a writ or other originating process) service of which is\neffected under rule 2 or under rule 5(1)(a) between midnight on a Friday and midnight\non the following Sunday or after 4 p.m. on any other weekday shall, for the purpose\nof computing any period of time after service of that document, be deemed to have\nbeen served on the Monday following that Friday or on the day following that other\nweekday, as the case may be.\n8.\nAffidavit of service (O.65, r.8)\n8.\nAn affidavit of service of any document must state by whom the document was\nserved, the day of the week and date on which and the time when it was served, where\nit was served and how.\n9.\nNo service required in certain cases (O.65, r.9)\n9.\nWhere by virtue of these Rules any document is required to be served on any person\nbut is not required to be served personally, and at the time when service is to be\neffected that person is in default as to acknowledgment of service or has no address\nfor service, the document need not be served on that person unless the Court otherwise\ndirects or any of these Rules otherwise provides.\n\nORDER 65\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 340\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n10.\nService of process on Sunday (O.65, r.10)\n10. (1) No process shall be served or executed within the jurisdiction on a Sunday\nexcept, in case of urgency, with the leave of the Court.\n(2) For the purpose of this rule \"process\" includes a writ, judgment, notice, order,\npetition, originating or other summons, or warrant.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (replaced 10.07.22)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 66\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 341\n\nORDER 66\nPAPER, PRINTING, BINDING AND COPIES\n\n1.\nQuality and size of paper (O.66, r.1)\n1.\n(1) Unless it is impracticable, every document prepared by a party for use in the\nCourt must be on letter sized paper (11\" long and 8.5\" wide) of durable quality,\nhaving a margin, not less than 1\" wide, to be left blank on the left side of the\nface of the paper, and on the right side of the reverse.\n(2) When the use of A4 paper is unavoidable, it shall have a margin of at least 1\" to\nbe left blank at the top and bottom of each page.\n2.\nRegulations as to printing, etc. (O.66, r.2)\n2.\n(1) Except where these Rules otherwise provide, every document prepared by a\nparty for use in the Court must be produced by one of the following means, that\nis to say, printing, writing (which must be clear and legible) and typewriting\notherwise than by means of a carbon, and may be produced partly by one of\nthose means and partly by another or others of them.\n(2) [Repealed.]\n(3) Any type used in producing a document for use as aforesaid must be such as to\ngive a clear and legible impression and must be not smaller than 11 point type\nfor printing or elite type for type lithography, stencil duplicating or typewriting.\n(4) Any document produced by a photographic or similar process giving a positive\nand permanent representation free from blemishes shall, to the extent that it\ncontains a facsimile of any printed, written or typewritten matter, be treated for\nthe purposes of these Rules as if it were printed, written or typewritten, as the\ncase may be.\n(5) Any notice required by these Rules may not be given orally except with the\nleave of the Court.\n3.\nCopies of documents for other party (O.66, r.3)\n3.\nWhere a document prepared by a party for use in the Court is written or typewritten,\nthe party by whom it was prepared must supply any other party entitled to a copy of\nit, not being a party on whom it has been served, with one copy of it and where the\ndocument in question is an affidavit, of any document exhibited to it. The copy must\nbe ready for delivery within 48 hours after a written request for it, together with an\nundertaking to pay the proper charges, is received and must be supplied thereafter on\npayment of those charges.\n\nORDER 66\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 342\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n4.\nRequirements as to copies (O.66, r.4)\n4.\n(1) Before a copy of a document is supplied to a party under these Rules, it must be\nindorsed with the name and address of the party or attorney by whom it was\nsupplied.\n(2) The party by whom a copy is supplied under rule 3, or, if the party sues or\nappears by an attorney, the party\u2019s attorney, shall be answerable for the copy\nbeing a true copy of the original or of an office copy, as the case may be.\n5.\nRequirements as to binding (O.66, r.5)\n5.\n(1) Documents or bundles of documents not exceeding 50 pages in length may be\nfirmly stapled in the top left hand corner and shall be punched with a hole for\nfiling.\n(2) Documents or bundles of documents exceeding 50 pages shall be placed in ring\nbinders or otherwise suitably bound and the cover thereof must bear a frontsheet\ncontaining the title of the action and a description or index of the documents\ncontained therein.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 67\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 343\n\nORDER 67\nATTORNEYS-AT-LAW\n\nPART 1 - CHANGE OF ATTORNEY\n\n1.\nNotice of change of attorney (O.67, r.1)\n1.\n(1) A party to any cause or matter who sues or defends by an attorney may change\nthe party\u2019s attorney without an order for that purpose but, unless and until notice\nof the change is filed and copies of the notice are served in accordance with this\nrule, the former attorney shall, subject to rules 5 and 6, be considered the\nattorney of the party until the final conclusion of the cause or matter in the Court.\n(2) The party giving the notice must serve on every other party to the cause or matter\n(not being a party in default as to acknowledgment of service) and on the former\nattorney a copy of the notice.\n(3) The party giving the notice may perform the duties prescribed by this rule in\nperson or by the party\u2019s new attorney.\n2.\nNo rule (O.67, r.2)\n2.\nNo rule (O.67, r.2)\n3.\nNotice of appointment of attorney (O.67, r.3)\n3.\nWhere a party, after having been sued or defended in person, appoints an attorney to\nact in the cause or matter on the party\u2019s behalf, the change may be made without an\norder for that purpose and rule 1 shall, with the necessary modifications, apply in\nrelation to a notice of appointment of an attorney as it applies in relation to a notice\nof change of attorney.\n4.\nNotice of intention to act in person (O.67, r.4)\n4.\nWhere a party, after having sued or defended by an attorney, intends and is entitled\nto act in person, the change may be made without an order for that purpose and rule\n1 shall, with the necessary modifications, apply in relation to a notice of intention to\nact in person as it applies in relation to a notice of change of attorney except that the\nnotice of intention to act in person must contain an address for service of the party\ngiving it.\n5.\nRemoval of attorney from record at instance of another party (O.67, r.5)\n5.\n(1) Where \u2014\n\nORDER 67\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 344\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n (a) an attorney who has acted for a party in a cause or matter has died or\nbecomes bankrupt or cannot be found or has been struck off the roll of\nattorneys or has been suspended from practising or has for any other reason\nceased to practice; and\n(b) the party has not given notice of change of attorney or notice of intention\nto act in person in accordance with the foregoing provisions of this Order,\nany other party to the cause or matter may apply to the Court for an order\ndeclaring that the attorney has ceased to be the attorney acting for the first\nmentioned party in the cause or matter, and the Court may make an order\naccordingly.\n(2) An application for an order under this rule must be made by summons and the\nsummons must, unless the Court otherwise directs, be served on the party to\nwhose attorney the application relates.\n\nThe application must be supported by an affidavit stating the grounds of the\napplication.\n(3) Where an order is made under this rule the party on whose application it was\nmade must file the order and serve a copy on every other party to the cause or\nmatter (not being a party in default as to acknowledgment of service).\n(4) An order made under this rule shall not affect the rights of the attorney and the\nparty for whom the attorney acted as between themselves.\n6.\nWithdrawal of attorney who has ceased to act for party (O.67, r.6)\n6.\n(1) Where an attorney who has acted for a party in a cause or matter has ceased so\nto act and the party has not given notice of change in accordance with rule 1, or\nnotice of intention to act in person in accordance with rule 4, the attorney may\napply to the Court for an order declaring that the attorney has ceased to be the\nattorney acting for the party in the cause or matter, and the Court may make an\norder accordingly, but unless and until the attorney files and serves a copy of\nthe order on every party to the cause or matter (not being a party in default as to\nacknowledgment of service) the attorney shall be considered the attorney of the\nparty until the final conclusion of the cause or matter in the Court.\n(2) An application for an order under this rule must be made by summons and the\nsummons must, unless the Court otherwise directs, be served on the party for\nwhom the attorney acted.\n\nThe application must be supported by an affidavit stating the grounds of the\napplication.\n(3) An order made under this rule shall not affect the rights of the attorney and the\nparty for whom the attorney acted as between themselves.\n(4) Notwithstanding anything in paragraph (1), where a certificate within the\nmeaning of Section 2 of the Legal Aid Act (as amended and revised) in respect\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 67\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 345\n\nof any matter is revoked or discharged, the attorney assigned to the person to\nwhom the certificate was granted shall cease to be the attorney acting in the\ncause or matter; and if the person whose certificate has been revoked or\ndischarged desires to proceed with the cause or matter without legal aid and\nappoints that attorney or another attorney to act on the person\u2019s behalf, the\nprovisions of rule 3 shall apply as if that party had previously sued or defended\nin person.\n7.\nAddress for service of party whose attorney is removed, etc. (O.67, r.7)\n7.\nWhere \u2014\n(a)\nan order is made under rule 5; or\n(b) an order is made under rule 6, and the applicant for that order has complied\nwith rule 6(1); or\n(c)\na certificate within the meaning of Section 2 of the Legal Aid Act (as\namended and revised)  is revoked or discharged,\nthen, unless and until the party to whose attorney or to whom, as the case may\nbe, the order or certificate relates either appoints another attorney and complies\nwith rule 3 or, being entitled to act in person, gives notice of the party\u2019s intention\nso to do and complies with rule 4, the party\u2019s last known address or, where the\nparty is a body corporate, its registered or principal office shall, for the purpose\nof the service on the party of any document not required to be served personally,\nbe deemed to be the party\u2019s address for service.\n8.\nCopy of notice to be filed (O.67, r.8)\n8.\nA notice required to be given under rule 1, 3 or 4 shall be filed on the Court file.\n\nPART 2 \u2013 DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST ATTORNEYS\n9.\nCommencement and service of Proceedings (O. 67, r. 9)\n9.\n(1) No proceedings against an attorney pursuant to section 7 of the Legal\nPractitioners Act (as amended and revised) (the \u201cAct\u201d) shall be commenced\nwithout the prior authorisation of the Chief Justice.  Upon the Chief Justice\nauthorising the commencement of such proceedings the Attorney General, as ex\nofficio head of the legal profession and acting in the public interest, shall file\nand serve on the attorney an originating notice of motion embodying full\nparticulars of charge (which shall be a pleading for the purpose of Order 18)\ntogether with affidavit evidence in support thereof.  The form of notice of\noriginating motion shall be in Form 6A of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II -\nForms (as amended and revised).\n(2) The Clerk of the Court shall place the notice of originating motion on a\nRestricted Register of Writs and other Originating Processes.\n\nORDER 67\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 346\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(3)   From the date of service of the notice of originating motion on the attorney until\nthe determination of the proceedings (including any appeals) against the\nattorney:\n(a)  any application by the attorney to the Clerk of the Court voluntarily\nseeking to be struck off the Court Roll will be stayed;\n(b)  if, at any time during that period, the attorney has for a period of twentyfour months not been in possession of an annual practising certificate\npursuant to section 12 of the Act, the Clerk of the Court will stay\nconsideration of striking the attorney off the Court Roll pursuant to section\n14 of the Act pending the determination of the proceedings.\n(5) At any time the Attorney General may delegate conduct of the proceedings to\nthe Solicitor General.\n10.\nAcknowledgment of Service (O. 67, r. 10)\n10. Within 14 days of the service of the notice of originating motion, the attorney shall\nfile and serve on the Attorney General an acknowledgment of service.  The provisions\nof Order 12 with respect to acknowledgment of service of an originating summons\nshall apply mutatis mutandis.\n11.\nCase management (O. 67, r. 11)\n11. Within 28 days of the service of the notice of originating motion and the affidavit\nevidence referred to in rule 9(1) of this Order, there shall be a case management\nconference for the future conduct of the proceedings.\n12.\nTrial (O. 67, r. 12)\n12. (1) The burden and standard of proof shall be the same as in criminal proceedings.\n(2)  If at the conclusion of the trial the Court determines that the attorney either be\nsuspended from, or struck off, the Court Roll then, absent agreement from the\nattorney, the judgment will be effective from 14 days after delivery of the\njudgment or such longer period as the Court orders.\n(3)   Unless the Court dismisses the motion then 14 days after delivery of the\njudgment, or such longer period as the Court orders, all judgments delivered in\nthe proceedings will be placed on the Register of Judgments and Orders and a\ncopy of the notice of originating motion (and any amendments thereto) will be\nplaced on the Register of Writs and other Originating Processes.\n(4)  If the Court dismisses the motion then the Court may order that any such judgment\nin anonymised or redacted format may be placed on the Register of Judgments\nand Orders.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 67\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 347\n\n13.\nConfidentiality of proceedings (O. 67, r. 13)\n13. Unless the Court otherwise orders all hearings, including the trial, shall be conducted\nin private.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (replaced 10.07.22)\n\nORDER 68\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 348\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 68\nNO ORDER\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 69\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 349\n\nORDER 69\nPROVISIONS AS TO FOREIGN PROCEEDINGS; SERVICE OF\nFOREIGN PROCESS\n\n1.\nDefinitions (O.69, r.1)\n1.\nIn this Order \u2014\n\"a convention country\" means a foreign country in relation to which there\nsubsists a civil procedure convention providing for service in that country of\nprocess of the Court, and includes a country which is a party to the Convention\non the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or\nCommercial Matters signed at the Hague on 15th November 1965; and\n\"process\" includes a citation.\n2.\nApplications (O.69, r.2)\n2.\nThis Order applies to the service on a person in the Islands of any process in\nconnection with civil or commercial proceedings in a foreign Court or tribunal where\nthe Clerk of the Court receives a written request for service \u2014\n(a)\nfrom the Governor, with a recommendation by the Governor that service\nshould be effected; or\n(b) where the foreign Court or tribunal is in a convention country, from a\nconsular or other authority of that country.\n3.\nService of process (O.69, r.3)\n3.\n(1) The request shall be accompanied by a translation thereof in English, two copies\nof the process and, unless the foreign Court or tribunal certifies that the person\nto be served understands the language of the process, two copies of a translation\nthereof.\n(2) Subject to paragraphs (3) and (4), and to any enactment providing for the manner\nof service of documents on corporate bodies, the process shall be served by the\nBailiff's leaving a copy of the process and a copy of the translation or certificate,\nas the case may be, with the person to be served.\n(3) The Bailiff shall send to the Clerk of the Court a copy of the process and an\naffidavit, certificate or report proving due service of the process or stating the\nreason why service could not be effected, as the case may be, and if the Court\ndirects shall specify the costs involved in effecting or attempting to effect\nservice.\n(4) Order 65, rule 4 (substituted service) shall apply to the service of foreign process\nas it applies to the service of writs except that a Judge may make an order for\n\nORDER 69\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 350\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nsubstituted service of foreign process on the basis of the Bailiff's affidavit,\ncertificate or report, without an application being made to the Judge in that\nbehalf.\n(5) The Clerk of the Court shall send a certificate, together with a copy of the\nprocess, to the consular or other authority or the Governor, as the case may be,\nstating \u2014\n(a)\nwhen and how service was effected or the reason why service could not be\neffected, as the case may be; and\n(b) where appropriate, the amount certified by the Clerk of the Court to be the\ncosts of effecting or attempting to effect service.\n(6) The certificate under paragraph (5) shall be sealed with the seal of the Court for\nuse out of the jurisdiction.\n4.\nService of process by private process server (O.69, r.4)\n4.\nNothing in this Order shall prevent the service of process in connection with civil or\ncommercial proceedings in a foreign Court or tribunal otherwise than pursuant to a\ncivil procedure convention being effected by an attorney or private process server.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 70\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 351\n\nORDER 70\nOBTAINING EVIDENCE FOR FOREIGN COURTS, ETC.\n\n1.\nInterpretation (O.70, r.1)\n1.\nIn this Order \u2014\n\n\"the Law\" means the Evidence (Proceedings in Other Jurisdictions) (Cayman\nIslands) Order 1978 (S.I. 1890\/78) and the expressions used in the Law which are\nused in this Order shall have the same meaning as in the Law.\n2.\nApplication for order (O.70, r.2)\n2.\n(1) Subject to rule 3, an application for an order under the Law may be made ex\nparte and must be supported by affidavit.\n(2) There shall be exhibited to the affidavit the request in pursuance of which the\napplication is made and, if the request is not in the English language, a\ntranslation thereof in that language.\n(3) An order under this rule shall be in Form No. 56 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol\nII - Forms (as amended and revised).\n3.\nApplication by Attorney General in certain cases (O.70, r.3)\n3.\nWhere a request \u2014\n(a)\nis received by the Governor and sent by the Governor to the Clerk of the\nCourt with an intimation that effect should be given to the request without\nrequiring an application for that purpose to be made by the agent in the\nIslands of any party to the matter pending before the Court or tribunal; or\n(b) is received by the Clerk of the Court in pursuance of a civil procedure\nconvention providing for the taking of the evidence of any person in the\nIslands for the assistance of a Court or tribunal in the foreign country, and\nno person is named in the document as the person who will make the\nnecessary application on behalf of such a party,\nthe Clerk of the Court shall send the document to the Attorney General and the\nAttorney General may make an application for an order under the Law and take\nsuch other steps as may be necessary to give effect to the request.\n4.\nPerson to take and manner of taking examination (O.70, r.4)\n4.\n(1) Any order made in pursuance of this Order for the examination of a witness may\norder the examination to be taken before any fit and proper person nominated\nby the person applying for the order or before such qualified person as to the\nCourt deems fit.\n\nORDER 70\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 352\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n (2) Subject to rule 6 and to any special directions contained in any order made in\npursuance of this Order for the examination of any witness, the examination\nshall be taken in manner provided by O.39, rr.5 to 10 and 11(1) to (3), and an\norder may be made under O.39, r.14, for payment of the fees and expenses due\nto the examiner, and those rules shall apply accordingly with any necessary\nmodifications.\n5.\nDealing with deposition (O.70, r.5)\n5.\nUnless any order made in pursuance of this Order for the examination of any witness\notherwise directs, the examiner before whom the examination was taken must send\nthe deposition of that witness to the Clerk of the Court and the Clerk shall \u2014\n(a)\ngive a certificate sealed with the seal of the Court identifying the\ndocuments annexed thereto, that is to say, the letter of request, the order of\nthe Court for examination and the deposition taken in pursuance of the\norder; and\n(b) send the certificate with the documents annexed thereto to the Governor,\nor, where the request was sent to the Clerk of the Court by some other\nperson in accordance with a Civil Procedure Convention to that other\nperson, for transmission to the Court or tribunal out of the jurisdiction\nrequesting the examination.\n6.\nClaim to privilege (O.70, r.6)\n6.\n(1) The provisions of this rule shall have effect where a claim by a witness to be\nexempt from giving any evidence on the ground specified in Section 3(1)(b) of\nthe Law is not supported or conceded as mentioned in subsection (2) of that\nSection.\n(2) The examiner may, if the examiner thinks fit, require the witness to give the\nevidence to which the claim relates and if the examiner does not do so, the Court\nmay do so, on the ex parte application of the person who obtained the order\nunder Section 2.\n(3) If such evidence is taken \u2014\n(a)\nit must be contained in a document separate from the remainder of the\ndeposition of the witness;\n(b) the examiner shall send to the Clerk of the Court with the deposition a\nstatement signed by the examiner setting out the claim and the ground on\nwhich it was made;\n(c)\non receipt of the statement the Clerk of the Court shall, notwithstanding\nanything in rule 5, retain the document containing the part of the witness'\nevidence to which the claim relates and shall send the statement and a\nrequest to determine the claim to the foreign Court or tribunal with the\ndocuments mentioned in rule 5;\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 70\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 353\n\n (d) if the claim is rejected by the foreign Court or tribunal, the Clerk of the\nCourt shall send to that Court or tribunal the document containing that part\nof the witness' evidence to which the claim relates, but if the claim is\nupheld the Clerk of the Court shall send the document to the witness, and\nshall in either case notify the witness and the person who obtained the\norder under Section 2 of the Law of the Court or tribunal's determination.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nORDER 71\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 354\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 71\nFOREIGN JUDGMENTS RECIPROCAL ENFORCEMENT ACT (as\namended and revised)\n\n1.\nInterpretation (O.71, r.1)\n1.\nIn this Order \u2014\n\n \"the Law\" means the Foreign Judgments Reciprocal Enforcement Act (as amended\nand revised) and expressions used in the Law which are used in this Order shall have\nthe same meaning as in the Law.\n2.\nApplication for registration (O.71, r.2)\n2.\nAn application under Section 4 of the Law to have a judgment registered in the Court\nshall be made by an ex parte originating summons unless the Court directs the\nsummons to be served on the judgment debtor.\n3.\nEvidence in support of application (O.71, r.3)\n3.\nAn application for registration must be supported by an affidavit \u2014\n(a)\nexhibiting the judgment or a verified or certified or otherwise duly\nauthenticated copy thereof, and where the judgment is not in the English\nlanguage, a translation thereof in that language certified by a notary public\nor authenticated by affidavit;\n(b) stating the name, trade or business and the usual or last known place of\nabode or business of the judgment creditor and the judgment debtor\nrespectively, so far as known to the deponent;\n(c)\nstating to the best of the information or belief of the deponent \u2014\n(i)\nthat the judgment creditor is entitled to enforce the judgment;\n(ii) as the case may require, either that at the date of the application the\njudgment has not been satisfied, or the amount in respect of which it\nremains unsatisfied;\n(iii) that the judgment does not fall within any of the cases in which a\njudgment may not be registered under Section 4 of the Law.\n4.\nSecurity for costs (O.71, r.4)\n4.\nSave as otherwise provided by any relevant Order in Council made under Section 3\nof the Law, the Court may order the judgment creditor to give security for the costs\nfor the application for registration and of any proceedings which may be brought to\nset aside the registration.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 71\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 355\n\n5.\nOrder for registration (O.71, r.5)\n5.\n(1) An order giving leave to register a judgment must be drawn up by, or on behalf\nof, the judgment creditor.\n(2) No such order need be served on the judgment debtor, unless the Court\notherwise directs.\n(3) Every such order shall state the period within which an application may be made\nto set aside the registration and shall contain a notification that execution on the\njudgment will not issue until after the expiration of that period.\n(4) The Court may, on an application made at any time while it remains competent\nfor any party to apply to have the registration set aside, extend the period (either\nas originally fixed or as subsequently extended) within which an application to\nhave the registration set aside may be made.\n6.\nFiling of judgments (O.71, r.6)\n6.\nEvery judgment ordered to be registered under the Law shall be filed in the Register\nof Judgments as if it were a judgment or order made by the Court.\n7.\nNotice of registration (O.71, r.7)\n7.\n(1) Notice of registration of a judgment must be served on the judgment debtor by\ndelivering it to the judgment debtor personally or by sending it to the judgment\ndebtor at the judgment debtor\u2019s usual or last known place of abode or business\nor in such other manner as the Court may direct.\n(2) Service of such a notice out of the jurisdiction is permissible without leave, and\nO.11, rr.4, 5 and 6, shall apply in relation to such a notice as they apply in\nrelation to a writ.\n(3) The notice of registration must state \u2014\n(a)\nfull particulars of the judgment registered and the order for registration;\n(b) the name and address of the judgment creditor or of the judgment creditor\u2019s\nattorney or agent on whom, and at which, any summons issued by the\njudgment debtor may be served;\n(c)\nthe right of the judgment debtor to apply to have the registration set aside;\nand\n(d) the period within which an application to set aside the registration may be\nmade.\n8.\nNo rule (O.71, r.8)\n8.\nNo rule (O.71, r.8)\n\nORDER 71\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 356\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n9.\nApplication to set aside registration (O.71, r.9)\n9.\n(1) An application to set aside the registration of a judgment must be made by\nsummons supported by affidavit.\n(2) The Court hearing the application may order any issue between the judgment\ncreditor and the judgment debtor to be tried in any manner in which an issue in\nan action may be ordered to be tried.\n10.\nIssue of execution (O.71, r.10)\n10. (1) Execution shall not issue on a judgment registered under the Law until after the\nperiod which in accordance with rule 5(3) is specified in the order for\nregistration as the period within which an application may be made to set aside\nthe registration or, if that period has been extended by the Court, until after the\nexpiration of that period as so extended.\n(2) If an application is made to set aside the registration of a judgment execution on\nthe judgment shall not issue until after such application is finally determined.\n(3) Any party wishing to issue execution on a judgment registered under the Law\nmust produce to the Clerk of the Court an affidavit of service of the notice of\nregistration of the judgment and any order made by the Court in relation to the\njudgment.\n11.\nNo rule (O.71, r.11)\n11. No rule (O.71, r.11)\n12.\nNo rule (O.71, r.12)\n12. No rule (O.71, r.12)\n13.\nCertified copy of Grand Court judgment (O.71, r.13)\n13. (1) An application under Section 11 of the Law for a certified copy of a judgment\nentered in the Court must be made by ex parte summons in the proceeding in\nwhich the judgment is given.\n(2) Such an application must be supported by an affidavit stating \u2014\n(a)\nthat the judgment creditor wishes to enforce the judgment in a foreign\ncountry to which Part I of the Law extends;\n(b) the name, trade or business and the usual or last known place of residence\nof the judgment debtor so far as known to the deponent;\n(c)\nthe extent to which the judgment is outstanding;\n(d) that the judgment is not subject to any stay of execution and that the time\nfor appealing has expired or, as the case may be, the date on which it will\nexpire; and\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 71\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 357\n\n(e)\nthat there is no other impediment to enforcement of the judgment or reason\nwhy it may not be enforced.\n(3) The certified copy of the judgment shall be an office copy sealed with the seal\nof the Court and indorsed with a certificate signed by the Clerk of the Court,\ncertifying that the copy is a true copy of a judgment obtained in the Grand Court\nof the Islands and that it is issued in accordance with Section 11 of the Law.\n(4) There shall also be issued with such certified copy of the judgment a certificate\nof the Clerk of the Court having annexed to it a copy of the writ, originating\nsummons or other process by which the proceedings were begun and stating \u2014\n(a)\nthe manner in which the writ or other process was served on the defendant\nor that the defendant acknowledged service thereof;\n(b) what objections, if any, were made to the jurisdiction;\n(c)\nwhat pleadings, if any, were served;\n(d) the grounds on which the judgment was based;\n(e)\nthat the time for appealing has expired, or, as the case may be, the date on\nwhich it will expire;\n(f)\nwhether notice of appeal against the judgment has been filed; and\n(g) such other particulars as may be necessary to give to the Court in the\nforeign country in which it is sought to obtain execution of the judgment,\nand a certificate (signed and sealed as aforesaid) stating the rate at which\nthe judgment carries interest.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nORDER 72\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 358\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 72\nFINANCIAL SERVICES PROCEEDINGS\n\n1.\nApplication and Interpretation (O.72, r.1)\n1.\n(1) This Order applies to financial services proceedings and the other provisions of\nthese Rules apply to those proceedings subject to the provisions of this Order.\n(2)  In these Rules \"financial services proceeding\" means \u2014\n(a)  any proceeding relating to a mutual fund, including an action by or against\nits directors (in the case of a corporate fund), its trustee (in the case of a\nunit trust), its general partner (in the case of a limited partnership), its\ninvestment manager or adviser, its administrator, its prime broker or its\nauditor;\n(b)  any proceeding relating to an exempted insurer, including an action by or\nagainst its directors, insurance manager or auditor;\n(c)  any action for breach of a contract of insurance (including an application\nfor a declaration) where the amount claimed exceeds $1 million;\n(d)  any application (including an appeal by a licensee) made to the Court under\nany of the regulatory laws;\n(e)  any administration action or application under the Trusts Act (as amended\nand revised) (to which O.85 applies) except those relating to the estates of\ndeceased persons who died domiciled in the Islands and the net asset value\nof the estate is less than $1 million;\n(f)  any action against a trustee or protector of a trust or the executor or\nadministrator of an estate for breach of trust or breach of fiduciary duty,\nexcept those actions relating to a trust or estate whose net asset value is\nless than $1 million;\n(g)  any application made to the Court under the Companies Act (as amended\nand revised) (to which O.102 applies), including any application made in\na winding up proceeding (to which the Companies Winding Up Rules (as\namended and revised) apply);\n(h)  any application for an order for the dissolution of a partnership which\ncarries on business as a mutual fund, including any application made in the\ndissolution proceeding;\n(i)  any action for breach of contract or breach of duty by or against a\nprofessional service provider, except for actions relating to the nonpayment or over-payment of fees where the amount claimed is less than\n$250,000;\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 72\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 359\n\n(j)  any application for an order for evidence pursuant to a letter of request to\nwhich O.70 applies, including any related application for directions to\nwhich O.103 applies;\n(k)  any application to which the Grand Court (Bankruptcy) Rules (as amended\nand revised) or the Foreign Bankruptcy Proceedings (International CoOperation) Rules (as amended and revised) apply;\n(l)  any action for the enforcement of a foreign judgment, whether at common\nlaw or pursuant to the Foreign Judgments Reciprocal Enforcement Act;\n(m)  any action for the enforcement of a foreign arbitral award pursuant to the\nForeign Arbitral Awards Enforcement Act;\n(n)  any application made to the Court pursuant to the Arbitration Act\n2012[Law 3 of 2012].\n(2)  In this Order \u2014\n(a)  \"the Registrar\" means the Registrar of the Financial Services Division of\nthe Court;\n(b)  \"mutual fund\" has the meaning ascribed to it in Section 2 of the Mutual\nFunds Act (as amended and revised);\n(c)  \"external insurer\" has the meaning ascribed to it in Section 2 of the\nInsurance Act (as amended and revised);\n(d)  \"regulatory laws\" has the meaning ascribed to it in Section 2 of the\nMonetary Authority Act (as amended and revised); and\n(e)  \"professional service provider\" has the meaning ascribed to it in Section\n89 of the Companies Act (as amended and revised).\n2.\nCommencement of Financial Services Proceedings (O.72, r.2)\n2.\n(1) Every financial services proceeding shall be commenced in the Financial\nServices Division.\n(2)  Every financial services proceeding shall be commenced by writ, originating\nsummons, originating motion or petition in accordance with O.5 and entered\ninto the Register of Writs and other Originating Process in accordance with\nO.63, r.8.\n(3)  The title of every proceeding commenced in or transferred to the Financial\nServices Division shall include the words In the Grand Court of the Cayman\nIslands, Financial Services Division.\n(4)  In addition to establishing and maintaining a Court file in accordance with O.63,\nr.2, the Registrar shall create and maintain a computerised record for each\nfinancial services proceeding which shall comprise the following documents\nand\/or produce reports comprising the following information \u2014\n(a)  a chronological index of all the pleadings, affidavits and orders;\n\nORDER 72\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 360\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(b)  a copy of each pleading, affidavit (without its exhibits) and order;\n(c)  a copy of each skeleton argument (without copy authorities); and\n(d)  a schedule containing details of \u2014\n(i)  the fixed Court fee paid;\n(ii)  the date and length of each hearing;\n(iii)  the Court hearing fees paid (if any); and\n(iv)  the identity of the party or parties by whom the fixed fee and any\nCourt hearing fees have been paid.\n(5)  The computerised record (created and maintained in accordance with paragraph\n(4) above) shall enable the Registrar to produce reports in respect of each\nproceeding which is commenced in or transferred to the Financial Services\nDivision containing the following information \u2014\n(a)  the date on which the proceeding was commenced or transferred to the\nFinancial Services Division;\n(b)  the title of the proceeding;\n(c)  the name of the Commercial Judge to whom it has been assigned;\n(d)  particulars of the parties' attorneys and any foreign lawyers;\n(e)  the date and a brief description of each hearing;\n(f)  the date and estimated length of future hearings;\n(g) particulars of the date and manner in which the proceeding was concluded.\n(6)  The Registrar, acting in consultation with the Chief Justice, shall assign every\nfinancial services proceeding to one of the Commercial Judges and the cause\nnumber assigned to it in accordance with O.5, r.1(5)(b) shall include the judge's\ninitials.\n(7)  The trial of every financial services proceeding shall be heard by the\nCommercial Judge assigned to it.\n(8)  Every interlocutory application made in a financial services proceeding\n(including every application made in a winding up proceeding) shall be heard\nor determined by the Commercial Judge assigned to it, except that another\nCommercial Judge may hear or determine an urgent application if the Judge\nassigned to the proceeding is not available.\n3.\nTransfer of Proceedings (O.72, r.3)\n3.\nAny cause or matter pending in the Court, including matters commenced prior to the\nCommencement Date, may be transferred to the Financial Services Division on the\nground that \u2014\n (a)  it is a financial services proceedings which ought properly to have been\ncommenced in the Financial Services Division; or\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 72\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 361\n\n(b)  the Court is satisfied upon the application of any party that it would be\nappropriate in all the circumstances for the cause or matter to be tried by a\nCommercial Judge.\n4.\nCase management and summonses for directions (O.72, r.4)\n4.\n(1) Order 25 shall apply to proceedings pending in the Financial Services Division\nsubject to the following modifications.\n(2)  The Registrar shall issue an initial summons for directions in Form No.71 of the\nGrand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) in every financial\nservices proceeding within 3 months of the date on which it was commenced or\ntransferred to the Financial Services Division unless in the meantime \u2014\n(a)  the cause or matter has been finally determined;\n(b)  the Registrar has received notice that the cause or matter has been\ndiscontinued or settled;\n(c)  the Court has already made an order for directions; or\n(d)  one or other of the parties has taken out a summons for directions.\n(3)  In order that the Court may be informed of the general nature of the case and\nthe issues which are expected to arise, the attorneys for each party shall prepare\nand file an agreed case memorandum (within such period as the Registrar shall\ndirect) which should contain \u2014\n(a)  a short and uncontroversial description of what the case is about;\n(b)  a list of issues, including both issues of fact and law, to the extent that it is\npractical to do so having regard to the state of the pleadings; and\n(c)  a procedural history.\n(4)  The attorneys for the plaintiff shall be responsible for filing the agreed case\nmemorandum.\n(5)  The Registrar may at any time issue a notice in Form No.72 of the Grand Court\nRules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) requiring that the parties'\nattorneys and their foreign lawyers (if any) attend before the Judge for the\npurposes of a case management conference.\n(6)  If a party has instructed or intends to instruct a foreign lawyer to appear at the\ntrial or any interlocutory hearing the Registrar shall be so informed and such\nforeign lawyer may be required to appear on any summons for directions or case\nmanagement conference.\n(7)  If one or more of the parties have instructed a foreign lawyer, the Registrar may\nrequire that the hearing of any summons for directions or any case management\nconference be conducted via a video link, in which case the parties shall provide\nsuitable conference room facilities for the use of the Judge.\n\nORDER 72\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 362\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n5.\nListing interlocutory hearings and trials (O.72, r.5)\n5.\n(1) The Registrar shall be responsible for listing the hearing of all case management\nconferences, interlocutory applications and trials.\n(2)  Order 34 shall not apply to proceedings pending in the Financial Services\nDivision.\n(3)  The Registrar shall maintain \u2014\n(a)  a composite Court diary for the Financial Services Division; and\n(b)  an individual Court diary for each Commercial Judge.\n6.\nTransitional Provisions (O.72, r.6)\n6.\n(1) The Financial Services Division Court shall be established with effect from the\n1st day of November 2009 (referred to in this Rule as \"the Commencement\nDate\") and this Rule shall apply to every financial services proceeding\ncommenced prior to the Commencement Date.\n(2)  Any party or parties to a cause or matter commenced prior to the\nCommencement Date may apply to the Registrar in Form No. 73 of the Grand\nCourt Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) for an order that it be\ntransferred to the Financial Services Division and the Registrar shall make a\ntransfer order if the Registrar is satisfied that the cause or matter is a financial\nservices proceeding within the meaning of Rule 1(2).\n(3)  Whenever a party seeks to issue an interlocutory summons or an application is\nmade to fix a hearing date for a trial and it appears to the Registrar that the cause\nor matter is a financial services proceeding, the Registrar shall \u2014\n(a)  invite the parties to apply in Form No. 73 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol\nII - Forms (as amended and revised) for a transfer order; or\n(b)  if the parties or any of them fail to apply in Form No. 73 of the Grand\nCourt Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) within 14 days, the\nRegistrar shall make a transfer order on the Registrar\u2019s own motion.\n(4)  Every transfer order made by the Registrar under this rule shall be in Form No.\n74 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) and\nshall specify \u2014\n(a)  the Commercial Judge to whom the proceeding has been assigned;\n(b)  the amount of the transfer fee payable in accordance with Rule 3(5) of the\nCourt Fees Rules (as amended and revised); and\n(c)  the party or parties liable to pay the transfer fee.\n(5)  The liability for payment of the transfer fee shall be determined as follows \u2014\n(a)  the parties may agree that any one of them shall be liable or that liability\nbe divided amongst them in agreed proportions;\n\nand, in default of agreement \u2014\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 72\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 363\n\n(b)  the party by whom a transfer application is made under paragraph (2) of\nthis Rule shall be liable to pay the transfer fee; or\n(c)  in the case of a transfer order made under paragraph (3)(b) of this Rule,\nthe party seeking to issue the summons or fix the hearing date shall be\nliable to pay the transfer fee; or\n(d)  in the case of an application made in a winding up proceeding (to which\nthe Companies Winding Up Rules (as amended and revised) apply), the\nofficial liquidator shall be liable to pay the transfer fee as an expense of\nthe liquidation.\n(6)  Every transfer order made by the Registrar shall be served by the Registrar upon\nthe attorneys for all the parties by facsimile or e-mail and by placing an office\ncopy in the attorneys' Court office post box.\n(7)  Any party who is dissatisfied with the decision to make a transfer order may\napply within 7 days to the Chief Justice who shall review the matter de novo and\nmay substitute the Chief Justice\u2019s own decision for that of the Registrar.\n(8)  Any party who is dissatisfied with the terms of a transfer order may apply within\n7 days to the Chief Justice who shall review the matter de novo and may vary\nthe transfer order by assigning the matter to a different Commercial Judge\nand\/or reducing the amount of the transfer fee and\/or varying the paying party\nor parties.\n(9)  An application under paragraphs (7) or (8) of this Rule shall be made in writing\nin Form No.75 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and\nrevised) upon notice to the other parties who may submit their own reply or\nsubmission in writing within 3 days after receiving notice of the application.\n(10) No step may be taken in any proceeding which has been transferred to the\nFinancial Services Division under this rule, except for any application under\nparagraphs (7) or (8) for a review of the transfer order, unless and until the\ntransfer fee has been paid in full.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 01.11.09) (amended 01.07.13)\n\nORDER 73\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 364\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 73\nARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS\n\nPART I\n1.\nThe overriding objective (O.73, r.1)\n1.\nThis Order is founded on the general principles in Section 3(3) of the 2012 Law and\nshall be construed accordingly.\n2.\nMeaning of arbitration application (O.73, r.2)\n2.\n(1) Subject to paragraph (2), \u201carbitration application\u201d means the following \u2014\n(a)  an application to the Court under the 2012 Law;\n(b)  proceedings to determine \u2014\n(i)  whether there is a valid arbitration agreement;\n(ii)  whether an arbitration tribunal is properly constituted;\n(iii)  what matters have been submitted to arbitration in accordance with\nan arbitration agreement;\n(c)  proceedings to declare that an award by an arbitral tribunal is not binding\non a party;\n(d)  any other application \u2014\n(i)  affecting arbitration proceedings (whether instituted or anticipated);\nor\n(ii)  to construe or affecting an arbitration agreement,\nand includes the originating process by which an arbitration application is\nbegun.\n(2)  In this Part of this Order, an arbitration application does not include proceedings\nto enforce an award to which Part II of this Order applies.\n3.\nInterpretation (O.73, r.3)\n3.\nIn this Order \u2014\n(1)  \u201cthe 1974 Law\u201d means the Arbitration Law 1974 [Law 2 of 1974];\n(2)  \u201cthe 1975 Law\u201d means the Foreign Arbitral Awards Enforcement Act 1975\n[Law 30 of 1975];\n(3)  \u201cthe 2012 Law\u201d means the Arbitration Act, 2012 [Law 3 of 2012];\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 73\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 365\n\n(4)  References to the 1974 Law, the 1975 Law or the 2012 Law include references\nto any current amendments and Revisions to those Laws as may be in force from\ntime to time;\n(5)  \u201cthe 1967 Order\u201d means the Arbitration (International Investment Disputes)\nAct 1966 (Application to Colonies etc.) Order 1967 [UKSI 1967\/159] (as\namended);\n(6)  \u201cthe 1988 Order\u201d means the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency\n(Overseas Territories) Order 1988 [UKSI 1988\/791];\n(7)  \u201cthe MIGA Convention\u201d means the Convention establishing the Multilateral\nInvestment Guarantee Agency signed in Seoul on 11 October 1985;\n(8)  \u201cthe Washington Convention\u201d means the Convention on the Settlement of\nInvestment Disputes between States and Nationals of other States done at\nWashington, 18 March 1965;\n4.\nForm and content of arbitration application (O.73, r.4)\n4.\n(1) Except where paragraph (5) applies, every arbitration application must be in\nForm No. 6A of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and\nrevised).\n (2)  Every arbitration application must \u2014\n(a)  include a concise statement of \u2014\n(i)  the remedy or relief claimed, and\n(ii)  (where appropriate) the questions on which the applicant seeks the\ndetermination or direction of the Court;\n(b)  give details of any arbitration award that is challenged by the applicant,\nshowing the grounds for any such challenge;\n(c)  where the applicant claims an order for costs, identify the respondent\nagainst whom the claim is made;\n(d)  (where appropriate) specify the Section of the 2012 Law under which the\napplication is brought; and\n(e)  show that any statutory requirements have been satisfied.\n(3)  The arbitration application must also state \u2014\n(a)  whether it is made ex parte or on notice and, if made on notice, must give\nthe names and addresses of the persons to whom notice is to be given,\nstating their role in the arbitration and whether they are made respondents\nto the application;\n(b)  whether (having regard to Section 83 of the 2012 Law) the applicant\nintends to apply for the proceedings to be heard in open court; and\n(c)  the date and time when the application will be heard or that such date has\nnot yet been fixed.\n\nORDER 73\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 366\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(4)  Every arbitration application which is used as an originating process shall be\nindorsed with the applicant's address for service in accordance with O.6, r.5.\n(5)  An application to stay proceedings under Section 9 of the 2012 Law must be\nmade by summons in those proceedings.\n5.\nIssue of application (O.73, r.5)\n5.\nEvery arbitration application shall be commenced in the Financial Services Division,\npursuant to O.72 rr.1(2)(m) or (n) as applicable.\n6.\nStay of legal proceedings (O.73, r.6)\n6.\n(1) An application under section 9 of the 2012 Law to stay legal proceedings shall\nbe served \u2014\n(a)  in accordance with O.65, r.5, on the party bringing the relevant legal\nproceedings and on any other party to those proceedings who has given an\naddress for service; and\n(b)  on any party to those legal proceedings who has not given an address for\nservice, by sending to the party (whether or not the party is within the\njurisdiction) at the party\u2019s last known address or at a place where it is likely\nto come to the party\u2019s attention, a copy of the application for the party\u2019s\ninformation.\n(2)  Where a question arises as to whether an arbitration agreement has been\nconcluded or as to whether the dispute which is the subject-matter of the\nproceedings falls within the terms of such an agreement, the Court may\ndetermine that question or give directions for its determination, in which case it\nmay order the proceedings to be stayed pending the determination of that\nquestion.\n7.\nService of arbitration application (O.73, r.7)\n7.\n(1) Subject to paragraphs (2) and (4) below and to rules 6(1) and 8 of this Order, an\narbitration application shall be served in accordance with O.10.\n(2)  Where the Court is satisfied on an ex parte application that \u2014\n(a)  arbitral proceedings are taking place, or an arbitration award has been\nmade, within the jurisdiction; and\n(b)  an arbitration application is being made in connection with those arbitral\nproceedings or being brought to challenge the award or to appeal on a\nquestion of law arising out of the award; and\n(c)  the respondent to the arbitration application (not being an individual\nresiding or carrying on business within the jurisdiction or a body corporate\nhaving a registered office or a place of business within the jurisdiction) \u2014\n(i)  is or was represented in the arbitral proceedings by an attorney or\nother agent within the jurisdiction who was authorised to receive\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 73\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 367\n\nservice of any notice or other document served for the purposes of\nthose proceedings; and\n(ii)  has not (at the time when the arbitration application is made)\ndetermined the authority of that attorney or agent,\nthe Court may authorise service of the arbitration application to be effected on\nthe attorney or agent instead of the respondent.\n(3)  An order made under paragraph (2) must limit a time within which the\nrespondent must acknowledge service and a copy of the order and of the\narbitration application must be sent by post, by courier or electronically to the\nrespondent at the respondent\u2019s address or electronic address out of the\njurisdiction.\n(4)  Where an arbitration application has been issued, any subsequent arbitration\napplication made by the respondent and arising out of the same arbitration or\narbitration agreement may be served on the applicant in accordance with O.65,\nr.5 (Ordinary service: how effected) and similarly any subsequent arbitration\napplication by any party may be served at the address for service given in the\nfirst arbitration application or in the acknowledgment of service.\n(5)  For the purposes of service, an arbitration application is valid in the first\ninstance \u2014\n(a)  where service is to be effected out of the jurisdiction, for such period as\nthe Court may fix;\n(b)  in any other case, for one month,\nbeginning with the date of its issue and O.6 r.8 shall apply with the substitution,\nin paragraphs (2) and (3), of \"2 months\" for \"4 months\" and \"6 months\" for \"12\nmonths\".\n8.\nService out of the jurisdiction (O.73, r.8)\n8.\n(1) Service out of the jurisdiction of an arbitration application is permissible with\nthe leave of the Court if \u2014\n(a)  the applicant seeks to challenge, or to appeal to the Court on a question of\nlaw arising out of, an arbitration award made within the jurisdiction (the\nplace where an award is treated as made being determined by Section 63(4)\nof the 2012 Law);\n(b)  the application is for an order under Section 43 of the 2012 Law (Court\u2019s\npowers exercisable in support of arbitral proceedings). Where the\napplication is for interim relief in support of arbitral proceedings which are\ntaking (or will take) place outside the jurisdiction, the Court may give\nleave for service out of the jurisdiction notwithstanding that no other relief\nis sought; or\n(c)  the applicant \u2014\n\nORDER 73\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 368\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(i)  seeks some other remedy or relief, or requires a question to be\ndecided by the Court, affecting an arbitration (whether pending or\n\nanticipated), an arbitration agreement or an arbitration award; and\n(ii)  the seat of the arbitration is or will be within the jurisdiction.\n(2)  An application for the grant of leave under this rule must be supported by an\naffidavit \u2014\n(a)  stating the grounds on which the application is made; and\n(b)  showing in what place or country the person to be served is, or probably\nmay be found,\nand no such leave shall be granted unless it shall be made sufficiently to appear\nto the Court that the case is a proper one for service out of the jurisdiction under\nthis rule.\n(3)  Order 11, rules 5 to 8 shall apply to the service of an arbitration application\nunder this rule as they apply to the service of a writ.\n(4)  Service out of the jurisdiction of any order made on an arbitration application is\npermissible with the leave of the Court.\n9.\nAffidavit in support of arbitration application (O.73, r.9)\n9.\n(1) The applicant shall file an affidavit in support of the arbitration application\nwhich sets out the evidence on which the applicant intends to rely and a copy of\nevery affidavit so filed must be served with the arbitration application.\n(2)  Where an arbitration application is made with the written agreement of all the\nother parties to the arbitral proceedings or with the permission of the arbitral\ntribunal, the affidavit in support must \u2014\n(a)  give details of the agreement or, as the case may be, permission; and\n(b)  exhibit copies of any document which evidences that agreement or\npermission.\n10.\nRequirements as to notice (O.73, r.10)\n10. (1) Where the 2012 Law requires that an application to the Court is to be made upon\nnotice to other parties notice shall be given by making those parties respondents\nto the application and serving on them the arbitration application and any\naffidavit in support.\n(2)  Where an arbitration application is made under Section 20, 65 or 67 of the 2012\nLaw, the arbitrators or, in the case of an application under Section 20, the\narbitrator concerned shall be made respondents to the application and notice\nshall be given by serving on them the arbitration application and any affidavit\nin support.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 73\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 369\n\n(3)  In cases where paragraph (2) does not apply, an applicant shall be taken as\nhaving complied with any requirement to give notice to the arbitrator if the\napplicant sends a copy of the arbitration application to the arbitrator for the\narbitrator\u2019s information at the arbitrator\u2019s last known address or electronic\naddress with a copy of any affidavit in support.\n(4)  This rule does not apply to applications under Section 9 of the 2012 Law to stay\nlegal proceedings.\n11.\nAcknowledgment of service by respondent (O.73, r.11)\n11. (1) Service of an arbitration application may be acknowledged by completing an\nacknowledgment of service in Form No. 9A in the Grand Court Rules - Vol II -\nForms (as amended and revised) in accordance with O.12 (as that Order applies\nby virtue of rule 9 of that Order).\n(2)  A respondent who \u2014\n(a)  fails to acknowledge service within the time limited for so doing; or\n(b)  having indicated on the respondent\u2019s acknowledgment of service that the\napplicant does not intend to contest the arbitration application, then wishes\nto do so,\nshall not be entitled to contest the application without the leave of the Court.\n(3)  The Court will not give notice of the date on which an arbitration application\nwill be heard to a respondent who has failed to acknowledge service.\n(4)  The failure of a respondent to give notice of intention to contest the arbitration\napplication or to acknowledge service shall not affect the applicant's duty to\nsatisfy the Court that the order applied for should be made.\n(5)  This rule does not apply to \u2014\n(a)  applications under Section 9 of the 2012 Law to stay legal proceedings; or\n(b)  subsequent arbitration applications.\n12.\nAcknowledgment of service, etc., by arbitrator (O.73, r.12)\n12. (1) An arbitrator who is sent a copy of an arbitration application for the arbitrator\u2019s\ninformation may make \u2014\n(a)  a request ex parte in writing to be made a respondent; or\n(b)  representations to the Court under this rule,\nand, where an arbitrator is ordered to be made a respondent, the arbitrator shall\nacknowledge service within 14 days of the making of that order.\n(2)  An arbitrator who wishes to make representations to the Court under this rule\nmay file an affidavit or make representations in writing to the Court.\n\nORDER 73\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 370\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(3)  The arbitrator shall as soon as is practicable send a copy of any document filed\nor made under paragraph (2) to all the parties to the arbitration application.\n(4)  Nothing in this rule shall require the Court to admit a document filed or made\nunder paragraph (2) and the weight to be given to any such document shall be a\nmatter for the Court.\n13.\nAutomatic directions (O.73, r.13)\n13. (1) Unless the Court otherwise directs, the following directions shall take effect\nautomatically and to this extent O.72, r.4 shall not apply to arbitration\napplications.\n(2)  A respondent who wishes to put evidence before the Court in response to any\naffidavit filed in support of an arbitration application shall serve the\nrespondent\u2019s affidavit on the applicant before the expiration of 21 days after the\ntime limited for acknowledging service or, in a case where a respondent is not\nrequired to file an acknowledgment of service, within 21 days after service of\nthe arbitration application.\n(3)  An applicant who wishes to put evidence before the Court in response to an\naffidavit lodged under paragraph (2) shall serve the applicant\u2019s affidavit on the\nrespondent within 7 days after service of the respondent's affidavit.\n(4)  Where a date has not been fixed for the hearing of the arbitration application,\nthe applicant shall, and the respondent may, not later than 14 days after the\nexpiration of the time limit specified in paragraph (2), apply to the Court for\nsuch a date to be fixed.\n(5)  Agreed indexed and paginated bundles of all the evidence and other documents\nto be used at the hearing shall be prepared by the applicant (with the cooperation of the respondent).\n(6)  Not later than 5 clear days before the hearing date estimates for the length of the\nhearing shall be lodged with the Court together with a complete set of the\ndocuments to be used.\n(7)  Not later than 2 days before the hearing date the applicant shall lodge with the\nCourt \u2014\n(a)  a chronology of the relevant events cross-referenced to the bundle of\ndocuments;\n(b)  (where necessary) a list of the persons involved;\n(c)  a skeleton argument which lists succinctly \u2014\n(i)  the issues which arise for decision,\n(ii)  the grounds of relief (or opposing relief) to be relied upon,\n(iii)  the submissions of fact to be made with the references to the\nevidence, and\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 73\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 371\n\n(iv)  the submissions of law with references to the relevant authorities,\nand shall send a copy to the respondent.\n(8)  Not later than the day before the hearing date the respondent shall lodge with\nthe Court a skeleton argument which lists succinctly \u2014\n(a)  the issues which arise for decision,\n(b)  the grounds of relief (or opposing relief) to be relied upon,\n(c)  the submissions of fact to be made with the references to the evidence, and\n(d)  the submissions of law with references to the relevant authorities,\nand shall send a copy to the applicant.\n14.\nDirections by the Court (O.73, r.14)\n14. (1) The Court may give such directions as to the conduct of the arbitration\napplication as it thinks best adapted to secure the just, expeditious and\neconomical disposal thereof.\n(2)  Where the Court considers that there is or may be a dispute as to fact and that\nthe just, expeditious and economical disposal of the application can best be\nsecured by hearing the application on oral evidence or mainly on oral evidence,\nit may, if it thinks fit, order that no further evidence shall be filed and that the\napplication shall be heard on oral evidence or partly on oral evidence and partly\non affidavit evidence, with or without cross-examination of any of the\ndeponents, as it may direct.\n(3)  The Court may give directions as to the filing of evidence and as to the\nattendance of deponents for cross-examination and any directions which it could\ngive in proceedings begun by writ.\n(4)  If the applicant makes default in complying with these rules or with any order\nor direction of the Court as to the conduct of the application, or if the Court is\nsatisfied that the applicant is not prosecuting the application with due dispatch,\nthe Court may order the application to be dismissed or may make such other\norder as may be just.\n(5)  If the respondent fails to comply with these rules or with any order or direction\ngiven by the Court in relation to the evidence to be relied on, or the submission\nto be made by that respondent, the Court may, if it thinks fit, hear and determine\nthe application without having regard to that evidence or those submissions.\n15.\nNo rule (O.73, r.15)\n15. No rule (O.73, r.15)\n\nORDER 73\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 372\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n16.\nSecuring the attendance of witnesses (O.73, r.16)\n16. A party to arbitral proceedings being conducted in the jurisdiction who wishes to\nsecure the attendance of a witness may apply to the Court pursuant to Section 40 of\nthe 2012 Law for a writ of subpoena ad testificandum or of subpoena duces tecum. A\nwrit of subpoena shall not be issued until the applicant lodges an affidavit which\n\n shows that the application is made with the permission of the tribunal or the\nagreement of the other parties.\n17.\nSecuring for costs (O.73, r.17)\n17. Subject to Section 77(6) of the 2012 Law, the Court may order any applicant\n(including an applicant who has been granted leave to appeal) to provide security for\ncosts of any arbitration application.\n18.\nPowers exercisable in support of arbitral proceedings (O.73, r.18)\n18. (1) Where the case is one of urgency, an application for an order under Section 43\nof the 2012 Law (Court\u2019s powers exercisable in support of arbitral proceedings)\nmay be made ex parte on affidavit (before the issue of an arbitration application)\nand the affidavit shall (in addition to dealing with the matters required to be\ndealt with by rule 9) state the reasons \u2014\n(a)  why the application is made ex parte; and\n(b)  (where the application is made without the permission of the arbitral\ntribunal or the agreement of the other parties to the arbitral proceedings)\nwhy it was not practicable to obtain that permission or agreement, and\n(c)  why the deponent believes that the condition in section 43(5) is satisfied.\n(2)  Where the case is not one of urgency, an application for an order under Section\n43 of the 2012 Law shall be made on notice and the affidavit in support shall (in\naddition to dealing with the matters required to be dealt with by rule 9 and\nparagraph (1) (c) above) state that the application is made with the permission\nof the tribunal or the written agreement of the other parties to the arbitral\nproceedings.\n(3)  Where an application for an order under Section 43 of the 2012 Law is made\nbefore the issue of an arbitration application, any order made by the Court may\nbe granted on terms providing for the issue of an application and such other\nterms, if any, as the Court thinks fit.\n19.\nApplications under Sections 27(9) and 71 of the 2012 Law (O.73, r.19)\n19. (1) This rule applies to the following arbitration applications \u2014\n(a)  applications for the determination of a question as to the jurisdiction of the\narbitral tribunal under section 27(9) of the 2012 Law; and\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 73\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 373\n\n(b)  applications for the determination of a preliminary point of law under\nsection 71 of the 2012 Law.\n(2)  Where an application is made without the agreement in writing of all the other\nparties to the arbitral proceedings but with the permission of the arbitral tribunal,\nthe affidavits filed by the parties shall set out any evidence relied on by the\nparties in support of their contention that the Court should, or should not,\nconsider the application.\n(3)  As soon as practicable after the affidavits are lodged, the Court shall decide\nwhether or not it should consider the application and, unless the Court otherwise\ndirects, may so decide without a hearing.\n20.\nApplications for leave to appeal (O.73, r.20)\n20. (1) Where the applicant seeks leave to appeal to the Court on a question of law\narising out of an arbitration award, the arbitration application shall identify the\nquestion of law and state the grounds on which the applicant alleges that leave\nshould be granted.\n(2)  The affidavit in support of the application shall set out any evidence relied on\nby the applicant for the purpose of satisfying the Court of the matters mentioned\nin Section 76(4) of the 2012 Law and for satisfying the Court that leave should\nbe granted.\n(3)  The affidavit lodged by the respondent to the application shall \u2014\n(a)  state the grounds on which the respondent opposes the grant of leave;\n(b)  set out any evidence relied on by the respondent relating to the matters\nmentioned in Section 76(4) of the 2012 Law; and\n(c)  specify whether the respondent wishes to contend that the award should be\nupheld for reasons not expressed (or not fully expressed) in the award and,\nif so, state those reasons.\n(4)  As soon as practicable after the lodging of the affidavits, the Court shall\ndetermine the application for leave to appeal.\n(5)  Where leave is granted, a date shall be fixed for the hearing of the appeal.\n21.\nExtension of time: applications under Section 13 (O.73, r.21)\n21. An application for an order under Section 13 of the 2012 Law may include as an\nalternative an application for a declaration that such an order is not needed.\n22.\nTime limit for challenges to or appeals from awards (O.73, r.22)\n22. (1) An applicant shall not be taken as having complied with the time limit of one\nmonth referred to in Section 77(3) of the 2012 Law unless the arbitration\napplication has been issued, and all the affidavits in support have been sworn\nand filed, by the expiry of that time limit.\n\nORDER 73\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 374\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(2)  An applicant who wishes \u2014\n(a)  to challenge an award under Section 75 of the 2012 Law; or\n(b)  to appeal under section 76 on a question of law arising out of an award,\nmay, where the time limit of 30 days or one month, as the case may be,\nhas not yet expired, apply ex parte on affidavit for an order extending\nthat time limit.\n(3)  In any case where an applicant seeks to challenge an award under Section 75 of\nthe 2012 Law or to appeal under Section 76 after the time limit of 30 days or\none month, as the case may be, has already expired, the following provisions\nshall apply \u2014\n(a)  the applicant must state in the applicant\u2019s arbitration application the\ngrounds why an order extending time should be made and the applicant\u2019s\naffidavit in support shall set out the evidence on which the applicant relies;\n(b)  a respondent who wishes to oppose the making of an order extending time\nshall file an affidavit within 7 days after service of the applicant's affidavit,\nand\n(c)  the Court shall decide whether or not to extend time without a hearing\nunless it appears to the Court that a hearing is required,\nand, where the Court makes an order extending the time limit, the respondent\nshall file the respondent affidavit in response to the arbitration application 21\ndays after the making of the order.\n23.\nNo rule (O.73, r.23)\n23. No rule (O.73, r.23)\n24.\nNo rule (O.73, r.24)\n24. No rule (O.73, r.24)\n25.\nNo rule (O.73, r.25)\n25. No rule (O.73, r.25)\n26.\nNo rule (O.73, r.26)\n26. No rule (O.73, r.26)\n27.\nNo rule (O.73, r.27)\n27. No rule (O.73, r.27)\n28.\nNo rule (O.73, r.28)\n28. No rule (O.73, r.28)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 73\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 375\n\n29.\nNo rule (O.73, r.29)\n29. No rule (O.73, r.29)\n30.\nNo rule (O.73, r.30)\n30. No rule (O.73, r.30)\n\nPART II\n31.\nEnforcement of awards (O.73, r.31)\n31. (1) An application for leave under Section 52 or 72 of the 2012 Law or under\nSection 5 of the 1975 Law to enforce an arbitral award, shall be made by ex\nparte originating summons.\n(2)  The Court hearing an application under paragraph (1) may direct that the\napplication is to be served on such parties to the arbitration as it may specify\nand service of the application out of the jurisdiction is permissible with the leave\nof the Court irrespective of where the award is, or is treated as, made.\n(3)  Where a direction is given under paragraph (2), rules 11 and 13 to 17 shall apply\nwith the necessary modifications as they apply to applications under Part I of\nthis Order.\n(4)  Where the applicant applies to enforce an agreed award within the meaning of\nSection 62 of the 2012 Law, the application must state that the award is an\nagreed award and any order made by the Court shall also contain such a\nstatement.\n(5)  An application for leave must be supported by an affidavit \u2014\n(a)  Exhibiting \u2014\n(i)  where the application is under Section 52 or 72 of the 2012 Law, the\narbitration agreement and the original award or, in either case, a copy\nthereof;\n(ii)  where the application is made under Section 5 of the 1975 Law,\nexhibiting the documents specified in Section 6 of the 1975 Law.\n(b)  stating the name and usual or last known place of residence or business of\nthe applicant and of the person against whom it is sought to enforce the\naward respectively;\n(c)  stating as the case may require, either that the award has not been complied\nwith or the extent to which it has not been complied with at the date of the\napplication.\n(6)  An order giving leave must be drawn up by or on behalf of the applicant and\nmust be served on the respondent by delivering a copy to the respondent\n\nORDER 73\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 376\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\npersonally or by sending a copy to the respondent at the respondent\u2019s usual or\nlast known place of residence or business or in such other manner as the Court\nmay direct, including electronically.\n(7)  Service of the order out of the jurisdiction is permissible without leave, and\nO.11, rr.5 to 8, shall apply in relation to such an order as they apply in relation\nto a writ.\n(8)  Within 14 days after service of the order or, if the order is to be served out of\nthe jurisdiction, within such other period as the Court may fix, the respondent\nmay apply to set aside the order and the award shall not be enforced until after\nthe expiration of that period or, if the respondent applies within that period to\nset aside the order, until after the application is finally disposed of.\n(9)  The copy of the order served on the respondent shall state the effect of paragraph\n(8).\n(10)  In relation to a body corporate this rule shall have effect as if for any reference\nto the place of residence or business of the applicant or the respondent there\nwere substituted a reference to the registered or principal address of the body\ncorporate.\nNothing in this rule shall affect any enactment which provides for the manner in\nwhich a document may be served on a body corporate.\n32.\nInterest on awards (O.73, r.32)\n32. (1) Where an applicant seeks to enforce an award of interest, the whole or any part\nof which relates to a period after the date of the award, the applicant shall file\nan affidavit giving the following particulars \u2014\n(a)  whether simple or compound interest was awarded;\n(b)  the date from which interest was awarded;\n(c)  the rate of interest awarded; and\n(d)  a calculation showing the total amount claimed up to the date of the\naffidavit and any sum which will become due thereafter on a per diem\nbasis.\n(2)  The affidavit under paragraph (1) must be filed whenever the amount of interest\nhas to be quantified for the purpose of obtaining a judgment or order under\nSection 52 or 72 of the 2012 Law or under Section 5 of the 1975 Law, or for the\npurposes of enforcing such a judgment or order by one of the means mentioned\nin O.45, r.1.\n33.\nNo rule (O.73, r.33)\n33. No rule (O.73, r.33)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 73\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 377\n\n34.\nRegistration of awards under 1967 Order (O.73, r.34)\n34. (1) In this rule and in any provision of these rules as applied by this rule, \"award\"\nmeans an award rendered pursuant to the Washington Convention.\n(2)  Subject to the provisions of this rule, the following provisions of O.71, namely,\nrules 3, 7 (except paragraph (3)(c) and (d) thereof) and 10(3) shall apply with\nnecessary modifications in relation to an award as they apply in relation to a\njudgment to which the Foreign Judgments Reciprocal Enforcement Act (as\namended and revised) applies. For that purpose, the expressions \"judgment\ncreditor\" and \"judgment debtor\" as they appear in O.71 shall mean the person\nseeking recognition or enforcement of an award and the other party to the award.\n(3)  An application to have an award registered under the 1967 Order shall be made\nby originating summons.\n(4)  The affidavit required by O.71, r.3, in support of an application for registration\nshall \u2014\n(a)  in lieu of exhibiting the judgment or a copy thereof, exhibit a copy of the\naward certified pursuant to the Washington Convention; and\n(b)  in addition to the matters mentioned in paragraph 3(c)(i) and (ii) of O.71,\nstate whether at the date of the application the enforcement of the award\nhas been stayed (provisionally or otherwise) pursuant to the Washington\nConvention and whether any, and if so what, application has been made\npursuant to the Washington Convention, which, if granted, might result in\na stay of the enforcement of the award.\n(5)  There shall be kept by the Clerk of the Court a public register of the awards\nordered to be registered under the 1967 Order and particulars shall be entered in\nthe register of any execution issued on such an award.\n(6)  Where it appears to the Court on granting leave to register an award or on an\napplication made by the applicant after an award has been registered \u2014\n(a)  that the enforcement of the award has been stayed (whether provisionally\nor otherwise) pursuant to the Washington Convention; or\n(b)  that an application has been made pursuant to the Washington Convention,\nwhich, if granted, might result in a stay of the enforcement of the award,\nthe Court shall, or, in the case referred to in subparagraph (b) may, stay\nexecution of the award for such time as it considers appropriate in the\ncircumstances.\n(7)  An application by the applicant under paragraph (6) shall be made by summons\nand supported by affidavit.\n\nORDER 73\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 378\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n35.\nRegistration of awards under the 1988 Order (O.73, r.35)\n35. Rule 34 shall apply, with the necessary modifications, in relation to an award rendered\npursuant to the MIGA Convention as it applies to an award rendered pursuant to the\nWashington Convention.\n36.\nArbitrations conducted under the 1974 Law (O.73, r.36)\n36. Any arbitration application made in respect of an arbitration commenced under the\n1974 Law shall be conducted in accordance with such Rules of the Grand Court as\nwere in force at the time that such arbitration was commenced.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 01.07.13)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 74\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 379\n\nORDER 74\nAPPLICATIONS AND APPEALS UNDER THE MERCHANT\nSHIPPING ACTS\n\n1.\nInterpretation (O.74, r.1)\n1.\nIn this Order \u2014\n\"the Merchant Shipping Act 1970\" shall mean the United Kingdom\u2019s\nMerchant Shipping Act 1970 as modified and applied in the Cayman Islands by\nthe Merchant Shipping Act 1970 (Cayman Islands) Order 1988 [UKSI\n1988\/246]; and\n\"the Merchant Shipping Act 1894\" shall mean the United Kingdom\u2019s\nMerchant Shipping Act 1894 as modified and applied in the Cayman Islands by\nSchedule 2 of the Merchant Shipping Act 1988 (Cayman Islands) Order 1988\n[UKSI 1988\/1841].\n2.\nRehearing of and appeal from inquiries and investigations (O.74, r.2)\n2.\n(1) Orders 55 and 56 shall apply to the rehearing of and appeal from any inquiry or\ninvestigation conducted by the Cabinet and for this purpose a rehearing and an\napplication under Section 52(2) of the United Kingdom\u2019s Merchant Shipping\nAct 1970 shall be treated as an appeal.\n (2) Where a rehearing by the Court is ordered under Section 57 of the United\nKingdom\u2019s Merchant Shipping Act 1970 the Cabinet shall cause such\nreasonable notice to be given to the parties whom the Cabinet considers to be\naffected by the rehearing as the circumstances of the case may, in the Cabinet\u2019s\nopinion, permit.\n3.\nOrder for sale on transmission of a ship to an unqualified person (O.74, r.3)\n3.\nAn application for an order for sale under Section 28 of the United Kingdom\u2019s\nMerchant Shipping Act 1894 shall be made by originating motion which shall be\nserved on all the persons having an interest, whether as owners or mortgagees, of the\nship in question.\n4.\nProceedings on forfeiture of ship (O.74, r.4)\n4.\nAn application under Section 76 of the United Kingdom\u2019s Merchant Shipping Act\n1894 for adjudication where any ship has become subject to forfeiture shall be made\nby originating motion which shall be served on all the persons having an interest,\nwhether as owners, mortgagees or charterers, of the ship in question.\n\nORDER 74\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 380\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n5.\nProceedings before Courts of Survey (O.74, r.5)\n5.\nProceedings before a Court of Survey established pursuant to Section 31 of the\nMerchant Shipping Law, 1992 shall be conducted, as nearly as may be possible, in\naccordance with the United Kingdom Rules of the Court of Survey 1876 and the\nforms contained in Appendix B thereof shall be used with such modifications as may\nbe necessary.1\n1 (Note: The Merchant Shipping Law, 1992 (Law 12 of 1992) was repealed by S.466\nof the Merchant Shipping Law, 1997(Law 24 of 1997). The Court of Survey was\nreplaced by the arbitration provision found in s.201 of the Merchant Shipping Act (as\namended and revised))\n6.\nAwards of wreck commissioners (O.74, r.6)\n6.\n(1) An application pursuant to Part XII of the Merchant Shipping Act (as amended\nand revised) for an award of a wreck commissioner to be made on order of the\nCourt shall be made by letter in writing addressed to the Clerk of the Court and\naccompanied by a minute of the order sought.\n (2) An award of costs made by a wreck commissioner shall be taxable by the Clerk\nof the Court on an indemnity basis in accordance with O.62, r.12(2), of the Rules\nof the Supreme Court of England and Wales.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 75\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 381\n\nORDER 75\nADMIRALTY PROCEEDINGS\n\n1.\nApplication and interpretation (O.75, r.1)\n1.\n(1) This Order applies to admiralty actions, and the other provisions of these Rules\napply to those actions subject to the provisions of this Order.\n(2) In this Order \u2014\n\"action in rem\" means an admiralty action in rem;\n\"caveat against arrest\" means a caveat entered in the caveat book under rule\n6;\n\"caveat against release and payment\" means a caveat entered in the caveat\nbook under rule 14;\n\"caveat book\" means the book kept in the Court office in which caveats issued\nunder this Order are entered;\n\"collision regulations\" means regulations under the Merchant Shipping\n(Prevention of Collisions and Use of Distress Signals) Regulations (as amended\nand revised);\n\"limitation action\" means an action by shipowners or other persons under\nSecrion 342 of the Merchant Shipping Act (as amended and revised);\n\"Merchant Shipping (Oil Pollution) Act 1971\" and the \"Merchant Shipping\nAct 1974\" are references to those Acts as modified and applied in the Cayman\nIslands by the Merchant Shipping (Oil Pollution) (Cayman Islands) Order 1975\n[UKSI 1975\/2166] as amended by [UKSI 1981\/217];\n\"RSC Appendix B\" means Appendix B to the Rules of the United Kingdom\u2019s\nSupreme Court 1999 (contained in Part 6 of the Supreme Court Practice 1999);\n\"ship\" includes any description of vessel used in navigation.\n(3) Admiralty actions include \u2014\n(a)\nevery action to enforce a claim for damage, loss of life or personal injury\narising out of \u2014\n(i)\na collision between ships; or\n(ii) the carrying out of or omission to carry out a manoeuvre in the case\nof one or more of two or more ships; or\n(iii) non-compliance, on the part of one or more of two or more ships,\nwith the collision regulations;\n(b) every limitation action; and\n\nORDER 75\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 382\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(c)\nevery action to enforce a claim under Section 1 of the United Kingdom\u2019s\nMerchant Shipping (Oil Pollution) Act 1971.\n2.\nForms (O.75, r.2)\n2.\nThe Forms contained in RSC Appendix B shall be used, with such modifications as\nmay be necessary, for the purposes of all proceedings governed by this Order.\n2A.\nProceedings against, or concerning, the International Oil Pollution\nCompensation Fund (O.75, r.2A)\n2A. (1) All proceedings against the International Oil Pollution Compensation Fund (in\nthis rule referred to as \"the Fund\") under Section 356 of the Merchant Shipping\nAct (as amended and revised) shall be commenced by originating summons.\n(2) For the purposes of Section 6(2) of the United Kingdom\u2019s Merchant Shipping\nAct 1974 any party to proceedings brought against an owner or guarantor in\nrespect of liability under Sections 338 and 338A of the Merchant Shipping Act\n(as amended and revised) may give notice to the Fund of such proceedings by\nserving a notice in writing on the Fund together with a copy of the writ and\ncopies of the pleadings (if any) served in the action.\n(3) The Court shall, on the application made ex parte by the Fund, grant leave to\nthe Fund to intervene in any proceedings to which the preceding paragraph\napplies, whether notice of such proceedings has been served on the Fund or not\nand paragraphs (3) and (4) of rule 17 shall apply to such an application.\n(4) Where judgment is given against the Fund in any proceedings under Sections\n338 and 338A of the Merchant Shipping Act (as amended and revised) the Clerk\nof the Court shall cause an office copy of the judgment to be sent by post to the\nFund.\n(5) The Fund shall notify the Clerk of the Court of the matters set out in Section\n360(3) of the Merchant Shipping Act (as amended and revised) by a notice in\nwriting sent to the Court office.\n3.\nIssue of writ and acknowledgment of service (O.75, r.3)\n3.\n(1) An admiralty action must be begun with writ in Form No. 1 of RSC Appendix\nB, or in the case of a limitation action in Form No. 2 of RSC Appendix B.\n(2) Subject to the following paragraphs O.6, r.8, shall apply in relation to a writ by\nwhich an admiralty action is begun, and O.12 shall apply in relation to such an\naction.\n(3) An acknowledgment of service in an action in rem or a limitation action shall\nbe in Form No. 2B of RSC Appendix B.\n(4) A defendant to an action in rem in which the writ has not been served, or a\ndefendant to a limitation action who has not been served with a writ, may, if the\ndefendant desires to take part in the proceedings, acknowledge the issue of the\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 75\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 383\n\nwrit by handing in at, or sending to the Court office, an acknowledgment of\nservice but with the substitution for the reference therein to service of references\nto the issue of the writ.\n(5) These Rules shall apply, with the necessary modifications, in relation to an\nacknowledgment of issue or service in Form No. 2B of RSC Appendix B as they\napply in relation to an acknowledgment of service in Form No. 8 of the Grand\nCourt Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) which contains a\nstatement to the effect that the defendant intends to contest the proceedings to\nwhich the acknowledgment relates.\n4.\nService of writ out of jurisdiction (O.75, r.4)\n4.\n(1) Subject to the following provisions of this rule, service out of the jurisdiction of\na writ, or notice of a writ, containing a claim relative to any admiralty cause or\nmatter is permissible with the leave of the Court if, but only if \u2014\n(a)\nthe defendant has the defendant\u2019s habitual residence or a place of business\nwithin the Islands; or\n(b) the cause of action arose within the territorial waters of the Islands; or\n(c)\nan action arising out of the same incident or series of incidents is\nproceeding in the Court or has been heard and determined in the Court; or\n(d) the defendant has submitted or agreed to submit to the jurisdiction of the\nCourt.\n(1A)  Service out of the jurisdiction of a writ in an action to enforce a claim under\nSection 1 of the United Kingdom\u2019s Merchant Shipping (Oil Pollution) Act 1971\nor Section 4 of the United Kingdom\u2019s Merchant Shipping Act 1974 is\npermissible with the leave of the Court.\n(2) Order 11, rule 5 and rule 6(2) and (4) shall apply in relation to an application\nfor the grant of leave under this rule as they apply in relation to an application\nfor the grant of leave under rule 1 or 2 of that Order.\n(3) Paragraphs (1) and (1A) shall not apply to an action in rem.\n(4) Order 11, rule 1(2) shall not apply to a writ by which any admiralty action is\nbegun.\n5.\nWarrant of arrest (O.75, r.5)\n5.\n(1) After a writ has been issued in an action in rem a warrant in Form No. 3 of RSC\nAppendix B for the arrest of the property against which the action or any\ncounterclaim in the action is brought may, subject to the provisions of this rule,\nbe issued at the instance of the plaintiff or of the defendant, as the case may be.\n(2) A party applying for the issue out of the Court office of a warrant to arrest any\nproperty shall procure a search to be made in the caveat book for the purpose of\n\nORDER 75\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 384\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nascertaining whether there is a caveat against arrest in force with respect to that\nproperty.\n(3) A warrant of arrest shall not be issued until the party applying for it has filed an\naffidavit made by the party or the party\u2019s agent containing the particulars\nrequired by paragraph (8); however, the Court may, if it thinks fit, give leave to\nissue a warrant notwithstanding that the affidavit does not contain all those\nparticulars.\n(4) Except with the leave of the Court, a warrant of arrest shall not be issued in an\naction in rem against a foreign ship belonging to a port of a State having a\nconsulate in London, being an action for the possession of the ship or for wages,\nuntil notice that the action has been begun has been sent to the consul.\n(5) A warrant of arrest may not be issued as of right in the case of property whose\nbeneficial ownership has since the issue of the writ changed as a result of a sale\nor disposal by any Court exercising admiralty jurisdiction.\n(6) Where by any convention or treaty, the United Kingdom has undertaken on\nbehalf of the Cayman Islands to minimise the possibility of arrest of ships of\nanother State no warrant of arrest shall be issued against a ship owned by that\nState until notice in Form No. 15 of RSC Appendix B has been served on a\nconsular officer at the consular office of that State in London.\n(7) Issue of a warrant of arrest takes place upon its being sealed by the Clerk of the\nCourt.\n(8) An affidavit required by paragraph (3) must state \u2014\n(a)\nin every case \u2014\n(i)\nthe nature of the claim or counterclaim and that it has not been\nsatisfied and, if it arises in connection with a ship, the name of that\nship; and\n(ii) the nature of the property to be arrested and, if the property is a ship,\nthe name of the ship and its port of registry; and\n(b) in the case of a claim against a ship by virtue of Section 3(4) of the United\nKingdom\u2019s Administration of Justice Act 19561 \u2014\n(i)\nthe name of the person who would be liable on the claim in an action\nin personam (\"the relevant person\"); and\n(ii) that the relevant person was when the cause of action arose the owner\nor charterer of, or in possession or in control of, the ship in\nconnection with which the claim arose; and\n (iii) at the time of the issue of the writ the relevant person was either the\nbeneficial owner of all the shares in the ship in respect of which the\nwarrant is required or (where appropriate) the charterer of it under a\ncharter by demise; and\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 75\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 385\n\n(c)\nin the case of a claim for possession of a ship or for wages, the nationality\nof the ship in respect of which the warrant is required and that the notice\n(if any) required by paragraph (4) has been sent; and\n(d) in the case of a claim in respect of liability incurred under Sections 338\nand 338A of the Merchant Shipping Act (as amended and revised), the\nfacts relied on as establishing that the Court is not prevented from\nentertaining the action by reason of Sections 338(1) and 338A(1) of that\nAct.\n(9) Where appropriate, a copy of any notice sent to a consul under paragraph (4)\nshall be exhibited to an affidavit required by paragraph (3).\n1 (Note: The United Kingdom\u2019s Administration of Justice Act 1956 was repealed by\nS.152(4), Sch 7 of the Supreme Court Act 1981.\n6.\nCaveat against arrest (O.75, r.6)\n6.\n(1) A person who desires to prevent the arrest of any property must file in the Court\noffice a praecipe, in Form No. 5 of RSC Appendix B, signed by the person or\nthe person\u2019s attorney undertaking \u2014\n (a) to acknowledge issue of service (as may be appropriate) of the writ in any\naction that may be begun against the property described in the praecipe;\nand\n(b) within 3 days after receiving notice that such an action has been begun, to\ngive bail in the action in a sum not exceeding an amount specified in the\npraecipe or to pay the amount so specified into Court,\nand on the filing of the praecipe a caveat against the issue of a warrant to arrest\nthe property described in the praecipe shall be entered in the caveat book.\n(2) The fact that there is a caveat against arrest in force shall not prevent the issue\nof a warrant to arrest the property to which the caveat relates.\n7.\nRemedy where property protected by caveat is arrested without good and\nsufficient reason (O.75, r.7)\n7.\nWhere any property with respect to which a caveat against arrest is in force is arrested\nin pursuance of a warrant of arrest, the party at whose instance the caveat was entered\nmay apply to the Court by motion for an order under this rule and, on the hearing of\nthe application, the Court, unless it is satisfied that the party procuring the arrest of\nthe property had a good and sufficient reason for so doing, may by order discharge\nthe warrant and may also order the last-mentioned party to pay to the applicant\ndamages in respect of the loss suffered by the applicant as a result of the arrest.\n8.\nService of writ in action in rem (O.75, r.8)\n8.\n(1) Subject to paragraph (2), a writ by which an action in rem is begun must be\nserved on the property against which the action is brought except \u2014\n\nORDER 75\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 386\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(a)\nwhere the property is freight, in which case it must be served on the cargo\nin respect of which the freight is payable or on the ship in which that cargo\nwas carried; or\n(b) where that property has been sold and the proceeds of the sale paid into\nCourt, in which case it must be served on the Clerk of the Court.\n(2) A writ need not be served on the property or the Clerk of the Court if the writ is\ndeemed to have been duly served on the defendant by virtue of O.10, rr.1(2) or\n(3).\n(3) Where by virtue of this rule a writ is required to be served on any property, the\nplaintiff may request service of the writ to be effected by the Bailiff if, but only\nif, a warrant of arrest has been issued for service against the property or the\nproperty is under arrest, and in that case the plaintiff must file in the Court office\na praecipe in Form No. 6 of RSC Appendix B and \u2014\n(a)\ndeliver an office copy of the writ to be served; and\n(b) file an undertaking to pay on demand all expenses incurred by the Bailiff\nin respect of the service of the writ, and thereupon the Bailiff shall serve\nthe writ on the property described in the praecipe.\n(3A)  Where a writ is served on any property by the Bailiff, the person effecting\nservice must indorse on the writ the following particulars, that is to say, where\nit was served, the property on which it was served, the day of the week and the\ndate on which it was served, the manner in which it was served and the name\nand address of the person effecting service, and the indorsement shall be\nevidence of the facts stated therein.\n(4) Where the plaintiff in an action in rem, or the plaintiff\u2019s attorney, becomes\naware that there is in force a caveat against arrest with respect to the property\nagainst which the action is brought, the plaintiff must serve the writ forthwith\non the person at whose instance the caveat was entered.\n(5) Where a writ by which an action in rem is begun is amended under O.20, r.1,\nafter service thereof, O.20, r.1(2), shall not apply and, unless the Court\notherwise directs on an application made ex parte, the amended writ must be\nserved on any intervener and any defendant who has acknowledged issue or\nservice of the writ in the action or, if no defendant has acknowledged issue of\nservice of the writ, it must be served in accordance with paragraph (1) of this\nrule.\n9.\nCommittal of attorney failing to comply with undertaking (O.75, r.9)\n9.\nWhere the attorney of a party to an action in rem fails to comply with a written\nundertaking given by the attorney to any other party or the other party\u2019s attorney to\nenter an appearance in the action, give bail or pay money into Court in lieu of bail,\nthe attorney shall be liable to committal.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 75\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 387\n\n10.\nExecution, etc., of warrant of arrest (O.75, r.10)\n10. (1) A warrant of arrest is valid for 12 months beginning with the date of its issue.\n(2) A warrant of arrest may be executed only by the Bailiff.\n(3) A warrant of arrest shall not be executed until an undertaking in writing,\nsatisfactory to the Clerk of the Court, to pay on demand the fees and expenses\nof the Bailiff has been filed in the Court office.\n(4) A warrant of arrest shall not be executed if the party at whose instance it was\nissued files a written request to that effect with the Bailiff.\n(5) A warrant of arrest issued against freight may be executed by serving the\nwarrant on the cargo in respect of which the freight is payable or on the ship in\nwhich that cargo was carried or on both of them.\n(6) Subject to paragraph (5), a warrant of arrest must be served on the property\nagainst which it is issued. (7) Within 7 days after the service of a warrant of\narrest, the warrant must be filed in the Court office by the Bailiff.\n11.\nService on ships, etc.: how effected (O.75, r.11)\n11. (1) Subject to paragraph (2), service of a warrant of arrest or writ in an action in\nrem against a ship, freight or cargo shall be effected by \u2014\n(a)\naffixing the warrant or writ for a short time on any mast of the ship or on\nthe outside of any suitable part of the ship's superstructure; and\n(b) on removing the warrant or writ, leaving a copy of it affixed (in the case\nof the writ) on a sheltered, conspicuous part of the ship.\n(2) Service of a warrant of arrest or writ in an action in rem against freight or cargo\nor both shall, if the cargo has been landed or transshipped be effected \u2014\n(a)\nby placing the warrant or writ for a short time on the cargo, and, on\nremoving the warrant or writ, leaving a copy of it on the cargo; or\n(b) if the cargo is in the custody of a person who will not permit access to it,\nby leaving a copy of the warrant or writ with that person.\n(3) Order 65, rule 10, shall not apply in relation to a warrant of arrest or writ in rem.\n12.\nDirections with respect to property under arrest (O.75, r.12)\n12. (1) The Bailiff may at any time apply to the Court for directions with respect to\nproperty under arrest in an action and may, or, if the Court so directs, shall, give\nnotice of the application to any or all of the parties referred to in paragraph (2).\n(2) The Bailiff shall send a copy of any order made under paragraph (1) to all those\npersons who, in relation to that property, have \u2014\n(a)\nentered a caveat which is still in force; or\n\nORDER 75\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 388\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(b) caused a warrant for the arrest of the property to be executed by the Bailiff;\nor\n(c)\nacknowledged issue of service of the writ in any action in which the\nproperty is under arrest; or\n(d) intervened in any action in which the property is under arrest.\n(3) A person other than the Bailiff may make an application under this rule by\nsummons or motion in the action in which the property is under arrest and the\nsummons or notice of motion together with copies of any affidavit in support\nmust be served upon the Bailiff and all persons referred to in paragraph (2)\nunless the Court otherwise orders on an application made ex parte.\n13.\nRelease of property under arrest (O.75, r.13)\n13. (1) Except where property arrested in pursuance of a warrant of arrest is sold under\nan order of the Court, property which has been so arrested shall be released only\nunder the authority of an instrument of release (in this rule referred to as a\n\"release\"), in Form No. 7 of RSC Appendix B, issued out of the Court office.\n(2) A release shall not be issued with respect to property as to which a caveat against\na release is in force, unless, either \u2014\n(a)\nat the time of the issue of the release the property is under arrest in one or\nmore other actions; or\n(b) the Court so orders.\n(3) A release may be issued at the instance of a party interested in the property under\narrest if the Court so orders, or, subject to paragraph (2), if all the other parties,\nexcept any defendant who has not acknowledged issue or service of the writ,\nconsent.\n(4) Before property under arrest is released in compliance with a release issued\nunder this rule, the party at whose instance it was issued must, in accordance\nwith the directions of the Bailiff either \u2014\n(a)\npay the fees of the Bailiff already incurred and file in the Court office an\nundertaking to pay on demand the other fees and expenses in connection\nwith the arrest of the property and the care and custody of it while under\narrest and of its release; or\n(b) file in the Court office an undertaking to pay on demand all such fees and\nexpenses, whether incurred or to be incurred.\n(5) The Court, on the application of any party who objects to directions given to\nthat party by the Bailiff under paragraph (4), may vary or revoke the directions.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 75\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 389\n\n14.\nCaveat against release, etc. (O.75, r.14)\n14. (1) A person who desires to prevent the release of any property under arrest in an\naction in rem and the payment out of Court of any money in Court representing\nthe proceeds of sale of that property must file in the Court office a praecipe in\nForm No. 9 of RSC Appendix B, and on the filing of the praecipe a caveat\nagainst the issue of a release with respect to that property and the payment out\nof Court of that money shall be entered in the caveat book.\n (2) Where the release of any property under arrest is delayed by the entry of a caveat\nunder this rule, any person having an interest in that property may apply to the\nCourt by motion for an order requiring the person who procured the entry of the\ncaveat to pay to the applicant damages in respect of the loss suffered by the\napplicant by reason of the delay, and the Court, unless it is satisfied that the\nperson procuring the entry of the caveat had a good and sufficient reason for so\ndoing, may make an order accordingly.\n15.\nDuration of caveats (O.75, r.15)\n15. (1) Every caveat entered in the caveat book is valid for 12 months beginning with\nthe date of its entry but the person at whose instance a caveat was entered may\nwithdraw it by filing a praecipe in Form No. 10 of RSC Appendix B.\n(2) The period of validity of a caveat may not be extended but this provision shall\nnot be taken as preventing the entry of successive caveats.\n16.\nBail (O.75, r.16)\n16. (1) Bail on behalf of a party to an action in rem must be given by bond in Form No.\n11 of RSC Appendix B; and the sureties to the bond must enter into the bond\nbefore a Justice of the Peace.\n(2) Subject to paragraph (3), a surety to a bail bond must make an affidavit stating\nthat the surety is able to pay the sum for which the bond is given.\n(3) Where a corporation is a surety to a bail bond given on behalf of a party, no\naffidavit shall be made under paragraph (2) on behalf of the corporation unless\nthe opposite party requires it, but where such an affidavit is required it must be\nmade by a director, manager, secretary or other similar officer of the\ncorporation.\n(4) The party on whose behalf bail is given must serve on the opposite party a notice\nof bail containing the names and addresses of the persons who have given bail\non the party\u2019s behalf and of the Justice of the Peace before whom the bail bond\nwas entered into; and after the expiration of 24 hours from the service of the\nnotice (or sooner with the consent of the opposite party) the party may file the\nbond and must at the same time file the affidavits (if any) made under paragraph\n(2) and an affidavit proving due service of the notice of bail to which a copy of\nthat notice must be exhibited.\n\nORDER 75\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 390\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n17.\nInterveners (O.75, r.17)\n17. (1) Where property against which an action in rem is brought is under arrest or\nmoney representing the proceeds of sale of that property is in Court, a person\nwho has an interest in that property or money but who is not a defendant to the\naction may, with the leave of the Court, intervene in the action.\n(2) An application for the grant of leave under this rule must be made ex parte by\naffidavit showing the interest of the applicant in the property against which the\naction is brought or in the money in Court.\n(3) A person to whom leave is granted to intervene in an action under this rule shall\nthereupon become a party to the action.\n(4) The Court may order that a person to whom it grants leave to intervene in an\naction shall, within such period as may be specified in the order, serve on every\nother party to the action such pleading as may be so specified.\n18.\nPreliminary acts (O.75, r.18)\n18. (1) In an action to enforce a claim for damage, loss of life or personal injury arising\nout of a collision between ships, unless the Court otherwise orders, the plaintiff\nmust, within 2 months after issue of the writ, and the defendant must, within 2\nmonths after acknowledging issue or service of the writ in the action, and before\nany pleading is served, file in the Court office a document (in these Rules\nreferred to as a preliminary act) containing a statement of the following\nparticulars \u2014\n(a)\nthe names of the ships which came into collision and their ports of registry;\n(b) the date and time of the collision;\n(c)\nthe place of the collision;\n(d) the direction and force of the wind;\n(e)\nthe state of the weather;\n(f)\nthe state, direction and force of the tidal or other current;\n(g) the course steered and speed through the water of the ship when the other\nship was first seen or immediately before any measures were taken with\nreference to the first ship\u2019s presence, whichever was the earlier;\n(h) the lights or shapes (if any) carried by the ship;\n(i)    (i)\nthe distance and bearing of the other ship if and when its echo was\nfirst observed by radar;\n(ii) the distance, bearing and approximate heading of the other ship when\nfirst seen;\n(j)\nwhat light or combination of lights (if any) of the other ship was first seen;\n(k) what other lights or combinations of lights (if any) of the other ship were\nsubsequently seen before the collision, and when;\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 75\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 391\n\n(l)\nwhat alterations (if any) were made to the course and speed of the ship\nafter the earlier of the two times referred to in subparagraph (g) up to the\ntime of the collision, and when, and what measures (if any), other than\nalterations of course or speed, were taken to avoid the collision, and when;\n(m) the heading of the ship, the parts of each ship which first came into contact\nand the approximate angle between the two ships at the moment of contact;\n(n) what sound signals (if any) were given, and when;\n(o) what sound signals (if any) were heard from the other ship, and when.\n(2) Every preliminary act shall be sealed by the Clerk of the Court and shall be filed\nin a closed envelope (stamped with an official stamp showing the date of filing)\nand, unless the Court otherwise orders, no envelope shall be opened until the\npleadings are closed and a consent signed by each of the parties or the parties\u2019\nattorney to the opening of the preliminary acts filed in the Court office.\n(2A) A defendant who has filed a preliminary act must within 7 days thereafter serve\nnotice of filing on all other parties to the action.\n(3) Where the Court orders the preliminary acts to be opened, the Court may further\norder the action to be tried without pleadings but, where the Court orders the\naction to be so tried, any party who intends to rely on the defence of compulsory\npilotage must give notice of the party\u2019s intention to do so to the other parties\nwithin 7 days after the opening of the preliminary acts.\n(4) Where the Court orders the action to be tried without pleadings, it may also\norder each party, within such period as may be specified in the order, to file a\nstatement of the grounds on which the party charges any other party with\nnegligence in connection with the collision and to serve a copy thereof on that\nother party.\n(5) Order 18, rule 1, shall not apply to an action in which preliminary acts are\nrequired but, unless the Court orders the action to be tried without pleadings, the\nplaintiff must serve a statement of claim on each defendant within 14 days after\nthe latest date on which the preliminary act of any party to the action is filed.\n19.\nFailure to file preliminary act: proceedings against party in default (O.75,\nr.19)\n19. (1) Where in such an action as is referred to in rule 18(1) the plaintiff fails to file a\npreliminary act within the prescribed period, any defendant who has filed such\nan act may apply to the Court by summons for an order to dismiss the action or\nmake such other order on such terms as it thinks just.\n(2) Where in such an action, being an action in personam, a defendant fails to file a\npreliminary act within the prescribed period, O.19, rr.2 and 3, shall apply as if\nthe defendant's failure to file the preliminary act within that period was a failure\nby the defendant to serve a defence on the plaintiff within the period fixed by\n\nORDER 75\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 392\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\norder under these Rules for service thereof, and the plaintiff, if the plaintiff has\nfiled a preliminary act may, subject to O.77, r.9, accordingly enter judgment\nagainst the defendant in accordance with the said rule 2 or the said rule 3, as the\ncircumstances of the case require.\n(3) Where in such an action, being an action in rem, a defendant fails to file a\npreliminary act within the prescribed period, the plaintiff, if the plaintiff has\nfiled such an act, may apply to the Court by motion for judgment against that\ndefendant, and it shall not be necessary for the plaintiff to file or serve a\nstatement of claim or an affidavit before the hearing of the motion.\n(4) On the hearing of a motion under paragraph (3) the Court may make such order\nas it thinks just, and where the defendant does not appear on the hearing and the\nCourt is of opinion that judgment should be given for the plaintiff provided the\nplaintiff proves the plaintiff\u2019s case, it shall order the plaintiff's preliminary act\nto be opened and require the plaintiff to satisfy the Court that the plaintiff\u2019s\nclaim is well founded.\n\nThe plaintiff's evidence may, unless the Court otherwise orders, be given by\naffidavit without any order or direction in that behalf.\n(5) Where the plaintiff in accordance with a requirement under paragraph (4)\nsatisfies the Court that the plaintiff\u2019s claim is well founded, the Court may give\njudgment for the claim with or without a reference to the Clerk of the Court and\nmay at the same time order the property against which the action is brought to\nbe appraised and sold and the proceeds to be paid into Court or make such order\nas it thinks just.\n(6) The Court may, on such terms as it thinks just, set aside any judgment entered\nin pursuance of this rule.\n(7) In this rule references to the prescribed period shall be construed as references\nto the period within which by virtue of rule 18(1) or of any order of the Court\nthe plaintiff or defendant, as the context of the reference requires, is required to\nfile a preliminary act.\n20.\nSpecial provisions as to pleadings in collision, etc., actions (O.75, r.20)\n20. (1) Notwithstanding anything in O.18, r.3, the plaintiff in any such action as is\nreferred to in rule 1(3)(a) may not serve a reply or a defence to counterclaim on\nthe defendant except with the leave of the Court.\n(2) If in such an action there is a counterclaim and no defence to counterclaim by\nthe plaintiff, then, notwithstanding O.18, r.14(3), but without prejudice to the\nother provisions of that rule, there is an implied joinder of issue on the\ncounterclaim, and the joinder of issue operates as a denial of every material\nallegation of fact made in the counterclaim.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 75\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 393\n\n21.\nJudgment by default (O.75, r.21)\n21. (1) Where a writ is served under rule 8(4) on a party at whose instance a caveat\nagainst arrest was issued, then if \u2014\n(a)\nthe sum claimed in the action begun by the writ does not exceed the amount\nspecified in the undertaking given by that party or that party\u2019s attorney to\nprocure the entry of the caveat; and\n(b) that party or that party\u2019s attorney does not within 14 days after service of\nthe writ fulfil the undertaking given by that party as aforesaid,\n\nthe plaintiff may, after filing an affidavit verifying the facts on which the action\nis based, apply to the Court for judgment by default.\n(2) Judgment given under paragraph (1) may be enforced by the arrest of the\nproperty against which the action was brought and by committal of the party at\nwhose instance the caveat with respect to that property was entered.\n(3) Where a defendant to an action in rem fails to acknowledge service of the writ\nwithin the time limited for doing so, then, on the expiration of 14 days after\nservice of the writ and upon filing an affidavit proving due service of the writ,\nan affidavit verifying the facts on which the action is based and, if a statement\nof claim was not indorsed on the writ, a copy of the statement of claim, the\nplaintiff may apply to the Court for judgment by default.\n\nWhere the writ is deemed to have been duly served on the defendant by virtue\nof O.10, r.1(2), or was served by the Bailiff under rule 8 of this Order, an\naffidavit proving due service of the writ need not be filed under this paragraph,\nbut the writ indorsed as mentioned in the said rule 1(2) or indorsed as mentioned\nin 8(3A) must be filed with the affidavit verifying the facts on which the action\nis based.\n(4) Where a defendant to an action in rem fails to serve a defence on the plaintiff,\nthen after the expiration of the period fixed by or under these Rules for service\nof the defence and upon filing an affidavit stating that no defence was served on\nthe plaintiff by that defendant during that period, an affidavit verifying the facts\non which the action is based and, if a statement of claim was not indorsed on the\nwrit, a copy of the statement of claim, the plaintiff may apply to the Court for\njudgment by default.\n(5) Where a defendant to a counterclaim in an action in rem fails to serve a defence\nto counterclaim on the defendant making the counterclaim, then, subject to\nparagraph (6), after the expiration of the period fixed by or under these Rules\nfor service of the defence to counterclaim and upon filing an affidavit stating\nthat no defence to counterclaim was served on the defendant by the first\nmentioned defendant during that period, an affidavit verifying the facts on\nwhich the counterclaim is based and a copy of the counterclaim, the defendant\nmaking the counterclaim may apply to the Court for judgment by default.\n\nORDER 75\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 394\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(6) No application may be made under paragraph (5) against the plaintiff in any\nsuch action as is referred to in rule 1(3)(a).\n(7) An application to the Court under this rule must be made by motion and if, on\nthe hearing of the motion, the Court is satisfied that the applicant's claim is well\nfounded it may give judgment for the claim with or without the reference to the\nClerk of the Court and may at the same time order the property against which\nthe action or, as the case may be, counterclaim is brought to be appraised and\nsold and the proceeds to be paid into Court or may make such other order as it\nthinks just.\n(8) In default actions in rem evidence may, unless the Court otherwise orders, be\ngiven by affidavit without any order or direction in that behalf.\n(9) The Court may, on such terms as it thinks just, set aside or vary any judgment\nentered in pursuance of this rule.\n(10) O.13 and O.19 (except rule 1) shall not apply to actions in rem.\n22.\nOrder for sale of ship: determination of priority of claims (O.75, r.22)\n22. (1) Where in an action in rem against a ship the Court has ordered the ship to be\nsold, any party who has obtained judgment against the ship or proceeds of sale\nof the ship may \u2014\n (a) in a case where the order for sale contains the further order referred to in\nparagraph (2), after the expiration of the period specified in the order under\nsubparagraph (2)(a); or\n(b) in any other case, after obtaining judgment,\napply to the Court by motion for an order determining the order of priority of\nthe claims against the proceeds of sale of the ship.\n(2) Where in an action in rem against a ship the Court orders the ship to be sold, it\nmay further order \u2014\n(a)\nthat the order of priority of the claims against the proceeds of the sale shall\nnot be determined until after the expiration of 90 days, or of such other\nperiod as the Court may specify, beginning with the day on which the\nproceeds of sale are paid into Court;\n(b) that any party to the action or to any other action in rem against the ship or\nthe proceeds of sale thereof may apply to the Court in the action to which\nthat party is a party to extend the period specified in the order;\n(c)\nthat within 7 days after the date of payment into Court of the proceeds of\nsale the Clerk of the Court shall send for publication in the Gazette, Lloyd's\nList and Shipping Gazette and such other newspaper, if any, as the Court\nmay direct a notice complying with paragraph (3).\n(3) The notice referred to in subparagraph (2)(c) must state \u2014\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 75\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 395\n\n(a)\nthat the ship (naming that ship) has been sold by order of the Court in an\naction in rem, identifying the action;\n(b) that the gross proceeds of the sale, specifying the amount thereof, have\nbeen paid into Court;\n(c)\nthat the order of priority of the claims against the said proceeds will not be\ndetermined until after the expiration of the period (specifying it) specified\nin the order for sale; and\n(d) that any person with a claim against the ship or the proceeds of sale thereof,\non which the person intends to proceed to judgment should do so before\nthe expiration of that period.\n(4) The expenses incurred by the Clerk of the Court in complying with an order of\nthe Court under this rule shall be included in the Clerk of the Court\u2019s expenses\nrelating to the sale of the ship.\n(5) An application to the Court to extend the period referred to in subparagraph\n(2)(a) must be made by motion, and a copy of the notice of motion, must, at\nleast 3 days before the day fixed for the hearing thereof, be served on each party\nwho has begun an action in rem against the ship or the proceeds of sale thereof.\n23.\nAppraisement and sale of property (O.75, r.23)\n23. (1) A commission for the appraisement and sale of any property under an order of\nthe Court shall not be issued until the party applying for it has filed a praecipe\nin Form No. 12 of RSC Appendix B.\n(2) Such a commission must, unless the Court otherwise orders, be executed by the\nClerk of the Court and must be in Form No. 13 of RSC Appendix B.\n(3) A commission for appraisement and sale shall not be executed until an\nundertaking in writing satisfactory to the Clerk of the Court to pay the fees and\nexpenses of the Bailiff on demand has been filed.\n(4) The Bailiff shall pay into Court the gross proceeds of the sale of any property\nsold by the Bailiff under a commission for sale and shall bring into Court the\naccount relating to the sale (with vouchers in support) for taxation.\n(5) On the taxation of the Bailiff's account relating to a sale any person interested\nin the proceeds of the sale shall be entitled to be heard, and any decision made\non the taxation shall be subject to review by the Court.\n23A. Undertakings as to expenses, etc. (O.75, r.23A)\n23A. (1) Every undertaking under rule 8(3), 10(3), 13(4) or 23(3) shall be given in writing\nto the satisfaction of the Clerk of the Court.\n(2) Where a party is required by rule 8(3), 10(3), 13(4) or 23(3) to give to the Bailiff\nan undertaking to pay any fees or expenses, the Bailiff or the Clerk of the Court,\nas the case may be, may accept instead of the undertaking the deposit with the\n\nORDER 75\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 396\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nBailiff or the Clerk of the Court of such sum as the Bailiff considers reasonable\nto meet those fees and expenses.\n(3) The Court may on the application of any party who is dissatisfied with a\ndirection or determination under rule 13(5) or this rule, vary or revoke the\ndirection or determination.\n24.\nPayment into and out of Court (O.75, r.24)\n24. (1) O.22 (except rr.3, 4 and 5) shall apply in relation to an admiralty action as it\napplies to an action for debt or damages.\n(2) Subject to paragraph (3), money paid into Court shall not be paid out except in\npursuance of an order of the Court.\n(3) The Clerk of the Court may, with the consent of the parties interested in money\npaid into Court, order the money to be paid out to the person entitled thereto in\nthe following cases, that is to say \u2014\n(a)\nwhere property has been sold and the proceeds of sale thereof paid into\nCourt, and the parties are agreed as to the persons to whom the proceeds\nshall be paid and the amount to be paid to each of those persons;\n(b) where in any other case there is no dispute between the parties.\n25.\nSummons for directions (O.75, r.25)\n25. (1) Order 25 shall apply to admiralty actions (other than limitation actions) as it\napplies to other actions, except that \u2014\n(a)\nthe summons for directions shall be returnable in not less than 21 days;\n(b) any notice under O.25, r.7(1), must be served within 14 days after service\nof the summons for directions on the party giving the notice.\n(2) An order made on the summons for directions shall determine whether the trial\nis to be without assessors or with one or more assessors, whether nautical\nassessors or other assessors.\n(3) The trial shall be before a Judge without jury unless, on the ground that there\nare special reasons to the contrary, an order made on the summons for directions\notherwise provides.\n(4) Any such order or direction as is referred to in paragraph (2) or (3) (including\nan order made on appeal) may be varied or revoked by a subsequent order or\ndirection made or given by the Court at or before the trial.\n26.\nFixing date for trial, etc. (O.75, r.26)\n26. (1) The date for trial of an admiralty action shall be fixed by the Judge at the hearing\nof the summons for directions, unless the Court otherwise directs.\n(2) Order 34 shall apply to admiralty actions subject to the following and any other\nnecessary modifications \u2014\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 75\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 397\n\n(a)\nthe bundles referred to in rule 10(1) shall include any preliminary acts and\nany notice given under rule 18(3) or filed under 18(4) of this Order, and\nwhere trial with one or more assessors has been ordered an additional\nbundle shall be delivered to the Clerk of the Court for the purpose of each\nassessor; and\n(b) in an action which has been ordered to be tried with an assessor or\nassessors the attorney to the party setting it down must file in the Court\noffice an undertaking to pay the proper fees and expenses of such assessor\nor assessors.\n(3) If all the parties to an action consent, the action may be withdrawn without the\nleave of the Court at any time before trial by producing to the Clerk of the Court\na written consent to the action being withdrawn signed by all the parties.\n27.\nStay of proceedings in collision, etc., actions until security given (O.75, r.27)\n27. Where an action in rem, being an action to enforce any such claim as is referred to in\nrule 1(3)(a), is begun and a cross action in rem arising out of the same collision or\nother occurrence as the first mentioned action is subsequently begun, or a\ncounterclaim arising out of that occurrence is made in the first mentioned action,\nthen \u2014\n(a)\nif the ship in respect of or against which the first mentioned action is\nbrought has been arrested or security given to prevent that ship\u2019s arrest;\nbut\n(b) the ship in respect of or against which the cross action is brought or the\ncounterclaim made cannot be arrested and security has not been given to\nsatisfy any judgment given in favour of the party bringing the cross action\nor making the counterclaim,\nthe Court may stay proceedings in the first mentioned action until security is\ngiven to satisfy any judgment given in favour of that party.\n28.\nInspection of ship, etc. (O.75, r.28)\n28. Without prejudice to its powers under O.29, rr.2 and 3, and O.35, r.8, the Court may,\non the application of any party, make an order for the inspection by the assessors (if\nthe action is tried with assessors), or by any party or witness, of any ship or other\nproperty, whether real or personal, the inspection of which may be necessary or\ndesirable for the purpose of obtaining full information or evidence in connection with\nany issue in the action.\n29.\nNo rule (O.75, r.29)\n29. No rule (O.75, r.29)\n\nORDER 75\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 398\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n30.\nExamination of witnesses and other persons (O.75, r.30)\n30. (1) The power conferred by O39, r.1, shall extend to the making of an order\nauthorising the examination of a witness or person on oath before a Judge sitting\nin Court as if for the trial of the cause or matter, without that cause or matter\nhaving been set down for trial or called on for trial.\n(2) The power conferred by the said O.39, r.1, shall also extend to the making of an\norder, with the consent of the parties, providing for the evidence of a witness\nbeing taken as if before an examiner, but without an examiner actually being\nappointed or being present.\n(3) Where an order is made under paragraph (2), it may make provision for any\nconsequential matters and, subject to any provision so made, the following\nprovisions shall have effect \u2014\n(a)\nthe party whose witness is to be examined shall provide a shorthand writer\nto take down the evidence of the witness;\n(b) any representative, being an attorney, of either of the parties shall have\nauthority to administer the oath to the witness;\n(c)\nthe shorthand writer need not themselves be sworn but shall certify in\nwriting as correct a transcript of the shorthand writer\u2019s notes of the\nevidence and deliver it to the attorney for the party whose witness was\nexamined, and that attorney shall file it in the Court office;\n (d) unless the parties otherwise agree or the Court otherwise orders, the\ntranscript or a copy thereof shall, before the transcript is filed, be made\navailable to the attorney or other persons who acted as advocates at the\nexamination, and if any of those persons is of opinion that the transcript\ndoes not accurately represent the evidence the person shall make a\ncertificate specifying the corrections which in the person\u2019s opinion should\nbe made therein, and that certificate must be filed with the transcript.\n(4) In actions in which preliminary acts fall to be filed under rule 18, an order shall\nnot be made under O.39, r.1, authorising any examination of a witness before\nthe preliminary acts have been filed, unless for special reasons the Court thinks\nfit so to direct.\n31.\nTrial without pleadings (O.75, r.31)\n31. Order 18, rule 21, shall apply to admiralty as it applies to other actions except that the\nsummons must be served on every other party not less than 7 clear days before the\nday specified in the summons for the hearing thereof.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 75\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 399\n\n32.\nFurther provisions with respect to evidence (O.75, r.32)\n32. (1) Unless the Court otherwise directs, O.38, r.21(1), shall not apply in relation to\nany statement which is admissible in evidence by virtue of Section 32, 34 or 35\nof the Evidence Act (as amended and revised) and which an applicant for\njudgment in default under rule 19 or 21 desires to give in evidence at the hearing\nof the motion by which the application for judgment is made.\n(2) Unless the Court otherwise directs, an affidavit for the purposes of rule 19(4),\n21 or 38(2) may, except insofar as it relates to the service of a writ, contain\nstatements of information or belief with the sources and grounds thereof.\n33.\nProceedings for apportionment of salvage (O.75, r.33)\n33. (1) Proceedings for the apportionment of salvage, the aggregate amount of which\nhas already been ascertained, shall be begun in the Court office by originating\nmotion.\n(2) The notice of such motion, together with the affidavits in support thereof, must\nbe filed in the Court office at least 7 days before the hearing of the motion,\nunless the Court gives leave to the contrary, and a copy of the notice and of the\naffidavits must be served on all the other parties to the proceedings before the\noriginals are filed.\n33A. No rule (O.75, r.33A)\n33A. No rule (O.75, r.33A)\n34.\nNotice of motion in actions in rem (O.75, r.34)\n34. (1) The affidavits, if any, in support of a motion in an action in rem must be filed\nwhen the notice of motion is issued.\n(2) A notice of motion, except a motion for judgment in default, must be served on\nall caveators together with copies of the affidavits, if any, in support of the\nmotion at least 4 clear days before the hearing, unless the Court gives leave to\nthe contrary.\n35.\nAgreement between attorneys may be made an order of Court (O.75, r.35)\n35. Any agreement in writing between the attorneys of the parties to a cause or matter,\ndated and signed by those attorneys, may, if the Judge thinks it reasonable, be filed\nin the Court office, and the agreement shall thereupon become an order of Court.\n36.\nNo rule (O.75, r.36)\n36. No rule (O.75, r.36)\n\nORDER 75\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 400\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n37.\nLimitation action: parties (O.75, r.37)\n37. (1) In a limitation action the person seeking relief shall be the plaintiff and shall be\nnamed in the writ by the person\u2019s name and not described merely as the owner\nof, or as bearing some other relation to, a particular ship or other property.\n (2) The plaintiff must make one of the persons with claims against the plaintiff in\nrespect of the casualty to which the action relates defendant to the action and\nmay make any or all of the others defendants also.\n (3) At least one of the defendants to the action must be named in the writ by the\ndefendant\u2019s name but the other defendants may be described generally and not\nnamed by their names.\n(4) The writ must be served on one or more of the defendants who are named by\ntheir names therein and need not be served on any other defendant.\n(5) In this rule and rules 38, 39 and 40 \"name\" includes a firm name or the name\nunder which a person carries on that person\u2019s business, and where any person\nwith a claim against the plaintiff in respect of the casualty to which the action\nrelates has described themselves for the purposes of the person\u2019s claim merely\nas the owner of, or as bearing some other relation to, a ship or other property,\nthat person may be so described as defendant in the writ and, if so described,\nshall be deemed for the purposes of the rules aforesaid to have been named in\nthe writ by that person\u2019s name.\n37A. Limitation action: payment into Court (O.75, r.37A)\n37A. (1) The plaintiff may constitute a limitation fund by paying into Court the currency\nequivalent of the number of special drawing rights to which the plaintiff claims\nto be entitled to limit the plaintiff\u2019s liability under the United Kingdom\u2019s\nMerchant Shipping Act 1979 together with interest thereon from the date of the\noccurrence giving rise to the plaintiff\u2019s liability to the date of payment into\nCourt.\n(2) A limitation fund may be constituted under paragraph (1) in any designated\ncurrency and references in this rule to the \"currency equivalent\" means the\nequivalent in the designated currency of the relevant number of special drawing\nrights.\n(3) Where the plaintiff does not know the currency equivalent of the said number\nof special drawing rights on the date of payment into Court the plaintiff may\ncalculate the same on the basis of the latest available published currency\nequivalent of a special drawing right as fixed by the International Monetary\nFund, and in the event of the currency equivalent of a special drawing right on\nthe date of payment into Court under paragraph (1) being different from that\nused for calculating the amount of that payment into Court, the plaintiff may \u2014\n(a)\nmake up any deficiency by making a further payment into Court which, if\nmade within 14 days after the payment into Court under paragraph (1),\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 75\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 401\n\nshall be treated, except for the purposes of the rules relating to the accrual\nof interest on money paid into Court, as if it had been made on the date of\nthat payment into Court; or\n(b) apply to the Court for payment out of any excess amount (together with\nany interest accrued thereon) paid into Court under paragraph (1).\n(4) An application under subparagraph (3)(b) may be made ex parte and must be\nsupported by evidence proving the currency equivalent of the appropriate\nnumber of special drawing rights on the date of payment into Court.\n(5) On making any payment into Court under this Rule, the plaintiff shall give\nnotice thereof in writing to every defendant, specifying the date of payment in,\nthe amount paid in, the amount of interest included therein, the rate of such\ninterest and the period to which it relates.\n\nThe plaintiff shall also give notice in writing to every defendant of any excess\namount (and any interest thereon) paid out to the plaintiff under subparagraph\n(3)(b).\n(6) O.22, r.13, shall apply to a limitation action as it applies to an action for debt or\ndamages, and rule 24(2) and (3) of this Order shall apply with the necessary\nmodifications to the payment out of money paid into Court under this rule.\n38.\nLimitation action: summons for decree or directions (O.75, r.38)\n38. (1) Within 7 days after the acknowledgment of issue or service of the writ by one\nof the defendants named therein by their names or, if one of them acknowledges\nissue or service, within 7 days after the time limited for acknowledging service\nthe plaintiff, without serving a statement of claim, must take out a summons\nreturnable in Chambers before a Judge asking for a decree limiting the plaintiff\u2019s\nliability or, in default of such a decree, for directions as to the further\nproceedings in the action.\n(2) The summons must be supported by an affidavit or affidavits proving \u2014\n(a)\nthe plaintiff's case in the action; and\n(b) if none of the defendants named in the writ by their names has entered an\nappearance, service of the writ on at least one of the defendants so named.\n(3) The affidavit in support of the summons must state \u2014\n(a)\nthe names of all the persons who, to the knowledge of the plaintiff, have\nclaims against the plaintiff in respect of the casualty to which the action\nrelates, not being defendants to the action who are named in the writ by\ntheir names; and\n(b) the address of each of those persons, if known to the plaintiff.\n(4) The summons and every affidavit in support thereof must, at least 7 days before\nthe hearing of the summons, be served on any defendant who has acknowledged\nissue or service of the writ.\n\nORDER 75\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 402\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(5) On the hearing of the summons the Judge, if it appears to the Judge that the\nplaintiff has a right to limit the plaintiff\u2019s liability, shall make a decree limiting\nthe plaintiff's liability and fix the amount to which the liability is to be limited.\n(6) On the hearing of the summons the Judge, if it appears to the Judge that any\ndefendant has not sufficient information to enable the defendant to decide\nwhether or not to dispute that the plaintiff has a right to limit the plaintiff\u2019s\nliability, shall give such directions as appear to the Judge to be appropriate for\nenabling the defendant to obtain such information and shall adjourn the hearing.\n(7) If on the hearing or resumed hearing of the summons the Judge does not make\na decree limiting the plaintiff's liability, the Judge shall give such directions as\nto the further proceedings in the action as appear to the Judge to be appropriate\nincluding, in particular, a direction requiring the taking out of a summons for\ndirections under O.25, and if the Judge gives no such direction, a direction fixing\nthe period within which any notice under O.38, r.21, must be served.\n(8) Any defendant who, after the Judge has given directions under paragraph (7),\nceases to dispute the plaintiff's right to limit the plaintiff\u2019s liability must\nforthwith file a notice to that effect in the Court office and serve a copy on the\nplaintiff and on any other defendant who has acknowledged issue or service of\nthe writ.\n(9) If every defendant who disputes the plaintiff's right to limit the plaintiff\u2019s\nliability serves a notice on the plaintiff under paragraph (8) the plaintiff may\ntake out a summons returnable in Chambers before the Judge asking for a decree\nlimiting the plaintiff\u2019s liability; and paragraphs (4) and (5) shall apply to a\nsummons under this paragraph as they apply to a summons under paragraph (1).\n39.\nLimitation action: proceedings under decree (O.75, r.39)\n39. (1) Where the only defendants in a limitation action are those named in the writ by\ntheir names and all the persons so named have either been served with the writ\nor acknowledge the issue thereof, any decree in the action limiting the plaintiff's\nliability \u2014\n(a)\nneed not be advertised; but\n(b) shall only operate to protect the plaintiff in respect of claims by the persons\nso named or persons claiming through or under them.\n(2) In any case not falling within paragraph (1), any decree in the action limiting\nthe plaintiff's liability \u2014\n(a)\nshall be advertised by the plaintiff in such manner and within such time as\nmay be provided by the decree;\n(b) shall fix a time within which persons with claims against the plaintiff in\nrespect of the casualty to which the action relates may acknowledge issue\nof the writ (if they have not already done so) and file their claims, and, in\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 75\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 403\n\ncases to which rule 40 applies, take out a summons, if they think fit, to set\nthe order aside.\n(3) The advertisement to be required under subparagraph (2)(a), shall, unless for\nspecial reasons the Judge thinks fit otherwise to provide, be a single\nadvertisement in a newspaper specified in the decree, identifying the action, the\ncasualty and the relation to the plaintiff thereto (whether as owner of a ship\ninvolved in the casualty or otherwise as the case may be), stating that the decree\nhas been made and specifying the amount fixed thereby for the entering of\nappearances, the filing of claims and the taking out of summonses to set the\ndecree aside.\n\nThe plaintiff must within the time fixed under subparagraph (2)(b) file in the\nCourt office a copy of the newspaper in which the advertisement required under\nsubparagraph (2)(a) appears.\n(4) The time to be allowed under subparagraph (2)(b) shall, unless for special\nreasons the Judge thinks fit otherwise to provide, be not less than 2 months from\nthe latest date allowed for the appearance of the advertisements; and after the\nexpiration of the time so allowed, no claim may be filed or summons taken out\nto set aside the decree except with the leave of the Judge.\n (5) Save as aforesaid, on the making of any decree limiting the plaintiff's liability\narising out of an occurrence the Court may distribute the limitation fund and\nmay stay any proceedings relating to any claim arising out of that occurrence\nwhich are pending against the plaintiff.\n40.\nLimitation action: proceedings to set aside decree (O.75, r.40)\n40. (1) Where a decree limiting the plaintiff's liability fixes a time in accordance with\nrule 39(2), any person with a claim against the plaintiff in respect of the casualty\nto which the action relates, who \u2014\n(a)\nwas not named by the person\u2019s name in the writ as a defendant to the\naction; or\n(b) if so named, neither was served with the writ nor has acknowledged the\nissue thereof,\n\nmay, within that time, after acknowledging issue of the writ, take out a summons\nreturnable in Chambers before a Judge asking that the decree be set aside.\n(2) The summons must be supported by an affidavit or affidavits showing that the\ndefendant in question has a bona fide claim against the plaintiff in respect of the\ncasualty in question and that the defendant has sufficient prima facie grounds\nfor the contention that the plaintiff is not entitled to the relief given the plaintiff\nby the decree.\n\nORDER 75\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 404\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(3) The summons and every affidavit in support thereof must, at least 7 clear days\nbefore the hearing of the summons, be served on the plaintiff and any defendant\nwho has acknowledged issue or service of the writ.\n(4) On hearing the summons the Judge, if the Judge is satisfied that the defendant\nin question has a bona fide claim against the plaintiff and sufficient prima facie\ngrounds for the contention that the plaintiff is not entitled to the relief given the\nplaintiff by the decree, shall set the decree aside and give such directions as to\nthe further proceedings in the action as appear to the Judge to be appropriate\nincluding, in particular, a direction requiring the taking out of a summons for\ndirections under O.25.\n41.\nNo rule (O.75, r.41)\n41. No rule (O.75, r.41)\n42.\nNo rule (O.75, r.42)\n42. No rule (O.75, r.42)\n43.\nNo rule (O.75, r.43)\n43. No rule (O.75, r.43)\n44.\nNo rule (O.75, r.44)\n44. No rule (O.75, r.44)\n45.\nDrawing up and filing judgments and orders (O.75, r.45)\n45. Every judgment given or order made in an admiralty cause or a matter shall be drawn\nup and filed in accordance with O.42, r.5.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 76\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 405\n\nORDER 76\nCONTENTIOUS PROBATE PROCEEDINGS\n\n1.\nApplication and interpretation (O.76, r.1)\n1.\n(1) This Order applies to probate causes and matters, and the other provisions of\nthese Rules apply to those causes and matters subject to the provisions of this\nOrder.\n(2) In these Rules \"probate action\" means an action for the grant of probate of the\nwill, or letters of administration of the estate, of a deceased person or for the\nrevocation of such a grant or for a decree pronouncing for or against the validity\nof an alleged will, not being an action which is non-contentious or common form\nprobate business.\n(3) In this Order \u2014\n(a)\n\"will\" includes a codicil;\n(b) \"the Probate Rules\" means the Probate and Administration Rules (as\namended and revised) made under the Succession Act (as amended and\nrevised);\n(c)\n\"the Registry\" means the Probate Registry created under rule 3 of the\nProbate Rules.\n2.\nRequirements in connection with issue of writ (O.76, r.2)\n2.\n(1) A probate action must be begun by writ and the requirements of O.5, r.1(4) shall\napply notwithstanding that a file has already been created in the Registry\npursuant to rule 4 of the Probate Rules.\n(2) Before a writ beginning a probate action is issued it must be indorsed with \u2014\n(a)\na statement of the nature of the interest of the plaintiff and of the defendant\nin the estate of the deceased to which the action relates; and\n(b) the Probate Registry file number, if any, of the relevant estate.\n3.\nParties to action to revocation of grant (O.76, r.3)\n3.\nEvery person who is entitled or claims to be entitled to administer the estate of a\ndeceased person under or by virtue of an unrevoked grant of probate of the deceased\nperson\u2019s will or letters of administration of the deceased person\u2019s grant shall be made\na party to any action for revocation of the grant.\n4.\nNo rule (O.76, r.4)\n4.\nNo rule (O.76, r.4)\n\nORDER 76\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 406\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n5.\nAffidavit of testamentary scripts (O.76, r.5)\n5.\n(1) Unless the Court otherwise directs, the plaintiff and every defendant who has\nacknowledged service of the writ in a probate action must swear an affidavit \u2014\n(a)\ndescribing any testamentary script of the deceased person, whose estate is\nthe subject of the action, of which the plaintiff and every defendant has\nany knowledge or, if such be the case, stating that that person knows of no\nsuch script; and\n(b) if any such script of which the plaintiff and every defendant has knowledge\nis not in that person\u2019s possession or under that person\u2019s control, giving the\nname and address of the person in whose possession or under whose\ncontrol it is or, if such be the case, stating that the plaintiff and every\ndefendant does not know the name or address of that person.\n(2) Any affidavit required by this rule must be filed on the Court file before the\naction is listed for trial.\n(3) Where any testamentary script required by this rule to be filed or any part thereof\nis written in pencil, then, unless the Court otherwise directs, a facsimile copy of\nthat script, or of the page or pages thereof containing the part written in pencil,\nmust also be filed and the words which appear in pencil in the original must be\nunderlined in red ink in the copy.\n(4) Except with the leave of the Court, a party to a probate action shall not be\nallowed to inspect an affidavit filed, or any testamentary script referred to\ntherein by any other party to the action under this rule, unless and until an\naffidavit sworn by that party containing the information referred to in paragraph\n(1) has been filed.\n(5) In this rule \"testamentary script\" means a will or draft thereof, written\ninstructions for a will made by or at the request or under the instructions of the\ntestator and any documents purporting to be evidence of the contents, or to be a\ncopy, of a will which is alleged to have been lost or destroyed.\n6.\nFailure to acknowledge service (O.76, r.6)\n6.\n(1) Order 13 shall not apply in relation to a probate action.\n(2) Where any of several defendants to a probate action fails to acknowledge service\nof the writ, the plaintiff upon filing an affidavit proving due service of the writ\non that defendant may, after the time limited for appearing, proceed with the\naction as if that defendant had acknowledged service.\n(3) Where the defendant, or all the defendants, to the probate action, fails or fail to\nacknowledge service of the writ then, unless on the application of the plaintiff\nthe Court orders the action to be discontinued, the plaintiff may after the time\nlimited for acknowledging service by the defendant apply to the Court for an\norder for trial of the action.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 76\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 407\n\n(4) Before applying for an order under paragraph (3) the plaintiff must file an\naffidavit proving due service of the writ on the defendant and, if no statement\nof claim is indorsed on the writ, the plaintiff must file a statement of claim.\n(5) Where the Court grants an order under paragraph (3), it may direct the action to\nbe tried on affidavit evidence.\n7.\nService of statement of claim (O.76, r.7)\n7.\nThe plaintiff in a probate action must, unless the Court gives leave to the contrary or\nunless a statement of claim is indorsed on the writ, serve a statement of claim on every\ndefendant who acknowledges service of the writ in the action and must do so before\nthe expiration of 6 weeks after acknowledgment of service by that defendant or of 14\ndays after the filing by that defendant of an affidavit under rule 5, whichever is the\nlater.\n8.\nCounterclaim (O.76, r.8)\n8.\n(1) Notwithstanding anything in O.25, r.2(1), a defendant to a probate action who\nalleges that the defendant has any claim or is entitled to any relief or remedy in\nrespect of any matter relating to the grant of probate of the will, or letters of\nadministration of the estate, of the deceased person which is the subject of the\naction, must add to the defendant\u2019s defence a counterclaim in respect of that\nmatter.\n(2) If the plaintiff fails to serve a statement of claim, any such defendant may, with\nthe leave of the Court, serve a counterclaim and the actions shall then proceed\nas if the counterclaim were the statement of claim.\n9.\nContents of pleadings (O.76, r.9)\n9.\n(1) Where the plaintiff in a probate action disputes the interest of a defendant the\nplaintiff must allege in the plaintiff\u2019s statement of claim that the plaintiff denies\nthe interest of that defendant.\n(2) In a probate action in which the interest by virtue of which a party claims to be\nentitled to a grant of letters of administration is disputed, the party disputing that\ninterest must show in that party\u2019s pleading that if the allegations made therein\nare proved that party would be entitled to an interest in the estate.\n(3) Without prejudice to O.18, r.7, any party who pleads that at the time when a\nwill, the subject of the action, was alleged to have been executed the testator did\nnot know and approve of its contents must specify the nature of the case on\nwhich the party intends to rely, and no allegation in support of that plea which\nwould be relevant in support of any of the following other pleas, that is to say \u2014\n(a)\nthat the will was not duly executed;\n(b) that at the time of the execution of the will the testator was not of sound\nmind, memory and understanding; and\n\nORDER 76\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 408\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(c)\nthat the execution of the will was obtained by undue influence or fraud,\nshall be made by that party unless that other plea is also pleaded.\n10.\nDefault of pleadings (O.76, r.10)\n10. (1) Order 19 shall not apply in relation to a probate action.\n(2) Where any party to a probate action fails to serve on any other party a pleading\nwhich the party is required by these Rules to serve on that other party, then,\nunless the Court orders the action to be discontinued or dismissed, that other\nparty may after the expiration of the period fixed by or under these Rules for\nservice of the pleading in question, apply to the Court for an order for trial of\nthe action; and if an order is made the Court may direct the action to be tried on\naffidavit evidence.\n11.\nDiscontinuance and dismissal (O.76, r.11)\n11. (1) Order 21 shall not apply in relation to a probate action.\n(2) At any stage of the proceedings in a probate action the Court may, on the\napplication of the plaintiff or of any party to the action who has acknowledged\nservice of the writ therein, order the action to be discontinued or dismissed on\nsuch terms as to costs or otherwise as it thinks just, and may further order that a\ngrant of probate of the will, or letters of administration of the estate, of the\ndeceased person, as the case may be, which is the subject of the action, be made\nto the person entitled thereto.\n(3) An application for an order under this rule may be made by motion or summons\nor by notice under O.25, r.7.\n12.\nCompromise of action: trial on affidavit evidence (O.76, r.12)\n12. Where, whether before or after the service of the defence in a probate action, the\nparties to the action agree to a compromise, the Court may order the trial of the action\non affidavit evidence.\n13.\nApplication for order to bring will, etc. (O.76, r.13)\n13. (1) Any application in a probate action for an order requiring a person to bring a\nwill or other testamentary paper into the Registry or to attend in Court for\nexamination shall be made by summons which must be served on the person\nagainst whom the order is sought.\n(2) Any application in a probate action for the issue of a subpoena requiring a person\nto bring into the Registry a will or other testamentary paper may be made ex\nparte and must be supported by an affidavit setting out the grounds of the\napplication.\n(3) Any person against whom a subpoena is issued pursuant to paragraph (2) and\nwho denies that the will or other testamentary paper referred to in the subpoena\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 76\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 409\n\nis in that person\u2019s possession or under that person\u2019s control may file an affidavit\nto that effect.\n14.\nAdministration pending suit (O.76, r.14)\n14. (1) An application for an order for the grant of administration pending suit may be\nmade by summons issued by any party to the suit.\n(2) Where an order for a grant of administration is made O.30, rr.2, 3, 4, 5 and 6,\nshall apply as if the administrator were a receiver appointed by the Court.\n(3) The order appointing an administrator pending suit shall \u2014\n(a)\noperate as a grant of letters of administration to the person so appointed;\nand\n(b) contain all such directions as may be necessary.\n15.\nProbate counterclaim in other proceedings (O.76, r.15)\n15. (1) In this rule \"probate counterclaim\" means a counterclaim in any action other\nthan a probate action by which the defendant claims any such relief as is\nmentioned in rule 1(2).\n(2) Subject to paragraph (3), this Order shall apply with the necessary modifications\nto a probate counterclaim as it applies to a probate action.\n(3) A probate counterclaim must contain a statement of the nature of the interest of\nthe defendant and of the plaintiff in the estate of the deceased to which the\ncounterclaim relates.\n16.\nNo Rule (O.76, r.16)\n16. No Rule (O.76, r.16)\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nORDER 77\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 410\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 77\nPROCEEDINGS BY AND AGAINST THE CROWN\n\n1.\nApplication and interpretation (O.77, r.1)\n1.\n(1) These Rules apply to civil proceedings to which the Crown is a party subject to\nthe following rules of this Order.\n(2) In this Order \u2014\n\n \"the Law\" means the Crown Proceedings Act (as amended and revised);\n\"civil proceedings by the Crown\", \"civil proceedings against the Crown\" and\n\"civil proceedings by or against the Crown\" have the same respective\nmeanings as in Part III of the Law, and do not include any proceedings brought\nby the Attorney General upon the relation of some other person;\n\"civil proceedings to which the Crown is a party\" shall be construed as\nincluding a reference to civil proceedings to which the Attorney General as such\nis a party, not being proceedings brought by the Attorney General upon the\nrelation of some other person;\n\"order against the Crown\" means any order (including an order for costs)\nmade in any civil proceedings by or against the Crown or in connection with\nany arbitration to which the Crown is a party, in favour of any person against\nthe Crown or against a Government Department or against an officer of the\nCrown as such;\n\"order\" includes a judgment, decree, rule, award or declaration.\n2.\nNo rule (O.77, r.2)\n2.\nNo rule (O.77, r.2)\n3.\nParticulars to be included in indorsement of claim (O.77, r.3)\n3.\n(1) In the case of a writ which begins civil proceedings against the Crown the\nindorsement of claim required by O.6, r.2, shall include a statement of the\ncircumstances in which the Crown's liability is alleged to have arisen and as to\nthe Minister and officers of the Crown concerned.\n(2) If in civil proceedings against the Crown the Attorney General considers that\nthe writ does not contain a sufficient statement as required by this rule, the\nAttorney General may, before the expiration of the time limited for\nacknowledging service of the writ, apply to the plaintiff by notice for a further\nand better statement containing such information as may be specified in the\nnotice.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 77\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 411\n\n(3) Where the Attorney General gives a notice under this rule, the time limited for\nacknowledging service of the writ shall not expire until 4 days after the Attorney\nGeneral has notified the plaintiff in writing that the Attorney General is satisfied\nwith the statement supplied in compliance with the notice or 4 days after the\nCourt has, on the application of the plaintiff by summons served on the Attorney\nGeneral not less than 7 days before the return day, decided that no further\ninformation as to the matters referred to in paragraph (1) is reasonably required.\n4.\nService on the Crown (O.77, r.4)\n4.\n(1) O.10, O.11 and any other provision of these Rules relating to service out of the\njurisdiction shall not apply in relation to the service of any process by which\ncivil proceedings against the Crown are begun.\n(2) Personal service of any document required to be served on the Crown for the\npurpose of or in connection with any civil proceedings is not requisite; but where\nthe proceedings are by or against the Crown service on the Crown must be\neffected by leaving the document at the office of the Attorney General or at the\noffice of an officer prescribed by the Attorney General for the purpose of\naccepting service.\n(3) In relation to the service of any document required to be served on the Crown\nfor the purpose of or in connection with any civil proceedings by or against the\nCrown, O.65, rr.5 and 9, shall not apply, and O.65, r.7, shall apply as if the\nreference therein to rules 2 and 5(1)(a) of that Order were a reference to\nparagraph (2) of this rule.\n5.\nNo rule (O.77, r.5)\n5.\nNo rule (O.77, r.5)\n6.\nCounterclaim and set-off (O.77, r.6)\n6.\n(1) Notwithstanding O.15, r.2, and O.18, rr.17 and 18, no counterclaim may be\nmade, or set-off pleaded against the Crown if the proceedings are for the\nrecovery of, or the counterclaim or set-off arises out of a right or claim to\nrepayment in respect of, any taxes, duties or penalties.\n(2) Notwithstanding O.15, r.2, and O.18, rr.17 and 18, no counterclaim may be\nmade, or set-off pleaded, without the leave of the Court, by the Crown in\nproceedings against the Crown, or by any person in proceedings by the Crown.\n(3) Any application for leave under this rule must be made by summons.\n7.\nSummary judgment (O.77, r.7)\n7.\n(1) No application against the Crown shall be made under O.14, r.1, or O.86, r.1, in\nany proceedings against the Crown nor under O.14, r.5, in any proceedings by\nthe Crown.\n\nORDER 77\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 412\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(2) Where an application is made by the Crown under O.14, r.1, O.14,\n\nr.5, or O.86, r.1, the affidavit required in support of the application must be made\nby \u2014\n(a)\nthe Attorney General or crown counsel having conduct of the matter; or\n(b) an officer duly authorised by the Attorney General or by the Minister\nconcerned,\nand the affidavit shall be sufficient if it states that in the deponent's belief the\napplicant is entitled to the relief claimed and there is no defence to the claim or\npart of a claim to which the application relates or no defence except as to the\namount of any damages claimed.\n8.\nNo rule (O.77, r.8)\n8.\nNo rule (O.77, r.8)\n8A.\nNo rule (O.77, r.8A)\n8A. No rule (O.77, r.8A)\n9.\nJudgment in default (O.77, r.9)\n9.\n(1) Except with the leave of the Court, no judgment in default of notice of intention\nto defend or of pleading shall be entered against the Crown in civil proceedings\nagainst the Crown or in third party proceedings against the Crown.\n(2) Except with the leave of the Court, O.16, r.5(1)(a), shall not apply in the case of\nthird party proceedings against the Crown.\n(3) An application for leave under this rule may be made by summons or except in\nthe case of an application relating to O.16, r.5, by motion; and the summons or,\nas the case may be, notice of the motion must be served not less than 7 days\nbefore the return day.\n10.\nThird party notices (O.77, r.10)\n10. (1) Notwithstanding anything in O.16, a third party notice (including a notice\nissuable by virtue of O.16, r.9) for service on the Crown shall not be issued\nwithout the leave of the Court, and the application for the grant of such leave\nmust be made by summons, and the summons must be served on the plaintiff\nand the Crown.\n(2) Leave to issue such a notice for service on the Crown shall not be granted unless\nthe Court is satisfied that the Crown is in possession of all such information as\nit reasonably requires as to the circumstances in which it is alleged that the\nliability of the Crown has arisen and as to the Ministers and officers of the\nCrown concerned.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 77\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 413\n\n11.\nInterpleader: application for order against Crown (O.77, r.11)\n11. No order shall be made against the Crown under O.17, r.5(3), except upon an\n\napplication by summons served not less than 7 days before the return day.\n12.\nDiscovery and interrogatories (O.77, r.12)\n12. (1) O.24, rr.1 and 2, shall not apply in civil proceedings to which the Crown is a\nparty.\n(2) In any civil proceedings to which the Crown is a party any order of the Court\nmade under the powers conferred by Section 19(1) of the Law, shall be\nconstrued as not requiring the disclosure of the existence of any document, the\nexistence of which it would, in the opinion of the Governor, be injurious to the\npublic interest to disclose.\n(3) Where in any such proceedings an order of the Court directs that a list of\ndocuments made in answer to any order for discovery against the Crown shall\nbe verified by affidavit, the affidavit shall be made by such officer of the Crown\nas the Court may direct.\n(4) Where in any such proceedings an order is made under the said Section 19 for\ninterrogatories to be answered by the Crown, the Court shall direct by what\nofficer of the Crown the interrogatories are to be answered.\n13.\nNo rule (O.77, r.13)\n13. No rule (O.77, r.13)\n14.\nEvidence (O.77, r.14)\n14. (1) Civil proceedings against the Crown may be instituted under O.39, r.15, in any\ncase in which the Crown is alleged to have an interest or estate in the honour,\ntitle, dignity or office or property in question.\n(2) For the avoidance of doubt it is hereby declared that any powers exercisable by\nthe Court in regard to the taking of evidence are exercisable in proceedings by\nor against the Crown as they are exercisable in proceedings between subjects.\n15.\nExecution and satisfaction of orders (O.77, r.15)\n15. (1) Nothing in Orders 45 to 52 shall apply in respect of any order against the Crown.\n(2) An application under subsection (1) of Section 16 of the Law for a direction that\na separate certificate shall be issued under that subsection with respect to the\ncosts (if any) ordered to be paid to the applicant, may be made to the Court ex\nparte without summons.\n16.\nAttachment of debts (O.77, r.16)\n16. (1) No order \u2014\n\nORDER 77\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 414\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(a)\nfor the attachment of debts under O.49;\n(b) for the appointment of a sequestrator under O.45; or\n(c)\nfor the appointment of a receiver under O.30 or 51,\nshall be made or have effect in respect of any money due or accruing due, or\nalleged to be due or accruing due, from the Crown.\n(2) No application shall be made under paragraph (3) unless the order of the Court\nto be enforced is for a sum of money amounting in value to at least $500.\n(3) Every application for an order under Section 18 of the Law restraining any\nperson from receiving money payable to that person by the Crown and directing\npayment of the money to the applicant or some other person must be made by\nsummons and, unless the Court otherwise directs, served \u2014\n(a)\non the Crown at least 15 days before the return day; and\n(b) on the person to be restrained or that person\u2019s attorney at least 7 days after\nthe summons has been served on the Crown and at least 7 days before the\nreturn day.\n(4) An application under paragraph (3) must be supported by an affidavit \u2014\n(a)\nsetting out the facts giving rise to the application;\n(b) stating the name and last known address of the person to be restrained;\n(c)\nidentifying the order to be enforced and stating the amount of such order\nand the amount remaining unpaid under it at the time of application; and\n(d) identifying the particular debt from the Crown in respect of which the\napplication is made.\n(5) O.49, rr. 5 and 6, shall apply in relation to such an application as is mentioned\nin paragraph (3) for an order restraining a person from receiving money payable\nto that person by the Crown as those rules apply to an application under Order\n49, rule 1, for an order for the attachment of a debt owing to any person from a\nguarantee except that the Court shall not have the power to order execution to\nissue against the Crown.\n17.\nNo rule (O.77, r.17)\n17. No rule (O.77, r.17)\n18.\nApplication under Section 20 of the Crown Proceedings Act (as amended\nand revised) (O.77, r.18)\n18. An application such as is referred to in Section 20(2) of the Law may be made to the\nCourt at any time before trial by motion or summons, or may be made at the trial of\nthe proceedings.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 77\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 415\n\nORDER 77A\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 416\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 77A\nPROCEEDINGS UNDER SECTIONS 23 AND 26 OF THE\nCONSTITUTION\n\n1.\nDefinitions  (O.77A, r.1)\n1.\n(1) In this Order \u2014\n\"act\" includes a failure to act but excludes a failure to introduce before the\nCayman Islands Parliament, or for the Legislature to enact, primary legislation;\n\"Bill of Rights\" means Part 1 of the Constitution;\n\"Constitution\" means the Cayman Islands Constitution Order 2009 (UKSI\n1379\/2009) (as amended);\n\"Lower Court\" means the Summary Court, the Youth Court, the Drug\nRehabilitation Court, and the Coroner's Court;\n\"primary legislation\" means a Law enacted by the Legislature;\n\"public official\" \u2014\n(a)\nincludes a public or governmental body, including any statutory body or\ncompany or association in which the Cayman Islands has an interest and\nperforms a public function or duty;\n(b) includes any organisation or person carrying out a public function or duty,\nincluding the Governor, except where the nature of their act is private;\n(c)\nexcludes private schools (whether or not in receipt of government funding,\nsubsidy or other assistance), churches, the Legislature and the Court, Court\nof Appeal, and any Lower Court;\n\"tribunal\" means any tribunal, board or authority constituted by or under any\nenactment but excludes any Lower Court, the Court, the Court of Appeal or the\nJudicial Committee of the Privy Council.\n2.\nGeneral (O.77A, r.2)\n2.\n(1) Pursuant to O.5, r.4A, proceedings under Section 23 or 26(1) of the Constitution\nshall be begun by petition or writ.\n(2) References to the Court pursuant to Section 26(2) of the Constitution shall be\nbegun by petition.\n(3) No such writ shall be issued unless it is indorsed with a statement of claim.\nEvery reference in this Order to a writ shall be deemed to include the statement\nof claim indorsed on the writ.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 77A\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 417\n\n(4) At the same time as every such petition is presented an affidavit shall be sworn\nby or on behalf of the petitioner confirming the facts and matters referred to in\nthe petition.\n(5) Unless the Court otherwise orders, all proceedings (interlocutory and final)\npursuant to this Order shall be heard in open Court.\n3.\nProceedings under Section 23 of the Constitution (O.77A, r.3)\n3.\n(1) In any proceedings to which the Attorney General is not already a party, where\na party seeks a declaration that primary legislation, or any part thereof, is\nincompatible with a section or sections of the Bill of Rights, the party seeking\nthe declaration shall forthwith serve on the Attorney General copies of the\noriginating process together with all pleadings and particulars already served on\nthe parties to those proceedings.\n\n(2) In any proceedings where there is no claim for a declaration that primary\nlegislation, or any part thereof, is incompatible with a section or sections of the\nBill of Rights, but the Court considers that the proceedings may necessarily raise\na real question as to whether primary legislation, or any part thereof, is\ncompatible with a section or sections of the Bill of Rights, then the Court shall\nconvene a hearing to determine whether or not the Attorney General should be\ngiven notice of the proceedings and generally for the future conduct of the\nproceedings.\n(3) Unless the Court otherwise orders, no further step may be taken in the\nproceedings until the earlier of \u2014\n(a)  7 days after the service on the Attorney General of the copies of the\noriginating process and any pleadings and particulars, or\n(b)  the service on the parties of a notice of non-intervention by the Attorney\nGeneral pursuant to rule 2(4) of this Order.\n(4) Within 7 days of service on the Attorney General of the originating process and\nany pleadings and particulars, the Attorney General shall file and serve on the\nparties a notice stating whether or not the Attorney General wishes to intervene\nin the proceedings, provided that if, after the expiry of the said 7 days, the\nAttorney General shall determine that it is in the public interest for the Attorney\nGeneral to intervene the Attorney may do so by filing and serving a notice on\nthe parties.  If the Attorney General's notice states that the Attorney General\nwishes to intervene in the proceedings the Attorney General shall automatically\nbecome an intervener in the proceedings without further order.\n(5) If the Attorney General gives notice of intervention then, unless the Court\notherwise orders, no party may seek costs against the Attorney General nor may\nthe Attorney General seek costs against any party.\n(6) Upon the Attorney General serving a notice of intervention, the party seeking\nthe aforesaid declaration shall issue forthwith a summons and serve it on all the\n\nORDER 77A\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 418\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nother parties and on the Attorney General seeking directions as to the future\nconduct of the action.\n(7) If the Court grants a declaration that primary legislation, or any part thereof, is\nincompatible with a section or sections of the Bill of Rights, the Attorney\nGeneral shall cause a copy of the order embodying the declaration to be served\nforthwith on the Clerk of the Cayman Islands Parliament.\n4.\nProceedings under Section 26(1) of the Constitution (O.77A, r.4)\n4.\n(1) A petition, or a writ, or any pleading alleging that the government has breached\nor threatened the applicant's rights and freedoms under the Bill of Rights shall\ninclude full particulars of \u2014\n(a)\nthe circumstances in which the government's liability is alleged to have\narisen, and the circumstances of the conduct of any public official or\nofficials in respect of which the applicant complains;\n(b) the decision or decisions or the act or acts that is or are alleged to breach\nthe Bill of Rights, and the date or dates of each such decision or act;\n(c)\nto the extent that any such decision or act as referred to in rule 4(1)(b) of\nthis Order is alleged to have taken place more than one year prior to the\nissuing of the writ, the presentation of the petition, or filing of the pleading,\nthe date or dates on which such decision or act was alleged to be known or\nalleged could reasonably have been known to the applicant.\n(2) The respondent to such a petition, or the defendant to such a writ, as the case\nmay be, shall be the Attorney General and any relevant public official.\n(3) If a claim is brought by way of counterclaim then the defendant to such a\ncounterclaim shall be the Attorney General and any relevant public official.\n5.\nReference to the Court under Section 26(2) of the Constitution; general\nprovisions (O.77A, r.5)\n5.\n(1) Every reference from a Lower Court or tribunal to the Court shall concisely set\nout \u2014\n(a)\nin the case of any criminal cause or matter, or in proceedings pursuant to\nthe Extradition Act (Overseas Territories) Order 2016 [UKSI 2016\nNo.990], the charge, summons, information or complaint in respect of\nwhich the proceedings arose;]\n(b) in any other proceedings, cause or matter, the identity of the parties and\nthe allegations contained in the pleadings or, if there are no pleadings, a\nrecord of the proceedings;\n(c)\nthe facts, if any, found by the Lower Court or tribunal to have been proved\nor admitted, and\/or the facts to be presumed; and\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 77A\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 419\n\n(d) the issue as to the interpretation of the Bill of Rights on which the opinion\nof the Court is sought.\n(2) The Lower Court or tribunal shall not in its reference provide a record of the\nevidence taken before it.\n(3) Where a Lower Court or tribunal makes a reference to the Court the applicant\nseeking the opinion of the Court must:\n(a)\nwithin 5 days after\n(i)\nin the case of a reference made by a Lower Court, the applicant\nreceiving the reference from the Clerk of the Court, or\n(ii) in the case of a reference made by a tribunal, the applicant being\nserved with the reference,\n\nthe applicant shall present a petition to which is annexed the reference; and\n(b) within 3 days after the applicant has received from the Court a sealed copy\nof the petition, serve on the parties a copy of that petition together with the\nreference annexed and the affidavit in support of the petition.\n(4) Unless the Attorney General is already a party to the proceedings before the\nLower Court or tribunal, within 3 days after the petitioner has received from the\nCourt a sealed copy of the petition, the petitioner must serve on the Attorney\nGeneral a copy of that petition together with the reference annexed and the\naffidavit in support of the petition.\n(5) The petition must set out the petitioner's contentions on the issue as to the\ninterpretation of the Bill of Rights as settled by the Lower Court pursuant to rule\n5(1)(d) of this Order.\n(6) Within 5 days of service on the Attorney General of the petition under rule 5(4)\nof this Order, the Attorney General shall file and serve on the parties a notice\nstating whether or not the Attorney General wishes to intervene in the\nproceedings, provided that if, after the expiry of the said 5 days, the Attorney\nGeneral shall determine that it is in the public interest for the Attorney General\nto intervene the Attorney General may do so by filing and serving a notice on\nthe parties.  If the Attorney General's notice states that the Attorney General\nwishes to intervene in the proceedings the Attorney General shall automatically\nbecome an intervener in the proceedings without further order.\n(7)  If the Attorney General gives notice of intervention then, unless the Court\notherwise orders, no party may seek costs against the Attorney General nor may\nthe Attorney General seek costs against any party.\n(8) Unless the Court otherwise orders, a reference in a pending criminal cause or\nmatter, or in proceedings pursuant to the Extradition Act (Overseas Territories)\nOrder 2016, shall be heard on an expedited basis; a reference in any other matter\nshall not be heard sooner than 10 days after the petitioner has served a copy of\nthe petition on the persons specified in rules 5(3), 5(4) and 8 of this Order.\n\nORDER 77A\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 420\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n6.\nProcedure to be applied for a reference by a Lower Court to the Court under\nSection 26(2) of the Constitution (O.77A, r.6)\n6.\n(1) If in proceedings before any Lower Court, any issue arises as to the\ninterpretation of the Bill of Rights, and if the Lower Court is satisfied that it is\nnecessary for the issue to be determined then it shall refer the question to the\nCourt.\n(2) In any proceedings before a Lower Court where an application is made to the\nLower Court to refer an issue to the Court the following rules shall apply \u2014\n(a)\nThe applicant shall file with the Clerk of the Court and serve on all other\nparties a notice in writing.\n(b) The notice shall be signed by the applicant or the applicant\u2019s attorney and\nit shall state the facts found by the Lower Court, or the presumed facts, and\nthe issue as to the interpretation of the Bill of Rights on which the opinion\nof the Court is sought.\n(c)\nUnless the Lower Court shall refuse to make a reference, within 4 days\nafter filing of the notice the Magistrate or Justices shall cause the Clerk of\nthe Court to send to the parties or their attorneys a draft reference in which\nare stated the matters required by rules 5(1) and 5(2) of this Order.\n(d) Within 4 days of receipt of the draft reference under rule 6(2)(c) of this\nOrder each party may make representations on the draft reference.  Any\nsuch representations shall be in writing and signed by the party making\nthem or the party\u2019s attorney and shall be filed.\n(e)\nWithin 4 days after the latest day on which representations may be made\nunder rule 6(2)(d) of this Order, the Magistrate or Justices shall make such\nadjustments, if any, to the draft reference prepared for the purpose of that\nrule as the Magistrate or they shall think fit, after considering any such\nrepresentations, and shall refer the issue to the Court.\n(f)\nForthwith after the reference has been made, the Clerk of the Court shall\nsend a copy of the reference to the parties or their attorneys.\n(g) If the Clerk of the Court is unable to send a draft reference under rule\n6(2)(c) of this Order, or the Magistrate is, or Justices are, unable to make\nthe reference under rule 6(2)(e) of this Order, the Magistrate or they shall\ndo so as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter and the time periods in\nthose rules shall be extended accordingly.  In any such event, the Clerk of\nthe Court shall notify the parties or their attorneys in writing of the delay\nand the reasons therefor.\n(h) Any party may apply in writing to the Lower Court for leave to extend the\nperiod under rule 6(2)(d) of this Order, as may have been extended, but\nnot after any such period has expired.\n(i)\nThe making of a reference shall not in itself have the effect of \u2014\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 77A\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 421\n\n(i)\nif and to the extent that the proceedings before the Lower Court are\nstill pending, suspending those proceedings, or\n(ii) suspending the execution or enforcement of any decision, sentence\nor order of the Lower Court.\n(3) Upon making any reference the Lower Court may give consideration to the\nfuture conduct of the proceedings before it including, without limitation,\npending the determination of the reference whether or not it should suspend\nthose proceedings, or suspend the execution or enforcement of any decision,\nsentence or order of it, in the case of any criminal cause or matter, or\nproceedings pursuant to the Extradition Act (Overseas Territories) Order 2016\n[UKSI 2016 No.990].\n(4) The Lower Court may refuse to make a reference if it considers the matter to be\nvexatious or unreasonable but if so it shall provide to the applicant written\nreasons for its refusal.\n7.\nSigning and service of reference by a tribunal (O.77A, r.7)\n7.\n(1) A reference by the Governor must be signed by the head of the Governor's office\nand a reference by the Cabinet must be signed by the Clerk of the Cabinet.\n (2) A reference by any other tribunal, not being an individual, must be signed by\nthe chairperson or president of the tribunal, and a reference by a tribunal being\nan individual must be signed by that person or by a person authorised in that\nbehalf to do so.\n(3) The reference must be served on the party at whose request the reference was\nmade.\n8.\nService of petition under GCR O.77A, rule 5(3) (O.77A, r.8)\n8.\nThe petitioner shall serve a petition under rule 5(3) of this Order together with the\naffidavit in support and a copy of the reference, on \u2014\n(a)\nthe head of the Governor's office, the Clerk of the Cabinet, the secretary\nof the tribunal, or other person by whom the reference was made, unless\nthe Governor, the Cabinet, that tribunal or other person is the petitioner;\nand\n(b) every party (other than the petitioner) to the proceedings in which the\nreference relates arose; and\n(c)\nthe Attorney General, unless the Attorney General is already a party to the\nproceedings before the tribunal.\n9.\nAmendment of reference (O.77A, r.9)\n9.\nThe Court hearing a reference from a Lower Court or a tribunal may amend the\nreference.\n\nORDER 77A\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 422\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n10.\nRight of Governor, the Cabinet, etc. to appear and be heard (O.77A, r.10)\n10. In proceedings for the determination of a reference by a tribunal to the Court, the\nGovernor, the Cabinet, chairperson or president of the tribunal, or other person by\nwhom the reference was made shall be entitled to appear and be heard.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 06.11.12)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 78-79\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 423\n\nORDER 78-79\nNO ORDERS\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nORDER 80\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 424\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 80\nDISABILITY\n\nI. CONDUCT OF LITIGATION\n\n1.\nInterpretation (O.80, r.1)\n1.\n(1) In this Order \u2014\n(a)\n\"the Law\" means the Mental Health Act (as amended and revised);\n(b) \"patient\" means \u2014\n(i)\na person who is a patient within the meaning of Section 2 of the Law;\nor\n(ii) a person in respect of whom a guardian has been appointed under\nSection 14 of the Grand Court Act (as amended and revised);\n(c)\n\"person under disability\" means a person who is a child or a patient.\n2.\nPerson under disability must sue, etc., by next friend or guardian ad litem\n(O.80, r.2)\n2.\n(1) A person under disability may not bring, or make a claim in, any proceedings\nexcept by that person\u2019s next friend and may not defend, make a counterclaim or\nintervene in any proceedings, or appear in any proceedings under a judgment or\norder, notice of which has been served on that person, except by that person\u2019s\nguardian ad litem.\n(2) Subject to the provisions of these Rules, anything which in the ordinary conduct\nof any proceedings is required or authorised by a provision of these Rules to be\ndone by a party to the proceedings shall or may, if the party is a person under\ndisability, be done by that party\u2019s next friend or guardian ad litem.\n(3) A next friend or guardian ad litem of a person under disability must act by an\nattorney.\n3.\nAppointment of next friend or guardian ad litem (O.80, r.3)\n3.\n(1) Except as provided by paragraph (3) or (4) or by rule 6, an order appointing a\nperson next friend or guardian ad litem of a person under disability is not\nnecessary.\n(2) Where a person is authorised under Section 19(a)(vi) of the Law to conduct legal\nproceedings in the name of a patient or on the patient\u2019s behalf, that person shall\nbe entitled to be next friend or guardian ad litem, as the case may be, of the\npatient in any proceedings to which that person\u2019s authority extends unless, in a\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 80\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 425\n\ncase to which paragraph (3) or (4) or rule 6 applies, some other person is\nappointed by the Court under that paragraph or rule to be next friend or guardian\nad litem, as the case may be, of the patient in those proceedings.\n(3) Where a person has been or is next friend or guardian ad litem of a person under\ndisability in any proceedings no other person shall be entitled to act as such\nfriend or guardian, as the case may be, of the person under disability in those\nproceedings unless the Court makes an order appointing that person such friend\nor guardian in substitution for the person previously acting in that capacity.\n(4) Where, after any proceedings have been begun, a party to the proceedings\nbecomes a patient, an application must be made to the Court for the appointment\nof a person to be next friend or guardian ad litem, as the case may be, of that\nparty.\n(5) Except where the next friend or guardian ad litem, as the case may be, of a\nperson under disability has been appointed by the Court \u2014\n(a)\nthe name of any person shall not be used in a cause or matter as next friend\nor guardian ad litem of a person under disability;\n(b) service shall not be acknowledged in a cause or matter for a person under\ndisability; and\n(c)\na person under disability shall not be entitled to appear by that person\u2019s\nguardian ad litem on the hearing of a petition, summons or motion which,\nor notice of which, has been served on that person,\nunless and until the documents listed in paragraph (6) have been filed in the\nCourt office.\n(6) The documents referred to in paragraph (5) are the following \u2014\n(a)\na written consent to be next friend or guardian ad litem, as the case may\nbe, of the person under disability in the cause or matter in question given\nby the person proposing to be such friend or guardian;\n(b) where the person proposing to be next friend or guardian ad litem of the\nperson under disability, being a patient, has been appointed guardian under\nSection 14 of the Grand Court Act (as amended and revised), an office\ncopy of the order appointing the person;\n(c)\nwhere the person proposing to be next friend or guardian ad litem of the\nperson under disability, being a child, has been appointed guardian under\nthe Children Act (as amended and revised), an office copy of the order\nappointing the person;\n(d) where the person under disability, being a child, is the subject of an order\nfor care and control or custody made under Sections 20(a) or 22(1) of the\nMatrimonial Causes Act (as amended and revised), an office copy of such\norder; and\n\nORDER 80\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 426\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n (e) a certificate made by the attorney for the person under disability\ncertifying \u2014\n(i)\nthat that attorney knows or believes, as the case may be, that the\nperson to whom the certificate relates is a child or a patient, giving\n(in the case of a patient) the grounds of that attorney\u2019s knowledge or\nbelief; and\n(ii) where the person under disability is a patient, that there is no person\nauthorised as aforesaid; and\n(iii) that the person so named has no interest in the cause or matter in\nquestion adverse to that of the person under disability.\n(3) If it appears to the Court that there is no fit and proper person who is\nwilling and able to act as next friend or guardian ad litem for a person\nunder disability, it shall appoint the Solicitor General.\n4.\nNo rule (O.80, r.4)\n4.\nNo rule (O.80, r.4)\n5.\nNo rule (O.80, r.5)\n5.\nNo rule (O.80, r.5)\n6.\nAppointment of guardian where person under disability does not\nacknowledge service (O.80, r.6)\n6.\n(1) Where \u2014\n(a)\nin an action against a person under disability begun by writ, or by\noriginating summons, no acknowledgment of service is given in the action\nfor that person; or\n(b) the defendant to an action serves a defence and counterclaim on a person\nunder disability who is not already a party to the action, and no\nacknowledgment of service is given for that person,\nan application for the appointment by the Court of a guardian ad litem of that\nperson must be made by the plaintiff or defendant, as the case may be, after the\ntime limited (as respects that person) for appearing and before proceeding\nfurther with the action or counterclaim.\n(2) Where a party to an action has served on a person under disability who is not\nalready a party to the action a third party notice within the meaning of O.16 and\nno acknowledgment of service is given for that person to the notice, an\napplication for the appointment by the Court of a guardian ad litem of that\nperson must be made by that party after the time limited (as respects that person)\nfor acknowledging service and before proceeding further with the third party\nproceedings.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 80\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 427\n\n(3) Where in any proceedings against a person under disability begun by petition or\nmotion, that person does not appear by a guardian ad litem at the hearing of the\npetition or motion, as the case may be, the Court hearing it may appoint a\nguardian ad litem of that person in the proceedings or direct that an application\nbe made by the petitioner or applicant, as the case may be, for the appointment\nof such a guardian.\n(4) At any stage in the proceedings under any judgment or order, notice of which\nhas been served on a person under disability, the Court may, if no\nacknowledgment of service is given for that person, appoint a guardian ad litem\nof that person in the proceedings or direct that an application be made for the\nappointment of such a guardian.\n(5) An application under paragraph (1) or (2) must be supported by evidence\nproving \u2014\n(a)\nthat the person to whom the application relates is a person under disability;\n(b) that the person proposed as guardian ad litem is willing and a proper person\nto act as such and has no interest in the proceedings adverse to that of the\nperson under disability;\n(c)\nthat the writ, originating summons, defence and counterclaim or third party\nnotice, as the case may be, was duly served on the person under disability;\nand\n(d) subject to paragraph (6), that notice of the application was, after the\nexpiration of the time limited for appearing and at least 7 days before the\nday named in the notice for hearing of the application, so served on the\nperson under disability.\n(6) If the Court so directs, notice of an application under paragraph (1) or (2) need\nnot be served on a person under disability.\n(7) An application for the appointment of a guardian ad litem made in compliance\nwith a direction of the Court given under paragraph (3) or (4) must be supported\nby evidence proving the matters referred to in subparagraph (5)(b).\n7.\nApplication to discharge or vary certain orders (O.80, r.7)\n7.\nAn application to the Court on behalf of a person under disability served with an order\nmade ex parte under O.15, r.7, for the discharge or variation of the order must be\nmade \u2014\n(a)\nif a next friend or guardian ad litem is acting for that person in the cause\nor matter in which the order is made, within 14 days after the service of\nthe order on that person;\n(b) if there is no next friend or guardian ad litem acting for that person in that\ncause or matter, within 14 days after the appointment of such a friend or\nguardian to act for that person.\n\nORDER 80\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 428\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n8.\nAdmission not to be implied from pleading of person under disability (O.80,\nr.8)\n8.\nNotwithstanding anything in O.18, r.13(1), a person under disability shall not be taken\nto admit the truth of any allegation of fact made in the pleading of the opposite party\nby reason only that the person under disability has not traversed it in that person\u2019s\npleadings.\n9.\nDiscovery and interrogatories (O.80, r.9)\n9.\nOrders 24 and 26 shall apply to a person under disability and to that person\u2019s next\nfriend or guardian ad litem.\n10.\nCompromise, etc. by person under disability (O.80, r.10)\n10. Where in any proceedings money is claimed by or on behalf of a person under\ndisability, no settlement, compromise or payment and no acceptance of money paid\ninto Court, whenever entered into or made, shall so far as it relates to that person's\nclaim be valid without the approval of the Court.\n11.\nApproval of settlement (O.80, r.11)\n11. (1) Where, before proceedings in which a claim for money is made by or on behalf\nof a person under disability (whether alone or in conjunction with any other\nperson) are begun, an agreement is reached for the settlement of the claim, and\nit is desired to obtain the Court's approval to the settlement, then\nnotwithstanding anything in O.5, r.2, the claim may be made in proceedings\nbegun by originating summons and in the summons an application may also be\nmade for \u2014\n(a)\nthe approval of the Court to the settlement and such orders or directions as\nmay be necessary to give effect to it or as may be necessary or expedient\nunder rule 12; or\n(b) alternatively, directions as to the further prosecution of the claim.\n(2) Where in proceedings under this rule a claim is made under the Torts (Reform)\nAct (as amended and revised), the originating summons must include the\nparticulars mentioned in Section 5 of the Torts (Reform) Act (as amended and\nrevised).\n(3) An originating summons under this rule shall be in Form No. 3 of the Grand\nCourt Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised).\n(4) In this rule \"settlement\" includes a compromise.\n12.\nControl of money recovered by person under disability (O.80, r.12)\n12. (1) Where in any proceedings \u2014\n(a)\nmoney is recovered by or on behalf of, or adjudged or ordered or agreed\nto be paid to, or for the benefit of, a person under disability; or\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 80\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 429\n\n(b) money paid into Court is accepted by or on behalf of a plaintiff who is a\nperson under disability,\nthe money shall be dealt with in accordance with directions given by the Court,\nand not otherwise.\n(2) Directions given under this rule may provide that the money shall, as to the\nwhole or any part thereof, be paid into the Court and invested or otherwise dealt\nwith there.\n(3) Without prejudice to the foregoing provisions of this rule, directions given under\nthis rule may include any general or special directions that the Court thinks fit\nto give and, in particular, directions as to how the money is to be applied or dealt\nwith and as to any payment to be made, either directly or out of the amount paid\ninto Court to the plaintiff, or to the next friend in respect of monies paid or\nexpenses incurred for or on behalf or for the benefit of the person under\ndisability or for that person\u2019s maintenance or otherwise for that person\u2019s benefit\nor to the plaintiff's attorney in respect of costs.\n(4) Where in pursuance of directions given under this rule money is paid into Court\nto be invested or otherwise dealt with there, the money (including any interest\nthereon) shall not be paid out, nor shall any securities in which the money is\ninvested, or the dividends thereon, be sold, transferred or paid out of Court,\nexcept in accordance with an order of the Court.\n(5) The foregoing provisions of this rule shall apply in relation to a counterclaim by\nor on behalf of a person under a disability, and a claim made by or on behalf of\nsuch person in an action by any other person for relief under Section 504 of the\nUnited Kingdom\u2019s Merchant Shipping Act 1894,1 as if for the references to a\nplaintiff and a next friend there were substituted references to a defendant and\nto a guardian ad litem respectively.\n1 (Note: Section 504 of theUK\u2019s Merchant Shipping Act 1894 was repealed by Schedule\n7 of the UK\u2019s Merchant Shipping Act, 1979.)\n13.\nAppointment of guardian of child's estate (O.80, r.13)\n13. (1) In any of the circumstances described in paragraph (2) the Court may appoint a\nlicensed trust corporation to be a guardian of the estate of a child provided\nthat \u2014\n(a)\nthe appointment is to subsist only until the child reaches the age of 18; and\n(b) the consent of the child's parents has been signified to the Court or, in the\nopinion of the Court, cannot be obtained or may be dispensed with.\n(2) The circumstances referred to in paragraph (1) are \u2014\n(a)\nwhere money is paid into Court on behalf of the child in accordance with\ndirections given under rule 12(2);\n\nORDER 80\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 430\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(b) where a Court or tribunal outside the Islands notifies the Court that it has\nordered or intends to order that money be paid to the child;\n(c)\nwhere the child is absolutely entitled to proceeds of a pension fund;\n(d) where the child is absolutely entitled to a trust fund; or\n(e)\nwhere such an appointment seems desirable to the Court.\n(3) Rules 23 and 24 of this Order shall apply, mutatis mutandis, to a licensed trust\ncorporation appointed under this rule as they apply to a receiver appointed under\nPart II of this Order, provided that an application for its removal may only be\nmade by \u2014\n(a)\nthe child's parent;\n(b) if the child has no parents, by any guardian appointed under Section 7 of\nthe Children Act (as amended and revised); or\n(c)\nthe Solicitor General.\n14.\nNo rule (O.80, r.14)\n14. No rule (O.80, r.14)\n15.\nProceedings under the Torts (Reform) Act (as amended and revised) -\napportionment by Court (O.80, r.15)\n15. (1) Where a single sum of money is paid into Court under O.22, r.1, in satisfaction\nof causes of action arising under the Torts (Reform) Act (as amended and\nrevised) and the Estates Proceedings Act (as amended and revised) and that sum\nis accepted, the money shall be apportioned between the different causes of\naction by the Court either when giving directions for dealing with it under rule\n10 (if that rule applies) or when authorising its payment out of Court.\n(2) Where, in an action in which a claim under the Torts (Reform) Act (as amended\nand revised) is made by or on behalf of more than one person, a sum in respect\nof damages is adjudged or ordered or agreed to be paid in satisfaction of the\nclaim, or a sum of money paid into Court under O.22, r.1, is accepted in\nsatisfaction of the cause of action under the Torts (Reform) Act (as amended and\nrevised), then it shall be apportioned between those persons by the Court.\n\nThe reference in this paragraph to a sum of money paid into Court shall be\nconstrued as including a reference to part of a sum so paid being the part\napportioned by the Court under paragraph (1) to the cause of action under the\nTorts (Reform) Act (as amended and revised).\n16.\nService of certain documents on person under disability (O.80, r.16)\n16. (1) Where in any proceedings a document is required to be served personally on\nany person and that person is a person under disability this rule shall apply.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 80\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 431\n\n(2) Subject to the following provisions of this rule and to O.24, r.20(3), and O.26,\nr.6(3), the document must be served \u2014\n(a)\nin the case of a child who is not also a patient, on the child\u2019s parent or\nguardian or, if the child has no parent or guardian, on the person with\nwhom the child resides or in whose care the child is;\n(b) in the case of a patient, on the person (if any) who is authorised under\nSection 14 of the Grand Court Act (as amended and revised) to conduct in\nthe name of the patient or on the patient\u2019s behalf the proceedings in\nconnection with which the document is to be served or, if there is no person\nso authorised, on the person with whom the patient resides or in whose\ncare the patient is,\n\nand must be served in the manner required by these Rules with respect to the\ndocument in question.\n(3) Notwithstanding anything in paragraph (2), the Court may order that a document\nwhich has been, or is to be, served on the person under disability or on a person\nother than a person mentioned in that paragraph shall be deemed to be duly\nserved on the person under disability.\n(4) A judgment or order requiring a person to do, or refrain from doing, any act, a\nnotice of motion or summons for the committal of any person, and a writ of\nsubpoena against any person, must, if that person is a person under disability,\nbe served personally on that person unless the Court otherwise orders.\n\nThis paragraph shall not apply to an order for interrogatories or for discovery or\ninspection of documents.\n\nII. ADMINISTRATION OF PATIENT'S PROPERTY\n17.\nApplication to appoint receiver, etc. (O.80, r.17)\n17. (1) Subject to rule 18, an application to appoint a receiver or other person under\nSection 13 of   the   Grand Court Act (as amended and revised) may be made\nby \u2014\n(a)\nthe patient themselves;\n(b) the patient's spouse or civil partner;\n(c)\nany guardian of the patient appointed under Section 14 of the Grand Court\nAct (as amended and revised);\n(d) any near relative of the patient as defined in Section 2 of the Law; or\n(e)\nthe Solicitor General.\n(2) Subject to paragraph (3), an application under this rule shall be made by\noriginating summons.\n\nORDER 80\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 432\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(3) The Court may dispense with the need for issuing an originating summons\nwhenever the Court considers that it is necessary for an application to be made\nurgently.\n(4) An application under this rule may be combined with an application under rule\n27.\n18.\nPower to direct application by officer of Court or Solicitor General (O.80, r.18)\n18. Where in the opinion of the Court an application ought to be made for the appointment\nor discharge of a receiver or other person appointed under Section 14 of the Grand\nCourt Act (as amended and revised) or for the exercise of any other power conferred\non the Court with respect to the property and affairs of a patient, and there appears to\nthe Court to be no other suitable person able and willing to make the application, or\nthe Court for any other reason thinks fit, the Court may direct that the application be\nmade by the Solicitor General.\n19.\nRepresentation of patient by Solicitor General (O.80, r.19)\n19. Where in any proceeding the Court considers that the interests of a patient are not\nadequately represented the Court may direct that the Solicitor General shall act as\nattorney for the patient either generally or in the proceedings or for any particular\npurpose connected with the proceedings, so, however, that it shall not be necessary\nto appoint the Solicitor General to be receiver or guardian ad litem for the patient.\n20.\nEvidence to be filed on application under rule 17 (O.80, r.20)\n20. (1) An application under rule 17 shall be supported by \u2014\n(a)\na report by a medical practitioner that the patient is incapable of managing\nand administering that patient\u2019s property and affairs; and\n(b) an affidavit giving particulars of the patient's relatives, property and affairs\nand of the circumstances giving rise to the application.\n(2) Whenever the Court thinks it expedient to do so, it may request the Chief\nMedical Officer to examine a patient and provide the Court with a further report\nfor the purpose of \u2014\n(a)\ncertifying whether or not the patient is capable of managing the patient\u2019s\nproperty and affairs; or\n(b) answering such specific questions as may be put to the patient by the Court.\n(3) Whenever the Court proceeds in accordance with rule 17(3), the Court may\ndispense with the requirements of paragraphs (1) and (2).\n21.\nService on patient (O.80, r.21)\n21. (1) An originating summons under rule 17 shall be served on \u2014\n(a)\nthe patient unless the Court is satisfied that service on the patient would be\ninjurious to the patient\u2019s health;\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 80\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 433\n\n(b) in the case of a child who is also a patient, on the child\u2019s parent or guardian\nor, if the child has no parent or guardian, on the person with whom the\nchild resides or in whose care the child is;\n(c)\nany guardian appointed in respect of the patient under Section 14 of the\nGrand Court Act (as amended and revised);\n(d) any person with whom the patient resides; or\n(e)\nsuch other person as the Court may direct.\n(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the Court may dispense with service altogether\nif it is satisfied that service on the patient or upon any person mentioned in\nparagraph (1) would be injurious to the patient's health.\n(3) Where service has been dispensed with under paragraph (2) the Court may\nrequest the Chief Medical Officer to visit the patient and report to the Court as\nto the patient\u2019s condition and welfare.\n(4) An affidavit of service showing where, when, how and by whom service was\neffected shall be filed as soon as practicable after service of a document has\nbeen effected in accordance with this rule.\n22.\nAppointment of receiver (O.80, r.22)\n22. (1) O.30, rr.2, 3 and 4, shall apply to the appointment of a receiver under this Part\nof this Order.\n(2) Where a receiver is appointed for a patient, the Court may allow the receiver\nremuneration for the receiver\u2019s services at such amount or at such rate as the\nCourt considers reasonable and proper and any remuneration so allowed shall\nconstitute a debt due to the receiver from the patient and the patient\u2019s estate.\n(3) An order for the appointment of a receiver shall contain such directions as the\nCourt thinks fit including \u2014\n(a)\ndirections in respect of the investment and management of the patient's\nproperty;\n(b) directions in respect of the maintenance of the patient, the patient\u2019s\ndependants and the application of the patient\u2019s income; and\n(c)\ndirections for the payment of the patient's debts.\n(4) The receiver may apply by summons in the proceedings for such further or other\ndirections as the receiver considers necessary.\n23.\nReceiver's accounts (O.80, r.23)\n23. (1) Every receiver shall annually, or at such intervals as the Court may direct,\ndeliver the receiver\u2019s accounts to the Court and attend at or within such time as\nthe Court may appoint \u2018x \u2018 to have the accounts taken and passed.\n\nORDER 80\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 434\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(2) On the passing of any accounts the Court shall make all proper allowances out\nof the patient's estate, including an allowance in respect of the reasonable and\nproper costs of the receiver of passing the accounts and of any other person\nallowed to attend.\n(3) The Court may, if it thinks fit, direct that a receiver need not account under this\nrule or may dispense with the passing of any accounts at any time at which they\nwould otherwise require to be passed.\n(4) The balance found due from a receiver on the passing of the receiver\u2019s accounts\nor so much thereof as the Court may direct shall \u2014\n(a)\nbe paid by the receiver into Court to the credit of the proceedings and\ninvested in such manner as the Court may direct; or\n(b) be invested or otherwise dealt with by the receiver in such manner as the\nCourt may direct.\n(5) Unless otherwise directed, any money ordered to be paid by a receiver for\nmaintenance shall be paid out of income and any costs ordered to be paid by a\nreceiver may, when determined, be paid out of any monies coming into the\nreceiver\u2019s hands, after providing for any maintenance and fees payable under\nthese Rules.\n24.\nDefault by receiver (O.80, r.24)\n24. (1) Where a receiver fails to comply with rule 23 or fails to pay into Court or invest\nor to otherwise deal with any money in accordance with any direction of the\nCourt, the Court may disallow any remuneration which would otherwise be due\nto the receiver and, if the receiver has made default in paying into Court or\ninvesting in or otherwise dealing with any money, may charge the receiver with\ninterest thereon at such rate as the Court may fix for the period of the receiver\u2019s\ndefault.\n(2) Any person who would be entitled to apply for the appointment of a receiver\nunder rule 17 may apply for an order under paragraph (1) or for an order\nremoving the receiver on the ground that \u2014\n(a)\nthe person is in default; or\n(b) the person is no longer willing, able or fit to perform the duties required of\nthe person with respect to the patient.\n25.\nDischarge of receiver (O.80, r.25)\n25. (1) A receiver may apply to the Court for that receiver\u2019s discharge on the ground\nthat \u2014\n(a)\nthe receiver desires to resign;\n(b) the patient has recovered and is capable of managing the patient\u2019s own\naffairs; or\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 80\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 435\n\n(c)\nthe patient has no significant property or income such that the services of\na receiver are no longer required,\n\nprovided that an order shall not be made under subparagraph (a) of this rule\nunless or until the Court is able to appoint a successor.\n(2) A patient may apply to the Court for the discharge of that patient\u2019s receiver on\nthe grounds mentioned in subparagraph (1)(b) or (c).\n(3) Subject to applying for the receiver\u2019s final accounts to be passed, a receiver shall\nbe discharged upon the death of the patient in respect of whom the receiver was\nappointed.\n(4) An order for the discharge of a receiver shall take effect from the date upon\nwhich the receiver\u2019s final accounts are passed by the Court.\n(5) A receiver who is removed pursuant to rule 24 shall not be discharged until any\nliability to the patient or the patient\u2019s estate has been satisfied and the receiver\u2019s\nfinal accounts have been passed by the Court.\n26.\nApplication for settlement or gift of patient's property or for execution of will\nof patient (O.80, r.26)\n26. An application for an order for the settlement or gift of any property of a patient or\nan application for execution for a patient of a will, may be made only by \u2014\n(a)\nthe receiver or other person appointed for the patient under Section 14 of\nthe Grand Court Act (as amended and revised); or\n(b) any person who has made an application for the appointment of a receiver\nor other person under Section 14 of the Grand Court Act (as amended and\nrevised)  which has not yet been determined; or\n(c)\nany person who, under any known will of the patient or the patient\u2019s\nintestacy, may become entitled to any property of the patient or any interest\ntherein; or\n(d) any person for whom the patient might be expected to provide if the patient\nwere not mentally impaired.\n27.\nApplication to be heard in Chambers (O.80, r.27)\n27. Every application under this Part of this Order shall be heard in Chambers unless the\nCourt directs pursuant to O.32, r.13, that an application should be adjourned into open\ncourt.\n\nIII. APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN\n\nORDER 80\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 436\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n28.\nApplication for appointment of guardian (O.80, r.28)\n28. (1) An application for the appointment of a guardian under Section 14 of the Grand\nCourt Act (as amended and revised) may be made by any of the persons\nmentioned in rule 17(1)(a),(b),(d) or (e).\n(2) Subject to paragraph (3), an application under this rule shall be made by\noriginating summons.\n(3) The Court may dispense with the need for issuing an originating summons\nwhenever the Court considers that it is necessary for an application to be made\nurgently.\n(4) Rules 18 and 19 shall apply, mutatis mutandis, to this Part of this Order.\n(5) An application under this rule may be combined with an application under rule\n17.\n29.\nEvidence in support of an application under rule 28 (O.80, r.29)\n29. (1) An application under rule 28 shall be supported by \u2014\n(a)\na report by a medical practitioner certifying that the person is of unsound\nmind or suffering from mental illness; and\n(b) an affidavit giving particulars of the patient's relatives and of the\ncircumstances giving rise to the application.\n(2) Whenever the Court thinks it expedient to do so, it may request the Chief\nMedical Officer to examine a person and provide the Court with a further report\nfor the purpose of \u2014\n(a)\ncertifying whether or not the person is of unsound mind or suffering from\nmental illness; or\n(b) answering such specific questions as may be put to the person by the Court.\n(3) Whenever the Court proceeds in accordance with rule 28(3), the Court may\ndispense with the requirements of paragraphs (1) and (2).\n30.\nService (O.80, r.30)\n30. Rule 21 shall apply to an application made under this Part of this Order.\n31.\nOrder appointing guardian (O.80, r.31)\n31. (1) An order for the appointment of a guardian in respect of any person shall specify\nthe duties to be performed by the guardian, provided that the guardian shall not\nhave any duty in respect of the administration of a person's property generally\nunless the guardian is also appointed receiver.\n(2) The guardian may apply by summons in the proceedings for such further or\nother directions as the guardian considers necessary, including an application\nunder rule 17 that the guardian be appointed receiver.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 80\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 437\n\n32.\nRemoval of guardian (O.80, r.32)\n32. (1) A guardian may apply to the Court for the guardian\u2019s own removal on the\nground that \u2014\n(a)\nthe guardian desires to resign; or\n(b) the patient has recovered, is of sound mind and no longer suffering from\nmental illness,\n\nprovided that an order shall not be made under subparagraph (a) of this rule\nunless and until the Court is able to appoint a successor.\n(2) A patient or any person who would have been able to apply under rule 28(1) for\nthe appointment of the guardian may apply to the Court for the guardian's\nremoval on the ground \u2014\n(a)\nmentioned in subparagraph (1)(b) of this rule;\n(b) that the guardian has failed to discharge the guardian\u2019s duty; or\n(c)\nthat the guardian is no longer willing, able or fit to perform the duties\nrequired of the guardian with respect to the patient.\n\nORDER 80\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 438\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 81\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 439\n\nORDER 81\nPARTNERS\n\nI. GENERAL PARTNERSHIPS\n1.\nActions by and against firms within jurisdiction (O.81, r.1)\n1.\nSubject to the provisions of any enactment, any two or more persons claiming to be\nentitled, or alleged to be liable, as partners in respect of a cause of action and carrying\non business within the jurisdiction may sue, or be sued, in the name of the firm (if\nany) of which they were partners at the time when the cause of action accrued.\n2.\nDisclosure of partners' names (O.81, r.2)\n2.\n(1) Any defendant to an action brought by partners in the name of a firm may serve\non the plaintiffs or their attorneys a notice requiring them or their attorneys\nforthwith to furnish the defendant with a written statement of the names and\nplaces of residence of all the persons who were partners in the firm at the time\nwhen the cause of action accrued; and if the notice is not complied with the\nCourt may order the plaintiffs or their attorneys to furnish the defendant with\nsuch a statement and to verify it on oath or otherwise as may be specified in the\norder, or may order that further proceedings in the action be stayed on such\nterms as the Court may direct.\n(2) When the names of the partners have been declared in compliance with a notice\nor order given or made under paragraph (1), the proceedings shall continue in\nthe name of the firm but with the same consequences as would have ensued if\nthe persons whose names have been so declared had been named as plaintiffs in\nthe writ.\n(3) Paragraph (1) shall have effect in relation to an action brought against partners\nin the name of a firm as it has effect in relation to an action brought by partners\nin the name of a firm but with the substitution, for references to the defendant\nand the plaintiffs, of references to the plaintiff and the defendants respectively,\nand with the omission of the words \"or may order\" to the end.\n3.\nService of writ (O.81, r.3)\n3.\n(1) Where by virtue of rule 1 partners are sued in the name of a firm, the writ may,\nexcept in the case mentioned in paragraph (2), be served \u2014\n(a)\non any one or more of the partners; or\n(b) at the principal place of business of the partnership within the jurisdiction,\non any person having at the time of service the control or management of\nthe partnership business there,\n\nORDER 81\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 440\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nand where service of the writ is effected in accordance with this paragraph, the\n\nwrit shall be deemed to have been duly served on the firm, whether or not any\nmember of the firm is out of the jurisdiction.\n(2) Where a partnership has, to the knowledge of the plaintiff, been dissolved before\nan action against the firm is begun, the writ by which the action is begun must\nbe served on every person within the jurisdiction sought to be made liable in the\naction.\n(3) Every person on whom a writ is served under paragraph (1) must at the time of\nservice be given a written notice stating whether the person is served as a partner\nor as a person having the control or management of the partnership business or\nboth as partner and as such a person; and any person on whom a writ is so served\nbut to whom no such notice is given shall be deemed to be served as a partner.\n4.\nAcknowledgment of service in action against firm (O.81, r.4)\n4.\n(1) Where persons are sued as partners in the name of their firm, service may not\nbe acknowledged in the name of the firm but only by the partners thereof in their\nown names but the action shall nevertheless continue in the name of the firm.\n(2) Where in an action against a firm the writ by which the action is begun is served\non a person as a partner, that person, if that person denies that that person was a\npartner or liable as such at any material time, may acknowledge service of the\nwrit in the action and state in that person\u2019s acknowledgment that that person\ndoes so as a person served as a partner in the defendant firm but who denies that\nthat person was a partner at any material time.\n\nAn acknowledgment of service given in accordance with this paragraph shall,\nunless and until it is set aside, be treated as an acknowledgment by the defendant\nfirm.\n(3) Where an acknowledgment of service has been given for a defendant in\naccordance with paragraph (2), then \u2014\n(a)\nthe plaintiff may either apply to the Court to set it aside on the ground that\nthe defendant was a partner or liable as such at a material time or may\nleave that question to be determined at a later stage of the proceedings;\n(b) the defendant may either apply to the Court to set aside the service of the\nwrit on the defendant on the ground that the defendant was not a partner\nor liable as such at a material time or may at the proper time serve a defence\non the plaintiff denying in respect of the plaintiff's claim either the\ndefendant\u2019s liability as a partner or the liability of the defendant firm or\nboth.\n (4) The Court may at any stage of the proceedings in an action in which a defendant\nhas acknowledged service in accordance with paragraph (2), on the application\nof the plaintiff or of that defendant, order that any question as to the liability of\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 81\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 441\n\nthat defendant or as to the liability of the defendant firm be tried in such manner\nand at such time as the Court directs.\n(5) Where in an action against a firm the writ by which the action is begun is served\non a person as a person having the control or management of the partnership\nbusiness, that person may not acknowledge service in the action unless that\nperson is a member of the firm sued.\n5.\nEnforcing judgment or order against firm (O.81, r.5)\n5.\n(1) Where a judgment is given or order made against a firm, execution to enforce\nthe judgment or order may, subject to rule 6, issue against any property of the\nfirm within the jurisdiction.\n(2) Where a judgment is given or order made against a firm, execution to enforce\nthe judgment or order may, subject to rule 6 and to the next following\nparagraphs, issue against any person who \u2014\n(a)\nacknowledged service of the writ in the action as a partner; or\n(b) having been served as a partner with the writ failed to acknowledge service\nof the writ in the action; or\n(c)\nadmitted in that person\u2019s pleading that that person is a partner; or\n(d) was adjudged to be a partner.\n(3) Execution to enforce a judgment or order given or made against a firm may not\nissue against a member of the firm who was out of the jurisdiction when the writ\nwas issued unless the person \u2014\n(a)\nacknowledged service of the writ in the action as a partner; or\n(b) was served within the jurisdiction with the writ as a partner; or\n(c)\nwas, with the leave of the Court given under O.11, served out of the\njurisdiction with the writ as a partner,\n\nand, except as provided by paragraph (1) and by the foregoing provisions to this\nparagraph, a judgment or order given or made against a firm shall not render\nliable, release or otherwise affect a member of the firm who was out of the\njurisdiction when the writ was issued.\n(4) Where a party who has obtained a judgment or order against a firm claims that\na person is liable to satisfy the judgment or order as being a member of the firm,\nand the foregoing provisions of this rule do not apply in relation to that person,\nthat party may apply to the Court for leave to issue execution against that person,\nthe application to be made by summons which must be served personally on that\nperson.\n(5) Where the person against whom an application under paragraph (4) is made does\nnot dispute that person\u2019s liability, the Court hearing the application may, subject\nto paragraph (3), give leave to issue execution against that person, and, where\n\nORDER 81\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 442\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nthat person disputes that person\u2019s liability, the Court may order that the liability\nof that person be tried and determined in any manner in which any issue or\nquestion in an action may be tried and determined.\n6.\nEnforcing judgment or order in actions between partners, etc. (O.81, r.6)\n6.\n(1) Execution to enforce a judgment or order given or made in \u2014\n(a)\nan action by or against a firm in the name of the firm against or by a\nmember of the firm; or\n(b) an action by a firm in the name of the firm against a firm in the name of\nthe firm where those firms have one or more members in common,\n\nshall not issue except with the leave of the Court.\n(2) The Court hearing an application under this rule may give such directions,\nincluding directions as to the taking of accounts and the making of inquiries, as\nmay be just.\n7.\nAttachment of debts owed by firm (O.81, r.7)\n7.\n(1) An order may be made under O.49, r.1, in relation to debts due or accruing due\nfrom a firm carrying on business within the jurisdiction notwithstanding that\none or more members of the firm is resident out of the jurisdiction.\n(2) An order to show cause under the said rule 1 relating to such debts as aforesaid\nmust be served on a member of the firm within the jurisdiction or on some other\nperson having the control or management of the partnership business.\n(3) Where an order made under the said rule requires a firm to appear before the\nCourt, an appearance by a member of the firm constitutes a sufficient\ncompliance with the order.\n8.\nActions begun by originating summons (O.81, r.8)\n8.\nRules 2 to 7 shall, with the necessary modifications, apply in relation to an action by\nor against partners in the name of their firm begun by originating summons as they\napply in relation to such an action begun by writ.\n9.\nApplication to person carrying on business in another name (O.81, r.9)\n9.\n(1) An individual carrying on business within the jurisdiction in a name or style\nother than the individual\u2019s own name, may be sued in that name or style as if it\nwere the name of a firm, and rules 2 to 8 shall, so far as applicable, apply as if\nthe individual were a partner and the name in which the individual carries on\nbusiness were the name of the individual\u2019s firm.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 81\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 443\n\n10.\nApplications for orders charging partner's interest in partnership property,\netc. (O.81, r.10)\n10. (1) Every application to the Court by a judgment creditor of a partner for an order\nunder Section 23 of the Partnership Act (as amended and revised) (which\nauthorises the Court to make certain orders on the application of a judgment\ncreditor of a partner, including an order charging the partner's interest in the\npartnership property), and every application to the Court by a partner of the\njudgment debtor made in consequence of the first-mentioned application must\nbe made by summons.\n(2) Every summons issued by a judgment creditor under this rule, and every order\nmade on such a summons, must be served on the judgment debtor and on such\nof the judgment debtor\u2019s partners as are within the jurisdiction.\n(3) Every summons issued by a partner of a judgment debtor under this rule, and\nevery order made on such a summons, must be served \u2014\n(a)\non the judgment creditor; and\n(b) on the judgment debtor; and\n(c)\non such of the other partners of the judgment debtor as do not join in the\napplication and are within the jurisdiction.\n(4) A summons or order served in accordance with this rule, on some only of the\npartners of a partnership, shall be deemed to have been served on all the partners\nof that partnership.\n\nII. LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS\n11.\nDefinitions (O.81, r.11\n11. In Part II of this Order \u2014\n(a)\n\"ordinary limited partnership\" means a limited partnership registered in\naccordance with Section 49 of the Partnership Act (as amended and\nrevised);\n(b) \"exempted limited partnership\" means a limited partnership registered\nin accordance with Section 9 of the Exempted Limited Partnership Act (as\namended and revised);\n(c)\n\"general partner\" when used in relation to an ordinary limited partnership\nmeans a partner who is not a limited partner as defined by Section 46(2)(a)\nof the Partnership Act (as amended and revised), and when used in relation\nto an exempted limited partnership means a person who is named as such\nin the statement filed pursuant to Section 9 of the Exempted Limited\nPartnership Act (as amended and revised);\n\nORDER 81\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 444\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(d) \"firm\" means an ordinary limited partnership or an exempted limited\npartnership.\n12.\nActions by and against firms within jurisdiction (O.81, r.12)\n12. Any actions by or against an ordinary limited partnership or exempted limited\npartnership may be commenced in the name of the firm.\n13.\nService of writ (O.81, r.13)\n13. Where an action is commenced against a firm, whether sued in the firm name or in\nthe name of the general partner, the writ shall be served \u2014\n(a)\nin the case of an ordinary limited partnership, by delivering the writ to its\nregistered principal place of business; and\n(b) in the case of an exempted limited partnership, by delivering the writ to its\nregistered office.\n14.\nAcknowledgment of service in action against firm (O.81, r.14)\n14. Where an ordinary limited partnership or exempted limited partnership is sued in its\nfirm name, service may not be acknowledged in the name of the firm but only by the\ngeneral partner thereof in the general partner\u2019s own name, but the action shall\nnevertheless continue in the name of the firm.\n15.\nEnforcing judgment or order against firm (O.81, r.15)\n15. (1) Where a judgment is given or order made against a firm, execution to enforce\nthe judgment or order may be issued against any property of the firm within the\njurisdiction.\n(2) Where a judgment is given or order made against a firm, execution to enforce\nthe judgment or order may be issued against any person who \u2014\n(a)\nacknowledged service of the writ in the action as a general partner; or\n(b) is registered as a general partner of the firm; or\n(c)\nwas admitted in any pleading to be a general partner of the firm; or\n(d) was adjudged to be a general partner of the firm pursuant to Section 52(2)\nof the Partnership Act (as amended and revised), or Section 14 of the\nExempted Limited Partnership Act (as amended and revised), as the case\nmay be.\n(3) Except as provided by paragraph (2), where a judgment is given or order made\nagainst a firm, execution to enforce the judgment or order shall not be issued\nagainst any person who is registered as a limited partner.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 82\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 445\n\nORDER 82\nDEFAMATION ACTIONS\n\n1.\nApplication (O.82, r.1)\n1.\nThese Rules apply to actions for libel or slander.\n2.\nIndorsement of claim in libel action (O.82, r.2).\n2.\nBefore a writ in an action for libel is issued it must be indorsed with a statement giving\nsufficient particulars of the publications in respect of which the action is brought to\nenable them to be identified.\n2A.\nApplication for leave to institute defamation action (O.82, r.2A)\n2A. (1) An application under Section 38 of the Limitation Act (as amended and revised)\nfor leave to institute a defamation action shall be made by originating summons\nin Form No. 3 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and\nrevised) and shall be heard in Chambers.\n (2) The application must be supported by an affidavit setting out the grounds on\nwhich leave is sought and any facts necessary to substantiate those grounds.\n3.\nObligation to give particulars (O.82, r.3)\n3.\n(1) Where in an action for libel or slander the plaintiff alleges that the words or\nmatters complained of were used in a defamatory sense other than their ordinary\nmeaning, the plaintiff must give particulars of the facts and matters on which\nthe plaintiff relies in support of such sense.\n(2) Where in an action for libel or slander the defendant alleges that, insofar as the\nwords complained of consist of statements of fact, they are true in substance and\nin fact, and, insofar as they consist of expressions of opinion, they are fair\ncomment on a matter of public interest, or pleads to the like effect, the defendant\nmust give particulars stating which of the words complained of the defendant\nalleges are statements of fact and of the facts and matters the defendant relies\non in support of the allegation that the words are true.\n(2A) Without prejudice to O.18, r.8, but subject to paragraph (2B), where the\ndefendant makes an allegation as described in paragraph (2), the plaintiff shall\nserve a reply specifically admitting or denying any such allegation raised by the\ndefendant and specifying any fact or matter upon which the plaintiff relies in\nopposition to the defendant's allegations.\n(2B) No reply shall be required under paragraph (2A) where all the facts or matters\non which the plaintiff intends to rely in opposition to the defendant's allegations\n\nORDER 82\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 446\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nas described in paragraph (2) are already particularised elsewhere in the\npleadings.\n(3) Where in an action for libel or slander the plaintiff alleges that the defendant\nmaliciously published the words or matters complained of, the plaintiff need not\nin the plaintiff\u2019s statement of claim give particulars of the facts on which the\nplaintiff relies in support of the allegation of malice, but if the defendant pleads\nthat any of those words or matters are fair comment on a matter of public interest\nor were published upon a privileged occasion and the plaintiff intends to allege\nthat the defendant was actuated by express malice, the plaintiff must serve a\nreply giving particulars of the facts and matters from which the malice is to be\ninferred.\n(3A)  Without prejudice to O.18, r.12, the plaintiff must give full particulars in the\nstatement of the facts and matters on which the plaintiff relies in support of the\nplaintiff\u2019s claim for damages, including details of any conduct by the defendant\nwhich it is alleged has increased the loss suffered and of any loss which is\npeculiar to the plaintiff's own circumstances.\n(4) This rule shall apply in relation to a counterclaim for libel or slander as if the\nparty making the counterclaim were the plaintiff and the party against whom it\nis made the defendant.\n3A.\nRuling on meaning (O.82, r.3A)\n3A. (1) At any time after the service of the statement of claim either party may apply to\na judge in chambers for an order determining whether or not the words\ncomplained of are capable of bearing a particular meaning or meanings\nattributed to them in the pleadings.\n(2) If it appears to the judge on the hearing of an application under paragraph (1)\nthat none of the words complained of are capable of bearing the meaning or\nmeanings attributed to them in the pleadings, the Judge may dismiss the claim\nor make such other order or give such judgment in the proceedings as may be\njust.\n(3) Subject to paragraph (4), each party to the proceedings may make only one\napplication under paragraph (1).\n(4) Where a party has made an application under paragraph (1) and the respondent\nto that application subsequently amends that respondent\u2019s pleadings to allege a\nnew meaning, the Court may allow the other party to make a further application\nunder paragraph (1) in relation to that new meaning.\n(5) This rule shall apply in relation to a counterclaim for libel or slander as if the\nparty making the counterclaim were the plaintiff and the party against whom it\nis made the defendant, and as if the counterclaim were the statement of claim.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 82\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 447\n\n4.\nProvisions as to payment into Court (O.82, r.4)\n4.\n(1) Where in an action for libel or slander against several defendants sued jointly\nthe plaintiff, in accordance with O.22, r.3(1), accepts money paid into Court by\nany of those defendants in satisfaction of the plaintiff\u2019s cause of action against\nthat defendant, then, notwithstanding anything in rule 3(4) of that Order, the\naction shall be stayed as against that defendant only, but \u2014\n(a)\nthe sum recoverable under any judgment given in the plaintiff's favour\nagainst any other defendant in the action by way of damages shall not\nexceed the amount (if any) by which the amount of the damages exceeds\nthe amount paid into Court by the defendant as against whom the action\nhas been stayed; and\n(b) the plaintiff shall not be entitled to the plaintiff\u2019s costs of the action against\nthe other defendant after the date of the payment into Court unless either\nthe amount of the damages awarded to the plaintiff is greater than the\namount paid into Court and accepted by the plaintiff or the Judge is of\nopinion that there was reasonable ground for the plaintiff to proceed with\nthe action against the other defendant.\n(2) Where in an action for libel a party pleads the defence for which Section 10 of\nthe Defamation Act (as amended and revised) provides, O.22, r.7, shall not\napply in relation to that pleading.\n5.\nStatement in open Court (O.82, r.5)\n5.\n(1) Where a party accepts money paid into Court in satisfaction of a cause of action\nfor libel or slander, malicious prosecution or false imprisonment, that party may\napply to a Judge in Chambers by summons for leave to make in open Court a\nstatement in terms approved by the Judge.\n(2) Where a party to an action for libel or slander, malicious prosecution or false\nimprisonment which is settled before trial desires to make a statement in open\nCourt, an application must be made to a Judge in Chambers for an order that the\naction be set down for trial, and before the date fixed for the trial the statement\nmust be submitted for the approval of the Judge before whom it is to be made.\n6.\nInterrogatories not allowed in certain cases (O.82, r.6)\n6.\nIn an action for libel or slander where the defendant pleads that the words or matters\ncomplained of are fair comment on a matter of public interest or were published on a\nprivileged occasion, no interrogatories as to the defendant's sources of information or\ngrounds of belief shall be allowed.\n7.\nNo rule (O.82, r.7)\n7.\nNo rule (O.82, r.7)\n\nORDER 82\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 448\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n8.\nFulfilment of offer of amends under Section 11 of the Defamation Act (as\namended and revised) (O.82, r.8)\n8.\n(1) An application to the Court under Section 11 of the Defamation Act (as amended\nand revised) to determine any question as to the steps to be taken in fulfilment\nof an offer of amends made under that Section must, unless the application be\nmade in the course of proceedings for libel or slander in respect of the\npublication to which the offer relates, be made to a Judge in Chambers.\n(2) An originating summons by which such application is made shall be in Form\nNo. 3 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised).\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 20.01.97)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 83-84\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 449\n\nORDER 83-84\nNO ORDERS\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nORDER 85\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 450\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 85\nADMINISTRATION AND SIMILAR ACTIONS\n\n1.\nInterpretation (O.85, r.1)\n1.\nIn this Order \u2014\n\"administration action\" means an action for the administration under the\ndirection of the Court of the estate of a deceased person or for the execution\nunder the direction of the Court of a trust;\n\"enforcer\" has the meaning ascribed to it by Part VIII of the Trusts Act (as\namended and revised);\n\"special trust\" has the meaning ascribed to it Part VIII of the Trusts Act (as\namended and revised);\n\"trust\" and \"trustee\" have the meanings ascribed to them in Section 2 of the\nTrusts Act (as amended and revised), and includes a special trust except where\nthe context otherwise requires.\n2.\nDetermination of questions, etc., without administration (O.85, r.2)\n2.\n(1) An action may be brought for the determination of any question or for any relief\nwhich could be determined or granted, as the case may be, in an administration\naction and a claim need not be made in the action for the administration or\nexecution under the direction of the Court of the estate or trust in connection\nwith which the question arises or the relief is sought.\n(2) Without prejudice to the generality of paragraph (1), an action may be brought\nfor the determination of any of the following questions \u2014\n(a)\nany question arising in the administration of the estate of a deceased person\nor in the execution of a trust;\n(b) any question as to the composition of any class of persons having a claim\nagainst the estate of a deceased person or a beneficial interest in the estate\nof such a person or in any property subject to a trust;\n(c)\nany question as to the rights or interests of a person claiming to be a\ncreditor of the estate of a deceased person or to be entitled under a will or\non the intestacy of a deceased person or to be beneficially entitled under a\ntrust; or\n(d) any question as to the rights or duties of an enforcer.\n(3) Without prejudice to the generality of paragraph (1), an action may be brought\nfor any of the following reliefs \u2014\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 85\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 451\n\n(a)\nan order requiring an executor, administrator or trustee to furnish and, if\nnecessary, verify accounts;\n(b) an order requiring the payment into Court of money held by a person in\nthat person\u2019s capacity as executor, administrator or trustee;\n(c)\nan order directing a person to do or abstain from doing a particular act in\nthat person\u2019s capacity as executor, administrator, trustee or enforcer;\n(d) an order approving any sale, purchase, compromise or other transaction by\na person in that person\u2019s capacity as executor, administrator or trustee;\n(e)\nan order directing any act to be done in the administration of the estate of\na deceased person or in the execution of a trust which the Court could order\nto be done if the estate or trust were being administered or executed, as the\ncase may be, under the direction of the Court; or\n(f)\nthe advice or opinion of the Court on any question respecting the\nmanagement of the estate or trust or the enforcement of a special trust.\n(4) An action may be brought under this rule by \u2014\n(a)\nany executor or administrator of an estate;\n(b) any trustee of a trust;\n(c)\nany beneficiary of an estate or trust, not being a special trust; or\n(d) any enforcer of a special trust.\n3.\nParties (O.85, r.3)\n3.\n(1) All the executors or administrators of the estate or trustees of the trust, as the\ncase may be, to which an administration action or such an action as is referred\nto in rule 2 relates must be parties to the action, and where the action is brought\nby executors, administrators or trustees, any of them who does not consent to\nbeing joined as a plaintiff must be made a defendant.\n(2) Notwithstanding anything in O.15, r.4(2), and without prejudice to the powers\nof the Court under that Order, all the persons having a beneficial interest in or\nclaim against the estate or having a beneficial interest under the trust and all\nenforcers of a special trust, as the case may be, to which such an action as is\nmentioned in paragraph (1) relates need not be parties to the action; but the\nplaintiff may make such of those persons, whether all or any one or more of\nthem, parties as, having regard to the nature of the relief or remedy claimed in\nthe action, the plaintiff thinks fit.\n(3) For the purposes of this rule, a beneficiary of a special trust who is not also an\nenforcer, shall not be treated as having a beneficial interest under the trust.\n(4) Where, in proceedings under a judgment or order given or made in an action for\nthe administration under the direction of the Court of the estate of a deceased\nperson, a claim in respect of a debt or other liability is made against the estate\nby a person not a party to the action, no party other than the executors or\n\nORDER 85\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 452\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nadministrators of the estate shall be entitled to appear in any proceedings\nrelating to that claim without the leave of the Court, and the Court may direct or\nallow any other party to appear either in addition to, or in substitution for, the\nexecutors or administrators on such terms as to costs or otherwise as it thinks\nfit.\n4.\nGrant of relief in action begun by originating summons (O.85, r.4)\n4.\nIn an administration action or such an action as is referred to in rule 2, the Court may\nmake any certificate or order and grant any relief to which the plaintiff may be entitled\nby reason of any breach of trust, wilful default or other misconduct of the defendant\nnotwithstanding that the action was begun by originating summons, but the foregoing\nprovision is without prejudice to the power of the Court to make an order under O.28,\nr.8, in relation to the action.\n5.\nJudgments and orders in administration actions (O.85, r.5)\n5.\n(1) A judgment or order for the administration or execution under the direction of\nthe Court of an estate or trust need not be given or made unless in the opinion\nof the Court the questions at issue between the parties cannot properly be\ndetermined otherwise than under such a judgment or order.\n(2) Where an administration action is brought by a creditor of the estate of a\ndeceased person or by a person claiming to be entitled under a will or on the\nintestacy of a deceased person or to be beneficially entitled under a trust, and\nthe plaintiff alleges that no or insufficient accounts have been furnished by the\nexecutors, administrators or trustees, as the case may be, then, without prejudice\nto its other powers, the Court may \u2013\n(a)\norder that proceedings in the action be stayed for a period specified in the\norder and that the executors, administrators or trustees, as the case may be,\nshall within that period furnish the plaintiff with proper accounts;\n(b) if necessary to prevent proceedings by other creditors or by other persons\nclaiming to be entitled as aforesaid, give judgment or make an order for\nthe administration of the estate to which the action relates and include\ntherein an order that no proceedings are to be taken under the judgment or\norder, or under any particular account or inquiry directed without the leave\nof the Judge.\n6.\nConduct of sale of trust property (O.85, r.6)\n6.\nWhere in an administration action an order is made for the sale of any property vested\nin executors, administrators or trustees, those executors, administrators or trustees, as\nthe case may be, shall have the conduct of the sale unless the Court otherwise directs.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 85\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 453\n\n7.\nOrdinary application under Section 48 of the Trusts Act (as amended and\nrevised) (O.85, r.7)\n7.\n(1) Unless made by written submission under rule 8, an application by an executor,\nadministrator, trustee or enforcer under Section 48 of the Trusts Act (as amended\nand revised) for the opinion, advice or direction of the Court upon any question\nrespecting the management or administration of the estate or trust fund shall be\nmade in accordance with this rule.\n(2) An application under this rule shall be made by originating summons in Form\nNo. 3 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) or\nan ex parte originating summons in Form No. 4 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol\nII - Forms (as amended and revised).\n(3) Every application under this rule shall be supported by an affidavit which\nshall \u2014\n(a)\nhave exhibited to it \u2014\n(i)\nthe will and order of probate;\n(ii) the letters of administration;\n(iii) the deed of settlement; or\n(iv) the declaration of trust,\nas the case may be;\n(b) contain full particulars of the beneficiaries or classes of beneficiaries and\ntheir respective interests;\n(c)\ndefine the question in respect of which the Court's opinion, advice or\ndirection is sought; and\n(d) give a full and frank disclosure of all facts material to the application.\n8.\nWritten application under Section 48 of the Trusts Act (as amended and\nrevised) (O.85, r.8)\n8.\n(1) An application by an executor, administrator, trustee or enforcer under Section\n48 of the Trusts Act (as amended and revised) for the opinion, advice or\ndirection of the Court upon any question respecting the management or\nadministration of the estate or trust fund may be made by written submission\nwithout any oral hearing.\n(2) An application under this rule shall be made by ex parte originating application\nin Form No. 57 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and\nrevised).\n(3) An application under this rule shall be supported by a written submission signed\nby the applicant's attorney which shall \u2014\n(a)\nexplain why the application is not made under rule 2 and served in\naccordance with rule 3;\n\nORDER 85\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 454\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(b) define the question in respect of which the Court's opinion, advice or\ndirection is sought;\n(c)\nidentify and discuss all matters of law which are material to the\napplication; and\n(d) give a full and frank disclosure of all facts material to the application.\n(4) An application under this rule may be supported by a statement of agreed facts\nsigned by \u2014\n(a)\nthe executor, administrator or trustee, as the case may be;\n(b) all the adult beneficiaries of the estate or trust; or\n(c)\nall the adult enforcers of a special trust.\n(5) Unless supported by a statement of agreed facts signed in accordance with\nparagraph (4), an application under this rule shall be supported by an affidavit\nwhich shall \u2014\n(a)\ncontain full particulars of the beneficiaries or classes of beneficiaries and\ntheir respective interests; and\n(b) verify the statement of material facts contained in the written submission.\n(6) A statement of agreed facts or affidavit shall have exhibited to it a true copy of\nthe will and grant of probate or the letters of administration or the deed of\nsettlement or the declaration of trust, as the case may be.\n(7) Upon an application under this rule the Court may \u2014\n(a)\ngive its written opinion, advice or direction; or\n(b) give directions for the application to proceed in accordance with rule 2 or\nrule 7.\n(8) An application may not be made under this rule by an executor, administrator,\ntrustee or enforcer acting in person.\n(9) Order 28 shall not apply to a written application under this rule unless the Court\ngives directions for the application to proceed in accordance with rule 2 or rule\n7.\n(10) Order 42, rule 5, shall not apply to a written opinion, advice or direction given\non an application under this rule, which shall be drawn up by the Judge and sent\nby the Clerk of the Court to the applicant's attorney.\n9.\nApplication for reformation of a special trust (O.85, r.9)\n9.\n(1) An application under Section 103(4) or Section 104(1) of the Trusts Act (as\namended and revised) to reform a special trust or settle a plan for its\nadministration shall be made by originating summons in Form No. 3 of the\nGrand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised).\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 85\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 455\n\n(2) An application under this rule may be made by a trustee or an enforcer of a\nspecial trust.\n(3) Notwithstanding anything in O.15, r.4(2), and without prejudice to the powers\nof the Court under that Order, all the enforcers of a special trust in respect of\nwhich an application under this rule is made need not be parties to the\napplication, but the applicant may make such of the enforcers parties as, having\nregard to the circumstances of the case, the applicant thinks fit.\n(4) Every application under this rule shall be supported by an affidavit.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 01.01.98)\n\nORDER 86\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 456\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 86\nACTIONS FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE, ETC.: SUMMARY\nJUDGMENT\n\n1.\nApplication by plaintiff for summary judgment (O.86, r.1)\n1.\n(1) In any action begun by writ indorsed with a claim \u2014\n(a)\nfor specific performance of an agreement (whether in writing or not) for\nthe sale, purchase or exchange of any property or for the grant or\nassignment of a lease of any property with or without an alternative claim\nfor damages; or\n(b) for rescission of such an agreement; or\n(c)\nfor the forfeiture or return of any deposit made under such an agreement,\n\nthe plaintiff may, on the ground that the defendant has no defence to the action,\napply to the Court for judgment.\n(2) An application may be made against a defendant under this rule whether or not\nthe defendant has acknowledged service of the writ in the action.\n2.\nManner in which application under rule 1 must be made (O.86, r.2)\n2.    (1)\nAn application under rule 1 must be made by summons supported by an affidavit\nmade by some person who can swear positively to the facts verifying the cause\nof action and stating that in that person\u2019s belief there is no defence to the action.\nUnless the Court otherwise directs an affidavit for the purposes of this paragraph\nmay contain statements of information or belief with the sources and grounds\nthereof.\n(2) The summons must set out or have attached thereto minutes of the judgment\nsought by the plaintiff.\n(3) The summons, a copy of the affidavit in support and of any exhibit referred to\ntherein, must be served on the defendant not less than 4 clear days before the\nreturn day.\n3.\nJudgment for plaintiff (O.86, r.3)\n3.\nUnless on the hearing of an application under rule 1 either the Court dismisses the\napplication or the defendant satisfies the Court that there is an issue or question in\ndispute which ought to be tried or that there ought for some other reason to be a trial\nof the action, the Court may give judgment for the plaintiff in the action.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 86\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 457\n\n4.\nLeave to defend (O.86, r.4)\n4.\n(1) A defendant may show cause against an application under rule 1 by affidavit or\notherwise to the satisfaction of the Court.\n(2) The Court may give a defendant against whom such an application is made leave\nto defend the action either unconditionally or on such terms as to giving security\nor time or mode of trial or otherwise as it thinks fit.\n(3) On the hearing of such an application the Court may order a defendant showing\ncause or, where that defendant is a body corporate, any director, manager,\nsecretary or other similar officer thereof, or any person purporting to act in any\nsuch capacity \u2014\n(a)\nto produce any document;\n(b) if it appears to the Court that there are special circumstances which make\nit desirable that the defendant should do so, to attend and be examined on\noath.\n5.\nDirections (O.86, r.5)\n5.\nWhere the Court orders that a defendant have leave to defend the action, the Court\nshall give directions as to the further conduct of the action, and O.25, rr. 2 to 7, shall,\nwith the omission of so much of rule 7(1) as requires parties to serve a notice\nspecifying the orders and directions which they require and with any other necessary\nmodifications, apply as if the application under rule 1 were a summons for directions.\n6.\nCosts (O.86, r.6)\n6.\nIf the plaintiff makes an application under rule 1 where the case is not within this\nOrder, or if it appears to the Court that the plaintiff knew that the defendant relied on\nthe contention which would entitle the plaintiff to unconditional leave to defend, then,\nthe Court may dismiss the application with costs and may, if the plaintiff is not a\nlegally aided person, require the costs to be paid by the plaintiff forthwith.\n7.\nSetting aside judgment (O.86, r.7)\n7.\nAny judgment given against a defendant who does not appear at the hearing of an\napplication under rule 1 may be set aside or varied by the Court on such terms as it\nthinks just.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nORDER 87-91\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 458\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 87-91\nNO ORDERS\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 92\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 459\n\nORDER 92\nLODGMENT, INVESTMENT, ETC., OF FUNDS IN COURT\n\n1.\nInterpretation (O.92, r.1)\n1.\nIn this Order, the following expressions shall have the following meanings \u2014\n\"the Bank\" means such bank or banks as may be designated by the Cabinet\nunder Schedule 1, paragraph 1(2) of the Judicature Act (as amended and\nrevised);\n\"the Court\" includes the Court of Appeal and the Summary Court;\n\"General Account\" means the non-interest bearing bank account established in\naccordance with rule 7(1);\n\"designated mutual fund\" means a mutual fund designated under Schedule 1,\nparagraph 3(1) of the Judicature Act (as amended and revised);\n\"funds\" or \"funds in Court\" means any money, securities, investments or other\nproperty standing or to be placed to the account of the Courts Administrator by\nvirtue of Schedule 1, paragraph 1(1) of the Judicature Act (as amended and\nrevised), or of any other person by virtue of rules made under subsection (6) of\nthat Section;\n\"lodge in Court\" means to pay or transfer into Court or deposit in Court;\n\"lodgment schedule\" means a schedule to an order directing funds to be lodged\nto the account of the Court Administrator;\n\"Nominated Account\" means an interest bearing nominated bank account\nestablished in accordance with rule 7(3);\n\"payment schedule\" means a schedule to an order directing the payment of\nfunds from the account of the Court Administrator;\n2.\nPayment into Court under the Trusts Act (as amended and revised) (O.92,\nr.2)\n2.\n(1) Any trustee wishing to pay a trust fund into Court under Section 69 of the Trusts\nAct (as amended and revised), must make an affidavit setting out \u2014\n(a)\na short description of the trust and the instrument creating it or, as the case\nmay be, of the circumstances in which the trust arose;\n(b) the names of the persons interested in or entitled to the money or securities\nto be paid into Court with their addresses so far as known to the trustee;\n\nORDER 92\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 460\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(c)\nthe trustee\u2019s submission to answer all such inquiries relating to the\napplication of such money or securities as the Court may make or direct;\nand\n(d) an address where the trustee may be served with any summons or order, or\nnotice of any proceedings, relating to the money or securities paid into\nCourt.\n(2) In the case of a trust fund which is the subject of a proceeding pending in Court,\nthe affidavit required to be made under paragraph (1) shall be filed in Court and\na copy of it shall be served on the Court Administrator.\n(3) In the case of a trust fund which is not the subject of any proceeding pending in\nthe Court, the affidavit required to be made under paragraph (1) shall be filed\nwith the Court Administrator.\n(4) An application under this rule shall be in Form No. 105 of the Grand Court\nRules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised).\n3.\nNotice of lodgment (O.92, r.3)\n3.\nAny person who has lodged money or securities in Court in accordance with rule 2\nmust forthwith send notice of the lodgment to every person appearing from the\naffidavit on which the lodgment was made to be entitled to, or to have an interest in,\nthe money or securities lodged.\n4.\nApplications with respect to funds in Court (O.92, r.4)\n4.\n(1) Where an application is made to the Court \u2014\n(a)\nfor the payment or transfer to any person of any funds in Court standing to\nthe credit of any cause or matter or for the transfer of any such funds to a\nseparate account or for payment to any person of any dividend of or\ninterest on any securities or money comprised in such funds;\n(b) for the investment or change of investment, of any funds in Court;\n(c)\nfor payment of the dividends of or interest on any funds in Court\nrepresenting or comprising money or securities lodged in Court under any\nenactment; or\n(d) for the payment or transfer out of Court of any such funds as are mentioned\nin subparagraph (c),\nthe application may be disposed of in Chambers.\n(2) Subject to paragraph (3), any such application must be made by summons, and\nunless the application is made in a pending cause or matter or an application for\nthe same purpose has previously been made by petition or originating summons,\nthe summons must be an originating summons.\n(3) Where an application under subparagraph (1)(d) is required to be made by\noriginating summons, then, if the funds to which the application relates do not\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 92\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 461\n\nexceed CI$10,000.00 in value, and subject to any enactment, the application\nmay be made ex parte and the Judge hearing it may either dispose of the\napplication or may direct it to be served.\n(4) This rule does not apply to any application for an order under O.22.\n5.\nCourt Funds Office (O.92, r.5)\n5.\nThe office of the Courts Administrator or of any officer appointed by the Courts\nAdministrator shall be known as the Courts Funds Office.\n6.\nDischarge of the Court Administrator\u2019s functions (O.92, r.6)\n6.\nThe functions of the Courts Administrator under these Rules may be discharged, to\nsuch extent as the Courts Administrator may direct, by any officer appointed by the\nCourt Administrator.\n7.\nBank accounts (O.92, r.7)\n7.\n(1) The Courts Administrator shall establish accounts with the Bank (referred to as\n\"the General Account\") denominated in Cayman Islands Dollars, United States\nDollars and such other currencies as may be required.\n(2) Any interest earned on money credited to the General Account shall be treated\nas Government revenue.\n(3) The Courts Administrator may from time to time establish with the Bank\nnominated interest bearing accounts (referred to as \"Nominated Accounts\")\ndenominated in such currencies as may be appropriate.\n(4) All money lodged with the Court Funds Office shall be paid into the General\nAccount unless the lodgment schedule requires that it be paid into a Nominated\nAccount.\n(5) All Nominated Accounts shall be established in the name of \"The Courts\nAdministrator of the Grand Court\" followed by such designation as may be\nappropriate to identify the trust, cause or matter to which it relates.\n(6) Interest shall accrue on Nominated Accounts from the date upon which they are\nestablished with the Bank and the rate of interest applicable shall be that which\nmay be agreed from time to time between the Bank and the Court Administrator.\n8.\nLodgment schedule (O.92, r.8)\n8.\n(1) Where a lodgment of funds in Court is directed by an order of any court, other\nthan an attachment of earnings order, the Courts Administrator shall not make\nany such lodgment until the Courts Administrator has received a lodgment\nschedule in Form No. 101 or Form No. 102 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II -\nForms (as amended and revised), as may be appropriate.\n(2) Money payable by an employer pursuant to an attachment of earnings order\nshall be lodged in such manner as may be directed by the Court Administrator.\n\nORDER 92\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 462\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n9.\nPayment schedule (O.92, r.9)\n9.\n(1) Where an order, other than an attachment of earnings order, directs the manner\nin which any fund in Court is to be dealt with by the Court Administrator, a\npayment schedule in Form No. 201 or Form No. 202 of the Grand Court Rules\n- Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) signed by an authorised officer and\nbearing the seal of the Court shall be sufficient authority to the Courts\nAdministrator to deal with a fund in accordance with the schedule.\n(2) An attachment of earnings order shall be sufficient authority for the Courts\nAdministrator to pay to the judgment creditor sums of money received from the\njudgment debtor's employer.\n(3) For the purposes of giving effect to this rule the Chief Justice shall from time to\ntime make practice directions specifying the authorised officers and the scope\nof their respective authority.\n(4) Every authorised officer shall sign a signature card in such form as shall be\nacceptable to the Court Administrator.\n10.\nPreparation of schedules (O.92, r.10)\n10. (1) In any proceedings in Court where an order is made for the lodgment of or\ndealing with funds in Court, the party having carriage of the order shall also be\nresponsible for drawing up the necessary lodgment or payment schedule which\nshall be presented to the Clerk of the Court at the same time as the order to\nwhich it relates.\n(2) Where all the parties to a cause or matter are agreed upon the terms of a\njudgment or order to which O.42, r.5A applies and such judgment or order\nprovides for the lodgment of or dealing with funds in Court, the necessary\nlodgment or payment schedule shall be presented to the Clerk of the Court at\nthe same time as the consent order to which it relates.\n(3) Where funds have been paid into Court as security for costs and the amount of\ncosts payable has been agreed without the need for a taxation, the parties may\napply for payment out of Court by presenting the Clerk of the Court with a\npayment schedule together with written evidence of the parties' agreement\nthereto.\n11.\nLodgment of money in Court (O.92, r.11)\n11. (1) Money to be lodged in Court shall be paid into the Court Funds Office and all\ncheques or other instruments shall be made payable to \"The Courts\nAdministrator of the Grand Court\".\n(2) Money shall not be paid directly to the Bank save on the direction of the Court\nAdministrator.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 92\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 463\n\n12.\nSecurities transferable by delivery and deposit of property (O.92, r.12)\n12. (1) The lodgment in the Court of securities transferable by delivery and the deposit\nof property shall be made by delivery to the Court Funds Office.\n(2) Any person who deposits property in Court in accordance with paragraph\n(1)above shall provide the Courts Administrator with an inventory of that\nproperty signed and certified by that person as a true and accurate record.\n13.\nSecurities not transferable by delivery (O.92, r.13)\n13. (1) Where any securities (other than securities transferable by delivery) are paid\ninto Court, they shall be transferred into the name of the Courts Administrator\ntogether with such designation as may be appropriate.\n(2) Where securities have been transferred into the Court Administrator's name in\nthe books of a bank or other company, the bank or other company, as the case\nmay be, shall certify to the Courts Administrator that the securities have been\ntransferred to the Court Administrator's name.\n14.\nAppropriation (O.92, r.14)\n14. (1) Where a defendant has lodged money in Court in accordance with O.14 as a\ncondition of liberty to defend and desires to appropriate the whole or any part\nof such money in satisfaction of the whole or any part of the plaintiff's claim\npursuant to O.22, r.8, the defendant shall lodge with the Courts Administrator a\nnotice of appropriation in Form No. 104 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II -\nForms (as amended and revised).\n(2) On receipt of a notice of appropriation the Courts Administrator shall note the\nrelevant account accordingly.\n(3) If the plaintiff does not give notice of acceptance within 21 days after receiving\nnotice of appropriation the Courts Administrator shall transfer the money to a\nNominated Account designated in accordance with rule 7(5).\n15.\nWithdrawal of money from Nominated Accounts (O.92, r.15)\n15. Money shall only be withdrawn from a Nominated Account where the money,\nincluding any interest which has accrued at the time of withdrawal, is required to be\nwithdrawn for the purpose of giving effect to a direction or order of the Court.\n16.\nRange of investments (O.92, r.16)\n16. Money under the control of, or subject to an order of the Court, may be invested or\nreinvested by the Court Administrator, in the following ways \u2014\n(a)\nit may be credited to a Nominated Account;\n(b) it may be invested in any designated mutual fund.\n\nORDER 92\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 464\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n17.\nTime for investment (O.92, r.17)\n17. Subject to any directions of the Court, money required to be invested in an interest\nbearing account shall be credited to a Nominated Account as soon as it becomes\navailable.\n18.\nDesignated mutual funds (O.92, r.18)\n18. Where funds in Court are required to be invested in designated mutual funds or where\nfunds so invested are required to be realised, the purchases or sales are to be effected\non the first available valuation day.\n19.\nPayment, transfer and delivery of funds out of Court (O.92, r.19)\n19. (1) In this Rule the person entitled to the payment out of money is referred to as the\n\"payee\".\n(2) Subject to paragraphs (3) and (4) below, the payment out of money lodged in\nCourt shall be made by crossed cheque which may be sent to the payee by post\nto the address specified in the payment schedule.\n(3) On receipt of a written request from the payee or a donee under a power of\nattorney given by the payee, the Courts Administrator may make payment to a\nbank in the Islands for the credit of the account of the payee at that bank or at a\nbank in the country in which the payee resides.\n(4) The Courts Administrator may, if the Courts Administrator thinks fit, refuse to\nmake a payment until the Courts Administrator is satisfied as to the identity and\nentitlement of any person claiming to be the payee and the Courts Administrator\nmay refuse to make a remittance by post in any individual case and may require\nthe personal attendance of the payee at the Court Funds Office as a condition of\npayment.\n20.\nPayment to representatives of deceased persons (O.92, r.20)\n20. (1) Where a person entitled to a fund in Court either in that person\u2019s own right or\nas sole, or sole surviving executor dies, the Courts Administrator may, where\nthe fund exceeds CI$5,000.00, pay it to the personal representative of the\ndeceased on production of an office copy of the grant of probate or letters of\nadministration in respect of the deceased's estate.\n(2) Where a person entitled to a fund in Court in the person\u2019s own right dies intestate\nand no grant of administration has been issued, the Courts Administrator may,\nwhere the assets of the deceased (including the fund in Court and after the\ndeduction of debts and funeral expenses) do not exceed CI$5,000.00, pay the\nfund to the person who appears to the Courts Administrator to have the prior\nright to the grant of administration of the estate, on lodgment in the Court Funds\nOffice of a written declaration of kinship.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 92\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 465\n\n(3) Where two or more persons were entitled to payment of a fund in Court as\npersonal representatives and any of them dies before the fund is dealt with, the\nCourts Administrator may pay the fund to the surviving personal\nrepresentative(s) on proof of the death of the deceased personal representative;\nand where the fund does not exceed CI$5,000.00 the Courts Administrator may,\nunless a Court otherwise directs, pay the fund to any one of them.\n21.\nPayment out without order of money lodged in satisfaction (O.92, r.21)\n21. (1) In this rule and rule 22 a person in respect of whose cause of action a sum has\nbeen paid into Court in satisfaction, whether by way of claim or counterclaim,\nis referred to as a plaintiff and a person against whom such cause of action lies\nis referred to as a defendant.\n(2) A defendant wishing to pay a sum into Court pursuant to O.22, r.1, in\nsatisfaction of a plaintiff's claim shall file with the Courts Administrator a\nrequest for lodgment in Form No. 103 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms\n(as amended and revised).\n(3) The Courts Administrator shall, on receipt of a request for payment in Form No.\n203 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised), pay\nby cheque to the plaintiff money lodged in Court in satisfaction of a claim, or\nappropriated in accordance with rule 14, and accepted by the Courts\nAdministrator in accordance with these Rules; provided that where an attorney\nis acting for the plaintiff in the proceedings in which the money was lodged or\nappropriated by virtue of a legal aid certificate issued in accordance with the\nLegal Aid Act (as amended and revised), the Courts Administrator shall pay the\nmoney to that attorney, provided that attorney is still so acting.\n22.\nPayment out of interest on securities (O.92, r.22)\n22. Where securities are lodged in Court under rule 12 or 13, any interest or dividends\nwhich accrue shall be credited by the Courts Administrator to a Nominated Account\ndesignated in the same manner as the designation of the securities.\n23.\nCharges on purchase or sale of securities (O.92, r.23)\n23. Subject to any directions of the Court \u2014\n(a)\nwhere money in Court is invested in securities, the payment for the\npurchase shall include all applicable charges; and\n(b) where securities in Court are sold, all applicable charges shall be deducted\nfrom the proceeds of sale;\n\nprovided that, if the schedule directing a purchase or sale also directs that\ncharges are not to be deducted from the fund in Court, the transaction shall\nnot be completed until such charges have been paid either to the\nstockbroker or to the Court Administrator, as the case may be.\n\nORDER 92\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 466\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n24.\nCertificates of funds in Court, copies of accounts, etc. (O.92, r.24)\n24. (1) The Courts Administrator may, on receipt of a written request from a person\nappearing to the Courts Administrator to be interested in a fund in Court, issue\nto the person a certificate as to lodgment in court, non-payment into Court under\nan order or any other dealing with the fund.\n(2) On receipt of a written request, the Courts Administrator may issue to a person\nappearing to the Courts Administrator to be interested in a Nominated Account\na copy of the statements of account and any advice notes issued by the Bank in\nrelation to it.\n(3) The Courts Administrator shall supply an annual statement of any fund in Court\nfor the benefit of a child to that child\u2019s parent or guardian.\n25.\nTransitional provisions (O.92, r.25)\n25. (1) On the commencement date the Courts Administrator shall:\n(a)\ntransfer to the General Account all funds then standing to the credit of the\nGovernment's \"Courts Office deposits subsidiary ledger\";\n(b) establish a sub-account of the General Account to correspond with each\nentry in the \"Courts Office deposits subsidiary ledger\"; and\n(c)\nsend to the Clerk of the Court details of all the sub-accounts established\npursuant to this rule.\n(2) Within 14 days of the commencement date the Courts Administrator shall \u2014\n(a)\ntransfer to Nominated Accounts designated in accordance with rule 7(3)\nall funds then in Court and credited to interest bearing accounts;\n(b) send to the Clerk of the Court a list of all the Nominated Accounts\nestablished pursuant to this rule;\n(c)\nsend to each of the persons appearing to be interested in the funds credited\nto the Nominated Accounts established pursuant to this rule, particulars of\nthe account together with a statement of account issued by the Bank.\n(3) In the event of any uncertainty or dispute concerning funds paid into Court prior\nto the commencement date, the Courts Administrator shall apply to the Court\nfor directions.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 22.01.96)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 93\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 467\n\nORDER 93\nTHE ELECTIONS ACT (as amended and revised)\n\n1.\nInterpretation and application (O.93, r.1)\n1.\n(1) In this Order \u2014\n\"the Law\" means the Elections Act (as amended and revised), and any\nexpressions used in this Order and in the Law have the same meanings in this\nOrder as they have in the Law;\n\"election petition\" means a petition complaining of the undue election or undue\nreturn of a member of the Cayman Islands Parliament, under the Law;\n\"electoral district\" means the area to which the election petition relates;\n\"respondent\" in relation to an election petition, means the member whose\nelection or return is complained of, or the returning officer, in a case in which\nthe conduct of such returning officer is complained of; and\n\"returning officer\" means the returning officer of the electoral district to which\nthe election petition relates.\n(2) Order 24 shall apply to proceedings under an election petition as if it were an\naction begun by writ.\n2.\nForm, presentation and service of election petitions (O.93, r.2)\n2.\n(1) An election petition shall be in Form No. 58 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II\n- Forms (as amended and revised) and shall state \u2014\n(a)\nthe capacity in which the petitioner or each of the petitioners presents the\npetition;\n(b) the date and result of the election to which the petition relates showing the\ndate on which the return was made of the member declared to have been\nelected;\n(c)\nthe grounds on which relief is sought, setting out with sufficient\nparticularity the facts relied on but not the evidence by which they are to\nbe proved; and\n\nshall conclude with a prayer setting out particulars of the relief claimed.\n(2) Subject to rule 3, an election petition shall be presented by filing it in accordance\nwith O.5, r.1.\n(3) Every election petition shall be served on \u2014\n(a)\nthe respondent;\n(b) the Attorney General; and\n\nORDER 93\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 468\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(c)\nthe returning officer in any case in which the returning officer is not the\nrespondent.\n(4) An affidavit of service shall be filed as soon as practicable after service has been\neffected.\n3.\nSecurity for costs (O.93, r.3)\n3.\nWhen presenting a petition under rule 2, the petitioner must at the same time pay the\nsum of $3,000 into Court as security for costs and the petition may not be served\nunless it is accompanied by a notice of payment into Court.\n4.\nPublication of election petition (O.93, r.4)\n4.\nA list of election petitions at issue shall be conspicuously displayed in the foyer of\nthe Court office by the Clerk of the Court and shall be available for inspection by the\npublic during office hours.\n5.\nFixing time for hearing election petition (O.93, r.5)\n5.\n(1) Order 9, rule 4, shall not apply to election petitions.\n(2) Within 28 days after the date on which it was served, the petitioner shall apply\nby summons to a Judge for a date and time to be fixed for the trial of the petition\nand if the petitioner fails to do so, any respondent may within a further period\nof 28 days apply in the same manner as the petitioner could have done.\n(3) If no application to fix a date and time for the trial of an election petition is made\nin accordance with paragraph (2), the Clerk of the Court shall refer the matter\nto a Judge, who shall thereupon fix such a date and time.\n(4) The Clerk of the Court, not less than 7 days before the day so fixed for the trial,\nshall cause notice of the date and time of the trial to be displayed in a\nconspicuous place in the foyer of the Court office and shall serve a copy of such\nnotice on \u2014\n(a)\nthe petitioner; and\n(b) the persons on whom the petition was served in accordance with rule 2(3).\n6.\nEvidence to be filed (O.93, r.6)\n6.\n(1) Where the election petition claims the seat for an unsuccessful candidate on the\nground that the candidate had a majority of lawful votes, every party shall, not\nless than 7 days before the day fixed for the trial, file a list of the votes which\nthat party contends were wrongly admitted or rejected, stating in respect of each\nsuch vote the grounds for that party\u2019s contention and serve a copy of the list on\nevery other party and the Attorney General.\n(2) Where the respondent to an election petition complaining of an undue election\nand claiming the seat for some other person intends to give evidence to prove\nthat the person was not duly elected, the respondent shall, not less than 7 days\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 93\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 469\n\nbefore the date fixed for the trial of the election petition, file a list of the\nrespondent\u2019s objections to the election of that person on which the respondent\nintends to rely and serve a copy of the list on the petitioner and the Attorney\nGeneral.\n(3) Any party to the election petition may inspect and obtain an office copy of any\nlist filed pursuant to this rule.\n(4) Except by leave of the Court \u2014\n(a)\nno evidence shall be given by a party against the admission or rejection of\nany vote, or as to any ground of contention which is not specified in a list\nfiled by that party pursuant to paragraph (1) of this rule; and\n(b) no evidence shall be given by a respondent of any objection to a person's\nelection which is not specified in a list filed by that respondent pursuant to\nparagraph (2) of this rule.\n7.\nWithdrawal of election petition (O.93, r.7)\n7.\n(1) An application for leave to withdraw an election petition shall be made by\nmotion to the Court on such date and time as the Court may appoint.\n(2) Not less than 7 days before the day so appointed the petitioner shall \u2014\n(a)\nserve notice of the motion on the respondent, the returning officer and the\nAttorney General;\n(b) publish notice of the intended motion in a newspaper and the website of\nthe Elections Office, <https:\/\/portal.elections.ky\/>.\n(3) The notice of motion shall state the grounds on which the application to\nwithdraw is made and contain a statement to the effect that on the hearing of the\napplication any person who might have been a petitioner in respect of the\nelection may apply to the Court to be substituted as a petitioner.\n(4) The returning officer shall upon receipt of notice forthwith publish it in\nreturning officer\u2019s electoral district.\n(5) Where on the hearing of the application a person is substituted as a petitioner,\nany security required to be given by that person shall be given within 3 days\nafter the order of substitution.\n8.\nSummary dismissal and stay of election petition (O.93, r.8)\n8.\n(1) An application by a respondent to stay or dismiss a petition before the day fixed\nfor the trial shall be made by motion to the Court on such date and time as the\nCourt may appoint.\n(2) Not less than 7 days before the date so appointed the respondent shall serve\nnotice of the motion stating the grounds thereof, on the petitioner, any other\nrespondent, the returning officer and the Attorney General.\n\nORDER 93\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 470\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n9.\nDeath of petitioner (O.93, r.9)\n9.\n(1) Where a petition is abated by the death of a sole petitioner or the survivor of\nseveral petitioners, the attorney acting for the sole petitioner in the proceedings\nat the date of that sole petitioner\u2019s death or, if that sole petitioner had no such\nattorney, any respondent learning of that sole petitioner\u2019s death shall \u2014\n(a)\nlodge notice thereof with the Clerk of the Court;\n(b) serve notice thereof on the returning officer who shall forthwith publish it\nin the returning officer\u2019s electoral district; and\n(c)\npublish notice thereof in a newspaper circulating in the electoral district to\nwhich the petition relates.\n(2) Each such notice shall contain a statement that within 28 days after the\npublication of any notice referred to in this rule any person who might have been\na petitioner in respect of the election may apply by motion to the Court on such\ndate and time as the Court may appoint to be substituted as a petitioner.\n10.\nRespondent's nature of non-opposition (O.93, r.10)\n10. A respondent who does not intend to oppose the petition shall, not less than 7 days\nbefore the day fixed for trial serve notice to that effect on the petitioner and the\nAttorney General.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 94\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 471\n\nORDER 94\nAPPLICATIONS TO THE GRAND COURT UNDER VARIOUS\nSTATUTES\n\n1.\nApplications under the Bills of Sale Act (as amended and revised) (O.94, r.1)\n1.\n(1) An application under Section 5 of the Bills of Sale Act (as amended and revised)\nfor an order that a memorandum of satisfaction be entered by the Public\nRecorder upon the margin of the record of a bill of sale shall be made by an\noriginating summons in Form No. 3 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms\n(as amended and revised).\n(2)  Every originating summons under this rule shall be entitled in the matter of the\nbill of sale in question and in the matter of the Bills of Sale Act (as amended and\nrevised).\n(3)  Every person whose interest under the bill of sale is alleged to have been\nsatisfied or discharged shall be joined as a defendant.\n(4)  The application shall be supported by an affidavit containing full particulars of\nthe manner in which the debt arose and the manner in which it is alleged to have\nbeen satisfied or discharged.\n2.\nApplications under the Building Societies Act (as amended and revised)\n(O.94, r.2)\n2.\n(1)  Every application under Section 38 of the Building Societies Act (as amended\nand revised) for the appointment of an actuary or accountant and every\napplication under Section 36 or Section 40 of the Building Societies Act (as\namended and revised) for the appointment of an inspector shall be commenced\nby originating motion, notice of which shall be served upon the Building Society\nin question and upon the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority.\n(2)  Every originating motion under this rule shall be entitled in the matter of the\nBuilding Societies Act (as amended and revised) and in the matter of the\nBuilding Society in question and shall specify the full name and address of each\napplicant.\n(3)  Every application under this rule shall be supported by the following\naffidavits \u2014\n(a)  separate affidavits sworn by or on behalf of each individual applicant\ncontaining full particulars of that applicant\u2019s interest in the Building\nSociety and the period during which the applicant has had such interest;\n(b)  a composite affidavit sworn by or on behalf of all the applicants containing\nfull particulars of the grounds upon which they claim that the Court should\n\nORDER 94\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 472\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\norder the appointment of an accountant, actuary or inspector, as the case\nmay be; and (c) an affidavit of fitness containing the full name, business\naddress and professional qualifications of the person or persons whom the\napplicants seek to have appointed as accountant, actuary or inspector, as\nthe case may be.\n(4)  O.30, rr.2, 3, 4 and 5 shall apply to an accountant, actuary or inspector as if that\nperson were a receiver appointed under that Order.\n(5)  In addition to the requirements of O.30, r.4, every order made under this rule\nshall be served upon the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority.\n3.\nNo rule (O.94, r.3)\n3.\nNo rule (O.94, r.3)\n4.\nApplication under Section 9 of the Strata Titles Registration Act (as amended\nand revised) (O.94, r.4)\n4.\nAn application for the appointment of an administrator pursuant to Section 9 of the\nStrata Titles Registration Act (as amended and revised) may be made by originating\nsummons or motion and the provisions of O.30 shall apply as if the administrator was\na receiver appointed pursuant to that Order.\n5.\nApplication under Section 17 of the Strata Titles Registration Act (as\nAmended and Revised) (O.94, r.5)\n5.\n(1) In this rule \u2014\n\n \"the Law\" means the Strata Titles Registration Act (as amended and revised),\nand any expressions used in this rule and in the Law have the same meanings in\nthis rule as they have in the Law.\n(2)  An application for a declaration under Section 23(2)(b) of the Law and any\nconsequential directions under Section 23(3) or winding up order under Section\n23(6) shall be made by petition entitled in the matter of the strata plan\nconcerned.\n(3)  A petition under this rule shall be served on \u2014\n(a)  the strata corporation;\n(b)  the registered proprietor of every strata lot comprised in the strata plan;\n(c)  every insurer of the common property and every strata lot;\n(d)  the registered proprietor of any charge or other incumbrance over the\ncommon property and every strata lot;\n(e)  any administrator appointed pursuant to Section 9 of the Law; and\n(f)  the Registrar.\n(4)  A petition under this rule may be served in the following manner \u2014\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 94\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 473\n\n(a)  in the case of the strata corporation, by posting it to the address shown on\nthe strata plan or placing it in the receptacle maintained in accordance with\nSection 7(1) of the Law;\n(b)  in the case of the proprietor of a strata lot, by posting it to that proprietor\u2019s\naddress appearing in the proprietorship section of the Land Register, or\ndelivering it to that proprietor\u2019s unit;\n(c)  in the case of an insurer, in any manner allowed by O.65, r.5;\n(d)  in the case of the registered proprietor of any charge or incumbrance, by\nposting it to their address appearing in the Land Register;\n(e)  in the case of an administrator, in any manner allowed by O.65, r.5; and\n(f)  in the case of the Registrar, in any manner allowed by O.65, r.5.\n(5)  A petition under this rule shall be advertised.\n(6)  Where a petition under this rule seeks a winding up order, it must nominate a fit\nand proper person to be appointed as liquidator and must be supported by an\naffidavit of fitness.\n(7)  Every order made pursuant to this rule shall be served on the Registrar and\nadvertised.\n(8)  The provisions of O.30, rr.2 to 8 shall apply to a liquidator appointed pursuant\nto this rule as if the liquidator was a receiver appointed pursuant to that Order.\n6.\nApplications under the Married Women's Property Act (as amended and\nrevised) (O.94, r.6)\n6.\n(1) An application under Section 13 of the Married Women's Property Act (as\namended and revised) for the determination of any question between husband,\nwife or civil partner as to the title to or possession of the property of either or\nboth of them shall be made by originating summons in Form No. 2 of the Grand\nCourt Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised).\n(2)  The action shall be entitled in the matter of the property in question and in the\nmatter of the Married Women's Property Act (as amended and revised).\n(3)  The application shall be supported by an affidavit containing full particulars of\nthe property in issue and the facts and matters relied upon by the applicant in\nsupport of the applicant\u2019s application.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 16.03.15)\n\nORDER 95\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 474\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 95\nTHE BANKS AND TRUST COMPANIES ACT (as amended and\nrevised)\n\n1.\nDefinitions (O.95, r.1)\n1.\nIn this Order \u2014\n(a)\n\"the Law\" means the Banks and Trust Companies Act (as amended and\nrevised);\n(b) \"the Monetary Authority Law\" means the Monetary Authority Act (as\namended and revised);\n(c)\n\"the Authority\" means the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority\nestablished under Section 5 of the Monetary Authority Act (as amended\nand revised);\n(d) \"licensee\" has the meaning ascribed to it by Section 2 of the Law.\n2.\nApplication by the Authority (O.95, r.2)\n2.\n(1) An application by the Authority under Section 18(4) of the Law shall be made\nby ex parte originating summons in Form No. 4 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol\nII - Forms (as amended and revised) entitled in the matter of the licensee\nconcerned and in the matter of the Law.\n(2) An application under this rule shall be supported by an affidavit which shall \u2014\n(a)\nidentify the offence suspected of having been committed and specify the\nAuthority's grounds for suspecting that such offence has been or is being\ncommitted;\n(b) identify the person or persons who are suspected of committing or to have\ncommitted the offence;\n(c)\nspecify the Authority's reasons for believing that the interests of the\ndepositors of any licensee or the beneficiaries of any trust administered by\nany licensee or the other creditors of any licensee are being or are likely to\nbe prejudiced; and\n(d) stating what assets are held or are believed to be held by the person against\nwhom relief is sought and stating precisely what action the Authority seeks\nto take in order to preserve such assets,\nexcept that subparagraph (c) shall not apply if the suspected offence is that of\ncarrying on banking or trust business without a licence.\n(3) Upon an application under this rule the Court may \u2014\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 95\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 475\n\n(a)\ngrant the relief sought by the Authority in whole or in part either\npermanently or for such interim period as the Court may specify;\n(b) grant such other relief as the Court thinks fit; or\n(c)\nadjourn the application and direct that it be served upon the licensee and\nthe person against whom relief is sought.\n(4) An order under subparagraph 3(a) or (b) shall provide that the licensee or the\nperson against whom it is directed may apply, on not less than 3 clear days' prior\nnotice to the Authority, by summons to discharge or vary the order.\n3.\nApplication by the Authority for a winding up order (O.95, r.3)\n3.\n(1) An application by the Authority for an order to wind up any licensee under\nSection 18(4)(d) of the Law shall be made by petition entitled in the matter of\nthe licensee concerned and in the matter of the Companies Act (as amended and\nrevised).\n(2) A petition under this rule shall be supported by an affidavit verifying that the\nlicensee's licence has been revoked, but need not give reasons for its revocation.\n(3) A petition under this rule shall be served upon the licensee and any controller\nappointed under Section 18(1)(v) of the Law.\n(4) Any shareholder, director or creditor of the licensee may be heard on a petition\nunder this rule provided that that person shall have given to the Authority 7 clear\ndays' prior notice of that person\u2019s intention to appear.\n(5) If the licensee intends to oppose the petition, its affidavit in opposition shall be\nfiled in Court and served on the Authority not less than 7 clear days' prior to the\ndate fixed for the hearing.\n(6) If the licensee has instituted an appeal against the revocation of its licence under\nSection 25 of the Law, the Court may adjourn the petition and may appoint a\nprovisional liquidator pending the outcome of the appeal.\n(7) A winding up order or an order for the appointment of a provisional liquidator\nmade under this rule shall be gazetted by the liquidator.\n4.\nApplication by the Authority for other relief (O.95, r.4)\n4.\n(1) An application for a compulsory winding up order under Section 18(4) or an\napplication for other relief under Section 25 of the Law shall be made by petition\nentitled in the matter of the licensee concerned and in the matter of the\nCompanies Act (as amended and revised).\n(2) A petition under this rule shall be supported by a verifying affidavit sworn on\nbehalf of the Authority which shall have exhibited to it any relevant report made\nby the Authority or any person appointed by Section 18(1)(iv) or (v) of the Law.\n(3) A petition under this rule shall be served on the licensee's voluntary liquidator.\n\nORDER 95\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 476\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(4) Any shareholder or creditor of the licensee may be heard on a petition under this\nrule provided that that shareholder or creditor shall have given to the Authority\n7 clear days' prior notice of that shareholder\u2019s or creditor\u2019s intention to appear.\n(5) If the voluntary liquidator of the licensee intends to oppose the petition, the\nvoluntary liquidator\u2019s affidavit in opposition shall be filed and served on the\nAuthority not less than 7 clear days prior to the date fixed for the hearing.\n(6) An order made upon an application under this rule shall be gazetted by the\nAuthority.\n5.\nApplication for an order requiring a person to provide information,\ndocuments or assistance to the Authority (O.95, r.5)\n5.\n(1) An application for an order requiring a person to provide information,\ndocuments or assistance under Section 34(9) of the Monetary Authority Act (as\namended and revised) shall be made by originating notice of motion.\n(2) A notice of motion under this rule shall be served on the person or persons\nagainst whom an order is sought.\n(3) The Court may direct that a notice of motion under this rule shall also be served\non any client of the person against whom the order is sought and to whom the\nperson owes a duty of confidentiality.\n(4) An application under this rule shall be supported by an affidavit sworn on behalf\nthe Authority;\n(5) In this rule \"person\" has the meaning ascribed by Section 34(8)(a) of the\nMonetary Authority Act (as amended and revised).\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 96\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 477\n\nORDER 96\nTHE REGISTERED LAND ACT (as amended and revised)\n\n1.\nInterpretation (O.96, r.1)\n1.\nIn this Order \u2014\n\"the Law\" means the Registered Land Act (as amended and revised) and any\nexpression used in this Order and in the Law shall have the same meaning in\nthis Order as it has in the Law;\n\"charged land\" includes land comprised in a charged lease; and\n\"public auction\" includes the listing and marketing of the charged land for sale\non a public multiple listing system approved by the Court.\n2.\nApplications under Section 75(2) (O.96, r.2)\n2.\n(1) An application by a chargee under Section 75(2) of the Law to recover\npossession of the charged land upon a bid being accepted at a public auction\ncarried out pursuant to section 75(1) of the Law shall be made by originating\nsummons in accordance with the provisions of this rule.\n(2)  The originating summons under this rule shall be in Form No. 78 of the Grand\nCourt Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) and no acknowledgement\nof service shall be required.\n(3)  The chargee shall file in support of the originating summons an affidavit\nstating \u2014\n(a)  the evidence that the chargee has complied with section 75(2) of the Law;\nand\n(b)  the names of the persons in occupation of the land, if known,\n\nand, unless the Court otherwise directs, any such affidavit may contain\nstatements of information and belief and the sources and grounds thereof.\n(4)  The affidavit shall also exhibit \u2014\n(a)  a copy of the land register for the charged land to which the application\nrelates; and\n(b)  a copy of the charge to which the application relates, including any\nschedule or other attached document containing the terms of the power of\nsale exercised by the chargee under section 75(1) of the Law.\n(5)  The originating summons together with a copy of the affidavit shall be served\non the person or persons in occupation of the land either \u2014\n(a)  personally; or\n\nORDER 96\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 478\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(b)  by affixing a copy of the summons and a copy of the affidavit to the main\ndoor or other conspicuous part of the main building on the charged land;\nor\n(c)  by placing stakes in the ground at conspicuous parts of the charged land,\nto each of which shall be affixed a sealed transparent envelope addressed\nto \"the occupiers\" and containing a copy of the originating summons and\na copy of the affidavit; or\n(d)  in such other manner as the Court may direct.\n(6)  Without prejudice to O.15, rr.6 and 10, any person not named as a defendant\nwho is in occupation of the land and wishes to be heard on the question whether\nan order for possession should be made may apply at any stage of the\nproceedings to be joined as a defendant.\n(7)  A final order for possession in proceedings under this rule shall not, except in\ncase of emergency and by leave of the Court, be made \u2014\n(a)  in the case of residential premises, less than 5 clear days after the date of\nthe service; and\n(b)  in the case of other land, less than 2 clear days after the date of service.\n\nNothing in this rule shall prevent the Court from ordering possession to be given\non a specified date, in the exercise of any power which could have been\nexercised if possession had been claimed in an action begun by writ.\n(8)  Order 45, rule 3(2), shall not apply in relation to an order for possession under\nthis rule but no writ of possession to enforce such an order shall be issued after\nthe expiry of 3 months from the date of the order without leave of the Court.\n\nAn application for leave may be made ex parte unless the Court otherwise\ndirects.\n\nThe writ of possession shall be in Form No. 79 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol\nII - Forms (as amended and revised).\n(9)  The Court may, on such terms as it thinks just, set aside or vary any order made\nin proceedings under this rule.\n3.\nApplications under Section 77 (O.96, r.3)\n3.\n(1) An application under Section 77 of the Law, for an order seeking the Court's\nsanction of any variation of or addition to Sections 70(2) and (3), 72, 73, 74 or\n75 of the Law, in their application to a charge registered under the Law, shall be\nmade by originating summons in Form No. 2 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II\n- Forms (as amended and revised), and, save as provided in this rule, the\nprovisions of Orders 7 and 28 shall apply.\n (2) The originating summons under this rule shall be titled in the matter of an\napplication under Section 77 of the Law, and shall state \u2014\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 96\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 479\n\n(a)  with respect to the charged land to which the application relates\n(i)  the registration section, block number and parcel number;\n(ii)  the entry number or numbers on the land register of the charge or\ncharges to which the application relates;\n(b)  the section or sections of the Law the variation of or addition to which the\nplaintiff seeks sanction; and\n(c)  the nature of the variations or additions sought.\n(3)  On every application under this rule all the registered proprietors of the charged\nland shall be named as parties to the application and, in addition to each\ndefendant, the originating summons shall be served on the proprietors of every\ncharge entered on the land register for the charged land.\n(4)  The affidavit supporting every application under this rule shall exhibit \u2014\n(a)  a copy of the land register for the charged land to which the application\nrelates;\n(b)  a copy of the charge to which the application relates, including any\nschedule or other attached document containing the variations of or\nadditions to the provisions of the Law in respect of which the Court's\nsanction is sought.\n(5)  Where a chargee makes an application under this rule seeking the Court's\nsanction of a variation of or addition to the provisions of Section 75 of the Law\nto permit the sale of the charged land by private treaty, the affidavit supporting\nthe application shall set out \u2014\n(a)  the evidence that the chargee has complied with Section 72 of the Law;\n(b)  the steps taken by the chargee, if any, prior to the filing of the application,\nto sell the charged land by public auction;\n(c)  the reserve price or listing price which was adopted for the purposes of the\npublic auction;\n(d)  details of every offer which the chargee received in the attempts to sell the\ncharged land by public auction,\n\nand shall exhibit at least one written valuation report prepared in respect of the\ncharged land by an independent professional real estate appraiser selected from\nthe list of approved appraisers published from time to time by the Grand Court\nRules Committee.\n(6)  A valuation report submitted for the purposes of this rule must have been\nprepared no more than three months prior to the date of the filing of the\napplication.\n(7)  Without prejudice to the wide discretion conferred by Section 77 of the Law,\nthe Court may, on the hearing of an application under this rule, give directions\n\u2013\n\nORDER 96\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 480\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(a)  as to service of notice of the application on any person who appears to have\nan interest in the charged land but who has not been served with the\napplication;\n(b)  requiring the production of further evidence as to the valuation of the\ncharged land;\n(c)  requiring the chargee to take further steps to sell the charged land by public\nauction on the open market;\n(d)  fixing a reserve or minimum price for the sale;\n(e)  prescribing such conditions to which the sale shall be subject as the Court\ndeems fit.\n(8)  On an application made under this rule the Court may order that any person in\npossession of the charged land or in receipt of the rents or profits of the charged\nland deliver up vacant possession of the charged land or receipt of the rents and\nprofits to such person and on such date as the Court may direct.\n(9)  Where, on an application made under this rule, a chargee seeks vacant\npossession of the charged land, the chargee shall provide evidence, to the best\nof the chargee's knowledge and belief, of the persons in occupation of the\ncharged land and of their relationship, if any, to the chargor, and shall serve\nnotice of the application for vacant possession on such person or persons in\naccordance with O.96, r.2(5).\n(10)  The provisions of rule 2 (6), (7), (8) and (9) of this Order shall apply to orders\nfor possession made under this rule.\n4.\nApplication under Section 96 (O.96, r.4)\n4.\n(1) An application under Section 96 of the Law to extinguish or modify any\neasement, restrictive agreement or profit shall be made by petition entitled in\nthe matter of the servient land concerned.\n(2)  A petition under this rule shall be served on \u2014\n(a)  every person having a registered interest in the dominant lands concerned\nwhether registered in the appurtenances, proprietorship or incumbrances\nsections of the Land Register;\n(b)  any person, other than the petitioner, having a registered interest in the\nservient land whether registered in the appurtenances, proprietorship or\nincumbrances section of the Land Register; and\n(c)  any person who has registered a caution or restriction over any of the\ndominant lands.\n(3)  A petition under this rule may be served by posting it to the persons concerned\nat their addresses appearing in the Land Register and shall be deemed to have\nbeen received \u2014\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 96\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 481\n\n(a)  in the case of a person whose address is within the Islands, 7 days after the\ndate of posting; and\n(b)  in the case of a person whose address is outside the Islands, 21 days after\nthe date of posting.\n(4)  A petition under this rule shall be advertised.\n(5)  A petition under this rule shall be supported by an affidavit giving full\nparticulars of the facts and arguments relied upon by the petitioner.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 16.03.15)\n\nORDER 97-98\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 482\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 97-98\nNO ORDERS\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 99\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 483\n\nORDER 99\nPRIZE\n\nWhenever the Court is constituted as a Prize Court by commission issued pursuant to\nSection 2 of the United Kingdom\u2019s Prize Courts Act 1894 its proceedings shall be\ngoverned by the Prize Court Rules 1939.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nORDER 100-101\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 484\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 100-101\nNO ORDERS\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 102\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 485\n\nORDER 102\nAPPLICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE COMPANIES ACT (as\namended and revised)\n\n1.\nDefinitions and application (O.102, r.1)\n1.\n(1) In this Order \u2014\n\n \"the Law\" means the Companies Act (as amended and revised) and expressions\nused in this Order have the same meaning as in the Law.\n(2) This Order shall not apply to proceedings governed by the Companies Winding\nUp Rules (as amended and revised).\n2.\nApplications to be made by originating summons (O.102, r.2)\n2.\n(1) The following applications under the Law must be made by originating\nsummons, namely \u2014\n(a)\nunder Section 44 of the Law, for an order to inspect the register of\nmembers of a company;\n(b) under Section 46 of the Law, for an order for rectification of the register\nof members of a company;\n(c)\nunder Section 54 of the Law, for an order for inspection of a company's\nregister of mortgages and charges;\n(d) under Section 201 of the Law, for an order approving changes to the\ncharter documents of a registrant;\n(e)\nspent following the commencement of  Section 5 of the  Companies\n(Amendment)(No.3) Act, 2020 [Act 60 of 2020]\n(f)\nany other application under the Law not specifically provided for in this\nrule or rules 3 and 4.\n(2) An originating summons under this rule shall be in Form No. 3 of Grand Court\nRules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised) except for applications referred\nto in subparagraphs (1)(a), (c) and (d) which may be made ex parte in Form No.\n4 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised).\n(3) All applications of the kind referred to in subparagraph (1)(e) shall be served\nupon the Registrar of Companies.\n3.\nApplications to be made by originating motion (O.102, r.3)\n3.\nThe following applications under the Law must be made by originating motion,\nnamely \u2014\n\nORDER 102\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 486\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(a)\nunder Section 64 of the Law, for an order for the appointment of inspectors\nin respect of a company;\n(b) under Section 88 of the Law, for a declaration that a bidder is neither\nentitled nor bound to acquire compulsorily the shares of dissentient\nmembers of a company.\n4.\nApplications to be made by petition (O.102, r.4)\n4.\nThe following applications under the Law must be made by petition, namely \u2014\n(a)\nunder Section 15 of the Law, for an order confirming a resolution for\nreducing the share capital of a company;\n(b) under Section 35 of the Law, for an order sanctioning the issue by a\ncompany of shares at a discount;\n(c)\nunder Section 86 of the Law for an order sanctioning a compromise or\narrangement between a company and its creditors or members or any class\nof them;\n(d) under Section 226 of the Law, for an Order relieving a director of a\nsegregated portfolio company from personal liability; and\n(e)\nunder Section 225 of the Law, for a receivership order in respect of a\nsegregated portfolio of a segregated portfolio company.\n5.\nEntitlement of proceedings (O.102, r.5)\n5.\nEvery originating summons, notice of originating motion and petition by which any\nsuch proceedings are begun and all affidavits, notices and other documents in those\nproceedings must be entitled in the matter of the company in question and in the\nmatter of the Companies Act (as amended and revised).\n6.\nSummons for directions (O.102, r.6)\n6.\n(1) Upon the issue of a petition by which any such application as is mentioned in\nrule 4 is made, the petitioner must at the same time take out a summons for\ndirections under this rule.\n(2) A summons for directions under this rule and the petition to which it relates\nmust be served on the company at the same time.\n(3) On the hearing of the summons, the Court may by order give such directions as\nto the proceedings to be taken before the hearing of the petition as it thinks fit\nincluding, in particular, directions for the publication of notices and the making\nof any inquiry.\n(4) Where the application made by the petition is to confirm a reduction of the share\ncapital of a company, then, without prejudice to the generality of paragraph (2)\nthe Court may give directions under Section 15 of the Law \u2014\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 102\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 487\n\n(a)\nfor an inquiry to be made as to the debts of, and claims against, the\ncompany or as to any class or classes of such debts or claims;\n(b) as to the proceedings to be taken for settling the list of creditors entitled to\nobject to the reduction and fixing the date by reference to which the list is\nto be made; and\n(c)\nthe power of the Court under Section 15(3) of the Law to direct that Section\n15(2) thereof shall not apply as regards any class of creditors may be\nexercised on any hearing of the summons.\n(5) Rules 6 to 11 shall have effect subject to any directions given by the Court under\nthis rule.\n7.\nInquiry as to debts: company to make list of creditors (O.102, r.7)\n7.\n(1) Where under rule 6 the Court orders such an inquiry as is mentioned in\nparagraph (3) thereof, the company in question must, within 7 days after the\nmaking of the order, file in Court an affidavit made by an officer of the company\ncompetent to make it, verifying a list containing \u2014\n(a)\nthe name and address of every creditor entitled to any debt or claim to\nwhich the inquiry extends;\n(b) the amount due to each creditor in respect of such debt or claim or, in the\ncase of a debt or claim which is subject to any contingency or sounds only\nin damages or for some other reason does not bear a certain value, a just\nestimate of the value thereof; and\n(c)\nthe total of those amounts and values.\n(2) The deponent must state in the affidavit the deponent\u2019s belief that at the date\nfixed by the Court as the date by reference to which the list is to be made there\nis no debt or claim which, if that date were the commencement of the winding\nup of the company, would be admissible in proof against the company, other\nthan the debts or claims set out in the list and any debts or claims to which the\ninquiry does not extend, and must also state the deponent\u2019s means of knowledge\nof the matters deposed to.\n8.\nInspection of list of creditors (O.102, r.8)\n8.\n(1) Copies of the list made under rule 7 with the omission, unless the Court\notherwise directs, of the amount due to each creditor and the estimated value of\nany debt or claim to which any creditor is entitled, shall be kept at the registered\noffice of the company and at the office of that company's attorneys, if any.\n (2) Any person shall be entitled during ordinary business hours to inspect the said\nlist at any such office and to take extracts therefrom or copies thereof.\n\nORDER 102\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 488\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n9.\nNotice to creditors (O.102, r.9)\n9.\nWithin 7 days after filing the affidavit required by rule 7 the company must send by\npost to each creditor named in the list exhibited to the affidavit, at that creditor\u2019s last\nknown address, a notice stating \u2014\n(a)\nthe amount of the reduction sought to be confirmed;\n(b) the effect of the order directing an inquiry as to debts and claims;\n(c)\nthe amount or value specified in the list as due or estimated to be due to\nthat creditor; and\n(d) the time fixed by the Court within which, if that creditor claims to be\nentitled to a larger amount, that creditor must send particulars of that\ncreditor\u2019s debt or claim and the name and address of that creditor\u2019s\nattorney, if any, to the company's attorney.\n10.\nAdvertisement of petition and list of creditors (O.102, r.10)\n10. After filing the affidavit required by rule 7 the company must insert in such\nnewspapers and at such times as the Court directs, a notice stating \u2014\n(a)\nthe date of issue of the petition and the amount of reduction thereby sought\nto be confirmed;\n(b) the inquiry ordered by the Court under rule 6;\n(c)\nthe places where the list of creditors may be inspected in accordance with\nrule 9; and\n(d) the time within which any creditor not named in the list who claims to be\nentitled to any debt or claim to which the inquiry extends must send that\ncreditor\u2019s name and address, the name and address of that creditor\u2019s\nattorney, if any, and particulars of that creditor\u2019s debt or claim to the\ncompany's attorney.\n11.\nAffidavit as to claims made by creditors (O.102, r.11)\n11. Within such time as the Court directs the company must file in Court an affidavit\nmade by an officer of the company or other person competent to make it \u2014\n(a)\nproving service of the notices mentioned in rule 9 and advertisement of the\nnotice mentioned in rule 10;\n(b) verifying a list containing the names and addresses of the persons (if any)\nwho in pursuance of such notice sent in particulars of debts or claims,\nspecifying the amount of each debt or claim;\n(c)\ndistinguishing in such list those debts or claims which are wholly, or as to\nany and what part thereof, admitted by the company, disputed by the\ncompany or alleged by the company to be outside the scope of the inquiry;\nand\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 102\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 489\n\n(d) stating which of the persons named in the list made under rule 7 and which\nof the persons in the list made under this rule, have been paid or consent\nto the reduction sought to be confirmed.\n12.\nAdjudication of disputed claims (O.102, r.12)\n12. If the company contends that a person is not entitled to be entered in the list of\ncreditors in respect of any debt or claim in respect of the full amount claimed by that\nperson in respect of any debt or claim, then, unless the company is willing to secure\npayment of that debt or claim by appropriating the full amount of the debt or claim,\nthe company must, if the Court so directs, send to that person by post at that person\u2019s\nlast known address a notice requiring that person \u2014\n(a)\nwithin such time as may be specified in the notice being not less than 4\nclear days after service thereof, to file an affidavit proving that person\u2019s\ndebt or claim or, as the case may be, so much thereof as is not admitted by\nthe company; and\n(b) to attend the adjudication of that person\u2019s debt or claim at the place and\ntime specified in the notice, being the time appointed by the Court for the\nadjudication of debts and claims.\n13.\nCertifying lists of creditors entitled to object to reduction (O.102, r.13)\n13. The list of creditors entitled to object to such reduction as is mentioned in rule 6(3)\nas settled by the Court under Section 15(2) of the Law, shall be certified and filed and\nthe Court's certificate shall \u2014\n(a)\nspecify the debts or claims (if any) disallowed by the Court;\n(b) distinguish the debts or claims (if any), the full amount of which is\nadmitted by the company, the debts or claims (if any), the full amount of\nwhich, though not admitted by the company, the company is willing to\nappropriate, the debts or claims (if any), the amount of which has been\nfixed by adjudication of the Court under Section 15(2) of the Law and\nother debts or claims;\n(c)\nspecify the amount of debts or claims, payment of which has been secured\nby appropriation under the said Section 15(2);\n(d) show which creditors consent to the reduction and the total amount of their\ndebts or claims;\n(e)\nspecify the creditors who sought to prove their debts or claims under rule\n11 and state which of such debts or claims were allowed.\n14.\nEvidence of consent of creditor (O.102, r.14)\n14. The consent of a creditor to such reduction as is mentioned in rule 6(3) may be proved\nin such manner as the Court thinks sufficient.\n\nORDER 102\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 490\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n15.\nTime, etc., of hearing of petition for confirmation of reduction (O.102, r.15)\n15. (1) A petition for the confirmation of any such reduction as is mentioned in rule\n6(3) shall not, where the Court has directed an inquiry pursuant to that rule, be\nheard before the expiration of at least 8 clear days after the filing of the\ncertificate mentioned in rule 13.\n (2) Before the hearing of such a petition, a notice specifying the day appointed for\nthe hearing must be published at such times and in such newspapers as the Court\nmay direct.\n16.\nService out of the jurisdiction without leave (O.102, r.16)\n16. Any originating summons, originating motion or petition issued pursuant to rule 2, 3\nor 4 may be served out of the jurisdiction upon any shareholder, director or creditor\nof the company concerned without the leave of the Court.\n17.\nRestoration of companies to the register: Application by a company or a\nmember thereof (O.102, r.17)\n17. (1) An application by a company or any member thereof under Section 159 of the\nLaw shall be made by originating application in Form No. 66 of the Grand Court\nRules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised).\n(2) The originating application shall be supported by an affidavit proving the\nfollowing facts and matters \u2014\n(a)\nthe company\u2019s registration number and the date of its registration;\n(b) the date upon which the company was struck off the register of companies;\n(c)\nif the company was struck off the register more than two years prior to the\ndate of the originating application, the Cabinet has no objection to its\nrestoration to the register of companies;\n(d) the Registrar of Companies has no objection to the company\u2019s restoration\nto the register of companies;\n(e)\nthe amount of the reinstatement fee payable and the amount of any\noutstanding annual return fees, the payment of which is sought by the\nRegistrar of Companies;\n(f)\nthe address of the premises which will become the company\u2019s registered\noffice in the event that it is restored to the register of companies;\n(g) if the proposed registered office is the premises of a professional service\nprovider, such person has agreed to provide registered office services to\nthe company.\n(3) Every originating application under this rule shall be accompanied by a draft\norder (in triplicate) in Form No. 67 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms\n(as amended and revised).\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 102\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 491\n\n(4) Every originating application under this rule shall be determined by the Clerk\nof the Court without hearing the applicant.\n(5) If the Clerk of the Court is satisfied that the requirements of this rule and of\nSection 159 of the Law have been met, the Clerk of the Court shall make an\norder in Form No. 67 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended\nand revised).\n(6) If the Clerk of the Court is not satisfied that the requirements of this rule or\nSection 159 of the Law have been met, the Clerk of the Court may \u2014\n(a)\nrequire the applicant to file further evidence;\n(b) direct that the application be served on the Registrar of Companies;\n(c)\nrefer the application for an oral hearing before a judge; or\n(d) dismiss the application.\n18.\nRestoration of companies to the register - Application by a creditor (O.102,\nr.18)\n18. (1) An application by a creditor under Section 159 of the Law may be combined\nwith an application under Section 94 of the Law and may be made by petition\nin Form No. 68 of Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised),\nin which case O.3 of the Companies Winding Up Rules (as amended and\nrevised) shall apply.\n(2) A petition under this rule shall be served on \u2014\n(a)\nthe last known registered office of the company; and\n(b) the Registrar of Companies.\n(3) Unless the Court otherwise directs, a petition under this rule shall be advertised\nin accordance with O.3, r.6 of the Companies Winding Up Rules (as amended\nand revised).\n(4) The petition shall be verified by an affidavit that the statements in the petition\nare true, or are true to the best of the deponent\u2019s knowledge, information and\nbelief.\n(5)   If the petitioner seeks a winding up order, the petition must be supported by an\naffidavit sworn by the person nominated for appointment as official liquidator\nand containing the information required by O.3, r.4 of the Companies Winding\nUp Rules (as amended and revised).\n19.\nApplication to restore rights attaching to bearer shares (O.102, r.19)\n19. (1) An application under Section 229(7) of the Law by the holder of a bearer share\ncertificate for an order that the rights attaching to such share be restored, shall\nbe made by originating summons in Form No. 2 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol\nII - Forms (as amended and revised).\n\nORDER 102\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 492\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(2) Where the shares which are the subject of the application represented the whole\nof the company's issued share capital, the Financial Secretary shall be made\nparty to the application.\n(3) Where the shares which are the subject of the application represented part only\nof the company's issued share capital, the originating summons shall be served\non \u2014\n(a)\nthe company; and\n(b) subject to any direction given under paragraph (4), each shareholder of the\ncompany.\n(4) If the Court is satisfied that service upon each shareholder of the company is\nimpractical, it shall consider making representation orders pursuant to O.15, r.12\nand shall give directions for the application to be advertised in such manner as\nit thinks fit.\n(5) The originating summons shall be supported by an affidavit sworn by or on\nbehalf of the applicant which \u2014\n(a)\nexplains why the share certificates were not deposited with a custodian;\n(b) states the address which is or will be the registered office of the company\nin the event that the rights attaching to the shares are restored;\n(c)\nstates the names and addresses of the directors or the persons intended to\nbe appointed as directors of the company in the event that the rights\nattaching to the shares are restored;\n(d) sets out full particulars of the company's assets and liabilities and the\nnature of its business;\n(e)\nsets out full particulars of all special resolutions passed by the company\nsince 26th April, 2002; and\n(f)\nstates the amount of the company's issued share capital and particulars of\nany changes which have occurred since 26th April, 2002.\n(6) The Court may direct the company's directors to swear and serve upon the\napplicant an affidavit complying with the requirements of sub-paragraphs (c) to\n(f) of paragraph (5).\n(7) The originating summons shall also be supported by an affidavit sworn by an\nauthorised or recognised custodian stating that it has custody of the share\ncertificates which are the subject of the application and that it has agreed with\nthe applicant to hold the shares on the applicant\u2019s behalf in the event that the\nCourt makes an order that the rights attaching to such shares be restored.\n(8) An order that the rights attaching to a bearer share be restored shall be in Form\n70.1\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 102\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 493\n\n1 (Note: Section 5 of the Companies (Amendment) (No. 3) Act, 2020 [Act 60 of\n2020], which commenced on 1st March, 2021, prohibits the issue of bearer\nshares)\n20.\nSchemes of Arrangement (O.102, r.20)\n20. (1) An application under Section 86 of the Law for an order sanctioning a proposed\ncompromise or arrangement between a company and its creditors or members\nor any class of them shall be commenced by petition.\n(2) Upon the presenting of a petition under paragraph (1), the petitioner must at the\nsame time take out a summons for a direction convening the Court meeting(s).\n(3) The summons under paragraph (2) shall be supported by an affidavit which\nshall \u2014\n(a)\ndescribe the purpose and effect of the proposed scheme;\n(b) contain such information as may be necessary to enable the Court to\ndetermine whether it should convene class meetings and, if so, the\ncomposition of the classes;\n(c)\ncontain such information as may be necessary to enable the Court to\ndetermine whether the proposed time and place of the Court meeting(s)\nand the method of giving notice is appropriate in all the circumstances.\n(4) The following documents shall be exhibited to the supporting affidavit referred\nto in paragraph 3 \u2014\n(a)\nthe proposed scheme together with any supplementary documents to which\nit refers;\n(b) draft notice of the meeting(s);\n(c)\ndraft proxy forms;\n(d) draft voting instructions for use by custodians; and\n(e)\na draft explanatory memorandum or proxy statement which provides the\nshareholders or creditors with all the information reasonably necessary to\nenable them to make an informed decision about the merits of the proposed\nscheme.\n(5) If the proposed scheme relates to shares or debt instruments which are listed on\na stock exchange, the summons under paragraph (2) shall be supported by an\naffidavit or expert report which sets out the relevant listing rules and practice\nand explains the steps which have been or will be taken to comply with such\nlisting rules or practice.\n(6) The Court shall give such directions as may be necessary for the purpose of\nenabling it to determine whether or not the statutory majorities will have been\nachieved. If all or substantially all of the shares or debt instruments to which the\n\nORDER 102\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 494\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nproposed scheme relates are registered in the name of one or more custodians\nor clearing houses, the Court may direct that \u2014\n(a)\nsuch custodian or clearing house may cast votes both for and against the\nproposed scheme in accordance with the instructions of its clients;\n(b) such custodian or clearing house shall specify the number of votes cast in\nfavour of the scheme and the number of clients or members on whose\ninstructions they are cast and the number of votes cast against the proposed\nscheme and the number of clients or members on whose instructions they\nare cast.\n(7) The explanatory memorandum or proxy statement referred to in sub-paragraph\n(4)(e) above shall contain a timetable of principal events including \u2014\n(a)\nthe latest time for transmission to custodians or clearing houses of voting\ninstructions for the Court meeting;\n(b) the latest time for lodging forms of proxy for the Court meeting;\n(c)  the date of the Court meeting;\n(d) the date of the hearing of the petition to sanction the scheme; and\n(e)\nthe anticipated date upon which the scheme, if sanctioned, will become\neffective.\n(8) Within seven days after the date fixed for the Court meeting the petitioner shall\nfile an affidavit sworn by the chairperson of the meeting verifying that \u2014\n(a)\nnotice of the meeting was duly sent in accordance with the order for\ndirections;\n(b) the meeting was duly held in accordance with the order for directions; and\n(c)\nfull particulars of the voting.\n(9) The hearing of the summons taken out in accordance with paragraph (2) shall\nbe in chambers.\n(10) The final hearing of the petition shall be heard in open Court and any person\nwho \u2014\n(a)\nvoted at the Court meeting(s); or\n(b) gave voting instructions to a custodian or clearing house who voted at the\nCourt meeting(s),\n\nshall, be entitled to appear and be heard.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (amended16.10.95) (amended 01.03.99) (amended 04.06.01) (amended 01.01.09)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 103\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 495\n\nORDER 103\nTHE CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION DISCLOSURE ACT (as\namended and revised)\n\n1.\nDefinitions (O.103, r.1)\n1.\nIn this Order \u2014\n\n\"the Law\" means the Confidential Information Disclosure Act (as amended and\nrevised), and words and expressions used in the Law which are used in this Order\nshall have the same meaning as in the Law.\n2.\nApplications under Section 4 (O.103, r.2)\n2.\n(1) An application required to be made pursuant to Section 4 of the Law, including\none required to be made pursuant to O.24, r.5(4), or O.26, r.5(4), shall be made\nby ex parte originating summons in Form No. 59 of the Grand Court Rules -\nVol II - Forms (as amended and revised).\n(2) An originating summons issued pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be entitled in the\nmatter of the proceeding to which it relates and in the matter of the Law.\n3.\nService of summons (O.103, r.3)\n3.\n(1) Every originating summons issued pursuant to rule 1 shall be served on the\nAttorney General.\n(2) Upon the first hearing of every originating summons issued pursuant to rule 1\nthe Court shall direct whether, and if so upon whom, it shall be served in\naddition to the Attorney General.\n4.\nAffidavit evidence (O.103, r.4)\n4.\n(1) Every application to which this Order applies shall be supported by an affidavit\nsworn by or on behalf of the applicant.\n(2) The supporting affidavit shall \u2014\n(a)\nstate the circumstances in which the applicant intends or is required to give\nevidence;\n(b) identify the relevant principals having an interest in the confidential\ninformation intended or required to be given in evidence by the applicant\nand explain the circumstances giving rise to the confidential relationship;\n(c)\ndescribe in general terms the nature of the evidence intended or required\nto be given and the reason why it constitutes confidential information;\nand(d) state the reasons why or to what extent the relevant principal objects\n\nORDER 103\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 496\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nto disclosure by the applicant of the confidential information intended or\nrequired to be given in evidence.\n5.\nFiling and service of affidavits (O.103, r.5)\n5.\n(1) Every affidavit required to be sworn by rule 4 shall be filed and served on the\nAttorney General.\n(2) The Court shall direct on the first hearing of an originating summons issued in\naccordance with rule 2 whether, and if so, upon whom, the supporting affidavit\nshall be served.\n6.\nHearing of Section 4 applications (O.103, r.6)\n6.\nEvery application to which this Order applies shall be heard in Chambers.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 103\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 497\n\nORDER 104-111\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 498\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nORDER 104-111\nNO ORDERS\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 112\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 499\n\nORDER 112\nAPPLICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE STATUS OF CHILDREN\nACT, 2003 [Law 23 of 2003]\n\nPART 1 - GENERAL\n1.\nDefinitions (O.112, r.1)\n1.\nIn this Order \u2014\n\"the Law\" means the Status of Children Act, 2003 [Law 23 of 2003];\n\"accredited laboratory\" means the Cayman Islands Forensic Science\nLaboratory;\n\"authorised forensic person\" means a person who is employed at an accredited\nlaboratory and whom the medical director has authorised to take bodily samples\nby way of buccal swab;\n\"bodily sample\" has the meaning assigned to it by Section 2 of the Law;\n\"donor\" means the person required to provide a bodily sample for the purposes\nof a parentage testing procedure;\n\"medical director\" means the medical director of the Health Services Authority\nappointed by the Health Services Authority pursuant to the Health Services\nAuthority Act (as amended and revised);\n\"nominated reporter\" means the person nominated by an accredited laboratory\nto prepare a report relating to the information obtained as a result of carrying\nout a parentage testing procedure;\n\"report\" means a report prepared in accordance with Rule 15;\n\"representative\" means \u2014\n(a)  in relation to a donor under the age of 18 years: a parent or guardian of the\ndonor, or\n(b)  in relation to a donor under a disability \u2014\n(i)\n a person who is legally responsible for the care, welfare and\ndevelopment of the donor, or\n(ii)  a person appointed by the Grand Court to represent the donor.\n\"sample\" means a sample taken from a donor for the purposes of a parentage\ntesting procedure;\n\"sampler\" means a person who takes (or proposes to take) a bodily sample from\na donor for the purposes of a parentage testing procedure.\n\nORDER 112\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 500\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n2.\nApplication for a declaration of paternity (O.112, r.2)\n2.\nAn application for a declaration of paternity pursuant to section 10 of the Law shall\nbe made by writ or originating summons.\n3.\nApplication for a parentage testing order (O.112, r.3)\n3.\n(1) Except with the leave of the Court, an application in any proceedings for a\nparentage testing order shall be made on notice to every party to the proceedings\n(other than the applicant) and to the donor.\n(2)  An application for a parentage testing order shall be made by summons\nsupported by an affidavit.\n(3)  Any notice, summons or affidavit required by this rule to be served on a person\nwho is not a party to the proceedings shall be served on that person personally.\n(4)  Unless the Court otherwise orders, the fee payable to the accredited laboratory\nshall be paid or reimbursed by the applicant.\n(5)  The Court may make orders for costs of such applications as it sees fit.\n(6)  Any order for a parentage testing order shall require that the sample to be given\npursuant to the parentage testing order, and any information derived therefrom,\nand the identity of the donor shall not be disclosed by the accredited laboratory\nunless permitted by further order of the Court or operation of law.\n4.\nApplications involving persons under a disability (O.112, r.4)\n4.\nWhere an application is made for a parentage testing order in respect of a proposed\ndonor who is either \u2014\n(a)  under the age of 18 years, or\n(b)  is mentally impaired within the meaning of Section 2 of the Mental Health\nAct (as amended and revised) and is incapable of understanding the nature\nand purpose of a parental testing procedure,\n\nthe notice of application or summons shall state the name and address of the\nperson having charge of the proposed donor and shall be served on that person\ninstead of the proposed donor.\n5.\nJoinder of person to be tested (O.112, r.5)\n5.\nWhere an application is made for a parentage testing order involving the taking of\nbodily samples from a proposed donor who is not a party to the proceedings in which\nthe application is made, the Court may at any time direct that the proposed donor be\nmade a party to the proceedings.\n6.\nService of copy report (O.112, r.6)\n6.\nOn receipt by the Court of a report pursuant to rule 16, the Clerk of the Court shall\nsend forthwith a copy to every party to the proceedings and to the donor. If the donor\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 112\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 501\n\nis a person to whom rule 4(a) or (b) of this Order applies, then the Clerk of the Court\nshall not send a copy of the report to the donor but shall send a copy of the report to\nthe person having charge of the donor.\n\nPART 2 - PARENTAGE TESTING PROCEDURES AND REPORTS\n7.\nParentage testing procedures (O.112, r.7)\n7.\nFor the purposes of this order and for giving effect to the Law, DNA typing is a\nprescribed medical procedure.\n8.\nCompliance with this order (O.112, r.8)\n8.\nA parentage testing procedure is taken to be carried out in accordance with this order\nonly if \u2014\n(1)  it is carried out \u2014\n(a)  in compliance with Part 3; and\n(b)  at an accredited laboratory, and\n(2)  it is supplemented by a report under Part 4, and\n(3)  any sample that is taken by way of buccal swab as part of the procedure is taken\nby an authorised forensic person; and\n(4)  any other bodily sample that is taken as part of the procedure is taken by a\nmedical doctor or nurse who is registered under the Health Practice Act (as\namended and revised).\n\nPART 3 \u2013 COLLECTION, STORAGE AND TESTING OF SAMPLES\n9.\nProvision of information by donor or representative (O.112, r.9)\n9.\n(1) A sampler must not take a bodily sample from a donor unless the donor or, if\nappropriate, a person described in rule 9(3), has \u2014\n(a)  immediately before the sampler takes the bodily sample, sworn an affidavit\nin accordance with Form No. 401 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II -\nForms (as amended and revised), to which is attached a recent photograph\nof the donor named in the affidavit, and\n(b)  either \u2014\n(i)  provided to the sampler a recent photograph of the donor, measuring\napproximately 2 inches by 1.5 inches, that shows a full face view of\nthe donor\u2019s head and the donor\u2019s shoulders against a plain\nbackground, or\n(ii)  made a written arrangement with the sampler for a photograph of that\nkind to be taken. (2) The photograph required by rule 9(1)(b) is in\n\nORDER 112\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 502\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\naddition to the photograph that is required to be attached to Form No.\n401 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and\nrevised).\n(3)  If the donor is under the age of 18 years, or is a person under a disability, the\naffidavit referred to in rule 9(1)(a) must be sworn by a representative of the\ndonor.\n(4)  If the donor is under a disability for any reason other than being under the age\nof 18 years, a sampler shall not take a sample (other than one taken with a swab)\nunless a registered medical practitioner certifies that the giving of a bodily\nsample by the donor would not be prejudicial to the donor's proper care and\ntreatment.\n(5)  If the sample is to be taken from an unborn foetus a sampler shall not take a\nsample unless a registered medical practitioner certifies that the giving of a\nbodily sample would not be prejudicial to the proper care and treatment of the\nfoetus or its mother.\n(6)  A donor who attends a sampler for the taking of a sample may be accompanied\nby an attorney.\n10.\nCollection of blood samples (O.112, r.10)\n10. (1) A sampler may take a sample of blood from a donor only with a needle or\nsyringe that \u2014\n(a) has not been used for any purpose, and\n(b) is sterile, and\n(c) is disposable.\n(2)  Before taking a sample of blood from a donor, the sampler must ensure that the\narea of the donor\u2019s skin into which the needle is to be inserted to withdraw the\nblood has been cleaned with an antiseptic.\n11.\nCollection of bodily samples for DNA typing (O.112, r.11)\n11. (1) This rule applies to the taking of a bodily sample (other than a blood sample)\nfrom a donor for the purposes of a parentage testing procedure that is DNA\ntyping.\n(2)  A sampler must not take a bodily sample from a donor with a swab unless the\nswab:\n(a)  has not been used for any purpose, and\n(b)  is sterile.\n(3)  A sampler must not take a bodily sample from a donor that is a skin scraping or\nhair root unless the implement used by the sampler to take the sample is sterile.\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 112\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 503\n\n12.\nContainer to be sealed and labelled (O.112, r.12)\n12. If a bodily sample is taken from a donor, the sampler must ensure that \u2014\n(a)  the sample is placed in a container:\n(i)  immediately after it is taken; and\n(ii)  in the presence of the donor (and, where relevant, the representative\nof the donor), and\n(b)  the container has not previously been used for any purpose, and\n(c)  the container is sealed in a way that, if it were opened after being sealed,\nthat fact would be evident on inspection of the container, and\n(d)  the container is labelled in a way that:\n(i)  if the label, or part of the label, were removed, or\n(ii)  if the writing on the label were impaired by alteration or erasure,\nthe removal of the label or the impairment would be evident on inspection\nof the container, and\n(e)  the particulars on the label are inscribed in ink and include:\n(i)  the full name of the donor, and\n(ii)  the date of birth and sex of the donor, and\n(iii)  the date and time at which the sample was taken, and\n(f)  the label inscribed with the particulars referred to in paragraph (e) is signed\nin ink by the sampler and by the donor or, where relevant, by the\nrepresentative of the donor.\n13.\nStatement by sampler (O.112, r.13)\n13. After taking a bodily sample from a donor, the sampler must \u2014\n(1)  complete a statement in accordance with Form No. 402 of the Grand Court\nRules - Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised), and\n(2)  affix the photograph of the donor referred to in rule 9(1)(b) to that statement,\nand\n(3)  sign the sampler\u2019s name partly on the photograph and partly on the statement in\na way that, if the photograph were later removed from the statement, the removal\nwould be evident from inspection of the statement.\n14.\nPackaging and storage (O.112, r.14)\n14. (1) A bodily sample must be packed, stored and transported to a laboratory for\ntesting in a manner that \u2014\n(a)  will preserve the integrity of the sample, and\n\nORDER 112\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 504\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(b)  ensures that the testing of the sample will produce the same results as\nwould have been obtained if the sample had been tested immediately after\ncollection.\n(2)  The sampler must ensure that the following documents are sent to the laboratory\nwith the sample \u2014\n(a)  the affidavit sworn under rule 9; and\n(b)  the statement completed under rule 13.\n15.\nTesting of bodily samples (O.112, r.15)\n15. A laboratory to which a bodily sample has been sent for testing must ensure that the\ntesting is completed within a reasonable time after the sample is taken.\n\nPART 4 - REPORTS\n16.\nReports (O.112, r.16)\n16. (1) A report must be prepared in accordance with this rule relating to the\ninformation obtained as a result of carrying out a parentage testing procedure.\n(2)  The report must be in accordance with Form No. 403 of the Grand Court Rules\n- Vol II - Forms (as amended and revised).\n(3)  Part 1 of the report must be completed by the nominated reporter identified in\nthe report.\n(4)  Part 2 of the report must be completed by \u2014\n(a)  the person who carried out the parentage testing procedure; or\n(b)  the person under whose supervision the parentage testing procedure was\ncarried out.\n(5)  Unless the Court otherwise orders, a report completed otherwise than in\naccordance with this rule is not admissible.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised) (amended 21.10.13)\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 113\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 505\n\nORDER 113\nSUMMARY PROCEEDINGS FOR POSSESSION OF LAND\n\n1.\nProceedings to be brought by originating summons (O.113, r.1)\n1.\nWhere a person claims possession of land which that person alleges is occupied solely\nby a person or persons (not being a tenant or tenants holding over after the termination\nof the tenancy) who entered into or remained in occupation without that person\u2019s\nlicence or consent or that of any predecessor in title of that person\u2019s, the proceedings\nmay be brought by originating summons in accordance with the provision of this\nOrder.\n1A.\nNo rule (O.113, r.1A)\n1A. No rule (O.113, r.1A)\n2.\nForm of originating summons (O.113, r.2)\n2.\nThe originating summons shall be in Form No. 60 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol II\n- Forms (as amended and revised) and no acknowledgment of service shall be\nrequired.\n3.\nAffidavit in support (O.113, r.3)\n3.\nThe plaintiff shall file in support of the originating summons an affidavit stating \u2014\n(a)\nthe plaintiff\u2019s interest in the land;\n(b) the circumstances in which the land has been occupied without licence or\nconsent and in which the plaintiff\u2019s claim to possession arises; and\n(c)\nthat the plaintiff does not know the name of any person occupying the land\nwho is not named in the summons,\nand, unless the Court otherwise directs, any such affidavit may contain\nstatements of information and belief with the sources and grounds thereof.\n4.\nService of originating summons (O.113, r.4)\n4.\n(1) Where any person in occupation of the land is named in the originating\nsummons, the summons together with a copy of the affidavit in support shall be\nserved on that person \u2014\n(a)\npersonally; or\n(b) by leaving a copy of the summons and of the affidavit, or sending them to\nthat person, at the premises; or\n(c)\nin such other manner as the Court may direct.\n\nORDER 113\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 506\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\n(2) Where any person not named as a defendant is in occupation of the land, the\nsummons shall be served (whether or not it is also required to be served in\n\naccordance with paragraph (1)), unless the Court otherwise directs, by \u2014\n(a)\naffixing a copy of the summons and a copy of the affidavit to the main\ndoor or other conspicuous part of the premises; or\n(b) placing stakes in the ground at conspicuous parts of the occupied land, to\neach of which shall be affixed a sealed transparent envelope addressed to\n\"the occupiers\" and containing a copy of the summons and a copy of the\naffidavit.\n(3) Every copy of an originating summons for service under paragraph (1) or (2)\nshall be sealed with the seal of the Court.\n(4) Order 28, rule 3, shall not apply to proceedings under this Order.\n5.\nApplication by occupier to be made a party (O.113, r.5)\n5.\nWithout prejudice to O.15, rr.6 and 10, any person not named as a defendant who is\nin occupation of the land and wishes to be heard on the question whether an order for\npossession should be made may apply at any stage of the proceedings to be joined as\na defendant.\n6.\nOrder for possession (O.113, r.6)\n6.\n(1) A final order for possession in proceedings under this Order shall, except in case\nof emergency and by leave of the Court, not be made \u2014\n(a)\nin the case of residential premises, less than 5 clear days after the date of\nthe service; and\n(b) in the case of other land, less than 2 clear days after the date of service.\n(2) Nothing in this Order shall prevent the Court from ordering possession to be\ngiven on a specified date, in the exercise of any power which could have been\nexercised if possession had been claimed in an action begun by writ.\n7.\nWrit of possession (O.113, r.7)\n7.\n(1) Order 45, rule 3(2), shall not apply in relation to an order for possession under\nthis Order but no writ of possession to enforce such an order shall be issued after\nthe expiry of 3 months from the date of the order without leave of the Court.\nAn application for leave may be made ex parte unless the Court otherwise\ndirects.\n(2) The writ of possession shall be in Form No. 28 of the Grand Court Rules - Vol\nII - Forms (as amended and revised).\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders I (2023 Revision)\n\nORDER 113\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 507\n\n8.\nSetting aside order (O.113, r.8)\n8.\nThe Court may, on such terms as it thinks just, set aside or vary any order made in\nproceedings under this Order.\n\nGCR 1995 (Revised)\n\nORDER 113\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 508\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nApproved by the Rules Committee of the Grand Court this 21st day of October,\n2022.\nGrand Court Rules - Orders 38 and 95 were approved by the Chief Justice this 21st\nday of October, 2022.\nPublication in consolidated form authorised by the Cabinet this 10th day of\nJanuary, 2023.\nKim Bullings\nClerk of the Cabinet\n\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nENDNOTES\n\nc\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nPage 509\n\nENDNOTES\nTable of Grand Court Rules history:\nSL #\nAdded or\nreplaced\nOrders #\nAdded or\nreplaced\nForms #\nLegislation\nCommencement\nGazette\n27\/2022\n5, 63. 65 & 67\n\nGrand Court (Amendment) (No. 1) Rules, 2022\n10-Jul-2022\nLG26\/2022\/s1\n\nGrand Court Rules \u2013 Vol I \u2013 Orders  (2022\nConsolidation)\n20-Jan-2022\nLG4\/2022\/s1\n\nGrand Court Rules \u2013 Vol II \u2013 Forms (2022\nConsolidation)\n20-Jan-2022\nLG4\/2022\/s2\n\n80,r17, 94, r6\n\nCivil Partnership Law, 2020 (Law 35 of 2020)\n4-Sep-2020\nLG64\/2020\/s1\n54\/2016\n62\n\nGrand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2016\n29-Mar-2016\nGE78\/2016\/s2\n6\/2015\n94 & 96\n78 & 79\nGrand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2015\n16-Mar-2015\nG6\/2015\/s3\n67\/2014\n11\n\nGrand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2014\n12-Dec-2014\nGE94\/2014\/s2\n35\/2013\n112\n401 to 403\nGrand Court (Amendment) (No. 2) Rules, 2013\n21-Oct-2013\nGE83\/2013\/s1\n32\/2013\n11, 72 & 73\n6A, 9A, 76\n&77\nGrand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2013\n1-Jul-2013\nG13\/2013\/s2\n4\/2013\n63\n\nGrand Court (Amendment) (No. 3) Rules, 2012\n1-Feb-2013\nG1\/2013\/s2\n54\/2012\n5 & 77A\n\nGrand Court (Amendment) (No. 2) Rules, 2012\n6-Nov-2012\nG23\/2012\/s1\n31\/2012\n7, 11 & 38\n\nGrand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2012\n1-Oct-2012\nG19\/2012\/s1\n17\/2011\n32\n\nGrand Court (Amendment) (No. 2) Rules, 2011\n13-Jul-2011 GE54\/2011\/2011\n10\/2011\n11, 14 & 62\n314\nGrand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2011\n1-Jun-2011\nG11\/2011\/s2\n30\/2009\n1, 4, 5 & 72\n71 to 75\nGrand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2009\n1-Nov-2009\nGE63\/2009\/s2\n6\/2008\n1 & 102\n\nGrand Court (Amendment) (No. 2) Rules, 2008\n1-Mar-2009\nGE5\/2009\/s2\n27\/2008\n14\n\nGrand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2008\n24-Nov-2008\nG25\/2008\/s3\n3\/2006\n50\n\nGrand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2006\n30-Oct-2006\nG22\/2006\/s1\n2\/2003\n\nGrand Court Rules, 1995 (Revised)* revised in 2003\n8-Sept-2003\nG24\/2003\/s1\n32\/2002\n102\n\nGrand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2002\n15-Jul-2002\nG14\/2002\/s1\n15\/2001\n01 & 62\n301 to 314\nCourt Cost Rules, 2001\n01-Jan-2002\nG12\/2001\/s3\n29\/2001\n50A, 95 &102\n\nGrand Court (Amendment) Rules, 2001\n04-Jun-2001\nG22\/2001\/s1\n8\/2000\n42\n\nGrand Court (Amendment) Rules 2000\n1-Apr-2000\nG6\/2000\/s6\n15\/1999\n18, 41, 42, 48,\n53 & 102\n30A, 66, 67\n& 68\nGrand Court (Amendment) Rules 1999\n01-Mar-1999\nG4\/1999\/s7\n20\/1997\n85\n\nGrand Court (Amendment) (No.2) Rules 1997\n01-Jan-1998\nG26\/1997\/s1\n19\/1997\n\n64 & 65\nGrand Court (Amendment) Rules 1997\n1-Jun-1997\nG10\/1997\/s3\n11\/1996\n14, 15, 18, 22,\n\nGrand Court (Amendment) Rules 1996\n20-Jan-1997\nG2\/1997\/s2\n\nENDNOTES\nGrand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (2023 Revision)\n\nPage 510\nRevised as at 31st December, 2022\nc\n\nSL #\nAdded or\nreplaced\nOrders #\nAdded or\nreplaced\nForms #\nLegislation\nCommencement\nGazette\n28, 32 & 82\n23\/1995\n92\n\nGrand Court (Amendment) (No. 2) Rules, 1995\n22-Jan-1996\nG2\/1996\/s7\n22\/1995\n1, 15 & 102\n9, 11 & 33\nGrand Court (Amendment) Rules 1995\n16-Oct-1995\nG21\/1995\/s1\n19\/1995\n\nGrand Court Rules, 1995\n1-Jun-1995\nGE9\/1995\/s1\n\n(Price: $102.40)","akn_extracted_at":"2026-06-22 15:38:33.662809+00","cms_id":"2003-0002","law_type":"subordinate","year":"2003","number":"2","title":"Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders","status":"in_force"},"provenance":{"files":[{"file_id":"5950","expr_id":"718","kind":"akn_xml","filename":"2003-0002_2023 Revision.akn.xml","source_url":null,"storage_path":"\/Users\/q\/kyleg-data\/working\/SUBORDINATE\/2003\/2003-0002\/2003-0002_2023 Revision.akn.xml","content_md5":"ecd9b5bb6a8338c1f89fb713a78b2fde","byte_size":"1009515","http_last_modified":null,"fetched_at":"2026-06-22 15:38:36.133294+00"},{"file_id":"1435","expr_id":"718","kind":"pristine_pdf","filename":"2003-0002_2023 Revision.pdf","source_url":"\/cms\/images\/LEGISLATION\/SUBORDINATE\/2003\/2003-0002\/2003-0002_2023 Revision.pdf","storage_path":"\/Users\/q\/kyleg-data\/pristine\/SUBORDINATE\/2003\/2003-0002\/2003-0002_2023 Revision.pdf","content_md5":"4c89bb1197f0309d1e47ba790c47a6f4","byte_size":"5046415","http_last_modified":null,"fetched_at":"2026-06-21 23:09:35.250256+00"},{"file_id":"1436","expr_id":"718","kind":"working_pdf","filename":"2003-0002_2023 Revision.pdf","source_url":"\/cms\/images\/LEGISLATION\/SUBORDINATE\/2003\/2003-0002\/2003-0002_2023 Revision.pdf","storage_path":"\/Users\/q\/kyleg-data\/working\/SUBORDINATE\/2003\/2003-0002\/2003-0002_2023 Revision.pdf","content_md5":"4c89bb1197f0309d1e47ba790c47a6f4","byte_size":"5046415","http_last_modified":null,"fetched_at":"2026-06-21 23:09:35.250256+00"}],"paragraph_count":38,"latest_history":null},"quality":{"expr_id":"718","doc_id":"718","quality_state":"needs_review","quality_score":"68","needs_human_review":"t","deterministic_categories":"{commencement_metadata_problem,duplicate_text,page_header_footer_noise,paragraph_numbering_problem}","llm_categories":"{truncated_text,other}","repair_actions":"{collapse_duplicate_text,manual_review,rebuild_paragraphs,reextract_full_text,strip_page_furniture,verify_commencement_metadata}","finding_severity_counts":"{\"low\": 1, \"medium\": 1}","finding_summary":"Extraction appears mostly clean but ends mid\u2011sentence; review for completeness and stray page numbers.","assessed_at":"2026-06-22 15:29:45.664547+00","updated_at":"2026-06-22 15:29:45.664547+00"}}